Selected quad for the lemma: city_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
city_n	call_v	holy_a	place_n	4,457	4	5.1998	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A03884	A treatise concerning the church Wherin it is shewed, by the signes, offices, and properties therof, that the Church of Rome (and consequently such particuler churches as liue in her communion) is the only true church of Christ. VVritten in Latin, by the Reuerend Father Iames Gordon Huntley of Scotland, Doctour of Diuinity, of the Society of Iesus. And translated into English by I.L. of the same Society. The third part of the second controuersy.; Controversiarum epitomes. English. Selections	Gordon, James, 1541-1620.; Wright, William, 1563-1639.	1614 (1614)	STC 13997B; ESTC S114238	53,360	142

do visibly gouerne in Christs steed so also neyther should Christ be sayd truly to gouerne visibly the whole Church vnlesse there were some one who in his person might visibly gouerne the whole Church But this person can be no other but the Byshop of Rome 4. And that which hath byn said before of the head is also to be vnderstood of the rocke and foundation For Christ is indeed the chiefest foundation of all true belieuers but the secondary and subordinate foundation vnto Christ is also the doctrine of the Apostles and Prophets as the Apostle expressely saith to the Ephesians and Caluin also acknowledgeth it to be most true But if the doctrine of all the Apostles be also the foundation of the Church why should not also S. Petres doctrine be the same For when we say that S. Peter is the foundation of the Church by S. Peter we doe vnderstand not his person only but also his doctrine preached in the Church of Rome 5. Moreouer seing that S. Iohn in his Apocalyps sayth that the Citty of God hath twelue foundations and in them twelue names of the twelue Apostles of the lambe VVhat meruaile is it if S. Peter the first of the Apostles be called a rocke or foundation of the Citty of God 6. And heere it is to be considered that when the Apostle sayth that there is no other foundation besides Christ this word besides hath the same signification that contrary or against hath as appeareth by many other places of holy Scripture For otherwise all the Apostles are called the foundations of the Church as we haue sayd before but they are not contrary or against Christ but vnder Christ and subiect vnto him 7. Finally yf we examine more exactely the true sense of those wordes of S. Paul to the Corinthians yt will appeare manifestly that our aduersaries wrest the said wordes of the Apostle to a contrary sense and meaning For the Apostle doth not speake of the foundatiō of the whole buylding of the Church of Christ wherof only is our present Cōtrouersy but of the foundatiō of particuler priuate actions of euery true belieuer For S. Paul manifestely writeth that he layd that foundatiō wherof he speaketh that euery one buyldeth his owne proper worke vpon this foundation But there is a great difference among these foundations because heere Christ himselfe is he who made ordayned S. Peter to be a foun●ation I say vnto thee saith Christ to S. Peter that thou art Cephas there S. Paul is he who lōg after laid that ●oundation wherof he speaketh as a wise worke-mayster saith he haue I layed the foundation Heere Christ himselfe is he who buildeth Vpon this rocke saith our lord I will buyld There euery priuate man is he who buyldeth but let euery one looke saith the Apostle ●ow he buildeth theron heere the Church is that which is built theron I will build saith our Lord my Church There the worke of euery priuate man is that which is built theron If any mans worke abide saith the Apostle that which he built therupon shall receaue reward S. Paul therfore speaketh of the foundatiō of good workes which belong vnto iustice and life euerlasting wherof as we haue said Christ is the only foundation We treate here of the foundation of the outward and visible gouernement of the Church and doctrine of sound faith Now S. Peter his successors were such a foundation Wher●ore that which our Aduersaries alleadge out of S. Paul doth nothing concerne this our prese●t ●i●putation 8. The second argument S. Peter denyed Christ th●ice ther●ore he could not be the re●ke against whome the gates of hell should neuer preuayle I answere that when S. Peter denyed Christ he was not as then the foundation of the Church For promise was made vnto him only Matth. 16. I will build c. I will gi●e thee c. speaking alwaies in the future tense but afterward Ioan 21. the authority was actually giuen which was b●f●re promised vn●o him and that after that denyall of S. Peter as also after the resurrection of Christ feede my lambes saith Christ f●ede my she●pe 9. The third argument After that the foresayd authority was giuen Ioan. 21. S. Peter was reprehended by S. Paul Gal. 2. I answere that as witnesseth Tertullian the Marcionists obiected this very same place against Catholikes vnto whome Tertullian answereth in these words Indeed saith he it was a vice or fault of his conuersation and not of his preaching And he answered very well for S. Peter might peraduenture thē haue synned but he could not erre in fayth because he knew very well that the Moysaicall Law was not necessary to saluation for the Gentills neyther did he euer teach the same to be necessary Yea when there arose any controuersy about this matter he manifestly taught that t●e Gentills were not obliged by it as may be seen in the Acts of the Apostles Wherfore if S. Peter offēded in any thing it was a synne of his conuersation and not of his preaching doctrine wherof we now only dispute albeit there are many who thinke that S. Peter did not offende at all in any respect of whom see Bellarmine and Baronius 10. The fourth argument S. Paul reprehended those that said they belonged to S. Peter I answere that those men deuided Christ from S. Peter and S. Paul and they opposed them against Christ as equalls vnto him making them as it were so many Christs The which S. Paul declareth in these wordes Is Christ deuided Moreouer they attributed to S. Peter and S. Paul the internall and inuisible giftes of the holy Ghost and the effect of the Sacrament yea and our redemption also no otherwise then they did vnto Christ. Hence are those wordes of S. Paul in the same place why was Paul crucified for you or were you baptized in the name of Paul 11 But we teach that the Pope of Rome is inferior and not equall vnto Christ wherupon he is also called the Vicar of Christ as subiect vnto him and not deuided from him Moreouer we teach that the Pope doth not giue the inward and spirituall gyftes of Fayth Hope and Charity but he is only the ●icar of Christ in the doctrine of fayth and exteriour gouernement of the Church 12. The f●rst argument The Apostle to the Corinthians and Ephesians doth recount diuers offices of the Church and yet he sayth nothing of S. Peter I answere first that it is not necessary that the Apostle make any mention of S. Peter in euery place for it is sufficient that in some one place or other he hath euidently declared that S. Peter was a chiefe member of the Church the which he did when he said that he came to Hierusalem to see S. Peter and tarryed with him fifteene dayes 13. Furthermore in these very places he manifestly