power to purge the Conscience To proceed unto particulars the parts of the Comparison are two 1. The Proposition 2. The Reddition The first Ver. 13 the second Ver. 14. In the first we have the Cause the Blood of Bulls and Goats and the Ashes of an Heifer then the Effect sanctifying to the purifying of the Flesh. Of the Blood of Bulls and Goats which is the same with the Blood of Goats and Calvs Ver. 12. you have heard before for that was the Expiatory Blood wherewith the Priest entring the most Holy place did sprinkle the Mercy-Seat and the Effect of this was the Expiation of the Sins of the Priest and the People whereby they were freed from such penalties as the Law imposed upon persons for some Legal and Ceremonial Offences The second purifying was by the Ashes of a red Heifer mixed with running Water and sprinkled upon Persons or things polluted by touching or being near the dead Of this you may read at large Numb 19. The Effect of both was sanctifying by cleansing from some Legal pollution and Guilt but neither of these could free any person from the Obligation to eternal penalties nor spiritually purify and make holy the Spirit and Soul of Man Some think that the Blood did signify the Death and bloody Sacrifice of Christ the Water the sanctifying Spirit Yet both are here compared with the Blood of Christ as Shadows of it This is the Proposition § 13. The Reddition followeth Ver. 14. Where we have two absolute Propositions and part of the Comparison 1. That Christ offered himself through the eternal Spirit without Spot unto God 2. That the Blood of Christ who thus offered himself doth purge the Conscience from dead Works to serve the Living God 3. The Comparative part is that it hath much more Power or doth much more purge the Conscience The first Proposition is Christ through the eternal Spirit offered himself without Spot unto God Where we may consider 1. The Priest 2. The thing offered 3. The manner how 4. The thing by which 5. The Person to whom the Offering was made 1. The Priest was Christ the Word made Flesh and the Son of God designed a Priest by God 2. The thing offered by this Priest was Himself that is his own Life his own Body and some add his own Soul This was spoken in opposition to such things as the Levitical High-Priests offered as Buls and Goats for none of them offered either other men or themselvs 3. The manner how this was offered is this that it was offered without Spot The thing offered and the Offering and the manner of offering were all pure 4. That by or through which he made this Offering was the eternal Spirit By Spirit some understand the Soul which is said to be eternal because it 's immortal And certainly in respect of his Body he may rather be said to be the thing offered and in respect of his Soul the Priest offering For this offering is said to be the doing of God's Will and an Act of Obedience unto death the death of the Cross and this is a proper Act of his immortal Soul and Spirit Yet this Soul and Body too were united to the Word which as God was an eternal Spirit in which respect some understand by eternal Spirit the Word and Divine Nature of Christ And both Soul and Body were in the highest degree sanctified and supported especially in suffering death by the Holy Ghost which some think is here meant It 's certain he did offer himself by his immortal Spirit sanctified and supported by the Holy Spirit and united to the Word which with the Father and the Holy Ghost are one God and eternal spiritual Substance 5. The party to whom he offered himself was God as supream Lord of Life and Death Law-giver and Judg of Man-kind For he alone had power to appoint him to be Priest to be Offering and to offer and also to accept this Offering in behalf of sinful Man and thereupon to justify him believing and reward him with eternal Life All these are expressed and joyned together to set forth the Excellency and the immanent and internal Vertue of Christ's Blood For How excellent and of what rare vertue and causality must that Blood Death Sacrifice be which was the Blood of Christ who was by God's own immediate Commission and Designment made the highest and the greatest Priest and offered Himself the best Sacrifice that ever was and that through the eternal Spirit purely spiritual and most holy and impolluted and that unto God the supream Lord and Judg and in that manner that the very Act of offering from first to last was most exactly conformable to his Will It had all the perfections of a Sacrifice and in the highest degree The Levitical High-Priest was a Priest but far inferiour to Christ he offered Goats and Calvs but not himself and if he had offered himself yet the thing offered had been nothing to this he offered indeed to God yet he had not that near Relation unto Agreement with and Interest in God as this Priest had He offered by or through his own Spirit which was very imperfect and the imperfections of his very Act of Offering were very many and great Therefore it was no wonder that it should not have the like rare efficiency with this The second Proposition in this Verse is That Christ's Blood doth purge the Conscience c. This is the outward Efficacy and Working of this Blood upon a certain Subject rightly disposed In the words we may observe 1. The Conscience which is the Subject 2. The pollution of the Conscience 3. The purging and cleansing of it 4. The â—ind and Consequent of this cleansing 1. The Conscience is the Spirit and immortal Soul of Man which is Intimum Hominis the in most and most excellent part yet this is not here considered meerly as a spiritual immortal intellective and free Substance created and preserved by God but as subject unto his Power bound by his Laws conscious to it 's own Disobedience and sensible of it For the Blood of Christ doth actually purge no other Soul nor any Soul but thus qualified neither without this Qualification is the Soul immediately capable of this Purgation 2. The Pollution of the Soul is from dead Works where by dead Works it 's generally granted are meant Sins and that not only of Commission but Omission All the Works of Man should be living Works and issue from a Soul endued with a spiritual and supernatural Life have a spiritual and supernatural Form which is Conformity to Divine Law and should tend unto a supernatural and spiritual end When they either issue from a Soul destitute of this heavenly Life or want this Conformity they are dead Works base and such as becomes not so excellent a Creature The ordinary Reasons given by Authors why Sins are called dead Works are because they are the Works of men dead in sin want the Life and
Oblatio the death of the thing Sacrificed and the offering of it to God and the blood must not only be shed but in the Law it must be sprinkled either upon the horns of the Altar without or upon and before the Mercy-seat within the second Vail The blood being shed was the death of the thing Sacrificed and the sprinkling of it upon the Altar or the Mercy-seat was the presenting it to God These both did signify that life must go for life and the blood wherein is the life must be presented to God as Supream Judge and accepted of him before the work of Sacrificing could be finished and made efficacious Therefore Christ's Sacrifice could not be compleated except he be not only slain on Earth but present himself as slain before the Mercy-seat of God in Heaven and both the suffering and offering must be with Incense and Prayer requesting eternal Redemption Whether he did miraculously take some or all his blood shed as some conceit into Heaven is not necessary to be believed except it be evident out of Scripture unto us that he did so Some Socinians affirm and inferr from hence that Christ was not a Priest till he entred Heaven because though his Suffering was on Earth yet his Offering was in Heaven But this is ridiculous and not worth the answering For though this work of Sacrificing was not finished before he entred Heaven yet it doth not follow that he was no Priest before that time because this great Sacrifice was not finished For Aarou must be a Priest before he can minister in the Tabernacle much more before he enter into the inner Sanctuary with the expiatory blood The Socinian doth not assert any entrance of Christ into Heaven but that only one by and upon his Ascension yet Christ was made a compleate Priest instantly upon his Resurrection For from these words This Day which was the day of Resurrection have I begotten thee the Apostle proves Christ to be made a Priest and that by those words This is point-black against his assertion Christ may be and was a Priest by Designation Consecration Constitution Confirmation He was designed from his Birth yet more solemnly upon his Baptism he was consecrated by his great Sacrifice he was fully constituted and made a compleate Priest upon his Resurrection he was confirmed Priest by Oath upon his Ascension and Session at the right hand of God He must needs therefore be very ignorant that shall think that he was no Priest before this confirmation in Heaven But 2. How was this propitiation made and this eternal Redemption obtained for us It 's said he gave himself a Ransome for all 1 Tim. 2. 6. That he gave his life a Ransonâ—â— for many Matth. 20. 28. That he was delivered for our Offences Rom. 4. 25. That he is the propitiation for our sins and not for ours only but also for the sins of the whole World 1 Joh. 2. 2. And more fully in the Prophet All we like Sheep have gone astray we have turned every one to his own way and the Lord hath laid on him the iniquities of us all Esay 53. 6. Out of all which places especially the last we may observe 1. That Christ suffered and by his blood entred Heaven for man 2. For man as sinful 3. To make God propitious to us for ever 4. God in this is to be considered as a Judge punishing us in him and by laying the iniquities that is the punishments of the iniquities of us all upon him 5. He did not suffer not offer for his own sins for God made him who knew no sin sin that is a suffering or propitiatory and redemptory Sacrifice for us so that the benefit redounds to us 6. Seeing he suffered for sin though not for his own his Death was a punishment in proper sense 7. The blood of Christ shed and offered to God as Supream Judge was the price of our Redemption and the immediate effect thereof was eternal propitiation 8. In this work Christ by God's appointment and his own voluntary submission became our Surety and Hostage and so liable to Death That God did punish sin in him was justice that he did punish our sins in him was mercy unto us It 's true that God considered as a private person and as the party offended was merciful and pityed Man but as supream Law-giver and Judg of Mankind he must be just and punish Sin that his Justice being satisfied he might have free and full power to pardon Sin and that without any breach of Justice The Intention of the Apostle in this Text is to prove and make it evident That this Service and Sacrifice was far more excellent than the greatest Service the Levitical High-Priest could or did perform This super-excellency is set forth in respect 1. Of the Blood which was not that of Goats or Calvs but his own Blood 2. In respect of the place into which he entred which was not an earthly Sanctuary but the Holy place of Heaven 3. And most of all in respect of the Effect which was not a yearly Expiation but an eternal Redemption In Form he argues thus That Service wherein by his own Blood he enters Heaven but once and obtains eternal Redemption is more excellent than the Service of that Priest who enters often with the Blood only of Calvs and Goats into an earthly Sacrary and obtains but a yearly Remission But Christ's is such and the Levitical High-Priest's Service but such as is formerly described Therefore Christ's Service is more excellent § 12. The Apostle goes on and proves by a second Argument that the Service and Ministry of Christ is far more excellent and that in respect of the Effect which it hath vertue to produce The former Effect was Propitiation or Expiation this latter and second is cleansing or Purification This as the former is delivered by way of Comparison and the Comparison is in Quantity yet presupposing another in Quality The whole may be reduced to Propositions in this manner 1. The Blood of Bulls and Goats and the Ashes of an Heifer sprinkling the unclean sanctify to the purifying of the Flesh. 2. The Blood of Christ who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without Spot to God purgeth the Conscience from deaÌ„d Works to serve the Living God 3. If the Blood of Buls and Goats and the Ashes of an Heifer sprinkling the unclean sanctifieth to the purifying of the Flesh then much more doth the Blood of Christ who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without spot unto God to purge the Conscience to serve the Living God The Comparison in quality is between the Blood of Buls and Goats the thing wherein they are compared and do agree is purging and sanctifying The Comparison in quantity presupposing also a dissimilitude in this that one doth sanctify the Flesh the other the Conscience is this That if the one hath power to purge and cleanse the Flesh the other hath much more
that Blood was necessary not only for confirmation of the New Covenant but also for the purification of the Called Covenanteers And therefore there could be no reason why these Hebrews of the Jews should be offended with the Death of Christ seeing it was so useful and so necessary not only for Expiation but for purging the Conscience from dead Works and confirming the New Covenant and Testament And here two things are observable 1. That if this Blood should not expiate Sin and purge the Conscience the Covenant could not be firm to the Called so as to receive the eternal Inheritance For if the Inheritance be not purchased and meâ—ted and the Called justified from sin they can have no title or right unto it and if not sanctified and cleansed from the pollution of sin they cannot be capable of it so as to enjoy it 2. This Blood was necessary for the Expiation of the sins not only of them who live after it was shed but also of those who lived under the Law For under it there was no Blood of any Sacrifice that could expiate sin as polluting the Conscience and making the Sinners liable to eternal punishments and as it could not expiate so it could not purge the Conscience though sprinkled with it § 20. The Reddition or Application followeth Ver. 23. It was therefore necessary that the paterns of things in the Heavens should be purified with these but the heavenly things themselves with better Sacrifices then these THe sum of these words is this That as it was necessary that earthly and carnal things and shadows should be purified by the blood of these carnal Sacrifices for the confirmation of the first Covenant so it 's necessary that spiritual and heavenly things should be purified with the blood of better Sacrifices then these for the confirmation of the New Covenant This Reddition is made by a repetition in brief of the former proposition and protasis of the Comparison So that in these few words we have the full Similitude whereof there be two parts The first Is the necessity of purging the Types and Shadows The second Is the necessity of purging the Anti-types Both agree in this 1. That they must be purged 2. They must be purged with the blood of Sacrifices 3. There is a necessity of purging both with the blood of Sacrifices Yet they differ 1. In that the one are earthly and carnal Types 2. In the purging as well in the things purged For the first are purged with earthly carnal Sacrifices suitable to their nature the second with far better Sacrifices The whole may be reduced to two Axioms or Propositions 1. It 's necessary that the paterns of heavenly things should be purified with these 2. It 's necessary that the heavenly things should be purified with better Sacrifices then these Yet there is a third implyed and that is As it 's necessary for the one to be purged with these so it is necessary the other should be purged with better The disposition of the Text seems to be Dianoâ—tical and the argumentation in form to be this If it was necessary that the paterns of things in Heaven should be purified with these then it 's necessary that the heavenly things should be purified with better Sacrifices then these But the first was necessary Therefore the second is so too From all this we understand that the Apostle inferrs the necessity of purging heavenly things from the necessity of purging earthly and further that if the purification of the Types was necessary then the purification of the Anti-types with better Sacrifices was much more necessary This is the reason why the Apostle brings in this Text by the illanve Therefore which is to be understood to follow the proposition and to go before and bring in the Reddition In the first Proposition we have 1. Things in Heaven 2. Paterns of things in Heaven 3. The purifying of the Paterns 4. The purifying of them with these 5. The necessity of purifying them with these 1. By things in Heaven are meant heavenly things as appears in the latter part of the Text and by heavenly are meant spiritual and more excellent things We read of Jerusalem above Gal. 4. 26. and of the heavenly Jerusalem Chap. 12. 22. of this Epistle And this is the Church which is first Militant and then Triumphant which is first from Heaven then in Heaven 2. The patterns of the things in Heaven are such things as were Signs Images Shadows and imperfect Representations of things in Heaven For 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the word in the Original signifies Signs and Images which represent though but darkly other things These are not Patterns in proper sense but things that do sub-demonstrate or obscurely signify some other things They are called Examples and Shadows Examples and Shadows of heavenly things Chap. 8. 5. where it's observable that the very word which is there turned Example is here turned Pattern And Chap. 10. 1. it 's said The Law had a Shadow of good things to come These Shadows Signs and Figures were the Tabernacle the Vessels with many other things which under the Law were purified with Blood 3. What the purifying of these was you have heard before for it was Consecration Expiation Sanctification whereby the things purified of unholy were made holy 4. These were purified with these that is with Scarlet Wool Hyssop Water Blood Ashes and the principal of these was Blood and this Blood was the Blood usually of Bullocks and Goats which was ordained by God to be the Blood of Expiation and Sanctication So outward and carnal things were purged with outward and carnal Blood and both the things the Blood and the Purification were Mystical and did signify some spiritual and more excellent things Blood Purification 5. There was a necessity why these things should be so purified Where we may consider that not onely the Purification but this purification by these was necessary The necessity did arise from God's Institution and Command that these things and shadows should be purified and purified by these things And if these things must signify persons and things guilty and polluted by Sins which God would have purified then in this respect also there was a necessity because otherwise there had been no Agreement between the Types and Anti-Types § 21. The second Proposition is That it 's necessary the heavenly things themselvs be purified by better Sacrifices than these Where we must examine 1. What these heavenly things be 2. What these better Sacrifices are 3. What it 's to be purified by these 4. How this is necessary The heavenly things themselvs are some better and more excellent things for as Heaven is far above the Earth and more glorious so heavenly things must be some better and more glorious than earthly The one are bodily and corruptible and the other spiritual incorruptible and immortal in comparison whereof the best things under the Law were but Shadows These spiritual
own prayers and offerings will not be excepted they can do us no good The Levitical Priests have sins and infirmities of their own and they can offer nothing but the Blood of Beasts And how can these purge the conscience There must be a Priest an High-Priest and he must be without sin and offer an unspotted Sacrifice far more noble precious and excellent then that of Beasts and enter into the heavenly Sacrary otherwise he can do us no good such an High-Priest only Christ is Therefore our condition was such as none but he was convenient for us could do us good and save us And seeing he and he alone was such and without him we must needs perish therefore he was necessary to our Salvation For we must of necessity have such an High-Priest as shall by his purity and his spotless Sacrifice satisfy God's Justice merit his favour and enter Heaven and by his Intercession procure the actual remission of our sins and our full and everlasting Salvation And how much are we bound to acknowledg the unspeakable mercy of our God who knowing our sad condition pittying us and resolving to save us provided such an High-Priest as was convenient for to save us and reconcile us to himself for ever But we unworthy wretches being ignorant and sensless of our sin guilt and misery do not understand what need we have of Christ nor do we seek him and long after him nor praise our God for his greatest love in Providing him for us § 28. But who is this High-Priest and how and when was he made It could not be the Levitical High-Priest for he had infirmities therefore it must be some other and the Text following will inform us who he is how he was made and when he was constituted in these words Ver. 28. For the Law made men High-Priests which have infirmity but the word of the Oath which was since the Law maketh the Son who is consecrated for evermore BY these words we understand 1. Who he was that was made a Priest for ever after the Order of Melchizedec and it was not the Levitical High-Priest but the Son 2. How he was made and that was by the word of the Oath 3. When he was made and that was after the Law and in them he finisheth his discourse upon Psalm 110. 4. They have some coherence with the former words but how is not so clear Yet they have much agreement with the Text immediately antecedent which makes mention of Priests which must offer first for their own sins and of a Priest who being free from all sin had no need to offer for himself but only for others and that but one Sacrifice once and the same so perfect that it was of eternal virtue And here he gives a reason by the rational Conjunction for why they had need to offer for themselves and that is because he had infirmity and the Law made no better Priests And also implies another reason why this other Priest made by the word of the Oath had no need to do any such thing and it 's because he had no infirmity but was consecrated for evermore The former Priests did not become us would not serve our turn therefore God abolished that Priest-hood and would never confirm it by Oath and also abrogated the Law which had no better High-Priests And because the Son was free from all infirmities and able to finish the work of man's Salvation therefore he pitched upon him and gave him an everlasting Priest-hood But let us consider the words in themselves and we shall find in them two divine Axioms 1. The Law maketh men High-Priests which have infirmity 2. The word of the Oath which was after the Law maketh the Son who is consecrated for ever And here it 's to be observed That these two make but one compound Axiom and it 's discretive as appears by the particle But Therefore we must consider 1. The parts severally in themselves 2. Joyntly in their opposition In the first we have 1. Men which have infirmities 2. These made High-Priests 3. These made such by the Law By infirmities are meant sins as appeareth from the former verse where it 's plainly implied That the Levitical High-Priests had sins because they must offer Sacrifice first for their own sins There is a natural and bodily and there is a spiritual and moral infirmity And though Christ was not subject to the latter yet he had something of the former for though he had no diseases yet he was subject to hunger thirst fainting weariness pain and such like infirmities All men born of Adam had their bodily infirmities and all men but Christ have their spiritual infirmities Yet though all have their infirmities yet some of them were made Priests and some High-Priests and they must officiate and draw near to God and officiate and perform religious Services not only for themselves but for others And because there were no other kind of men free from sin therefore the Law made such men High-Priests and the best and the most holy of them had their failings and lesser sins though they were not wicked And whereas it 's said the Law made them it 's meant God in the Law made them High-Priests and therefore they were such by the Law of God instituting that Priest-hood and by that Law making them who were men of infirmity High-Priests they were bound first to offer for themselves the great Sacrifice of expiation and then for others Lâ—v. 16. 11 15. and none of them could offer up themselves without spot to God § 29. The second Axiom is That the word of the Oath which is since the Law maketh the Sov who is consecrated for ever Where we may observe 1. The constitution or making of the Son a Priest for ever 2. The word of the Oath which makes him such 3. The time when he was made such by this Oath 1. By Son understand Jesus Christ who though he be the Son of Man yet is the Son of God in a more eminent manner then ever any other was is or shall be It 's that Son whom God hath made Heir of all things by whom he made the Worlds the brightness of his Fathers Glory and the express Image of his Person This Son is constituted and made a Priest for ever for to be consecrated or perfect for ever is nothing else then to be made a compleat and everlasting Priest 2. This Son was made thus by the word of the Oath that is God by the word of this Oath did constitute and make him such The word of the Oath is Thou art a Priest for ever after the Order of Melchizedec for this did signify and declare the Will of God concerning him The Oath was that whereby God did confirm this Word and signify his Will that the Priest-hood of the Son should remain unto him so that it should never be changed in it self or pass from him or be abolished The word did
Othâ—â— imagine it was the whole World which with the parts thereof both the Tabernacle and Temple did represent wherein the Heaven of Heavens is the Sanctum Sanctorâ—n the Holiest of all and the Sanctuary through which the High-Priest passed into the Holiest place the Aethercal part of the World where the Sun and Moon and Stars represented by the Lights in the Golden Candlestick do ever shine Others determine it to 〈◊〉 the Heaven of Heavens whereof they make some different parts as one to be the place of Angels and Saints and another far more glorious which was the place of God's most blessed and special presence That Christ entred the Heaven of Heavens and that 〈◊〉 he ever ministers and makes Intercession there is express Scripture what difference and degrees of places be there we do not certainly know But let the Tabernacle â—e his Body or the Church Militant or the World or the Heaven of Heavens the second doubt is Whither these words concerning this Tabernacle are to be referred If to the former words which say that Christ being rome an High-Priest of good things to come then it 's nothing but this That Christ is the Minister and High-Priest of a far more glorious Sanctuary But some refer them to the word entred and make the sense to be that as the High-Priest under the Law passeth through the first Sanctuary to enter into the second which is the Holiest of all so Christ passed through the Militant into the Church Triumphant And it 's very true that Christ hath his Sanctuary and Temple here on Earth and that 's his Church wherein God dwels in a special manner and he passed through and from this into the Church Triumphant of Saints and Angels where God is more gloriously present and powerful nay he entred through the Aetherdal part of the World into the highest Heavens and through the Heaven of Angels and Saints unto the highest and most glorious place and Throne of God But the former sense that Christ is come an High-Priest and Minister of a far more glorious and excellent Sanctuary seems to be more genuine and confirmed by Chap. 8. 2. § 11. The third Proposition is concerning Christ's Service and Sacrifice offered in this Temple For Christ not by the Blood of Goats and Calves but by his own Blood iâ—â—red in once into the holy place Where 1. We have the Holy place 2. Christ's Entrance into it 3. His Entrance once 4. His Entrance once by Blood not of Goats and Calvs but by his own Blood 1. The Holy place is the Heaven of Heavens signified by the Holiest of all in the Tabernacle and in the Temple for that was the place into which the High-Priest with Blood entred in once every Year so that there is no difficulty in this particular And that Christ entred into Heaven is clear enough For Christ is not entred into the holy places made with hands which are the Figures of the true but into Heaven it self there to appear before God for us Ver. 24. of this Chapter 2. Christ entred into this Holy place But there is a Question made of the time when he entred That he entred forty dayes after the Resurrection it 's clear and express For he was taken up into Heaven Acts 1. 11. He was carried up into Heaven Luke 24. 71. And He that descended is the same also that ascended far above all Heavens to fulfil all things Ephes. 4. 10. But there seems to be another entrance before this and that was immediately upon his Death For when he had given up the Ghost immediately the Vail of the Temple was rent in the midst from the top to the bottom and his Soul separated from his Body and commended into his Fathers hands entred into Paradise That he entred at that time into Heaven with his Soul separated from his Body the Text doth seem to affirm And what should the renting of the Catapetasm and the Inner-Vail immediately upon his Death signify but that the great High-Priest was ready to enter Heaven Again it may be said more properly that he entred Heaven with or by his Blood when his Soul was separated from his Body than when his Body was risen and made immortal and both Soul and Body joyntly ascended For it was the custom of the High-Priest according to God's Institution upon the slaying of the Sacrifice and taking of the Blood to enter the holy Place and the Type and Anti-type should agree especially in this particular Further the expiatory Offering was not compleate till the Blood was presented before the Throne of God in the inner Sacrary and it was suitable to the Type that the great High-Priest should after he was slain on Earth present himself as slain in Heaven before the Supream Judge as having suffered Death and satisfied Justice for the sin of man But all this I leave to the judgment of Learned men who shall seriously search the Book of God and impartially examine whether God doth not speak this in Scripture And howsoever it 's certain that whether he entred thus then yet he so entred at one time or other that he obtained eternal Redemption 3. He entred once This informs us that though the High-Priest entred once every year and so might enter above a thousand times yet Christ entred thus but once For as we shall read both in the latter end of this and also in the beginning of the next Chapter once to enter or one entrance in this manner was sufficient because one Death one Offering was able to do that which all the Offerings of all the High-Priests under the Law could not do neither was any more Offering needful seeing this had done all that was requisite for satisfaction and merit 4. This entrance was by or with Blood and this is set down negatively and affirmatively Negatively this was not blood of Goats and Calves and that with which the Legal High-Priests did enter within the Vail For as we may read Levit. 16. upon the day of expiation a Bullock and a Goat must be slain and with the Blood of these he must enter the holy Place The reason of this is because the blood of Beasts could not satisfy divine justice expiate the sin of man and purge his conscience and immortal Soul and so make the eternal penalty removable Therefore it must be a far more excellent blood the blood of the Son of God his own blood which was pare unspotted and most precious The reason 1. Why it must be by blood is because as without blood under the Law there was no Legal Remission or Expiation so it was the Will of God that without blood there should be no eternal Remission For though God was merciful and sate in the Throne of Grace and Mercy yet his Justice did require that satisfaction should be made and seeing sin was committed and punishment was deserved and due by his Law violated therefore sin must be punished before it could be pardonable
Form of Holiness and merit death and Punishment or because men are dead and sensless of them and so continue in them Yet the Apostle seems to allude in this to the Pollutions by the dead whereof we read Num. 19. 18. For he that touched a Bone or one slain or one dead or a Grave was legally unclean and polluted In every sin we commit our Soul doth come too near unto or morally and spiritually doth touch something that is base vile and far below it self and so debaseth and defileth it self and makes it self not only guilty but unholy and unfit for having any Communion with God 3. To purge this Conscience is to free this Soul thus conscious of sin from the Guilt and the Impurity and other sad Consequents of Sin so that thereupon the Sinner is neither liable to Punishment or debarred from Communion with God This purging is not only Justification but that which is called Sanctification and inherent Holiness without which no Man shall see God the want whereof if we consider it as following upon a former demerit is the greatest Punishment of all other For if we could imagine a Man pardoned and freed from the Guilt of former sin and left inherently polluted and unsanctified he must needs remain in a sad condition But we cannot truly thus imagine if want of the sanctifying Spirit be a Punishment for former Sin If we be once thus purged there is no more Conscience of Sin once pardoned no fear of God's wrath nor of the eternal penalty for we being once purged have peace with God quiet of Conscience and hope of Glory 4. To serve the true and living God following upon the purging of the Conscience is a special priviledg To understand this more distinctly we must know that under the Law whosoever was polluted by the presence or touch of the dead could not enter into the Congregation with the rest of God's sanctified People for to worship or have any Communion with God If he should dare and presume to enter before he was purged or purified he defiled the Tabernacle and Sanctuary of God and that Soul must be cut off Numb 19. 13 20. That which answers unto this Priviledg is the liberty of free access with boldness and confidence unto the Throne of Grace to offer up our Prayers Thanks-giving and other Services unto God propitiated and reconciled so as to be accepted and receive Mercies and Blessings from him For being justified and sanctified we do not fear God as a severe Judg we do not stand at a distance or fly from him but come near unto him as Children to a loving Father This same Service of the true and living God who is Light most pure and holy doth presuppose us justified sanctified reconciled adopted There are degrees as of this cleansing so of this serving God for we are not cleansed fully from all Sin in this Life but we shall be in the Life to come and then we shall have full Communion with our God and serve him far more perfectly in the glorious Temple and Sacrary of Heaven This is the purging of the Conscience in it self Now we must consider it as an Effect predicated of the Blood of Christ the Cause for it being so noble and excellent an Effect must have some rare and noble Cause The Cause therefore must be Blood yet no Blood but this Blood of Christ with which he entred into the Holy place of Heaven after it was shed will serve the turn or reach this Effect yet this is not an immediate but a mediate Effect of this Blood thus shed and presented to God For one immediate effect antecedent to this is expiation and satisfaction of God's Justice whereby Sin became pardonable And if Christ had not obtained and found eternal Expiation by this blood he could never by it have purged the Conscience Yet this blood hath this power first and then doth exercise it when he finds a Subject rightly disposed which is a Conscience sensible of sin and appealing to the Throne of Grace where it pledges this blood of Christ. So that this purging actually considered presupposeth the blood of Christ shed offered accepted as a sufficient propitiation and the Sinner to be purged penitent and believing This seems to be signified by that Ceremony of purification described and prescribed Numb 19. For he that was once polluted and unclean must be willing desirous and careful to be cleansed with the ashes mixt with water sprinkled upon him The blood of some Sacrifice did expiate the ashes with water sprinkled did cleanse So the blood of Christ shed and offered doth expiate sin so far as to make it remissible and the sprinkling of that by the Spirit upon the penitent and believing doth purge The third Proposition in this verse is that much more doth the blood of Christ purge the conscience that is 1. It purgeth the conscience 2. It purgeth it effectually and fully But joyn this with the former and then we have the substance of the whole in one proposition which you heard before and the Apostle in the words argues to this purpose If the blood of Bulls and Goates c. had power of sanctifying the Flesh then much more the blood of Christ doth purge the Conscience But the blood of Bulls and Goates c. did sanctify the Flesh. Therefore much more the blood of Christ c. doth purge the Conscience c. This place implies that the expiations by Blood and purifications of the Law could neither satisfy God's Justice nor purge the Conscience from spiritual filth and guilt of sin yet the blood of Christ could do both And here we must seriously consider the excellency of the blood of Christ the wonderful purging efficacy thereof and the unspeakable mercy of God in providing this remedy and setting open this fountain to wash and cleanse away our sin O blessed blood O happy man O come to this Fountain wash and bathe thy self here every day Here the wrath of God is quenched the tormenting conscience quieted the filthy Soul washed and prepared for the communion with her God But we are ignorant of the virtue of this blood sensless of our sins careless of our purification and so presume to enter into God's presence and defile his Tabernacle and bring his wrath upon us But before I leave this Text something further must be said concerning the efficacy of the blood of Buls and Goates and the ashes of an Heifer also of the efficacy of the blood of Christ. For it must be enquired whether the efficacy of both depend meerly upon divine Institution oâ— upon the nature of the Causes 1. That neither is Physical will be granted 2. That the purifying efficacy of the blood of Goates and Bulls and the ashes of an Heifer sprinkling the unclean did depend meerly upon the will and positive Institution of God will not be denyed For neither the blood nor ashes nor sprinkling had any moral spiritual intrinsecal virtue
They were all in themselves considered indifferent things and a fit matter and subject of some positive Law 3. The offering and also the shedding of the blood of Christ were in respect of Christ acting and officiating in both purely moral and divine in the highest degree of Service For his suffering of Death for the sin of man at the Command of his heavenly Father was the highest degree of obedience that ever was performed to God There was in it so much love to God so much love of Man so much self denial so much humility and patience and such a resignation of himself to God as never could be parallel'd It was so excellently qualified that it was in a moral sense most powerfull to move God to mercy who is so mightily inclined to mercy of his own accord It was most pleasing unto God and most highly accepted of God considered in it self But seeing it was the suffering of a party different from man guilty who was bound himself to make satisfaction or to suffer according to the Law transgressed that it should be so far accepted of God as to make the Sinner pardonable and that certain pardon should follow upon Repentance and Faith depended upon the free will of God who in strict justice might have refused any satisfaction offered him in behalf of man who deserved to dye and might justly have been condemned to eternal Death It was one thing to accept the service and obedience in it self and another thing to accept it so for sinful man as to determine such inestimable benefits should follow thereupon and accrue to the sinful guilty Wretch The Socinian upon the Text is very muddy and obscure And 1. Though he deny Christ's satisfaction and merit yet he confesseth that the shedding of the blood of Christ even of its own nature had force and power to procure unto Christ all power in Heaven and Earth and all judgment and arbitrament of our Salvation and to produce in us the cleansing of Conscience This is not only obscure but if well examined false For what is it of its own nature to procure For if he mean by the word procure merit upon satisfaction it 's true that by his blood he satisfied and merited but both these he denies If he understand that of it own nature it did so procure this power and this effect so as it did solely or principally depend upon the will of Christ as Man for he denies him to be God and not principally and solely upon the will of God it 's false Here I must demand What difference he makes between procuring and meriting and also take occasion to shew the nature of meriting which is a moral act upon which some good or reward doth follow not necessarily and exnaturá rei but voluntarily according to the will of him in whose power the reward is but of this else-where 2. He puts a difference between Christ's Priest-hood and his Mediatourship and makes his Mediatourship to end with his Death and his Priest-hood there to begin But the Apostle makes no such difference but in this Epistle he takes Mediatour and Priest for the same That his Mediatourship should end and his Priest-hood should begin with and upon his Death I will believe when he can prove it which he can never do for there is not the least ground for it in the Word of God and it must needs be false upon this account that both are the same 3. He affirms that the blood of Christ takes efficacy and force to purge fin from the subsequent oblation of Christ in offering himself in Heaven and this he not only here but else-where doth often assert But 1. It 's very clear and certain that the total resignation of himself unto the will of his heavenly Father and his willing suffering of Death the voluntary laying down of his life the making himself a whole Burnt-offering was properly the oblation of himself This was on Earth this was the great act of Obedience the great Service that was so acceptable to God wherein Christ shewed himself a mirrour of so many heavenly virtues The representing of himself slaln in Heaven was not this offering nor the appearing before his Fathers Throne upon his Ascension The Scripture no where affirms it he cannot instance in one place for this And though God did require it yet it was not the meritorious act therefore never let him or any of that party delude us with his false and groundless notion of offering himself in Heaven By his Death Christ did satisfy and merit by his Resurrection and Ascension he makes his Death effectual unto us both by revealing the Gospel and sending the Spirit to work Faith in us and make us capable of remission and eternal life and by his Intercession and pleading his blood he obtains actual pardon and in the end full fruition of eternal life This is the meaning of those words Who was delivered for our Offences and rose again for our Justification Rom. 4. 25. 4. He tells us that Christ was filled with the eternal Spirit that is with the power of God which clarified him from all mortality and made him eternal subject to no destruction This is a strange fancy of his own and invented because he is so great an Adversary to Satisfaction And 1. He saith that eternal Spirit is the power of God which he so understands as that he denies him to be God 2. The power is either God himself or some active power whether natural or supernatural created by God in some of his Creatures or an act of God extrinsecally supporting and preserving something creued Now that which made Christ's Sacrifice and Suffering so acceptable to God and so efficacions was the sanctifying power of the Spirit enduing him with such heavenly virtues and supporting him in this great Service of sacrificing himself For if he had not received a divine and supernatural active power of holiness and righteousness inherent in his Soul which so strongly inclined and moved him to obedience in greatest temptations and had been extrinsecally supported by him this Offering had never been so acceptable to God nor efficacious to purge the Conscience And this was a far more glorious effect of the Spirit then to make him immortal and bring him into Heaven For this immortality and entrance into Heaven were Rewards not Virtues and only made way for the exercise of his Regal and Sacerdotal Power in the Palace and Temple of Heaven 5. He saith that by the Offering of Christ is signified his singular and only care for the Expiation of our Sins and for our Salvation Where it is to be observed 1. That he understands this of Christ as entred by his Ascension into Heaven 2. That by Expiation he means Remission and Sanctification without any respect unto Propitiation and Satisfaction by blood antecedent 3. Christ's offering of himself is a religious Service performed unto God as Supream Lord and Judge offended with sinful
man yet willing upon certain terms to be merciful unto him And one condition which performed he will accept is that Christ as Surety for man should suffer Death for man to satisfie divine Justice In this respect is he said to give himself a Ransome or Price How far different this is from the offering here described is easy to understand The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is used about sixteen times in this Epistle but never taken in his sense which is so absurd and unworthy that no rational man as rational much less a Christian and a Schollar can any wayes approve but reject with scorn The rest of his discourse upon this Text is like his description of Christ's offering and by it he seeks to cast a mist upon the divine Doctrine of the Apostle lest he should confound himself and suffer his Reader to see the truth Dr. Gouge upon this Text affirms Christ to be a Priest in both natures which cannot be true for though he that is Priest be God yet as God he is not he cannot be a Priest For a Priest is an Officer and all Officers as Officers are made such by Commission from the Supream Power from whom they derive their Office whom they represent and are Servants under them to serve them There are two prime and proper acts of Christ as a Priest to Sacrifice and offer himself to God as Supream Lord and to make Intercession to him To attribute either of these to God as God and affirm them of him in proper sense is plainly blasphemous and inexcusable it turns the Lord into the Servant and God into Man § 14. Hitherto the excellency of Christ's Sacrifice and Service hath been manifested by two glorious and excellent effects the one immediate which is Expiation the other mediate which is purging the Conscience from Dead Works The former made Sin pardonable and the Consequents thereof removable the latter actually takes away Sin and the Consequents thereof in him who believeth Besides these two there is a third effect shewing it to be yet more excellent and that is confirmation of the New Covenant for thus he writes Ver. 15. And for this cause is he the Mediatour of the New Covenant that by means of Death for the Redemption of Transgressions under the first Test ament they which are called might receive the promise of eternal Inheritance THe subject of this Verse is the confirmation of the New Covenant by the Death and Sacrifice of Christ which is affirmed here and illustrated from ver 16. to the 23. afterwards And here the Coherence is 1. To be examined 2. The Text in it self to be considered The coherence with the former is in these words And for this cause The Copulative and may be as in other places expletive or it may be used to signify that the Death and bloody Sacrifice of Christ as it was ordained for another end besides the two former of Propitiation and purging the Conscience so it hath another and a third effect which is The confirmation of the New Covenant For this is to observed that he speaks and still continues his discourse of the Death and Blood of Christ. The words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for this cause which are turned by some therefore may referr either to that which goes before or that which follows If to that which goes before then they inform us that because Christ by his Blood entring the holy place of Heaven obtained eternal Remission and by it offering himself through the eternal Spirit without spot doth purge the Conscience to serve the living God therefore and for this cause and in respect of these two effects is he the Mediatour of the New Covenant If they relate to that which follows they are to be understood in this manner That because by the Death of Christ the Called receive the promise of eternal Inheritance therefore he is the Mediatour of the New Covenant This is the Coherence The absolute consideration of the Text followeth wherein we have two principal express Axioms or Propositions 1. Christ is the Mediatour of the New Covenant 2. By means of Death for the Redemption of Transgressions under the first Covenant the Called might receive the promise of eternal Inheritance 3. Christ is a Mediatour of the New Covenant that by means of Death for Redemption c. the Called may receive the promise c. In the first we have 1. A New Covenant 2. A Mediatour of this New Covenant 3. Christ the Mediatour 1. The New Covenant is that of the Gospel whereof you have heard in the former Chapter where it was opposed unto and compared with the Old Covenant made with the Fathers in the Wilderness Exod. 19. as established upon better promises And that word which was there turned Covenant is turned Testament not that there is any necessity but a conceived congruity For because here is mention of an Inheritance which is usually conveyed by the Will and Testament of man which Will is then firm and unalterable when the Testatour dieth therefore it was conceived by some that in this place that which formerly was called a Covenant should be called here a Testament yet notwithstanding it agrees with a Testament and may by a Metaphor be so termed yet it is more properly a Covenant 2. We have a Mediatour of this Covenant and what a Mediatour is you have heard before as also the distinctions of Mediators Some tell us that a Mediatour is aut â—untius aut sequester pacis aut arbiter aut sponsor yet we need not insist upon these terms for the Mediatour of this Covenant is a Priest and a Minister of it as the High-Priest was of the former Covenant 3. This Mediatour is Christ who may be said to be Nuntius à Dâ—o Intercessor pro hâ—mine Arbiter inter utrumque Sponsor pro utroque and he is a Messenger declaring the Covenant as a Prophet an Arbitratour between God and Man as a King a Surety and Intercessour as a Priest Yet though all this said may be in some respect true yet it 's neither accurate nor pertinent in this place Christ as a Priest and as a Priest officiating and offering himself a Sacrifice to propitiate God and purge the conscience of sinful Man is the Mediatour of this Covenant For as such and in this respect he mediates between God and Man to propitiate God and to make man fit for the receiving of the eternal Reward promised and both these he doth by his Blood and Death without which offered and applyed the promise would be void and never take effect It 's true that Christ doth procure the Covenant declares it confirms it and makes it effectual and in all these respects he may be said to be a Mediatour Yet here he is made such principally and most properly as confirming and making it effectual Moses and not Aaron was the Mediatour in the making and confirming the Old Covenant For he dealt between God and the
People as a third part 1. In making the Covenant in signifying God's Will unto the People and returning the People's Answer unto God Exod. 19. 2. 2. In confirming it by Blood as an indifferent distinct person Exod. 24. To which place the Apostle doth allude as we shall understand hereafter in the illustration This is the meaning of the first Proposition The second may be divided for explication and made two 1. Christ by means of Death expiated Transgressions under the former Covenant 2. By means of this Death the Called receive the promise of eternal Inheritance The first implies 1. That there were Transgressions under the former Covenant 2. That there was a Redemption of these Transgressions 3. This Redemption was by the Death of Christ. The first is clear enough for Moses Aaron David and the Saints of God from the times of Moses till the exhibition of Christ had their sins much more others not sanctified The second cannot be doubted of for if there was no Redemption of those Sins and Transgressions then they could not be saved they must suffer eternal punishments as they did temporal By Redemption here is meant Expiation and Propitiation whereby their sins were made remissible and upon certain terms and conditions performed actually to be remitted The third will be granted in general that the Expiation was by Death and Blood but that they were expiated by the Blood of Christ many of the Jews denied Yet if they had understood the Books of Moses they might have known that the Blood of Bulls and Goats could not expiate the Sin of Man a rational and immortal Creature not free from the eternal Punishment Some Legal frailties and infirmities they might expiate and avert some temporal penalties Therefore there must of necessity be some other Death and Blood that must do it And this was the Blood of Christ which all their Ilastical Sacrifices and Lustrations did typify Yet this is not so to be understood as though their Sins were not remissible and remitted till Christ dyed and offered his Sacrifice for by vertue of this Death fore-seen and fore-accepted they were in their Life-time upon their Repentance Faith in Christ to come and their fervent Prayers pardoned They did not rely upon their Legal Sacrifices nor expected Remission from them but relyed upon this Death of Christ to come according to the Promise That in him all Nations should be blessed This Proposition is not to be understood exclusively as though Christ's Death did expiate no Sin but that which was committed under the first Covenant but emphatically to singnify 1. That there was no Expiation for Transgressions under the Law 2. That if Christ's Death expiate former Transgressions under the Law much more will it expiate such as are committed under the Gospel 3. That there was no reason as some observe why they should be offended with the Death of Christ seeing without his Death and Blood neither they nor their Fathers could be saved but must suffer eternal penalties The second part of this second Proposition informs us that 1. There is an eternal Inheritance 2. There is a Promise of it 3. The called receive this Promise 4. By means of Christ's Death they receive this Promise For in the words we have an Inheritance the Heirs the Conveyance the Purchase or rather the price whereby it 's purchased The Inheritance is eternal Happiness the Heirs are the called the Conveyance is by Promise and Covenant the price of the purchase is Christ's Death and Blood 1. The Inheritance is that blessed and glorious Estate which is to be enjoyed upon the Resurrection for the full possession and enjoyment is reserved for Heaven where it 's said to be laid up and reserved It 's said to be eternal in opposition to the Land of Canaan which was the temporal Inheritance of them and their Fathers and to be enjoyed with the Blessings thereof so long as they kept the Covenant of their God and this was the Inheritance promised in the former Covenant and to this which formerly was called God's Rest the Apostle seems to allude as a Type of this which was far more excellent and glorious of eternal continuance in respect of the Inheritance it self the parties enjoying it and the enjoyment thereof 2. This eternal Inheritance was promised there was a Promise of it It was God's and the disposal of it was at his Will Man for his sin was cast out of Paradise and forfeited Heaven with the eternal Bliss thereof yet it was in his mind to give it sinful Man who deserved it not so great was his mercy and bounty and Man must know this For this end he promised it and by his Promise bound himself to give it and in it did signify his Will The Effect of this Promise was Obligation on God's part and a Right unto it on Man's part an Hope to obtain it and a Comfort upon this Hope And here it 's to be observed that our Title to eternal life depends immediately upon the Promise and is derived from it for as the Israelites had the Land of Canaan and held it by Covenant and Promise so do all the Children of God expect the heavenly Canaan and hope to have it by Promise of the new Covenant Some do ' understand by the Promise of eternal Inheritance this Inheritance promised yet there must be a Promise received before we receive the thing promised 3. After the Inheritance and the Promise and Conveyance follows the Heirs which are here said to be the called Some are not called at all these have no Promise of the Inheritance Such were the Gentiles before the Gospel was preached unto them they were Strangers from the Covenants of Promise having no Hope and without God in the World Ephes. 2. 12. Some are called and have the means of Conversion but reject the terms of the Covenant and refuse to enter into it and engage themselvs such were the unbelieving Jews and many others Some are called enter the Covenant and solemnly bind themselvs to the observation of it yet do not observe it In respect of these two last it is that Christ saith Many are called but few are chosen Matth. 22. 14. None of these are Heirs Some are called and are obedient to the heavenly Call and keep the Covenant these receive the eternal Inheritance promised and first acquire the Title and after that the Possession Some were called before the Exhibition of Christ some after the former are here principally meant though the latter with them receive the Inheritance 4. These called Ones of former times with us receive this Promise by vertue of Christ's Death expiating their sins and of his Blood purging their Conscience To understand this you must consider that none but such whose Sins are expiated and their Consciences purged can be Heirs for they must be regenerated and acted by the Spirit and adopted Sons before they can be Heirs For as the Apostle argues If Sons then Heirs
Rom. 8. 17. so may we likewise say If no Sons then no Heirs None can be Sons that are not justified none can be justified which believe not in the Death and Blood of Christ there can be no Belief in this Blood if not shed This Death and Blood of Christ 1. Expiates sin and makes it remissible 2. Merits the eternal Inheritance promised and the Promise too 3. It merits the Spirit to enable Man to keep the Covenant so as to obtain and receive the Inheritance 4. It merits a Power in Christ 1. To reveal the Gospel and give the Spirit to work Repentance and Faith in sinful Man's heart 2. Upon Repentance and Faith and his Intercession a Power to give Remission and the eternal Inheritance Take away this Death this Blood there is no Expiation of Sin no Inheritance no Covenant and suppose a Covenant and a Promise yet it 's ineffectual invalid without this Blood this Death For all the heavenly Promises are made for and in consideration of this Blood satisfying his Justice and meriting his Favour so that without it they are all nothing to purpose neither without it can the called though obedient to the heavenly Call ever have any Right unto or Possession of eternal Life So that the whole strength and efficacy of the Covenant doth depend upon this Blood for by it our Sins are expiated and our Consciences purged so as to be capable of the Inheritance This is a most clear Text to prove that the Saints even under the Law were called and saved and that not by the Ministry and Sacrifice of the Levitical Priests but by the Blood of Christ the vertue whereof extended to former times even the times of Adam Neither did they trust in their Sacrifices and their Priests and the Blood of Bulls and Goats and their Water of separation but in the Blood of Christ yet their Faith was very implicit The third Proposition is Christ is the Mediator of the new Covenant for this Reason and for this End An excellent Covenant must have an excellent Priest and Mediator and seeing this Covenant doth promise eternal Remission and an eternal Inheritance it requires such a Priest as shall be able by his Ministry and Service to obtain this Remission and Inheritance This no Priests by their Sacrifices or any other Service could do but Christ could and therefore not they but He and He alone was made the Mediator of this new Covenant For by his Death he expiates sin and purgeth the Conscience so that the called receive the Promise of eternal Inheritance and the vertue of this Death is universal in respect of time and persons called The Sum of all this is That Christ by reason of his Death and Blood expiating Sin and purging the Conscience is the Mediator of the new Testament or Covenant to confirm and make it effectual to the Heirs of the Promise § 15. This Confirmation of the new Covenant is illustrated from a two-fold Similitude the one is taken a Jure Naturali the other a Jure Ceremoniali The first is taken from the Law of Nature for to it the Civilians refer the Rules of Testaments and Wills and is delivered Ver. 16. For where a Testament is there must also of necessity be the death of the Testator Ver. 17. For a Testament is of force after men are dead otherwise it is of no strength at all whilest the Testator liveth THis is an imperfect and contract Similitude for the parts thereof as of all Comparisons are two 1. The Proposition 2. The Reddition And yet the Proposition is only expressed and the Reddition is only implyed and to be supplied from the antecedent Context In the Proposition we may observe two things 1. The necessity of the Death of the Testator barely asserted Ver. 16. 2. The Reason thereof rendred Ver. 17. The Argument in Form may be this That which is not of force whilest the Testator liveth that necessarily requireth the Death of the Testator to make it of force But a Testament is not of force whilest the Testator liveth Therefore it requireth to make it of force the Death of the Testator The Assumption is expressed 1. Affirmatively A Testament is of force after men who are Testators are dead 2. Negatively It 's of no strength whilest the Testator liveth The Comparison at large is this As the Death of the Testator is necessary to make the Testament of force so the Death of Christ is necessary for to make the new Covenant of force For though Christ might in some respect be a Mediator of the new Covenant yet he could not make it valid firm and effectual without his death neither we under the Gospel nor the Fathers under the Law could without this Death be saved by it And as the death of the Testator gives full force and efficacy to the Testament and this Confirmation is an Effect of his Death so the Death of Christ gives full force to the new Covenant and makes â—â— effectual and this validity and efficacy is an Effect of this Death of Christ and manifests the excellency of this Sacrifice and of Christ the Priest who offered it The things compared as like are the Death of Christ and the Death of a Testator The things wherein they agree are 1. The like Effect of both which is to confirm and make effectual some Instrument 2. The necessity of both for that end to confirm and make effectual § 16. The Propositions in the first part of the Comparison are these 1. There are Testaments of men 2. These are not of force whilest the Testators live 3. They are of force upon the Death of the Testators 4. The Death of the Testators is necessary to make them of force 1. The matter of all Testaments is a temporal estate of these earthly Goods which God hath given Man to preserve this temporal Life The Testator is one that hath a just Title unto these Goods so that he hath power to dispose of them The Testament it self is the manner of disposing these Goods so as to give the same Right which he had in them unto other Persons after his Death and therefore it must signify his Will concerning these Goods and nominate the Persons who must succeed him so as to have them And because it 's an Act of Reason so to do therefore the Testator when he makes his Will must be Compos mentis and have the Use of his Reason and also sui Juris and not under the power of another The end of it is to prevent future suits and dissensions and Injustice about his Estate The Light of Nature doth teach men thus to dispose of their temporal Goods and therefore they are of ancient and universal Use. 2. These are not in force whilest the Testators live and the Reason of this is not only because whilest they are living they have need of or do use their Goods and though they make their Will in their life-time yet they
and heavenly things principally intended are the Consciences and immortal Souls of men which being purged make up the Body of the Church which is Militant first on Earth and after that to be Triumphant in Heaven 2. The better Sacrifice above the former is the Sacrifice of Christ and the pure unsported Blood of him who offered himself by the eternal Spirit to God The purifying vertue of this Sacrifice was in this that Christ the Son of God innocent holy righteous as Surety and Hostage of Man-king appointed to be so by God did deny himself took up the Cross shed his Blood for to expiate the Sin of Man and was obedient unto death the death of the Cross For him so excellent to suffer death so willingly for so glorious an end and that at the Command of God was the highest and purest degree of Obedience that ever was performed unto God and was highly accepted and did fully satisfy divine Justice so far as was required In the offering of this Sacrifice he gave himself wholly to his heavenly Father and became as it were a whole Burnt-Offering being wholly consumed with the Zeal of his Father's Glory and the Love of Man-kind And here it is to be noted upon the By That though in the Text we read Sacrifices in the plural number yet this one Sacrifice of Christ is onely meant Estius thinks it's an Enallage of number the Plural for the Singular for the Sacrifice whereby heavenly things are purified is but only one once offered Yet it may be called Sacrifices because it had more vertue than all other purifying Sacrifices and also because it was one of those expiating Sacrifices which were offered unto God yet more excellent than all the rest It 's like that expression of Jâ—phtah's Butial for it 's said he was buried in the Cities of Gâ—lead that is one of the Cities of that Country which was Mizpeh as some think Judg. 12. 7. 3. For the heavenly things and the Consciences of men to be purified is to be freed from Sin that is from the Guilt and Dominion of Sin which is to be justified and sanctified as these words are usually taken This Purification is vertual or actual for when the Blood of Christ was shed offered and accepted for the Sins of men then they may be said to be purified virtually as upon the death of Christ we are said to be reconciled because made reconcilable And when by Faith this Blood is sprinkled upon our Consciences and pardon obtained by Christ's Intercession for peniâ—ent and believing Sinners then they are said to be actually purified and when they are wholly freed from all the Guilt and Power of Sin then they are perfectly purified 4. This Purification by this Sacrifice was necessary for supposing God's Will and Decree concerning the eternal Happiness of sinful Man in Communion with his God it was necessary Man should be purified for otherwise he could have no fellowship with God so as to derive eternal Happiness from him For as God is Light and just and holy so they must be Light just and holy who shall see and enjoy him And because no Sacrifice but this of Christ could thus qualify him therefore it was necessary both that he should be purified and purified with this Sacrifice § 22. Thus far you have heard of the necessity of the death of Christ for the Confirmation of the Covenant illustrated by Similitudes taken from the Law of Nature and the Ceremonial Law of Moses Therefore the Jews except they were very ignorant could have no cause to be offended with this death upon the Cross seeing it was so necessary to the purchasing of the eternal Inheritance and the purging of mens Consciences that they might be capable of the Possession and have a Title unto it for the ground of the Promise from whence the Title is immediately derived is this Sacrifice without which the Promise was never made neither if it had been made could it without this have been valid But let 's consider what follows for he saith Ver. 24. For Christ is not entred into the Holy places made with hands which are Figures of the true but into Heaven it self now to appear before God for us THese words considered absolutely in themselvs seem to be plain and easily understood but the coherence is doubtful Some and amongst the rest Esâ—ius takes little notice of it as not much material Many others finding the causal Conjunction For do agree that in these words the Apostle gives a Reason of something that went before but they differ much in the particular Explication of the Reason Dr. Gouge conceivs that the Apostle's intention is to prove that the Sacrifice of Christ is more excellent than the Sacrifices of the Law and this is true but yet imperfect Beza thinks that the Author in this Text begins another and a new Collation or Comparison to prove the excellency of this Offering and this cannot be denyed Dr. Lushington who is said to be the Translator of Crellius tells us that here is proved That the Heavenly places are purified by better Sacrifices and that because Christ entred not into the earthly Sanctuary but into Heaven it self This doth presuppose that Heaven it self is purified by the Blood of Christ and that Christ entred thereinto for that end But this is difficult to understand and supposeth that which few will grant him A Lapide differs from all these and saith that the Apostle gives in this Text a Reason why he called the Church heavenly or heavenly things and that is because Christ entred into Heaven to unlock the Gates and open the Doors thereof that the faithful might enter thereinto This is not so clear and satisfactory though it hath something of Truth To find out the Connexion we must observe 1. That the Conjunction for or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is sometimes expletive and redundant 2. Sometimes the same that but or moreover is 3. That though it be called by the Grammarians a Causal yet it doth not alwayes imply a Cause but it 's used to bring in any other Reason or Argument and therefore might be called a rational Conjunction Yet Whittington in his Grammar saith that a Causal Conjunction signifies the Cause or Order of that which goeâ— before where he implies that it doth not alwayes joyn the Cause and the Effect 4. Let it be taken for a Conjunction which joyns these words to the former so as to contain a Reason we must consider what was formerly â—ffiâ—med and how it 's here proved To this end let us remember that the Subject of the former discourse was Purification or Expiation of things by Blood of Sacrifices and these things are earthly and carnal or spiritual and heavenly Of these latter he affirmed that it was necessary they should be purified with better Sacrifices The manner how he proves this is this He presupposing that these heavenly things must be purified proves 1. That they were purified by
and of our Title to eternal Life and of our perseverance it might be though an high degree of Faith and separable from true and sincere Faith in many but the object of this full Assurance is the Word and Promise of God considered antecedently to the application of them to this or that particular Subject or our selves and to the conclusion we deduce from thence concerning our own particular estate And it 's necessarily required in every one who will draw near to God The confidence and reliance which is grounded upon God's Promise is not an assurance that God hath justified us already or that he will justify and save us absolutely but that he will justify save and reward those who by Repentance and Faith in Christ diligently seek him and by consequence that he will save us seeking him in that manner For the Promises of God include the Duty of Man and bind God only unto such as perform the Duty And he that comes to the Throne of Grace without a full assurance of Christ's Merit and God's Promise and the performance of it to them that do their Duty they come not aright their Worship is not acceptable their Prayers not effectual Therefore said the Apostle If any man lack Wisdom let him ask it of God c. But let him ask it in Faith nothing wavering c. For let not that man think that he shall receive any thing of God Jam. 1. 5 6 7. Where by a wavering man some understand not only a man not assured of the truth of God's Promises or doubting of them but one not resolved to perform the Conditions of the Covenant For any such unresolved man to think that he shall receive the mercies promised and prayed for is plain Presumption Therefore this full assurance is necessarily required in every person drawing nigh to God even then when he draws nigh and converseth with his God We must therefore draw near to God and pray every where lifting up holy hands without Wrath or Doubting 1 Tim. 2. 8. Doubting is as prejudicial to Prayer as Wrath or impure hands This is the qualisication of actual Worship 3. The qualification of the Party followeth which is the purification of the heart and body For 1. Our hearts must be sprinkled from an evil Conscience 2. Our Bodies washed with pure water and the Apostle seems to presuppose them thus qualified because Believers The expressions are taken out of the Books of Moses in which God prescribed a two-fold purification one by bood which we have spoken of another by water And no person legally impure might draw nigh to God to worship him in the Tabernacle or Temple before he was purified And by this was signified that no man guilty and conscious of sin is fit to draw nigh unto or to worship God before he be purged from Sin The Ethiopick Translation is not here so wording as many other Translations be but is a Paraphrase and gives the true sense thus Our hearts being purged and our selves purified from Sin The reason hereof is this God heareth not Sinners Joh. 9. 31 But for the more distinct explication of the words we must observe 1. Our Hearts 2. The sprinkling of our Hearts 3. The sprinkling of them from an evil Conscience 4. The purifying of our Bodies with pure water 1. By Hearts are meant the rational appetite and will as subject unto the power of God and bound by his Laws This Heart and Will is the principal efficient of our actual Sins and proper and primary subject of Unrighteousness If this be pure all is pure if this be polluted all that issues out of it is polluted For out of the heart proceed evil Thoughts Murders Adulteries c. Matth. 15. 19. 2. If this be unclean it must be sprinkled that is purged and cleansed for that 's the true meaning of the word For under the Law the blood of Bulls and Goats and the ashes of an Heifer were sprinkled upon the unclean and their Bodies being sprinkled with this Blood with these ashes were sanctified to the purifying of the Flesh so that the sanctified might be admitted into God's holy Tabernacle or Temple to Worship God with the rest of the People which were clean So under the Gospel such as are morally and spiritually unclean must be spiritually sprinkled and purged by the Blood of Christ which doth not only justify but sanctify the penitent Believer So that to have our hearts sprinkled is to have them justified and sanctified by the Blood of Christ. 3. The thing from which they must be cleansed is an evil Conscience which the Aethiopick Translatour interprets to be an evil Work or Sin For Evil here is Sin and an evil Conscience is the Sin whereof we are guilty and conscious For nothing doth spiritually and morally pollute us but Sin which makes us not only guilty and liable to punishment but also filthy and unfit for Communion with God 4. The Body must be washed with pure water Some understand the Body in proper sense as contra-distinct to the Heart and Soul and this water to be the water of Baptism which is sprinkled upon the Body and though not physicially yet sacramentally and mystically doth purge it and the Soul too from Sin This it 's said to do by virtue of the Institution by the merit of Christ's Blood and the power of the Spirit For Baptism is the washing of Renegeration by the renewing of the Holy Ghost Tiâ— 3. 5. Yet this purifying cannot be by washing away the filth of the Flesh but the answer of a good conscience towards God by the Resurrection of Christ 1 Pet. 3. 21. It 's true that not only the Soul but the Body are polluted with Sin and both by reason of Sin are liable to punishment and both must be cleansed by the sprinkling of Christ's Blood and the Sanctification of the Spirit and this is the principal sense of the words The thing to be observed is That 1. No man unconverted unregenerate not sanctified by the Holy Ghost is fit to draw nigh to God 2. The regenerate who are in the State of justification and sanctification if they contract new guilt must by Repentance Faith in Christ's Blood and Prayer for the Spirit to sanctify them first cleanse themselves before they come to God The Body is but once washed with water and that is in Baptism but as it 's taken here it must be often washed and cleansed by the renewing of out Repentance and Faith So that by Heart and Body is meant the whole man and by sprinkling and washing is understood justification and sanctification not only begun upon our first conversion but continued by our Repentance and Faith continued habitually and re-iterated and actually exercised especially upon our relapfes and contracting of new guilt and pollution David knew this qualification to be necessary and therefore said I will wash my hands in innocency so will I compass thine Altar Psal. 26 6. To
his transcendent Gifts nor his heavenly Wisdom nor his Glorious Workâ— nor his rare Virtues nor his great work of Expiation nor his Glory and Power which he enjoyes at the right hand of God could any wayes move him but he vilifies him and debaseth him that was higher then the Heavens as low as the dust and dirt under his feet yet this debasement was only an act of his base mind but could not in the least degree diminish or obscure the Glory and Excellency of Christ This is the first aggravation of Apostacy 2. He counteth the Blood of the Covenant whereby he was sanctified an unholy thing Where we have 1. The Blood of the Covenant 2. The sanctifying Power of this Blood 3. The counting of it unholy 1. By the Blood understand the blooddy Sacrifice of Christ so much magnified in the former Chapter for it 's that Blood by which Christ entring the holy place of Heaven obtained eternal Redemption that Blood which purgeth the Conscience from dead Works to serve the living God that Blood which confirmed the everlasting Covenant in which respect it 's called the Blood of the Covenant This Covenant is called the Conant of Grace wherein for and in consideration of the unspotted Blood of Christ once shed God promiseth Remission of Sins and the eternal Inheritance of Glory upon condition of Repentance and Faith in Christ. And it 's called the Blood of this Covenant because upon it the Covenant was grounded and by virtue of it all the Promises thereof are made unalterable firm and effectual 2. This was the Blood by which this Apostate upon his receiving the knowledg of the Truth was sanctified For 1. This Blood as offered and accepted of God made his Sin remissible 2. Upon the profession of his Faith and his Baptism his Sin was at least conditionally pardoned and purged 3. So long as he continued in his profession and so far as he proceeded according to certain degrees in Faith and the profession of it so far he might be said to be in a state of Justification or at least in the way to Justification and not only to Justification but Sanctification as it 's made distinct from Justification though Sanctification be taken in this Epistle for Justification For this Blood of Christ is more beneficial to those which receive the Gospel are baptized believe with some degree of Faith than to others who either never heard the Gospel or if they heard did reject it And all the power against sin that any professing baptized Christian receives all the hope joy comfort which follows upon their profession are from the Blood of Christ. And how far some men may proceed in Christianity and what benefit they may receive by Christ and yet after fall away you have heard something in this sixth Chapter And such is the benefit which such do receive by the Blood of Christ that in a fair sense they may be said to be sanctified and have their sins purged by it Yet the meaning of the Apostle may be not only that they were some wayes sanctified by it but that it was the Blood and the Blood alone which could sanctify them and from which alone they could expect Sanctification 3. Yet this sanctifying Blood the Apostate counts unholy or common To be common Blood may be understood 1. Such as hath no expiating and purging power 2. Such as is no better then the Blood of Bulls and Goats sacrificed 3. Such as differs not from the Blood of other men 4. Such as is the Blood of a Malefactor guilty and vicious person and that is impure and unholy Blood So that the Apostate though he had received some kind and measure of Sanctification from it yet ascribed no more virtue and excellency to it then to common Blood denyed the sanctifying power of it nay did account it unholy and polluted Yet you must note that though it be so vile in his conceit and judgment yet it 's really in it self the onely sanctifying Blood and effectually sanctifying to all such as do sincerely believe This is the second aggravation 3. The Apostate doth despite unto the Spirit of Grace where we must enquire 1. What this Spirit is 2. Why he is called the Spirit of Grace 3. What it is to do despite unto this Spirit 1. This Spirit is not the spirit of Man neither is it any Angel nor any created Person or Substance but it 's an uncreated Spirit the Spirit of God so as that it is God therefore the perfections and operations of God are predicated of it It 's that Spirit which with the Father and the Son is the Supream object of our Faith that Spirit by which God made the World preserves and governs the same that Spirit whereby he regenerates and sanctifies his People and animates the whole Body of the Church 2. This Spirit is said to be the Spirit of Grace Thus he may be called in opposition to the Spirit of bondage and fear which is the Spirit proper to the Law For the Spirit by the Law which had no Expiation for Sin no Blood to purge the Conscience no promise of power to keep it nor of pardon if transgressed could work nothing but fear which was a continued slavery and bondage The Spirit of the Gospel which is the Spirit of Christ promised and given in the Gospel is a Spirit of comfort and confidence a Spirit of Adoption which manifests the special love of God in Christ our Justification Reconciliation and gives us power to keep the Covenant Some understand it to be called the Spirit of Grace because he is given out of Grace and free Mercy Others think that this Name is given to this Spirit because by it God gives us Grace For by Grace they understand those spiritual and supernatural Graces which sanctify the Soul and dispose it for communion with God and all those supernatural comforts which issue from that Communion And it 's very true that as God by this Spirit works all things so especially by him he produceth these heavenly Virtues which tend so much unto eternal life 3. They do despite unto this Spirit In this despight there are Injury Reproach Contempt and the greater the Person to whom the despite is done the more hainous it is This here meant is not done to Man but God because done to that Spirit which is so the Spirit of God that he is God This is committed 1. By resisting the sanctifying Power of God 2. By undoing all that God by his Spirit had done in him for his Salvation 3. By accounting the Gifts Notions Motions of this Spirit the Works Delusions and Impulses of the Devil and that not only in himself but in others sanctified by this Spirit and endued with his Gifts This is the more hainous because done not out of ignorance or infirmity but out of pure malignity of the Will with malice to Christ and deâ—estation of Christian Religion and all this after upon conviction
that he was miraculously delivered and restored unto them for their great Comfort and the benefit of the Church And it 's certain many Prayers were made for Paul's Liberty when a Prisoner at Rome For they thought it a great Prejudice to the Gospel a Dammage to the Church and an hinderance of the Conversion of many Souls that so vigilant laborious faithful zealous and eminent an Apostle should be imprisoned and consined And Paul himself knew that his Liberty and his Presence would be both a great Comfort and also a Benefit not only unto these Hebrews but to many other Christians and Disciples Therefore he requests them as they desired the Comfort and Benefit of his presence amongst them upon his speedy Release to pray for him frequently and servently § 18. The next part of the Conclusion is the Apostle's Prayer Ver. 20. Now the God of all Peace that brought again from the dead our Lord Jesus that great Shepherd of the Sheep through the Blood of the everlasting Covenant Ver. 21. Make you perfect in every good Work to do his Will working in you that which is well-pleasing in his sight through Jesus Christ to whom be Glory for ever and ever Amen THESE words are a perfect Prayer of which we have two principal parts 1. A Petition 2. A Doxology Yet these may be made four 1. The Compellation of the Party invocated 2. The Petition of the Party invocating 3. The Doxology 4. The Conclusion and Confirmation of the whole Yet the first and last of these four belong both to the Petition and Doxology To begin with the Petition which presupposing Adoration begins with the Compellation and goes on with the Petition In the Compellation we have a Description of God the Party prayed to and that is from his Titles 1. Of Peace and 2. Of Power He is first acknowledged the God of Peace as in another place the God of all Grace 1 Pet. 5. 10. The God of all Peace and Grace may be the same and that is a most gracious and loving God Yet if Peace be taken according to the Hebrew for perfect Happiness and the Enjoyment of all Blessings then the God of Peace is that God which is the Fountain of all Goodness and perfect full eternal Happiness yet such he is as a gracious God and loving Father reconciled and propitiated by the Blood of Christ. As he is a God of Peace so he is of Power and this Power is set forth by that glorious Work of raising Christ from the dead for therein was manifested the exceeding greatness of his Power according to the working of the sâ—â—e when he raised Christ Ephes. 1. 19 20. The Party whom he raised was Jesus Christ whom he describes from his Relation to the Church to be the great Shepherd of the Sheep through the Blood of the everlasting Covenant Where we may observe 1. That there is the Blood of the everlasting Covenant 2. By or through this Blood Christ became the great Shepherd of the Sheep 3. God raised this great Shepherd from the dead 1. The Covenant is the Law and Covenant of Grace wherein God binds himself to sinful Man by excellent Promise upon the Conditions of Repentance and Faith to give him remission of all his Sins and everlasting Life Of this you have heard Chap. 8. This Covenant is everlasting because though the Covenant made with Israel in the Wilderness was abolished yet this is unalterable and shall continue for ever and by it and it alone the Called attain both the title and possession of the eternal Inheritance The Blood of this Covenant so called by Christ Mark 13. 22. Luke 22. 20. is the Blood of Christ which was shed as for other ends so for the confirmation of this Covenant And the Blood Death and Sacrifice of Christ confirmed the Covenant because it made it effectual and able to reach the end which was the eternal Salvation of sinful man For by this Blood being shed he satisfied divine Justice and made Sin remissible and merited the mercies promised the promises themselves the terms and conditions and power to perform them and by this Blood pleaded in Heaven upon the performance of the conditions he obtains actual Remission and in the end actual fruition of their eternal Inheritance The former Covenant with Israel was indeed confirmed with Blood of Sacrifices yet because that Blood could not expiate Sin and the Levitical High-Priest could not enter Heaven to plead any such expiatory Blood therefore that Covenant was not everlasting In respect of this Blood purging mens Consciences from dead Works Christ was made the Mediatour of the New Covenant of which you may see Chap. 9. 15. By this Blood therefore it is said That Christ is the great Shepheard of the Sheep For because Christ took upon him the form of a Servant and became obedient unto Death the Death of the Cross and shed his Blood therefore God exalted him and gave him a Name above every Name And therefore did his Father love him and made him an eternal Shepheard of the Sheep because he had laid down his life for his Sheep Joh. 10. 17. For this very cause his Father gave him Poâ—er over all Flesh that he might give eternal Life to as many as he had given him Joh. 17. 2. So that by this Blood he became the Shepheard the Great Shepheard For all the Prophets and the Apostles and Ministers of the Gospel are Shepheards yet so that they are but Servants under him the Sheep are not theirs but Christ's who bought them by his Blood And God raised him and made him Lord and the great and chief Shepheard of the Flock that he might keep them raise them up at the last Day and then give them everlasting life This Shepheard was raised by the mighty power of God who not only raised him From the Dead but made him King and Priest for ever that is the great and chief Shepheard This is more at large described Eph. 1. 19 20 21. to the end for that place doth expound this for one part For if we consider Christ in this place as the Object of God's almighty Power We may observe 1. His Humiliation 2. His Exaltation His Humiliation is signified by his Blood and Death whereby the new and everlasting Covenant is confirmed Thus humbled thus Dead he is the subject of God's almighty Power which did manifest it self 1. By raising him from the Dead 2. By making him the great Shepheard Lord and King advancing him above the Angels the Principalities Powers and Dominions of Heaven and all Names and Powers on Earth and gave him to be Head and Shepheard of the Church-Universal And the reason why the Apostle gives God these titles of Peace and Power and instanceth in the Resurrection and Exaltation of Christ as glorious Effects of this Power is because the continued sanctification and perfection of man once regenerate which is the thing desired in the Petition following depends