Sacred Majesty for which he had been Arraigned the day before and pleaded Not Guilty And therefore his Jury being Imparinelled and none of them challenged by him the same was read now to them viz. Sir Philip Matthews Sir Reginald Foster Sir John Kirke Sir John Cutler Sir Richard Blake John Bifield Esq Simon Middleton Esq Thomas Cross Esq Henry Johnson Esq Charles Vmphrevil Esq Thomas Eaglesfield Esq William Bohee Esq To this Indictment Sir Creswel Levins Serjeant Maynard and the Attorney General briefly spoke The Attorney General giving this Account why they chose first to bring this Man to trial That it was to convince those who believed all Designs against the King's Person by any Papist was but a Fiction this Man being a Papist and having said these words even since the discovery of the Plot. And for the proof hereof then appeared William Casters who deposed That on the 14th Instant about 11 a Clock in the Day he saw Stayley with another a Frenchman in a Victualling-house who called for a Pot of Ale and a Slice of Roast-Beef which when it was called for his Landlord said it should be brought him He was in another Room opposite to him both the Doors being open Stayley standing at one Door and he at the other his Face strait towards him and within 7 or 8 foot of him and discoursing with the French-man he heard Stayley twice over in French say The King was a Grand Heretick making his Demonstration with his Hand upon his Breast stamping five or six times with his Foot in great fury That the old Man Fromante his Friend said That the King of England was a Tormenter of the People of God and that Stayley answered again in a great fury He is a great Heretick and the greatest Rogue in the World There 's the Heart and here 's the Hand that would kill him And the King and Parliament think all is over but the Rogues are mistaken Then stamping said I would kill him my self I would kill him my self Then Alexander Southerland deposed that he also was there and perfectly saw Stayley while he Apoke those words which presently he writ down in French as they were spoken And then the Prisoner being gone they enquired his Name and where he live and the next day got him apprehended The third Witnes was one Philip Garret who not understanding French could only depose That being with the other two he heard Stayley speak Whereupon his Captain William Casters cam to him in a great passion and said he could not suffer it he would run upon him he could not be quiet To all which the Prisoner made but a weak Defence relating the manner of his Apprehension and saying That his discourse with Fromante was about the King of France and that he said he would kill himself instead of I will kill him my self alleadging his Loyalty and protesting his Innocence and how that the Witnesses after his apprehension would have had him took it up Then the Statue of Decimo tertio was read and Sir John Kirke one of the Jury who understood French attested that Translation of his words to be true Then the Prisoner's Witnesses were called who were one Anselm the Master of the Cross-Keys in Covent-Garden where the Prisoner was brought when he was apprenhended who deposed That they kept him in his House from 8 till 11 without any Constable Which the Witnesses answered was because they could get no Constable to come along with them without a Warrant from a Justice of Peace and that they sent to White-hall and desired a Guard but the Officer said it was the Constables part Another Witness appeared for the Prisoner who testified that he had often heard him declare much Loyalty to his Prince and an aversion to the Jesuits insomuch that if he knew any of the Persons concerned in this Plot he would be their Executioner himself and that he would lose his Blood for the King But the Ld. Ch. Justice reply'd That was his discourse only when he spoke to a Protestant Then the Prisoner having no more Witnesses nor any thing more to say for himself the Ld. Ch. Justice made a Speech to the Jury setting forth the Treasonableness of the Words and the manner of speaking them and the plainness of the Proof with great zeal against the Jusuits and their Tenants whom he look'd upon as the Foundations of all this Mischief excusing his warmness saying 'T was better to be warm here than in Smithfield and that he hoped he should never go to that Heaven where Men are made Saints for killing Kings The Jury then presently brought the Prisoner in Guilty who said he had nothing more to say so Sentence was pronounced against him to be Hang'd Drawn and Quartered and the same was accordingly executed upon him at Tyburn on Tuesday following being Novemb. 26. It was his Majesty's pleasure because of the Prisoner's seeming Penitence and his Relations humble Petition to suffer his Body to have a decent private Burial But his Friends abusing this gracious Favour with a publick and more than ordinary Funeral Pomp his buried Quarters were ordered to be taken up and to be disposed by the Common Executioner upon the Gates of the City The Trial of Edward Coleman Gent. at the King's-Bench Bar on Wednesday Novemb. 27. 1678. HE then and there appearing having been Arraigned the Saturday before his Indictment was read to the Jury viz. Sir Reginald Forster Bar. Sir Charles Lee. Edward Wilford Esq John Bathurst Esq Joshua Galliard Esq John Bifield Esq Simon Middleton Esq Henry Johnson Esq Charles Vmfrevile Esq Thomas Johnson Esq Thomas Eaglesfield Esq William Bohee Esq His Indictment was for endeavouring to subvert the Protestant Religion and introduce Popery and kill the King Whereto he having pleaded Not Guilty Mr. Recorder Serjeant Maynard and then the Attorney General severally spoke opening the Nature and shewing the heighnousness of the Crimes therein charg'd upon the Prisoner After which the Prisoner praying for a favorable Trial and professing that he had confessed all the Truth in the Examinations that had been made of him in Prison and that he gave over his Corresponding beyond-Seas in 75. Dr. Oates was called forth who deposed That in November last he visiting one John Keins his Father Confessor lodging at Mr. Coleman's House in Stable-Yard Mr. Coleman by him understanding that he was going to St. Omers told him That he would trouble him with a Letter or two thither and would leave them with one Fenwick Procurator for the Jesuits in London Which Letters he carried to St. Omers being directed for the Rector there and was at the opening of them The out-side Sheet was a Letter of News and in it Expressions of the King calling him Tyrant and that the Marriage between the Prince of Orange and the Lady Mary would prove the Traytor 's and Tyrant's Ruin In it was a Latin Letter to Father Le-Chese writ by the same Hand giving
endeavours to have over-ruled without so much as hearing the Prisoners Counsel for the maintaining it for that they said it was nought because it produced no Record of his Impeachment and did not specify what the High-Treason was for which he was Impeached and that the King had Power to proceed on an Impeachment or Indictment for the same thing at his Election Nevertheless the Attorny General demurred and the Prisoner joined in the Demurrer And then after much arguing a Day was given to argue the Plea till Saturday May. 7. At which time the Attorny General added to the Exceptions he took to the Plea Whether a Suit in a Superior Court can take away the Jurisdiction of the Cause of the Person and of the Fact at the time of the Fact committed To maintain the Plea Mr. VVilliams of Counsel for the Prisoner in a very long and learned Discourse first spoke stating the Prisoner's Case upon the Indictment the Plea to the Indictment and the Demurrer to the Plea Alledging the Difference of an Impeachment from an Indictment and offering some Reasons why this Court ought not to proceed upon this Indictment Then answering distinctly Mr. Attorney's Exceptions to the Plea producing some Presidents of this Courts Prosecution being stop'd by Pleas to the Jurisdiction shewing what had been done upon those Pleas What Doom they had Laying before the Court the Right of the Commons to Impeach in Parliament the Judicature of the Lords to determine that Impeachment and the Method and Proceedings of Parliament submitting it to them how far they would lay their Hands on this Case thus circumstantiated Here the Ld. Ch. Justice declared That all these Things were quite foreign to the Case and the Matter in Hand only was Whether this Plea as thus pleaded was sufficient to protect the Prisoner from being questioned in this Court for the Treasonable Matter in the Indictment before them To which Mr. VVilliams reply'd That 't was an hard matter for the Bar to answer the Bench. After which Sir Francis Winnington pleaded That he conceived that it was confessed by the Demurrer that there is an Impeachment by the Commons of England of High-Treason against Fitz-Harris lodged in the House of Lords Secundum Legem consuetudinem Parliamenti And that the Treason for which he was impeached is the same Treason contained in the Indictment So that now the general Question was Whether an Impeachment for Treason by the House of Commons and still depending were a sufficient Matter to oust the Court from proceeding upon an Indictment for the same Offence Which he learnedly endeavoured to make good by several Reasons as well as Presidents Mr. Wallop pleaded next on the same side whose Province was to prove That the Treason in the Impeachment and in the Indictment was the same and that this was well averred in the Plea Mr. Pollexfen pleaded That a general Impeachment in Parliament was a good Impeachment and the Judges had declared so to the King and Council concerning the five Popish Lords who could not therefore be tried upon Indictments so long as general Impeachments were depending for the same Treason and that therefore this Plea was good both as to Matter and Form c. In reply to vitiate the Plea it was insisted on by Mr. Attorn Gen. Mr. Sol. Gen. Serj. Jefferies and Sir Francis VVithens of Counsel for the King that the Plea concluded not in the usual Form That perhaps this Matter if the Prisoner had been acquitted upon the Impeachment might have been pleaded in Bar to the Indictment but it was not pleadable to the Jurisdiction of the Court That in the Case of the five Lords the Indictments were removed into the House of Lords and that the Judges Opinion given at the Council-Board was not a Judicial Opinion nor did any way affect this Cause After which the Ld. Ch. Justice thought fit not to give present Judgment but to take time for Deliberation Whereupon the Prisoner was carried back to the Tower And on Tuesday May 10. Mr. Attorney moved the Court to appoint a Day for their Judgment on the Plea and for Fitz-Harris to be brought up which they appointed to be the next Morning Accordingly on Wednesday Morning May 11. the Prisoner being brought to the Bar the Ld. Ch. Justice deliver'd the Opinion of the Court upon Conference had with other Judges That his Brother Jones his Brother Raymond and himself were of Opinion that the Plea was insufficient his Brother Dolben not being resolved but doubting concerning it and therefore awarded the Prisoner should plead to the Indictment which he did Not Guilty and his Trial ordered to be the next Term. The Trial of Edward Fitz-Harris at the King's-Bench Bar at Westminster before the Lord Chief Justice Pemberton on Thursday June 9. 1681. THE Prisoner then and there appearing after several Challenges made for the King the Jury sworn were Thomas Johnson Lucy Knightly Edward Wilford Alexander Hosey Martin James John Viner William Withers William Cleave Thomas Goffe Ralph Farr Samuel Freebody John Lockier To whom the Indictment was read which was for High-Treason in conspiring the Death of the King and subversion of the Government the which Mr. Heath Serj. Maynard and Mr. Attorn Gen. opened And then Mr. Everard deposed How the Prisoner was with him on Monday Feb. 21. 1681. having a little before been with him to renew the Acquaintance which had been between them while they were both in the French King's Service and to perswade him to re-ingratiate himself into the French and Popish Interest and gave him by word of Mouth Heads to write a Pamphlet to scandalize the King raise Rebellion alienate the Hearts of the People and set them together by the Ears Whereupon he acquainted one Mr. Savile of Lincolns-Inn Mr. Crown Mr. Smith and Sir William Waller with it And the next day Mr. Fitz-Harris coming again to his Chamber in Grays-Inn he convey'd Mr. Smith into a Closet Sir William Waller failing to come where he both saw and heard the Prisoner ask him What he had done as to the Libel and give him further Instructions about what to write viz. That the King was Popishly Affected and Arbitrarily Inclined That King Charles the First had an Hand in the Irish Rebellion and King Charles the Second did countenance the same c. That the People should therefore be stirred up to rebel especially the City c. That the Day after he coming again he had convey'd Sir William Waller into the next Room where he also might both hear and see shewing him to Copies of what he had drawn up which he marked that he might know them again and see what alteration would be made That Fitz-Harris did them read one of the Copies and amended it adding some things and striking out other things saying The Libel was to be presented to the French Ambassador's Confessor and he was to present it to the French Ambassador and that it was to beget a
1684. was brought from thence by Habeas-Corpus to the Bar at the King's-Bench at Westminster where being Arraign'd he was told of his being Indicted and Outlaw'd and thereby Attainted for High-Treason and ask'd what he had to say why Execution should not be awarded against him upon that Attainder To which be reply'd that since he had made an Ingenuous Confession to his Majesty of all that he knew of any manner of Conspiracy against him he hoped That would render him Capable of Mercy and Pardon Upon which the Attorny-General offer'd him a Trial that if he had any thing to say he Defend himself from the Indictment but he Confessing himself Guilty of many things therein declin'd it and threw himself wholly upon the King's Mercy But the Court telling him that the King was the Dispenser of his own Mercy and that they were only to Execute his Justice gave a Rule for his Execution upon Wednesday Sevennight after there being no other Judgment to be pronounced in such Cases as the Court told the Attorny-General when he moved for it the Outlawry it self being the Judgment Which accordingly was Executed upon him on Wednesday the 30th of April 1684. at Tyburn Proceedings in the Court of King's-Bench against Sir Thomas Armstrong June 14. 1684. Sir George Jefferies being Lord Chief Justice SIR Thomas Armstrong Kt. was upon the 14th of June 1684. brought by a Writ of Habeas-Corpus from Newgate to the Bar of the Court of King's-Bench at Westminster and there Arraign'd upon an Outlawry of High-Treason for conspiring the Death of the King c. And being ask'd what he had to say for himself why Sentence should not be awarded against him upon that Attainder pleaded his being beyond-Sea at the time of the Outlawry and desired to be tried upon the Indictment Which the Court refusing to grant him he pleaded the Statute of the 6th of Edw. the 6th which gives the Person Outlaw'd a Year's time to reverse the Outlawry and desired it might be read which accordingly was done But it appearing by the Statute That the Person Outlaw'd ought to render himself to the Chief Justice of England within a Year's time Sir Thomas was told this did not concern him for he had not rendred himself but was taken and brought thither against his Will To which he answered That the Year was not then expir'd fie was there and did now render himself and pray'd Counsel might be assign'd him to argue it in Point of Law but the Court over-rul'd him in it telling him There was no such Doubt or Difficulty in the Matter as to need any such thing Upon which insisting much upon his Innocency and offering to make proof of it if he might be admitted to a Trial he produc'd Holloway's Case as a Precedent for it who had but a little before been offer'd it at the same Place but the Court told him that what had been done therein was meerly from the King's Grace and Mercy and that the King might extend the same Mercy to him also if he so pleas'd but since he had not done so and it not being their Business they must proceed to award Execution upon the Outlawry Upon which Mrs. Matthews Daughter to the Prisoner call'd out to the Court not to Murder her Father For which the Chief Justice caus'd her to be committed to the Marshal and accordingly she wishing that God Almighty's Judgments might light upon them was carried away the Chief Justice saying That he thanked God he was Clamour-proof After which the Attorn Gen. offered to shew the Reasons why the King extended that Grace to Holloway but ought not to extend it to Sir T.A. as not at all deserving any sort of Indulgence or Mercy but that having relation to the Evidence and not to the Outlawry the Court refus'd to hear any thing of it and so proceeded to give a Rule for his Execution the Friday following telling him upon his earnest pressing to have the Benefit of the Statute he had cited the he should have the Full Benefit of the Law And accordingly on Friday the 20th of June he was Executed at Tyburn Mrs. Matthews upon a Petition being before releas'd out of Custody without Fees The Trial between Sir William Pritchard Kt. and Alderman of the City of London Plaintiff and Thomas Papillon Esq Defendant in an Action upon the Case at the Sessions of Nisi Prius holden for the Court of Kings-Bench at the Guild-hall in the City of London on Thursday the 6th of November in Michaelmas Term in the 36th Year of the Reign of King Charles the Second 1684. Before Sir George Jefferies Kt. and Baronet then Lord Chief Justice of the said Court of Kings-Bench SIR William Pritchard late Lord Mayor of the City of London having in Easter Term last brought an Action upon the Case for falsly maliciously and without probable cause procured him to be arrested and imprisoned in his Mayoralty against Thomas Papillon Esq The Defendant pleaded Not Guilty and thereupon issue being joined it came this day to be tried before the Lord Chief Justice Jefferys and the Jury sworn to try this Cause were these Bartholomew Ferryman Thomas Blackmore Thomas Symonds William Whatton John Green Thomas Amy Joseph Baggs Daniel Chandler John Reynalds John Allen Joseph Caine William Withers jun. Then Mr. Munday being of Counsel for the Plaintiff opened the Case to which Mr. Attorney General added something And then Mr. Solicitor General called Mr. Keeling who being sworn deposed That on April the 24th he being sent for by a Letter from Mr. Goodenough came to Mr. Russel's a Cooks-shop in Iron-monger-lane to meet him where were 30 or 40 Persons together By whom while he was gone for a little while his Name was put into a Warrant to be a special Bailiff to arrest the Lord Mayor which he seeming unwilling to do was urged thereto for fear of displeasing the Discontented Party which he said were such as he and the Goodenoughs were of even such as would have killed the King and the Duke that being prevailed upon he went along with the Coroner Mr. Burton and Mr. Francis Goodenough to Grocers-hall where Sir William Pritchard kept his Mayoralty to whom the Coroner came up and said he had a Warrant against him and therefore pray'd him to give an Appearance at the Suit of Mr. Thomas Papillon and another at the Suit of Mr. John Dubois whereupon some Words passed between them and the Lord Mayor refusing to give any Appearance the Coroner bid us execute our Warrants upon which he came up to the Lord Mayor and touched him upon the Shoulder telling him that he did arrest him at the Suit of Thomas Papillon Esq and one Ferdinando Burley arrested him then again at the Suit of Mr. John Dubois and then the Coroner dismissing them and taking the Lord Mayor into his own Custody he went thence to Sir Henry Tulse's and arrested him also Then Sir Henry Tulse being called and sworn deposed that about
Cornish and Bethel got in to be Sheriffs 3. Their arresting the Lord Mayor in his Mayoralty-year and not staying till that was ended did carry Vengeance and Malice in the very face of it as if they had a mind to affront the Government in arresting and imprisoning the Kings Lieutenant in one of the highest Places both of Trust and Honour Nay and because they would be sure their Malice and Revenge should take place 4. They took the very Scoundrels of the Party to be employed in this work 5. The Consequents designed herein which was the destruction of the Government all the Magistrates being took up that had any care for it And 5. The particular Persons that were to be sued being only some of the Aldermen and not all though the Mandamus was directed to all and the Return made by the whole Court yet Cornish and his Party were not to be medled with which is another Circumstance of Malice And if it had not been for some Purpose 6. Mr. Papillon is know to be a Person that would never have been so greedy of an Office he had before declined and fined for minding rather his Counting-house than a Scarlet-Gown And therefore the Design he told them was from the beginning to the end nothing but to cause a Tumult and Confusion in the City in order to put that damned hellish Conspiracy for the destruction of the King and his Brother and every Man that was honest and loyal in Execution That therefore they were to find for the Plantiff and to give Damages according to the Malice design'd not as to Sir William Pritchard but as Lord Mayor For that the Government was infinitely concern'd in this Cafe which made it so popular a Cause The Government of the City the Honour of their Chief Magistrate and indeed the Honour of the King whose Substitute he was and that was to put a weight upon their Inquiry into the Damages of this Case telling them that their severity in this Case would deter all People from entring into Clans and Cabals to make Disturbances and affront the Government Then the Jury withdrew to consider of their Verdict and after half an hours stay returned and found for the Plaintiff and assessed Damages to 10000 l. and costs to 4 Marks The Lord Chief Justice then told the Jury that they seem'd to be Persons that had some sense upon them and consideration for the Government and had given a good Verdict and were to be greatly commended for it Aster which the Court broke up The Trial of Titus Oates at the King's-Bench Bar at Westminster before the Lord Chief Justice Jefferies on Friday and Saturday the 8th and 9th days of May 1685. THen and there the Prisoner appearing upon an Information of Perjury shewing how that he had sworn falsly to a Consult of Jesuits at the White-Horse Tavern April 24. 1678. at the Trial of Ireland Pickering and Grove To which having pleaded Not Guilty the Jury sworn were Sir William Dodson Sir Edmund Wiseman Richard Aley Thomas Fowlis Thomas Blackmore Peter Pickering Robert Beddingfield Thomas Rawlinson Roger Reeves Ambrose Isted Henry Collier Richard Howard Then Dr. Oates moved that he might have three very material Witnesses who were Prisoners in the Kings-Bench brought into the Court but the Ld. Ch. Justice told him the Law would not allow it and it would be an Escape The Information therefore was read and Mr. Philips opened it and Mr. Attorn Gen. opened the Evidence Then in order to prove the Information the Record of the Trial of Ireland was produced and read Then Mr. Foster was sworn who deposed that he was one of the Jury at Ireland's Trial and heard Dr. Oates depose about the Consult's being April 24 1678 and that he was at it and carried the Resolution from Chamber to Chamber to be signed and saw it signed c. Then Martin Hilsley Esq a Papist deposed That he came from St. Omers April 14 Old Stile where he lest Oates and saw him but the day before and that he was not at all in his Company from thence to London where he arrived April 21 having staid four or five days at Bockston-street hard by where he met Mr. Burnaly at a Relations of his That afterwards he told Mr. Osborn that he had lest Sampson Lucy by which Name Mr. Oates went as also sometimes by Titus Ambrosius at St. Omers Then Dr. Oates would have ask'd this Witness What his Employment was at St. Omers Whether his Superiors did not set him on to do this And what Inducements he had to give in an Evidence now which he had given six Years ago at Langhorn's Trial and was not believed But these the Ld. Ch. Justice called Ensnaring Questions and would suffer no Answer to them Then Mr. John Dorrel now a Papist deposed that about the 15th or 16th of April he heard one Mr. Osborn telling his Mother of one Sampson Lucy alias Oates being then a Scholar at St. Omers as a Gentleman newly come from thence had assured him Then Mr. Osborn a Papist deposed About the 27th or 28th of April Mr. Hilsley talking to him about Oates telling that he lest him in the Colledg when he came away from St. Omers and this he told afterwards to Madam Dorrel and his own Mother who was since dead Then Mr. Bournaby a Papist supposed a Jesnit who went by the Name of Blunt deposed That he met Mr. Hilsley April 18 1678 that he arrived at St Omers April 21 and saw Oates there the next day and so from day to day to June 10. but that he neither knew or heard of any Consult Then Mr. Pool alias Killingbeck a Papist of the Sodality of the Virgin Mary as was supposed being sworn deposed That he came from St. Omers April 25 and saw Mr. Oates that very Morning and left him there and saw him there the 21st and 22d of the same Month That he heard something of a Triennial Congregation but of no Consult Then Mr. Henry Thornton a Papist deposed That he had been a Student at St. Omers seven Years and came thence about two Years after Mr. Oates that he knew Oates there very well and saw him almost every day in the Colledg from Christmass 1677 to the 13th of June 1678 that in all that time he was never out of the Colledg unless a day or two at Watton in January which is not a League out of Town That he saw him particularly the day of Mr. Hilsley's departure April 14 and Mr. Bournaby's coming April 21 and again the next day April 22 at a Play which the Scholars acted That he heard of a Triennial Congregation but of no Consult Then Mr. William Conway a Papist a Student of St. Omers who went by the Name of Parry when he was a Witness at the Trial of the five Jesuits deposed That he knew Mr. Oates at St. Omers that he came in December 1677 and stirr'd not out of the Colledg except one Night
Meetings was upon the account of carrying on the Conspiracy and discoursing about the Condition the Conspirators were in As to the intended Insurrection he said If he could but see a Cloud at big as a Man's Hand he would not be wanting to employ his Interest That the Prisoner also had told him that he intended to take an House near the Tower to place Men in in order to surprize it to that end he held correspondence with some Sea-Captains and that he had been with them at Coffee-Houses Mr. Richard Goodenough deposed That being in company with the Prisoner he had heard him approve of the Design and promise to use his Interest in raising Men and not only to be assisting in the Division allotted him but in surprising the City Savoy c. and in driving the Guards out of Town Then the Prisoner called several Witnesses to invalidate Lee's Testimony Sir Robert Adams testified to a false Report of his about beating three Knights Sir Simon Lewis was called to the same purpose but appeared not James Child could say nothing but that Lee was an Honest Man One Baker was also call'd to testify that Lee would have suborned him against the Prisoner to his Prejudice some Years since of which he had made Affidavit before Sir William Turner But Baker not appearing Sir William Turner was desired to give account of it but it being above two Years since he could not remember such Particulars His Clerk Mr. Tomkins remembred such an Affidavit was made in 1682 which mention'd Mr. Lee but to the best of his remembrance it was returned before the King and Council and he could not give any account of the Particulars Mr. Bateman then desiring to know upon what Statute he was Indicted and being assisted by his Son by reason of his Incapacity making little more Defence the Ld. Ch. Justice of the King's-Bench summ'd up the Evidence and other Prisoners were tried and just before the Jury went out the aforesaid Baker being found with much ado it was obtain'd that he should give in his Evidence which was That Lee perswaded him to intrude himself into the Prisoner's Company and some others and to discourse of State-Affairs by which means he would find a way to make him a Man of which he had made Affidavit before Sir William Turner But this the Court interpreted to Lee's Advantage as if he only thereby designed to make a discovery of the Plot and so have got a further Evidence to corroborate his own reflecting on Baker as a broken Fellow c. After which the Jury withdrawing for half an hour brought the Prisoner in Guilty And accordingly he being brought again to the Bar on Friday following Mr. Recorder sentenc'd him to be Drawu Hang'd and Quarter'd which was executed upon him at Tyburn on Friday Decemb. 18th following The Trial of John Hambden Gent. At the Session's-House in the Old-Baily on Wednesday Decemb. 30. 1685. THen and there the Prisoner appearing and the grand Jury for the County of Middlesex call'd over his Indictment was read which was for High-Treason in conspiring the Death of the late King and raising a Rebellion in this Kingdom To which before Mr. Hambden pleaded he intimated his having been tried for the same Fact above two Years ago and withal gave the Lord Chief Justice to understand that he thought he had as much to say in Point of Law for himself as any Prisoner that ever came before him but that he was resolved to pass by all Pleas whatsoever and cast himself wholly upon the King's Mercy The Lord Chief Justice told him his former Indictment was for High-Misdemeanour but this for High-Treason and therefore a different Fact requiring him therefore to plead Then he pleaded Guilty to the Indictment requesting his Lordship's Intercession for him with the King Which was readily enough granted and the Method he was perswaded to take highly approved as answering the Design of giving Life and Credit to the Fanatick Rlot and gratifying the Importunity possibly of some Great Ones However the dismal Sentence of Death was by Mr. Recorder pronounced upon him due to High-Treason yet not without a shew of Tenderness and some encouragement of an Obligation this brave Person had hereby merited with them This getting a Pardon when nothing else must Books lately Printed and Sold by Jonathan Robinson at the Golden Lion in St. Pauls Church-yard relating to the great Revolutions in England and Scotland 1688 1689. ☞ AN Account of the Reasons of the Nobility and Gentry's Invitation of the Prince of Orange into England Being a Memorial from the English Protestants concerning their Grievances with a large account of the Birth of the Prince of Wales presented to their Highnesses the Prince and Princess of Orange A Collection of Political and Historical Papers relating to the wonderful Revolutions in England and Scotland in 12 Parts from the time of the seven Bishops petitioning K. James the 2d to the Coronation of K. Willian and Q. Mary A Brief History of the Succession of the Crown of England c. Collected out of the Records and the most Authentick Historians written for the Satisfaction of the Nation Wonderful Predictions of Nostredamus Grebner David Pareus and Autonius Torquatus wherein the Grandeur of their Present Majesties the Happiness of England and Downfall of France and Rome are plainly Delineated With a large Preface shewing That the Crown of England has not been obscurely foretold to their Majesties William the 3d and Queen Mary late Prince and Princess of Orange and that the People of this Ancient Monarchy have duly contributed thereunto in the present Assembly of Lords and Commons notwithstanding the Objections of Men of different Extremes A Seasonable Discourse wherein is examined what is lawful during the Confusions and Revolutions of Government especially in the Case of a King deserting his Kingdoms and how far a Man may lawfully conform to the Powers and Commands of those who with Various Successes hold Kingdoms Whether it be lawful 1 In Paying Taxes 2 In personal Service 3 In taking of Oaths 4 In giving up himself to a final Allegiance A Seasonable Treatise wherein is proved That King William commonly called the Conqueror did not get the Imperial Crown of England by the Sword but by the Election and Consent of the People To whom he swore to observe the Original Contract between King and People An Answer to a Paper Intituled The Desertion Discussed being a Vindication of the Proceedings of the late Honourable Convention in their Filling up the Throne with King William and Queen Mary An Exact Collection of the Debates of the House of Commons particularly such as relate to the Bill of Exclusion of a Popish Successor c. held at Westminster Octob. 21. 1680 Prorogued the 10th and Dissolved the 18th of January following With the Debates of the House of Commons at Oxford Assembled March. 21. 1680. Also a Just and Modest Vindication of the Proceedings of the said