upon statute Merchant and upon return nulla bona mobilia And that he is beneficed at D. and awarding of an Extent c. See the Register of Writs fol. 148. An action 147. C. B. F. N B. fol. 131. A. M. 39. H. 6. rot 134. fi fa. de bonis eccliastices H 45. Eliz. Rot. Rot. 1211. Brownlow C. Ebor. ss The Sheriffs were commanded that 400 l. of the movable goods and Chattles of Richard Baitson of B. in the county of York Clerk in the Bailywick without delay they levy and cause to be had to Eliz. M. of the City of York merchant which the same Richard the 9th July Ao. R. nunc 44. before T. M. Mayor of the City of York and Thomas Royston then clerk deputed to take Recognizance of debts according to the form of the statute merchant within the same city acknowledged himselfe to owe to the same E. which he ought to have paid to him at the Feast of St. Michael then next coming and the same to him hath not yet paid c. And in as much c. They should make known here at this day to wit in October Pur. S. Mariae c. And now here at the day came the same Eliz. by James Bryâ— his attorny here into the court the Recognizance aforesaid which the debt aforesaid in Form aforesaid testifieth And the Sheriff now retorneth that the same Richard hath no movable goods or chattles in their Bailywick wherof they could levy the debt aforesaid or any parcel thereof And that the same Rich. is a clerk and benificed within the Dioces of York to wit at B. aforesaid And that he hath no lay Fee within their Bailywick and hereupon the same Eliz. praveth a writ of the Lady the Queen by the statute c. to the Reverent Father in Christ to Mathew Arch-Bishop of York Primate and Metropolitan of England to be directed and it is granted to him c. And in asmuch c. the same Archb. should make knowne here 15. Trin. the same day is given to the same Eliz. here c. Distringas Distress against the Lord of a mannor in aneient demesnes to hold his court c. Mich. 1. Mariae Rot. 123. entry of a writ of distresse against the Lord of a Mannor of ancient demesnes to hold his court so that the Sheriff recordari fac Loq in a writ of false iudgment upon a writ de recto clause T 3. Ca. Rot. 1887. Pytt Philizer London ss Entrey of a distringas against the Sheriff for returning of Pettit issues the plaintiff prayeth a Test Distringas to a forreigne county that the defendant may be distrained by greater issues omnia issues 10 l. It was commanded the Sheriffs as more times the King had commanded the same Sheriffs that they should destrain the Mayor Cominalty citizens of the city of London otherwise called M C. and C. of the city of London by all their lands c. and that of the issues c. And that they should have their bodys here at this day to witt in Cr. Trin. to answer D. B. widow R. B. Esquire and T. B. gent. executors of the testament of Tho. Bennet otherwise called T. B. the younger citizen and Alderman of London of a plea that they render unto to them 1500 l. which from them they uniustly detaine c. And now here at this day come the same D.R. and T. Bennet by Richard Williams their attorney and offered themselves the 4. day against the said Mayor and Cominalty citizens of the city of London in the plea aforesaid and they came not the sheriffs to wit R. F. and E. Brumfeyld now retorn that the same M. and C. and citizens of London are distrained by their chattles to the value of 40 l. and bayled by I. G. and R. R. Therefore they in mercy and because it is testified in the same court of the Lord the King here on the behalfe of the same executors that the said Mayor and C. and. citizens of London have divers lands and chattles in the county of Surrey Testat distringas awarded to the Sheriff of Surry whereof they may be distrained for better issues of their lands and chattles so that the Lord the King now may be answered of better issues of the lands chattles of the same Mayor Cominalty and citizens of the city of London if the same Mayor and C. C. of the city of London in the same court here will not soone appeare to answer the same D. R. and T. Bennet in the plea aforesaid Therefore it is commanded to the sheriff of Surrey that he destrain the same Mayor and Cominality citizens of the city of London by all their lands c. And that for the issues See the old Book of entries fol. 226. title distresses pl. 4. accord Surry c. so that he may have their bodies here tres Mich. to answer the said Dorothey Rich. and Tho. Bennet in the plea aforesaid c. And it is to be knowne that a writ thereof the Justices here have delivered to Theophi Tipton undersheriff of Surrey present in Court here that same Tearm to execute in Forme of Law c. Elegit M 19. Ja Rot. 1949. Entrey of a writ of Elegit in the same term wherein it was returned not upon the indictment Roll nor upon the Roll of the writ of Scire facias the custom it But note that the writ of Elegit is demanded and adjudged to the enter upon Roll of the entrey of the Scire fac The like form of entrey of Elegit P 10. H. 4. Rot. 140. It was commanded to the sheriff of Derb. whereas lately in the court of the Lord the King now here to wit at Westminster it had been considered that P. Moyl should have execution against Robert Turner Gent. one of the attornies of the Court of the common Bench of the Lord the King here aswell of a certaine debt of 40 l. which the same Prudence in the court of the Lord the King here had recovered against him as of c. which to the same P. in the same court of the King here were adjudged for her damages which she had by occasion of the detayning of that debt whereof he is convicted The same Prudence afterwards came into the same court of the Lord the King here and by the statute therein provided chose to be delivered to her all the goods and Chattles of the same Rob. besids his Oxen and necessaries of his Plough H. 12 Eliz. rot 1470. s. Fylmer T. against L. entry of a Writ of Partition by prec fuit vic P. 12 Eliz Rot 1016. the like upon an extent T. 20. Jac. Rot 2080. B. against M. H. 19 Jac. Rot 3192. S. g. J.T. 1. Caâ— Regis rot 569. M. against C. and likewise the moyety of all his lands and Tenements in your Bayliwick to hold to her the goods and chattles aforesaid as her
the whole time aforesaid to be replevied by the sheriffs Ministers of the City aforesaid for the time being by vertue of a plaint in the Court of the sayd Lady the Queen and her progenitors Kings of England held before the Sheriffs of the City aforesaid for the time being levied and not by writ of the said Lady the Qu. or her progenitors Kings of E. issuing out of the Chancery and also that all the customes of the City aforesaid by Authority of Parliament of the Lord E late King of England after the Conquest at Westminster The Sheriffs are free men of London and held by their oath to observe the customes of the City the fifteenth year of his Reign held were ratified and confirmed to the then Mayor and Comminalty of the same City and their successors which said Liberties and free Customes of the same City they the same sheriffs and freemen of the City aforesaid before the purchasing of the said Originall Writ and alwaies afterwards hitherto being bound by oath have observed and are bound to hold without any violation for which causes the sheriffs aforesaid could not replevy the goods and chattells in the sayd Writ specified or do Execution upon the sayd writ nor can at the present but because it seemeth to the Court here that the Return aforesaid The Returne of the Sheriff vicious in form aforesaid made is as well in contempt and prejudice of the said Lady the Queen now and of her Court and also in Derrogation of her Crown and Dignity and manifest Danger of her Dis-inheriting and also that it giveth way and redoundeth to the immoderat damage and greivance of the same W and Delay of his suit therefore as before the sheriffs are commanded without Delay to replevy to the same W. the goods and Chattells aforesaid according to the Tenor of the commands of the said Lady the Queen now aforesaid therein to them directed Plur. repleg awarded and in as much c. They make appear here in 8 Sancti Hillarii c. It is also commanded the Coroners of the said Lady the Queen that they cause to come here the same sheriffs at the same Term to answer as well to the said Lady the Queen as to the same W of and upon the premisses further to do and receive what the Court of the said Lady the Queen here shall consider of them in this behalfe and in as much c. The same Coroner cause to appear at the same Term c. Pone Sheriffs returne upon a Pone adjudged void for that he shew edssino the cattell in specie named in the Returne See p. 3 El. Dyer fol. 199. pl. 54. Report of the case 21 E 4 fol. 23. M. 18. H. 6. rot 428. H 2. Eliz. rot 191. It is recorded by the Court here the third day of May in the year of the Raign of the Lady Elizabeth now 3. That the Returne aforesaid is vitious invalid and insufficient in Law for that there are no cattell named in Specie in the Return aforesaid contained for which the same Sheriff by vertue of a Writ of _____ was attached to be here at the said Octab. Pur. c. whereupon no judgement by the Justices then here for any forfeiture to be made to the Lady the Queen upon the Attachment by the Law of the Land ought to be given nor is given as it appeareth above and so the processe and extracts for the price or value of the Cattell aforesaid to be forfeited without Judgement and consent of the Court here by the Officers of the same Court without Warrant was made c. Quaere if not between Netherfall and Lawrence Priviledge H 45. Eliz. rot 818. Brownlow Lanc. ss At the return of a Capias against a servant of the câ—cife Cleâ—k of the Kings Bench the servant came in person into the Court of Common Beuch delivered to the Justices a writ of supersedias prayed the allowance thereof that they would not hold plea c A writ of priviledge for a servant of the cheif clark of the Kings bench It was commanded the Sherif that he should take John Wood late of Brenset in the county aforesaid Yeoman of c. and safely c. so that hee might have his body here at this day to wit in Octab. Sancti Hillarii to answer to T. L in a plea wherefore with force and arms one Messuage ten acres of Land with the Appurtenances in B. which Margeret Erlington widdow to the same T. devised for a Terme which is not past entred and him from his Farme aforesaid ejected and other Enormities c. To the great Damage c. and against the peace c. And now here at this day came as well the same T. by I. P. his Attorney as the same John Wood in his proper person and hereupon the same J W. brought here into the Court a certain Writ of the sayd Lady the Queen of Supersedeas in the cause aforesaid closed to them directed The Tenor whereof followeth in these words Elizabeth c. To our Beloved and faithfull Edmund Anderson Knight and his Associates Justices of the same Bench greeting As well of our Dignity as according to the ancient Custome used and approved of in times past hitherto obtained That our cheif Clark of the pleas in our Court before us ought not to be drawn or compelled to answer before any secular Judges upon any pleas or complaints pleas of Free Tenement only excepted nor by the whole time aforesaid were accustomed And now in our Court here before us on the behalf of John Wood one of the servants of John Rooper Knight our cheif Clarke assigned to Roll pleas in our said Court before us It is given us to understand That one Thomas Lacke little regarding the custome aforesaid the same I W by the name of I. W. late of B. in the County of Kent Yeoman hath drawn into plea of a plea wherefore with force and armes one Messuage c. as above untill against our peace c. to the very great disprofit and greivance of the said I. W and manifest infringement of the Liberties and priviledges aforesaid in our Court before us by the whole time aforesaid hitherto used and approved whereupon we are willing to provide him a fit speedy remedy to observe the Liberties priviledges aforesaid for so long time used infringed We command you that from further holding of the plea aforesaid before you or compelling him the said I. W. further to answer before you in the plea aforesaid ye be altogether superseded saying on our behalf to the same T L. That he at our said Court before us may come and have Justice there if he will Teste Iohn Popham at Westminster the twenty fourth day of January Anno Regni nostri 45. Rooper Which said Writ being read and heard the same Iohn Wood saith That he is and at the day of purchasing of the Writ
of the Rolls of our chancery allowed c. Entry of a writ of attachment of priviledge in the Common Bench for an attorney of the same Bench in debt against 2 severall persons severally M 19 Iac. rot 2948 Brownlow Lincolne ss The Sheriff was commanded that he should attach T B. clerk and L E clerke so that hee should have them here upon Satturday next after the morrow of all Soules to answer R Clarke Gent. one of the Attornyes of the court of the Lord the King of Common Bench here according to the liberties and priviledges c. in a plea of Debt severally And now here at this day came the said Robert in his proper person and offered himselfe against the said T and L in the plea aforesaid and they came not and the sheriff to wit T T Esquire now returneth that he by vertue of the writ aforesaid to him directed tooke the bodies of the same T and L. whose bodyes the same sheriff hath now here ready as by the said writ it was commanded him Cedi corpus returned and because the same sheriff the bodies of the same T and L now here at this day hath not ready therefore the same sheriff to wit the same Tho. T Esquire in mercy c. and he is fined by the Justices here at forty shillings and it is commanded to the same sheriff that he have here upon Wednesday next after 15 san Martini the bodies of the same T and L whom c. to answer to the same Robert in the plea aforesaid and the same sheriff to wit T.T. Esquire now returneth that the said T. and L. are in prison of the Lord the King at his Castle of Lincolne so languishing that he could not have their bodies here at this day without perill of death as by the said writ it was commanded him c. And hereupon in the same Court of the King here on the behalfe of the said Robert it is testified that the same T and L are sound and whole and able to travell therefore it is commanded the same sheriff that he or his under sheriff be here upon Wednesday next after eight dayes of Saint Hillary bringing with him the same T and L whether they be found or infirme to answer to the same Robert in the plea aforesaid and that he omit nothing herein under the penalty of 20 l. which if he shall not do the sheriff shall know he is to loose c. Duces recum awarded under the penalty of 20 l. Procedendo H 35. H. 8. Rot. 318. ss A Procedend awarded in a plea of lands to be removed out of an inferiour Court by Recordare Whereupon the cause aforesaid being seen alleaged by the same B. to remove the Plaintiff aforesaid in the writ aforesaid above specified It seemeth to the justices here that cause to be in sufficient in law to remove the plaint aforesaid out of the Court of the said Elizabeth B. nor but that the Bayliff of the said E. B of her mannor of B. with the Soke aforesaid in the court of the same E. B. and upon the plaint aforesaid ought to proceed c. Therefore it is considered that the said Brian notwithstanding the said Writ to the said sheriff to Record and remove the plaint aforesaid before directed he may proceed in the plaint aforesaid with effect And to the parties aforesaid exhibit full and speedy justice therein according to the Law and Custome of the Lord the King of England and the Court aforesaid c. M 8. H. 4. Rot. 114. Procedendo Rege inconsulto In a Sci. Fac. the Tenant pleads an attaint of the predecessor of the demandant by act of Parliament that the Tenements of the demandant came to the Kings hands and prayeth judgment si Rege in consulto c. And the King sent his writ de procedendo therein directed to the Justices that the Tenant plead de novo with the demandant c. H 13. Jac. Rot. Brownlow London ss A Procedendo after much debate granted upon a speciall return made upon a Hab. cor upon the custom of London concerning Prentices their ages and their Indentures between them and their Masters Indenture void if the Prentice be not of the age of fourteen years when he was bound An Habeas Corpus upon the privileges in the Bench for Martin Slater was directed to the Mayor Aldermen and sheriffs of London retornable immediatly before Henry Hobert Knight and Baron Cheife Justice c. Test 28. Nov. 13. Iac. by H. Hobert Execution c. ss London ss we I. Kt. Mayor of the said City of London and of the same City Aldermen and W. I. and I. G sheriffs of London to H. H. Knight and Baronet Chief Justice of the Lord the King now of the common Bench at this time in the precincts of great S. Bartholomew London do certifie that c. Prohibition BE it remembred that the 20. day of November the same Terme came here into the Court I. L. in his owne person and gave the Court here to understand Prohibition to the Court of Stanneries in the County of Cornw for holding plea of maters which contcern the Stanneries Suggestion That whereas by the lawes statutes of the Realme of the Lord the King of England it is provided that Keeper of the stanuaries of the Lord the King and of the court of the Stannaries within the counties of Devon and Cornewall or Keeper or Keepers of his place for the time being may not nor shall not hold pleas before him in the Court of Stannaries aforesaid unlesse arising between the Stannators whilst they work in the stannaries and between them and other Forreigners of any trespasses plaints or contracts made within the places wherein they work within the Stannaries neverthelesse certaine I. C. Gent. Administrator of the Goods and Chattles which were of I. C. his Father not being a Tinner in any of the stannaries aforesaid not ignorant of the premisses but indeavouring and intending very much to vex and disturb the same I against the lawes of the Realm of the Lord the King of England In the stannary court of the Lord the King of F in the said county of C before the Substeward of the Stannary Court aforesaid or deputy or Keeper of his place in the Court aforesaid or any of them in a certaine plea of Account by plaint by the said I. C. the same against the said L. in the same Court levyed upon supposall that the said L. was receivour of the monies of the said I. C. the Father and to have received of the monies of the said I.C. the Father in his life time 20 l. of one I. M to render an account thereof to the said I. C. drew into plea And the same L. to appeare in the said Stannery Court of F. aforesaid by occasion of the premisses and to answer the said C. of and upon the premisses
the goods and chattells of the same T. at the time of his death being in the hands of the said A to be administred to be made and ought not to be rendred to the same E. according to the Forme of the Recognizance aforesaid if c. And now here at this day came aswell the same E. by A his Attorney as the same A by D D her Attorney and the Sheriff now returneth that she hath nothing c. nor is found c. And hereupon the same E prayeth Execution against the same A for the said one hundred and fifty pounds in Forme aforesaid acknowledged of the goods and chattells which were of the same T at the time of his Death in the hands of the same A Being to be administred to be adjudged him c. And the said Ann saith That the said E. ought not to have Execution against her for the said one hundred and fifty pounds by the same T. M. in Forme aforesaid acknowledged of the goods and chattells which were of the same T. at the time of his Death in the hands of the said A to be administred because the saith That after the Recognizance aforesaid by the same T. M. in Forme aforesaid acknowledged and before the same Terme of Saint Hlllary Anno 42 of Queen Eliz. abovesaid to wit the tenth day of December Anno 42 Eliz. c. abovesaid in the Court of the said late Queen held at the City of London beâ—ore R. C. Alderman then one of the Sheriffs of the City aforesaid in his Counter scituate in the parish of Siant Michael in Woodstreet London according to the custome of the same City from the time whereof no memory is extant used approved in the same came certain M C and I W in their proper persons then and there by the name of M C and I W. of London Brewers levied a certain plaint against the said T. M. in his life time by the name of T M c. in a plea of Debt upon demand of a hundred pounds and then and there found pledges to prosecute that plaint to wit I. D. and R. R. and then and there in the same Court put in their places T H their Attorney against T M. of the plea aforesaid And aâ—terwards to wit at the Court of the said late Queen held at Guild Hall of the City aforesaid scituate in the parish of Saint Lawrence in the Old Jury London the â—ourteenth day of January Anno 42 Eliz. abovesaid before the same Sheriff came the said M and I. by their Attorney afoâ—esaid The Defendant appears gratis and pleads at the perill of the plaintiff Note That such form is the Common form of bayles in London and offered themselves against the said T. in the plea aforesaid whereupon the same T. M. in the same Court then and there in his proper person likewise came and freely offered himselfe to answer the said M and I. in the plea aforesaid whereupon the said T. M. afterwards in the same Court was bayled by I. D. and R. R. at the instance and perill of the same M and I. according to the custome of the City aforesaid to have the same T. M. at the said Court the same fourteenth day of January at Guildhall aforesaid to be held according to the custome of the City aforesaid and so afterwards from Court to Court untill the end of the plea Forme of the recognizance of the plaint aforesaid to answer the same M and I in the plea aforesaid according to the custome of the City aforesaid and the said T. M. then in the same Court put in his place F. T against the said M and I. in the plea aforesaid whereupon afterwards to wit at the Court of the said Lady the Queen held at Guildhall aforesaid Defendant makes his Attorney before the sa d then Sheriff the sixteenth day of January Anno 42 Eliz. abovesaid came as well the same M and I as the said T. by their Attornyes aforesaid and the same M and I by their Attornyes aforesaid declared against the said T of and upon their plaint aforesaid in manner and form as in these words followeth ss M. E. I. W. c. by T H. their Attorney demand against T. M. c. as in the Count word for word Count upon a Concessit solide untill Praedict sextam c. And the same T by his Attorney aforesaid then and there acknowledged the Debt aforesaid to be true whereupon then and there it was considered in the same Court of the said Lady the Queen That the same M and I should recover against the same T their Debt aforesaid together with nine shillings four pence Judgement by confession of the debt for their Damages costs and charges by them in and about their suit in that behalfe layd out and that the said T should be in mercy c. as by the Record aforesaid in the same Court of the said late Queen remaining more fully appeareth And the said Anne further saith That the said T. M. after the judgement aforesaid against the same T. in the said Court of the late Queen in Guildhal aforesaid in Forme aforesaid given to wit the thirtieth of December Anno c. at London in the parish c. made his last Will and Testament in writing and the same A constituted and ordained Executrix of the Testament aforesaid The death of the Defendannt and afterwards such a day and yeare at London in the parish and ward aforesaid the same M and I of the same one hundred pounds nine sh llings and four pence in form aforesaid recovered not being satisfied after whose death the same A took upon her the burthen of the Execution of the Testament aforesaid diverse goods and chattells which were of the said T. at the time of his Death Exâ—ences about the Fnner all to the value of thirty six pounds and five shilli after the Death of the same T came to the hands and possession of the same A whereby the same A 4. pounds of the said thirty six pound five shillings about the Funerall of the said T after the death of the same T expended Expences about proving the will and the same A twenty seven shillings of the said thirty sixe pounds five shillings about the probate of the Will aforesaid as Executrix of that Will after the Death of the said T likewise Expended And the same A further saith That she after the Death of the same T. and before the same A had any notice of the said Debt of one hundred and fifty pounds by the same T in his life time to the said E. in Forme aforesaid acknowledged and before the day of purchasing the Writ of Scire facias of the said E. E. to wit such a day and year at London in the said parish of Saint Lawrence in the Old Jury London Payment of the judgment befere notice of such debt and
Court with his owne hands the writ aforesaid directed to the said Mayor Aldermen sheriffs in Forme aforesaid The writ delivered in Cou t. The party comes in his proper person Returne de causes And before the said chief Justice by the same Mayor Aldermen and sheriffs the 10th day of Jan. last past retorned and executed and the same cheif Justice hath certified here in court that then and there before the said Châ—ife Justice at his chamber aforesaid came the said P. in his proper person under the custody of the said sheriffs and Martin L. and P. P. Sheriffs of the City aforesaid now retorne that before the coming of the said writ the 15th day of Dec. An. R. c. 12. The same Peter was taken in the City aforesaid and detained in the prison of the said Lord the King under the custody of the said Sheriffs by vertue of a complaint levied against him the same day and year in the Court of the Lord the King held before the same M. L. by the name of Peter Furbusher Gent. at the suit of H. R. in a plea of Trespasse 1 Cause in a plea of Trespass Damages 40 l. to the Damages of forty pounds the said Peter was also detained by vertue of a complaint against him 20 Ja. praed levaet in the Court of the sayd Lord the King held before the said Martin Limny by the name of P. F. at the suit of Alexander Ratcliffe in a plea of Debt upon demand of sixty pounds 2 Cause in debt for 60 l. and so recite all the causes whereof the partyes aforesayd have pleaded and so depend undetermined and that these were the causes of taking and detaining of the sayd Peter in the prison aforesaid whose body they have ready as by the sayd Writ to them it is commanded c. whereupon the premisses being seen and by the said cheife Justice then and there fully examined and understood The party and She iffs are discharged it seemed to the said cheif Justice that the sayd P. ought then and there to enjoy the liberties and priviledges aforesaid whereupon the same Peter was then and there dismissed from the custody of the said Sheriffs by the said cheif Justice Vpona forraign Attachment accordingly 1 H 15 Elâ—â—t 588 and the same Sheriffs then and there were discharged by the same cheif Justice from his custody and hereupon the same P. and R. H. of Stepney c. and I.B. of the same Dyer undertook and every of them did undertake Mâ—ch 8 and 9 El. rot 329. Entry of a priviledge for diverse causes and the bail entred severally and there rot 1754. Recognizance to appear to Writs or Actions to be brought Note that in this case the Originall ought to be brought the next Terme ensuing but in a reversall the plaintiff hath liberty of two Termes to bring his Writ to wit the same P. in the summe of one hundred and twenty pounds and the same R. and I. severally in the summe of sixty pounds at the suit of Alexander Ratcliff and Sic de ceteris c. That the said P. should appear here in Court in his proper person or by his sufficient Attorney in Law and answer to the severall Actions or Writs of the same H.R. c. against the same P. of and upon the severall pleas aforesaid before 15 Pasch then next coming to be brought and prosecuted here in Court and also if it shall happen judgment after the apperance of the sayd P. here in Court made in the same pleas for the same H. and A. and against the said P to be given to satisfie the same H. c. of their Damages and the sayd Alexander of his Debt and Damages for the same H. c. and A. against the same Peter in the same Court here to be recovered or adjudged in the pleas aforesaid or that the same P. render himself to the prison of the Fleete of the Lord the King for those occasions which sayd severall summs by the said Manucaptors in forme aforesaid acknowledged the same Manucaptors acknowledge to be made of their Lands and Chattells and which sayd severall summs by the same P in form aforesaid acknowledged the sayd Peter acknowledgeth to be made of his Lands and Chattells and to be levied to the use and behoof of the sayd H. and A. in form aforesaid if it happen the same P. make Default in any of the premisses and in lawfull manner to be convinced thereof Brownlow T 41 Eliz. rot 1229. ss That the said R shall appear here in Court in his proper person or by his sufficient Attorney in Law to the Action or Writ of the said A against the said R. of and upon the cause aforesaid before such a day to be brought and prosecuted in Court here and to answer to the said A. in the plea aforesaid and also if it happen c. Entry of a priviledge returnable immediat in banck H 12 Jac. rot 2262. Brownlow As before in the president for P.F. untill or one of them should have before the Justices of the Lord the King here to wit at Westminster immediatly after the receit of the said Writ that the same Justices of the said Lord the King seeing the cause aforesaid c. untill the end of the Writ Afterwards to wit the ninth of February that same Terme came here into Court the same Michael in his own person under the custody of the Bailiff of the Marshall and Judges c. And recite the Return of the Writ whereupon the premisses being seene and by the Justices here fully examined and understood it seemeth to the said Justices here that the sayd M at present ought to enjoy the liberties and priviledges aforesaid and so as in the president before Alit T 14 Eliz. rot 1288. Divers causes returned wherein are diverse Complaints in Trespasse and debt and the Entry is that he shall appear in Court in his proper person or his sufficient Attorney in Law of and upon the severall Actions of and for the summs aforesaid against the same W. by the said T. M. and M. or any of them before 8 Michaelis next coming to be brought or prosecuted here in Court severally to the same T. M. and M. or either of them in the said Court here in the severall pleas aforesaid P. 28 Eliz. rot 328. the like against the said W. severally to be recovered or adjudged or that he the same W. render himselfe upon that occasion or occasions to the prison of the Fleet of the Lord the said King which sayd summ of fifty pounds to wit twenty pounds thereof the same T. ten pounds to the said M and O. to the sayd I. I. acknowledged every of them acknowledgeth severally to be made of their Lands and Chattells and to the use c. Speciall Amerciament of the Sheriff for not returning of a Writ of Habeas corpus in debt after
in Labours Suits Delayes and Expences be thereof levied c. and in as much c. hee make appear here 15. Trinitat c. Mittimus T 3. Jac. rot 24 10. Entry of a Mittimus of the Record and proceedings Which was removed out of another Court by a certiorare out of the Chancery and sent to the Justices of the Bench. The Lord the King sent to his Iustices of the Bench here his Writ closed in these words James by the Grace of God c. To his Justices of the Bench greeting The Record and proceedings in a certain plaint which was in the Court of our Honor and Castle of Windsor before our deare Cosen and Counsellour Charles Earle of Nottingham of the noble Order of the Garter Knight Admirall of England Constable of our honorable Castle aforesaid and keeper of the whole Forrest of the same or to his Deputy of Keeper of his place there without any writ between William R. Esquire and J. M. Gent of cattell of the same W. taken and unjustly detained as is said by Jo. Trevor Knight Deputy of the same County by vertue of our writ of Certiorare to you into our Chancery certified we send you in these presents inclosed commanding you that the Records and proceedings of the plaint aforesaid being inspected you further do therein at the prosecution of the same James what of right and according to the Law and custome of our Realme of England is to be done Teste c. James by the grace of God c. To our dear Cosen c. greeting we willâ—ng for certain causes to be certified by the Record and proceedings in a certain plaint which is before you in our Court of the Honour and Castle aforesaid without out writ between W.R. Esquire and I Moor of cattell of the same W. c. we command you that the Record and proceedings in the plaint aforesaid with all things touching the same by whatsoever names the parties aforesaid in the said plaint are distinguished to us into our Chancery wheresoever it shall then be under your seale without delay you distinctly and plainely send and this VVrit c. Note Nota. That if the Record had been sent to the Justices of the common Bench they could not have proceeded upon the Tenor of the Record but upon the Return sent c. H 17 Eliz rot 939. Nota. Cause certified into the Bench was removed by a procedendo because the monies in the plaint amounted not to 40 s. T 20 Jac rot 3371. Brownlow The Lord the King c. The Tenor of the Record and proceedings c. We send to you inclosed in these presents and so recite the Certiorare which is we willing for certaine causes to be satisfied upon the Tenor of the Record c and the plaint c And now here to wit at Westminster in Cr. Trin. that same Term came as well the said Plaintiff by T. R. his Attorney as the said Defendant by F. M. his Attorney and the Writs and Return aforesaid being seen and by the Justices here fully understood and examined to the said Iustices here it sufficiently appeareth that the Court here upon the Tenor of the Record aforesaid cannot proceed Therefore it is considered that the said Mayor and Burgesses of the Burrough of N aforesaid in the plaint aforesaid according to the Law and custome of the Burrough aforesaid at the prosecution of the said William may proceed with effect and to the parties aforesaid full and speedy Iustice therein according to the custome of the Court aforesaid may exhibit c. betweene C. and A. Ne Exeat Regnum Ne exeat Regnum M 7. H. 6. rot 600. or 606. Security found that he depart not the Kingdome Nvsance Selde M. 8. Car. Regis rot _____ To the Sheriff of Middlesex greeting whereas of late we have made publick Proclamation amongst other things that none should erect any Walls whereupon _____ might be super added within our City of London or the Subburbs of the same or within the distance of three thousand paces of any of the Gates of the same City or from the Palace of Westminster license from our Commissioners assigned to oversee the buildings in those parts not before had Notwithstanding Thomas Ford late of the parish of Saint Andrew Holborne in your County Yeoman contemning our commands promulgated license of our Commissioners not before had in a certaine Feild in the Parish of Saint Clements Danes without Temple Bar London Selde on the south part of the ancient Inne called Clemants Inne of a long time appointed for the Residence of men incumbent in the study of our Lawes a certain wall to which _____ may be superadded of Brick Lime and Sand to erect and part of the same Feild intendeth to inclose as an ally or common place to bowle in And the foundation of the same Wall hath now laid and more Brick Lime and Sand for further progresse in the same Wall hath here also put and hath ready as it is said and if that place should be also inclosed It would happen that the Students of that Inn incumbent in the same in the study of our Lawes with the Clamors and noise of men resortng to that place would be so much disturbed that they could not Follow their Studies We to observe our commands and willing to regard the quiet and tranquility of the students aforesaid that they should not be diverted from their Studyes Command you that you omit not for any liberty of your county but that you command the said Thomas on our behalfe that from further building of the wall aforesaid he be altogether superseded and the wall begun and the Foundation of that wall by him in the place aforesaid put he cause to be demolished upon the danger to follow Test 19. Nov. Car. T. C. C. S. Cartwright Originall M 18. H 8. Rot. 2. ss An originall Writ out of the Chancery at the Suit of the party directed to the Justices of the Common Bench to stifying that he is a Lord of the Parliament that they should make no other proces against him onely such as are made against the Peeâ—s of the Land The Lord the King sent to his Justices of the bench here his writ closed in these words Henry the 8. by the grace of God c. To his Justices of the Common Bench Greeting we command you that if Edward Sutton of Dudly in the County of Staff Knight be impleaded before you at the suit of any one in a personall action you cause so to be made against him such Proces and no other in the action aforesaid as ought against Lords Peeres Earls and Barons of this our Kingdom of England which ought to come to our Parliaments upon our summons or any of them as according to our Lawes and Customes of the Realm of England ought to be made Because we record the same Edward one of the
Sancti Tri. then next following Adjâ—uâ—ment of the Terme to answer as well to the said Lady the Queen of the contempt c. as to the said M. of Damages and injuries to her in this behalfe done before which said Octob. S. Trin. the plaint aforesaid was adjourned by writ of the said Lady the Queen De C. adjornamento from the said Castle of Herford unto Westminster aforesaid Plaintiff and Defendants appear by Attornyes And now here to wit at Westminster aforesaid at the same day to wit at the said 8. S. Trin. came as well the said M. by T. H. her Attorney as the said E. and W. by L. S. their Attorney and hereupon the said M. declaring against the said E. and W. in the plaint aforesayd complaineth that the said E. and W. the twenty fourth day of June Anno 4. Eliz at O in a certaine place called B took the said Oxe of the said M. price eight pounds Count in replevin for cattell and the value c. and that the Defendant may gage deliverance and him unjustly detained against sureties and pledges c. whereupon she said that c. damages twenty pounds and thereupon bringeth suit c. and prayeth that the said E. and W. may gage deliverance of the Oxe aforesaid and the sayd E. and W. pray license to imparle here untill 8 Mich. and have it c. the same day is given to the said M. here c. And now here at this day to wit 8 Mich. came as well the said M as the said E and VV. by their Attornyes aforesaid Nil dicit A writ to enquire of damages for taking the oxe awarded Quere if it ought not to be also of the value c. and nothing in Bar or preclusion of the Action c. as in others untill without defence for which the said M her Damages by occasion of the taking and unjust detaining of the Oxe aforesaid against the said E. and VV. ought to recover but because it is not known what Damages the sayd M. sustained by occasion of the taking and unjust detaining of the Oxe aforesaid the Sheriff is commanded that by the oath of honest and lawfull men of the County aforesaid he diligently enquire what Damages the said M. sustained as well by occasion of the premisses as for her costs and charges by her about her suit in this behalfe layd out and the Inquisition which c. The Sheriff make appear here in 8 Hill under his seal and seales c. Entry of a plur repleg A. B. in homine repleg the Sheriff returneth that A is enlarged c. and a. Capias in Withernam of the body of the avowant awarded see F N B fol. 68. agreeth M 32 H. 8. rot 319. Essex ss The Sheriff was commanded as more times that he should replevy A. B. Spinster who E. L. took and taken kept c. or that the same Sheriff should be here at this day to wit in Cro. Ani. to shew wherefore he could not execute the commands of the Lord the King to him so often therein directed at which day the sheriff to wit I. D. Esquire returned that the same A. was enlarged to places to him unknown so that he could not replevy her according to the Tenors of the commands to him therein directed Therefore the Sheriff is commanded that he take the body of E. in Withernam and cause him safely and securely to be kept untill the same A. in forme aforesaid taken may be replevied and if the same Sheriff can replevy the same A. that then the same A shall secure the same sheriff to prosecute her plaint by return of her body if return thereof shall be adjudged then the same sheriff put by sureties and safe pledges the same E. that he be here 15. Hillarii to answer to the said A. of the taking and unjust detaining of the same A and as well to the Lord the King of the contempt as to the said A. of the Damages and Injuries to her in this behalfe offered and in as much c. the same sheriff should make appeare here at the same Terme c M 7 and 8 Eliz. rot 1729. Fylmer London ss Entry of a writ of plur Repl. See M. 7 8 El. rot 245 pl. 67. Dyer this case reported H 12 H 6 rot 316. It was commanded the sheriffs whereas of late more times the Lord the King had commanded the same sheriffs that justly and without delay they should cause to be replevied to William Hurst all the goods and chattells which Richard Millers Knight N.W. and I.S. took and unjustly detained or would signifie the cause to the said Lady the Queene wherefore they would not execute her command otherwise to the same sheriffs therein directed or that they could not and the same sheriffs contemning the commands of the said Lady the Queen to the same William have not replevied his goods and chattells aforesaid or at leastwise hitherto have not regarded to signifie to the said Lady the Queene the cause wherefore they would not or could not do the same in manifest contempt of the said Lady the Queen now and her commands aforesaid and the immoderate Damage and greivance of the said William wherewith the Lady the Queen is very much injured and moved Return thereof Custome of the City of Lond. that when any goods are distrained within the City that they ought to be reâ—levied by plaint within the city before the sheriffs to be levied and not by a writ issuing out of the Chancery Note Dyer fol. 246. That before the statute of Marlebridge cap 21. The Sheriffs by the common Law could not make replevy without a writ that Returne is not made to the said W. of his goods and chattells aforesaid according to the Tenor of the commands of the said Lady the Queen before to them therein directed therefore let the same sheriffs be here at this day to wit in C. A. to shew wherefore they have contemned to execute the commands of the said Lady the Queen so often to them therein directed And now here at this day came the sayd W.H. by T. H. his Attorney and the sheriffs to wit I.R. and I.H. to the Justices here have certified That any Writ of the Lady the Queen to replevy any goods or chattells to the same W.H. besides the Writ aforesaid to the same sheriff or either of them was not delivered and that the City of London is and from the time whereof the memory of man is not to the contrary was an ancient City and that within the same City is had and from the time whereof the memory of man is not to the contrary was had accustomed used and approved that whensoever any Cattell goods or chattells by the Law of the Land were replevyable within any place of the City aforesaid or liberties thereof were taken that then all such cattell goods and chattells ought and were accustomed by
by attorney if it shall happen that the said T. P. not to make deliverance of the Cattle aforesaid taken in Withernam or the value of them c. Scire Facias TRini 9. Jac. Roll. 3510. Entry of a Scire facias upon a Recognizance against sureties in Replevin after Averia elongat returned Otherwise as it appeareth in Easter Term in the 9. yeare of the Reign of the Lord the King now Roll. 2982 it is thus contayned London ss It was commanded the sheriffes whereas I. A. of the City of Coventry Taylor B A. of L. in the county of N. clerk and W. S. of C. in the county of Warr Gent. to wit the fift day of Ju being there in Trinity Term in the 7. yeare of the Reigne of the Lord now King of England before Peter W. Knight one of the Justices of the said Lord the King of the common Bench at his chamber in Chancery Lane London in their proper persons undertook and every one of them did undertake for H. A. in the sum of 20 l. and the same H. A. then and there before the said Justices of the Lord the King in his own person undertook for himself in the summ of 40 l. that the same H. should cause to be retorned to David Harris certaine cattle of the same H. formerly taken by the same David and which were adjudged by the court here to the said David for the default of the said Henry The Recognizance recited See the statute West cap 2. 13. E 1. if retorn of them to the same David by the court here should be adjudged which said summe of 20 l. every one of the Manucaptors do acknowledg to be levied upon their lands and chattles And which said sume of 40 l. the same Henry acknowledgeth to be levied of his lands and chattles to the use and behoof of the same David if it happen that the said Hen. make default in the premisses therof be lawfully convicted which said recognizance in Form aforesaid taken afterwards to wit the same fift day of July in the said Term of the holy Trinity in the seventh yeare of the Reigne of the Lord the Keng now of England abovesaid the said Justices of the same court of the said Lord the King before his then Justices with his owne hands delivered to be inroled upon record Delivery of the Recognizance in Court to be inrolled Count upon the second deliverance as by the record thereof remayning in the same court here manifestly appeareth wheras therupon the same David was attached by the writ of the said Lord the King de Sec. Delib to be in the Court here to wit at Westminster aforesaid to answer the same H. A. of a plea wherefore he such a day and year at W. in a certaine place there called Woodpark had taken the cattle that is to say 35. heifers of the same H. and unjustly detayned them against sureties and pledges untill Avowry c. the same David in the said court of the said Lord the King appearing for a certaine reason by him alleaged as Bayliff of G. C. Kt. well acknowledged the taking of the cattle aforesaid in the place aforesaid to be just Nonsuit of the Plaintiff for default of Bar to the Avowry Return Haben awarded whereupon the said Henry afterwards although solemnly called in the same court of the said Lord the King came not nor hath not further prosecuted his said writ wherupon it was considered in the same Court here that the said Hen. and his pledges for prosecution should be in mercy c. And that the same David should goe thereof without day c. and that he should have retorne of the cattle aforesaid to hold to him for ever irreplevishable whereupon the said Lord the King by his writ commanded the sheriff of Devon that without delay he cause to be retorned to the said David the cattle aforesaid to hold to him irreplevishable Averia elongat returned and as much c. he should make to appeare here in Oct. Mich at which day the said sheriff of Devon retorned to the Justices here that before the coming of the said writ to him directed the cattle aforesaid by the said Henry A. were conveyed to places unknown to him so that he could not make retorne of the same cattle of the said David and therefore the said Lord the King commanded the said sheriff of Devon that of other Catles of the same Henry to the value of the Catle aforesaid before taken Capias in Withernam awayded he should take in Withernam and should deliver them to the said David to keep by him untill the cattle aforesaid before taken could be retorned to the same David and that he should put by sureties and safe pledges Nâ—lla averria returned the said Henry that he should be here in Oct. S. Hill aswell to answer the said Lord the King of his contempt as the same Da. of his damages injuries in this behalf done The same sheriff of Devon at that day retorned to the Justices here that the same A. H. had no Cattle in his Bayliwick Sci fac against the party and Manucaptors severally which he could take in Withernam according to the Exigency of that Writ and that the same Henry had nothing in his Bayliwick by which he could be attached as by the record and proceedings in the same court here remayning doth manifestly appeare And because c. That by honest c. it should be made known to the said I. B. W. and H. that they should be herein Oct. Pur. to shew if any thing c. wherefore the same David ought not to have execution against the same I. for the said 20 l. by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged to be levied of his lands and chattles and against the said Bartholomew for the said 20 l. by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged to be levyed of his lands and Tenements and against the said William and others as before The Plaintiff offiers himselfe against the Defendant c. according to the Form of the Recognizance aforesaid if c. And now here at this day came the same David by R R. his attorney offered himself the 4. day against the said I. B W. and H. in the plea aforesaid and they being solemnly called came not the sheriffs of Lond now return that the same I. B. W H. have nothing Nichil returned nor any one of them hath any thing nor are found nor any one of them is to be found c. Therefore as before it is commanded the said sheriffs of London that they should make known to the said I. B. W. and H. that they be here 15. Alias Sci fac awarded Pas to shew in Form aforesaid and now here at this day came aswell the same David by his attorney aforesaid as the same I. B. W. and H. by H. W. their attorny
in Forme aforesaid published and the judgment thereupon by the said Coroners given they have here at this day to wit in Oct. S. Trin. That the same justices may doe therein what of right and according to the Law and custome of England ought in this behalfe to be done and now here at this day came the same W. H. by W. B. his attorney and because the Coroners of the County aforesaid the writ aforesaid which was otherwise delivered to them to be executed in Form of Law had not here at this day Miserec XL s. Therefore the said Coroners to writ H. T. and I. L. in Miser And are fined by the Iustices here at 40 s. P 12. Jac. Rot. 2243. Goldesbursh Montgomery ss E. P. Esquire sheriff of the County aforesaid for that he returned not here in court a certaine writ of Capias utlagat against M. P. at the suite of R. O. Kni. in a plea of Debt retornable before the Justices here Mens Pas that same Term. in mercy c. And is fined by the Iustices aforesaid at 60 s. See Grislyes case Cok. 8. fo 40. B. according to the old book of entryes title record M. 27. H. 7 rot 531. Amerciament det ver at 10 l. for not returning the Habeas Corpus Jur. Devant the Justices de Nisi prius P 13. Jac. rot 733. Brownlow Sar. ss Reversall of an Utlary for insufficient return of a Certiorare It was commanded the sheriff that he should not omit for any liberty of his county but that he should take H N. of c. utlawed in London on Monday next after the Feast of S. Leonard the Abbot An. regis c. 12. at the suite of Henry Breton in a plea of debt if c. so that he might have his body here at this day to wit A dâ—e Pas in 15. dies To do and receive what the court of the King here should consider of him in this behalfe and now here at this day came the said Henry N. in his proper person and the sheriff to wit Rowland Traps Esquire now retorneth that he by vertue of the said writ to him directed took the body of the said He. N. whose said body he now hath here ready as by the said writ it was commanded him c. And hereupon the said Henry N. prayeth the hearing of the writ of Cerciorare whereupon the utlawry aforesaid by Iohn Gore and William Gore then sheriffs of London To the court of the Lord the King here was certified and to him it is read in these words London ss we I. G and W G. sheriffs of London do certifie to the Justices of the Lord the King at Westminster in the writ to this schedule annexed specifyed that searching the roles records and other memorables being under our custody we find in the same that Henry N. of A. in the County of Sur. Esquire in the writ aforesaid named put in the hustings of London being five times called and not appearing he was utlawed in mannor as followeth That is to say at the hustings of the Common pleas held in Guild-hall in the City of London upon Monday next after the Feast of c. An. Rs. c. 12. the said Henry N. was the first time called and appeared not and at the bustings of the Common pleas held in Guild-hall c. on Munday next after the Feast c. An. Sup. the same H. was the second time called and appeared not The answer of H. Iay and T. B. sheriffs That writ as above indorsed was delivered subscirbed to the sheriffs by the said sheriffs at their departure from theire office At the hustings of common pleas held at Guild-hall of the City aforesaid on Munday next before the Feast c. An. Supr the said Henry was the third time called and appeared not At the hustings of the common pleas held c. The said Henry was the fourth time called and appeared not at the husting c. The said Henry was the fift time called and appeared not Therefore he was utlawed The answer of P. P. and M L. sheriffs and this is the utlawry in manner and Forme as it is published against the said Henry Nudigate which we have ready before the Justices at the day and place contayned in the same writ according to the intent of that writ The answer of Iohn Gore and William Gore sheriffs which being read and heard the same H. Nudigate saith that he is injured in this behalfe and that by the law of the land ought not to be charged with the said utlawry because he saith that in the retorne aforesaid between these words said sheriffs a certaine materiall word is omitted to wit late so that by the omission of the said word it doth not appeare by the returne aforesaid by which sheriffs the said Henry N. was the third fourth and fift time called or by the said sheriffs now or by the said late sheriffs as it ought to appeare by the said retorne For that cause the said returne is insufficient in Law and this he is ready to verifie whereupon he prayeth judgment that he may be discharged from the said utlawry whereupon the said return being seen and by the said Justices here being fully examined and understood It seemed to the Justices here that the allegation of the said H. N. is true in his discharge from the utlawry aforesaid therefore it is considered that the said utlawry be adnulled and altogether taken for nothing And that the said H. N. for that occasion be unmolested not in any thing grieved But goe therein quiet c. Vtlary reversed for variance between the Record and the writ of Exig fac T 7. Jac. rot 3608. Brownlow Sussex ss It was commanded the sheriff and so recite the Capias utlagat as in the next before as by the said writ to him it was commanded c. which said Francis being so taken and had prayeth bearing of the writ of Exigent whereupon the same F. at the suite of the said W. in Forme aforesaid is utlawed And it is read unto him in these words James by the Grace of God c. reciting the writ and Test untill you come to and of Scotland the XL. he also prayeth the hearing of the record whereupon that writ Issued And it is read unto him in these words ss It was commanded the sheriff that he should take Francis Challoner late of c. in the county aforesaid Esquire otherwise called F. C. de L. in the County of Sussex Esquire if c. and safely c. so that he shall have his body c. and so recite the whole entry untill you come to in Forme of Law to be executed c. which being read and heard the said Francis saith that he is injured in this behalfe and that he by the law of the land ought not to be charged with the utlawry aforesaid because he saith that there is manifest variance between
occasion shall not be molested or in any manner greived but be thereof in quiet and dismissed at large c. T 10. Jac. rot Brownlow London Reversall for that the Defendant was the 1 and 2 time called before the Tâ—ste of the Exigent R. adds of Evans Utlawry reversed for variance between the Originall Writ and the Exigent in this that in the Writ of Exigi fac this word Gent. which is the name of the degree of the said Henry is omitted which is inserted in the Originall writ Et pro ea causa c. T 11. Jac. rot 1521. Brownlow Int. G. and P. Outlawry reversed for that the Defendant was the first and second time called before the Teste of the Exigent T 18. Eliz. rot 1529. Civit. Bristoll ss Afterwards to wit Vtlawry reversed for that the 5 County was held as appears by the returne of the writ before the Teste of the Allocat the fourteenth day of May then next following came here into the court one T. D. on the behalf of the sayd Ellen and prayeth heareing of the Writ of Allocat whereupon the Waviary aforesaid is published against the same E. and it is read unto him in these words Elizabeth by the Grace of God c. reciting the whole Writ Test 16. die Novemb. anno c. 18. And also prayeth hearing of the Returne of the said Writ and it is read to him in these words Alloc to her four Countyes c. Att our County held at the City of Bristoll in the Guildhall there 13. Ian. Anno infra script c. which being read and heard the same T. D. faith for the said Ellen That the Return of the said Writ of Allocat is insufficient in Law for that by the Return it evidently appeareth to the Justices here that the said fifth County held the same thirteenth day of Ian. Anno 18. abovesaid at which County the said E. was the fifth time called and appeared not was held Before the issuing forth of the sayd Writ of Allocat whereupon the said Writ Mich 6 7 Eliz oâ— 1971. the like siâ—e and returne upon the said Writ made by the Iustices here being fully understood it doth seem to the said Justices here that the said Returne is insufficient in Law whereby the Waviary aforesaid against the same E. in forme aforesayd published and had is altogether void and of no force nor effect in Law Therefore let no processe nor any other thing against the said E. upon the Waviary aforesaid The Sheriff amerced for ill returning of the Writ of Allocat be further made c. and the sheriffs of the sayd City of Bristoll to wit A. and B. in mercy for the insufficiency of the Return aforesaid made and they are fined by the Justices here at twenty shillings c. T 7. Iac. rot 3648. Brownlow ss Prayeth hearing of the Return of the Writ of Exigent and it is read unto him in these words A County holden at the Castle of Salop Utlary reversed for this word Meâ—m T. 13 Jac â—ot 633. c. which being read c. Onerari non because he saith that by the Returne aforesaid it appeareth not that the Countyes aforesaid in that Returne specified whereunto the said Iames was in forme aforesaid called were the Counties of the said sherif of Salop as by the Return aforesaid it ought to appear whereupon c. the Outlawry was reversed Int. Burmom and Ap-Thomas Salop T 7. Jac. rot 3647. Brownlow hereof Oyre of the retorne of the Exigent prayed at the hustings of the common Pleas in Guild-hall of the City aforesaid upon Munday next after the Feast Utlary reversed for omission of this word Tent. and for Sâ—do for being without a tittle â—r dash c. the same Henry was the second time called and appeared not which being read c. Onerare non Because he saith that by the retorne aforesaid it doth not appeare that any hustings of Common pleas were held at the Guild-Hall in the City of Herford the said Monday next after the Feast c. in the same retorne mentioned for that this materiall word Tent. in the same retorn was there omitted And also for that this word Scdo in the same retorne specified was written without any dash having no signification And for those causes and others c. pet judicium c. may be discharged from the utlawry c. And it is reversed Int. Vaughan and Masters Vtlary reversed for that the Capias was not returned M 32. and 33. Eliz. rot 131. Brownlow Midd. ss It was commanded the sheriff that he should not omit c. and here upon the said I prayeth hearing of the said writ of exigent whereupon he at the suit of the said W. is utlawed And it is read unto him in these words Elizabeth c. which being read and heard the said I. saith c. because he saith that the originall writ in the Court here in Oct. S. Mich. An. Reg. c. 30. retornable and was retorned and that upon the same writ three Writs de Capiendeum by the Court here in Mich. Terme An. Regin 30. and 31. were considered and adjudged As it appeareth in the Roll of the same Term To wit one of the said Writs de Capiend retornable in the court here in Cr. Ani. An. 30. abovesaid one other writ de capiend by the Court here in Form aforesaid considered and adjudged retornable at the said Cr. Ani. in the same Court here amongst the writs of Cr. Anim. An. 30. abovesaid in the said County of Ebor. is filed which said writ is not retorned whereupon the Justices here can in no wise certifie in Execution of the said Writ that it is indorsed As by the said Writ of Capias amongst the said Writs de Cr. Anim. in the Court here filed fully appeareth And so the said writs of alias and plures Capiend and the said Writ of Exi against the same I. afterwards considered and adjudged erroniosly and without sufficient warrant issued And for that cause he prayeth to be discharged by the Court here from the utlawry aforesaid c. whereupon the said Writ de Capiend filed in the Bench here at the said Cr. Ani. being seene it sufficiently appeareth to the Justices here upon Record that the allegation of the said I. is true therefore it is considered that the said I. by occasion of the utlawry aforesaid be not molested nor greived but goe thereof quiet c. T 16. Iac rot 3109. Brownlow between Ioanes and Griffin Vtlary reversed for infram for infranominat dua for duo utlawry reversed infrom for infra nominat and dua for duo T 16 Iac. Rot. 3114. Brownlow in t Washer and Dignbey In this that it appeareth to the Court here Vtlary reversed for the misplacing of the Sheriffs names that that writ was retorned by certaine Peter Proby and Martine Lumnly sheriffs of the City of London
whereas in truth Martine Lumnly was not then sheriff of the said City but certaine Martain Lumnley and the said Peter Probey were then sheriffs of the said City c. M 23. and 24. Eliz. rot 339. Midd. ss For that the same R. by vertue of the publishing of the utlawry aforesaid Utlary reversed for that the Supersedeas upon the Exigent was entred upon Record before the Defendant was 5 exactus to wit the 27. day of Ap. An. c. came here into the court and then proved a writ of the said Lady the Queen of Super quia improvide For that the said Writ of Exigi fac whereupon the said R. is utlawed out of the Court here erroniously issued For that the said Rob. by the said I. C. his attorney at the day of the returne of the plu Cap. thereupon and alwaies afterwards before the issuing forth of the said writ of Exigi facias often times offered himselfe to answer to the said M. in the plea aforesaid By pretext whereof it is commanded to the said sheriff of Midd. that of putting in Exigent utlawing taking or in any thing molesting of the said same R by occasion of the premises he be altogether Superseded as by the said Writ of Supers entred upon Roll in the Court of the Queen in the county held 15. Pas Rot. 1020. it sufficiently appeareth And this the same I. C. for the said R. is ready to veryfie by the Record And so the utlawry aforesaid against him in Forme aforesaid published is void Whereupon he prayeth judgment and that the said R. may be quiet of the utlawry aforesaid and discharged from the court here and set at large whereupon the Record being seene and upon the oath of R. U. servant of the said I. C. of his delivery of the writ of Sup. before the publishing of the utlawry aforesaid To one T. L. then being under sheriff of the county of Mi. before I. Dyer Knight Cheife Justice here examined and also the said T. L. then present not contradicting the reception of the said writ It sufficiently appeareth to the Justices here that the allegation of the said I. C. in discharge of the said R. from the utlawry aforesaid is true therefore it is considered that the said utlawry be adnulled and altogether taken for nothing And that the said R. upon that occasion be in nothing molested or grieved but goe thereof without day c. M 19. Iac. rot 2047. Brownlow London in t B. and E. Oyer of the return of the Ex. fac prayed which being read c. onerari non because he saith that in many places of the said return is used a certaine word to wit Civit. written for this word Civit. which word Civit. so written is no word of sense nor Latine having in it any signification Eaq causa Utlaâ— reversed for this Word Civit. for Civitat H 12 Jac rot 2265 quto for quinto the utlawry reversed by Justice Hutton Hill 8. Iac. Rot. 3526. Coronator for Coronatorum H. 12. Iac. Rot. 1949 Brownl inter S. and S. exact and not written exact with a dash T. 13 Iac. Rot. 3538. ura for vra T 19. Jac. rot 635. Anino for Anno. H. 11. Ja rot 3524 praedictus for praedictis same roll mercii for marcii rot 3522 mertris for martins ad Com. Exon for ad commit Civitatis Exoniae T 13 Jac Rot. 3527 Brownlow quinto Exactus for quarto Exact 13 Jacobus Rot 2538 utlawry that it appeared not where the Castle of Leic. is Hill 12. Iac. rot 2265. T. 13. Iac. rot 3538 that there is no such Feast as Kenelim Rs. and Martiris T. 13. Iac. Rot. 635. for no returne in the Writ of Exigi fac-to warrant the writ H. 37 Eliz. rot 132. non comperuit omitted in the retorne of the Exigi fac P. 24 H. 6. rot 24. reversall for that 2. Cap. were filed and not the plures T. 9. Iac. rot 129. Crompton for that the Feast at which the first hustings were held was before the Test of the Exigi fac M 10. Iac. rot 1709. Brownlow reversal for false Lattine Vtlary of the intestate reversed by the Administrator by speciall entry in the same term in which the Utlary was reversed to wit comperuit for comperuere H. 11. Iac. rot 3522. reversall for that it appeareth not in the returne that the old sheriffs had delivered the Writ to the new M 21. Iac. rot 3059. Brownlow Norff. ss It was commanded the sheriff that he should not omit for any liberty of the County aforesaid but that he should take I. B. late of F. in the County aforesaid Gent. Executor of the Testament of I. B. late called I. B of F in the County of Norff Yeoman utlawed in the County aforesaid 6 Ap. An. 22. Eliz. at the suite of W. Gray Administrator of the goods and Chattles which were of R. G. who dyed intestate c. T 3. or 5 Car rot 531. the like for B. in a plea of debt whereof he is convicted if c. And safely c. so that he should have his body here at this day to wit in Oct. Martini to doe and receive what the Court of the Lord the King shall consider of him in that behalf Return mortues And now here at this day to wit in Oct. S. Martini the sheriff of the said County of Norff. to wit R. B. Baronet retorneth that the said I. H 12 Jac rot 829. tiel H 45 Eliz rot 2834. generall pardon pleaded by the Executor for him that died utlawed is dead And hereupon came in to the Court one R. S. of F. in the county aforesaid Gent. Administrator of the goods and Chattles which were of the said James in his proper person and saith that the said Iames after the publishing of the said utlawry to wit The 8. day of Ianuary An. 20 Rs. nunc at F. aforesaid dyed intestate c. And that the administration of the goods and chattles which were of the said I. at the time of his death by Robert Redmaine Doctor of laws c. The tenth day of Ianuary An. Dom. 1622. at F. aforesaid to the said administrator after the death of the said Iames was committed and he bringeth here into the Court the letters administratory of the said Officiall which the commission of the administration aforesaid in Forme aforesaid testifie c. whose date is the same 10. day of Ianuary An. Dom. 1622. abovesaid and for the securing of the goods and chattles which were of the said I. at the time of his death from the utlawry aforesaid he prayeth the hearing of the return of the said writ de Exigi Faciend whereupon the said Ia. at the suit of the said VVilliam was utlawed And it is read unto him in these words Norff. At my county held at the castle of Nor. within the shiere-house in the county aforesaid the 25. day of December An. Reg. 24 within written The within