basons 2. Chron. 4.8 It is expressed that there were an hundred basons CHAP. VIII Vers 1. THen Solomon assembled the Elders of Israel c. To wit to attend upon the ark when it was removed out of the City of David which is Zion where it had been ever since David brought it thither 2 Sam. 6.12 of which see the note there unto the Temple which Solomon had now built in mount Moriah for by this personall attendance both of Princes and people upon the ark they did acknowledge the Lord of whose presente the ark was a type to be the God and Lord of Israel and themselves his servants A great question indeed it is how it can be said here that the ark was carried out of Sion that it might be placed in the Temple seeing ordinarily in the Scripture Sion is spoken of as the place where God dwelt in his Temple amongst his people as Psal 78.68.69 where it is said that God chose the tribe of Judah the mount Zion which he loved and he built his Sanctuary like high places c. and Esa 8.18 where God is called the Lord of hosts that dwelleth in mount Zion and so in many other places But for this we must know that to speak properly and in a strict sence the Temple was not built in mount Sion but in mount Moriah 2. Chron. 3.1 therefore it is said here that the ark was carried out of the citie of David which is Zion into the Temple but because the whole citie of Jerusalem is usually called Sion and mount Sion from that mount which was a chief part of it thence it is that the Temple Gods dwelling place is so usually said to have been in Sion Vers 2. And all the men of Israel assembled themselves unto king Solomon at the feast c. That is at the time when they were from all parts of the land to assemble themselves together to keep the feast in the moneth of Ethanim which is the seventh moneth By the feast is meant as is most probably held by the most of Interpreters the feast of tabernacles which began the 15 day of the seventh moneth Levit. 23.34 and was indeed the chief feast of this moneth as being one of those three feasts whereto all the males of Israel were bound to resort yet it must needs be that the people assembled at least the heads of the tribes and the chief of the fathers seven or eight dayes before the feast of tabernacles for the feast of tabernacles was kept from the fifteenth to the end of the two and twentieth day and on the three and twentieth day Solomon dismissed the people 2. Chron. 7.10 And on the three and twentieth day of this seventh moneth he sent the people away unto their tents so that the seven dayes which he kept for the dedication of the temple whereof mention is made vers 65. of this chapter and 2. Chron. 7.9 were before the feast of tabernacles yet if they were the seven dayes immediately foregoing the feast of tabernacles which was on the fifteenth day of the moneth doubtlesse the tenth day was excepted which was the day wherein they afflicted their souls with fasting Levit 23.27 and therefore not likely to have been one of the dayes of this festivitie of the Temples dedication now whereas it may be objected that till the eight moneth the Temple was not finished chap. 6.38 And in the eleventh yeare in the moneth Bul which is the eight moneth was the house finished to this I answer that the dedication therefore was doubtlesse in the seventh moneth of the following yeare that moneth being chosen for the peoples convenience who were then to assemble themselves to keep the feast of Tabernacles and that in the interim there might be time for the drying of the walls and to make all things ready for the dedication of it Vers 3. And the priests took up the ark In 2. Chron. 5.4 it is and the Levites took up the ark but that is onely because the priests also were of the tribe of Levi. Vers 4. And they brought up the ark of the Lord and the tabernacle of the congregation c. To wit that which was made by Moses which onely was called the tabernacle of the congregation this had been hitherto in Gibeon 2. Chron. 1.3 but was now removed thence with all the holy vessels thereof and laid up in the treasuries of the Temple not onely because they had been consecrated to God but also to make sure that the Temple should now be the onely place of Gods worship Vers 5. Sacrificing sheep and oxen that could not be told nor numbred for multitude To wit when they were going in a solemn manner before the ark to remove it from the citie of David into the Temple and therefore perhaps in the same manner too that was observed by David when he removed the ark from the house of Obed Edom 2. Sam. 6.13 And it was so that when they that bare the ark of the Lord had gone six paces he sacrificed oxen and fatlings Vers 8. And they drew out the staves that the ends of the staves were seen out in the holy place c. Some conceive the meaning of this hard place is this to wit that they drew out the staves quite out of the rings of the ark thereby to signifie that the ark was now to be removed no more and so the staves being laid upon the ground in the fore part of the Sanctuary their foure ends or heads might be seen as one went out of the holy place into the most holy but out of that place they were never seen because the ark was never removed but it is hard to make this exposition agree with the words the most approved exposition therefore is this when they had set the ark in his place behind the Cherubims to wit the two great Cherubims which Solomon had made neither the ark nor the staves could be seen but then they drew out the staves eastward that so though the ark was not seen yet the end of the staves might be seen to put them in mind of the ark which was behind the wings of the Cherubims for by this means the ends of the staves were seen out in the holy place before the oracle that is in that part of the most holy place which was before the ark which was more especially called the oracle and they were not seen without that is they were not seen out of the ark they that were before the oracle in the most holy place might discern by the ends of the staves that they were in the ark as it is expressed 2. Chron. 5.9 And they drew out the staves of the ark that the ends of the staves were seen from the ark before the oracle but the staves were never seen out of the ark for that was against Gods Law Exod. 25.15 The staves shall be in the rings of the ark they shall not be taken from it
it to wit that the king of Moab having the king of Edoms eldest sonne in his power whether left with him as an hostage formerly or now taken lately in that salley which he had made upon the king of Edoms quarters he took him and sacrificed him upon the walls of the city whereupon the Edomites being enraged against the king of Israel because by his pressing the continuance of this siege so lamentable a mischief was fallen upon their king and his sonne they brake up and went in a fury away from the camp and so the siege was raised But I rather conceive it was the king of Moabs own sonne whom he sacrificed First because the king of Edom was but a vice-roy chosen and set over them by Jehoshaphat for in his time they had no king of their own 2. Chron. 21.8 and therefore he could not have a sonne that should have succeeded him in his throne Secondly because this barbarous fact would rather have enraged both the king of Edom himself and the other kings to have pressed the siege the more vehemently that they might come to be revenged on him better therefore do most of Expositours understand this of the king of Moabs sonne to wit first that finding himself in extremity of distresse he fled to this last refuge of sacrificing his own sonne and heir to his idol-gods that with so pretious a sacrifice he might prevail with them for help and secondly that this he did on the wall both to let his enemies see how resolved he was still to hold out and that they might be afraid of the event of such a sacrifice and thirdly that the great indignation against Israel here spoken of was either that the Edomites moved with this lamentable spectacle were offended with the Israelites for it and so broke up their quarters and went away or rather that after this prodigious act of blind devotion both the king of Moab and the inhabitants of the city were more bitterly enraged against the Israelites then ever and were resolved to fight it out to the last man which the Israelites perceiving and withall perhaps moved with some compassion upon that lamentable spectacle they raised the siege and went away home As for that place whereby some would prove it was the king of Edoms sonne that was slain Amos 2.1 Thus saith the Lord for three transgressions of Moab and for foure I will not turn away the punishment thereof because he burnt the bones of the king of Edom into lime that speaks of burning the king of Edom not the kings sonne how ever it may be meant of any other salvage act of cruelty in the Moabites against the king of Edom. CHAP. IIII. Vers 1. THy servant my husband is dead and thou knowest that thy servant did feare the Lord. This she adds first to cleare her husband from the suspition of wasting what he had by any evill courses secondly to move him the rather to pity her because her husband was one as Elisha knew well that did truly and unfainedly feare the Lord and indeed observable it is how respectively she speaks of her husband though he had left her in so great poverty and distresse And the creditour is come to take unto him my two sonnes to be bondmen See the notes Exod 21.2 and Levit. 25.39 Vers 2. Tell me what hast thou in thine house As if Elisha should have said come let me see what thou hast of any value in thy house that may go toward the payment of thy debts and thus whilest the prophet made shew as if he desired to know how farre she was able to discharge her husbands debts that so he might try if he could compose the difference betwixt her and the creditour he brought her to speak of the pot of oyle she had to wit that being the onely thing of any value she had for we cannot think she was so poore that she had nothing at all else left in her house intending to take that occasion to give order for that whereby she was to be miraculously supplyed Vers 4. Thou shalt shut the doore upon thee c. This was enjoyned first as an act or signe approving or testifying her faith that being left to her self hopelesse of all help and succour from man she did yet expect from the Lord that miraculous help which the prophet had promised her secondly as a circumstance implying that it was fit they should pray unto God when they undertook this work whereto privacy was required thirdly that they might not be disturbed by others when they were imployed in this businesse they had in hand but fourthly and principally for the clearer manifestation of the intended miracle that there might be no suspicion that the oyle was by any body secretly conveyed into the house to them Vers 6. She said unto her sonne Bring me yet a vessell That is to one of her sonnes for that she had two sonnes is evident vers 1. Vers 8. Elisha passed to Shunem A city in the tribe of Issachar not farre from mount Carmel Josh 19.17 18. the very same from whence Abishag was fetched to David 1 Kings 1.3 Vers 9. I perceive that this is an holy man of God Not onely a prophet but a man of eminent holinesse Vers 10. Let us make a little chamber I pray thee on the wall Not that she had not room in her house to lodge him but because she considered that the tumult of a large family might be some disturbance to the devotions study and meditations of a prophet and therefore thought it convenient to provide a place for him where he might be more retired Vers 12. Call this Shunamite And when he had called her she stood before him Vers 15. it is againe said that Elisha bad Gehazi call her so that though it be here expressed that she came and stood before Elisha yet that which follows must be conceived to have been done before her coming the order of the cariage of the businesse it seems was this Elisha sent Gehazi to call her to him and withall willed him to acquaint her with the businesse namely that in recompence of her kindnesse if she had any suit to the king or captain of the host he would be her mediatour she answering Gehazi that she dwelt among her own people and Gehazi carrying back this answer to his master he consulted with Gehazi what then might be done for her and Gehazi putting him in mind that she had no child Elisha bade him again call her Vers 13. And he said unto him Say now unto her Behold now thou hast been carefull for us c. This was the message which Elisha bade Gehazi carry her when he was first sent to call her wherein he makes a thankfull acknowledgement of her great care of them and then tenders to speak for her if she had any occasion either to the king or the captain of the host whereby it appears also that the succour which
blessed Martyr at his death the Lord look upon it and require it before that yeare was expired the Syrians invaded the land again and executed the judgements of God with great severitie for though the Syrians it seems came rather to pillage then to perform any great action for they came with a small company of men and Jehoash went out against them with a very great army yet by the providence of God this small band of Syrian rovers overthrew that great host of Judah wherewith being encouraged they went up against Jerusalem and destroyed all the Princes of the people who had drawn away their king from the worship of the true God and sent all the spoil of them to the king of Damascus and as for Jehoash they left him in sore diseases perhaps by tortures they had put him to which advantage two of his servants apprehending they made a conspiracie against him and slew him in his bed when he had reigned fourty years vers 1. to wit two and twenty years with Jehu and the rest with his sonne Jehoahaz and his grandchild Jehoash which is largely related 2. Chron. 24.18 25. Vers 21. For Jozachar the sonne of Shimeath and Jehozabad the sonne of Shomer his servants smote him and he died This Jozachar was also called Zabad 2. Chron. 24.26 where also it is expressed that Shimeah was an Ammonitesse and that Shomer there called Shimrith was a Moabitesse And these are they that conspired against him Zabad the sonne of Shimeath an Ammonitesse and Jehozabad the sonne of Shimrith a Moabitesse And they buried him with his fathers in the citie of David But not in the sepulchres of the kings 2 Chron. 24.25 CHAP. XIII Vers 1. JEhoahaz the sonne of Jehu began to reigne over Israel in Samaria and reigned seventeen years Yet two years before his death he made his sonne Joash king see vers 10 22. Vers 3. And he delivered them into the hands of Hazael king of Syria and into the hands of Ben-hadad the sonne of Hazael all their dayes That is all the time of the reigne both of Jehu the father and Jehoahaz his sonne Vers 4 And Jehoahaz besought the Lord. Namely when he was brought so low by the Syrians that he had not left him above fifty horsmen and ten chariots and ten thousand footmen as is afterward expressed vers 7. Vers 5. And the Lord gave Israel a saviour c. To wit Joash the sonne of Jehoahaz who afterward prevailed mightily against the Syrians and after that also Jeroboam his sonne chap. 14.27 so that afterward the children of Israel dwelt in their tents as beforetime that is they dwelt in their houses quietly and peaceably see the note 1 Kings 12.16 Vers 7. The king of Syria had destroyed them and had made them like the dust by threshing That is he had broken them to pieces and scattered them as corn may be with too much threshing so that scarse any where was there an army together and they were become a people of no power and no esteem Vers 8. Now the rest of the acts of Jehoahaz and all that he did and his might c That is with what courage and valour he resisted the Syrians though they still prevailed against him which is the rather noted to make it manifest that the calamities that befell the Israelites in his time were of Gods just judgement because of their sinnes rather then from any want of courage and might in their king Vers 9. And Jehoahaz slept with his fathers Having reigned seventeen years vers 1. all which time Jehoash the sonne of Ahaziah reigned in Judah Vers 10. In the thirty and seventh yeare of Joash king of Judah began Jehoash the sonne of Jehoahaz to reigne c. Jehoahaz the father of Joash began his reigne in the three and twentieth yeare of Joash king of Judah and reigned seventeen years vers 1. which must needs be till the nine and thirtieth yeare of Joash king of Judah complete and how then did his sonne begin his reigne in the thirty seventh yeare of Joash king of Judah as is here said I answer that Joash was made king his father yet living and reigned three years together with his father but reigned not alone till the last that is the fourtieth yeare of Joash king of Judah and hence it is also that Amaziah the sonne of Joash king of Judah is said to have begun his reigne in the second yeare of Joash sonne of Jehoahaz king of Israel chap. 14.1 either therefore because Jehoahaz being wearied and broken with long adversity desired to discharge himself in part of those heavie cares that lay upon him or because Elisha had perhaps foretold the victories of this his sonne of which we reade vers 14.15 c. two years before his death he made his sonne king Vers 12. And the rest of the acts of Joash and all that he did c. As namely the three great victories which he obtained against the Syrians of which Elisha foretold him vers 17 18 19. and his rescuing many cities of Israel from the Syrians vers 25. and how he prevailed against Amaziah king of Judah which is related in the following chapter Vers 13. And Joash slept with his fathers Having reigned sixteen years vers 10. to wit after his fathers death besides the three years that he reigned with his father the first yeare of his sole government Joash the sonne of Ahaziah reigned in Judah and Amaziah his sonne the other fifteen years Vers 14. Now Elisha was fallen sick of the sicknesse whereof he dyed To wit about five and fifty years at least as is generally thought after Elijah was taken up into heaven in which time Jehoshaphat Jehoram Ahaziah Athaliah and Jehoash swayed the scepter of Judah and Jehoram the sonne of Ahab Jehu Jehoahaz his sonne and Joash the sonne of Jehoahaz did successively sit in the throne of Israel yet some Expositours hold that Joash his visiting this sick prophet related in the following words was whilest his father Jehoahaz was yet living to wit that when his father had sought unto the Lord as is said before vers 4. then this his sonne Joash came both to visit the sick prophet and to enquire concerning those sad calamities that had befallen the kingdome of Israel and so when he saw him in so weak a condition wept over his face and said O my father my father the chariot of Israel and the horsemen thereof with the same words wherewith Elisha had bewailed the losse of Elijah chap. 2.12 concerning which see the note there Nor is it strange that this wicked king that would not be guided by the doctrine of Elisha should yet thus passionately bewail the sicknesse of the prophet if we consider in what a distressed condition his kingdome was at present and how great things God had done for his predecessours the kings of Israel by Elishaes means Vers 16. And Elisha put his hands upon the kings hands The
the kingdome of the ten tribes as well as those of Judah and Benjamin the advice which he took with his counsel 2. Chron. 25.17 Then Amaziah king of Judah took counsel and advise and sent to Joash the sonne of Jehoahaz the sonne of Jehu saying Come let us see one another in the face seems to imply that they debated amongst them these just grounds which he had to make warre against the king of Israel and most likely it is that these things were objected by him in this challenge that he sent but because he sent this message in an insolent manner as one that did rather desire to decide the businesse by the sword then to have it otherwise composed and to try the strength and courage of the king of Israel in a pitched battel therefore is this onely expressed that he challenged him to meet him in the field and give him battel face to face for that is the meaning of these words Come let us look one another in the face Vers 9. The thistle that was in Lebanon sent to the cedar that was in Lebanon c. Thus Joash answered Amaziah by a parable and the drift of it was to put Amaziah in mind how vain a thing it was for them that are comparatively weak and of little strength easily overborn and troden down to entertain proud and aspiring thoughts concerning themselves as if they were above the reach of danger and he makes the thistles pride in this parable to be the desiring of the cedars daughter for his sonnes wife therein to couch secretly an argument from the lesse to the greater if it were too much for the thistle to offer affinitie with the cedar much more then to make warre against the cedar which he would have Amaziah know was just his case because he looked upon Amaziah as a poore weak and contemptible king in comparison of himself though proud and quarrelsome he compares him to a thistle the basest of all shrubs though full of prickles and himself who had ten of the tribes of Israel under his command whereas the other had but two to a cedar the most noble of all trees onely he compares Amaziah to a thistle in Lebanon as well as himself to a cedar in Lebanon because Amaziah was a king as well as he again from the foolish pride in the thistle in sending such a message he implies how farre greater the pride and folly of Amaziah was in sending such a challenge to him and last of all by shewing what became of the thistle There passed by a wild beast that was in Lebanon and trode down the thistle he gives Amaziah to understand what his end would be if he persevered in his resolution to make warre against him to wit that his forces would easily crush and ruine him and indeed the miseries that would befall him are well compared to the treading down of a wild beast because warre bellum quasi bellua doth usually destroy and tread down all before it and souldiers as men void of all reason and carried on merely with fury and brutish passions are wont without all consideration in a rude and brutish manner to beat and trample down all where they come and therefore is the time of warre called a day of trouble and treading down Isa 22.5 Vers 11. But Amaziah would not heare To wit because God would have him punished for his idolatry whereunto he was then newly fallen upon his victory against the Edomites 2. Chron. 25.20 But Amaziah would not heare for it came of God that he might deliver them into the hand of their enemies because they sought after the Gods of Edom. Therefore Jehoash king of Israel went up c. That is he stay not till the enemie brake in and spoiled his countrey but entred the kingdome of Judah and so encountred with him in Beth-shemesh which belonged to Judah which is added because there was another Beth-shemesh in the tribe of Naphtali Josh 19.38 Vers 13. And Jehoash king of Israel took Amaziah c. And thus in this Amaziah the sonne of Joash God did yet further revenge the death of Zachariah the sonne of Jehoiada who was most inhumanely and ungratefully murthered in his fathers dayes according to that which he said at his death the Lord look upon it and require it and withall Amaziah himself was severely punished for his Apostacy to idolatry upon his victory over the Edomites And brake down the wall of Jerusalem from the gate of Ephraim unto the corner gate foure hundred cubits Some conceive that this part of the wall was broken down that the inhabitants might be rendred hereby the more fearfull to attempt any thing against the kingdome of Israel the strength of the citie being so farre impaired but such a breach that might be so easily made up again could be no great curb to them others say that it was done at Joash his command that at that breach he might enter the citie in his chariot carrying the king before him as in triumph but why should foure hundred cubits of the wall be beaten down that he might enter with his chariot more probable therefore it is that the citie at first standing out against him he battered down that part of the wall by the north gate which was towards Ephraim and therefore called the gate of Ephraim and so took the citie by force Vers 14. And he took all the gold and silver c. and hostages and returned to Samaria These hostages he took for assurance of their performing the conditions he had imposed upon them but having Jerusalem in possession and their king his prisoner why did he not seize upon the kingdome and joyn the twelve tribes again under his government I answer that which lately had befallen Athaliah shewed plainly how constantly affected the people stood to the house of David neither could he tell what forces the people abroad in the countrey might presently raise against him no marvell therefore though he chose rather to go away with a certain spoil then to hazard all by aiming at the crown of Judah upon such weak and uncertain terms Vers 16. And Jehoash slept with his fathers See the note chap. 13.13 It seems he out-lived not long that sacrilegious act of his in robbing the Temple of Jerusalem Vers 17. And Amaziah the sonne of Joash king of Judah lived after the death of Jehoash sonne of Jehoahaz king of Israel fifteen years To wit un-unto the fifteenth yeare of Jeroboam the sonne of Joash king of Israel See the note verse 2. Vers 19. Now they made a conspiracy against him in Jerusalem c. Ascribing all the miseries that had befallen their citie and kingdome to him who had provoked the king of Israel to invade their land whereupon Jerusalem was taken and pillaged c. they were enraged against him and so conspired together to take away his life which though he discovered and fled to Lachish yet they pursued him thither and there
good part of the wall adjoyning even to the tower of Meah they sanctified it unto the tower of Hananeel where by the tower of Meah is meant a tower not farre from the sheep-gate so called as is thought because it had an hundred pinacles or was an hundred cubits high or some such like reason for Meah signifies an hundred and by the tower of Hananeel a tower further northward mentioned again Zach. 14.10 Vers 3. But the fish gate did the sonnes of Hassenaah build This was doubtlesse on the northwest of Jerusalem in the citie of David towards the sea as appears also by that which is said of Manasseh 2. Chron. 33.14 He built a wall without the citie of David on the west side of Gihon in the valley even to the entring in of the fish gate c. It was called the fish gate because they brought in their fish from the sea coasts of Tyre and Sydon at that gate according to that chap. 13.16 There dwelt men of Tyre therein which also brought fish c. and had happely their market for the selling of their fish not farre from it it is mentioned again Zeph. 1.10 There shall be the noise of a cry from the fish gate Vers 5. And next unto them the Tekoites repaired c. That is some of the inhabitants of Tekoa for other of them also repaired in another place as it is expressed afterward vers 27. but yet it was onely the common people amongst them that did what was done for concerning their nobles there is a clause of exception added but the nobles put not their necks to the work of the Lord that is the nobles would not do any service herein to their Lord the God of Israel because their arrogancie in regard of their greatnesse was the cause of their refusing their help in this work as pretending they would not be taxed nor have any such burthen imposed upon them their folly is noted herein that they refused to put their necks to his work who is the nobles Lord as well as the common peoples Vers 6. Moreover the old gate repaired Jehoiada So called happely because it was the oldest of all the gates in Jerusalem and this was also as is generally held on the north-side of Jerusalem Vers 7. And next unto them repaired Melatiah c. unto the throne of the governour on this side the river It seems there was formerly in this part of the wall a palace or place of judicature where those that were appointed governours under the Babylonian and Persian kings over all the countrey on this side Euphrates did use to sit in judgement unto which place these men of Gibeah and Mizpah and others here mentioned did repair the wall and that palace where had been the throne of the governour some Expositours conceive was repaired by Nehemiah and his servants he being now governour of Judea whence are those expressions chap. 4.16 The half of my servants wrought in the work and the other half of them held both the spears the shields c. and 5.16 I continued in the work of this wall c. Vers 8. And they fortified Jerusalem unto the broad wall That is they repaired the wall unto that place where the wall was made much broader then in other places and therefore called the broad wall and so having brought the work so farre there they left off building because here it was not ruined and therefore needed no repairing in which sence it may be read according to the translation noted in the margin They left Jerusalem unto the broad wall Vers 9. And next unto them repaired Rephaiah the sonne of Hur the ruler of the half part of Jerusalem For Jerusalem being part in Judah and part in Benjamin had accordingly two severall rulers and this Rephaiah was ruler of one of them and Shallum vers 12. was ruler of the other Vers 11. And Hashub the sonne of Pahath-moab repaired the other piece and the tower of the furnaces That is the next portion of the wall set out to be repaired wherein also was the tower of the furnaces so called happely because either in the tower it self or in the street adjoyning there were many furnaces Vers 12. Shallum the sonne of Haloesh the ruler of the half part of Jerusalem See above vers 9. Vers 13. The valley gate repaired Hanun c. See chap. 2.13 Vers 14. But the dung-gate repaired Malchiah the sonne of Rechab That is of the famous familie of the Rechabites Vers 15. But the gate of the fountain repaired Shallun See chap. 2.14 Unto the stairs that go down from the citie of David That is from mount Sion which was called the citie of David into the lower part of Jerusalem Vers 16. After him repaired Nehemiah c. Here begins the repairing of the wall about mount Zion wherein stood the Temple and the palace of the kings of Judah and the first part of this wall was repaired by one Nehemiah the sonne of Azbuck the ruler of the half part of Bethzur and so as farre as to the pool that was made and unto the house of the mighty and by the pool that was made is meant a pool not naturall but made by art to wit by Hezekiah 2. Kings 20.20 yet this was not the pool of Siloah mentioned in the former verse for that was happely a naturall pool and was in the lower part of Jerusalem but another in mount Zion called therefore the upper pool 2. Kings 18.17 and by the house of the mighty is meant some house built for Davids worthies or some house where the garrison souldiers for the citie lay or where youths were taught to handle their arms Vers 17. After him repaired the Levites It may be because the wall here was over against the Temple Vers 19. The ruler of Mizpah another piece over against the going up to the armory at the turning of the wall To wit the citie armoury to which that place of Solomons seemeth to allude Cant. 4.4 Thy neck is like the tower of David builded for an armoury it is evident that the house of the forrest of Lebanon which Solomon built was for many generations a magazine of arms for the kings of Judah for thence is that Isa 22.8 Thou didst look in that day to the armour of the house of the forrest and therefore it may be it was that house that is here meant or if not so it may be they had severall arsenalls or armouries one for the citie armoury and another for the kings magazine or that this was some place where anciently there had been an armoury before the house of Lebanon was built Vers 22. And after him repaired the priests the men of the plain To wit the men that inhabited the plain countrey about Jerusalem 2. Sam. 2.28 chap. 12.28 Vers 24. Binnui the sonne of Henadad another piece from the house of Azariah unto the turning of the wall This is thought to be the turning of the
was anointed king at Jerusalem 1. Kings 1.9 49. by the valley of the sonne of Hinnom unto the south-side of the city Jebus which was afterwards called Jerusalem not the fort of Sion for that was more south-ward in Judahs portion but the city it self which by that means was shut out of Judahs lot and left in the portion of Benjamin see the following note upon verse 63. Vers 9. And the border was drawn to Baalah which is Kirjath-jearim Called Kirjath-baal verse 60. and chap. 18.14 Vers 10. And the border compassed from Baalah west-ward unto mount Seir c. That is having before fetched a compasse north-ward it now turned west-ward unto mount Seir which was not that in the land of Idumea but another of that name Vers 12. And the west-border was to the great sea and the coast thereof See chap. 13.23 Vers 14. And Caleb drove thence the three sonnes of Anak c. That is from the mountains about Hebron See the note upon chap. 11.21 Vers 15. He came up thence to the inhabitants of Debir c. There was a Debir taken before by Joshua chap. 10.38 39. but that which Joshua took I conceive was not this which lay so near to Hebron which Caleb now took but that mentioned above vers 7. in the borders of Judah and much nearer to Jordan whence it is happely that Joshua is said to have taken that in his return towards Gilgal chap. 10.38 and that here this city is expressely said to be that city which was formerly called Kirjath-sepher to distinguish it from Debir taken by Joshua Vers 16. He that smiteth Kirjath-sepher and taketh it to him will I give Achsah my daughter to wife That is I will give my consent that he shall have my daughter we cannot hence inferre that he might lawfully force upon his daughter what husband he pleased for this he speaks as taking it for granted that his daughter would be guided by him Vers 17. And Othniel the sonne of Kenaz the brother of Caleb took it This was that Othniel which was afterwards the judge of Israel Judg. 3.9 And when the children of Israel cryed unto the Lord the Lord raysed up a deliverer to the children of Israel who delivered them even Othniel the sonne of Kenaz Calebs younger brother and happely for this exploit he became first famous amongst the Israelites and we may well think that this story is here inserted chiefly for his sake by brother here may be meant kinsman and so be referred to Othniel that he was the brother that is the near kinsman of Caleb but because of that word younger added Judg. 1.13 Othniel the sonne of Kenaz Calebs younger brother and so again Judg. 3.9 I conceive this word brother is to be referred to Kenaz that he was the father of Othniel and the brother of Caleb for though Caleb was the sonne or grandchild of Kenaz and thence called a Kenezite chap. 14.16 yet he might have a Kenaz to his brother too Vers 18. And it came to passe as she came unto him that she moved him to ask of her father a field c. This following passage concerning the enlarging of Achsahs dowry by a portion of land which her father gave her may well be added to shew how Caleb prized Othniel because of this his taking Debir It came to passe saith the text as she came unto him that is as she was going from her fathers to her husbands family she moved him to ask of her father a field that is taking the opportunity of her being now to leave her father for then the affections of fathers are wont to be moved towards their daughters she perswaded her husband to ask a field of her father to wit over and above that which he had already given her as an encrease of her dowry For Caleb had sonnes 1. Chron. 4.15 and in this case it is clear they might not give away any part of their inheritance from their sonnes to their daughters Numb 27.8 9. If a man die and have no sonne then ye shall cause his inheritance to passe unto his daughter And if he have no daughter then ye shall give his inheritance unto his brethren and therefore we must know that the land which Caleb had already given his daughter and which she further now desired of him was to be given her onely as a dowry for term of life or till the yeare of Jubile Being it seems not content with that portion of land which her father had already given her vers 19. she moved her husband to ask or for so also the words may be understood she moved her husband that she might ask another field to wit as an enlargement of her dowry And she lighted off her asse and Caleb said unto her What wouldest thou We may two severall wayes understand this which is here said concerning Achsah Calebs daughter that she lighted off her asse for either the meaning may be that when they had set her upon an asse that she might ride home with her husband Othniel to his house she slipped down again as in discontent and seeming to be unwilling to go with her husband to wit because her husband had not as she had moved him desired of her father an enlargement of her dowry and so thereupon her father demanded of her what wouldest thou as perceiving that she was discontented and desirous to know what it was that troubled her Or else that having desired her husband as they were riding away from her fathers house to make sute to her father for another field to be added to what he had already given her when she perceived that he was loth to do it or perswaded her rather to undertake it her self she lighted off her asse as addressing her self to make her request to her father which her father perceiving demanded of her presently what she would have Vers 19. Who answered Give me a blessing for thou hast given me a south land give me also springs of water To intimate that the portion of land which he had given her was dry and not well watered she calls it a south land to wit either because the southern parts of Iudahs portion were dry and barren and hence such lands were called south lands or else because the southern parts of Calebs portion in particular were such And hereupon she desires him to give her also springs of water thereby intending either merely some springs of water which might be conveyed into the south land to make it fruitfull or else some portion of land that was well watered And he gave her the upper springs and the nether springs That is some higher grounds that were well watered and some lower or which tends much to one he gave her some springs or watered grounds on each side the land he had formerly given her for a dowry both above it and below it Vers 21. And the uttermost cities of the tribe of the children of Judah toward the coast
of Edom southward were Kabzeel c. It is called Iekabzeel Neh. 11.25 Vers 32. All their cities are twenty nine with their villages There are indeed eight and thirty cities or towns named in the foregoing verses and therefore for the clearing of this some hold that because nine of these were afterwards assigned to the tribe of Simeon therefore it is said here that all the cities of Iudah in those parts were nine and twenty But the better answer I conceive is that nine and twenty of them onely were walled cities the other were the most famous towns and villages in those parts And here in this first catalogue of Iudahs cities in the Southern parts the most noted towns are expressed by name as well as the walled cities that in the following catalogues we may conceive the same to wit that there were many towns of note besides the cities there mentioned though they be not expressed by name as here they are Vers 36. Fourteen cities with their villages There are fifteen named in the foregoing verses either therefore one of them was no citie but some noted town or rather it may be very probably conceived that Gederah and Gederothaim were but one citie and therefore some reade it as it is in the margin of our bibles Gederah or Gederothaim Vers 62. And Nibshan and the citie of salt This citie might have its name The citie of salt from the salt pits that were there and the abundance of salt that was dayly made by the inhabitants of the citie Vers 63. As for the Jebusites the inhabitants of Jerusalem the children of Judah could not drive them out It is a question much argued amongst writers whether Jerusalem stood in Judahs or in Benjamins portion By many places of Scripture it seems evident that it was in Benjamins portion For in the 18. chapter of this book vers 28. it is reckoned amongst the cities that were in Benjamins lot and we see that Moses did before his death prophesie concerning Benjamin that the Temple which was in Jerusalem should be built in Benjamins portion for that is the drift of those words Deut. 33.12 And of Benjamin he said The beloved of the Lord shall dwell in safety by him and the Lord shall cover him all the day long and he shall dwell between his shoulders yea and Jer. 6.1 the inhabitants of Jerusalem are expressely called the children of Benjamin O ye children of Benjamin gather your selves to flee out of the midst of Jerusalem and Judg. 1.21 the same that is here said of the children of Judah is likewise there said of the children of Benjamin The children of Benjamin did not drive out the Jebusites the inhabitants of Jerusalem but the Jebusites dwell with the children of Benjamin in Jerusalem unto this day But now again by other places of Scripture it seems as evident that Jerusalem was in Judahs portion For first mention is here made of it as one of Judahs cities The Jebusites dwell with the children of Judah at Jerusalem unto this day and secondly Jerusalem is said to have been taken by the children of Judah Judg. 1.8 and thirdly it is reckoned as the great priviledge of the children of Judah that the Lord in his Temple dwelt amongst them Psal 78.67 68 69. Moreover he refused the Tabernacle of Joseph and chose not the tribe of Ephraim but chose the tribe of Judah the mount Sion which he loved and he built his Sanctuary like high places c. but the truth herein is that Jerusalem stood in the border of these two tribes and so was part in Judahs and part in Benjamins portion and therefore the places of Scripture before cited do not any way contradict one another the fort of Sion and some of the south skirts of the city were in Judahs portion but the greatest part of the city in Benjamins and therefore it may well be that when they went about to expell the Jebusites that dwelt there both Iudah and Benjamin joyned their forces together as Judah and Simeon did in a like case Judg. 1.3 And Judah said unto Simeon his brother Come up with me into my lot that we may fight aganst the Canaanites and I likewise will go with thee into thy lot As for that which is here said concerning Jerusalem to wit that the children of Judah could not drive out the Jebusites thence and the like we see is said concerning the children of Benjamin Judg. 1.21 we must know that the Iebusites continued in Ierusalem unto Davids time Indeed Adoni-zedek the king of Jerusalem was slain by Ioshua chap. 10.23 26. for he was one of those five kings that made warre against Gibeon though we find no mention there of his taking Ierusalem yea and it is expressely said Iudg. 1.8 that afterwards the children of Iudah took the city of Jerusalem and burnt it with fire that is some part of it Well but yet the fort of Sion which was the chief strength of Ierusalem was not at that time taken by them for that the Iebusites held till David took it 2. Sam. 5 6 7. yea and it seems that afterward the Iebusites did also by the help of this fort recover the city again at least so farre that they forced the Israelites to let the Iebusites dwell there amongst them as it is said here For in the dayes of the Iudges we see that Iebus that is Ierusalem was still inhabited by the Iebusites Iudg. 19.12 We will not turn aside hither into the city of a stranger that is not of the children of Israel saith the Levite there concerning Iebus we will passe over to Gibea But however we must not think that this which is said here that the children of Judah could not drive them out is added by way of excusing them no but rather to their shame and reproch for though the fort of Sion was a place of great strength so that when David set himself down with his army before it the Iebusites scorned him bragged that their lame and blind and impotent people should defend it against him 2. Sam. 5.6 Yet God would certainly have driven them out according to his promise had they not been wanting to themselves But they grew slothfull and faint hearted and by these and other their sinnes provoked the Lord to withdraw himself from them and so then indeed they could not drive out the inhabitants but were glad to purchase peace upon any tearms according to that Iudg. 2.20 21. And the anger of the Lord was hot against Israel and he said Because this people hath transgressed my covenant which I commanded their fathers and have not hearkned to my voice I also will not hence forth drive out any from before them of the nations which Joshua left when he died c. CHAP. XVI Vers 1. ANd the lot of the children of Joseph fell from Jordan by Jericho unto the water of Jericho on the east c. It is the opinion of some learned writers that
Deborah sets forth the warre that was made against the Israelites cities by this expression then was warre in the gates but withall it may also imply the prevailing power of the enemy when they made inroads into their land to wit that they many times came up to the very gates of their cities Was there a shield or spear seen among fourty thousand in Israel This may be meant either of the scarcity of arms amongst them the enemy whereever they prevailed disarming them that they might not afterward be able to attempt any thing against him or rather because we see not but Baraks troops were armed for warre that the Israelites were so quelled that not a man amongst the many thousands of Israel durst take up a shield or spear against them according to that Levit. 26.36 And upon them that are left alive of you I will send a faintnesse into their hearts in the land of their enemies and the sound of a shaking leaf shall chase them and they shall flee as fleeing from a sword and they shall fall when none pursueth Vers 9. My heart is to the governours of Israel that offered themselves willingly amongst the people That is I cannot but highly love and honour the governours of Israel that were as willing to hazard themselves in this warre against Jabin as any of the people yea and to undergo the same travell and hardnesse together with them and indeed this in the heads and rulers of the people was most to be admired and extolled first because such men have usually the fairest estates and for them therefore to hazard all they enjoyed in rising up with Deborah against this great tyrant as willingly as those of the poorer sort that had scarce any thing to lose was a signe of an heroicall spirit for which they deserved to be highly honoured secondly because men that had been formerly imployed in offices of peace are not men usually fit for the service of warre and therefore it must needs be a singular zeal for Gods glory and the good of Gods people that made them lay by their gowns to gird on a sword thirdly because such men are usually puffed up with their greatnesse and it was therefore a rare thing for such to stoop to joyn with meaner men yea to put too their helping hand amongst the meanest for the cause of God and his people against their enemies and fourthly because the examples of men of such rank was no doubt a mighty means to draw on the meaner sort to come flocking in to the service Vers 10. Speak ye that ride on white asses ye that sit in judgement and walk by the way That is let all those that are men of honour and eminency above others that use to ride up and down upon white asses all magistrates and Judges that sit in the seat of justice and so likewise all the common sort of people that travell on foot from one place to another let them all in their severall places speak of this great deliverance which God hath wrought for his people Riding on asses it seems was a note of great and honourable persons in those times and countreys and therefore it is noted of Jair who was one of the Judges that he had thirty sonnes that rode on thirty asse-colts and they had thirty cities chap. 10.40 and so likewise of Abdon who was another of the Judges chap. 12.14 that he had fourtie sonnes and thirty nephews that rode on threescore and ten asse-colts and unlesse by white asses here nothing else be meant but slick and goodly asses it seems that white asses were principally used by such persons and though the most Expositours limit this first clause to merchants who they say used to ride on white asses yet I conceive we may better understand it of all men of eminency that used to ride in pomp and State and so likewise by those that sit in judgement are meant their Judges and chief Magistrates and by those that walk by the way are meant the meaner and common sort of people and the reasons why Deborah stirres up these men under these expressions to praise God for the vanquishing of Jabin and Sisera is to intimate the just cause they had to speak with joy of this great mercy of God to wit because whereas formerly all the wayes of the land were pestred with cut-throat souldiers so that there was no stirring in safety from one place to another and all course of justice was in a manner stopped up the sword having silenced the Laws now the Judges might sit in Judgment as formerly the great ones might now ride up and down upon their white asses according to their wonted manner which before they could not and the common people of all sorts might now passe to and fro and travell about their businesses from one place to another without fear Vers 11. They that are delivered from the noise of the archers in the place of drawing waters there shall they rehearse c. This may be meant of the Israelites that followed Barak and fought against Sisera and his archers at the river Kishon see chap. 4.7 And I will draw unto thee unto the river Kishon Sisera the Captain of Jabins army with his chariots and his multitude but the most of Expositours understand it of the meaner sort of people that were wont to be slain or taken captives by the enemies that lay in wait for them at the place of drawing waters Fountains wells of water were rare in those dry countreys of great esteem they went in many places farre to fetch water here therefore the Canaanites used to ly in wait for them so that no sooner could the poore people come thither but presently the Canaanites with a great outcry were ready to set upon them and their arrows came presently singing about their ears and oft struck them dead for both these may be intended by the noise of the archers but now saith Deborah these poore wretches being delivered from this danger may go freely to those places and there declare the righteous acts of God in destroying these their enemies Then shall the people of the Lord go down to the gates Hereby many things may be implyed first their freedome to go forth at the gates of their cities within which they were in a manner cooped up before secondly the restoring of the people to the gates as places of judicature from which they were restrained before there was warre in the gates now there was Law and judgement there thirdly their returning to the cities that were thence banished or fled and the countrey peoples resorting thither upon their severall occasions Vers 12. Awake awake Deborah utter a song This expression Deborah useth onely to imply the exceeding greatnesse of the mercy which God had afforded them which required that she should rouze up her self to praise the Lord for it with all her might and with all the strength of her soul Arise Barak and lead
this way to work the poore Gibeonites could never have escaped his fury no though his intentions were utterly to root them all out of the land yet the way he took to effect it was by picking quarrells severally against them some at one time and some at another that so he might cut them off by degrees and that under a pretence of Justice either by charging them with forged accusations or by aggravating any smaller offence and making it to them capitall or some such other wayes of heavie oppression and thus intending to proceed in this close politick way though he slew many of them as is here expressed yet it seems he was some way taken off before he could accomplish what he had determined however for this cruelty of Sauls against the Gibeonites it was as the Lord here tells David that the famine had been so long upon the land It is for Saul and for his bloudy house because he slew the Gibeonites Indeed considering what an execrable act of cruelty that of Sauls was when he slew fourescore and five of the Priests and utterly destroyed their citie with all that were therein both men and women children and sucklings c. It is strange that Sauls posterity were not called to an account for that cruelty of Sauls against the Priests of the Lord as well as for this against the Gibeonites but for this two reasons may be probably given first that it was to let the Israelites see that God will be avenged for shedding the bloud of the meanest such as the Gibeonites were who were as bondmen and slaves to the Israelites as well as for shedding the bloud of the greatest secondly that it was to let the Jewes see that those of other Nations if they were of the faith of Israel and were once received to be his people were as acceptable to God and as precious in his sight as the Jewes were and thirdly that it was to discover how the Lord abhorres all falsifying of oaths and covenants in that he proceeded with such severity against Sauls posterity because he had done the Gibeonites conrary to what Joshua and the Israelites had covenanted and sworn many hundred years ago so hatefull to God all persidiousnesse is whatsoever pretences are put upon it Vers 2. The Gibeonites were not of the children of Israel but of the remnant of the Amorites c. The Gibeonites were Hivites Josh 9.7 And the men of Israel said unto the Hivites Peradventure ye dwell among us c. But both Hivites and generally all the inhabitants of Canaan are usually in the Scripture called Amorites Gen. 15.16 For the iniquitie of the Amorites is not yet full Ezek. 16.3 Thy Father was an Amorite and thy mother an Hittite Vers 3. Wherefore David said unto the Gibeonites What shall I do for you c. It seems by this that when David enquired of the Lord he did not onely tell him wherefore this famine was sent but also enjoined him to satisfie the Gibeonites for the wrong which had been done them for why else should he allow them to prescribe what should be done And wherewith shall I make the atonement that ye may blesse the inheritance of the Lord That is that ye may pray for the people of God and the land which God hath given them for their inheritance because the Lord had pleaded the cause of the Gibeonites by sending a famine upon the whole land of Israel David looked upon them as men highly favoured of God and therefore was the more desirous that they should pray for them Vers 4. We will have no silver nor gold of Saul nor of his house neither for us shalt thou kill any man in Israel That is save onely of his family that did oppresse us Vers 6. Let seaven men of his sonnes be delivered unto us and we will hang them up unto the Lord c. That is to satisfie his justice and appease his wrath and that others by this example may learn to keep covenant and not to oppresse the stranger that is taken under Gods protection See the note Numb 25.4 Vers 8. But the King tooke the two sonnes of Rizpah c. and the five sonnes of Michal the daughter of Saul whom she brought up for Adriel c. It is certain that not Michal but Merab her elder sister was married to this Adriel the son of Barzillai called the Meholathite because he was of Abel-meholah in the Tribe of Benjamin Judg. 7.22 and to distinguish him from Barzillai the Gileadite chap. 19.31 1. Sam. 18.19 When Merab Sauls daughter should have been given to David she was given to Adriel the Meholathite to wife and that Michal had no children to her dying day 2. Sam. 6.22 Therefore Michal the daughter of Saul had no child unto the day of her death and therefore doubtlesse these five sonnes of Adriel were the children of Merab Michals sister and were onely brought up by Michal as her own she having no children and therefore called her sonnes but are said to be brought up for Adriel her sisters husband Vers 9. And they hanged them in the hil before the Lord. That is in a hill in Gibeah of Saul vers 6. that they might be a spectacle of Gods indignation against Saul for that sinne of his in slaying the Gibeonites and thus did the Lord punish that cruelty of Saul toward the Gibeonites and withall did provide for the setling of the Kingdome upon David and his seed by cutting off the posterity of Saul lest they should be still plotting and practising against them Vers 10. And Rizpah the daughter of Ajah took sackcloth and spread it for her upon the rock c. Rizpah Sauls concubine the mother of two of those that were hanged knowing it seems that the bodies of her sonnes were to hang up till God should testifie that he was appeased by giving them rain again wherein doubtlesse David had speciall direction from the Lord for otherwise it had been against the expresse letter of the Law Deut. 21.23 His body shall not all night remain upon the tree but thou shalt bury him that day That she might defend their bodies both from birds and beasts she resolved to watch them and to that end she took sackcloth and spread it for her upon the rock that is she spread therewith a Tent in the rock next adjoyning the better to defend her from the heat and withall perhaps to testifie her sad and mournfull condition in regard of this shamefull death of her children and so continued watching them untill water dropped upon them out of Heaven till God sent rain upon the land as was desired she that had been Sauls concubine it is likely had servants to have done this but such was the strength of her affection that she could not be satisfied unlesse she did it or saw it done her self Vers 12. And David went and took the bones of Saul c Hearing as it is said in the foregoing verse
which is related 2. Chron. 26.5 15. Vers 5. And the Lord smote the king so that he was a leper c. The cause of this is expressed 2. Chron. 26.16 c. to wit that Uzziah or Azariah puffed up with his prosperity would needs usurp the Priests office and went into the Temple to burn incense whereupon Azariah the high Priest attended with fourescore other priests went in after him and withstood him and reprehended this his presumption for which whilest he was wrath with the Priest the Lord smote him with a leprosie and that in his forehead that every one might see the judgement of God upon him and so he was presently thrust out of the temple And thus because his sinne was pride and arrogance by striking him with such a lothsome disease in his very face the Lord filled his face with shame and confusion making him ashamed to shew his face amongst men and because he had sinned with so much impudence coming openly into the Temple to burn incense as it were to out-face the Priests therefore God struck him in the forehead where impudence is wont to shew it self Jer. 3.3 Thou hadst a whores forehead thou refusedst to be ashamed and because not content with the Regall dignity he would needs usurp the Priests office he was not suffered to abide in the throne for by reason of his leprosie he dwelt in a severall house that is in a private dwelling where he might be severed as much as was possible from the society of others And Jotham the kings sonne was over the house judging the people of the land that is he lived in the kings palace and kept his court there in stead of his father whose place he supplyed and as his Vice-roy and deputy governed the whole kingdome wherein yet there was something to mitigate the poore kings sorrows in the midst of all these miseries that befell him to wit that his sonne did not take this advantage to depose his father but was content to govern the people as his substitute under him Besides all these particulars one memorable passage we find mentioned elsewhere that is not recorded either here or in the book of the Chronicles to wit that in this kings reigne there was also a most terrible earthquake as we see Amos 1.1 The words of Amos who was amongst the herdmen of Tekoa which he saw concerning Israel in the dayes of Vzziah c. two years before the earthquake and again Zach. 14.5 Ye shall flee like as ye fled from before the earthquake in the dayes of Vzziah king of Judah Vers 6. And the rest of the acts of Azariah and all that he did are they not written in the book of the Chronicles c. The acts of Uzziah or Azariah were also written by Isaiah the Prophet 2. Chron. 26.22 Now the rest of the acts of Vzziah first and last did Isaiah the prophet the sonne of Amos write Vers 7. And they buried him with his fathers in the city of David To wit in the field of the buriall where the sepulchres of the kings were but not in their sepulchres because he was a leper 2. Chron. 26.23 So Uzziah slept with his father and they buried him with his fathers in the field of the buriall which belonged to the kings for they said He is a leper When this king died it seems the Philistines did greatly triumph and rejoyce because he had been such a scourge to them as is related 2. Chron. 26.6 7. And he went forth and warred against the Philistines and brake down the wall of Gath and the wall of Jabneh and the wall of Ashdod c. whereupon it was that Isaiah prophesied that the grandchild of this Uzziah to wit Hezekiah should sting them worse then ever he had done Isa 14.29 Rejoyce not thou whole Palestina because the rod of him that smote thee is broken for out of the serpents root shall come forth a cockatrice and his fruit shall be a fiery flying serpent Vers 8. In the thirty and eighth yeare of Azariah king of Judah did Zachariah the sonne of Jeroboam reigne over Israel in Samaria six moneths The first of the fifty years of Azariahs reigne was the seven and twentieth of Jeroboams reigne verse 1. In the twenty and seventh yeare of Jeroboams Azariah the sonne of Amaziah king of Judah began to reigne Jeroboam reigned in all but one and fourty years chap. 14.23 so that the last yeare of Jeroboams reigne was but the fifteenth or sixteenth of Azariahs Now if Jeroboam died the sixteenth yeare of Azariahs reigne how came it to passe that his sonne Zachariah began not his reigne till the eight and thirtieth yeare of Azariah which was two and twenty years after the death of his father Jeroboam I answer Some hold that the eight and thirtieth of Azariah here spoken on was the eight and thirtieth from the time he began to reigne with his father Amaziah but rather however it seems upon the death of Jeroboam Zachariah found a party that stuck to him to whom the crown of right did belong and so the text speaks of his immediate succeeding his father chap. 14.29 And Jeroboam slept with his fathers and Zachariah his sonne reigned in his stead yet two or three and twentie years did passe before he was by uniform consent received as king whether it were the ambition of Jeroboams captains each striving to keep what he held for himself or some generall dislike taken both by Prince and people against Zachariah though he were the sonne of so deserving a father yet they would not stoop to his government till at length wearied with dissention they were in a manner forced unto it which was as is here said in the thirty eighth yeare of Azariahs reigne after which time that he was by generall consent settled in the kingdome he enjoyed it onely six moneths Vers 10. And Shallum the sonne of Jabesh conspired against him and smote him before the people c. In that little time that he reigned it seems he carried himself so ill that the displeasure of the people newly appeased was soon stirred up again and Shallum one of his captains taking the advantage hereof conspired against him and slew him before the people that is the people not opposing but rather approving what was done they were not at first more unwilling to receive him then they were now glad to be rid of him Vers 12. This was the word of the Lord which he spake to Jehu c. For Zachariah was in the fourth descent from Jehu See the note chap. 10.30 Vers 16. Then Menahem smote Tiphsah c. Many Expositours take this Tiphsah to be that mentioned 1 Kings 4.24 but because that was upon the frontiers of Syria as is evident because it is there said of Solomon that he had dominion over all the region on this side the river from Tiphsah even unto Azzah and this was not farre from Tirzah which was in the heart
his father Uzziah but that foure years before he died he wholly resigned his kingdome to his sonne Ahaz and so it was in the fourth yeare of Ahaz when Hoshea slew Pekah and took upon himself the title of king of Israel but this fourth yeare of Ahaz is called the twentieth of Jotham because Jotham had still the title of king though he had foure years before resigned his kingdome to his sonne Ahaz Vers 32. In the second yeare of Pekah the sonne of Remaliah king of Israel began Jotham c. To wit after his father Uzziahs death for he had the government of the kingdome under his father a long time before this to wit ever since his father became a leper as is noted verse 5. About this time therefore did the prophet Isaiah see that glorious vision Isa 6.1 In the yeare that king Uzziah died I saw also the Lord sitting upon a throne high and lifted up and his train filled the temple c. and in this kings reigne Hosea and Micah prophesied to the people Vers 33. Five and twenty years old was he when he began to reigne and he reigned sixteen years c. Some Expositours conceive that he was thus old when he began to reign in his fathers life-time which they hold thereby to resolve that great difficulty concerning the age of his grand-child Hezekiah when he began to reigne of which see the note chap. 18.2 But I rather think it must be understood for so the words seem clearly to import of his age when he began his sixteen years reigne which was after his fathers death to wit to the seventeenth yeare of Pekah as is evident in the first verse of the following chapter In the seventeenth yeare of Pekah the sonne of Remaliah Ahaz the sonne of Jotham king of Judah began to reigne Vers 34. And he did that which was right in the sight of the Lord c. This is more fully expressed 2. Chron. 27.21 And he did that which was right in the sight of the Lord according to all that Uzziah his father did howbeit he entred not into the temple of the Lord and the people did yet corruptly Vers 35. He built the higher gate of the house of the Lord. Or the high gate 2. Chron. 27.3 which was it seems the outer east-gate the gate whereby they went to the kings palace 2. Chron. 23.20 And they came through the high gate into the kings house the same I conceive it was which afterward for the statelinesse of it was called the beautifull gate of the Temple Acts 3.2 and by Jeremy often the new gate as Jer. 26.10 and 36.10 c. Vers 36. Now the rest of the acts of Jotham c. Some of these are related in the Scripture Chronicles as first that he built divers cities in the hills of Judah and in the forrests towers and palaces and secondly that he enforced the Ammonites to pay him tribute to wit of silver an hundred talents of wheat and barley twenty thousand measures 2. Chron. 27.4 5. Vers 37. In those dayes the Lord began to send against Judah Rezin the king of Syria and Pekah the sonne of Remaliah That is towards the end of his reigne they began to conspire against the land of Judah but it seems till his sonnes reigne after his decease they did not invade the land the Lord herein shewing mercy to good Jotham that he took him away before those heavy calamities that immediately after fell upon the kingdome of Judah CHAP. XVI Vers 1. IN the seventeenth yeare of Pekah the sonne of Remaliah Ahaz the sonne of Jotham c. The seventeenth yeare of Pekah was the sixteenth yeare of Jotham chap. 15.32 at which time Jotham did either resigne the kingdome to his sonne Ahaz or at least he left the government to him but yet the lived at least foure years after See chap. 15.30 Vers 2. Twenty years old was Ahaz when he began to reigne and he reigned sixteen years c. If Ahaz was twenty years old when he began his reigne when he died sixteen years after he was but thirty six years old and then was Hezekiah his sonne twenty five years old chap. 18.2 Twenty and five years old was Hezekiah when he began to reigne and he reigned twenty and nine years in Jerusalem whereby it may seem that Hezekiah was born to Ahaz when he was yet but ten or eleven years old which say some Expositours we need not wonder at considering the singular blessing that nation had for generation but because it is very unlikely that the Jews had children so young therefore other Expositours do answer this objection two other wayes to wit first that Ahaz was twenty years old when he that is Jotham his father of whom he had spoken in the former verse began to reigne to wit after the death of his father Uzziah or secondly and I think thus it is better answered that Ahaz began to reigne when he was first designed king in the life of Jotham his father and then he was but twenty years old and the like must then be said of Jotham too chap. 15.30 but when after his fathers death he began to reigne as absolute king himself from which these sixteen years must be reckoned he might be twenty five or twenty six years old or perhaps more Vers 3. But he walked in the wayes of the kings of Israel That is he worshipped idols as they also did for so it is expressed 2. Chron. 28.3 He burnt incense in the valley of the sonne of Hinnom and burnt his children in the fire after the abominations of the heathen Yea made his sonne to passe through the fire c. Concerning this abominable idolatry of making their children to passe through the fire see what is noted Levit. 18.21 But the Ahaz did indeed burn his sonnes at least some one of his sonnes as by way of sacrificing them to his idol-gods is evident 2. Chron. 28.3 where also the place is named where he offered this inhumane oblation to wit the valley of the sonne of Hinnom a valley not farre from Jerusalem Moreover he burnt incense in the valley of the sonne of Hinnom and burnt his children in the fire This high place was called Tophet and was it seems especially used for this execrable idolatry Jer. 7.31 They have built the high places of Tophet which is in the valley of the sonne of Hinnom to burn their sonnes and their daughters in the fire and by Josiah it was defiled chap. 23.10 He defiled Tophet which is in the valley of the children of Hinnom that no man might make his sonne or his daughter to passe through the fire to Molech Vers 5. Then Rezin king of Syria and Pekah sonne of Remaliah king of Israel came up to Jerusalem to warre No sooner was Ahaz settled in the throne of Judah but both Rezin king of Syria and Pekah king of Israel began streight to invade Judah for Pekah reigned in all but
14. And Hezekiah went up into the house of the Lord and spread it before the Lord. That is he spread Sennacheribs letter before the altar the signe of Gods presence amongst them and this he did partly to quicken his own spirit and to strengthen his own faith in prayer by the sight of that blasphemous writing and partly by that outward signe to imply what he desired of God namely that God would take notice of and revenge the horrible blasphemies of that daring wretch against his great and glorious name Vers 16. And heare the words of Sennacherib which hath sent him to reproch the living God That is the messenger that brought his letter Vers 21 This is the word that the Lord hath spoken concerning him The virgin the daughter of Sion hath despised thee c. That is the inhabitants of Sion Jerusalem shall laugh thee to scorn The people inhabiting any citie or countrey are in the Scripture usually called the daughter of that citie or countrey Psal 45.12 And the daughter of Tyre shall be there with a gift Psal 137.8 O daughter of Babylon who art to be destroyed because they have been bred born and nourished theâ—e and have lived under the defence government thereof and ought to be faithfull and obedient to the government under which they live whence naturally all nations are wont to stile their countrey their mother 2. Sam. 20.19 Thou seekest to destroy a citie and a mother in Israel and they are called the virgin daughter of Sion not so much because they were not now defiled with idolatry which is spirituall fornication for even heathen people are so called Isa 47.1 Come down and sit in the dust O virgin-daughter of Babylon sit on the ground there is no throne O daughter of the Caldeans Jer. 46.11 Go up into Gilead and take balme O virgin the daughter of Egypt and where had been grosser idolatry then amongst the inhabitants of Jerusalem in the dayes of Ahaz nor because she had never yet been subdued and brought under the command of any forrain prince for after they were under the Babylonian command they are still called so Lam. 1 15. the Lord hath troden the virgin the daughter of Judah as in a winepresse and 2.13 What thing shall I liken to thee O daughter of Jerusalem what shall I equall to thee that I may comfort thee O virgin daughter of Sion but rather because of their constant abode in those places for in that regard they might most fitly be resembled to a virgin daughter that lives with her mother tenderly and delicately brought up by her yea perhaps in this place this phrase is used also to imply the weaknesse of Jerusalem at this time Vers 23. By thy messengers thou hast reproched the Lord. By this circumstance doth the Prophet aggravate the insolent pride of Sennacherib that he set his servants to blaspheme the holy name of God With the multitude of my chariots I am come up to the height of the mountains c. That is the strongest places of the kingdome I have subdued and passed through as a conquerour even those that seemed to them most inaccessible and am now come to the sides of Lebanon that is their chief citie and strength the citie Jerusalem and hereby is intimated that nothing could or should stand in the way of his armies that as he had hitherto so he would still subdue the land before him take possession of their forts and castles cut down the tall cedar trees and the choice firre trees that is destroy there Princes Nobles and great men enter the lodgings of his borders and into the forrest of his Carmel that is possesse himself of their frontier towns and all the fruitfull and pleasant places of their countrey even as conquerours in a land subdued are wont to do as they go along what they please themselves Vers 24. I have digged and drunk strange waters and with the sole of my feet have I dried up all the rivers of besieged places That is when I have come in places most destitute of water it hath been no hindrance to me because even there I have digged up strange waters that is fountains waters where never any were seen before on the other side where cities have been environed with great deep waters no sooner have I set my foot there to besiege them but with the multitude of my souldiers I have dried them up Thus he boasts that nothing could be a let to his numerous army and laughs to scorn Hezekiahs policie in cutting of the waters 2. Chron. 32.3 Vers 25. Hast thou not heard long ago how I have done it and of ancient times that I have formed it c. As if the Lord should have said Thou boastest of the conquest of many nations but didst thou never heare that there is a God in heaven that ruleth the world by whose providence and decree all such things are done surely thus it is with thee now have I brought it to passe that thou shouldest be to lay waste fenced cities into ruinous heaps that is that which I before determined I have now by thee brought to passe using thee as my scourge to punish the wickednesse of men and to turn their strong fenced cities into ruinous heaps which agrees with that which the Prophet saith elsewhere Isaiah 10.5 6. O Assyrian the rod of mine anger and the staffe in their hand is mine indignation I will send him against an hypocriticall nation and against the people of my wrath will I give him a charge to take the spoil and to take the prey and to tread them down like the mire in the streets there is indeed another translation of these words which is set in the margin of our Bibles Hast thou not heard how I have made it long ago and formed it of ancient times should I now bring it to be laid waste and fenced cities to be ruinous heaps and according to this translation the meaning may be that God had long ago and of ancient times made and formed the Israelites to be his peculiar people and had planted them in the land of Canaan which he had provided for their inheritance a thing so famously known that Sennacherib must needs have heard of it and that therefore it was not likely that God would now suffer him wholly to lay waste their countrey and to turn their cities into ruinous heaps but the first exposition doth farre best agree with the scope of the Lords upbraiding the pride of Sennacherib in boasting of what he had done to so many nations Vers 26. Therefore their inhabitants were of small power they were dismaied and confounded they were as the grasse of the field c. That is because I gave them up into thy power therefore they were soon and easily destroyed Vers 27. But I know thy abode and thy going out c. That is I know all thy counsels and enterprizes there is nothing thou
order before thy death Hezekiah had not yet a sonne to succeed him in the throne for Manasseh was borne three years after this as being but twelve years old at his fathers death chap. 21.1 and therefore it is probable that this was one chief thing which Isaiah had respect to in these words that he should advise and determine what was requisite concerning his successour for saith he thou shalt dye and not live that is thou art but a dead man by the ordinary course of nature there is no way of recovery for thee unlesse the Lord shall be pleased by his almighty power to deliver thee it is true indeed this condition was not expressed yet was it understood the Lord purposely or else where concealing this part of his will that Hezekiah receiving the sentence of death in himself might the more earnestly seek for help unto the Lord and that Hezekiah took it for a conditionall threatning and not a declaration of what God had absolutely determined is evident by his praying to God for mercy herein Vers 2. Then he turned his face to the wall and prayed c. To wit either because that wall was towards the Temple or rather to hide his tears and that being thereby the freer from distractions he might the more freely poure forth his requests unto God to whom he now turned as to his onely hope and comfort Vers 3. I beseech thee O Lord remember now how I have walked before thee in truth c. Besides that love of life and horrour of death which is naturally in all men and which grace hath much adoe to overmaster even in the best of Gods servants there were many things that made the sentence of death in a speciall manner terrible to Hezekiah as first because he had yet no sonne to succeed him in the throne chap. 21.1 and it must needs be very grievous to him to think that the promise made to David and Solomon 1. Kings 8.25 There shall not fail thee a man in my sight to sit on the throne of Israel should not be made good to him in his posteritie who had to his utmost endeavoured to keep the condition required of God at the giving of that promise Secondly because he could not but fear lest upon his death Religion would go to wrack again lest the reformation newly begun would soon come to nothing and the poore Church of God would quickly be overgrown with superstition again Thirdly because he saw that those that had been already forward enough to ascribe all the calamities that had befallen the kingdome in his time to his suppressing their high places altars and idols would be now much more bold to insult over him if God should thus suddenly cut him off And fourthly especially because his own faith must needs be sorely assaulted and shaken with these temptations and that the rather because the coming of the Prophet to him in such a manner as Gods Herald to threaten him with death Thou shalt die and not live might seem to imply that God meant to hew him down in displeasure doubtlesse in these regards the heart of Hezekiah was almost overwhelmed with terrours as himself afterward expressed in his song Isa 38.10 14. and hence it is that in this his prayer he pleads his integritie that what he had done in the reformation of his kingdome he had done with an upright heart because he knew it was good in his eyes not by way of expostulation or pleading his merits but to support and strengthen his faith against these temptations that he might with the more hope and confidence call upon God and might by this argument move the Lord to shew him mercy Vers 4. And it came to passe afore Isaiah was gone out into the middle court c. Some reade this afore Isaiah was gone out into the middle citie and indeed it is by many held that Jerusalem was divided into three parts whereof one was the citie of David which is called Zion another that which was of old called Jebus or Salem and a third that which lay betwixt these two and joyned them together and was called the middle citie the same where Huldah the prophetesse dwelt chap. 22.14 for so some reade that place she dwelt in Jerusalem in the second part and accordingly they understand this place that before the Prophet was gone out of the citie of David into the middle citie the Lord sent him back to Hezekiah with a promise of recovery but because the text seems most plainly to speak of the Prophets going out of the kings house and the tender compassion of God in the speedy sending back of the Prophet to comfort the afflicted soul of Hezekiah is the more eminently discovered by this that afore Isaiah was gone out into the middle court of the kings house he was sent back again to the king this translation is justly put into the text of our Bibles as the best and this middle court I take to be the same which is called the court within the porch 1. Kings 7.8 Vers 5. Thus saith the Lord the God of David thy father I have heard thy prayer c. In sending to Hezekiah the promise of his recovery the Lord stiles himself the God of David his father because the promise made to David concerning the continued succession of his seed in the throne of Judah should by this means be made good to Hezekiah who should now live to have an heir to succeed him even as in former time to imply that God would perform to the Israelites what he had promised to Abraham Isaac and Jacob he used to stile himself the God of Abraham the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob. On the third day thou shalt go up unto the house of the Lord. The suddennesse of his recovery makes it evident that it was miraculous and the mention of his going to the house of the Lord sweetens the tidings of his recovery since nothing could more glad his heart then to heaâ—e that having received the sentence of death in himself he should yet again praise God in his holy Temple Vers 6. And I will deliver thee and this citie out of the hand of the king of Assyria c. Though Sennacherib were returned as is most probable into his own countrey yet first there might be some garrisons left behind here and there in the cities he had taken and secondly just cause had Hezekiah to fear that having reinforced his army he would return again and endeavour to wipe of the stain of his present flight and to remove those fears the Lord assures him that as he had so he would still deliver both him and Jerusalem out of the hand of the Assyrian Vers 7. And Isaiah said Take a lump of dry figges c. That is a masse made of drie figges Both the boil that Hezekiah had in this dangerous sicknesse and the masse of figges appointed to be laid to the boil which are
to wit the tenth of tithes Numb 18.26 Thus speak unto the Levites and say unto them when ye take of the children of Israel tithes which I have given you from them for your inheritance then ye shall offer up an heave-offering of it for the Lord even a tenth part of the tithe yea perhaps one of the priests the sonnes of Aaron was alwayes to be present when the Levites received the tithes of the people as a witnesse that the priests portion was faithfully set out for them Vers 39. And we will not forsake the house of our God That is we will not fail to frequent the Temple to serve the Lord there and we will not leave it destitute of any requisite provision for the service there to be performed CHAP. XI Vers 1. ANd the rulers of tbe people dwelt at Jerusalem the rest of the people also cast lots c. Because there were not found enough in Jerusalem for the inhabiting and defence of the city and people were loth to dwell there because the neighbours round about did exceedingly envie the glory of this city and were continually plotting some mischief against it to the great perill of the inhabitants and secondly because withall as there was more safety so also there was more profit in dwelling elsewhere therefore one chief businesse that Nehemiah had to do at this assembly of the people was after he had numbred them to chuse out a sufficient number of the people to dwell there see chap. 7.3 4 5. which to avoid all exception was done by lot The chief rulers of the people of their own accord settled themselves to dwell as reason indeed required in this chief city of the kingdome but for the people the tenth part of them were chosen by lot onely there were some that did voluntarily offer themselves to dwell there vers 2. and this taking of one in ten to dwell in Jerusalem some Expositours look upon also as a shadow of the paucity of those that shall be received to dwell in the heavenly Jerusalem to wit that scarce one in ten even of those that professe themselves Gods people shall dwell there according to that Isaiah 6.13 But yet in it shall be a tenth c. and Jerem. 3.14 I will take you one of a city and two of a family and I will bring you to Zion Vers 2. And the people blessed all the men that willingly offered themselves to dwell at Jerusalem That is they commended them for it and desired the Lord to blesse and prosper them Vers 3. Now these are the chief of the province that dwelt in Jerusalem To wit that were chosen now by lot to dwell there In 1. Chron. 9. there is another catalogue of them wherein more are mentioned then are mentioned here But it seems in that both those that were chosen by lot and those that voluntarily offered themselves to dwell there are set down here onely those that were chosen by lot Vers 4. And at Jerusalem dwelt certain of the children of Judah and of the children of Benjamin Because Jerusalem stood partly in Judah and partly in Benjamin therefore those that were chosen by lot to dwell there were of those two tribes yet there were some also of Ephraim and Manasseh that dwelt there 1. Chron. 9.3 which were doubtlesse of those that voluntarily profered themselves Vers 5. And Maaseiah the sonne of Baruch c. Concerning this catalogue of those that dwelt at Jerusalem see 1. Chron. 9.5 6. Vers 9. Second over the city That is next in place and government after Joel afore-mentioned Vers 16. And Shabbethai and Jozabad of the chief of the Levites had the oversight of the outward businesse of the house of God That is such businesses as appertained to the Temple but were to be done abroad not in the Temple as the providing of those things as were to be bought with the money that was collected c. see 1. Chron. 26.29 Vers 17. The sonne of Asaph was the principall to begin the thanksgiving in prayer That is the principall of the singers that used to begin the Psalmes when they sung and praised God Vers 19. Akkub Talmon and their brethren that kept the gates were an hundred seventy two See 1. Chron. 9.17 22. Vers 23. For it was the kings commandment concerning them that a certain portion should be for the singers c. That is the king of Persia had commanded that a certain allowance should every day be given them out of the kings treasure this may have reference to the decree of Darius Ezra 6.9 10. or that of Artaxerxes Ezra 7.23 24. or happely to some new directions given by him to Nehemiah at his coming to Jerusalem Some reade these words thus that it was the kings commandment concerning them that a sure ordinance should be for the singers and so they understand it either of David that he had established it as a sure ordinance that the singers should praise the Lord in the Temple every day or else of Artaxerxes that he had ordained that according to the ancient custome the singers should every day perform this service Vers 24. And Pethahiah the sonne of Meshezabel c. was at the kings hand in all matters concerning the people That is the king of Persia made use of him in all things he gave in charge concerning the people as happely to gather the kings allowance for the Temple to receive the peoples petitions and it may be to assist the governour in matter of judgement Vers 36. And of the Levites were divisions in Judah and in Benjamin That is besides the Levites that dwelt at Jerusalem there were some of them also allowed to dwell in severall towns and cities of Judah that they might teach the people the law of God in their severall divisions CHAP. XII Vers 1. NOw these are the priests and the Levites that went up with Zerubbabel c. Nehemiah intending here to relate with what solemnity they kept the dedication of the new built walls of Jerusalem and how the priests and Leuites were imployed herein first he sets down their ancestours to wit who were the chief priests and Levites in the dayes of Jeshua the high priest and that came with Zerubbabel and Ezra or immediately after him from Babylon into the land of Judea and then secondly who were the chief priests and Levites in the daies of Joiakim the high priest the sonne of Jeshua c. vers 12. Now by the chief of the priests is doubtlesse meant in both these catalogues the heads of the severall divisions of the priests that did in their turns wait upon the service of the Temple but then seeing there were twenty foure courses or orders of the priests established by David 1. Chron. 24.7 why there should be here but two and twenty mentioned in the first catalogue and but twenty in the second vers 12. I find not any probable reason given by Expositours Vers 9. Their brethren were over
for the pillar which Absalom here reared up that the memory of his name might thereby be preserved unto posterity it is very probably conceived by some Expositours that it was some monument such as were the Egyptian pyramids which he intended to be the place of his buriall and that upon the relation of his ignoble buriall in the foregoing verse to wit that he was cast into a pit and had a heap of stones thrown upon him this is presently inserted concerning the goodly sepulchral monument which he had provided for himself to shew how he was crossed in his expectation For he said I have no sonne to keep my name in remembrance Hereby it appears that God had before this time deprived him of his three sonnes mentioned chap. 14.27 not judging him worthy of sonnes that would not stoop to honour his own father and that had murthered his own brother and withall hereby God provided for the more peaceable advancing of Solomon to the throne after Davids decease Vers 22. Then said Ahimaaz the son of Zadok yet again to Joab But howsoever let me I pray thee also run after Cushi He pressed again for libertie to go after Cushi as hoping to out-run him and having be-thought himself that he might acquaint David with the good tidings of the victory though he suppressed that particular concerning the death of Absalom Vers 23. Then Ahimaaz ran by the way of the plain and over-ran Cushi Whereas Cushi ran the nearest way which was hilly and mountainous Ahimaaz chose to go a further way by the way of the plain and so by the advantage of the way he out-ran Cushi and came first to David Vers 24. And David sate between the two gates c. That is at the entring in of the citie Mahanaim waiting to heare tidings from the army that was gone forth against Absalom It seems that the gates of cities were in those times built as they are now with high towers and so stronger and thicker then other parts of the wall and therefore had two gates one inward toward the citie and another outward toward the suburbs and between these two gates it was that David now sate Vers 25. And the king said If he be alone there is tidings in his mouth That is if there were many coming together we might well fear they fled from the face of the enemy but if there be but one alone doubtlesse it is a messenger that is sent with some tidings Vers 27. And the king said He is a good man and cometh with good tidings David inferres that if it were Ahimaaz that was coming he doubtlesse brought good tidings because he was a good man whereof there may be two reasons conceived First that being a good man he was not likely to be the first in flying away and therefore it was not likely he fled from the enemy but rather he came with tidâ—ngs and secondly that being a good man he was the more likely to be desirous to bring good tidings to the king or had used to bring him good tidings Vers 33. And the king was much moved and went up to the chamber over the gate See the note above vers 5. partly as apprehending the misery of Absaloms dying in his sinne and partly as remembring that his sinne in the matter of Uriah was now punished in the death of this his ungracious sonne he felt his passions breaking out so violently that not being able to go home to his own house and being withall doubtles ashamed that his passion should be seen he was glad to run up to the chamber over the gate where he was sitting when he heard the tidings there in secret to poure out his sorrow nor was he able to suppresse his passions â—o long but as he went up as it follows in the next words he brake out into a bitter lamentation O my sonne Absalom my sonne my sonne Absalom would God I had died for thee c. Because he feared his everlasting perdition he wished that he had died rather then Absalom CHAP. XIX Vers 3. ANd the people gat them by stealth that day into the citie as people being ashamed steal away when they flee in battel That is in stead of entring the citie in a triumphant manner as souldiers are wont to do that return with victory from the battel they scattered themselves asunder and stole secretly into the citie as if they had fled in the battel and as ashamed of their cowardise were now loth that any body should see them Vers 4. But the king covered his face c. See the note chap. 15.30 Vers 5 And Joab came into the house to the king and said Thou hast shamed this day the faces of all thy servants c. Joab saw that there was some danger lest the hearts of Davids friends and servants should be alienated from him by his carrying of himself so disrespectfully to those that had hazarded their lives for him and he perceived too that his passions were so violent that there was no way to winne him to withstand them unlesse he spake that which might startle him and scare him and hence it was that he spake so roughly and sharply to David more roughly indeed then otherwise it had been fit for a subject to speak to his sovereigne Vers 7. Now therefore arise go forth and speak comfortably unto thy servants c. This Joab advised David to do that he might prevent the alienating of his servants affections from him and perhaps too because the addressing of himself to the affairs of his kingdome would be the best means to allay his passions and indeed after that he came forth and sat in the gate we heare no more of his violent weeping and wailing Vers 9. And all the people were at strife throughout all the tribes of Israel c. That is throughout all the ten tribes of the Israelites the people began to blame one another for siding with Absalom in his insurrrection against his father and to call upon their Elders and Officers to go and submit themselves to him and to fetch him back again into the land of Israel to the citie of Jerusalem that he might be reestablished in the throne to reigne over them again as he had done Vers 10. And Absalom whom we anointed over us is dead in battel c. This is another argument wherewith the Israelites perswaded one another to submit themselves again to David and it is as if they had said we see that God was against us in that attempt of ours to make Absalom king and why do we then still stand it out and not go in and seek reconciliation with our king whom we have wronged Vers 11. And king David sent to Zadok and to Abiathar the priests saying Speak unto the Elders of Judah c. The men of Judah had been the first and chief in siding with Absalom and had delivered up to him the citie of Jerusalem and the strong fort of
Sion and being therefore conscious to themselves of much ingratitude against their sovereigne and fearing withall his just displeasure against them they durst not think of going forth to meet him David therefore by the priests who had stayed all this while in Jerusalem sends them word how ready he was to pardon and forget all that was past Why are you the last to bring the king back to his house and assures them that his affection to them was singular as being his brethren of the same tribe with himself Ye are my brethren ye are my bones and my flesh and acquainting them what he had heard concerning the resolution of the other tribes warns them to take heed that they were not the last in fetching home their king that had cause to be the first and thus was David a notable type of Christ who doth also fetch in rebels to God by proclaiming the tidings of mercy to them the terrours of the Law may scare sinners and make them desire if it were possible to runne away from God but it is the tender of grace in the Gospel that makes them come in and submit themselues Vers 13. And say ye to Amasa Art thou not of my bone and of my flesh c. David doubting that Amasa despairing of the pardon of his offence might draw from him a great part of the strength of Israel now under his command he sent particularly to him both to assure him that he was ready to receive him into his favour again and to give him the respect of a near kinsman for he was indeed his sisters sonne 1. Chron. 2.16 17. and also to proffer him the place of captain of the host the place which Absalom had given him and which Joab now enjoyed and had long since purchased by his valour 1. Chron. 11.6 God do so to me and more also if thou be not captain of the host before me continually in the room of Joab and thus did David seek both to satisfie Amasa and winne him to come in and withall to weaken the excessive power of Joab who had alwayes carried himself too too insolently towards him and had now lately much provoked him both by slaying Absalom against his expresse command and speaking so roughly and rudely to him when he was in heavinesse lamenting his death Vers 14. And he bowed the heart of all the men of Judah even as the heart of one man c. Some understand this of Amasa that upon this promise made to him by David he presently inclined the hearts of all the men of Judah to David so that unanimously they sent to the king their desire that he should return to Jerusalem again and the tender of their fealtie and alleageance to him as in former times but I rather think with others that this is spoken of David and that it is mentioned as the happy effect of this his wise and gentle carriage of himself both towards the men of Judah in generall and Amasa in particular namely that herewith he bowed the heart of all the men of Judah to desire unanimously to settle him again in the throne it might have cost a great deal of bloud to have subdued them by force but by these tenders of grace he bowed their hearts to him even according to his own desire Vers 17. And they went over Jordan before the king That is before the king came over to wit to meet him there on the other side and to fetch him over Vers 20. I am come the first this day of all the house of Joseph to go down to meet my Lord the king It may be justly questioned why Shimei who was of the tribe of Benjamin chap. 16.5 should here say I am come the first this day of all the house of Joseph but to this two answers may be given which have good evidence of reason in them to omit others that are not so satisfactory as these are to wit first that hereby is meant that he was the first of all the tribes of Israel that came to the king as considered apart from the tribe of Judah the Scripture is wont ordinarily to divide the tribes into Judah and Israel and the tribes of Israel so reckoned a part from Judah are usually called Ephraim because that was the chief of those tribes as Esa 7.2 Syria is confederate with Ephraim and the house of Joseph Psal 80.1 Give eare O shepherd of Israel thou that leadest Joseph like a flock and Zach. 10.6 I will strengthen the house of Judah and I will save the house of Joseph and so here in the same regard all the tribes of Israel as distinguished from Judah are comprehended under these words the house of Joseph or secondly that hereby is meant that he was come before any of the house of Joseph I am come the first this day of all the house of Joseph that is I am come before any of the tribes of Israel and because indeed where Judah and Israel or the house of Judah are distinguished in the Scriptures Benjamin is usually reckoned with Judah therefore many Expositours do rather approve of this last resolution of this doubt Vers 22. And David said What have I to do with you ye sonnes of Zeruiah that ye should this day be adversaries unto me That is that you should advise me to that which may prove so exceeding prejudiciall to me my adversaries could not wish me more hurt then this which you advise may bring upon me For do not I know that I am this day king over Israel That is am I not this day reestablished again in my kingdome which I had in a manner lost and would it be convenient to damp the joy of this day with shedding bloud or would it be safe to beat off them that begin now to submit themselves and to endanger my yet unsettled estate by shewing such severitie to him that first stooped and acknowledged his fault and should not Gods mercy in restoring me to my kingdome induce me to shew mercy to others Vers 23. Therefore the king said unto Shimei Thou shalt not die and the king sware unto him Yet at his death he gave Solomon charge to put him to death 1. kings 2.9 his hoar head bring thou down to the grave with bloud as perswading himself happely that therein he should not break his oath first because he sware onely for himself that he would not put him to death I sware to him by the Lord saying I will not put thee to death secondly because he did not as it may seem absolutely enjoyn his sonne to put him to death for this fact but to take some other occasion to do it for so much those words seem to imply which there he useth thou art a wise man and knowest what thou oughtest to do unto him namely that if he watched and observed him well his malice and wickednesse would break forth and give occasion enough in somewhat or other to proceed against him