Selected quad for the lemma: city_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
city_n abraham_n heaven_n zion_n 48 3 8.9889 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A41414 The Christian sodality, or, Catholick hive of bees sucking the hony of the Churches prayers from the blossome of the word of God blowne out of the epistles and Gospels of the divine service throughout the yeare / collected by the puny bee of all the hive, not worthy to be named otherwise than by these elements of his name: F. P. Gage, John, priest. 1652 (1652) Wing G107 592,152 1,064

There are 3 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

Saint Mark Saint Luke and Saint Paul Now the reason why Sinai is said to ingender unto bondage is because the Law which Moses brought the people from Sinai was a Law of terrour punishment and servitude as menacing temporal punishments and corporal death to the infringers thereof and giving onely temporal rewards to the observers of it namely prosperity and plenty in the land of Canaan and this Law is therefore represented by Agar the woman of servitude and bondage whose children could not hope for better condition then that of their parent Agar Hence we may figuratively say that as Abraham Noah Moses and the rest of the Prophets of the old Law were Christians because they served God filially and freely in hope of Christs coming to redeem them so all wicked Christians are Jews serving God onely servilely that is for fear of Hell 25. This vicinity is of Similitude not of Site or Place for between Sinai and Jerusalem lyes a great distance and that tedious by the interposition of the Idumean Mountains so that this vicinity consists in the sterility of Jerusalem producing no fruits of vertue but the meer ceremonial servitude of the Synagogue as Sinai was a very barren ground again as in Sinai this steril law was given so in Jerusalem it was principally kept and as Sinai was out of the land of Promise so this legal or earthly Jerusalem was out of the Church of Christ Militant and triumphant which is the heavenly Jerusalem but lastly and perhaps most appositely to the Apostles Sense as the people who received the law in Sinai were Parents to the Jews of Ierusalem which is a natural vicinity in blood and consequently begets in the Jews the same dispositions of fear and servitude as was in their parents so Ierusalem with her children is by the Apostle called a servant here of fear and not a childe of love 26. whereas the heavenly Ierusalem the mother of Christians is free and bringeth forth children of love not of fear according to that of the Apostle c. Love banisheth or shutteth fear out of doors for in heaven there is no fear at all but a continual and fervent love which rules in that blessed kingdom The Etymology of this word Ierusalem is worthy our remark not that it is derived as Erasmus would have it of Jebus and Salem by both which names it was formerly called but rather of the Hebrew Jire which signifies videbit or shall see and of the old name it had Salem alluding to the mystery which reports unto this change of the name for example the passage between Abrabam and Isaac on the mount Sion when Isaac seeing the fire burn asked his Father Abraham where the victime was that should be sacrificed and Abraham answered God will see to that or provide it whence the mount Sion is called Moria that is to say visio Dei the sight of God as we read Gen. 22. or his provision for that which shall please his Divine Majesty and hence the city which was neer this mountain was called Ierusalem more exactly after the Hebrew written Ierusalem beginning with Iod then with He though the other be as usual as this thorough a common errour in Orthography Now hence it is easie to apply the reason why Heaven is called Ierusalem or Sion since there God hath provided most abundantly for his own glory where he hath made a glory by vertue whereof all the Saints and Angels see his most glorious face and so the Prophets words are verified saying in thy light we shall see light that is in thy light of glory we shall see thy light of Deity an inaccessible however by thy mercy it is become a visible light of comfort to all the blessed court of heaven whose bliss consisteth in the Majesty and Glory of that blissful Sight and is therefore called the beatifical Vision and it is most literally called Ierusalem because as the old Law was given upon mount Sinai so the new was given upon Sion a mount neer to Ierusalem though figuratively it hath this name from being the place of blessed vision or provision as above It is called Free for four respects it hath to freedom First Civil which is opposite to slavish Second Moral which is opposite to the servitude of sin Third Spiritual which is opposite to temporal or corporal and so serves in the freedom of the true Spirit not in the servitude of the binding Letter Fourth Heavenly which is opposite to earthly or transitory She is called fecund or fertil because out of steril Souls bred up in Gentilism she bringeth forth fruitful Christians such as abound in all vertues whatsoever 27. Whence the next verse bids her rejoyce even for this cause of her fecundity joyned to her freedom and though Isai 54. v. 1. bid her rejoyce in her sterility because out of it as out of nothing to be expected from her own barren Gentilism God by his holy Grace brought forth a plentiful Issue of the Church of Christ when the Synagogue of the Jews was antiquated or taken quite away so though she of her self be steril yet she is to rejoyce that out of her sterility springs Christianity as out of barren Sara sprung fruitful Isaac though she travail not with any Homogeneal fruit of her own barren womb yet she is in travail with the Heterogeneal the spiritual fruit of grace so her cry is to be of joy not of sorrow and why because many more are the children of the Church that was desolate when she did first fructifie then were those of the Synagogue that had a husband that was actually and long married unto God but under the notion of a punisher rather then of a rewarder whereas when Christ was espoused to this desolate Church of the Gentiles then God became husband to his Spouse under the notion of a redeemer a rewarder and a Saviour of his people again more are the children of the desolate than of her that hath an husband might be understood comparatively spoken to the time of the primitive Church unto that time of the Synagogue as who should say God hath more servants in the very first days of the primitive Church then he had in all the time that the Synagogue of the Jews did last so fruitfull was the child of the Spirit so barren that of the letter so abundant the child of grace so sparing that of flesh and bloud the reason was because Moses being but a man of flesh and blood was the first-born of the Synagogue but Christ who was both God and Man was the first-born of the Church not that therefore he was not the head and founder thereof but that in the order of Gods decree the first thought was to serve himselfe of his creatures or people regulated in the old Law by a Synagogue in the new by a Church and so by priority of nature as the Schoolemen speake the Jdaea's of Synagogue and Church were first in Gods decree
he lost his own life for that purpose And that this was the last time of our Saviours going to this City of Hierusalem in observation of their Paschall solemnity all the four Evangelists agree Saint John onely adding this circumstance Chap. 11. ver 54. that Jesus came now from the City Ephrem privately to this Feast having fled thither for fear of the Jewes after he had raised Lazarus from death to life a little before and was much envied and sought after to punish not to reward him for his said goodness Now some Expositours will have it that from this very instant of Christ foretelling his Apostles he should die and rise again Judas gave his first way to the temptation of covetousness which moved him to betray his Master for Mony since he did believe the first part of his death but gave no credit to his last of Rising again and so concluded when once his Master was dead all the little treasure of the common purse would fall to his share that feared no account to be exacted from a dead man by his Resurrection nor is this conjecture improbable But to the letter of the Text we shall not doe amisse to observe the phrase our Saviour useth saying here Behold we goe up and indeed the word Ascend or goe up alludes deeply to the mystery of the prediction as above of Christ his passion for by ascending voluntarily now to this Feast he shewed he was as voluntarily to ascend within few dayes out of this City up the Mount Calvary to his Passion Again the Temple of Hierusalem was upon the highest part of the Town and contiguous if not continuous to the Mount Sion which over-looked the City and so by Analogie the heavenly Hierusalem is called Sion besides he now said we ascend as shewing with what alacrity he resolved to rise up the ascending Mount when he was upon the Cross to triumph over Sin Death the Devill and Hell for as Saint Chrysostome sayes well By his voluntary death he shewed himself to be God as well as Man since though to be able to die argued he was man yet to be willing to die shewed he was more than man But see how he was not content to tell them in generall termes of his future Death and Passion and that it should be consummated as was written by the Prophets unlesse he had farther told them what particular death he was to die saying as followes 32. For he shall be delivered to the Gentiles as he was when Pilate and Herod substitutes of the Roman Empire set upon him as Judges and condemned him after many mockeries scourgings and revilings even to the Death of the Crosse but because the proper place to enlarge upon this subject will be when the Passion is dilated upon here we shall say no more of it than that 33. He foretells the Glory of his Resurrection shall recompence the ignominy of his death and this hony of his rising he gave them a taste off thereby to sweeten the gall of his Passion nor shall we now adde more here than that as Christ used the prediction of his Death as a meanes of comfort to his Apostles in hope of his future Resurrection so we must make affliction sorrow grief persecution and death it self for love of God sweet unto us in hope we shall rise from death to glory and from our corruption to incorruptibility as our Saviour did 34. No marvell they understood not these words nor the things they meant for our Saviour did not then intend they should understand them but then only told them what they should hereafter know by experience and remembring they had been foretold as much should not be dismayed but hope they should by the integrity of the prediction including the joy of his Resurrection be eased of their affliction at his Death and Passion Then therefore he gave them the cordiall of comfort and they were after to feel this effect th●reof when it should have a comfortable operation in them which actually it had as soon as he arose from his grave and did appear alive again amongst them all according as he now foretold them he was to doe 35. There is some difficulty in the true meaning of this verse in regard Saint Matthew chap. 20. ver 19. and Saint Mark in his tenth chap. ver 46. both of them say this blinde man was cured by our Saviour as he went out of Jericho whereas Saint Luke here tells us it was done as Jesus went into Jericho again Saint Luke and Saint Mark make mention onely of one blinde man restored to his sight and yet Saint Matthew speaking of the same time and place tells us of two blind then and there cured by Jesus as he passed by them and heard them both in the same words as the other two Evangelists say one onely they called on him for cure saying Iesus son of David have mercy on me on us saith Saint Matthew but for reconciliation of these two different relations by the Evangelists we must recurre to our accustomed observation that Saint Matthew generally under takes to write the Story of our Saviours life most methodically and therefore since he from the verse 29. above cited to the verse 33. ending his said twentieth Chapter continues his Story in the plurall number we are to presume there were two blind men cured though here S. Luke mentions but one and though Saint Mark name that one to be Bartimaeus the sonne of Timaeus so called as Bartholomaeus is called the son of Tholomaeus Bar in Hebrew importing Son hence therefore we are to conclude there is no contradiction in the relation though it be more amply and intirely made by Saint Matthew than by the other Evangelists and as for the differing circumstances of the Miracle being done as Saint Luke here saith when our Saviour went into Iericho happily one of the Two was then cured and the other namely Bartimaeus when our Saviour came out again Saint Matthew and Saint Mark may relate the Story as perfected by a double cure in the exit of our Saviour from Iericho which S. Luke began with a single one in his entrance thither as if it were a continuation of one and the same cure exercised upon two severall persons one at the entrance the other at the exit of the City and so the circumstantialls of the cure make n● diversity therein all being but a restitution of sight to the blinde but whither Christ were going or coming restoring sight to one or two it makes no great matter the Miracle being of the same nature and equally shewing Christ to be God and all Evangelists agreeing they both believed alike and both petitioned in the same stile if there were two of them in fine as silence is no disproof nor contradiction to what another positively affirmeth so Saint Matthews positive affirmation stands good without any constradiction by the silence of Saint Mark and S. Luke to part of the Story
you shall receive or reap corruption But the common sense is that the fruit of carnality is disease corruption death damnation that of spirit vertue life everlasting glory and salvation 9. The Apostle here exhorts to a perseverance in doing good the Priest constantly continuing to teach the Lay to learn to relieve his teacher and to work according as he is taught as if incessant reward were not otherwise to be hoped but for incessant labour So as we may understand this in two sorts we shall reap in due time in the next world if we do not cease our labours in this or we shall even in this world reap incessant reward in due time for our labours here if we labour constantly and slack not our zeales since it is the end that crownes the work either with grace in due time here or glory in due time in the next world 10. That is whilest we have time to sow the seeds of good works let us do good to all people Christians or Heathens not onely to those we catechize though principally to Christians as being domesticals and of one house with us fellow servants in the Church of Christ the true house of God The Application 1. THe last Sundayes service and this do seem to be almost the same onely that was a more general Application to all mankind this to the chosen sort of men who make up the mystical body of Christ his holy Church Wherefore S. Paul in this Epistle makes his addresse particularly to the Priests and Pastours of our soules from the first verse to the end of the fifth at the sixth he begins to tell the sheep their duty to the shepherd and so continues to the end of the eighth verse in the two last verses he concludes with an exhortation to them of perseverance in their Christian duties bidding them do good to all men whatsoever but especially to one another to the domesticals of Faith to those who have not onely Christ their Father but do professe his holy Spouse the Church to be their Mother 2. We see by the Illustration above that the Priests office to us is double the one to cleanse us by administring the holy Sacraments unto us the other to defend us by preaching praying and offering up their daily sacrifices for us Hence we must conclude our duty consists in preparing our selves worthily for receiving those Sacraments from the hands of the Priests lest we incurr the censures of unworthy receivers no lesse then our own damnation if it be the Sacrament of the holy Altar that we do receive and if any other of them there hangs a curse at least upon all who perform the work of God negligently as all unworthy receivers of any Sacraments do or the negligent hearers of any Sermons or of Masse which is the sacrifice as well of the people as of the Priest and these are peculiarly indeed the works of God as being instituted by his sacred Son nay more they are the works of his continued mercy towards us and so surpasse all other his works whatsoever because we are told his mercy is above all his works 3. Hence the Priest is put in mind further then in the Explication above with what a holy intention attention reverence and zeal of soules he ought to administer any Sacrament and also how with the like regards he ought to preach or offer up his sacrifices thereby to comply with the trust of Sayntity which both God and man have put into his hands lest he incurr the odious brand of becoming like the people so the Priest for how ever both are sinners to God yet the Priests are set apart as Saints to the eyes of men and they peculiarly were those he bade be holy as himself was holy who made them dispensers of the mysteries of God unto the people Lastly hence the Lay-men are minded with what humility reverence fear and trembling yet with what confidence comfort obedience with what Faith what hope what love with what adoration with what zeal to God Almighties honour and glory they ought to receive the holy Sacraments to hear the Word of God to assist at the sacrifice of Masse which is not onely a commemoration but even a renovation a repetition in a mysterious way of our Saviours death and passion so they are to look upon the Priest going to the Altar with the same devotion as if they did behold our Saviour going to be crucified Now that both may do this our holy Mother prayes to day as above for that special gift of God that bounty whereby it is performable that ardent charity which sets on fire the world of flesh and makes it flye out into flames of holy love unto his heavenly Majesty for by this love it is that the Church militant is govern'd and by the same love God is glorified for all eternity in his Church Triumphant The Gospel Luk. 7.11 11 And it came to passe afterwards he went into a City that is called Naim and there went with him his disciples and a very great multitude 12 And when he came nigh to the gate of the City behold a dead man was carried forth the onely son of his mother and she was a widow and a great multitude of the City with her 13 Whom when our Lord had seen being moved with mercy upon her he said to her Weep not 14 And he came near and touched the Coffin and they that carried it stood still and he said young man I say to thee arise 15 And he that was dead sate up and began to speak and he gave him to his mother 16 And fear took them all and they magnified God saying that a great Prophet is risen among us and that God hath visited his people The Explication 11. THis was a fair Citie in Galilee within two miles of mount Thabor and so had the name of Faire for Naim imports as much This made the sadder funerall and the more gladsome miracle being in so vast so famous a City into which so great a multitude such a train of people followed our Saviour 12. This seeming chance to man of two such multitudes meeting those within and those without the City at the funerall was designed by God to render more authenticall the miracle God thereby more glorified and Christ the more beloved though it is to be noted that the Jews and Romans too had their burials alwayes out of the Cities unlesse rarely for Kings who were buried in the Citie of Sion David building a place for that purpose Note this onely sonne was also her onely child hence the mothers sorrow was greater to lose in him all the whole hopes of her house being a widdow of note and so past hopes of more of that family 13. By saying to her weep not he shewed his compassion of her sorrow was such that he meant to take away the cause of her tears by restoring her son to life again and so doubtlesse she believed when he