throne on Seates both before after Babilon is destroied this sheweth that they are the only spirituall Rulers ordained by God to gouerne his church vnder Christ to the vvorlds end and by him set about his throne as those vvhich by his ordinance haue had the Ecclesiasticall gouernment ought still to haue it by the furtherance of Christian kings and princes that are nursing fathers and in Gods good time shall haue it againe Christ vviloe in the midst of the Elders Both that of the Bishop of Rome and of all other diocessian and prouinciall Bishops shall be ouerthrovven Isa 9.7 Heb. 2.8 and then of the increase of his gouernment and peace there shall be no ende but he vvill put all things in subiection vnder his feete VVhich all as vvell high as lovv should endeauour to knovv that knovving it vvhen in praier they say thy kingdome come in heart they may both pray that God vvould sent it and vse the best meanes they can to effect it By all vvhich is manifest that the Presbiters vvere the Bishops and Gouernours of the church in the time of the Apostles a vvhile after and that the preeminence vvhich after some one in a prouince obtained vvas by consent and custome not by authoritie of Scripture VVhich is ingeniously acknovvledged by S. Austin August in Epist 19. ad Hibron quae iam Ecclesiae vsus obtinuit Ambros comment in cap. 4. ad Ephes Bellar. de clericis l. 4. cap. 4. For although according to the termes of honour vvhich now the vse of the church hath obtained a Bishop vvhich is greater then the Presbiterie neuerthelesse Austin is in many things lesse then Hierom Note those vvords vvhich now the custom of the church hath obtained he saith not vvhich is giuen in the nevv TestameÌ„t Ambrose saith that of old the antienter Presbiters vvere called bishops that the eldest dying the next might succeede him but because the following presbiters began to be found vnworthy to hold the primacie the reason vvas changed vvisdome foreseeing that not order but merrit should make a bishop he vvas ordained by the choice of manie preists VVhence vvee see that the litle primacie authoritie the bishop had in his time gained vvas not obtained all at a time but by degrees vvherin things had bene still altered Bellar. ' de clericis lib 4. cap. 14. VVich Bellarmin vvould faine denie but can not striuing to make nothing of these al other proofes vvithout daring to taske these fathers of heresie vvhich yet he boldly fastens on Caluin Caluin l. 4 Instit c. 4. Kemnitius and others for holding the same things and producing these proofes Caluin saith he speakes thus Such as to vvhome the duty of teaching vvas enioined vvere named presbiters they out of their number in diuers cities choose one to vvhom they specially gaue the title of a bishop least out of equalitie as it is vvont to be discords should arise yet vvas not the bishop so the superiour in dignitie and honour that he should haue lordship ouer his collegues but looke vvhat priueleidges a Consull hath in the Senate to make report of the buisnesses that by aduising warning perswading he may preceede others gouern the vvhole action by his authoritie and put in execution that vvhich is determined by common consent the same office had the bishop in the companie of the presbiters and that this verie thing vvas brought in for the necessitie of the time by humaine consent the ancient fathers themselues confesse it ye haue heard their testimonie Against this Bellarmin for lack of better proofes alleadgeth the Acts of the Councell of Trent Vbi supra vvherein the bishops vvere Iudges in their ovvne cause as they had euer beene since the Councell of Nice In Trent it vvas alleadged that the Augustin confession put noe difference betweene a bishop Histor of the Counc of Trent pag. 606. and a preist but by humaine constitution and affirmed the superioritie of bishops vvas first by custome and after by Ecclesiasticall constitution VVhich those Trent fathers vvould faine haue disproued but could not For though in the age after the Apostles custome had brought in a kinde of diocessan bishops to preside in Synods yet in other respects they vvere reckoned among other presbiters Euseb Hist Ecclesiast lib. 5. c. 22.23.24 till about the yeere 195. vvhen Victor presbiter or bishop of Rome tooke on him to excommunicate the churches of Asia about the feast of Easter and for it as Eusebius shevveth vvas reproued by sundrie bishops among the rest by Ireneus in an Epistle to Victor The Preists saith he which before Soter presided in that church vvhich you novv gouerne namely Anicetus Pius Higinus Telesphorus and Xistus neither obserued that day themselues nor suffered others to obserue it yet they kept peace with others that did vvhere note he calleth them not bishops but Preists * or presbiters notvvithstanding the eminencie of that church and the custome of presiding among other presbiters as a kinde of diocessan because a presbiter vvas a bishop Againe But the preist vvhich vvere before you sent vnto them c. So fared it betweene Policarpus and Anicetus the priest that is the bishop of Rome It is true that after this proud and rash act of Victor the bishop of Rome grevv greater the name of a bishop came to be more restrained to those that liued in greate cities and presided in Synods as also by that act of Steuen bishop of Rome vvho attempted â—o restore Basilides Martialis tvvo bishops of Spaine about the yeere 250. And as Monsieur du Plesses obserueth * Myster of Iniquit in the councell held at Rome vnder Syluester an 324. the Preists stood behind the place vvhere the bishops sate And in the concell of Nice held the yere after Concil Nicen. 1. can 6.7 the 6. canon is read in these words let the ancient customes be obserued vvhich are in Egipt Lybia Pentapolis so that the bishop vvhich is in Alexandria haue authoritie ouer all these because such also is the manner or custome of the bishop of Rome VVhich is but a vveake authority for prouincial bishops seeing the canon confesseth that it had beene only a thing of custom vvheras if it had bene an Apostolick institution the concell vvould rather haue alledged that Mounsieur du * Vbi supra Plesses proues that many of the Ancient call it a custome Other things aduanced this dignity the vvrath of God for it Cyprian l. de lapsis Euseb lib. 8. cap. 1. Cyprian yealdeth this reason of the persecution of Decius because euerie man slept in the coueteous desires of his owne heart VVhich he shevveth in the clergie Eusebius giues a like reason of the succeeding persecutioÌ„ of Dioclesian There vvas saith he amongst vs nought els but cursed speakings continuall iarres of prelates falling out vvith Prelates congregations vvith congregations
They also vvhich seemed to be pastors casting of this law and rule of pietie kindled contentions betweene themselues seeking only to increase debates threats iealousies heart burnings and reuenge vvith an immoderate desire to command and sway as in a Tyrannie It is easie to conceiue that vvhen peace and plentie came in all things vvould vvaxe vvorse Constantine to bring his people to Christianitie Anno 330. Damasus Anastas in vita Sylvest as he pulled dovvne Idolatrie so he applied the reuenues of their Temples to the maintenance of the Christian churches and besides gaue them other great gifts his greatest Princes beeing conuerted did the like as appeares in the life of Syluest and by Cedranus his Historie S. Hierom complaineth of Preists that vvrunge rewards from ladies Cedrenus pag. 243. Hieron ad Eustich Epist 22. Ad Nepotian 2. In God Theodos and from others Others there are vvho spend theire vvhole times in learntng the names houses and qualities of these ladies Ovid in another place There be Clerks vvhich possesse more vnder poore Christ then erst they did vnder the rich diuell This contagion spread so far that the Imperours Valentinian Valens Gratian made lavves against it prohibiting Clergie men to set foote vvithin the doores of vvidowes or Orphans to receiuee gifts by Testament c. VVith plentie came in corruption in life and religion Baronius confesseth that men at that time hallovved heathenish rites ceremonies BaroÌ„ To 1. art 44. art 88. c. To. 3. art 324. art 78. 79. by bringing them into christian churches That Constantine ordained That the bishops of the Christian lavve should thence forvvard haue the same priueleidges vvhich the idolatrous preists had enioied That the Pagan preists had a chiefe among them Rex Sacrificulus and their soueraigne Pontife arbitrator of all questions among them And vvho saith he can thinke that Constantine vvould long endure that these should exceed the Christians in pompe and glory then he proues the Pope and Cardinals to haue the like glory in riding clothing salutations and crovvning VVhich is to shevv the Pope in habit of a pagan Thus vvhile diocessan Bishops vvere ordained to vvithstand dinisions on the contrarie they vvere increased therby as appeares by the reasons Cyprian Eusebius giue of the persecutions others about the feast of Easter appeales pride errours in such as was Paulus Semosateneus Arrius Nestorius others by whose great names Fuseb de vit Constant lib. 1. c. 37. 38. grosse errours were receiued propagated CoÌ„stantine by reason of suÌ„dry dissentions which he saw daily to arise betwene bishops assembled Synods Novv to see more exactly hovv from so small beginnings bishops came to the greate power they haue Hist of the coure of Trent pag. 226. vvee may sinde it proued in the historie of the councell of Trent That at first the churches were gouerned by the common councell of the presbitery and how after to withstand diuisions the monarchicall gouernment was instituted giuing superintendency to the bishop The neighbour bishops whose churches because they were vnder one prouince had commerce did gouerne themselues also by Synods and to make the gouernment more easy attributing much to the Bishop of the principall citie they made him as it were head of that body and so the Bishop of the citie where the Ruler did reside gained a certaine superiority by custome These prefectures were the Imperiall citie of Rome the prefecture of Alexandria which gouerned Egypt Libia and Pentapolis of Antioch for Syria and other Prouinces of the East This gouernment brought in apâ—â—â—ued by custom only was established by the first councell of Nice The Pope had no other ground of his greatnes saue this and the translation of the seate of the Empire from Rome to Constantinople till about the yeere 607. vvhen he obtained of Phocas that murdered his master to be called vniuersall Bishop vvhich title vvas a litle before proued to be Antichristian by his Predecessor Gregorie 1. The inundation of the Gothes and Vandals had eclipsed his glorie Guiciard and so did the Fxarchs of Rauenna till the Lombards hauing gotten that Exarchat long oppressed all Italie Pipin chased them avvay and gaue this part to the Bishop church of Rome vvhich vvas confirmed by his Sonne Charles that vtterlie rooted the Lombards out and vvas by the Pope crovvned Emperour yet the Popes vvere subiect to him till his posteritie grovving vveake seuen Electors vvere ordained and the Imperiall povver being translated to the Germans and noe longer hereditarie vvas much diminished and that of the Popes thereby increased espetially after they obtained of the Emperour Henry the second that the Cardinals only should choose the Pope and then the Cardinals also vvaxed great If this shevv not hovv bishops but rather hovv the Pope grevv greate it is supplied by another discourse in the Historie of the councell of Trent vvhere it being considered in vvhat cases Christ saith Mat. 18.17 Tell the church and vvhat povver is giuen to a congregation in that place to the Corinthians vve may see hovv things vvere carried after diocessan Bishops vvere thus ordained 1. Cor. 5.4 The iudgment of the church as is necessary in euery multitude was fiâ— Histor of the concell of Trent pag. 330. to pag. 335. hat it should be conducted by one who should preside and guide the action This care due to the most principall and worthy person was alwaies committed to the Bishop And where the churches were many the propositions and deliberations were made by the Bishop first in the colledge of Preists and Deacons which they called the Presbiterie and there were ripened to receiue afterward the last resolution in the generall congregation of the church This forme was still on foote in the yeere 250. is plainly seene by the Epistles of Cyprian who in matter concerning those who did eate of meates offered to Idols and subseribe to the Religion of the Gentiles writeth to the Presbiterie that he doth not thinke to do any thing without their counsells consent of the people and writeth to the people that at his retourne he will examine the causes and merits thereof in their presence and vnder their iudgment and he wrote to those Preists who of their owne braine had reconciled some that they should giue an account to the people I must here referre you to the Historie it selfe vvhich sheweth hovv this gouernment had bene defended against the Canonists only recite som things to shevv hovv it decaied hovv in the ruine thereof that of the Bishops increased vvherein if I striue to much too abridge things coÌ„sult the with place it selfe for better satisfaction The goodnesse and Charitie of the Bishops I dem vbi supra made their opinion for the most part to be followed by title and litle was cause that the churches charity waxing cold not regarding the charge laide vpon them by Christ
gouernment shall be vpon his shoulders He shall smite the earth vvith the rod of of his mouth And so they are subordinate Shepheards and Bishops to feed the flock to keepe and reduce the sheepe vnto the obedience of the chiefe Shepheard Bishop of theire soules 1. Pet. 2.25 chap. 5.4 vvhich is Christ In regard vvhereof the vveapons of theire vvarfare are not carnall but mightie through God to the pulling downe of strong holds 2. Cor. 10.4 casting downe imaginations and euerie high thought that exalteth it selfe against the knowledge of God and bringing into captiuitie euery thought to the obedience of Christ The greatest question is aboute the dignitie iurisdiction povver and authoritie of these Officers and especially of the office of a Bishop vvhether by Gods Testament and ordinance it be to superintend ouer other Pastors and Elders in a diocesse or Prouince or as others affirme Pastoral ouer one flocke and congregation vvherein he is an Elder and vvith other Elders an ouerseer of the same In vvhich controuersie men that are not vvillingly ignorant or vvilfully obstinate and blind may receiue full satisfaction by the cleere testimonies of Scripture and consent of the Fathers shevving vs the old and good vvay that all should seeke follow VVhereas he that commeth vvith a scoffing or preuidicate censure speaking euill of the things he knowes not Iude 10. Pro. 3.22 Pro. 14.6 Psa 25.14 or in frowardnes will not know can not so easily discerne the Truth Ascorner seeketh vvisdome and findeth it not but knowledge is easy to him that vvill vnderstand The secret of the lord is vvith them that feare him and he vvill shew them his couenant VVhen Paul the Apostle of the Gentiles had first preached the Gospell in diuers of their cities he Barnabas retourned againe to Lystra to Iconium and Antioch Act. 13. chap. 14.21.22.23 to confirme the soules of the Disciples exhort them to continue in the faith then it is said expresly They ordained them Elders in euerie church by election The vvord in the Greeke is Presbuterois Presbyters or Elders Of it comes the Latin vvord Presbyter vvhich signifies an Elder and vvhich as all confesse in the primatiue ages of the church was giuen if not to som others yet at least to euerie ordinarie Pastor of euerie congregatioÌ„ in regard that he vvatched ouer the flock to keepe them sound in the saith and holy in life and manners In place of those that men call parsons or Curates of seuerall Parishes there vvere then presbiters of seuerall congregations Nicod Dictionar French and Latin Our vvord preist seemes to come from the French vvord Prestre a preist vvhich as Nicod obserueth properlie signifies an Elder or presbiter though after the masse vvas vnderstood to be a Sacrifice offered by the hand of presbiters the name prestre or preist remained but vvas also corruptly applied to a Sacrificer or Masse preist in time vvas only taken in that sense both in France and elsvvhere VVherein vve may ansvvere vvith our Sauiour from the beginning it vvas not so but a Preist that was a Presbiter or Elder therfore throughout the vvhole booke of God vvhere there is any speech of those orders of Aarons Sons that vvaited at the Altar the french Protestants do not in their Bibles translate it preist but Sacrificer blame vs that vvee do not the like to distinguish them all masse mongers from the presbiters or priests ordained in the nevv Testament Indeede Reuel 1. Christ is sâ—â—de to make vs kings Hiereis Sacrificers vvhere you haue the same vvord that in the Septuagint and in the Gospell is put for the Ievvish Sacricificers but this is by Iohn mysticallie applied to all true Christians and is not here Presbuterois Presbiters but a vvord far different and therefore can not be vnderstood of the office and ministrie of the Presbyters ordained by the Apostles In the nevv Testament mention is oft made of these Presbyters or Elders Act. 15.2.4.6 Paul Barnabas and others vvere sent to Ierusalem vnto the Apostles and Elders vvhen they came thither vers 22. They vvere receiued of the church and of the Apostles and Elders And the Apostles and Elders came together Act. 16.4 to consider of this matter Then it pleased the Apostles and Elders vvith the vvhole church And vvrote letters The Apostles chap. 10.17.18 c. and Elders and brethren send greeting They deliuered them the decrees that vvere ordained of the Apostles and Elders From Miletus he sent to Ephesus called the Elders of the church and said vnto them ye know from the first daie that I came into Asia c. vers 28. Take heede therefore vnto your selues and to all the flock ouer vvhich the holy Ghost hath made you Bishops to feede the church of God The new translation reads it Ouerseers but the vvord is Episcopus Bishops the same that is vsed 1. Tim. 3. A Bishop must be blamelesse c. Indeede both there and here it may be translated a Bishop or an Ouerseer For in the original as a Presbiter is an Elder so a Bishop is an Ouerseer But marke he saith to the Presbyters Take heede to all the flock ouer vvhich the holy Ghost hath made you Bishops to feede c. VVhence it is infalliblie plaine 1. That the Presbiterall gouernment is the expresse ordinance of the holy Ghost Ioh. 16. vvho changeth not and of vvhome Christ saith He shall not speake of himselfe for he shall take of mine shew vnto you Heb. 13. Novv Christ is yesterdaie and to daie and the same also for euer This ordinance is therefore vnalterable 2. That Elders by Christs ordinance are or ought to be ouer euery congregation Take heede to all the flock ouer vvhich the holy Ghost hath made you Bishops Act 14 23 So Paul and Barnabas ordained them Elders in euerie church by election Paul saith to Titus I left thee in Creete to set in order the things that are vvanting Tit. 1.5 c. ordaine Elders in euerie citie as I had appointed thee For a vvhole prouince or diocesse is to greate a flock for one man he can not take heede to all the flock as the Elders of one church may 3. That their office is to feede the flock church of God vvhich one man can not doe in a vvhole Diocesse vvhen they haue occasion to binde or loose to reproue correct or comfort to excommunicate or restore that must also be by the vvord for it is he that in iust causes giues them authority themselues are not Lords of Gods heritage as S Peter saith 1. Pet. 5.3 to doe it at their ovvne pleasure by their ovvne rules and traditions but * 1. Cor. 5.4 vvith the power of Christ. For he smites the earth vvith the rod of his mouth 4. That the holy Ghost hath made the Presbiters Bishops ouer the flock For the vvords are
peremptorie Take heede to your selues to all the flock ouer vvhich the holy Ghost hath made you Bishops there vvere diuers Elders of the church of phesus the places that bordered neer it as of that of Philippi or Ierusalem act 21.18 to them all Paul saith The holy Ghost hath made you bishops to feede the church So Phil. 1. To all the saints vvhich are at Philippi vvith the Bishops Deacons that is vvith the Elders presbiters Phil. 1.1 and deacons for ye see the presbiters are bishops or othervvise you must graunt that there vvere more bishops then one in 〈◊〉 citie therefore Theodore vvell vnderstands it of the presbiters vvhich Bellarmine obseruing can not denie Bellar. de Clericis l 4 c. 14. Tit. 1.5.6.7 but that here also presbiters are called Bishops VVhich is yet more cleere by that to Titus I left thee in Creete that thou shouldest â—â—daine presbiters in euerie citie if any be blamelesse the husband of one vvife haueing faithfull children not accused of riot â—r vnrulie for a bishop that is the Presbiter before mentioned must be blamelesse c. Vbi supra All vvhich places are so cleare that Bellarmine confesseth that in them all the presbiters are called Bishops consequently that the Trent fathers cried vvho vvould proue that Diocessan Bishops are instituted by Christ and superiour to Presbyters iure diuino Histor of the councel of Trent pag. 597. 598. english because Paul saith Take heede to all the flock ouer vvhich the holy Ghost hath made you Bishops vvhich by his ovvne confession is spoken to Presbyters therefore he ansvvers to all the three places verrie poorely that in those daies these names Bishop Presbyter vvere common to all preists as if Phil. 1. vvith the Bishops and deacons the sense must be thus VVith the Preists theire ministers the deacons vvhich is a vveake shift of a Iesuit and so learned a Cardinal For did the Apostle call the presbyters Bishops in all these three places say the holy Ghost had made them Bishops ouer the flocke yet are they not so And if it vvere then a name so common to all preists why should it novv be thus restrained to one in a countie or prouince and he accounted an heretick that vvith the holy Ghost affirmeth the presbiters to be Bishops as in these three places And therefore out of all doubt 1. Tim. 3. vvhen Paul saith If any man desire the office of a Bishop he desireth a good vvorke c. That is the office of a presbiter or Elder vvho is a Bishop that so he addeth These things vvrite I unto thee that thou mightest know how thou a Bishop or presbiter oughtest to behaue thy selfe Othervvise he vvould not haue passed as he doth from the duty of a Bishop to the duty of a deacon but rather first from the duty of a Bishop to the duty of a presbiter or pastor that is if it had not beene one and the fame office somtime set forth vnder the name of an Elder or presbiter Tit. 1.5.6.7 somtime of a Bishop as in that to Titus before alleadged vvhich shevves vs that vvhen it is said of Titus that he vvas ordained the first Bishop of the Cretians that must needes be the first presbiter Chrisost in 1. Tim. 3. so Timothie 2. Tim. in fin vvhich in effect is acknovvledged by Chrysos in his Comentarie on that chapter to Timothie vvho though he liued in a time vvhen canons custom and cloaked ambition had made a litle difference saith There is almost no difference betweene a Bishop and a presbyter seeing the care of the church is also graunted to the presbyters surely by giuing of orders only they are their superiours herein they only seeme to be more then the presbiters Bellarmin acknovvledgeth that Primasius Bellar. de clerìcis l. 4. c. 14. Theophilact and Oecumenius in their Comentaries vpon the same place do teach the same thing almost in the same vvords VVherin they come but litle short of that vvhich is more plainly affirmed by Hierom on the first of Titus Hieron in Tit. 1. A presbiter and a Bishop is one and the same thing and before by the instinct of the deuil factions vvere made in religion and it vvas said among the people I am of Paul I of Apollo I of Cephas the churches vvere gouerned by the common consent of the presbiters but after euery one thought those which he had baptised to be his not Christs it vvas ordained in all the vvorld that one chosen from among the presbiters should be set ouer the rest unto vvhome all the care of the church should pertaine and the seedes of Sbhismes should be taken away And a litle lovver As therfore presbiters know themselues to be subiect by the custome of the church to him that is set ouer them so let the Bishops know it is rather by the custom of the church then by any disposition of the diuine truth that they are greater then the presbiters and that the church ought to be gouerned in commune Vbi supra Bellarmin doth not only cite these places thus but confesseth farther that HieroÌ„ hath the like things in his 85. Epistle to Euagrius Yet he vvould faine haue it thought that HieroÌ„ held a Bishop to be greater then a presbiter iure diuino contenting himselfe for lack of a better to take that for a sufficient proofe vvhere he saith to Euagrius vvhat doth the Bishop giueing of orders excepted vvhich the presbiter may not also doe vvhereas indeede this doth rather proue the contrarie namely that presbiters had decisiue voices in councels might excommunicate or doe any thing else in their flocks belonging to gouernment saue the giuing of orders this beeing all the difference of povver and authority the Bishops had them gained VVherein you must needes vnderstand him as before that it is rather by the custome of the church then any disposition of the diuine truth that they vvere herein greater then the Elders the same or the like humain ordinance custom vvhich restrained the title of a Bishop to one in a Diocesse vvhich before vvas common to all presbiters gaue him also the sole povver of giuing of orders vvhich before belonged to presbiters in common 1. Tim. 4.14 as is cleere by that Neglect not the gift that is in thee vvhich vvas giuen thee by prophesie vvith the laying on of the hands of the presbiterie Kemnitius therefore doth vvell obserue here Vbi supra that a Bishop may be ordained by Presbiters therefore there is no difference betweene a Bishop and a presbiter Bellarmin hereat offended ansvvers vvith the Greekes verie vveakely By the presbiterall name they vnderstood the quire or companie of the presbiters that iâ— of the Bishops vvhich laide their hands on the new bishop They that laied their hands on him vvere presbiters but that is say Bellarmin and others Bishops So saith
no others that he set to gouerne besides the Apostles and Euangelist but presbyters Hath God then set them for Gouernours in the church vvill men presume to supplant them and set others Dare men say that the gouernment by diocessan Bishops ordained by men is better then this of Elders ordained by God To vvhome indeede God must needes giue a better blessing as beeing his ovvne ordinance he hath set them in the church Neither doth that proue the contrarie because in Amsterdam and som other cities of Holland there are many Religions for neither Bishops if they had such nor Elders can hinder it if the pollicie suffer them But looke into the reformed churches there in France and elsvvhere and you shall finde them better gouerned and much better vvould be if som burgers to enritch themselues and get places of authority or a league trade vvith Spaine did not vvaxe negligent in religion and for such ends turne Arminians and nevvters If an Apostle vvere novv liuing and should vvrite an Epistle to Mr. Moulin pastor and Elder in Sedan Against an Elder receiue not an accusation vnder two or there vvitnesses that vvould not argue that he vvere ouer other Pastors and Elders in the prouince nor as a Lord in his ovvne congregation but rather vvhat vvere his duty yea the duty of all Elders assembled in such a case The Apostle recounting all the officers and Gouernours of the church Ephes 4. saith He gaue some Apostles and some Prophets and some Pastors and Teachers vvhere he neither names Bishops nor Elders much lesse both as tvvo distinct callings because the Pastor by his place vvas a Presbiter and so a Bishop properlie the deacons had the care of the Almes In such a church as that of Ephesus or Philippi there vvere diuers vvho vvere teachers and helpers but one vvho vvas somevvhat more properlie the Pastor and so the bishop of that flock therefore though the charge go to all the Elders Take beede to your selues Reuel 2. and to all the flocke c yet this is somvvhat more especiallie applied to him that is pastor and so the first Elder or bishop Vnto the Angel of the church of Ephesus vvrite that is to the pastor Euen as in the church of Paris at this day vvhich is one congregation of about six thousand communicants there are three preachers vvho are all Elders to feede the flock yet one of them is reckoned the pastor the other tvvo helpers the like in Diepe and diuers other cities vvhere they liue amoÌ„g persecuting Papists as the old Christians did among the heathen hauing but one congregation or flock in a citie In some lesser cities or vvhere there are fevver protestants there is only a pastor vvith lay Elders And thus out of all doubt Act. 14. Tit. 1.5 it vvas in the primatiue church till after the death of the Apostles vvho ordained Elders in euerie church and citie vvhere one vvas the pastor yet in matter of gouernment all the Elders of a church ruled together by commoÌ„ consent euen in Ierusalem things were not done vvithout the Elders but the decrees vvent out in all their names VVhen Paul vvent last to Ierusalem there vvere diuers vvith him But saith Luke Act. 21.18 Paul vvent in vvith vs to Iames all the Elders vvere present The Apostle would doe nothing vvithout them Therefore Paul saith 1. Tim. 5.17 Let the Elders that rule vvell be counted vvorthy of double honour espectiallie they vvho labour in the vvord doctrine VVhence also som collect that there vvere som Elders that vvere not ministers but lay-men of the more vnderstaÌ„ding best gouerned sort Hovvsoeuer ye see they had all share in the gouernment vvere it vvith Timothie Titus or vvhosoeuer For these vvere not greater then the Apostles vvhich vvas the highest calling in the church yet euen vvith them in Ierusalem there vvere Elders as it vvere in ioynt commission for matter of gouernment they themselues tooke on them this office disdained not to be reckoned vvith other presbiters Peter saith 1. Pet. 5.1 The * or Elders 2. Ioh. presbiters vvhich are among you I exhort vvho am also Sumpresbuteros a fellovv presbiter and Iohn that might haue said The Apostle chooseth rather to say The Elder to the elect ladie The * or Elder Presbiter to the vvelbeloued Gaius None of the Apostles are in the nevv Testament called bishops but presbiters because a presbiter vvas a bishop then a name of no lesse honour but rather of greater beeing Indeed one and the same pastorall office in euerie congregation it vvas the highest in the church next the Apostles Euangelists and pastors the Elders beeing the officers vvhich God had appointed to gouern his church to the vvorlds end The holy Ghost saith not Bishops least aftervvard it should haue bene takeÌ„ for diocessan Bishops but Elders Neither doth Iohn set the Pope or any Bishop but Christ among them as their only head for chap. 5. Christ standeth in the midst of the throne and in the midst of the Elders to shevv they truly belong to his gouernment as diocessan Bishops so that of Antichrist It was stoutly defended in the councell of Trent Histor of the concell of Trent pag. 599. 613. Rom. 13.1 that they held of the Pope not immediately of God True not so rightly as the Elders doe nor yet in a manner so litle digressing as the first diocessan Bishops did as vve shall further see in the sequel therfore they are not so truly of Gods Kingdome but rather of a contrarie For indeede There is no power but of God The powers that be are ordained of God VVhence it follovves that all povvers much more those that gouerne the church must be ordained of God or else they be not lavvfull Novv this can not be said of the Pope and Cardinals nor of Diocessan Bishops for these vvere not ordained of God but of men Ergo c. They are indeede against Elders vvhich are the povvers ordained of God VVhosoeuer therefore resisteth these powers resisteth the ordinance of God One of the Elders speakes to Iohn concerning the Martirs Reuel 7. that suffered in the ten persecutions signified by those troubles that follovved the opening of the seauen seales then past gone And though vvhilst the vvoman the true Church fled and remained in the vvildernes from Antichristian titannie and superstition their gouernment must needes be hid and persecured vvith her yet vvhen the Gospell is restored the Temple of God opened diuers kingdoms of this vvorld became the kingdoms of our Lord Reuel 11. and of his Christ the Elders vvorship giue thanks as also vvhen Babilon is destroied herevpon it is said The Lord God omnipotent reighneth that is in his vvord and ordinances â—hap 194.5.6 Elders are then restored vvhereas before she her traditions hierarchie gouerned churches For in that they are euer thus about the
did leaue the care to the Bishop and ambition a wittie passion which doth insinuate it selfe in shew of vertue caused it to be readily embraced But the principall cause of the change was the ceasing of the persecutions For then the Bishops did erect as it were a tribunall which was much frequented because as temporall commodities so suits did increase The iudgment though distering from the former in forme to determine all by the opinion of the church was yet of the same sinceritie Which Constantine obseruing made a law that there should lie no appeale from the sentences of Bishops and if in a cause depending before a secular tribunall either of the parties shall demand Episcopall iudgment the cause shal be remitted to him Here the tribunall of the Bishop began to be a common pleading place The Emperour Valence enlarging it in the yeere 365. gaue the Bishops the care ouer all the prizes of vindible things Which troubled Austin and other good Bishops Afterwards some Bishops beginning to abuse the power giuen them by Constantine that law was 70. yeeres after reuoked by Arcadius and an ordination made that they should iudge causes of religion and not ciuill except both parties did consent and declared that they should not be thought to haue a court Which law beeing not much obserued in Rome in regard of the greate power of the Bishop Valentinian being then in the citie an 452. did renew it and made it to be put in execution But a litle after part of the power taken away was restored by the following Princes So that Iustinian established vnto them a court and audience the causes of Religion Ecclesiasticall faults of the clergie diuers voluntarie surisdictions ouer the laietie By these degrees they got domination The Empire being diuided and kingdoms erected Idem pag. 332. the Bishops for the most part were made councellors of the Prince which by mixture of spirituall and temporall charges caused their iurisdiction to increase exceedingly Before 200. yeeres were past they pretended absolutely all iudicature criminall and ciuill ouer the Clergie and in some things ouer the laietie After the yeere 1050. All the causes of the Clergie beeing appropriated to the Bishops and verie many of the laiesie vnder the title of spiritualitie and almost all the rest vnder the name of a mixed iudicature and placing themselues aboue the secular Magistrates vpon pretence of iustice denied they came to say that the Bishop had that power to iudge not by graunt or conniuence of Princes or by the will of the people or by custome but that it was essentiall to the Episcopall dignitie and giuen it by Christ And though the lawes of the Emperours remaine in the Codes of Theodosius and Iustinian in the capitulars of Charles the greate and Lewis the debonaire and others of later Princes which all shew when by whome this power was graunted and all Histories Ecclesiasticall and prophane agree in the same yet so notorious a truth hath bene ouercome by a contrary affirmation only without any proofe Pag. 334. In the councell of Trent a defect was considered that the charitie of the superiours was turned into domination and that thence grew appeale vpon appeale Iohannes Groperus who assisted there as a diuine and a lawier spake honourably of appeales said that while the heare of faith remained in the breasts of Christians Appeales were not heard of But charitie in the Iudges waxing cold and place being giuen to passion they entred into the church for the same reasons which brought them into the secular courts that is for the ease of the oppressed And as the first iudicatures belonged not to the bishop only but to him with the councell of his Preists so the Appeale was not diuolued to one man but vnto another congregation But the Bishops taking away the Synods did institute courts and officers like the seculars Neither did the mischiefe stop there but passed to greater abuses then in the secular court Which he shewes in that Appeale was made from Appeale till it came to the Pope and somtime by a leap to him without more a doe Iohn Baptista Castellus vvas made to salue vp these soares by a cunning oration Pag. 335. and 336. in the next congregation And so to restore Synodall iudicatures was reiected almost by all because it did diminish the Episcopall was too popular For proceeding against the persons of the Bishops no man desiring to facilitate the iudicature against himselfe the restoring of it to parochiall Synods vnto which it did formerly belong was not spoken of English Bishops in like wisdome suppresse all bookes Preachers that speake of the right of Elders or of such Synods and the like things that neither theu nor their owne vsurpations may be knowne By all vvhich vvee may see that it is a vveake defence for the authoritie of Bishops against the Eldership to alleadge the grant of Emperours Kings or as Bellarmin doth the Acts of any councell much lesse that of Trent Gods ordinance vvord should euer be of more force esteeme vvith true Christians then any of this kinde vvhatsoeuer By these affirmations of this impartiall Author vvhome they can not call a Brovvnist or a Puritan vvee may see that they in the church of England vvho vnderstand this clause Tell the church as if it vvere meant tell the Bishops or their Officials doe not only vvilfully vnderstand it as Christ neuer meant it of such as he neuer ordained but euen contrarie to the interpretation vnderstanding and practise of the primitiue church till the time of Cyprian that is for 250. yeers after Christ VVhich shevves the Gouernment of Diocessan Bishops their Officials Chancellors Courts and proceedings to be popish nouell intollerable such as make the ordinance of God of none effect take things vpon them vvhich belong not to them If a man dvvelling in the Isle of Ieresey in the Isle of vvight or in Surrey find himselfe much vvronged molested by a neighbour vvould Tell the church should he run to the Bishop of the Diocesse or to his Chancelour at VVinchester and not rather to the flock and the Elders thereof vvhereof he and the offendour are members vvhich flock should haue the povver the church of Corinth had It is remarkeable that vvhen Christ vvould reproue the seuen churches for certaine corruptions crept into them he doth not say vvrite and send it to the chiefe officers of the church to the Archbishops bishops or their officials Chancelours c. For there vvere no such officers then but vvrite and send it vnto the seuen churches Reu. 1.11 that is to the vvhole flock in Ephesus so to that in Smyrna and so in all the rest So it is still added Let him that hath an eare chap. 2.7 heare vvhat the Spirit saith to the churches Euerie man that vvas a member of the church must heare it and take care to redresse it Indeed