priests were seated partly in the tribe of Judah where the Temple was afterwards to be built and partly in the two bordering tribes of Simeon and Benjamin and so whilst they shall approve their piety and devotion to the service of God in being content to leave their dwellings to go up unto Jerusalem in their turns to attend upon the service of God yet withall God provides for their ease that their journeys might not be over long and burthensome to them As for their assigning as it is here said of thirteen cities to the priests herein God and the governours of Israel had respect unto succeeding times when the posterity of Aaron should be encreased for at present there were but a few priests not enough to inhabit the half part of one city but in the mean time they were given them for their possession which they might dispose of according to the right they had in them For that they might so do and that the cities of the Levites were given them not onely for their habitation but also for their possessions and inheritance is evident in severall places See Levit. 25.32 Vers 9. And they gave out of the tribe of the children of Judah and out of the tribe of the children of Simeon these cities c. Judahs and Simeon cities are reckoned together because Simeons portion lay within Judahs Chap. 19.1 And the second lot came forth to Simeon even for the tribe of the children of Simeon according to their families and their inheritance was within the inheritance of the children of Judah Vers 11. And they gave them the city of Arbah the father of Anak which is Hebron in the hill-countrey of Judah c. This city with the land adjoyning was formerly given to Caleb which makes it more probable that the cities for the Levites were taken by lot because it was not likely that both Hebron and Debir should be taken out of his inheritance without the Lords speciall direction But God requiring it Caleb willingly yields the rather because the countrey and land about was the chief of his possession which was not taken from him and besides no doubt they desired to have the Levites who were to instruct them in the Law of the Lord to be seated amongst them Vers 15. And Holon with her suburbs Called Hilen 1. Chron. 6.58 Vers 16. And Ain with her suburbs and Juttah with her suburbs c. This citie Ain is not reckoned 1. Chron. 6. amongst the cities given to the sonnes of Aaron nor Gibeon here named vers 17. As for Juttah it is called Ashan 1. Chron. 6.59 Some indeed conceive that it is Ain that is there called Ashan but there is an argument against that which seems to me unanswerable to wit that Ashan and Ain are in one verse distinctly named amongst the cities of Simeon chap. 19.7 and so also Almon vers 18. is called Alemeth 1. Chron. 6.60 Vers 22. And Kibzaim with her suburbs Called Jokneam 1. Chron. 6.68 Vers 23. And out of the tribe of Dan Eltekeh with her suburbs Gibbethon with her suburbs These two cities are omitted 1. Chron. 6. And Aijalon and Gath-rimmon are there ioyned with the cities of Ephraim but that they were given out of Dans portion is evident by this place Vers 25. And out of the half tribe of Manasseh Tanach with her suburbs c. To wit that half of the tribe which was seated within Jordan next Dan and Ephraim Tanach here mentioned is called Aner 1. Chron. 6.70 as also Gath-Rimmon is there called Bileam Vers 27. And Beeshterah with her suburbs Called Ashtaroth 1. Chron. 6.71 Vers 28. And out of the tribe of Issachar Kishon with her suburbs c. Which is called Kedesh as also Dabareh is called Deberath and Jarmuth Ramoth and Engannim Anem 1. Chron. 6.72.73 Vers 30. And out of the tribe of Asher Mishal with her suburbs c. Called Mashal 1. Chron. 6.74 as also Helkath is there called Hukok Vers 32. And Hammoth-dor with her suburbs c. Called Hammon 1. Chron. 6.76 as also Kartan is there called Kirjathaim Vers 34. Out of the tribe of Zebulun Jokneam with her suburbs c. Jokneam and Kartah are omitted 1. Chron. 6.77 and Dimnah is there called Rimmon and Nahalal Tabor Vers 36. And out of the tribe of Reuben Bezer with her suburbs and Jahazah with her suburbs It is said that Bezer was a city of refuge chap. 20.8 though it be not here expressed as it is in the rest vers 13.20 27. which why it is here omitted we cannot say As for Jahazah it is called Jahzah 1. Chron. 6. Vers 41. All the cities of the Levites within the possession of the children of Israel were fourty and eight cities with their suburbs It may seem strange why in the 19. chapter we reade of but two and twenty cities given to the tribe of Asher nineteen to the tribe of Naphtali yea but twelve cities to the tribe of Zebulun and yet the Levites which were nothing so many in number as they have here eight and fourty cities given them I answer first that besides the cities mentioned the other tribes had many towns and villages wherein they dwelt which the Levites had not secondly that the chief cities are onely there mentioned it is evident in severall places that many cities which were in the severall portions of those tribes are not there set down thirdly others did no doubt inhabit these cities besides the Levites and fourthly it is no wonder though God deals bountifully with the Levites that were to be imployed in his speciall service Vers 43. And the Lord gave unto Israel all the land which he sware to give unto their fathers and they possessed it and dwelt therein Though there were much of the land out of which the Canaanites were not yet expelled we cannot therefore call this truth in question for First he had given them all by lot divided amongst them which was a kind of actuall enstating them in it Secondly he had put them into possession of the greatest part of it neither had he promised them otherwise but that they should possesse it by degrees See Exod. 23.29 So both clauses of that which is here said are true to wit first That God had given them all the land which he swore to give unto their fathers and secondly That they possessed it and dwelt therein onely we must conceive of them severally thus to wit 1. That he had already actually given them the whole land and enabled them to divide it amongst their tribes and 2. That they possessed it and dwelt therein to wit by degrees a great deal of it they had already in their possession and the rest by degrees came into their hands as God had promised and sooner then they did they might have enjoyed it had it not been for their sinnes CHAP. XXII Vers 3. YE have not left your brethren these many dayes unto this day That for which Joshua here
Vers 4. Eleazar begat Phinehas Phinehas begat Abishua c. Eleazar succeeded his father Aaron in the high priesthood in the fourtieth yeare after their coming out of Egypt Numb 20.25 c. and 33.18 and was high priest all the time of Joshua and died immediately after him as may seem by the relation of their deaths together Josh 24.29 33. Phinehas his sonne that succeeded him was he that slew Zimri and Cozbi in the wildernesse and had thereupon a promise from God that the high priesthood should be settled upon him and his seed for ever see Numb 25.7 13. He succeeded his father Eleazar about the death of Joshua Josh 24.29 33. How long he lived high priest it is no where expressed but probable it is he was high priest all the time that the people served the Lord after Joshuahs death in the dayes of the elders that out-lived Joshua Judg. 2.7 and perhaps in the time of the first revolting of the people in the time of the Judges which must needs then be a matter of much grief to a man of such zeal as he was for it is evident that when the Israelites made warre against Benjamin he was high priest Josh 20.28 And Phinehas the sonne of Eleazar the sonne of Aaron stood before it in those dayes As for the next three that follow Abishau Bukki his sonne and Vzzi his sonne they were it seems high priests in those corruptest times of Israel under the Judges whereto agrees that which is by some said that in the dayes of Uzzi it was that Eli and so his posterity after him got the high priests office not being of Eleazars stock but of the stock of Ithamar and if so it were then the foure next following of the stock of Eleazar were never high priests to wit Zerahiah and Meraioth and Amariah and Ahitub but Zadok the sonne of Ahitub vers 8. was the first that recovered that dignity again which was in the dayes of Solomon who thrust out Abiathar of the posterity of Eli and of the stock of Ithamar from being high priest and put Zadok the sonne of Ahitub in his room 1. Kings 2.27 35. Vers 10. And Johanan begat Azariah he it is that executed the priests office in the temple that Solomon built in Jerusalem That is this is that Azariah of whom such honourable mention is made in the book of the Chronicles 2. Chron. 26.16 c. who did so worthily execute maintain the honour and office of the priesthood against the intrusion and usurpation of Uzziah the king of Judah and it is expressely noted that it was in the temple which Solomon built in Jerusalem because at the time when this was written there was another Temple in Jerusalem built by Zerub-babel Yet some understand these words of Johanan the father of Azariah that he was that Jehoiada that was high priest in the dayes of Athaliah by whom both the Temple and Common-wealth were preserved when they were in danger to be ruined by her Vers 13. And Shallum begat Hilâ—iah Who found the book of the Law in the dayes of Josiah 2. Kings 22.8 Vers 14. And Azariah begat Seraiah c. Seraiah was the high priest whom Nebuchadnezzar slew see 2. Kings 25.18 21. He was also the father or grand-father of Ezra Ezra 7.1 Now after these things in the reigne of Artaxerxes king of Persia Ezra the sonne of Seraiah the sonne of Azariah the sonne of Hilkiah c. and then Jehozadak his sonne was the father of Josuah who was so famous at the return of the Jews and the rebuilding of the Temple Hag. 1.1 In the second yeare of Darius the king in the sixth moneth in the first day of the moneth came the word of the Lord by Haggai the Prophet unto Zerubbabel the sonne of Shealtiel governour of Judah and to Josuah the sonne of Josedech the high priest Vers 19. And these are the families of the Levites according to their fathers That is of these before named were the severall families of the Levites called to wit the family of the Libnites c. Vers 20. Of Gershom Libni his sonne Jahath his sonne Zimmah his sonne c. Here follows a catalogue of those that were successively the Heads both of the Gershonites Kohathites and Merarites perhaps unto the dayes of David who did dispose of the Levites into new orders and whereas Zimmah is here said to be the sonne of Jahath thereby is meant that he was his grandchild for Shimei was the sonne of Jahath and Zimmah the sonne of Shimei vers 42 43. Vers 25. And the sonnes of Elkanah Amasai and Ahimoth The sonnes of Elkanah are here more particularly expressed because from him descended that Elkanah who was the father of Samuel Vers 26. As for Elkanah the sonnes of Elkanah Zophai his sonne c. This is another Elkanah who was the sonne of Mahath and grandchild of Amasai mentioned in the former verse as is evident vers 35 36. Vers 27. Jeroham his sonne Elkanah his sonne The father of Samuel Vers 31. And these are they whom David set over the service of song in the house of the Lord c. That is these are they that David made chief in the three quires of singers after the Ark had rest that is after it was brought to Davids house for before it was removed from one place to another to wit these mentioned in the sequel of this chapter Heman of the Kohathites ver 33. who was the chief and therefore had the middle quire and Asaph who stood on Hemans right hand v. 39. and was of the Gershonites and Ethan who was also called Jeduthun chap. 25.1 and was of the Merarites and stood on Hemans left hand ver 44. These were in their times famous men as being the chief singers and withall Prophets and pen-men of some of the Psalmes 2. Chron. 29.30 Moreover Hezekiah the king and the princes commanded the Levites to sing praise unto the Lord with the words of David and of Asaph the seer Vers 33. Heman a singer the sonne of Joel the sonne of Shemuel That is Samuel for Heman was Samuels grandchild Vers 50. And these are the sonnes of Aaron Eleazar his sonne Phinehas his sonne c. By occasion of the mention that is made of the severall offices and imployments of the priests in the foregoing verse the catalogue of the sonnes of Eleazar is here again set down unto the dayes of David by whom the priests were divided into foure severall orders Vers 57. And to the sonnes of Aaron they gave the cities of Judah c. And Simeon Josh 21.9 And they gave out of the tribe of the children of Judah and out of the tribe of the children of Simeon these cities which are here mentioned by name Vers 60. All their cities throughout their families were thirteen cities To wit the eleven here mentioned and Ain in Judahs portion and Gibeon in Benjamins which are reckoned amongst the rest Josh 21.16 17. but
are not here mentioned Vers 61. And unto the sonnes of Kohath which were left of the family of that tribe were cities given out of the half tribe c. That is to the rest of the sonnes of Kohath to wit those that were not of the priests the sonnes of Aaron there were cities given out of the half tribe of Manasseh that was placed within Jordan yea and by lot there were given them in all ten cities to wit foure out of the tribe of Ephraim and foure out of the tribe of Dan and two out of the half tribe of Manasseh most of which are expressed by name vers 67 c. and more fully Josh 21.21 Vers 65. And they gave by lot these cities which are called by their names To wit above ver 57 c. Vers 66. And the residue of the families of the sonnes of Kohath had cities c. Here the cities that were given to the rest of the Kohathites are expressed also by name which were before spoken of ver 61. as they are also Josh 21.20 though indeed many of the names there and here differ concerning which see the notes there Vers 69. And Aijalon with her suburbs c. These were given them out of the tribe of Dan as also Eltekeh and Gibbethon which are not here mentioned Josh 21.23 24. CHAP. VII Vers 1. NOw the sonnes of Issachar were Tola and Puah Jashub c. This Puah and Jashub we called Phuvah and Job Gen. 46.13 Having before set down the genealogies of Reuben Simeon Levi and Judah Issachars is next here related because Issachar was Jacobs next sonne by Leah Vers 2. Whose number was in the dayes of David two and twenty thousand and six hundred To wit when he appointed Joab to number the people 2. Sam. 24.1 Vers 3. And the sonnes of Uzzi Izrahiah and the sonnes of Izrahiah Michael and Obadiah and Joel Ishiah five That is there were five descended of Uzzi to wit Izrahiah and his foure sonnes Vers 4. And with them by their generations after the house of their fathers were bands of souldiers c. Hereby it is evident that there were six and thirty thousand men of the posterity of Uzzi alone so that the two and twenty thousand six hundred mentioned before vers 2. was the number of the posterity of Tola by his other sonnes Uzzi being excepted whose posterity are here numbred by themselves as being more then all the rest together Vers 5. And their brethren among all the families of Issachar were men of might c. That is all the children of Issachar together were fourescore and seven thousand men of might when Joab numbred them Vers 6. The sonnes of Benjamin Bela and Becher and Jodiael three Jediael is called Ashbel Gen. 46.21 Zebulun was the sixth sonne of Leah born next after Issachar but neither Zebuluns nor Dans genealogie is at all here mentioned perhaps because at the return of the people out of Babylon when it is thought that Ezra wrote this book their genealogies were not found Benjamins genealogy is therefore next inserted who was the sonne of Rachel yet here are but onely three of Benjamins ten sonnes mentioned perhaps because the posterity of these onely were numbred when Joab numbred the people vers 2. Vers 12. Shuppim also and Huppim c. That is these also were of Benjamins posterity Vers 13. The sonnes of Naphtali Jahziel and Guni and Jezer and Shallum the sonnes of Bilhah That is the grand-children for Bilhah Rachels handmaid was the mother of Naphtali whose sonnes these were Vers 14. The sonnes of Manasseh Ashriel whom she bare c. There was an Ashriel that was the sonne or one of the posterity of Gilead Numb 26.30 31. These are the sonnes of Gilead of Jeezer the family of the Jeezerites of Helek the family of the Helekites And of Asriel the family of the Asrielites and of Shechem the family of the Shechemites either therefore this was another Ashriel the immediate sonne of Manasseh by his wife whereas Machir was Manassehs sonne by his concubine the Aramitesse or else Ashriel is here reckoned onely as one of the posterity of Manasseh whom she bare that is either the wife of Gilead or the wife of Hepher the mother of Zelophehad and thence it follows vers 15. that Zelophehad who was the sonne of Hepher the sonne of Gilead Num. 27.1 was the second that is the second sonne of Hepher the younger brother of Ashriel And if we thus take Ashriel for one of the posterity of Gilead the sonne of Machir then we must understand that the following words But his concubine the Aramitesse bare Machir c. are onely added to shew that this Ashriel and the rest afterward mentioned were not the posterity of Manasseh by his wife but by his concubine the Aramitesse Vers 17. These were the sonnes of Gilead c. To wit Ashriel and Zelophehad above mentioned but not Peresh and Sheresh and his posteritie the last here mentioned for they were the sonnes of Machir by Maachah and so the brethren of Gilead Vers 18. And his sister Hammoleketh bare Ishhad c. That is Gileads sister Vers 19. And the sonnes of Shemida were Ahian c. And Shemida was also the sonne or of the stock of Gilead see Numb 26.30 32. Vers 21. Whom the men of Gath that were born in that land slew c. Either this must be referred to all those before named vers 20. the sonnes of Ephraim Shuthelah and Bered his sonne and Tahath his sonne c. to wit as taking them all to be the severall sonnes of Ephraim namely that Shuthelah vers 20. was the sonne of Ephraim and so also Bered who seems to be mentioned as the sonne of Shuthelah was another sonne of Ephraim and Tahath another and so on forward who were all slain by the men of Gath when the Israelites were in Egypt or else if this seems not so probable because then Ephraim should have two sonnes called Shuthelah and two called Tahath then though those in the twentieth verse be taken as severall generations to wit that Shuthelah was the sonne of Ephraim and Bered his grandchild and Tahath his grandchild and so forward yet Zabad the first mentioned vers 21. must be reckoned another sonne of Ephraim and Shuthelah and Ezer and Elead his grandchildren whom the men of Gath slew or thirdly if all those before mentioned be reckoned as severall succeeding generations to wit that Shuthelah the sonne of Ephraim begat Bered and Bered Tahath and Tahath Eladah and Eladah Tahath and Tahath Zabad and Zabad Shuthelah and Ezer and Elead then the words whom the men of Gath slew c. must be referred onely to some of the former of these here mentioned or fourthly that which follows vers 22. And Ephraim their father mourned many dayes and his brethren came to comfort him must be meant of Zabad who was called also Ephraim perhaps onely because he was the head of that tribe
of Edom southward were Kabzeel c. It is called Iekabzeel Neh. 11.25 Vers 32. All their cities are twenty nine with their villages There are indeed eight and thirty cities or towns named in the foregoing verses and therefore for the clearing of this some hold that because nine of these were afterwards assigned to the tribe of Simeon therefore it is said here that all the cities of Iudah in those parts were nine and twenty But the better answer I conceive is that nine and twenty of them onely were walled cities the other were the most famous towns and villages in those parts And here in this first catalogue of Iudahs cities in the Southern parts the most noted towns are expressed by name as well as the walled cities that in the following catalogues we may conceive the same to wit that there were many towns of note besides the cities there mentioned though they be not expressed by name as here they are Vers 36. Fourteen cities with their villages There are fifteen named in the foregoing verses either therefore one of them was no citie but some noted town or rather it may be very probably conceived that Gederah and Gederothaim were but one citie and therefore some reade it as it is in the margin of our bibles Gederah or Gederothaim Vers 62. And Nibshan and the citie of salt This citie might have its name The citie of salt from the salt pits that were there and the abundance of salt that was dayly made by the inhabitants of the citie Vers 63. As for the Jebusites the inhabitants of Jerusalem the children of Judah could not drive them out It is a question much argued amongst writers whether Jerusalem stood in Judahs or in Benjamins portion By many places of Scripture it seems evident that it was in Benjamins portion For in the 18. chapter of this book vers 28. it is reckoned amongst the cities that were in Benjamins lot and we see that Moses did before his death prophesie concerning Benjamin that the Temple which was in Jerusalem should be built in Benjamins portion for that is the drift of those words Deut. 33.12 And of Benjamin he said The beloved of the Lord shall dwell in safety by him and the Lord shall cover him all the day long and he shall dwell between his shoulders yea and Jer. 6.1 the inhabitants of Jerusalem are expressely called the children of Benjamin O ye children of Benjamin gather your selves to flee out of the midst of Jerusalem and Judg. 1.21 the same that is here said of the children of Judah is likewise there said of the children of Benjamin The children of Benjamin did not drive out the Jebusites the inhabitants of Jerusalem but the Jebusites dwell with the children of Benjamin in Jerusalem unto this day But now again by other places of Scripture it seems as evident that Jerusalem was in Judahs portion For first mention is here made of it as one of Judahs cities The Jebusites dwell with the children of Judah at Jerusalem unto this day and secondly Jerusalem is said to have been taken by the children of Judah Judg. 1.8 and thirdly it is reckoned as the great priviledge of the children of Judah that the Lord in his Temple dwelt amongst them Psal 78.67 68 69. Moreover he refused the Tabernacle of Joseph and chose not the tribe of Ephraim but chose the tribe of Judah the mount Sion which he loved and he built his Sanctuary like high places c. but the truth herein is that Jerusalem stood in the border of these two tribes and so was part in Judahs and part in Benjamins portion and therefore the places of Scripture before cited do not any way contradict one another the fort of Sion and some of the south skirts of the city were in Judahs portion but the greatest part of the city in Benjamins and therefore it may well be that when they went about to expell the Jebusites that dwelt there both Iudah and Benjamin joyned their forces together as Judah and Simeon did in a like case Judg. 1.3 And Judah said unto Simeon his brother Come up with me into my lot that we may fight aganst the Canaanites and I likewise will go with thee into thy lot As for that which is here said concerning Jerusalem to wit that the children of Judah could not drive out the Jebusites thence and the like we see is said concerning the children of Benjamin Judg. 1.21 we must know that the Iebusites continued in Ierusalem unto Davids time Indeed Adoni-zedek the king of Jerusalem was slain by Ioshua chap. 10.23 26. for he was one of those five kings that made warre against Gibeon though we find no mention there of his taking Ierusalem yea and it is expressely said Iudg. 1.8 that afterwards the children of Iudah took the city of Jerusalem and burnt it with fire that is some part of it Well but yet the fort of Sion which was the chief strength of Ierusalem was not at that time taken by them for that the Iebusites held till David took it 2. Sam. 5 6 7. yea and it seems that afterward the Iebusites did also by the help of this fort recover the city again at least so farre that they forced the Israelites to let the Iebusites dwell there amongst them as it is said here For in the dayes of the Iudges we see that Iebus that is Ierusalem was still inhabited by the Iebusites Iudg. 19.12 We will not turn aside hither into the city of a stranger that is not of the children of Israel saith the Levite there concerning Iebus we will passe over to Gibea But however we must not think that this which is said here that the children of Judah could not drive them out is added by way of excusing them no but rather to their shame and reproch for though the fort of Sion was a place of great strength so that when David set himself down with his army before it the Iebusites scorned him bragged that their lame and blind and impotent people should defend it against him 2. Sam. 5.6 Yet God would certainly have driven them out according to his promise had they not been wanting to themselves But they grew slothfull and faint hearted and by these and other their sinnes provoked the Lord to withdraw himself from them and so then indeed they could not drive out the inhabitants but were glad to purchase peace upon any tearms according to that Iudg. 2.20 21. And the anger of the Lord was hot against Israel and he said Because this people hath transgressed my covenant which I commanded their fathers and have not hearkned to my voice I also will not hence forth drive out any from before them of the nations which Joshua left when he died c. CHAP. XVI Vers 1. ANd the lot of the children of Joseph fell from Jordan by Jericho unto the water of Jericho on the east c. It is the opinion of some learned writers that
from east to west from the lake of Sodome to Kirjath-jearim this from the west to the east from Kirjath-jearim to the lake of Sodome concerning which see the note there Vers 18. And passed along toward the side over against Arabah north-ward and went down unto Arabah Which is called Beth-arabah chap. 15.6 Vers 21. Now the cities of the tribe of the children of Benjamin according to their families were Jericho c. It is no wonder though in severall places of Scripture we find mention made of some cities belonging to the tribe of Benjamin that are not in this Catalogue For many cities might be built in after times And besides it is probable that all the cities in Benjamins lot are not here mentioned but such onely as were requisite to be known because by them the bounds of their lot are described or for the better understanding of some other passages in the sacred history where these cities are mentioned And the like we must conceive of the catalogues that are given us in the following chapter of the cities that were in the severall lots of the other tribes CHAP. XIX Vers 1. ANd their inheritance was within the inheritance of the children of Judah That is the inheritance of the tribe of Simeon the reason whereof is given vers 9. Out of the portion of the children of Judah was the inheritance of the children of Simeon for the part of the children of Judah was too much for them therefore the children of Simeon had their inheritance within the inheritance of them It seems that they that were sent to search the land not yet divided that they might part it into seven lots for the seven remaining tribes chap. 18.4 found that the portion which Joshua and Eleazar and the other Commissioners for the dividing of the land had formerly at Gilgal assigned to the tribe of Judah was farre too large considering what they now found left for the other tribes upon this second review and therefore agreed unanimously with those said Commissioners for the dividing of the land that a whole portion for one of the tribes that had not yet their inheritance should be taken off that which was formerly given to Judah and so should make one of the lots for the seven tribes besides some other cities which they took also from Judah to be as part of another lot as is shown afterwards verse 40.41 and no doubt the children of Judah acknowledged the equitie thereof and were well contented with it and so when they came to draw the lots of the seven remaining tribes in the second place next after Benjamins came out this lot which was wholly taken out of Judahs portion for the tribe of Simeon And thus by the providence of God first there being one tribe to be seated within that portion formerly given to Judah the lot fell upon this tribe which was fewest in number of all the tribes as we may see by the account that was taken of them at the last numbring of the people Num. 26.14 and secondly this tribe of Simeon having their portion assigned them within the portion of Iudah and so being as it were intermingled with them nor having an inheritance apart by themselves that was now fulfilled which Jacob long since prophesied of them Gen. 49.7 I will divide them in Jacob and scatter them in Israel concerning which see what is noted there Vers 2. And they had in their inheritance Beer-sheba c. The bounds of this tribes portion is not described as are the bounds of most of the other tribes onely the chief cities and towns are named that were in their lot and that because their inheritance was within the inheritance of Judah whose bounds are formerly described chap. 15. As for Beersheba and Sheba that are first here mentioned they are but the longer and shorter names of one and the same city for it is said vers 6. that in this first catalogue there are thirteen cities and there are fourteen if Beersheba and Sheba be counted two severall cities and besides 1. Chron. 4.28 where these cities of the Simeonites are again reckoned up there is mention made of Beersheba onely Vers 3. And Hazar-shual and Balah and Azem c. Called Ezem 1. Chron. 4.29 as the following Eltolad is called also Tolad and Bethul Bethuel Vers 5. And Ziklag and Bethmarcaboth and Hazor-susah c. Which is called 1. Chron. 4.31 Hazar-susim as also in the following verse Bethlebaoth is called chap. 15.32 Lebaoth and in the 1. Chron. 4.31 Bethbirei and Sharuhen seems to be the same that is called Shauraim Vers 7. Ain Remmon and Ether c. Or Etam 1. Chron. 4.32 this with the rest here mentioned are there called villages and therefore are here severally reckoned by themselves Vers 9. For the part of the children of Judah was too much for them c. See the note above vers 1. Vers 10. And the border of their inheritance was Sarid c. This Sarid was the Southwest corner of Zebuluns portion from whence it is said that it went West-ward to Maralah and so to Dabbasheth which stood by the sea from whence it went Northward by the sea coast as farre as the river near Iokneam And thus having the midland sea on the West and the sea of Galilee on the East that was truly accomplished which Jacob said concerning this tribe Gen. 49.13 Zebulun shall dwell at the haven of the sea and he shall be for a haven of ships and Moses also Deut. 33.18 And of Zebulun he said Rejoyce Zebulun in thy going out c. Vers 12. And turned from Sarid eastward toward the sunne rising c. As before the western border was drawn from Sarid vers 10. so here the south border begins also at Sarid and so is carried on eastward as farre as Japhia Vers 13. And from thence passeth on along on the east to Gittah-Hepher c. That is from Japhia a city in the south-east corner of Zebuluns portion the border turns northward along by the sea of Galilee and within a while goeth up into the land as farre as Remmon and Neah where is the going out of the utmost reach of the eastern border Vers 14. And the border compasseth it on the north side to Hannathon c. This is the north border which fetcheth a compasse and so ends in the valley of Jiphthah-el Vers 15. And Idalah and Bethlehem This was not that Bethlehem where Christ was afterward born for that was in the tribe of Judah this in the tribe of Zebulun Twelve cities with their villages There are more then twelve mentioned in the foregoing verses but it seems some of them were border towns that stood in the other tribes that had their lots next to Zebuluns and but twelve of them onely were belonging to the tribe of Zebulun Vers 18. And their border was toward Jezreel c. Because Issachars portion lay between Benjamins and Zebuluns whose borders have been already described
spoken an expression this is therefore much like that Jer. 2.12 Be ye astonished O ye heavens at this and be horribly afraid be ye very desolate saith the Lord. Vers 29. Joshua the sonne of Nun the servant of the Lord dyed being an hundred and ten years old It is manifest there were but foure hundred and eighty years betwixt the building of the Temple and the Israelites coming out of Egypt 1. Kings 6.1 And it came to passe in the foure hundred and fourescore years after the children of Israel were come out of the land of Egypt in the fourth yeare of Solomons reigne over Israel in the moneth Zif which is the second moneth that he began to build the house of the Lord of which yielding fourty years to their travels in the wildernesse and then to Othniels government fourty years Judges 3.11 to Ehuds eighty years verse 30. to Shamgars some few moneths vers 31. to Deborah and Barak fourty Judges 5.31 to Gideon fourty Judges 8.28 to Abimelech three Judges 9.22 to Tolah three and twenty Judges 10.2 and to Jair two and twenty years verse 3. to Jephthe six Judges 12.7 and Ibzan seven verse 9. and Elon ten verse 11. and Abdon eight verse 14. to Samson twenty Judges 15.20 to Elie fourty 1. Sam. 4.18 to Samuel and Saul fourty years Acts 13.21 to David fourty 1. Kings 2.11 and then foure to Solomon ere he began the temple all together make foure hundred sixty and three and then the most left for Joshua will be seventeen though there should be no interregnum between the Judges Vers 32. And the bones of Joseph which the children of Israel brought up out of Egypt buried they in Shechem c. Joseph had commanded the Israelites to carry his bones with them out of Egypt Gen. 50.25 which accordingly they did Exod. 13.19 Here now we are told where they buried his bones to wit in Shechem in a parcell of ground which Jacob bought of the sonnes of Hamor the father of Shechem for an hundred pieces of silver Which was doubtlesse the parcell of a field mentioned Gen. 33.19 which Jacob bought of Hamor the father of Shechem and which when he lay upon his deathbed he gave to Joseph as a speciall legacy Gen 48.22 and this might well be the reason why they buried Josephs bones here whereas it is evident that his forefathers and their wives too were buried in the cave of Machpelah Gen. 49.29 30 31. I am saith Jacob to be gathered unto my people Bury me with my fathers in the cave that is in the field of Ephron the Hittite In the cave that is in the field of Machpelah which is before Mamre in the land of Canaan which Abraham bought with the field of Ephron the Hittite for a possession of a burying place There they buried Abraham and Sarah his wife there they buried Isaac and Rebekah his wife and there I buried Leah to wit because it was the inheritance peculiarly bequeathed him by his father Indeed by the words of Stephen Acts 7.15 16. it might seem that all the Patriarchs the sonnes of Jacob and so Josephs bones amongst the rest were buried not in the field which Jacob bought Gen. 33.19 but in the burying-place which Abraham bought of Ephron in Machpelah Gen. 23.17 18. For though Stephen saith they were buried in a field bought of the sonnes of Emor the father of Sichem yet withall he saith expressely that they were buried in a Sepulchre purchased by Abraham Acts 7.15 16. So Jacob went down into Egypt and died he and our fathers and were carried over into Sichem and laid in the sepulchre which Abraham bought for a summe of money Now we reade of no burying place which Abraham bought but that of the cave of Machpelah which he bought of Ephron the Hittite Gen. 23.16.17 c. wherein it is evident Gen. 49.29 30 31. that Abraham and Sarah and Isaac and Rebekah and Jacob Leah were buried but to this I answer that many of our best Expositours are of opinion that this place in the Acts of the Apostles is corrupted by the carelesnesse or rather the mistake of those that transcribed the copies yet because it is dangerous to allow that the Greek copies of the new Testament are generally falsified in any one passage I think it is better answered that though Stephen said that the fathers were laid in the sepulchre of Abraham bought for a summe of money of Emor the father of Sichem yet he meant onely thereby that they were laid in the Sepulchre which the posterity or the sonne of Abraham bought of the sonnes of Emor and that was Jacob because that which the sonne doth the father may be said to do in him and if so then it seems that the bones of the other Patriarchs the sonnes of Jacob were buried here together with Josephs At what time they buried Josephs bones here it is not expressed yet by the last clause of this verse where it is said of this parcell of ground and it became the inheritance of the children of Joseph it appears that it was done after they had rest in the land and had divided the whole countrey of Canaan amongst the tribes and so this part of Canaan where this parcell of land lay falling then by lot to the sonnes of Joseph to whom Jacob at his death had bequeathed it here they buried the bones of their father Vers 33. And they buried him in a hill that pertained to Phinehas his sonne which was given him in mount Ephraim Because the cities that fell to the priests by lot were taken out of the tribe of Judah and out of the tribe of Simeon and out of the tribe of Benjamin chap. 21.4 and thence it might seem strange that Eleazar or Phinehas his sonne should have any inheritance in mount Ephraim wherein for that cause Eleazar the high priest should be buried since mount Ephraim belonged to the sonnes of Joseph therefore in the last clause of this book it is expressely said that it belonged to Phinehas by warrant of a speciall and extraordinary gift and not by the designement of the lot which was drawn forth for the priests it was given him in mount Ephraim Whether this hill was given to Eleazar or Phinehas it is not fully and clearly expressed the words seem rather to imply that it was given to Phinehas they buried him in a hill which pertained to Phinehas his sonne which was given him in mount Ephraim but yet it may be that the place where Eleazar was buried is here said to be the hill of Phinehas or a hill that pertained to Phinehas not because it did not first pertain to Eleazar but with relation to future times whence it seems it was usually called the hill of Phinehas and the reason that Expositours give why this place in mount Ephraim was by extraordinary gift conferred upon the high priest whereas the priests had their dwellings by lot in the other tribes above mentioned are
they began presently to provoke the Lord with their sinnes For it is evident that these cities were not long after this inhabited by the Philistines chap. 3.1 2 3. Now these are â—he nations which the Lord left to prove Israel by them c. Namely five Lords of the Philistines c. and so again 1. Sam. 6.17 Now these are the golden Emerods which the Philistines returned for a trespasse-offering unto the Lord For Ashdod one for Gaza one for Askelon one for Gath one for Ekron one As for Ekron one of the cities here mentioned it was in Dans lot Josh 19.43 therefore it seems that the tribe of Judah joyned with those of Dan as well as with those of Simeon for the clearing of their coasts the rather because they could not hold those cities they had gotten from the Philistines if they had let them alone in this neighbouring citie Vers 19. And the Lord was with Judah and he drave out the inhabitants of the mountain This clause and the Lord was with Judah is added to shew of what difficulty their attempts were if the Lord had not been with them and withall to condemne their cowardise that durst not proceed in their conquests against the inhabitants of the valleys having had such incouraging experience of Gods assistance But could not drive out the inhabitants of the valley because they had chariots of iron Their own fears disabling them and God for their sinnes withdrawing himself from them Concerning these chariots of iron see the note Josh 17.16 Vers 21. And the children of Benjamin did not drive out the Jebusites that inhabited Jerusalem c. See Josh 15.63 Vers 26. And the man went into the land of the Hittites and built a city Whence it seems probable that the Israelites did not onely spare his life and the life of his family but also gave him a rich reward to wit for shewing them the way into Bethel as is before said Vers 27. Neither did Manasseh drive out the inhabitants of Bethshean c. See the note Josh 17.12 Thus in the dayes after the death of Joshua when it seems they had no one set over them in chief but were onely governed by the joynt-authority of the Elders in each tribe they began to be remisse in endeavouring to drive out the remainder of the Canaanites that dwelt in the land but were content to make peace with them and this was the first step of their defection from God which did by degrees lead them into grosser sinnes and greatly provoked the Lord to displeasure against them Vers 35. Yet the hand of the house of Joseph prevailed so that they became tributaries That is though the Danites were sorely for a time oppressed by the Amorites as is expressed before vers 34. And the Amorites forced the children of Dan into the mountain for they would not suffer them to come down to the valley yet afterward with the help of the sonnes of Joseph who bordered upon Dans portion and came up to aid them they prevailed against them so that they became tributaries Vers And the coast of the Amorites was from the going up to Akrabbim from the rock and upward This is added to shew how the Israelites through their own sloth suffered themselves to be hemmed in with these accursed enemies CHAP. II. Vers 1. ANd an Angel of the Lord came up from Gilgal to Bochim It is very hard to determine whether this were an Angel indeed or some man either priest or prophet that by speciall commission was sent at this time from God unto the people to reprove them for their sinnes The word in the originall may well be translated either angell or messenger as it is in the margin of our bibles and the reasons are very considerable which have moved many to think that it was some man of God that was sent to them to wit first because it is said that he came up from Gilgal not that he came down from heaven and so appeared to them and secondly because he spake in a generall assembly as is evident vers 4. where it is said that he spake unto all the children of Israel whereas the apparitions of Angels have been usually onely to some particular men in private But yet the most of Expositours conceive that it was a true Angel and that having assumed for this present service the body of man the Scripture therefore speaks of him as a man that he came up from Gilgal to Bochim and this they hold 1. Because he speaks after the manner of Angels not thus saith the Lord as the prophets were wont to speak but as in the person of God I made you to go up out of Egypt and 2. Because the Authour of this book elsewhere speaks differently of the prophet and the Angel as chap. 6.8 The Lord sent a prophet unto the children of Israel which said unto them Thus saith the Lord God of Israel I brought you up from Egypt and brought you forth out of the house of bondage But then vers 12. And the Angel of the Lord appeared unto him that is to Gideon and said unto him The Lord is with thee thou mighty man of valour Yea some hold that it was the sonne of God the Angel of the covenant who was wont thus to appear to the fathers and that because he ascribes here to himself that which was the work of God as the bringing this people out of Egypt and the making of a covenant with them However most probable it is that this was done in the dayes of the Elders that outlived Joshua and that before they began to worship the Gods of the nations they dwelt amongst for else doubtlesse this Angel or messenger of the Lord would have reproved them for their idolatry as well as for making a league of peace with the land It seems therefore that finding themselves sorely annoyed by the Canaanites in severall parts of the land there was an assembly of the people called of all the tribes that they might consult what was fit to be done and so thereupon the Lord sent his Angel to them with a message and very likely it is that it was some place about Shiloh where the people were now met together which upon occasion of the peoples weeping here was called Bochim that is weepers For first thither the tribes used to assemble themselves especially at their three solemn feasts and some generall assembly of the people there was at this time as is before noted and secondly the people did offer sacrifices there vers 5. and that they might onely do where the altar and tabernacle was Vers 2. But ye have not obeyed my voice why have ye done this That is consider how great and inexcusable your sinne is for these words why have ye done this are as much in effect as if he had said that they had not the least colour for that they had done and that if they were challenged to give a reason
Penuel and slew the men of the city That is the Magistrates of the city as before he did in Succoth Vers 18. Then said he unto Zebah and Zalmunna What manner of men were they whom ye slew at Tabor Because it seems Gideon had heard that these kings had slain certain men of the Israelites that had retired themselves for shelter to some strong holds or caves in mount Tabor and feared they vvere his brethren because they amongst others sought to provide for the saving of their lives in those dangerous times as others did chap. 6.2 And the hand of Midian prevailed against Israel and because of the Midianites the children of Israel made them the dens which are in the mountains and caves and strong holds and had not been since heard of therefore he inquires thus concerning the men vvhom they had there slain And they answered As thou art so were they each one resembled the children of a king This may be meant of that likenesse of feature which is usually amongst brethren but plainly it intends that they were of a goodly and comely personage even as Gideon was and such as might well beseem men of a princely and Royall stock Vers 19. As the Lord liveth if ye had saved them alive I would not slay you The meaning is that he would have spared them because they had shown mercy to his brethren and hereby he expresseth his sorrow for his brethren and shews what little cause they had now to expect any mercy from him Vers 20. And he said unto Jether his first-born Up and slay them Upon him he imposeth this work rather then any other first that he might train him up even from his young years to draw his sword against the enemies of Israel and to be severe to those that should rise up against God and against his people secondly that it might be done by way of avenging the death of his brethren thirdly because it would adde if not to the pain yet to the dishonour of their death to die by such a hand Vers 21. Then Zebah and Zalmunna said Rise thou and fall upon us for as the man is so is his strength In this reply of theirs first they descant in a kind of scornfull manner upon that command of Gideons setting a child to take away their lives whereas indeed this his young heire had scarce courage enough to look them in the face secondly they provoke Gideon as impatient of delay to rise upon them himself and rid them out of the way thereby discovering their contempt of death and how much they scorned to begge life and withall happely being loath to die by the hand of a child And took away the ornaments that were on their Camels necks As the memorials of this great victory Vers 22. Then the men of Israel said unto Gideon Rule thou over us both thou and thy sonne c. That is they offered to receive him to be their king and to settle the kingdome successively upon his posterity Vers 23. And Gideon said unto them I will not rule over you c. That is not as a king he judged Israel unto his dying day but it was the kingdome of Israel the regall power which they proffered and he now refused and that upon this ground because the accepting of this would have been in a manner a taking of the government out of Gods hand the Lord saith he shall rule over you Not that God rules not by kings as well as by other kind of Magistrates but because God had established this way of governing them by Judges who had not so great a degree of soveraignty and power over the people as kings usually have were extraordinarily called of God withall because God had in his Law expressed that in case they should desire a king they were to take him whom the Lord should choose Deu. 17.14 15 When thou art come to the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee and shalt possesse it and shall dwell therein and shalt say I will set a king over me like all the nations that are about Thou shalt in any wise set him a king over thee whom the Lord thy God shall chuse One from among thy brethren shalt thou set over thee thou mayest not set a stranger over thee which is not thy brother Therefore he takes this rash proffer of changing the government to be a shaking of Gods government because they went about to change it without Gods leave and refuseth to give any consent to it all which is evident by that which the Lord said of the Israelites desiring a King in Samuels dayes 1. Sam. 8.6 7. But the thing displeased Samuel when they said Give us a King to judge us and Samuel prayed unto the Lord And the Lord said unto Samuel Hearken unto the voice of the people in all that they say unto thee for they have not rejected thee but they have rejected me that I should not reigne over them Vers 26. And the weight of the golden ear-rings which he requested was a thousand and seven hundred shekles of gold c. Which is esteemed to be according to the account of our weight 2380 pounds it is not impossible that all this should be spent in the making of one ephod as it is said vers 27. especially if it were made as that of Aarons with a brestplate set with so many precious stones of great value Exod. 28.15 16.17 But the words will well enough bear that of part of this gold now given him he made an ephod Vers 27. And Gideon made an ephod thereof and put it in his city Not a linen ephod but such a one as that which was made for the high priest of gold blue purple scarlet c. Exod. 28.6 It is probable enough that he intended it onely as a memoriall of this their victory over the Midianites the monument being of the very prey which was there taken though afterwards it became a snare both to him and to his house But why then did he make an ephod rather then any other monument this indeed seems to imply that his purpose was to make use also of this ephod either in offering sacrifices in his own house and then under this ephod all the priestly garments may be comprehended or else thereby to enquire what the will of the Lord was according to the judgement of Urim Not considering that this previledge was onely annexed to Aarons ephod wherein was the brestplate of judgement with the Urim and Thummim and therein therefore he sinned greatly and brought Gods wrath upon his posterity And all Israel went thither a whoring after it c. Either they went thither as to a famous Oracle to inquire concerning the will of God in any doubtfull cases or else drawn with the superstitious conceits they had entertained of this ephod they set up there a place of sacrificing contrary to the expresse letter of the Law of God or else they resorted
proffered to them yet it was sufficient that they were content to be serviceable to God and man in their places and desired not this sovereigne power and fables need not answer in every particular that which they are intended to shadow forth and generally indeed all men of worth good men and fearing God that are content to do good in their places and no way ambitious of being exalted to high places and lastly by the bramble that is a dry fruitlesse base shrub the curse of the earth good for nothing but to be cast into the fire may be meant all worthlesse ambitious persons but Abimelech in particular who grew out of the baser hedgegrow of a concubine and had not been able to lift up his head so high as he did but that he was supported by the men of Shechem and by their help scrambled up to be king of Israel one that was alwayes as fruitlesse as base that had no substance in him nor was likely to yield any comfort to those that trusted in him but rather to vex and to tear and to fetch bloud from the people by his tyrannous government as he had done already from his brethren the other sonnes of Gideon Vers 9. But the olive tree said unto them Should I leave my fatnesse wherewith by me they honour God and man c. To wit God in his offerings lamps and other services of the Tabernacle and man both in anointing men to be kings priests and Prophets and likewise in many other civill uses wherein great and rich and honourable persons were wont to refresh themselves with oyl especially in oderiferous costly ointments Now in this passage of this fable and the like must be conceived of the answer returned by the figtree and vine too Jotham seeks to imply not onely that good men and men of worth are best contented to be servicable to God and man in their places and desire not to be exalted to places of magistracy and sovereignty over others as they had seen in Gideons refusing to be king and likewise the reasons why as Gideon had so other wise and good men would refuse thus to be promoted namely first because the place of soveraignty though it might seem most glorious yet would certainly bring them greater cares and deprive them of much of those comforts which in their private condition they did formerly enjoy and secondly because such great promotion doth usually make vines and fig trees and olive trees fruitlesse and barren that is it makes them farre lesse serviceable to God and man then formerly they were Vers 14. Then said the trees unto the bramble c. See the note above vers 8. Vers 15. Come and put your trust under my shadow c. That is come under my government and protection and thus tyrants are wont to pretend the common good of the people when they seek themselves onely He that thrusts himself under a bramble shall be in an ill case not able to stirre hand or foot but he is in danger to be torn and scratched and such is the misery of those that live under a tyrants government they shall not live as free subjects but shall ever and anon be in danger to have their clothes torn from their backs yea their skinnes from their bones and if the greatest of them anger their lord never so little nothing but fire and destruction is to be expected and therefore is that clause added Let fire come out of the bramble and devoure the Ceders of Lebanon that is the nobles and men of greatest renown amongst the people as indeed tyrants are wont principally to seek the destruction of them Vers 20. And let fire come out from the men of Shechem and from the house of Millo and devoure Abimelech This was accomplished when his scull was broken by a piece of a milstone thrown down upon his head by a woman from the tower of Thebez vers 50.53 for Thebez was doubtlesse a place of strength belonging to the Shechemites why else did Abimelech in the quarrell he had against the Shechemites go up and encamp against Thebez and so losing his life by means of the warre raised betwixt him and the Shechemites it might well be said that a fire that came out from them devoured Abimelech Vers 21. And Jotham ran away and fled and went to Beer c. This may be that city in the tribe of Simeon which is called Baalath-Beer Josh 19.8 where he saved himself either by living there unknown or by the aid of the inhabitants who perhaps with other cities had not yet stooped to the tyrannous yoke of Abimelech Vers 22. When Abimelech had reigned three years over Israel c. A while therefore he prospered in his usurped sovereignty but it was but a while for just when he might now begin to hope that his kingdome was established and the curse of Jotham might seem vain and not likely to have effect then on a sudden God brought that upon him which Jotham had prophetically foretold See Hab. 2.6 Shall not all these take up a parable against him and a taunting proverb against him and say Wo to him that encreaseth that which is not his how long and to him that ladeth himself with thick clay Vers 23. Then God sent an evill spirit betwixt Abimelech and the men of Shechem c. That is a spirit of envy malice and discord to wit not by instâ—lling any evill motions into their minds but in a way of just revenge as by letting loose Satan upon them the great kindle-cole and make-bate of the world to raise jealousies and grudges and discontents between them by giving them up to the lusts and corruptions of their own wicked hearts and by giving occasions of enraging them more and more one against another For in this regard though the wickednesse of these things were wholly of themselves and not of God as the stink of the dunghill riseth not from the sunne though the sunne shining upon it be the occasion of it yet because these things were also through the concurring providence of God it may well be said that God sent this spirit of division between them especially if we consider that God did all this as a judge raising these divisions and combustions that hereby he might punish them for their former damnable agreeing together for the ruine of others and so making their treachery one against another the just reward of their joynt treachery against others as it follows in the next words And the men of Shechem dealt treacherously with Abimelech that is they revolted from him whom themselves had chosen for their king Vers 25. And the men of Shechem set liers in wait for him in the top of the mountains c. Thus at first by these men set to lie in ambush they attempted secretly ere their purpose of casting off his government was discovered to have killed or at least to have seized upon the person of Abimelech onely these
answered c. and her father his father in law in severall places Why Bethlehem from whence this Levite had his concubine is called Bethlehem-Judah See in the note chap. 17.7 Vers 2. And his concubine plaid the whore against him went away from him unto her fathers house c. It seems upon some discoverie of her whoredome or at least some suspition the Levite had of it there arose some quarrell betwixt him and his concubine and thereupon she left him and went home again to her fathers house who was too ready to entertain her The sad effects that followed upon this Levites taking a concubine makes it manifest that even in those times though it were an ordinary thing amongst all sorts of men even amongst the Levites to have concubines yet God was not pleased with it from the beginning it was not so saith our Saviour Matth. 19.8 Vers 3. And her husband arose and went after her to speak friendly unto her and to bring her again having his servant with him and a couple of asses To wit to carrie their provision and happely that both himself and his concubine if she would return with him might sometimes ease themselves by riding as occasion served Vers 11. Come I pray thee and let us turn in unto this citie of the Jebusites and lodge in it For though the children of Judah had taken from the Jebusites that part of Jebus that is Jerusalem which was in their tribe chap. 1.8 The children of Judah had fought against Jerusalem and had taken it and had smitten it with the edge of the sword yet out of that part which belonged to Benjamin on which side the Levite was now travelling the Jebusites were not wholly expelled chap. 1.21 The children of Benjamin did not drive out the inhabitants of Jerusalem but the Jebusites dwell in Jerusalem with the children of Benjamin unto this day Vers 14. And the sunne went down upon them when they were by Gibeah which belongeth to Benjamin There was a Gibeah in the tribe of Judah Josh 15.57 to distinguish this from that it is here called Gibeah which belongeth to Benjamin and else where Gibeah of Saul 1. Sam. 11.4 it is thought to be the same which Josh 21.17 is called Gebah which was a citie given to tho Priests the sonnes of Aaron Against which it makes nothing that here it is said vers 16. the men of the place were Benjamites for the priests did not dwell alone in such cities though they were the lords and owners of them Vers 15. And they turned aside thither to go in and to lodge in Gibeah Though it were a pious resolution in the Levite rather to chose to lodge in Gibeah then in Jebus and that because Jebus was a citie wherein the idolatrous and uncircumcised Jebusites dwelt yet this proved fatall both to him and his as the best counsell may have the worst successe and that because there is a secret over-ruling hand of God that may by this means bring about what he hath determined for the punishment of some other sinnes which we mind not Vers 16. And behold there came an old man from his work out of the field at even which was also of mount Ephraim Though he were an old man yet he followed his work in the field and that untill the even which is doubtlesse noted to his praise As for that last clause that he was also of mount Ephraim that no doubt is expressed to intimate that this amongst other things made the old man the readier to entertain the Levite when he heard him say vers 18. that he was of mount Ephraim too Vers 18. But I am now going to the house of the Lord. The Tabernacle at this time was in Shiloh Josh 18.1 and Shiloh was in the tribe of Ephraim either therefore there the Levites dwelling was or else he meant first to go to the house of the Lord to do his service there and then afterwards to passe forward on his journey homeward However it is probable that he mentions his going to the house of the Lord that he might know him to be a Levite Vers 22. Behold the men of the city certain sonnes of Belial beset the house round about c. A like fact to this we have formerly related concerning the Sodomites of which see the note Gen. 19.4 as for this term Sonnes of Belial see Deut. 13.13 Vers 24. Behold here is my daughter a mayden and his concubine them I will bring out now c. See the note Gen. 19.8 Vers 25. So the man took his concubine and brought her forth unto them and they knew her c. In the foregoing words it is said that when the old man the Levites host proffered these varlets his daughter a virgin and the Levites concubine thereby to take them off from that unnaturall uncleannesse wherewith they meant to satisfie their lust upon the Levite himself the men would not hearken to him yet when immediately by the Levites means his concubine was indeed brought out unto them and left amongst them they fell upon her and defiled her and that in such an outrageous barbarous manner that she died of it which was doubtlesse because having once an object for their lust in their power they could not forbear and so forgetting their former resolutions they laid hold on her and abused her in a most inhumane and execrable manner Vers 26. Then came the woman in the dawning of the day and fell down at the doore of the mans house c. That is she fell down dead at the doore of the mans house and there lay till break of day when her husband going forth to see what was become of her found her dead and thus though her husband had pardoned her whoredome yet God punished it and that too with her own sinne adulterie was her sinne and adulterie was her death she had dealt treacherously against her husband one would not satisfie her but she exposed her self to the lust of a stranger and now she was abused to death by the lusts of so many barbarous wretches whom she knew not that by so abusing her they murdered her Vers 27. And her hands were upon the threshold This is added to implie the reason of that which follows why the Levite spake to her to rise vers 28. And he said unto her Vp let us be going to wit because she lay in such a manner her hands laid upon the threshold under her head as if she had been asleep Vers 29. He took a knife and laid hold on his concubine and divided her together with her bones into twelve pieces and sent her into all the coasts of Israel That is to each of the twelve tribes a piece for to the tribe of Levi that was dispersed through all the land there was none sent and this was done that the fight of her dead limbs might affect them the more and stirre them up to be the more zealous for the punishment
Libnah a citie in his own countrey and then no wonder though he stayed not to prosecute his victory in the land of Edom. Then Libnah revolted at the same time Libnah was a great citie within Judah one of the royall cities of Canaan when Joshua entred it Josh 10.29 30 It was by him given to the priests the sonnes of Aaron Josh 21.13 and now it rebelled against Joram because he had made such innovations in Religion and forced the people to idolatry as is expressed 2. Chron. 21.10 11. which no marvell though the Levites were least able to endure It is much indeed that one citie alone should venture upon such an attempt but perhaps the kings absence whilest he was in Edom and the discontent of the people yea perhaps some correspondence they might have with the Philistines who ere long invaded the land 2. Chron. 21.16 17. gave them hope of abettors and how they sped in the conclusion the Scripture expresseth not Vers 24. And Joram slept with his fathers and was buried with his fathers in the citie of David Before his death there was a prophesie in writing delivered him from Elijah the Prophet 2. Chron. 21.12 which threatned both his people his children his wives and his own body and immediatly what was threatned came to passe for first the Philistines and Arabians brake into Judea took the kings house made spoil of his goods and slew or carried away all his children save the youngest onely and then afterwards the Lord smote him with a grievous disease in his bowels which left him not till his guts fell out and being dead he was obscurely buried in the citie of David but not in the sepulchres of his Ancestours the kings of Judah and that without the lamentations and solemnities that had been used in other princes funeralls 2. Chron. 21.16 All the time of this kings reigne another king of the same name reigned in Israel to wit Joram the sonne of Ahab his brother in law And Ahaziah his sonne reigned in his stead He is elswhere called Jehoahaz 2. Chron. 21.17 and Azariah 2. Chron. 22.6 He was the youngest sonne of Joram for all the elder sonnes were slain or carried away by the Philistines 2 Chron. 21.17 In S. Matthews catalogue of the kings of Judah it is said Matth. 1.8 that Jehoshapoat begat Joram and Joram begat Ozias and so this Ahaziah who succeeded Joram and Joash who succeeded Ahaziah 2 Kings 11.2 and Amaziah who succeeded Joash 2. Kings 12.21 and was the father of Ozias are quite left out but this I conceive was onely because the Evangelist resolving to distribute the Ancestours of Christ into three severall ranks according to the three great changes that had happened in the state and finding just fourteen in the first rank from Abraham to David he laboured to reduce the other ranks to the same number too as knowing that equall numbers are a help to the memory and so to make just fourteen generations in that rank also from David to the captivitie he leaves out Ahaziah Joash and Amaziah and them perhaps rather then others because they were the next from Ahab by Athaliah the daughter of Ahab and wife of Joram Vers 25. In the twelfth yeare of Joram the sonne of Ahab king of Israel c. Yet chap. 9.29 it is said that he began to reigne in the eleventh yeare of Joram king of Israel which is because the yeare of Ahaziahs reigne did concurre with the latter end of the eleventh and the beginning of the twelfth yeare of Joram king of Israel Vers 26. Two and twentie years old was Ahaziah when he began to reigne c. In the 2. Chron. 22.2 it is said that he was two and fourty years old when he began to reigne we may reconcile this thus that he was two and fourty years old when he began to reigne alone by himself but that he was made king also when he was but two twenty years old his father yet living but then that must be granted which is before noted upon 1. Kings 22.42 to wit that Asa also was made king in his fathers life time and indeed because this answer may have some strong objections made against it therefore others do rather reconcile these two places thus to wit that those words in 2. Chron. 22.2 Fourty and two years old was Ahaziah when he began to reigne must be understood of the continuance of Omries pedigree who was great grandfather to this Ahaziah Omri reigned as sole king six years 1. Kings 16.23 Ahab two and twenty 1. Kings 16.29 Ahaziah his sonne two 1. Kings 22.51 Joram twelve 2. Kings 3.1 And thus Omries stock continued fourty and two years and therefore it is said that Ahaziah who was of that stock by his mother Athaliah in his two and fourtieth yeare began his reigne But this answer methinks is more unsatisfactory then the other the words in 2. Chron. 22.2 will hardly bear such an interpretation And his mothers name was Athaliah the daughter of Omri king of Israel That is the grandchild of Omri the daughter of Ahab the sonne of Omri vers 18. Vers 27. He was the sonne in law of the house of Ahab That is the sonne of Ahabs sonne in law to wit the sonne of Joram by Athaliah Ahabs daughter yet perhaps even he also by his mother Athaliahs perswasion married a daughter of the house of Ahab though by another wife Joash was born who succeeded him in the throne chap. 12.1 Vers 28. And he went with Joram the sonne of Ahab to the warre against Hazael the king of Syria in Ramoth Gilead Toward the latter end of his reigne Joram king of Israel undertook the recovery of Ramoth Gilead out of the hands of Hazael then king of Syria which Ahab his father had formerly attempted with ill successe and Ahaziah the king of Judah his sisters sonne joyned with him in that expedition as Jehoshaphat had formerly done with Ahab Vers 29. And king Joram went back to be healed in Jezreel of the wounds which the Syrians had given him at Ramoth c. That is Ramoth Gilead having wonne the town and then manned it strongly leaving the chief of his army there behind him with his captains of whom Jehu was the chief he withdrew himself to Jezreel to be cured of the wounds which he received in this siege of Ramoth Gilead See the note chap. 9.14 CHAP. IX Vers 1. ANd Elisha the prophet called one of the children of the prophets and said unto him Gird up thy loins c. That is prepare thy self and go with speed the excution that was to be done by Jehu upon the house of Ahab was to be dispatched presently whilest Jehu had the army with him at Ramoth Gilead and Jehoram was gone from thence to Jezreel and therefore the prophet that was to give him his commission was sent with such speed which may also be the reason why aged Elisha went not himself but sent one of
c That is all these families were of the stock of Hananiel Vers 22. And the sonnes of Shechaniah Shemaiah and the sonnes of Shemaiah Hattush and Igeal and Bariah and Neariah and Shaphat six That is the sonnes of Shechaniah were six to wit reckoning his sonne Shemaiah and his five grand-children the sonnes of Shemaiah CHAP. IIII. Vers 1. THe sonnes of Judah Pharez Hezron c. That is the posterity of Judah for onely Pharez was Judahs sonne immediately and Hezron was the sonne of Pharez and Carmi called also Chelubai and Caleb was the sonne of Hezron chap. 2.9 18. and Hur was the sonne of Carmi or Caleb chap. 2.19 and Shobal was the sonne of Caleb the sonne of Hur chap. 2.50 and Reaiah or Haroe chap. 2.52 was the sonne of Shobal and because this Shobals posterity were here to be more fully expressed vers 2. therefore in the first verse it is shewen briefly how he was lineally descended from Judah from hence unto the tenth chapter the families of all the severall tribes are expressed besides Zebulon and Dan and Dan some say is omitted because there was but one family of that tribe to wit the family of Hushim Gen. 46.23 But why the genealogies of these two tribes are omitted I conceive we cannot certainly say yet see what is noted afterwards chap. 7.6 Vers 3. And these were of the father of Etam c. It is not expressed who was this father of Etam that is this father of the inhabitants of Etam onely by the last words of the fourth verse it is clear that both he and his sonnes were of the posterity of Hur and perhaps by Shobal the sonne of Caleb the sonne of Hur as those were mentioned in the former verses for in the latter end of the fourth verse with reference to that which went before it is said These are the sonnes of Hur the first-born of Ephratah that is the first born of Caleb by his wife Ephratah chap. 2.19 the father of Beth-lehem for he was the grandfather of Salmah who was the father of the inhabitants of Beth-lehem chap. 2.50 51. Vers 5. And Ashur the father of Tekoa had two wives c. This Ashur was the posthumus sonne of Hezron born of his wife Abiah after Hezron was dead chap. 2.24 Vers 8. And Coz begat Anub and Zobebah and the families of Aharhel c. It is not expressed here who was the father of this Coz but by the joyning of these words to those that went before it may seem that he was the sonne of Helah or Ethnan the last mentioned in the former verse and so of the posterity of Ashur Vers 9. And Jabez was more honourable then his brethren c. Jabez is here mentioned as the father of one of the forenamed families of Aharhel Vers 11. And Chelub the brother of Shuah begat Mehir c. This Chelub is as I conceive added as another head of the families of Aharhel mentioned vers 8. Vers 12. These are the men of Recah That is these sonnes of Chelub were the inhabitants of Rechah Vers 13. And the sonnes of Kenaz Othniel c. It is not expressed whose sonne Kenaz was but probably it may be thought by the adding of this to that which went before that he was the sonne of Chelub vers 11. Vers 14. And Meonothai begat Ophrah Who was also as it seems the sonne of Othniel as was also Hathath mentioned in the former verse And Seraiah begat Joab the father of the valley of Charashim c. Or craftsmen which stood in the confines of Judah and Benjamin See Neh. 11.31 35. Vers 15. And the sonnes of Caleb the sonne of Jephunneh c. Who was the sonne of Kenaz or at least of his posterity and therefore called the Kenezite Numb 32.12 Vers 16. And the sonnes of Jehaleleel Ziph and Zipha Tyria and Asareel And Jehaleleel was also it seems the sonne of Kenaz mentioned the last in the foregoing verse Vers 17. And the sonnes of Ezra were Jether c. The sonne as it seems of Asareel And she bare Miriam c. To wit the wife of Ezra Vers 18. And his wife Jehudijah bare Jered c. This was a second wife of Ezra And these are the sonnes of Bithiah the daughter of Pharaoh which Mered took c. The sonnes of Ezra being named here we have next expressed the sonnes of Mered who was one of Ezra's sonnes vers 17. He had it seems also two wives the first Bithiah the daughter of Pharaoh as here it is expressed the second Hodiah the sister of Maham vers 19. and by these Mered had the father of Keilah the Garmite and Eshtemoa the Maachathite vers 19. This I conceive is the plainest exposition of this intricate place Vers 20. And the sonnes of Shimon were Amnon and Rinnah Ben-hanan and Tilon It is not expressed whose sonne this Shimon was onely it is generally thought that he is reckoned as one of Chelubs posterity mentioned vers 11. And the sonnes of Ishi were Zoheth and Ben-zoeth This Ishi was happely the sonne of Filan before mentioned Vers 22. Who had the dominion in Moab c. It seems that in the times when the Moabites were tributaries to the kings of Judah these sonnes of Shelah before mentioned were by their appointment governours in Moab Vers 23. These were the potters and those that dwelt amongst plants and hedges there they dwelt with the king for his work That is of these sonnes of Shelah came also those that were potters and those that dwelt amongst plants and hedges that is those that were gardiners and husbandmen to the kings of Judah Vers 24. The sonnes of Simeon were Nemuel c. Because the tribe of Simeon had their inheritance assigned them within the inheritance of the children of Judah Josh 19.1 therefore is their genealogy here joyned with Judahs Here are but five sonnes of Simeon mentioned whereas Gen. 46.10 there are six mentioned which may be because happely one of them never came to be reckoned as the head of a family yea happely died without issue nor need we be troubled that their names are not the same since the Israelites had usually two or three severall names Vers 31. These were their cities unto the reigne of David Either this is added because there was in the cities of Simeon some alteration in Davids time to wit because one of these cities namely Ziklag having been in the possession of the Philistines was by Achish given to David and thenceforth being a part of the crown land of the kings of Judah it was ordinarily reckoned one of Judahs cities or else onely to expresse that even unto Davids time not excluding the times following they were esteemed the inheritance of Simeon as here is said Yet some understand this clause thus These were their cities unto the reigne of David that is so long as the kingdome of Judah remained in Davids posterity to wit untill the captivity of Babylon Vers 32. And
free-will-offerings of God c. As these before mentioned vers 12 13. had the charge of keeping the offerings and tithes and dedicate things so Kore and those under him mentioned vers 15. had the charge of distributing them to the priests and Levites to whom they belonged Vers 16. Beside their genealogie of males from three years old and upward c. Here is expressed more particularly who they were to whom these holy things were distributed to wit besides the males of three years old and upward but under the age of twenty years who had also their portion allotted to them vers 18. they give both to the priests and Levites from twenty years old and upwards as they came in their courses to do their service in the house of the Lord yea and besides vers 18. they gave to all that were registred in the genealogies of the priests and Levites even to their little ones their wives and their sonnes and their daughters through all the congregation Vers 18. For in their set office they sanctified themselves in holinesse That is in this their office to which they were sanctified and set apart they did faithfully and in an holy manner discharge that trust that was reposed in them and were carefull to keep themselves from pollution that so they might be capable of eating these holy things Vers 19. Also the sonnes of Aaron the priests which were in the fields of the suburbs of their cities c. That is besides those mentioned before vers 14 15. that were to distribute the holy things to those that dwelt in Jerusalem or that came up thither in their severall courses for the service of the Temple there were others also chosen who were then expressed by name of the priests that dwelt in the other cities of the kingdome that were to give portions to the priests and Levites that were then abiding in those places and not attending in Jerusalem upon the service of God in the Temple CHAP. XXXII Vers 1. SEnnacherib king of Assyria came and entred into Judah and encamped against the fenced cities c. See the notes 2. Kings 18.13 c. for many severall passages in this chapter And thought to winne them for himself That is resolved to take them for himself and indeed accordingly he took many of them 2. Kings 18.13 Vers 3. He took counsel with his princes and his mighty men to stop the waters of the fountains which were without the citie That is to fill up the fountains and springs with earth and to carry the waters by pipes under ground into the citie that so the Assyrians if they came against Jerusalem might be distressed for want of water whilest they within the citie were abundantly supplyed And they did help him That is his Princes and his mighty men aided him in this work Vers 4. Who stopt all the fountains and the brook that ran through the midst of the land c. That is the brook Gihon of which vers 30. that ranne through the midst of the countrey where Jerusalem stood See 1. Kings 1.33 Vers 10. Whereon do ye trust that ye abide in the siege in Jerusalem That is being thus shut up without hope of help yet notwithstanding ye still refuse to yield up the citie Vers 17. He wrote also letters to rail on the Lord God of Israel c. To wit upon Rabshakeh his return to Sennacherib at Libnah and the report of the approch of Tirhakah the king of Ethiopia See 2. Kings 19.8 9. Vers 18. To affright them and to trouble them that they might take the citie That is to sow the seeds of discord amongst them whilest some should desire to have the citie yielded up and others should oppose them Vers 20. For this Hezekiah the king and the prophet Isaiah the sonne of Amos prayed and cried to heaven See 2. Kings 19.14 15. and at the same time Isaiah sent a comfortable message to Hezekiah wherein he prophesied of the destruction of Sennacherib and the good of Sion Vers 21. And the Lord sent an angel which cut off all the mighty men of valour c. A hundred fourescore and five thousand in all and that in one night See the note 2. Kings 19.35 They that came forth of his own bowels slew him there with the sword That is his own sonnes Adramelech and Sherezer 2. Kings 19.27 Vers 22. Thus the Lord saved Hezekiah c. and guided them on every side He governed them and took care of them all as a shepheard doth of his flock Vers 24. In those dayes Hezekiah was sick to the death and prayed unto the Lord. The prophet Isaiah having visited him and told him that he should die and not live See the notes 2. Kings 20.1 2 3. And he spake unto him and he gave him a signe That is he assured him that he should recover and confirmed that promise with a signe from heaven but withall he gave him also direction to lay a lump of figgs to the boil See the 2. Kings 20.5 c. Vers 25. For his heart was lifted up And this he manifested in shewing his riches to the Babylonian Embassadours for which he was reproved and threatned by the prophet Isaiah See 2. Kings 20.12 19. Vers 27. And Hezekiah had exceeding much riches and honour c. This is added to shew what it was for which his heart was lifted up as was said before v. 25. Vers 30. This same Hezekiah also stopped the upper water-course of Gihon c. The brook Gihon divided it self into two streams one of which Hezekiah turned from the usuall channell and brought it strait down into the west side of the city of David Vers 31. Howbeit in the businesse of the embassadours of the princes of Babylon c. To wit the Embassadours which Besodach-Baladan king of Babylon by the advice of his princes sent unto him see 2. Kings 20.12 God left him to try him that he might know all that was in his heart See Gen. 22.1 CHAP. XXXIII Vers 1. MAnasseh was twelve years old when he began to reigne See 2. Kings 21.1 c. many severall notes for the explanation of this chapter Vers 6. And he caused his children to passe through the fire in the valley of the sonne of Hinnom See 2. Kings 16.3 Vers 10. And the Lord spake to Manasseh and to his people To wit by his servants the prophets the summe of their prophesies is expressed 2. Kings 21.11 15. Vers 11. Wherefore the Lord brought upon them the captains of the host of the king of Assyria which took Manasseh among the thorns It seems he thought to hide himself in some woods and thickets and therefore it is said here that he was taken among the thorns The like is said concerning the Israelites when they were affraid of the Philistines that were come into their land 1. Sam. 13.6 When the men of Israel saw they were in a strait then they did hide themselves in caves and in