the Lords day c. Hence it is thus argued this day is called the Lords day as the last Supper of Christ is called the Lords Supper now as Christ did substitute the last Supper in roome of the Passeouer so he substituted the Lords day in roome of the Sabbath I answere 1. it doth not followe it must be called the Lords day in the same sense as Christs Supper is called the Lords Supper for it may be called the Lords day 1. in reference to God the Creator meaninge there by the Lords Sabbath of the 7th day since thes Sabbathes were caled the Lords dayes as the lords Holy day Isa 58 13. now if the Sabbath be the Lords holy day then is it the Lords day 2. In reference to God the Redeemer it might be called the Lords day as the day is wherein Christ will come to Indgment Luk 17 24 30. that is a day wherein Christ will shewe himselfe Maruailouse to the world so did Christ in the day of his Incarnation Passion Resurrection and Ascention in euery of thes he did a remarkable worke and euery of thes might be called the Lords day and which of them Iohn had respect vnto Scripture is altogether silent and therfore can we not builde vpon infallible growndes herein and we must not set vp Sabbathes tyeinge mens consciences vpon probabilities and contingencies furthermore who wold argue from Luk 17 24. that because the day of Iudgment is called Christs day Therfore that day must then be kept for a Sabbath day but admit S. Iohn meant the day of Christs Resurrection that is a day wherein he would declare himselfe mightely to be the Sonne of God by the resurrection from the dead Rom 1 4. What is this to a Sabbath which men must celebrate how doth it appeare Christ rose one this day and called it the Lords day with this intendement that men shold for euer after keepe it a Sabbath shewe me an institution of a Sabbath day by Christs riseing one this day or by S. Iohns calling it the Lords day finally say it were a Sabbath day how will it appeare in the Canon of Holy Scripture that the Lords day was in the Apostles dayes a weekly day kept euery 7th day as now it is or rather an annuall day as Easter day is for properly Easter day is the Lords day I answere further there is not like reason of thes two the Lords day and the Lords Supper for a day and a Supper differ much so as a day may be called the Lords in one sense and a Supper may be called the Lords in an other sense I answere secondly it will not follow that there must be the same reason and likenesse betweene the Lords day and the Sabbath which was betwene the Lords Supper and the Passeouer for the Passeouer was a branche of the Ceremoniall Law and a Ceremony and a type of Christ and therfore to be abolisht at Christs comeing But the Sabbath was a branch of the Morall Law and a Morall neither euer was it made a death to life now that God Sanctified the first day of the weeke for Christ to rise on I deny not nor doe I refuse to reioyce there on and be thankfull to God for so greate a worke euen euery day in the weeke and yeere or more solemnely once in a yeere as at Easter or ofter if the Church see it expedient But that this Text doth prophecy of this day for euer to be kept for our sole Sabbath in a Rest all day long and in holy duties euery 7th day this I denye since this Text saith not this day was Sanctified for men but it was Sanctified for Christ yea we may reioyce and be glad in it annually as the Iewes were in theire annuall dayes of purim Ester 9.26.27 and yet not keepe it in a stricte Rest all day long as on a Sabbath I answer secondly by day in the Psalme is not necessarily vnderstod a shorte ordinary day of 12. or 24. howres but rather a long space of tyme as all the tyme after Dauid came to the Crowne and so it may be applied to type out the whole tyme of Christ vpon the earth ruleing as King in the Kingdom of his Church thus Abraham sawe Christs day Ioh. 8.56 thus t is called the day of Saluation 2. Cor. 6.2 If then by day here be meante the day of grace or the tyme of Christs abode one the earth then heer is no footing for a Sabbath day of 12. or 24. howres long 4. A 4th Text they produce is Act. 2.1.14 where Peter preached one Pentecost which is one our white Sunday and administred the Sacramentes of Baptisme and the Lords Supper after he had converted 3000. soules wherfore this must nedes be a Sabbath day because in it were performed the workes of a Sabbath c. Here to I answere 1. That Peters actions are no diuine institutions vnlesse backt by some precept now nor Christ nor his Apostles gaue any precept for performance of thes duties one this day 2. Peters sermone was extraordenary for it was vpon the extraordenary comeing downe of the Holy Ghost then and to remoue away the false slander of drunkenesse v. 13. and it was occasioned by the greate concourse of people extraordenarily met and assembled not to heare a sermone but to heare the Apostles myraculously speake straunge tounges v. 6. now extraordenary things binde not to ordenary practise 3. Preaching and administration of Sacraments be not proper duties of a Sabbath but commone to any day of the weeke Christ administred Lords Supper one a Thursday night the night before he was Crucified Phillip baptized the Eunuch one a trauileing day Act. 8.38.39 and for preaching it was an euery dayes worke if occation serued preach the word in season and our of season 2. Timoth. 4.2 Christ preached to the Samaritane Ioh. 4. on a working day for his Disciples were gone in to the citty to buye meate v. 8. He preached one the Mountaine Mat. 5.1 and out of a shippe at an other tyme Luk. 5.1.2.3 which dayes were no Sabbaths for on the Sabbaths Christ and the people mett in theire Synagogues Luk. 4.14 Paul preacht daily in the Temple and from house to house Act. 5.42 and daily in the schoole of Tyrannus Act. 19.9 Now vnles thes duties of preaching and administration of the Sacraments were so proper to the Sabbath as they were vsed vpon no day else how can thes duties be markes of a Sabbath no no nothing but a Commandement will establish a Sabbath day doe not we preache reade Scriptures praye administer the Sacrament and performe as many Sabbath duties on Christmas day when it falls on a weeke day as we doe on any Sabbath day and yet vvho vvill therfore gather vve keepe that Christmas day for a Sabbath 4. Note Walaeus vpon the 4th Com pag. 161. saith it is called in to question of some whither this day of Pentecost then fell vpon the Lords day
is theire part to proue Paul begane his Sermon in the morneinge vvhoe say Paul kept this daye a Sabbath daye by preaching in it yea moreouer they must proue that the disciples here at Troas did refraine all servile labour and the ordinary vvorkes of theire caleinge all this first day of the vveeke or Lords day from morneinge to the end of this day if they vvill prove this day kept as a Sabbath for to refraine all workes and Rest is a branch of the 4th Com and one parte of a Sabbath dayes dutie but how they can prove this oute this text passeth myn vnderstanding 5. I deny that Paul preacht now at this tyme in conscience of the 4th Com and this they must proue or else they say nothing might not Paul preach at this extraordinary tyme in conscience of that Com 2. Tim. 4.2 preache the word in season and out of season surely this text was warrant sufficient for Paul to take all occasions of preaching the word euery day or night Sabbath day or other dayes finally how will it be proued that Paul kept this Lords day here for a Sabbath day by his preaching since that preachinge it is an euery dayes worke as hath bene showne afore can it be proved that Pauls intent and purpose in preaching was to celebrate thereby that day for a Sabbath this must be proved 6 A 6th Text produced is 1. Cor. 16.2 vpon the first day of the weeke let euery one of you put aside by himselfe c. here say they vvas a constant weekely collection for the poore now collections vsed to be after the word preached and Sacramentes administred all which were done one the Sabbath day as appeares in the histories of the Church ergo this first day of the weeke was a Sabbath I answere 1. indeed our oulde translatiō gaue some waye to vs to thinke this collection was weekly when it reade the text thus Euery first day of the weeke let euery one of you put aside c. but our newe Translatores haue well amended it and doe reade it thus vpō the first day of the weeke c. as of a single action once to be done onely and this further appeares to be true by those words in latter ende of v. 2. that so there be no gatheringe when I come so as Paul wold haue this collection cease when he came emongst them but had it bene weekly Paul wold rather haue had it reuined a freshe at his presence whoe was a furtherer of all holy performances This collection therefore was extraordinary tyeth vs not to ordenary practise for if it did then were we bound euery Lords day in euery Congregation to gather for the poore as a Sabbath dayes dutie 2. This collection was extraordenary in that it was not for their owne poore at Corinthe but for the poore of other Churches and therfore this mony collected was to be sente vpon the first day of the weeke If any shall demande which first day of the weeke the Church vvas to lay aside their almes one because there were many first dayes of the weeke in a yeere I answere since I finde it not differenced from others in the text I therefore thinke it must be vnderstoode of the first Lords day or first first day of the vveek vvhich came next after the Corinthians receiued this Epistle like as if I say to a frend come to my house one Saturday it is to be vnderstoode of the next Saturday first cominge after my invitation of him 7 A 7th and last text produced is Ioh. 20.19.26 where Christs frequent apparitiones to his disciples vpon the Lords day is made an argument to proue it a Sabbath daye but by what authority or rule of just consequēce Christs apparitions must constitute a Sabbath day nor can I conceiue nor euer haue I heard nor doe I thinke euer shall heare I answere 2. whereas the frequency and constancy of Christs apparitions one the Lords day is so much vrged I wold faine see where Christ appeared one the Lords day euer aboue once onely and that in Ioh. 20.19 as for his seconde apparition in v. 26. eight dayes after vvhich is supposed to be the next Lords daye after his first apparition it is quite other wise for in the originall it goes thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and after eight dayes c. now after 8. dayes cold not be the same daye sennight vpon the 8th daye but after the 8th day as on the 9th or 10th dayes after and so this seconde apparition was not vpon the Lords daye I grante there is a phrase Mark 8.31 that Christ after three dayes must rise againe and yet it must be vnderstood thus vpon the third he must rise againe But herein we must knowe thus to reade it is a departing from the naturall and proper sense of the words which is not sufferable saue in a case of necessity as to recōcile two textes of Scripture or the like as in this instance last propounded because other textes of Scripture say Christ rose vpon the thirde day 1. Cor. 15.4 and this text Mark. 8.31 saith after 3. dayes c. therfore to recōcile these two we vnderstand this latter text and the word after to be no more but vpon but now to apply this is there the like necessity in Ioh. 20.26 to vnderstand by after vpon is there any other text affirminge that vpon the 8th day Christ appeared to Thomas and the Disciples or is there any inconveniency or absurdity to take the words in their commō proper sense if neighther of these can be showne then the readinge which I vrge is sound and good I answere 3. if Christs apparition to his disciples cold be an argument of a Sabbath day Then of Gods word for the keeping of an other day then God apointed in his morall Law or 4th Com least I partake of that brande of a wicked man prophecied of Daniel 7.25 in changing tymes and the Law now since it is a propriety of God to change tymes and seasons Dan. 2.21 had not I need be carefull there be no new day as is the Lords day set vp for a Sabbath vnles it can be expresly infallibly demonstratiuely proued to be of Gods owne doeing least I say I be accessary to the sin of changeing Godes tymes Dan. 7.25 Thus haue I answered their textes of Scripture brought for the Lords daye to be a Sabbath and the common objections now let vs in next place examine their reasons whereby the Lords day is proued a Sabbath 1 The first reason is drawne from the frequēt and constant practise of Christ and of his Apostles celebration of the Lords day the which is authority sufficient for justification of the Lords day to be a Sabbatth I answere 1. admit Christ and his Apostles did preache on the Lords day thereby honour this day aboue any of the 6. working dayes yet how doth it appeare they did this on this day to
permitteth Apocrypha Scriptures to be reade sometymes in our congregations yet it permitteth them not to be vsed and alleaged as a sole ground to establishe any doctrine of our church and what I pray is our reason better then Apocrypha Scriptures that wee shuld leane more to tone then to other vvere it meete we should receiue doctrines into the church vvhich haue a binding power ouer the conscience tying the whole man to obedience of them vpon payne of damnation vvhich are framed and maintainede only by force of our reason wherfore to conclude let reasons be subseruient and handmaide to the Holy Scriptures and euer follow them neuer to goe before them nor to goe vvithout them and therfore since our Sauiour Christ and his Apostles be auouched to be the founders of our new Sabbath I pray in the first place shewe vs where euer Christ or any of his Apostles gaue any commandement for it or whereas you say collection for the poore preaching be markes of a Sabbath shew me your text of Scripture vvhere it is said that collections preaching be proper infallible markes of any Sabbath day or which is yet lesse let it be showne where euer they said or did any thing which necessarily and infallibly doth giue vs notice that it was but their minde that euer after the churches should euery weeke keepe the Lords day a Sabbath in conscience of the 4th Com and since God at creation gaue a commandement for that Sabbath vvhy should we not thinke Christ would a giuen a commandement too for this Sabbath if euer he had intended to haue had it kept as a Sabbath vvould God giue a commandement for his Sabbath and Christ leaue his Sabbath without a commandement and to be collected by feeble reason vvas our Sauiour so carefull to giue a commandement for the Lords Supper to be done in remembrance of him and did he forget thinke you to leaue a commandement for the Lords day to be kept in remembrance of him could it be possible a matter of so great importance as is a Sabbath and such a Sabbath as would make so much for his remembrance to the worlds ende should be passed ouer in deepe silence not only by Christ himselfe but also by his succeeding Apostles so as not only not to commande it but which yet is lesse not so much as mention it by the name of a Sabbath whoe that considereth of this would or could euer thinke that Christ did institute and appointe this Lords day for a Sabbath vvas not these those considerations which made Calvin vpon Col. 2.16 say it is not vnlawfull to labour worke on our Sabbathes thus in effecte hee was not this it also which moued zanchie vpon the 4th com Thesis 1. to say The Apostles left the Lords day at liberty and that we are not bounde to keepe it for a Sabbath by any bonde or tye of conscience thus hee To come yet nerer home to our owne diuines was it not hence that Perkins though a greate frend to the Lords day for Sabbath as Walaeus on the 4th com quoteth him thus Perkins ingenuously saith he confesseth that as touching Christs institution the argumentes he bringes for our Lords day they be not necessary but only probable ones c. and see Perk cases of conscience chapt 16. vvhere the holy man durst not speake to the conscience peremptorily as of a thing for certaine true but tremblingly as it were repeatinge his doubtfull speeches 3. or 4. tymes ouer in 6. or 8. lines wrighting as 1. In all likely hoode saith he 2. as I take it c. 3. now I suppose c. 4. for in these pointes stil we must goe by likely hoodes c. surely had there beene any sufficient grounds for our new Sabbath this holy man durst not haue concealed them no nor would he haue spake so doubtfully whoe in other pointes speakes peremptorily and confidently and was it not hence that Doctour Prideaux in his worke vpon the Sabbath saith where is there the least mention of surrogation of the Lords day in roome of the Sabbath pag. 140. Againe where saith he amongst the Euangelists or Apostles is there any distinct institution of the Lords day yea further where is the texte whence you will necessarily proue it vvhat should I reckone vp particular men is it not the doctrine of our churche very lately a booke came to my hands printed at Oxford in the yeere 1621. written by M. Broad touching the Sabbath where on the margent pag. 2. thus he wrighteth Christian people chose the first day of the weeke and made it their Sabbath saith the booke of Homilies By the doctrine then of our church saith M. Broad the obseruation of the Lords day is an Ecclesiasticall ordinance and not an Apostolicall precept againe pag. 21. It is not by any expresse command from Christ or his Apostles but by an ordinance of the church as is the doctrine of many great diuines and of our church in the booke of Homilies that we sanctify the Lords day rather then any other day of the weeke thus wrighteth M. Broade of the Lords day and of its institution as being in the judgement of our owne church not from God nor from Christ but from certaine Godly christian and well disposed people One obiection remaineth to be remoued which is That the Church of God hath kept this Lords day for a Sabbath many hundreds of yeeres and can it be thought Gods whole church should erre and that so long I answere t is true indeed we ought to hould a reuerent regard of the tenentes of our Mother the church so as not lightely nor rashely to receiue any opinions which blemishe hir practise Neuerthelesse this we must know also that the church whilst on earth is liable to miscariages through ignorance for as much as God doth not reueale his whole truth to hir at once but successiuely now on thing and then another as she is able to beare it as the tymes may permite and as it seemes good to his Godly pleasure doe we not see daily light is brought into the church and God reueales himselfe more and more and what doth this argue but what we cannot deny that is that before such light came we were in darkenes and error as touching those pointes yea we must grante the church may doth erre in some things vnles we will affirme that shee is growne to fulnesse of stature and perfection in knowledge so as nothing more can be added I verily perswade my selfe these very cōceipts that the true Church of God cannot erre in any maine thing is the very foundation of errour in those mindes where such conceipts rule for vvhoe would be so idle to spend labour and tyme to try all thinges and with the Bereanes to serch the Scriptures if alredy our curch hath tryed all and serched all to perfection so as they haue no vvayes erred more humble thoughts of our
In sondry places in diuerse churches not at one place or two but at more 3. that vvhere they abode diuerse dayes they chose the Sabbath day not the Lords day to teache and to preache in as Act. 16.12.13 Act. 13.42.44 Act. 17.2 Act. 18.4 4. They kept Sabbath with both Jewes and Gentiles together sometyme with you see the duties of a Sabbath meditation in Gods Law vvith ioy and delight and admiration of the workes of God There be I confesse that would haue all this vnderstood of the Lords day but Ignatius speakes both of the Sabbath also of the Lords day distinctly in the same Text for the very next words are thus And after the Sabbath let the Lords day be celebrated c. Athanasius in his Homilie de semente saith thus We assemble together in the Sabbath day not as if vve were sicke of Iudaizme but therefore we meete on the Sabbath that we may vvorship Iesus the Lord of the Sabbath vvhere ye see Athanasius not only auowching that they of this tyme kept the Sabbath but also he defendeth theire keeping of it from superstition or Iudaizme but our tymes are now of a contrary minde thinking and saying if we should keepe the Sabbath day we should play the Iewes and be infected with Judaizme Socrates in his History chap 8. booke 6th saith Assemblies were vvonte to be in the Churches euery weeke vpon the Sabbath vpon the Lords day Zanchie ypon the 4th Com Thes 1. saith out of Sozomen That thos of Constantinople almost all others haue Ecclesiasticall assemblies to heare Gods Word on the Sabbath day and on the Lords day Doctour Prideaux on the Sabbath saith The Churches after Christ kept both the Sabbath the Lords day for diuerse yeeres with holy assemblies and this thing is so manifest saith he as it needeth no proofe c. In a word is it not plaine the Sabbath was in vse in the Church vntill the yeere of Christ 364. at vvhat tyme the Laodicean counsaile enacted a Law against it and for the Lords day Hosp de Orig. Fest cap. 9. pag. 27. but how vniustifiable this their acte was may appeare in that they enacted a Law against Gods Law and were guilty of that brande in Dan. 7.25 of vnlawfull changing of Tymes and the Law yea how full of suspition this their facte was may appeare in this that Church of Laodicea it was the worst of all the 7. churches that S. Iohn wrote vnto in his Reuelations yea and in that this change was not made till the yeere 364. t is of small accounte since the elder the church grewe the more corrupt it grewe for 364. yeeres after Christ crept into the church superstition and so dayly thence forwards popery by degrees But how soeuer it is plaine that the Sabbath day was in vse in the church at that tyme in which they enacted a Lavv against it or else they made a Law against nothing Here it shall not be amisse to adde the testimony of two or three of our owne Diuines auowching the morality of the 7th day Sabbath I could produce many but two or three for all strengthen my selfe and vvronge not them 3. Doctour Prideaux vpon the Sabbath lately comne forth pag. 140. saith Where did Christ abrogate the Sabbath vvhere is there any mention of setting the Lords day in the roome of it well Christ ascendeth he left his Apostles preachers and did not they vvithout any scruple obserue the Sabbath of the Iewes wich the Iewes did not they institute most freely assemblies in the Sabbath day did not the succeding churches the like c And now let me propounded vnto your choise these two dayes The Sabbath day on Saturday or the Lords day on Suneday and keepe whither of the twaine you shall in conscience finde the more safe If you keepe the Lords day but prophane the Sabbath day you vvalke in great danger and perill to say the last of transgressing one of Gods eternall inviolable Laws the 4th Com but on the other side if you keep the Sabbath day though you prophane the Lords day you are out of all guneshot and danger for so you transgresse no Law at all since Christ nor his Apostles did euer leaue any Law for it 1. To conclude let me take away two or three obiections and so an end Say some what a doe is here about a day is God so strict for a day so be he hath the duties it matters not so much for the tyme To whom I answere and make not you as much a doe too as you can for the Lords day the 8th day else why may not Mooneday or Tewsday or some other day be kept in memory of Christs Resurrection as well as Sunday the first day of the vveeke and doe not our diuines of best ranke lay it downe as their judgement that the Church the whole Church cannot now alter the Lords day to any other it seemes then in your owne judgement that tyme and day how light a circumstance soeuer you make it when you dispute about the 7th day in the 4th Com yet it is a matter of vveight and moment when you argue for the Lords day for vvhich yet you haue no Com 2. Thinke you it a light matter the which God hath beene pleased to stampe his Commandement vpon Exod. 35.2 The 7th day shall be vnto you the Holy Sabbath c. Will you sleight Gods Commandements admite the tyme and 7th day be as thing little profitable to God as was the fruite of the tree of knowledge of good euill in Paradise dareth any man hazard with God as Adam did The lesse the thing is vvith the more ease vve may shew our obedience and the greater our sine if disobedient 3. We dare not forfighte a bonde with man vpon such shiftes saying whē t is paiable on 7th day of Ianuary oh my neighbour regardeth not so much the day so I carry him the full some though it be the day after t is due nor durst those faithfull Israelites so sleight Gods tymes as to circumcise on the 9th day to call Passeouer on the 15th day vvhen God hath commanded CIrcumcision on the 8th day and the Passeouer on the 14th day 2. Saith an other this vvere to bringe into the Church Iudaizme againe and that strict rigorous obseruation of the Sabbath vvhich they vsed Here to I answere Athanasius afore cited said They kept the Sabbath day in their tymes and yet he saith they were not infected with Judaizme Further Iudaizme is when obedience is yeelded to a Law Ceremoniall but he that keepes the Sabbath day doth it in obedience to a Law Morall And as touching the rigorous strictenesse of the Iewish Rest or Sabbath it is not better than an euill reporte brought vp vpon the Lords Sabbath to loathe men of it vvhat and if men erroniously thinke the Iewes vvere more strictly tyed then indeed they vvere that is their errour and what and
title of it to the vvorlds end Matth. 5.18 He turnetb himselfe to thos of the Ministry to looke to it afore others that by their liefe and doctrine they teach not breake not one of the last of those Cemmandements saying v. 19. whosoeuer therfore shall breake one of the last of those commandements teach men so he shall be called the last of the Kingdome of Heauen my selfe so farr forth as to cause me liften redily to what may be said to the contrary and to scanne and serch it to my vtmost yea so farre forth too as in partt to vvith hould me from the practise of it and so accordingly vpon the same ground to counsaill others to doe the like If it please God to blesse this point so as it be generally found to be a truth of Gods then will there be a farre more comfortable and laudable course to goe together vvith ioynte petitions humble requestes vnto his Maiesty and that honorable house of Parlament desiring them to take this matter into their considerations whose it is properly to reforme Ministers may informe but Magistrats should reforme it was Nehemiah chapt 13.15.16.17.18.19.20.21.22 that reformed the prophanation of the Sabbath day in his tyme and hauing done it Remember mee O my God conseruing this saith he c. it was Christ a King as well as a Prophet who whipped the buyers scelleres out of the Temple that holy place and it is the office of Gods Anoynted a King to purge the Lords Sabbath day on our Saturday that sacred Tyme from buyers and scellers and markelinges Let vs patiently therfore vvith prayers to God wait and expect vntill God shall be pleased first to moue the harts of mcn generally to embrace this truth and then to stirre vp the harte and couradge and zeale of King to doe this great vvorke For conclusion of all one scruple and case of conscience would be satisfied and t is this If our consciences be once rightely informed as we thinke that Saturday is the true Sabbath by force of the 4th Comm how can vve dispence with Gods Commandement and still our consciences vntill a publike reformation cometh and is it not hypocrisy to thinke one thing and practise an other judging Saturday to be Sabbath day yet keeping Sunday Sabbath For thus a Diuine of note deliuered it in publike that for a man to diuide betwixt his profession or in judgement and his practise is a note of hypocrisy Here to I answere 1. Hypocrisy is vvhen a man maketh an outward shew of doeing some thing but indeed he doth it not now this agreeth not to vs since we make no shew to men that vve keep Saturday Sabbath but the quite contrary for both our actions and our shewes and appearances to men are both one that is to labour on the Saturday so we vse no hypocriticall dissimulations Paul when he became all things to all men that he might wine some therfore he circumcised Timothie Act. 16.3 the which fact him selfe else where in an other case speakes against Gal. 5.2 and it vvas vnlawfull to be done It was a Law of God who so shedeth mans blood by man shall his blood be shede Genes 9.6 and the Magistrat is Gods Minister to take vengeance c. Rom. 13.14 now Dauid being King Ioab murthered 2. Captaines 1. King 2.5 here it was the duty of Dauid to haue taken vengeance for God but Dauid finding Joab to strong for him 2. Sam. 3.27.39 omitted execution and gaue it in charge to his Sonne Salomon to execute it after his death 1. King 2.6 I trust no man vvill counte Dauid or Paul herein Hypocrites yet their judgement and practise was diuided 2. To the scruple of conscience in a case of necessity you reade vvhat Dauid did vvhen he was an hungred he prophaned hallowed breade contrary to Gods Law and Christ justified him Math. 12.3.4 you reade how Circumcision vvas omitted all the tyme the Israelites vvere in the wildernesse Iosh 5.5 if in case of necessity thes might doe thus I trust there is mercy for vs also if our case be like specially since vve doe not vtterly abolish all dayes for we doe but change the day and for a tyme giue God one day for an other That necessity is vpon vs as it was on those Israelites is plaine doe not vve liue in a Church whose gouernement is establisht by law the which law cannot be transgressed with safety to our persons goods besides is not necessity vpon vs as touching the good of our soules A Sabbath should be celebrated with publike and holy conuocations and assemblies Leuit. 23.3 〈◊〉 with publike preaching and reading Luk. 4.16 now can we haue in safety assemblies in priuate housen or can vve haue possible a preacher in euery family how shall they heare without a preacher Rom. 10.14 vvere not these the very causes vvhy the good King Hezekiah 2. Chron. 30.3 altered the day of the passeouer 1. Because they had not Priests who had fitted themselues for that day 2. Because the people were not togeather assembled in publike on that first day It may be said how doe they in a voyage at Sea keep Sabbath who cannot haue these I answer the case is not a like for would they put of the Sabbath day from one day vnto an other they cold not amende themselues but we by a change and defering the day we may obtaine all those comfortes which else we cannot enioy and if any shall say Keep both dayes I answere t is more then euer God required nor vvill the necessity of our callings permitte it God himselfe thought it needfull we should haue 6. dayes for our workes to one day for his seruice as in the 4th Com. One instance more shewing God permitted a change of a day in case of necessity The Passeouer was to be eaten ordenarily on the 14th day of the first Moneth Numb 9.1.2.3 but in case a man were in a farr iourney then he might keep the Passeouer in the 14th day of the second Moneth Numb 9.10.11 now it is farther to be noted that euer the next day after the Passeouer it was a Sabbath Leuit. 23.7 so that as the Passeouer day was altered so also this Annuall Sabbath vvas changed answerablie so that not only the Passeouer day but also the Passeouer Sabbath day in a case of necessity might be altered and changed But it vvill be said these vvere Ceremonials and what is this to a Morall I answere vvhy Ceremoniales in theire tyme vvhilst they stood in force called for obedience as vvell as Moralls yea the first Sabbath of the Passeouer which followed next day after Passeouer day it vvas eommanded to be kept just as a Sabbath in holy conuocations and in resting from seruile labour Leuit. 23.7 yea death vvas to be inflicted vpon the breakers of this Ceremoniall Sabbath Numb 9.13 as vvell as vpon thos that violated the Morall Sabbath Exod. 31.15 The summe of vvhich
note that we may call the Lords day or first day of the weeke and other common Holy dayes Resting dayes but we must know with all that thus to call and to name them is meerly humane and of our owne deuise for God neuer named or called the Lords day nor common holy dayes Resteing dayes if therfore we will call dayes as God calleth them then must vve call only the 7th day Sabbath day or Resting day for said God Exod. 20.10 The 7th day is the Sabbath or Resting day I answere 2. Sabbath day may be vsed in reference to the 4th Com or not in any reference vnto it if it be vsed not in reference to the 4th Comm I am not against it for so may we call Christmas day when t is one a weeke day Sabbath day and so may we call dayes of publike thanksgiuing and reioycing Sabbath dayes as coronation dayes Gunpowder Treason dayes c. but if vve call any day Sabbath day religiously in relation to the 4th Comm as in that sense we call our Lords day Sabbath day then know it cannot be called Sabbath day for that this name Sabbath day in reference to 4th Com it must haue these properties 1. it must be set vpon its proper day our Saturday the which is named by God Sabbath day or Resting day 2. it must be the 7th day from the creation or last day of the vveeke 3. it must be the day which God blessed and sanctified Genes 2.3 Exod. 20.11 now none of these thinges agree to our Lords day 5. The next point to be treated one is the vvord Day Remember the Sabbath day now as before vve haue heard of the Sabbath day vvhich it is for order and place as vvhither the first or 2d c. or 7th or 8th day so now vve are to heare of the duration and length of that Sabbath day A day is commonly diuided into a day naturall of 24. howres or artificiall of 12. howres but I must craue leaue to departe from this distinction though a common receiued one because how euer it may haue its vse in ciuill affaires yet is it not Canonicall and Diuine and therfore not to be a rule in expounding the word Day in Scripture that I may not seeme sleightily to deny a common distinction note the reasons moueing me here too are 1. Because it is no vvhere founde in Scripture that they had any day of 24. howres a day of 12. howres I reade of I confesse but I neuer reade of a day of 24. howres it is not safe therfore by Day in 4th Com to interpret it of a day of 24. howres 2. By a day naturall of 24. howres vve vnderstand both the light and the darknesse the day and the night vvhich fale within compasse of these 24. howres novv I pray what a woefull confusion and jumbling of things together is here vvhat is this but to put light for darkenesse vvhen ye call the night or darknesse Day may you not as vvell put darknesse for light and call the day or light Nighte may vve not as vvell comprize Hell vnder the vvord Heauen as darkenes vnder the vvord Day vnles it be Ironically I thinke this is matchlesse But hereto it will be said doth not Scripture thus Genes 1.5 So the Euening and the morning vvere the first day by Euening here is meante the night and by morning the day or light and both these made vp the first day I answere the Euening doth no vvhere in Scripture betoken the night or darkenesse and that I am not singular in this see Perkins cases of conscience at end of 2d booke but by Euening vve are to vnderstand the afternoone as vve in this land doe saying Good euene to you Sir if once it be past noone that euening is takē for the afternoone and tyme of perfect light and before Sune set appeares by the phrase of euening sacrifice which was celebrated about 3. or 4. a clocke in after noone see these textes Ex. 29.38.39 Deu. 23.11 losh 8.29 Ezra 9.4.5 Iere. 6.4 Deut. 16.6 so then according to Scriptures sense by Euening I vnderstand the afternoone and by morning the forenoone and thus the Euening that is the afternoone and the Morning that is the forenoone made the first day Genes 1.5 Hauing thus giuen my reasons why I reiect a day naturall of 24. howres consisting of day and night both In next place I am to shewe vvhat I meane by Day in 4th Com By Day I vnderstand the tyme of light only namly all that space of tyme and light from day peepe or day breake in the morning vntill day be quite off the skye at night that by Day is meante the light see Gene. 1.5 God vvhoe know best to name things called the Light Day see 1. Thes 5.5.8 1. Cor. 3.13 and that the day begines euen vvhilst it is but a little light and much darke see Ioh. 20.1 and see Mark. 1.35 this last text is to be reade as Chemnitius vvell obserues thus In the morning vvhilst it vvas very much night c. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and so Beza reades it too of dayes I may say there are 2. kindes according to Scripture 1. a naturall day and this is from first aproche of light vpon our horizon before Sune rise vnto the last departure of light after Sune sett from off our horizon 2. is an artificiall day and this consistes of 12. howres Joh. 11.9 are there not 12. howres in the day the naturall day is variable now longer as in Sommer novv shorter as in Winter The artificiall day is constantly of the same lenght 12. howres long I conclude by Day in 4th Com I rather thinke the the naturall day to be meante then the artificiall day for it is the safest to giue God the longer of the two that is the day from day breake to last shutting in of the day so long as is any light in the skye Here a case of conscience would be discussed that is if our Sabbath be but from day breake to shutting vp of day hovv shall vve doe in depth of vvinter at vvhat tyme vve haue not 12. howres of day light novv your opinion vvas euen novv that it is the safest to giue God the longer of the two dayes rather the naturall than the artificiall but in depth of vvinter the artificiall day of 12. howres is the longer day I ansvvere 1. though for that tyme the artificiall day be longer than the naturall day yet it is so but for a little vvhile during the depth of the winter only vvhich tyme excepted all the yeere after the naturall day is the longer and so these 2. dayes compared together in all tymes vve giue God the longer day vvhen vve giue him the naturall day 2. For so much as it is not likely that God would haue vs measure him his day by two diuers metevvands that is by the day naturall at one tyme of the yeere and by the day artificiall
Gods Rest on the same day after the vvork of creation and as it is a day for the benefit of both our bodies for rest and our soules for holinesse Thus none of those former textes you see can proue that the 7th day Sabbath vvas euer ceremoniall or yet abolisht but yet they haue two textes more behinde vvherein they put great confidence and especially in the former of the two and if they faile in these two as I trust in God they shall then are they quite gone and for euer to hould their peace for speaking more against the Lord Gods Sabbath 6. The 6th text is that Colos 2.16.17 let no man condemne you in meate and drinke or in respect of an holy day or of the new Moone or of the Sabbath dayes vvhich are a shaddow of things to come but the body is of Christ Loe say they here you haue Sabbath dayes forbidden the very point in question they are counted a shaddaw of Christ and therfore abolisht I answere 1. as there is two Lavves a morall Lavv consisting of 10. Comm all vvritten by the finger of God vpon Tables of stone and a ceremoniall Law vvritten by Moses and deliuered to the people so are there Sabbaths morall that is such as God engraued vpon the Tables of stone vvith other 9. preceptes and there are Sabbaths ceremoniall that is such as you finde no mention of in the Decalogue but such as you finde recorded by Moses dispersed here there in the 5. bookes of Moses specially in Leuit. 23.4 c. to the end of the chapter Novv as vvhen you reade Heb. 7.12 Ephes 2.15 If the priesthode be changed then must there be a change of the lavv you vvill not here permite any man to iumble confusedly together the lavv morall and Law ceremoniall and say both these lawes are here changed but you vvill distinguish of Lawes granting them the ceremoniall Law to be meante here but not the morall so doe I in answere to this text Col. 2.16 distinguish of Sabbaths granting them here is meante only ceremoniall Sabbaths denying that here is meante the Morall Sabbath of 7th day That this distinction is good and that by Sabbaths here is meant only ceremoniall Sabbaths doe beare witnesse to me euen vvorthy diuines of their owne side as Greenham in his vvorke vpon the Sabbath day and Perkins in his cases of conscience booke 2. chapt 16. Sect. 3. and Dod vpon the 4th Comm pag. 133. and Elton vpon the Colossians 2.16 and Ames in his Thesis touching the Sabbath 2. That here is meante only ceremoniall Sabbaths is plaine by the context and that by two reasons the former in that these Sabbathes are ranked vvith other things all vvhich be ceremonies as meates and drinkes and new Moones and holy dayes so that all other things in this text vvhich the Apostle abolisheth being ceremonies it giues vs cause to thinke the Sabbaths placed and ioyned vvith them be only ceremoniall Sabbaths as M. Dod vvell obserueth vpon the 4th Com the latter reason is for that this 16th verse is as you may see by the vvord of inference Therfore a conclusion vvhose premise you haue in the 14th verse and here the Apostles discourse is on this wise If the hand wrighting of ordinances which is the Law that commanded meates drinkes and Holy dayes new Moones Sabbath dayes be put out and taken away Then let no man condemne you in meates and drinkes in Holy dayes new Moones or Sabbaths dayes But the handwrighting of ordinances is put out and taken away Therfore let no man condemne you in meates and drinkes in Holy dayes new Moones or Sabbath dayes The minor you haue v. 14. the conclusion in v. 16. Now for asmuch as it is a rule vvith Logicians that there should not be more in the conclusion then vvas in the premisses Hence it followeth that if by the vvord Sabbathes in v. 16. you vvill vnderstand the morall Sabbath of the 7th day then by handvvrighting of ordinances in v. 14. you must vnderstand at least that parte of the Morall Law vvhich is the 4th Com the vvhich commanded that Sabbath The vvhich if you doe then you rune vpon this absurdety that you make the Apostle to abolish in this text a branch of morall Law as the vvhole or at least a parte of the 4th Com and so wheras the Lord wrote vpon the Table tenne commandements Deut. 10.4 you make by this interpretation but nyne commandements or at most but nyne and an halfe or but nyne and three quarters or there abouts for tenne compleate there is not I am sure Against my distinction they say by Sabbaths in this text of necessity must morall Sabbaths be meante because vnder the name of Holy dayes is comprised all ceremoniall Sabbathes so that then the word Sabbaths must meane the morall Sabbath whereto I answere that I vvill lay you out for euery word its proper day it signifies and yet the morall Sabbath excepted 1. by nevv Moones is meante only the first day of month Numb 28.11 2. Holy day is in the originall feast day or a feaste or in parte of a feaste 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 now the Lord had commanded the Jewes a feast of 7. dayes Leuit. 23.34.39 of vvhich feast the first day and also the last day were Sabbaths now the dayes goeing betwene the first and last day these vvere the parte of a feast 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and these the Apostle aimed at by holy day and then 3d. and lastly by Sabbaths are meante those annuall Sabbaths vvhich vvere on the first and last day of the Feast of 7. dayes now least ye think this distinction and application but a conceipte see Leuit. 23.37.38 where the Lord himselfe distinguisheth twixt Feastes and Sabbathes vvhen he said These are the Feastes c. besides the Sabbathes c. Or if by Holy day or Feast you vvill vnderstand all these 7. dayes with the first and last dayes which were Sabbathes then by the vvord Sabbathes in Col. 2.16 may be vnderstood these Sabbathes Leuit. 23.24.32 which were feastes but of one single day a peece and eighther of them called Sabbathes and these vvere the Sabbathes vvhich Paul abolished so you see there is no necessity by Sabbathes to vnderstand the Morall Sabbath at all I answere 2. to the text Col. 2.16 that hereby vve ought not to vnderstand the Morall Sabbath as if that were abolisht for this vvere to set Paul against Christ the seruant against his Lord for Christ established the morall Law and euery iott and title of it to the vvorlds end Math. 5.18 now the 7th day Sabbath vvas not lesse than a iott or title of the Law and did Christ please to ratifie it to the vvorlds end and shall vve make Paul with in a fewe yeeres after to abolish it vvhat necessety is there of such large vnderstanding of the vvord Sabbathes is there any besides mens pleasures so to haue it that they might throw downe the
day vvas chosen what can be thought should incline them to this choise but the 4th Comm 2. Note here is not any reason to thinke here were any Iewes because vve reade not of any Synagues the Iewes had here the people assembled in the open fields besides a riuer to pray as the Text speaketh and therfore not with the Iewes in their Synagogues as they were wonte to doe where the Jewes had Synagogues As for Lydia it will not follow shee was a Iewesse because the Text saith shee was a vvorshipper of God for so was Cornelius Act. 10.2 but yet no Iewe no nor any proselyte for he vvas vncircumcised then Act. 11.3 finally I say suppose here was a mixture of Iewes and Gentiles and also in that other place Act 13.42.44 yet ther is no cause of scruple or doubt that the Apostles would vse any ceremonies as they suppose the Sabbath to be amongst those Iewes that vvere mingled with the Gentiles no more then they would amongst the Gentiles alone for saith the Text Act. 21.21 Paul taught those Jewes that were mixed among the Gentiles to forsake Ceremonies c. and you see it his practise Gal. 2.11 he would not endure no not a Peter to Iudaize it amongst the Gentiles and can we thinke himselfe would doe vvhat he reproued in an other besides it was against reason for so he should builde vp things as ceremonies which he labored to destroy Gal. 5.1.2 I say build vp for Paul counted Judaising amongst Gentiles a constraining of those Gentiles vnto Judaizme Gal. 2.14 for all this I deny not but Paul did Iudaize but it was only in such places of assemblie where vvere none but Iewes only as at Ierusalem and the like places Act. 21.17.20.26 but in assemblies mixed of Iewes and Gentiles there he would not Iudaize lest he should constraine the Gentiles to Iudaizme as hath beene said An other and seconde answer vsually brought against this practise of the Apostles is that Paul did keepe Sabbath here vvith the Iewes to beare with their weakenesse for a tyme and as he did Iudaize it by circumcision of Timothie Here vnto I say 1. it appeareth he did not keepe Sabbath only for the Iewes sake for then vvould he not haue kept the Sabbath with the Gentiles as he did 2. vvas it a weakenesse in the Iewes to yeeld obedience to a morall precepts to the 4th Com 3. The things vvherin properly Paul was said to Iudaize were Ceremoniall things standing in force by the Ceremoniall Law as Circumcision and the Rest but things standing in force by the Morall Law as doth the Sabbath day performance of these is no Iudaizing but Moralizing if I may so speake A 3d answere is that the Apostles must take such dayes as they found in vse in the Church then or else they cold not preach and divulge the Gospell and the Iewes then would assemble on no dayes but the Sabbath Here vnto I say the Apostles cold make knowne the Gospell though they had neuer frequented the Iewes vsuall assemblies for the Apostles taught and preached Christ in priuate housen from house to house Act. 5.42 and when Paul forsooke preaching in the Synagogue he taught else where as in the Schoole of one Tyrannus and there frequented him both Iewes and Grecians Act. 19.9.10 yea Paul cold assemble the Iewes them selues vpon occasion the very chiefe of them refused not to assemble at his calle Act. 28.17.20 wherefore necessity compelled him not to keepe the Sabbath vvith them To make a more full answere to those common obiections vvhich they bring against the practise of the Apostles in keeping the Sabbath day one of vvhich maine obiections is that fore spoken of to this effecte true the Apostles practised the 7th day Sabbath but it was amongst the Iewes not amongst the Gentiles where vnto I say vvhat and if it vvere only amongst the Ievves are therefore the Apostles practises and actions vnvvareantable and vnimitable because they vvere done amongst the Iewes are all their actions amongst Jewes but of an indifferent nature if such obiections be lawfull if a preacher confirmes his doctrines in the pulp it by the practise of the Apostles then is it lawfull for any thus to cauill against it oh but that it vvas done among Jewes for instance suppose this the doctrine Ministers must preach constantly on the Sabbath day novv after it is proued c. then he confirmes it by the constant practise of the Apostles Act. 13.14.44 Act. 17.2 Act. 18.4 is it tollerable for an auditor to cauill thus oh this it dience and reference vnto some of those Commandements The last obiection is that t is true indeed the Apostles kept the Sabbath but it was but for a tyme till the Iewes vvere better instructed the vvhich if they had refused to keepe the Iewes vvould neuer haue heard them preach of Christ c. Here vnto I answere this obiection presupposeth now as granted two false suppositions the one that the Apostles vvould not if they cold haue auoided it haue kept this Sabbath the other that the Iewes vvere needlesly religiouse making conscience of this Sabbath now vvhen they neded not for the former for any thus to imagine or say is growndlesse for vvhere hath any of the Apostles declared themselues any enemies to the Morall Sabbath that it should be thought they had rather not to haue kept the Sabbath then to haue kept it for the latter t is true of Circumcision it might be said the Iewes vvere needlessely religious and carefull of it because vve finde the Apostle inueighing against it Galat. 5.2 but how can vve say so of the Iewes as touching the Sabbath day since vve no where finde the Apostles inueighing against it or reprehending the Iewes for keeping it as they did for Circumcision The maine errour in these obiections is that they take it for granted vvhich is not granted that is supposing the Sabbath day in the 10. Commandements to be a Ceremony as vvell as Circumcision and that so it vvas abolisht by Christ vvhereof there is no grownd in Scripture as else vvhere I haue largely shewed nay farther for any to say the Sabbath is a ceremony or that any vvord or letter of the Law or 10. Commandements is Ceremoniall is no better then blasphemy against Gods Law and Truth to speake euill of the way of God Thus you see I haue proued the practise of the Apostles vvas constantly to keep the Sabbath day and the keeping of the Sabbath day vvas an Apostolicall practise the vvhich proofe I haue made to this end that you might see vve haue better grounds for the Apostles keeping the Sabbath day then for their keeping the Lords day nay there is good ground for the Sabbath day but no ground at all for the Lords day Further more as by the way you may see it hath beene showne the Apostles kept the Sabbath day 1. constantly not once or twice or thrice and no no more 2.
sacred tyme of the Lords Sabbath Beware ye be not found fighters against God and to side it vvith that branded vvicked one in Dan. 7.25 vvho thought he might change tymes and the law It is not to be passed by vvithout obseruation that the Apostle condemnes Sabbathes but indefinitly he said not all Sabbaths generally but Sabbaths indefinitly as of some Sabbathes only but say now that an indefinite axion may be conserued eighther generally or particularly aâ— the matter and circumstances of the place requireth why shew me now vvhat occasion this context giueth you to vnderstand here Sabbathes of all Sabbathes morall and ceremoniall or of any but ceremoniall or if you haue grownds so to doe from some other text I pray shew the text or if from som reasons I pray shew the reasons and let them be necessarily sounde and demonstratiuly true for there is great cause it should be so since by force thereof you vvill confront one of Gods expresse commandements you had need looke you goe on sure grownde vvhen you attempt to altar any branch of those commandements vvhich God himselfe tooke care to wright in Tables of stone for my part I trust it shall euer be my care to death to maintaine the inviolable and eternall Law of God those is commandements and euery iett and title of them so as not to departe with any of them nor suffer a title to be snatcht from me by any light distinctions or humane vnnecessary enlargement of the sense of words I trust God vvill euer giue me to make conscience of that Commandement Deut. 12.32 vvhatsoeuer I command you take heede you doe it Thou shalt put nothing there to nor take ought there from if I must not take any thing from the Law of God then resolue I not to consent to or yeelde that the Lords Sabbath should be rente from Gods Law vpon euery or any light coniecture and probable argument I answere 3d. if by Sabbathes here must be meante all Sabbathes as well the Morall as the Ceremoniall Sabbathes then by like reason may I gather an abolition not only of the ceremoniall Law but also of the morall Law for Ephes 2.15 t is said Christ hath abrogated the law of commandements and Heb. 7.12 of necessety there must be a change of the Law now vvhy may not I by the word Law vnderstand both morall and Ceremoniall Law as vvell as you by the vvord Sabbathes to vnderstande the Morall and ceremoniall Sabbathes see therfore vvhat absurdetyes would follow if it were lawfull thus to extende vvords but happily some thinke it no absurdety to say that Christ by his death abolisht both Lawes the ceremoniall and the morall but if such thoughtes and sayings be not blasphemouse against the Law of God I know not vvhat are if such collections be not of most perniciouse dangerouse consequence in Gods Church I cannot tell what be did not the same Christ whom they vvould make to abolish the morall Law renounce this facte and also contrariwise establish this morall Law Mat. 5.17.18 saying I came not to destroy the Law c. and then vntill heauen and earth perish one iotte or title of this Law shall not passe but they vvill say it vvas reestablished againe after by the in the 4th Comm and then you giue liberty for men to exercise themselues in seruile labours at home in their families and a part a brode in the fields in ploughing dikeing carteing and the like now these exercises doe vtterly abolish Holines I doe not say Holines absolutly for a man may be holy in a calling but I say it abolisheth a Sabbaths Holinesse vvhich is to be exercised in holy performances without labour and a whole day and in holy assemblies but how can they be in the congregation in the assemblie togeather who be euery man at his owne house seuerally or in the field scatteredly at their labours the same whereof is that take away Sabbaths and you take away Rest which is signified by the vvord Sabbath againe take away Rest and you necessarily take away Holinesse that other dutie also And againe if you by this text of Col. 2.16 doe abolish the very duties of the Sabbath Rest and Holines as you doe haue you not made faire worke think you by abolishing that which you call the morality of the Sabbath euer Rest and Holinesse 7. The 7th and last text they produce for the abolishing of the 7th day Sabbath is that in Exo. 31.13 where the Sabbath are said to be a signe that the Lord did sanctifie his people now they say all signes be abrogated and therfore the Sabbath day I answere 1. The Lord God doth not say expresly in this text you shall not hereafter as namly after the death of Christ keepe the Sabbath day any more because I haue made it a signe now no but thus much is collected by humane reason because God made the Sabbath a signe now I can but vvonder how mortall man dareth by bare force of his blind feeble reason thus to confront his God God said in his 4th Comm which he wrote aboue all Scripture by his owne finger Remember the Sabbath day to sanctifie it The 7th day is the Sabbath in it thou shalt not work Now the quite contrary to God men now a dayes blushe not by bare force of reason to anowche Namly that the Sabbath day is abolished and therfore not to be remembred any more nor to refraine seruile work in it yea they contradict their Sauiour too who said of the Morall Law one iott or title of it should not passe to the vvorlds end Mat. 5.18 but they say yis that one iott to vvit the 7th day Sabbath may passe c. now choose you vvhither it be safer to leaue the vveight of your soules vpon Gods and Christes expresse wordes or vpon mens force of reason by way of collections and consequentes we haue formerly showne how blinde a thing mans reason is in matter of religion and especially in the duties of the first Table vvhich conserueth God and that therfore Diuines in other are signes and yet in vse still I answere 5. by distinguishing of signes and that two wayes first there be signes of things present as is the Sabbath Exod. 31.13 it is a signe c. that I the Lord doe sanctify you here the signe the thing signified are together in tyme and there be signes of things to come and such vvas the signe of circumcision Genes 17.11 vvhich aimed at Christ to come now though I grant that signes of things to come be abrogate yet I deny that signes of things present be abrogate such are the Sabbaths mentioned Exod. 31.13 a difference must be put twixt the signes of things present and future since that vvhen a signe and thing signified futurly doe mete together in tyme then the signe vanisheth as vvhen circumcision and Christs death came together then the signe circumcision vanished but t is other vvise vvith
Argument is because there can be no day for a Sabbath vveekly and ordenarily but the 7th day and it may thus be framed If no day of the 7. can be Sabbath vveekly but the 7th day Then must the 7th day now be Sabbath day But no day of the 7. can be Sabbath weekly but the 7th day Therfore must the 7th day now be Sabbath day the consequence is cleere of it selfe and needs no proofe to him that howlds there ought to be a Sabbath as we all doe The Minor I thus proue because God without repeale or exception hath commanded vs or at least permitted and freely giuen vs leaue to labour and vvorke and doe all that we haue to doe in those 6. dayes whichgoe next before the Sabbath or 7th day Exod. 20.9.11 sixe dayes shalt thou labour and doe all thy worke for in sixe dayes the Lord made Heauen Earth c. so then we may worke vpon the Lords day or any other of the sixe dayes and that by Gods authority by his Morall Law neither may it be thought that this branch of the 4th Comm is repealed for the 6. dayes for labour were neuer made typicall and ceremoniall these were neuer shadowes of Chtist yea the Lords day it selfe vvas neuer excepted for Christ himselfe after his resurrection did both trauaile vpon the first day of the 6. namly the Lords day a matter of 15. myles and also approued of the like facte in the two disciples by his iournying together with them to Emmaus that day Luk. 24.13 as hath beene more largly declared in the former parte of this booke now looke what Christ did the like we may doe safely follow me as I follow Christ 1. Cor. 11.1 said Paul so then Christs example is our pattorne and president so as we may worke still vpon the first day of the weeke or on the Lords day if then we may work vpon any of the 6. dayes then are we not tyed to keep any of those dayes a Sabbath in resting from vvorke If any shall thinke we now keepe the 7th day and that day which followeth these dayes labour to him I say that our Lords day vvhich we keepe is the 8th day or first day in the vveeke by Diuine accounte and the 6. dayes labour spoken of in 4th Com are those 6. dayes vvhich goe next before our Saturday for those are the dayes we are to imitate God by working in them since we all confesse Saturday was the 7th day and that day whereon God rested after his 6. dayes work and since vve confesse those were the dayes the Jewes till and at Christs death did labour in 6. My 6th Argument is because God must haue one day in euery 7. dayes from the creation to the vvorlds end and it may be thus framed If God must haue one day in euery 7. dayes for a Sabbath Then must he haue Saturday the 7th day for a Sabbath and not Sunday the first day of the vveeke But God must haue one day in euery 7. dayes for a Sabbath Therfore must God haue Saturday the 7th day for a Sabbath and not Sunday the first day of the vveeke For the Minor it is confessed of all and it may be proued by the 4th Comm vvhere the Lord said Remember the Sabbath that is euery Sabbath Againe The 7th day is the Sabbath that is euery 7th day is the Sabbath like as Thou shalt not kill that is euery thou Loue thy neighbour that is euery neighbour c. For the Maior I proue its consequence Saturday the 7th day it being the last day of that vveeke if you omitte it making a change for you say that day is changed and if so then it is omitted by just consequence giue God Sunday the first day of the next vveeke for it then it is plaine God hath not a Sabbath in euery vveeke or 7. dayes for the wanted one Sabbath in that vveeke wherin the change vvas made from Saturday to Sunday now this lacke and want of a Sabbath in that vveeke can no wayes be supplied but by returning backe to giue God Saturday the 7th day againe So then if God must haue one day in euery 7 you must giue him Saturday which is the last of 7. vvithout any change to the day after or else you both deny that in practise vvhich euery man houldes in judgement to wit that God must haue one day in euery 7. and also liue in the breach of the 4th Com vvhich enioyneth euery 7th day neither vvill it serue your turne to say this change vvas made by others many 100. yeeres a gone for so long as you vphould their day and change you treade in their steppes and justify their facte and are accessary to it 7. My 7th argument is because God had expresly commanded vs the 7th day Sabbath in his Morall Law it may be thus framed Whatsoeuer God hath commanded in this Morall Law that is now in force But the 7th day Sabbath God hath commanded in his Morall Law Therefore the 7th day Sabbath is now in force For the Minor see it expresly proued Exod. 20.8.10 Exod. 23.12 Exod. 31.14.15 Exod. 35.2 Exod. 16.29 Leuit. 23.3 vvhere both the Sabbath day is commanded and likewise the 7th day is commanded equally and if any shall answere a 7th day is commanded but not the 7th day I referre him to my exposition vpon the 4th Comm and vnto the 2d thing ther in vvhere I haue sufficiently proued that God pointed at one singular vvell knowne day from all others and left vs not at rouers to take any day For the Maior namely that vvhatsoeuer God hath commanded in his Morall Law that is now in force this Maxime is so Orthodoxe as it should trouble the conscience of any man once to heare it questioned fearing men hereby goe about to serue God by halues and by peeces to take and to leaue out vvhat they lost not hauing respect vnto all Gods Commandements the very naming and mention that a thing is commanded and that in the 10. Commandements it beares downe all contradiction Hereby vve controule the Atheist the Papist the vaine swearer the Sabbath breaker the disobedient childe the murtherer adulterer theife false witnes bearer and the couetuouse person but now if any begin to question this truth and once to make one breache the flood of iniquity vvill flowe in amaine and if any exception be giuen vvay too for the 7th day commanded vnder what pretense soeuer why other sinners and prophane persons will and may be looke for the like and so the vvhole Law shall be of no force to binde vs now vvhy may not the Papist cauile against 2d Com and say that I indeed it forbad Images to the Jewes but not to Christians vvhy may not the Atheist cauill at first Command Thou shalt loue the Lord thy God with all thy hart Matt. 22.37 I sayes he this belongs not to vs for t is impossible so intirely to loue God as with all