Selected quad for the lemma: city_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
city_n	call_v	king_n	part_n	4,451	4	4.0694	3	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A23817	The period of the grand conspiracy delivered in two sermons, The desire of nations, preached on the fast day, April 6, 1660, the second, The joy of nations, preached on the thanksgiving day, June 29, 1660 / by John Allington.	Allington, John, d. 1682.	1663 (1663)	Wing A1212; ESTC R25234	38,105	114

From which variety I shall press this onely lesson That good resolutions ought not to be delaid for the not pursuing whom God calleth do many times move God to make choice of other instruments Hester 4. When Mordecai writ to Hester about rescuing the Jews out of the hands of Haman he sent her this admonition If thou altogether holdest thy peace at this time then shall there enlargement and deliverance arise to the Jews from another place We have seen in these days of ours those who sometime were as Hester those who having power and opportunity to have setled our Nations upon the bottom of truth and righteousness neglected and despised the time God gave them For as much as in that their day they saw not what belonged to their peace preferring a private to a publick interest we have lived to see such laid aside and may live to see deliverance arise to the oppressed from another way Yea these very people in my text The Israelites though they were early in their intentions and the very first discoursers of the business yet for as much as they did not pursue their timely resolutions they lost the glory and the blessing of this so great a work for not the Rebellious but the Royal not Israel but Judah had the honour of doing indeed what all Israel onely talked on for The men ●f Judah not onely talked on it but they sent this word unto the King return thou and all thy servants so the King returned and came to Jordan and Judah came to Gilgal to goe mte● the King and to conduct the King over J dan. All the men of Israel strove but it seems no man stir'd they were in this so excellent a purpose so still and slow that nothing was indeed done till Judah went to the water side and brought the King back And so I will passe from their delay to their debate 4. The Motives and Inducements that moved them to think on David and to solicite his return and those we shall finde insinuated in this comparison between David and Absolon The King saved us out of the hands of our enemies and out of the hands of the Philistines and now is fled out of the land for Absolon and Absolon also is dead in battle therefore 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Why are ye so hard of hearing why so deaf why so slow in bringing back the King In which words there are clearly two Reasons 1. The usurper is taken away Absolon is dead 2. The advantages of their old Kings reign He saved us he delivered us and shall we not recal him again First of the first the usurper Absolon is dead therefore all Israel as convinced seem to say Better call home the undoubted owner then set up another rebel A King it seems is one of those good things whose want doth best commend them for whilst David was at home and in the City the Citizens would not strengthen his hands would not stand to him for he was fain to fly But now when out of the land then they begin to consider the feeling and sensible distance between an Usurper and a Father between an Absolon and a David And then they finde there was as much difference between the King and his Usurper as is between an Husband and an Adulterer for as the one takes a woman for his love and the other for his lust even so do they take Crowns the King to promote the Usurper to make a prey on it the King he loves the Usurper he lusts the King studieth the advance peace and improvement of his people David saved us from all our enemies David delivered us out of the hands of the Philistines But the Usurper he studieth how to advance himself how to build up his house and to make all enemies that are not his friends so that indeed as a yong man who weddeth an old rich widow marrieth her estate and not her even so Vsurpers they take the power of Dominion and Government over Nations not out of any affection or indulgence to the people but onely that they may command what they have and riot in the expence of their sweat and blood and therefore all the people having now their eyes open they cry for a King they will have their old David rather then any fresh Absolon Prov. 28. 2. For the transgression of a land many are the princes thereof Many Princes they too too oft prove to the body politick as the fresh horse-leeches in the Fable extream suckers and therefore Solomon the wise as to the happiness of a people he opposeth one to many even as a blessing to a curse For thus he writes For the transgression or punishment of a land many are the princes but by a man a single person of understanding and knowledge the state thereof shall be prolonged One may establish what many cannot And therefore the men of Sichem they choose rather to have one Abimelech and he naught too then threescore and ten to rule over them And indeed Absolon being now dead they lay at the mercy of the General they lay at Amasa's dispose to have what Government he pleased and therefore if they consulted no further then their own welfare they could not say less when Absolon was now dead then strive to bring David home again for they know his they feared what a new Form might bring Absolon whom we anointed over us is dead in battle therefore usquequo si letis as the vulgar Latine Why so silent why so backward in bringing back the King Secondly The other Reason is drawn from the excellent times they had under Davids government The King saved us from out of the hands of our enemies but Absolon he hath made us enemies to the King the King delivered us from the Philistines but Absolon he hath made us as Philistines Rebels against the Lords anointed David he smote the Moabites he smote the Syrians he smote the Ammonites he brought all Edom under his subjection In the days of David he so smote the Philistines that the men of Israel feared them not in the days of David Israel and Judah were a renowned people feared abroad in security at home but in the days of Absolon Israel was as odious as the uncircumcised In the days of David The Lord had given them rest round about from all their enemies In the days of Absolon all were enemies that were round about them yea in the days of David the Ark was brought into the City of David The glory of Israel the Ark of God the holy Testimony of his presence it was by David brought into the City of David And yet for all this so ungrateful had they been to David that to promote a Rebel they exiled a King against David undoubtedly the Lords anointed they anoint Absolon his ungracious son to rule over them Absolon was brought to the royal City and David for Absolon fled out of the land But Israel now

now Absolon was dead bethinking what they had done and what they had to do How they must either live in a perpetual war or call back their King How if they set up another instead of Absolon they must keep an Army on foot to maintain the usurpation Josephus relating the story telleth us they thus concluded That it behoved them since he was dead whom they had chosen to make their supplication and submission unto David that dismissing his wrath he would receive the people into his favour and according as before time so now also he would vouchsafe them his pardon and protection And indeed as before I intimated the King was so gracious that not so much as Shimei who reviled cursed and threw stones at him suffered upon that account Now if the desires of Israel was as the desires of England To settle Peace and Government upon foundations of Truth and Righteousness they could then pitcht upon no better course then indeed was done which was the bringing back of David to Jerusalem the King to the City For a righteous Foundation builds upon this score That every man may have his right and that made David himself to say unto his God Thou hast maintained my Right and my Cause Thou satest in the throne judging right Now the men both of Judah and Israel they were all convinced they all very well knew that the seat of the Kingdom was Davids knew Absolon to have no Title but what the sword made him knew the right of the Throne belonged to him who was fled to him who was out of the land And therefore if they would have peace and government built upon the foundation of Righteousness they could not but conclude the King himself must have his right He who was unjustly banisht must in Righteousness be called home He who was unjustly driven from his Royal City must in all right and reason be reduced and brought back again For if there were all the right and reason in the world that Ahab who unjustly got possession should restore Naboths vineyard certainly then there is no less righteousness that all the people of Israel should restore David to his own when themselves very well knew there was nothing but Rebellion and Treason that drove him out so that either righteousness and right dealings must be confined to the subject or else David the King must have his right and of this doubtless all the people of Israel were then convinced when they thus said Why speak ye not a word of bringing the King back Again as Righteousness even so Truth requires it For if you will run through the whole book of Kings you shall finde that true Religion it always adhered to the Kings party during the rebellion of Absolon Zadock and Abiathar and all the Levites they were of Davids side they went out with him they carried the Ark with him they returned it to Jerusalem upon command from him yea when after Solomons days there was a division made between the house of Judah and the house of Israel when there was Kings of Israel and Kings of Judah In Judah still was the Lord known in the City of David was the Temple the Sacrifice and the undoubted Priests of God 1 Kings 12. 28. When Jeroboam had exalted himself to be King of Israel you shall finde one of the first things he fate in Council on it was Religion And because he knew the true Religion and his false Title could not do together he made two Calves of Gold and said to the people It is too much for you to go up to Jerusalem Behold thy gods oh Israel which brought thee out of the land of Egypt They who will live under an usurped Title they must never hope to live under a true Religion for Usurpers they will have such Worship such Priests and such Confessions as may serve their turns And therefore had the men of Israel onely upon the account of Truth and Religion considered and consulted they could not have found a better expedient for the enjoying of it then by moving as they did to bring back their King again For to David and his line adhered the profession of the true Religion In a word to settle Peace and Government upon those two immoveable Pillars Truth and Righteousness cannot possibly be effected unless we be true to this common principle Suum cuique To give every one his own Now Matth. 22. 21. Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesars and unto God the things that are Gods saith the Saviour of the world the Prince of Peace Whence it appears that both God and King have their interests and their properties Caesar hath and God hath his Rights Now if God and Caesar have a right how can we expect that God should bless us with the blessing of peace unless we give both to him and his anointed what is their rights Suppose Absolon Achitophel Amasa or all Israel whilst the power was in their hands had sold the Tabernacle which David pitched to put the Ark in or had they made sale or given away the Kings Cedar house that was in Jerusalem ● Could the Government of Israel have been settled upon Truth and Righteousness till God had had his Tabernacle and the King his palace certainly Restitution is as great a part of Righteousness as Preservation and God and Caesar as considerable to their dues as any persons in the world Truly among us Christians it is a great defect that we are quick and highly sensible of every trespass of every wrong of every encroachment that is personal and done to us but what is done to others the s●questrations deprivations wrongs and ejectments of any but our own relations those as nothing at all to us we scarce lend an ear to so we scape all 's well And hence it comes to pass what is done to God or what is done to Caesar we make no account no reckoning on Now sure I am God Almighty was very ill pleased with them who in their fulness did not think of them that wanted who drank wine in Bowls anointed themselves with the chief ointments but grieved not for the affliction of Joseph Now certainly if the afflictions of Joseph the troubles of David should be remembred and indeed with what face can we desire our God to settle us in peace if we have no Bowels for our Brethren nor melting hearts for the Father of our Countrey certainly we are not worthy to sit in peace under our own Vines if we will not endeavour to bring the Lord of our Vineyards to his own possessions To the people of Israel whilst they understood themselves nothing was so dear as the Ark and the King But neither the Ark without the King nor the King without the Ark could make a settlement A time there was when Jerusalem had their King but the Ark was at Kiriath-jearim and whilst so David himself could be contented and therefore that

man save us even very then some despised him And 2 Sam. 20. When God beyond all expectation had removed the usurpation and brought that King who was fled out of the land to his royall City even then Sheba the son of Bichri blew a trumpet and said We have no part in David neither have we inheritance in the son of Iesse every man to his tents O Israel The Son of Bichri in behalf of himself and his party professed unless they might have inheritances out of the son of Iesse unless they might have the Crown land they were rather for a war then a settlement rather for confusion then a King they valued a King at no more then what was their own interest and their own advantage Now truly thus to do is not with the Spirit of God to deem a King a stone a Corner stone a Head stone but a stepping stone a stirrup stone a stone laid onely for advance to private interests and to raise and get up to personal advantages But they who so did the Spirit of God puts an eternal brand upon them calling them Children of Belial A man of Belial yea between the Loyal and the Seditious the Spirit of God most remarkably distinguisheth for they who adhered and went with the King they are said to be such Whose hearts God had touched but those who despised and brought him no presents they who looked upon him but as one of them they are such Whose hearts Sathan governed men of Belial Those whose hearts God had touched they owned and joyed and triumphed in their King they shouted and said not God save Saul as a man But God save the King God grant he may live not as a man but a King in Glory and Majesty in Power and Greatness But the children of Belial they hung down their heads like a Bulrush and had rather see a Kings head on a block then to be as God would have it the head stone of the corner But in despight of all who devised how to put him by whom God would exalt the Lord would and hath compassed his own design For The stone which the Builders refused is become the head stone of the corner This is the Lords doing and marvelous in our eyes c. In the words we may for methods sake observe these two Generals First Matter of fact Secondly The manner of doing In the matter of fact two Considerabl● 1. A Reprobation a Stone Refused 2. A Reparation Exalted The stone which the Builders refused is become the Head c. In the second General in the manner of doing two Particulars 1. Gods extraordinary efficiency The Lords doing 2. Mans duty and regard in these words Marvelous in our eyes First of the matter of fact The stone which the Builders refused is become the Head stone of the corner Now for as much as Expositors of great note attribute the prime sense to David and the principal to the Son of David I shall follow their steps and indeed shall consider this matter of fact upon three accounts 1. Davids Reprobation and Reparation how he was the stone both refused and exalted 2. The Son of David Christ our Lord his Reprobation and Reparation how the Builders refused him who became the Head 3. Lastly how far by way of Analogy or resemblance our David and our Davids Son our late King and the Son of this King may be here concerned whether he who is become the Head of the corner hath not been a stone reprobated and refused First That David was a rejected stone the History of his life will easily evince For if we look upon him upon the account of Nature we finde him the youngest not the seventh but the eighth Son yea we finde seven at home or about home but he as a neglected Pebble in the Fields keeping sheep when Samuel came to look him up 1 Sam. 15. 11. Yea afeter this when Samuel by anointing had made him a precious stone Eliab his eldest brother even then when he came by Gods appointment to work a mighty deliverance accused him of pride and naughtiness of heart 1 Sam. 17. 28. Saul he adopts him for a Son gives him a daughter but hurls him off as a stone and persecutes him as a Partridge upon the Mountains Yea 1 Sam. 26. 19. David himself complaineth saying They have driven me out this day from abiding in the inheritance of the Lord saying Go serve strange gods So that he was now become a very rowling stone a stone one would think neither fit to Bed nor Head Yea when he was in the land of strangers even there and that by those who pretended of loyalty to follow him when a cross accident befell them They began to speak of stoning of him 1 Sam. 30. 6. So that a poor King had need be a stone a well weathered stone for storms and cross winds will soon crack break and crumble him to dust else Now who would think that a poor shepheard Boy persecuted by a King driven out of the Land of his Nativity despised by his brethren ready to be stoned by his followers opposed by a General who would think that that stone which such Master-Builders did set at naught should become the Head of the corner and the Glory of his people And yet such was his Reparation for 2 Sam. 2. 4. The men of Judah anointed him King in Hebron And the tribes of Israel seven years and six moneths after came and made him King over all Israel So that albeit Judah and Israel were not two Nations nor two Kingdoms yet they were two high parties malignant and well-affected loyal and rebellious for the King and against the King But when the rejected stone was put in where it ought to be when the Builders wearied with war and perverseness put him in his right place and made him the Head of the corner This union made up the breach and that Head so closed the joynts that Israel and Judah the rebellious and the loyal all Davids days lived as brethren So that to this change and reparation of King David we may well say This is the Lords doing and marvelous in our eyes Secondly let us consider this stone as relating to the son of David and truly we shall finde him a stone refused and set at naught indeed In every Erection there are divers sorts of Builders some plot some work some serve The Master-Builders are for plotting the Masons for raising the labourers for serving Now by every of these was the stone in the Text refused Psalm 2. 2. The Kings of the earth set themselves and the rulers took counsel together against the Lord and against his anointed Against the Kings son against the son of David there was a combination of Princes the very Master-Builders took counsel and plotted against him they would not have this stone to head them The Pharisees Scribes and Elders those whom I may call the Masons in