priests were seated partly in the tribe of Judah where the Temple was afterwards to be built and partly in the two bordering tribes of Simeon and Benjamin and so whilst they shall approve their piety and devotion to the service of God in being content to leave their dwellings to go up unto Jerusalem in their turns to attend upon the service of God yet withall God provides for their ease that their journeys might not be over long and burthensome to them As for their assigning as it is here said of thirteen cities to the priests herein God and the governours of Israel had respect unto succeeding times when the posterity of Aaron should be encreased for at present there were but a few priests not enough to inhabit the half part of one city but in the mean time they were given them for their possession which they might dispose of according to the right they had in them For that they might so do and that the cities of the Levites were given them not onely for their habitation but also for their possessions and inheritance is evident in severall places See Levit. 25.32 Vers 9. And they gave out of the tribe of the children of Judah and out of the tribe of the children of Simeon these cities c. Judahs and Simeon cities are reckoned together because Simeons portion lay within Judahs Chap. 19.1 And the second lot came forth to Simeon even for the tribe of the children of Simeon according to their families and their inheritance was within the inheritance of the children of Judah Vers 11. And they gave them the city of Arbah the father of Anak which is Hebron in the hill-countrey of Judah c. This city with the land adjoyning was formerly given to Caleb which makes it more probable that the cities for the Levites were taken by lot because it was not likely that both Hebron and Debir should be taken out of his inheritance without the Lords speciall direction But God requiring it Caleb willingly yields the rather because the countrey and land about was the chief of his possession which was not taken from him and besides no doubt they desired to have the Levites who were to instruct them in the Law of the Lord to be seated amongst them Vers 15. And Holon with her suburbs Called Hilen 1. Chron. 6.58 Vers 16. And Ain with her suburbs and Juttah with her suburbs c. This citie Ain is not reckoned 1. Chron. 6. amongst the cities given to the sonnes of Aaron nor Gibeon here named vers 17. As for Juttah it is called Ashan 1. Chron. 6.59 Some indeed conceive that it is Ain that is there called Ashan but there is an argument against that which seems to me unanswerable to wit that Ashan and Ain are in one verse distinctly named amongst the cities of Simeon chap. 19.7 and so also Almon vers 18. is called Alemeth 1. Chron. 6.60 Vers 22. And Kibzaim with her suburbs Called Jokneam 1. Chron. 6.68 Vers 23. And out of the tribe of Dan Eltekeh with her suburbs Gibbethon with her suburbs These two cities are omitted 1. Chron. 6. And Aijalon and Gath-rimmon are there ioyned with the cities of Ephraim but that they were given out of Dans portion is evident by this place Vers 25. And out of the half tribe of Manasseh Tanach with her suburbs c. To wit that half of the tribe which was seated within Jordan next Dan and Ephraim Tanach here mentioned is called Aner 1. Chron. 6.70 as also Gath-Rimmon is there called Bileam Vers 27. And Beeshterah with her suburbs Called Ashtaroth 1. Chron. 6.71 Vers 28. And out of the tribe of Issachar Kishon with her suburbs c. Which is called Kedesh as also Dabareh is called Deberath and Jarmuth Ramoth and Engannim Anem 1. Chron. 6.72.73 Vers 30. And out of the tribe of Asher Mishal with her suburbs c. Called Mashal 1. Chron. 6.74 as also Helkath is there called Hukok Vers 32. And Hammoth-dor with her suburbs c. Called Hammon 1. Chron. 6.76 as also Kartan is there called Kirjathaim Vers 34. Out of the tribe of Zebulun Jokneam with her suburbs c. Jokneam and Kartah are omitted 1. Chron. 6.77 and Dimnah is there called Rimmon and Nahalal Tabor Vers 36. And out of the tribe of Reuben Bezer with her suburbs and Jahazah with her suburbs It is said that Bezer was a city of refuge chap. 20.8 though it be not here expressed as it is in the rest vers 13.20 27. which why it is here omitted we cannot say As for Jahazah it is called Jahzah 1. Chron. 6. Vers 41. All the cities of the Levites within the possession of the children of Israel were fourty and eight cities with their suburbs It may seem strange why in the 19. chapter we reade of but two and twenty cities given to the tribe of Asher nineteen to the tribe of Naphtali yea but twelve cities to the tribe of Zebulun and yet the Levites which were nothing so many in number as they have here eight and fourty cities given them I answer first that besides the cities mentioned the other tribes had many towns and villages wherein they dwelt which the Levites had not secondly that the chief cities are onely there mentioned it is evident in severall places that many cities which were in the severall portions of those tribes are not there set down thirdly others did no doubt inhabit these cities besides the Levites and fourthly it is no wonder though God deals bountifully with the Levites that were to be imployed in his speciall service Vers 43. And the Lord gave unto Israel all the land which he sware to give unto their fathers and they possessed it and dwelt therein Though there were much of the land out of which the Canaanites were not yet expelled we cannot therefore call this truth in question for First he had given them all by lot divided amongst them which was a kind of actuall enstating them in it Secondly he had put them into possession of the greatest part of it neither had he promised them otherwise but that they should possesse it by degrees See Exod. 23.29 So both clauses of that which is here said are true to wit first That God had given them all the land which he swore to give unto their fathers and secondly That they possessed it and dwelt therein onely we must conceive of them severally thus to wit 1. That he had already actually given them the whole land and enabled them to divide it amongst their tribes and 2. That they possessed it and dwelt therein to wit by degrees a great deal of it they had already in their possession and the rest by degrees came into their hands as God had promised and sooner then they did they might have enjoyed it had it not been for their sinnes CHAP. XXII Vers 3. YE have not left your brethren these many dayes unto this day That for which Joshua here
answered c. and her father his father in law in severall places Why Bethlehem from whence this Levite had his concubine is called Bethlehem-Judah See in the note chap. 17.7 Vers 2. And his concubine plaid the whore against him went away from him unto her fathers house c. It seems upon some discoverie of her whoredome or at least some suspition the Levite had of it there arose some quarrell betwixt him and his concubine and thereupon she left him and went home again to her fathers house who was too ready to entertain her The sad effects that followed upon this Levites taking a concubine makes it manifest that even in those times though it were an ordinary thing amongst all sorts of men even amongst the Levites to have concubines yet God was not pleased with it from the beginning it was not so saith our Saviour Matth. 19.8 Vers 3. And her husband arose and went after her to speak friendly unto her and to bring her again having his servant with him and a couple of asses To wit to carrie their provision and happely that both himself and his concubine if she would return with him might sometimes ease themselves by riding as occasion served Vers 11. Come I pray thee and let us turn in unto this citie of the Jebusites and lodge in it For though the children of Judah had taken from the Jebusites that part of Jebus that is Jerusalem which was in their tribe chap. 1.8 The children of Judah had fought against Jerusalem and had taken it and had smitten it with the edge of the sword yet out of that part which belonged to Benjamin on which side the Levite was now travelling the Jebusites were not wholly expelled chap. 1.21 The children of Benjamin did not drive out the inhabitants of Jerusalem but the Jebusites dwell in Jerusalem with the children of Benjamin unto this day Vers 14. And the sunne went down upon them when they were by Gibeah which belongeth to Benjamin There was a Gibeah in the tribe of Judah Josh 15.57 to distinguish this from that it is here called Gibeah which belongeth to Benjamin and else where Gibeah of Saul 1. Sam. 11.4 it is thought to be the same which Josh 21.17 is called Gebah which was a citie given to tho Priests the sonnes of Aaron Against which it makes nothing that here it is said vers 16. the men of the place were Benjamites for the priests did not dwell alone in such cities though they were the lords and owners of them Vers 15. And they turned aside thither to go in and to lodge in Gibeah Though it were a pious resolution in the Levite rather to chose to lodge in Gibeah then in Jebus and that because Jebus was a citie wherein the idolatrous and uncircumcised Jebusites dwelt yet this proved fatall both to him and his as the best counsell may have the worst successe and that because there is a secret over-ruling hand of God that may by this means bring about what he hath determined for the punishment of some other sinnes which we mind not Vers 16. And behold there came an old man from his work out of the field at even which was also of mount Ephraim Though he were an old man yet he followed his work in the field and that untill the even which is doubtlesse noted to his praise As for that last clause that he was also of mount Ephraim that no doubt is expressed to intimate that this amongst other things made the old man the readier to entertain the Levite when he heard him say vers 18. that he was of mount Ephraim too Vers 18. But I am now going to the house of the Lord. The Tabernacle at this time was in Shiloh Josh 18.1 and Shiloh was in the tribe of Ephraim either therefore there the Levites dwelling was or else he meant first to go to the house of the Lord to do his service there and then afterwards to passe forward on his journey homeward However it is probable that he mentions his going to the house of the Lord that he might know him to be a Levite Vers 22. Behold the men of the city certain sonnes of Belial beset the house round about c. A like fact to this we have formerly related concerning the Sodomites of which see the note Gen. 19.4 as for this term Sonnes of Belial see Deut. 13.13 Vers 24. Behold here is my daughter a mayden and his concubine them I will bring out now c. See the note Gen. 19.8 Vers 25. So the man took his concubine and brought her forth unto them and they knew her c. In the foregoing words it is said that when the old man the Levites host proffered these varlets his daughter a virgin and the Levites concubine thereby to take them off from that unnaturall uncleannesse wherewith they meant to satisfie their lust upon the Levite himself the men would not hearken to him yet when immediately by the Levites means his concubine was indeed brought out unto them and left amongst them they fell upon her and defiled her and that in such an outrageous barbarous manner that she died of it which was doubtlesse because having once an object for their lust in their power they could not forbear and so forgetting their former resolutions they laid hold on her and abused her in a most inhumane and execrable manner Vers 26. Then came the woman in the dawning of the day and fell down at the doore of the mans house c. That is she fell down dead at the doore of the mans house and there lay till break of day when her husband going forth to see what was become of her found her dead and thus though her husband had pardoned her whoredome yet God punished it and that too with her own sinne adulterie was her sinne and adulterie was her death she had dealt treacherously against her husband one would not satisfie her but she exposed her self to the lust of a stranger and now she was abused to death by the lusts of so many barbarous wretches whom she knew not that by so abusing her they murdered her Vers 27. And her hands were upon the threshold This is added to implie the reason of that which follows why the Levite spake to her to rise vers 28. And he said unto her Vp let us be going to wit because she lay in such a manner her hands laid upon the threshold under her head as if she had been asleep Vers 29. He took a knife and laid hold on his concubine and divided her together with her bones into twelve pieces and sent her into all the coasts of Israel That is to each of the twelve tribes a piece for to the tribe of Levi that was dispersed through all the land there was none sent and this was done that the fight of her dead limbs might affect them the more and stirre them up to be the more zealous for the punishment
free-will-offerings of God c. As these before mentioned vers 12 13. had the charge of keeping the offerings and tithes and dedicate things so Kore and those under him mentioned vers 15. had the charge of distributing them to the priests and Levites to whom they belonged Vers 16. Beside their genealogie of males from three years old and upward c. Here is expressed more particularly who they were to whom these holy things were distributed to wit besides the males of three years old and upward but under the age of twenty years who had also their portion allotted to them vers 18. they give both to the priests and Levites from twenty years old and upwards as they came in their courses to do their service in the house of the Lord yea and besides vers 18. they gave to all that were registred in the genealogies of the priests and Levites even to their little ones their wives and their sonnes and their daughters through all the congregation Vers 18. For in their set office they sanctified themselves in holinesse That is in this their office to which they were sanctified and set apart they did faithfully and in an holy manner discharge that trust that was reposed in them and were carefull to keep themselves from pollution that so they might be capable of eating these holy things Vers 19. Also the sonnes of Aaron the priests which were in the fields of the suburbs of their cities c. That is besides those mentioned before vers 14 15. that were to distribute the holy things to those that dwelt in Jerusalem or that came up thither in their severall courses for the service of the Temple there were others also chosen who were then expressed by name of the priests that dwelt in the other cities of the kingdome that were to give portions to the priests and Levites that were then abiding in those places and not attending in Jerusalem upon the service of God in the Temple CHAP. XXXII Vers 1. SEnnacherib king of Assyria came and entred into Judah and encamped against the fenced cities c. See the notes 2. Kings 18.13 c. for many severall passages in this chapter And thought to winne them for himself That is resolved to take them for himself and indeed accordingly he took many of them 2. Kings 18.13 Vers 3. He took counsel with his princes and his mighty men to stop the waters of the fountains which were without the citie That is to fill up the fountains and springs with earth and to carry the waters by pipes under ground into the citie that so the Assyrians if they came against Jerusalem might be distressed for want of water whilest they within the citie were abundantly supplyed And they did help him That is his Princes and his mighty men aided him in this work Vers 4. Who stopt all the fountains and the brook that ran through the midst of the land c. That is the brook Gihon of which vers 30. that ranne through the midst of the countrey where Jerusalem stood See 1. Kings 1.33 Vers 10. Whereon do ye trust that ye abide in the siege in Jerusalem That is being thus shut up without hope of help yet notwithstanding ye still refuse to yield up the citie Vers 17. He wrote also letters to rail on the Lord God of Israel c. To wit upon Rabshakeh his return to Sennacherib at Libnah and the report of the approch of Tirhakah the king of Ethiopia See 2. Kings 19.8 9. Vers 18. To affright them and to trouble them that they might take the citie That is to sow the seeds of discord amongst them whilest some should desire to have the citie yielded up and others should oppose them Vers 20. For this Hezekiah the king and the prophet Isaiah the sonne of Amos prayed and cried to heaven See 2. Kings 19.14 15. and at the same time Isaiah sent a comfortable message to Hezekiah wherein he prophesied of the destruction of Sennacherib and the good of Sion Vers 21. And the Lord sent an angel which cut off all the mighty men of valour c. A hundred fourescore and five thousand in all and that in one night See the note 2. Kings 19.35 They that came forth of his own bowels slew him there with the sword That is his own sonnes Adramelech and Sherezer 2. Kings 19.27 Vers 22. Thus the Lord saved Hezekiah c. and guided them on every side He governed them and took care of them all as a shepheard doth of his flock Vers 24. In those dayes Hezekiah was sick to the death and prayed unto the Lord. The prophet Isaiah having visited him and told him that he should die and not live See the notes 2. Kings 20.1 2 3. And he spake unto him and he gave him a signe That is he assured him that he should recover and confirmed that promise with a signe from heaven but withall he gave him also direction to lay a lump of figgs to the boil See the 2. Kings 20.5 c. Vers 25. For his heart was lifted up And this he manifested in shewing his riches to the Babylonian Embassadours for which he was reproved and threatned by the prophet Isaiah See 2. Kings 20.12 19. Vers 27. And Hezekiah had exceeding much riches and honour c. This is added to shew what it was for which his heart was lifted up as was said before v. 25. Vers 30. This same Hezekiah also stopped the upper water-course of Gihon c. The brook Gihon divided it self into two streams one of which Hezekiah turned from the usuall channell and brought it strait down into the west side of the city of David Vers 31. Howbeit in the businesse of the embassadours of the princes of Babylon c. To wit the Embassadours which Besodach-Baladan king of Babylon by the advice of his princes sent unto him see 2. Kings 20.12 God left him to try him that he might know all that was in his heart See Gen. 22.1 CHAP. XXXIII Vers 1. MAnasseh was twelve years old when he began to reigne See 2. Kings 21.1 c. many severall notes for the explanation of this chapter Vers 6. And he caused his children to passe through the fire in the valley of the sonne of Hinnom See 2. Kings 16.3 Vers 10. And the Lord spake to Manasseh and to his people To wit by his servants the prophets the summe of their prophesies is expressed 2. Kings 21.11 15. Vers 11. Wherefore the Lord brought upon them the captains of the host of the king of Assyria which took Manasseh among the thorns It seems he thought to hide himself in some woods and thickets and therefore it is said here that he was taken among the thorns The like is said concerning the Israelites when they were affraid of the Philistines that were come into their land 1. Sam. 13.6 When the men of Israel saw they were in a strait then they did hide themselves in caves and in
against Sihon and Og which being long since done the same thereof might be well in this time carried to a land farre off beyond the borders of Canaan Vers 14. And the men took of their victuals and asked not counsell at the mouth of the Lord. That is they took them and looked upon them and through too much credulity ranne away with a conceit that this plainly shewed the truth of what they had said never inquiring of God what an answer they should give them Vers 15. And Joshua made peace with them and made a league with them that that they should live Which he might lawfully do supposing them not to be the inhabitants of Canaan Deut. 20.10 11. When thou comest nigh a city to fight against it then proclaim peace unto it And it shall be if it make thee answer of peace and open unto thee then it shall be that all the people that is found therein shall be tributaries unto thee and shall serve thee And again verse 15 16. Thus shalt thou do to the cities which are farre off from thee which are not of the cities of these nations But of the cities of these people which the Lord thy God doth give thee for an inheritance thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth Vers 16. And it came to passe that at the end of three dayes after they had made a league with them that they heard that they were their neighbours c. This is added to set forth the folly of their unadvised rashnesse who without any deliberation do presently make a covenant with the Gibeonites whereas if they had but deferred their answer even for a day or two they had found out the truth and had not been so gulled and abused as now they were Vers 18. And the children of Israel smote them not because the Princes of the Congregations had sworn unto them by the Lord God of Israel That the Israelites did well in sparing the Gibeonites because of the oath which their Princes had taken and that they had sinned greatly if they had slain them is evident 2. Sam. 21.1 2. where we reade that God sent a famine upon the land because Saul foure hundred years after this had slain some of the Gibeonites and so brake the oath which their fathers had now obtained of Joshua and the Israelites and yet Saul did it too in his zeal to the children of Israel and Judah If it be objected that the Gibeonites had fraudulently drawn the Princes into that oath and therefore there was no reason why they should be tied thereby to that which they never intended for they had covenanted to grant peace to a people that dwelt far off and the Gibeonites were of the inhabitants of the land so that this covenant made with them under these terms was of it self void and of none effect to this I answer That though when men are drawn by force or fraud into any promise or covenant they are not bound to keep that promise or covenant and that because he to whom the promise or covenant is made with whom onely we have to do in this case cannot by any rule of equity challenge any right to that which he hath obtained by deceit or violence yet when men do confirm any such promise or covenant by oath the case is otherwise because they are bound then to God and not to the man onely that used such fraud and violence whose wickednesse in so drawing them into an oath cannot make void the engagement that lieth upon them that have sworn in regard of God And if it be again objected as it is by many That the Princes had sworn to do that which was against the expresse command of God who had often enjoyned them to destroy all the inhabitants of Canaan and not to make any league of peace with them as is noted before upon vers 7. to this I answer too That though an oath or vow doth not bind men for the doing of any thing that is absolutely unlawfull yet in this case it was not so and that because the charge which God had given them for slaying all the inhabitants of the land was a particular command so farre onely to bind their consciences as it might be obeyed without any breach of the Morall Law as in Rahabs case is also evident But here they could not obey that command of Gods concerning their destroying all the inhabitants of Canaan without perjury which is directly against the law and light of nature and besides it would have given the heathen great occasion of blaspheming the name of the Lord if they had sworn in his name and had not kept it all which must needs lie as a strong bond upon the consciences of the Israelites strictly to observe this oath though they were deluded by the Gibeonites for in this that rule holds good I will have mercy and not sacrifice Vers 21. But let them be hewers of wood and drawers of water unto all the congregation That is for the use of all the congregation to provide wood and water which they were to use in their sacrifices as is evident vers 27. And Joshua made them that day hewers of wood and drawers of water for all the congregation and for the altar of the Lord yet because it is certain that the inhabitants of these foure cities could not dwell in any one place where the Tabernacle was seated nor yet in Jerusalem when the Temple was built but were severally dispersed throughout the land coming up happely in their courses as the Levites did to do their service in the house of God I should think it most probable that in the time when they waited not at the Tabernacle as publick servants they were also imployed in other servile offices for the people These were they that afterwards were called Nethinims 1. Chron. 9.2 that is Deodati men given to God or the publick service of the Tabernacle for though Ezra 8.20 it is said that David and the Princes appointed the Nethinims for the service of the Levites yet it is meant onely of the ordering of them how they should in their severall courses attend upon that service for even now they were allotted to this service and did therein doubtlesse attend upon the Levites in the service of the Tabernacle from this time unto the dayes of David Vers 23. Now therefore ye are cursed and there shall none of you be freed from being bondmen c. These words Now therefore ye are cursed the most of Expositours understand of the curse or punishment of bondage which for their dissembling and fraudulent dealing they were adjudged to undergo and so they take the following words and there shall none of you be freed from being bondmen to be an explanation of the words that went before but it is better understood of that generall curse which God had laid upon all the inhabitants of Canaan to wit as if Joshua had said The curse which God
Jordan is described which was by Moses given to the Reubenites and the Gadites and the one half tribe of Manasseh and then afterwards is shown what each of them had severally Vers 11. And Gilead and the border of the Geshurites and Maachathites Even the border of the Geshurites and the Maachathites are here mentioned as a part of the land without Jordan belonging to the two tribes and a half planted there because Moses had indeed given them their countrey together with the rest though as yet they had it not in their possession as is afterwards expressed verse 13. Vers 12. For these did Moses smite and cast them out To wit Sihon and Og before mentioned and their people For this cannot be referred to all the inhabitants of the land before named because it is expressely said in the following verse that the Geshurites and the Maachathites were not cast out Vers 13. Neverthelesse the children of Israel expelled not the Geshurites c. Though the land without Jordan was vanquished whilest Moses was yet living yet they did not then drive out these Geshurites Maachathites who inhabited the outmost skirts of the countrey to wit because having in their possession enough for the present use of the two tribes and a half that were planted there it was not judged requisite to delay their passing over Jordan till they had fully cleared all the utmost corners of that land Neither was it therefore any sinne in Moses and the Israelites thus at first to forbear a while the casting out of these people But yet when in after times they continued still to suffer them to roost amongst them that was an act of base sloth and is noted doubtlesse in the last words of this verse to their just reproch the Geshurites and the Maachathites dwell among the Israelites untill this day Vers 14. Onely unto the tribe of Levi he gave none inheritance This which is in so many places repeated is here inserted to shew the reason of that verse 7. why God enjoyned Joshua to divide the land within Jordan unto the nine tribes and the half of Manasseh to wit because the tribe of Levi was to have no part of the land for had they been to have had a share too there would have been still ten tribes and a half to provide for Vers 15. And Moses gave unto the tribe of the children of Reuben inheritance according to their families That is proportionably according to the number of their families Now the bounds of each tribe are thus exactly set down to prevent all discord and division for the time to come Vers 16. And their coast was from Aroer c. That is it reached from Aroer exclusively Aroer indeed belonged to the tribe of Gad Num. 32.34 And the children of Gad built Dibon and Ataroth and Aroer So that the city of Aroer and the outsides of the plains of Medeba for the plain it self was a part of Reubens possession are here made the bounds for this tribe Vers 17. Heshbon and all her cities that are in the plain of Dibon c. This town is reckoned amongst Reubens possessions Num. 32.37 And the children of Reuben built Heshbon yet Josh 21.39 and 1. Chron. 6.81 it is reckoned amongst the cities of Gad given to the Levites The next city Dibon is indeed reckoned amongst the cities of Gad Num. 32.34 And the children of Gad built Dibon but the reason of this is because they stood in the confines of both tribes and so were in common inhabited by both Vers 21. And all the kingdome of Sihon king of the Amorites which reigned in Heshbon That is and all the kingdome of Sihon in those parts within the bounds before mentioned for it is expressely said verse 27. that the rest of the kingdome of Sihon king of Heshon was given to Gad. And this seems added partly to imply that though some of these cities had been the Moabites yet at that time they were Sihons and so according to Gods commandment they meddled not with the Ammonites and Moabites countrey Whom Moses smote with the princes of Midian Evi and Rekem c. These five princes of Midian were not slain at the same time and in the same battell wherein Sihon was slain at Jahaz Numb 21.23 24. but long after by a party that were purposely sent out by Moses against the Medianites Numb 31.8 and therefore it is very probably conceived by Expositours that the reason why the death of Sihon these princes is mentioned here together is because these princes though they were princes of Midian yet withall were as it follows here in the next words Dukes of Sihon dwelling in the countrey to wit in the countrey of the Amorites where Sihon reigned and so aided him in his warre against the Israelites and however they were not slain then together with Sihon but escaped away into the land of Midian and Sihon being now dead took upon them the power and title of kings for so they are therefore called Numb 31.8 in some cities of Midian that were happely before tributary to Sihon yet afterward in another expedition of the Israelites which they undertook by the direction of Moses against the Midianites they were slain as Sihon their Lord was before in a former battell and so the cutting off both of Sihon and these his vassals is here mentioned together Some Expositours do indeed otherwise conceive of that last clause Which were Dukes of Sihon dwelling in the countrey to wit that though they were the vassals of Sihon yet they were native Midianites and such as dwelt in that countrey and so were the more zealous for the defence of their countrey against the Israelites and so the slaying of Sihon and these princes of Midian is here mentioned together onely because both the one and the other were slain by the Israelites and much about the same time but that where the text is discribing the countrey of Sihon it should be said of these princes that they were Dukes of Sihon dwelling in the countrey meaning thereby the countrey of Midian may be justly thought somewhat improbable and therefore the first Exposition seems to me the best Vers 22. Balaam also the sonne of Beor the Soothsayer did the children of Israel slay c. See the note upon Numb 24.25 Vers 23. And the border of the children of Reuben was Jordan and the border thereof That is the banks or border or coasts of Jordan all along was the border to wit the western border of Reuben Vers 25. And their coast was Jasher and all the cities of Giliad That is all the cities of Gilead within the bounds afterward mentioned for half Gilead was given to the tribe of Manasseh vers 31. And half the land of the children of Ammon c. Which it seems Sihon had taken away from the Ammonites as he had also encroched upon the Moabites countrey Numb 21.26 For Heshbon was the city of Sihon the king of the Amorites who
of Edom southward were Kabzeel c. It is called Iekabzeel Neh. 11.25 Vers 32. All their cities are twenty nine with their villages There are indeed eight and thirty cities or towns named in the foregoing verses and therefore for the clearing of this some hold that because nine of these were afterwards assigned to the tribe of Simeon therefore it is said here that all the cities of Iudah in those parts were nine and twenty But the better answer I conceive is that nine and twenty of them onely were walled cities the other were the most famous towns and villages in those parts And here in this first catalogue of Iudahs cities in the Southern parts the most noted towns are expressed by name as well as the walled cities that in the following catalogues we may conceive the same to wit that there were many towns of note besides the cities there mentioned though they be not expressed by name as here they are Vers 36. Fourteen cities with their villages There are fifteen named in the foregoing verses either therefore one of them was no citie but some noted town or rather it may be very probably conceived that Gederah and Gederothaim were but one citie and therefore some reade it as it is in the margin of our bibles Gederah or Gederothaim Vers 62. And Nibshan and the citie of salt This citie might have its name The citie of salt from the salt pits that were there and the abundance of salt that was dayly made by the inhabitants of the citie Vers 63. As for the Jebusites the inhabitants of Jerusalem the children of Judah could not drive them out It is a question much argued amongst writers whether Jerusalem stood in Judahs or in Benjamins portion By many places of Scripture it seems evident that it was in Benjamins portion For in the 18. chapter of this book vers 28. it is reckoned amongst the cities that were in Benjamins lot and we see that Moses did before his death prophesie concerning Benjamin that the Temple which was in Jerusalem should be built in Benjamins portion for that is the drift of those words Deut. 33.12 And of Benjamin he said The beloved of the Lord shall dwell in safety by him and the Lord shall cover him all the day long and he shall dwell between his shoulders yea and Jer. 6.1 the inhabitants of Jerusalem are expressely called the children of Benjamin O ye children of Benjamin gather your selves to flee out of the midst of Jerusalem and Judg. 1.21 the same that is here said of the children of Judah is likewise there said of the children of Benjamin The children of Benjamin did not drive out the Jebusites the inhabitants of Jerusalem but the Jebusites dwell with the children of Benjamin in Jerusalem unto this day But now again by other places of Scripture it seems as evident that Jerusalem was in Judahs portion For first mention is here made of it as one of Judahs cities The Jebusites dwell with the children of Judah at Jerusalem unto this day and secondly Jerusalem is said to have been taken by the children of Judah Judg. 1.8 and thirdly it is reckoned as the great priviledge of the children of Judah that the Lord in his Temple dwelt amongst them Psal 78.67 68 69. Moreover he refused the Tabernacle of Joseph and chose not the tribe of Ephraim but chose the tribe of Judah the mount Sion which he loved and he built his Sanctuary like high places c. but the truth herein is that Jerusalem stood in the border of these two tribes and so was part in Judahs and part in Benjamins portion and therefore the places of Scripture before cited do not any way contradict one another the fort of Sion and some of the south skirts of the city were in Judahs portion but the greatest part of the city in Benjamins and therefore it may well be that when they went about to expell the Jebusites that dwelt there both Iudah and Benjamin joyned their forces together as Judah and Simeon did in a like case Judg. 1.3 And Judah said unto Simeon his brother Come up with me into my lot that we may fight aganst the Canaanites and I likewise will go with thee into thy lot As for that which is here said concerning Jerusalem to wit that the children of Judah could not drive out the Jebusites thence and the like we see is said concerning the children of Benjamin Judg. 1.21 we must know that the Iebusites continued in Ierusalem unto Davids time Indeed Adoni-zedek the king of Jerusalem was slain by Ioshua chap. 10.23 26. for he was one of those five kings that made warre against Gibeon though we find no mention there of his taking Ierusalem yea and it is expressely said Iudg. 1.8 that afterwards the children of Iudah took the city of Jerusalem and burnt it with fire that is some part of it Well but yet the fort of Sion which was the chief strength of Ierusalem was not at that time taken by them for that the Iebusites held till David took it 2. Sam. 5 6 7. yea and it seems that afterward the Iebusites did also by the help of this fort recover the city again at least so farre that they forced the Israelites to let the Iebusites dwell there amongst them as it is said here For in the dayes of the Iudges we see that Iebus that is Ierusalem was still inhabited by the Iebusites Iudg. 19.12 We will not turn aside hither into the city of a stranger that is not of the children of Israel saith the Levite there concerning Iebus we will passe over to Gibea But however we must not think that this which is said here that the children of Judah could not drive them out is added by way of excusing them no but rather to their shame and reproch for though the fort of Sion was a place of great strength so that when David set himself down with his army before it the Iebusites scorned him bragged that their lame and blind and impotent people should defend it against him 2. Sam. 5.6 Yet God would certainly have driven them out according to his promise had they not been wanting to themselves But they grew slothfull and faint hearted and by these and other their sinnes provoked the Lord to withdraw himself from them and so then indeed they could not drive out the inhabitants but were glad to purchase peace upon any tearms according to that Iudg. 2.20 21. And the anger of the Lord was hot against Israel and he said Because this people hath transgressed my covenant which I commanded their fathers and have not hearkned to my voice I also will not hence forth drive out any from before them of the nations which Joshua left when he died c. CHAP. XVI Vers 1. ANd the lot of the children of Joseph fell from Jordan by Jericho unto the water of Jericho on the east c. It is the opinion of some learned writers that
in the utmost north-end of Canaan whence the length of the land is ordinarily described to be from the entrance of Hamath to the river of Egypt 1. Kings 8.65 See Num. 13.22 and Cinnereth was a city in the eastern parts whence the lake so often mentioned in Scripture was called the lake of Genezereth Vers 38. Nineteen cities with their villages For some of them mentioned before in drawing the border of their lot stood happely in the portion of the bordering tribes Vers 40. And the seventh lot came out for the tribe of the children of Dan. Though this tribes lot was not wholly taken out of that which was given to Judah as Simeons was yet that a part of it was is manifest by some of the cities mentioned here that chap. 15. are numbered amongst those that were at first in Judahs portion it was compassed with the sea and the borders of the other tribes formerly described and so the borders of this tribe are here omitted Vers 41. And the coast of their inheritance was Zorah and Eshtaol c. In this Zorah Samson was born Judges 13.2 and between Zorah and Eshtaol he was buried Vers 43. And Elon and Timnathah c. Whence Samson took a wife Judges 14.1 Vers 47. Therefore the children of Dan went up to fight against Leshem c. Or Laish The story we have Judges 18. This then happened after Joshuas death but here it is mentioned lest it should seem strange how the Danites came to inhabite the north parts of the land when their lot fell to them in the south parts even close by Judahs portion the reason was because being not able to drive out the Philistines out of their land they were streightned for room so went out and took Laish a city that was in Naphtalies lot though then in the Zidonians possession and transplanted a Colony thither calling it Dan from their father Dan the sonne of Jacob it stood almost in the furthest north part of the land Judges 20.1 The congregation was gathered together as one wan from Dan to Beersheba Vers 50. According to the word of the Lord they gave him the citie he asked even Timnath-serah in mount Ephraim c. To wit the word of the Lord which he spake to Moses not onely concerning Caleb but concerning Joshua for why indeed should he be left out see Iosh 14.7 to wit that he should chuse a peculiar portion to himself where he would yet it may be meant also of some direction given him by Eleazar the priest upon his inquiry of God for him However herein first was the modesty of Ioshua remarkable that he was content to stay till all the tribes had their portion ere there was any motion made of that which by way of speciall Prerogative was to be conferred upon him secondly That he was content to receive what God had promised him as by way of gift from the people he asked and they gave him the city he asked thirdly That whereas he might have chosen the fairest and goodliest city in all their tribes he chose his seat in a mountainous countrey nothing so pleasant and delightfull as many other places were yea and it seems a city that was ruinated so that he was fain to build it ere he dwelt in it for so it follows in the next words and he built the city and dwelt therein CHAP. XX. Vers 2. APpoint out for you cities of refuge c. Concerning these cities of refuge see the notes Numb 35.6 and 24 c. Vers 6. And he shall dwell in that city untill he stand before the congregation for judgement and untill the death of the high priest c. That is untill he be fetched thence to the place where the fact was done that it may be there tryed whether it were done wittingly or unwittingly so long he was to abide there however or untill the death of the high Priest if it were found that he did it unwittingly for then he was to be sent back to the city of refuge and to be kept there till the high priest dyed Concerning the mysticall reason of the man-slayers staying in the city of refuge till the death of the high priest see the note upon Num. 35.25 But to this some also do adde a literall reason to wit that hereby was implyed how hainous a fault it was to shed the bloud of a man and how displeasing to God in that the man that was but unwittingly defiled with the shedding of bloud must be thus shut up lest he should happen to come into the sight of him who did as it were represent Gods person amongst them to wit the high priest nor could be suffered to stirre from thence till he was dead Vers 8. And on the other side Jordan by Jericho eastward they assigned Bezer c. That is they confirmed and ratified these to be cities of refuge without Jordan which Moses himself had formerly chosen and set apart for that use See Deut. 4.41 42 43. CHAP. XXI Vers 1. THen came near the heads of the fathers of the Levites unto Eleazar the priest c. It was doubtles immediately after they had made an end of dividing the land that the Levites came thus to Eleazer and the rest of the Commissioners to receive from them the cities which God had appointed to be set apart for their dwelling For first it is not probable that there was any delay which might move the Levites to challenge their right and secondly it is as improbable that the Israelites did first settle themselves in these cities and then were afterwards put out to give way to the Levites Vers 2. The Lord commanded by the hand of Moses to give us cities to dwell in c. See the notes upon Numb 35.2 c. Vers 4. And the lot came out for the familie of the Kohathites God had expressed the number of cities that were to be given them to wit fourty eight Numb 35.7 So all the cities which ye shall give to the Levites shall be fourty and eight cities he had also given them directions to take these cities out of each tribe some according as their proportion was greater or lesser and therefore the Commissioners for the dividing of the land made choice no doubt of these cities as in their wisdome they found them most convenient for the Levites and for the people and then having divided the cities they had chosen into foure parts one for the priests a second for the Levites of Kohaths familie a third for the Gershonites and a fourth for the Merarites then was it at last decided in which of the tribes the priests should be placed and so of the rest or at least of those cities which were judged convenient they took the number agreed upon by lot See vers 11. And the children of Aaron the priest which were of the Levites had by lot out of the tribe of Judah c. Thus by Gods speciall providence the
Penuel and slew the men of the city That is the Magistrates of the city as before he did in Succoth Vers 18. Then said he unto Zebah and Zalmunna What manner of men were they whom ye slew at Tabor Because it seems Gideon had heard that these kings had slain certain men of the Israelites that had retired themselves for shelter to some strong holds or caves in mount Tabor and feared they vvere his brethren because they amongst others sought to provide for the saving of their lives in those dangerous times as others did chap. 6.2 And the hand of Midian prevailed against Israel and because of the Midianites the children of Israel made them the dens which are in the mountains and caves and strong holds and had not been since heard of therefore he inquires thus concerning the men vvhom they had there slain And they answered As thou art so were they each one resembled the children of a king This may be meant of that likenesse of feature which is usually amongst brethren but plainly it intends that they were of a goodly and comely personage even as Gideon was and such as might well beseem men of a princely and Royall stock Vers 19. As the Lord liveth if ye had saved them alive I would not slay you The meaning is that he would have spared them because they had shown mercy to his brethren and hereby he expresseth his sorrow for his brethren and shews what little cause they had now to expect any mercy from him Vers 20. And he said unto Jether his first-born Up and slay them Upon him he imposeth this work rather then any other first that he might train him up even from his young years to draw his sword against the enemies of Israel and to be severe to those that should rise up against God and against his people secondly that it might be done by way of avenging the death of his brethren thirdly because it would adde if not to the pain yet to the dishonour of their death to die by such a hand Vers 21. Then Zebah and Zalmunna said Rise thou and fall upon us for as the man is so is his strength In this reply of theirs first they descant in a kind of scornfull manner upon that command of Gideons setting a child to take away their lives whereas indeed this his young heire had scarce courage enough to look them in the face secondly they provoke Gideon as impatient of delay to rise upon them himself and rid them out of the way thereby discovering their contempt of death and how much they scorned to begge life and withall happely being loath to die by the hand of a child And took away the ornaments that were on their Camels necks As the memorials of this great victory Vers 22. Then the men of Israel said unto Gideon Rule thou over us both thou and thy sonne c. That is they offered to receive him to be their king and to settle the kingdome successively upon his posterity Vers 23. And Gideon said unto them I will not rule over you c. That is not as a king he judged Israel unto his dying day but it was the kingdome of Israel the regall power which they proffered and he now refused and that upon this ground because the accepting of this would have been in a manner a taking of the government out of Gods hand the Lord saith he shall rule over you Not that God rules not by kings as well as by other kind of Magistrates but because God had established this way of governing them by Judges who had not so great a degree of soveraignty and power over the people as kings usually have were extraordinarily called of God withall because God had in his Law expressed that in case they should desire a king they were to take him whom the Lord should choose Deu. 17.14 15 When thou art come to the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee and shalt possesse it and shall dwell therein and shalt say I will set a king over me like all the nations that are about Thou shalt in any wise set him a king over thee whom the Lord thy God shall chuse One from among thy brethren shalt thou set over thee thou mayest not set a stranger over thee which is not thy brother Therefore he takes this rash proffer of changing the government to be a shaking of Gods government because they went about to change it without Gods leave and refuseth to give any consent to it all which is evident by that which the Lord said of the Israelites desiring a King in Samuels dayes 1. Sam. 8.6 7. But the thing displeased Samuel when they said Give us a King to judge us and Samuel prayed unto the Lord And the Lord said unto Samuel Hearken unto the voice of the people in all that they say unto thee for they have not rejected thee but they have rejected me that I should not reigne over them Vers 26. And the weight of the golden ear-rings which he requested was a thousand and seven hundred shekles of gold c. Which is esteemed to be according to the account of our weight 2380 pounds it is not impossible that all this should be spent in the making of one ephod as it is said vers 27. especially if it were made as that of Aarons with a brestplate set with so many precious stones of great value Exod. 28.15 16.17 But the words will well enough bear that of part of this gold now given him he made an ephod Vers 27. And Gideon made an ephod thereof and put it in his city Not a linen ephod but such a one as that which was made for the high priest of gold blue purple scarlet c. Exod. 28.6 It is probable enough that he intended it onely as a memoriall of this their victory over the Midianites the monument being of the very prey which was there taken though afterwards it became a snare both to him and to his house But why then did he make an ephod rather then any other monument this indeed seems to imply that his purpose was to make use also of this ephod either in offering sacrifices in his own house and then under this ephod all the priestly garments may be comprehended or else thereby to enquire what the will of the Lord was according to the judgement of Urim Not considering that this previledge was onely annexed to Aarons ephod wherein was the brestplate of judgement with the Urim and Thummim and therein therefore he sinned greatly and brought Gods wrath upon his posterity And all Israel went thither a whoring after it c. Either they went thither as to a famous Oracle to inquire concerning the will of God in any doubtfull cases or else drawn with the superstitious conceits they had entertained of this ephod they set up there a place of sacrificing contrary to the expresse letter of the Law of God or else they resorted
the words must be that in those dayes there was no King in Israel that is no supreme Magistrate armed with such sovereigne authoritie to punish offenders that transgressed the law as the Kings afterwards had the Judges rather governing the people by counsell shewing them what was the law and will of God then by the sword of justice at least in those times of the Judges when they were in subjection to those neighbouring nations that tyrannised over them Vers 7. And there was a young man out of Bethlehem-Judah c. That is Bethlehem in the tribe of Judah which was called Bethlehem Ephratah Mich. 5.2 to distinguish it from that Bethlehem which was in the tribe of Zebulun Josh 19.15 But why is it said in the next words that he was a Levite and yet withall too of the familie of Judah I answer because though he was a Levite yet he was born and bred up amongst them of the familie of Judah It may be true which some conceive that his father being a Levite and sojourning there marryed a wife of the familie of Judah but it is not usuall in Scripture to style men by the mothers familie and therefore the meaning is that there he had his birth and breeding for which cause he is also said to have sojourned there because he was not of that tribe neither was Bethlehem one of the Levites cities but there he lived as a stranger as the Levites it seems did in many other places Afterwards his name is expressed and of what familie he was to wit that his name was Jonathan and that he was the sonne of Gershom the sonne of Manasseh Vers 8. And the man departed out of the city from Bethlehem-Judah to sojourn where he could find a place c. This shews the corruptions of those times God had provided liberally for the tribe of Levi but in these idolatrous times the people had in a great measure forsaken the Tabernacle and so their appointed maintenance of tythes it seems was not yielded them for then this Levite needed not have wandered up and down to procure means of livelyhood See the like Neh. 13.10 11. And I perceived that the portion of the Levites had not been given them for the Levites and the singers that did the work were fled every one to his field Then I contended with the rulers and said Why is the house of God forsaken and I gathered them together and put them in their places Vers 10. And Micah said unto him Dwell with me and be unto me a father and a priest c. Though he had consecrated his sonne to execute the priests office in his idolatrous chappel yet because he thought it would be a great honour to his idol-worship to have one of the tribe of Levi to his priest either he was content to put his sonne out of that place and to put in this Levite in his room or else meant to joyn him with his sonne and so began to treat with him to this purpose But yet observable it is that though he promised to reverence this Levite as a father notwithstanding his youth if he would be his priest be unto me saith he a father and a priest yet it was but a poore salarie that he tendered him for his service I will give thee ten shekels of silver by the yeare and a suit of apparell and thy victuals eleven hundred shekels of silver were set apart to make their idols and the appurtenances thereto belonging and yet ten shekels of silver were thought enough for the priests wages Indeed had not the time when this was done been extremely corrupt a Levite would never have prostituted himself to such a base service as to be a priest to their idol-dunghill-gods and that too upon such base terms but hunger will snap at any thing when there is no grace to restrain men for so it follows in the next verse and the Levite was content to dwell with the man c. Vers 11. And the young man was unto him as one of his sonnes c. Though he reverenced him as a father as he had promised him before vers 10 yet it is said here that the young man was unto him as one of his sonnes that is he loved him and used him as if he had been his own child Vers 13. Now I know that the Lord will do me good seeing I have a Levite to my priest But how much he was deceived the following chapter sheweth CHAP. XVIII Vers 1. IN those dayes there was no King in Israel See the note chap. 17. vers 6. For unto that day all their inheritance had not fallen unto them among the tribes of Israel By reason of the Amorites who cooped them up in the mountains chap. 1.34 And the Amorites forced the children of Dan into the mountain for they would not suffer them to come into the valley Vers 3. When they were by the house of Micah they knew the voice of the young man the Levite The Danites had part of their inheritance in that part of Canaan which was at first assigned to the tribe of Judah therefore it is not unlikely that some of these spies were formerly acquainted with this Levite whilst he sojourned in Bethlehem-Judah and so now knew his voice However by the different dialect or manner of speech and pronunciation which the men of Judah used from that which was used by the inhabitants of mount Ephraim they might know him to belong to Judah though he now sojourned in Ephraim as we may see in that instance chap. 12.6 where the men of Ephraim said Sibboleth in stead of Shibboleth And besides if they heard him speak concerning the employments of his calling by that they might know he was a Levite Vers 5. And they said unto him Ask counsel we pray thee of God c. Hearing from the Levite that Micah had there a chappel of gods and amongst the rest an Ephod and Teraphim which were the Oracles whereby in those idolatrous times they were wont to enquire of God and that he was hired to be Micahs priest they desired him that he would enquire of God concerning the successe of that great businesse they were going about Vers 6. Go in peace before the Lord is your way wherein ye go That is the eye of the Lord it upon your way to remove all difficulties and to make your journey prosperous he will go out before you and take care of your journey Now this answer he might return of his own head flatteringly as false Prophets are wont to do But yet God might permit Satan by his Teraphim or some such Oracle to foretell this concerning the successe of their journey Deut. 13.1 2 3. If there arise among you a prophet or a dreames of dreams and giveth thee a signe or a wonder and the signe or the wonder come to passe whereof he spake unto thee saying Let us go after other gods which thou hast not known and let
bring the following judgement upon them or rather that this was an extraordinary act of devotion whereto the Priests were led by reasons grounded upon this strange and extraordinary work which God had wrought and perhaps also by a speciall instinct of Gods Spirit and is not therefore to be judged of according to the rules of other ordinary burnt offerings They considered that these kine had been given up by the Philistines to the service of the Lord in bringing home the Ark and that having been employed in so sacred of service it was not fit they should be imployed to any other use or much lesse that they should be sent back to the Philistines again and therefore they resolved by this way of an extraordinary burnt-offering to yield them up to the Lord by whose all-ruling providence they were so miraculously swayed to bring back the Ark unto that place And indeed had they sinned in offering these kine for a burnt-offering why should not this be mentioned vers 19. as the cause of Gods displeasure against them as well as their looking into the Ark. Vers 15. And the Levites took down the Ark of the Lord c. That is the Priests who were of the tribe of Levi for Bethshemesh as is before noted was one of the Priests cities Josh 21.16 nor was it lawfull for the Levites to touch the Ark Num. 4.15 And when Aaron and his sonnes have made an end of covering the Sanctuarie and all the vessels of the Sanctuarie as the camp is to set forward after that the sonnes of Kohath shall come to bear it but they shall not touch any holy thing lest they die Vers 18. And the golden mice according to the number of all the cities of the Philistines belonging to the five lords both of fenced cities and of countrey villages c. That is according as all the cities and villages of the Philistines were divided into five parts and were under the command of their five great lords each of those cities before mentioned being the mother citie in each division so accordingly there were five golden mice given as was said before vers 4. and that in the name and happely at the charge not of the mother-cities onely but of all the severall circuits or provinces that belonged to them because all had been punished with that plague of mice which were sent amongst them even all the land of the Philistines unto the great stone of Abel that is mourning so called doubtlesse because of the peoples lamentation vers 19. as upon a like occasion the floore of Atad where the sonnes of Jacob with the Egyptians mourned for the death of Jacob was called Abel-mizraim Gen. 50.11 that is the mourning of the Egyptians Vers 19. And he smote the men of Bethshemesh because they had looked into the Ark of the Lord. It was not lawfull for any but the Priests no not the Levites who carried it to look upon the Ark bare and uncovered Num. 4.20 But they shall not go in to see when the holy things are covered lest they die It was therefore sufficient to render the people obnoxious to the judgement that fell upon them if we suppose that it came covered from the Philistines and they uncovered it to look upon it or that it came uncovered and they took libertie without any fear or reverence to stare and gaze upon it But yet the words seem to import that they proceeded further even to look into the Ark either merely out of curiositie or perhaps to see whether the Philistines had not put any thing into it or taken any thing out of it onely I see not how so many could offend in this kind Even he smote of the people fiftie thousand and threescore and ten men That is of them and of the people together that came flocking from all parts to see the Ark there were slain fiftie thousand and threescore and ten men It were much that there should be so many found in so little a citie as Bethshemesh was but amongst those multitudes that might come from all parts to see the Ark there might well be fiftie thousand and threescore and ten slain Vers 21. And they sent messengers to the inhabitants of Kirjath-jearim c. Pretending happely that their citie of Bethshemesh was not a place of such safetie for the Ark to be in as Kirjath-jearim was they sent to the inhabitants of Kirjath-jearim to desire them to fetch the Ark thither The Philistines say they have brought again the Ark of the Lord come ye down and fetch it up to you CHAP. VII Vers 1. ANd the men of Kirjath-jearim came and fetcht up the Ark of the Lord c. Three particulars are here related concerning this removall of the Ark. The first is that it was fetcht up from Bethshemesh by the men of Kirjath-jearim a citie in the tribe of Judah not farre from Bethshemesh called formerly Baalah and Kirjath-Baal Josh 15.9 60. and 18.14 Now this being none of the cities of the Priests who onely might touch the Ark though it be said that the men of Kirjath-jearim fetcht up the Ark yet thereby is meant onely that they came up to have it carried to their citie and attended it when it was removed for they were doubtlesse priests either of Bethshemesh or of some other place that carried the Ark. Notwithstanding the men of Bethshemesh were smitten for looking into the Ark chap. 6.19 yet the men of Kirjath-jearim did not oppose the removing of it to their citie but themselves fetched it thither no doubt with much joy and that because they knew that it was not the presence of the Ark amongst the men of Bethshemesh but their unreverend carriage of themselves in gazing upon the Ark or looking into it that was the cause of their miserie The second thing related is that they brought the Ark into the house of Abinadab in the hill It is likely that Abinadab was a man of singular holinesse and perhaps as some hold a Levite too but yet the reason which the text implies why his house was chosen for the keeping of this sacred treasure is this that it was in the hill to wit first because high places were in these times in great request and judged fittest for holy employments and secondly because it might be a place of strength and so of safetie for the Ark to be kept in whence it was that the Ark was kept there till Davids time when it was fetched away from thence 1. Chron. 13.6 7. And David went up and all Israel to Baalah that is to Kirjath-jearim which belonged to Judah to bring up thence the Ark of God the Lord. And they carried the Ark of God in a new cart out of the house of Abinadab Indeed in 2. Sam. 6.3 it is said that the Ark was brought out of the house of Abinadab that was in Gibeah but by Gibeah there is meant the hill as it is translated there in the margin of our Bibles
Christs government to wit because God the father appointed him to be our king according to that Psal 2.6 I have set my king upon my holy hill of Sion and in that David rejected not these Israelites that so long opposed the government which they knew God had appointed there is an intimation of comfort for those that being convinced of the truth of the Gospel do yet stand out a long time against knowledge to wit that if at last yet they repent and come in Christ will not reject them Vers 3. And king David made a league with them in Hebron before the Lord. To wit concerning the government they binding themselves to obey him as their king and he binding himself to forget all that was past and to govern them like a good king according to the Law and because this was done with invocation of God as a witnesse of their league therefore it is said that this league was made before the Lord. And they anointed David king over Israel This was the third time that David was anointed king and so was Christ three times by an audible voice from heaven declared to be the Sonne of God and the promised Messiah First at his baptisme Matth. 3.16 17. And Jesus when he was baptized went straightway out of the waters And lo the heavens were opened unto him and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove and lighting upon him And lo a voice from heaven saying This is my beloved Sonne in whom I am well pleased Secondly at his transfiguration Matth 17.5 While he yet spake behold a bright cloud overshadowed them and behold a voice out of the cloud which said This is my beloved Sonne in whom I am well pleased Heare ye him And thirdly a little before his death whilest he was teaching the people John 12.28 when Christ had said Father glorifie thy name then came there a voice from heaven saying I have glorified it and will glorifie it again Vers 4. David was thirty years old when he began to reigne At the same age was Christ also inaugurated as it were into the office of the Mediatour Luke 3.22 23. Vers 6. And the king and his men went to Jerusalem unto the Jebusites the inhabitants of the land c. Jerusalem stood in the very confines of Judah and Benjamin so that part of it which stood on the hill Salem was in Judahs lot and part of it yea the greatest part of it which stood in mount Sion was in Benjamins the men of Judah took that part of it which belonged to them and smote it with the edge of the sword Judg. 1.8 But the children of Benjamin could not drive out the Jebusites out of their portion Judg. 1.21 no not when they had the help of their brethren the men of Judah as may be gathered by that whith is written Josh 15.63 As for the Jebusites the inhabitants of Jerusalem the children of Judah could not drive them out but the Jebusites dwell with the children of Judah at Jerusalem unto this day And therefore we reade that afterward it was a city of strangers when the Levite and his concubine went that way Judg. 19.10 11 12. yea so it continued till this time when David intending not without the instinct of the spirit of God to make Jerusalem the chief seat of his kingdome and having now the advantage of a mighty assembly of the men of warre of Israel that were come up armed to Hebron to make him king took this opportunity and led them forth against Jerusalem resolving that the wresting this out of the Jebusites hands should be his first enterprise Except thou take away the blind and the lame thou shalt not come in hither c. There are many severall expositions of this passage concerning the Jebusites scoffing at David when he came to besiege them But two expositions there are which are both very probable The first which indeed most Expositours follow is this That being over-confident in the strength of the place they in a flouting manner answered David when he required them to yield up the fort that except he could take from them the blind and the lame amongst the inhabitants he should not come in thither implying that though they should man their walls onely with the blind and the lame of the people even they should be able to defend that place against him and all the forces he could make And indeed it seems to have been a place of exceeding great strength because they had held it ever since Joshua entred the land that is almost foure hundred years and yet it was even in the heart of their countrey The second Exposition is That they spake this of their gods in whom they were never a whit the lesse confident because the Israelites despised them except thou take away the blind and the lame thou shalt not come in hither that is even those gods of ours which you in contempt call blind and lame gods shall easily defend us against all thy forces and will in that be found to be neither lame nor blind And indeed this exposition seems best to agree with the following passages in the 8. verse And David said on that day Whosoever getteth up to the gutter and smiteth the Jebusites and the lame and the blind that are hated of Davids soul he shall be chief captain Wherefore they say The lame and the blind shall not enter into the house Nor need it seem strange that they call their own gods blind and lame for this they might do purposely to let the Israelites see how little they were discouraged by these reproches which the Israelites cast upon their idol-gods from putting their trust in them as being most confident of their aid and assistance Vers 7. Neverthelesse David took the strong hold of Sion the same is the city of David For David having proclaimed that whosoever should first scale the walls and so get up to the gutter as it is expressed in the next verse and enter the fort he should be chief captain that is the Generall of his forces Joab the rather happely that he might recover Davids favour whom he had highly offended by killing Abner did hereupon first scale the walls and so was made the Lord General of the kings forces as it is more fully expressed 1. Chron. 11.6 and this was that strong hold of Sion which because it was taken by him was afterward called the city of David Vers 8. Whosoever getteth up to the gutter and smiteth the Jebusites and the lame and the blind that are hated of Davids soul c. That is the blind and the lame Jebusites wherewith they had or pretended they could manne their walls and that it should be sufficient for the defence of the place which are here said to be hated of Davids soul because of that bitter taunt wherewith he had been flouted concerning them and herein David gives his souldiers to understand that if they took the fort
David had called together thirty thousand men of the chief of Israel both priests and others there should not be one amongst them all that should stumble at this but that they should all runne on so confidently in so grosse an errour But we must consider that they had been long strangers to the ark and never questioned but that they might safely do what the Philistines had done before them without any danger and then besides God would let us see how easily multitudes of Gods people may erre if they do not the more heedfully examine all by the rules of the word Vers 4. And Ahio went before the Ark. To wit to look to the oxen as Uzzah went behind to take care of the cart and the ark that was in it Vers 6. And when they came to Nachons threshing floor c. This Nachon is also called Chidon 1. Chron. 13.9 and the last clause of this verse which is here translated for the oxen shook it is there translated for the oxen stumbled and it may well be that the oxens stumbling shook the ark and so thereupon Uzzah laid hold on the ark to stay it for fear it should have fallen Where this threshing floor of Nachon or Chidon was it is not expressed but most probable it is that they had not gone farre from the house of Abinadab in Kirjath-jearim ere the Lord by this sad disaster testified his displeasure against them for carrying the ark in a cart Vers 7. And God smote him there for his errour c. To wit because having put the ark into a cart which should have been carried on the Levites shoulders he now also laid hold on the ark which no man might touch but the priests onely Num. 4.15 The sonnes of Kohath shall come to bear it but they shall not touch any holy thing lest they die Indeed the ark was to be covered by the law but perhaps in this as in other things they had neglected the direction of the law or else being covered onely with a loose covering that might flie up with the tottering of the cart Uzzah might touch the bare ark with his hand and for this God presently struck him dead in the place A most remarkable example of Gods severity against those that will not keep close to the direction of his word in all things that concern his worship upon what pretence soever they do it Though Abinadab the father of this Uzzah had entertained the ark in his house above fourty years together and took it in at a time when others were afraid to receive it through the terrour of the judgement which fell upon the men of Bethshemesh 1. Sam. 6.19 20. Yet was his sonne now struck suddenly dead because he reached forth his hand and touched the ark and yet he did it too with a good intention to stay the ark from falling and suddenly not thinking of the unlawfulnesse of this act as is intimated in these words God smote him there for his errour or rashnesse as it is in the margin of our bibles Vers 8. And David was displeased because the Lord had made a breach upon Vzzah That is he was grieved troubled and disquieted because of this heavy judgement wherewith the Lord had broken forth upon Uzzah Some will have this understood that David was merely displeased with themselves for their heedlesnesse as thinking it too harsh to say of David that he was displeased with God but doubtlesse it was partly the very judgement it self that befell Uzzah that he was troubled at he could not well keep his heart from murmuring and rising against this severitie of God in striking Uzzah dead in the place for so small a matter he was discontented that when they had undertaken such a work of piety on a sudden all the joy of the people should be dashed and damped with such a sad disaster and so partly because he did not so quietly stoop at first under Gods hand as he ought to have done therefore it is said David was displeased Vers 9. How shall the ark of the Lord come to me That is I shall not do it without danger yea it seems the Lord is not pleased that the ark should be carried to Jerusalem and therefore it will be safer to desist from my purpose Vers 10. But David carried it aside to the house of Obed-edom the Gittite Who it seems gladly entertained it Though no doubt he knew well enough what a slaughter was made amongst the men of Bethshemesh at the first coming of the ark thither and though now also perhaps he saw when Uzzah was stricken dead by the hand of God for touching the ark and that David himself trembled and was afraid to to carry home the ark to his house yet considering that there was no danger in harbouring the ark if they carried themselves with that respect and reverence therein that God required he gladly received the ark into his house That this Obed-edom was a Levite is evident 1. Chron. 15.17 18. and therefore it seems he is here called Obed-edom the Gittite because he was of Gathrimmon a citie which was given in common by the tribes of Dan and Manasseh to the Levites of the family of Kohath as we may see Josh 21.24 25. Vers 12. And it was told king David saying The Lord hath blessed the house of Obed-edom c. It is not expressed what it was wherein they perceived that God had blessed Obed-edom and all his family but doubtlesse it was some extraordinary and wonderfull blessing that God poured forth upon him and his in the encrease of his cattell and the successe of all his affairs c. because it was so presently discovered and notice taken of it by those that dwelt about him in so short a time for the ark was in his house but three moneths in all as is noted in the foregoing verse Indeed in the 1. Chron. 26.5 it is said that the numerousnesse of his children was because the Lord blessed him but this could not be the blessing here spoken of that in the space of three moneths was so clearly discerned by those that lived about him So David went and brought up the Ark of God c. That is perceiving by Gods bounty to Obed-edom that the ark might be entertained without danger he at length found out where their former errour had been and so resolving to amend that he undertook again to fetch the ark to Jerusalem and having again assembled the people and given the Priests and Levites their charge to wit to carry the ark on their shoulders he fetched it with great solemnity from the house of Obed-edom as is largely related in the 15. and 16. chapters of the first book of Chronicles Vers 13. When they that bare the ark of God had gone six paces he sacrificed oxen and fatlings And this he did First by way of testifying their thankfulnesse to God for their successefull entrance upon this great work so soon as
no necessity at all why this second apparition of the Lord to Solomon might not be after all his buildings were finished as the words in our translation do plainly imply Thirteen years indeed were spent in building his own house after the Temple was finished and so long therefore it seems it was after the finishing of the Temple ere the Lord appeared the second time to Solomon and assured him that he had heard his prayer which he had made at the dedication of the Temple for God would first settle him in the full glory of his kingdome and then he takes that opportunity to renew his covenant with him in a second vision assuring him that in this glory his kingdome should be continued to his posterity in case both he and his children would keep covenant with him and withall threatning that if they revolted from him he would leave both them and the Temple and all and poure forth his wrath and fury upon them Vers 2. The Lord appeared to Solomon the second time c. To wit in a dream by night chap. 3.5 and so it is partly expressed 2. Chro. 7.12 And the Lord appeared unto Solomon by night and said unto him I have heard thy prayer and chosen this place to my self for a house of sacrifice once since that vision in Gibeon we reade that the word of the Lord came to Solomon chap. 6.11 But that it seems was by some messenger or Prophet sent to him for this was the second time the Lord appeared unto him in a vision as is here expressely noted Vers 3. I have hallowed this house which thou hast built to put my name there for ever c. That is untill the coming of the Messiah without interruption As for that following clause and my eyes and mine heart shall be there perpetually thereby is promised both the Lords carefull preservation of that house in succeeding times and his readinesse to heare the prayers that were offered to him there and likewise that he would do this out of his fatherly care over them and love to them Vers 7. This house which I have hallowed for my name will I cast out of my sight c. That is I will cast it out of my protection as a filthy polluted thing concerning the following clause and Israel shall be a proverb c. see the note Deut. 28.37 Vers 11. Now Hiram the king of Tyre had furnished Solomon with cedar trees and firre trees and with gold To wit one hundred and twenty talents as is expressed vers 14. Solomon gave Hiram twenty cities in the land of Galilee By way of requiting Hirams bountie in supplying him with those thing mentioned in the former words or by way of satisfying him for those things It was questionlesse unlawfull for Solomon to give away any part of the land of Canaan to a strange king or people for therein first there should have been wrong done to that tribe in whose lot these cities were who should hereby have been deprived of a part of their inheritance which God had given them and secondly he should have incroached upon Gods royaltie who still held the land as his and onely allowed the Israelites to dwell in it as sojourners by right derived unto them from him and to manifest this had conveyed it to them with this condition or proviso that it should not be lawfull for any of them to alienate or sell a way their estates for ever no not to any of their brethren the Israelites Levit. 25.23 But how then could Solomon who yet continued in his uprightnesse give away twenty cities in the land of Galilee to Hiram king of Tyre I answer either Solomon gave him these cities onely that he might receive thence for certain years till he was satisfied for that which was owing him the tribute or other profits which were thence yearly paid to Solomon or else rather these cities were not a part of that land which God had of old given for the inheritance of his people but lay in a tract of ground on the outside of the borders of Asher Josh 19.24 betwixt them and mount Libanus and being now reduced under Solomons dominion and either now or afterward counted as a part of Galilee to which they were joyned thence Solomon gave unto Hiram twenty cities And indeed this answer seems most probable because upon Hirams refusing these cities they were repaired and inlarged by Solomon and certain colonies of the Israelites were planted therein 2 Chron. 8.1 2. whereas before they were inhabited by the heathen which some say was the first occasion why Galilee was called Galilee of the Gentiles Esa 9.1 Vers 12. And they pleased him not That is he liked them not because they stood in an unfruitfull and marish ground or because he thought it would be long ere he should thence reap that satisfaction he expected from Solomon and as he misliked them so it seems he refused the profer and chose rather to receive satisfaction some other way for at this very time to wit in the one and twentieth yeare after the foundation of the Temple was laid Solomon repaired and fortified these places which Hiram refused as was before noted from 2 Chron. 8.1 2. Vers 15. And this is the reason of the levie which king Solomon raised for to build the house of the Lord c. That is for the same reason that he had received this aid from Hiram did he also raise a levie both of men and money amongst the people namely for to build the house of the Lord and his own house c. of the levie of men we reade chap. 5.13 and of the levie of money that is understood as some Expositours hold which we reade 2 Chron. 9.13 14. And though the people yielded willingly to this levie for the Temple yet when it was still continued for these other buildings it seems they grudged at it as we may gather from what they said to Rehoboam Chap. 12.4 And Millo and the wall of Jerusalem and Hazor and Megiddo c. Concerning this Millo see the note 2 Sam. 5.19 either it was now repaired and enlarged by Solomon or else a new one was built in another place Hazor was in the tribe of Napthali Josh 19.32 36. the chief citie aforetimes of the Canaanites Josh 11.1 10. and Megiddo belonged to Manasseh Josh 17.11 Vers 16. For Pharaoh king of Egypt had gone up and taken Gezer This Gezer was a city allotted to the Levites in Ephraims tribe Josh 21.20 21. yet it had been hitherto it seems in the Canaanites possession till perhaps upon some distast given Solomon being then busied in his magnificent buildings entreated Pharaoh his father in law to rid him of these neighbours which he accordingly performed and gave the citie as a present for his daughter Vers 17. And Solomon built Gezer and Beth-horon the nether Yea and Beth-horon the upper also 2 Chron. 8.5 one being here expressed for both this was also a
citie of the Levites in the tribe of Ephraim Josh 21.21 22. Vers 18. And Baalath and Tadmor in the wildernesse in the land Baalath was a citie in the tribe of Dan Josh 19.40.44 as for that last clause of this verse in the land it may have relation to Tadmor alone to imply that it was in the land of Israel though in the utmost coasts thereof or else to all the towns and cities before mentioned and is added to shew that besides what Solomon built elsewhere all these before mentioned he built or repaired in the land of Canaan Vers 19. And that which Solomon desired to build in Jerusalem and in Lebanon To wit in the place where the house of Lebanon stood or else in the mountain of Lebanon which was on the north bounds of the land of Canaan for there he might build certain forts or towns though the house of Lebanon were built not far from Jerusalem of which see the note chap. 7.2 Vers 21. Whom the children of Israel were not able utterly to destroy See the note Josh 15.63 Upon those did Solomon levie a tribute of bond-service unto this day That is not onely of money but also of personall service and that in more servile imployments then he would impose upon the Israelites fitter for bondmen then for free men as we may see 2 Chron. 2.18 and hence it was that the posteritie of these strangers were called Solomons servants Ezra 2.55 58. nor is it necessary that we should think that this was a transgression of that law Deut. 7.2 And when the Lord thy God shall deliver them before thee thou shalt smite them and utterly destroy them thou shalt make no covenant with them nor shew mercy to them since that may be meant onely of the inhabitants that were in the land at their entring first into it not of their posteritie especially if the Israelites had made peace with them and much more if they had embraced the true religion Vers 23. These were the chief of the officers that were over Solomons work five hundred and fifty c. In the fifth chapter of this book and the sixteenth verse we reade of a far greater number to wit of three thousand and three hundred but there the storie speaks of those chief officers which were over the work in mount Lebanon where the materials were prepared for the building of the Temple and here it speaks onely of those chief officers that had the oversight of those that were imployed at home in building the greater difficultie is how to reconcile this place with that in the 2 Chron. 8.10 where it is said that the chief of King Solomons officers were but two hundred and fifty men but to this three answers may be given first that there the number of Solomons chief officers of state is expressed that bare rule over the people not as here of those that were imployed about his buildings or secondly there only those officers were numbred which were to take account of the builders and had the chief command over the work but that here the master builders that had the charge to oversee the rest and give direction for the building which were three hundred are also comprehended or thirdly though there were five hundred chief officers and fifty in a higher rank above them which were over the five hundred all which are here together numbred yet those five hundred did execute their places by turns two hundred and fifty at a time and that therefore there are but two hundred and fifty mentioned 2 Chron. 8.10 Vers 25. And three times in the yeare did Solomon offer burnt offerings c. That is at the three great feasts the feast of unleavened bread the feast of Pentecost and the feast of Tabernacles but under these by a Synechdoche all other parts of Gods worship required by the law are comprehended and therefore in 2 Chron. 8.13 there is mention made also of the daily sacrifices and of the sacrifices on the Sabbaths and on the new moons So he finished the house c. That is having finished the building of the house he imployed it in those services for which it was appointed and therefore 2 Chron. 8.14 it is also added that he appointed the priests and Levites to their severall charges in their courses according to the order which David by direction from the Lord had ordained Vers 26. And king Solomon made a navie of ships in Ezion-geber c. Though this be here first related yet evident it is that this navie was sent forth before the Temple was built because of the Almug-trees brought home by this navie And the king made of the Almug-trees pillars and terrises for the house of the Lord and harps and psalteries for singers chap. 10.12 and 2 Chron. 9.10.11 How Jehoshaphat attempted to enrich himself by sending out a navie after the same manner as Solomon had done before him and how he sped we may read Chap. 22.48 Vers 27. And Hiram sent in the navie his servants c. To wit because the Tyrians that were under Hirams government were always held the most expert sea-men neither did Hiram onely afford him mariners but was also at cost to build certain ships in Ezion-geber where Solomons navie was built that should go along in that voyage with the ships of Solomon for that must needs be the meaning of that place 2 Chron. 8.18 And Hiram sent by the hands of his servants ships and servants that had knowledge of the sea and they went with the servants of Solomon to Ophir and that because Hiram could not send ships ready built from Tyre which was in the midland sea to Ezion-geber which was in the red sea without fetching an infinite great compasse by sea which hath no appearance of likelyhood in it Vers 28. And they came to Ophir and fet from thence gold foure hundred and twenty talents c. Ophir is thought to be in the east Indies for thither indeed they might most easily fail from Ezion-geber which was in the red sea and whereas in 2 Chron. 8.18 we read of foure hundred and fifty talents it seems that thereof thirty talents went in expence for the charges of the fleet and for the wages of the men or it was the return of the adventure of some private persons and onely foure hundred and twenty as here came clear to the king CHAP. X. Vers 1. THe Queen of Sheba heard of the fame of Solomon concerning the name of the Lord. Sheba was a countrey that lay southward and far remote from Jerusalem Jer. 6.20 To what purpose cometh there to me incense from Sheba and the sweet cane from a farre countrey and thence this Queen is called by our Saviour the Queen of the south Matth. 12.42 and is said to have come from the utmost parts of the earth to heare the wisedome of Solomon some conceive it to have been in Ethiopia others more probably in Arabia the happie however both her
15. For the Lord shall smite Israel as a reed is shaken in the water That is the Lord shall continually afflict this kingdome of the ten tribes both prince and people with uncessant troubles and warres both intestine and forraigne so that they shall never abide long in any settled condition and so indeed it came passe even as the reeds that grow in the water are continually shaken sometimes with the blowing of the wind alwayes with the force of the stream that glides along by them so was the kingdome of the ten tribes continually shaken partly by the frequent transferring of the crown from one familie to another one still killing the other and making himself king in his room and partly by the frequent invasion of the men of Judah or some other of the neighbouring nations And shall scatter them beyond the river That is the river Euphrates to wit into the land of Assyria Mesopotamia and Media which lay beyond the river whither the ten tribes were indeed afterwards carried captives some of them first by Tiglath-pileser in the dayes of Pekah king of Israel 2. Kings 15.29 but the greatest part afterward by Salmanassar in the dayes of Hoshea king of Israel 2. Kings 17.6 c. Vers 17. And Jeroboams wife arose and departed and came to Tirzath c. This Tirzah was an ancient and goodly citie for here one of the one and thirtie kings whom Joshua conquered did dwell Josh 12.24 and in Solomons time it was famous for the pleasantnesse of the situation and statelinesse of the building and therefore the Church is hereto compared Cant. 6.4 Thou art beautifull O my love as Tirzah though therefore at first Shechem was the royall citie of Jeroboams kingdome yet afterwards it seems he built some stately palace for himself in Tirzah and so both he and the other kings of Israel that succeeded him did usually keep their courts there yea till Samaria was built it seems to have been the chief of the royall cities of the kingdome of Israel chap. 15.33 In the third yeare of Asa king of Judah began Baasha the sonne of Abijah to reigne over all Israel in Tirzah so also chap. 16.6.8 23 24. Vers 19. Behold they are written in the book of the Chronicles of the kings of Israel Many things are said to be written in the book of the Chronicles which we find not in the Scripture Chronicles and therefore it is commonly held that this book of the Chronicles here and elsewhere often mentioned was some other book of the Chronicles of the kings of Judah and Israel wherein all the memorable acts and passages of those times were exactly recorded and out of which the penman of the Scripture Chronicles did afterward by the speciall instinct and the guidance of the spirit of God cull forth such things as are there related and which the Lord thought requisite for the edification of the Church in future ages Vers 20. And the dayes which Jeroboam reigned were two and twenty years Jeroboam therefore out-lived Rehoboam who reigned but seventeen years vers 21. and Abijam his sonne who reigned in Jerusalem but three years chap. 15.1 2. and died in the second yeare of Asa the sonne of Abijam chap. 15.25 being stricken by the immediate hand of God with some remarkable judgement 2. Chron. 13.20 Neither did Jeroboam recover strength again in the dayes of Abijah and the Lord struck him and he died but before this death there was a mighty battel between him and Abijam king of Judah wherein he lost five hundred thousand men a blow which he never recovered Vers 22. And Judah did evil in the sight of the Lord. That is the people of Judah and Rehoboam their king For Three years they walked in the way of David and Solomon doing that which was right in the sight of the Lord 2. Chron. 11.17 as being troubled with the losse of the ten tribes of Israel in which time Rehoboam fortified and victualled fifteen cities in Judah and Benjamin and many other strong holds and the priests and Levites and other Rehoboam whereby the kingdome of Judah was much strengthened 2. Chron. 11.5.17 whereupon he took eighteen wives and sixty concubines 2. Chron. 11.21 and had many children but then having thus strengthened his kingdome and as he thought assured his estate he forsook the Law of the Lord and all Israel with him 2. Chron. 12.1 Vers 25. Shishak king of Egypt came up against Jerusalem c. Rehoboams father married the king of Egypts daughter yet the succeeding king of Egypt invited thereto perhaps by Jeroboam who was a while in Egypt before he was king and now fearing the growing strength of Rehoboam might lay before Shishak the incountable riches of David and Solomon which might easily be had because ten of the twelve tribes were revolted from him came up against Judah with a mighty army twelve hundred chariots sixty thousand horsemen and footmen without number some Egyptians and some of other nations as is expressed 2. Chron. 12.2 3. and having taken many of their strong cities at length he went up against Jerusalem but the king and princes humbling themselves upon the Lords message to them by Shemaiah the Prophet the Lord would not suffer him to destroy them utterly onely Judah henceforth became tributarie to Egypt and Shishak carried away as a ransome of the citie all the treasures of the Temple and of the kings house 2. Chron. 12.4 9. Vers 27. And king Rehoboam made in their stead brazen shields c. See the note chap. 10.16 hereby it appears how exceedingly the kingdome of Judah was impoverished by this invasion of Shishak king of Egypt The Israelites of the ten tribes were farre more grossely idolatrous then those of Judah and yet the Lord suffered them to live in peace but these of Judah had scarce been fallen away two years from the pure worship of God when presently the Lord did with great severitie afflict them a clear evidence of Gods more tender care over them for their welfare Vers 29. Are they not written in the book of the Chronicles of the kings of Judah In 2. Chron. 12.15 the other acts of Rehoboam first and last are said to have been written in the book of Shemaiah the Prophet and of Iddo the Seer concerning genealogies Vers 31. And Abijam his sonne reigned in his stead Or Abijah 2. Chron. 12. CHAP. XV. Vers 2. THree years reigned he in Jerusalem Abijam began his reigne in the eighteenth yeare of Jeroboam vers 1. and died in the twentieth yeare of his reigne vers 9. whereby it may seem that he reigned but two years but to this I answer that when kings have reigned two complete years they then begin to write the third yeare of their reigne and so it was with Abijam the eighteenth yeare of Jeroboam was the first yeare of his reigne the nineteenth yeare of Jeroboam was his second yeare and the twentieth yeare was his third and though in that
came to the crown of Judah and had a while continued the wars against Ahab with good successe 2. Chron. 17.1 2 3. And Jehoshaphat his sonne reigned in his stead and strengthened himself against Israel And he placed forceâ— in all the fenced cities of Judah c. And the Lord was with Jehoshaphat because he walked in the first wayes of his father David fearing it seems lest their divisions might expose them both to the prevailing power of the Syrians who began in in these times to encroach upon them he judged it the best policie to put an end to these warres betwixt them and the kings of Israel and so made a firm league with Ahab and made also a match betwixt his sonne Joram and Athaliah the daughter of Ahab 2. Chron. 18.1 and 21.6 and hereupon it was that Jehoshaphat went down to visit Ahab who with great cost and state entertained and feasted both him and his followers 2. Chron. 18.2 Ahab killed sheep and oxen in abundance for Jehoshapat and for the people that were with him Vers 3. And the king of Israel said unto his servants Know ye that Ramoth in Gilead is ours c. One article in the league which three years since Ahab had made with Ben-hadad was that he should restore all the cities of Israel which were in his possession chap. 20.34 And Ben-hadad said unto him The cities which my father took from thy father I will restore But Ramoth Gilead it seems he was loth to part with and therefore now Ahab enters into consultation to recover it by forte since he would not by fair means yield it up to him It was a goodly citie and besides it belonged to the Levites and was a citie of refuge Josh 21.38 and therefore no wonder though he were unwilling that it should be any longer in the hands of the Syrians Vers 6. Then the king of Israel gathered the prophets together about foure hundred men c. To wit his Baalitish false prophets who were the great supporters of that linsey woolsey religion that was now in fashion amongst the Israelites pretending themselves the prophets of the Lord Jehovah the God of Israel and yet withall the priests of Baal as by the number we may guesse perhaps they were those foure hundred prophets of the groves which were reserved from appearing to Elijahs chalenge chap. 18.19 20. however they were doubtlesse of Baals false prophets for such Jehoshaphat knew them to be and therefore could not rest in their predictions vers 7. and Jehoshaphat said is there not here a prophet of the Lord besides that we might enquire of him Vers 8. And the king of Israel said unto Jehoshaphat There is yet one man c. To wit in Samaria whom I could presently send for this word yet may have reference either to those prophets that had prophecyed good successe to Ahab to wit that besides those there was one man a prophet of the Lords or else to the true prophets of the Lord to wit that though they were all in a manner slain or fled there was yet one man left namely Micaiah the sonne of Imlah c. And Jehoshaphat said Let not the king say so As if he should have said we must not say we hate the prophets of the Lord because they speak that which pleaseth us not if he be a faithfull prophet of the Lords he must speak the truth what ever it be and God forbid the king should say that for that he hates him Vers 11. And Zedekiah the sonne of Chenaaenah made him horns of Iron c. whereby was signified the power of these two kings that were now to go against the Syrians for the recovery of Ramoth Gilead Vers 13. Let thy word I pray thee be like the word of one of them c. This the messenger that came for Micaiah might say first out of a kind of carnall curtesie as wishing well to the prophet and secondly out of some speciall desire he had that the warre should go forward Vers 15. And he answered him Go and prosper c. This Micaiah spake ironically not to deceive Ahab for we see he spake these words after such a manner that Ahab himself perceived he meant not what he said but by way of deriding the false prophets who had all returned this pleasing answer to Ahab and to intimate that he knew well enough that the king would not be pleased unlesse he said the same that they did and therefore Micaiah said not Thus saith the Lord Go and prosper c. but in a tone of derision Go and prosper for the Lord shall deliver it into the hand of the king as if he should have said you had best go as your prophets advise you they all tell you that your expedition against Ramoth Gilead shall be prosperous and that the Lord shall deliver it into your hands and can you question the truth of such oracles Indeed I know well that Iâ— shall not be so but if I tell you the truth I know you will not believe me and therefore since you desire to be deceived be deceived Go and prosper c. this was that which Micaiah intended and the like ironicall expressions we have in other places as that Gen. 3.22 concerning our first parents when they by sinne were fallen from that blessed estate wherein God had created them Behold the man is become like one of us to know good and evil and that of Elijah to Baals priests 1. Kings 18.27 Crie aloud for he is a God either he is talking or he is pursuing or he is in a journey or peradventure he sleepeth and must be awaked and that of Solomon Eccles 11.9 Rejoyce O young man in thy youth and let thy heart chear thee in the dayes of thy youth and walk in the wayes of thine heart and in the sight of thine eyes Vers 17. And he said I saw all Israel scattered upon the hills as sheep that have not a shepherd c. Hereby was intimated that Ahab should be slain and his army routed this expression of being scattered upon the hills is used because in that countrey when they sought to escape the enemy that pursued them they used to fly to the hills and mountains there to hide themselves whence is that Matth. 24.16 Then let them which be in Judea flee into the mountains Vers 18. Did I not tell thee that he would prophesie no good concerning me but evil By these words Ahab sought to intimate to Jehoshaphat that he should not be troubled with these words of Micaiah but conceive of them as spoken as he had beforehand said he would do out of hatred and malice against him And indeed happely hereby it was that Jehoshaphat was deceived and so went with Ahab though Micaiah had foretold the death of Ahab and dispersion of his army Vers 19. And he said Heare thou therefore the word of the Lord. This word therefore hath relation to that which Ahab said to
Libnah a citie in his own countrey and then no wonder though he stayed not to prosecute his victory in the land of Edom. Then Libnah revolted at the same time Libnah was a great citie within Judah one of the royall cities of Canaan when Joshua entred it Josh 10.29 30 It was by him given to the priests the sonnes of Aaron Josh 21.13 and now it rebelled against Joram because he had made such innovations in Religion and forced the people to idolatry as is expressed 2. Chron. 21.10 11. which no marvell though the Levites were least able to endure It is much indeed that one citie alone should venture upon such an attempt but perhaps the kings absence whilest he was in Edom and the discontent of the people yea perhaps some correspondence they might have with the Philistines who ere long invaded the land 2. Chron. 21.16 17. gave them hope of abettors and how they sped in the conclusion the Scripture expresseth not Vers 24. And Joram slept with his fathers and was buried with his fathers in the citie of David Before his death there was a prophesie in writing delivered him from Elijah the Prophet 2. Chron. 21.12 which threatned both his people his children his wives and his own body and immediatly what was threatned came to passe for first the Philistines and Arabians brake into Judea took the kings house made spoil of his goods and slew or carried away all his children save the youngest onely and then afterwards the Lord smote him with a grievous disease in his bowels which left him not till his guts fell out and being dead he was obscurely buried in the citie of David but not in the sepulchres of his Ancestours the kings of Judah and that without the lamentations and solemnities that had been used in other princes funeralls 2. Chron. 21.16 All the time of this kings reigne another king of the same name reigned in Israel to wit Joram the sonne of Ahab his brother in law And Ahaziah his sonne reigned in his stead He is elswhere called Jehoahaz 2. Chron. 21.17 and Azariah 2. Chron. 22.6 He was the youngest sonne of Joram for all the elder sonnes were slain or carried away by the Philistines 2 Chron. 21.17 In S. Matthews catalogue of the kings of Judah it is said Matth. 1.8 that Jehoshapoat begat Joram and Joram begat Ozias and so this Ahaziah who succeeded Joram and Joash who succeeded Ahaziah 2 Kings 11.2 and Amaziah who succeeded Joash 2. Kings 12.21 and was the father of Ozias are quite left out but this I conceive was onely because the Evangelist resolving to distribute the Ancestours of Christ into three severall ranks according to the three great changes that had happened in the state and finding just fourteen in the first rank from Abraham to David he laboured to reduce the other ranks to the same number too as knowing that equall numbers are a help to the memory and so to make just fourteen generations in that rank also from David to the captivitie he leaves out Ahaziah Joash and Amaziah and them perhaps rather then others because they were the next from Ahab by Athaliah the daughter of Ahab and wife of Joram Vers 25. In the twelfth yeare of Joram the sonne of Ahab king of Israel c. Yet chap. 9.29 it is said that he began to reigne in the eleventh yeare of Joram king of Israel which is because the yeare of Ahaziahs reigne did concurre with the latter end of the eleventh and the beginning of the twelfth yeare of Joram king of Israel Vers 26. Two and twentie years old was Ahaziah when he began to reigne c. In the 2. Chron. 22.2 it is said that he was two and fourty years old when he began to reigne we may reconcile this thus that he was two and fourty years old when he began to reigne alone by himself but that he was made king also when he was but two twenty years old his father yet living but then that must be granted which is before noted upon 1. Kings 22.42 to wit that Asa also was made king in his fathers life time and indeed because this answer may have some strong objections made against it therefore others do rather reconcile these two places thus to wit that those words in 2. Chron. 22.2 Fourty and two years old was Ahaziah when he began to reigne must be understood of the continuance of Omries pedigree who was great grandfather to this Ahaziah Omri reigned as sole king six years 1. Kings 16.23 Ahab two and twenty 1. Kings 16.29 Ahaziah his sonne two 1. Kings 22.51 Joram twelve 2. Kings 3.1 And thus Omries stock continued fourty and two years and therefore it is said that Ahaziah who was of that stock by his mother Athaliah in his two and fourtieth yeare began his reigne But this answer methinks is more unsatisfactory then the other the words in 2. Chron. 22.2 will hardly bear such an interpretation And his mothers name was Athaliah the daughter of Omri king of Israel That is the grandchild of Omri the daughter of Ahab the sonne of Omri vers 18. Vers 27. He was the sonne in law of the house of Ahab That is the sonne of Ahabs sonne in law to wit the sonne of Joram by Athaliah Ahabs daughter yet perhaps even he also by his mother Athaliahs perswasion married a daughter of the house of Ahab though by another wife Joash was born who succeeded him in the throne chap. 12.1 Vers 28. And he went with Joram the sonne of Ahab to the warre against Hazael the king of Syria in Ramoth Gilead Toward the latter end of his reigne Joram king of Israel undertook the recovery of Ramoth Gilead out of the hands of Hazael then king of Syria which Ahab his father had formerly attempted with ill successe and Ahaziah the king of Judah his sisters sonne joyned with him in that expedition as Jehoshaphat had formerly done with Ahab Vers 29. And king Joram went back to be healed in Jezreel of the wounds which the Syrians had given him at Ramoth c. That is Ramoth Gilead having wonne the town and then manned it strongly leaving the chief of his army there behind him with his captains of whom Jehu was the chief he withdrew himself to Jezreel to be cured of the wounds which he received in this siege of Ramoth Gilead See the note chap. 9.14 CHAP. IX Vers 1. ANd Elisha the prophet called one of the children of the prophets and said unto him Gird up thy loins c. That is prepare thy self and go with speed the excution that was to be done by Jehu upon the house of Ahab was to be dispatched presently whilest Jehu had the army with him at Ramoth Gilead and Jehoram was gone from thence to Jezreel and therefore the prophet that was to give him his commission was sent with such speed which may also be the reason why aged Elisha went not himself but sent one of
that ambition and zeal for Idolatry do usually blind men and women and make them most unnaturally cruell Secondly that there might be other reasons inducing her thereto though they be not expressed in the Scripture as for instance perhaps she might have other sonnes and grandchildren either by adultery or by a former husband or by some daughter of Jorams upon whom she might rather desire to settle the crown of Judah perhaps those that brake up the house of God and bestowed the dedicated things thereof upon Baalim 2. Chron. 24.7 For the sonnes of Athaliah that wicked woman had broken up the house of God and also all the dedicate things of the house of the Lord did they bestow upon Baalim Thirdly howsoever sure we are that there is no wickednesse so unnaturall and unreasonable whereinto a wicked woman may not run raised up of God to be a plague to wicked and idolatrous people and besides there was a speciall hand of God in it that those that were descended from Ahab though onely by the mothers side might be destroyed save onely Joash who was left to succeed in the throne of Judah Vers 2. But Jehosheba the daughter of king Joram sister of Ahaziah took Joash the sonne of Ahaziah c. This Jehosheba or Jehoshabeath 2. Chron. 22.11 the sister of Ahaziah and daughter of Joram was married to Jehoiada the high priest as is noted in that place of the Chronicles before cited and therefore it is not likely that she was the daughter of Joram by Athaliah but by some other of his wives because we cannot well think that he would have taken a wife of that cursed idolatrous stock But however sister she was to Ahaziah the late king of Judah and therefore hearing of Athaliahs bloudy project she stole this young infant her brothers youngest sonne out of the nursery and hid him with his nurse in the bed-chamber that is in some bedchamber of the priests which were adjoyning to the Temple and so kept him close six years together how it came to passe that this young late-born infant was not missed or being missed was not hunted after and by diligent search discovered it is hard to say most probable it is that some deceit or cunning was used as by the substitution of some other child in his room whether dead or living or by corrupting those Athaliah had imployed in this bloudy service or some such way by which means Athaliah might verily think he was killed with the rest or if she had same small ground to suspect any thing to the contrary she might in policie forbear to make any noise of it lest the people hearing such a rumour should be the readier to hearken after innovations and be the lesse conformable to the present government However because Joash this young infant thus miraculously saved is expressely here called the sonne of Ahaziah and so elsewhere constantly vers 4.12 chap. 12.18 2. Chron. 22.11 1. Chron. 3.11 it is therefore no way probable which some affirme that he was of the posteritie of Nathan and succeeded in the throne because all Solomons posterity was extinguished by Athaliah especially if we consider that the reason intimated in these words why Jehosheba preserved him was because of her near alliance to him as being his aunt his fathers sister Vers 4. And the seventh yeare Jehoiada sent and fet the rulers over hundreds with the captains and the guard c. When Athaliah had usurped the crown of Judah six years and somewhat more without any disturbance either of domesticall adversaries or forreigne enemy for Jehu had enough to do at home to oppose the victorious armies of Hazael wherewith he was so farre overcharged at length Jehoiada began to think of settling him in the throne to whom of right it did belong who was now full seven years old vers 21. Seven years old was Jehoash when he began to reigne and had been hitherto hid in a cell of the Temple by his wife Jehosheba not judging it fit to conceal him any longer first that his young soveraigne might not want that princely education which was requisite and whereof his years began now to be capable and secondly that the idolatry of Baal might not by her means take too deep root before it were weeded up having therefore first imparted this secret to five of the chief captains of the land in whose fidelitie he had best assurance and made a covenant with them afterward by their means he drew in others of the principall men of the countrey both the Levites and others onely at first procuring that they should repair to Jerusalem where they should be further acquainted with the whole matter 2. Chro. 23.1 2. and so accordingly being met together as is here expressed in the temple having taken an oath of secrecy and fidelity of them he shewed them the kings sonne made a covenant with them to advance him to the kingdome and resolved how the businesse should be managed the next sabbath day in every particular as is expressed in the sequel of the story Indeed some Expositours conceive that those five mentioned 2. Chron. 23.1 to whom Jehoiada did first impart the businesse were priests and Levites and so also all that were imployed in this service and that because they managed this businesse in the temple whither none say they but those of the tribe of Levi might enter but yet considering that the court of the people was a part of the temple and within the gâ—tes thereof and withall because those five men are expressely termed captains of hundreds and it is said that they gathered to them not onely the Levites but also the chief of the fathers of Israel 2. Chron. 23.1 2. I see not why they should hold that they were onely Levites that Jehoiada did now call in to his help Vers 5. This is the thing that ye shall do a third part of you that enter in on the sabbath c. This he spake to the Levites the Levites were by an order established long since amongst them by David divided into foure and twenty orders or companies which did in their courses each company a week discharge the service of the temple the rest abiding the whilest in their own private dwellings in the severall cities of Judah and so every sabbath day they that had served the week before went out and another came in that served in their room and in each company or course there was in Davids time a thousand Levites besides the porters and singers Now therefore because the associates of Jehoiada were not able to bring together secretly so many trusty and serviceable hands as would suffice to mannage the businesse to help this want Jehoiada resolved to arm the Levites for the work and to the end they might be the stronger he took in the new company that were to come in on the sabbath and did not discharge the old that should have then gone out but retained them
house of the Lord and came by the way of the gate of the guard to the kings house That is the gate of the kings house where the guard usually stood CHAP. XII Vers 3. BUt the high places were not taken away c. So long had the people been inured to this erroneous worship of God that it seems even Jehoiada himself durst not advice the king to proceed to the reformation of this evil also for fear of causing some tumult amongst them Vers 4. And Jehoash said to the priests all the the money of the dedicated things c. The Temple was at this time sallen into great decay through the wickednesse of former kings but especially of Athaliah For the sonnes of Athaliah that wicked woman 2. Chron. 24.7 had broken up the house of God and also all the dedicate things of the house of the Lord did the bestow upon Baalim the first act therefore that Jehoash took in hand when he began to rule without a protectour was the reparation of that holy place as indeed most requisite it was that he should be carefull to uphold the Temple that had been the nursery of his infancy and the best means to secure his life and to uphold his just title to the crown of Judah and to this end he enjoyned the priests carefully to gather all the money of the dedicated things that is all the money dedicated to the service and repair of the Temple and then the particulars are expressed purposely I conceive to distinguish this money from that which was brought in for the use of the priests themselves as the money for the redemption of the first born and such like namely first the money of every one that passeth the account that is the half shekel that they were to pay when they were numbred from twenty years old and upward Exod. 30.12 13. which is therefore called 2. Chron. 24.6 the collection of Moses the servant of the Lord and of the congregation of Israel for the tabernacle of witnesse and vers 9. the collection that Moses the servant of God laid upon Israel in the wildernesse concerning which see the notes Exod. 30.12 13. secondly the money that every man is set at that is the money which any man shall by the priest be appointed to pay for his redemption when he hath vowed himself to God according to that law Levit. 27.2 c. of which see the note there and thirdly all the money that cometh into any mans heart to bring into the house of the Lord that is which any man shall voluntarily give for the reparation of the house Vers 5. Let the priests take it to them every man of his acquaintance In 2. Chron. 24.5 it is said that Joash appointed them to go out unto the cities of Judah and gather this money from yeare to yeare this receiving it therefore every man of his acquaintance is meant of their gathering it in the severall cities where they dwelt for the Levites were dispersed in severall cities of Judah where they were acquainted and well known amongst the people Vers 7. Now therefore receive no more money of your acquaintance but deliver it in for the breaches of the house That is he enjoyned them to meddle no more with the receiving of the money but to pay in that which they had already received when the king first set on foot this work as he appointed them to collect the moneyes above mentioned for the repairing of the temple so also he charged them to hasten the work 2. Chron. 24.5 Go out unto the cities of Judah and gather of all Israel money to repair the house of your God from yeare to yeare and see that ye hasten the matter when therefore in the twenty third yeare of his reigne he saw that yet nothing was done he took it for granted that either they had been negligent in collecting the money or that they did not faithfully pay in what they received or at least that the people suspecting their diverting of it to their own private uses did not pay it so willingly as otherwise they would and therefore he took the work out of their hands and appointed another way for the gathering of the money as is afterward expressed Vers 9. But Jehoiada the priest took a chest and bored a hole in the lid of it c. To wit by the command of the king 2. Chron. 24.8 to prevent all suspicion for the time to come of any corruption in this businesse first they made this chest whereinto the money should be put and wherein it should be kept and then they made a proclamation throughout the kingdome that every man should bring in the appointed contribution which accordingly was done with much alacrity and willingnesse 2. Chron. 24.9 10. Vers 10. The kings Scribe and the high priest came up and they put it up in baggs c. In 2. Chron. 24.11 it is the kings Scribe and the high priests officers came up and emptied the chest c. Vers 13. Howbeit there were not made for the house of the Lord bowls of silver snuffers c. That is not till the temple was fully repaired but when that work was finished the money that was left was imployed in making these vessels for the house 2. Chron. 24.14 Vers 16. The trespasse-money and sinne-money was not brought into the house of the Lord it was the priests That is the money which by the law those men were to pay by way of satisfaction according to the estimation of the priests that had any way wronged the Lord in his holy things Levit. 5.15 whether it were done ignorantly or wittingly in both the cases satisfaction was to be made and the one of these is called trespasse-money and the other sinne-money Vers 17. Then Hazael king of Syria went up Notwithstanding this fair beginning of Jehoash his reigne no sooner was Jehoiada dead but by his flattering princes he was drawn away to the worship of idols and so wrath came upon Judah and Jerusalem for this their trespasse 2. Chron. 24.17 18. namely by Gods letting loose Hazael king of Syria upon them as is here said from whom they were fain to purchase their peace by a great summe of money as is expressed vers 18. Vers 20. And his servants arose and made a conspiracie and slew Joash c. Some other passages are recorded in the Chronicles not here expressed as first when sundry prophets had in vain laboured to reclaim both king and people from their idolatry at length Zachariah the sonne of Jehoiada the priest was by the Spirit of the Lord stirred up to admonish them of their wickednesse who did it accordingly with great courage assuring them that this was the cause of Hazaels prevailing against them whereupon a conspiracie was made against him and by the kings commandment who forgat what his father Jehoiada had done for him he was stoned to death secondly that according to the prayer of this
he dyed it may seem that Ahaz begat Hezekiah when he was little above eleven years old for if Hezekiah was five and twenty years old when his father was but thirty six it must necessarily follow that Ahaz was but eleven years old when his sonne Hezekiah was born to avoid this inconvenience some hold that Ahaz was one and twenty years old or nigh so much when he began to reigne the incomplete yeare not being reckoned chap. 16.2 the like also they say concerning the years of his reigne to wit that he reigned seventeen years well nigh complete and so was thirty eight years old when he died on the other side they say that Hezekiah was but twenty foure years old when he began to reigne onely because he was foure and twenty years old complete and something more it is here said that he was five and twenty years old when he began to reigne Now according to this computation Ahaz being thirty eight eight years old when he died and Hezekiah twenty foure it will follow that Ahaz was fourteen years old when Hezekiah his sonne was born which say they was possible enough but because we find elsewhere that it was so usuall with the kings of Judah and Israel to cause their sonnes that were to succeed them to be designed kings in their life I should rather conceive that what is said both of Ahaz and Hezekiah concerning their age when they began to reigne is meant of the time when they were first designed kings as is before noted chap. 16.2 His mothers name was Abi the daughter of Zachariah Or Abijah 2. Chron. 29.1 and if she were as is supposed by many the daughter of that Zachariah by whom so long as he lived Uzziah was kept in the way of truth chap. 26.5 we may well think that her piety manifested in the carefull education of this her sonne was a chief means under God that he proved so zealous for the cause of the true Religion though his father was so extremely wicked Vers 4. He removed the high places and brake the images c. Other particulars are expressed in the Chronicles which are not here mentioned as first that in the first moneth of the first yeare of his reigne he opened the doores of the Temple which Ahaz had shut up and repaired them to wit by overlaying them with gold where they were decayed Secondly that having called together the priests and Levites he exhorted them to sanctifie themselves and to cleanse the house of God willing them to consider that all the calamities which had lately fallen upon them were for those foul corruptions in Religion which were crept in amongst them and that this the priests and Levites did carefully as he enjoyned them and so the king with the rulers of the citie came up immediately to the Temple and offered sacrifices there in a most solemne manner unto the Lord. Thirdly that upon advice taken because they could not keep the passeover at the usuall time they resolved to keep it on the fourteenth day of the second moneth to this end proclamation was made throughout the kingdome for the assembly of the people yea the king sent posts with letters to the Israelites of the ten tribes to perswade them also to return unto the Lord and to come up unto Jerusalem to keep the passeover and the feast of unleavened bread wherein he prevailed with divers of them though the most of them laughed his messengers to scorn and so there was a great assembly both of the men of Judah and Israel in Jerusalem where they kept the feast with exceeding great joy at which time it was that the people by the kings encouragement beginning first in Jerusalem and afterward procceeding to the other cities of Judah yea and to some cities of the Israelites too brake down all the idols and their appurtenance as is here relalated yea and removed the high places too which had hitherto stood in the dayes of their best king And fourthly that he ordered the courses of the priests and Levites and provided both for their work and maintainance wherein he sound the people very forward And he called it Nehushtan That is a lump or little piece of brasse to intimate the folly of the people in worshiping the brasen serpent when he had broken it he called it Nehushtan Vers 5. After him was none like him among all the kings of Judah nor aâ—y that were before him That is he excelled all that were before him and all that were after him for the kings that were before him the case is clear for the comparison is not betwixt him and David or Solomon but betwixt him and the kings of Judah that sate in the throne of David ever since the kingdome was rent into two kingdomes the kingdome of Judah and the kingdome of the ten tribes now all these he excelled in that he removed the high places which neither Jehoshaphat nor any other of the good kings of Judah had hitherto done But how did he excell all that were after him seeing of Josiah his grandchild it is said chap. 23.25 that there was no king before him like unto him I answer this needs not seem strange if we consider that though Josiah might excell him in some things as indeed he did yet Hezekiah might excell Josiah in other things as first in that Hezekiah was the first that removed the high places though none before him had done it yet he would not suffer them to stand but when Josiah removed the high places he had the example of this his good grandfather to encourage him and secondly in his many victories over the Philistines wherein Josiah was never so successefull Vers 7. And he rebelled against the king of Assyria and served him not If when Ahaz did send to the Assyrian to aid him against Rezin king of Syria and Pekah king of Israel chap. 16.7 he did not onely hire him thereto with a great summe of money but did alâ—o covenant to become his vassall and to pay him a yearely tribute and yet within a while after when Hezekiah succeeded his father Ahaz in the kingdome encouraged with his victories over the Philistines and others he resolved to cast off the yoke of the Assyrian and so withheld the tribute that had been formerly paid then no wonder it is though it be said here of Hezekiah that he rebelled against the king of Assyria some Expositours excuse yea commend this fact of Hezekiahs and that either by supposing that Ahaz had covenanted to pay tribute for some certain yeares and so that term of years being now expired Hezekiah was free or else by pleading that it was unlawfull for Ahaz to subject Gods free people to the yoke of a heathen prince and therefore it was lawfull for Hezekiah to cast off his yoke but rather I conceive it was a weaknesse and errour in Hezekiah to do this though he did it out of a zeal against the subjection of Gods people to
Vers 4. Eleazar begat Phinehas Phinehas begat Abishua c. Eleazar succeeded his father Aaron in the high priesthood in the fourtieth yeare after their coming out of Egypt Numb 20.25 c. and 33.18 and was high priest all the time of Joshua and died immediately after him as may seem by the relation of their deaths together Josh 24.29 33. Phinehas his sonne that succeeded him was he that slew Zimri and Cozbi in the wildernesse and had thereupon a promise from God that the high priesthood should be settled upon him and his seed for ever see Numb 25.7 13. He succeeded his father Eleazar about the death of Joshua Josh 24.29 33. How long he lived high priest it is no where expressed but probable it is he was high priest all the time that the people served the Lord after Joshuahs death in the dayes of the elders that out-lived Joshua Judg. 2.7 and perhaps in the time of the first revolting of the people in the time of the Judges which must needs then be a matter of much grief to a man of such zeal as he was for it is evident that when the Israelites made warre against Benjamin he was high priest Josh 20.28 And Phinehas the sonne of Eleazar the sonne of Aaron stood before it in those dayes As for the next three that follow Abishau Bukki his sonne and Vzzi his sonne they were it seems high priests in those corruptest times of Israel under the Judges whereto agrees that which is by some said that in the dayes of Uzzi it was that Eli and so his posterity after him got the high priests office not being of Eleazars stock but of the stock of Ithamar and if so it were then the foure next following of the stock of Eleazar were never high priests to wit Zerahiah and Meraioth and Amariah and Ahitub but Zadok the sonne of Ahitub vers 8. was the first that recovered that dignity again which was in the dayes of Solomon who thrust out Abiathar of the posterity of Eli and of the stock of Ithamar from being high priest and put Zadok the sonne of Ahitub in his room 1. Kings 2.27 35. Vers 10. And Johanan begat Azariah he it is that executed the priests office in the temple that Solomon built in Jerusalem That is this is that Azariah of whom such honourable mention is made in the book of the Chronicles 2. Chron. 26.16 c. who did so worthily execute maintain the honour and office of the priesthood against the intrusion and usurpation of Uzziah the king of Judah and it is expressely noted that it was in the temple which Solomon built in Jerusalem because at the time when this was written there was another Temple in Jerusalem built by Zerub-babel Yet some understand these words of Johanan the father of Azariah that he was that Jehoiada that was high priest in the dayes of Athaliah by whom both the Temple and Common-wealth were preserved when they were in danger to be ruined by her Vers 13. And Shallum begat Hilâ—iah Who found the book of the Law in the dayes of Josiah 2. Kings 22.8 Vers 14. And Azariah begat Seraiah c. Seraiah was the high priest whom Nebuchadnezzar slew see 2. Kings 25.18 21. He was also the father or grand-father of Ezra Ezra 7.1 Now after these things in the reigne of Artaxerxes king of Persia Ezra the sonne of Seraiah the sonne of Azariah the sonne of Hilkiah c. and then Jehozadak his sonne was the father of Josuah who was so famous at the return of the Jews and the rebuilding of the Temple Hag. 1.1 In the second yeare of Darius the king in the sixth moneth in the first day of the moneth came the word of the Lord by Haggai the Prophet unto Zerubbabel the sonne of Shealtiel governour of Judah and to Josuah the sonne of Josedech the high priest Vers 19. And these are the families of the Levites according to their fathers That is of these before named were the severall families of the Levites called to wit the family of the Libnites c. Vers 20. Of Gershom Libni his sonne Jahath his sonne Zimmah his sonne c. Here follows a catalogue of those that were successively the Heads both of the Gershonites Kohathites and Merarites perhaps unto the dayes of David who did dispose of the Levites into new orders and whereas Zimmah is here said to be the sonne of Jahath thereby is meant that he was his grandchild for Shimei was the sonne of Jahath and Zimmah the sonne of Shimei vers 42 43. Vers 25. And the sonnes of Elkanah Amasai and Ahimoth The sonnes of Elkanah are here more particularly expressed because from him descended that Elkanah who was the father of Samuel Vers 26. As for Elkanah the sonnes of Elkanah Zophai his sonne c. This is another Elkanah who was the sonne of Mahath and grandchild of Amasai mentioned in the former verse as is evident vers 35 36. Vers 27. Jeroham his sonne Elkanah his sonne The father of Samuel Vers 31. And these are they whom David set over the service of song in the house of the Lord c. That is these are they that David made chief in the three quires of singers after the Ark had rest that is after it was brought to Davids house for before it was removed from one place to another to wit these mentioned in the sequel of this chapter Heman of the Kohathites ver 33. who was the chief and therefore had the middle quire and Asaph who stood on Hemans right hand v. 39. and was of the Gershonites and Ethan who was also called Jeduthun chap. 25.1 and was of the Merarites and stood on Hemans left hand ver 44. These were in their times famous men as being the chief singers and withall Prophets and pen-men of some of the Psalmes 2. Chron. 29.30 Moreover Hezekiah the king and the princes commanded the Levites to sing praise unto the Lord with the words of David and of Asaph the seer Vers 33. Heman a singer the sonne of Joel the sonne of Shemuel That is Samuel for Heman was Samuels grandchild Vers 50. And these are the sonnes of Aaron Eleazar his sonne Phinehas his sonne c. By occasion of the mention that is made of the severall offices and imployments of the priests in the foregoing verse the catalogue of the sonnes of Eleazar is here again set down unto the dayes of David by whom the priests were divided into foure severall orders Vers 57. And to the sonnes of Aaron they gave the cities of Judah c. And Simeon Josh 21.9 And they gave out of the tribe of the children of Judah and out of the tribe of the children of Simeon these cities which are here mentioned by name Vers 60. All their cities throughout their families were thirteen cities To wit the eleven here mentioned and Ain in Judahs portion and Gibeon in Benjamins which are reckoned amongst the rest Josh 21.16 17. but
are not here mentioned Vers 61. And unto the sonnes of Kohath which were left of the family of that tribe were cities given out of the half tribe c. That is to the rest of the sonnes of Kohath to wit those that were not of the priests the sonnes of Aaron there were cities given out of the half tribe of Manasseh that was placed within Jordan yea and by lot there were given them in all ten cities to wit foure out of the tribe of Ephraim and foure out of the tribe of Dan and two out of the half tribe of Manasseh most of which are expressed by name vers 67 c. and more fully Josh 21.21 Vers 65. And they gave by lot these cities which are called by their names To wit above ver 57 c. Vers 66. And the residue of the families of the sonnes of Kohath had cities c. Here the cities that were given to the rest of the Kohathites are expressed also by name which were before spoken of ver 61. as they are also Josh 21.20 though indeed many of the names there and here differ concerning which see the notes there Vers 69. And Aijalon with her suburbs c. These were given them out of the tribe of Dan as also Eltekeh and Gibbethon which are not here mentioned Josh 21.23 24. CHAP. VII Vers 1. NOw the sonnes of Issachar were Tola and Puah Jashub c. This Puah and Jashub we called Phuvah and Job Gen. 46.13 Having before set down the genealogies of Reuben Simeon Levi and Judah Issachars is next here related because Issachar was Jacobs next sonne by Leah Vers 2. Whose number was in the dayes of David two and twenty thousand and six hundred To wit when he appointed Joab to number the people 2. Sam. 24.1 Vers 3. And the sonnes of Uzzi Izrahiah and the sonnes of Izrahiah Michael and Obadiah and Joel Ishiah five That is there were five descended of Uzzi to wit Izrahiah and his foure sonnes Vers 4. And with them by their generations after the house of their fathers were bands of souldiers c. Hereby it is evident that there were six and thirty thousand men of the posterity of Uzzi alone so that the two and twenty thousand six hundred mentioned before vers 2. was the number of the posterity of Tola by his other sonnes Uzzi being excepted whose posterity are here numbred by themselves as being more then all the rest together Vers 5. And their brethren among all the families of Issachar were men of might c. That is all the children of Issachar together were fourescore and seven thousand men of might when Joab numbred them Vers 6. The sonnes of Benjamin Bela and Becher and Jodiael three Jediael is called Ashbel Gen. 46.21 Zebulun was the sixth sonne of Leah born next after Issachar but neither Zebuluns nor Dans genealogie is at all here mentioned perhaps because at the return of the people out of Babylon when it is thought that Ezra wrote this book their genealogies were not found Benjamins genealogy is therefore next inserted who was the sonne of Rachel yet here are but onely three of Benjamins ten sonnes mentioned perhaps because the posterity of these onely were numbred when Joab numbred the people vers 2. Vers 12. Shuppim also and Huppim c. That is these also were of Benjamins posterity Vers 13. The sonnes of Naphtali Jahziel and Guni and Jezer and Shallum the sonnes of Bilhah That is the grand-children for Bilhah Rachels handmaid was the mother of Naphtali whose sonnes these were Vers 14. The sonnes of Manasseh Ashriel whom she bare c. There was an Ashriel that was the sonne or one of the posterity of Gilead Numb 26.30 31. These are the sonnes of Gilead of Jeezer the family of the Jeezerites of Helek the family of the Helekites And of Asriel the family of the Asrielites and of Shechem the family of the Shechemites either therefore this was another Ashriel the immediate sonne of Manasseh by his wife whereas Machir was Manassehs sonne by his concubine the Aramitesse or else Ashriel is here reckoned onely as one of the posterity of Manasseh whom she bare that is either the wife of Gilead or the wife of Hepher the mother of Zelophehad and thence it follows vers 15. that Zelophehad who was the sonne of Hepher the sonne of Gilead Num. 27.1 was the second that is the second sonne of Hepher the younger brother of Ashriel And if we thus take Ashriel for one of the posterity of Gilead the sonne of Machir then we must understand that the following words But his concubine the Aramitesse bare Machir c. are onely added to shew that this Ashriel and the rest afterward mentioned were not the posterity of Manasseh by his wife but by his concubine the Aramitesse Vers 17. These were the sonnes of Gilead c. To wit Ashriel and Zelophehad above mentioned but not Peresh and Sheresh and his posteritie the last here mentioned for they were the sonnes of Machir by Maachah and so the brethren of Gilead Vers 18. And his sister Hammoleketh bare Ishhad c. That is Gileads sister Vers 19. And the sonnes of Shemida were Ahian c. And Shemida was also the sonne or of the stock of Gilead see Numb 26.30 32. Vers 21. Whom the men of Gath that were born in that land slew c. Either this must be referred to all those before named vers 20. the sonnes of Ephraim Shuthelah and Bered his sonne and Tahath his sonne c. to wit as taking them all to be the severall sonnes of Ephraim namely that Shuthelah vers 20. was the sonne of Ephraim and so also Bered who seems to be mentioned as the sonne of Shuthelah was another sonne of Ephraim and Tahath another and so on forward who were all slain by the men of Gath when the Israelites were in Egypt or else if this seems not so probable because then Ephraim should have two sonnes called Shuthelah and two called Tahath then though those in the twentieth verse be taken as severall generations to wit that Shuthelah was the sonne of Ephraim and Bered his grandchild and Tahath his grandchild and so forward yet Zabad the first mentioned vers 21. must be reckoned another sonne of Ephraim and Shuthelah and Ezer and Elead his grandchildren whom the men of Gath slew or thirdly if all those before mentioned be reckoned as severall succeeding generations to wit that Shuthelah the sonne of Ephraim begat Bered and Bered Tahath and Tahath Eladah and Eladah Tahath and Tahath Zabad and Zabad Shuthelah and Ezer and Elead then the words whom the men of Gath slew c. must be referred onely to some of the former of these here mentioned or fourthly that which follows vers 22. And Ephraim their father mourned many dayes and his brethren came to comfort him must be meant of Zabad who was called also Ephraim perhaps onely because he was the head of that tribe
the first yeare of his reigne in the first moneth opened the doores of the house of the Lord. And in the first day of the moneth for then presently they began to cleanse the Temple vers 17. Vers 4. And gathered them together in the east-street That is the street before the east-gate the chief gate of the Temple Vers 6. And have turned away their faces from the habitation of the Lord and turned their backs That is they have openly basely and opprobriously forsaken the worship of God in his Temple The like expression we have Jer. 2.27 They have turned their back unto me and not their face Vers 17. And on the eighth day of the moneth came they to the porch of the Lord c. That is in eight dayes they purged and sanctified the Temple it self the most holy and the holy place and the porch before the holy place they began with or came to on the eighth day and then in eight dayes more they purged the courts and chambers thereof and so made an end on the sixteenth day of the first moneth and all this is noted to imply what a deal of idolatrous trash Ahaz had brought into the Temple when they were so many dayes imployed in the removing and casting it out and setting all things in order as they were in former times Vers 21. And they brought seven bullocks and seven rammes c. That is they brought all kind of clean beasts appointed for sacrifice some for the consecrating of the Temple c. some for sinne offerings some for burnt offerings and some for peace offerings and seven they brought of each sort to signifie the generality of the sacrifice that it was for the whole kingdome the prince and all the people Vers 23. And they brought forth the he-goats for the sinne offering c. To wit the seven he-goats mentioned vers 21. In Levit. 4.13 the law enjoyneth a young bullock to be offered for a sinne-offering for the congregation but that was for the expiation of some one particular sinne whereof through ignorance the whole congregation might be guilty and now the expiation was to be made for all the many sinnes whereof the whole land both king and people were guilty in which case they were not tyed to that law in Levit. 4. Vers 24. And they made reconciliation with their bloud upon the altar to make an attonement for all Israel That is not onely for the kingdome of Judah but also for the brethren of the ten tribes who had been sorely of late oppressed by the Assyrians which was the reason why Hezekiah gave expresse charge concerning this Vers 31. Now ye have consecrated your selves unto the Lord come near and bring sacrifices c. That is Let the people now bring in their sacrifices or do you O priests bring in the peoples sacrifices Vers 33. And the consecrated things were six hundred oxen and three thousand sheep That is the other sacrifices of severall sorts to wit peace-offerings and free-will-offerings were six hundred oxen and three thousand sheep Vers 34. But the priests were too few so that they could not slay all the burnt-offerings Which was properly the work of the priests onely Levit. 1.5 6. For the Levites were more upright in heart to sanctifie themselves then the priests That is they were more forward to sanctifie themselves then the priests were and so there were more of them sanctified Vers 35. And also the burnt-offerings were in abundance with the fat of the peace-offerings and the drink-offerings c. That is these things besides the burnt-offerings were to be offered on the altar so that the priests being but few had not leasure to slay all the sacrifices Vers 36. For the thing was done suddenly It was evident that God had extraordinarily enclined the hearts of the people to this reformation because it was done so suddenly CHAP. XXX Vers 1. ANd Hezekiah sent to all Israel and Judah and wrote letters also to Ephraim and Manasseh c. That is to the remainder of the ten tribes that were not yet carried away by Tiglath-pilneser king of Assyria as many of their brethren were 2. Kings 15.29 Vers 2. The king had taken counsel and his princes and all the congregation in Jerusalem to keep the passeover in the second moneth See Numb 9.10 11. Vers 3. For they could not keep it at that time because the priests had not sanctified themselves sufficiently c. To wit when they should have kept it that is the foureteenth day of the first moneth for the Temples purgation was not finished till the sixteenth day chap. 29.17 And in the sixteenth day of the first moneth they made an end Vers 6. He will return to the remnant of you that have escaped out of the hand of the king of Assyria To wit out of the hands of Pul and Tiglath-pilneser for both these kings already carryed away many of the ten tribes into captivity but the last captivity under Shalmaneser as is most likely had not yet been Vers 14. And they arose and took away the altars that were in Jerusalem c. To wit by the kings encouragement and at this time also the brasen serpent which Moses made was broken in pieces 2. see Kings 18.4 This was done in Jerusalem before they kept the Passeover how they proceeded afterwards after the same manner in other places we see chap. 3.11 Now when all this was finished all Israel that were present went out to the cities of Iudah and brake the images in pieces c. Vers 15. And the priests and the Levites were ashamed and sanctified themselves c. That is the priests and Levites that had been hitherto remisse were ashamed of their own negligence when they saw the forwardnesse of the people and so sanctified themselves c. Vers 16. The priests sprinkled the bloud which they received of the hands of the Levites To wit the bloud of the sacrifices upon the altar as was accustomed in all sacrifices Levit. 1.5 And he shall kill the bullocks before the Lord and the priests Aarons sonnes shall bring the bloud and sprinkle the bloud round about c. Vers 17. For there were many in the congregation that were not sanctified therefore the Levites had the charge of the killing of the passeover c. By the passeovers here are meant as I conceive the sacrifices which by the law were to be offered at the feast of the Passeover and did accompany the eating of the Paschall lambe as Deut. 16.2 Thou shalt therefore sacrifice the passeover unto the Lord thy God of the flock and heard called elsewhere the passeover-offerings chap. 35.7 8. And Josiah gave to the people of the flock lambes and kids for the passeover-offerings c. These sacrifices were to be killed according to the rule of the law by the priests onely Levit. 1.5 Here therefore a reason is given why at this time the Levites had the charge of killing them namely because
there were so many of the people that were not sanctified but were unclean and consequently there were so many sacrifices to be offered for their purifying and cleansing that the priests alone could not do the work and therefore the Levites were imployed therein Vers 18. For a multitude of the people even many of Ephraim and Manasseh Issachar and Zebulun had not cleansed themselves c. That is though the Levites did help the priests as is before said yet very many of the Israelites did eat the Passeover being not purified from their uncleannesse Vers 20. And the Lord hearkened to Hezekiah and healed the people That is he sanctified them by his spirit in an extraordinary way or he did not punish them but forgive them that their infirmity and accepted them as if they had been purified Vers 22. And Hezekiah spake comfortably to all the Levites that taught the good knowledge of the Lord. That is he encouraged them in their work and gave them hope of Gods mercy to the people as concerning those that had eaten the Passeover and were not cleansed according to the Law Vers 24. And a great number of the priests sanctified themselves To wit that were not before sanctified see vers 3. and chap. 29.34 Vers 26. For since the time of Solomon the sonne of David king of Israel there was not the like in Jerusalem That is since the Israelites were divided from Judah and Benjamin Vers 27. Then the priests the Levites arose and blessed the people and their voice was heard c. That is the Lord heard their prayer and blessed them as was promised Numb 6.27 And they shall put my name upon the children of Israel and I will blesse them CHAP. XXXI Vers 1. NOw when all this was finished all Israel that were present went out to the cities of Judah and brake the images in pieces c. See chap. 30.14 In Ephraim also and Manasseh untill they had utterly destroyed them all To wit in those cities of Ephraim and Manasseh that had been taken in the warres by the kings of Judah from the kings of Israel for all this was done by the authority and command of Hezekiah See 2. Kings 18.4 Vers 2. And Hezekiah appointed the courses of the priests and the Levites c. to minister and to give thanks and to praise in the gates of the tents of the Lord. That is in the Temple called the tents of the lord because there the priests and Levites who for their severall functions number and order are called an army or host Levit. 4.3 kept the watch of the Lord and there the people assembled together in troops as souldiers in the camp and that to pray unto the Lord which is the chief service of our spirituall warfare Vers 3. He appointed also the kings portion of his substance for the burnt-offerings to wit for the morning and evening burnt-offerings c. All the particular sacrifices here mentioned as is written in the law of the Lord that is which in the law were severally prescribed for every feast and for the daily sacrifice Num. 28. they were ordinarily provided by the people in generall as it was also afterward Nehem. 10.32 33. Also we made ordinances for us to charge our selves yearely with the third part of a shekel for the service of the house of our God for the shew-bread and for the continuall meat-offering and for the continuall burnt-offerings of the Sabbaths and of the new moons c. but now it seems to ease the people in their poverty Hezekiah appointed a portion for and toward these services out of his own substance Vers 4. He commanded the people that dwelt in Jerusalem to give the portion of the priests and the Levites that they might be encouraged in the law of the Lord. That is that they might not be distracted with worldly cares of providing for themselves nor follow their callings heavily for want of maintenance but might chearfully bend themselves wholly to the service of the Lord. Vers 5. The children of Israel brought in abundance the first fruits of corn wine and oyle c. To wit those in and about Jerusalem where the commandment was first given for of the Israelites inhabiting the other cities of Judah the following verse speaks or else in this verse there is mention of the tithes and first-fruits of such as grew out of the earth and in the following verse of the tithes of cattell and such other things And concerning the children of Israel and Judah that dwelt in the cities of Judah they also brought in the tythes of oxen and sheep and the tithe of holy things that is all other tithes that were by the Law of God due which are here called the tithe of holy things because the tithes were to be set apart from the rest of their goods as things consecrated and holy to the Lord yet happely these words are specially intended of those second tithes which were not given for the maintenance of the Levites but separated for other holy uses for which see Deut. 14.22 and Levit. 27.30 Vers 7. In the third moneth they began to lay the foundation of the heaps and finished them in the seventh moneth For in the third moneth was their harvest and therefore the feast of Pentecost which was in that moneth was called the feast of harvest and in the seventh moneth they gathered all other fruits of the land and therefore the feast of Tabernacles which was in that moneth was called the feast of in gathering in the end of the yeare Exod. 23.16 Vers 9. Then Hezekiah questioned with the priests and the Levites concerning the heaps That is he demanded how it came to passe that they had spent no more of that provision that was brought in for them Vers 10. And Azariah the chief priest of the house of Zadok answered him c. There were still two chief priests of the two severall families of Eleazar and Ithamar that had the chief command in the Temple under the high priest of which it seems this Azariah was one who is therefore also called vers 13. the ruler of the house of God For the Lord hath blessed his people and that which is left is this great store That is since they brought in their first fruits and tithes God hath so abundantly blessed the people that their offerings have yielded us sufficient provision and this overplus which is left besides Vers 12. And brought in the offerings and the tithes and the dedicate things faithfully over which Cononiah the Levite was ruler c. To wit to see the offerings and the tithes and the dedicate things safely stored up and carefully preserved in the severall garners or chambers appointed for them and to keep an account both of what was brought in and what was delivered forth according to the order established 1. Chron. 26.20 Vers 14. And Kore the sonne of Imnah the Levite the porter toward the east was over the
Vers 3. The children of Parosh c. That is the posterity of Parosh or rather the family whereof Parosh was the head or chief afterwards vers 21. many of the people are mentioned by the names of the cities where they had formerly dwelt as the children of Beth-lehem the children of Netophah c. but that the proper names here mentioned are not the names of cities but the names of men that were the heads of families is evident Neh. 10.14 where many of them are mentioned as the chief of the people that sealed the covenant Vers 5. The children of Arah seven hundred seventy and five Neh. 7.10 it is six hundred fifty two which must thus be reconciled that seven hundred seventy five as here is said gave up their names in Babylon that they would return but onely six hundred fifty two mentioned in Nehemiah came up into Judea the rest changing their minds or dying by the way and the like must be held concerning vers 8 27 28 33 42 60. Vers 6. Of the children of Jeshua and Joab two thousand eight hundred and twelve Neh. 7.11 the number is two thousand eight hundred and eighteen to wit because when they came up into Judea there were six more then had given up their names in Babylon the like must be held concerning vers 10 11 13 14 15 17 19 35 41 65. Vers 16. The children of Ater of Hezekiah ninety and eight That is whereas there were severall families descended of Ater of the children of Hezekiah who was the head of one of those families there were ninety and eight Vers 21. The children of Beth-lehem c. That is the children of those that were formerly inhabitants of Beth-lehem and so we must understand the following verses wherein there are any townes or cities mentioned Vers 25. The children of Kirjath-arim Chephirah c. Or Kiriath-jearim and Ceprah Neh. 7.29 Vers 29. The children of Nebo fifty and two Not Nebo in the tribe of Ruben but Nebo in the tribe of Judah called usually Nob and therefore Nehemiah calleth it the other Nebo Neh. 7.33 Vers 30. The children of Magbish an hundred fifty and six These are not mentioned at all in Nehemiah see above vers 5. Vers 43. The Nethinims See 1. Chron. 9.2 Vers 44. The children of Siaha Or Sia Neh. 7.47 Vers 55. The children of Solomons servants That is the strangers proselytes that were imployed by Solomon in the building of the Temple and having lived long amongst the children of Judah were now reckoned amongst them Vers 61. Which took a wife of the daughters of Barzillai the Gileadite and was called after their name Some conceive that Barzillai was a priest and these priests that married the daughters and heirs of the family were therefore called by that name but because they could not prove their genealogie were put from the priesthood Others conceive that these priests marrying into the noble family of Barzillai disregarding the honour of the priesthood because in the captivity where they were not imployed as priests in offering up sacrifices they had neither any profit nor honour by being priests did therefore chuse to be called after the family of their wives but now being returned to Judea and the priesthood growing into fame and request again these degenerate priests would fain have taken place among the priests of the Lord but not being now able to prove their genealogie they were amongst others put from the priesthood Vers 63. And the Tirshatha said unto them that they should not eat c. Tirshatha is a name of office as the commissary the governour or deputy of the king It is elsewhere given to Nehemiah Neh. 8.9 And Nehemiah which is the Tirshatha and therefore some think that this catalogue was taken by Nehemiah though it be set down here but because Nehemiah came out of Babylon so long after the Jewes came first thence therefore it is rather here meant of Zerubbabel who was now chief governour called also Sheshbazzar chap. 1.8 and whereas it is here said that these priests that could not prove their genealogie should not eat of the most holy things till there stood up a priest with Urim and with Thummim hereby it is manifest that the Urim and Thummim was either lost or burnt together with many other things when the Chaldees took Jerusalem and indeed however Zerubbabel hoped as it seemes by these words that they might by the providence of God he had again yet they were never found again the Lord thereby teaching the Church that the ceremonies were going and the Messias coming that salvation was not to be placed in the ordinances of Moses but that they were shortly to expect the true Urim and Thummim Christ Jesus the high priest of their profession Vers 64. The whole congregation together was fourty and two thousand three hundred and threescore That is both of those of Judah and Benjamin of whom the particular numbers are before punctually expressed and those of the other ten tribes who are not here mentioned If we summe up the particular numbers before set down they all amount but to twenty nine thousand eight hundred and eighteen which is above twelve thousand lesse then the totall summe here expressed and these no doubt were those of the other ten tribes that returned with their brethren of Judah and Benjamin 1. Chron. 9.3 And in Jerusalem dwelt of the children of Judah and of the children of Benjamin and of the children of Ephraim and Manasseh we no where reade of so many that were carryed into Babylon but it seems they multiplyed greatly in Babylon as formerly in Egypt Vers 65. And there were among them two hundred singing-men and singing-women These were such as were imployed amongst them in singing at their weddings and funerals and such other solemnities 2. Chron. 35.25 in Nehemiah 7.67 it is said there were of these two hundred forty five but for this see the note above vers 6. Vers 68. When they came to the house of the Lord which is at Jerusalem c. That is to the place where the Temple had stood Vers 70. So the priests and the Levites and some of the people c. That is some of the people dwelt in the cities to the priests and Levites assigned for their habitation CHAP. III. Vers 1. ANd when the seventh moneth was come c. That is when the seventh moneth approached for they began to offer burnt offerings on the first day of the moneth vers 6. From the first day of the seventh moneth began they to offer burnt offerings unto the Lord c. because there were many festivals by the law appointed to be kept on this moneth which were the first after their return out of Babylon to wit the feast of trumpets on the first day Levit. 23.24 the feast of expiation or day of attonement on the tenth day Levit. 23.27 and the feast of Tabernacles on the fifteenth day Levit. 23.34 and besides the first feast
good part of the wall adjoyning even to the tower of Meah they sanctified it unto the tower of Hananeel where by the tower of Meah is meant a tower not farre from the sheep-gate so called as is thought because it had an hundred pinacles or was an hundred cubits high or some such like reason for Meah signifies an hundred and by the tower of Hananeel a tower further northward mentioned again Zach. 14.10 Vers 3. But the fish gate did the sonnes of Hassenaah build This was doubtlesse on the northwest of Jerusalem in the citie of David towards the sea as appears also by that which is said of Manasseh 2. Chron. 33.14 He built a wall without the citie of David on the west side of Gihon in the valley even to the entring in of the fish gate c. It was called the fish gate because they brought in their fish from the sea coasts of Tyre and Sydon at that gate according to that chap. 13.16 There dwelt men of Tyre therein which also brought fish c. and had happely their market for the selling of their fish not farre from it it is mentioned again Zeph. 1.10 There shall be the noise of a cry from the fish gate Vers 5. And next unto them the Tekoites repaired c. That is some of the inhabitants of Tekoa for other of them also repaired in another place as it is expressed afterward vers 27. but yet it was onely the common people amongst them that did what was done for concerning their nobles there is a clause of exception added but the nobles put not their necks to the work of the Lord that is the nobles would not do any service herein to their Lord the God of Israel because their arrogancie in regard of their greatnesse was the cause of their refusing their help in this work as pretending they would not be taxed nor have any such burthen imposed upon them their folly is noted herein that they refused to put their necks to his work who is the nobles Lord as well as the common peoples Vers 6. Moreover the old gate repaired Jehoiada So called happely because it was the oldest of all the gates in Jerusalem and this was also as is generally held on the north-side of Jerusalem Vers 7. And next unto them repaired Melatiah c. unto the throne of the governour on this side the river It seems there was formerly in this part of the wall a palace or place of judicature where those that were appointed governours under the Babylonian and Persian kings over all the countrey on this side Euphrates did use to sit in judgement unto which place these men of Gibeah and Mizpah and others here mentioned did repair the wall and that palace where had been the throne of the governour some Expositours conceive was repaired by Nehemiah and his servants he being now governour of Judea whence are those expressions chap. 4.16 The half of my servants wrought in the work and the other half of them held both the spears the shields c. and 5.16 I continued in the work of this wall c. Vers 8. And they fortified Jerusalem unto the broad wall That is they repaired the wall unto that place where the wall was made much broader then in other places and therefore called the broad wall and so having brought the work so farre there they left off building because here it was not ruined and therefore needed no repairing in which sence it may be read according to the translation noted in the margin They left Jerusalem unto the broad wall Vers 9. And next unto them repaired Rephaiah the sonne of Hur the ruler of the half part of Jerusalem For Jerusalem being part in Judah and part in Benjamin had accordingly two severall rulers and this Rephaiah was ruler of one of them and Shallum vers 12. was ruler of the other Vers 11. And Hashub the sonne of Pahath-moab repaired the other piece and the tower of the furnaces That is the next portion of the wall set out to be repaired wherein also was the tower of the furnaces so called happely because either in the tower it self or in the street adjoyning there were many furnaces Vers 12. Shallum the sonne of Haloesh the ruler of the half part of Jerusalem See above vers 9. Vers 13. The valley gate repaired Hanun c. See chap. 2.13 Vers 14. But the dung-gate repaired Malchiah the sonne of Rechab That is of the famous familie of the Rechabites Vers 15. But the gate of the fountain repaired Shallun See chap. 2.14 Unto the stairs that go down from the citie of David That is from mount Sion which was called the citie of David into the lower part of Jerusalem Vers 16. After him repaired Nehemiah c. Here begins the repairing of the wall about mount Zion wherein stood the Temple and the palace of the kings of Judah and the first part of this wall was repaired by one Nehemiah the sonne of Azbuck the ruler of the half part of Bethzur and so as farre as to the pool that was made and unto the house of the mighty and by the pool that was made is meant a pool not naturall but made by art to wit by Hezekiah 2. Kings 20.20 yet this was not the pool of Siloah mentioned in the former verse for that was happely a naturall pool and was in the lower part of Jerusalem but another in mount Zion called therefore the upper pool 2. Kings 18.17 and by the house of the mighty is meant some house built for Davids worthies or some house where the garrison souldiers for the citie lay or where youths were taught to handle their arms Vers 17. After him repaired the Levites It may be because the wall here was over against the Temple Vers 19. The ruler of Mizpah another piece over against the going up to the armory at the turning of the wall To wit the citie armoury to which that place of Solomons seemeth to allude Cant. 4.4 Thy neck is like the tower of David builded for an armoury it is evident that the house of the forrest of Lebanon which Solomon built was for many generations a magazine of arms for the kings of Judah for thence is that Isa 22.8 Thou didst look in that day to the armour of the house of the forrest and therefore it may be it was that house that is here meant or if not so it may be they had severall arsenalls or armouries one for the citie armoury and another for the kings magazine or that this was some place where anciently there had been an armoury before the house of Lebanon was built Vers 22. And after him repaired the priests the men of the plain To wit the men that inhabited the plain countrey about Jerusalem 2. Sam. 2.28 chap. 12.28 Vers 24. Binnui the sonne of Henadad another piece from the house of Azariah unto the turning of the wall This is thought to be the turning of the
came to Jerusalem to inform them of the conspiracy of their enemies against them As for the intelligence they brought them some conceive that the wayes that led from Jerusalem to Samaria are intended in those words from all places whence ye shall return unto us they will be upon you But others and I think more probably understand it of all places about the city from whence the builders of the wall should return into the citie where the Jews were when they gave them this intelligence from all places whence ye shall return unto us they will be upon you that is they will on a suddain beset the city and assault it on every side when you shall leave your work and return to us into the city either to eat or to rest and refresh your selves from the severall places round about the city where you are now imployed in building the walls on a sudden they will break in upon us Vers 13. Therefore set I in the lower places behind the wall and on the higher places c. That is hearing by the consonant report of our brethren that came from severall places that our adversaries had a purpose to assault us I caused the people to give over their work and to arm themselves to keep off the enemy and to that end I set some of them beneath behind the wall and others above in the towers and other fortifications to beat off the adversaries and keep them from entring the citie Vers 15. We returned all of us to the wall every one unto his work That is when the enemies hearing that their purpose was discovered gave over their intended invasion of the city and so their counsell was brought to nought we having notice thereof returned to our work which was a while given over that we might be in a readinesse to withstand the enemies if they had come against us Vers 16. The half of my servants wrought in the work c. That is though we returned to our work again when we heard that the enemy had given over their plot of coming suddenly upon us to fight against us yet after this we were the more carefull to be in a readinesse to resist them lest they should again at some other time renew their conspiracie to which end first there was never but half of my servants that is my houshold servants and guard or trained bands whose captain Nehemiah was employed in building the wall the other half stood alwayes ready armed to keep off the enemy if occasion should be and secondly even those that were employed in building were also alwayes armed as is expressed vers 17. They which builded on the wall and they that bare burdens with those that laded every one with one of his hands wrought in the work and with the other hand held a weapon And the rulers were behind all the house of Judah To wit to oversee them and encourage them in their work and sometimes perhaps when need was to help them too Vers 17. Every one with one of his hands wrought in the work and with the other hand held a weapon That is even they also that wrought in the building were also alwayes armed ready at all assayes to have joyned with the rest in resisting the enemy if he had set upon them literally this cannot be understood for how could they build the wall or lay burdens upon the shoulders of those that bare them and yet all the while hold their weapons in one of their hands It is therefore a proverbiall kind of speech signifying onely that whilest they vvere busiest in building they had also their weapons ready at hand to fight against the enemy if need were for so Nehemiah explains this phrase in the following words vers 18. For the builders had every one his sword girded by his side c. Vers 22. Likewise at the same time said I unto the people Let every one with his seruant lodge within Jerusalem c. That is he gave charge to the people that none of them should go out of the city to lodge and that because he would have them alwayes in a readinesse to keep their turns both of watching by night and of working by day Vers 23. Saving that every one put them off for washing To wit either their garments or their bodies for upon occasion of legall pollutions the Jews did wash their bodies often CHAP. V. Vers 2. THere were that said We our sonnes and our daughters are many therefore we take up corn for them c. That is having a great charge of children that which we earn will not maintain us and therefore we are constrained whilest we work for the publick to take up corn upon use of the nobles and rulers and rich men amongst us to keep us from starving and that by pawning or selline our children to them for servants till we can redeem them which we are never like to do as is expressed vers 5. We bring into bondage our sonnes and our daughters to be servants and some of our daughters are brought unto bondage already neither is it in our power to redeem them so that we are in as bad or worse a condition then when we were bondslaves in Babylon and the having of many children which is of it self a great blessing of God is turned to us as a bitter curse Vers 3. We have morgaged our lands vineyards and houses that we might buy corn because of the dearth Even those that had not so great a charge of children were forced to morgage their estates because of the dearth that was amongst them Vers 4. There were also that said We have borrowed money for the kings tribute c. That is though we had sufficient to sustain the charge of our selves and families yet not also to defray the tribute that was laid upon us but even to pay that we have been constrained to morgage our lands and vineyards for though the Jews had liberty given them to return from Babylon into their own countrey yet they were to pay tribute there as is evident Ezra 4.13 If this city be builded and the walls set up again then will they not pay toll tribute and custome and so thou shalt endamage the revenue of the king and chap. 7.24 Also we certifie you that touching any of the Priests and Levites singers porters Nethinims or ministers of this house of God it shall not be lawfull to impose toll tribute or custome upon them Vers 5. Yet now our flesh is as the flesh of our brethren our children as their children That is we are reasonable creatures as well as they not beasts yea Israelites of the seed and linage of Abraham as well as they not heathens though they use us as if we were not such Vers 7. And I set a great assembly against them To wit both of those that were oppressed and those of the better sort in the congregation that were not tainted with this sinne yea
this register of the genealogie of them that returned out of Babylon we may see in the notes upon the second chapter of Ezra Vers 70. And some of the chief of the fathers gave unto the work Some conceive that this is still a continuation of the register that was found mentioned above vers 5. containing a catalogue of what was given at their first return out of Babylon towards the building of the Temple c. And whereas it may be objected that there is a great deal of difference betwixt that which is said to be given there Ezra 2.69 and that which here is said was given to this they answer that all that was given by the encouragement of Cyrus both by Jews and Persians is there set down here onely that which was given by the Jews But I rather conceive with other Expositours that the register that was found mentioned vers 5. ended with the former verse and that here now is added what was collected after the people were numbred by Nehemiah according to the president of the register that was found for as there was a collection of money and other things made when they were numbred according to their genealogies in Zerubbabels time at their first coming out of Babylon Ezra 2.68 so was it now also onely that was merely for the building of the Temple this was partly for the service of the Temple for why else were so many priests garments given mentioned in the following words but in part also for the rebuilding of the city See above vers 4. The Tirshatha gave to the treasure That is Nehemiah chap. 10.1 and 8.9 Now those that sealed were Nehemiah the Tirshatha c. See the note also Ezra 2.63 Vers 73. So the priests and the Levites and the porters c. See the note Ezra 2.70 CHAP. VIII Vers 1. ANd all the people gathered themselves together as one man c. To wit on the first day of the seventh moneth vers 2. which was the feast of trumpets Levit. 23.24 and not many dayes after the wall was finished which was on the twentie fifth day of the sixth moneth chap. 6.15 Some Expositours conceive that this is but onely a more full and large relation of those things which were done long since at Zerubbabels first coming into Judea and which were before more breifly related by Ezra Ezra 3.1 c. and that first because as the second chapter of Ezra ends and the third begins so with the same words in effect doth the seventh chapter of Nehemiah end and the eighth begin and secondly because it is not likely that Ezra being sent to instruct the people in the Law of God would suffer them so long to wit till Nehemiahs coming to be ignorant of the main duties of Gods worship and service as it seems now they were vers 14. And they found written in the Law which the Lord had commanded by Moses that the children of Israel should dwell in booths in the feast of the seventh moneth c. But these reasons are too weak to winne us to admit of such a confusion in the order of the history rather therefore I conceive that what is here related was done in Nehemiahs time after the wall was finished as is above related The place where they met together was as is here added the street that was before the water-gate a gate mentioned before chap. 3.26 and in the street hereof it seems the people were assembled because the court of the Temple could not contain such a multitude And they spake unto Ezra the scribe to bring the book of the Law of Moses c. See the note Ezra 7.1 and 6. Vers 4. And beside him stood Mattithiah c. To wit as witnesses ready to approve and maintain the truth of that which from the Law of God should be delivered to them and in their turn also to perform the work Vers 7. Also Joshua and Bani c. That is not onely Ezra did thus expound the Law unto the people but others also of the priests and Levites caused the people to understand the Law because they could not all conveniently heare Ezra they were divided into severall companies and in each of them there were pulpits or scaffolds erected as may be gathered chap 9.4 from whence they read and expounded the Law unto them there being severall teachers in each place that might successively discharge that work And the people stood in their place To wit some in one company and some in another according to their divisions So they read in the book in the Law of God distinctly and gave the sense and caused them to understand the reading It is a weak conceit of some popish Expositours that they did reade onely that in the Syriak tongue to the people which in the originall book was written in Hebrew and that because the people since their return out of Babylon did neither speak nor perfectly understand the Hebrew tongue but the Syriak onely for the words do plainly import that they expounded that which they read to them Vers 9. And Nehemiah which is the Tirshatha See Ezra 2.63 This day is holy unto the Lord your God mourn not nor weep That is this day the Lord hath appointed to be consecrated to him as a holy day of spirituall rejoyceing and feasting together Numb 10.10 In the day of your gladnesse and in your solemne dayes and in the beginnings of your moneths ye shall blow the trumpet c. and therefore be comforted and chear up your hearts with the assurance of Gods mercy and make not your selves unfit for the service of this day by your excessive and unseasonable mourning For all the people wept when they heard the words of the Law Because they they perceived by that they had heard from their teachers how many wayes they had broken the Law of their God and had by that means provoked the Lord to poure forth those judgements upon them which they saw he had long since threatned against those which did not obey his commandments Vers 10. Then he said unto them Go your way eat the fat and drink the sweet c. This is meant of their feasting together with their peace-offerings to which he addes and send portions unto them for whom nothing is prepared that is to the poore the fatherlesse and widows which was according to the Law Deut. 16.14 Thou shalt rejoyce in thy feast thou and thy sonne and thy daughter c. and the Levite the stranger the fatherlesse and the widow c. For the joy of the Lord is your strength That is your rejoycing in the Lord his love and favour and manifold mercies which he hath of late conferred upon you and doth still continue to you is that whereby you must be strengthened both in the outward and inward man Vers 13. And on the secend day were gathered together the chief c. even to understand the words of the Law That is to advise with him
to wit the tenth of tithes Numb 18.26 Thus speak unto the Levites and say unto them when ye take of the children of Israel tithes which I have given you from them for your inheritance then ye shall offer up an heave-offering of it for the Lord even a tenth part of the tithe yea perhaps one of the priests the sonnes of Aaron was alwayes to be present when the Levites received the tithes of the people as a witnesse that the priests portion was faithfully set out for them Vers 39. And we will not forsake the house of our God That is we will not fail to frequent the Temple to serve the Lord there and we will not leave it destitute of any requisite provision for the service there to be performed CHAP. XI Vers 1. ANd the rulers of tbe people dwelt at Jerusalem the rest of the people also cast lots c. Because there were not found enough in Jerusalem for the inhabiting and defence of the city and people were loth to dwell there because the neighbours round about did exceedingly envie the glory of this city and were continually plotting some mischief against it to the great perill of the inhabitants and secondly because withall as there was more safety so also there was more profit in dwelling elsewhere therefore one chief businesse that Nehemiah had to do at this assembly of the people was after he had numbred them to chuse out a sufficient number of the people to dwell there see chap. 7.3 4 5. which to avoid all exception was done by lot The chief rulers of the people of their own accord settled themselves to dwell as reason indeed required in this chief city of the kingdome but for the people the tenth part of them were chosen by lot onely there were some that did voluntarily offer themselves to dwell there vers 2. and this taking of one in ten to dwell in Jerusalem some Expositours look upon also as a shadow of the paucity of those that shall be received to dwell in the heavenly Jerusalem to wit that scarce one in ten even of those that professe themselves Gods people shall dwell there according to that Isaiah 6.13 But yet in it shall be a tenth c. and Jerem. 3.14 I will take you one of a city and two of a family and I will bring you to Zion Vers 2. And the people blessed all the men that willingly offered themselves to dwell at Jerusalem That is they commended them for it and desired the Lord to blesse and prosper them Vers 3. Now these are the chief of the province that dwelt in Jerusalem To wit that were chosen now by lot to dwell there In 1. Chron. 9. there is another catalogue of them wherein more are mentioned then are mentioned here But it seems in that both those that were chosen by lot and those that voluntarily offered themselves to dwell there are set down here onely those that were chosen by lot Vers 4. And at Jerusalem dwelt certain of the children of Judah and of the children of Benjamin Because Jerusalem stood partly in Judah and partly in Benjamin therefore those that were chosen by lot to dwell there were of those two tribes yet there were some also of Ephraim and Manasseh that dwelt there 1. Chron. 9.3 which were doubtlesse of those that voluntarily profered themselves Vers 5. And Maaseiah the sonne of Baruch c. Concerning this catalogue of those that dwelt at Jerusalem see 1. Chron. 9.5 6. Vers 9. Second over the city That is next in place and government after Joel afore-mentioned Vers 16. And Shabbethai and Jozabad of the chief of the Levites had the oversight of the outward businesse of the house of God That is such businesses as appertained to the Temple but were to be done abroad not in the Temple as the providing of those things as were to be bought with the money that was collected c. see 1. Chron. 26.29 Vers 17. The sonne of Asaph was the principall to begin the thanksgiving in prayer That is the principall of the singers that used to begin the Psalmes when they sung and praised God Vers 19. Akkub Talmon and their brethren that kept the gates were an hundred seventy two See 1. Chron. 9.17 22. Vers 23. For it was the kings commandment concerning them that a certain portion should be for the singers c. That is the king of Persia had commanded that a certain allowance should every day be given them out of the kings treasure this may have reference to the decree of Darius Ezra 6.9 10. or that of Artaxerxes Ezra 7.23 24. or happely to some new directions given by him to Nehemiah at his coming to Jerusalem Some reade these words thus that it was the kings commandment concerning them that a sure ordinance should be for the singers and so they understand it either of David that he had established it as a sure ordinance that the singers should praise the Lord in the Temple every day or else of Artaxerxes that he had ordained that according to the ancient custome the singers should every day perform this service Vers 24. And Pethahiah the sonne of Meshezabel c. was at the kings hand in all matters concerning the people That is the king of Persia made use of him in all things he gave in charge concerning the people as happely to gather the kings allowance for the Temple to receive the peoples petitions and it may be to assist the governour in matter of judgement Vers 36. And of the Levites were divisions in Judah and in Benjamin That is besides the Levites that dwelt at Jerusalem there were some of them also allowed to dwell in severall towns and cities of Judah that they might teach the people the law of God in their severall divisions CHAP. XII Vers 1. NOw these are the priests and the Levites that went up with Zerubbabel c. Nehemiah intending here to relate with what solemnity they kept the dedication of the new built walls of Jerusalem and how the priests and Leuites were imployed herein first he sets down their ancestours to wit who were the chief priests and Levites in the dayes of Jeshua the high priest and that came with Zerubbabel and Ezra or immediately after him from Babylon into the land of Judea and then secondly who were the chief priests and Levites in the daies of Joiakim the high priest the sonne of Jeshua c. vers 12. Now by the chief of the priests is doubtlesse meant in both these catalogues the heads of the severall divisions of the priests that did in their turns wait upon the service of the Temple but then seeing there were twenty foure courses or orders of the priests established by David 1. Chron. 24.7 why there should be here but two and twenty mentioned in the first catalogue and but twenty in the second vers 12. I find not any probable reason given by Expositours Vers 9. Their brethren were over
19. When the gates of Jerusalem began to be dark c. That is when the sunne was well nigh set for then the mountains in Jerusalem intercepting the light of the setting sunne the gates of Jerusalem began to be shadowed and dark and thus timely he commanded that the gates should be shut that he might be sure the whole sabbath should be kept holy which began there at the sunne setting and lasted till the sunne setting of the following day Levit. 23.32 From even unto even shall ye celebrate your sabbath And some of my servants set I at the gates that there should be no burden brought in on the sabbath day Though he had charged that the gates should not be opened that is set wide open that all might have free egresse and regresse as on other dayes till after the sabbath as is expressed in the foregoing words yet there was a necessity of opening the doores to let in and out those that had any necessary occasion especially such as dwelt in the suburbs and were to come in to serve God in the Temple therefore he set some of his servants to be at the gates to see that under that pretence none were admitted that would bring in any burden Vers 21. Then I testified against them and said unto them Why lodge ye about the wall c. To wit first because those that dwelt without the walls might still buy of them on the sabbath day secondly because their being there with wares ready to sell might be a dangerous temptation to move those within the walls to try by some meanes to get out to them Vers 22. And I commanded the Levites that they should cleanse themselves and that they should come and keep the gates to sanctifie the sabbath day Some understand this also of the city gates to wit that the Levites as men of greatest fidelity should see that the gates were duly kept shut But because his own servants were appointed to that service and because it is said that the Levites should cleanse themselves that they might be fit to keep these gates I conceive this is meant of the gates of the Temple through which they were to take care that no unclean person did enter in that great concourse of people that resorted thither on the sabbath day Remember me O my God concerning this also and spare me c. Because by his stricktnesse in reforming these profanations of the sabbath he knew that many were highly displeased with him he desires the Lord would accept of his service and then it was no great matter what men thought of him but withall because he knew that his best actions would not indure the exact tryall of Gods justice therefore even herein he implores Gods mercy and spare me according to the greatnesse of thy mercy Vers 29. And their children spake half in the speech of Ashdod c. So likewise those of other nations which besides that it was in it self dishonourable to the people of God it was also a dangerous signe that they had a mixture of the manners as well as of the language of their heathen mothers Vers 25. And I contended with them and cursed them c. First he curseth that is he pronounced them accursed and accordingly excommunicated them and cast them out of the congregation of the Lord secondly He smote certain of them that is those whom he found most obstinate he caused to be beaten according to that law Deut. 25.2 If the wicked man be worthy to be beaten the judge shall cause him to lie down and to be beaten before his face according to his fault by a certain number and indeed we read that Paul was so punished by the Jews 2. Cor. 11.25 Thrice was I beaten with rods c. yea and happely also to be smitten with the fist for so it seems the custome was among the Jews to use those that were condemned for any great offence Isaiah 54.4 Ye fast for strife and debate and to smite with the fist of wickednesse Matth. 26.67 They spit in his face and buffetted him and others smote him with the palmes of their hands John 18.22 One of the officers that stood by struck Jesus with the palme of his hand Acts 23.2 And the high priest commanded them that stood by to smite him on the mouth and thirdly he plucked off their hair for it seemes that amongst the Jews those that were found guilty of any foul offence were delivered up to the reproches either of the people in generall or of those that were to punish them who were accordingly wont not onely to buffet them but also to pluck off their hair Isaiah 50.6 I gave my back to the smiters and my cheeks to them that pulled off the haire and so were these men now used by Nehemiahs appointment Vers 28. And one of the sonnes of Joiada the sonne of Eliashib the high priest was sonne in law to Sanballat That is one of the grand children of Joiada for this was according to Josephus one Manasses the brother of Jaddua the high priest who was the sonne of Jonathan and the grandchild of Joiada the sonne of Eliashib He having married the daughter of Sanballat that he might not turn away his wife which either he must do or be turned out of the priesthood his father in law Sanballat undertook to build a Temple every way as stately and goodly as that at Jerusalem wherein Manasses should be the chief priest which accordingly having first obtained leave of Alexander he did perform and built this new Temple that it might have the greater honour in mount Gerizim hard by the city Sichem and from this beginning came that famous schisme as touching the place where sacrifices were to be offered betwixt the Samaritanes and Jews John 4.20 Our father 's worshiped in this mount and ye say that in Jerusalem is the place where men ought to worship but whether therefore this was that Sanballat that is so often mentioned in this book or another of his posterity of the same name it is hard to say Therefore I chased him from me Because he would not put away his wife I caused him to be excommunicated and banished from amongst us and so he went and became the chief priest in the Samaritanes temple as is above mentioned in the former note ANNOTATIONS Upon the book of ESTHER CHAP. I. NOw it came to passe in the dayes of Ahasuerus It is not expressed who was the authour of this book of Esther but by the common consent of the Church in all ages it hath been received as a part of those sacred Hebrew oracles of God which were committed to the Jews and by them unto the coming of Christ faithfully preserved though the name of the Lord Jehovah be not mentioned in it and by a passage in this book chap. 9.20.21 And Mordecai wrote these things and sent letters unto all the Jews that were in all the provinces c. some Expositours have