in the utmost north-end of Canaan whence the length of the land is ordinarily described to be from the entrance of Hamath to the river of Egypt 1. Kings 8.65 See Num. 13.22 and Cinnereth was a city in the eastern parts whence the lake so often mentioned in Scripture was called the lake of Genezereth Vers 38. Nineteen cities with their villages For some of them mentioned before in drawing the border of their lot stood happely in the portion of the bordering tribes Vers 40. And the seventh lot came out for the tribe of the children of Dan. Though this tribes lot was not wholly taken out of that which was given to Judah as Simeons was yet that a part of it was is manifest by some of the cities mentioned here that chap. 15. are numbered amongst those that were at first in Judahs portion it was compassed with the sea and the borders of the other tribes formerly described and so the borders of this tribe are here omitted Vers 41. And the coast of their inheritance was Zorah and Eshtaol c. In this Zorah Samson was born Judges 13.2 and between Zorah and Eshtaol he was buried Vers 43. And Elon and Timnathah c. Whence Samson took a wife Judges 14.1 Vers 47. Therefore the children of Dan went up to fight against Leshem c. Or Laish The story we have Judges 18. This then happened after Joshuas death but here it is mentioned lest it should seem strange how the Danites came to inhabite the north parts of the land when their lot fell to them in the south parts even close by Judahs portion the reason was because being not able to drive out the Philistines out of their land they were streightned for room so went out and took Laish a city that was in Naphtalies lot though then in the Zidonians possession and transplanted a Colony thither calling it Dan from their father Dan the sonne of Jacob it stood almost in the furthest north part of the land Judges 20.1 The congregation was gathered together as one wan from Dan to Beersheba Vers 50. According to the word of the Lord they gave him the citie he asked even Timnath-serah in mount Ephraim c. To wit the word of the Lord which he spake to Moses not onely concerning Caleb but concerning Joshua for why indeed should he be left out see Iosh 14.7 to wit that he should chuse a peculiar portion to himself where he would yet it may be meant also of some direction given him by Eleazar the priest upon his inquiry of God for him However herein first was the modesty of Ioshua remarkable that he was content to stay till all the tribes had their portion ere there was any motion made of that which by way of speciall Prerogative was to be conferred upon him secondly That he was content to receive what God had promised him as by way of gift from the people he asked and they gave him the city he asked thirdly That whereas he might have chosen the fairest and goodliest city in all their tribes he chose his seat in a mountainous countrey nothing so pleasant and delightfull as many other places were yea and it seems a city that was ruinated so that he was fain to build it ere he dwelt in it for so it follows in the next words and he built the city and dwelt therein CHAP. XX. Vers 2. APpoint out for you cities of refuge c. Concerning these cities of refuge see the notes Numb 35.6 and 24 c. Vers 6. And he shall dwell in that city untill he stand before the congregation for judgement and untill the death of the high priest c. That is untill he be fetched thence to the place where the fact was done that it may be there tryed whether it were done wittingly or unwittingly so long he was to abide there however or untill the death of the high Priest if it were found that he did it unwittingly for then he was to be sent back to the city of refuge and to be kept there till the high priest dyed Concerning the mysticall reason of the man-slayers staying in the city of refuge till the death of the high priest see the note upon Num. 35.25 But to this some also do adde a literall reason to wit that hereby was implyed how hainous a fault it was to shed the bloud of a man and how displeasing to God in that the man that was but unwittingly defiled with the shedding of bloud must be thus shut up lest he should happen to come into the sight of him who did as it were represent Gods person amongst them to wit the high priest nor could be suffered to stirre from thence till he was dead Vers 8. And on the other side Jordan by Jericho eastward they assigned Bezer c. That is they confirmed and ratified these to be cities of refuge without Jordan which Moses himself had formerly chosen and set apart for that use See Deut. 4.41 42 43. CHAP. XXI Vers 1. THen came near the heads of the fathers of the Levites unto Eleazar the priest c. It was doubtles immediately after they had made an end of dividing the land that the Levites came thus to Eleazer and the rest of the Commissioners to receive from them the cities which God had appointed to be set apart for their dwelling For first it is not probable that there was any delay which might move the Levites to challenge their right and secondly it is as improbable that the Israelites did first settle themselves in these cities and then were afterwards put out to give way to the Levites Vers 2. The Lord commanded by the hand of Moses to give us cities to dwell in c. See the notes upon Numb 35.2 c. Vers 4. And the lot came out for the familie of the Kohathites God had expressed the number of cities that were to be given them to wit fourty eight Numb 35.7 So all the cities which ye shall give to the Levites shall be fourty and eight cities he had also given them directions to take these cities out of each tribe some according as their proportion was greater or lesser and therefore the Commissioners for the dividing of the land made choice no doubt of these cities as in their wisdome they found them most convenient for the Levites and for the people and then having divided the cities they had chosen into foure parts one for the priests a second for the Levites of Kohaths familie a third for the Gershonites and a fourth for the Merarites then was it at last decided in which of the tribes the priests should be placed and so of the rest or at least of those cities which were judged convenient they took the number agreed upon by lot See vers 11. And the children of Aaron the priest which were of the Levites had by lot out of the tribe of Judah c. Thus by Gods speciall providence the
priests were seated partly in the tribe of Judah where the Temple was afterwards to be built and partly in the two bordering tribes of Simeon and Benjamin and so whilst they shall approve their piety and devotion to the service of God in being content to leave their dwellings to go up unto Jerusalem in their turns to attend upon the service of God yet withall God provides for their ease that their journeys might not be over long and burthensome to them As for their assigning as it is here said of thirteen cities to the priests herein God and the governours of Israel had respect unto succeeding times when the posterity of Aaron should be encreased for at present there were but a few priests not enough to inhabit the half part of one city but in the mean time they were given them for their possession which they might dispose of according to the right they had in them For that they might so do and that the cities of the Levites were given them not onely for their habitation but also for their possessions and inheritance is evident in severall places See Levit. 25.32 Vers 9. And they gave out of the tribe of the children of Judah and out of the tribe of the children of Simeon these cities c. Judahs and Simeon cities are reckoned together because Simeons portion lay within Judahs Chap. 19.1 And the second lot came forth to Simeon even for the tribe of the children of Simeon according to their families and their inheritance was within the inheritance of the children of Judah Vers 11. And they gave them the city of Arbah the father of Anak which is Hebron in the hill-countrey of Judah c. This city with the land adjoyning was formerly given to Caleb which makes it more probable that the cities for the Levites were taken by lot because it was not likely that both Hebron and Debir should be taken out of his inheritance without the Lords speciall direction But God requiring it Caleb willingly yields the rather because the countrey and land about was the chief of his possession which was not taken from him and besides no doubt they desired to have the Levites who were to instruct them in the Law of the Lord to be seated amongst them Vers 15. And Holon with her suburbs Called Hilen 1. Chron. 6.58 Vers 16. And Ain with her suburbs and Juttah with her suburbs c. This citie Ain is not reckoned 1. Chron. 6. amongst the cities given to the sonnes of Aaron nor Gibeon here named vers 17. As for Juttah it is called Ashan 1. Chron. 6.59 Some indeed conceive that it is Ain that is there called Ashan but there is an argument against that which seems to me unanswerable to wit that Ashan and Ain are in one verse distinctly named amongst the cities of Simeon chap. 19.7 and so also Almon vers 18. is called Alemeth 1. Chron. 6.60 Vers 22. And Kibzaim with her suburbs Called Jokneam 1. Chron. 6.68 Vers 23. And out of the tribe of Dan Eltekeh with her suburbs Gibbethon with her suburbs These two cities are omitted 1. Chron. 6. And Aijalon and Gath-rimmon are there ioyned with the cities of Ephraim but that they were given out of Dans portion is evident by this place Vers 25. And out of the half tribe of Manasseh Tanach with her suburbs c. To wit that half of the tribe which was seated within Jordan next Dan and Ephraim Tanach here mentioned is called Aner 1. Chron. 6.70 as also Gath-Rimmon is there called Bileam Vers 27. And Beeshterah with her suburbs Called Ashtaroth 1. Chron. 6.71 Vers 28. And out of the tribe of Issachar Kishon with her suburbs c. Which is called Kedesh as also Dabareh is called Deberath and Jarmuth Ramoth and Engannim Anem 1. Chron. 6.72.73 Vers 30. And out of the tribe of Asher Mishal with her suburbs c. Called Mashal 1. Chron. 6.74 as also Helkath is there called Hukok Vers 32. And Hammoth-dor with her suburbs c. Called Hammon 1. Chron. 6.76 as also Kartan is there called Kirjathaim Vers 34. Out of the tribe of Zebulun Jokneam with her suburbs c. Jokneam and Kartah are omitted 1. Chron. 6.77 and Dimnah is there called Rimmon and Nahalal Tabor Vers 36. And out of the tribe of Reuben Bezer with her suburbs and Jahazah with her suburbs It is said that Bezer was a city of refuge chap. 20.8 though it be not here expressed as it is in the rest vers 13.20 27. which why it is here omitted we cannot say As for Jahazah it is called Jahzah 1. Chron. 6. Vers 41. All the cities of the Levites within the possession of the children of Israel were fourty and eight cities with their suburbs It may seem strange why in the 19. chapter we reade of but two and twenty cities given to the tribe of Asher nineteen to the tribe of Naphtali yea but twelve cities to the tribe of Zebulun and yet the Levites which were nothing so many in number as they have here eight and fourty cities given them I answer first that besides the cities mentioned the other tribes had many towns and villages wherein they dwelt which the Levites had not secondly that the chief cities are onely there mentioned it is evident in severall places that many cities which were in the severall portions of those tribes are not there set down thirdly others did no doubt inhabit these cities besides the Levites and fourthly it is no wonder though God deals bountifully with the Levites that were to be imployed in his speciall service Vers 43. And the Lord gave unto Israel all the land which he sware to give unto their fathers and they possessed it and dwelt therein Though there were much of the land out of which the Canaanites were not yet expelled we cannot therefore call this truth in question for First he had given them all by lot divided amongst them which was a kind of actuall enstating them in it Secondly he had put them into possession of the greatest part of it neither had he promised them otherwise but that they should possesse it by degrees See Exod. 23.29 So both clauses of that which is here said are true to wit first That God had given them all the land which he swore to give unto their fathers and secondly That they possessed it and dwelt therein onely we must conceive of them severally thus to wit 1. That he had already actually given them the whole land and enabled them to divide it amongst their tribes and 2. That they possessed it and dwelt therein to wit by degrees a great deal of it they had already in their possession and the rest by degrees came into their hands as God had promised and sooner then they did they might have enjoyed it had it not been for their sinnes CHAP. XXII Vers 3. YE have not left your brethren these many dayes unto this day That for which Joshua here
was anointed king at Jerusalem 1. Kings 1.9 49. by the valley of the sonne of Hinnom unto the south-side of the city Jebus which was afterwards called Jerusalem not the fort of Sion for that was more south-ward in Judahs portion but the city it self which by that means was shut out of Judahs lot and left in the portion of Benjamin see the following note upon verse 63. Vers 9. And the border was drawn to Baalah which is Kirjath-jearim Called Kirjath-baal verse 60. and chap. 18.14 Vers 10. And the border compassed from Baalah west-ward unto mount Seir c. That is having before fetched a compasse north-ward it now turned west-ward unto mount Seir which was not that in the land of Idumea but another of that name Vers 12. And the west-border was to the great sea and the coast thereof See chap. 13.23 Vers 14. And Caleb drove thence the three sonnes of Anak c. That is from the mountains about Hebron See the note upon chap. 11.21 Vers 15. He came up thence to the inhabitants of Debir c. There was a Debir taken before by Joshua chap. 10.38 39. but that which Joshua took I conceive was not this which lay so near to Hebron which Caleb now took but that mentioned above vers 7. in the borders of Judah and much nearer to Jordan whence it is happely that Joshua is said to have taken that in his return towards Gilgal chap. 10.38 and that here this city is expressely said to be that city which was formerly called Kirjath-sepher to distinguish it from Debir taken by Joshua Vers 16. He that smiteth Kirjath-sepher and taketh it to him will I give Achsah my daughter to wife That is I will give my consent that he shall have my daughter we cannot hence inferre that he might lawfully force upon his daughter what husband he pleased for this he speaks as taking it for granted that his daughter would be guided by him Vers 17. And Othniel the sonne of Kenaz the brother of Caleb took it This was that Othniel which was afterwards the judge of Israel Judg. 3.9 And when the children of Israel cryed unto the Lord the Lord raysed up a deliverer to the children of Israel who delivered them even Othniel the sonne of Kenaz Calebs younger brother and happely for this exploit he became first famous amongst the Israelites and we may well think that this story is here inserted chiefly for his sake by brother here may be meant kinsman and so be referred to Othniel that he was the brother that is the near kinsman of Caleb but because of that word younger added Judg. 1.13 Othniel the sonne of Kenaz Calebs younger brother and so again Judg. 3.9 I conceive this word brother is to be referred to Kenaz that he was the father of Othniel and the brother of Caleb for though Caleb was the sonne or grandchild of Kenaz and thence called a Kenezite chap. 14.16 yet he might have a Kenaz to his brother too Vers 18. And it came to passe as she came unto him that she moved him to ask of her father a field c. This following passage concerning the enlarging of Achsahs dowry by a portion of land which her father gave her may well be added to shew how Caleb prized Othniel because of this his taking Debir It came to passe saith the text as she came unto him that is as she was going from her fathers to her husbands family she moved him to ask of her father a field that is taking the opportunity of her being now to leave her father for then the affections of fathers are wont to be moved towards their daughters she perswaded her husband to ask a field of her father to wit over and above that which he had already given her as an encrease of her dowry For Caleb had sonnes 1. Chron. 4.15 and in this case it is clear they might not give away any part of their inheritance from their sonnes to their daughters Numb 27.8 9. If a man die and have no sonne then ye shall cause his inheritance to passe unto his daughter And if he have no daughter then ye shall give his inheritance unto his brethren and therefore we must know that the land which Caleb had already given his daughter and which she further now desired of him was to be given her onely as a dowry for term of life or till the yeare of Jubile Being it seems not content with that portion of land which her father had already given her vers 19. she moved her husband to ask or for so also the words may be understood she moved her husband that she might ask another field to wit as an enlargement of her dowry And she lighted off her asse and Caleb said unto her What wouldest thou We may two severall wayes understand this which is here said concerning Achsah Calebs daughter that she lighted off her asse for either the meaning may be that when they had set her upon an asse that she might ride home with her husband Othniel to his house she slipped down again as in discontent and seeming to be unwilling to go with her husband to wit because her husband had not as she had moved him desired of her father an enlargement of her dowry and so thereupon her father demanded of her what wouldest thou as perceiving that she was discontented and desirous to know what it was that troubled her Or else that having desired her husband as they were riding away from her fathers house to make sute to her father for another field to be added to what he had already given her when she perceived that he was loth to do it or perswaded her rather to undertake it her self she lighted off her asse as addressing her self to make her request to her father which her father perceiving demanded of her presently what she would have Vers 19. Who answered Give me a blessing for thou hast given me a south land give me also springs of water To intimate that the portion of land which he had given her was dry and not well watered she calls it a south land to wit either because the southern parts of Iudahs portion were dry and barren and hence such lands were called south lands or else because the southern parts of Calebs portion in particular were such And hereupon she desires him to give her also springs of water thereby intending either merely some springs of water which might be conveyed into the south land to make it fruitfull or else some portion of land that was well watered And he gave her the upper springs and the nether springs That is some higher grounds that were well watered and some lower or which tends much to one he gave her some springs or watered grounds on each side the land he had formerly given her for a dowry both above it and below it Vers 21. And the uttermost cities of the tribe of the children of Judah toward the coast
from east to west from the lake of Sodome to Kirjath-jearim this from the west to the east from Kirjath-jearim to the lake of Sodome concerning which see the note there Vers 18. And passed along toward the side over against Arabah north-ward and went down unto Arabah Which is called Beth-arabah chap. 15.6 Vers 21. Now the cities of the tribe of the children of Benjamin according to their families were Jericho c. It is no wonder though in severall places of Scripture we find mention made of some cities belonging to the tribe of Benjamin that are not in this Catalogue For many cities might be built in after times And besides it is probable that all the cities in Benjamins lot are not here mentioned but such onely as were requisite to be known because by them the bounds of their lot are described or for the better understanding of some other passages in the sacred history where these cities are mentioned And the like we must conceive of the catalogues that are given us in the following chapter of the cities that were in the severall lots of the other tribes CHAP. XIX Vers 1. ANd their inheritance was within the inheritance of the children of Judah That is the inheritance of the tribe of Simeon the reason whereof is given vers 9. Out of the portion of the children of Judah was the inheritance of the children of Simeon for the part of the children of Judah was too much for them therefore the children of Simeon had their inheritance within the inheritance of them It seems that they that were sent to search the land not yet divided that they might part it into seven lots for the seven remaining tribes chap. 18.4 found that the portion which Joshua and Eleazar and the other Commissioners for the dividing of the land had formerly at Gilgal assigned to the tribe of Judah was farre too large considering what they now found left for the other tribes upon this second review and therefore agreed unanimously with those said Commissioners for the dividing of the land that a whole portion for one of the tribes that had not yet their inheritance should be taken off that which was formerly given to Judah and so should make one of the lots for the seven tribes besides some other cities which they took also from Judah to be as part of another lot as is shown afterwards verse 40.41 and no doubt the children of Judah acknowledged the equitie thereof and were well contented with it and so when they came to draw the lots of the seven remaining tribes in the second place next after Benjamins came out this lot which was wholly taken out of Judahs portion for the tribe of Simeon And thus by the providence of God first there being one tribe to be seated within that portion formerly given to Judah the lot fell upon this tribe which was fewest in number of all the tribes as we may see by the account that was taken of them at the last numbring of the people Num. 26.14 and secondly this tribe of Simeon having their portion assigned them within the portion of Iudah and so being as it were intermingled with them nor having an inheritance apart by themselves that was now fulfilled which Jacob long since prophesied of them Gen. 49.7 I will divide them in Jacob and scatter them in Israel concerning which see what is noted there Vers 2. And they had in their inheritance Beer-sheba c. The bounds of this tribes portion is not described as are the bounds of most of the other tribes onely the chief cities and towns are named that were in their lot and that because their inheritance was within the inheritance of Judah whose bounds are formerly described chap. 15. As for Beersheba and Sheba that are first here mentioned they are but the longer and shorter names of one and the same city for it is said vers 6. that in this first catalogue there are thirteen cities and there are fourteen if Beersheba and Sheba be counted two severall cities and besides 1. Chron. 4.28 where these cities of the Simeonites are again reckoned up there is mention made of Beersheba onely Vers 3. And Hazar-shual and Balah and Azem c. Called Ezem 1. Chron. 4.29 as the following Eltolad is called also Tolad and Bethul Bethuel Vers 5. And Ziklag and Bethmarcaboth and Hazor-susah c. Which is called 1. Chron. 4.31 Hazar-susim as also in the following verse Bethlebaoth is called chap. 15.32 Lebaoth and in the 1. Chron. 4.31 Bethbirei and Sharuhen seems to be the same that is called Shauraim Vers 7. Ain Remmon and Ether c. Or Etam 1. Chron. 4.32 this with the rest here mentioned are there called villages and therefore are here severally reckoned by themselves Vers 9. For the part of the children of Judah was too much for them c. See the note above vers 1. Vers 10. And the border of their inheritance was Sarid c. This Sarid was the Southwest corner of Zebuluns portion from whence it is said that it went West-ward to Maralah and so to Dabbasheth which stood by the sea from whence it went Northward by the sea coast as farre as the river near Iokneam And thus having the midland sea on the West and the sea of Galilee on the East that was truly accomplished which Jacob said concerning this tribe Gen. 49.13 Zebulun shall dwell at the haven of the sea and he shall be for a haven of ships and Moses also Deut. 33.18 And of Zebulun he said Rejoyce Zebulun in thy going out c. Vers 12. And turned from Sarid eastward toward the sunne rising c. As before the western border was drawn from Sarid vers 10. so here the south border begins also at Sarid and so is carried on eastward as farre as Japhia Vers 13. And from thence passeth on along on the east to Gittah-Hepher c. That is from Japhia a city in the south-east corner of Zebuluns portion the border turns northward along by the sea of Galilee and within a while goeth up into the land as farre as Remmon and Neah where is the going out of the utmost reach of the eastern border Vers 14. And the border compasseth it on the north side to Hannathon c. This is the north border which fetcheth a compasse and so ends in the valley of Jiphthah-el Vers 15. And Idalah and Bethlehem This was not that Bethlehem where Christ was afterward born for that was in the tribe of Judah this in the tribe of Zebulun Twelve cities with their villages There are more then twelve mentioned in the foregoing verses but it seems some of them were border towns that stood in the other tribes that had their lots next to Zebuluns and but twelve of them onely were belonging to the tribe of Zebulun Vers 18. And their border was toward Jezreel c. Because Issachars portion lay between Benjamins and Zebuluns whose borders have been already described
spoken an expression this is therefore much like that Jer. 2.12 Be ye astonished O ye heavens at this and be horribly afraid be ye very desolate saith the Lord. Vers 29. Joshua the sonne of Nun the servant of the Lord dyed being an hundred and ten years old It is manifest there were but foure hundred and eighty years betwixt the building of the Temple and the Israelites coming out of Egypt 1. Kings 6.1 And it came to passe in the foure hundred and fourescore years after the children of Israel were come out of the land of Egypt in the fourth yeare of Solomons reigne over Israel in the moneth Zif which is the second moneth that he began to build the house of the Lord of which yielding fourty years to their travels in the wildernesse and then to Othniels government fourty years Judges 3.11 to Ehuds eighty years verse 30. to Shamgars some few moneths vers 31. to Deborah and Barak fourty Judges 5.31 to Gideon fourty Judges 8.28 to Abimelech three Judges 9.22 to Tolah three and twenty Judges 10.2 and to Jair two and twenty years verse 3. to Jephthe six Judges 12.7 and Ibzan seven verse 9. and Elon ten verse 11. and Abdon eight verse 14. to Samson twenty Judges 15.20 to Elie fourty 1. Sam. 4.18 to Samuel and Saul fourty years Acts 13.21 to David fourty 1. Kings 2.11 and then foure to Solomon ere he began the temple all together make foure hundred sixty and three and then the most left for Joshua will be seventeen though there should be no interregnum between the Judges Vers 32. And the bones of Joseph which the children of Israel brought up out of Egypt buried they in Shechem c. Joseph had commanded the Israelites to carry his bones with them out of Egypt Gen. 50.25 which accordingly they did Exod. 13.19 Here now we are told where they buried his bones to wit in Shechem in a parcell of ground which Jacob bought of the sonnes of Hamor the father of Shechem for an hundred pieces of silver Which was doubtlesse the parcell of a field mentioned Gen. 33.19 which Jacob bought of Hamor the father of Shechem and which when he lay upon his deathbed he gave to Joseph as a speciall legacy Gen 48.22 and this might well be the reason why they buried Josephs bones here whereas it is evident that his forefathers and their wives too were buried in the cave of Machpelah Gen. 49.29 30 31. I am saith Jacob to be gathered unto my people Bury me with my fathers in the cave that is in the field of Ephron the Hittite In the cave that is in the field of Machpelah which is before Mamre in the land of Canaan which Abraham bought with the field of Ephron the Hittite for a possession of a burying place There they buried Abraham and Sarah his wife there they buried Isaac and Rebekah his wife and there I buried Leah to wit because it was the inheritance peculiarly bequeathed him by his father Indeed by the words of Stephen Acts 7.15 16. it might seem that all the Patriarchs the sonnes of Jacob and so Josephs bones amongst the rest were buried not in the field which Jacob bought Gen. 33.19 but in the burying-place which Abraham bought of Ephron in Machpelah Gen. 23.17 18. For though Stephen saith they were buried in a field bought of the sonnes of Emor the father of Sichem yet withall he saith expressely that they were buried in a Sepulchre purchased by Abraham Acts 7.15 16. So Jacob went down into Egypt and died he and our fathers and were carried over into Sichem and laid in the sepulchre which Abraham bought for a summe of money Now we reade of no burying place which Abraham bought but that of the cave of Machpelah which he bought of Ephron the Hittite Gen. 23.16.17 c. wherein it is evident Gen. 49.29 30 31. that Abraham and Sarah and Isaac and Rebekah and Jacob Leah were buried but to this I answer that many of our best Expositours are of opinion that this place in the Acts of the Apostles is corrupted by the carelesnesse or rather the mistake of those that transcribed the copies yet because it is dangerous to allow that the Greek copies of the new Testament are generally falsified in any one passage I think it is better answered that though Stephen said that the fathers were laid in the sepulchre of Abraham bought for a summe of money of Emor the father of Sichem yet he meant onely thereby that they were laid in the Sepulchre which the posterity or the sonne of Abraham bought of the sonnes of Emor and that was Jacob because that which the sonne doth the father may be said to do in him and if so then it seems that the bones of the other Patriarchs the sonnes of Jacob were buried here together with Josephs At what time they buried Josephs bones here it is not expressed yet by the last clause of this verse where it is said of this parcell of ground and it became the inheritance of the children of Joseph it appears that it was done after they had rest in the land and had divided the whole countrey of Canaan amongst the tribes and so this part of Canaan where this parcell of land lay falling then by lot to the sonnes of Joseph to whom Jacob at his death had bequeathed it here they buried the bones of their father Vers 33. And they buried him in a hill that pertained to Phinehas his sonne which was given him in mount Ephraim Because the cities that fell to the priests by lot were taken out of the tribe of Judah and out of the tribe of Simeon and out of the tribe of Benjamin chap. 21.4 and thence it might seem strange that Eleazar or Phinehas his sonne should have any inheritance in mount Ephraim wherein for that cause Eleazar the high priest should be buried since mount Ephraim belonged to the sonnes of Joseph therefore in the last clause of this book it is expressely said that it belonged to Phinehas by warrant of a speciall and extraordinary gift and not by the designement of the lot which was drawn forth for the priests it was given him in mount Ephraim Whether this hill was given to Eleazar or Phinehas it is not fully and clearly expressed the words seem rather to imply that it was given to Phinehas they buried him in a hill which pertained to Phinehas his sonne which was given him in mount Ephraim but yet it may be that the place where Eleazar was buried is here said to be the hill of Phinehas or a hill that pertained to Phinehas not because it did not first pertain to Eleazar but with relation to future times whence it seems it was usually called the hill of Phinehas and the reason that Expositours give why this place in mount Ephraim was by extraordinary gift conferred upon the high priest whereas the priests had their dwellings by lot in the other tribes above mentioned are
hand foot for foot Exod. 21.24 Some Expositours indeed conceive that the Israelites knew not of this particular cruelty that he had used to others till himself acknowledged the just hand of God upon him herein verse 7. Threescore and ten kings having their thumbs and their great toes cut off gathered their meat under my table and so they ascribe this which the Israelites did wholly to the secret providence of God who moved them thus to return his cruelty upon himself they not knowing why they did it But no such thing can be necessarily inferred from his acknowledgement of that which he had done to the kings that he had conquered for either to confesse how many kings he had used so or out of remorse of conscience being as it were constrained to confesse that it was the just vengeance of God upon him he might well say what he did though he knew the Israelites had purposely done thus to him because he had formerly done so to others Vers 7. Threescore and ten kings having their thumbs and great toes cut off gathered their meat under my table c. This need not seem strange to us if we consider first what petty kings there were in those times and secondly that this may be understood of so many kings who at severall times had been thus used not that there were seventy all at one time thus waiting upon him though even that is not so incredible considering that in those dayes every city almost had a severall king And as for their gathering or gleaning their meat under his table the meaning is not that they lay like dogs under the table but that they were kept as slaves in such a manner that for hunger they were glad to gather up the crumbs and scraps that fell under the kings table as having nothing allowed them to eat but that and happely the king to please himself with this cruell spectacle did sometimes cause them to be fetched in when he was in his cups feasting himself that he might see them in this piteous plight whereunto he had brought them and insult over them And they brought him to Jerusalem and there he died To Jerusalem I conceive they brought him as a spectacle worthy to be beheld that men might learn by him how just God is in punishing men according to the nature of their wickednesse and therefore it is most likely also that he dyed there presently of the wounds he had received in the warre in that severe punishment that was inflicted on him or else that he was kept there upon this extraordinary occasion purposely that men might see in him how God abhorres such cruelty as his was he being otherwise one of those accursed nations that might not be spared Vers 8. Now the children of Judah had fought against Jerusalem and had taken it c. That is before Joshuas death for this is added to shew the reason why they carryed him to Jerusalem to wit because Jerusalem that is that part of Jerusalem that was in Judahs lot was now in their possession though not the fort So that most Expositours hold that both this and the following verses unto verse 17. are a repetition of the memorable acts done by the tribe of Judah whilest Joshua was now living Indeed before the land was divided all Israel fought as in one army against the Canaanites but after the tribes were seated in their severall portions each tribe made warre against the inhabitants in their severall lots and thus the men of Judah are here said to have done these things here related for it is not necessary to hold that Jerusalem was taken when the king thereof was slain Josh 10.23 See the note Josh 15.63 Vers 9. And afterwards the children of Judah went down to fight against the Canaanites that dwelt in the mountain c. That is from Jerusalem which stood in a mountainous countrey Psalme 125.2 As the mountains are round about Jerusalem so the Lord is round about his people Vers 10. And Judah went against the Canaanites that dwelt in Hebron c. That is against the Canaanites that dwelt in the mountains about Hebron which they did in the dayes of Joshua and under the conduct of Caleb who then commanded in chief It is evident that Hebron was taken by Joshua concerning which see the note Joshua 10.37 and that afterwards Caleb drove out the giants that had possessed themselves of the strong holds in and about Hebron Ioshua 15.13 14. Concerning which see the note Ioshua 11.21 But because the Authour of this history was here to relate the memorable exploits that were done by the men of Iudah therefore together with those noble acts which they did after the death of Ioshua he repeats also those that were done by them whilest Ioshua was yet living under the command of Caleb both against Hebron and against Debir in the following verses so to set forth the glory of this tribe the more fully Vers 11. And from thence he went against the inhabitants of Debir c. See the notes that concern these following verses Ioshua 15.15 16 c. Vers 16. And the children of the Kenite Moses father in Law went up out of the city of palm-trees c. That is out of Jericho Deut. 34.3 the plain of the valley of Jericho the city of palm-trees Concerning these Kenites see the note upon Numb 10.31 in tents they alwayes dwelt chap. 4.17 Howbeit Sisera fled away on his feet to the tent of Jael the wife of Heber the Kenite it seems therefore that being appointed to have their lot with Judah having formerly dwelt in their tents in the countrey about Jericho for Jericho it self was many years ago destroyed Josh 6.24 after Judahs portion was cleared they removed with them to the wildernesse of Judah there to dwell with the men of Judah as Moses had promised to Hobab the Kenite Num. 10.32 And it shall be if thou go with us yea it shall be that what goodnesse the Lord shall do unto us the same will we do unto thee Vers 17. And Judah went with Simeon his brother To wit to help Simeon in the clearing his lot as before Simeon had helped Judah vers 3. And they slew the Canaanites that inhabited Zephah and utterly destroyed it and the name of the citie was called Hormah That is utter destruction they were not wont thus utterly to destroy all the cities they took it is therefore probable that they did thus destroy this place because of the vow which the Israelites had made long since when Arad the king of the Canaanites made warre against them see the note Numb 21.3 and the mention of Arad in the foregoing verse makes this opinion the more probable Vers 18. Also Judah took Gaza with the coast thereof c. Yet it seems soon after the Philistines recovered these cities with the coasts thereof and drave out the Israelites ere they could well settle themselves therein to wit because
they began presently to provoke the Lord with their sinnes For it is evident that these cities were not long after this inhabited by the Philistines chap. 3.1 2 3. Now these are â—he nations which the Lord left to prove Israel by them c. Namely five Lords of the Philistines c. and so again 1. Sam. 6.17 Now these are the golden Emerods which the Philistines returned for a trespasse-offering unto the Lord For Ashdod one for Gaza one for Askelon one for Gath one for Ekron one As for Ekron one of the cities here mentioned it was in Dans lot Josh 19.43 therefore it seems that the tribe of Judah joyned with those of Dan as well as with those of Simeon for the clearing of their coasts the rather because they could not hold those cities they had gotten from the Philistines if they had let them alone in this neighbouring citie Vers 19. And the Lord was with Judah and he drave out the inhabitants of the mountain This clause and the Lord was with Judah is added to shew of what difficulty their attempts were if the Lord had not been with them and withall to condemne their cowardise that durst not proceed in their conquests against the inhabitants of the valleys having had such incouraging experience of Gods assistance But could not drive out the inhabitants of the valley because they had chariots of iron Their own fears disabling them and God for their sinnes withdrawing himself from them Concerning these chariots of iron see the note Josh 17.16 Vers 21. And the children of Benjamin did not drive out the Jebusites that inhabited Jerusalem c. See Josh 15.63 Vers 26. And the man went into the land of the Hittites and built a city Whence it seems probable that the Israelites did not onely spare his life and the life of his family but also gave him a rich reward to wit for shewing them the way into Bethel as is before said Vers 27. Neither did Manasseh drive out the inhabitants of Bethshean c. See the note Josh 17.12 Thus in the dayes after the death of Joshua when it seems they had no one set over them in chief but were onely governed by the joynt-authority of the Elders in each tribe they began to be remisse in endeavouring to drive out the remainder of the Canaanites that dwelt in the land but were content to make peace with them and this was the first step of their defection from God which did by degrees lead them into grosser sinnes and greatly provoked the Lord to displeasure against them Vers 35. Yet the hand of the house of Joseph prevailed so that they became tributaries That is though the Danites were sorely for a time oppressed by the Amorites as is expressed before vers 34. And the Amorites forced the children of Dan into the mountain for they would not suffer them to come down to the valley yet afterward with the help of the sonnes of Joseph who bordered upon Dans portion and came up to aid them they prevailed against them so that they became tributaries Vers And the coast of the Amorites was from the going up to Akrabbim from the rock and upward This is added to shew how the Israelites through their own sloth suffered themselves to be hemmed in with these accursed enemies CHAP. II. Vers 1. ANd an Angel of the Lord came up from Gilgal to Bochim It is very hard to determine whether this were an Angel indeed or some man either priest or prophet that by speciall commission was sent at this time from God unto the people to reprove them for their sinnes The word in the originall may well be translated either angell or messenger as it is in the margin of our bibles and the reasons are very considerable which have moved many to think that it was some man of God that was sent to them to wit first because it is said that he came up from Gilgal not that he came down from heaven and so appeared to them and secondly because he spake in a generall assembly as is evident vers 4. where it is said that he spake unto all the children of Israel whereas the apparitions of Angels have been usually onely to some particular men in private But yet the most of Expositours conceive that it was a true Angel and that having assumed for this present service the body of man the Scripture therefore speaks of him as a man that he came up from Gilgal to Bochim and this they hold 1. Because he speaks after the manner of Angels not thus saith the Lord as the prophets were wont to speak but as in the person of God I made you to go up out of Egypt and 2. Because the Authour of this book elsewhere speaks differently of the prophet and the Angel as chap. 6.8 The Lord sent a prophet unto the children of Israel which said unto them Thus saith the Lord God of Israel I brought you up from Egypt and brought you forth out of the house of bondage But then vers 12. And the Angel of the Lord appeared unto him that is to Gideon and said unto him The Lord is with thee thou mighty man of valour Yea some hold that it was the sonne of God the Angel of the covenant who was wont thus to appear to the fathers and that because he ascribes here to himself that which was the work of God as the bringing this people out of Egypt and the making of a covenant with them However most probable it is that this was done in the dayes of the Elders that outlived Joshua and that before they began to worship the Gods of the nations they dwelt amongst for else doubtlesse this Angel or messenger of the Lord would have reproved them for their idolatry as well as for making a league of peace with the land It seems therefore that finding themselves sorely annoyed by the Canaanites in severall parts of the land there was an assembly of the people called of all the tribes that they might consult what was fit to be done and so thereupon the Lord sent his Angel to them with a message and very likely it is that it was some place about Shiloh where the people were now met together which upon occasion of the peoples weeping here was called Bochim that is weepers For first thither the tribes used to assemble themselves especially at their three solemn feasts and some generall assembly of the people there was at this time as is before noted and secondly the people did offer sacrifices there vers 5. and that they might onely do where the altar and tabernacle was Vers 2. But ye have not obeyed my voice why have ye done this That is consider how great and inexcusable your sinne is for these words why have ye done this are as much in effect as if he had said that they had not the least colour for that they had done and that if they were challenged to give a reason
conceive how is it possible that we should determine any thing concerning their names Sufficient it is for us to know that even in this regard the angel might well answer Manoah that his name was secret or wonderfull that is that it was a thing not to be revealed and therefore not to be enquired into or a thing too wonderfull for him to understand or that as the other angels so he also had no other name but this that he was one of those ministring spirits whom God did continually employ in the effecting of many wonderfull works for his people with respect whereto therefore it may well be that vers 19. it is expressely noted that the angel did wondrously But now granting what was formerly said that this angel of the Lord was the Sonne of God the great angel of the Covenant it must needs seem the lesse strange that he should tell Manoah that his name was secret and not to be searched into or wonderfull and incomprehensible and that because first as he is very God his name that is his essence or being is infinitely above our understanding it is a secret we must not prie into it is too wonderfull for us onely we know of him what by his word and works he hath been pleased to reveal to us and that is enough to astonish any man that will seriously ponder it with himself and secondly as he was appointed of God to be in our nature the mediatour between God and man there was nothing in him nor nothing that was to be done by him but was every way wonderfull whence it is that the prophet said of him His name shall be called wonderfull Isa 9.6 Vers 19. So Manoah took a kid with a meat-offering and offered it c. Neither the person sacrificing nor the place where they offered this sacrifice were warrantable by the law but the allowance of the angel vers 16. If thou wilt offer a burnt offering thou must offer it unto the Lord was warrant sufficient Vers 20. For it came to passe when the flame went up towards heaven from off the altar c. Because there is no mention made either of wood or of fire that was brought by Manoah for the offering of this sacrifice therefore many Expositours hold that by the ministerie of the angel there came fire out of the rock to consume the burnt offering as it was before in Gideons sacrifice chap. 6.21 But that cannot certainly be concluded from thence However it was doubtlesse the angels ascending up in the flame of the altar that was the principall miraculous work whereby the angel did discover what he was to Manoah and his wife and methinks too this is one of the strongest evidences to make it most probable that this angel was the Sonne of God and that because his going up to heaven in the flame of the sacrifice did most sweetly represent and shadow forth the office of Christ the great Angel of the covenant whose work it is to present all our services before God and to procure them to be graciously accepted of him Vers 22. And Manoah said unto his wife We shall surely die c. See the note chap. 6.22 Vers 23. But his wife said unto him If the Lord were pleased to kill us he would not have received a burnt offering c. By three severall arguments doth Manoahs wife comfort him first from Gods accepting of their sacrifice and that she takes for granted because the angel advised them to offer that their sacrifice vers 16. If thou wilt offer a burnt offering thou must offer it unto the Lord and secondly because he had made known Gods accepting of it both by that his miraculous ascending up to heaven in the flame of it whereby they might see that their sacrifice went up with him into the presence of God and also as Expositours generally conceive by causing fire miraculously to ascend out of the rock and consume the sacrifice as formerly in that of Gideons Judg. 6.21 The angel of the Lord put forth the end of the staff that was in his hand and touched the flesh and the unleavened cakes and there arose fire out of the rock consumed the flesh and the unleavened cakes secondly from those wonders God had shewed them neither saith she would he have shewed us all these things that is all these miraculous signes of Gods favour towards us to wit the strange burning of the sacrifice and ascending of the angel in the flame thereof and thirdly from his imparting those secrets to them concerning their child Nor saith she would he as at this time have told us such things as these that is neither would he thus beforehand in a time of such great distresse have told us such comfortable tidings concerning the birth and education of our child and the worthy service he should do for the deliverance of his Church and people Vers 24. And the child grew and the Lord blessed him That is he indued him with admirable strength of body courage of mind and all other gifts requisite for those worthy services God had appointed him to do Vers 25. And the spirit of the Lord began to move him at times in the camp of Dan c. The camp of Dan was either the place of Samsons dwelling so called by occasion of that which we find written concerning the expedition of the Danites against Laish which it seems was before the dayes of Samson chap. 18.11 12. And there went from thence of the familie of the Danites out of Zorah and out of Eshtaol six hundred men appointed with weapons of warre And they went up and pitched in Kiriath-jearim in Judah wherefore they call that place Mahaneh-Dan unto this day or else it may be meant of a camp which the Danites had formed at present in this place having raised an army to withstand the incursions of the Philistines who did sorely now oppresse them where Samson serving in his young years began to give proof of the noble acts he should afterwards do For the spirit of God began now and then at times to come upon him and to put him upon strange and admirable exploits even beyond the ordinary courage and strength of man CHAP. XIV Vers 1. ANd Samson went down to Timnath c. A citie that was at first in the lot of Judah Josh 15.57 and afterward was separated for the tribe of Dan Josh 19.43 but was often if not alwayes in the possession of the Philistines in the confines of whose land it stood and so now it seems it was Vers 2. I have seen a woman in Timnath of the daughters of the Philistines now therefore get her for me to wife It was unlawfull for any Israelite much more for a Nazarite to marry with a daughter of the Philistines Deut. 7.3 but it seems Samson did this not without a speciall warrant from God either by revelation or by a strong instinct of the spirit which he knew well
Vers 4. Eleazar begat Phinehas Phinehas begat Abishua c. Eleazar succeeded his father Aaron in the high priesthood in the fourtieth yeare after their coming out of Egypt Numb 20.25 c. and 33.18 and was high priest all the time of Joshua and died immediately after him as may seem by the relation of their deaths together Josh 24.29 33. Phinehas his sonne that succeeded him was he that slew Zimri and Cozbi in the wildernesse and had thereupon a promise from God that the high priesthood should be settled upon him and his seed for ever see Numb 25.7 13. He succeeded his father Eleazar about the death of Joshua Josh 24.29 33. How long he lived high priest it is no where expressed but probable it is he was high priest all the time that the people served the Lord after Joshuahs death in the dayes of the elders that out-lived Joshua Judg. 2.7 and perhaps in the time of the first revolting of the people in the time of the Judges which must needs then be a matter of much grief to a man of such zeal as he was for it is evident that when the Israelites made warre against Benjamin he was high priest Josh 20.28 And Phinehas the sonne of Eleazar the sonne of Aaron stood before it in those dayes As for the next three that follow Abishau Bukki his sonne and Vzzi his sonne they were it seems high priests in those corruptest times of Israel under the Judges whereto agrees that which is by some said that in the dayes of Uzzi it was that Eli and so his posterity after him got the high priests office not being of Eleazars stock but of the stock of Ithamar and if so it were then the foure next following of the stock of Eleazar were never high priests to wit Zerahiah and Meraioth and Amariah and Ahitub but Zadok the sonne of Ahitub vers 8. was the first that recovered that dignity again which was in the dayes of Solomon who thrust out Abiathar of the posterity of Eli and of the stock of Ithamar from being high priest and put Zadok the sonne of Ahitub in his room 1. Kings 2.27 35. Vers 10. And Johanan begat Azariah he it is that executed the priests office in the temple that Solomon built in Jerusalem That is this is that Azariah of whom such honourable mention is made in the book of the Chronicles 2. Chron. 26.16 c. who did so worthily execute maintain the honour and office of the priesthood against the intrusion and usurpation of Uzziah the king of Judah and it is expressely noted that it was in the temple which Solomon built in Jerusalem because at the time when this was written there was another Temple in Jerusalem built by Zerub-babel Yet some understand these words of Johanan the father of Azariah that he was that Jehoiada that was high priest in the dayes of Athaliah by whom both the Temple and Common-wealth were preserved when they were in danger to be ruined by her Vers 13. And Shallum begat Hilâ—iah Who found the book of the Law in the dayes of Josiah 2. Kings 22.8 Vers 14. And Azariah begat Seraiah c. Seraiah was the high priest whom Nebuchadnezzar slew see 2. Kings 25.18 21. He was also the father or grand-father of Ezra Ezra 7.1 Now after these things in the reigne of Artaxerxes king of Persia Ezra the sonne of Seraiah the sonne of Azariah the sonne of Hilkiah c. and then Jehozadak his sonne was the father of Josuah who was so famous at the return of the Jews and the rebuilding of the Temple Hag. 1.1 In the second yeare of Darius the king in the sixth moneth in the first day of the moneth came the word of the Lord by Haggai the Prophet unto Zerubbabel the sonne of Shealtiel governour of Judah and to Josuah the sonne of Josedech the high priest Vers 19. And these are the families of the Levites according to their fathers That is of these before named were the severall families of the Levites called to wit the family of the Libnites c. Vers 20. Of Gershom Libni his sonne Jahath his sonne Zimmah his sonne c. Here follows a catalogue of those that were successively the Heads both of the Gershonites Kohathites and Merarites perhaps unto the dayes of David who did dispose of the Levites into new orders and whereas Zimmah is here said to be the sonne of Jahath thereby is meant that he was his grandchild for Shimei was the sonne of Jahath and Zimmah the sonne of Shimei vers 42 43. Vers 25. And the sonnes of Elkanah Amasai and Ahimoth The sonnes of Elkanah are here more particularly expressed because from him descended that Elkanah who was the father of Samuel Vers 26. As for Elkanah the sonnes of Elkanah Zophai his sonne c. This is another Elkanah who was the sonne of Mahath and grandchild of Amasai mentioned in the former verse as is evident vers 35 36. Vers 27. Jeroham his sonne Elkanah his sonne The father of Samuel Vers 31. And these are they whom David set over the service of song in the house of the Lord c. That is these are they that David made chief in the three quires of singers after the Ark had rest that is after it was brought to Davids house for before it was removed from one place to another to wit these mentioned in the sequel of this chapter Heman of the Kohathites ver 33. who was the chief and therefore had the middle quire and Asaph who stood on Hemans right hand v. 39. and was of the Gershonites and Ethan who was also called Jeduthun chap. 25.1 and was of the Merarites and stood on Hemans left hand ver 44. These were in their times famous men as being the chief singers and withall Prophets and pen-men of some of the Psalmes 2. Chron. 29.30 Moreover Hezekiah the king and the princes commanded the Levites to sing praise unto the Lord with the words of David and of Asaph the seer Vers 33. Heman a singer the sonne of Joel the sonne of Shemuel That is Samuel for Heman was Samuels grandchild Vers 50. And these are the sonnes of Aaron Eleazar his sonne Phinehas his sonne c. By occasion of the mention that is made of the severall offices and imployments of the priests in the foregoing verse the catalogue of the sonnes of Eleazar is here again set down unto the dayes of David by whom the priests were divided into foure severall orders Vers 57. And to the sonnes of Aaron they gave the cities of Judah c. And Simeon Josh 21.9 And they gave out of the tribe of the children of Judah and out of the tribe of the children of Simeon these cities which are here mentioned by name Vers 60. All their cities throughout their families were thirteen cities To wit the eleven here mentioned and Ain in Judahs portion and Gibeon in Benjamins which are reckoned amongst the rest Josh 21.16 17. but
are not here mentioned Vers 61. And unto the sonnes of Kohath which were left of the family of that tribe were cities given out of the half tribe c. That is to the rest of the sonnes of Kohath to wit those that were not of the priests the sonnes of Aaron there were cities given out of the half tribe of Manasseh that was placed within Jordan yea and by lot there were given them in all ten cities to wit foure out of the tribe of Ephraim and foure out of the tribe of Dan and two out of the half tribe of Manasseh most of which are expressed by name vers 67 c. and more fully Josh 21.21 Vers 65. And they gave by lot these cities which are called by their names To wit above ver 57 c. Vers 66. And the residue of the families of the sonnes of Kohath had cities c. Here the cities that were given to the rest of the Kohathites are expressed also by name which were before spoken of ver 61. as they are also Josh 21.20 though indeed many of the names there and here differ concerning which see the notes there Vers 69. And Aijalon with her suburbs c. These were given them out of the tribe of Dan as also Eltekeh and Gibbethon which are not here mentioned Josh 21.23 24. CHAP. VII Vers 1. NOw the sonnes of Issachar were Tola and Puah Jashub c. This Puah and Jashub we called Phuvah and Job Gen. 46.13 Having before set down the genealogies of Reuben Simeon Levi and Judah Issachars is next here related because Issachar was Jacobs next sonne by Leah Vers 2. Whose number was in the dayes of David two and twenty thousand and six hundred To wit when he appointed Joab to number the people 2. Sam. 24.1 Vers 3. And the sonnes of Uzzi Izrahiah and the sonnes of Izrahiah Michael and Obadiah and Joel Ishiah five That is there were five descended of Uzzi to wit Izrahiah and his foure sonnes Vers 4. And with them by their generations after the house of their fathers were bands of souldiers c. Hereby it is evident that there were six and thirty thousand men of the posterity of Uzzi alone so that the two and twenty thousand six hundred mentioned before vers 2. was the number of the posterity of Tola by his other sonnes Uzzi being excepted whose posterity are here numbred by themselves as being more then all the rest together Vers 5. And their brethren among all the families of Issachar were men of might c. That is all the children of Issachar together were fourescore and seven thousand men of might when Joab numbred them Vers 6. The sonnes of Benjamin Bela and Becher and Jodiael three Jediael is called Ashbel Gen. 46.21 Zebulun was the sixth sonne of Leah born next after Issachar but neither Zebuluns nor Dans genealogie is at all here mentioned perhaps because at the return of the people out of Babylon when it is thought that Ezra wrote this book their genealogies were not found Benjamins genealogy is therefore next inserted who was the sonne of Rachel yet here are but onely three of Benjamins ten sonnes mentioned perhaps because the posterity of these onely were numbred when Joab numbred the people vers 2. Vers 12. Shuppim also and Huppim c. That is these also were of Benjamins posterity Vers 13. The sonnes of Naphtali Jahziel and Guni and Jezer and Shallum the sonnes of Bilhah That is the grand-children for Bilhah Rachels handmaid was the mother of Naphtali whose sonnes these were Vers 14. The sonnes of Manasseh Ashriel whom she bare c. There was an Ashriel that was the sonne or one of the posterity of Gilead Numb 26.30 31. These are the sonnes of Gilead of Jeezer the family of the Jeezerites of Helek the family of the Helekites And of Asriel the family of the Asrielites and of Shechem the family of the Shechemites either therefore this was another Ashriel the immediate sonne of Manasseh by his wife whereas Machir was Manassehs sonne by his concubine the Aramitesse or else Ashriel is here reckoned onely as one of the posterity of Manasseh whom she bare that is either the wife of Gilead or the wife of Hepher the mother of Zelophehad and thence it follows vers 15. that Zelophehad who was the sonne of Hepher the sonne of Gilead Num. 27.1 was the second that is the second sonne of Hepher the younger brother of Ashriel And if we thus take Ashriel for one of the posterity of Gilead the sonne of Machir then we must understand that the following words But his concubine the Aramitesse bare Machir c. are onely added to shew that this Ashriel and the rest afterward mentioned were not the posterity of Manasseh by his wife but by his concubine the Aramitesse Vers 17. These were the sonnes of Gilead c. To wit Ashriel and Zelophehad above mentioned but not Peresh and Sheresh and his posteritie the last here mentioned for they were the sonnes of Machir by Maachah and so the brethren of Gilead Vers 18. And his sister Hammoleketh bare Ishhad c. That is Gileads sister Vers 19. And the sonnes of Shemida were Ahian c. And Shemida was also the sonne or of the stock of Gilead see Numb 26.30 32. Vers 21. Whom the men of Gath that were born in that land slew c. Either this must be referred to all those before named vers 20. the sonnes of Ephraim Shuthelah and Bered his sonne and Tahath his sonne c. to wit as taking them all to be the severall sonnes of Ephraim namely that Shuthelah vers 20. was the sonne of Ephraim and so also Bered who seems to be mentioned as the sonne of Shuthelah was another sonne of Ephraim and Tahath another and so on forward who were all slain by the men of Gath when the Israelites were in Egypt or else if this seems not so probable because then Ephraim should have two sonnes called Shuthelah and two called Tahath then though those in the twentieth verse be taken as severall generations to wit that Shuthelah was the sonne of Ephraim and Bered his grandchild and Tahath his grandchild and so forward yet Zabad the first mentioned vers 21. must be reckoned another sonne of Ephraim and Shuthelah and Ezer and Elead his grandchildren whom the men of Gath slew or thirdly if all those before mentioned be reckoned as severall succeeding generations to wit that Shuthelah the sonne of Ephraim begat Bered and Bered Tahath and Tahath Eladah and Eladah Tahath and Tahath Zabad and Zabad Shuthelah and Ezer and Elead then the words whom the men of Gath slew c. must be referred onely to some of the former of these here mentioned or fourthly that which follows vers 22. And Ephraim their father mourned many dayes and his brethren came to comfort him must be meant of Zabad who was called also Ephraim perhaps onely because he was the head of that tribe
of Edom southward were Kabzeel c. It is called Iekabzeel Neh. 11.25 Vers 32. All their cities are twenty nine with their villages There are indeed eight and thirty cities or towns named in the foregoing verses and therefore for the clearing of this some hold that because nine of these were afterwards assigned to the tribe of Simeon therefore it is said here that all the cities of Iudah in those parts were nine and twenty But the better answer I conceive is that nine and twenty of them onely were walled cities the other were the most famous towns and villages in those parts And here in this first catalogue of Iudahs cities in the Southern parts the most noted towns are expressed by name as well as the walled cities that in the following catalogues we may conceive the same to wit that there were many towns of note besides the cities there mentioned though they be not expressed by name as here they are Vers 36. Fourteen cities with their villages There are fifteen named in the foregoing verses either therefore one of them was no citie but some noted town or rather it may be very probably conceived that Gederah and Gederothaim were but one citie and therefore some reade it as it is in the margin of our bibles Gederah or Gederothaim Vers 62. And Nibshan and the citie of salt This citie might have its name The citie of salt from the salt pits that were there and the abundance of salt that was dayly made by the inhabitants of the citie Vers 63. As for the Jebusites the inhabitants of Jerusalem the children of Judah could not drive them out It is a question much argued amongst writers whether Jerusalem stood in Judahs or in Benjamins portion By many places of Scripture it seems evident that it was in Benjamins portion For in the 18. chapter of this book vers 28. it is reckoned amongst the cities that were in Benjamins lot and we see that Moses did before his death prophesie concerning Benjamin that the Temple which was in Jerusalem should be built in Benjamins portion for that is the drift of those words Deut. 33.12 And of Benjamin he said The beloved of the Lord shall dwell in safety by him and the Lord shall cover him all the day long and he shall dwell between his shoulders yea and Jer. 6.1 the inhabitants of Jerusalem are expressely called the children of Benjamin O ye children of Benjamin gather your selves to flee out of the midst of Jerusalem and Judg. 1.21 the same that is here said of the children of Judah is likewise there said of the children of Benjamin The children of Benjamin did not drive out the Jebusites the inhabitants of Jerusalem but the Jebusites dwell with the children of Benjamin in Jerusalem unto this day But now again by other places of Scripture it seems as evident that Jerusalem was in Judahs portion For first mention is here made of it as one of Judahs cities The Jebusites dwell with the children of Judah at Jerusalem unto this day and secondly Jerusalem is said to have been taken by the children of Judah Judg. 1.8 and thirdly it is reckoned as the great priviledge of the children of Judah that the Lord in his Temple dwelt amongst them Psal 78.67 68 69. Moreover he refused the Tabernacle of Joseph and chose not the tribe of Ephraim but chose the tribe of Judah the mount Sion which he loved and he built his Sanctuary like high places c. but the truth herein is that Jerusalem stood in the border of these two tribes and so was part in Judahs and part in Benjamins portion and therefore the places of Scripture before cited do not any way contradict one another the fort of Sion and some of the south skirts of the city were in Judahs portion but the greatest part of the city in Benjamins and therefore it may well be that when they went about to expell the Jebusites that dwelt there both Iudah and Benjamin joyned their forces together as Judah and Simeon did in a like case Judg. 1.3 And Judah said unto Simeon his brother Come up with me into my lot that we may fight aganst the Canaanites and I likewise will go with thee into thy lot As for that which is here said concerning Jerusalem to wit that the children of Judah could not drive out the Jebusites thence and the like we see is said concerning the children of Benjamin Judg. 1.21 we must know that the Iebusites continued in Ierusalem unto Davids time Indeed Adoni-zedek the king of Jerusalem was slain by Ioshua chap. 10.23 26. for he was one of those five kings that made warre against Gibeon though we find no mention there of his taking Ierusalem yea and it is expressely said Iudg. 1.8 that afterwards the children of Iudah took the city of Jerusalem and burnt it with fire that is some part of it Well but yet the fort of Sion which was the chief strength of Ierusalem was not at that time taken by them for that the Iebusites held till David took it 2. Sam. 5 6 7. yea and it seems that afterward the Iebusites did also by the help of this fort recover the city again at least so farre that they forced the Israelites to let the Iebusites dwell there amongst them as it is said here For in the dayes of the Iudges we see that Iebus that is Ierusalem was still inhabited by the Iebusites Iudg. 19.12 We will not turn aside hither into the city of a stranger that is not of the children of Israel saith the Levite there concerning Iebus we will passe over to Gibea But however we must not think that this which is said here that the children of Judah could not drive them out is added by way of excusing them no but rather to their shame and reproch for though the fort of Sion was a place of great strength so that when David set himself down with his army before it the Iebusites scorned him bragged that their lame and blind and impotent people should defend it against him 2. Sam. 5.6 Yet God would certainly have driven them out according to his promise had they not been wanting to themselves But they grew slothfull and faint hearted and by these and other their sinnes provoked the Lord to withdraw himself from them and so then indeed they could not drive out the inhabitants but were glad to purchase peace upon any tearms according to that Iudg. 2.20 21. And the anger of the Lord was hot against Israel and he said Because this people hath transgressed my covenant which I commanded their fathers and have not hearkned to my voice I also will not hence forth drive out any from before them of the nations which Joshua left when he died c. CHAP. XVI Vers 1. ANd the lot of the children of Joseph fell from Jordan by Jericho unto the water of Jericho on the east c. It is the opinion of some learned writers that
and so consequently Issachars also therefore the line of their borders is not here described as in the other tribes but onely the principal towns and cities are named first those that stood in the south border vers 18 19. secondly those in the west vers 20. and thirdly those in the north ver 21 22. Now this portion set apart for Issachar being in a fat and fruitfull soil that was fulfilled which Jacob foretold Gen. 49.14 And he saw that rest was good and the land that it was pleasant and bowed his shoulders to bear and became a servant unto tribute and Moses Deut. 32.18 Vers 24. And the fifth lot came out for the tribe of the children of Asher c. Even here also the hand of God is still observable in his ordering the lots Hitherto the lots had come out onely for those tribes that were descended of Jacobs two wives Leah and Rachel and the tribe of Gad who was the eldest of Jacobs sonnes by Zilpah Leahs handmaid had already received their inheritance without Jordan upon speciall suit made unto Moses so now the next lot came out for the tribe of Asher who was also the sonne of Zilpah the handmaid of Leah Jacobs first wife and therefore preferred before the two tribes of Dan and Naphtali that were descended of Bilhah the handmaid of Rachel his second wife Vers 25. And their border was Helkath c. The cities that are first here mentioned stood on the northwest border which is drawn all along the coast of the midland sea as far as to mount Carmel westward that is to the west side of mount Carmel and Shihor-libnah and so here the line turneth eastward vers 27. and makes the south bounds of this tribes portion and then fetcheth a compasse northward again like to the bending of a bow till it comes to Zidon on the north end of the sea coast then turneth southward again as far as Tyre c. Now by the mention that is here made of mount Carmel in the lot of this tribe we may see how the prophesie of Jacob concerning this tribe was folly accomplished Gen. 49.20 Out of Asher his bread shall be fat and he shall yield royall dainties for mount Carmel and the land about it was a fruitfull soil and had many mines in it Isa 39.9 Sharon is like a wildernesse and Bashan and Carmel shake off their fruits and Isa 35.2 It shall blossome abundantly and rejoyce even with joy and singing the glory of Lebanon shall be given unto it the excellency of Carmel and Sharon See also Deut. 33.24 25. And of Asher he said Let Asher be blessed with children let him be acceptable to his brethren and let him dip his foot in oyl Thy shoes shall be iron and brasse and as thy dayes so shall thy strength be Vers 27. And goeth out to Cabul on the left hand See the note upon vers 30. Vers 29. And the out-goings thereof are at the sea from the coast to Achzib That is all the coast from the sea even unto Achzib Vers 30. Vmmah also and Aphek and Rehob twenty and two cities with their villages That is Ummah Aphek and Rehob were cities of note in the portion of Asher though not before mentioned in describing the borders of their lot So that in all the cities here named belonging to the tribe of Asher are twenty and two Indeed he that reckons all the names of places before mentioned shall find them to be twenty and three but to this it is answered by some that Cabul mentioned vers 27. was not a city but a part of the countrey which Solomon gave unto Hiram and because of the censure which was then by him passed upon it was called Cabul 1. Kings 9.13 And he said What cities are these which thou hast given me my brother and he called them the land of Cabul unto this day And again others say that some one of the bordering cities before named belonged not to Asher but to some of the neighbouring tribes Vers 33. And their coast was from Heleph c. This is the east border of the tribe of Naphtali beginning at these towns which stood somewhat more northerly then the fountains of Jordan and so Iordan even as farre as the lake of Genezereth was the utmost southernly end of the eastern border Thus Naphtalies land lay along by the banks of Iordan in a large extent and so Iacobs prophesie was fulfilled Gen. 49.21 Naphtali is a hind let loose and that of Moses Deut. 33.23 And of Naphtali he said O Naphtali satisfied with favour and full with the blessings of the Lord possesse thou the west and the south Vers 34. Then the coast turneth westward to Aznoth-tabor c. Here now the south border of this tribes portion is described to wit that it turned from Iordan westward first to Aznoth-tabor and thence to Hukkok and so went on till it came to have as it follows in the next words Zebulun on the south side and Asher on the west side And indeed this last clause seems to have reference to that prophesie of Moses before mentioned concerning this tribe Deut. 33.23 Possesse thou the west and the south for however it is noted before upon that place as the opinion of some Expositours that thereby might be signified that the lot of their inheritance should be in the southwest part of the land yet it being so evident here that this tribe had their inheritance in the utmost northeast part of the land the meaning of that clause possesse thou the west and the south must needs be this that however this tribes lot was to be seated in the furthest northeast corner of the kingdome yet it should reach forth so far both westward and southward that they should enjoy all the benefits both of the western and southern parts and the rather by their commerce with those other tribes upon whom they bordered And reacheth to Zebulun on the southside and unto Asher on the westside and to Judah upon Jordan toward the sun-rising It may seem strange that this tribe should be said to border upon Iudah but either the river of Iordan belonged peculiarly to Iudah as a royalty given them of God above all the other tribes in regard whereof Naphtali is said to border upon Iudah in Iordan or else this is added to imply the convenient situation of this tribes portion by reason it lay along by the banks of Iordan in a large extent For by this means though this tribe were seated in the uttermost north part of the kingdome yet they might by the river have commerce with the other tribes as farre as Iudah between whom and Naphtali many other tribes were seated and so being the utmost north tribe might in that sense be said to border upon Iudah who were seated in the utmost south parts of the kingdome Vers 35. And the fenced cities are Ziddim Zer and Hammath Rakkath and Cinnereth Hammath was a city standing
Penuel and slew the men of the city That is the Magistrates of the city as before he did in Succoth Vers 18. Then said he unto Zebah and Zalmunna What manner of men were they whom ye slew at Tabor Because it seems Gideon had heard that these kings had slain certain men of the Israelites that had retired themselves for shelter to some strong holds or caves in mount Tabor and feared they vvere his brethren because they amongst others sought to provide for the saving of their lives in those dangerous times as others did chap. 6.2 And the hand of Midian prevailed against Israel and because of the Midianites the children of Israel made them the dens which are in the mountains and caves and strong holds and had not been since heard of therefore he inquires thus concerning the men vvhom they had there slain And they answered As thou art so were they each one resembled the children of a king This may be meant of that likenesse of feature which is usually amongst brethren but plainly it intends that they were of a goodly and comely personage even as Gideon was and such as might well beseem men of a princely and Royall stock Vers 19. As the Lord liveth if ye had saved them alive I would not slay you The meaning is that he would have spared them because they had shown mercy to his brethren and hereby he expresseth his sorrow for his brethren and shews what little cause they had now to expect any mercy from him Vers 20. And he said unto Jether his first-born Up and slay them Upon him he imposeth this work rather then any other first that he might train him up even from his young years to draw his sword against the enemies of Israel and to be severe to those that should rise up against God and against his people secondly that it might be done by way of avenging the death of his brethren thirdly because it would adde if not to the pain yet to the dishonour of their death to die by such a hand Vers 21. Then Zebah and Zalmunna said Rise thou and fall upon us for as the man is so is his strength In this reply of theirs first they descant in a kind of scornfull manner upon that command of Gideons setting a child to take away their lives whereas indeed this his young heire had scarce courage enough to look them in the face secondly they provoke Gideon as impatient of delay to rise upon them himself and rid them out of the way thereby discovering their contempt of death and how much they scorned to begge life and withall happely being loath to die by the hand of a child And took away the ornaments that were on their Camels necks As the memorials of this great victory Vers 22. Then the men of Israel said unto Gideon Rule thou over us both thou and thy sonne c. That is they offered to receive him to be their king and to settle the kingdome successively upon his posterity Vers 23. And Gideon said unto them I will not rule over you c. That is not as a king he judged Israel unto his dying day but it was the kingdome of Israel the regall power which they proffered and he now refused and that upon this ground because the accepting of this would have been in a manner a taking of the government out of Gods hand the Lord saith he shall rule over you Not that God rules not by kings as well as by other kind of Magistrates but because God had established this way of governing them by Judges who had not so great a degree of soveraignty and power over the people as kings usually have were extraordinarily called of God withall because God had in his Law expressed that in case they should desire a king they were to take him whom the Lord should choose Deu. 17.14 15 When thou art come to the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee and shalt possesse it and shall dwell therein and shalt say I will set a king over me like all the nations that are about Thou shalt in any wise set him a king over thee whom the Lord thy God shall chuse One from among thy brethren shalt thou set over thee thou mayest not set a stranger over thee which is not thy brother Therefore he takes this rash proffer of changing the government to be a shaking of Gods government because they went about to change it without Gods leave and refuseth to give any consent to it all which is evident by that which the Lord said of the Israelites desiring a King in Samuels dayes 1. Sam. 8.6 7. But the thing displeased Samuel when they said Give us a King to judge us and Samuel prayed unto the Lord And the Lord said unto Samuel Hearken unto the voice of the people in all that they say unto thee for they have not rejected thee but they have rejected me that I should not reigne over them Vers 26. And the weight of the golden ear-rings which he requested was a thousand and seven hundred shekles of gold c. Which is esteemed to be according to the account of our weight 2380 pounds it is not impossible that all this should be spent in the making of one ephod as it is said vers 27. especially if it were made as that of Aarons with a brestplate set with so many precious stones of great value Exod. 28.15 16.17 But the words will well enough bear that of part of this gold now given him he made an ephod Vers 27. And Gideon made an ephod thereof and put it in his city Not a linen ephod but such a one as that which was made for the high priest of gold blue purple scarlet c. Exod. 28.6 It is probable enough that he intended it onely as a memoriall of this their victory over the Midianites the monument being of the very prey which was there taken though afterwards it became a snare both to him and to his house But why then did he make an ephod rather then any other monument this indeed seems to imply that his purpose was to make use also of this ephod either in offering sacrifices in his own house and then under this ephod all the priestly garments may be comprehended or else thereby to enquire what the will of the Lord was according to the judgement of Urim Not considering that this previledge was onely annexed to Aarons ephod wherein was the brestplate of judgement with the Urim and Thummim and therein therefore he sinned greatly and brought Gods wrath upon his posterity And all Israel went thither a whoring after it c. Either they went thither as to a famous Oracle to inquire concerning the will of God in any doubtfull cases or else drawn with the superstitious conceits they had entertained of this ephod they set up there a place of sacrificing contrary to the expresse letter of the Law of God or else they resorted
answered c. and her father his father in law in severall places Why Bethlehem from whence this Levite had his concubine is called Bethlehem-Judah See in the note chap. 17.7 Vers 2. And his concubine plaid the whore against him went away from him unto her fathers house c. It seems upon some discoverie of her whoredome or at least some suspition the Levite had of it there arose some quarrell betwixt him and his concubine and thereupon she left him and went home again to her fathers house who was too ready to entertain her The sad effects that followed upon this Levites taking a concubine makes it manifest that even in those times though it were an ordinary thing amongst all sorts of men even amongst the Levites to have concubines yet God was not pleased with it from the beginning it was not so saith our Saviour Matth. 19.8 Vers 3. And her husband arose and went after her to speak friendly unto her and to bring her again having his servant with him and a couple of asses To wit to carrie their provision and happely that both himself and his concubine if she would return with him might sometimes ease themselves by riding as occasion served Vers 11. Come I pray thee and let us turn in unto this citie of the Jebusites and lodge in it For though the children of Judah had taken from the Jebusites that part of Jebus that is Jerusalem which was in their tribe chap. 1.8 The children of Judah had fought against Jerusalem and had taken it and had smitten it with the edge of the sword yet out of that part which belonged to Benjamin on which side the Levite was now travelling the Jebusites were not wholly expelled chap. 1.21 The children of Benjamin did not drive out the inhabitants of Jerusalem but the Jebusites dwell in Jerusalem with the children of Benjamin unto this day Vers 14. And the sunne went down upon them when they were by Gibeah which belongeth to Benjamin There was a Gibeah in the tribe of Judah Josh 15.57 to distinguish this from that it is here called Gibeah which belongeth to Benjamin and else where Gibeah of Saul 1. Sam. 11.4 it is thought to be the same which Josh 21.17 is called Gebah which was a citie given to tho Priests the sonnes of Aaron Against which it makes nothing that here it is said vers 16. the men of the place were Benjamites for the priests did not dwell alone in such cities though they were the lords and owners of them Vers 15. And they turned aside thither to go in and to lodge in Gibeah Though it were a pious resolution in the Levite rather to chose to lodge in Gibeah then in Jebus and that because Jebus was a citie wherein the idolatrous and uncircumcised Jebusites dwelt yet this proved fatall both to him and his as the best counsell may have the worst successe and that because there is a secret over-ruling hand of God that may by this means bring about what he hath determined for the punishment of some other sinnes which we mind not Vers 16. And behold there came an old man from his work out of the field at even which was also of mount Ephraim Though he were an old man yet he followed his work in the field and that untill the even which is doubtlesse noted to his praise As for that last clause that he was also of mount Ephraim that no doubt is expressed to intimate that this amongst other things made the old man the readier to entertain the Levite when he heard him say vers 18. that he was of mount Ephraim too Vers 18. But I am now going to the house of the Lord. The Tabernacle at this time was in Shiloh Josh 18.1 and Shiloh was in the tribe of Ephraim either therefore there the Levites dwelling was or else he meant first to go to the house of the Lord to do his service there and then afterwards to passe forward on his journey homeward However it is probable that he mentions his going to the house of the Lord that he might know him to be a Levite Vers 22. Behold the men of the city certain sonnes of Belial beset the house round about c. A like fact to this we have formerly related concerning the Sodomites of which see the note Gen. 19.4 as for this term Sonnes of Belial see Deut. 13.13 Vers 24. Behold here is my daughter a mayden and his concubine them I will bring out now c. See the note Gen. 19.8 Vers 25. So the man took his concubine and brought her forth unto them and they knew her c. In the foregoing words it is said that when the old man the Levites host proffered these varlets his daughter a virgin and the Levites concubine thereby to take them off from that unnaturall uncleannesse wherewith they meant to satisfie their lust upon the Levite himself the men would not hearken to him yet when immediately by the Levites means his concubine was indeed brought out unto them and left amongst them they fell upon her and defiled her and that in such an outrageous barbarous manner that she died of it which was doubtlesse because having once an object for their lust in their power they could not forbear and so forgetting their former resolutions they laid hold on her and abused her in a most inhumane and execrable manner Vers 26. Then came the woman in the dawning of the day and fell down at the doore of the mans house c. That is she fell down dead at the doore of the mans house and there lay till break of day when her husband going forth to see what was become of her found her dead and thus though her husband had pardoned her whoredome yet God punished it and that too with her own sinne adulterie was her sinne and adulterie was her death she had dealt treacherously against her husband one would not satisfie her but she exposed her self to the lust of a stranger and now she was abused to death by the lusts of so many barbarous wretches whom she knew not that by so abusing her they murdered her Vers 27. And her hands were upon the threshold This is added to implie the reason of that which follows why the Levite spake to her to rise vers 28. And he said unto her Vp let us be going to wit because she lay in such a manner her hands laid upon the threshold under her head as if she had been asleep Vers 29. He took a knife and laid hold on his concubine and divided her together with her bones into twelve pieces and sent her into all the coasts of Israel That is to each of the twelve tribes a piece for to the tribe of Levi that was dispersed through all the land there was none sent and this was done that the fight of her dead limbs might affect them the more and stirre them up to be the more zealous for the punishment
see that instead of looking with an envious and malignant eye upon him he entertained him with all possible courtesie and did what he could to honour him amongst the people As for that clause And will tell thee all that is in thine heart thereby is meant either that he would tell him all that he had a purpose to enquire of him or else he would tell him many secret things which no body knew but himself onely and indeed though for the present he told him of the asses onely as it follows in the next verse And as for thine asses that were lost three dayes ago set not thy mind on them for they are found which doubtlesse he did to free him from that care and that he might be the more willing to stay with him yet it may well be that afterward when they were together alone he told him many other secret things for the greater confirmation of his faith concerning the promise of the kingdome as Christ did to the woman of Samaria to make her know he was the Messiah Joh. 4.29 where we have an expression much like this of Samuel Come see a man saith she that hath told me all that ever I did Vers 20. And on whom is all the desire of Israel is it not on thee and on all thy fathers house That is on whom must the kingdome and royall dignity which all Israel desire may be reared up amongst them be conferred but on thee and on thy fathers house Vers 21. And Saul answered and said Am not I a Benjamite of the smallest of the tribes of Israel c. Though Samuel had in the foregoing words spoken very covertly concerning Sauls being king And on whom is all the desire of Israel c. yet the peoples eagernesse at this time to have a king being so famously known Saul might well hereby guesse at Samuels meaning and the strangenesse of such tydings makes him therefore as one astonished so debase himself Am not I a Benjamite of the smallest of the tribes of Israel c. Nor need we wonder that he calls the tribe of Benjamin the smallest of the tribes if we remember that this tribe was almost wholly destroyed not many years before in that warre that was between this tribe and their brethren of the other tribes Judg. 20. Long it was it seems ere this tribe recovered the desolation that was then made amongst them if ever they recovered it for even in regard that there were so few of this tribe it may well be that when this tribe kept faithfull to the house of David in the dayes of Jeroboam as well as the tribe of Judah yet still the Scripture speaks but of one tribe that did cleave to the house of David to wit the tribe of Judah as we may see 1. kings 11.32 and so in many other places Benjamin not being mentioned because of their paucity but comprehended under the men of Judah Vers 22. And Samuel took Saul and his servant and brought them into the parlour and made them sit in the cheifest place among them that were bidden Doubtlesse those invited were of the Elders and cheif of the city by placing Saul therefore above them he began to give a signe of the dignity he should be raised too and withall shewed how farre he was from envying him because he should be obscured by his advancement Vers 23. And Samuel said unto the cook Bring the portion which I gave thee of which I said unto thee Set it by thee Samuel it seems had given order to the cook for one speciall extraordinary messe that should be set by reserved as for some extraordinary guest and not sent up till Samuel sent for it and hereupon therefore he now called upon him to bring him that messe that it might be set before Saul As for the custome of those times in allotting a severall messe to every guest see the note upon Gen. 43.34 Vers 24. And the cook took up the shoulder and that which was upon it and set it before Saul To wit the left shoulder for the right shoulder of all peace-offerings was the priests portion Levit. 7.32 33. The shoulder was it seems in these times accounted the cheif peice and therefore doubtlesse was it alloted for the priests portion and here at this time appointed for Sauls messe It is hard to say what is meant by those words and that which was upon it to wit whether it be meant of any thing that was poured or laid upon it as sauce or onely for garnishing the meat or of any other joynt that was here brought in together with the shoulder as the neck or breast which before they are severed are upon the shoulder but because the shoulder is the onely joynt mentioned the first I conceive is most probable Behold that which is left set it before thee and eat for unto this time hath it been kept for thee since I said I have invited the people That is since I first gave order to the cook that he should prepare this provision for those that were invited Now this is expressed that hereby Saul might see that God had beforehand revealed his coming thither to Samuel for how else could Samuel have purposely set apart this portion for him Vers 25. Samuel communed with Saul upon the top of the house Where they might be most private for thence also is that Acts 10.9 Peter went up upon the house to pray about the sixth houre Both this and his choosing the spring of the day to anoint Saul in vers 26. before any bodie was stirring and his going forth to the end of the citie and sending his servant away vers 27. they all shew how carefull Samuel was that it should not yet be known that Saul was anointed king to wit that when he was afterward chosen by lot no body as yet thinking of any such thing it might be the more manifest that he was chosen of God and that no body else had any hand in it and secondly that Saul might hereby be taught to wait upon God to content himself with the promise for a time and to stay Gods leisure for the performance of what was promised Vers 26. And Saul arose and they went out both of them he and Samuel abroad The calling up Saul therefore to the top of the house mentioned in the foregoing words Samuel called Saul to the top of the house c. was onely that Samuel might will him to make ready presently to be gone which Saul accordingly did and so then Samuel went along with him out of the citie intending at their parting to anoint him king CHAP. X. Vers 1. THen Samuel took a viall of oyl and poured it upon his head and kissed him c. Two ceremonies are here mentioned which Samuel used when he conferred upon Saul the supreme power of being king of Israel The first is that he took a viall of oyl and poured it upon his head which he did
Libnah a citie in his own countrey and then no wonder though he stayed not to prosecute his victory in the land of Edom. Then Libnah revolted at the same time Libnah was a great citie within Judah one of the royall cities of Canaan when Joshua entred it Josh 10.29 30 It was by him given to the priests the sonnes of Aaron Josh 21.13 and now it rebelled against Joram because he had made such innovations in Religion and forced the people to idolatry as is expressed 2. Chron. 21.10 11. which no marvell though the Levites were least able to endure It is much indeed that one citie alone should venture upon such an attempt but perhaps the kings absence whilest he was in Edom and the discontent of the people yea perhaps some correspondence they might have with the Philistines who ere long invaded the land 2. Chron. 21.16 17. gave them hope of abettors and how they sped in the conclusion the Scripture expresseth not Vers 24. And Joram slept with his fathers and was buried with his fathers in the citie of David Before his death there was a prophesie in writing delivered him from Elijah the Prophet 2. Chron. 21.12 which threatned both his people his children his wives and his own body and immediatly what was threatned came to passe for first the Philistines and Arabians brake into Judea took the kings house made spoil of his goods and slew or carried away all his children save the youngest onely and then afterwards the Lord smote him with a grievous disease in his bowels which left him not till his guts fell out and being dead he was obscurely buried in the citie of David but not in the sepulchres of his Ancestours the kings of Judah and that without the lamentations and solemnities that had been used in other princes funeralls 2. Chron. 21.16 All the time of this kings reigne another king of the same name reigned in Israel to wit Joram the sonne of Ahab his brother in law And Ahaziah his sonne reigned in his stead He is elswhere called Jehoahaz 2. Chron. 21.17 and Azariah 2. Chron. 22.6 He was the youngest sonne of Joram for all the elder sonnes were slain or carried away by the Philistines 2 Chron. 21.17 In S. Matthews catalogue of the kings of Judah it is said Matth. 1.8 that Jehoshapoat begat Joram and Joram begat Ozias and so this Ahaziah who succeeded Joram and Joash who succeeded Ahaziah 2 Kings 11.2 and Amaziah who succeeded Joash 2. Kings 12.21 and was the father of Ozias are quite left out but this I conceive was onely because the Evangelist resolving to distribute the Ancestours of Christ into three severall ranks according to the three great changes that had happened in the state and finding just fourteen in the first rank from Abraham to David he laboured to reduce the other ranks to the same number too as knowing that equall numbers are a help to the memory and so to make just fourteen generations in that rank also from David to the captivitie he leaves out Ahaziah Joash and Amaziah and them perhaps rather then others because they were the next from Ahab by Athaliah the daughter of Ahab and wife of Joram Vers 25. In the twelfth yeare of Joram the sonne of Ahab king of Israel c. Yet chap. 9.29 it is said that he began to reigne in the eleventh yeare of Joram king of Israel which is because the yeare of Ahaziahs reigne did concurre with the latter end of the eleventh and the beginning of the twelfth yeare of Joram king of Israel Vers 26. Two and twentie years old was Ahaziah when he began to reigne c. In the 2. Chron. 22.2 it is said that he was two and fourty years old when he began to reigne we may reconcile this thus that he was two and fourty years old when he began to reigne alone by himself but that he was made king also when he was but two twenty years old his father yet living but then that must be granted which is before noted upon 1. Kings 22.42 to wit that Asa also was made king in his fathers life time and indeed because this answer may have some strong objections made against it therefore others do rather reconcile these two places thus to wit that those words in 2. Chron. 22.2 Fourty and two years old was Ahaziah when he began to reigne must be understood of the continuance of Omries pedigree who was great grandfather to this Ahaziah Omri reigned as sole king six years 1. Kings 16.23 Ahab two and twenty 1. Kings 16.29 Ahaziah his sonne two 1. Kings 22.51 Joram twelve 2. Kings 3.1 And thus Omries stock continued fourty and two years and therefore it is said that Ahaziah who was of that stock by his mother Athaliah in his two and fourtieth yeare began his reigne But this answer methinks is more unsatisfactory then the other the words in 2. Chron. 22.2 will hardly bear such an interpretation And his mothers name was Athaliah the daughter of Omri king of Israel That is the grandchild of Omri the daughter of Ahab the sonne of Omri vers 18. Vers 27. He was the sonne in law of the house of Ahab That is the sonne of Ahabs sonne in law to wit the sonne of Joram by Athaliah Ahabs daughter yet perhaps even he also by his mother Athaliahs perswasion married a daughter of the house of Ahab though by another wife Joash was born who succeeded him in the throne chap. 12.1 Vers 28. And he went with Joram the sonne of Ahab to the warre against Hazael the king of Syria in Ramoth Gilead Toward the latter end of his reigne Joram king of Israel undertook the recovery of Ramoth Gilead out of the hands of Hazael then king of Syria which Ahab his father had formerly attempted with ill successe and Ahaziah the king of Judah his sisters sonne joyned with him in that expedition as Jehoshaphat had formerly done with Ahab Vers 29. And king Joram went back to be healed in Jezreel of the wounds which the Syrians had given him at Ramoth c. That is Ramoth Gilead having wonne the town and then manned it strongly leaving the chief of his army there behind him with his captains of whom Jehu was the chief he withdrew himself to Jezreel to be cured of the wounds which he received in this siege of Ramoth Gilead See the note chap. 9.14 CHAP. IX Vers 1. ANd Elisha the prophet called one of the children of the prophets and said unto him Gird up thy loins c. That is prepare thy self and go with speed the excution that was to be done by Jehu upon the house of Ahab was to be dispatched presently whilest Jehu had the army with him at Ramoth Gilead and Jehoram was gone from thence to Jezreel and therefore the prophet that was to give him his commission was sent with such speed which may also be the reason why aged Elisha went not himself but sent one of
free-will-offerings of God c. As these before mentioned vers 12 13. had the charge of keeping the offerings and tithes and dedicate things so Kore and those under him mentioned vers 15. had the charge of distributing them to the priests and Levites to whom they belonged Vers 16. Beside their genealogie of males from three years old and upward c. Here is expressed more particularly who they were to whom these holy things were distributed to wit besides the males of three years old and upward but under the age of twenty years who had also their portion allotted to them vers 18. they give both to the priests and Levites from twenty years old and upwards as they came in their courses to do their service in the house of the Lord yea and besides vers 18. they gave to all that were registred in the genealogies of the priests and Levites even to their little ones their wives and their sonnes and their daughters through all the congregation Vers 18. For in their set office they sanctified themselves in holinesse That is in this their office to which they were sanctified and set apart they did faithfully and in an holy manner discharge that trust that was reposed in them and were carefull to keep themselves from pollution that so they might be capable of eating these holy things Vers 19. Also the sonnes of Aaron the priests which were in the fields of the suburbs of their cities c. That is besides those mentioned before vers 14 15. that were to distribute the holy things to those that dwelt in Jerusalem or that came up thither in their severall courses for the service of the Temple there were others also chosen who were then expressed by name of the priests that dwelt in the other cities of the kingdome that were to give portions to the priests and Levites that were then abiding in those places and not attending in Jerusalem upon the service of God in the Temple CHAP. XXXII Vers 1. SEnnacherib king of Assyria came and entred into Judah and encamped against the fenced cities c. See the notes 2. Kings 18.13 c. for many severall passages in this chapter And thought to winne them for himself That is resolved to take them for himself and indeed accordingly he took many of them 2. Kings 18.13 Vers 3. He took counsel with his princes and his mighty men to stop the waters of the fountains which were without the citie That is to fill up the fountains and springs with earth and to carry the waters by pipes under ground into the citie that so the Assyrians if they came against Jerusalem might be distressed for want of water whilest they within the citie were abundantly supplyed And they did help him That is his Princes and his mighty men aided him in this work Vers 4. Who stopt all the fountains and the brook that ran through the midst of the land c. That is the brook Gihon of which vers 30. that ranne through the midst of the countrey where Jerusalem stood See 1. Kings 1.33 Vers 10. Whereon do ye trust that ye abide in the siege in Jerusalem That is being thus shut up without hope of help yet notwithstanding ye still refuse to yield up the citie Vers 17. He wrote also letters to rail on the Lord God of Israel c. To wit upon Rabshakeh his return to Sennacherib at Libnah and the report of the approch of Tirhakah the king of Ethiopia See 2. Kings 19.8 9. Vers 18. To affright them and to trouble them that they might take the citie That is to sow the seeds of discord amongst them whilest some should desire to have the citie yielded up and others should oppose them Vers 20. For this Hezekiah the king and the prophet Isaiah the sonne of Amos prayed and cried to heaven See 2. Kings 19.14 15. and at the same time Isaiah sent a comfortable message to Hezekiah wherein he prophesied of the destruction of Sennacherib and the good of Sion Vers 21. And the Lord sent an angel which cut off all the mighty men of valour c. A hundred fourescore and five thousand in all and that in one night See the note 2. Kings 19.35 They that came forth of his own bowels slew him there with the sword That is his own sonnes Adramelech and Sherezer 2. Kings 19.27 Vers 22. Thus the Lord saved Hezekiah c. and guided them on every side He governed them and took care of them all as a shepheard doth of his flock Vers 24. In those dayes Hezekiah was sick to the death and prayed unto the Lord. The prophet Isaiah having visited him and told him that he should die and not live See the notes 2. Kings 20.1 2 3. And he spake unto him and he gave him a signe That is he assured him that he should recover and confirmed that promise with a signe from heaven but withall he gave him also direction to lay a lump of figgs to the boil See the 2. Kings 20.5 c. Vers 25. For his heart was lifted up And this he manifested in shewing his riches to the Babylonian Embassadours for which he was reproved and threatned by the prophet Isaiah See 2. Kings 20.12 19. Vers 27. And Hezekiah had exceeding much riches and honour c. This is added to shew what it was for which his heart was lifted up as was said before v. 25. Vers 30. This same Hezekiah also stopped the upper water-course of Gihon c. The brook Gihon divided it self into two streams one of which Hezekiah turned from the usuall channell and brought it strait down into the west side of the city of David Vers 31. Howbeit in the businesse of the embassadours of the princes of Babylon c. To wit the Embassadours which Besodach-Baladan king of Babylon by the advice of his princes sent unto him see 2. Kings 20.12 God left him to try him that he might know all that was in his heart See Gen. 22.1 CHAP. XXXIII Vers 1. MAnasseh was twelve years old when he began to reigne See 2. Kings 21.1 c. many severall notes for the explanation of this chapter Vers 6. And he caused his children to passe through the fire in the valley of the sonne of Hinnom See 2. Kings 16.3 Vers 10. And the Lord spake to Manasseh and to his people To wit by his servants the prophets the summe of their prophesies is expressed 2. Kings 21.11 15. Vers 11. Wherefore the Lord brought upon them the captains of the host of the king of Assyria which took Manasseh among the thorns It seems he thought to hide himself in some woods and thickets and therefore it is said here that he was taken among the thorns The like is said concerning the Israelites when they were affraid of the Philistines that were come into their land 1. Sam. 13.6 When the men of Israel saw they were in a strait then they did hide themselves in caves and in
to wit the tenth of tithes Numb 18.26 Thus speak unto the Levites and say unto them when ye take of the children of Israel tithes which I have given you from them for your inheritance then ye shall offer up an heave-offering of it for the Lord even a tenth part of the tithe yea perhaps one of the priests the sonnes of Aaron was alwayes to be present when the Levites received the tithes of the people as a witnesse that the priests portion was faithfully set out for them Vers 39. And we will not forsake the house of our God That is we will not fail to frequent the Temple to serve the Lord there and we will not leave it destitute of any requisite provision for the service there to be performed CHAP. XI Vers 1. ANd the rulers of tbe people dwelt at Jerusalem the rest of the people also cast lots c. Because there were not found enough in Jerusalem for the inhabiting and defence of the city and people were loth to dwell there because the neighbours round about did exceedingly envie the glory of this city and were continually plotting some mischief against it to the great perill of the inhabitants and secondly because withall as there was more safety so also there was more profit in dwelling elsewhere therefore one chief businesse that Nehemiah had to do at this assembly of the people was after he had numbred them to chuse out a sufficient number of the people to dwell there see chap. 7.3 4 5. which to avoid all exception was done by lot The chief rulers of the people of their own accord settled themselves to dwell as reason indeed required in this chief city of the kingdome but for the people the tenth part of them were chosen by lot onely there were some that did voluntarily offer themselves to dwell there vers 2. and this taking of one in ten to dwell in Jerusalem some Expositours look upon also as a shadow of the paucity of those that shall be received to dwell in the heavenly Jerusalem to wit that scarce one in ten even of those that professe themselves Gods people shall dwell there according to that Isaiah 6.13 But yet in it shall be a tenth c. and Jerem. 3.14 I will take you one of a city and two of a family and I will bring you to Zion Vers 2. And the people blessed all the men that willingly offered themselves to dwell at Jerusalem That is they commended them for it and desired the Lord to blesse and prosper them Vers 3. Now these are the chief of the province that dwelt in Jerusalem To wit that were chosen now by lot to dwell there In 1. Chron. 9. there is another catalogue of them wherein more are mentioned then are mentioned here But it seems in that both those that were chosen by lot and those that voluntarily offered themselves to dwell there are set down here onely those that were chosen by lot Vers 4. And at Jerusalem dwelt certain of the children of Judah and of the children of Benjamin Because Jerusalem stood partly in Judah and partly in Benjamin therefore those that were chosen by lot to dwell there were of those two tribes yet there were some also of Ephraim and Manasseh that dwelt there 1. Chron. 9.3 which were doubtlesse of those that voluntarily profered themselves Vers 5. And Maaseiah the sonne of Baruch c. Concerning this catalogue of those that dwelt at Jerusalem see 1. Chron. 9.5 6. Vers 9. Second over the city That is next in place and government after Joel afore-mentioned Vers 16. And Shabbethai and Jozabad of the chief of the Levites had the oversight of the outward businesse of the house of God That is such businesses as appertained to the Temple but were to be done abroad not in the Temple as the providing of those things as were to be bought with the money that was collected c. see 1. Chron. 26.29 Vers 17. The sonne of Asaph was the principall to begin the thanksgiving in prayer That is the principall of the singers that used to begin the Psalmes when they sung and praised God Vers 19. Akkub Talmon and their brethren that kept the gates were an hundred seventy two See 1. Chron. 9.17 22. Vers 23. For it was the kings commandment concerning them that a certain portion should be for the singers c. That is the king of Persia had commanded that a certain allowance should every day be given them out of the kings treasure this may have reference to the decree of Darius Ezra 6.9 10. or that of Artaxerxes Ezra 7.23 24. or happely to some new directions given by him to Nehemiah at his coming to Jerusalem Some reade these words thus that it was the kings commandment concerning them that a sure ordinance should be for the singers and so they understand it either of David that he had established it as a sure ordinance that the singers should praise the Lord in the Temple every day or else of Artaxerxes that he had ordained that according to the ancient custome the singers should every day perform this service Vers 24. And Pethahiah the sonne of Meshezabel c. was at the kings hand in all matters concerning the people That is the king of Persia made use of him in all things he gave in charge concerning the people as happely to gather the kings allowance for the Temple to receive the peoples petitions and it may be to assist the governour in matter of judgement Vers 36. And of the Levites were divisions in Judah and in Benjamin That is besides the Levites that dwelt at Jerusalem there were some of them also allowed to dwell in severall towns and cities of Judah that they might teach the people the law of God in their severall divisions CHAP. XII Vers 1. NOw these are the priests and the Levites that went up with Zerubbabel c. Nehemiah intending here to relate with what solemnity they kept the dedication of the new built walls of Jerusalem and how the priests and Leuites were imployed herein first he sets down their ancestours to wit who were the chief priests and Levites in the dayes of Jeshua the high priest and that came with Zerubbabel and Ezra or immediately after him from Babylon into the land of Judea and then secondly who were the chief priests and Levites in the daies of Joiakim the high priest the sonne of Jeshua c. vers 12. Now by the chief of the priests is doubtlesse meant in both these catalogues the heads of the severall divisions of the priests that did in their turns wait upon the service of the Temple but then seeing there were twenty foure courses or orders of the priests established by David 1. Chron. 24.7 why there should be here but two and twenty mentioned in the first catalogue and but twenty in the second vers 12. I find not any probable reason given by Expositours Vers 9. Their brethren were over