Selected quad for the lemma: city_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
city_n	abate_v	judgement_n	writ_n	28	3	10.5108	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A66669	Maximes of reason, or, The reason of the common law of England by Edmond Wingate ...	Wingate, Edmund, 1596-1656.	1658 (1658)	Wing W3021; ESTC R10401	1,156,030	747

Wardship of an use 8 In a writ of Ward the case was this before the Stat. of 27 H. 8. Dyer 12. 28 H. 8. 54. c. a man enfeoffs I. S. of Knight-service land to the use of the Feoffor and his heirs after I. S. enfeoffs I. N. to the use of the Feoffor and his wife and the heirs of the Feoffor the Feoffor dies living the wife having a sonne within age In this case the sonne shall be in Ward in the life of the Feme by the Stat. of 4 H. 7. as heire of Cestuy que use because the ancient use doth still remain in the sonne notwithstanding it be in some sort altered in respect of the Feme for by the last feofment the sonne had no more conferred upon him then he had before so as notwithstanding the last Feofment there was still a reversion of use in the sonne and not a new remainder because a thing cannot be given to a man which he hath already Vide plus ibidem vers fine So Cestuy que use of two acres one holden by priority the other by posteriority makes a Feofment of both to his own use this makes no equality of tenure Recovery Feoffment because the ancient use which he had before still remains The Lord Rosses case 9 If one recover against me by a common recovery Dyer 18. 105. 28 H. 8. and after I infeoffe the recoveror he shall be still seised to my use for he shall be adjudged in by the recovery and not by the Feofment 39 Lex non Praecipit inutilia Vide M. 177. 5. Co. Inst pars 1. 389. b. 3. Littl. § 743. 1 If Tenant in taile enfeoffe his Vncle in fée Warranty destroyed who aliens to a stranger with warranty to hold to him and his heires or to him his heires and assignes and the Vncle afterwards takes again an estate of the land in fée in this case the warranty is destroyed because it were néedlesse for the Vncle to warrant the land to himselfe and the Law will not command or suffer things that are in themselves uselesse and unprofitable Co. l. 5 89. a. 4. Frosts case 2 When a man is in the custodie of the Sheriffe by process of Law A prisoner in custodie needs not be formally arrested and after another Writ is delivered unto him to take the bodie of him that is so in his custodie he is immediately by judgement of Law in his custody by force of the second Writ albeit he make no actuall arrest of him for to what purpose should he arrest him when he is already in his custodie Et lex non praecipit inutilia quia inutilis labor stultus c. Co. l. 6. 29. b. 2. Greens case 3 When a Parson is admitted instituted and inducted to a Church An Incumbent not reading the Articles is out without sentence and doth not read the Articles according to the Statute of 13 Eliz. 12. the Benefice is thereupon void by force of that Statute without procuring a sentence declaratory to deprive him for it will be néedlesse to obtaine such a sentence when the Living is already voyd and open for the Patron to present another Co. l. 8. 61. a 3. Beechers case Co. lib. 8. 126. a. b. 4 In judicial processe In a Judiciall writ the plaintiff shall not find pledges the Plaintiffe shall not be enjoyned to finde pledges de prosequendo for in those processe although the Plaintiff be barred nonsuited or that the Writ abate yet shall he not be amercied because such processe are grounded upon a judgement and record And it is a needlesse and vaine thing to binde the Plaintiff to finde pledges in such cases where he cannot be amercied Vide supra 35. 20. The case of the City of London 5 That which appears plainly to the Court That which appears need not be averred ought not to be averred by the party So in the City of Londons case the Constitution there made appearing to be agréeable to and warranted by their Charter néeded not to be so averred So also no price of money shall be expressed in the Writ because it appears of it selfe 46 E. 3. 16. Likewise 12 H. 4. 17. The sonne within age brings an Assise of Mortdancester he ought not to aver that it is within time of limitation for it appears Co. l. 10. 67. b. 4. The case of the Church-warden of St. Saviour c. 6 In a speciall verdict concerning a Bargain and Sale Demise The consideration not to be found by a Jury or the like the Iurors shall not be constrained to finde the payment of the money mentioned amongst the other considerations for it shall be néedlesse to finde that which is affirmed to be already payd and satisfied in time before the Grant and is a personall consideration already executed And this is true as well in the Kings case as in the case of a Subject F. N. B. 38. l. 7 Where in a writ of right of Advowson Parson imparsonee shall not have a writ to the Bishop c. the Defendant claims the same Advowson as Parson imparsonée albeit the title be found for the Defendant yet shall he not in that case have a Writ to the Bishop ad admittendum Clericum For in construction of Law he is already in the Benefice F. N. B. 106. g h. 8 If a man recover in a Praecipe quod reddat against a Tenant by false Verdict No attaint before execution the Tenant cannot have an attaint before execution bée had against him because in an Attaint the judgement is that he shall be restored c. and it were improper and néedlesse to give such judgement when the Tenant still retains the possession of the land Note that this is put as a quere in Fitz but hee seemes rather to favour this opinion c. 〈◊〉 tenants 〈◊〉 need not ●verred ●nced 9 In an action upon the Statute of 32 H. 8. 9. Pl. Co. 87. b. 3. Partridges case against buying of pretenced Titles if the Plaintiff sheweth by his count that neither the Defendant nor any of his Ancestors nor any other by whom he claims c. were in possession of the land c. nor of the reversion or remainder c. nor received the rents or profits c. by the space of a yeare c. The Plaintiff néed not aver the title to be pretenced for the Statute it selfe maketh the right of him which hath not béen so in possession to be pretenced and therefore to aver that which appears plainly by the Statute it selfe and the Declaration is néedlesse and impertinent So if it be pleaded ●eed of ●nment that the Lessée surrendred to the Grantée of the reversion there is no néed of pleading attornment for attornment is included in the surrender 40 Where the foundation faileth all goeth to the ground Debile fundamentum fallit opus

sutes Co. l. 10. 48. a. 3. in Lampets case great oppression of the people principally of terre-tenants and the subversion of the due and equal execution of Iustice the wisdom and policy of the Sages and Founders of our Law have provided that no possibility right title or thing in action shall be granted or assigned to strangers and as they cannot be granted by the act of the party so right of action cannot be transferred by act in Law as unto the Lord by escheat neither shall the Lord of a Villein have things in action as appears in 22 Ass pl. 37. c. Co. l. 3. fol. 1. And in the Marquess of Winchesters case Right of action to land was not given to the King by an Act of Attainder And all this was for the quiet and repose of terre-tenants Howbeit all rights titles and actions may by the like prudence and policy of the Law be released to the terre-tenant for the same reason of his repose and quiet and for the avoidance of contentions and sutes and that every one may live in his vocation in peace and plenty Ecclesiastical livings 26 To preserve Ecclesiastical possessions from alienation in prejudice of the Successor Co. l. 10. 60. a. 3. in the Bish of Sarums case the prudence of the Sages of the Law did provide that no sole Corporation should be trusted with the disposition of his possessions as to bind his Successors but in such case they were to have the consent of others as the Bishop was to have the consent of his Dean and Chapter the Abbot of his Covent the Parson of his Patron and Ordinary sic de caeteris Auditor of the Court of Wards 27 The Law to prevent any miscarriage in matters of Iudicature hath provided Co. l. 11 4. a. 2. in Auditor Curles case that no judicial office shall be granted in reversion and the rule of Law in this point is Officia Judicialia non concedantur antequam vacent And the reason is to prevent a great inconvenience which may insue thereupon for that he who at the time of the grant in reversion may be able and sufficient to supply the office of Iudicature and to administer equal justice to the Kings Liege people may before the office fall become unable and insufficient to perform it And therefore the Kings grant of the office of Auditor of the Court of Wards unto John Churchil and Iohn Tooke in reversion after the death of Walter Tooke and William Curle was adjudged void because it was an office of Iudicature in that Court and therefore could not be granted in reversion Error in London 28 If a man hath judgement given for him in London in the Sheriffs Court F.N.B. 24. a. or before the Maior and Sheriffs in the Hustings of London and the defendant to delay the execution of the judgement sues a writ of Error to remove the Record before the Maior c. in the Hustings or before certain Commissioners if the judgement be given in the Hustings c. and afterwards the defendant eloyns his goods goods out of the City or wasts them to the intent that the plaintif should not have execution of those goods In this case the plaintiff may have a special writ directed to the Maior and Sherifs to take order that so many of the goods of the defendant as amount to the value of that which is recovered may be safely kept to satisfie the plaintif if he shall have the judgement affirmed for him so as execution of the former judgement may be made c. of the same goods c. Security of the Peace 29 Before a man can have security of the Peace against another F.N.B. 79. h. lest the cause of his complaint may arise rather from malice than any just ground of fear the party complainant ought first to make oath that he requires the Peace against the other for the safeguard of his body and not out of malice And this course is stil used in the K. B. and before Iustices of Peace And it was also the usual course in the Chancery to make such oath before a Master of that Court before he could have it granted but of later times that course hath been left in Chancery which Fitzharbert saith is not well done because such prosecution for the most part procéeds rather from malice than any just cause of fear F.N.B. 113 a. 30 The King of right ought to save and defend his Realm as well against the Sea as against Enemies Oyer Terminer for Nusances that it be not surrounded and laid waste and to provide remedy for the same and also to take order that his subjects may have their passage throughout the Realm by bridges and safe wayes c. And therefore if the banks of the Sea be broken or the Sewers and drains be not scowred that the fresh waters may have their direct course the King for the prevention of such damage as may happen by reason of such defaults might by the Common Law before any Commissions of Sewers c. grant commissions to inquire hear and determine such defaults Pl. Co. 67. a. 2. in Dyve Maninghams case 31 The persons mentioned in the second branch of the Statute of 23 H. 6. 10. viz. such as were in ward by Condemnation Bailment exemption Capias utlagatum or excommunicatum surety of the peace or committed by command of the Iustices or Vagabonds refusing to serve were not bailable by the Common Law before that Statute for the Inconveniences which might ensue thereupon Co. l. 5. 83. b. in the case of Market overt 32 No sale of stoln goods but in a Market overt Market overt alters the property And therefore if stoln plate be openly sold in London or elswhere in any other market overt in a Scriveners shop that sale alters not the property because it is no market overt for plate it is otherwise if it be openly sold in a Goldsmiths shop but if the sale be there behind a hanging or Cupboard or in a ware-house or other part of the house and not openly that passengers may observe it such sale alters not the property And this the Law hath ordained to prevent felony c. Vide Max. 191. 3. 134. 14. Co. I●st pars 1. 6. b. 4. 31 It was resolved in the C. B. Pasc 10. Feme covert no witnesse for the Baron Iac. that a wife cannot be produced as a witness either against or for her husband and one of the reasons of that resolution was in respect it might be a cause of implacable discord and dissention betwixt the husband and wife and a mean of great inconvenience H b. 36. Druries case 32 Drury brought a Quare Impedit against Kent the Incumbent and others and upon surmise made to the Court Prohibition that Kent did fell timber upon the Glebe and upon the lands of