Selected quad for the lemma: city_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
city_n	robert_n	sir_n	thomas_n	13,568	5	9.0568	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A53380	A display of tyranny, or, Remarks upon the illegal and arbitrary proceedings, in the courts of Westminster, and Guild-Hall London from the year, 1678, to the abdication of the late King James, in the year 1688, in which time, the rule was, quod principi placuit, lex esto : the first part.	Oates, Titus, 1649-1705.	1689 (1689)	Wing O35; ESTC R16065	100,209	272

charged against them touching the Proceedings against Sr Thomas Armstrong Then Mrs Mathews Sr Thomas Armstrong's Daughter was called in and examined what she knew of the Prosecution against her Father And Sr Robert Sawyer then Attorney General being named by her as one of the Prosesecutors After she was with-drawn he was heard in his place to what was objected against him and then he withdrew and upon debate of the matter it was Resolved That Sr Robert Sawyer 's name be put into the Bill as one of the Prosecutors of Sr Thomas Armstrong Resolved That Sr Robert Sawyer be expelled the House for the same Saturday the 25th of January 1689. The House being acquainted that according to their Order Sr Francis W●thens Sr Richard Holloway Mr Graham and Mr Burton attended at the Door th●y were severally called in and examined touching the Prosecution and Proceedings against Sr Thomas Armstrong And also the Executors of the late Lord Jeffryes that were attending at the Door were likewise called in and asked what hey had to say why Reparation should not be made out of the Lord Jeffryes Estate to the said Sr Thomas Armstrong's Family No Persons appearing as Executors to the late Justice Walcot the House was acquainted that he dyed Intestate and had not left an Estate sufficient to pay his Debts After the Persons before-mentioned were heard and with-drawn Mr Blaney was called in who gave the House an Account of the Proceedings in the Court of King's-Bench upon the Awarding Execution against Sr Thomas Armstrong And then the House proceeded upon the Amendments made by the Committee to the Bill for annulling the Attainder of Sr Thomas Armstrong And after having inserted the Name of Sr Robert Sawyer as a Prosecutor and resolved That the sum of five thousand Pounds should be paid by the Judges and Prosecutors to Sr Tho. Armstrong's Lady and Children as a Recompence of the Losses they had sustained by reason of his Attainder the Bill was recommitted upon the debate of the House to the same Committee Notes upon the Tryal between Sr William Pritchard Alderman of London and Thomas Papillon Esq. at Guildhall upon the 6th day of November 1684. before Sr George Jeffryes Lord Chief Justice of the Kings-Bench THat Mr Papillon was second to none in his zealous and undaunted opposition to the wicked attempts of introducing Popery and Arbitrary Government is very well known and deserves to be for ever remembred with honour None out did him in a diligent and faithful discharge of his Trust in several Parliaments In the Year 1681 there appeared a Race of Men fond of Vassalage and Slavery to that degree that they made Addresses of Thanks to the King for breaking two Parliaments in the compass of three Months meerly upon the score of their steady Resolution to extirpate the Popish Plot and Popery One of these fawning Addresses with promise of venturing their Lives and Fortunes to maintain this Violation of the Constitution of the Government having been presented to the King by Sr William Pritchard Sr George Jefferies and others Mr Papillon in abhorrence of it promoted and personally prosecuted a Petition to the Lord Mayor Aldermen and Common-Council praying that the Thanks of the City might be returned to Sr Robert Clayton Sr Thomas Player Alderman Pilkington and Alderman Love their worthy and well deserving Representatives in the Oxford Parliament and shewing That as matters then stood the Papists being animated in their Bloody designs by the hopes of a Popish Successor a Declaration to have frequent Parliaments could not attribute to the safety of the Kingdom and the composing the minds of Protestants but that it must be the sitting of a Parliament so as to search the Plot to the bottom to Prosecute the Conspirators and provide suitable Laws against the impending Evils and that nothing else could be effectual Further This Gentleman having in the same year 1681. greatly added to his guilt by baffling the Popish designs upon the Lives Liberties and Estates of all Protestants in the attempt upon the Earl of Shaftesbury He exerts himself in the year 1682. in the defence of the great and undoubted Right of the Citizens to chuse their own Sheriffs but now arbitrary Power being by the aid of ill Men become rampant and uncontroulable he must be sacrificed to their Revenge Mr Papillon having been duly elected one of the Sheriffs of London and Middlesex he brought a Writ of Mandamus out of the Court of King's-Bench to command the Mayor Aldermen to swear him into the Office that being disobeyed he is advised by his Counsel that he is entitled to an Action at Law for the wrong done him he sends in a respectful way to the Mayor and Aldermen requesting them to give voluntary appearances to his Action that being refused he proceeds by a legal process to bring them to answer him at Law whereupon Sr William Pritchard being arrested by the Coroner of London to whom the King's Writ was directed and detained some hours upon his refusal to give an appearance to Mr Papillon's Action Sr William brings an Action against him for thus arresting him and demands 10000 l. damages wherein he committed a great over-sight for had he ask'd 100000 l. the usual damages given in that day he had not failed of it with the following Jury which tryed the Cause Bartholomew Ferryman an old Informer one of the Jury of the Guildhall Riot Thomas Blackmore One of Dr Otes's Jury and also of the Riot Jury Thomas Symonds William Whatton One of the Riot Jury John Greene Thomas Amy One of Sr S. Barnardiston's Jury Joseph Baggs Daniel Chandler John Reynolds John Allen. Joseph Caine and Will. Wythers junior Fathers own Son. Mr Mundy opened the Declaration to this effect That the Plantiff being Lord Mayor and to attend that Office in the diligent Government of the City The Defendant envying the happy Estate of the Plantiff and contriving unjustly to disturb him in the Execution of his Office did to vex him not having any probable Cause of Action against him maliciously prosecute the King 's Writ out of the Court of King's-Bench against him directed to the Coroner of London commanding him to take Sr William Pritchard at Mr Papillon 's suite in an Action of Trespass and did procure Mr John Brome The Coroner to arrest him and that he was detained in custody six hours To the disgrace and scandal of the Plantiff and of his Office Whereas in fact he had not any just Cause of Action against him to his damage 10000 l. Then the Attorney General told the Jury that the action was brought to vindicate the honour of the Chair from such Affronts as these which in no Age till our times of faction and confusion it ever met with and he said We shall shew you that there lay a further Malice in this case and that there was a design in it against the Government This design was laid to carry on the great

purposes of that Juncture THat the Conspiracy to introduce Popery and Arbitrary Government in England took life in the Year 1660. and was from that time carried on is now little doubted by any English-man who was not a well-wisher to it We are not to question the late King Charles the second 's dying a Papist and 't is as true that he so lived but upon his Restoration that the Duke's turn might be served he must not then declare An Act of Parliament was made to forbid our talking of it under most severe Penalties Then another Act put the Sword into his Hands by Vesting the Militia solely in him The Pulpits of the Kingdom generally speaking were filled with Gentlemen who had imbibed the Doctrine of passive Obedience and Non-Resistance An Oath was imposed That it was not lawful upon any pretence whatsoever to take up Arms against the King or against any commissionated by him About two thousand sober and pious Ministers were thrust from the Churches and Corporations and many of them into loathsome Goals for Non-conformity to that Oath and to a few slight and as they judged unwarranted Ceremonies and the best Members were thrown out of all the Corporations of England by a pretended Regulation much more early then that of the late King James Matters being thus ripened and the Nation sufficiently dehauched by the Court-Example what was wanting but an actual execution This the Conspirators well knowing as they did that the famous City of London was the chief if not the only obstacle to their Hellish design a Resolution was taken to destroy it which they effectually accomplished discovery of this horrid Villany being made not to mention anything of the worthy Sr Robert Brookes Chair-man of the Committee of Inspection into the firing of London Hubert a poor French Papist being thereof Convict the House of Commons knowing that such a contemptible Varlet was not alone in that Fact resolved to take him the next day into Examination for discovery of his Accomplices and Directors but to prevent it that Wretches Mouth was stopt at Tyburn in the Morning before the House met I am conscious that there are Persons now in being who do not only pretend to doubt of this part of the Popish Plot the burning of London but of the Plot it self I shall therefore here subjoyn the Sence of one of the best Houses of Commons which ever met at Westminster January the 10th 1680. Resolved That it is the Opinion of this House that the City of London was burnt in the Year 1660 by the Papists designing thereby to introduce Arbitrary Power Popery into this Kingdom It may also be here observed that at this as at every other juncture when any Popish Plot was near the point of Execution The Papists had constantly the Fanaticks at hand to answer for their Villanies without doubt the Burning this Nest of Hereticks had been concerted both at Paris and at Rome and the time for puting it in execution approaching In April 1666 a Fanatick plot is brought upon the Stage seven or eight were Condemned at the Old-Bayly for Ploting to kill the King and to Burn the City upon the 3 d day of September then following For a more full account of this the Reader is referred to the London Gazette of April the ●0 th 1666. Numb 48. The whole Kingdom bring alarmed and put into a serment by this accursed Enterprize the Plot was post-poned however it was kept alive and the unwearied Conspirators carried it on and in the Year 1678 the blow was ready to be given but then by the Providence of the Almighty Dr Otes detected their Machinations He gave his first Information thereof to that worthy and never to be forgotten Justice of the Peace Sr Edmundbury Godfrey of which the Conspirators having notice for the stifling so fatal a discovery they in a most barbarous manner hurried him out of the World and did with effronted Impudence attempt to perswade the World to believe that that Gentleman was Felo de se but Heaven bringing that matter to light and his Murderers to justice The Plot maugre all oppositions and discouragements began to be searched into and was made out beyond contradiction by some loose Letters and Papers found in the House of Colman the Duke of York's Secretary who had early notice of the discovery and thereupon had carried his most material and as it may be reasonably concluded he thought all Papers which might endanger him or his Master's Cause to the Chamber of Mr Wright a Profligate Lawyer of Lincoln's-Inn where they were burnt for which assistance and good service Wright was afterwards preferred to sit by turns in every of the Courts of Westminster and at length to the place of Lord Chief Justice of England then whom a Person more scandalous and ignorant was never in any Age placed there Well Colman was indicted the Plot proved by Dr Otes and other Witnesses thereby by his own Papers he was convicted and executed as were by degrees several others but for the sake of the Duke and of the Roman Catholick Cause the game must be retrived in order thereto fit Engines were employed some of the Clergy who had long asserted that Popery was more tolerable than Presbytery with their guide the Observator made it their business to decry the Evidence of the Plot impudently affirming as in particular did one Scotred a grand Jury-Man in the Isle of Ely who at the time of the Assizes there began the Pope's health to his Brethren of the Grand Jury That there was no Popish but a Presbyterian Plot. A great part of the unwary and loose Church of England Men throughout the Kingdom appeared to be infected with this mad Doctrine so that to offer Instances thereof may seem impertinent however I shall take the liberty to inform the Reader that upon complaint to the Judge sitting in Court in September 1679. of the above-named Scotred's discourse and drinking the Pope's health a Justice of the Peace then upon the Bench fell upon the Person who made that complaint with great rage and swore By the Name of God there is a Presbyterian Plot. To this I shall only subjoyn that which will be a more authentick Evidence of what is above asserted viz. October the 28th 1680. In the House of Commons Resolved That it doth appear by the evidence this day given to this House that Sr Robert Can is guilty of publickly declaring in the City of Bristol in October 1679. That there was no Popish Plot but a Presbyterian Plot. Ordered That Sr Robert Can a Member of this House be committed to the Prison of the Tower and that he be expelled this House Ordered That Sr Robert Yeomans be sent for in Custody to answer for publickly declaring in Bristol That there was no Popish Plot but a Presbyterian Plot. These easie mis-guided Gentlemen were Disciples of famous Parson Thompson of Bristol whose Breath infected that great City and