in the utmost north-end of Canaan whence the length of the land is ordinarily described to be from the entrance of Hamath to the river of Egypt 1. Kings 8.65 See Num. 13.22 and Cinnereth was a city in the eastern parts whence the lake so often mentioned in Scripture was called the lake of Genezereth Vers 38. Nineteen cities with their villages For some of them mentioned before in drawing the border of their lot stood happely in the portion of the bordering tribes Vers 40. And the seventh lot came out for the tribe of the children of Dan. Though this tribes lot was not wholly taken out of that which was given to Judah as Simeons was yet that a part of it was is manifest by some of the cities mentioned here that chap. 15. are numbered amongst those that were at first in Judahs portion it was compassed with the sea and the borders of the other tribes formerly described and so the borders of this tribe are here omitted Vers 41. And the coast of their inheritance was Zorah and Eshtaol c. In this Zorah Samson was born Judges 13.2 and between Zorah and Eshtaol he was buried Vers 43. And Elon and Timnathah c. Whence Samson took a wife Judges 14.1 Vers 47. Therefore the children of Dan went up to fight against Leshem c. Or Laish The story we have Judges 18. This then happened after Joshuas death but here it is mentioned lest it should seem strange how the Danites came to inhabite the north parts of the land when their lot fell to them in the south parts even close by Judahs portion the reason was because being not able to drive out the Philistines out of their land they were streightned for room so went out and took Laish a city that was in Naphtalies lot though then in the Zidonians possession and transplanted a Colony thither calling it Dan from their father Dan the sonne of Jacob it stood almost in the furthest north part of the land Judges 20.1 The congregation was gathered together as one wan from Dan to Beersheba Vers 50. According to the word of the Lord they gave him the citie he asked even Timnath-serah in mount Ephraim c. To wit the word of the Lord which he spake to Moses not onely concerning Caleb but concerning Joshua for why indeed should he be left out see Iosh 14.7 to wit that he should chuse a peculiar portion to himself where he would yet it may be meant also of some direction given him by Eleazar the priest upon his inquiry of God for him However herein first was the modesty of Ioshua remarkable that he was content to stay till all the tribes had their portion ere there was any motion made of that which by way of speciall Prerogative was to be conferred upon him secondly That he was content to receive what God had promised him as by way of gift from the people he asked and they gave him the city he asked thirdly That whereas he might have chosen the fairest and goodliest city in all their tribes he chose his seat in a mountainous countrey nothing so pleasant and delightfull as many other places were yea and it seems a city that was ruinated so that he was fain to build it ere he dwelt in it for so it follows in the next words and he built the city and dwelt therein CHAP. XX. Vers 2. APpoint out for you cities of refuge c. Concerning these cities of refuge see the notes Numb 35.6 and 24 c. Vers 6. And he shall dwell in that city untill he stand before the congregation for judgement and untill the death of the high priest c. That is untill he be fetched thence to the place where the fact was done that it may be there tryed whether it were done wittingly or unwittingly so long he was to abide there however or untill the death of the high Priest if it were found that he did it unwittingly for then he was to be sent back to the city of refuge and to be kept there till the high priest dyed Concerning the mysticall reason of the man-slayers staying in the city of refuge till the death of the high priest see the note upon Num. 35.25 But to this some also do adde a literall reason to wit that hereby was implyed how hainous a fault it was to shed the bloud of a man and how displeasing to God in that the man that was but unwittingly defiled with the shedding of bloud must be thus shut up lest he should happen to come into the sight of him who did as it were represent Gods person amongst them to wit the high priest nor could be suffered to stirre from thence till he was dead Vers 8. And on the other side Jordan by Jericho eastward they assigned Bezer c. That is they confirmed and ratified these to be cities of refuge without Jordan which Moses himself had formerly chosen and set apart for that use See Deut. 4.41 42 43. CHAP. XXI Vers 1. THen came near the heads of the fathers of the Levites unto Eleazar the priest c. It was doubtles immediately after they had made an end of dividing the land that the Levites came thus to Eleazer and the rest of the Commissioners to receive from them the cities which God had appointed to be set apart for their dwelling For first it is not probable that there was any delay which might move the Levites to challenge their right and secondly it is as improbable that the Israelites did first settle themselves in these cities and then were afterwards put out to give way to the Levites Vers 2. The Lord commanded by the hand of Moses to give us cities to dwell in c. See the notes upon Numb 35.2 c. Vers 4. And the lot came out for the familie of the Kohathites God had expressed the number of cities that were to be given them to wit fourty eight Numb 35.7 So all the cities which ye shall give to the Levites shall be fourty and eight cities he had also given them directions to take these cities out of each tribe some according as their proportion was greater or lesser and therefore the Commissioners for the dividing of the land made choice no doubt of these cities as in their wisdome they found them most convenient for the Levites and for the people and then having divided the cities they had chosen into foure parts one for the priests a second for the Levites of Kohaths familie a third for the Gershonites and a fourth for the Merarites then was it at last decided in which of the tribes the priests should be placed and so of the rest or at least of those cities which were judged convenient they took the number agreed upon by lot See vers 11. And the children of Aaron the priest which were of the Levites had by lot out of the tribe of Judah c. Thus by Gods speciall providence the
priests were seated partly in the tribe of Judah where the Temple was afterwards to be built and partly in the two bordering tribes of Simeon and Benjamin and so whilst they shall approve their piety and devotion to the service of God in being content to leave their dwellings to go up unto Jerusalem in their turns to attend upon the service of God yet withall God provides for their ease that their journeys might not be over long and burthensome to them As for their assigning as it is here said of thirteen cities to the priests herein God and the governours of Israel had respect unto succeeding times when the posterity of Aaron should be encreased for at present there were but a few priests not enough to inhabit the half part of one city but in the mean time they were given them for their possession which they might dispose of according to the right they had in them For that they might so do and that the cities of the Levites were given them not onely for their habitation but also for their possessions and inheritance is evident in severall places See Levit. 25.32 Vers 9. And they gave out of the tribe of the children of Judah and out of the tribe of the children of Simeon these cities c. Judahs and Simeon cities are reckoned together because Simeons portion lay within Judahs Chap. 19.1 And the second lot came forth to Simeon even for the tribe of the children of Simeon according to their families and their inheritance was within the inheritance of the children of Judah Vers 11. And they gave them the city of Arbah the father of Anak which is Hebron in the hill-countrey of Judah c. This city with the land adjoyning was formerly given to Caleb which makes it more probable that the cities for the Levites were taken by lot because it was not likely that both Hebron and Debir should be taken out of his inheritance without the Lords speciall direction But God requiring it Caleb willingly yields the rather because the countrey and land about was the chief of his possession which was not taken from him and besides no doubt they desired to have the Levites who were to instruct them in the Law of the Lord to be seated amongst them Vers 15. And Holon with her suburbs Called Hilen 1. Chron. 6.58 Vers 16. And Ain with her suburbs and Juttah with her suburbs c. This citie Ain is not reckoned 1. Chron. 6. amongst the cities given to the sonnes of Aaron nor Gibeon here named vers 17. As for Juttah it is called Ashan 1. Chron. 6.59 Some indeed conceive that it is Ain that is there called Ashan but there is an argument against that which seems to me unanswerable to wit that Ashan and Ain are in one verse distinctly named amongst the cities of Simeon chap. 19.7 and so also Almon vers 18. is called Alemeth 1. Chron. 6.60 Vers 22. And Kibzaim with her suburbs Called Jokneam 1. Chron. 6.68 Vers 23. And out of the tribe of Dan Eltekeh with her suburbs Gibbethon with her suburbs These two cities are omitted 1. Chron. 6. And Aijalon and Gath-rimmon are there ioyned with the cities of Ephraim but that they were given out of Dans portion is evident by this place Vers 25. And out of the half tribe of Manasseh Tanach with her suburbs c. To wit that half of the tribe which was seated within Jordan next Dan and Ephraim Tanach here mentioned is called Aner 1. Chron. 6.70 as also Gath-Rimmon is there called Bileam Vers 27. And Beeshterah with her suburbs Called Ashtaroth 1. Chron. 6.71 Vers 28. And out of the tribe of Issachar Kishon with her suburbs c. Which is called Kedesh as also Dabareh is called Deberath and Jarmuth Ramoth and Engannim Anem 1. Chron. 6.72.73 Vers 30. And out of the tribe of Asher Mishal with her suburbs c. Called Mashal 1. Chron. 6.74 as also Helkath is there called Hukok Vers 32. And Hammoth-dor with her suburbs c. Called Hammon 1. Chron. 6.76 as also Kartan is there called Kirjathaim Vers 34. Out of the tribe of Zebulun Jokneam with her suburbs c. Jokneam and Kartah are omitted 1. Chron. 6.77 and Dimnah is there called Rimmon and Nahalal Tabor Vers 36. And out of the tribe of Reuben Bezer with her suburbs and Jahazah with her suburbs It is said that Bezer was a city of refuge chap. 20.8 though it be not here expressed as it is in the rest vers 13.20 27. which why it is here omitted we cannot say As for Jahazah it is called Jahzah 1. Chron. 6. Vers 41. All the cities of the Levites within the possession of the children of Israel were fourty and eight cities with their suburbs It may seem strange why in the 19. chapter we reade of but two and twenty cities given to the tribe of Asher nineteen to the tribe of Naphtali yea but twelve cities to the tribe of Zebulun and yet the Levites which were nothing so many in number as they have here eight and fourty cities given them I answer first that besides the cities mentioned the other tribes had many towns and villages wherein they dwelt which the Levites had not secondly that the chief cities are onely there mentioned it is evident in severall places that many cities which were in the severall portions of those tribes are not there set down thirdly others did no doubt inhabit these cities besides the Levites and fourthly it is no wonder though God deals bountifully with the Levites that were to be imployed in his speciall service Vers 43. And the Lord gave unto Israel all the land which he sware to give unto their fathers and they possessed it and dwelt therein Though there were much of the land out of which the Canaanites were not yet expelled we cannot therefore call this truth in question for First he had given them all by lot divided amongst them which was a kind of actuall enstating them in it Secondly he had put them into possession of the greatest part of it neither had he promised them otherwise but that they should possesse it by degrees See Exod. 23.29 So both clauses of that which is here said are true to wit first That God had given them all the land which he swore to give unto their fathers and secondly That they possessed it and dwelt therein onely we must conceive of them severally thus to wit 1. That he had already actually given them the whole land and enabled them to divide it amongst their tribes and 2. That they possessed it and dwelt therein to wit by degrees a great deal of it they had already in their possession and the rest by degrees came into their hands as God had promised and sooner then they did they might have enjoyed it had it not been for their sinnes CHAP. XXII Vers 3. YE have not left your brethren these many dayes unto this day That for which Joshua here
answered c. and her father his father in law in severall places Why Bethlehem from whence this Levite had his concubine is called Bethlehem-Judah See in the note chap. 17.7 Vers 2. And his concubine plaid the whore against him went away from him unto her fathers house c. It seems upon some discoverie of her whoredome or at least some suspition the Levite had of it there arose some quarrell betwixt him and his concubine and thereupon she left him and went home again to her fathers house who was too ready to entertain her The sad effects that followed upon this Levites taking a concubine makes it manifest that even in those times though it were an ordinary thing amongst all sorts of men even amongst the Levites to have concubines yet God was not pleased with it from the beginning it was not so saith our Saviour Matth. 19.8 Vers 3. And her husband arose and went after her to speak friendly unto her and to bring her again having his servant with him and a couple of asses To wit to carrie their provision and happely that both himself and his concubine if she would return with him might sometimes ease themselves by riding as occasion served Vers 11. Come I pray thee and let us turn in unto this citie of the Jebusites and lodge in it For though the children of Judah had taken from the Jebusites that part of Jebus that is Jerusalem which was in their tribe chap. 1.8 The children of Judah had fought against Jerusalem and had taken it and had smitten it with the edge of the sword yet out of that part which belonged to Benjamin on which side the Levite was now travelling the Jebusites were not wholly expelled chap. 1.21 The children of Benjamin did not drive out the inhabitants of Jerusalem but the Jebusites dwell in Jerusalem with the children of Benjamin unto this day Vers 14. And the sunne went down upon them when they were by Gibeah which belongeth to Benjamin There was a Gibeah in the tribe of Judah Josh 15.57 to distinguish this from that it is here called Gibeah which belongeth to Benjamin and else where Gibeah of Saul 1. Sam. 11.4 it is thought to be the same which Josh 21.17 is called Gebah which was a citie given to tho Priests the sonnes of Aaron Against which it makes nothing that here it is said vers 16. the men of the place were Benjamites for the priests did not dwell alone in such cities though they were the lords and owners of them Vers 15. And they turned aside thither to go in and to lodge in Gibeah Though it were a pious resolution in the Levite rather to chose to lodge in Gibeah then in Jebus and that because Jebus was a citie wherein the idolatrous and uncircumcised Jebusites dwelt yet this proved fatall both to him and his as the best counsell may have the worst successe and that because there is a secret over-ruling hand of God that may by this means bring about what he hath determined for the punishment of some other sinnes which we mind not Vers 16. And behold there came an old man from his work out of the field at even which was also of mount Ephraim Though he were an old man yet he followed his work in the field and that untill the even which is doubtlesse noted to his praise As for that last clause that he was also of mount Ephraim that no doubt is expressed to intimate that this amongst other things made the old man the readier to entertain the Levite when he heard him say vers 18. that he was of mount Ephraim too Vers 18. But I am now going to the house of the Lord. The Tabernacle at this time was in Shiloh Josh 18.1 and Shiloh was in the tribe of Ephraim either therefore there the Levites dwelling was or else he meant first to go to the house of the Lord to do his service there and then afterwards to passe forward on his journey homeward However it is probable that he mentions his going to the house of the Lord that he might know him to be a Levite Vers 22. Behold the men of the city certain sonnes of Belial beset the house round about c. A like fact to this we have formerly related concerning the Sodomites of which see the note Gen. 19.4 as for this term Sonnes of Belial see Deut. 13.13 Vers 24. Behold here is my daughter a mayden and his concubine them I will bring out now c. See the note Gen. 19.8 Vers 25. So the man took his concubine and brought her forth unto them and they knew her c. In the foregoing words it is said that when the old man the Levites host proffered these varlets his daughter a virgin and the Levites concubine thereby to take them off from that unnaturall uncleannesse wherewith they meant to satisfie their lust upon the Levite himself the men would not hearken to him yet when immediately by the Levites means his concubine was indeed brought out unto them and left amongst them they fell upon her and defiled her and that in such an outrageous barbarous manner that she died of it which was doubtlesse because having once an object for their lust in their power they could not forbear and so forgetting their former resolutions they laid hold on her and abused her in a most inhumane and execrable manner Vers 26. Then came the woman in the dawning of the day and fell down at the doore of the mans house c. That is she fell down dead at the doore of the mans house and there lay till break of day when her husband going forth to see what was become of her found her dead and thus though her husband had pardoned her whoredome yet God punished it and that too with her own sinne adulterie was her sinne and adulterie was her death she had dealt treacherously against her husband one would not satisfie her but she exposed her self to the lust of a stranger and now she was abused to death by the lusts of so many barbarous wretches whom she knew not that by so abusing her they murdered her Vers 27. And her hands were upon the threshold This is added to implie the reason of that which follows why the Levite spake to her to rise vers 28. And he said unto her Vp let us be going to wit because she lay in such a manner her hands laid upon the threshold under her head as if she had been asleep Vers 29. He took a knife and laid hold on his concubine and divided her together with her bones into twelve pieces and sent her into all the coasts of Israel That is to each of the twelve tribes a piece for to the tribe of Levi that was dispersed through all the land there was none sent and this was done that the fight of her dead limbs might affect them the more and stirre them up to be the more zealous for the punishment
are not here mentioned Vers 61. And unto the sonnes of Kohath which were left of the family of that tribe were cities given out of the half tribe c. That is to the rest of the sonnes of Kohath to wit those that were not of the priests the sonnes of Aaron there were cities given out of the half tribe of Manasseh that was placed within Jordan yea and by lot there were given them in all ten cities to wit foure out of the tribe of Ephraim and foure out of the tribe of Dan and two out of the half tribe of Manasseh most of which are expressed by name vers 67 c. and more fully Josh 21.21 Vers 65. And they gave by lot these cities which are called by their names To wit above ver 57 c. Vers 66. And the residue of the families of the sonnes of Kohath had cities c. Here the cities that were given to the rest of the Kohathites are expressed also by name which were before spoken of ver 61. as they are also Josh 21.20 though indeed many of the names there and here differ concerning which see the notes there Vers 69. And Aijalon with her suburbs c. These were given them out of the tribe of Dan as also Eltekeh and Gibbethon which are not here mentioned Josh 21.23 24. CHAP. VII Vers 1. NOw the sonnes of Issachar were Tola and Puah Jashub c. This Puah and Jashub we called Phuvah and Job Gen. 46.13 Having before set down the genealogies of Reuben Simeon Levi and Judah Issachars is next here related because Issachar was Jacobs next sonne by Leah Vers 2. Whose number was in the dayes of David two and twenty thousand and six hundred To wit when he appointed Joab to number the people 2. Sam. 24.1 Vers 3. And the sonnes of Uzzi Izrahiah and the sonnes of Izrahiah Michael and Obadiah and Joel Ishiah five That is there were five descended of Uzzi to wit Izrahiah and his foure sonnes Vers 4. And with them by their generations after the house of their fathers were bands of souldiers c. Hereby it is evident that there were six and thirty thousand men of the posterity of Uzzi alone so that the two and twenty thousand six hundred mentioned before vers 2. was the number of the posterity of Tola by his other sonnes Uzzi being excepted whose posterity are here numbred by themselves as being more then all the rest together Vers 5. And their brethren among all the families of Issachar were men of might c. That is all the children of Issachar together were fourescore and seven thousand men of might when Joab numbred them Vers 6. The sonnes of Benjamin Bela and Becher and Jodiael three Jediael is called Ashbel Gen. 46.21 Zebulun was the sixth sonne of Leah born next after Issachar but neither Zebuluns nor Dans genealogie is at all here mentioned perhaps because at the return of the people out of Babylon when it is thought that Ezra wrote this book their genealogies were not found Benjamins genealogy is therefore next inserted who was the sonne of Rachel yet here are but onely three of Benjamins ten sonnes mentioned perhaps because the posterity of these onely were numbred when Joab numbred the people vers 2. Vers 12. Shuppim also and Huppim c. That is these also were of Benjamins posterity Vers 13. The sonnes of Naphtali Jahziel and Guni and Jezer and Shallum the sonnes of Bilhah That is the grand-children for Bilhah Rachels handmaid was the mother of Naphtali whose sonnes these were Vers 14. The sonnes of Manasseh Ashriel whom she bare c. There was an Ashriel that was the sonne or one of the posterity of Gilead Numb 26.30 31. These are the sonnes of Gilead of Jeezer the family of the Jeezerites of Helek the family of the Helekites And of Asriel the family of the Asrielites and of Shechem the family of the Shechemites either therefore this was another Ashriel the immediate sonne of Manasseh by his wife whereas Machir was Manassehs sonne by his concubine the Aramitesse or else Ashriel is here reckoned onely as one of the posterity of Manasseh whom she bare that is either the wife of Gilead or the wife of Hepher the mother of Zelophehad and thence it follows vers 15. that Zelophehad who was the sonne of Hepher the sonne of Gilead Num. 27.1 was the second that is the second sonne of Hepher the younger brother of Ashriel And if we thus take Ashriel for one of the posterity of Gilead the sonne of Machir then we must understand that the following words But his concubine the Aramitesse bare Machir c. are onely added to shew that this Ashriel and the rest afterward mentioned were not the posterity of Manasseh by his wife but by his concubine the Aramitesse Vers 17. These were the sonnes of Gilead c. To wit Ashriel and Zelophehad above mentioned but not Peresh and Sheresh and his posteritie the last here mentioned for they were the sonnes of Machir by Maachah and so the brethren of Gilead Vers 18. And his sister Hammoleketh bare Ishhad c. That is Gileads sister Vers 19. And the sonnes of Shemida were Ahian c. And Shemida was also the sonne or of the stock of Gilead see Numb 26.30 32. Vers 21. Whom the men of Gath that were born in that land slew c. Either this must be referred to all those before named vers 20. the sonnes of Ephraim Shuthelah and Bered his sonne and Tahath his sonne c. to wit as taking them all to be the severall sonnes of Ephraim namely that Shuthelah vers 20. was the sonne of Ephraim and so also Bered who seems to be mentioned as the sonne of Shuthelah was another sonne of Ephraim and Tahath another and so on forward who were all slain by the men of Gath when the Israelites were in Egypt or else if this seems not so probable because then Ephraim should have two sonnes called Shuthelah and two called Tahath then though those in the twentieth verse be taken as severall generations to wit that Shuthelah was the sonne of Ephraim and Bered his grandchild and Tahath his grandchild and so forward yet Zabad the first mentioned vers 21. must be reckoned another sonne of Ephraim and Shuthelah and Ezer and Elead his grandchildren whom the men of Gath slew or thirdly if all those before mentioned be reckoned as severall succeeding generations to wit that Shuthelah the sonne of Ephraim begat Bered and Bered Tahath and Tahath Eladah and Eladah Tahath and Tahath Zabad and Zabad Shuthelah and Ezer and Elead then the words whom the men of Gath slew c. must be referred onely to some of the former of these here mentioned or fourthly that which follows vers 22. And Ephraim their father mourned many dayes and his brethren came to comfort him must be meant of Zabad who was called also Ephraim perhaps onely because he was the head of that tribe
to wit the tenth of tithes Numb 18.26 Thus speak unto the Levites and say unto them when ye take of the children of Israel tithes which I have given you from them for your inheritance then ye shall offer up an heave-offering of it for the Lord even a tenth part of the tithe yea perhaps one of the priests the sonnes of Aaron was alwayes to be present when the Levites received the tithes of the people as a witnesse that the priests portion was faithfully set out for them Vers 39. And we will not forsake the house of our God That is we will not fail to frequent the Temple to serve the Lord there and we will not leave it destitute of any requisite provision for the service there to be performed CHAP. XI Vers 1. ANd the rulers of tbe people dwelt at Jerusalem the rest of the people also cast lots c. Because there were not found enough in Jerusalem for the inhabiting and defence of the city and people were loth to dwell there because the neighbours round about did exceedingly envie the glory of this city and were continually plotting some mischief against it to the great perill of the inhabitants and secondly because withall as there was more safety so also there was more profit in dwelling elsewhere therefore one chief businesse that Nehemiah had to do at this assembly of the people was after he had numbred them to chuse out a sufficient number of the people to dwell there see chap. 7.3 4 5. which to avoid all exception was done by lot The chief rulers of the people of their own accord settled themselves to dwell as reason indeed required in this chief city of the kingdome but for the people the tenth part of them were chosen by lot onely there were some that did voluntarily offer themselves to dwell there vers 2. and this taking of one in ten to dwell in Jerusalem some Expositours look upon also as a shadow of the paucity of those that shall be received to dwell in the heavenly Jerusalem to wit that scarce one in ten even of those that professe themselves Gods people shall dwell there according to that Isaiah 6.13 But yet in it shall be a tenth c. and Jerem. 3.14 I will take you one of a city and two of a family and I will bring you to Zion Vers 2. And the people blessed all the men that willingly offered themselves to dwell at Jerusalem That is they commended them for it and desired the Lord to blesse and prosper them Vers 3. Now these are the chief of the province that dwelt in Jerusalem To wit that were chosen now by lot to dwell there In 1. Chron. 9. there is another catalogue of them wherein more are mentioned then are mentioned here But it seems in that both those that were chosen by lot and those that voluntarily offered themselves to dwell there are set down here onely those that were chosen by lot Vers 4. And at Jerusalem dwelt certain of the children of Judah and of the children of Benjamin Because Jerusalem stood partly in Judah and partly in Benjamin therefore those that were chosen by lot to dwell there were of those two tribes yet there were some also of Ephraim and Manasseh that dwelt there 1. Chron. 9.3 which were doubtlesse of those that voluntarily profered themselves Vers 5. And Maaseiah the sonne of Baruch c. Concerning this catalogue of those that dwelt at Jerusalem see 1. Chron. 9.5 6. Vers 9. Second over the city That is next in place and government after Joel afore-mentioned Vers 16. And Shabbethai and Jozabad of the chief of the Levites had the oversight of the outward businesse of the house of God That is such businesses as appertained to the Temple but were to be done abroad not in the Temple as the providing of those things as were to be bought with the money that was collected c. see 1. Chron. 26.29 Vers 17. The sonne of Asaph was the principall to begin the thanksgiving in prayer That is the principall of the singers that used to begin the Psalmes when they sung and praised God Vers 19. Akkub Talmon and their brethren that kept the gates were an hundred seventy two See 1. Chron. 9.17 22. Vers 23. For it was the kings commandment concerning them that a certain portion should be for the singers c. That is the king of Persia had commanded that a certain allowance should every day be given them out of the kings treasure this may have reference to the decree of Darius Ezra 6.9 10. or that of Artaxerxes Ezra 7.23 24. or happely to some new directions given by him to Nehemiah at his coming to Jerusalem Some reade these words thus that it was the kings commandment concerning them that a sure ordinance should be for the singers and so they understand it either of David that he had established it as a sure ordinance that the singers should praise the Lord in the Temple every day or else of Artaxerxes that he had ordained that according to the ancient custome the singers should every day perform this service Vers 24. And Pethahiah the sonne of Meshezabel c. was at the kings hand in all matters concerning the people That is the king of Persia made use of him in all things he gave in charge concerning the people as happely to gather the kings allowance for the Temple to receive the peoples petitions and it may be to assist the governour in matter of judgement Vers 36. And of the Levites were divisions in Judah and in Benjamin That is besides the Levites that dwelt at Jerusalem there were some of them also allowed to dwell in severall towns and cities of Judah that they might teach the people the law of God in their severall divisions CHAP. XII Vers 1. NOw these are the priests and the Levites that went up with Zerubbabel c. Nehemiah intending here to relate with what solemnity they kept the dedication of the new built walls of Jerusalem and how the priests and Leuites were imployed herein first he sets down their ancestours to wit who were the chief priests and Levites in the dayes of Jeshua the high priest and that came with Zerubbabel and Ezra or immediately after him from Babylon into the land of Judea and then secondly who were the chief priests and Levites in the daies of Joiakim the high priest the sonne of Jeshua c. vers 12. Now by the chief of the priests is doubtlesse meant in both these catalogues the heads of the severall divisions of the priests that did in their turns wait upon the service of the Temple but then seeing there were twenty foure courses or orders of the priests established by David 1. Chron. 24.7 why there should be here but two and twenty mentioned in the first catalogue and but twenty in the second vers 12. I find not any probable reason given by Expositours Vers 9. Their brethren were over
Academiae Cantabrigiensis Liber TO THE Right worshipfull Mr. Augustine Philips Master Mr. Clement Cooley Mr. George Reinolds Mr. Thomas Stevenson and Mr. Edmond Clark Wardens Together with the rest of the Assistants of the Company of the CLOTH-WORKERS My very loving and much honoured friends Right worshipfull HAving but a very few years since published for the good of those that desire to reade the Scripture with understanding Certain short Notes of Exposition upon the five books of Moses and finding that they have been entertained by many with farre greater esteem and approbation then ever I expected or they deserved I have now adventured to send forth the rest after them which I had then lying by me to wit the like Notes upon the remaining historicall part of the old Testament and indeed I did then in a manner engage my self by promise that if those found welcome these ere long should follow after and having been often since pressed to make good that promise by the importunity of many Christian friends but especially those of my reverend brethren in the Ministery whose judgement I prized above mine own there lay an obligation upon me for the satisfying of their desires which I could not gainsay Now as the first part of these Annotations I did then dedicate to that particular congregation which the Lord hath been pleased to commit to my care so this second part I now make bold to present unto you who above twenty years since were also pleased to choose me to dispense the word of grace unto you at some set times of your solemn meetings and whom in many other respects I have great cause to love and honour It were indeed engagement enough if there were nothing else to endear my affections to this worthy Society that my dear father whose memory is precious with me and both his brothers were whilest they lived members of this Company and in their times too honoured with those places of credit and trust which since your selves have severally born But besides this it is well known how much I owe you and I willingly thus declare it that this may remain as a publick testimony of my thankfulnesse to you not onely for the great love and respect you have ever shown to me upon all occasions but also especially for the bounteous support which for divers years you have been pleased to afford to one of mine for my sake Adde therefore I beseech you to your former favours the gracious acceptance of this piece of my labours and the God of all grace improve it to you for your spirituall advantage Histories of former times have been ever acknowledged both most pleasant and most profitable if a faire prospect from a high hill be so pleasing to the eye how pleasant must it needs be to the mind of man to have the memorable passages of ancient times presented to our view in a fair prospect of History as if we had then lived to see those things done But above all it must needs be thus in the History of the Scripture both because this chiefly acquaints us with the dispensations of Gods providence towards his Church the dearly beloved of his soul in comparison of whom the rest of the world is not worth the regarding and likewise because this was written by the unerring pen of men inspired by the holy Ghost and that purposely too as the Apostle saith for our learning that we through patience and comfort of the Scriptures might have hope But what need I commend to you the usefulnesse of any part of Gods word which I hope you esteem with David above thousands of Gold and silver If these Annotations shall afford any help for the understanding of such passages in these books as may seem at first somewhat intricate and obscure I have my desire My prayer shall ever be for this worthy Company that the word of Christ may dwell in you richly in all wisdome and that God would still raise up many amongst you that may be to others patterns of piety and zeal for Gods truth in this honourable City and so I rest Your Worships ever ready to do you any service I am able ARTHUR JACKSON The Preface to the READER Christian Reader WHat I prefixed by way of Preface before my Annotations upon the five books of Moses may serve also for these upon the remaining Historicall part of the old Testament these being carried on in the same manner and with respect unto the same ends as the other were Onely one thing I thought good to adde here which is this that there are some Expositions which as I went along I met with so often in so many severall places such as that where men desperately wicked are termed children of Belial and that where the Church is called the Lords portion and the Lords inheritance and some other of the like nature that I was at last wearied with referring the Reader so often to those places where I had formerly given the grounds of those expressions and so resolved to avoid the tedium of such reiterated references rather to leave every man by himself to consider where the like expression was formerly used which by the help of a Concordance at least may be easily found that so there he might seek for satisfaction herein Further then this I have not at present to advertise you concerning these Notes but am onely now to desire your favourable acceptance of what is here published Indeed when the late Annotations came forth upon the whole Bible composed by divers worthy Divines authorized thereto by command of Parliament I did at first question whether there would now be any need of these But considering with my self first that those for the most part are very brief as being at first intended onely for marginall notes secondly that there are very few Expositours that have written upon this part of the Bible and therefore a supply of further help herein could not be thought altogether uselesse and thirdly that I was in some sort already engaged by promise for these Annotations which I formerly made known were then collected I did at last in these regards determine to proceed in my former resolutions Whether I shall ever go on any further in this way the Lord onely knows the infirmities of age grow so fast upon me that I may well fear I shall not And besides there is little encouragement for any work of this nature in these contentious times There are some we see risen up amongst us that are not afraid to deny the Scriptures to be Gods word which must needs be the ruine of religion and open a doore to all profanenesse and Atheisme should it be suffered in the land But we trust the Magistrate whom God hath so highly honoured will be so zealous for the honour of God as ere long to stop the mouthes of such blasphemers and in the mean season none but those that are given up of God to believe lies will
a sudden not thinking of any such thing as he looked up he saw a man stand before him with a drawn sword in his hand and this was the sonne of God the Angel of the Covenant who now appeared thus to Joshua in the shape of a man to encourage him with assurance that God would fight for him against the inhabitants of the land and particularly to give him directions what course he should take against Jericho as we may see in the following chapter vers 2. where of this man thus appearing to Joshua it is said that the Lord or Jehovah said unto Joshua See I have given into thy hand Jericho c. Vers 14. And he said Nay but as a Captain of the host of the Lord am I now come That is not for your adversaries am I here but as a Captain of the Israelites to fight for them Vers 15. Loose thy shoe from off thy foot c. See the note upon Exod. 3.5 CHAP. VI. Vers 2. ANd the Lord said unto Joshua c. Who now appeared to Joshua in the shape of an armed man as was said before chap. 5.13 Vers 3. And ye shall compasse the citie all the men of warre and go round about the citie once c. This no doubt they were enjoyned to do at such a distance from the walls that they might not be in danger of any arrows or other things which the inhabitants might shoot at them That which is most worthy our enquiring in this course which the Lord here prescribes for the taking of Jericho is why the Lord would have such means used for the effecting of this as were not onely so unlikely to effect it but also so absurd and ridiculous in the eye of reason what likelihood was there in humane judgement that their tracing about the city once every day for six dayes together and seven times the seventh day or that the Priests blowing with trumpets of rams-horns and the shouting of the people should batter down the walls of so strong a city yea the appointing of trumpets of rams-horns for the Priests had above all the rest a shew of ridiculousnesse Had they made use of the silver trumpets of the Sanctuary there had been both more state and a better ground of hope in the sounding of those sacred signes of Gods presence amongst them but these trumpets of rams-horns might seem onely fit to move laughter for a work of such importance as they had now in hand But to all this now it may be answered First that hereby the Lord made it manifest beyond all exception that it was he onely that delivered the city into their hands The lesse they did herein the lesse cause had they to ascribe any thing to their own wisdome or valour and the more ridiculous the means were that were used the more evident it was that the work was not done by any power of the means but by the sole power of God Secondly that hereby the almighty power of God was the more magnified who could effect such great works by such unlikely and simple means for this did discover plainly how farre the power of God did surpasse the reach of mans wisdome even that as the Apostle speaks 1. Cor. 5.25 The foolishnesse of God is wiser then men and the weaknesse of God is stronger then men And thirdly that the more absurd and simple the means appointed were in reason the better was the faith of Gods people tryed whether they would in confidence of Gods promise do what he enjoyned them however strange it might seem to them and would become fools that they might be wise as the same Apostle speaks 1. Cor. 3.18 So that we see the Lord did in great wisdome prescribe this course for the taking of Jericho which reason was like to scorn and deride yea and herein we have besides an observable figure of Gods subduing the world to Christ our Joshua or Jesus in these dayes of the Gospel For as by trumpets of rams-horns that is by the foolishnesse of preaching for so carnall men judge of it 1. Cor. 1.21 doth the Lord beat down all the strong holds and fortifications of Satan raised in mens hearts even every high thing that exalts it self against the knowledge of God bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ 2. Cor. 10.4 5. That which the world counts foolishnesse 1. Cor. 1.23 We preach Christ crucified to the Jews a stumbling block and to the Greeks foolishnesse it proves the mighty power of God unto salvation to those that believe and thus hath God provided that all the glory should redound to him and not unto his instruments the preachers of the Gospel We have this treasure in earthen vessels that the excellency of the power may be of God and not of us 2. Cor. 4.7 Thus shalt thou do six dayes c. Six dayes together once a day are the Israelites here appointed to march about Jericho in a solemn manner as is afterwards expressed and on the seventh day vers 4. they were to do it seven severall times this doubtlesse was to exercise the faith and patience of the people It had been as easie for God to have caused the walls of Jericho to fall at the first dayes compassing the citie as after seven dayes toyl but thus God loves to try the faith and patience of his people to see whether they will wait for the accomplishment of his promises when they are not presently fulfilled As for their marching about the citie on the sabbath day which must needs be granted because they did it seven dayes together we need not stumble at it for Gods precept is the rule of righteousnesse nor can men sinne in doing what God hath commanded Vers 5. And it shall come to passe that when they make a long blast c. See the note upon Exod. 19.19 And the wall of the citie shall fall down flat c. But how was it then that Rahabs house did not fall together with the wall for it is expressely said before Chap. 2.15 that her house was upon the wall and she dwelt upon the wall and yet after the wall was fallen it is said vers 22. of this chapter that Joshua commanded the two men that he had formerly sent to spie out the countrey to go into the harlots house and to bring her out and all that she had Now to this I answer that doubtlesse therefore all the wall about the city did not fall but onely that part of the wall over against which the Israelites were in a long train when they had compassed the city the last time that so they might go up every man right from the place where they were and enter at this breach into the citie And indeed this makes the fall of the citie wall the more strange and miraculous Vers 9. And the armed men went before the priests that blew the trumpets and the rereward came after the ark I doubt not but
this order prescribed here by Joshua for the peoples marching about the citie was formerly given him in charge by the Lord though it be not there expressed However very observable is the peoples readinesse in obeying his command which makes it to me most probable that Joshua had told them what the Lord had imparted to him concerning the falling of the citie wall which they believing the rather because of the miracle they had so lately seen of the dividing of Jordan were the readier to do what Joshua enjoyned them and thence is that which the Apostle saith Heb. 11.30 By faith the walls of Jericho fell down after they were compassed about seven dayes It is questioned by some why those Israelites were armed that went before the ark seeing the wall was to fall of it self But this scruple is altogether causelesse for it was fit they should be armed for their own defence and the defence of the ark in case the inhabitants should sally out upon them and besides they were to go up upon the citie to destroy the inhabitants so soon as ever the wall was fallen and their going armed beforehand did testifie that they believed what God had said herein and were ready to execute the Lords command The greatest difficulty in these words is who are here meant by the rereward that came after the ark Some hold that this is meant of the tribes of Dan Asher and Naphtali and that because Numb 10.25 their camp is called the rereward and used alwayes as the Israelites travelled through the wildernesse to march in the rere which order they conceive was here observed for the greater pomp and state But yet because the words seem so plainly to imply that all the people that were armed went before the ark Let him that is armed passe on before the ark of the Lord vers 7. and here again the armed men went before the priests that blew with the trumpets therefore it may seem more probable which others say that by rereward here is meant the remainder of the people that were not armed Vers 16. Joshua said unto the people Shout c. The following reason for the Lord hath given you the citie shows the ground why this shouting was enjoyned them to wit first to strike the hearts of the men of Jericho with fear secondly to testifie their faith in Gods promise and their joyfull assurance that now the citie should be delivered up unto them and thirdly to encourage one another in the following assault Vers 17. And the city shall be accursed even it and all that are therein to the Lord. This Joshua received in charge from the Lord though it were not formerly expressed as is evident 1. Kings 16.34 In his dayes did Hiel the Bethelite build Jericho he laid the foundation in Abiram his first-born and set up the gates thereof in his youngest sonne Segub according to the word of the Lord which he spake by Joshua the sonne of Nun. And by Joshua no doubt this charge was given to the people before the time when they were to shout but here it is inserted vvhen it vvas to be put in execution to make vvay to the follovving story of Achans transgression chap. 7. Why this citie vvas thus destroyed rather then the other cities vve need not enquire since it is enough that it pleased God so to appoint But probably tvvo reasons may be given first that hereby the other inhabitants might be vvarned not to stand out against God or if they did to render them the more inexcusable and secondly that it might be offered to the divine justice as a kind of first-fruits as the words implie the citie shall be accursed to the Lord thereby acknowledging that the whole land was his but that he was pleased to give it them As concerning things accursed or devoted see the notes upon Levit. 27.28 Vers 19. But all the silver and gold and vessels of brasse and iron are consecrated unto the Lord. Under these we may probably conceive that all other metalls are comprehended and happely they were made to passe through the fire ere they were brought into the Lords treasurie as those were Num. 31.22 23. Onely the gold the silver the brasse the iron the tinne and the lead Every thing that may abide the fire ye shall make it go through the fire and it shall be clean concerning their images of gold and silver there is no question to be made but that either they were melted and so brought into the treasurie or else utterly wafted with the things in the citie according to that law Deut. 7.25 The graven images of their gods shall ye burn with fire thou shalt not desire the silver or gold that is on them nor take it unto thee lest thou be snared therein for it is an abomination to the Lord thy God Vers 20. The wall fell down flat so that the people went up into the citie c. Thus God without the help of the Israelites beat down the walls of Jericho wherein the Israelites were to have no part of the spoil See the former note upon vers 5. Vers 23. And they brought out all her kindred and left them without the camp of Israel That is having fetched Rahab her kindred and all she had out of her house they carried them to some place without their camp and there they left them And thus both the Israelites testified what an esteem they had of the holinesse of their camp where God was pleased to dwell amongst them and withall Rahab and her kindred were hereby taught to acknowledge bewail and forsake the impuritie of their gentile condition and were kept as aliens from the common-wealth of Israel till they had made profession of their desire to imbrace the religion and faith of Israel and were cleansed from their former pollutions according to the Law Numb 31.19 And do ye abide without the camp seven dayes whosoever hath killed any person and whosoever hath touched any slain purifie both your selves and your captives on the third day and on the seventh day Vers 24. And they burnt the citie with fire and all that was therein It might well in reason have been very grievous to the people to destroy such goodly houses wherein they might so conveniently have seated themselves and the whole prey and spoil of so fair a citie which might so greatly have enriched them But herein is noted their observable obedience at present to the Lords command not a man of them offering to meddle with one jot of the spoil save onely Achan of whose sacriledge we have the relation in the following chapter Vers 26. Cursed be the man before the Lord that riseth up and buildeth this citie Jericho God would have the ruines of this town remain as a perpetuall monument of the power of God shewed both in his severitie against this idolatrous citie and his mercie to his people and therefore Joshua is by the Lord appointed to curse him that should
men of Ai would have adventured to sallie out against them secondly Because the place assigned for the ambush both vers 4. and vers 12. is the very same to wit the west side of Ai between Bethel and Ai nor can any probable reason be given either why two severall ambushes should be laid on the same side of the citie or how such a mighty number of armed men as first thirtie thousand and then five thousand should conveniently be disposed of to lie undiscovered in two severall ambushes between Ai and Bethel a town near at hand and confederate with Ai and thirdly especially Because there is no mention made in the sequel of this storie of any thing that was done for the surprisall of Ai but onely by one ambush who when the men of Ai were pursuing the rest of the Israelites came out and on a sudden took the citie and set it on fire Upon these grounds I say most that have written upon this place do hold that there was but one ambush laid to wit that of five thousand men mentioned vers 12. So that according to this opinion of theirs whereas it is said here that Joshua chose out thirty thousand mighty men of valour and sent them away by night and he commanded them saying Behold ye shall lie in wait against the citie c. The words must not be so understood as if he commanded all those thirtie thousand men to lie in ambush behind Ai but that he commanded them that they should lay some in ambush to wit the five thousand mentioned afterward vers 12. And indeed this Exposition I conceive to be the most probable onely because it is so expressely said vers 1. Take all the people of warre with thee and arise go up to Ai and here again So Joshua arose and all the people of warre to go up against Ai I cannot see how it can be denied that Joshua carried the whole armie of Israel with him so that thus I think we may best conceive of the whole carriage of this expedition against Ai to wit first That Joshua marched with all the men of warre from Gilgal till they were come so near it that they might the following night go up to the citie vers 3. secondly That he sent away from thence that night vers 3 4. thirty thousand of his choicest men with a charge that taking the advantage of the night they should lay an ambush behind the citie between Bethel and Ai to wit an ambush of five thousand men as is afterwards expressed vers 12. the other five and twentie thousand being sent with him that they staying some where not farre from them might be able to encounter the enemie in case the inhabitants of the citie should discover them and come out with all their power against them all which they did accordingly vers 9. and Joshua lodged that night amongst the rest of the people thirdly That early the next morning before it was yet day Joshua went up after this thirtie thousand and pitched on the north side of Ai joyning happely now with the five and twentie thousand that went along with those that were to lie in ambush but in a place where the men of Ai could not yet discover them there being a valley between them and the Israelites vers 10 11. fourthly Having thus set the ambush on the west side of the citie and the bodie of the armie on the North Joshua went presently before it was day into the midst of the valley vers 13. purposely that the men of Ai might see them and therefore questionlesse he carried with him into this valley but a small party that the inhabitants might be the readier to salley out against them and fifthly That when the men of Ai taking notice thereof hereupon came out and set upon them and were drawn off farre from the city by the counterfeit flight of the Israelites hereupon Joshua made a stand and set upon those that pursued them and withall the ambush rose out of their place surprised the city and set it on fire Vers 7. And ye shall rise up from the ambush and seise upon the city To wit upon a signe given them concerning which see the note upon vers 18. Vers 10. And Joshua rose up early in the morning and numbred the people Which it seems he did that when the people should afterwards see that they had now vanquished their enemies without any losse they might be the more courageous and wholly overcome their former fears See the note also upon vers 3. Vers 11. And all the people even the people of warre that were with him went up and drew nigh and came before the citie and pitched on the North side of Ai c. They marched first forward on the East side of the citie but then fetching a little compasse pitched on the North side because that place was most convenient for them and there they should be the nearer to those that were laid in ambush See the note also upon vers 3. Vers 12. And he took about five thousand men and set them to lie in ambush c. See the note upon vers 3. Vers 13. Joshua went that night into the midst of the valley That is early in the morning when it was yet dark vers 10. And Joshua rose up early in the morning and numbred the people See also the note upon vers 3. Vers 14. And the men of the city went out against Israel to battell he and all his people at a time appointed c. That is they all came together at a time appointed from all the severall parts of the city and at the self same time rushed all out together and set upon the Israelites with great violence When Joshua came into the valley with that small company he brought with him he desired there should be notice taken of it so that happely by the noise they made they might be discovered whereof when word was brought to the King he appointed that all the Garrison souldiers in the city should be in readinesse at such a time that they might go out against the Israelites and accordingly at the time appointed which shews how forward they were by reason of their former victory they were all met and together with their King did sally forth and set upon them Vers 15. And Joshua and all Israel made as if they were beaten before them and fled by the way of the wildernesse They fled doubtlesse towards the body of their armie which they had left on the hill beyond the plain where they now fled before the men of Ai. This wildernesse therefore here mentioned was it seems in that place and we may probably conceive that it was the wildernesse of Beth-aven for that was nigh unto Bethel chap. 18.12 13. Vers 16. And all the people that were in Ai were called together to pursue after them That is all the souldiers all that could bear arms for that others were left
hath pronounced against the people of this land requires that you should be cut off as well as the rest yet because of the oath which we have taken this curse shall be upon you in bondage and not in death And indeed here was that curse literally fulfilled in the Gibeonites which Noah pronounced against the Canaanites in generall Gen. 9.25 And he said Cursed be Canaan a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren CHAP. X. Vers 1. ANd how the inhabitants of Gibeon had made peace with Israel and were among them This is mentioned as the last and greatest cause of the fear of the king of Jerusalem and his people to wit the report they had newly heard that the inhabitants of Gibeon had made peace with Israel and were among them Now by these last words and were among them two things may be implyed to wit First that they were not onely confederate with them but also had become one people with them having incorporated themselves with the Israelites to live under the same laws and government with them And secondly that hereupon they had peaceable intercourse one with another the Israelites having free admission into their cities mentioned chap. 9.17 and the Gibeonites having liberty to go and come to and from the Israelites as being now reputed their subjects and servants Vers 2. They feared greatly because Gibeon was a great city as one of the royall cities c. That is both the king of Jerusalem and his people were exceedingly afraid because Gibeon was a very great city very little inferiour to any of the cities that had kings reigning in them And indeed considering first what an advantage it might be to the Israelites to have these cities delivered up to them both for the supply they might have from thence of all things requisite for them and the shelter they might have there from thence to infest the neighbouring cities and secondly what full information they might receive from the Gibeonites concerning the state of the whole land and all the cities therein and thirdly how dangerous their revolt might be to move other cities to do the like no wonder it is though these tydings concerning the Gibeonites did greatly dismay them Vers 4. Come up unto me and help me that I may smite Gibeon c. These kings together with others inhabiting in other parts of Canaan had before entred into a confederacy to go with their united forces against the Israelites chap. 9.1 But now these that dwelt â—igh to Gibeon hearing that the Gibeonites were fallen off to the Israelites are first called together to go against Gibeon Nor need it seem strange that they should resolve thus first to begin with them First because as the timely surprising of these cities of the Gibeonites would be a notable means to secure their own cities so the delivering them up to the Israelites would open a way to their certain ruine Secondly because it was fit that some speedy course should be taken to make all other cities afraid to fall off to the Israelites as the Gibeonites had done Thirdly because they were not so afraid to encounter with these their neighbours as with the Israelites and hope that by prevailing against these they should both daunt the Israelites and encourage their own people and Fourthly because their wrath against these neighbours for revolting from them was so exceeding great that in case they should weaken themselves by spending their forces upon them yet so they might be revenged upon them first they did not so much care Vers 6. And the men of Gibeon sent to Joshua to the camp to Gilgal saying Slack not thy hand c. To wit before they were besieged so soon as they heard these kings were coming against them Vers 7. So Joshua ascended from Gilgal he and all the people of warre with him c. Considering how little assurance Joshua could have that the Gibeonites would not some way deal treacherously with him and what cause he had to fear lest his own souldiers should not be very chearfully forward to fight for the defence of those whom themselves ere-while would have destroyed it is much that Joshua should thus readily go to aid the Gibeonites But then on the other side if we consider of how great importance it was for the Israelites to get the cities of the Gibeonites into their power and how also in point of conscience Joshua was bound to relieve them that had now yielded up themselves to be their servants it will easily appear that Joshua was bound with all speed to go up and raise the siege of Gibeon and when he had done his duty herein to leave the successe to God Yea and it may be too he enquired of God and received from him that encouragement set down in the following verse before he undertook this expedition for the relief of Gibeon And the Lord said unto Joshua Fear them not for I have delivered them into thine hand c. Vers 9. Joshua therefore came unto them suddenly and went up from Gilgal all night To wit that he might surprise them suddenly but yet from hence we cannot conclude that they were but one night a marching from Gilgal to Gibeon Vers 11. And it came to passe as they fled from before Israel and were in the going down to Beth-horon that the Lord cast down great stones from heaven upon them c. It is said in the foregoing verse that the Lord chased them along the way that goeth up to Beth-horon and yet here now it is added that the Lord slew them with hailstones as they were in the going down to Beth-horon the reason whereof may be because there was an upper and a nether Beth-horon 1. Chron. 7.24 by both which it seems the Canaanites fled at this time when they were chased by the Israelites for though it be said in that place of the Chronicles that these towns were after built by one Sherah a famous woman of the stock of Ephraim yet we must know that it is usuall in this story to speak of places in the land of Canaan by the names that were afterwards given them by the Israelites yea and perhaps too there might be at this time an upper and a nether Beth-horon though by that Sherah they were afterwards rebuilt beautified and fortified as for this storm of hail that fell upon the Canaanites it was miraculous in a twofold regard first in regard of the exceeding greatnesse of the hailstones which were of such a mighty bignesse and weight that they brained and killed the Canaanites upon whom they fell so that they were more which died with the hailstones then they which the children of Israel slew with the sword and secondly in regard they were so ordered and levelled as I may say by the hand of Gods providence that though the Israelites pursued the Canaanites so closely that here and there they must needs be mingled amongst them yet they onely fell upon the
fought hitherto with the Canaanites there is no mention made and before whom how the Israelites should be able to stand that were all foot he might perhaps doubt and therefore the Lord doth now again assure Joshua that he should overcome and destroy them all and that he might not question the promise made to him he tells him particularly the very time when this should be done To morrow saith he about this time will I deliver them up all slain before Israel Thou shalt though their horses and burn their chariots with fire Thou shalt not think to reserve these for thine own use and therefore shalt altogether make the one unserviceable and burn up the other In future times the Israelites made use both of horse and chariots in warre and that no doubt without sinne Now God would not allow it that the worse provided they were for the conquest of these nations the more evident it might be that God had thrust out these nations before them and the lesse cause they might have to glory in themselves Vers 8. And the Lord delivered them into the hand of Israel who smote them and chased them unto great Zidon Zidon so called from Sidon the eldest sonne of Canaan Gen. 10.15 is here styled great not to distinguish it from any other lesser city of that name but onely because it was indeed a very great city and in great fame in those times partly by reason the inhabitants were excellent artificers for all kind of workmanship but especially because there was there a goodly haven and so they had of all other cities the greatest store of ships and sea-men and indeed that it was the Metropolis of that countrey afterward called Phenicia we may the rather think because Tyrus a great citie too not farre from Zidon is called the daughter of Zidon Isaiah 53.12 Vers 10. And Joshua at that time turned back and took Hazor and smote the king thereof with the sword Either Jabin the king of Hazor mentioned vers 1. escaped in the fight and fled into Hazor and so was slain there when they took the citie or else hearing that their king was slain they had presently made another king for the better preservation of their city the rather because it was the head of all those kingdomes in those parts or else it may be the king was slain in the battell onely his death is related here where the story relates how his city was taken as is noted before upon a like passage chap. 10.37 which last seems the most probable because the like is said afterward concerning all the kings that were confederate with Jabin in this warre verse 12. And all the cities of those kings and all the kings of them did Joshua take and smote them with the edge of the sword For it is not probable that all those kings did escape to their cities and were taken and slain there or that there were new kings chosen in the room of those that were slain in all those cities As concerning the rebuilding repeopling again of this Hazor whose kings were happely called by the name of Jabin as those of Egypt were called Pharaohs see what is noted upon Judges 4.2 where we reade of another Jabin that reigned in Hazor that did mightily oppresse Gods people Vers 13. But as for the cities that stood still in their strength Israel burned none of them save Hazor onely c. That is that were not beaten down burnt and ruined in the taking of them Some it seems in the taking put the Israelites to more work and were burnt and destroyed ere they could be wonne but those that could be taken otherwise the Israelites reserved for their own use Onely Hazor though after it was taken it stood still in its strength was burnt down to the ground because the king thereof was the first and chief in raising these forces which were now overthrown against the Israelites Vers 15. As the Lord commanded Moses his servant c. See the note chap. 10.40 Vers 16. So Joshua took all that land the hills c. and the mountain of Israel and the valley of the same Expositours guesse severally what mountain it was that is here called the mountain of Israel But the best and most probable opinion is that it is not meant of any one particular mountain but that it is meant generally of all the mountainous parts of the land of Canaan which the Israelites inhabited considered apart from the tribe of Judah Vers 18. And Joshua made warre a long time with all those kings Because the warres which Joshua had made with the kings of Canaan mentioned in the former chapter are succinctly related in a few words it might therefore be thought that they were dispatched in a few dayes and therefore to prevent this mistake it is here expressely said that these warres lasted a long time though they be here briefly related one immediately after another How many years were spent in subduing these nations we cannot say onely it is evident that when Caleb required of Joshua that part of the land which Moses had promised him chap. 14.6 the warres had lasted about seven years for that was five and fourtie years as Caleb saith there vers 10. after he with others were sent from Kadesh-barnea to search the land of Canaan out of which if we take eight and thirtie yeares which were after that spent in the wandring of the Israelites through the wildernesse there will remain seven years which were spent in the warres of Joshua from the time that they passed over Jordan unto the time that Caleb desired of Joshua that peculiar portion of the land which had been promised him We know well that God could many wayes have driven or rooted out these kings and their people in a shorter time But God would have it thus done by degrees first That the more opposition and difficultie they found in the work the more the power and the love of God and his provident care over them might be magnified who did at last carrie them through all these difficulties Secondly that he might hereby exercise their faith and patience and teach them whenever they met with great opposition in any thing God enjoyned them not to despair but to wait upon God as knowing that in the conclusion God would not suffer their hope to make them ashamed Thirdly that the obstinacy of the Canaanites might be the more clearly discovered to render them inexcusable and Fourthly that he might prevent hereby the encrease of wild beasts in the land according to that which Moses had said to them Deut. 7.22 The Lord thy God will put out those nations before thee by little and little thou mayest not consume them at once lest the beasts of the field encrease upon thee Vers 19. There was not a city that made peace with the children of Israel c. This is added as a reason why the warres with the Canaanites lasted so long as it
Israelites that beholding them all thus joyntly together we might be the more affected with the consideration of Gods goodnesse and faithfulnesse towards his people From the river Arnon unto mount Hermon and all the plain on the east This was the length of the countrey on the outside of Jordan it reached from the river Arnon where it ran into the dead sea unto mount Hermon Vers 2. And from half Gilead unto the river Jabbok c. For the other half of Gilead was possessed by Og as we may see vers 5. See the note also upon Num. 32.40 Vers 9. The king of Ai which is beside Bethel one This clause which is added concerning the city of Ai that it was nigh unto Bethel is to distinguish it from another city of the same name in the countrey of the Amorites whereof the prophet Jeremy speaks Jer. 49.3 Howl O Hesbon for Ai is spoyled Vers 23. The king of the nations of Gilgal one This cannot be that Gilgal where the Israelites pitched their tents immediately after they had passed over Jordan for there was no city that had a king reigning in it and therefore it is probably conjectured by many Expositours that this was some city of that name in that part of the land of Canaan which was called Galilee yea and Galilee of nations Esa 9.1 as this Gilgal is here called Gilgal of nations to wit because the inhabitants of this place were a mixt people of severall nations or because being a place of great trading many severall nations resorted thither for commerce and so continued there often for many years together Some are of opinion that Tidal Gen. 14.1 who was one of those kings that fought against Sodome was king of this countrey CHAP. XIII Vers 1. NOw Joshua was old and stricken in years and the Lord said unto him Thou art old c. God had promised that Joshua should divide this land unto the people chap. 1.6 Be strong and of a good courage For unto this people shalt thou divide for an inheritance the land which I sware unto their fathers to give them and herein was he a type of Christ who having vanquished all our enemies is now ascended up into heaven to prepare a place for us John 14.2 In my fathers house are many mansions if it were not so I would have told you I go to prepare a place for you He therefore being now old God calls upon him to dispatch this work before he dyes and not to deferre it till they were possessed of all as happely he thought he must have done Vers 2. This is the land that still remaineth all the borders of the Philistines and all Geshuri The land of the Philistines lay along the coasts of the midland sea and the land of Geshuri was on the North part of Canaan Vers 3. From Sihor which is before Egypt even unto the borders of Ekron northward which is counted to the Canaanite c. That is this land of the Philistines belongs to Canaan consequently to the Israelites though as yet they have not taken it For the Philistines called Caphtorims because thence they came Amos 9.7 Have not I brought up Israel out of the land of Egypt and the Philistines from Caphtor entered upon this part of Canaan drove out the old inhabitants and dwelt in it themselves Deut. 2.23 The Avims which dwelt in Hazerim even unto Azzah the Caphtorims which came forth out of Caphtor destroyed them and dwelt in their stead Concerning Sihor see the note upon Num. 34.30 Also the Avites Or the Avims Deut. 2.23 who being expelled out of their land by the Philistines as is above noted did yet it seems continue in some portion of their land adjoyning to the Philistines Vers 4. From the south all the land of the Canaanites c. That is as this land of the Philistines which lies at the south end of the sea-coasts so also all the land of the Canaanites from thence along the sea-coasts was not yet possessed by the Israelites even Mearah or the cave that is besides the Sidonians and Aphek a town in the tribe of Asher not farre from Sidon and so to the borders of the Amorites for there were Amorites on both sides of Jordan There was a town indeed called Aphek whose king was slain by Joshua chap. 12.18 but this it seems was not that but another in the tribe of Asher called Aphik Judges 1.31 Vers 5. And the land of the Giblites and all Lebanon toward the sunne rising c. The Giblites were a people who inhabited Gebel Psal 83.7 a promontary near Sidon All their countrey and all Lebanon c. was not yet subdued For now he turns to the midland sea to shew what lay unvanquished on the northern bounds to wit the countrey about Libanus and so easternly as farre as Hamath where even in Davids time there was a Canaanitish king 2. Sam. 8.9 Vers 6. Them will I drive out before the children of Israel This promise is to be understood conditionally if they should continue faithfull in keeping covenant with him wherein failing they never came to possesse them though in Davids and Solomons time they became tributary unto them Onely divide thou it by lot unto the Israelites c. That is even that land before spoken of not yet conquered which God enjoyns to strengthen their faith and that having it in their charter from God this might be a spurre to them in future times not to neglect the seeking of it and driving out the rest of the nations See the note upon Num. 26.53 Vers 8. With whom the Reubenites and the Gadites have received their inheritance c. That is with which tribe of Manasseh to wit the other half of them the Reubenites and the Gadites had already received their inheritance without Jordan For these words are added to shew the reason why in the foregoing verse Joshua was commanded to divide the land within Jordan to the nine tribes and the half tribe of Manasseh to wit because the Reubenites and the Gadites had already received their inheritance together with the other half of the Manassites in the land without Jordan which Moses had given them And though there may seem to be a tautology or a vain repetition of the same thing in the following words which Moses gave them even as Moses the servant of the Lord gave them yet if the words be well weighed we shall find it is not so for that second clause even as Moses the servant of the Lord gave them is added as it were to imply the just confirming of the former donation now by Joshua and the rest that now divided the land as if it had been said they have already received their inheritance which Moses gave them beyond Jordan as is fitting because Moses the servant of the Lord did so order it Vers 9. From Aroer that is upon the bank of the river Arnon c. Here first the whole land without
Jordan is described which was by Moses given to the Reubenites and the Gadites and the one half tribe of Manasseh and then afterwards is shown what each of them had severally Vers 11. And Gilead and the border of the Geshurites and Maachathites Even the border of the Geshurites and the Maachathites are here mentioned as a part of the land without Jordan belonging to the two tribes and a half planted there because Moses had indeed given them their countrey together with the rest though as yet they had it not in their possession as is afterwards expressed verse 13. Vers 12. For these did Moses smite and cast them out To wit Sihon and Og before mentioned and their people For this cannot be referred to all the inhabitants of the land before named because it is expressely said in the following verse that the Geshurites and the Maachathites were not cast out Vers 13. Neverthelesse the children of Israel expelled not the Geshurites c. Though the land without Jordan was vanquished whilest Moses was yet living yet they did not then drive out these Geshurites Maachathites who inhabited the outmost skirts of the countrey to wit because having in their possession enough for the present use of the two tribes and a half that were planted there it was not judged requisite to delay their passing over Jordan till they had fully cleared all the utmost corners of that land Neither was it therefore any sinne in Moses and the Israelites thus at first to forbear a while the casting out of these people But yet when in after times they continued still to suffer them to roost amongst them that was an act of base sloth and is noted doubtlesse in the last words of this verse to their just reproch the Geshurites and the Maachathites dwell among the Israelites untill this day Vers 14. Onely unto the tribe of Levi he gave none inheritance This which is in so many places repeated is here inserted to shew the reason of that verse 7. why God enjoyned Joshua to divide the land within Jordan unto the nine tribes and the half of Manasseh to wit because the tribe of Levi was to have no part of the land for had they been to have had a share too there would have been still ten tribes and a half to provide for Vers 15. And Moses gave unto the tribe of the children of Reuben inheritance according to their families That is proportionably according to the number of their families Now the bounds of each tribe are thus exactly set down to prevent all discord and division for the time to come Vers 16. And their coast was from Aroer c. That is it reached from Aroer exclusively Aroer indeed belonged to the tribe of Gad Num. 32.34 And the children of Gad built Dibon and Ataroth and Aroer So that the city of Aroer and the outsides of the plains of Medeba for the plain it self was a part of Reubens possession are here made the bounds for this tribe Vers 17. Heshbon and all her cities that are in the plain of Dibon c. This town is reckoned amongst Reubens possessions Num. 32.37 And the children of Reuben built Heshbon yet Josh 21.39 and 1. Chron. 6.81 it is reckoned amongst the cities of Gad given to the Levites The next city Dibon is indeed reckoned amongst the cities of Gad Num. 32.34 And the children of Gad built Dibon but the reason of this is because they stood in the confines of both tribes and so were in common inhabited by both Vers 21. And all the kingdome of Sihon king of the Amorites which reigned in Heshbon That is and all the kingdome of Sihon in those parts within the bounds before mentioned for it is expressely said verse 27. that the rest of the kingdome of Sihon king of Heshon was given to Gad. And this seems added partly to imply that though some of these cities had been the Moabites yet at that time they were Sihons and so according to Gods commandment they meddled not with the Ammonites and Moabites countrey Whom Moses smote with the princes of Midian Evi and Rekem c. These five princes of Midian were not slain at the same time and in the same battell wherein Sihon was slain at Jahaz Numb 21.23 24. but long after by a party that were purposely sent out by Moses against the Medianites Numb 31.8 and therefore it is very probably conceived by Expositours that the reason why the death of Sihon these princes is mentioned here together is because these princes though they were princes of Midian yet withall were as it follows here in the next words Dukes of Sihon dwelling in the countrey to wit in the countrey of the Amorites where Sihon reigned and so aided him in his warre against the Israelites and however they were not slain then together with Sihon but escaped away into the land of Midian and Sihon being now dead took upon them the power and title of kings for so they are therefore called Numb 31.8 in some cities of Midian that were happely before tributary to Sihon yet afterward in another expedition of the Israelites which they undertook by the direction of Moses against the Midianites they were slain as Sihon their Lord was before in a former battell and so the cutting off both of Sihon and these his vassals is here mentioned together Some Expositours do indeed otherwise conceive of that last clause Which were Dukes of Sihon dwelling in the countrey to wit that though they were the vassals of Sihon yet they were native Midianites and such as dwelt in that countrey and so were the more zealous for the defence of their countrey against the Israelites and so the slaying of Sihon and these princes of Midian is here mentioned together onely because both the one and the other were slain by the Israelites and much about the same time but that where the text is discribing the countrey of Sihon it should be said of these princes that they were Dukes of Sihon dwelling in the countrey meaning thereby the countrey of Midian may be justly thought somewhat improbable and therefore the first Exposition seems to me the best Vers 22. Balaam also the sonne of Beor the Soothsayer did the children of Israel slay c. See the note upon Numb 24.25 Vers 23. And the border of the children of Reuben was Jordan and the border thereof That is the banks or border or coasts of Jordan all along was the border to wit the western border of Reuben Vers 25. And their coast was Jasher and all the cities of Giliad That is all the cities of Gilead within the bounds afterward mentioned for half Gilead was given to the tribe of Manasseh vers 31. And half the land of the children of Ammon c. Which it seems Sihon had taken away from the Ammonites as he had also encroched upon the Moabites countrey Numb 21.26 For Heshbon was the city of Sihon the king of the Amorites who
of Edom southward were Kabzeel c. It is called Iekabzeel Neh. 11.25 Vers 32. All their cities are twenty nine with their villages There are indeed eight and thirty cities or towns named in the foregoing verses and therefore for the clearing of this some hold that because nine of these were afterwards assigned to the tribe of Simeon therefore it is said here that all the cities of Iudah in those parts were nine and twenty But the better answer I conceive is that nine and twenty of them onely were walled cities the other were the most famous towns and villages in those parts And here in this first catalogue of Iudahs cities in the Southern parts the most noted towns are expressed by name as well as the walled cities that in the following catalogues we may conceive the same to wit that there were many towns of note besides the cities there mentioned though they be not expressed by name as here they are Vers 36. Fourteen cities with their villages There are fifteen named in the foregoing verses either therefore one of them was no citie but some noted town or rather it may be very probably conceived that Gederah and Gederothaim were but one citie and therefore some reade it as it is in the margin of our bibles Gederah or Gederothaim Vers 62. And Nibshan and the citie of salt This citie might have its name The citie of salt from the salt pits that were there and the abundance of salt that was dayly made by the inhabitants of the citie Vers 63. As for the Jebusites the inhabitants of Jerusalem the children of Judah could not drive them out It is a question much argued amongst writers whether Jerusalem stood in Judahs or in Benjamins portion By many places of Scripture it seems evident that it was in Benjamins portion For in the 18. chapter of this book vers 28. it is reckoned amongst the cities that were in Benjamins lot and we see that Moses did before his death prophesie concerning Benjamin that the Temple which was in Jerusalem should be built in Benjamins portion for that is the drift of those words Deut. 33.12 And of Benjamin he said The beloved of the Lord shall dwell in safety by him and the Lord shall cover him all the day long and he shall dwell between his shoulders yea and Jer. 6.1 the inhabitants of Jerusalem are expressely called the children of Benjamin O ye children of Benjamin gather your selves to flee out of the midst of Jerusalem and Judg. 1.21 the same that is here said of the children of Judah is likewise there said of the children of Benjamin The children of Benjamin did not drive out the Jebusites the inhabitants of Jerusalem but the Jebusites dwell with the children of Benjamin in Jerusalem unto this day But now again by other places of Scripture it seems as evident that Jerusalem was in Judahs portion For first mention is here made of it as one of Judahs cities The Jebusites dwell with the children of Judah at Jerusalem unto this day and secondly Jerusalem is said to have been taken by the children of Judah Judg. 1.8 and thirdly it is reckoned as the great priviledge of the children of Judah that the Lord in his Temple dwelt amongst them Psal 78.67 68 69. Moreover he refused the Tabernacle of Joseph and chose not the tribe of Ephraim but chose the tribe of Judah the mount Sion which he loved and he built his Sanctuary like high places c. but the truth herein is that Jerusalem stood in the border of these two tribes and so was part in Judahs and part in Benjamins portion and therefore the places of Scripture before cited do not any way contradict one another the fort of Sion and some of the south skirts of the city were in Judahs portion but the greatest part of the city in Benjamins and therefore it may well be that when they went about to expell the Jebusites that dwelt there both Iudah and Benjamin joyned their forces together as Judah and Simeon did in a like case Judg. 1.3 And Judah said unto Simeon his brother Come up with me into my lot that we may fight aganst the Canaanites and I likewise will go with thee into thy lot As for that which is here said concerning Jerusalem to wit that the children of Judah could not drive out the Jebusites thence and the like we see is said concerning the children of Benjamin Judg. 1.21 we must know that the Iebusites continued in Ierusalem unto Davids time Indeed Adoni-zedek the king of Jerusalem was slain by Ioshua chap. 10.23 26. for he was one of those five kings that made warre against Gibeon though we find no mention there of his taking Ierusalem yea and it is expressely said Iudg. 1.8 that afterwards the children of Iudah took the city of Jerusalem and burnt it with fire that is some part of it Well but yet the fort of Sion which was the chief strength of Ierusalem was not at that time taken by them for that the Iebusites held till David took it 2. Sam. 5 6 7. yea and it seems that afterward the Iebusites did also by the help of this fort recover the city again at least so farre that they forced the Israelites to let the Iebusites dwell there amongst them as it is said here For in the dayes of the Iudges we see that Iebus that is Ierusalem was still inhabited by the Iebusites Iudg. 19.12 We will not turn aside hither into the city of a stranger that is not of the children of Israel saith the Levite there concerning Iebus we will passe over to Gibea But however we must not think that this which is said here that the children of Judah could not drive them out is added by way of excusing them no but rather to their shame and reproch for though the fort of Sion was a place of great strength so that when David set himself down with his army before it the Iebusites scorned him bragged that their lame and blind and impotent people should defend it against him 2. Sam. 5.6 Yet God would certainly have driven them out according to his promise had they not been wanting to themselves But they grew slothfull and faint hearted and by these and other their sinnes provoked the Lord to withdraw himself from them and so then indeed they could not drive out the inhabitants but were glad to purchase peace upon any tearms according to that Iudg. 2.20 21. And the anger of the Lord was hot against Israel and he said Because this people hath transgressed my covenant which I commanded their fathers and have not hearkned to my voice I also will not hence forth drive out any from before them of the nations which Joshua left when he died c. CHAP. XVI Vers 1. ANd the lot of the children of Joseph fell from Jordan by Jericho unto the water of Jericho on the east c. It is the opinion of some learned writers that
fewer then when they were numbred the first time at their first coming out of Egypt but for this we must know that though the tribe of Ephraim was so much decreased at that last numbring of the people yet since that time under the government of Joshua they might be greatly encreased again but however though at that time the sonnes of Ephraim were eight thousand fewer then when they came out of Egypt yet even at that time on the other side of the tribe of Manasseh there were twenty thousand and five hundred more then at the first numbring Num. 26.34 and therefore the sonnes of Joseph speaking here of themselves joyntly together both Ephraim and Manasseh they might well say they were a great people and that God had greatly blessed them in regard of their number Vers 15. And Joshua answered them If thou be a great people then get thee up to the wood countrey c. Thus he covertly retorts their plea upon them as making more for him then for them for sayes he being a great people the more able art thou to drive the Canaanites out of those parts allotted you for your proportion and the more shame is it that you should let them alone and yet complain of the narrownesse of your lot Get thee up saith Joshua to the wood countrey and cut down for thyself there in the land of the Perizzites and the giants that is cut down the woods and drive out and destroy the inhabitants that lurk there in their fastnesses and strong holds and then if mount Ephraim be to narrow for thee that is the mountains out of which the Canaanites are already expelled whereof you have the possession at present you may by this means have land enough to dwell in and need not complain that your portion is too streight for you It is likely that when the sonnes of Joseph came to make their complaint to Joshua they assured themselves that they should find the more favour because he was of the tribe of Ephraim But in a point of justice we see they found Joshua farre from yielding to them in the least degree upon that ground Vers 16. And the children of Joseph said The hill is not enough for us c. These first words seem to have been spoken with some kind of anger and discontent Joshua had told them what they should do if mount Ephraim were too narrow for them now as men discontented are wont to do they snap at those last words of Joshua yes say they the hill is not enough for us meaning that mount Ephraim whereof Ioshua had spoken and then they adde And all the Canaanites that dwell in the land of the valley have chariots of iron as if they should have said Whereas you call upon us to enlarge our dwellings in the wood countrey by cutting down the wood by expelling and destroying the Perizzites and the giants that dwell there you may know that this we cannot do and that because the valleys we must passe through ere we can come to that mountainous wood countrey which you referre us to are inhabited by the Canaanites that have chariots of iron so that there is no hope for us to prevail over them This I conceive to be the best exposition of this place Yet some understand those first words The hill is not enough for us of that mountainous wood countrey to which Ioshua had referred them for the enlarging of their dwellings and so conceive the scope of this reply of the sonnes of Ioseph to be that even that mountainous countrey if they had it in their possession would not be enough for them and for the valleys there was no hope to subdue them because the Canaanites that dwelt there had chariots of iron that is as all Expositours agree chariots whose wheels were armed with sythes as I may say or hooks of iron wherewith when they broke in amongst their enemies they must needs mightily tear cut and mow down those that stood in their way and indeed these chariots could onely be usefull in the valleys and plains in the mountains and wood countreys they could not be used Vers 17. And Joshua spake unto the house of Joseph even to Ephraim and to Manasseh saying Thou art a great people c. As if he should have said What I answered before I must answer again Thou art a great people by thine own confession and hast great power and therefore besides Gods promise ye have otherwise no cause of distrust thou shalt not have one lot onely that is thou shalt if thou wilt not be failing to thy self prevail over those places and then thou shalt find the portion allotted thee is more then one lot fully enough for two such numerous tribes Vers 18. But the mountain shall be thine for it is a wood and thou shalt cut it down and the outgoings of it shall be thine c. That is not onely the mountain shall be thine which when thou hast cut down the wood will be found good ground but also the outgoings of it that is the valleys round about the mountains shall be thine too CHAP. XVIII Vers 1. ANd the whole congregation of the children of Israel assembled themselves together at Shiloh and set up the Tabernacle c. No doubt God appointed them to remove the Tabernacle to Shiloh so much may be gathered from that which is said Deut. 12.5 But unto the place which the Lord your God shall chuse out of all your tribes to put his name there even unto his habitation shall ye seek and thither thou shalt come as also Ier. 7.12 where it is plainly called the place where God set his Name at the first Hitherto both camp and Tabernacle had been in Gilgal a place in the very first entrance into the land of Canaan now they removed further into the land both the camp vers 9. And the men went and passed through the land and described it by cities into seven parts in a book and came again to Joshua to the host at Shiloh and the tabernacle as is here expressed both as a manifest signe of their taking possession of the land they had conquered and for the more convenient coming of the people to the tabernacle to worship And Shiloh God appointed to be the place a city in Ephraim therein God honouring Ioshua the ruler of the people who was of this tribe and withall it was brought nearer to the place which God had decreed to be the settled place of his worship to wit Ierusalem from this time therefore the people was bound to the strict observation of the Ceremoniall Law Deut. 12.8 9 10 11. Ye shall not do after all the things that we do here this day every man what is right in his own eyes For ye are not as yet come to the rest and to the inheritance which the Lord your God giveth you But when ye come over Jordan and dwell in the land which the Lord your God giveth
you to inherit and when he giveth you rest from all your enemies round about so that you dwell in safety Then there shall be a place which the Lord your God shall chuse to cause his name to dwell there thither shall ye bring all that I command you your burnt offerings and your sacrifices your tithes and the heave offering of your hands and all your choice vows which ye vow unto the Lord c. and here the Tabernacle continued unto the dayes of Samuel to wit above three hundred years And the land was subdued before them That is the land about Shiloh was subdued and the inhabitants driven out of it and those that dwelt further off were so stricken with the terrour of God that they durst not stirre to molest the Israelites Vers 2. And there remained among the children of Israel seven tribes which had not yet received their inheritance It may seem strange that the Israelites having begun in Gilgal to divide the land by lot went not on in that work but having drawn three lots which fell to Judah Ephraim and Manasseh gave over and intermitted this work and that as it seems a long time for so much is evident by Joshua his expostulation with them vers 3. though it be not expressely said how long it was How long saith he are you slack to go to possesse the land c. why they did this no reason is given in the text But this by Expositours is thought the most probable reason to wit that the other tribes perceiving what a large circuit of land was given to Judah out of which indeed more then the portion of one tribe was afterward taken see chap. 19.9 they began to murmure as supposing that there would not be left an equall share for them and the rather because they heard the sonnes of Joseph already complain and therefore pretending that there could not be any equall division made when the remote parts were no better known to them as being yet in the enemies possession they desired some stay of the work till they had further prevailed and might know the land they were to divide better then yet they could do And thus the work being put off for a time by degrees they began to mind it no more till Joshua finding them shamefully remisse urged them to set upon it again and for their better satisfaction to send forth men to search the land Vers 4. Give out from among you three men of each tribe c. To wit not onely of the seven tribes mentioned vers 2. but also of Judah Ephraim and Manasseh lest if these searchers should conceive that it was fit somewhat should be taken from those that had their lots already they might otherwise complain of partialitie in those that were sent to search the land As for the work that these men were to do namely to describe the land according to the inheritance of them it is meant doubtlesse of some catalogue they were to bring of the severall countreys and parts of the land that were not yet divided with the severall cities and towns and villages that were in each of them that so accordingly they might the better divide it into so many parts Vers 5. Judah shall abide on their coasts on the south c. The meaning of this is onely that the tribe of Judah and the sonnes of Ioseph Ephraim and Manasseh should continue seated the one on the South the other on the North in that part of the land wherein the lots that were drawn for them in Gilgal fell and not that they should have still the same quantity of land that was at first assigned them for we see afterward that the tribe of Simeon had their portion assigned them out of that which was at first in the lot of Iudah chap. 19.9 Vers 6. Ye shall therefore describe the land into seven parts and bring the descrition hither to me that I may cast lots here for you before the Lord our God This some say was spoken to the men that were chosen to describe the land But I conceive it might as well be spoken to the whole assembly to whom hitherto Ioshua had directed his speech Ye shall therefore describe the land into seven parts and bring the description c. that is ye shall take order that by the men you send out the land be described into seven parts and then that the description thereof be brought to me However the mention he makes in the last words of the account they were to give of what they had done before the Lord in the tabernacle was doubtlesse to intimate how carefull the men that were sent had need to be diligently and carefully to carry themselves in this great charge that was imposed upon them Vers 9. And the men went and passed through the land and described it by cities into seven parts c. They might use some likely means to prevent danger when they searched the countreys of their enraged enemies perhaps they divided themselves and went not all together they might also go under pretence of negotiation and it may be disguised that they might not seem Isralites But doubtlesse the astonishment and fear wherewith God had stricken the inhabitants upon the Israelites late victories were the best means of their safety and by their preservation in this dangerous service we may well think their brethren were much encouraged to set upon the getting of the remainder of the land into their possession Vers 11. And the lot of the tribe of the children of Benjamin came up c. Thus had Benjamin the honour of having the first lot amongst the seven tribes and was by Gods providence seated the very next to his brethren Ephraim and Manasseh who likewise were of Rachel and had also the royall city of Ierusalem within his borders where God dwelt in his holy Temple wherein that was accomplished which Moses prophesied of this tribe Deut. 33.12 And of Benjamin he said The beloved of the Lord shall dwell in safety by him and the Lord shall cover him all the day long and he shall dwell between his shoulders Vers 12. And their border on the North was from Jordan c. This North border of Benjamin is the same with the South border of the sonnes of Ioseph described before chap. 16.1 concerning which therefore see the notes there Vers 14. And the border was drawn thence and compassed the corner of the sea southward c. Here begins the Western border of Benjamins portion for here the line turns from North to South and fetching a compasse about an inlet or creek of the sea goeth on southward till it comes to Kirjath-baal in Iudahs portion called by the Israelites to suppresse the name of their idol-god Kirjath-jearim Vers 15. And the south quarter was from the end of Kirjath-jearim c. See chap. 15.5 6. where you shall find the same to be made the north border of Judah onely that line is drawn
and so consequently Issachars also therefore the line of their borders is not here described as in the other tribes but onely the principal towns and cities are named first those that stood in the south border vers 18 19. secondly those in the west vers 20. and thirdly those in the north ver 21 22. Now this portion set apart for Issachar being in a fat and fruitfull soil that was fulfilled which Jacob foretold Gen. 49.14 And he saw that rest was good and the land that it was pleasant and bowed his shoulders to bear and became a servant unto tribute and Moses Deut. 32.18 Vers 24. And the fifth lot came out for the tribe of the children of Asher c. Even here also the hand of God is still observable in his ordering the lots Hitherto the lots had come out onely for those tribes that were descended of Jacobs two wives Leah and Rachel and the tribe of Gad who was the eldest of Jacobs sonnes by Zilpah Leahs handmaid had already received their inheritance without Jordan upon speciall suit made unto Moses so now the next lot came out for the tribe of Asher who was also the sonne of Zilpah the handmaid of Leah Jacobs first wife and therefore preferred before the two tribes of Dan and Naphtali that were descended of Bilhah the handmaid of Rachel his second wife Vers 25. And their border was Helkath c. The cities that are first here mentioned stood on the northwest border which is drawn all along the coast of the midland sea as far as to mount Carmel westward that is to the west side of mount Carmel and Shihor-libnah and so here the line turneth eastward vers 27. and makes the south bounds of this tribes portion and then fetcheth a compasse northward again like to the bending of a bow till it comes to Zidon on the north end of the sea coast then turneth southward again as far as Tyre c. Now by the mention that is here made of mount Carmel in the lot of this tribe we may see how the prophesie of Jacob concerning this tribe was folly accomplished Gen. 49.20 Out of Asher his bread shall be fat and he shall yield royall dainties for mount Carmel and the land about it was a fruitfull soil and had many mines in it Isa 39.9 Sharon is like a wildernesse and Bashan and Carmel shake off their fruits and Isa 35.2 It shall blossome abundantly and rejoyce even with joy and singing the glory of Lebanon shall be given unto it the excellency of Carmel and Sharon See also Deut. 33.24 25. And of Asher he said Let Asher be blessed with children let him be acceptable to his brethren and let him dip his foot in oyl Thy shoes shall be iron and brasse and as thy dayes so shall thy strength be Vers 27. And goeth out to Cabul on the left hand See the note upon vers 30. Vers 29. And the out-goings thereof are at the sea from the coast to Achzib That is all the coast from the sea even unto Achzib Vers 30. Vmmah also and Aphek and Rehob twenty and two cities with their villages That is Ummah Aphek and Rehob were cities of note in the portion of Asher though not before mentioned in describing the borders of their lot So that in all the cities here named belonging to the tribe of Asher are twenty and two Indeed he that reckons all the names of places before mentioned shall find them to be twenty and three but to this it is answered by some that Cabul mentioned vers 27. was not a city but a part of the countrey which Solomon gave unto Hiram and because of the censure which was then by him passed upon it was called Cabul 1. Kings 9.13 And he said What cities are these which thou hast given me my brother and he called them the land of Cabul unto this day And again others say that some one of the bordering cities before named belonged not to Asher but to some of the neighbouring tribes Vers 33. And their coast was from Heleph c. This is the east border of the tribe of Naphtali beginning at these towns which stood somewhat more northerly then the fountains of Jordan and so Iordan even as farre as the lake of Genezereth was the utmost southernly end of the eastern border Thus Naphtalies land lay along by the banks of Iordan in a large extent and so Iacobs prophesie was fulfilled Gen. 49.21 Naphtali is a hind let loose and that of Moses Deut. 33.23 And of Naphtali he said O Naphtali satisfied with favour and full with the blessings of the Lord possesse thou the west and the south Vers 34. Then the coast turneth westward to Aznoth-tabor c. Here now the south border of this tribes portion is described to wit that it turned from Iordan westward first to Aznoth-tabor and thence to Hukkok and so went on till it came to have as it follows in the next words Zebulun on the south side and Asher on the west side And indeed this last clause seems to have reference to that prophesie of Moses before mentioned concerning this tribe Deut. 33.23 Possesse thou the west and the south for however it is noted before upon that place as the opinion of some Expositours that thereby might be signified that the lot of their inheritance should be in the southwest part of the land yet it being so evident here that this tribe had their inheritance in the utmost northeast part of the land the meaning of that clause possesse thou the west and the south must needs be this that however this tribes lot was to be seated in the furthest northeast corner of the kingdome yet it should reach forth so far both westward and southward that they should enjoy all the benefits both of the western and southern parts and the rather by their commerce with those other tribes upon whom they bordered And reacheth to Zebulun on the southside and unto Asher on the westside and to Judah upon Jordan toward the sun-rising It may seem strange that this tribe should be said to border upon Iudah but either the river of Iordan belonged peculiarly to Iudah as a royalty given them of God above all the other tribes in regard whereof Naphtali is said to border upon Iudah in Iordan or else this is added to imply the convenient situation of this tribes portion by reason it lay along by the banks of Iordan in a large extent For by this means though this tribe were seated in the uttermost north part of the kingdome yet they might by the river have commerce with the other tribes as farre as Iudah between whom and Naphtali many other tribes were seated and so being the utmost north tribe might in that sense be said to border upon Iudah who were seated in the utmost south parts of the kingdome Vers 35. And the fenced cities are Ziddim Zer and Hammath Rakkath and Cinnereth Hammath was a city standing
Shamgar the sonne of Anath therefore it is commonly held that he was the next Judge after Ehud onely they say it was but for a very short time and thence it is that there is no mention of the lands resting under him and the story of Deborah in the following chapter begins as if she were the next after Ehud there being no mention made there of Shamgar at all vers 1. And the children of Israel did evill in the sight of the Lord when Ehud was dead However this miraculous deliverence which he wrought for the Israelites was certainly after Ehuds death for then it seems the people returned to their former sinnes and the Lord suffered the Philistines thereupon to invade the land but then he also delivered them miraculously by this worthy till finding that they would not be warned by these things he sold them into the hands of Jabin as it is expressed in the following chapter CHAP. IV. Vers 1. ANd the children of Israel again did evill in the sight of the Lord when Ehud was dead In none of the Judges dayes did the Israelites enjoy so long a peace as in the dayes of Ehud as is evident in that clause however we understand it chap. 3.30 Moab was subdued under the hand of Israel and the land had rest fourscore years and here we see what effect this long peace wrought amongst them and how ill they requited the Lord for so great a mercy even as standing waters are wont to putrifie so they were corrupted by their long peace and by degrees fell off from God as they had formerly done Vers 2. And the Lord sold them into the hand of Jabin king of Canaan that reigned in Hazor See the note chap. 2.14 There was a Jabin that reigned in Hazor formerly who it is likely was called as this is here king of Canaan for Hazor is there said to be the head of all the neighbouring kingdomes Josh 11.10 the same who was the cheif in that confederacy against Joshua Joshua 11.1 but he was slain by Joshua and his city burnt with fire Josh 11.11 It seems therefore that this was some one of that stock who afterward recovered from the Israelites that part of the land and repaired the city Hazor and so reigned there again as his predecessours had done When this was done we cannot say but doubtlesse it was not in Joshuas time as some think for it is not to be thought that the Lord ever suffered the Canaanites to recover any part of the land which the Israelites had taken from them till they by their sinnes had provoked the Lord to anger against them But now at last not contented with his own kingdome it seems he made warre with the Israelites in generall brought them into bondage and no doubt oppressed them the more cruelly in revenge of that Joshua had done to Hazor and Jabin king thereof Josh 11.11 who perhaps was his father or grandfather And besides it must needs be most terrible to the Israelites to be oppressed by the Canaanites of all other nations because God had promised to cast them out before the Israelites so that their prevailing over them was in a speciall manner a signe that God had cast them off The Captain of whose host was Sisera which dwelt in Harosheth of the Gentiles So called as it is probably thought because in the time of the Israelites prevailing against the severall nations of the Canaanites many of them fled thither as to a place of great strength and there fortified themselves unto this time or else for the reasons given in a like case Josh 12.23 Vers 3. For he had nine hundred chariots of iron and twenty years he mightily oppressed the children of Israel Concerning these chariots of iron see the note Josh 17.16 This clause and he mightily oppressed the children of Israel is no where else inserted where mention is made of the bondage of Israel under other kings and therefore it seems this king did farre more cruelly oppresse them then the rest had done which might be partly from the deadly hatred which the Canaanites above other nations did bear to the Israelites because the Israelites had taken their land from them and partly from the just vengeance of God upon the Israelites because God had afforded them so long a peace in the dayes of Ehud chap. 3.30 and they had made so ill an use of his long-suffering and goodnesse therein See the note also chap. 3.14 Vers 4. And Deborah a prophetesse c. A woman the weaker sex that the glory of the work might be given to God and not to the instrument he used Vers 6. And she sent and called Barak the sonne of Abinoam out of Kedesh-naphtali c. That is Kedesh in the tribe of Naphtali to distinguish it from other towns of the same name in other tribes as Kedesh in Issachar 1. Chron. 6.72 Kedesh in Judah Josh 15.23 and others Now Deborah did thus send for Barak not of her own head chusing him as a man of eminency for the undertaking of the service but by speciall direction from God as the words she spake to Barak when he came to her do imply Hath not the Lord God of Israel commaded saying Go and draw toward mount Tabor c Deborah was a prophetesse and therefore no doubt God had revealed unto her that which now she imparted to Barak to wit either by secret instinct of his Spirit or perhaps by the ministry of an Angel for that some Angel did appear to her either before or after the battell which they fought with Sisera seems evident in that clause of Deborahs song chap. 5.26 Curse ye Meroz saith the Angel of the Lord curse ye bitterly the inhabitants thereof And take with thee ten thousand men of the children of Naphtali and of the children of Zebulun To wit first because they were nearest at hand secondly because Naphtali was likely to be the forwardest in this work because Barak was of that tribe and they were most oppressed Hazor and Harosheth being both in their tribe Vers 8. And Barak said unto her If thou wilt go with me then I will go c. Barak no doubt believed what Deborah had told him in the foregoing words as from the Lord namely that Sisera should be vanquished by him and therefore we see that he was willing to hazard his life and all that he had in rising against this mighty king that had brought the Israelites into bondage whence it is that Barak is commended for his faith by S. Paul and reckoned amongst those who through faith subdued kingdomes Heb. 11.32 33. But why then did he refuse to undertake the service enjoyned him unlesse Deborah would go along with him I answer partly because he considered that Deborah being a prophetesse he should have a great advantage in having her with him to pray for them to give them counsell and to advise them what to do upon every occasion but partly also no
of the Church and people of God and that she preferred their welfare before any thing that concerned her self CHAP. V. Vers 1. THen sang Deborah and Barak the sonne of Abinoam c. Deborah is first named here because she was a prophetesse and as upon this ground it is probably thought the composer of this song and in every respect the chief in this businesse as we see in the former chapter yet with her Barak is joyned too who as he was the chief Commander in the victory gotten so he was also one of the prime in singing Gods praises and he being of the tribe of Naphtali we have in this sweet song one instance of the accomplishment of that prophecy of Jacob concerning the tribe of Naphtali though it were not intended of this onely to wit that this tribe should give goodly words Gen. 49.21 Naphtali is a hind let loose he giveth goodly words Vers 2. Praise ye the Lord for the avenging of Israel when the people willingly offered themselves Principally hereby are meant those of the tribe of Zebulun and Naphtali of whom Baraks army did chiefly consist though such of the other tribes as did put too their helping hand are not excluded and these are said to have offered themselves willingly because they did readily yield to follow Barak when he called them together though he had no authority to constrain them to take up arms God working their hearts thereto to whom therefore the praise is principally given Praise ye the Lord for the avenging of Israel when the people willingly offered themselves Vers 3. Heare O ye kings give eare O ye princes c. Deborah undertaking in this song to ascribe to the Lord the glory of that victory which she and Barak had gotten over Sisera to shew what a glorious work God had therein done for his people in the first place in a poeticall strain she calls upon kings and princes to hearken to her Heare O ye kings give eare O ye princes thereby onely to imply that in the ecstasie of her joy she could be glad if all the kings and princes of the earth could heare what she had now to say concerning this great work which God had done for his Israel and she addresseth her speech particularly to kings and princes First because they are most ready to ascribe to themselves the glory which is due to the Lord onely and secondly because they are wont in their pride to oppresse others and to think they may do whatsoever they please and therefore she desired they might know what God had done to Jabin and Sisera and so beware of provoking God by oppressing others as these had done Vers 4. Lord when thou wentest out of Seir when thou marchest out of the field of Edom the earth trembled c. The most of Expositours understand this to be a poeticall expression of the terrours werewith the neighbouring nations were affrighted when the Lord carried the Israelites from the borders of Edom towards the land of Canaan to wit that there was then a trembling on every side so that not men onely but even the heavens and mountains and hills seemed to tremble and melt away and that even as Sinai trembled and shook at the Lords coming down upon it when the Law was given for to that end they conceive the melting or shaking of Sinai is mentioned vers 5. The mountains melted from before the Lord even that Sinai before the Lord God of Israel to wit by way of similitude so when the Lord in a pillar of fire marched before the Israelites against the Amorites the neighbouring nations were terribly amazed the Lord casting such a fear upon them as if the earth had trembled and great storms and tempests intermixt with thunder and lightnings had been showred down from the clouds yea as if the mountains had melted c. according to that Deut. 2.24 25. Rise ye up take your journey and passe over the river Arnon c. This day will I begin to put the dread of thee and the fear of thee upon the nations that are under the whole heavens who shall hear report of thee and shall tremble and be in anguish because of thee But I rather conceive that it is to be understood of those thunders lightnings earthquakes tempests and such other terrible expressions of Gods majestie wherein he manifested himself unto his people at the giving of the Law for then he is also said to come from Seir Deut. 33.2 And he said The Lord came down from Sinai and rose up from Seir unto them he shined forth from mount Paran and he came with ten thousand of saints from his right hand went a fiery Law for them and the shaking of Sinai we see is expressely mentioned vers 5. The mountains melted from before the Lord even that Sinai before the Lord God of Israel as it is also Psal 68.7 8. O God when thou wentest forth before thy people when thou didst march through the wildernesse Selah The earth shook the heavens also dropped at the presence of God even Sinai it self was moved at the presence of God the God of Israel and though there be no mention of the clouds dropping water at the giving of the Law yet there is of thunders and lightnings which are usually accompanied with violent showers But why should Deborah mention this here I answer first because Gods entring into covenant with them is the ground of all that he doth for his people and secondly because she would the better expresse how terrible God had been now to their adversaries by comparing the terrours of this day with those when the Law was given on mount Sinai and to intimate that God continued to do the same things still for his people that he had done for them from their first coming out of Egypt Vers 6. In the dayes of Shamgar the sonne of Anath in the dayes of Jael the high-wayes were unoccupied c. That is even from the death of Ehud whom Shamgar succeeded though he was a worthy champion and did miraculously avenge the Israelites upon the Philistines unto this present time wherein Jael lived though she were a woman of an heroicall spirit and one that grieved to see the poore people of God so miserably oppressed as was evident by that which she had now done for them the land was held in miserable desolation the people not daring to travell in the high-wayes nor to dwell in the villages but onely in the walled cities whither they all fled to secure themselves till God was pleased by me a poore woman to set on foot this work of their deliverance Vers 8. They chose new gods then was warre in the gates That is then was there warre in every city the Lord letting loose the neighbouring nations to make warre against the severall cities of Israel because they were corrupted with their idolatry Because a great part of the strength of their cities was in their gates therefore
Penuel and slew the men of the city That is the Magistrates of the city as before he did in Succoth Vers 18. Then said he unto Zebah and Zalmunna What manner of men were they whom ye slew at Tabor Because it seems Gideon had heard that these kings had slain certain men of the Israelites that had retired themselves for shelter to some strong holds or caves in mount Tabor and feared they vvere his brethren because they amongst others sought to provide for the saving of their lives in those dangerous times as others did chap. 6.2 And the hand of Midian prevailed against Israel and because of the Midianites the children of Israel made them the dens which are in the mountains and caves and strong holds and had not been since heard of therefore he inquires thus concerning the men vvhom they had there slain And they answered As thou art so were they each one resembled the children of a king This may be meant of that likenesse of feature which is usually amongst brethren but plainly it intends that they were of a goodly and comely personage even as Gideon was and such as might well beseem men of a princely and Royall stock Vers 19. As the Lord liveth if ye had saved them alive I would not slay you The meaning is that he would have spared them because they had shown mercy to his brethren and hereby he expresseth his sorrow for his brethren and shews what little cause they had now to expect any mercy from him Vers 20. And he said unto Jether his first-born Up and slay them Upon him he imposeth this work rather then any other first that he might train him up even from his young years to draw his sword against the enemies of Israel and to be severe to those that should rise up against God and against his people secondly that it might be done by way of avenging the death of his brethren thirdly because it would adde if not to the pain yet to the dishonour of their death to die by such a hand Vers 21. Then Zebah and Zalmunna said Rise thou and fall upon us for as the man is so is his strength In this reply of theirs first they descant in a kind of scornfull manner upon that command of Gideons setting a child to take away their lives whereas indeed this his young heire had scarce courage enough to look them in the face secondly they provoke Gideon as impatient of delay to rise upon them himself and rid them out of the way thereby discovering their contempt of death and how much they scorned to begge life and withall happely being loath to die by the hand of a child And took away the ornaments that were on their Camels necks As the memorials of this great victory Vers 22. Then the men of Israel said unto Gideon Rule thou over us both thou and thy sonne c. That is they offered to receive him to be their king and to settle the kingdome successively upon his posterity Vers 23. And Gideon said unto them I will not rule over you c. That is not as a king he judged Israel unto his dying day but it was the kingdome of Israel the regall power which they proffered and he now refused and that upon this ground because the accepting of this would have been in a manner a taking of the government out of Gods hand the Lord saith he shall rule over you Not that God rules not by kings as well as by other kind of Magistrates but because God had established this way of governing them by Judges who had not so great a degree of soveraignty and power over the people as kings usually have were extraordinarily called of God withall because God had in his Law expressed that in case they should desire a king they were to take him whom the Lord should choose Deu. 17.14 15 When thou art come to the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee and shalt possesse it and shall dwell therein and shalt say I will set a king over me like all the nations that are about Thou shalt in any wise set him a king over thee whom the Lord thy God shall chuse One from among thy brethren shalt thou set over thee thou mayest not set a stranger over thee which is not thy brother Therefore he takes this rash proffer of changing the government to be a shaking of Gods government because they went about to change it without Gods leave and refuseth to give any consent to it all which is evident by that which the Lord said of the Israelites desiring a King in Samuels dayes 1. Sam. 8.6 7. But the thing displeased Samuel when they said Give us a King to judge us and Samuel prayed unto the Lord And the Lord said unto Samuel Hearken unto the voice of the people in all that they say unto thee for they have not rejected thee but they have rejected me that I should not reigne over them Vers 26. And the weight of the golden ear-rings which he requested was a thousand and seven hundred shekles of gold c. Which is esteemed to be according to the account of our weight 2380 pounds it is not impossible that all this should be spent in the making of one ephod as it is said vers 27. especially if it were made as that of Aarons with a brestplate set with so many precious stones of great value Exod. 28.15 16.17 But the words will well enough bear that of part of this gold now given him he made an ephod Vers 27. And Gideon made an ephod thereof and put it in his city Not a linen ephod but such a one as that which was made for the high priest of gold blue purple scarlet c. Exod. 28.6 It is probable enough that he intended it onely as a memoriall of this their victory over the Midianites the monument being of the very prey which was there taken though afterwards it became a snare both to him and to his house But why then did he make an ephod rather then any other monument this indeed seems to imply that his purpose was to make use also of this ephod either in offering sacrifices in his own house and then under this ephod all the priestly garments may be comprehended or else thereby to enquire what the will of the Lord was according to the judgement of Urim Not considering that this previledge was onely annexed to Aarons ephod wherein was the brestplate of judgement with the Urim and Thummim and therein therefore he sinned greatly and brought Gods wrath upon his posterity And all Israel went thither a whoring after it c. Either they went thither as to a famous Oracle to inquire concerning the will of God in any doubtfull cases or else drawn with the superstitious conceits they had entertained of this ephod they set up there a place of sacrificing contrary to the expresse letter of the Law of God or else they resorted
the city with fire This is mentioned before Josh 19.47 concerning which see the note there It may seem strange why the Danites should burn this city seeing they surprized it purposely that they might dwell in it and it must needs be a great work and of great charge to rebuild it again but this we must consider is usuall when cities are stormed and taken partly through the fury of the souldiers in the heat of the assault and partly that they may the more easily destroy the inhabitants whilst they are forced to busie themselves in quenching the fire cities are seldome taken by force but that some part of them is burnt with fire Vers 28. And there was no deliverer because it was farre from Sydon c. See the note above vers 7. And it was in the valley that lyeth by Beth-Rehob c. Rehob was a city in the utmost north part of the land near unto mount Libanus and Hamath Num. 13.21 So they went up and searched the land from the wildernesse of Zin unto Rehob as men come to Hamath it was within the portion assigned to Asher Josh 19 28. and appointed for the Levites in that tribe Josh 21.31 but is reckoned amongst those cities whose inhabitants the Asherites did not drive out Judg. 1.31 who are called Syrians of Beth-Rehob 2. Sam. 10.6 It is evident therefore that Laish which was also now in the possession of the Canaanites or Syrians and was nigh Rehob stood also in the utmost north parts of the land near to the fountain of Dan one of the heads of that river which was therefore called Jordan whence was that proverbiall speech from Dan even to Beersheba Vers 29. And they called the name of the city Dan after the name of Dan their father c. Because the Danites that seated themselves here so farre off from the rest of their brethren might fear lest in future times their reference to their brethren should be questioned they named their city Dan which was before called Laish that it might be known to what tribe they belonged yet withall it is probable they so named their city too in honour of their father the Patriarch of whom they were descended but in the mean time they were idolaters and robbers and this their father Dan did not do as Christ speaks in a like case John 8.40 But now ye seek to kill me a man that hath told you the truth which I have heard of God this did not Abraham Vers 30. And the children of Dan set up the graven image c. The good successe which they had in their attempt upon Laish according to the answer which they had received from this Oracle made them highly esteem both this priest and his images and accordingly they established this idolatrous worship of their false gods amongst them and so this Levite Jonathan the sonne of Gershom c. and his posteritie were priests unto these idolatrous Danites untill the captivitie of the land The most of Expositours understand this of that captivitie when the ark was taken and carried away by the Philistines 1. Sam. 4.10 11. And the Philistines fought and Israel was smitten and they fled every man into his tent and there was a very great slaughter for there fell of Israel thirty thousand footmen And the Ark of God was taken and the two sonnes of Eli Hophni and Phinehas were slain for then we see there was a great slaughter amongst the Israelites and no doubt many of them were carried away captive together with the ark and all this befell them because of the idolatrie that was then in the land Psal 78.58 59. They provoked him to anger with their high places and moved him to jealousie with their graven images When God heard this he was wroth and greatly abhorred Israel So that he forsook the Tabernacle of Shiloh the tent which he placed among men c. Besides Micahs graven image upon which depended the service of this idolatrous priest and his successours stood up onely till the remove of the Tabernacle from Shiloh vers 31. And they set them up Micahs graven image which he made all the time that the house of God was in Shiloh which was doubtlesse about that time when the Ark was taken by the Philistines so that hence it may seem very probable that the priesthood of these men continued no longer and that this is the captivitie here spoken of Besides if it be understood of that captivitie when the ten tribes were carried away captives into Assyria by Shalmaneser 2. Kings 17. it may be judged very unlikely that these idolatrous priests should in Samuels time be suffered especially in Davids who was so holy and potent a King But yet because the captivieie of the land cannot well be understood otherwise then of a generall captivitie I see not why it should not be understood of that captivitie when the people were carried away into Assyria by Shalmaneser It is indeed manifest by the following verse that Micahs image was pulled down not long after the Tabernacle was removed from Shiloh and in Sauls time it is manifest that the Tabernacle was in Nob 1. Sam. 21. But yet though the idol was supprest these idolatrous priests might in secret especially though not openly continue to do this impious service for the Danites unto the time of Jeroboam and then might be employed as priests for his golden calf which was erected in this citie Dan 1. Kings 12.29 He set the one in Bethel and the other he put in Dan for though he made priests of the lowest of the people that were not Levites vers 31. yet that doth not hinder but that these idolaters though Levites might be of the number of his priests too and so they might continue till that generall captivitie of the ten tribes CHAP. XIX Vers 1. ANd it came to passe in those dayes c. Concerning the time when these things were done see chap. 17. vers 6. There was a certain Levite sojourning on the side of mount Ephraim who took to him a concubine out of Bethlehem-Judah Some concubines there were amongst the Hebrews that were esteemed lawfull wives as concerning the right of the bed who yet were not esteemed in the rank with other wives principally and most properly so called for they had not the honour of being accounted the mother of the familie their children did not inherit with the rest c. and that either because they were before such as lived in a servile condition as Hagar or because they were taken in a second place and were not with the same rites and solemnities married to them as the others were concerning which see the note Gen. 22.24 and 25.6 and such a concubine it seems this was and therefore is the Levite called her husband both here vers 3. And her husband arose and went after her to speak friendly unto her and again chap. 20.4 And the Levite the husband of the woman that was slain
of this horrible villanie that had been committed upon his concubine Some conceive that there was none sent to the tribe of Benjamin but that there was two pieces sent to the tribe of Manasseh because that tribe dwelt half within Jordan and half without But this is altogether a groundlesse conceit for there was most reason for sending a piece to Benjamin in regard the fact was committed in a citie of their tribe and there was as much reason why they should have sent two pieces to the tribe of Dan as to the tribe of Manasseh since the tribe of Dan was also seated in two severall parts of the land some in the portion of Judah and some northward at Laish as in the former chapter was related Vers 30. And it was so that all that saw it said There was no such deed done nor seen c. The messengers relating the cause why the Levite had done this not onely the elders of each tribe to whom these parcels of her body were sent because there was no magistrate armed with regall power to punish this fact but even all that came to the hearing of it cried out against it as a matchlesse villâ—nie and stirred up one another not to let it passe unrevenged And hence is that expression of the prophet Hos 9.9 They have deeply corrupted themselves as in the dayes of Gibeah CHAP. XX. Vers 1. THen all the children of Israel went out and the congregation was gathered together c. All the children of Israel that is the chief of all the people as it follows in the next verse all the elders and officers captains and men of warre except onely they of the tribe of Benjamin went out from their own habitations severally and were gathered together as one man that is unanimously as readily as if one man onely had been appointed to come to any place and thus was there an assembly of all the land to wit those within Jordan from Dan to Beersheba and together with them also of the land of Gilead that is those without Jordan and that in Mizpeh Mizpeh was a place where the Israelites did usually hold their publick assemblies 1. Sam 7.5 And Samuel said Gather all the children of Israel to Mizpeh and so also chap. 10.17 and Jer. 40.7 8. It is very probable that it stood in the confines of Judah and Benjamin and is therefore reckoned amongst the cities of both tribes see Josh 15.38 18.26 neither could there be therefore for the businesse they met about a fitter place chosen now here they are said to be gathered together unto the Lord not because the Tabernacle was there as we shall after see vers 27. but either because they were assembled in Gods name and to heare what God would give them in charge or because in all judiciall assemblies the Lord is in a speciall manner present Psal 82.1 God standeth in the congregation of the mighty he judgeth among the gods or else because they met in a synagogue a house set apart for publick prayer and teaching the people which seems the more likely even because of that which we reade in one of our Apocryphal books 1. Macc. 3.46 Wherefore the Israelites assembled themselves together and came to Maspha over against Jerusalem for Maspha was the place where they prayed aforetime in Israel Some conceive I know that the Ark was at present removed to Mizpeh but of that see vers 27. Vers 2. Foure hundred thousand footmen that drew sword The number of these men of warre is expressed both to shew their zeal in seeking to punish this abominable fact of the men of Gibeah and also to shew how evidently the hand of God was against these Israelites when they were twice beaten by the Benjamites and yet were so many more in number then they Vers 3. Now the children of Benjamin heard that the children of Israel were gone to Mizpeh This is added to implie how resolved the Benjamites were to stand out in defence against the rest of the Israelites who hearing of the Israelites assembling themselves about this businesse neither went to the assembly themselves nor sent any messenger to them Vers 5. And the men of Gibeah rose against me and beset the house round about upon me by night and thought to have slain me To wit by their unnaturall lust as they had slain his wife or at least he means that they thought to have done that to him which rather then he would have endured he would have lost his life Vers 7. Behold ye are all children of Israel c. And therefore ought to take to heart that so foul an abomination should be committed in Israel it concerns you all and therefore look to it Vers 8. We will not any of us go to his tent neither will we any of us turn in to his house This is added to shew how zealous they were in seeking to punish this horrible sinne they vowed that they would not so much as go home to their houses till they had executed judgement upon those that were guiltie of it yea not onely so but also at the same place and time at least when the report was brought them that the Benjamites would not deliver the malefactours into their hands but were resolved rather to defend them they vowed also that having slain the Benjamites they would not give any of their daughters in marriage to any that were left alive chap. 21. vers 1. Now the men of Israel had sworn in Mizpeh saying There shall not any of us give his daughter to Benjamin to wife and that they would likewise destroy every town throughout the whole land of Israel that had not sent some of their people to this assemblie to help them in this warre chap. 21.5 They had made a great oath concerning him that came not up to the Lord to Mizpeh saying He shall surely be put to death Vers 9. We will go up by lot against it That is we will by lot determine it who shall go up to fight against Gibeah and who shall go forth to fetch in victuals and other provisions for the people one in ten had need to be set apart for this service and who they shall be the lot shall decide Vers 12. And the tribes of Israel sent men through all the tribe of Benjamin c. Though the Benjamites absenting themselves from the assembly of all Israel at Mizpeh was a just ground of suspition that they meant not to yield up the malefactours to be punished yet would not the Israelites thereupon make warre presently against them but first they sent messengers to all the families of the tribe of Benjamin to desire the deliverie of those sonnes of Belial to deserved punishment that so if it were possible bloud-shed and civill war might be prevented Vers 13. Deliver us the men the children of Belial which are in Gibeah that we may put them to death and put away evil from Israel That is make others
bring the following judgement upon them or rather that this was an extraordinary act of devotion whereto the Priests were led by reasons grounded upon this strange and extraordinary work which God had wrought and perhaps also by a speciall instinct of Gods Spirit and is not therefore to be judged of according to the rules of other ordinary burnt offerings They considered that these kine had been given up by the Philistines to the service of the Lord in bringing home the Ark and that having been employed in so sacred of service it was not fit they should be imployed to any other use or much lesse that they should be sent back to the Philistines again and therefore they resolved by this way of an extraordinary burnt-offering to yield them up to the Lord by whose all-ruling providence they were so miraculously swayed to bring back the Ark unto that place And indeed had they sinned in offering these kine for a burnt-offering why should not this be mentioned vers 19. as the cause of Gods displeasure against them as well as their looking into the Ark. Vers 15. And the Levites took down the Ark of the Lord c. That is the Priests who were of the tribe of Levi for Bethshemesh as is before noted was one of the Priests cities Josh 21.16 nor was it lawfull for the Levites to touch the Ark Num. 4.15 And when Aaron and his sonnes have made an end of covering the Sanctuarie and all the vessels of the Sanctuarie as the camp is to set forward after that the sonnes of Kohath shall come to bear it but they shall not touch any holy thing lest they die Vers 18. And the golden mice according to the number of all the cities of the Philistines belonging to the five lords both of fenced cities and of countrey villages c. That is according as all the cities and villages of the Philistines were divided into five parts and were under the command of their five great lords each of those cities before mentioned being the mother citie in each division so accordingly there were five golden mice given as was said before vers 4. and that in the name and happely at the charge not of the mother-cities onely but of all the severall circuits or provinces that belonged to them because all had been punished with that plague of mice which were sent amongst them even all the land of the Philistines unto the great stone of Abel that is mourning so called doubtlesse because of the peoples lamentation vers 19. as upon a like occasion the floore of Atad where the sonnes of Jacob with the Egyptians mourned for the death of Jacob was called Abel-mizraim Gen. 50.11 that is the mourning of the Egyptians Vers 19. And he smote the men of Bethshemesh because they had looked into the Ark of the Lord. It was not lawfull for any but the Priests no not the Levites who carried it to look upon the Ark bare and uncovered Num. 4.20 But they shall not go in to see when the holy things are covered lest they die It was therefore sufficient to render the people obnoxious to the judgement that fell upon them if we suppose that it came covered from the Philistines and they uncovered it to look upon it or that it came uncovered and they took libertie without any fear or reverence to stare and gaze upon it But yet the words seem to import that they proceeded further even to look into the Ark either merely out of curiositie or perhaps to see whether the Philistines had not put any thing into it or taken any thing out of it onely I see not how so many could offend in this kind Even he smote of the people fiftie thousand and threescore and ten men That is of them and of the people together that came flocking from all parts to see the Ark there were slain fiftie thousand and threescore and ten men It were much that there should be so many found in so little a citie as Bethshemesh was but amongst those multitudes that might come from all parts to see the Ark there might well be fiftie thousand and threescore and ten slain Vers 21. And they sent messengers to the inhabitants of Kirjath-jearim c. Pretending happely that their citie of Bethshemesh was not a place of such safetie for the Ark to be in as Kirjath-jearim was they sent to the inhabitants of Kirjath-jearim to desire them to fetch the Ark thither The Philistines say they have brought again the Ark of the Lord come ye down and fetch it up to you CHAP. VII Vers 1. ANd the men of Kirjath-jearim came and fetcht up the Ark of the Lord c. Three particulars are here related concerning this removall of the Ark. The first is that it was fetcht up from Bethshemesh by the men of Kirjath-jearim a citie in the tribe of Judah not farre from Bethshemesh called formerly Baalah and Kirjath-Baal Josh 15.9 60. and 18.14 Now this being none of the cities of the Priests who onely might touch the Ark though it be said that the men of Kirjath-jearim fetcht up the Ark yet thereby is meant onely that they came up to have it carried to their citie and attended it when it was removed for they were doubtlesse priests either of Bethshemesh or of some other place that carried the Ark. Notwithstanding the men of Bethshemesh were smitten for looking into the Ark chap. 6.19 yet the men of Kirjath-jearim did not oppose the removing of it to their citie but themselves fetched it thither no doubt with much joy and that because they knew that it was not the presence of the Ark amongst the men of Bethshemesh but their unreverend carriage of themselves in gazing upon the Ark or looking into it that was the cause of their miserie The second thing related is that they brought the Ark into the house of Abinadab in the hill It is likely that Abinadab was a man of singular holinesse and perhaps as some hold a Levite too but yet the reason which the text implies why his house was chosen for the keeping of this sacred treasure is this that it was in the hill to wit first because high places were in these times in great request and judged fittest for holy employments and secondly because it might be a place of strength and so of safetie for the Ark to be kept in whence it was that the Ark was kept there till Davids time when it was fetched away from thence 1. Chron. 13.6 7. And David went up and all Israel to Baalah that is to Kirjath-jearim which belonged to Judah to bring up thence the Ark of God the Lord. And they carried the Ark of God in a new cart out of the house of Abinadab Indeed in 2. Sam. 6.3 it is said that the Ark was brought out of the house of Abinadab that was in Gibeah but by Gibeah there is meant the hill as it is translated there in the margin of our Bibles
see that instead of looking with an envious and malignant eye upon him he entertained him with all possible courtesie and did what he could to honour him amongst the people As for that clause And will tell thee all that is in thine heart thereby is meant either that he would tell him all that he had a purpose to enquire of him or else he would tell him many secret things which no body knew but himself onely and indeed though for the present he told him of the asses onely as it follows in the next verse And as for thine asses that were lost three dayes ago set not thy mind on them for they are found which doubtlesse he did to free him from that care and that he might be the more willing to stay with him yet it may well be that afterward when they were together alone he told him many other secret things for the greater confirmation of his faith concerning the promise of the kingdome as Christ did to the woman of Samaria to make her know he was the Messiah Joh. 4.29 where we have an expression much like this of Samuel Come see a man saith she that hath told me all that ever I did Vers 20. And on whom is all the desire of Israel is it not on thee and on all thy fathers house That is on whom must the kingdome and royall dignity which all Israel desire may be reared up amongst them be conferred but on thee and on thy fathers house Vers 21. And Saul answered and said Am not I a Benjamite of the smallest of the tribes of Israel c. Though Samuel had in the foregoing words spoken very covertly concerning Sauls being king And on whom is all the desire of Israel c. yet the peoples eagernesse at this time to have a king being so famously known Saul might well hereby guesse at Samuels meaning and the strangenesse of such tydings makes him therefore as one astonished so debase himself Am not I a Benjamite of the smallest of the tribes of Israel c. Nor need we wonder that he calls the tribe of Benjamin the smallest of the tribes if we remember that this tribe was almost wholly destroyed not many years before in that warre that was between this tribe and their brethren of the other tribes Judg. 20. Long it was it seems ere this tribe recovered the desolation that was then made amongst them if ever they recovered it for even in regard that there were so few of this tribe it may well be that when this tribe kept faithfull to the house of David in the dayes of Jeroboam as well as the tribe of Judah yet still the Scripture speaks but of one tribe that did cleave to the house of David to wit the tribe of Judah as we may see 1. kings 11.32 and so in many other places Benjamin not being mentioned because of their paucity but comprehended under the men of Judah Vers 22. And Samuel took Saul and his servant and brought them into the parlour and made them sit in the cheifest place among them that were bidden Doubtlesse those invited were of the Elders and cheif of the city by placing Saul therefore above them he began to give a signe of the dignity he should be raised too and withall shewed how farre he was from envying him because he should be obscured by his advancement Vers 23. And Samuel said unto the cook Bring the portion which I gave thee of which I said unto thee Set it by thee Samuel it seems had given order to the cook for one speciall extraordinary messe that should be set by reserved as for some extraordinary guest and not sent up till Samuel sent for it and hereupon therefore he now called upon him to bring him that messe that it might be set before Saul As for the custome of those times in allotting a severall messe to every guest see the note upon Gen. 43.34 Vers 24. And the cook took up the shoulder and that which was upon it and set it before Saul To wit the left shoulder for the right shoulder of all peace-offerings was the priests portion Levit. 7.32 33. The shoulder was it seems in these times accounted the cheif peice and therefore doubtlesse was it alloted for the priests portion and here at this time appointed for Sauls messe It is hard to say what is meant by those words and that which was upon it to wit whether it be meant of any thing that was poured or laid upon it as sauce or onely for garnishing the meat or of any other joynt that was here brought in together with the shoulder as the neck or breast which before they are severed are upon the shoulder but because the shoulder is the onely joynt mentioned the first I conceive is most probable Behold that which is left set it before thee and eat for unto this time hath it been kept for thee since I said I have invited the people That is since I first gave order to the cook that he should prepare this provision for those that were invited Now this is expressed that hereby Saul might see that God had beforehand revealed his coming thither to Samuel for how else could Samuel have purposely set apart this portion for him Vers 25. Samuel communed with Saul upon the top of the house Where they might be most private for thence also is that Acts 10.9 Peter went up upon the house to pray about the sixth houre Both this and his choosing the spring of the day to anoint Saul in vers 26. before any bodie was stirring and his going forth to the end of the citie and sending his servant away vers 27. they all shew how carefull Samuel was that it should not yet be known that Saul was anointed king to wit that when he was afterward chosen by lot no body as yet thinking of any such thing it might be the more manifest that he was chosen of God and that no body else had any hand in it and secondly that Saul might hereby be taught to wait upon God to content himself with the promise for a time and to stay Gods leisure for the performance of what was promised Vers 26. And Saul arose and they went out both of them he and Samuel abroad The calling up Saul therefore to the top of the house mentioned in the foregoing words Samuel called Saul to the top of the house c. was onely that Samuel might will him to make ready presently to be gone which Saul accordingly did and so then Samuel went along with him out of the citie intending at their parting to anoint him king CHAP. X. Vers 1. THen Samuel took a viall of oyl and poured it upon his head and kissed him c. Two ceremonies are here mentioned which Samuel used when he conferred upon Saul the supreme power of being king of Israel The first is that he took a viall of oyl and poured it upon his head which he did
this dignity that God had conferred upon him but of a modest and humble spirit and therefore not prone to boast and brag of it as others would have been Secondly because he feared to provoke his uncle and others of his family and kindred to envy him for this honour to which God had designed him And thirdly because he remembred how carefull Samuel had been to anoint him in secret where no body should be present chap. 9.25 26 27. which was intimation enough to Saul not to discover this secret till God should himself openly make known his will herein Notwithstanding this prudence of Saul in concealing what had passed betwixt Samuel and him yet when he was publickly chosen certain sonnes of Belial did openly despise him vers 27. and what then would they have done had it been known that Samuel had beforehand anointed him would not this have been a fair pretence for them to have said that this had been plotted beforehand betwixt Samuel and him Vers 17. And Samuel called the people together unto the Lord to Mizpeh See the note upon Judges 20.1 Vers 18. Thus saith the Lord God of Israel I brought up Israel out of Egypt c. This recitall of the mercies which God had afforded the Israelites is premised for the aggravation of their present sinne in rejecting the government which God had established amongst them Vers 19. And ye have this day rejected your God c. That is by your desiring a king the businesse which this day you are come about And herein doth Samuel covertly strike at their willfull persisting in this their requiring a king Samuel had done what he could to beat them from it but they continued resolved that so they would have it whereupon it was that he had now called them together to discover by lots who it was that God had chosen and therefore Samuel useth these words Ye have this day rejected your God c. See the notes chap. 8.7 Now therefore present your selves before the Lord by your tribes and by your thousands That is your families Mich. 5.2 But thou Beth-leem Ephratah though thou be little among the thousands of Judah yet out of thee shall he come forth unto me that is to be ruler in Israel and this was done that by casting lots it might be discovered whom God had chosen to be their king Vers 22. Therefore they enquired of the Lord further if the man should yet come thither To wit either by Urim and Thummim in the high Preist or by desiring Samuel as a Prophet to enquire of the Lord for them And the Lord answered Behold he hath hid himself among the stuff That is among the publick carriages of the camp or among the baggage and implements of his own tent and this he did out of modesty as not deeming himself fit for so high an advancement or able to bear so great a burden especially the common-wealth of Israel being in such an unsettled and perillous condition as now it was Vers 25. Then Samuel told the people the manner of the kingdome c. That is both the duty of the king towards his subjects and the subjects toward their king and these were the fundamentall laws of the kingdome all which he wrote in a book as it follows in the next words and laid it up before the Lord that is before the Ark or in the Tabernacle and the reasons why this book vvas thus carefully laid up before the Lord we may well conceive were these First for the sure preservation of it Secondly to signifie that even these civill laws were the ordinance of God which men were bound to obey not onely for wrath but for conscience sake Rom. 13.2 5. And thirdly to intimate that God would take care of those laws to uphold and maintain them and to punish those that should vilifie and break them Vers 26. And there went with him a band of men whose hearts God had touched Though he was but a mean man to speak of and onely yet chosen and designed to the kingdome not inthroned for afterward he was solemnly confirmed and settled in the kingdome yet some were moved of God to think that it was fit they should attend upon him in his return home and accordingly there was a band of men who did voluntarily yeild him this service going along with him as a royall guard to attend and conduct him on the way Vers 27. But the children of Belial said How shall this man save us and they despised him and brought him no presents Because Saul was but a mean man to speak of therefore there was a company of proud dissolute lawlesse wretches that despised him as one altogether unfit to be king and unlikely to govern them and defend them from their enemies as a king should do and hence it was that they brought him no presents as it seems the rest of the people did to wit as a signe of their subjection and their acknowledging him to be their king for that was the custome of those times as is noted concerning Jehoshaphat 2. Chron. 17.5 The Lord established the kingdome in his hand and all Judah brought to Jehoshaphat presents whence it was also that when the wise men had found out Christ to whom they were directed by a starre as the king of the Jews they fell down and worshiped him Matt. 2.11 And when they had opened their treasures they presented unto him gifts gold and frankincense and myrrhe And indeed observable it is that though the Lord was highly displeased with the Israelites for desiring a king yet when he had once chosen Saul to be their king and conferred the royall dignity upon him those that despised him and would not submit to his government are for that branded to be children of Belial concerning which expression see the note Deut. 13.13 But he held his peace To avoid sedition and to winne them by lenity as considering that it was no wisdome to use severity being not yet settled in the kingdome CHAP. XI Vers 1. THen Nahash the Ammonite came up and encamped against Jabesh-Gilead A city without Jordan nigh unto the Ammonites This invasion was brewing against the Israelites before they desired a king and was in part the occasion of that their desire chap. 12.12 And when ye saw that Nahash the king of the children of Ammon came against you ye said unto me Nay but a king shall reigne over us when the Lord your God was your king But now happely it was the more hastened by Nahash the Ammonite because of the report which might be brought to him of the Israelites shaking off the government of Samuel and desiring a king to reigne over them and the division newly begun amongst them by reason of the discontent of some who would not acknowledge their new chosen king What they made the ground of their quarrell it is not expressed Like enough it was that old pretence which they stood upon Judg. 11.13 when
they durst do no other for fear of Abner Ye sought for David in times past to be king over you saith Abner to the Israelites chap. 3.17 And onely the tribe of Judah did generally at this time come into David therefore it is said that for the present he was onely anointed king over the house of Judah Hitherto David had been extremely persecuted by Saul and had endured a great deal of trouble and sorrow but now at last God made good his word and settled him in the throne which he had promised him and herein was David a notable type of Christ who through many sufferings entred into glory he endured the crosse despising the shame saith the Apostle Heb. 12.2 and is set down at the right hand of the throne of God Yea and the voluntary submission of these men to the government of David was a type of the voluntary submission of Christs subjects to his Sceptre according to that propheticall expression Psal 110.3 Thy people shall be willing in the day of thy power Indeed this was the very reason why they anointed David now again at Hebron whereas he had been before anointed by Samuel namely that they might thereby testifie their approbation of that which God had appointed and how freely and cheerfully they did all consent to accept of him as their king and sovereigne And they told David saying That the men of Jabesh-Gilead were they that buried Saul It may well be that David made enquiry after the bodies of Saul and his sonne as intending to have them honourably buried and that hereupon he was told what had been herein done by the men of Jabesh-Gilead Vers 6. And now the Lord shew kindnesse and truth unto you That is may the Lord recompence the kindnesse which you have shewed to Saul by being constantly kind and gracious to you these two words kindnesse and truth are often joyned together in the Scripture to signifie a constant sure hearty kindnesse Vers 7. Your master Saul is dead and also the house of Judah have anointed me king over them This clause is added to shew the reason why he sent this message to the men of Jabesh-gilead to wit because he was now anointed king in Sauls room and he would not have them entertain any thoughts of jealousie that he would bear them any spleen for their kindnesse to Saul but would rather study to requite them for it thus by kindnesse he sought to winne the other tribes to submit to his government Vers 8 But Abner the sonne of Ner Captain of Sauls host took Ishbosheth the sonne of Saul and brought him over to Mahanaim c. To wit that he might there anoint him king in the room of his father Saul as it follows in the next verse And he made him king over Gilead and over the Ashurites and over Jezreel not that of Judah Josh 15.26 but that of Issachar Josh 19.18 and over Ephraim and over Benjamin and over all Israel that is over all the other tribes of Israel except the tribe of Judah that had anointed David Abner was Sauls cousin german for Ner the father of Abner and Kish the father of Saul were brothers and in Sauls time he was the Lord Generall of all his forces fearing therefore that he should be displaced and disregarded if David were king at least that he could not hope for the preferment and favour under David that he might expect under a king of his own kindred and family especially if he were the chief means to make him king he resolved to continue the kingdome if he could in Sauls family and because Mephibosheth Jonathans sonne the heir apparant to Saul was but five years old and now lately lamed in his feet chap. 4.4 therefore he rather thought fit to proclaim Ishbosheth king who was the onely sonne of Saul that was now left except those that he had by his concubines and to that end he took him and carried to Mahanaim which was a citie in Gilead beyond Jordan in the tribe of Gad choosing there at first to settle his new made king either because he had heard of the message which David had sent to the men of Jabesh-gilead and so desired to strengthen himself in those parts lest they should be wonne to fall off to David or else onely because this being one of the remotest parts of the kingdome Ishbosheth might be here safest from Davids party It is indeed evident that Abner knew well enough that David was anointed by Samuel at Gods appointment to succeed Saul in the throne for we see that afterwards in his anger he could tell Ishbosheth that he would translate the kingdome to David even as the Lord had sworn to him chap. 3.9 But what do ambitious Athesticall men care for Gods command He considered at this time that Ishbosheth was his near kinsman and that being but a weak feeble-spirited man he might use him as a scale and in the mean time rule all himself and therefore he made no bones in the pursuit of these his ambitious designes to set up a king contrary to what he knew God had appointed Vers 10. Ishbosheth Sauls sonne was fourty years old when he began to reigne over Israel and reigned two years Some therefore conceive that Ishbosheth took not the kingdome upon him till five years after his fathers decease but I should rather think the meaning of this clause is not that Ishbosheth reigned but two years in all but that he had reigned but two years when Abner led forth an army against David and was overcome by Joab as is related in the sequel of the chapter for had not Ishbosheth reigned longer then two years why is it said chap. 3. vers 1. that there was long warre between the house of Saul and the house of David and why was it seven years and odde moneths ere the rest of the tribes accepted of David for their king Yet some Expositours hold that it was above five years after the death of Saul ere Abner rose up against David and made Ishbosheth king But the house of Judah followed David To wit even after the other tribes had made Ishbosheth king which is doubtlesse noted to the praise of the men of Judah They might well assure themselves that if they still stuck to David it would make a dangerous rent in the kingdome and that would prove the occasion of a civil warre wherein much bloud was like to be shed and yet because it was of Gods appointment that David should be king they are commended for this that they did still hold fast with David leaving the event for other things to God Vers 12. And Abner the sonne of Ner and the servants of Ishbosheth the sonne of Saul went out from Mahanaim to Gibeon To wit to make warre against David as is evident in the sequel of the story Vers 14. And Abner said to Joab Let the young men now arise and play before us c. The meaning of this
type of Christ Matth. 3.17 And so a voice from heaven saying This is my beloved sonne in whom I am well pleased Vers 26. And Joab fought against Râ—bbah of the children of Ammon and took the royall citie Rabbah it seems consisted of two parts which were as it were two cities joyned together and one of them was called both the royall city because there the king had his palace and the city of waters because it was invironed with waters or at least lay upon the side of some river as it is expressed vers 27. I have fought against Rabbah and have taken the city of waters Now Joab having continued almost a yeare in bâ—sâ—â—ging this city as indeed it was no wonder that God gave him no better successe abroad David having so displeased him by his sinne at home at length he took this royall citie or citie of waters and knowing that the other could not now long hold out because this was farre the strongest piece and the other depended upon this and had happely their water from this which was now cut off he therefore sent to David to come thither that he might have the glory of taking the citie Vers 29. And David gathered all the people together and went to Rabbah and fought against it and took it It may justly seem strange that David should go with a numerous army out of the land of Israel into the land of the Ammonites onely to take a citie that was in a manner taken already and which they were afraid would be wonne before he came and that for no other end but that David might have the name of taking the citie But for this we must consider first that even the best of Gods servants are naturally vain-glorious and too much transported with a desire of having their name famous and renowned and secondly there might be other occasions of Davids going thither as for the prosecuting of their conquests in the land of the Ammonites and for giving directions for the punishment of those that had with such scorn abused his embassadours and that Joab knowing this did advise him onely the rather to hasten his coming thither that the citie might be taken by him and so he might have the glory of this great piece of service Vers 30. And he took the kings crown from off his head the weight whereof was a talent of gold with the pretious stones c. There was but a talent of gold in the golden candlestick of the Sanctuary Exod 25.39 which is thought to have been at least an hundred and twenty pound weight but the common talent some say was but half so much as the talent of the Sanctuary to wit sixty pound weight and so much it may be therefore this crown weighed and if so doubtlesse it was too massie to be usually worn Rather it was a crown of state which was onely set upon the heads of their kings at their coronation or hung over their heads in some chair of state and so happely at this time it was set upon their kings head and then taken off and set upon Davids to shew that now the royall dignity was transferred from him to David and indeed because the brother of this king the sonne of Nahush succoured David when he fled from Absalom chap. 17.27.28 it is most probable that Hanun was now either deposed or put to death by David and his brother made governour of Rabbah whence it was that he shewed such respect to David in that time of his troubles Vers 31. And he brought forth the people that were therein and put them under saws and under harrows of iron and under axes of iron and made them passe through the brick-kiln Thus severely David punished them whether by expresse direction from God or otherwise we cannot say because they had against the law of nations so shamefully abused Davids messengers withall having perhaps respect to their inhumane idolatry in causing their children to passe through the fire to Molech which was their idol 1. Kings 11.7 Yet it is like that onely the principall ringleaders in that barbarous usage of Davids messengers and the stirring up of the neighbouring nations against him were thus punished CHAP. XIII Vers 1. ABsalom the sonne of David had a fair sister whose name was Tamar and Amnon the sonne of David loved her Tamar was Amnons sister as well as Absaloms for they were all Davids children but she is called peculiarly Absaloms sister because she was his sister both by father and mother for both Absalom and Tamar were born to David of his wife Maacha the daughter of Talmai king of Geshur and observable it is how much sorrow David had in both these his children which he had by the daughter of an heathenish idolatrous king the incestuous rape of the one and the unnaturall rebellion of the other were a fair evidence to let him see that his matching himself with such a wife was not pleasing to God Vers 2. For she was a virgin and Amnon thought it hard for him to do any thing to her That is being a virgin and so strictly kept and looked to he thought it would be an impossible thing for him ever to get an opportunity of satisfying his lust with her Vers 4. Why art thou being the kings sonne lean from day to day Two reasons may be given why Jonadab wondring that Amnon should so droop and pine away as he did amplified his wonder from this that he was the kings sonne to wit first because he thought the happinesse of being the kings sonne might easily over-weigh any cause of sorrow he could possibly pretend and secondly because there was nothing almost which he could desire which he might not have Why art thou being the kings sonne lean from day to day as if he should have said Being the kings sonne thou mayest command what thou wilt and wherefore then dost thou vex and afflict thy self And Amnon said I love Tamar my brother Absaloms sister He calls her here not his sister but Absaloms thereby seeking to palliate or extenuate his sinne in lusting after her by intimating that she was his sister onely by the half-bloud and not his sister by father and mother as she was Absaloms and yet afterward he calls her his sister the better to hide his purpose from his father vers 6. Amnon said unto the king I pray thee let Tamar my sister come c. Vers 6. The king was come to see him No sooner did Amnon pretend himself sick but presenâ—ly his father came to see him No doubt his late loosing of his child that he had by Bathsheba made him the more fearfull of his loosing this sonne too and being also his eldest sonne he could not but lay it the more to heart and yet how well had it been for David if he had been sick indeed yea sick unto death considering how much bâ—tter sorrow he immediately brought upon him by that unnaturall villany of his in
it is said he was before he died 1. Kings 1.1 therefore indeed the most of Expositours do otherwise compute these fourty years as that it is meant of Absaloms age or of the fourty years from the anointing of Saul or of the fourty years of the current Jubilee c. of which all that I can say is this namely that there are onely two of these wayes of accounting these fourty years that have any great shew of probability in them first that of those that account from Davids first anointing 1. Sam. 16.13 and secondly that of reckoning them from the first setting up a king amongst them which was when Saul was anointed and indeed upon such a remarkable change in the government of the commonwealth of Israel as that was it may well be that they used still to reckon the years from that observable change as they have done in many other kingdomes upon the like occasion Vers 10. But Absalom sent spies throughout all the tribes of Israel c. The meaning of this is that at the same time when he had plotted his journey to Hebron when he intended amongst his conspiratours to be anointed king he appointed also certain men as spies to go severally into all the tribes of Israel who were to search and to sift the hearts of the people in all places and to prepare and fit them for this change and at the set time agreed upon between them to wit when he was to be anointed king at Hebron upon the sound of trumpets they were to say Absalom reigneth in Hebron As soon saith he as ye hear the sound of the trumpet then ye shall say Absalom reigneth in Hebron whereby is meant either that upon the sounding of the trumpets in every tribe these spies should make known the reason of it to the people namely that it was because Absalom was made king in Hebron in stead of his father that so then the people mighty cry out as is usuall at such times God save king Absalom or rather that when the people were summoned by the sound of the trumpet to come to Hebron then these spies should make known the cause why they were called together to wit because Absalom in Hebron was newly crowned king Vers 11. And with Absalom went two hundred men out of Jer usalem that were called and they went in their simplicitie c. That is being invited to the feast of Absaloms peace-offerings they went in the simplicitie of their hearts merely as invited guests not knowing any thing of the plotted conspiracy but why would Absalom invite such of whom he could have no assurance whether they would further his designes or no I answer that severall reasons might induce him hereto to wit first because he knew that the people generally favoured him and therefore hoped that when they came thither and saw what was done they would soon approve of it and joyn in the conspiracy secondly because however if they proved firm to his father then his fathers party would be weakned by drawing so many out of the citie that would there have taken his part against Absalom and thirdly because by inviting such known faithfull men that meant no ill his plot intended would be the better concealed Vers 14. Arise and let us flee for we shall not else escape from Absalom c. David was a man of great courage the fort of Zion where he now was was a place of great strength bands of garrison souldiers he had that attended him as his guard the Cherethites Pelethites and Gittites that were experienced souldiers and men of tried valour and many of the people there were too that were very faithfull to him and yet when he heard that the hearts of the Israelites were generally for Absalom he would not stay in Jerusalem but fled presently away and he gives two reasons for it one lest Absalom should surprize him and the other lest the citie Jerusalem should be smitten whilest some stood for him and some for his sonne Absalom which rather then he would hazard he resolved to flee abroad and cast himself there upon the providence of God make speed saith he to depart lest he overtake us suddenly and bring evil upon us and sâ—te this citie with the edge of the sword by the third Psalme which David penned at this time the title of it is A Psalme of David when he fled from Absalom his sonne it is clear that he was greatly cheared with the hope of Gods help I will not â—aith he be afraid of ten thousands of people that have set themselves against me round about though remembring that the Lord had threatned to raise up evil against him out of his own house this might make him the more subject to be frighted and terrified yet it seems at other times he encouraged himself in the Lord his God so that his fleeing was onely because he saw that to be the safest and surest way both for his own preservation and the good of the citie he saw the people were divided in every place some holding with him and some with the traitour his sonne what party his sonne had in the citie as yet he knew not and should the adverse party prevail he might by them he delivered up to his sonne Absalom and the citie in that dissention might be utterly ruined and therefore that he might have time to discover how the people stood affected and to use some means to defeat his sonnes attempts he judged it best for the present not to trust himself in Jerusalem but to encamp abroad in the fields and desarts Vers 16. And the king left ten women which were concubines to keep the house It is hard to say what Davids intention was in leaving these his concubines to keep his house and indeed the lesse cause there was for it the more evident it was that there was an over-ruling providence of God in it for the effecting of that which he had threatned against David chap. 12.11 I will take thy wives before thine eyes and give them to thy neighbour and he shall lie with thy wives c. but yet the most probable conjecture is that he left them there to secure his palace not that he thought they were able to guard his house against Absalom and his crew but that he conceived that Absalom would not for shame cast them out because they were women and because they were his fathers wives so that if he had any regard to his father he would not use them despitefully for his fathers sake Vers 17. And the king went forth and all the people after him and tarried in a place that was farre off That is being gotten away some reasonable distance from the city there he stayed a while to wait for those that would come out to him and that he might observe the wayes and courses which the rebels would take Vers 18. And all his servants passed on besides him and all the Cherethites and all the
for the pillar which Absalom here reared up that the memory of his name might thereby be preserved unto posterity it is very probably conceived by some Expositours that it was some monument such as were the Egyptian pyramids which he intended to be the place of his buriall and that upon the relation of his ignoble buriall in the foregoing verse to wit that he was cast into a pit and had a heap of stones thrown upon him this is presently inserted concerning the goodly sepulchral monument which he had provided for himself to shew how he was crossed in his expectation For he said I have no sonne to keep my name in remembrance Hereby it appears that God had before this time deprived him of his three sonnes mentioned chap. 14.27 not judging him worthy of sonnes that would not stoop to honour his own father and that had murthered his own brother and withall hereby God provided for the more peaceable advancing of Solomon to the throne after Davids decease Vers 22. Then said Ahimaaz the son of Zadok yet again to Joab But howsoever let me I pray thee also run after Cushi He pressed again for libertie to go after Cushi as hoping to out-run him and having be-thought himself that he might acquaint David with the good tidings of the victory though he suppressed that particular concerning the death of Absalom Vers 23. Then Ahimaaz ran by the way of the plain and over-ran Cushi Whereas Cushi ran the nearest way which was hilly and mountainous Ahimaaz chose to go a further way by the way of the plain and so by the advantage of the way he out-ran Cushi and came first to David Vers 24. And David sate between the two gates c. That is at the entring in of the citie Mahanaim waiting to heare tidings from the army that was gone forth against Absalom It seems that the gates of cities were in those times built as they are now with high towers and so stronger and thicker then other parts of the wall and therefore had two gates one inward toward the citie and another outward toward the suburbs and between these two gates it was that David now sate Vers 25. And the king said If he be alone there is tidings in his mouth That is if there were many coming together we might well fear they fled from the face of the enemy but if there be but one alone doubtlesse it is a messenger that is sent with some tidings Vers 27. And the king said He is a good man and cometh with good tidings David inferres that if it were Ahimaaz that was coming he doubtlesse brought good tidings because he was a good man whereof there may be two reasons conceived First that being a good man he was not likely to be the first in flying away and therefore it was not likely he fled from the enemy but rather he came with tidâ—ngs and secondly that being a good man he was the more likely to be desirous to bring good tidings to the king or had used to bring him good tidings Vers 33. And the king was much moved and went up to the chamber over the gate See the note above vers 5. partly as apprehending the misery of Absaloms dying in his sinne and partly as remembring that his sinne in the matter of Uriah was now punished in the death of this his ungracious sonne he felt his passions breaking out so violently that not being able to go home to his own house and being withall doubtles ashamed that his passion should be seen he was glad to run up to the chamber over the gate where he was sitting when he heard the tidings there in secret to poure out his sorrow nor was he able to suppresse his passions â—o long but as he went up as it follows in the next words he brake out into a bitter lamentation O my sonne Absalom my sonne my sonne Absalom would God I had died for thee c. Because he feared his everlasting perdition he wished that he had died rather then Absalom CHAP. XIX Vers 3. ANd the people gat them by stealth that day into the citie as people being ashamed steal away when they flee in battel That is in stead of entring the citie in a triumphant manner as souldiers are wont to do that return with victory from the battel they scattered themselves asunder and stole secretly into the citie as if they had fled in the battel and as ashamed of their cowardise were now loth that any body should see them Vers 4. But the king covered his face c. See the note chap. 15.30 Vers 5 And Joab came into the house to the king and said Thou hast shamed this day the faces of all thy servants c. Joab saw that there was some danger lest the hearts of Davids friends and servants should be alienated from him by his carrying of himself so disrespectfully to those that had hazarded their lives for him and he perceived too that his passions were so violent that there was no way to winne him to withstand them unlesse he spake that which might startle him and scare him and hence it was that he spake so roughly and sharply to David more roughly indeed then otherwise it had been fit for a subject to speak to his sovereigne Vers 7. Now therefore arise go forth and speak comfortably unto thy servants c. This Joab advised David to do that he might prevent the alienating of his servants affections from him and perhaps too because the addressing of himself to the affairs of his kingdome would be the best means to allay his passions and indeed after that he came forth and sat in the gate we heare no more of his violent weeping and wailing Vers 9. And all the people were at strife throughout all the tribes of Israel c. That is throughout all the ten tribes of the Israelites the people began to blame one another for siding with Absalom in his insurrrection against his father and to call upon their Elders and Officers to go and submit themselves to him and to fetch him back again into the land of Israel to the citie of Jerusalem that he might be reestablished in the throne to reigne over them again as he had done Vers 10. And Absalom whom we anointed over us is dead in battel c. This is another argument wherewith the Israelites perswaded one another to submit themselves again to David and it is as if they had said we see that God was against us in that attempt of ours to make Absalom king and why do we then still stand it out and not go in and seek reconciliation with our king whom we have wronged Vers 11. And king David sent to Zadok and to Abiathar the priests saying Speak unto the Elders of Judah c. The men of Judah had been the first and chief in siding with Absalom and had delivered up to him the citie of Jerusalem and the strong fort of
house of Saul Vers 3. And the king took the ten women his concubines whom he had left to keep his house and put them in ward c. This David did first because they had yeilded to the incestuous lust of Absalom for they should rather have dyed then condescended to him and secondly because he judged it not fit to go in unto them that had been defiled by his own sonne or to leave them to be defiled by others Vers 4. Then said the king to Amasa Assemble me the men of Judah c. And thus as he had promised chap. 19.13 David imployed Amasa as the generall of his forces in Joabs room Vers 5. But he tarried longer then the set time which he had appointed him To wit either because the people that had been formerly commanded by Joab were not willing to change their Generall and to submit to Amasa or because Amasa did not cordially follow the businesse for David or because indeed the time prescribed by David for raising the trained bands of Judah was too little to do it in for out of a desire that David had presently to crush this insurrection of the ten tribes he had allowed Amasa but three dayes for that service as is expressed in the former verse Vers 6. And David said to Abishai Now shall Sheba the sonne of Bichri do us more harm c. David was much troubled at Amasa's delay but yet Joab he would not imploy both because he was still discontented against him for his killing Absalom and because he knew well that Joab was also discontented for the losse of his place and should he be now imployed again would be ready enough to presse into that place again from which he had deposed him and therefore he called Abishai and sent out him and enjoyned him to take his Lords servants that is Davids the kings guard and with them to pursue Sheba Vers 7. And there went out after him Joabs men and the Cherethites and the Pelethites c. Those are called Joabs men that had been under his command as for the Cherechites and Pelethites see the note chap. 8.18 Vers 8. And Joabs garment that he had put on was gâ—rded unto him and upon it a girdle with a sword c. Hereby it is manifest that Joab did of his own accord go along with his brother Abishai as intending to murther Amasa to which end also it was that he had girt his garment close about him that by hanging loose it might not encumber him and secondly he had girt his sword on the outside of his garment which perhaps was not his usuall custome and had it withall so loose in the scabbard that as he stepped forth to Amasa to bow down and salute him it fell out of it self which was no doubt purposely done that under a pretence of taking up the sword he might without any suspicion in Amasa do what he intended having formerly imbrued his hands in the bloud of Abner and not punished for it though his cousin german as is noted before chap. 17.25 because David had conferred his office upon him Vers 10. But Amasa took no heed to the sword that was in Joabs hand c. That is he never thought of any danger that was in that he took that to be occasioned by the casuall and unexpected falling of his sword out of his scabbard as he came to salute him and therefore hearing him speak so smoothly and seeing him embrace him so lovingly he never suspected any danger in his sword and thus was Amasa punished by the just hand of Gods providence for his unnaturall rebellion against his uncle David his Lord and Sovereign though David had pardoned him God would not suffer him to go unpunished Vers 11. And one of Joabs men stood by him and said He that favoureth Joab and he that is for David let him go after Joab c. Least the sight of their slain Generall should beat off the souldiers from going any further one of Joabs men stood by him no doubt by Joabs appointment as it were to justifie the fact and to advise them if they were friends to Joab and the king to go on after him who would now be their leader in this enterprize which David had neither justly nor safely committed to Amasa's trust Vers 12. And Amasa wallowed in bloud To wit by reason of the pangs of death that were upon him And when the man saw that all the people stood still c. That is when the man mentioned in the foregoing verse that had encouraged the souldiers to march on after Joab saw that for all this they stood still as astonished at that which was done he removed Amasa's dead body out of the high way Vers 14. And he went through all the tribes of Israel unto Abel and to Beth-maachah c. That is Sheba having gone through all the tribes to stirre them up against David came at length to Abel and to the places adjoyning where Joab found him Vers 18. They were wont to speak in old time saying They shall surely ask counsel at Abel and so they ended the matter According to the translation that is set in the margin the meaning of the place must needs be this that in the beginning the citizens of Abel perswaded themselves that surely Joab would before he proceeded to force them propound his demands to them and so they should make an end of the difference but as the words are rendred in the text they may have a double sense for first some expound it much after the same manner to wit that in old time they were wont to say according to the expresse law of God Deut. 20.10 that when they came against a citie they were first to make their demands and to propound conditions of peace and so they ended the matter as if she had said surely had this enterprise been undertaken in former times they would not have done as thou hast they would have said Surely we will first ask at Abel and see whether they will consent to do what we shall require of them secondly some conceive it to be an allegation of an old proverb They were wont to speak in old time saying They shall surely ask counsel at Abel to wit because it seems there were in times past in this citie men eminent for wisdome and abilitie to give counsel especially concerning the laws insomuch that they used to come up from all parts of the kingdome to take advice there and so they ended the matter that is many a controversie was thus peaceably decâ—ded and that this she putteth Joab in mind either as an inducement to winne him to mercy not to go about to destroy so famous a citie or else as by way of giving him a hint not to despise her counsel yea though she were a woman since counsel given out of Abel had wont to be held in high esteem but the first exposition is best and most generally received Vers
19. I am one of them that are peaceable and faithfull in Israel Here this wise woman of Abel doth further disswade Joab from proceeding with such severity against this Citie by three severall Arguments first by pleading their innocency I am one of them that are peaceable and faithfull in Israel for this she speaks not of her self in particular there being no reason that the whole citie should be spared because she was peaceable but she speaks in the name and person of the whole citie to wit that their citie Abel was peaceable and faithfull and indeed it may well be that either the citie knew nothing of Sheba's guilt and did shut their gates not to defend Sheba but onely because they heard of an Army that was coming against them or at least that though there might be a faction in the citie that were abettors of Sheba yet for the generality of the people they were otherwise minded and this she alledgeth to justifie the citie and to stay the rage of Joab secondly by pleading the dammage that would redound to the Israel of God by the ruine of this citie Thou seekest to destroy a citie and a mother in Israel that is the chief citie of a Province a mother citie The chief cities of a Countrey are called in the Scripture mothers partly in regard of the multitude of the Inhabitants which are there bred and brought up as it were in the lap and bosome of a mother and are by her defended and sheltred from the violence of those that would hurt them and liberally provided for and sent forth perhaps into other parts of the land with a large portion of outward things but principally in regard of the towns and villages about them either because the cities had the command over them or at least because the towns and villages had much dependance upon them as children upon their mother for counsell and direction in their weightiest affairs for defence against invading enemy and for a supply of thing convenient for them and so this woman tearms her citie a mother in Israel to shew what a mischief he should do to the land of Israel in ruinating such a citie and thirdly by pleading the wrong that therein would be done unto the Lord in that the people were the people of God that were like to be destroyed in it and the citie a part of the inheritance wherein God had placed his people Why wilt thou saith she swallow up the inheritance of the Lord where also the expression she useth of swallowing up the inheritance of the Lord is very observable for thereby she covertly blames him for his violent and furious proceedings against them and intimateth that if he would not do all in a passion but would a little deliberate of these his proceedings he would be soon of another mind Vers 21. But a man of mount Ephraim Sheba the sonne of Bichri by name hath lift up his hand against the King He was of the Tribe of Benjamin but dwelt it seemeth in mount Ephraim and therefore Joab calls him a man of mount Ephraim And the woman said unto Joab behold his head shall be thrown to thee over the wall This she promiseth with such confidence either because she knew already the minds of those that were able to do it or because she was assured they would be wonne to it and not hazard the citie to shelter a Traitour and indeed that the inhabitants were by her perswaded to yield to this the words in the following verse seem clearly to imply Then the woman went unto all the people in her wisdome c. that is by her wisdome in pleading with them and the strong reasons she alledged she perswaded the Citizens to cut off his head c. Vers 23. Now Joab was over all the host of Israel As before when David was first settled in the kingdome the names of his chief Officers were expressed chap. 8.16 So here again first to let us see that Joab recovered his place David perhaps not knowing how to oppose it and secondly to she how fully David was reetablished in the kingdome all things being setled again in the former order Vers 24. And Adoram was over the tribute This office was not mentioned before chap. 8. for since that David had enlarged his Dominions and made many nations tributary to him and thereupon this office was committed to Adoram Vers 25. And Sheva was scribe Or Seraiah chap. 8 17. CHAP. XXI Vers 1. THen there was a famine in the dayes of David three years yeare after yeare and David enquired of the Lord. Though this story of the three years famine be here related after that of Absaloms rebellion and Sheba's insurrection against David yet it is generally held that both this and the following story chap. 24. happened long before and indeed if Absaloms rebellion was in the the fourtieth yeare of his fathers reigne who reigned in all but fourty years chap. 5.4 as many gather from chap. 15.7 And it came to passe that after fourtie years Absalom said unto the King c. this consequently must needs be before that onely because all these fore-mentioned troubles that befell David befell him for his sinne with Bathsheba therefore are they there inserted immediately after that and these that concerned other matters are afterward related by themselves the Scripture rather respecting the coherence of the matter and argument then the consequence of the time and so much methinks the very Text doth imply giving no other note of the time but that it was in the dayes of David though the sinne was long since committed yet at length God began to punish the whole land for it by sending a famine amongst them caused as it seems vers 10. by want of rain and how ever at first David took it as a punishment laid upon them for the common sinnes of the land yet when he saw that it continued three years together he concluded there was some speciall thing wherewith God was offended and for which he would be satisfied and therefore then he enquired of the Lord. And the Lord answered It is for Saul and for his bloudy house because he slew the Gibeonites That is many of the Gibeonites in the following verse it is indeed expressed that he endeavoured to root them all out of the land Saul sought to stay them in his zeal to the children of Israel and Judah to wit as pretending that it was neither profitable nor honourable nor safe for Gods people to suffer any of those cursed nations to live amongst them whom God hath commanded them utterly to destroy Exod. 23.33 Deut. 7.2 but it seems he did not openly professe this which he had purposed with himself for this would have been too manifest an act of tryranny and injustice and too palpable a violation of the oath which Joshua and the Elders of Israel had taken that they should live peaceably amongst them Josh 9.15 and besides had he gone
the youth of his sonne he should attempt any thing against him after his decease and therefore gave astrict charge to Solomon to watch over him narrowly and to take some occasion to cut him off Vers 9. But his hoar head bring thou down to the grave with bloud How this order which he gave to Solomon to bring down his hoar head with bloud to the grave agreeth with that oath of his to Shimei 2 Sam. 19.23 see there Vers 10. So David slept with his fathers and was buried in the citie of David In 1 Chron. 29.28 it is said that he died in a good old age full of dayes riches and honour here the place of his buriall is named to wit that it was in the citie of David that is in that part of Jerusalem where he dwelt and kept his court and which he had first taken out of the hands of the Jebusites which was thence called the citie of David even the place of his buriall was an honour to him and it seems his sepulchre was strangely preserved notwithstanding Jerusalem was so oft sacked and burnt for it continued unto the Apostles times as the Apostle Peter noted Acts 2.29 Men and Brethren let me freely speak unto you of the Patriach David that he is both dead and buried and his sepulchre is with us unto this day Vers 13. And she said Comest thou peaceably She might easily suspect that Adonijah did even swell with envy against Solomon and against her too because by her means his conspiracy was defeated and therefore when she saw him come in to her she was jealous presently of some plot he had against her and her sonne and thence enquired whether he came peaceably or no. Vers 15. And he said Thou knowest that the kingdome was mine and that all Israel set their faces upon me c. That is in regard that I was king and in a fair way to have had the kingdome settled upon me by the favour of the people who looked upon me as my fathers eldest sonne though I be now but a private subject and content to be so since it was of God that my brother Solomon should reigne I hope you will be willing to afford me what honour a subject may be capable of and will not deny me any reasonable request that I shall make to you how farre Adonijah was from being really convinced that it was of God that Solomon was king or from a quiet submission to the good providence of God therein is evident by the plot he had now in hand to get Abishag to wife that so he might wrest the kingdome from Solomon onely to hide his drift in desiring Abishag to wife he would seem to be fully satisfied concerning Solomons being king the kingdome is turned about and is become my brothers for it was his from the Lord and onely to desire that by considering what great hopes he was fallen from she would compassionate his condition and be the readier to gratifie him in any thing a subject might lawfully desire Vers 17. Speak I pray thee unto Solomon the king c. The onely reason alledged here by Adonijah why he made choice of Bathsheba to get Solomons consent for his marrying Abishag is the great interest she had in the king her sonne for saith he he will not say thee nay but yet considering that there were many others that were of power enough to have obtained any reasonable request of the king for him we may well think that there was another thing that induced him to set her a work in this businesse namely the hope of winning her to undertake his petition indeed accordingly it came to passe though Bathsheba were so wise a woman that her counsel to her sonne is recorded by the spirit of God in the holy Scripture Prov. 31.1 yet she could not discern his drift but being gulled with his fair words and her melting thoughts of compassion towards him she undertook that suit of his whereby he thought to undermine her sonne and at last to shoulder him out of the throne Vers 21. And she said Let Abishag the Shunammite be given to Adonijah thy brother to wife Thus she intimates that because he was his brother forgetting what was past he should do well to gratifie him in any reasonable request Vers 22. Ask for him the kingdome also for he is mine elder brother even for him and for Abiathar c. There is nothing in the text whence we can certainly conclude whether Adonijah had a purpose again to wrest the kingdome from Solomon and had for that cause by the advise of his confederates Abiathar and Joab sought to obtain Abishag to wife yet it may seem probable first by the strangenesse of the suite that he should desire her to wife who had lain either as his wife or concubine in the bosome of his own father secondly by Solomons severe proceeding against him for though by an ordinary way of providence he might have suspected that Adonijah had some plot in this suit of his yet because he did so certainly conclude of it that presently without any more ado he adjudged him to death this mâ—kes it most probable that the drift of Adonijah was discovered to Solomon by a speciall instinct of the spirit of God and thirdly by Joabs flying to the altar upon this and not before vers 28. however it is evident that Solomon took it so to wit that by the friends Abishag had gotten whilest she lay in his fathers bosome he hoped to increase his faction and happely also by marrying a wife of the deceased king to strengthen his crakt title and that because it was still the successours right to have the deceased kings concubines 2. Sam. 12.8 And I gave thee thy masters house and thy masters wives into thy bosome c. Ask for him saith he the kingdome also as if he should have said this is it which he looks after and with him Joab and Abiathar too having already the plea of being the elder brother and Abiathar the high priest and Joab the Generall on his side if he could strengthen himself also by this marriage then he would not fear to shew himself and to obtain his desire Vers 23. Then king Solomon sware by the Lord. That his mother might not interpose any further in the businesse Vers 24. As the Lord liveth which hath established me and set me on the throne c. That is as surely as the Lord liveth who hath done this for me so surely shall Adonijah be put to death and that this day there must be no delay in a matter of such danger though Solomon had beforehand promised his mother to grant her request yet his intention was therein onely to grant her any reasonable request and therefore not thinking that any tie to intangle him for the granting of that which might prove the ruin both of himself and her in stead of satisfiing her desire he took on
Solomon to Naamah the Ammonitesse before he died as is evident because Rehoboam the sonne of Solomon by this Naamah was born a full year before Solomon was king for Solomon reigned in all but fourty years chap. 11.42 and Rehoboam was one and fourty years old when he came to be king in the room of his father chap. 14.21 so that if Solomon took this daughter of Pharaoh to wife after Shimei's death as it is here set down in the story who had lived three years in Jerusalem after Solomon was king chap. 2.39 this marriage was many years after his marriage with Naamah at least in the fourth or fifth yeare of his reigne whether Naamah were at that time dead or no it is no where expressed but however that one chief aim in this match was to strengthen himself by joyning himself in affinitie with such a potent neighbour Prince as the king of Egypt now was is evident for therefore it is not said barely that he took Pharaohs daughter to wife but that he made affinitie with Pharaoh king of Egypt and took Pharoahs daughter c. implying that to joyn himself in affinitie with the king of Egypt was the great plot of this match it is not said whether she had embraced the Religion of the Israelites when he took her to wife yet considering that he is no where blamed for this marriage nor any thing said but that as yet he continued to walk in Gods wayes the high places onely excepted it is most like she forsook her idolatry and however that either before or after her marriage she became a proselyte and worshipped the true God we cannot well question because Solomon in this marriage is made a type of Christ who wooed the Gentiles and made them his spouse calling them from their idolatries to serve the true and everlasting God for hereto the Psalmist seems to allude Psal 45.10 Hearken O daughter and consider and encline thine eare forget also thine own people and thy fathers house And brought her into the citie of David untill he had made an end of building his own house That is having taken the daughter of Pharaoh to wife he brought her into the citie of David but yet he did not dispose of her in his own house there but in some other part of the citie and that either because his own house was not sufficient to entertain her and all her retinue or because he was at that time in building or at least had purposed to build a fair palace for himself with another adjoyning thereto for his Queen chap. 7.8 and so in that part of the citie of David she continued untill he had made an end of building his own house c. and the wall of Jerusalem round about Now this last clause concerning the wall of Jerusalem is I conceive added onely by the way to give a hint how the glory of Solomons kingdome did still flourish in every thing more and more that Jerusalem was walled about before this time is evident 2. Sam. 5.9 and 1. Chron. 11.8 but it seems Solomon did either erect a new wall without the old or else repair enlarge and fortifie the old building them with many stately towers and bulworks and so this city which was the place of his residence became farre the more glorious Vers 2. Onely the people sacrificed in high places c. This I conceive hath reference to that which is said before concerning the flourishing estate of Solomon in the last verse of the former chapter and the beginning of this his royall glory was every way great onely this saith the text was a blemish which stained the glory of his kingdome that as yet the people yea and Solomon too did offer sacrifices in their high places vers 3. which was directly against the Law Deut. 12.13 14. but of these high places see the note 1. Sam. 9.12 Vers 4. And the king went to Gibeon to sacrifice there for that was the great high place That is the largest and fairest the most famous and most resorted to and that happely because the tabernacle of Moses was there and therefore did Solomon go thither and with him all the chief of the Princes and Governours of the people whom he had called together 2. Chron. 1.2 3. concerning which see the note there Vers 6. And Solomon said Thou hast shewed unto thy servant David my father great mercy c. This he said in his heart being asleep for God understands the langague of the heart as well as that of the tongue and as the Lord can enable men to attend upon that which he sayes to them in their sleep so he can also give them power distinctly and with the full and free use of their reason their sleep no way disturbing their phancy to poure forth the desires of their souls in prayer to him and yet it may well be too that the intention of his mind all the day before upon the service of God made him fitter for the impression of such holy desires and thoughts when he was asleep and particularly to beg wisdome of God which before of all things he had most desired And thou hast kept for him this great kindnesse that thou hast given him a sonne to sit on his throne c. This was spoken in reference to Saul though God made Saul king over Israel as well as David yet he did not give it to Saul and his heirs and successours as he did to David this was a peculiar favour and honour which God reserved for David Vers 7. And I am but a little child I know not how to go out or come in That is young and unexperienced in state affairs and in comparison of this great burthen which must now lie upon me a very child so the Prophet Jeremy also speaks of himself Jer. 1.6 then said I Ah Lord God I cannot speak for I am a child some writers would hence conclude that Solomon was not above twelve years old when he began to reigne if not younger and so withall are forced to maintain that at eleven years of age he begat his sonne Rehoboam for it is manifest Rehoboam was born the yeare before he began his reigne because he reigned in all but fourty years chap. 11.42 and Rehoboam was one and fourty years old when he succeeded him in the throne but there is no cause why we should entangle our selves with such difficulties because Solomon saith here I am but a little child or because David said of him 1. Chron. 22.5 Solomon my sonne is young and tender for on the other side before this we see how David spake of him chap. 2.9 thou art a wise man and knowest what thou oughtest to do unto him for thus the Scripture usually speaks of young men Ishmael is called a child when he was at least eighteen years old Gen. 21.14 15. and David a youth and stripling 1. Sam. 17.23 whereas before 1. Sam. 16.18 he is called a mighty
basons 2. Chron. 4.8 It is expressed that there were an hundred basons CHAP. VIII Vers 1. THen Solomon assembled the Elders of Israel c. To wit to attend upon the ark when it was removed out of the City of David which is Zion where it had been ever since David brought it thither 2 Sam. 6.12 of which see the note there unto the Temple which Solomon had now built in mount Moriah for by this personall attendance both of Princes and people upon the ark they did acknowledge the Lord of whose presente the ark was a type to be the God and Lord of Israel and themselves his servants A great question indeed it is how it can be said here that the ark was carried out of Sion that it might be placed in the Temple seeing ordinarily in the Scripture Sion is spoken of as the place where God dwelt in his Temple amongst his people as Psal 78.68.69 where it is said that God chose the tribe of Judah the mount Zion which he loved and he built his Sanctuary like high places c. and Esa 8.18 where God is called the Lord of hosts that dwelleth in mount Zion and so in many other places But for this we must know that to speak properly and in a strict sence the Temple was not built in mount Sion but in mount Moriah 2. Chron. 3.1 therefore it is said here that the ark was carried out of the citie of David which is Zion into the Temple but because the whole citie of Jerusalem is usually called Sion and mount Sion from that mount which was a chief part of it thence it is that the Temple Gods dwelling place is so usually said to have been in Sion Vers 2. And all the men of Israel assembled themselves unto king Solomon at the feast c. That is at the time when they were from all parts of the land to assemble themselves together to keep the feast in the moneth of Ethanim which is the seventh moneth By the feast is meant as is most probably held by the most of Interpreters the feast of tabernacles which began the 15 day of the seventh moneth Levit. 23.34 and was indeed the chief feast of this moneth as being one of those three feasts whereto all the males of Israel were bound to resort yet it must needs be that the people assembled at least the heads of the tribes and the chief of the fathers seven or eight dayes before the feast of tabernacles for the feast of tabernacles was kept from the fifteenth to the end of the two and twentieth day and on the three and twentieth day Solomon dismissed the people 2. Chron. 7.10 And on the three and twentieth day of this seventh moneth he sent the people away unto their tents so that the seven dayes which he kept for the dedication of the temple whereof mention is made vers 65. of this chapter and 2. Chron. 7.9 were before the feast of tabernacles yet if they were the seven dayes immediately foregoing the feast of tabernacles which was on the fifteenth day of the moneth doubtlesse the tenth day was excepted which was the day wherein they afflicted their souls with fasting Levit 23.27 and therefore not likely to have been one of the dayes of this festivitie of the Temples dedication now whereas it may be objected that till the eight moneth the Temple was not finished chap. 6.38 And in the eleventh yeare in the moneth Bul which is the eight moneth was the house finished to this I answer that the dedication therefore was doubtlesse in the seventh moneth of the following yeare that moneth being chosen for the peoples convenience who were then to assemble themselves to keep the feast of Tabernacles and that in the interim there might be time for the drying of the walls and to make all things ready for the dedication of it Vers 3. And the priests took up the ark In 2. Chron. 5.4 it is and the Levites took up the ark but that is onely because the priests also were of the tribe of Levi. Vers 4. And they brought up the ark of the Lord and the tabernacle of the congregation c. To wit that which was made by Moses which onely was called the tabernacle of the congregation this had been hitherto in Gibeon 2. Chron. 1.3 but was now removed thence with all the holy vessels thereof and laid up in the treasuries of the Temple not onely because they had been consecrated to God but also to make sure that the Temple should now be the onely place of Gods worship Vers 5. Sacrificing sheep and oxen that could not be told nor numbred for multitude To wit when they were going in a solemn manner before the ark to remove it from the citie of David into the Temple and therefore perhaps in the same manner too that was observed by David when he removed the ark from the house of Obed Edom 2. Sam. 6.13 And it was so that when they that bare the ark of the Lord had gone six paces he sacrificed oxen and fatlings Vers 8. And they drew out the staves that the ends of the staves were seen out in the holy place c. Some conceive the meaning of this hard place is this to wit that they drew out the staves quite out of the rings of the ark thereby to signifie that the ark was now to be removed no more and so the staves being laid upon the ground in the fore part of the Sanctuary their foure ends or heads might be seen as one went out of the holy place into the most holy but out of that place they were never seen because the ark was never removed but it is hard to make this exposition agree with the words the most approved exposition therefore is this when they had set the ark in his place behind the Cherubims to wit the two great Cherubims which Solomon had made neither the ark nor the staves could be seen but then they drew out the staves eastward that so though the ark was not seen yet the end of the staves might be seen to put them in mind of the ark which was behind the wings of the Cherubims for by this means the ends of the staves were seen out in the holy place before the oracle that is in that part of the most holy place which was before the ark which was more especially called the oracle and they were not seen without that is they were not seen out of the ark they that were before the oracle in the most holy place might discern by the ends of the staves that they were in the ark as it is expressed 2. Chron. 5.9 And they drew out the staves of the ark that the ends of the staves were seen from the ark before the oracle but the staves were never seen out of the ark for that was against Gods Law Exod. 25.15 The staves shall be in the rings of the ark they shall not be taken from it
no necessity at all why this second apparition of the Lord to Solomon might not be after all his buildings were finished as the words in our translation do plainly imply Thirteen years indeed were spent in building his own house after the Temple was finished and so long therefore it seems it was after the finishing of the Temple ere the Lord appeared the second time to Solomon and assured him that he had heard his prayer which he had made at the dedication of the Temple for God would first settle him in the full glory of his kingdome and then he takes that opportunity to renew his covenant with him in a second vision assuring him that in this glory his kingdome should be continued to his posterity in case both he and his children would keep covenant with him and withall threatning that if they revolted from him he would leave both them and the Temple and all and poure forth his wrath and fury upon them Vers 2. The Lord appeared to Solomon the second time c. To wit in a dream by night chap. 3.5 and so it is partly expressed 2. Chro. 7.12 And the Lord appeared unto Solomon by night and said unto him I have heard thy prayer and chosen this place to my self for a house of sacrifice once since that vision in Gibeon we reade that the word of the Lord came to Solomon chap. 6.11 But that it seems was by some messenger or Prophet sent to him for this was the second time the Lord appeared unto him in a vision as is here expressely noted Vers 3. I have hallowed this house which thou hast built to put my name there for ever c. That is untill the coming of the Messiah without interruption As for that following clause and my eyes and mine heart shall be there perpetually thereby is promised both the Lords carefull preservation of that house in succeeding times and his readinesse to heare the prayers that were offered to him there and likewise that he would do this out of his fatherly care over them and love to them Vers 7. This house which I have hallowed for my name will I cast out of my sight c. That is I will cast it out of my protection as a filthy polluted thing concerning the following clause and Israel shall be a proverb c. see the note Deut. 28.37 Vers 11. Now Hiram the king of Tyre had furnished Solomon with cedar trees and firre trees and with gold To wit one hundred and twenty talents as is expressed vers 14. Solomon gave Hiram twenty cities in the land of Galilee By way of requiting Hirams bountie in supplying him with those thing mentioned in the former words or by way of satisfying him for those things It was questionlesse unlawfull for Solomon to give away any part of the land of Canaan to a strange king or people for therein first there should have been wrong done to that tribe in whose lot these cities were who should hereby have been deprived of a part of their inheritance which God had given them and secondly he should have incroached upon Gods royaltie who still held the land as his and onely allowed the Israelites to dwell in it as sojourners by right derived unto them from him and to manifest this had conveyed it to them with this condition or proviso that it should not be lawfull for any of them to alienate or sell a way their estates for ever no not to any of their brethren the Israelites Levit. 25.23 But how then could Solomon who yet continued in his uprightnesse give away twenty cities in the land of Galilee to Hiram king of Tyre I answer either Solomon gave him these cities onely that he might receive thence for certain years till he was satisfied for that which was owing him the tribute or other profits which were thence yearly paid to Solomon or else rather these cities were not a part of that land which God had of old given for the inheritance of his people but lay in a tract of ground on the outside of the borders of Asher Josh 19.24 betwixt them and mount Libanus and being now reduced under Solomons dominion and either now or afterward counted as a part of Galilee to which they were joyned thence Solomon gave unto Hiram twenty cities And indeed this answer seems most probable because upon Hirams refusing these cities they were repaired and inlarged by Solomon and certain colonies of the Israelites were planted therein 2 Chron. 8.1 2. whereas before they were inhabited by the heathen which some say was the first occasion why Galilee was called Galilee of the Gentiles Esa 9.1 Vers 12. And they pleased him not That is he liked them not because they stood in an unfruitfull and marish ground or because he thought it would be long ere he should thence reap that satisfaction he expected from Solomon and as he misliked them so it seems he refused the profer and chose rather to receive satisfaction some other way for at this very time to wit in the one and twentieth yeare after the foundation of the Temple was laid Solomon repaired and fortified these places which Hiram refused as was before noted from 2 Chron. 8.1 2. Vers 15. And this is the reason of the levie which king Solomon raised for to build the house of the Lord c. That is for the same reason that he had received this aid from Hiram did he also raise a levie both of men and money amongst the people namely for to build the house of the Lord and his own house c. of the levie of men we reade chap. 5.13 and of the levie of money that is understood as some Expositours hold which we reade 2 Chron. 9.13 14. And though the people yielded willingly to this levie for the Temple yet when it was still continued for these other buildings it seems they grudged at it as we may gather from what they said to Rehoboam Chap. 12.4 And Millo and the wall of Jerusalem and Hazor and Megiddo c. Concerning this Millo see the note 2 Sam. 5.19 either it was now repaired and enlarged by Solomon or else a new one was built in another place Hazor was in the tribe of Napthali Josh 19.32 36. the chief citie aforetimes of the Canaanites Josh 11.1 10. and Megiddo belonged to Manasseh Josh 17.11 Vers 16. For Pharaoh king of Egypt had gone up and taken Gezer This Gezer was a city allotted to the Levites in Ephraims tribe Josh 21.20 21. yet it had been hitherto it seems in the Canaanites possession till perhaps upon some distast given Solomon being then busied in his magnificent buildings entreated Pharaoh his father in law to rid him of these neighbours which he accordingly performed and gave the citie as a present for his daughter Vers 17. And Solomon built Gezer and Beth-horon the nether Yea and Beth-horon the upper also 2 Chron. 8.5 one being here expressed for both this was also a
Libnah a citie in his own countrey and then no wonder though he stayed not to prosecute his victory in the land of Edom. Then Libnah revolted at the same time Libnah was a great citie within Judah one of the royall cities of Canaan when Joshua entred it Josh 10.29 30 It was by him given to the priests the sonnes of Aaron Josh 21.13 and now it rebelled against Joram because he had made such innovations in Religion and forced the people to idolatry as is expressed 2. Chron. 21.10 11. which no marvell though the Levites were least able to endure It is much indeed that one citie alone should venture upon such an attempt but perhaps the kings absence whilest he was in Edom and the discontent of the people yea perhaps some correspondence they might have with the Philistines who ere long invaded the land 2. Chron. 21.16 17. gave them hope of abettors and how they sped in the conclusion the Scripture expresseth not Vers 24. And Joram slept with his fathers and was buried with his fathers in the citie of David Before his death there was a prophesie in writing delivered him from Elijah the Prophet 2. Chron. 21.12 which threatned both his people his children his wives and his own body and immediatly what was threatned came to passe for first the Philistines and Arabians brake into Judea took the kings house made spoil of his goods and slew or carried away all his children save the youngest onely and then afterwards the Lord smote him with a grievous disease in his bowels which left him not till his guts fell out and being dead he was obscurely buried in the citie of David but not in the sepulchres of his Ancestours the kings of Judah and that without the lamentations and solemnities that had been used in other princes funeralls 2. Chron. 21.16 All the time of this kings reigne another king of the same name reigned in Israel to wit Joram the sonne of Ahab his brother in law And Ahaziah his sonne reigned in his stead He is elswhere called Jehoahaz 2. Chron. 21.17 and Azariah 2. Chron. 22.6 He was the youngest sonne of Joram for all the elder sonnes were slain or carried away by the Philistines 2 Chron. 21.17 In S. Matthews catalogue of the kings of Judah it is said Matth. 1.8 that Jehoshapoat begat Joram and Joram begat Ozias and so this Ahaziah who succeeded Joram and Joash who succeeded Ahaziah 2 Kings 11.2 and Amaziah who succeeded Joash 2. Kings 12.21 and was the father of Ozias are quite left out but this I conceive was onely because the Evangelist resolving to distribute the Ancestours of Christ into three severall ranks according to the three great changes that had happened in the state and finding just fourteen in the first rank from Abraham to David he laboured to reduce the other ranks to the same number too as knowing that equall numbers are a help to the memory and so to make just fourteen generations in that rank also from David to the captivitie he leaves out Ahaziah Joash and Amaziah and them perhaps rather then others because they were the next from Ahab by Athaliah the daughter of Ahab and wife of Joram Vers 25. In the twelfth yeare of Joram the sonne of Ahab king of Israel c. Yet chap. 9.29 it is said that he began to reigne in the eleventh yeare of Joram king of Israel which is because the yeare of Ahaziahs reigne did concurre with the latter end of the eleventh and the beginning of the twelfth yeare of Joram king of Israel Vers 26. Two and twentie years old was Ahaziah when he began to reigne c. In the 2. Chron. 22.2 it is said that he was two and fourty years old when he began to reigne we may reconcile this thus that he was two and fourty years old when he began to reigne alone by himself but that he was made king also when he was but two twenty years old his father yet living but then that must be granted which is before noted upon 1. Kings 22.42 to wit that Asa also was made king in his fathers life time and indeed because this answer may have some strong objections made against it therefore others do rather reconcile these two places thus to wit that those words in 2. Chron. 22.2 Fourty and two years old was Ahaziah when he began to reigne must be understood of the continuance of Omries pedigree who was great grandfather to this Ahaziah Omri reigned as sole king six years 1. Kings 16.23 Ahab two and twenty 1. Kings 16.29 Ahaziah his sonne two 1. Kings 22.51 Joram twelve 2. Kings 3.1 And thus Omries stock continued fourty and two years and therefore it is said that Ahaziah who was of that stock by his mother Athaliah in his two and fourtieth yeare began his reigne But this answer methinks is more unsatisfactory then the other the words in 2. Chron. 22.2 will hardly bear such an interpretation And his mothers name was Athaliah the daughter of Omri king of Israel That is the grandchild of Omri the daughter of Ahab the sonne of Omri vers 18. Vers 27. He was the sonne in law of the house of Ahab That is the sonne of Ahabs sonne in law to wit the sonne of Joram by Athaliah Ahabs daughter yet perhaps even he also by his mother Athaliahs perswasion married a daughter of the house of Ahab though by another wife Joash was born who succeeded him in the throne chap. 12.1 Vers 28. And he went with Joram the sonne of Ahab to the warre against Hazael the king of Syria in Ramoth Gilead Toward the latter end of his reigne Joram king of Israel undertook the recovery of Ramoth Gilead out of the hands of Hazael then king of Syria which Ahab his father had formerly attempted with ill successe and Ahaziah the king of Judah his sisters sonne joyned with him in that expedition as Jehoshaphat had formerly done with Ahab Vers 29. And king Joram went back to be healed in Jezreel of the wounds which the Syrians had given him at Ramoth c. That is Ramoth Gilead having wonne the town and then manned it strongly leaving the chief of his army there behind him with his captains of whom Jehu was the chief he withdrew himself to Jezreel to be cured of the wounds which he received in this siege of Ramoth Gilead See the note chap. 9.14 CHAP. IX Vers 1. ANd Elisha the prophet called one of the children of the prophets and said unto him Gird up thy loins c. That is prepare thy self and go with speed the excution that was to be done by Jehu upon the house of Ahab was to be dispatched presently whilest Jehu had the army with him at Ramoth Gilead and Jehoram was gone from thence to Jezreel and therefore the prophet that was to give him his commission was sent with such speed which may also be the reason why aged Elisha went not himself but sent one of
still and so by that meanes without any noise he had made up such a number as would be able to deal with the queens ordinary guard for in probability they might be about three thousand men which accordingly under the command of their severall captains either the chief of the Levites or those commanders of souldiers whom he had sworn his associates in this designe he thus disposed of those that were newly to enter in that sabbath unto the service of the temple for the work it seems was to be done on the sabbath day he divided into three parts one part whereof he assigned to watch at the gate of the outer court that led to the kings palace which was the north gate the same it seems which is called vers 19. the gate of the guard where Athaliah now was that no body might thence break in upon them another part he assigned to be at the gate of Sur which was the east gate that led into the city called also the gate of the foundation 2. Chron. 23.5 another part to ward at the south gate called here the gate behind the guard that is the gate right opposite against that gate where the kings guard used to stand which led to the kings house Again those that were to go out from the service of the temple that sabbath he divided into two parts and appointed them to be a guard in the temple unto the kings person the one on his right hand the other on his left Many conjectures I find amongst Expositours very different from this which I have noted both concerning the disposing of the Levites and concerning the gates at which they were set but herein it is hard indeed to determine the certainty because the passages are so obscure Vers 6 So shall ye keep the watch of the house that it be not broken down That is that the watch be not disordered by the breaking in of any body whereby the temple may be profaned by the rushing in of those that ought not to enter into it the person of our young king may be endangered and the businesse we have in hand may be utterly overthrown Vers 8. And he that cometh within the ranges let him be slain By the ranges are meant the rankes of the Levites thus ranged in their places according to the order of military discipline which if any should offer to break through by force they were appointed to slay them Vers 10. And to the captains over hundreds did the priest-give king Davids speares c. To wit for themselves and for their men These speares and shields might be such as David had taken in the warres and had laid up in the tabernacle as he did the sword of Goliath as memorials of the great victories that God had given him which were afterward by Solomon removed into the temple but however I conceive that there was an armoury in the temple provided purposely that they might be in a readinesse for the guarding and defence of that holy place upon all occasions and that because there were now found there weapons for so many thousands as were at present imployed and happely because for this as for other things David had given directions to his sonne Solomon therefore they are called here Davids speares and shields that were in the temple had they been to bâ—ing in men ready armed into the temple they could hardly have carried the businesse so closely as they did but the Levites being the men appointed for this exploit and they coming in unarmed as at other times for the service of Gods house and being there armed out of the Magazine that was in a readinesse in the temple there was not the least noise or suspition of any thing that was intended till it was put in execution Vers 12. And he brought forth the kings sonne and put the crown upon him and gave him the testimonie c. That is the book of the law as was enjoyned Deut. 17.18 Ver. 13. And when Athaliah heard the noise of the guard and of the people she came to the people into the temple of the Lord. That is when she heard the noise of the guard in the temple shouting and clapping their hands when the king was crown'd and the people running in the streets and making towards the temple with many unusuall acclamations and expressions of joy as it is expressed 2. Chron. 23.12 Athaliah heard the noise of the people running and praising the king she went to see what was done in the temple not any whit suspecting that which was done and so through the providence of God did unwittingly cast her self into their hands nor was it against the charge given by Jehoiada vers 8. he that cometh within the ranges let him be slain that she was suffered to come within the ranges because she came not in an hostile manner but quietly came in amongst them without any mistrust or fear and it must needs be known to be of great advantage to get her within their power Vers 14. And when she looked behold the king stood by a pillar as the manner was c. Where it seems the throne for the king was erected but the most of Expositours understand this of the brazen scaffold which Solomon made in the Temple 2. Chron. 6.13 the like is noted afterward of Josiah chap. 23.3 And the king stood by a pillar and made a covenant c. Vers 16. And they laid hands on her and she went by the way by the which the horses came into the kings house c. Some understand this of the way into the citie where was the horse gate mentioned Neh. 3.28 and Jer. 31.40 but the words do clearly enough shew that it was the ordinary horse and cart way that led into the court where were the stables and other out-houses that belonged to the kings palace and therefore it is said vers 20. that they slew Athaliah with the sword beside the kings house even in the place of her death they sought to cast reproch upon her her mother Jezebel was troden under the horse heels and now she was dragged by the horse way and slain amongst the stables and dunghills of the kings house Vers 18. And all the people of the land went into the house of Baal and brake it down his altars c. And the more chearfully no doubt they did this because they would not be behind the Israelites where Jehu had already suppressed the idolatry of Baal as they did now in the kingdome of Judah And the priest appointed officers over the house of the Lord. That is Jehoiada appointed officers for the watch of the Lords house the rather for fear of danger in this sudden change and withall perhaps reduced into order whatever besides had been disordered in the dayes of Athaliah 2. Chron. 24.7 For the sonnes of Athaliah that wicked woman had broken up the house of God c. Vers 19. They brought down the king from the
the kingdome of the ten tribes as well as those of Judah and Benjamin the advice which he took with his counsel 2. Chron. 25.17 Then Amaziah king of Judah took counsel and advise and sent to Joash the sonne of Jehoahaz the sonne of Jehu saying Come let us see one another in the face seems to imply that they debated amongst them these just grounds which he had to make warre against the king of Israel and most likely it is that these things were objected by him in this challenge that he sent but because he sent this message in an insolent manner as one that did rather desire to decide the businesse by the sword then to have it otherwise composed and to try the strength and courage of the king of Israel in a pitched battel therefore is this onely expressed that he challenged him to meet him in the field and give him battel face to face for that is the meaning of these words Come let us look one another in the face Vers 9. The thistle that was in Lebanon sent to the cedar that was in Lebanon c. Thus Joash answered Amaziah by a parable and the drift of it was to put Amaziah in mind how vain a thing it was for them that are comparatively weak and of little strength easily overborn and troden down to entertain proud and aspiring thoughts concerning themselves as if they were above the reach of danger and he makes the thistles pride in this parable to be the desiring of the cedars daughter for his sonnes wife therein to couch secretly an argument from the lesse to the greater if it were too much for the thistle to offer affinitie with the cedar much more then to make warre against the cedar which he would have Amaziah know was just his case because he looked upon Amaziah as a poore weak and contemptible king in comparison of himself though proud and quarrelsome he compares him to a thistle the basest of all shrubs though full of prickles and himself who had ten of the tribes of Israel under his command whereas the other had but two to a cedar the most noble of all trees onely he compares Amaziah to a thistle in Lebanon as well as himself to a cedar in Lebanon because Amaziah was a king as well as he again from the foolish pride in the thistle in sending such a message he implies how farre greater the pride and folly of Amaziah was in sending such a challenge to him and last of all by shewing what became of the thistle There passed by a wild beast that was in Lebanon and trode down the thistle he gives Amaziah to understand what his end would be if he persevered in his resolution to make warre against him to wit that his forces would easily crush and ruine him and indeed the miseries that would befall him are well compared to the treading down of a wild beast because warre bellum quasi bellua doth usually destroy and tread down all before it and souldiers as men void of all reason and carried on merely with fury and brutish passions are wont without all consideration in a rude and brutish manner to beat and trample down all where they come and therefore is the time of warre called a day of trouble and treading down Isa 22.5 Vers 11. But Amaziah would not heare To wit because God would have him punished for his idolatry whereunto he was then newly fallen upon his victory against the Edomites 2. Chron. 25.20 But Amaziah would not heare for it came of God that he might deliver them into the hand of their enemies because they sought after the Gods of Edom. Therefore Jehoash king of Israel went up c. That is he stay not till the enemie brake in and spoiled his countrey but entred the kingdome of Judah and so encountred with him in Beth-shemesh which belonged to Judah which is added because there was another Beth-shemesh in the tribe of Naphtali Josh 19.38 Vers 13. And Jehoash king of Israel took Amaziah c. And thus in this Amaziah the sonne of Joash God did yet further revenge the death of Zachariah the sonne of Jehoiada who was most inhumanely and ungratefully murthered in his fathers dayes according to that which he said at his death the Lord look upon it and require it and withall Amaziah himself was severely punished for his Apostacy to idolatry upon his victory over the Edomites And brake down the wall of Jerusalem from the gate of Ephraim unto the corner gate foure hundred cubits Some conceive that this part of the wall was broken down that the inhabitants might be rendred hereby the more fearfull to attempt any thing against the kingdome of Israel the strength of the citie being so farre impaired but such a breach that might be so easily made up again could be no great curb to them others say that it was done at Joash his command that at that breach he might enter the citie in his chariot carrying the king before him as in triumph but why should foure hundred cubits of the wall be beaten down that he might enter with his chariot more probable therefore it is that the citie at first standing out against him he battered down that part of the wall by the north gate which was towards Ephraim and therefore called the gate of Ephraim and so took the citie by force Vers 14. And he took all the gold and silver c. and hostages and returned to Samaria These hostages he took for assurance of their performing the conditions he had imposed upon them but having Jerusalem in possession and their king his prisoner why did he not seize upon the kingdome and joyn the twelve tribes again under his government I answer that which lately had befallen Athaliah shewed plainly how constantly affected the people stood to the house of David neither could he tell what forces the people abroad in the countrey might presently raise against him no marvell therefore though he chose rather to go away with a certain spoil then to hazard all by aiming at the crown of Judah upon such weak and uncertain terms Vers 16. And Jehoash slept with his fathers See the note chap. 13.13 It seems he out-lived not long that sacrilegious act of his in robbing the Temple of Jerusalem Vers 17. And Amaziah the sonne of Joash king of Judah lived after the death of Jehoash sonne of Jehoahaz king of Israel fifteen years To wit un-unto the fifteenth yeare of Jeroboam the sonne of Joash king of Israel See the note verse 2. Vers 19. Now they made a conspiracy against him in Jerusalem c. Ascribing all the miseries that had befallen their citie and kingdome to him who had provoked the king of Israel to invade their land whereupon Jerusalem was taken and pillaged c. they were enraged against him and so conspired together to take away his life which though he discovered and fled to Lachish yet they pursued him thither and there
order before thy death Hezekiah had not yet a sonne to succeed him in the throne for Manasseh was borne three years after this as being but twelve years old at his fathers death chap. 21.1 and therefore it is probable that this was one chief thing which Isaiah had respect to in these words that he should advise and determine what was requisite concerning his successour for saith he thou shalt dye and not live that is thou art but a dead man by the ordinary course of nature there is no way of recovery for thee unlesse the Lord shall be pleased by his almighty power to deliver thee it is true indeed this condition was not expressed yet was it understood the Lord purposely or else where concealing this part of his will that Hezekiah receiving the sentence of death in himself might the more earnestly seek for help unto the Lord and that Hezekiah took it for a conditionall threatning and not a declaration of what God had absolutely determined is evident by his praying to God for mercy herein Vers 2. Then he turned his face to the wall and prayed c. To wit either because that wall was towards the Temple or rather to hide his tears and that being thereby the freer from distractions he might the more freely poure forth his requests unto God to whom he now turned as to his onely hope and comfort Vers 3. I beseech thee O Lord remember now how I have walked before thee in truth c. Besides that love of life and horrour of death which is naturally in all men and which grace hath much adoe to overmaster even in the best of Gods servants there were many things that made the sentence of death in a speciall manner terrible to Hezekiah as first because he had yet no sonne to succeed him in the throne chap. 21.1 and it must needs be very grievous to him to think that the promise made to David and Solomon 1. Kings 8.25 There shall not fail thee a man in my sight to sit on the throne of Israel should not be made good to him in his posteritie who had to his utmost endeavoured to keep the condition required of God at the giving of that promise Secondly because he could not but fear lest upon his death Religion would go to wrack again lest the reformation newly begun would soon come to nothing and the poore Church of God would quickly be overgrown with superstition again Thirdly because he saw that those that had been already forward enough to ascribe all the calamities that had befallen the kingdome in his time to his suppressing their high places altars and idols would be now much more bold to insult over him if God should thus suddenly cut him off And fourthly especially because his own faith must needs be sorely assaulted and shaken with these temptations and that the rather because the coming of the Prophet to him in such a manner as Gods Herald to threaten him with death Thou shalt die and not live might seem to imply that God meant to hew him down in displeasure doubtlesse in these regards the heart of Hezekiah was almost overwhelmed with terrours as himself afterward expressed in his song Isa 38.10 14. and hence it is that in this his prayer he pleads his integritie that what he had done in the reformation of his kingdome he had done with an upright heart because he knew it was good in his eyes not by way of expostulation or pleading his merits but to support and strengthen his faith against these temptations that he might with the more hope and confidence call upon God and might by this argument move the Lord to shew him mercy Vers 4. And it came to passe afore Isaiah was gone out into the middle court c. Some reade this afore Isaiah was gone out into the middle citie and indeed it is by many held that Jerusalem was divided into three parts whereof one was the citie of David which is called Zion another that which was of old called Jebus or Salem and a third that which lay betwixt these two and joyned them together and was called the middle citie the same where Huldah the prophetesse dwelt chap. 22.14 for so some reade that place she dwelt in Jerusalem in the second part and accordingly they understand this place that before the Prophet was gone out of the citie of David into the middle citie the Lord sent him back to Hezekiah with a promise of recovery but because the text seems most plainly to speak of the Prophets going out of the kings house and the tender compassion of God in the speedy sending back of the Prophet to comfort the afflicted soul of Hezekiah is the more eminently discovered by this that afore Isaiah was gone out into the middle court of the kings house he was sent back again to the king this translation is justly put into the text of our Bibles as the best and this middle court I take to be the same which is called the court within the porch 1. Kings 7.8 Vers 5. Thus saith the Lord the God of David thy father I have heard thy prayer c. In sending to Hezekiah the promise of his recovery the Lord stiles himself the God of David his father because the promise made to David concerning the continued succession of his seed in the throne of Judah should by this means be made good to Hezekiah who should now live to have an heir to succeed him even as in former time to imply that God would perform to the Israelites what he had promised to Abraham Isaac and Jacob he used to stile himself the God of Abraham the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob. On the third day thou shalt go up unto the house of the Lord. The suddennesse of his recovery makes it evident that it was miraculous and the mention of his going to the house of the Lord sweetens the tidings of his recovery since nothing could more glad his heart then to heaâ—e that having received the sentence of death in himself he should yet again praise God in his holy Temple Vers 6. And I will deliver thee and this citie out of the hand of the king of Assyria c. Though Sennacherib were returned as is most probable into his own countrey yet first there might be some garrisons left behind here and there in the cities he had taken and secondly just cause had Hezekiah to fear that having reinforced his army he would return again and endeavour to wipe of the stain of his present flight and to remove those fears the Lord assures him that as he had so he would still deliver both him and Jerusalem out of the hand of the Assyrian Vers 7. And Isaiah said Take a lump of dry figges c. That is a masse made of drie figges Both the boil that Hezekiah had in this dangerous sicknesse and the masse of figges appointed to be laid to the boil which are
a pillar in the Temple for the king to stand on of which see the note chap. 11.14 and therefore 2. Chron. 34.31 it is said of Josiah that he stood in his place And all the people stood to the covenant That is they consented to renew their covenant with God and promised that they would do according to the covenant Vers 4. And the king commanded Hilkiah the high priest c. Josiah did begin to purge Judah and Jerusalem from the high places and the groves and the idols which the people had worshiped in the twelfth yeare of his reigne which was six years before the book of the law was found 2. Chron. 34.3 but upon his hearing of those grievous threatnings in the book of the law against idolatry he now proceeded further and perfected that work of reformation which was then began and therefore it is that in the Chronicles the penman of the sacred historie undertaking to relate the reformation that Josiah wrought in the twelfth yeare of his reigne he addes also what was done afterward when the book of the law was found and on the other side speaking here how he suppressed idolatry upon the hearing of the law he joynes also many things which were done of the same nature in the twelfth yeare of his reigne that all his zealous acts in rooting out idolatry might be related together As here that he commanded Hilkiah the high priest and the priests of the second order c. to bring out all the idolatrous trash that was in the Temple where by the priests of the second order may be meant the inferiour priests called priests of the second order with respect to the high priest or rather the first two chief priests of the two stocks of Eliazer and Ithamar of whom see the note 2. Sam. 8.17 Some Interpreters understand it of the priests of the order of Jedaiah the second of those twenty foure orders of the priests appointed by David 1. Chron. 24.1.7 but it is hard to say why they should be employed in purging the Temple rather then the rest of the priests And he burnt them without Jerusalem in the fields of Kidron and carried the ashes of them unto Beth-el Therewith to defile the prime seat of Jeroboams idolatry and withall to expresse his detestation of these idols and that idolatry there first erected from whence the infection had overspread the whole land and had been the main cause of all the evil that was fallen upon the people of God By the Law whatever touched the graves of dead men it was unclean and thus he manifested his detestation of these idolatrous monuments and that he esteemed them as most filthy things fi◠onely for such unclean places Nor need it seem strange that Josiah should have this power in Beth-el which was a citie of Samaria the kingdome of the ten tribes for first Abijah the sonne of Rehoboam had long since taken Beth-el from Jeroboam and annexed it to the kingdome of Judah 2. Chron. 13.19 And Abijah pursued after Jeroboam and took cities from him Beth-el with the towns thereof and so perhaps it had ever since continued and secondly it seems that the greatest part of the kingdome of Samaria was at this time under the dominion of Josiah whence is that vers 19. And all the houses also of the high places that were in the cities of Samaria which the kings of Israel had made to provoke the Lord to anger Josiah took away and did to them according to all the acts that he had done in Beth-el of which two reasons probable enough may be supposed for first it may be after the flight and death of Sennacherib when Merodach opposed himself against Esar-haddon his son Hezekiah took aduantage of this faction in the North and laid hold upon so much of the kingdome of Israel as he was able to people or secondly perhaps the same reason that moved the Babylonian king to set Manasseh free when he was his prisoner in Babylon did also perswade him to give him with his libertie the dominion of the greatest part of the countrey of Samaria to wit that he might defend these territories against the Egyptian who begun in these times with great power and successe to oppose the Babylonians and indeed the earnestnesse of Josiah in the king of Babels quarrel notwithstanding the kings of Judah had so long held great amitie with those of Egypt 2. Chron. 35.20 21 22. doth argue that the composition which Manasseh had made with that king or his Ancestour was upon such friendly terms as required not onely a faithfull observation but also a thankfull requitall Vers 5. And he put down the idolatrous priests whom the kings of Judah had ordained to burn incense c. The word in the originall here translated idolatrous priests is Chemarim and because we find them mentioned Zeph 1.4 as distinct from the priests I will cut off the remnant of Baal from this place and the name of the Chemarims with the priests therefore many Expositours hold that they were certain ministers of their idolatry different from the priests such as the monks are among the papists or at least that they were a peculiar sort of priests so called either because they wore black or coloured garments or because they lived a retired life in cells and cloisters or because of their fierie zeal and fervencie in their Religion or because they were peculiarly employed in burning incense Vers 6. And he brought out the grove from the house of the Lord c. By the grove is meant either the image or similitude of a grove which was hanged up in the Temple or rather a very grove which idolatours for devotion had planted near unto the Temple contrary to the commandment of the Lord Deut. 16.21 Thou shalt not plant thee a grove of any trees near unto the altar of the Lord thy God which therefore Josiah did now cut down and removed from the Temple burning it at the brook Kidron without Jerusalem and then cast the powder thereof upon the graves of the children of the people to wit both in contempt of the idols and in reproch of those that had worshipped them in their lives for this is plainly implied 2. Chron. 34.4 Vers 7. And he brake down the houses of the sodomites that were by the house of the Lord c. These Sodomites 〈◊〉 were kept and maintained not onely for the satisfying of mens unnaturall lust but also for the honour of their idol-gods whom they thought pleased with such horrid uncleannesse and therefore were their houses built close to the Temple and here the women wove hangings for the grove with which hangings they compassed in many severall places in the groves as so many severall tents and chappels◠darker the fitter for those horrid deeds of darknesse which were there done for there they worshipped their idols and defiled themselves with all kind both of spirituall and bodily uncleannesse Vers 8. And he brought
c That is all these families were of the stock of Hananiel Vers 22. And the sonnes of Shechaniah Shemaiah and the sonnes of Shemaiah Hattush and Igeal and Bariah and Neariah and Shaphat six That is the sonnes of Shechaniah were six to wit reckoning his sonne Shemaiah and his five grand-children the sonnes of Shemaiah CHAP. IIII. Vers 1. THe sonnes of Judah Pharez Hezron c. That is the posterity of Judah for onely Pharez was Judahs sonne immediately and Hezron was the sonne of Pharez and Carmi called also Chelubai and Caleb was the sonne of Hezron chap. 2.9 18. and Hur was the sonne of Carmi or Caleb chap. 2.19 and Shobal was the sonne of Caleb the sonne of Hur chap. 2.50 and Reaiah or Haroe chap. 2.52 was the sonne of Shobal and because this Shobals posterity were here to be more fully expressed vers 2. therefore in the first verse it is shewen briefly how he was lineally descended from Judah from hence unto the tenth chapter the families of all the severall tribes are expressed besides Zebulon and Dan and Dan some say is omitted because there was but one family of that tribe to wit the family of Hushim Gen. 46.23 But why the genealogies of these two tribes are omitted I conceive we cannot certainly say yet see what is noted afterwards chap. 7.6 Vers 3. And these were of the father of Etam c. It is not expressed who was this father of Etam that is this father of the inhabitants of Etam onely by the last words of the fourth verse it is clear that both he and his sonnes were of the posterity of Hur and perhaps by Shobal the sonne of Caleb the sonne of Hur as those were mentioned in the former verses for in the latter end of the fourth verse with reference to that which went before it is said These are the sonnes of Hur the first-born of Ephratah that is the first born of Caleb by his wife Ephratah chap. 2.19 the father of Beth-lehem for he was the grandfather of Salmah who was the father of the inhabitants of Beth-lehem chap. 2.50 51. Vers 5. And Ashur the father of Tekoa had two wives c. This Ashur was the posthumus sonne of Hezron born of his wife Abiah after Hezron was dead chap. 2.24 Vers 8. And Coz begat Anub and Zobebah and the families of Aharhel c. It is not expressed here who was the father of this Coz but by the joyning of these words to those that went before it may seem that he was the sonne of Helah or Ethnan the last mentioned in the former verse and so of the posterity of Ashur Vers 9. And Jabez was more honourable then his brethren c. Jabez is here mentioned as the father of one of the forenamed families of Aharhel Vers 11. And Chelub the brother of Shuah begat Mehir c. This Chelub is as I conceive added as another head of the families of Aharhel mentioned vers 8. Vers 12. These are the men of Recah That is these sonnes of Chelub were the inhabitants of Rechah Vers 13. And the sonnes of Kenaz Othniel c. It is not expressed whose sonne Kenaz was but probably it may be thought by the adding of this to that which went before that he was the sonne of Chelub vers 11. Vers 14. And Meonothai begat Ophrah Who was also as it seems the sonne of Othniel as was also Hathath mentioned in the former verse And Seraiah begat Joab the father of the valley of Charashim c. Or craftsmen which stood in the confines of Judah and Benjamin See Neh. 11.31 35. Vers 15. And the sonnes of Caleb the sonne of Jephunneh c. Who was the sonne of Kenaz or at least of his posterity and therefore called the Kenezite Numb 32.12 Vers 16. And the sonnes of Jehaleleel Ziph and Zipha Tyria and Asareel And Jehaleleel was also it seems the sonne of Kenaz mentioned the last in the foregoing verse Vers 17. And the sonnes of Ezra were Jether c. The sonne as it seems of Asareel And she bare Miriam c. To wit the wife of Ezra Vers 18. And his wife Jehudijah bare Jered c. This was a second wife of Ezra And these are the sonnes of Bithiah the daughter of Pharaoh which Mered took c. The sonnes of Ezra being named here we have next expressed the sonnes of Mered who was one of Ezra's sonnes vers 17. He had it seems also two wives the first Bithiah the daughter of Pharaoh as here it is expressed the second Hodiah the sister of Maham vers 19. and by these Mered had the father of Keilah the Garmite and Eshtemoa the Maachathite vers 19. This I conceive is the plainest exposition of this intricate place Vers 20. And the sonnes of Shimon were Amnon and Rinnah Ben-hanan and Tilon It is not expressed whose sonne this Shimon was onely it is generally thought that he is reckoned as one of Chelubs posterity mentioned vers 11. And the sonnes of Ishi were Zoheth and Ben-zoeth This Ishi was happely the sonne of Filan before mentioned Vers 22. Who had the dominion in Moab c. It seems that in the times when the Moabites were tributaries to the kings of Judah these sonnes of Shelah before mentioned were by their appointment governours in Moab Vers 23. These were the potters and those that dwelt amongst plants and hedges there they dwelt with the king for his work That is of these sonnes of Shelah came also those that were potters and those that dwelt amongst plants and hedges that is those that were gardiners and husbandmen to the kings of Judah Vers 24. The sonnes of Simeon were Nemuel c. Because the tribe of Simeon had their inheritance assigned them within the inheritance of the children of Judah Josh 19.1 therefore is their genealogy here joyned with Judahs Here are but five sonnes of Simeon mentioned whereas Gen. 46.10 there are six mentioned which may be because happely one of them never came to be reckoned as the head of a family yea happely died without issue nor need we be troubled that their names are not the same since the Israelites had usually two or three severall names Vers 31. These were their cities unto the reigne of David Either this is added because there was in the cities of Simeon some alteration in Davids time to wit because one of these cities namely Ziklag having been in the possession of the Philistines was by Achish given to David and thenceforth being a part of the crown land of the kings of Judah it was ordinarily reckoned one of Judahs cities or else onely to expresse that even unto Davids time not excluding the times following they were esteemed the inheritance of Simeon as here is said Yet some understand this clause thus These were their cities unto the reigne of David that is so long as the kingdome of Judah remained in Davids posterity to wit untill the captivity of Babylon Vers 32. And
Vers 4. Eleazar begat Phinehas Phinehas begat Abishua c. Eleazar succeeded his father Aaron in the high priesthood in the fourtieth yeare after their coming out of Egypt Numb 20.25 c. and 33.18 and was high priest all the time of Joshua and died immediately after him as may seem by the relation of their deaths together Josh 24.29 33. Phinehas his sonne that succeeded him was he that slew Zimri and Cozbi in the wildernesse and had thereupon a promise from God that the high priesthood should be settled upon him and his seed for ever see Numb 25.7 13. He succeeded his father Eleazar about the death of Joshua Josh 24.29 33. How long he lived high priest it is no where expressed but probable it is he was high priest all the time that the people served the Lord after Joshuahs death in the dayes of the elders that out-lived Joshua Judg. 2.7 and perhaps in the time of the first revolting of the people in the time of the Judges which must needs then be a matter of much grief to a man of such zeal as he was for it is evident that when the Israelites made warre against Benjamin he was high priest Josh 20.28 And Phinehas the sonne of Eleazar the sonne of Aaron stood before it in those dayes As for the next three that follow Abishau Bukki his sonne and Vzzi his sonne they were it seems high priests in those corruptest times of Israel under the Judges whereto agrees that which is by some said that in the dayes of Uzzi it was that Eli and so his posterity after him got the high priests office not being of Eleazars stock but of the stock of Ithamar and if so it were then the foure next following of the stock of Eleazar were never high priests to wit Zerahiah and Meraioth and Amariah and Ahitub but Zadok the sonne of Ahitub vers 8. was the first that recovered that dignity again which was in the dayes of Solomon who thrust out Abiathar of the posterity of Eli and of the stock of Ithamar from being high priest and put Zadok the sonne of Ahitub in his room 1. Kings 2.27 35. Vers 10. And Johanan begat Azariah he it is that executed the priests office in the temple that Solomon built in Jerusalem That is this is that Azariah of whom such honourable mention is made in the book of the Chronicles 2. Chron. 26.16 c. who did so worthily execute maintain the honour and office of the priesthood against the intrusion and usurpation of Uzziah the king of Judah and it is expressely noted that it was in the temple which Solomon built in Jerusalem because at the time when this was written there was another Temple in Jerusalem built by Zerub-babel Yet some understand these words of Johanan the father of Azariah that he was that Jehoiada that was high priest in the dayes of Athaliah by whom both the Temple and Common-wealth were preserved when they were in danger to be ruined by her Vers 13. And Shallum begat Hilâ—iah Who found the book of the Law in the dayes of Josiah 2. Kings 22.8 Vers 14. And Azariah begat Seraiah c. Seraiah was the high priest whom Nebuchadnezzar slew see 2. Kings 25.18 21. He was also the father or grand-father of Ezra Ezra 7.1 Now after these things in the reigne of Artaxerxes king of Persia Ezra the sonne of Seraiah the sonne of Azariah the sonne of Hilkiah c. and then Jehozadak his sonne was the father of Josuah who was so famous at the return of the Jews and the rebuilding of the Temple Hag. 1.1 In the second yeare of Darius the king in the sixth moneth in the first day of the moneth came the word of the Lord by Haggai the Prophet unto Zerubbabel the sonne of Shealtiel governour of Judah and to Josuah the sonne of Josedech the high priest Vers 19. And these are the families of the Levites according to their fathers That is of these before named were the severall families of the Levites called to wit the family of the Libnites c. Vers 20. Of Gershom Libni his sonne Jahath his sonne Zimmah his sonne c. Here follows a catalogue of those that were successively the Heads both of the Gershonites Kohathites and Merarites perhaps unto the dayes of David who did dispose of the Levites into new orders and whereas Zimmah is here said to be the sonne of Jahath thereby is meant that he was his grandchild for Shimei was the sonne of Jahath and Zimmah the sonne of Shimei vers 42 43. Vers 25. And the sonnes of Elkanah Amasai and Ahimoth The sonnes of Elkanah are here more particularly expressed because from him descended that Elkanah who was the father of Samuel Vers 26. As for Elkanah the sonnes of Elkanah Zophai his sonne c. This is another Elkanah who was the sonne of Mahath and grandchild of Amasai mentioned in the former verse as is evident vers 35 36. Vers 27. Jeroham his sonne Elkanah his sonne The father of Samuel Vers 31. And these are they whom David set over the service of song in the house of the Lord c. That is these are they that David made chief in the three quires of singers after the Ark had rest that is after it was brought to Davids house for before it was removed from one place to another to wit these mentioned in the sequel of this chapter Heman of the Kohathites ver 33. who was the chief and therefore had the middle quire and Asaph who stood on Hemans right hand v. 39. and was of the Gershonites and Ethan who was also called Jeduthun chap. 25.1 and was of the Merarites and stood on Hemans left hand ver 44. These were in their times famous men as being the chief singers and withall Prophets and pen-men of some of the Psalmes 2. Chron. 29.30 Moreover Hezekiah the king and the princes commanded the Levites to sing praise unto the Lord with the words of David and of Asaph the seer Vers 33. Heman a singer the sonne of Joel the sonne of Shemuel That is Samuel for Heman was Samuels grandchild Vers 50. And these are the sonnes of Aaron Eleazar his sonne Phinehas his sonne c. By occasion of the mention that is made of the severall offices and imployments of the priests in the foregoing verse the catalogue of the sonnes of Eleazar is here again set down unto the dayes of David by whom the priests were divided into foure severall orders Vers 57. And to the sonnes of Aaron they gave the cities of Judah c. And Simeon Josh 21.9 And they gave out of the tribe of the children of Judah and out of the tribe of the children of Simeon these cities which are here mentioned by name Vers 60. All their cities throughout their families were thirteen cities To wit the eleven here mentioned and Ain in Judahs portion and Gibeon in Benjamins which are reckoned amongst the rest Josh 21.16 17. but
the Israelites that is those who first returned from Babylon and were again settled in their severall possessions were the children of Israel for not onely those of Judah and Benjamin but some also of the other tribes returned thence vers 3. to wit such as sled to Judah when the ten tribes were first carried away by Tiglath-pileser and Shalmaneser and such as did at first leave the land of Israel when Jeroboam did first set up his golden calves there the priests also the Levites and the Nethinims that is as the word signifieth men given to wit to God and to the service of the Temple and it is meant of the Gibeonites see the note Josh 9.21 Vers 3. And in Jerusalem dwelt of the children of Judah and of the children of Benjamin c. To wit every tenth man amongst them chosen by lot and such as did besides voluntarily offer themselves to dwell there Nehem. 11.1 2. And the rulers of the people dwelt at Jerusalem the rest of the people also cast lots to bring one of ten to dwell in Jerusalem the holy city and nine parts to dwell in other cities And the people blessed the men that willingly offered themselves to dwell at Jerusalem Vers 5. And of the Shilonites Asaiah the first born c. That is the sonnes of Shiloni Neh. 11.5 and he that is here called Asaiah is in likelyhood the same that is there called Maaseiah Vers 7. Sallu the sonne of Meshullam the sonne of Hodaviah the sonne of Hasenuah c. Nehem. 11.7 Meshullam is said to be the sonne of Joed the sonne of Pedaiah either therefore Meshullams father was called both Joed and Hodaviah and his grandfather both Pedaiah and Hasenuah or else these here mentioned were his father and grandfather and those mentioned in Nehemiah were his progenitours farther off Vers 9. And their brethren according to their generations nine hundred and fifty and six Nehem. 11.8 they are said to have been nine hundred twenty and eight but there it may seem onely those are numbred that were chosen by lot to dwell in Jerusalem here those also that did voluntarily proffer themselves to dwell there Nehem. 11.2 And the people blessed all the men that willingly offered themselves to dwell at Jerusalem Vers 11. And Azariah the sonne of Hilkiah c. Called also Seraiah Neh. 11.11 and it is said here that this Azariah or Seraiah was the ruler of the house of God to wit at the return of the people from Babylon whereby is not meant that he was high priest for Joshua was then high priest Hagg. 1.1 but that he was the chief or one of the chief of the inferiour priests who were called the second priests Numb 3.32 And of his brethren there were when they returned from Babylon eight hundred twenty and two Nehem. 11.12 Vers 12. And Adaiah the sonne of Jeroham the sonne of Pashur c. Neh. 11.12 it is evident that there were three descents between Pashur and Jeroham and there also vers 13. it is expressed that of his brethren there were two hundred fourty and two And Maasiai the sonne of Adiel the sonne of Jahzerah c. Nehem. 11.13 he is called Amashai the sonne of Azareel the sonne of Ahasiai the sonne of Meshilemoh the sonne of Immer and of this family it is said that there were vers 14. an hundred twenty and eight Vers 14. And of the Levites Shemaiah c. Having formerly set down the chief of the priests that returned from Babylon here he also addes who were the chief of the Levites that returned of whom there were at Jerusalem besides those that were seated elsewhere and the porters and others afterwards mentioned two hundred fourescore and foure as is noted Nehem. 11.18 Vers 15. Mattaniah the sonne of Micah the sonne of Zichri Called also Zabdi Nehem. 11.17 Vers 16. And Obadiah the sonne of Shemaiah that dwelt in the villages of the Netophathites Who were of the tribe of Judah amongst whom the Levites were seated at first till their cites could be assigned them Vers 17. And the porters were Shallum and Akkub c. That is these were the chief for of them in all there were an hundred seventy and two Nehem. 11.19 besides those that were porters in the inner entries vers 21 22. Vers 18. Who hitherto waited in the kings gate eastward That is Shallum the chief of them and those of his course or family unto the time of the writing of this book waited in the east gate which was called the kings gate because formerly the kings of Judah used to go into the Temple at that gate Vers 19. And Shallum the sonne of Kore and his brethren of the house of his father the Korahites were over the work of the service keepers of the gates of the Tabernacle That is he and the rest of the Korahites were keepers of all the outer gates of the tabernacle or Temple for even the Temple is sometimes called the tabernacle And their fathers being over the host of the Lord were keepers of the entry That is and the fathers of them the heads and chief of them kept the entry that is the entry by which they passed from the outer court into the court of the priests the inward gate or else it may be meant of the fathers of these Levites who waited upon the tabernacle before the Temple was built and so is added onely to shew that these Levites were now keepers of the gates of the temple as their fathers in former times had waited at the entry of the Tabernacle and were over the host of the Lord that is over the Levites when after the manner of an host or army they pitched about the Tabernacle when the Israelites went through the wildernesse And indeed this exposition seems the more probable because of that which follows in the next verse Vers 20. And Phinehas the sonne of Eleazar was the ruler over them in time past That is Phinehas the sonne of Eleazar the sonne of Aaron had the chief command over the Levites in time past Vers 21. And Zechariah the sonne of Meshelemiah was porter of the doore of the Tabernacle of the congregation That is he and perhaps his brethren was porter of the doore that led out of the priests court into the Temple so that his was of all the chief place see chap. 26.1 2. Vers 22. All these which were chosen to be porters in the gates were two hundred and twelve See the note above vers 17. and Nehem. 11. and chap. 23.5 These were reckoned by their genealogies in their villages whom David and Samuel the seer did ordain in their set office That is whereas before the dayes of Samuel the Levites did all promiscuously intend the whole service of the Tabernacle when Samuel judged Israel 1. Sam. 7.6 he it seems began to divide the work amongst them and to appoint them their severall charges and imployments which David afterward did much perfect appointing so many
free-will-offerings of God c. As these before mentioned vers 12 13. had the charge of keeping the offerings and tithes and dedicate things so Kore and those under him mentioned vers 15. had the charge of distributing them to the priests and Levites to whom they belonged Vers 16. Beside their genealogie of males from three years old and upward c. Here is expressed more particularly who they were to whom these holy things were distributed to wit besides the males of three years old and upward but under the age of twenty years who had also their portion allotted to them vers 18. they give both to the priests and Levites from twenty years old and upwards as they came in their courses to do their service in the house of the Lord yea and besides vers 18. they gave to all that were registred in the genealogies of the priests and Levites even to their little ones their wives and their sonnes and their daughters through all the congregation Vers 18. For in their set office they sanctified themselves in holinesse That is in this their office to which they were sanctified and set apart they did faithfully and in an holy manner discharge that trust that was reposed in them and were carefull to keep themselves from pollution that so they might be capable of eating these holy things Vers 19. Also the sonnes of Aaron the priests which were in the fields of the suburbs of their cities c. That is besides those mentioned before vers 14 15. that were to distribute the holy things to those that dwelt in Jerusalem or that came up thither in their severall courses for the service of the Temple there were others also chosen who were then expressed by name of the priests that dwelt in the other cities of the kingdome that were to give portions to the priests and Levites that were then abiding in those places and not attending in Jerusalem upon the service of God in the Temple CHAP. XXXII Vers 1. SEnnacherib king of Assyria came and entred into Judah and encamped against the fenced cities c. See the notes 2. Kings 18.13 c. for many severall passages in this chapter And thought to winne them for himself That is resolved to take them for himself and indeed accordingly he took many of them 2. Kings 18.13 Vers 3. He took counsel with his princes and his mighty men to stop the waters of the fountains which were without the citie That is to fill up the fountains and springs with earth and to carry the waters by pipes under ground into the citie that so the Assyrians if they came against Jerusalem might be distressed for want of water whilest they within the citie were abundantly supplyed And they did help him That is his Princes and his mighty men aided him in this work Vers 4. Who stopt all the fountains and the brook that ran through the midst of the land c. That is the brook Gihon of which vers 30. that ranne through the midst of the countrey where Jerusalem stood See 1. Kings 1.33 Vers 10. Whereon do ye trust that ye abide in the siege in Jerusalem That is being thus shut up without hope of help yet notwithstanding ye still refuse to yield up the citie Vers 17. He wrote also letters to rail on the Lord God of Israel c. To wit upon Rabshakeh his return to Sennacherib at Libnah and the report of the approch of Tirhakah the king of Ethiopia See 2. Kings 19.8 9. Vers 18. To affright them and to trouble them that they might take the citie That is to sow the seeds of discord amongst them whilest some should desire to have the citie yielded up and others should oppose them Vers 20. For this Hezekiah the king and the prophet Isaiah the sonne of Amos prayed and cried to heaven See 2. Kings 19.14 15. and at the same time Isaiah sent a comfortable message to Hezekiah wherein he prophesied of the destruction of Sennacherib and the good of Sion Vers 21. And the Lord sent an angel which cut off all the mighty men of valour c. A hundred fourescore and five thousand in all and that in one night See the note 2. Kings 19.35 They that came forth of his own bowels slew him there with the sword That is his own sonnes Adramelech and Sherezer 2. Kings 19.27 Vers 22. Thus the Lord saved Hezekiah c. and guided them on every side He governed them and took care of them all as a shepheard doth of his flock Vers 24. In those dayes Hezekiah was sick to the death and prayed unto the Lord. The prophet Isaiah having visited him and told him that he should die and not live See the notes 2. Kings 20.1 2 3. And he spake unto him and he gave him a signe That is he assured him that he should recover and confirmed that promise with a signe from heaven but withall he gave him also direction to lay a lump of figgs to the boil See the 2. Kings 20.5 c. Vers 25. For his heart was lifted up And this he manifested in shewing his riches to the Babylonian Embassadours for which he was reproved and threatned by the prophet Isaiah See 2. Kings 20.12 19. Vers 27. And Hezekiah had exceeding much riches and honour c. This is added to shew what it was for which his heart was lifted up as was said before v. 25. Vers 30. This same Hezekiah also stopped the upper water-course of Gihon c. The brook Gihon divided it self into two streams one of which Hezekiah turned from the usuall channell and brought it strait down into the west side of the city of David Vers 31. Howbeit in the businesse of the embassadours of the princes of Babylon c. To wit the Embassadours which Besodach-Baladan king of Babylon by the advice of his princes sent unto him see 2. Kings 20.12 God left him to try him that he might know all that was in his heart See Gen. 22.1 CHAP. XXXIII Vers 1. MAnasseh was twelve years old when he began to reigne See 2. Kings 21.1 c. many severall notes for the explanation of this chapter Vers 6. And he caused his children to passe through the fire in the valley of the sonne of Hinnom See 2. Kings 16.3 Vers 10. And the Lord spake to Manasseh and to his people To wit by his servants the prophets the summe of their prophesies is expressed 2. Kings 21.11 15. Vers 11. Wherefore the Lord brought upon them the captains of the host of the king of Assyria which took Manasseh among the thorns It seems he thought to hide himself in some woods and thickets and therefore it is said here that he was taken among the thorns The like is said concerning the Israelites when they were affraid of the Philistines that were come into their land 1. Sam. 13.6 When the men of Israel saw they were in a strait then they did hide themselves in caves and in
appears that Nehemiahs journey was in the spring of the yeare Vers 2. Wherefore the king said unto me Why is thy countenance sad c. And indeed if we consider that his sorrow and grief for the sad estate of his brethren had been so long a time accompanied with much watching and fasting and prayer it is no wonder thought the king presently discerned the alteration of his countenance from that it had formerly wont to be Then I was very sore afraid To wit lest the king should suspect some evil or treacherous purpose fostered in his heart in which case guiltinesse of conscience doth usually distract the mind and make the countenance pale and wan and therefore perhaps it was that he answered presently vers 3. Let the king live for ever not onely because it was the usuall form of salutation when they were to speak to kings but also because he desired to assure him of his faithfull intentions towards him or else rather lest being pressed to discover the ground of his sorrow in such a publick presence for the queen was by vers 6. and therefore many also of his princes and nobles if he should make no answer that might increase their jealousie of him and if he should make known the cause of his grief he might well doubt how his request would be taken either by the king or his courtiers or what inconveniences might follow thereupon for both the greatnesse of the request he had to make and the majestie of the king might in these regards be dreadfull to him To this some adde also that he might fear the kings displeasure because it was not lawfull for any mourner to come into the presence of the kings of Persia and indeed it is said Esther 4.2 That none might enter into the kings gates clothed with sackeloth but whether it can be hence inferred that none that were heavie and sad might stand before the king it may well be questioned Vers 3. Why should not my countenance be sad when the citie the place of my fathers sepulchres lyeth waste c. That is the city where they lived and dyed This argument taken from natural compassion was most like to prevail with an heathen king Vers 5. If it please the king and if thy servant hath found favour in thy sight that thou wouldest send me unto Judah c. Hereby he seeks to intimate to the king that it was his former favour to him that emboldened him to make this request and that he desired it with a resolution however to submit to his will and onely sought it so farre as he should like well of the motion to approve it as reasonable and fitting Vers 6. And the king said unto me the queen also sitting by him For how long c. The queens sitting by is mentioned not onely because the relation of such particular circumstances are good proofs of the truth of that which is related but also happely to intimate that she was one that favoured Nehemiah and did what she might to further his suit which hath made some Expositours conceive that this was Esther the wife of Ahasuerus but however in this question which the king propounded to Nehemiah For how long shall thy journey be and when wilt thou rerurn he discovered his love to him and that he was loth he should be too long absent from him And I set him a time Some Expositours conceive that the time he prefixed for his return was after twelve years because it is evident that so long he was governour of the province of Judea under Artaxerxes to wit chap. 5.14 From the twentieth yeare even unto the two and thirtieth yeare of Artaxerxes the king which is twelve years c. but first because the king demanding when he would return as being loth he should be too long from him it is not probable he would prefixe so long a time and secondly because the building of the walls of Jerusalem the work for which chiefly he now went was finished in lesse then two moneths chap. 6.15 in fifty and two dayes more probable it is that at present he set a shorter time when accordingly he did return but then went again with commission of being governour there and was their governour twelve years though happely in that time also he often went to Artaxerxes into Persia Vers 7. Let letters be given me to the governours beyond the river that they may convey me over till I come into Judah This Ezra would not desire when he went to Jerusalem because they had then occasionally spoken to the king of the providence of their God over those that served him and therefore if he had desired a guard of souldiers he suspected they would have derided his former boasting in Gods defence and protection Ezra 8.22 For I was ashamed to require of the king a band of souldiers and horsmen to help us against the enemy in the way because we had spoken unto the king saying The hand of our God is upon all them for good that seek him But now Nehemiah not suspecting any such thing nor having happely that cause to suspect it required a safe conduct and that no doubt lawfully Vers 8. And a letter unto Asaph the keeper of the kings forrest that he may give me timber c. This forrest of the kings out of which Nehemiah desired timber was doubtlesse the forrest of Lebanon out of which Solomon had formerly his timber 1. Kings 5.6 and this timber he desired was for beams first for the gates of the palace which appertained to the house that is the Temple whereby either the building about the outward court is meant for though the Temple was finished before yet happely the gates and towers that belonged thereto were not set up or else rather the palace wherein formerly the kings of Judah dwelt which was in a manner joyned to the Temple and therefore may here be called the palace that appertained to the house and secondly for the wall of the citie that is the gates in severall parts of the wall and thirdly for a dwelling house for himself for the house saith Nehemiah that I shall enter into Vers 9. Now the king had sent the captains of the army and horsmen with me To wit to conduct him safe to the river Euphrates from whence afterward he was by the governours beyond the river conveyed to Jerusalem Vers 10. When Sanballat the Horonite and Tobiah the servant heard of it c. Sanballat is called the Horonite as it is thought because he was the deputy Lieutenant of the Moabites for Horonaim was a chief city in the land of Moab Isaiah 15.5 My heart shall cry out for Moab c. for in the way of Horonaim they shall raise up a cry of destruction and Jerem. 48.3 4. A voice of crying shall be from Horanaim spoiling and great destruction Moab is destroyed c. and Tobiah is called the servant the Ammonite either because he had been a
good part of the wall adjoyning even to the tower of Meah they sanctified it unto the tower of Hananeel where by the tower of Meah is meant a tower not farre from the sheep-gate so called as is thought because it had an hundred pinacles or was an hundred cubits high or some such like reason for Meah signifies an hundred and by the tower of Hananeel a tower further northward mentioned again Zach. 14.10 Vers 3. But the fish gate did the sonnes of Hassenaah build This was doubtlesse on the northwest of Jerusalem in the citie of David towards the sea as appears also by that which is said of Manasseh 2. Chron. 33.14 He built a wall without the citie of David on the west side of Gihon in the valley even to the entring in of the fish gate c. It was called the fish gate because they brought in their fish from the sea coasts of Tyre and Sydon at that gate according to that chap. 13.16 There dwelt men of Tyre therein which also brought fish c. and had happely their market for the selling of their fish not farre from it it is mentioned again Zeph. 1.10 There shall be the noise of a cry from the fish gate Vers 5. And next unto them the Tekoites repaired c. That is some of the inhabitants of Tekoa for other of them also repaired in another place as it is expressed afterward vers 27. but yet it was onely the common people amongst them that did what was done for concerning their nobles there is a clause of exception added but the nobles put not their necks to the work of the Lord that is the nobles would not do any service herein to their Lord the God of Israel because their arrogancie in regard of their greatnesse was the cause of their refusing their help in this work as pretending they would not be taxed nor have any such burthen imposed upon them their folly is noted herein that they refused to put their necks to his work who is the nobles Lord as well as the common peoples Vers 6. Moreover the old gate repaired Jehoiada So called happely because it was the oldest of all the gates in Jerusalem and this was also as is generally held on the north-side of Jerusalem Vers 7. And next unto them repaired Melatiah c. unto the throne of the governour on this side the river It seems there was formerly in this part of the wall a palace or place of judicature where those that were appointed governours under the Babylonian and Persian kings over all the countrey on this side Euphrates did use to sit in judgement unto which place these men of Gibeah and Mizpah and others here mentioned did repair the wall and that palace where had been the throne of the governour some Expositours conceive was repaired by Nehemiah and his servants he being now governour of Judea whence are those expressions chap. 4.16 The half of my servants wrought in the work and the other half of them held both the spears the shields c. and 5.16 I continued in the work of this wall c. Vers 8. And they fortified Jerusalem unto the broad wall That is they repaired the wall unto that place where the wall was made much broader then in other places and therefore called the broad wall and so having brought the work so farre there they left off building because here it was not ruined and therefore needed no repairing in which sence it may be read according to the translation noted in the margin They left Jerusalem unto the broad wall Vers 9. And next unto them repaired Rephaiah the sonne of Hur the ruler of the half part of Jerusalem For Jerusalem being part in Judah and part in Benjamin had accordingly two severall rulers and this Rephaiah was ruler of one of them and Shallum vers 12. was ruler of the other Vers 11. And Hashub the sonne of Pahath-moab repaired the other piece and the tower of the furnaces That is the next portion of the wall set out to be repaired wherein also was the tower of the furnaces so called happely because either in the tower it self or in the street adjoyning there were many furnaces Vers 12. Shallum the sonne of Haloesh the ruler of the half part of Jerusalem See above vers 9. Vers 13. The valley gate repaired Hanun c. See chap. 2.13 Vers 14. But the dung-gate repaired Malchiah the sonne of Rechab That is of the famous familie of the Rechabites Vers 15. But the gate of the fountain repaired Shallun See chap. 2.14 Unto the stairs that go down from the citie of David That is from mount Sion which was called the citie of David into the lower part of Jerusalem Vers 16. After him repaired Nehemiah c. Here begins the repairing of the wall about mount Zion wherein stood the Temple and the palace of the kings of Judah and the first part of this wall was repaired by one Nehemiah the sonne of Azbuck the ruler of the half part of Bethzur and so as farre as to the pool that was made and unto the house of the mighty and by the pool that was made is meant a pool not naturall but made by art to wit by Hezekiah 2. Kings 20.20 yet this was not the pool of Siloah mentioned in the former verse for that was happely a naturall pool and was in the lower part of Jerusalem but another in mount Zion called therefore the upper pool 2. Kings 18.17 and by the house of the mighty is meant some house built for Davids worthies or some house where the garrison souldiers for the citie lay or where youths were taught to handle their arms Vers 17. After him repaired the Levites It may be because the wall here was over against the Temple Vers 19. The ruler of Mizpah another piece over against the going up to the armory at the turning of the wall To wit the citie armoury to which that place of Solomons seemeth to allude Cant. 4.4 Thy neck is like the tower of David builded for an armoury it is evident that the house of the forrest of Lebanon which Solomon built was for many generations a magazine of arms for the kings of Judah for thence is that Isa 22.8 Thou didst look in that day to the armour of the house of the forrest and therefore it may be it was that house that is here meant or if not so it may be they had severall arsenalls or armouries one for the citie armoury and another for the kings magazine or that this was some place where anciently there had been an armoury before the house of Lebanon was built Vers 22. And after him repaired the priests the men of the plain To wit the men that inhabited the plain countrey about Jerusalem 2. Sam. 2.28 chap. 12.28 Vers 24. Binnui the sonne of Henadad another piece from the house of Azariah unto the turning of the wall This is thought to be the turning of the
and to beat him off by terrifying him from the work which God had given him in charge and likewise afterwards by the event because the enemies came not that night to seize upon him as Shemaiah had prophecyed they would Vers 15. So the wall was finished in the twenty and fifth day of the moneth Elul c. The very doores of the gates being then also set up which was not done before vers 1. The whole work was finished on the twenty fifth day of the moneth Elul which was their sixth moneth agreeing most what with our August and shewes that they undertook the work in the heighth of summer when the dayes were at the longest and the season every way most seasonable for building and so all was dispatched in fifty and two dayes to wit from the time that they first began the repairing of the wall Indeed because it seems impossible that so great a work should be finished in so short a compasse to wit fifty two dayes which was not full two moneths therefore some Expositours understand these fifty two dayes to be meant of the time after the stone wall was finished and that message was sent from Sanballat and Tobiah whereof mention is made vers 2. but because no such thing is here expressed I rather understand it of the time wherein the whole work was finished And indeed if we consider first that the walls and towers were not wholly razed to the ground but onely battered and broken and had many breaches in them secondly that there was a multitude of people who round about the city in severall places at one time were employed in the work and did with much earnestnesse follow it and thirdly that it was indeed finished to the astonishment of the enemies vers 16. before they dreamed it could have been done And it came to passe that when all our enemies heard thereof and all the heathen that was about us saw these things they were much cast down in their own eyes for they perceived this work was wrought of our God I say considering all these things it needs not seem so incredible that the work was begun and perfected in fifty two dayes CHAP. VII Vers 1. WHen the wall was built and I had set up the doores and the porters and the singers and the Levites were appointed By the Levites thus distinguished from the porters and singers are meant such of the Levites as were to attend upon the priests in their office and the meaning of this clause is either that Nehemiah did choose out and appoint some of these to perform some solemn service at the dedication of the walls by way of thanksgiving to God or else that such of the porters singers and Levites as had been some way imployed about the building were now appointed again to return to their service in the Temple Vers 2. I gave my brother Hanani and Hananiah the ruler of the palace charge over Jerusalem To his brother or kinsman Hanani who first brought him word of the sad estate of Jerusalem chap. 1.1 2. and to Hananiah the ruler of the palace he gave charge over Jerusalem that is to see that the gates were carefully shut and opened in due time and a sufficient watch for the better guard of the city alwayes maintained Vers 3. And while they stand by let them shut the doores and barre them That is let not those that have the charge of shutting and barring the gates appoint or send others to do it for them but let them at least stand by themselves and see it done as it should be Some indeed conceive that this is spoken of Hanani and Hananiah to wit that they were to see the gates shut up themselves but the words seem more clearly to import that it is spoken of them that by Hanani and Hananiah should be appointed to this service And appoint watches of the inhabitants of Jerusalem every one in his watch and every one to be over against his house That is every one to watch in that part which was nearest to his own dwelling those that dwelt in the west parts of the city were not to be called to watch on the walls on the east-side c. Vers 4. Now the city was large and great but the people were few therein and the houses were not builded So that there was no proportion betwixt the walls without and the houses of the city within nor were the inhabitants sufficient for the defence of the walls in so large a circuit which is alledged here as the reason why Nehemiah undertook the numbring of the people according to their genealogies as is related in the following verse Some indeed of the chief of the inhabitants were carefull to build themselves stately and fair houses Haggai 1.4 Is it time for you O ye to dwell in your cieled houses c. but the whilest it seems the most of the houses lay ruinated and unbuilt and though there came out of Babylon with Zerubbabel fourty two thousand three hundred and sixty Ezra 2 64. yet the greatest number of these happely chose to seat themselves in some other part of the countrey rather then in Jerusalem either because of the misery that had befallen the inhabitants of this city formerly when it was taken by the Chaldees or because they found the city unfit to dwell in Vers 5. And my God put into mine heart to gather together the nobles and the rulers and the people that they might be reckoned by genealogies To wit that knowing the number of the people according to their severall genealogies first those families that belonged to Jerusalem might be appointed to dwell there secondly that as need was found others might be also called in to inhabit Jerusalem though their progenitours had not dwelt there thirdly that according as men were found able they might be appointed to lend aid to the rebuilding of those houses in Jerusalem that lay in the rubbish This assembly was gathered upon the first day of the seventh moneth chap. 8.2 when they were first prepared by the hearing of the law that they might the more willingly undertake what was imposed for the common good and then order was taken for these things chap. 11.1 The rest of the people cast lots to bring one of ten to dwell in Jerusalem the holy city and nine parts to dwell in other cities c. And I found a register of the genealogie of them which came up at the first c. For their better proceeding a president was sought of their former numbring the people in the dayes of Zerubbabel and this register was found that follows in the next verse which in many things differs from that Ezra 2.1 and therefore it is thought that that in Ezra was taken and written when they were preparing to come out of Babylon this when they were come into Judea Vers 6. These are the children of the province c. What is to be noted for the understanding of