Selected quad for the lemma: city_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
city_n	aaron_n	josh_n	son_n	38	3	5.1331	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A89518	Vox turturis vel columba alba albionis=The voice of the turtle, or, Englands white dove in the deluge of division, the second time sent forth from Gods Arke, to prsent a peace-offering upon the altar of Jehovah Shalom. Humbly proposing that divine direction, which the God of Peace hath revealed in his word of truth, for determining differences by an holy ordinance of his owne institution, wherein himselfe is the sole judge, ... Shewing how by this divine way of Gods judgement, not onely the great differences here in church and state depending, may speedily and happily be determined with glory to God, honour to the King, and happinesse to the kingdomes, but also all the greatest controversies, both civill and sacred throughout Christendome may be composed, the effusion of blood prevented, many prophecies conducing to an universall peace fulfilled, the happy use of this holy ordinance made knowne, and the name of God thereby manifested, ... even among heathens. / Per E. M. Arm. Christi servorum minimo minorem.	Marbury, Edward, 1581-ca. 1655.	1647 (1647)	Wing M570; Thomason E518_4; ESTC R206163	81,199	64

one choice person to wit Eleazar drew for all Others that out of one Pot of Tickets containing the names of the portions one of each Tribe drew for the Tribe he was of Others lastly suppose that the Tribes names only were put into the Lot-pot and that each Tribe as it was drawn had his choice of which part he would yet undisposed of when he drew The first opinion seemes most probable and that first because once drawing so might well end all which could not be in the second where question might be who should draw first and secondly because it is not said that such a Tribe drew or was drawn first or second simply but that the Lot came out first or second for such a Tribe which agrees not with the third Num. 35.7 8. Losh 25.2 Now as the Land in generall was thus divided by Lot so in particular were the forty eight Cities assigned to the Levites divided among them by Lot according to their Families and whereas the Levites were divided into three Families according to Levi's three sons Kohath Gershom Merari and the Koathites subdivided into two ranks i.e. the Antonites or the issue of Aaron Kohath Nephew by his son A●●●● which alone had the Priesthod and the rest of that house which came not of Aaron Lots were cast among them for these their severall Families Iosh 21.8 in what Tribes there should Cities be assigned unto each and in conclusion the Aaronites had thirteene in Juda Sime●n and Benjamin the other Koathites ten in Ephraim Dan and the one halfe of Manasses and the Merarites twelve in Reuben Gad and Zebul●n the whole number forty eight At the return of the Jews unto the Land of promise from the Chaldean captivity a colonie was drawn by Lot for the peopling of Ierusalem one being taken of each ten and a tenth of the whole company for the storing of the City Yea the whole City it selfe was by lot shared in three parts by the three seditious Commanders in the time of the Roman siege Moreover Lots were used for partition of movables goods and chattells and the like as in the case of setting forth the tith of Bullocks Goats and Sheepe Levit. 27.32 And secondly in division of booties of prey and spoyles taken in warre Lorts are said to have been cast upon Jerusalem when it was sacked by the Chaldees and her people by Lot shared among the conquerours for slaves Obad. v. 11. Joel 3.3 Nahum 3.10 as the Nobles of Niniveh were shared by lot among the Medians or Scythians for slaves when it was severall times surprized by them And thirdly of goods gotten by pilage or stealth as David complaines that they had parted his garments among them and cast Lots upon his Vesture which is justly supposed to have been practised upon David 1 Sam. 19.11.12 but was certainly fulfilled in our Saviour Math. 27.35 Mark 15.24 Luk. 23.34 Ioh. 19.24 Such a Lot as this is alluded too by Solomon where he brings in theevish companions inviting to joyne and adventure with them saying Cost in thy lot among us Prov. 1 14. By Lott certaine persons were picked out to be saved or slain so David measured out the Moabites with two cords to be destroyed but with one cord to be saved alive as the Chald. Paraphr expounds the place 2. Sam. 8.2 and in this sence do Interpreters understand that place of Ezech. 24 6. where the Lord bids the Prophet pull the flesh piece by piece every piece of it out of the Pot or Caldron and cast no lot in it thereby signifying that the people should not be some saved and some destroyed but all utterly destroyed without distinction or difference In this kind was the lot cast on the two Goats for it was divisory meerly not divinatory to tell whether was fitter for service both being alike fit for it whereby the one was taken for the scape-goat to be sent out alive and saved the other left to be slain to make a sin sacrifice to God in behalfe of his people Among Prophane writers nothing is commoner than the use of Lotts in this kind Inheritances among coheires were by lot divided Saturns three Sons parted among them Heaven Sea and Hell by this way of Lottery Claros and Lacedaemon according to some Grammarians derive their names from hence that is Ex Near Eust ad Claros 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and Lacedamon quasi 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i.e. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Thus Poloponnesus after right of possession by joynt conquest recovered was parted between Cresphontes Temenus and the sons of Aristodemus Thus Lotharius his foure sons parted the Realme of France amongst them after their Fathers decease Greg. Tur. hist l. 4. c. 22. Thus Fredereck the second King of Denmarks and Adelph Duke of Holst divided between them the Territory of the elder Iohn of Holst deceased without issue The goods and chattels of every Courtier deceased where a fourth part is to come to the Court is to be parted into foure parts by the Heire or Executor and Lots are to be cast whether he shall choose his three or the Court her fourth by the civill Law And our common Law alloweth this course of partition of Land among Partners or female coheires viz. that by dividing the land into parts as equall as may be and then wrapping up of scrolls of each part in as many waxen Balls to be drawn by the partners in order of yeares out of the bonnet of some other indifferent party In Cities new built and at the first foundation or altering of a state as also upon enfranchising forreigners or non-freemen each one used to have his house portion of land or tribe he should belong to assigned him by Lot a thing practised by Lycurgus in the Spartan Republique and by Aeneas also Aen. 5. and by Romulus at the founding of the Roman State In Egypt they yearly assigned by Lott to each man or Kindred what land they should till After Victories obtained over some Countries the Greek and Roman Conquerours were wont to divide the land by lott among the Souldiers Aristoph Dionys Hal. li. 2. or other of the people In Countries overburdened with multitudes of people or such as were unable to maintain the Natives by reason of a long and grievous Famin it was an usuall course to decide by lot who should remain at home and who remove to seek their fortunes abroad Liv. l. 5. In the Palestine expedition it was tryed by lot which should be first assaulted Tyre or Askalon A Prey taken in the field or in the sacking of a City were it goods or jewells or garments or beasts or mens persons it was ordinarily divided by lot A swift horse able to travell one hundred miles a day was put to lot with the rest of the prey and drawn for one Probus one of the Emperours name of which name there being foure and Probus still comming out of the Lot pot