not as in the Temple of God as the answer here would import vvhich therefore is meerly shifting and full of deceit Thirdly he doeth not onely corrupt the text with evill gloses one upon another but he doeth in deed abuse the Scripture and directly pervert it vvhen for an inference he saith If they can proue that Antichrist is the true God c. as if Pauls vvords were not plaine to such as will understand that Antichrist exalteth himself aboue all that is called God so that he as God sitteth in the Temple of God c. and therefore is not the true God but the man of sinne sonne of perdition although that he as God sit in the Temple of God shewing himself that he is God 2 Thes 2 4. Fourthly difference is to be put as I haue noted here before between the man of sinne that sitteth and betvveen the Temple vvherein he sitteth The Man of sinne himself saith the Apostle sitteth as God yet the Temple wherein he sitteth saith the same Apostle is the Temple of God And othervvise how is it possible if he vvere in deed true God sitting in the Temple of God that he should also be the Man of sinne and sonne of perdition c. But see the like in the cases †Pag. 125 126. c. before mentioned that fell out at Ierusalem and the Temple there vvhen Baals Idoll of indignation vvas set at the entry of the house of God Ezech. 8 3 5. and vvhen Antiochus Epiphanes and his Officers profaned the Sanctuarie city of Ierusalem and set the image of Iupiter Olympius in the Temple and seat of God Dan. 11 31 36. c. who vvould not novv put difference between the idols and persons aforesaid on the one hand and betvveen the Temple and city of God vvherein they vvere set vvhich they polluted on the other And if question should be made vvhether the Temple and city so polluted vvere yet still notwithstanding the Temple and city of God and one for proof thereof should alledge the Scriptures aforesaid would any Opposite now reasoning thereabout be so absurde and voyd of reason as to make this or such like inference thereupon If they can proue that the idoll of Baal or Iupiter that Antiochus or any of his Officers is the true God then I wil yeeld that Baals Temple Jupiters Temple Antiochus and his Officers Temple is the true Temple and their city the true city Otherwise c. Or vvho vvould not rather in the feare of God reason thus Although that Baal Iupiter Antiochus and his Officers be idols and vile persons yea an abomination of desolation yet the Sanctuarie and city of Ierusalem wherein they were set and which they profaned were still Gods Temple and holy city notvvithstanding Fiftly obserue here throughout his treatise hovv still he calleth that the Temple Church and body of Antichrist vvhich Paul expressely and purposely calleth the Temple of God And so therein note still his shifts and his errours c. When Antiochus had polluted the Temple of God at Jerusalem and had set the image of Iupiter Olympius therein he sent then also an old man of Athens to compell the Iewes to call it the Temple of Jupiter Olympius 2 Mach. 6 1 2. Antichrist likevvise typed by Antiochus hath polluted the Temple of God in the church of Rome other like churches sitting therein as God and shewing himself to be God 2 Thes 2 4. and novv cometh this man of himself and like the old man of Athens wil needs call it perswade others to esteem and call it the Temple of Antichrist the church of Antichrist the body of Antichrist the Synagogue of Sathan c. Sixtly he doeth not onely pervert the Scripture but also crosse contradict it vvhiles that vvhich the Apostle saith is the Temple of God he saith it is an idoll like Antichrist himself Finally hovv ever he vvould shift of pervert obscure this Scripture and the matter in hand yet the light of the trueth so shineth before his eyes as euen here himself is forced to note and set it downe that upon the Apostles words who saith the man of sinne sitteth as God in the Temple of God our conclusion must be that Antichrist sitteth as God in the church of God These are his owne words and so in deed let this be our conclusion that Antichrist as the Apostle saith is exalted aboue all that is called God or that is worshipped so that he as God sitteth in the church of God Now then this man himself cannot deny but the Apostles vvords will beare this inference yea he saith our conclusion must be thus hereupon So notwithstanding all his strugling and opposition here against he is now driuen nill he will he to giue us the cause against himself and to overthrovv all his ovvne writing hereabout Which being novv done by himself I may the better spare labour in manifesting the vanity and iniquity of his pretended exceptions Onely because the point is of vvaight and of needfull use against the Papists and Anabaptists I will here briefly note a fevv things more which may giue some light for the present and occasion of further search hereafter about this matter And first seeing novv themselues affirme that our conclusion upon the Apostles words must be this that Antichrist as God sitteth in the church of God I aske vvhat church of God it is vvhereof the Apostle saith here that Antichrist as God sitteth therein If they say it is the church of Rome they giue us the cause If they say it is not the church of Rome but some other let them then shew it But in the vvhole processe of this treatise of theirs they still speak of the church of Rome And all the termes that here are used by the Apostle of the man of sinne the sonne of perdition his opposition his exaltation his sitting as God his shewing himself to be God c. they apply to Antichrist the Pope of Rome and his hierarchie But vvhen they come to this other clause of the Temple of God to expound it of the Temple body and Church of Antichrist the Synagogue of Sathan the Temple of the divell c. as they speak almost in every sentence of their treatise hereabout and this also in such sort as they vvill not haue it understood to be the church of God hovv straunge is this how far differing from their better and sounder vvritings heretofore If vve should thus expound and apply the Scripture what outcryes should we heare what reproach should we beare at their hands When M. Sm. as vve savv ‘ Pag. 133 erevvhile applied the city court without the Temple spoken off Rev. 11 2. to the confused assemblies of Antichrist Antichristian persecuters M. Ains could not bear it that the Court of the Temple should betoken Antichrists church c. but did soundly convince and sharply rebuke him Yet now loe himself in this treatise
a chief captain under Nebuchadnezar the king of Babylon how he burnt the house of the Lord and the houses of Ierusalem and brake dovvne the walles thereof c. Jer. 52 12 13. c. Lam. 2 7 9. To vvhich time the 97 Psalme also here alledged may be referred Daniel speaketh of Antiochus king of Syria who magnified himself against God took avvay the dayly sacrifice cast avvay the place of Gods sanctuarie trode it the host of God under foot and as it is in another place of the same prophecy polluted the Sanctuarie of strength or the Sanctuarie and munition meaning the Temple and city of Ierusalem and placed the abomination that maketh desolate So as though the Temple and City of Ierusalem novv remayned yet they were polluted spoiled cast avvay and trode under foot Dan. 8 11 13. and 11 36. with ver 31. Besides the Iewes in the captivitie of Babylon acknowledge that their sinnes deserved it as the Prophets also for their sinnes had denounced it Dan. 9 5 14. Psal 79 8 9. with Jeremies prophecy throughout Whereas the Iewes in the persecution of Antiochus alledge their integritie and faithfull constancie in the vvorship service of God euen unto death Psal 44 17 22. Albeit that divers also then eyther by the persecution of Antiochus or by his flatteries or both were corrupted and dealt vvickedly against the covenant of the Lord. Dan. 11 32 33 34 35. Wherein likevvise there was a fit type both of Antichrists dealing and of the churches estate in this behalf And in all these times the Iewes notvvithstanding vvere the church people of God though some of them were slayne and destroyed yet among them still God preserved his Church and people from the destruction intended by their adversaries Both vvhich as touching the question and Scripture in hand should carefully be observed Finally this Scripture is so to be understood as it may not contradict but agree with that which is written Rev. 11 2 3. where the Court of the Temple is giuen to the Gentiles and the holy City trode upon two and fourty moneths whether this be understood †Resēbling the times of Eliah of Antiochus of Christ among the Pharisees c. of shorter or longer times which yet should haue an end or vvith ver 3. of 1260 yeeres putting a day for a yere And afterward the Temple of God is opened in heauen and therein is seen the Ark of his Testament or covenant c. Rev. 11 19. and 14 15 17. and 15 5 6 8. and 16 1. And God hath his people stil in Babylon Rev. 18 4. So Gods church and people then remayne still undestroyed notvvithstanding all the opposition and exaltation of the Man of sinne with all his tyranny cruelty and persecution had in over and against the church and people of God from time to time untill himself being the sonne of perdition come to be consumed and destroyed in the end Othervvise also the Anabaptists plea should here againe be strengthned who hold †M.S. charact of the Beast p. 56 c. that Antichrist hath utterly destroyed the true Temple the true church and hath abolished the true baptisme of Christ and that therefore they must reare up a new church and get themselues a new baptisme c. And so they proceed from one errour and evill to another Wherein this mans erroneous opinions and corrupt gloses may harden them much the more And hitherto of the first exposition of the vvords aforesaid that here is giuen His other exposition is that vvhen the Apostle saith Antichrist sitteth as God in the Temple of God it is to be understood of their owne vaine ostentation vvhiles they vvill haue ‘ Doth he meane the church of Rome or vvhat els speaketh he off it what I pray you called the Christian catholick church and the Pope the head of the same First I ask vvhereof he speaketh this that they vvill haue it so called If of the Temple of God himself in his very last vvords told us that by it is understood Gods church people in deed If he speak of some other thing he speaketh not to the point in hand And besides vvhat is it that he speaketh off And why doeth he not name it Is it because if so he did his exposition vvould be found eyther contradictorie to the former or some other way to no purpose at all but against himself Secondly if the Apostle had meant that it vvas not the temple of God in deed but onely that they would haue it so called could he not so haue expressed his mynd for this clause of the Temple of God as he doeth in the next vvords touching Antichrist himself vvhen he saith he shevveth himself or pretendeth that he is God and as the Scripture speaketh othervvhere vvhen it noteth the blasphemie of them which say they are Jewes are not but are the Synagogue of Sathan and so doe lye Rev. 2 9. and 3 9. Thirdly if it be thus to be understood as now he saith that it is not the Temple of God in deed but onely that they vvill haue it so called in vain ostentation making the Pope the head thereof then besides his strengthning again of the Anabaptists opinion aforesaid his owne former exposition here giuen can not stand vvhere he said in the last vvords before that it is to be understood of Gods church and people invaded and destroyed by Antichrist as Jerusalem and the dvvellers therein were dealt vvith by the heathens of old For these were in deed the church and people of God though sinfully corrupted not onely in their owne vaine ostentation that they vvould be so called Lastly many often boast vainly of that vvhich notvvithstanding they haue or may haue in deed but yet abuse it or vvalk not worthy thereof as I shevved ‘ Pag. 106. 107. heretofore by the example of the Ievves here spoken off out of Esa 48 1 2. Zeph. 3 11. Matth. 3 9. Ioh. 8 37 39. as likevvise the church of Rome hath a long time boasted that it is the church of God and as other churches and people also doe vvhen yet they abuse and vvalk not vvorthy of that mercy of God unto them Besides that Lucifer the king of Babylons vain boasting of his sitting on the mount of the Congregation c. did not hinder but that it vvas in deed the Temple of God and the Mount of the congregation in the sides of the North c. Esa 14 13. Other things here I omitt as being meerly vaine in deed that a particular church should challenge to be the catholick church vvhich cannot be as they understand it the Pope to be the head of the same vvhich Christ onely is and no other can be Ephes 1 22 23. Let these clauses therefore all by-matters be omitted that perteyn not to the point in hand let the thing be simply propounded as it should be thus vvhether the church
time * 2 Kin. 17 18 9 10 11.12 Israell had no bill of divorce nor was put avvay of a loâ—â— time but abode in the land about two hundred yeeres after as appeareth plainly by the historie But this Scripture vvhich they joyne vvithâ—â— â—ut of Jer. 3.8 was spoken in ‡ Ier. 3 6. Josiahs time the †1 Chr. 3 10 14. fifteenth King from Reâ—oboam aforesaid who raigned ‘ 1 Kin. 14.21 2 Kin. 22 1. about three hundred yeere after him At vvhich time Israell vvas put out of the land of Canaan and caryed away into Assyria a “ Amo. â— 17 polluted land and so had the bill of divorce here â—poken off Which fell out * 2 Kin. 18 10 11. in the sixt yere of Hezekiahs raigne as I noâ—ed before Which times and cases therefore how far they differ one froÌ„ another so from the point in hand vvho is there that cannot obserue 7. Finally here might further be considered how in this chapter also the Lord biddeth Ieremie †Ier. 3 12 13 14. goe and proclaime these words toward the North and â—ay Returne thou backsliding Israell saith the Lord and I vvill not cause myne anger to fall upon you for I am mercifull saith the Lord I will not keep anger for ever Onely acknovvledge thyne iniquitie that thou hast transgressed against the Lord thy God and hast scattered thy waies to the straungers under everie green tree and ye haue not obeyed my voyce saith the Lord Turne O backsliding children saith the Lord for I am maried unto you and I will take you one of a city two of a family and I vvill bring you to Zion Ier. 3 12 13 14. Where divers things about the points in questioÌ„ might be observed if I would stand thereon As namely First that the Lord here biddeth the Prophet Ieremie Goe and proclaime these words tovvards the North that is towards †2 King 17 6. Assyria the land of the Medes vvhither Israell was now caried away out of the Land of Canaan 2. Secondly that he should call them to repentance saying Return thou back sliding Israell saith the Lord c. and so promise them mercy in the name of the Lord saying I vvil not cause myne anger to fall upon you c. which sheweth that the Lord had not dealt with them as they deserved â—ut could yet make his anger fall more upon them if he vvere not merciâ—â—ll and one that kept not anger for ever And that he dealt otherwise herein then a man doth vvith his vvife vvhom he putteth avvay and she becomes another mans as he shewed before in ‡ Ier. 3 1. this chapter Thirdly that he saith here to Israell Onely acknowledge thine iniquitie that thou hast transgressed against the Lord â—y God c. as in the other chapter before “ Ier. 2 2 19. he said to Iudah Thyne owne wickednesse shall correct thee and thy back slidings shall reproue thee know therefore and see that it is an evil thing bitter that thou hast forsaken the Lord thy God c. where those words the Lord thy God * Gen. 17 â— are words of the covenaÌ„t Fourthly and specially that he saith Turne O back sliding Israell saith the â—ord for I am maried unto you c. ‡ Piscator Calvin c Which mariage the best writers upon this â—â—ace expound also of the Lords covenant of grace 5. And finally that â—â—e Lord vvould take them one of a city and two of a familie and bring them to Ziâ—â—â— c. So teaching as †Calvin in Jer. 3 14. one vvell noteth upon this place that in their â—irning to God they should not stay one for another and that though â—â—e body of the people should remain obstinate yet if a few returned to â—â—e Lord he would be readie to receiue them Which sheweth the stabiâ—â—tie and eternitie of the Lords covenant as he spake to Abraham both â—â—r him and his seed in their generations Gen. 17 7. And that the Lord â—â—membreth and performeth his covenant if but a few be made partakers of that grace as Paul also shevveth Rom. 〈…〉 may â—â—â—â—vvise teach us in our comming to the Lord and yeelding obedience to his vvord not to depend upon the multitude nor to stand looking and wayting one for another but readily to follow the Lords calling as in another case Christ spake unto Peter Joh. 21 20 21 22. These and other like things might here be observed But they are not the things that I purpose to insist upon because this point coÌ„cerneth the case of Israel being now put out of the land of Canaan and caried away into Assyria vvhereas our question is of the estate of Israell in their defection from the time of Ieroboam that set up the calues and so forvvard vvhiles yet they were not put away but remained in the land of Cannaan By which all may see that this Scripture here cited by them is vainly alledged being not to the purpose and question in controversie Yet notwithstanding having this occasion I think it not amisse about this matter here to annexe two things further to be considered off the one concerning Israell the other concerning Iudah As touching Israel that whereas they were now put out of Canaan caried avvay into Assyria and placed in Halah and in Habor by the river of Gozan in the cities of the Medes as is recorded 2 King 17 6. there is particular and expresse mention among the places whither they were caried of the cities of the Medes Wherevvith if we compare the Acts of the Apostles we shal find also particular mention hovv when the holy Ghost came upon the Apostles at the feast of Pentecost after Christs ascension and they spake with toungues to the Ievves that were novv at Ierusalem of all nations under heauen to every one in their ovvne toungue that among the rest there were also Medes Act. 2 9. Which is the more to be observed first because this is one of the places before mentioned vvhither Israell was caried avvay by the king of Assyria vvhen God put them out of his land 2 Kin. 17 6. Secondly because Peter now speaking unto these with the rest saith unto them as to the rest the promise is made unto you and to your children c. Act. 2 9 39. like as also upon another occasion straightway after speaking to the Iewes in the Temple he saith unto them Ye are the children of the Prophets and of the covenant which God made vvith our Fathers saying unto Abraham And in thy seed shall all the kinreds of the earth be blessed Vnto you first God having raised up his sonne Jesus sent him to blesse you in turning away every one of you from his iniquities Act. 3 25 26. Thus shevving that God still remembred and regarded his covenant tovvard them and how the grace and benefit thereof vvas extended unto them in Christ Now whereas
8. My people for their sinnes is delivered unto the adversarie the nations stand up against them c. And hitherto of the application hereof unto Israell Now if this Scripture be understood of Iudah then the inferences that he bringeth from hence upon Israell vvill fal upon Iudah Which yet himself acknovvledgeth vvas novv the church and people of God And that it may thus be understood applyed to Iudah these reasons may shew 1. The * Mic. 1 1. title of the prophecy directeth it as vvell to Ierusalem of Iudah as to Samaria of Israell 2. Divers particular speaches in the prophecy it self as when he saith in the first chapter †Mic. 1 5. What are the high places of Judah are they not Ierusalem Again †ver 9. Her wound is incurable for it is come unto Judah he is come unto the gate of my people euen to Ierusalem And again ‡ ver 13. O thou inhabitant of Lachish a city of Iudah bynd the charet to the swift beast shee is the beginning of the sinne to the daughter of Zion for the transgressions of Israell were found in thee And in the second chapter the verses here alledged the general termes ‡ Cha. 2 3. 5 7 8 9. of the house of Jacob and the people of the Lord c. And that these the like termes are in the Scriptures divers times put for Iudah none vvil deny Among many other places see these towching the terme Jacob and the house of Jacob Esa 8 17. and 48 1. Jer. 5 20. Lam. 1 17. and 2 2. Obad. v. 10. and 11. Mic. 2 12. and 3 1 8 9. Nahum 2 2. And for the terme of the people of the Lord applyed to Iudah Jer. 2 11 13 31 32. and 4 11 22. and 5 31. and 6 27. and 8 7. and 23 2 22 27 32. Ezech. 13 10 18 19. Joel 2 17 18 19 26. Obad. v. 13. Zeph. 2 10. in an hundred places besides 3. The particular termes of Zion Jerusalem the mountayn of the Lords house and the like used in this prophecy Mic. 3 9 10 12. and 4 7 8 c. 4. The sharp denunciation uttered by Micah where he saith Zion for your sake shal be plowed as a field and Ierusalem shall become heaps and the mountayne of the house as the high places of the forest Mic. 3 12. is expresly noted to haue ben spoken in the daies of Hezekiah king of Iudah to al the people of Iudah Jer. 26 18. which is very specially to be observed 5. The direct and particular mention that the daughter of Zion shall goe forth of the city Ierusalem euen unto Babylon Mic. 4 10. By all vvhich and the like that in this Prophet may be observed it can not be denyed but that this prophecy was directed to Iudah aswell as to Israell Whither also may be referred the generall reasons here * Pag. 105. before alledged concerning them both Whereupon vvill followe upon these mens assertion that if the Scriptures here cited by them will beare their inference and be applyed to Iudah that they then were not the church and people of God neither however they would be so esteemed and named And so vvhatsoever they would bring upon Israell in this behalf is now by themselues brought upon Iudah so as Iudah by their assertions was not now the Lords not the people of the Lord nor his vvife nor under his covenant nor a true church nor had circumcision or other ordinances of the Lord that vvere the Lords signes and seales of his covenant and forgiuenes of sinnes but such a vvere in their use false and deceitfull cursed and detestable and what not if we should beleeue their assertions and conclusions But vvhether in deed such stuffe and dealing of theirs be not rather to be esteemed false and deceitfull accursed and detestable let the godly vvise judge Touching Hos 2.18.19.20.23 The next Scriptures here alledged are Hos 2 18 19 20 23. vvhich speak of the time to come after their exile and casting out of the land Hos 2 18.19 20 23. vvhen they should againe return unto the Lord agreeing with that vvhich followeth in the next chapter Hos 3 4 5. vvhereas our question is of their estate and condition vvith the Lord vvhiles they vvere yet in the land and not cast out of his house or presence as yet but beloved pitied and holpen of the Lord as appeareth by that vvhich vvent before and follovveth after in this prophecy of Hoseah and by the historie it self 2 Kin. 13 23. and 14 25 26 27. and in many other places both of the historie and of the Prophets as †Pag. 58. c. here before I haue shevved in sundry particulars vvhich I need not repeat Touching Ioh. 10.16 Act. 18 10. 1 Cor. 12 2. Rom. 11 11 20 23.25 26. and 9 4. with Esa 59 20 21. Ezech. 34 23 30. Hos 3 5. By this also may appeare how that which he annexeth of the Gentiles called Christs sheep because they should be brought into his fold and of the Ievves called Gods people and beloved because they shal be graffed againe into Christ is not to the point and question in hand And so the Scriptures also vvhich here they cite abused in this behalf viz. Ioh. 10 16. Act. 18 10. 1 Cor 12 2. Rom. 11 11 20 23 25 26. and 9 4. with Esa 59 20 21. Ezec. 34 23 30. Hos 3 5. inasmuch as they speak of the estate of Ievves Gentiles for time to come vvhereas our question and the Scriptures speaches alledged by us are of Israell for the time then present vvhen novv they vvere in the land of promise not cast out by the Lord as yet Which may suffice for a ful aunsvver hereunto Yet some other things also may be noted that vvil giue further light and confirmation hereunto As first that thus he vvould make Israels estate vvhiles yet they remayned in the land of promise and under the Lords covenant having also the great things of his lavv vvritten unto them c. to be like the estate of the Heathens vvhiles they vvere straungers from the covenants of promise and had not the vvord and statutes of the Lord giuen unto them c. Which I haue noted here before among his errours Secondly that he makes the estate of Israell vvhiles they vvere in the Lords land and before Christ vvas exhibited as is aforesaid to be like the estate of the Ievves at this day vvhen they are novv cast avvay for a time some of the braunches broken of Christ being come in the flesh and refused by them c. Rom. 11 11 12 15 17 20 25. Thirdly that in this treatise of his he so speaketh of Israell of old and of the Iewes at this day as if the Lords covenant euen on his part were not an everlasting covenant stable and enduring for ever concerning them Whereas the Lord himself saith I will establish my
Zedekiah and the other Ievves that remayned at Ierusalem called naughty figges for whoÌ„ greater punishment was reserved Ier. 24 1 2 3 5 c. Also Zedechiah is Iechoniahs uncle 2 Kin. 24 17. and his sonne 1 Chro. 3 16. and his brother 2 Chron. 36 10. in divers respects The place of the holy city is called profane Ezec. 48 15. and 42 20. yet the name of the city is The Lord is there Ezech. 48 35. and that place in other respect may be considered as a part of the holy oblation Ezec. 48 8 20. with 45 1. c. as Ierusalem also is called the holy city Neh. 11 1 8. Mat. 4 5. and 27 53. And the faithful city becometh an harlot and yet is still the daughter of Zion the house of Iacob the Church and people of God Esa 1 1 21. with 10 32. and 37 22. Ier 2 4 13. and 5 20 21. Mic. 2 5. and 3 1 9 10. c. And very many such like every where in the Scripture may be observed And hitherto of Rom 11 11 20 23 25 26. vvhich he citeth and of ver 27 28 29. the citation of which verses he omitteth whereas they are specially to be observed for confirmation and assurance of the perpetuity unchaungeablenes of the Lords covenant made vvith the Fathers Abraham Isaac Iacob and their seed for ever Rom. 9.4 Like things may be observed out of the other Scriptures here cited by him as Rom. 9 4. with vvhich he should haue joyned also ver 5. vvhere the Apostle shevveth that to the Iewes apperteyne the adoption covenants promises Esa 59.20 21. 〈…〉 Fathers c. And Esa 59 20 21. vvhere the Prophet teacheth that the Lords covenant is with them and their seed for ever And Ezech. 34 23 30. where the fruits of the Lords eternall covenant vvith his people are largely described euen * 〈…〉 2â— 25. vvhen he shall haue punished them for their sinnes and â—avenged the quarrell of his covenant upon them Where also is specially to be observed how he is still called the Lord then God and they his people ver 30. which are the words of the covenant And where moreover vve may learn to put difference between this phrase of the Lord being their God and they his people vvhich is so euen †Psal 89 30 34. 106 43 44 45. when and vvhiles the Lord doth visit their iniquities with the rod betvveen their knovving of the Lord their God to be vvith them and they to be his people by the enjoying of his mercies and fruits of his favour according to his adoption and eternal covenant ver 30. and 31. Like as there is difference betvveene “ Ezec. 2 3. 33 7. Zac. 1 1. 2 3 4. a Prophets being among them between ‡ Eze. 2 5. 33 33. Zach. 2 9.11 their knowing of this that a Prophet hath ben among theÌ„ Finally note here hovv this being the onely place of all those that he alledgeth together vvhere the title of Gods people vvhereof he speaketh is ascribed unto them the Prophet in this place speaketh not simply or onely of their being Gods people but of their knowing and finding by experience that the Lord their God is vvith them and that they are his people Which being well observed as I haue shevved here before is the more against this man himself Like as also is the next and last place which he citeth out of Hos 3 5. Hos 3 5. vvhere it is expressely said that vvhen the children of Israel being put out of the land and punished for their idolatrie and other sinnes shal haue fit many dayes without a king c. then afterward they shall returne and seek the Lord their God which are the vvords of the covenant and David their king and shall feare the Lord and his goodnes in the latter dayes By vvhich it is evident that there is all that time no default on the Lords part but that it is vvholly of themselues vvho in so long a time doe not returne and seek the Lord their God and Christ their king nor fear the Lord and come to his goodnesse all this while And vvhereas he speaketh of this people being called beloved in respect of their estate to come he may see in the beginning of this chapter but three or four verses before that which he citeth that this term of beloved yea beloved of their friend and husband was ascribed unto them by the Lord vvhen Hoseah prophecied notwithstanding their adulterous estate being idolaters and apostates The vvords are these vvhich upon like occasion haue ben treated off before Then said the Lord unto me saith Hoseah Goe yet loue a woman beloved of her †Or husband as Ier. 3 20. friend yet an adulteresse according to the loue of the Lord toward the children of Israell who look to other Gods and loue flagons of vvine Hos 3 1. Which Scripture being vvell considered and compared vvith the other Scriptures aforesaid doeth so evidently convince this mans erroneous assertions and abuse of Scriptures as it may suffice for answer and refutation of all that he hath throughout his treatise about the matters aforesaid And hitherto of these objections concerning the circumcision estate of Israell Some other things moe of like sort doth this man and others except hereabout vvhich I need not novv stand upon By that vvhich hath ben said the discreet Reader wil find how to answer any other objections which they bring hereabout And in the things aforesaid I haue vvritten more largely then I purposed that so I might vvith one labour both more convince them and better informe the Reader concerning these things Yet there being another objection or tvvo that are much urged about this matter I vvill novv also in particular annex somewhat further thereabout and then God vvilling proceed to other matters vvhich are novv likewise much called in question OBIECTION VI. But if Israel now were the church and people of God then ought none to haue left them it had ben schisme so to doe c. ANSWER 1. Nay the same Prophets that acknovvledged them to be the people of the Lord yet taught all to leaue and forsake their sinfull estate false vvorship vvhereinto they vvere fallen being novv become idolaters apostates schismaticks that had divided themselues from Iudah c. Hos 4 15 16 17. and 5 2 3 11. and 11 12. Amos 4 4 5. and 5 4 5. with Mic. 1 5 13. 2 5. and 6 16. 2. Euen in Iudah also it may be observed that both in the time of Manasseh vvhen he set up a grauen image in the Temple of God and caused Iudah to sinne vvith his idols as also in the dayes of Iehojakim long after in the time of the Machabees vvhen Antiochus set up his idoll and other profanations in the Lords sanctuarie then the faithfull syncere vvorshippers of God refused to communicate vvith them
by this faith in Christ saveth some of them who doe thus beleeue in simplicity and heare not of their other opinions and courses to be errors and corruptions nor resist the trueth vvhich God vouchsafeth to shew unto them And of this mynd concerning them I haue ben a long time haue by other occasion †In the Answer to M. Jacob p. 13 and 47. c. published it almost tvventie yeeres since And am the more confirmed in it inasmuch as some of them lay downe their liues and dye Martyrs in defence of the Christian faith acknovvledging Iesus to be the Christ the sonne of God against the Turks and Moores and such like enemies of Christian religion besides that many of the Indians and other Pagans with some Ievves are by them converted brought to the profession of Christian religion among whom I doubt not but the Lord hath and saveth his euen by that knovvledge faith of Iesus Christ which by their doctrine preaching among them they are through the mercy of God brought unto Yea and who can say but that wheresoever the name of Christ is preached and called upon the Lord saveth some according to his owne gracious purpose and mercy in Christ Iesus seeing that Iesus Christ is the vvay the truth and the life and whosoever beleeveth in him shal not perish but haue everlasting life Joh. 3 16 17. and 6 35. and 14 6. Act. 8 37. and 16 30 31. and 17 2 3 4. and 18 25 28. and 28 14 23 24. Rom. 10 9 13. Here also to the same purpose might be observed that out of the Church there is no salvation vvhich I suppuse themselues will not deny And that which is more that the Lords constitutions cease not to be his holy ordinances though the people that enjoy them should haue no benefit thereof to salvation but use or abuse them rather to their owne greater condemnation But omitting this I proceed to other reasons as follovveth 3 It hath ben the great question between the Ievves and us ever since the Apostles times and still is whether Iesus be the Christ that was promised and vvhether the Iewes or Christians novv be the church of God Now also there are in the vvorld the Christians the Ievves the Turks Pagans If then the question be asked vvhich of these is the church of God at this day should we not ansvver The Christians and among the Christians also comprise the churches aforesaid for the reasons before specified 4. Seeing baptisme is among Christians a visible signe of the visible Church of God as circumcision vvas of old among the Ievves hovv can vve soundly defend reteyn the visible baptisme received in the church of Rome and that also vvith reference to the circumcision received in the apostasies of Iudah and Israell if vve doe not accordingly acknovvledge the Church of Rome to be a visible church and the people of God as Iudah and Israell vvas in their defection of which more in the next reason follovving A visible church I say though miserably corrupted adulterate and apostate having Antichrist set therein c. Mat. 28 18 19. and Act. 2 41 47. with Gen. 17 7 12. 1 Cor. 1 13 16. and 10 1 2. Col. 2 11 12. and 2 Thes 2 3 4. with Dan. 11 31 36. c. 5. When Ierusalem the faithfull city became an harlot yet vvas it stil the citie of God Esa 1 21. Jer. 2 3 13 20 21 27. Ezec. 16 2 35. c. with Jer. 25 18 29. Dan. 9 18 19. and with Deut. 28.10 When Iudah fell into idolatrie apostasie and other notorious iniquity yet was it * Note the times and read the histories of the judges and Kings of Rehoboam Ahaz Manasseh Iehojakim Zedekiah c. still the church and people of God euen vvhen it had the transgressions and idolatries of Israell the abominations of the heathen as many Gods as she had cities the worship of Baal and of all the host of heauen building them high places images and groues in every high hill and under every green tree forsaking the Lord and setting an image of jelousy an idoll of abomination in the house of God vvhere the Lord put his name her children becomming the sonnes of the sorceresse the seed of the adulterer and the vvhore the children of defection a seed of falsehood and she her self so abominable as she justified Samaria and Sodom through her impieties c. Iud. 2 11 12 13 19 20. c. 1 King 14 21 24. 2 King 16 10 16. and 21 2 9. and 23 31 37. and 24 ch 2 Chron. 12 1 5. and 28 ch and 33 1 10. and 36 11 16. with Esa 1 3 4. and 57 3 4 5. Ier. 2 11 13 27 28. and 7 2 9 17 18. 12 7 10. and 24 ch and 31 21 22. Ezec. 16. and 23 ch Dan. 8 10 11 12. Mic. 1 1 5 9 13. and 2 5. and 2 1 3 5. and 6 2 3. The like may be observed touching Israell in her apostasie and defection as I haue shevved here †p. 58 c. before at large Therefore also the church of Rome that was a faithfull church is become an harlot being fallen into idolatrie apostasie and other notorious iniquitie as Ierusalem Iudah and Israell heretofore is in like sort to be estemed the church people of God that hath thus offended doth thus transgresse as is aforesaid The Proposition touching Iudah and Ierusalem I suppose these men vvill graunt themselues Yet for confirmation of it both touching Iudah Israell see the Scriptures alledged here and before besides many moe throughout the historie and Prophets that might be produced in this behalf The consequence is proved because these were figures and types of the like cases and estate of the Christian churches recorded for our instruction and learning 1 Cor. 10 6 11. with Rom. 15 4. and 2 Tim. 3 16 17. 2 Pet. 2 1. Iude v. 5 11. Rev. 2 14 20. and 11 2. c. And that so as the Scripture it self maketh these to be the very patternes of the Christians apostasie and more particularly of the estate of the church of Rome in this behalf For vvhich see moreover 2 Thes 2 3 4. compared with 2 King 21 7. Esa 14 12 13 14. Ezec. 8 3 5. c. Dan. 8 10 11 12. and 11 31 36 38. Also Rev. 11 2 5 6 compared vvith the Scriptures aforesaid and with Esa 1 10 11 11 21. Psal 59 5. 1 King 17 1. and 2 King 1 10 c. Of which more hereafter 6. And this is the more confirmed inasmuch as it should be sinne in the church of Rome for the Papists and apostate Christians to joyne in mariage with the Pagans to neglect Baptisme not to sanctifie the Lords day c. as it was in Iudah and Israell being in apostasie to joyne in mariage with the heathen to neglect circumcision to profane the Lords Sabbaths c. Dan. 11
waies far more cold corrupt in religion thē formerly had ben Where furthermore and in the verses follovving among other things come these particulars to be observed 1. That the faithfull Christians should be much fevver then the outvvard professing Christians vvho grew novv into apostasie deeper and deeper and so the inner church to be much lesser then the outvvard visible church of Christians like as the holy place vvith the Altar vvas far lesser then the court and city and the Priests that worshipped vvithin far fewer then the people that resorted to the Court and City vvithout To vvhich purpose also may be observed in the Prophet Esay hovv the Ievves professing religion flocked by heaps to the house of God bringing a multitude of sacrifices to the Lord frequenting his Courts and City continually when as now the daughter of Zion the faithfull church of the sealed and elect was left as a cottage in a vineyarde as a lodge in a Cucumber garden as a besieged City so as if the Lord of Hosts had not left them a feed a very small remnant they should haue ben as Sodome and Gomorrah utterly cut off and destroyed Esa 1 2 8 12. c. II. That the foresaid syncere Christians were as it vvere hid though knovven approved kept by the Lord in respect of the outvvard professing Christians that were open and knowen abroad unto men as the inward parts of the Temple were more hid and secret in respect of the outward Court and City that vvere patent to the view and accesse of al. III. That some had entrance accesse into the more invvard church so to call it through the way and estate of the outvvard and visible Church though ‘ Note this also for baptisme the sacrament of entrance into the church had in times of apostasie now held and frequented by the Hierarchie and Christians in apostasie like as the entrance and passage into the more inward parts of the Temple was through the City and Court that was vvithout though now giuen to the Gentiles the Iew Princes and people of Sodome and Gomorrah and by them trode upon as is aforesaid IIII. That as among the Ievves * Psal 59 3 4 5. 54 3 5. with Esa 1 2 10. c such as were tretcherous apostate persecuting strong prevayling outwardly were of old called Gentiles or heathens so now among the Christians such also as are tretcherous apostate persecuting mighty and outvvardly prevayling are likewise here called heathens or Gentiles V. That God in this estate stirred up among and against them his witnesses few yet sufficient seeing they are tvvo and are also strengthned sanctified directed preserved heard and blessed of the Lord as were †Rev. 11 4 with Zac. 3 4 ch Ioshua and Zerubbabel tvvo Oliue trees and two candlesticks in one respect ‡ Rev. 11.5 6. with Ex. 7 19. c. Numb 16 15 c. Moses and Aaron ‘ 1 Kin. 17 1. 18 19 9 17. 21.17 18 24. 1 King 1 10 12 17. and 2 9 23 24. 3. 5 6 7 8 9 13 14 21 Luk. 4 24 25 26 27. Rom. 11 1 5. Jam. 5 17 18. Eliah and Elisha in other respects to vvhom here may reference be made or as “ M. Forbis on Rev. 11 s 3. some think also to the faythful witnesses of the trueth that were among the Iewes when Antiochus persecuted them and profaned the Temple and vvorship of God Dan. 7 8 25 and 8 9 14. and 11 31 39. and 12 7 10. This also is fitly applied to the old and New Testamēt c by M. Bright Napeir c. VI. That †Rev. 11 7 12. with 14 9 12. and Col. 2 5. these vvitnesses being stayn by the beast the Antichristian hierarchie and Locusts aforesaid and their corps lying unburied in the street of the great city Babylon spiritually called Sodome Egypt where also our Lord was crucified and thus beheld of the people and nations to the great rejoycing of them that dvvell on the earth yet then aftervvard at the time appointed they stand upon their feet againe being revived by the power spirit of God as * Luk. 1 13 17. with Mal. 4 5. Matt. 11 14. and 17 10 13. Iohn Baptist in spirit povver was Elias †Ezec. 37. 1 10. the dead bones in Ezechiel vvere revived and stood up on their feet againe as ‘ Gen. 4 25 God gaue Sheth to Eue another seed in stead of Abell vvhom Cain slevv and so are called up into heauen being novv by the favour and power of God freed from the earth of Antichrists apostasie separated from communiō therewith to enjoy the heauenly estate and benefit of the faith and order of Christ wherein the churches at first were set by the Apostles VII Where note that by heauen in this book of the Revelat. is often meant the more syncere intire and heauenly estate of the church for the faith vvorship and order thereof and by the Earth the degenerate corrupt and earthly estate thereof in apostasie Also that as by degrees the church did degenerate and not all at once so also the restauration thereof is not all performed at once but proceeds on by degrees as we may obserue a different condition of these witnesses themselues in their first testimonie and in their revived estate and aftervvard again in the 14 chap. which may be a further explication of this the Angels there spoken off ‘ Rev. 14 6 8 9. proceed still one of them further then another and †v. 9 c. the third calleth more directly and earnestly for separation and utter leaving of the Beast his worship and marks then did the first and second and then afterward the other Angels there spoken of are said to come one of them “ ver 15. out of the Temple and another * ver 17. out of the Temple which is in heauen the Scripture thus shewing how the trueth is manifested and proceedeth on by degrees and hovv the faithfull are brought by the Gospell from yeelding homage unto the Hierarchie of Antichrist and grovv up more and more to haue the Temple in heauen the Church in her heauenly open and syncere estate as it was before the earthly corruptions apostasie grew upon it VIII That the event of things performed accordingly may the more confirme us that liue in this age hereabout inasmuch as now we know that ‘ Guiliel de Sancto amo re Marcilius Patuvius Dante 's Fracisc Petrarcha Eckhardu◠John Wicleff c. the former Angels and vvitnesses of old though godly men and Martyrs yet continued themselues many of them in the apostate church of Rome and other churches that were corrupted with the like apostasy preaching the Gospell unto among them calling them from idolatrie denouncing the fall of Babylon c. vvhereas the * Luther Viret Calvin
then apply it unto that vvhereof it vvas a figure and accordingly understand it Or may not vve so understand and apply it as the Apostle doeth vvho as himself saith here applies it to a particular church 1 Cor. 3 16 17. vvith which place may be joyned 2 Cor. 6.16 though that may also be further extended Besides was not the Temple in Israell for any and every Synagogue familie and person among them And may not we now accordingly apply it to the Churches and Christians of the Gentiles And that the more seeing that then also it vvas for them coÌ„ming to the faith of Israel vvhether mo or fevver Or vvere not the Ievves distributed into severall and particular Synagogues which being joyntly considered vvere and might be esteemed as one people And are not the Christians euen those among whom Antichrist hath most prevayled distributed likewise into particular churches or parishes Which if any would in some good respect consider joyntly as one people vvho would striue about it so as it were not any way abused for maintenance of any errour against the trueth or vvord of God But of this I will not insist neyther alledge other things that here might be observed That alone may suffice vvhich I noted here before By reason whereof also I need not stand on that vvhich he speaketh about the catholick or universall church seing it is ynough for the matter in hand to find it in the particular churches so as is aforesaid Yet some things by this occasion may here be noted vvithall As namely that the Church of Christ is sometimes accounted as one ‘ Sal. Song 4 12 16. and 5 1. 6 2 11 garden being considered joyntly in one sometimes as many or sundry * Sal. Song 4 15. 6 2. 8 13 gardens in respect of the divers particular congregations thereof Each of which particular ones both is a garden it self and is also a part of that one or universal garden of the Lord. So as he vvhich dwelleth the trees herbes vvhich grovv in any one of these may be said to dwell and grovv not onely in that particular garden alone but also in the general or universall garden as it compriseth al the particular gardens within it they being al of them parts of the generall Likevvise the Church is sometimes resembled by ‘ Exod. 25 31. 2 Chr. 13 11. Zac. 4 2 11. one Candlestick having one shank or shaft out of which come divers branches vvherein are * Exod. 25 37. with Rev. 1 11 12 20. and 2 3 ch seuen severall lampes so as the light vvhich is set in any one of the lampes standeth not onely in that particular lampe but in the generall candlestick sometimes by “ 2 King 7 49. 2 Chron. 4 7. ten candlesticks sometimes by ‡ Rev. 11 4. two c. so noting both one catholick Church in generall divers particular Congregations in speciall sometimes moe sometimes fewer yet so as they are alwaies parts and members of the generall or universall vvhether they be moe in number and more florishing or fevver more decaying Where note moreover that the Candlesticks and Lampes were set in the Temple of God and that the church of Rome vvas a golden Candlestick as well as the rest of the Primitiue Churches that this man himself saith definitely †Animad p. 103. the true churches were many of them apostate when John wrote whom yet notwithstanding the Scripture calleth Christ acknowledgeth them to be †Rev. 1 11 12 20. and 2 1. golden candlesticks In any of vvhich if Antichrist the man of sinne had sit as in the church of Rome I suppose this man vvould not deny but his fitting then should haue ben in the Temple of God whether it vvere coÌ„sidered as a particular Lampe and Candlestick it self ’‘ M. Brig on Rev. 11 4. or as a branch also and part of the great and generall Candlestick vvhich is †Rev. 1 11 12 20. and 2 1. observed in the respects aforesaid to be a type both of the Catholick church and of the particular Congregations thereof like as here the Temple is by this man himself acknowledged and rightly also to be a type of both Animad pag. 78. As for the catholick or universall Church which the Pope claymeth for his Temple what is that to us vvho speak of the Temple of God spoken off by the Apostle 2 Thes 2 4. And vvhereas he vvould be taught hovv that vvhorish company that worship the Beast and Dragon can be the true catholike church spouse of Christ although that which I haue noted before be sufficient for the point in hand neither meane I now to insist on other things yet seeing thus he speaketh here let him first remember hovv but a litle before he told us ‘ Animad p. 77. the catholike church of the novv Romish religion as themselues describe it hath one part thereof on earth another under the earth and a third part in heauen now here himself speaketh onely of such as are on earth and those also such as vvorship the Dragon and the Beast spoken off Rev. 13 4. whereas the Catholick Church in deed conteyneth al the Churches and people of God that haue ben from the beginning of the world before ever there vvas a church yea or a city at Rome and that shal be to the end of the vvorld in any and every age thereof and in another respect all and onely the elect of God both Angels and men 2. And let himself now tell us vvhether he think there was no other church or churches of Christians catholick or particular vvherein Antichrist sate synce the apostasie of the Man of sinne but such as worshipped the Dragon which gaue power unto the Beast and the beast also himself withall Rev. 13 4. And who then were the Tabernacle those that dwelt in heauen whom the beast blasphemed and the Saints with whom he made vvarre tvvo and fourty moneths Rev. 13 5 6 7. and of vvhat church or churches they were considering also that the apostasie began so soone and spread so far and continued so long 2 Thes 2 3 7. with Rev. 11 1 2 c. 3. Let him also remember how Ierusalem came to be ‘ Ezec. 16 2 35 c. and 23 2 43. c an harlot old in adulteries and the Ievves to be †Esa 1 4 5 c. a sinfull nation laden with iniquitie forsaking the Lord and revolting more and more yea * Esa 57 3 4 5. c. sonnes of the soâ—ceresse the seed of the adulterer and the whore “ Esa 65 2 3 c. a rebellious people which walked in a way not good after their ovvne thoughts ‡ 2 Chron. 36 14. c. transgressing after all the abominations of the heathen and polluting the house of the Lord which he had hallowed in Ierusalem c. vvhenas yet they vvere
still notwithstanding the city people and temple of the Lord. Esa 1 3. and 3 12. vvith Jer. 50 28. and 51 11 35 36 45 50 51. 4. And as for the true catholick church and spouse of Christ vvhereof he speaketh besides that it conteyneth onely the elect and all of them in all ages and places of the vvorld as is aforesaid himself also knoweth that it is a church invisible unto us whereas our question is of the Temple of God vvherein the Man of sinne sitteth and so of the visible Church polluted and profaned by Antichrist as the Temple of God at Ierusalem vvas of old both by the Iewes themselues and by Antiochus c. 2 Thes 2 4. Rev. 11 2. compared with 2 Chron. 36 14. c. and Dan. 8 9 14. and 11 31. c. 5. Lastly obserue here how still he speaketh and useth the terme of Antichrists Temple vvhereas vve speak of the Temple of God vvhereof the Apostle speaketh 2 Thes 2 4. and so of the Lords Court and City spoken of Rev. 11 2. vvhich hovv ever he cannot now admit to signifie the church of God yet he hath both taught it ‘ Def. of Script p. 14. c. heretofore so as he need not now be taught it again if he will but peruse what himself formerly vvrote about this matter and here againe he teacheth it †Animad p. 80. in the very next page follovving vvhere he interpreteth the Temple of God * 2 Thes 2 4. here spoken off to be Gods church and people thus still forgetting and contradicting himself of vvhethersoever he meane it vvhether of the church catholick or particular Let him chuse vvhich he vvill to expound it of and apply it unto And then let him tell us vvhether it be no othervvise the church of God but as the Divell himself is an Angell of light expounding his own words as shal please him best In the next place vvhere he saith that “ Animad p. 79. the very word Temple leadeth us to understand Antichrists church to be but a counterfeyt c. mark first how he keeps not the words of the Text. The Apostle saith not onely the Temple but the Temple of God So his exception and assertion here keeping to the Apostles vvords and the point in hand is this in deed thus to be propounded that the very phrase of the Temple of God leadeth us to understand Antichrists church to be but a counterfeyt Which if so it were then also when the Apostle saith to the Church of Corinth in the Scripture that himself cited ‘ Animad p. 78. here but a litle before ’‘ 1 Cor. 3 16. know ye not that ye are the Temple of God his meaning should be according to this glose know ye not that ye are a counterfeyt church Againe ‘ ver 17. If any man defile the Temple of God him shall God destroy that is according to his collection here If any man defile a counterfeyt church him shall God destroy And again “ 2 Cor. 6 16. What agreement hath the Temple of God with idols for ye are the Temple of the living God that is according to this understanding here What agreement hath a counterfeyt church vvith idols for ye are a counterfeyt church c. Or to keep to the word Temple alone as himself here chuseth to doe let him remember hovv he said here in ‘ Animad p. 78. the next page before that the Temple figured out Christ primarily Like as Christ speaking of his body said to the Ievves Destroy this Temple and in three dayes I vvill raise it up speaking of the Temple of his body Ioh. 2 19 21. Will this man therefore novv thereupon gather as here he doeth that the very vvord Temple leadeth us to understand Christs body to be but a counterfeyt So in deed ‘ Daenaeus in Augustin de haeres the Marcionites and other hereticks of old held that Christ was not truly man but had a feyned and fantasticall body vvhich he brought from heauen and took not of the substance of the Virgin Marie Wherefore also they put out of the Gospels the genealogie of Christ described by Mathevv and Luke c. What a strength now such collections as this man maketh giues to these heresies revived again by some Anabaptists let the wise judge and let the weak take heed of such counterfeit gloses Moreover in ’‘ Animad p. 80. the very next page following he tels us that Antichrists sitting as God in the Temple of God spoken off 2 Thes 2 4. is to be understood of his invading and destroying Gods church and people as the heathens of old dealt vvith Jerusalem and the dvvellers therein And novv here he tels us the vvord Temple leadeth us to a counterfeyt So as then by his doctrine eyther Antichrist hath invaded and destroyed but a counterfeyt and therefore not the church people of God in deed neyther is his dealing like the heathens of old vvho invaded and destroyed Ierusalem the Lords city and the dvvellers therein in very deed or els he doeth still contradict himself as in deed he doeth By which also may appeare hovv notably this man himself playeth the counterfeyt so might be left vvith all his counterfeyt gloses till God giue him better grace vvere it not that the trueth and good of others also are to be respected vvithall Where he saith the Temple and tabernacle in Israell vvas not the church congregation of Gods people ‘ properly See vvhat he saith to M. Sm. hereabout Def. of Scrip. p. 5 8 c. properly but a sacramentall signe of Gods dvvelling vvith them c. What then vvere they therefore but counterfeyts not a Temple and Tabernacle in deed and in trueth Or did they not in Gods ordinance figure out the church as himself affirmed here a litle before so were the church figuratiuely Or doeth not the Apostle so understand and apply them in the places before mentioned 1 Cor. 3 16 17. 2 Cor. 6 16. Ephes 2 21. Circumcision also and the Passeover in Israell vvere signes of Gods covenant leading unto Christ were they therefore but counterfeyts and not a cutting of the foreskin and a lambe in very deed Or were they not Gods holy Sacraments and fit antitypes of ours in deed and in trueth Thus by his doctrine might all Gods ordinances and types in Israell be esteemed but counterfeyts and all the doctrines comforts directions that throughout the Scriptures in ‘ Annot. on Gen. Exo. Psal c. his owne Annotations are derived from them might be turned avvay as being taken but from counterfeyts Hovv this again may strengthen the Anabaptists in their errors vvho vvould not haue us to reason from circumcision to baptisme from Israell to the church now c. all of judgment vvill easily discerne But novv at length after he hath made a great florish to shevv that the Temple is a