Mount XVII 6. IX Deut. 21. By which means the Calf was utterly abolished and demonstrated as Abarbinel notes to have no more Divinity in it than the dust or water hath And made the Children of Israel drink of it He did not constrain them but having no other water they could not avoid when they were thirsty to drink with this mixture Which Moses threw into it not to discover who were guilty of Idolatry as the Jews fancy who say this was like the Water of Jealousie V Numb 27. which made their Bellies swell or their Beards as some have since fabled turn yellow for it was a general Apostacy v. 1 3. but to make them sensible how vile a thing this Idol was which was gone into their Draught and mixed with their Dung and their Urine They that have a list to see the Conceits of the Jews about it may look into Selden de diis Syris Syntag. I. c. 4. and J. Wagenseil upon Sota p. 1128. Ver. 21. And Moses said unto Aaron what did this people unto thee It was not sufficient that the Idol was destroyed but he thought fit to call his Brother to an account for his mis-government in his absence Who makes a very weak defence as all Commentators observe to whom I refer the Reader And shall only note That the best Apology he could have made had been this if it had been true that he only represented God unto them as he had represented himself to him and the Elders of Israel when the Cherubims in the form of Oxen made part of the Train of the SCHECHINAH or Divine Majesty But he says not a word of this which I suppose therefore is a groundless opinion That thou hast brought so great a sin upon them If they had made or built an House for the Divine Worship saith Sepher Cosri in the place above-named according to their own fancies that they might have offered their Sacrifices there and directed their Devotions thither it would not have seemed to me so grievous a sin for at this day we make such Houses and have a veneration for them and promise our selves the Divine Benediction in them c. But to make an Image was directly against the Command of God and to fancy that he would be present with that which he abhorred very much aggravated the Crime Ver. 22. And Aaron said let not the anger of my Lord wax hot He beseeches him in a very humble manner to hear him calmly Thou knowest the people He had been long acquainted with their rebellious and obstinate Humour which made them fall a murmuring as soon as ever they were delivered from Pharaoh at the Red-sea XV. 24. XVI 2 c. That they are set on mischief The words in the Hebrew beráhu are more emphatical they are in wickedness or in Idolatry like that expression in St. John 1 Epist V. 19. the whole World lyeth in wickedness Or as we say in our Language they were stark naught Ver. 23. For they said unto me Make us Gods c. This Verse is but a recital of what the People said to him v. 2. see there Ver. 24. And I said unto them Whosoever hath any Gold let him break it off so they gave it me This is the sense of v. 2. 3. Then I cast it into the fire and there came out this Calf He speaks as if he did not make the Calf but the Gold being cast into the fire out it came in this form Which made Dr. Jackson think it more than probable that there was some Magical or Daemoniacal skill practised in the sudden moulting of this Idol which very much increased the Peoples Superstition to it For what else saith he could Aaron mean by these words I cast it into the fire and there came out this Calf than that there was some secret invisible operation whereby it was moulded into this form in an instant which raised as I said the Peoples Devotion to it Herein he follows some Jews who go a great deal further saying That the Devil entred into it and made it roar like a Bull to strike a greater awe into the People as R. Juda saith in Pirke Elieser c. 45. And in Tanchuma they say it not only roared but danced also Which seem to me to be Conceits invented for the Excuse of Aaron who is said plainly enough v. 4. to have made this molten Calf Which he could not have done without designing it and running the Gold into a Mould of this Figure Here is no account at all given what Judgment Moses made of this defence but it appears by IX Deut. 20. that God was so angry with him that he had been destroyed if Moses had not interceded for him and beseeched God to pardon his weakness in complying with a People set on Mischief v. 22. For no doubt in his own Mind he was against this Fact as the Levites were of whom he was the Chief Ver. 25. And when Moses saw that the people were naked Without the Divine Protection For the Glory of the LORD in the Cloud it is likely departed and went up from them which we read descended again XXXIII 9. For Aaron had made them naked c. Laid them open by this Sin to the Scorn of all their Enemies who should hear of such a shameful Revolt from their God Ver. 26. Then Moses stood in the gate of the Camp Where the Courts of Judgment were wont to sit to hear Causes and to punish Offenders So it was in their Cities in after times which it is likely was derived from the usage now as now they did but follow the practices of their Fore-fathers For in the days of Abraham the City Gate was the place where all publick and private Business was transacted XXIII Gen. 10 18. which seems to have been the manner in all the Country for at Schechem we find as well as here at Hebron when Hamor and his Son proposed to make an Alliance with the Israelites they motioned it to the People at the Gate of the City XXXIV Gen. 20. Which was the same thing with the Forum or Exchange among the Romans the Market being also held here where there were Seats for the Judges and Elders And said Who is on the LORD's side Abhors this Idolatry and cleaves to the Worship of the LORD only Let him come unto me To receive his Commands who was under God their Leader And all the Sons of Levi gathered themselves together unto him If not the whole Tribe yet as many as had any Zeal for the LORD who were the most This is an Argument there was a general defection of the People to this Idolatrous Worship that none but the Sons of Levi appeared to joyn with Moses on this occasion Ver. 27. And he said unto them thus saith the LORD God of Israel put every man his sword by his side The LORD himself by his Command warrants what I bid you do And go in and out from gate to
Selden shows L. IV. de Jure N. G. c. 2. An Officer of Justice was not bound to flee if he chanced in the Execution of his Office to kill a Man that resisted him Nor a Master if he killed his Scholar or a Father his Son when he gave him Correction Ver. 14. But if a man come presumptuously The Vulgar Latin rightly translates it industriously or with design to kill him for it is opposed to ignorance The Hebrew word also carries in it a signification of boiling anger which doth not alter the Case For if a Man in the height of his Rage resolved to kill another and laid wait for him to execute his Design it was justly judged to be wilful Murder and punished with Death Which was far more equal than Plato's Law That such a Man should only be banished for three years as he that on a sudden killed a Man in his Anger only for two L. IX de Legibus p. 867. Vpon his Neighbour The Hebrew Doctors by Neighbour understand only an Israelite or a Proselyte of Justice As for others they were not put to death if an Israelite killed one of them Which was not the intent of this Law whereby God would have all Men that lived among them safe and secure from being murdered To slay him with guile By which it appeared the Act was designed and deliberate For two things are denoted by this word with guile first fore-thought and then delay as Isaac Karo observes See L'Empereur in Bava kama cap. 3. sect 6. Thou shalt take him If it be inquired who should take him it seems to be determined XIX Deut. 12. where the Elders of the City were to fetch away a wilful Murderer from the City of Refuge In after times the King ordered it as Moses did while he lived 1 Kings I. ult II. 29. By which places it appears That if a Man refused to come from the Altar being judged upon proof to be a wilful Murderer or other high Offender he might be there killed as Georg. Ritterhusius shows L. de Jure Asylorum c. 8. where he observes out of Plutarch in his Laconioa that Agesilaus declared publickly at the Altar of Pallas where he sacrificed an Ox that he thought it lawful to kill one that treacherously assaulted him even at the Altar And thus the practice was among Christians as he there shows when their Temples became Sanctuaries to Malefactors From my Altar This was an Asylum as well as the Cities of Refuge but under many Limitations both with respect to the part of the Altar and to the Persons that fled thither and to the Crime they had committed as Mr. Selden shows in the place above-mentioned p. 475. That he may die Though he was the High Priest and in the Act of Sacrifice he was to be taken away without delay if he had committed wilful Murder If it was involuntary then he was to be taken from thence and carried to the City of Refuge For God would not have a Pious place as Conradus Pellicanus glosses be a Protection to Impiety See Mr. Selden L. III. de Synedr c. 8. p. 100. Maimonides his Observation is pertinent enough upon this occasion That the Mercy which is shown to wicked Men is no better than Tyranny and Cruelty to the rest of God's Creatures and therefore though such Persons sought to God for his Patronage by betaking themselves to that which was dedicated to his Name he would not afford them any protection but commanded them to be delivered up to Justice More Nevoch P. III. c. 39. Ver. 15. And he that smiteth his Father or Mother So as to wound them and to make the Blood come or to leave a mark of the stroke by making the flesh black and blue as we speak Selden L. II. de Synedr c. 13. p. 556. Shall be surely put to death Strangled say the Hebrews see v. 12. by the Sentence of the Judge there being competent Witnesses of the Fact as in other Cases The giving them saucy words or making mows at them which signified Contempt was punished also with Whipping There was no need to say any thing of killing them for all wilful Murder was punished with Death And Solon it is commonly noted made no Law about this because it was not to be supposed any Man would be so wicked Nor was this Crime known among the Persians as Herodotus saith in his days Nor do we find any mention of it in the Law of the XII Tables But in after times there were most severe Punishments enacted against Parricide which are described at large by Modestinus And Diodorus Siculus tells us of the like among the Egpytians See Hen. Stephanus in his Fontes Rivi Juris Civilis p. 18. Plato would have him that killed either Father or Mother Brethren or Children not only to be put to Death but to be disgraced after his Execution by throwing his dead Body naked into a common place without the City where all the Magistrates in the Name of the People should every one of them throw a Stone at his head and then carrying him out of the Coasts leave him without Burial L. IX de Legibus p. 873. Ver. 16. He that stealeth a Man By a Man the Hebrews understand an Israelite whether he was a Freeman or but a Servant as Mr. Selden observes L. VI. de Jure N. G. c. 2. And selleth him No Israelite would buy him and therefore such Plagiaries sold him to Men of other Nations Which made the Crime to be punished with Death because it was a cruel thing not only to take away his Liberty but make him a Slave to Strangers Or if he be found in his hand Though he had not actually sold him yet his intention was sufficiently known by his stealing him Shall be surely put to death I observed above v. 12. they interpret this Phrase every where to signifie strangling If it be said any where his blood shall be upon him it signifies stoning Maimonides makes this the reason why such a Man was condemned to die because it might well be thought he intended to kill him whom he violently carried away at least as I understand it if he could not find means to sell him More Nevoch P. III. c. 41. Ver. 17. And he that curseth his Father or his Mother c. The Hebrews take this Law to concern those who cursed their dead Parents no less than those who cursed them when they were alive but not without Praemonition and Witnesses as in other Capital Crimes And not unless they cursed their Parents by some proper Name of God as Mr. Selden observes out of the Jewish Doctors L. II. de Synedr c. 13. This and the other Law v. 15. enacted Death as the Punishment of such Crimes because they were a sign saith Maimonides More Nevoch P. III. c. 41. of a desperate Malice and audacious Wickedness being a subversion of that Domestick Order which is the prime part of good Government
Cubits which was the breadth of this East-end of the Court as well as of the West v. 12 13. Of blue and purple and scarlet c. Concerning all this see XXV 5. and here only observe that the Hangings of the Gate were far richer than of the rest of the Court which were meerly of fine twined Linen v. 9. but these of several other beautiful Colours and adorned with that work which they called Rokem which we translate Needle-work What that was see XXXVIII 39. And their pillars shall be four and their sockets four Proportionable to those on each side of the Gate which were three for Hangings of fifteen Cubits v. 14 15. as these were four for Hangings of twenty Ver. 17. All the Pillars round about the Court shall be filletted with silver Those at the East and West-end as well as those on the South and North-sides Their hooks shall be of silver and their sockets of brass As was before directed v. 10 11. Ver. 18. The length of the Court c. Here all the Dimensions of the Court are put together the length and breadth of which might be inferred from the Hangings v. 9 12 c. but here are expresly determined together with the height which was not at all intimated before and now appointed to be five Cubits l. e. two yards and an half of larger measure than ours So that the Tabernacle might be plainly seen by the People for it was as high again as the Walls if I may so call them that incompassed it Of twined Linen and their sockets of brass This seems to be a brief repetition of what was said before concerning the Hangings and the Pillars which stood on Bases of Brass Ver. 19. All the Vessels of the Tabernacle in all the service thereof This is also a repetition in general of what was said before particularly v. 3. for all the Vessels belonging to the Tabernacle it self were of Gold as we read in the XXVth Chapter And all the pins thereof The Tabernacle had nothing of Brass in the Fabrick of it but the Bases of the Pillars at the Entrance XXVI 37. and therefore these Pins I suppose belong to them whereby the Pillars were fastned in their Sockets And all the pins of the Court shall be of brass These brazen Pins were struck into the ground as Dr. Lightfoot understands it that the Hangings which were tied to them by Cords might be kept from flying up at the bottom Ver. 20. And thou shalt command the Children of Israel that they bring thee pure Oyl-olive beaten Not squeezed out by a Press or by a Mill for such was full of Sediment and Dregs but which run freely from the Olives being bruised with a Pestel For the light In the golden Candlestick XXV 37. To cause the Lamp to burn always Sufficient to keep the Lamp always burning Some imagine that it did not burn day and night but being lighted every Evening went out in the Morning And there are some places which seem to favour this Opinion particularly 1 Sam. III. 3. where mention is made of the Lamp going out viz. in the Morning See also 2 Chron. XIII 11. where we read of setting the Lamps to burn every Evening which seems to signisie that they did not burn in the Day But Josephus who was a Priest and could not but know and had no reason to tell a lie saith they burnt Day and Night And indeed it was but necessary for otherwise the Priests must have ministred in the dark at the Altar of Incense before the Divine Majesty Who kept a Table in the Sanctuary which required light for no Body feasts in darkness And therefore R. Levi of Barcelona Praecept XCVIII saith God commanded a Lamp should always burn in the Sanctuary for the Honour and Majesty of it there being no Light conveyed to it otherways But it is highly probable there were not so many of the Lamps burning in the Day as in the Night when all the seven Lamps were lighted some of which were put out in the Morning and lighted again in the Evening So Josephus saith expresly L. III. Antiq. c. 9. Three burnt all Day before the LORD and the rest were lighted in the Evening Ver. 21. In the Tabernacle of the Congregation without the Vail That is the second Vail which was before the most Holy Place Which is before the Testimony That is the Ark of the Testimony See XXV 21 22. Aaron and his sons shall order it from evening to morning before the LORD As direction is more fully given XXX 7 8. It shall be a Statute for over c. See XXXVIII 43. CHAP. XXVIII Verse 1. AND take thou Aaron thy brother and his sons with him from among the Children of Israel Here Aaron and his Sons are designed to the Priests Office and afterward XXXII 19. the whole Tribe of Levi were Consecrated to the LORD by a noble Act of Zeal which they performed And at last I Numb 51. and many other places it was made Capital for any one else to officiate at the Tabernacle but they only That he may minister unto me Attend on me as my Servant in my Court. For Cohen signifies one that serves in ministerio honorabili in an honourable Office as appears from XII Job 19. Therefore David's Sons are called by this Name 2 Sam. VIII 18. and it was given to the Priests quatenus fuerunt primarij Dei Ministri as they were the principal Ministers of God as Junius observes upon XLI Gen. 45. In the Priests Office Wheresoever there hath been any Religion there have been Priests whose Office it peculiarly was to Minister unto God in the Service belonging to him But this is the first time we read of any Constituted in Israel by a Divine appointment at least the Priesthood was not confined to the particular Family of Aaron who was made High Priest and his Sons Priests of a lower Order Some Heathens imitated this by continuing the Priesthood in a certain Family For Plato says there were in some places 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 both of Men and Women which in the founding of a City he would not have a Law-giver alter but where there was no such Constitution he would have annual Priests and none but grave Men of 60 years of Age put into the Office L. VI. de Leg. p. 759. Even Aaron Nadab and Abihu Eleazar and Ithamar Aarons sons These were all the Males in this Family at present whose Descendants in future Ages were all Priests Ver. 2. And thou shalt make holy Garments for Aarou thy brother If very good Authors did not affirm it we should scarce think it credible that the Priests among some of the ancient Heathens offered Sacrifices to their Gods naked Particularly the old Arabians as Hottinger observes in his Histor. Orientalis L. I. c. 7. But such filthiness was abhorred by most People whose Priests were not only Clothed but performed their Service at the Altar in a peculiar Habit.
that according to the Hebrew Doctors no Man was to be admitted a Proselyte to partake of the Paschal Lamb unless his whole Family was Circumcised with him both Children and Servants Ver. 45. A Foreigner The Hebrew word Toschab literally signifies a Dweller or Inhabitant by which Name those pious Gentiles were called who renounced Idolatry though they did not embrace the Jewish Religion because they were permitted to settle among them and dwell in their Country which was not allowed to other Foreigners who continued Idolaters See Selden L. II. de Jure N. G. c. 3. c. 5. Where he observes Maimonides makes this Exception That no such Persons might dwell in Jerusalem because of the singular Holiness of that City but any where else they might with the Profession of Judaism And no hired Servant Some of them were Servants to the Jews and so dwelt in the same House with them and were called Hirelings when they bound themselves to serve their Masters for three years as the Jews gather from XVI Isa 14. Ver. 46. In one House shall it be eaten c. In the first Night wherein this Sacrifice was slain they were enjoyned not to stir out of Doors v. 22. and therefore not to carry forth ought of the Flesh abroad into another House Besides they were in such haste that they had no time to send Messengers from one House to another which Maimonides makes the ground of this Precept More Nev. P. III. c. 46. In after-times also that Law being in force v. 4. that lesser Housholds who had not Company enough to eat the Lamb up should joyn with some other it is here explain'd that for maintenance of Friendly Society they should not divide the Lamb and carry half of it to another House but all meet together in one and feast upon it Which the ancient Fathers looked upon as a Figure of the Unity of the Church of Christ This seems to be the most natural Interpretation that it should be eaten under one Roof But R. Simeon saith That God only bound them to eat in one Company or Society not in two but it was lawful for that Family or Society to eat it in two places if they pleased Halicoth Olam P. IV. Sect. 3. Neither shall ye break a Bone thereof The Jews fancy this Law doth not speak of the lesser Bones but only of those in which there was some Marrow So Maimonides in his Treatise on this Subject c. 10. sect 1. And indeed being eaten in haste they could not have time to break the Bones and suck out the Marrow which in the place before-named in his More Nevochim he makes the Foundation of this Precept Which was exactly fulfilled in the true Paschal Lamb of which this was a Figure when he was offered for us as St. John observes XIX 33 36. Ver. 47. All the Congregation of Israel shall keep it Women and Children as well as Men. In after times indeed only Men were bound to come up at the three Feasts XXIII 17. XXXIV 23. XVI Deut. 16. But devout People were wont to carry up their Wives and Children with them as appears by Elkanah 1 Sam. I. 3 4. and by Joseph who went up with the Blessed Virgin II Luke 41. And that place in Samuel informs us that their Sons and Daughters did eat of the Sacrifice Ver. 48. When a Stranger shall sojourn with thee and will keep the Passover c. See v. 43 44. No uncircumcised Person shall eat thereof Which is the reason some have thought why they observed no Passover as far as we can sind after that in the very next year that followed their coming out of Egypt because they were generally Uncircumcised But this seems to relate to Men of another Nation who though they were not admitted to eat of the Lamb unless they received Circumcision yet having renounced Idolatry the Jews say they might eat of the unleavened Bread and of the bitter Herbs Ver. 49. One Law shall be to him that is home-born c. Nothing could be more equal than this that no Man should enjoy this Priviledge who was not of their Religion but whosoever embraced it should partake of the same Benefits Ver. 50. Thus did all the Children of Israel They kept this Passover and afterwards another by a special direction IX Numb but afterward during their stay in the Wilderness they seem to have omitted it because they omitted Circumcision without which v. 48. they were not capable to partake of it As the LORD commanded Moses and Aaron so did they Observed it according to all the Rites here enjoyned though in future Ages several of them were omitted as peculiar to this time Ver. 51. And it came to pass the self same day c. On the day after they celebrated the Passover they began their March out of Egypt Which was a thing so notorious that the memory of it was preserved in Nations far distant from them though the Story was much corrupted for want of the Knowledge of these Sacred Records For Strabo mentions it to name no more but saith the Report was that the Jews were descended from the Egyptians which might be believed by Strangers because they dwelt so long in that Country and that Moses was an Egyptian Priest who had a certain part of that Country but being dissatissied with the present state of things forsook it and many Worshippers of God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 followed him For he affirmed and taught that the Egyptians had not right Conceptions who likened God to wild Beasts and Cattle nor did the Asricans or Greeks conceive of him better who represented him like to Men 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For there is but this one only God that which comprehends us all and the Earth and the Sea which we call Heaven and the World c. In which words he makes Moses not so foolish as the Egyptians and other Nations but attributes a sensless Opinion to him that the World which we see is God if this be the right reading of his words But I rather think the place is corrupted and it should be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. For this is Moses his true Opinion with which he begins his Books that he only is God who made the Heaven and the Earth And this perfectly agrees with what follows in Strabo That no Image can be made of this God and therefore a Temple without any Image must be erected to him c. Which is not true if we take the visible World to be God for the Image of the Heaven and the Earth may be made as well as of a Man or a Beast However it is true which he adds That Moses perswaded many good Men and brought them into that Country where Jerusalem is the chief City where they lived a long time happily 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doing justly and being sincerely Religious Which is a notable Testimony from a Pagan to be noted aureis literis with Letters
had fulfilled which made him hope he would fulfil the other part which here follows And all this Land that I have spoken of will I give to your seed and they shall inherit it for ever XII Gen. 7. XIII 15. XV. 7. XXVIII 13. Ver. 14. And the LORD repented of the evil which he thought to do unto his people He did not change his Mind for there was not a peremptory Decree or definitive Sentence as they speak pronounced against them but only a signification of what they deserved v. 10. which unless it had been for the fore-named Reasons and Moses his Intercession he would have inflicted upon them Ver. 15. And Moses turned From the Presence of God with whom he had been forty days And came down from the Mount From the place where he was with God to that where he left Joshua waiting for his return See XXIV 13. And the two Tables of the Testimony were in his hand Which God promised to give him and one would think had ready prepared for him before he went up into the Mount XXIV 12. and when he was coming down delivered into his hands XXXI ult They are called Tables of Testimony because God declared and testified therein what his Mind and Will was as I have often noted The Tables were written on both their sides Some fancy that the Writing was both on the fore-part and the back part of them that so the Ten Commandments might be read by those who stood either before or behind when they were set up being written according to this Conceit twice over But they were not made to be set up but to be reposited in the Ark and therefore the meaning is they were written on both the Leaves as I may call them which were to be folded up and shut like a Book when they were laid in the Ark. On the one side and on the other were they written On the right hand and on the left How many were written on the one and how many on the other is variously disputed but cannot certainly be determined Ver. 16. And the Tables were the work of God and the writing was the writing of God graven on the Tables The Tables were made and planed by God himself as well as the Letters written by him XXXI 18. and no Creature imployed in either Work much less Moses who seems to have found them ready prepared for him when he came into the Mount as I observed before from XXIV 12. Ver. 17. And when Joshua heard the noise of the people as they shouted Being come to the foot of the Mount they could easily hear the noise which the People made in the Festival He said unto Moses there is a noise of war in the Camp Knowing nothing of the occasion he took it for the noise which Soldiers make called by the Hebrews teruah by the Greeks 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 who make a great shout when they give the onset and much greater when they get the Victory Ver. 18. And he said it is not the voice of them that shout for mastery neither is it the voice of them that cry for being overcome Being before instructed by God what the People were a doing v. 7. Moses could easily correct his Mistake assuring him it was neither the cry of strength nor of weakness as the words are in the Hebrew i. e. of Conquerours as we rightly translate it or of those that are overcome But the noise of those that sing do I hear Out of merriment in a Festival For thus Apis was brought in solemn Pomp to Memphis the Royal City the Children going before in Procession and singing a Song of Praise to the Deity Which was not the Pattern to the Israelites nor borrowed perhaps from them but the common Practice of the World on such occasions from ancient Times as I observed before out of Athenaeus v. 6. whose words are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And this was part of the Entertainment in private Feasts as appears by those known words of Homer 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 They feasted upon excellent chear and were very merry and then the Divine Songster sung among them Ver. 19. And it came to pass assoon as he came nigh unto the Camp Which was at some distance from the Mount XIX 21 23. XX. 21. XXIV 1. That he saw the Calf and the dancing Which began early in the morning and continued all day for we may presume it was towards the evening before Moses got to the Camp having spent a considerable part of the day in beseeching God for them And Moses anger waxed hot The sight of their Madness turned his Compassion he had for them v. 11 12 c. into a kind of Rage And he cast the Tables out of his hands and he brake them beneath the Mount He did not do it till now though he knew their guilt and no doubt was affected with it before he came night to the Camp and saw the Calf and dancing because he would have the People see how he resented their wickedness and with what indignation it filled him And now he did it no doubt by the same Divine Impulse or Heroick Motion which stirred him up to kill the Egyptian See II. 12. For he is never blamed for this and therefore did it by a Divine incitement to show the Israelites how unworthy they were to be espoused to God as some have expressed it by these Instruments or Deeds which were most precious Tokens of God's love to them To this effect Abarbinel discourses Moses did not leave the Tables in the Mount where they were delivered to him when he heard how the People had revolted but brought them along with him that he might make all Israel sensible what they had lost by breaking them before their eyes Ver. 20. And he took the Calf which they had made and burnt it in the fire Melted it down so that though the Matter remained i. e. the Gold yet the form and external shape of the Calf was so destroyed that it might be said properly enough to be burnt For the Romans as Bochart observes called that place where they melted their Metals Vstrina And ground it to powder Some have pretended to the knowledge of an Herb which will dissolve Gold and reduce it to Ashes but they do not say what it is or that it was to be found in that Wilderness And if Moses had known and used this Secret what need was there of his grinding it again after it was dissolved to Ashes It is most likely therefore that this was done with a file whereby it was grated into dust as small as flour which is ground in a Mill. With such dust some powdred their own Hair and the Mains of their Horses as Bochart observes in his Hierozoicon P. I. L. II. c. 34. which made them glitter and sparkle when the Sun shone upon them And strawed it upon the water Of the Brook which descended out of the
of Gold as Casaubon speaks in his Annotations on this place L. XVI p. 760 761. CHAP. XIII Verse 1. AND the LORD spake unto Moses saying After they came to Succoth where I suppose the SCHECHINAH appeared to him as it had done in Midian and in Egypt to direct him in his Conduct Ver. 2. Sanctifie unto me the First-born Separate or set apart from common uses for I appropriate them to my self as it follows in the end of the Verse This word Sanctifie as our Mr. Mede observes signifies differently in several Conjugations Sometimes it signifies to devote and consecrate to the Service of God and sometimes to use a thing as holy being already devoted to him And thus he reconciles this place where he bids him sanctifie all the First-born i. e. look upon them as things separated to his own use and therefore not to be used by them with another place XXVII Lev. 26. where he saith concerning the First-born No Man shall sanctifie it it is the LORD's i. e. the LORD hath already set it apart to himself and therefore no Man is to Consecrate that again which God hath already Consecrated that is taken for his own See L. II. de Sanctuario Dei p. 552. First-born There were two sorts of First-born Some who were the First-born of the Father called the beginning of his Strength XXI Deut. 17. The other the First-born of the Mother which are called here whatsoever openeth the Womb. The Hebrews make a great difference between these two and say That to the former sort belong the Prerogatives both of having the Inheritance of his Father and also the Priesthood but to the latter only belongs one of these Prerogatives viz. the Priesthood And they gather it from this very place Whatsoever openeth the Womb which is the First-born of the Mother is mine i. e. shall be employed in my Service But instead of these God took the Levites to attend upon him III Numb 12. After which the First-born were to be redeemed at a certain Rate which was part of the Priests maintenance XVIII Numb 15 16. See Selden de Successionibus ad Leg. Hebr. c. 7. Among the Children of Israel Whom this Precept concerned peculiarly but no other People Therefore the Jews say that if one of them and a Gentile had any Beast in Common between them the First-born was free as their Phrase is because it is here said among the Children of Israel not the Gentiles See Buxtorf Synag Jud. c. 38. Both of Man and Beast As is further directed and explained v. 12 13. It is mine And therefore was to be offered to God if it were a Male of any Beast only an Ass was to be redeemed XXXIV 19 20. God intended by this Law to teach them saith R. Levi Barzelonita that the whole World was his and that Men had nothing in it but by his gracious Grant who challenged the First-born of every thing to himself because all was his For the First-born Male was dearer to a Man saith he than the Apple of his Eye as no doubt he was yet he was bound to Consecrate him to God But the plainest reason of this Law was to put them in mind of God's miraculous Providence in sparing their First-born when those of the Egyptians were all killed To which the Jewish Doctors add a more ancient right God had to them being the Persons who Sacrificed to God before Priests were ordained by the Law of Moses So Onkelos takes the young men XXIV 5. to have been the First-born and the Priests mentioned XIX 22. Aben Ezra also upon XVI Numb 1. saith the same the truth of which I shall examine there Ver. 3. And Moses said unto the People God seems to have commanded Moses at the same time he gave this Precept to repeat here at Succoth what he had said to them in Egypt concerning the Observation of the Passover and of the Feast of Vnleavened Bread It being of great moment to have the Benefits hereby Commemorated in perpetual remembrance Remember this day c. Which was the first day of Unleavened Bread commanded to be kept holy XII 16. For by strength of hand the LORD brought you out That is by a miraculous Power which constrained Pharaoh to let you go much against his will So God promised at his first appearance to Moses III. 19. There shall no leavened Bread be eaten Unleavened Bread was to be eaten on the Passover Night and afterwards no leavened Bread See XII 15 c. where this is represented as the Sense of the Jews but the sixth and seventh Verse following seem to say otherwise Ver. 4. This day came ye out In the Morning of this Day they began their March In the Month of Abib This word Abib signifies an Ear of Corn for then Barley began to ear The Syriack word hababa hath something of its sound which signifies a flower and so they here translate it The Month of Flowers Whence Macarius saith God brought Israel out of Egypt 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Month of Flowers when the pleasant Spring first appeared See XXIII 15. Ver. 5. And it shall be when the LORD shall bring thee into the Land c. From hence they conclude this Precept did not oblige them in the Wilderness but it was by a special Direction and Command that they observed it the year after this IX Numb 1 2 c. See XII 25 50. In confirmation of which the XII Deut. 1. is alledged where he begins to recapitulate all the Laws they were to observe in Canaan among which this is one XII 5 6. yet this alone would not have been sufficient to prove this for he might be thought now only to reinforce his Laws at their etrance into Canaan if he had not added v. 8. Ye shall not do after all the things you do here this day c. Which supposes that in the unsetled Condition wherein they were in the Wilderness they had not kept themselves to all those Rules which follow and had been formerly delivered Which he sware unto thy Fathers to give thee c. XV Gen. 18 19 c. Ye shall keep this Service in this Month. Both the Passover and Feast of Unleavened Bread XII 25. Ver. 6. Seven days shalt thou eat unleavened Bread This seems to confute what the Jews say that they were not bound to eat unleavened Bread but only when they ate the Passover See XII 15. And in the seventh day shall be a Feast unto the LORD As the first day was holy v. 3. so was the last XII 16. that they might not fail in their Gratitude for so great a Benefit as they now Commemorated Ver. 7. Vnleavened Bread shall be eaten seven days This seems still to make the Injunction plainer that for seven days together they should eat unleavened Bread Which is so often repeated because this made them sensible more than any thing else of the wonderful Hand of God in bringing them out of