priests were seated partly in the tribe of Judah where the Temple was afterwards to be built and partly in the two bordering tribes of Simeon and Benjamin and so whilst they shall approve their piety and devotion to the service of God in being content to leave their dwellings to go up unto Jerusalem in their turns to attend upon the service of God yet withall God provides for their ease that their journeys might not be over long and burthensome to them As for their assigning as it is here said of thirteen cities to the priests herein God and the governours of Israel had respect unto succeeding times when the posterity of Aaron should be encreased for at present there were but a few priests not enough to inhabit the half part of one city but in the mean time they were given them for their possession which they might dispose of according to the right they had in them For that they might so do and that the cities of the Levites were given them not onely for their habitation but also for their possessions and inheritance is evident in severall places See Levit. 25.32 Vers 9. And they gave out of the tribe of the children of Judah and out of the tribe of the children of Simeon these cities c. Judahs and Simeon cities are reckoned together because Simeons portion lay within Judahs Chap. 19.1 And the second lot came forth to Simeon even for the tribe of the children of Simeon according to their families and their inheritance was within the inheritance of the children of Judah Vers 11. And they gave them the city of Arbah the father of Anak which is Hebron in the hill-countrey of Judah c. This city with the land adjoyning was formerly given to Caleb which makes it more probable that the cities for the Levites were taken by lot because it was not likely that both Hebron and Debir should be taken out of his inheritance without the Lords speciall direction But God requiring it Caleb willingly yields the rather because the countrey and land about was the chief of his possession which was not taken from him and besides no doubt they desired to have the Levites who were to instruct them in the Law of the Lord to be seated amongst them Vers 15. And Holon with her suburbs Called Hilen 1. Chron. 6.58 Vers 16. And Ain with her suburbs and Juttah with her suburbs c. This citie Ain is not reckoned 1. Chron. 6. amongst the cities given to the sonnes of Aaron nor Gibeon here named vers 17. As for Juttah it is called Ashan 1. Chron. 6.59 Some indeed conceive that it is Ain that is there called Ashan but there is an argument against that which seems to me unanswerable to wit that Ashan and Ain are in one verse distinctly named amongst the cities of Simeon chap. 19.7 and so also Almon vers 18. is called Alemeth 1. Chron. 6.60 Vers 22. And Kibzaim with her suburbs Called Jokneam 1. Chron. 6.68 Vers 23. And out of the tribe of Dan Eltekeh with her suburbs Gibbethon with her suburbs These two cities are omitted 1. Chron. 6. And Aijalon and Gath-rimmon are there ioyned with the cities of Ephraim but that they were given out of Dans portion is evident by this place Vers 25. And out of the half tribe of Manasseh Tanach with her suburbs c. To wit that half of the tribe which was seated within Jordan next Dan and Ephraim Tanach here mentioned is called Aner 1. Chron. 6.70 as also Gath-Rimmon is there called Bileam Vers 27. And Beeshterah with her suburbs Called Ashtaroth 1. Chron. 6.71 Vers 28. And out of the tribe of Issachar Kishon with her suburbs c. Which is called Kedesh as also Dabareh is called Deberath and Jarmuth Ramoth and Engannim Anem 1. Chron. 6.72.73 Vers 30. And out of the tribe of Asher Mishal with her suburbs c. Called Mashal 1. Chron. 6.74 as also Helkath is there called Hukok Vers 32. And Hammoth-dor with her suburbs c. Called Hammon 1. Chron. 6.76 as also Kartan is there called Kirjathaim Vers 34. Out of the tribe of Zebulun Jokneam with her suburbs c. Jokneam and Kartah are omitted 1. Chron. 6.77 and Dimnah is there called Rimmon and Nahalal Tabor Vers 36. And out of the tribe of Reuben Bezer with her suburbs and Jahazah with her suburbs It is said that Bezer was a city of refuge chap. 20.8 though it be not here expressed as it is in the rest vers 13.20 27. which why it is here omitted we cannot say As for Jahazah it is called Jahzah 1. Chron. 6. Vers 41. All the cities of the Levites within the possession of the children of Israel were fourty and eight cities with their suburbs It may seem strange why in the 19. chapter we reade of but two and twenty cities given to the tribe of Asher nineteen to the tribe of Naphtali yea but twelve cities to the tribe of Zebulun and yet the Levites which were nothing so many in number as they have here eight and fourty cities given them I answer first that besides the cities mentioned the other tribes had many towns and villages wherein they dwelt which the Levites had not secondly that the chief cities are onely there mentioned it is evident in severall places that many cities which were in the severall portions of those tribes are not there set down thirdly others did no doubt inhabit these cities besides the Levites and fourthly it is no wonder though God deals bountifully with the Levites that were to be imployed in his speciall service Vers 43. And the Lord gave unto Israel all the land which he sware to give unto their fathers and they possessed it and dwelt therein Though there were much of the land out of which the Canaanites were not yet expelled we cannot therefore call this truth in question for First he had given them all by lot divided amongst them which was a kind of actuall enstating them in it Secondly he had put them into possession of the greatest part of it neither had he promised them otherwise but that they should possesse it by degrees See Exod. 23.29 So both clauses of that which is here said are true to wit first That God had given them all the land which he swore to give unto their fathers and secondly That they possessed it and dwelt therein onely we must conceive of them severally thus to wit 1. That he had already actually given them the whole land and enabled them to divide it amongst their tribes and 2. That they possessed it and dwelt therein to wit by degrees a great deal of it they had already in their possession and the rest by degrees came into their hands as God had promised and sooner then they did they might have enjoyed it had it not been for their sinnes CHAP. XXII Vers 3. YE have not left your brethren these many dayes unto this day That for which Joshua here
Vers 4. Eleazar begat Phinehas Phinehas begat Abishua c. Eleazar succeeded his father Aaron in the high priesthood in the fourtieth yeare after their coming out of Egypt Numb 20.25 c. and 33.18 and was high priest all the time of Joshua and died immediately after him as may seem by the relation of their deaths together Josh 24.29 33. Phinehas his sonne that succeeded him was he that slew Zimri and Cozbi in the wildernesse and had thereupon a promise from God that the high priesthood should be settled upon him and his seed for ever see Numb 25.7 13. He succeeded his father Eleazar about the death of Joshua Josh 24.29 33. How long he lived high priest it is no where expressed but probable it is he was high priest all the time that the people served the Lord after Joshuahs death in the dayes of the elders that out-lived Joshua Judg. 2.7 and perhaps in the time of the first revolting of the people in the time of the Judges which must needs then be a matter of much grief to a man of such zeal as he was for it is evident that when the Israelites made warre against Benjamin he was high priest Josh 20.28 And Phinehas the sonne of Eleazar the sonne of Aaron stood before it in those dayes As for the next three that follow Abishau Bukki his sonne and Vzzi his sonne they were it seems high priests in those corruptest times of Israel under the Judges whereto agrees that which is by some said that in the dayes of Uzzi it was that Eli and so his posterity after him got the high priests office not being of Eleazars stock but of the stock of Ithamar and if so it were then the foure next following of the stock of Eleazar were never high priests to wit Zerahiah and Meraioth and Amariah and Ahitub but Zadok the sonne of Ahitub vers 8. was the first that recovered that dignity again which was in the dayes of Solomon who thrust out Abiathar of the posterity of Eli and of the stock of Ithamar from being high priest and put Zadok the sonne of Ahitub in his room 1. Kings 2.27 35. Vers 10. And Johanan begat Azariah he it is that executed the priests office in the temple that Solomon built in Jerusalem That is this is that Azariah of whom such honourable mention is made in the book of the Chronicles 2. Chron. 26.16 c. who did so worthily execute maintain the honour and office of the priesthood against the intrusion and usurpation of Uzziah the king of Judah and it is expressely noted that it was in the temple which Solomon built in Jerusalem because at the time when this was written there was another Temple in Jerusalem built by Zerub-babel Yet some understand these words of Johanan the father of Azariah that he was that Jehoiada that was high priest in the dayes of Athaliah by whom both the Temple and Common-wealth were preserved when they were in danger to be ruined by her Vers 13. And Shallum begat Hilâ—iah Who found the book of the Law in the dayes of Josiah 2. Kings 22.8 Vers 14. And Azariah begat Seraiah c. Seraiah was the high priest whom Nebuchadnezzar slew see 2. Kings 25.18 21. He was also the father or grand-father of Ezra Ezra 7.1 Now after these things in the reigne of Artaxerxes king of Persia Ezra the sonne of Seraiah the sonne of Azariah the sonne of Hilkiah c. and then Jehozadak his sonne was the father of Josuah who was so famous at the return of the Jews and the rebuilding of the Temple Hag. 1.1 In the second yeare of Darius the king in the sixth moneth in the first day of the moneth came the word of the Lord by Haggai the Prophet unto Zerubbabel the sonne of Shealtiel governour of Judah and to Josuah the sonne of Josedech the high priest Vers 19. And these are the families of the Levites according to their fathers That is of these before named were the severall families of the Levites called to wit the family of the Libnites c. Vers 20. Of Gershom Libni his sonne Jahath his sonne Zimmah his sonne c. Here follows a catalogue of those that were successively the Heads both of the Gershonites Kohathites and Merarites perhaps unto the dayes of David who did dispose of the Levites into new orders and whereas Zimmah is here said to be the sonne of Jahath thereby is meant that he was his grandchild for Shimei was the sonne of Jahath and Zimmah the sonne of Shimei vers 42 43. Vers 25. And the sonnes of Elkanah Amasai and Ahimoth The sonnes of Elkanah are here more particularly expressed because from him descended that Elkanah who was the father of Samuel Vers 26. As for Elkanah the sonnes of Elkanah Zophai his sonne c. This is another Elkanah who was the sonne of Mahath and grandchild of Amasai mentioned in the former verse as is evident vers 35 36. Vers 27. Jeroham his sonne Elkanah his sonne The father of Samuel Vers 31. And these are they whom David set over the service of song in the house of the Lord c. That is these are they that David made chief in the three quires of singers after the Ark had rest that is after it was brought to Davids house for before it was removed from one place to another to wit these mentioned in the sequel of this chapter Heman of the Kohathites ver 33. who was the chief and therefore had the middle quire and Asaph who stood on Hemans right hand v. 39. and was of the Gershonites and Ethan who was also called Jeduthun chap. 25.1 and was of the Merarites and stood on Hemans left hand ver 44. These were in their times famous men as being the chief singers and withall Prophets and pen-men of some of the Psalmes 2. Chron. 29.30 Moreover Hezekiah the king and the princes commanded the Levites to sing praise unto the Lord with the words of David and of Asaph the seer Vers 33. Heman a singer the sonne of Joel the sonne of Shemuel That is Samuel for Heman was Samuels grandchild Vers 50. And these are the sonnes of Aaron Eleazar his sonne Phinehas his sonne c. By occasion of the mention that is made of the severall offices and imployments of the priests in the foregoing verse the catalogue of the sonnes of Eleazar is here again set down unto the dayes of David by whom the priests were divided into foure severall orders Vers 57. And to the sonnes of Aaron they gave the cities of Judah c. And Simeon Josh 21.9 And they gave out of the tribe of the children of Judah and out of the tribe of the children of Simeon these cities which are here mentioned by name Vers 60. All their cities throughout their families were thirteen cities To wit the eleven here mentioned and Ain in Judahs portion and Gibeon in Benjamins which are reckoned amongst the rest Josh 21.16 17. but
are not here mentioned Vers 61. And unto the sonnes of Kohath which were left of the family of that tribe were cities given out of the half tribe c. That is to the rest of the sonnes of Kohath to wit those that were not of the priests the sonnes of Aaron there were cities given out of the half tribe of Manasseh that was placed within Jordan yea and by lot there were given them in all ten cities to wit foure out of the tribe of Ephraim and foure out of the tribe of Dan and two out of the half tribe of Manasseh most of which are expressed by name vers 67 c. and more fully Josh 21.21 Vers 65. And they gave by lot these cities which are called by their names To wit above ver 57 c. Vers 66. And the residue of the families of the sonnes of Kohath had cities c. Here the cities that were given to the rest of the Kohathites are expressed also by name which were before spoken of ver 61. as they are also Josh 21.20 though indeed many of the names there and here differ concerning which see the notes there Vers 69. And Aijalon with her suburbs c. These were given them out of the tribe of Dan as also Eltekeh and Gibbethon which are not here mentioned Josh 21.23 24. CHAP. VII Vers 1. NOw the sonnes of Issachar were Tola and Puah Jashub c. This Puah and Jashub we called Phuvah and Job Gen. 46.13 Having before set down the genealogies of Reuben Simeon Levi and Judah Issachars is next here related because Issachar was Jacobs next sonne by Leah Vers 2. Whose number was in the dayes of David two and twenty thousand and six hundred To wit when he appointed Joab to number the people 2. Sam. 24.1 Vers 3. And the sonnes of Uzzi Izrahiah and the sonnes of Izrahiah Michael and Obadiah and Joel Ishiah five That is there were five descended of Uzzi to wit Izrahiah and his foure sonnes Vers 4. And with them by their generations after the house of their fathers were bands of souldiers c. Hereby it is evident that there were six and thirty thousand men of the posterity of Uzzi alone so that the two and twenty thousand six hundred mentioned before vers 2. was the number of the posterity of Tola by his other sonnes Uzzi being excepted whose posterity are here numbred by themselves as being more then all the rest together Vers 5. And their brethren among all the families of Issachar were men of might c. That is all the children of Issachar together were fourescore and seven thousand men of might when Joab numbred them Vers 6. The sonnes of Benjamin Bela and Becher and Jodiael three Jediael is called Ashbel Gen. 46.21 Zebulun was the sixth sonne of Leah born next after Issachar but neither Zebuluns nor Dans genealogie is at all here mentioned perhaps because at the return of the people out of Babylon when it is thought that Ezra wrote this book their genealogies were not found Benjamins genealogy is therefore next inserted who was the sonne of Rachel yet here are but onely three of Benjamins ten sonnes mentioned perhaps because the posterity of these onely were numbred when Joab numbred the people vers 2. Vers 12. Shuppim also and Huppim c. That is these also were of Benjamins posterity Vers 13. The sonnes of Naphtali Jahziel and Guni and Jezer and Shallum the sonnes of Bilhah That is the grand-children for Bilhah Rachels handmaid was the mother of Naphtali whose sonnes these were Vers 14. The sonnes of Manasseh Ashriel whom she bare c. There was an Ashriel that was the sonne or one of the posterity of Gilead Numb 26.30 31. These are the sonnes of Gilead of Jeezer the family of the Jeezerites of Helek the family of the Helekites And of Asriel the family of the Asrielites and of Shechem the family of the Shechemites either therefore this was another Ashriel the immediate sonne of Manasseh by his wife whereas Machir was Manassehs sonne by his concubine the Aramitesse or else Ashriel is here reckoned onely as one of the posterity of Manasseh whom she bare that is either the wife of Gilead or the wife of Hepher the mother of Zelophehad and thence it follows vers 15. that Zelophehad who was the sonne of Hepher the sonne of Gilead Num. 27.1 was the second that is the second sonne of Hepher the younger brother of Ashriel And if we thus take Ashriel for one of the posterity of Gilead the sonne of Machir then we must understand that the following words But his concubine the Aramitesse bare Machir c. are onely added to shew that this Ashriel and the rest afterward mentioned were not the posterity of Manasseh by his wife but by his concubine the Aramitesse Vers 17. These were the sonnes of Gilead c. To wit Ashriel and Zelophehad above mentioned but not Peresh and Sheresh and his posteritie the last here mentioned for they were the sonnes of Machir by Maachah and so the brethren of Gilead Vers 18. And his sister Hammoleketh bare Ishhad c. That is Gileads sister Vers 19. And the sonnes of Shemida were Ahian c. And Shemida was also the sonne or of the stock of Gilead see Numb 26.30 32. Vers 21. Whom the men of Gath that were born in that land slew c. Either this must be referred to all those before named vers 20. the sonnes of Ephraim Shuthelah and Bered his sonne and Tahath his sonne c. to wit as taking them all to be the severall sonnes of Ephraim namely that Shuthelah vers 20. was the sonne of Ephraim and so also Bered who seems to be mentioned as the sonne of Shuthelah was another sonne of Ephraim and Tahath another and so on forward who were all slain by the men of Gath when the Israelites were in Egypt or else if this seems not so probable because then Ephraim should have two sonnes called Shuthelah and two called Tahath then though those in the twentieth verse be taken as severall generations to wit that Shuthelah was the sonne of Ephraim and Bered his grandchild and Tahath his grandchild and so forward yet Zabad the first mentioned vers 21. must be reckoned another sonne of Ephraim and Shuthelah and Ezer and Elead his grandchildren whom the men of Gath slew or thirdly if all those before mentioned be reckoned as severall succeeding generations to wit that Shuthelah the sonne of Ephraim begat Bered and Bered Tahath and Tahath Eladah and Eladah Tahath and Tahath Zabad and Zabad Shuthelah and Ezer and Elead then the words whom the men of Gath slew c. must be referred onely to some of the former of these here mentioned or fourthly that which follows vers 22. And Ephraim their father mourned many dayes and his brethren came to comfort him must be meant of Zabad who was called also Ephraim perhaps onely because he was the head of that tribe
free-will-offerings of God c. As these before mentioned vers 12 13. had the charge of keeping the offerings and tithes and dedicate things so Kore and those under him mentioned vers 15. had the charge of distributing them to the priests and Levites to whom they belonged Vers 16. Beside their genealogie of males from three years old and upward c. Here is expressed more particularly who they were to whom these holy things were distributed to wit besides the males of three years old and upward but under the age of twenty years who had also their portion allotted to them vers 18. they give both to the priests and Levites from twenty years old and upwards as they came in their courses to do their service in the house of the Lord yea and besides vers 18. they gave to all that were registred in the genealogies of the priests and Levites even to their little ones their wives and their sonnes and their daughters through all the congregation Vers 18. For in their set office they sanctified themselves in holinesse That is in this their office to which they were sanctified and set apart they did faithfully and in an holy manner discharge that trust that was reposed in them and were carefull to keep themselves from pollution that so they might be capable of eating these holy things Vers 19. Also the sonnes of Aaron the priests which were in the fields of the suburbs of their cities c. That is besides those mentioned before vers 14 15. that were to distribute the holy things to those that dwelt in Jerusalem or that came up thither in their severall courses for the service of the Temple there were others also chosen who were then expressed by name of the priests that dwelt in the other cities of the kingdome that were to give portions to the priests and Levites that were then abiding in those places and not attending in Jerusalem upon the service of God in the Temple CHAP. XXXII Vers 1. SEnnacherib king of Assyria came and entred into Judah and encamped against the fenced cities c. See the notes 2. Kings 18.13 c. for many severall passages in this chapter And thought to winne them for himself That is resolved to take them for himself and indeed accordingly he took many of them 2. Kings 18.13 Vers 3. He took counsel with his princes and his mighty men to stop the waters of the fountains which were without the citie That is to fill up the fountains and springs with earth and to carry the waters by pipes under ground into the citie that so the Assyrians if they came against Jerusalem might be distressed for want of water whilest they within the citie were abundantly supplyed And they did help him That is his Princes and his mighty men aided him in this work Vers 4. Who stopt all the fountains and the brook that ran through the midst of the land c. That is the brook Gihon of which vers 30. that ranne through the midst of the countrey where Jerusalem stood See 1. Kings 1.33 Vers 10. Whereon do ye trust that ye abide in the siege in Jerusalem That is being thus shut up without hope of help yet notwithstanding ye still refuse to yield up the citie Vers 17. He wrote also letters to rail on the Lord God of Israel c. To wit upon Rabshakeh his return to Sennacherib at Libnah and the report of the approch of Tirhakah the king of Ethiopia See 2. Kings 19.8 9. Vers 18. To affright them and to trouble them that they might take the citie That is to sow the seeds of discord amongst them whilest some should desire to have the citie yielded up and others should oppose them Vers 20. For this Hezekiah the king and the prophet Isaiah the sonne of Amos prayed and cried to heaven See 2. Kings 19.14 15. and at the same time Isaiah sent a comfortable message to Hezekiah wherein he prophesied of the destruction of Sennacherib and the good of Sion Vers 21. And the Lord sent an angel which cut off all the mighty men of valour c. A hundred fourescore and five thousand in all and that in one night See the note 2. Kings 19.35 They that came forth of his own bowels slew him there with the sword That is his own sonnes Adramelech and Sherezer 2. Kings 19.27 Vers 22. Thus the Lord saved Hezekiah c. and guided them on every side He governed them and took care of them all as a shepheard doth of his flock Vers 24. In those dayes Hezekiah was sick to the death and prayed unto the Lord. The prophet Isaiah having visited him and told him that he should die and not live See the notes 2. Kings 20.1 2 3. And he spake unto him and he gave him a signe That is he assured him that he should recover and confirmed that promise with a signe from heaven but withall he gave him also direction to lay a lump of figgs to the boil See the 2. Kings 20.5 c. Vers 25. For his heart was lifted up And this he manifested in shewing his riches to the Babylonian Embassadours for which he was reproved and threatned by the prophet Isaiah See 2. Kings 20.12 19. Vers 27. And Hezekiah had exceeding much riches and honour c. This is added to shew what it was for which his heart was lifted up as was said before v. 25. Vers 30. This same Hezekiah also stopped the upper water-course of Gihon c. The brook Gihon divided it self into two streams one of which Hezekiah turned from the usuall channell and brought it strait down into the west side of the city of David Vers 31. Howbeit in the businesse of the embassadours of the princes of Babylon c. To wit the Embassadours which Besodach-Baladan king of Babylon by the advice of his princes sent unto him see 2. Kings 20.12 God left him to try him that he might know all that was in his heart See Gen. 22.1 CHAP. XXXIII Vers 1. MAnasseh was twelve years old when he began to reigne See 2. Kings 21.1 c. many severall notes for the explanation of this chapter Vers 6. And he caused his children to passe through the fire in the valley of the sonne of Hinnom See 2. Kings 16.3 Vers 10. And the Lord spake to Manasseh and to his people To wit by his servants the prophets the summe of their prophesies is expressed 2. Kings 21.11 15. Vers 11. Wherefore the Lord brought upon them the captains of the host of the king of Assyria which took Manasseh among the thorns It seems he thought to hide himself in some woods and thickets and therefore it is said here that he was taken among the thorns The like is said concerning the Israelites when they were affraid of the Philistines that were come into their land 1. Sam. 13.6 When the men of Israel saw they were in a strait then they did hide themselves in caves and in
is said in the foregoing verse it was because the inhabitants did all so obstinately stand it out against the Israelites none of them attempting to procure conditions of peace from them save onely the Gibeonites Vers 20. For it was of the Lord to harden their hearts c. See the note upon Exod. 7.13 Vers 21. And at that time came Joshua and cut off the Anakims from the mountains from Hebron and from Debir c. Concerning these Anakims see what is noted before upon Numb 13.22 where it is also expressely said that the Israelites that were at first sent to search the land of Canaan saw these Anakims about Hebron from whence Joshua did now drive them It is evident that Hebron yea and Debir too or else another city of the same name was formerly taken by Joshua and the Israelites in that their expedition against those five kings that had joyned their forces together to besiege Gibeon as we may see chap. 10.36 37.38 That therefore which is said here that Joshua cut off the Anakims from Hebron from Debir c. must be understood of his cutting them off from the mountains that were about Hebron and Debir It seems that these gyants being a kind of wild salvage men monsters rather then men did chiefly abide in dens and caves that were in the mountains or at least that when Joshua had prevailed in that part of the land and had taken the severall towns and cities there and destroyed the inhabitants many of these monsters had withdrawn themselves to those their fastnesses and strong holds from whence afterwards they brake forth into the countreys adjoyning and so thereupon Joshua went out against them with his forces and cut them off some at one time and some at another from the mountains from Hebron from Debir from Anab that is the mountains adjoyning to those cities and from all the mountains of Judah and from all the mountains of Israel that is the mountains in that portion of the land which fell to the tribe of Judah and indeed from all the mountains throughout the land of Canaan which fell to the rest of the Israelites for Judah by reason of their dignity is often mentioned as distinct from the other tribes and in this regard I conceive this expression is used from all the mountains of Judah and from all the mountains of Israel and not with reference to that division of the land betwixt the kingdome of Judah and the kingdome of Israel in Jeroboams revolt it being most probable that this book was written before that time even before David had cast out the Jebusites out of Jerusalem as may be gathered from that place chap. 15.63 As for the Jebusites the inhabitants of Jerusalem the children of Judah could not drive them out but the Jebusites dwell with the children of Judah at Jerusalem unto this day The greatest difficulty in this place is this that here it is said that Joshua cut off the Anakims from Hebron from Debir c. cities that he had taken before from the inhabitants chap. 10.36 c. and yet afterwards chap. 15.14 it is said that Caleb took Hebron and drove the Anakims thence To this some answer That though Joshua took Hebron and afterwards cut off the Anakims from the mountains about Hebron as it is here said yet in processe of time the inhabitants and especially these Anakims did again seise upon Hebron and possesse it and so were after Joshuas death driven out thence by Caleb for though this be related chap. 15.14 yet that it was not done till after the death of Joshua is evident they say in the first chapter of Judges vers 9. where the same story is again related But because it is evident in the fourteenth chapter of this book vers 12. that Caleb whilest Joshua was yet living desired Hebron and the mountainous countrey about it to be given him for his inheritance as Moses had promised it should be undertaking withall that with Gods help he would drive out the Anakims thence Give me saith he this mountain c. If so be the Lord will be with me then I shall be able to drive them out as the Lord said nor is it probable that ever the Lord suffered the Canaanites to recover one foot of that land out of which Joshua had expelled them till after the death of Joshua when by their sinnes they provoked the Lord against them nor that the valourous Caleb would suffer the Canaanites to roost so long in that place which was given him for his inheritance as till after the death of Joshua therefore I conceive that the truer answer for the resolving of this difficulty is this That it was Caleb that did drive out the Anakims out of the mountains about Hebron as is related chap. 15.14 onely it is here ascribed to Joshua because Joshua was their chief Generall and so it was done under his government and command though it were done by Caleb However the destroying the Anakims throughout the land of Canaan is here particularly recorded that in Gods goodnesse and power in cutting them now off they might see the folly of their forefathers infidelity who were so scared with the sight and report of the formidable stature of these giants that they would not enter the land notwithstanding all that Moses Joshua and Caleb could say to them Vers 22. There was none of the Anakims left in the land of the children of Israel onely in Gaza in Gath c. These were cities of the Philistims whose land was also within the compasse of the promise made to the Israelites Exod. 23.31 And I will set thy bounds from the red sea even unto the sea of the Philistims though because of their sinnes they prevailed not as yet so farre In these cities there were of these Anakims these giants still remaining many years after for Goliath was of Gath see 1. Sam. 17.4 c. and those foure huge giants mentioned 2. Sam. 21.16 c. were all of the Philistims Vers 23. And Joshua took the whole land according to all that the Lord said unto Moses c. That is he vanquished the whole land before mentionâ—d or he is said to have taken the whole land because he had so far subdued it that none of the inhabitants durst take up arms against them or any way molest them so that they might now peaceably make a division of it amongst the tribes though there were some places which the Canaanites had yet in their possession as is largely expressed in the beginning of the 13. chapter yet they durst not stirre against the Israelites and therefore is that clause added in the last words of this chapter and the land rested from warre CHAP. XII Vers 1. NOw these are the kings of the land which the children of Israel smote c. In this chapter there are briefly presented as it were in a table or map the severall countreyes and kings vanquished by Moses Joshua and the
had fought against the former king of Moab and taken all his land out of his hand even unto Arnon which might be the ground of that challenge which the king of the Ammonites made to this land Judg. 11.13 And the king of the children of Ammon answered unto the messengers of Jephthah because Israel took away my land when they came up out of Egypt from Arnon even unto Jabbok and unto Jordan now therefore restore those lands again peaceably For otherwise the Israelites were forbidden to take any part of the Ammonites land away from them Deut. 2.19 And when thou comest nigh to the children of Ammon distresse them not nor meddle with them Vers 26. And from Heshbon unto Ramath-mizpeh c. Called Ramoth in Gilead chap. 20.8 Vers 29. And Moses gave inheritance unto the half tribe of Manasseh See the note upon Num. 32.33 Vers 30. And all the towns of Jair which are in Bashan threescore cities See the note upon Num. 32.41 Vers 31. And half Gilead and Ashtaroth and Edrei cities of the kingdome of Og in Bashan were pertaining unto the children of Machir the sonne of Manasseh See Num. 32.39 Even unto the one half of the children of Machir by their families For Manasseh had onely one sonne to wit Machir whose sonnes had their inheritance half within Jordan and half without Vers 33. But unto the tribe of Levi Moses gave not any inheritance See the note above upon verse 14. CHAP. XIIII Vers 1. WHich Eleazar the Priest and Joshua the sonne of Nun and the heads of the fathers of the tribes of the children of Israel distributed for inheritance unto them Who were chosen by the Lord and expressed by name Num. 34.17 See the note upon that place Vers 2. By lot was their inheritance c. For the manner how this was done see the note upon Num. 26.55 Onely the place where they should have their portion was divided by lot and afterward the quantitie of their severall portions was laid out by Joshua Eleazar and the heads of the tribes according as the tribe was more or fewer in number the first being done by casting of lots to prevent all murmurings and discontents and to make it the more evident that the prophesies both of Jacob and Moses concerning the severall inheritances of the tribes were from God Vers 4. For the children of Joseph were two tribes c. This is added to shew how there were still nine tribes and an half remaining amongst whom the land was to be divided notwithstanding the Levites were not reckoned amongst them See also the note Gen 48.5 Vers 6. Then the children of Judah came unto Joshua in Gilgal and Caleb c. It is evident by this place that they began the division of Canaan in Gilgal though they finished it afterwards in Shiloh chap. 18.1 6. and that because the Tabernacle was at present in Gilgal and it was fit this work should be done in the presence of God both that it might be done the more reverently and religiously and that hereby they might be put in mind that it was the Lord their God that would reach forth unto each tribe the lot which he had assigned for their portion Now when they were met together about this great businesse it is said here that Caleb who is called the sonne of Jephunneh the Kenezite because he was descended from Kenaz of the tribe of Judah 1. Chron. 4.13 15. and to distinguish him from another Caleb who was the sonne of Hezron 1. Chron. 2.18 came to Joshua to demand that portion of the land by way of speciall priviledge which God had long since promised him and because many of his tribe that is of the chief men of his tribe went along with him to wit to countenance him and to further him in his suit both in regard that Caleb was a man of great eminency in their tribe and also that the whole tribe were to be in some sort gainers by this extraordinary portion conferred upon him therefore it is said in the first place that the children of Judah came unto Joshua and then afterwards that Caleb attended thus with the chief elders of Judah propounded to Joshua the businesse about which they came Thou knowest the thing that the Lord said unto Moses the man of God concerning me and thee in Kadesh-barnea It is much questioned by Expositours what the thing is that the Lord said unto Moses concerning Caleb and Ioshua which Caleb here means Some hold that so far as it concerns Caleb it is meant of that particular promise which afterwards he doth plainly expresse vers 9. to wit that Hebron and the land adjoyning should be his inheritance and for Ioshua they say it is meant of some such like particular promise that was then also made to him though it be not expressed in the story as happely that he should succeed Moses in the government of Israel or that he should chuse what city or portion in the land he pleased to be his peculiar inheritance and this they judge the more probable First because it is not likely but that he dealing faithfully in the answer they returned concerning the land which they had searched as well as Caleb the Lord also rewarded him by some speciall promise as well as Caleb and Secondly because it is expressely said chap. 19.50 that according to the word of the Lord they gave him the citie which he asked even Timnath-serah in mount Ephraim Again others hold that the thing here meant that the Lord said to Moses both concerning Caleb and Ioshua is that mentioned Num. 14.30 Doubtlesse ye shall not come into the land concerning which I sware to make you dwell therein save Caleb the sonne of Jephunneh and Joshua the sonne of Nun. But all things considered I conceive it most probable that Caleb spake this indefinitely of every thing which the Lord had spoken to Moses concerning Ioshua and Caleb to wit that he doubted not but Ioshua knew well what God had said to Moses in Kadesh-barnea concerning them both when they returned thither from searching the land and so by affirming this in generall he makes way to the propounding of that particular promise vers 9. which God had made to him that Hebron and the countrey adjoyning should be his inheritance concerning which it was necessary that he should appeal to Joshuas knowledge because there were none else now living that could be witnesses of it and in propounding this introduction to that which he had further to say he calls Moses the man of God that what God had promised by Moses his speciall servant might be the more regarded by them Thou knowest saith he the thing that the Lord said unto Moses the man of God concerning thee and me in Kadesh-barnea Vers 7. Fourtie yeares old was I when Moses the servant of the Lord sent me from Kadesh-barnea See the note chap. 11.18 And I brought him word again as it was in mine heart That
was anointed king at Jerusalem 1. Kings 1.9 49. by the valley of the sonne of Hinnom unto the south-side of the city Jebus which was afterwards called Jerusalem not the fort of Sion for that was more south-ward in Judahs portion but the city it self which by that means was shut out of Judahs lot and left in the portion of Benjamin see the following note upon verse 63. Vers 9. And the border was drawn to Baalah which is Kirjath-jearim Called Kirjath-baal verse 60. and chap. 18.14 Vers 10. And the border compassed from Baalah west-ward unto mount Seir c. That is having before fetched a compasse north-ward it now turned west-ward unto mount Seir which was not that in the land of Idumea but another of that name Vers 12. And the west-border was to the great sea and the coast thereof See chap. 13.23 Vers 14. And Caleb drove thence the three sonnes of Anak c. That is from the mountains about Hebron See the note upon chap. 11.21 Vers 15. He came up thence to the inhabitants of Debir c. There was a Debir taken before by Joshua chap. 10.38 39. but that which Joshua took I conceive was not this which lay so near to Hebron which Caleb now took but that mentioned above vers 7. in the borders of Judah and much nearer to Jordan whence it is happely that Joshua is said to have taken that in his return towards Gilgal chap. 10.38 and that here this city is expressely said to be that city which was formerly called Kirjath-sepher to distinguish it from Debir taken by Joshua Vers 16. He that smiteth Kirjath-sepher and taketh it to him will I give Achsah my daughter to wife That is I will give my consent that he shall have my daughter we cannot hence inferre that he might lawfully force upon his daughter what husband he pleased for this he speaks as taking it for granted that his daughter would be guided by him Vers 17. And Othniel the sonne of Kenaz the brother of Caleb took it This was that Othniel which was afterwards the judge of Israel Judg. 3.9 And when the children of Israel cryed unto the Lord the Lord raysed up a deliverer to the children of Israel who delivered them even Othniel the sonne of Kenaz Calebs younger brother and happely for this exploit he became first famous amongst the Israelites and we may well think that this story is here inserted chiefly for his sake by brother here may be meant kinsman and so be referred to Othniel that he was the brother that is the near kinsman of Caleb but because of that word younger added Judg. 1.13 Othniel the sonne of Kenaz Calebs younger brother and so again Judg. 3.9 I conceive this word brother is to be referred to Kenaz that he was the father of Othniel and the brother of Caleb for though Caleb was the sonne or grandchild of Kenaz and thence called a Kenezite chap. 14.16 yet he might have a Kenaz to his brother too Vers 18. And it came to passe as she came unto him that she moved him to ask of her father a field c. This following passage concerning the enlarging of Achsahs dowry by a portion of land which her father gave her may well be added to shew how Caleb prized Othniel because of this his taking Debir It came to passe saith the text as she came unto him that is as she was going from her fathers to her husbands family she moved him to ask of her father a field that is taking the opportunity of her being now to leave her father for then the affections of fathers are wont to be moved towards their daughters she perswaded her husband to ask a field of her father to wit over and above that which he had already given her as an encrease of her dowry For Caleb had sonnes 1. Chron. 4.15 and in this case it is clear they might not give away any part of their inheritance from their sonnes to their daughters Numb 27.8 9. If a man die and have no sonne then ye shall cause his inheritance to passe unto his daughter And if he have no daughter then ye shall give his inheritance unto his brethren and therefore we must know that the land which Caleb had already given his daughter and which she further now desired of him was to be given her onely as a dowry for term of life or till the yeare of Jubile Being it seems not content with that portion of land which her father had already given her vers 19. she moved her husband to ask or for so also the words may be understood she moved her husband that she might ask another field to wit as an enlargement of her dowry And she lighted off her asse and Caleb said unto her What wouldest thou We may two severall wayes understand this which is here said concerning Achsah Calebs daughter that she lighted off her asse for either the meaning may be that when they had set her upon an asse that she might ride home with her husband Othniel to his house she slipped down again as in discontent and seeming to be unwilling to go with her husband to wit because her husband had not as she had moved him desired of her father an enlargement of her dowry and so thereupon her father demanded of her what wouldest thou as perceiving that she was discontented and desirous to know what it was that troubled her Or else that having desired her husband as they were riding away from her fathers house to make sute to her father for another field to be added to what he had already given her when she perceived that he was loth to do it or perswaded her rather to undertake it her self she lighted off her asse as addressing her self to make her request to her father which her father perceiving demanded of her presently what she would have Vers 19. Who answered Give me a blessing for thou hast given me a south land give me also springs of water To intimate that the portion of land which he had given her was dry and not well watered she calls it a south land to wit either because the southern parts of Iudahs portion were dry and barren and hence such lands were called south lands or else because the southern parts of Calebs portion in particular were such And hereupon she desires him to give her also springs of water thereby intending either merely some springs of water which might be conveyed into the south land to make it fruitfull or else some portion of land that was well watered And he gave her the upper springs and the nether springs That is some higher grounds that were well watered and some lower or which tends much to one he gave her some springs or watered grounds on each side the land he had formerly given her for a dowry both above it and below it Vers 21. And the uttermost cities of the tribe of the children of Judah toward the coast
of Edom southward were Kabzeel c. It is called Iekabzeel Neh. 11.25 Vers 32. All their cities are twenty nine with their villages There are indeed eight and thirty cities or towns named in the foregoing verses and therefore for the clearing of this some hold that because nine of these were afterwards assigned to the tribe of Simeon therefore it is said here that all the cities of Iudah in those parts were nine and twenty But the better answer I conceive is that nine and twenty of them onely were walled cities the other were the most famous towns and villages in those parts And here in this first catalogue of Iudahs cities in the Southern parts the most noted towns are expressed by name as well as the walled cities that in the following catalogues we may conceive the same to wit that there were many towns of note besides the cities there mentioned though they be not expressed by name as here they are Vers 36. Fourteen cities with their villages There are fifteen named in the foregoing verses either therefore one of them was no citie but some noted town or rather it may be very probably conceived that Gederah and Gederothaim were but one citie and therefore some reade it as it is in the margin of our bibles Gederah or Gederothaim Vers 62. And Nibshan and the citie of salt This citie might have its name The citie of salt from the salt pits that were there and the abundance of salt that was dayly made by the inhabitants of the citie Vers 63. As for the Jebusites the inhabitants of Jerusalem the children of Judah could not drive them out It is a question much argued amongst writers whether Jerusalem stood in Judahs or in Benjamins portion By many places of Scripture it seems evident that it was in Benjamins portion For in the 18. chapter of this book vers 28. it is reckoned amongst the cities that were in Benjamins lot and we see that Moses did before his death prophesie concerning Benjamin that the Temple which was in Jerusalem should be built in Benjamins portion for that is the drift of those words Deut. 33.12 And of Benjamin he said The beloved of the Lord shall dwell in safety by him and the Lord shall cover him all the day long and he shall dwell between his shoulders yea and Jer. 6.1 the inhabitants of Jerusalem are expressely called the children of Benjamin O ye children of Benjamin gather your selves to flee out of the midst of Jerusalem and Judg. 1.21 the same that is here said of the children of Judah is likewise there said of the children of Benjamin The children of Benjamin did not drive out the Jebusites the inhabitants of Jerusalem but the Jebusites dwell with the children of Benjamin in Jerusalem unto this day But now again by other places of Scripture it seems as evident that Jerusalem was in Judahs portion For first mention is here made of it as one of Judahs cities The Jebusites dwell with the children of Judah at Jerusalem unto this day and secondly Jerusalem is said to have been taken by the children of Judah Judg. 1.8 and thirdly it is reckoned as the great priviledge of the children of Judah that the Lord in his Temple dwelt amongst them Psal 78.67 68 69. Moreover he refused the Tabernacle of Joseph and chose not the tribe of Ephraim but chose the tribe of Judah the mount Sion which he loved and he built his Sanctuary like high places c. but the truth herein is that Jerusalem stood in the border of these two tribes and so was part in Judahs and part in Benjamins portion and therefore the places of Scripture before cited do not any way contradict one another the fort of Sion and some of the south skirts of the city were in Judahs portion but the greatest part of the city in Benjamins and therefore it may well be that when they went about to expell the Jebusites that dwelt there both Iudah and Benjamin joyned their forces together as Judah and Simeon did in a like case Judg. 1.3 And Judah said unto Simeon his brother Come up with me into my lot that we may fight aganst the Canaanites and I likewise will go with thee into thy lot As for that which is here said concerning Jerusalem to wit that the children of Judah could not drive out the Jebusites thence and the like we see is said concerning the children of Benjamin Judg. 1.21 we must know that the Iebusites continued in Ierusalem unto Davids time Indeed Adoni-zedek the king of Jerusalem was slain by Ioshua chap. 10.23 26. for he was one of those five kings that made warre against Gibeon though we find no mention there of his taking Ierusalem yea and it is expressely said Iudg. 1.8 that afterwards the children of Iudah took the city of Jerusalem and burnt it with fire that is some part of it Well but yet the fort of Sion which was the chief strength of Ierusalem was not at that time taken by them for that the Iebusites held till David took it 2. Sam. 5 6 7. yea and it seems that afterward the Iebusites did also by the help of this fort recover the city again at least so farre that they forced the Israelites to let the Iebusites dwell there amongst them as it is said here For in the dayes of the Iudges we see that Iebus that is Ierusalem was still inhabited by the Iebusites Iudg. 19.12 We will not turn aside hither into the city of a stranger that is not of the children of Israel saith the Levite there concerning Iebus we will passe over to Gibea But however we must not think that this which is said here that the children of Judah could not drive them out is added by way of excusing them no but rather to their shame and reproch for though the fort of Sion was a place of great strength so that when David set himself down with his army before it the Iebusites scorned him bragged that their lame and blind and impotent people should defend it against him 2. Sam. 5.6 Yet God would certainly have driven them out according to his promise had they not been wanting to themselves But they grew slothfull and faint hearted and by these and other their sinnes provoked the Lord to withdraw himself from them and so then indeed they could not drive out the inhabitants but were glad to purchase peace upon any tearms according to that Iudg. 2.20 21. And the anger of the Lord was hot against Israel and he said Because this people hath transgressed my covenant which I commanded their fathers and have not hearkned to my voice I also will not hence forth drive out any from before them of the nations which Joshua left when he died c. CHAP. XVI Vers 1. ANd the lot of the children of Joseph fell from Jordan by Jericho unto the water of Jericho on the east c. It is the opinion of some learned writers that
there was but one lot drawn for the children of Ioseph and that because one half of the tribe of Manasseh being already disposed of without Iordan it was judged the fittest way to joyn the other half of the tribe of Manesseh in one lot with the tribe of Ephraim under the common name of the children of Joseph for say they by this means they made sure that the children of Ioseph should be seated together in that part of Canaan which the lot that was drawn out with that which had their name in it did assigne to them And this likewise they seek to make good from the words of the text both here where it speaks of the inheritance of Ephraim Manasseh as comprehended in one lot And the lot of the children of Joseph fell from Jordan c. and again chap. 17.14 where the children of Ioseph seem to complain of this And the children of Joseph spake unto Joshua saying why hast thou given me but one lot and one portion to inherit But all things considered I think it more probable that there were two severall lots for the tribe of Ephraim and the half of Manasseh first because those words chap. 14.2 By lot was their inheritance for the nine tribes and for the half tribe seems rather to imply that there were severall lots both for the nine tribes and for the half tribe secondly because the portion that fell to the tribe of Ephraim being described in the latter part of this chapter it follows in the beginning of the next chapter There was also a lot for the tribe of Manasseh for do not those words clearly intimate that there was one lot drawn for Ephraim and another for Manasseh and thirdly because the providence of God in ordering the lots must needs be the more wonderfull if Iudahs lot coming forth first the next two lots also that were drawn should be these of Ephraim and Manasseh the sonnes of Ioseph immediately one after another upon whom also God had transferred a part of Reubens birthright as it is expressely said 1. Chron. 5.1 2. And indeed that complaint of the sonnes of Joseph chap. 17.14 Why hast thou given we but one lot and one portion to inherit was not meant of the drawing but one lot for them but of the quantitie of land assigned to them for their portion to wit that it was no more then might well have been assigned for one tribe For had they taken exception that there was but one lot for these two tribes they would have contested about this when they made the lots and not after their lot was drawn And here in this place the text speaks of the lot of the children of Joseph in the singular number not because there was but one lot drawn both for Ephraim and Manasseh but because the writer of this book intended first to shew joyntly together where the inheritance of these two tribes lay and then afterwards to shew severally what each of them had for their portion So that therefore in these first three verses of this chapter the south bounds of the inheritance of the sonnes of Joseph where it bordered upon Benjamins portion is described to wit that they began at that part of Jordan which was nigh unto Iericho and so went up unto the water of Jericho that is to certain streams that watered Iericho called afterwards the waters of Elisha because of that miracle which he wrought upon them 2. Kings 2.21 it is here said to have been on the east and chap. 18.12 on the north side of Jericho because it lay north-east of the city and so to the wildernesse that goeth up from Iericho throughout mount Bethel namely the wildernesse of Beth-aven chap. 18.12 and so from Bethel to Luz and thence to the borders of Archi to Ataroth called also Ataroth-addar verse 5. and again chap. 18 12. and so on still westward by the severall places here mentioned till they ended at last at the sea that is the Mediterranean sea Vers 5. The border of their inheritance on the east side was Ataroth-addar unto Beth-horon the upper Here begins the description of that portion of the land of Canaan which was assigned to the tribe of Ephraim which to us that cannot have any certain knowledge of that countrey as it was in those times must needs be very difficult and hard to be understood especially being described here in so few words as it is In this first clause all is said that is said concerning the eastern bounds to wit that it reached from Ataroth in the southern bounds to Beth-horon in the north side and so indeed the breadth of Ephraims portion is onely here set forth where it was broadest eastward Vers 6. And the border went out toward the sea to Michmethah c. There being mention made in the former verse of Beth-horon the upper which lay on the north side of Ephraims lot here now the text describes how the north border went out from the said Beth-horon first westward to Michmethah and then eastward by severall towns here mentioned till it ended at last at Jordan Vers 8. The border went out from Tappuah westward c. Here the text returns to shew what had been touched before verse 6. to wit how the northern border went on westward beyond Michmethah toward the sea namely that it went along by Tappuah unto the river Kanah and so at last to the midland sea Vers 9. And the separate cities for the children of Ephraim were among the inheritance of the children of Manasseh That is besides the cities that stood within the compasse of these bounds the Ephramites had certain cities allotted them within the portion of Manasseh as an addition because this portion here described was too little for them Vers 10. And they drave not out the Canaanites that dwelt in Gezer c. See the note chap. 17.12 CHAP. XVII Vers 1. THere was also a lot for the tribe of Manasseh for he was the first-born of Joseph to wit for Machir the first born of Manasseh c. This clause for he was the first born of Joseph is added to imply that though Jacob had prophesied that Ephraims dignitie should be the greater Gen. 49.19 His younger brother shall be greater then he and his seed shall become a multitude of nations yet Manasseh being one of Josephs sonnes yea his first born he was also to have the portion of a tribe as well as Ephraim according as Jacob had prophesied of them Gen. 48.5 6. And now thy two sonnes Ephraim and Manasseh which were born unto thee in the land of Egypt before I came unto thee into Egypt are mine As Reuben and Simeon they shall be mine And thy issue which thou begettest after them shall be thine Now the lot that fell to Manasseh is said to have been for Machir the first born of Manasseh because Manasseh had no other sonnes but Machir onely and therefore sometimes Machir seems to be put for the
whole tribe of Manasseh Judges 5.14 Out of Machir came down govâ—rnours and amongst his posterity it seems that Manassehs portion was now wholly divided But then it may be questioned by some why Machir is here called the first born of Manasseh To which I answer that the child that first openeth the wombe is usually in the Scripture called the first born though there were no more born after him Because he was a man of war therefore he had Gilead and Bashan That is because Machir the father of Gilead was a man of warre Many conceive that Machir had no other sonnes but Gilead and that all Manassehs portion was divided amongst Gileads posteritie But this we may well doubt 1. Because Gen. 50.23 there is mention made of Machirs children 2. Because Num. 26.29 we reade of a family of the Machirites distinct from those that were called by the names of the sonnes of Gilead concerning which see the note on the place However the posterity of Machir had the land of Gilead and Bashan that is the half of it settled upon them which is here mentioned by the way that after he might proceed to speak of their dividing to the other half of this tribe their portion of the land within Jordan and that because Machir was a man of warre that is because the Machirites were men of warre and did themselves win Gilead and dispossesse the enemie of it See the notes Numb 32.39 40. Vers 4. Therefore according to the commandment of the Lord he gave them an inheritance c. See Numb 27.7 Vers 5. And there fell ten portions to Manasseh That is the land was divided into six parts according to the number of the sonnes of Gilead mentioned verse 2. and Hephers part was divided into five parts and given to his sonne Zelophehads five daughters and so there were ten portions in all Vers 7. And the coast of Manasseh was from Asher to Michmethah c. If Asher was a town seated at the south-east end of Manassehs lot as some conceive it was then in this and the following verses we have onely the description of the southern bounds of this tribe of Manasseh which were also the north bounds of Ephraims portion as is evident because Michmethah and the other following places here mentioned as Tappuah and the river Kanah are the same that were named before in the north border of Ephraim But if Asher stood as others think in the north-east of Manassehs portion then in the first words we have the east bounds of this half tribe of Manasseh to wit that they were drawn from Asher on the north all along by the river Jordan to Michmethah on the south that lyeth before Shechem and then in the next words we have the southern bounds described from Michmethah to the midland sea to wit that from Michmethah it went a long on the right hand turning westward to Tappuah and so on the south of the river Kanah verse 9. and so right on to the sea and thus as is noted in that ninth verse the land was Manassehs both on the north and south side of the river Kanah though the cities that stood on the south side of that river belonged to Ephraim which is intended in those words these cities of Ephraim are among the cities of Manasseh that is the cities on the south side of the river belonged to Ephraim though they were within the coasts of Manasseh Vers 10. And they met together in Asher on the north and on Issachar on the east That is the north bounds of Josephs portion to wit Ephraims and Manassehs considered joyntly in one was the tribe of Asher on the north and Issachar on the east For otherwise then thus it cannot be conceived how they should meet together in Asher on the north since Ephraim no where could reach to Asher being bounded as Manasseh also was on the west by the main sea Vers 11. And Manasseh had in Issachar and in Asher Beth-shean and her towns c. even three countreys This is added to intimate that these towns to wit Bethshean Iblâ—am Dor and En-dor whither Saul went to a witch and Taanach and Megiddo being in the confines of Asher and Issachar and yet belonging to Manasseh stood not all in one place but were in three severall tracts of ground Or else it may be added to shew that three of the countreys before mentioned were in Ashers portion and three in Issachars and so Manasseh had in each of them three countreys Vers 12. Yet the children of Manasseh could not drive out the inhabitants of those cities c. This is spoken of the times after the death of Joshua and therefore the same is repeated Judg. 1.27 28. Partly through cowardlinesse and partly through Gods withdrawing his help at first they could not drive them out afterwards when their fear could not so much blind their judgements but that they must needs then acknowledge themselves strong enough yet they put them to tribute which did much aggravate their sinne Vers 14. And the children of Joseph spake unto Joshua saying Why hast thou given me but one lot c. Here the story relates how the sonnes of Joseph that is the two tribes of Ephraim and Manasseh came to Joshua and made a great complaint and it was doubtlesse after they had entred upon the land which fell to them by lot that there was not a convenient portion of land assigned to them for their inheritance no more indeed then was fitting to be the lot of one tribe for that is the meaning of those words Why hast thou given me but one lot and one portion to inherit that is why hast thou given us no more of the land then if we had been to be accounted but as one tribe and so to have but one lot Questionlesse Joshua and the rest that were intrusted in this businesse had not either through ignorance or partiality set forth a lesse portion of land for these sonnes of Joseph then was fitting But because a part of the land allotted them was over-grown with wood and a great part of it was still in the possession of the Perizzites and the Rephaims or giants with whom through infidelity and sloth they affraid to encounter therefore they judging this as nothing conclude they had no more given them to dwell in then might well be reckoned the portion of one tribe The most questionable passage in this complaint of theirs is this that to make good that they had not a competent portion of land assigned them they alledge the extraordinary encrease of their people in number through the speciall blessing of God upon them Why hast thou given me but one lot and one portion to inherit seeing I am a great people forasmuch as the Lord hath blessed me hitherto since it is evident as is noted Num. 26.37 that the sonnes of Ephraim when they were numbred the second time a little before their entrance into Canaan were eight thousand
from east to west from the lake of Sodome to Kirjath-jearim this from the west to the east from Kirjath-jearim to the lake of Sodome concerning which see the note there Vers 18. And passed along toward the side over against Arabah north-ward and went down unto Arabah Which is called Beth-arabah chap. 15.6 Vers 21. Now the cities of the tribe of the children of Benjamin according to their families were Jericho c. It is no wonder though in severall places of Scripture we find mention made of some cities belonging to the tribe of Benjamin that are not in this Catalogue For many cities might be built in after times And besides it is probable that all the cities in Benjamins lot are not here mentioned but such onely as were requisite to be known because by them the bounds of their lot are described or for the better understanding of some other passages in the sacred history where these cities are mentioned And the like we must conceive of the catalogues that are given us in the following chapter of the cities that were in the severall lots of the other tribes CHAP. XIX Vers 1. ANd their inheritance was within the inheritance of the children of Judah That is the inheritance of the tribe of Simeon the reason whereof is given vers 9. Out of the portion of the children of Judah was the inheritance of the children of Simeon for the part of the children of Judah was too much for them therefore the children of Simeon had their inheritance within the inheritance of them It seems that they that were sent to search the land not yet divided that they might part it into seven lots for the seven remaining tribes chap. 18.4 found that the portion which Joshua and Eleazar and the other Commissioners for the dividing of the land had formerly at Gilgal assigned to the tribe of Judah was farre too large considering what they now found left for the other tribes upon this second review and therefore agreed unanimously with those said Commissioners for the dividing of the land that a whole portion for one of the tribes that had not yet their inheritance should be taken off that which was formerly given to Judah and so should make one of the lots for the seven tribes besides some other cities which they took also from Judah to be as part of another lot as is shown afterwards verse 40.41 and no doubt the children of Judah acknowledged the equitie thereof and were well contented with it and so when they came to draw the lots of the seven remaining tribes in the second place next after Benjamins came out this lot which was wholly taken out of Judahs portion for the tribe of Simeon And thus by the providence of God first there being one tribe to be seated within that portion formerly given to Judah the lot fell upon this tribe which was fewest in number of all the tribes as we may see by the account that was taken of them at the last numbring of the people Num. 26.14 and secondly this tribe of Simeon having their portion assigned them within the portion of Iudah and so being as it were intermingled with them nor having an inheritance apart by themselves that was now fulfilled which Jacob long since prophesied of them Gen. 49.7 I will divide them in Jacob and scatter them in Israel concerning which see what is noted there Vers 2. And they had in their inheritance Beer-sheba c. The bounds of this tribes portion is not described as are the bounds of most of the other tribes onely the chief cities and towns are named that were in their lot and that because their inheritance was within the inheritance of Judah whose bounds are formerly described chap. 15. As for Beersheba and Sheba that are first here mentioned they are but the longer and shorter names of one and the same city for it is said vers 6. that in this first catalogue there are thirteen cities and there are fourteen if Beersheba and Sheba be counted two severall cities and besides 1. Chron. 4.28 where these cities of the Simeonites are again reckoned up there is mention made of Beersheba onely Vers 3. And Hazar-shual and Balah and Azem c. Called Ezem 1. Chron. 4.29 as the following Eltolad is called also Tolad and Bethul Bethuel Vers 5. And Ziklag and Bethmarcaboth and Hazor-susah c. Which is called 1. Chron. 4.31 Hazar-susim as also in the following verse Bethlebaoth is called chap. 15.32 Lebaoth and in the 1. Chron. 4.31 Bethbirei and Sharuhen seems to be the same that is called Shauraim Vers 7. Ain Remmon and Ether c. Or Etam 1. Chron. 4.32 this with the rest here mentioned are there called villages and therefore are here severally reckoned by themselves Vers 9. For the part of the children of Judah was too much for them c. See the note above vers 1. Vers 10. And the border of their inheritance was Sarid c. This Sarid was the Southwest corner of Zebuluns portion from whence it is said that it went West-ward to Maralah and so to Dabbasheth which stood by the sea from whence it went Northward by the sea coast as farre as the river near Iokneam And thus having the midland sea on the West and the sea of Galilee on the East that was truly accomplished which Jacob said concerning this tribe Gen. 49.13 Zebulun shall dwell at the haven of the sea and he shall be for a haven of ships and Moses also Deut. 33.18 And of Zebulun he said Rejoyce Zebulun in thy going out c. Vers 12. And turned from Sarid eastward toward the sunne rising c. As before the western border was drawn from Sarid vers 10. so here the south border begins also at Sarid and so is carried on eastward as farre as Japhia Vers 13. And from thence passeth on along on the east to Gittah-Hepher c. That is from Japhia a city in the south-east corner of Zebuluns portion the border turns northward along by the sea of Galilee and within a while goeth up into the land as farre as Remmon and Neah where is the going out of the utmost reach of the eastern border Vers 14. And the border compasseth it on the north side to Hannathon c. This is the north border which fetcheth a compasse and so ends in the valley of Jiphthah-el Vers 15. And Idalah and Bethlehem This was not that Bethlehem where Christ was afterward born for that was in the tribe of Judah this in the tribe of Zebulun Twelve cities with their villages There are more then twelve mentioned in the foregoing verses but it seems some of them were border towns that stood in the other tribes that had their lots next to Zebuluns and but twelve of them onely were belonging to the tribe of Zebulun Vers 18. And their border was toward Jezreel c. Because Issachars portion lay between Benjamins and Zebuluns whose borders have been already described
and so consequently Issachars also therefore the line of their borders is not here described as in the other tribes but onely the principal towns and cities are named first those that stood in the south border vers 18 19. secondly those in the west vers 20. and thirdly those in the north ver 21 22. Now this portion set apart for Issachar being in a fat and fruitfull soil that was fulfilled which Jacob foretold Gen. 49.14 And he saw that rest was good and the land that it was pleasant and bowed his shoulders to bear and became a servant unto tribute and Moses Deut. 32.18 Vers 24. And the fifth lot came out for the tribe of the children of Asher c. Even here also the hand of God is still observable in his ordering the lots Hitherto the lots had come out onely for those tribes that were descended of Jacobs two wives Leah and Rachel and the tribe of Gad who was the eldest of Jacobs sonnes by Zilpah Leahs handmaid had already received their inheritance without Jordan upon speciall suit made unto Moses so now the next lot came out for the tribe of Asher who was also the sonne of Zilpah the handmaid of Leah Jacobs first wife and therefore preferred before the two tribes of Dan and Naphtali that were descended of Bilhah the handmaid of Rachel his second wife Vers 25. And their border was Helkath c. The cities that are first here mentioned stood on the northwest border which is drawn all along the coast of the midland sea as far as to mount Carmel westward that is to the west side of mount Carmel and Shihor-libnah and so here the line turneth eastward vers 27. and makes the south bounds of this tribes portion and then fetcheth a compasse northward again like to the bending of a bow till it comes to Zidon on the north end of the sea coast then turneth southward again as far as Tyre c. Now by the mention that is here made of mount Carmel in the lot of this tribe we may see how the prophesie of Jacob concerning this tribe was folly accomplished Gen. 49.20 Out of Asher his bread shall be fat and he shall yield royall dainties for mount Carmel and the land about it was a fruitfull soil and had many mines in it Isa 39.9 Sharon is like a wildernesse and Bashan and Carmel shake off their fruits and Isa 35.2 It shall blossome abundantly and rejoyce even with joy and singing the glory of Lebanon shall be given unto it the excellency of Carmel and Sharon See also Deut. 33.24 25. And of Asher he said Let Asher be blessed with children let him be acceptable to his brethren and let him dip his foot in oyl Thy shoes shall be iron and brasse and as thy dayes so shall thy strength be Vers 27. And goeth out to Cabul on the left hand See the note upon vers 30. Vers 29. And the out-goings thereof are at the sea from the coast to Achzib That is all the coast from the sea even unto Achzib Vers 30. Vmmah also and Aphek and Rehob twenty and two cities with their villages That is Ummah Aphek and Rehob were cities of note in the portion of Asher though not before mentioned in describing the borders of their lot So that in all the cities here named belonging to the tribe of Asher are twenty and two Indeed he that reckons all the names of places before mentioned shall find them to be twenty and three but to this it is answered by some that Cabul mentioned vers 27. was not a city but a part of the countrey which Solomon gave unto Hiram and because of the censure which was then by him passed upon it was called Cabul 1. Kings 9.13 And he said What cities are these which thou hast given me my brother and he called them the land of Cabul unto this day And again others say that some one of the bordering cities before named belonged not to Asher but to some of the neighbouring tribes Vers 33. And their coast was from Heleph c. This is the east border of the tribe of Naphtali beginning at these towns which stood somewhat more northerly then the fountains of Jordan and so Iordan even as farre as the lake of Genezereth was the utmost southernly end of the eastern border Thus Naphtalies land lay along by the banks of Iordan in a large extent and so Iacobs prophesie was fulfilled Gen. 49.21 Naphtali is a hind let loose and that of Moses Deut. 33.23 And of Naphtali he said O Naphtali satisfied with favour and full with the blessings of the Lord possesse thou the west and the south Vers 34. Then the coast turneth westward to Aznoth-tabor c. Here now the south border of this tribes portion is described to wit that it turned from Iordan westward first to Aznoth-tabor and thence to Hukkok and so went on till it came to have as it follows in the next words Zebulun on the south side and Asher on the west side And indeed this last clause seems to have reference to that prophesie of Moses before mentioned concerning this tribe Deut. 33.23 Possesse thou the west and the south for however it is noted before upon that place as the opinion of some Expositours that thereby might be signified that the lot of their inheritance should be in the southwest part of the land yet it being so evident here that this tribe had their inheritance in the utmost northeast part of the land the meaning of that clause possesse thou the west and the south must needs be this that however this tribes lot was to be seated in the furthest northeast corner of the kingdome yet it should reach forth so far both westward and southward that they should enjoy all the benefits both of the western and southern parts and the rather by their commerce with those other tribes upon whom they bordered And reacheth to Zebulun on the southside and unto Asher on the westside and to Judah upon Jordan toward the sun-rising It may seem strange that this tribe should be said to border upon Iudah but either the river of Iordan belonged peculiarly to Iudah as a royalty given them of God above all the other tribes in regard whereof Naphtali is said to border upon Iudah in Iordan or else this is added to imply the convenient situation of this tribes portion by reason it lay along by the banks of Iordan in a large extent For by this means though this tribe were seated in the uttermost north part of the kingdome yet they might by the river have commerce with the other tribes as farre as Iudah between whom and Naphtali many other tribes were seated and so being the utmost north tribe might in that sense be said to border upon Iudah who were seated in the utmost south parts of the kingdome Vers 35. And the fenced cities are Ziddim Zer and Hammath Rakkath and Cinnereth Hammath was a city standing
in the utmost north-end of Canaan whence the length of the land is ordinarily described to be from the entrance of Hamath to the river of Egypt 1. Kings 8.65 See Num. 13.22 and Cinnereth was a city in the eastern parts whence the lake so often mentioned in Scripture was called the lake of Genezereth Vers 38. Nineteen cities with their villages For some of them mentioned before in drawing the border of their lot stood happely in the portion of the bordering tribes Vers 40. And the seventh lot came out for the tribe of the children of Dan. Though this tribes lot was not wholly taken out of that which was given to Judah as Simeons was yet that a part of it was is manifest by some of the cities mentioned here that chap. 15. are numbered amongst those that were at first in Judahs portion it was compassed with the sea and the borders of the other tribes formerly described and so the borders of this tribe are here omitted Vers 41. And the coast of their inheritance was Zorah and Eshtaol c. In this Zorah Samson was born Judges 13.2 and between Zorah and Eshtaol he was buried Vers 43. And Elon and Timnathah c. Whence Samson took a wife Judges 14.1 Vers 47. Therefore the children of Dan went up to fight against Leshem c. Or Laish The story we have Judges 18. This then happened after Joshuas death but here it is mentioned lest it should seem strange how the Danites came to inhabite the north parts of the land when their lot fell to them in the south parts even close by Judahs portion the reason was because being not able to drive out the Philistines out of their land they were streightned for room so went out and took Laish a city that was in Naphtalies lot though then in the Zidonians possession and transplanted a Colony thither calling it Dan from their father Dan the sonne of Jacob it stood almost in the furthest north part of the land Judges 20.1 The congregation was gathered together as one wan from Dan to Beersheba Vers 50. According to the word of the Lord they gave him the citie he asked even Timnath-serah in mount Ephraim c. To wit the word of the Lord which he spake to Moses not onely concerning Caleb but concerning Joshua for why indeed should he be left out see Iosh 14.7 to wit that he should chuse a peculiar portion to himself where he would yet it may be meant also of some direction given him by Eleazar the priest upon his inquiry of God for him However herein first was the modesty of Ioshua remarkable that he was content to stay till all the tribes had their portion ere there was any motion made of that which by way of speciall Prerogative was to be conferred upon him secondly That he was content to receive what God had promised him as by way of gift from the people he asked and they gave him the city he asked thirdly That whereas he might have chosen the fairest and goodliest city in all their tribes he chose his seat in a mountainous countrey nothing so pleasant and delightfull as many other places were yea and it seems a city that was ruinated so that he was fain to build it ere he dwelt in it for so it follows in the next words and he built the city and dwelt therein CHAP. XX. Vers 2. APpoint out for you cities of refuge c. Concerning these cities of refuge see the notes Numb 35.6 and 24 c. Vers 6. And he shall dwell in that city untill he stand before the congregation for judgement and untill the death of the high priest c. That is untill he be fetched thence to the place where the fact was done that it may be there tryed whether it were done wittingly or unwittingly so long he was to abide there however or untill the death of the high Priest if it were found that he did it unwittingly for then he was to be sent back to the city of refuge and to be kept there till the high priest dyed Concerning the mysticall reason of the man-slayers staying in the city of refuge till the death of the high priest see the note upon Num. 35.25 But to this some also do adde a literall reason to wit that hereby was implyed how hainous a fault it was to shed the bloud of a man and how displeasing to God in that the man that was but unwittingly defiled with the shedding of bloud must be thus shut up lest he should happen to come into the sight of him who did as it were represent Gods person amongst them to wit the high priest nor could be suffered to stirre from thence till he was dead Vers 8. And on the other side Jordan by Jericho eastward they assigned Bezer c. That is they confirmed and ratified these to be cities of refuge without Jordan which Moses himself had formerly chosen and set apart for that use See Deut. 4.41 42 43. CHAP. XXI Vers 1. THen came near the heads of the fathers of the Levites unto Eleazar the priest c. It was doubtles immediately after they had made an end of dividing the land that the Levites came thus to Eleazer and the rest of the Commissioners to receive from them the cities which God had appointed to be set apart for their dwelling For first it is not probable that there was any delay which might move the Levites to challenge their right and secondly it is as improbable that the Israelites did first settle themselves in these cities and then were afterwards put out to give way to the Levites Vers 2. The Lord commanded by the hand of Moses to give us cities to dwell in c. See the notes upon Numb 35.2 c. Vers 4. And the lot came out for the familie of the Kohathites God had expressed the number of cities that were to be given them to wit fourty eight Numb 35.7 So all the cities which ye shall give to the Levites shall be fourty and eight cities he had also given them directions to take these cities out of each tribe some according as their proportion was greater or lesser and therefore the Commissioners for the dividing of the land made choice no doubt of these cities as in their wisdome they found them most convenient for the Levites and for the people and then having divided the cities they had chosen into foure parts one for the priests a second for the Levites of Kohaths familie a third for the Gershonites and a fourth for the Merarites then was it at last decided in which of the tribes the priests should be placed and so of the rest or at least of those cities which were judged convenient they took the number agreed upon by lot See vers 11. And the children of Aaron the priest which were of the Levites had by lot out of the tribe of Judah c. Thus by Gods speciall providence the
Penuel and slew the men of the city That is the Magistrates of the city as before he did in Succoth Vers 18. Then said he unto Zebah and Zalmunna What manner of men were they whom ye slew at Tabor Because it seems Gideon had heard that these kings had slain certain men of the Israelites that had retired themselves for shelter to some strong holds or caves in mount Tabor and feared they vvere his brethren because they amongst others sought to provide for the saving of their lives in those dangerous times as others did chap. 6.2 And the hand of Midian prevailed against Israel and because of the Midianites the children of Israel made them the dens which are in the mountains and caves and strong holds and had not been since heard of therefore he inquires thus concerning the men vvhom they had there slain And they answered As thou art so were they each one resembled the children of a king This may be meant of that likenesse of feature which is usually amongst brethren but plainly it intends that they were of a goodly and comely personage even as Gideon was and such as might well beseem men of a princely and Royall stock Vers 19. As the Lord liveth if ye had saved them alive I would not slay you The meaning is that he would have spared them because they had shown mercy to his brethren and hereby he expresseth his sorrow for his brethren and shews what little cause they had now to expect any mercy from him Vers 20. And he said unto Jether his first-born Up and slay them Upon him he imposeth this work rather then any other first that he might train him up even from his young years to draw his sword against the enemies of Israel and to be severe to those that should rise up against God and against his people secondly that it might be done by way of avenging the death of his brethren thirdly because it would adde if not to the pain yet to the dishonour of their death to die by such a hand Vers 21. Then Zebah and Zalmunna said Rise thou and fall upon us for as the man is so is his strength In this reply of theirs first they descant in a kind of scornfull manner upon that command of Gideons setting a child to take away their lives whereas indeed this his young heire had scarce courage enough to look them in the face secondly they provoke Gideon as impatient of delay to rise upon them himself and rid them out of the way thereby discovering their contempt of death and how much they scorned to begge life and withall happely being loath to die by the hand of a child And took away the ornaments that were on their Camels necks As the memorials of this great victory Vers 22. Then the men of Israel said unto Gideon Rule thou over us both thou and thy sonne c. That is they offered to receive him to be their king and to settle the kingdome successively upon his posterity Vers 23. And Gideon said unto them I will not rule over you c. That is not as a king he judged Israel unto his dying day but it was the kingdome of Israel the regall power which they proffered and he now refused and that upon this ground because the accepting of this would have been in a manner a taking of the government out of Gods hand the Lord saith he shall rule over you Not that God rules not by kings as well as by other kind of Magistrates but because God had established this way of governing them by Judges who had not so great a degree of soveraignty and power over the people as kings usually have were extraordinarily called of God withall because God had in his Law expressed that in case they should desire a king they were to take him whom the Lord should choose Deu. 17.14 15 When thou art come to the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee and shalt possesse it and shall dwell therein and shalt say I will set a king over me like all the nations that are about Thou shalt in any wise set him a king over thee whom the Lord thy God shall chuse One from among thy brethren shalt thou set over thee thou mayest not set a stranger over thee which is not thy brother Therefore he takes this rash proffer of changing the government to be a shaking of Gods government because they went about to change it without Gods leave and refuseth to give any consent to it all which is evident by that which the Lord said of the Israelites desiring a King in Samuels dayes 1. Sam. 8.6 7. But the thing displeased Samuel when they said Give us a King to judge us and Samuel prayed unto the Lord And the Lord said unto Samuel Hearken unto the voice of the people in all that they say unto thee for they have not rejected thee but they have rejected me that I should not reigne over them Vers 26. And the weight of the golden ear-rings which he requested was a thousand and seven hundred shekles of gold c. Which is esteemed to be according to the account of our weight 2380 pounds it is not impossible that all this should be spent in the making of one ephod as it is said vers 27. especially if it were made as that of Aarons with a brestplate set with so many precious stones of great value Exod. 28.15 16.17 But the words will well enough bear that of part of this gold now given him he made an ephod Vers 27. And Gideon made an ephod thereof and put it in his city Not a linen ephod but such a one as that which was made for the high priest of gold blue purple scarlet c. Exod. 28.6 It is probable enough that he intended it onely as a memoriall of this their victory over the Midianites the monument being of the very prey which was there taken though afterwards it became a snare both to him and to his house But why then did he make an ephod rather then any other monument this indeed seems to imply that his purpose was to make use also of this ephod either in offering sacrifices in his own house and then under this ephod all the priestly garments may be comprehended or else thereby to enquire what the will of the Lord was according to the judgement of Urim Not considering that this previledge was onely annexed to Aarons ephod wherein was the brestplate of judgement with the Urim and Thummim and therein therefore he sinned greatly and brought Gods wrath upon his posterity And all Israel went thither a whoring after it c. Either they went thither as to a famous Oracle to inquire concerning the will of God in any doubtfull cases or else drawn with the superstitious conceits they had entertained of this ephod they set up there a place of sacrificing contrary to the expresse letter of the Law of God or else they resorted
the city with fire This is mentioned before Josh 19.47 concerning which see the note there It may seem strange why the Danites should burn this city seeing they surprized it purposely that they might dwell in it and it must needs be a great work and of great charge to rebuild it again but this we must consider is usuall when cities are stormed and taken partly through the fury of the souldiers in the heat of the assault and partly that they may the more easily destroy the inhabitants whilst they are forced to busie themselves in quenching the fire cities are seldome taken by force but that some part of them is burnt with fire Vers 28. And there was no deliverer because it was farre from Sydon c. See the note above vers 7. And it was in the valley that lyeth by Beth-Rehob c. Rehob was a city in the utmost north part of the land near unto mount Libanus and Hamath Num. 13.21 So they went up and searched the land from the wildernesse of Zin unto Rehob as men come to Hamath it was within the portion assigned to Asher Josh 19 28. and appointed for the Levites in that tribe Josh 21.31 but is reckoned amongst those cities whose inhabitants the Asherites did not drive out Judg. 1.31 who are called Syrians of Beth-Rehob 2. Sam. 10.6 It is evident therefore that Laish which was also now in the possession of the Canaanites or Syrians and was nigh Rehob stood also in the utmost north parts of the land near to the fountain of Dan one of the heads of that river which was therefore called Jordan whence was that proverbiall speech from Dan even to Beersheba Vers 29. And they called the name of the city Dan after the name of Dan their father c. Because the Danites that seated themselves here so farre off from the rest of their brethren might fear lest in future times their reference to their brethren should be questioned they named their city Dan which was before called Laish that it might be known to what tribe they belonged yet withall it is probable they so named their city too in honour of their father the Patriarch of whom they were descended but in the mean time they were idolaters and robbers and this their father Dan did not do as Christ speaks in a like case John 8.40 But now ye seek to kill me a man that hath told you the truth which I have heard of God this did not Abraham Vers 30. And the children of Dan set up the graven image c. The good successe which they had in their attempt upon Laish according to the answer which they had received from this Oracle made them highly esteem both this priest and his images and accordingly they established this idolatrous worship of their false gods amongst them and so this Levite Jonathan the sonne of Gershom c. and his posteritie were priests unto these idolatrous Danites untill the captivitie of the land The most of Expositours understand this of that captivitie when the ark was taken and carried away by the Philistines 1. Sam. 4.10 11. And the Philistines fought and Israel was smitten and they fled every man into his tent and there was a very great slaughter for there fell of Israel thirty thousand footmen And the Ark of God was taken and the two sonnes of Eli Hophni and Phinehas were slain for then we see there was a great slaughter amongst the Israelites and no doubt many of them were carried away captive together with the ark and all this befell them because of the idolatrie that was then in the land Psal 78.58 59. They provoked him to anger with their high places and moved him to jealousie with their graven images When God heard this he was wroth and greatly abhorred Israel So that he forsook the Tabernacle of Shiloh the tent which he placed among men c. Besides Micahs graven image upon which depended the service of this idolatrous priest and his successours stood up onely till the remove of the Tabernacle from Shiloh vers 31. And they set them up Micahs graven image which he made all the time that the house of God was in Shiloh which was doubtlesse about that time when the Ark was taken by the Philistines so that hence it may seem very probable that the priesthood of these men continued no longer and that this is the captivitie here spoken of Besides if it be understood of that captivitie when the ten tribes were carried away captives into Assyria by Shalmaneser 2. Kings 17. it may be judged very unlikely that these idolatrous priests should in Samuels time be suffered especially in Davids who was so holy and potent a King But yet because the captivieie of the land cannot well be understood otherwise then of a generall captivitie I see not why it should not be understood of that captivitie when the people were carried away into Assyria by Shalmaneser It is indeed manifest by the following verse that Micahs image was pulled down not long after the Tabernacle was removed from Shiloh and in Sauls time it is manifest that the Tabernacle was in Nob 1. Sam. 21. But yet though the idol was supprest these idolatrous priests might in secret especially though not openly continue to do this impious service for the Danites unto the time of Jeroboam and then might be employed as priests for his golden calf which was erected in this citie Dan 1. Kings 12.29 He set the one in Bethel and the other he put in Dan for though he made priests of the lowest of the people that were not Levites vers 31. yet that doth not hinder but that these idolaters though Levites might be of the number of his priests too and so they might continue till that generall captivitie of the ten tribes CHAP. XIX Vers 1. ANd it came to passe in those dayes c. Concerning the time when these things were done see chap. 17. vers 6. There was a certain Levite sojourning on the side of mount Ephraim who took to him a concubine out of Bethlehem-Judah Some concubines there were amongst the Hebrews that were esteemed lawfull wives as concerning the right of the bed who yet were not esteemed in the rank with other wives principally and most properly so called for they had not the honour of being accounted the mother of the familie their children did not inherit with the rest c. and that either because they were before such as lived in a servile condition as Hagar or because they were taken in a second place and were not with the same rites and solemnities married to them as the others were concerning which see the note Gen. 22.24 and 25.6 and such a concubine it seems this was and therefore is the Levite called her husband both here vers 3. And her husband arose and went after her to speak friendly unto her and again chap. 20.4 And the Levite the husband of the woman that was slain
answered c. and her father his father in law in severall places Why Bethlehem from whence this Levite had his concubine is called Bethlehem-Judah See in the note chap. 17.7 Vers 2. And his concubine plaid the whore against him went away from him unto her fathers house c. It seems upon some discoverie of her whoredome or at least some suspition the Levite had of it there arose some quarrell betwixt him and his concubine and thereupon she left him and went home again to her fathers house who was too ready to entertain her The sad effects that followed upon this Levites taking a concubine makes it manifest that even in those times though it were an ordinary thing amongst all sorts of men even amongst the Levites to have concubines yet God was not pleased with it from the beginning it was not so saith our Saviour Matth. 19.8 Vers 3. And her husband arose and went after her to speak friendly unto her and to bring her again having his servant with him and a couple of asses To wit to carrie their provision and happely that both himself and his concubine if she would return with him might sometimes ease themselves by riding as occasion served Vers 11. Come I pray thee and let us turn in unto this citie of the Jebusites and lodge in it For though the children of Judah had taken from the Jebusites that part of Jebus that is Jerusalem which was in their tribe chap. 1.8 The children of Judah had fought against Jerusalem and had taken it and had smitten it with the edge of the sword yet out of that part which belonged to Benjamin on which side the Levite was now travelling the Jebusites were not wholly expelled chap. 1.21 The children of Benjamin did not drive out the inhabitants of Jerusalem but the Jebusites dwell in Jerusalem with the children of Benjamin unto this day Vers 14. And the sunne went down upon them when they were by Gibeah which belongeth to Benjamin There was a Gibeah in the tribe of Judah Josh 15.57 to distinguish this from that it is here called Gibeah which belongeth to Benjamin and else where Gibeah of Saul 1. Sam. 11.4 it is thought to be the same which Josh 21.17 is called Gebah which was a citie given to tho Priests the sonnes of Aaron Against which it makes nothing that here it is said vers 16. the men of the place were Benjamites for the priests did not dwell alone in such cities though they were the lords and owners of them Vers 15. And they turned aside thither to go in and to lodge in Gibeah Though it were a pious resolution in the Levite rather to chose to lodge in Gibeah then in Jebus and that because Jebus was a citie wherein the idolatrous and uncircumcised Jebusites dwelt yet this proved fatall both to him and his as the best counsell may have the worst successe and that because there is a secret over-ruling hand of God that may by this means bring about what he hath determined for the punishment of some other sinnes which we mind not Vers 16. And behold there came an old man from his work out of the field at even which was also of mount Ephraim Though he were an old man yet he followed his work in the field and that untill the even which is doubtlesse noted to his praise As for that last clause that he was also of mount Ephraim that no doubt is expressed to intimate that this amongst other things made the old man the readier to entertain the Levite when he heard him say vers 18. that he was of mount Ephraim too Vers 18. But I am now going to the house of the Lord. The Tabernacle at this time was in Shiloh Josh 18.1 and Shiloh was in the tribe of Ephraim either therefore there the Levites dwelling was or else he meant first to go to the house of the Lord to do his service there and then afterwards to passe forward on his journey homeward However it is probable that he mentions his going to the house of the Lord that he might know him to be a Levite Vers 22. Behold the men of the city certain sonnes of Belial beset the house round about c. A like fact to this we have formerly related concerning the Sodomites of which see the note Gen. 19.4 as for this term Sonnes of Belial see Deut. 13.13 Vers 24. Behold here is my daughter a mayden and his concubine them I will bring out now c. See the note Gen. 19.8 Vers 25. So the man took his concubine and brought her forth unto them and they knew her c. In the foregoing words it is said that when the old man the Levites host proffered these varlets his daughter a virgin and the Levites concubine thereby to take them off from that unnaturall uncleannesse wherewith they meant to satisfie their lust upon the Levite himself the men would not hearken to him yet when immediately by the Levites means his concubine was indeed brought out unto them and left amongst them they fell upon her and defiled her and that in such an outrageous barbarous manner that she died of it which was doubtlesse because having once an object for their lust in their power they could not forbear and so forgetting their former resolutions they laid hold on her and abused her in a most inhumane and execrable manner Vers 26. Then came the woman in the dawning of the day and fell down at the doore of the mans house c. That is she fell down dead at the doore of the mans house and there lay till break of day when her husband going forth to see what was become of her found her dead and thus though her husband had pardoned her whoredome yet God punished it and that too with her own sinne adulterie was her sinne and adulterie was her death she had dealt treacherously against her husband one would not satisfie her but she exposed her self to the lust of a stranger and now she was abused to death by the lusts of so many barbarous wretches whom she knew not that by so abusing her they murdered her Vers 27. And her hands were upon the threshold This is added to implie the reason of that which follows why the Levite spake to her to rise vers 28. And he said unto her Vp let us be going to wit because she lay in such a manner her hands laid upon the threshold under her head as if she had been asleep Vers 29. He took a knife and laid hold on his concubine and divided her together with her bones into twelve pieces and sent her into all the coasts of Israel That is to each of the twelve tribes a piece for to the tribe of Levi that was dispersed through all the land there was none sent and this was done that the fight of her dead limbs might affect them the more and stirre them up to be the more zealous for the punishment
of this horrible villanie that had been committed upon his concubine Some conceive that there was none sent to the tribe of Benjamin but that there was two pieces sent to the tribe of Manasseh because that tribe dwelt half within Jordan and half without But this is altogether a groundlesse conceit for there was most reason for sending a piece to Benjamin in regard the fact was committed in a citie of their tribe and there was as much reason why they should have sent two pieces to the tribe of Dan as to the tribe of Manasseh since the tribe of Dan was also seated in two severall parts of the land some in the portion of Judah and some northward at Laish as in the former chapter was related Vers 30. And it was so that all that saw it said There was no such deed done nor seen c. The messengers relating the cause why the Levite had done this not onely the elders of each tribe to whom these parcels of her body were sent because there was no magistrate armed with regall power to punish this fact but even all that came to the hearing of it cried out against it as a matchlesse villâ—nie and stirred up one another not to let it passe unrevenged And hence is that expression of the prophet Hos 9.9 They have deeply corrupted themselves as in the dayes of Gibeah CHAP. XX. Vers 1. THen all the children of Israel went out and the congregation was gathered together c. All the children of Israel that is the chief of all the people as it follows in the next verse all the elders and officers captains and men of warre except onely they of the tribe of Benjamin went out from their own habitations severally and were gathered together as one man that is unanimously as readily as if one man onely had been appointed to come to any place and thus was there an assembly of all the land to wit those within Jordan from Dan to Beersheba and together with them also of the land of Gilead that is those without Jordan and that in Mizpeh Mizpeh was a place where the Israelites did usually hold their publick assemblies 1. Sam 7.5 And Samuel said Gather all the children of Israel to Mizpeh and so also chap. 10.17 and Jer. 40.7 8. It is very probable that it stood in the confines of Judah and Benjamin and is therefore reckoned amongst the cities of both tribes see Josh 15.38 18.26 neither could there be therefore for the businesse they met about a fitter place chosen now here they are said to be gathered together unto the Lord not because the Tabernacle was there as we shall after see vers 27. but either because they were assembled in Gods name and to heare what God would give them in charge or because in all judiciall assemblies the Lord is in a speciall manner present Psal 82.1 God standeth in the congregation of the mighty he judgeth among the gods or else because they met in a synagogue a house set apart for publick prayer and teaching the people which seems the more likely even because of that which we reade in one of our Apocryphal books 1. Macc. 3.46 Wherefore the Israelites assembled themselves together and came to Maspha over against Jerusalem for Maspha was the place where they prayed aforetime in Israel Some conceive I know that the Ark was at present removed to Mizpeh but of that see vers 27. Vers 2. Foure hundred thousand footmen that drew sword The number of these men of warre is expressed both to shew their zeal in seeking to punish this abominable fact of the men of Gibeah and also to shew how evidently the hand of God was against these Israelites when they were twice beaten by the Benjamites and yet were so many more in number then they Vers 3. Now the children of Benjamin heard that the children of Israel were gone to Mizpeh This is added to implie how resolved the Benjamites were to stand out in defence against the rest of the Israelites who hearing of the Israelites assembling themselves about this businesse neither went to the assembly themselves nor sent any messenger to them Vers 5. And the men of Gibeah rose against me and beset the house round about upon me by night and thought to have slain me To wit by their unnaturall lust as they had slain his wife or at least he means that they thought to have done that to him which rather then he would have endured he would have lost his life Vers 7. Behold ye are all children of Israel c. And therefore ought to take to heart that so foul an abomination should be committed in Israel it concerns you all and therefore look to it Vers 8. We will not any of us go to his tent neither will we any of us turn in to his house This is added to shew how zealous they were in seeking to punish this horrible sinne they vowed that they would not so much as go home to their houses till they had executed judgement upon those that were guiltie of it yea not onely so but also at the same place and time at least when the report was brought them that the Benjamites would not deliver the malefactours into their hands but were resolved rather to defend them they vowed also that having slain the Benjamites they would not give any of their daughters in marriage to any that were left alive chap. 21. vers 1. Now the men of Israel had sworn in Mizpeh saying There shall not any of us give his daughter to Benjamin to wife and that they would likewise destroy every town throughout the whole land of Israel that had not sent some of their people to this assemblie to help them in this warre chap. 21.5 They had made a great oath concerning him that came not up to the Lord to Mizpeh saying He shall surely be put to death Vers 9. We will go up by lot against it That is we will by lot determine it who shall go up to fight against Gibeah and who shall go forth to fetch in victuals and other provisions for the people one in ten had need to be set apart for this service and who they shall be the lot shall decide Vers 12. And the tribes of Israel sent men through all the tribe of Benjamin c. Though the Benjamites absenting themselves from the assembly of all Israel at Mizpeh was a just ground of suspition that they meant not to yield up the malefactours to be punished yet would not the Israelites thereupon make warre presently against them but first they sent messengers to all the families of the tribe of Benjamin to desire the deliverie of those sonnes of Belial to deserved punishment that so if it were possible bloud-shed and civill war might be prevented Vers 13. Deliver us the men the children of Belial which are in Gibeah that we may put them to death and put away evil from Israel That is make others
see that instead of looking with an envious and malignant eye upon him he entertained him with all possible courtesie and did what he could to honour him amongst the people As for that clause And will tell thee all that is in thine heart thereby is meant either that he would tell him all that he had a purpose to enquire of him or else he would tell him many secret things which no body knew but himself onely and indeed though for the present he told him of the asses onely as it follows in the next verse And as for thine asses that were lost three dayes ago set not thy mind on them for they are found which doubtlesse he did to free him from that care and that he might be the more willing to stay with him yet it may well be that afterward when they were together alone he told him many other secret things for the greater confirmation of his faith concerning the promise of the kingdome as Christ did to the woman of Samaria to make her know he was the Messiah Joh. 4.29 where we have an expression much like this of Samuel Come see a man saith she that hath told me all that ever I did Vers 20. And on whom is all the desire of Israel is it not on thee and on all thy fathers house That is on whom must the kingdome and royall dignity which all Israel desire may be reared up amongst them be conferred but on thee and on thy fathers house Vers 21. And Saul answered and said Am not I a Benjamite of the smallest of the tribes of Israel c. Though Samuel had in the foregoing words spoken very covertly concerning Sauls being king And on whom is all the desire of Israel c. yet the peoples eagernesse at this time to have a king being so famously known Saul might well hereby guesse at Samuels meaning and the strangenesse of such tydings makes him therefore as one astonished so debase himself Am not I a Benjamite of the smallest of the tribes of Israel c. Nor need we wonder that he calls the tribe of Benjamin the smallest of the tribes if we remember that this tribe was almost wholly destroyed not many years before in that warre that was between this tribe and their brethren of the other tribes Judg. 20. Long it was it seems ere this tribe recovered the desolation that was then made amongst them if ever they recovered it for even in regard that there were so few of this tribe it may well be that when this tribe kept faithfull to the house of David in the dayes of Jeroboam as well as the tribe of Judah yet still the Scripture speaks but of one tribe that did cleave to the house of David to wit the tribe of Judah as we may see 1. kings 11.32 and so in many other places Benjamin not being mentioned because of their paucity but comprehended under the men of Judah Vers 22. And Samuel took Saul and his servant and brought them into the parlour and made them sit in the cheifest place among them that were bidden Doubtlesse those invited were of the Elders and cheif of the city by placing Saul therefore above them he began to give a signe of the dignity he should be raised too and withall shewed how farre he was from envying him because he should be obscured by his advancement Vers 23. And Samuel said unto the cook Bring the portion which I gave thee of which I said unto thee Set it by thee Samuel it seems had given order to the cook for one speciall extraordinary messe that should be set by reserved as for some extraordinary guest and not sent up till Samuel sent for it and hereupon therefore he now called upon him to bring him that messe that it might be set before Saul As for the custome of those times in allotting a severall messe to every guest see the note upon Gen. 43.34 Vers 24. And the cook took up the shoulder and that which was upon it and set it before Saul To wit the left shoulder for the right shoulder of all peace-offerings was the priests portion Levit. 7.32 33. The shoulder was it seems in these times accounted the cheif peice and therefore doubtlesse was it alloted for the priests portion and here at this time appointed for Sauls messe It is hard to say what is meant by those words and that which was upon it to wit whether it be meant of any thing that was poured or laid upon it as sauce or onely for garnishing the meat or of any other joynt that was here brought in together with the shoulder as the neck or breast which before they are severed are upon the shoulder but because the shoulder is the onely joynt mentioned the first I conceive is most probable Behold that which is left set it before thee and eat for unto this time hath it been kept for thee since I said I have invited the people That is since I first gave order to the cook that he should prepare this provision for those that were invited Now this is expressed that hereby Saul might see that God had beforehand revealed his coming thither to Samuel for how else could Samuel have purposely set apart this portion for him Vers 25. Samuel communed with Saul upon the top of the house Where they might be most private for thence also is that Acts 10.9 Peter went up upon the house to pray about the sixth houre Both this and his choosing the spring of the day to anoint Saul in vers 26. before any bodie was stirring and his going forth to the end of the citie and sending his servant away vers 27. they all shew how carefull Samuel was that it should not yet be known that Saul was anointed king to wit that when he was afterward chosen by lot no body as yet thinking of any such thing it might be the more manifest that he was chosen of God and that no body else had any hand in it and secondly that Saul might hereby be taught to wait upon God to content himself with the promise for a time and to stay Gods leisure for the performance of what was promised Vers 26. And Saul arose and they went out both of them he and Samuel abroad The calling up Saul therefore to the top of the house mentioned in the foregoing words Samuel called Saul to the top of the house c. was onely that Samuel might will him to make ready presently to be gone which Saul accordingly did and so then Samuel went along with him out of the citie intending at their parting to anoint him king CHAP. X. Vers 1. THen Samuel took a viall of oyl and poured it upon his head and kissed him c. Two ceremonies are here mentioned which Samuel used when he conferred upon Saul the supreme power of being king of Israel The first is that he took a viall of oyl and poured it upon his head which he did
Libnah a citie in his own countrey and then no wonder though he stayed not to prosecute his victory in the land of Edom. Then Libnah revolted at the same time Libnah was a great citie within Judah one of the royall cities of Canaan when Joshua entred it Josh 10.29 30 It was by him given to the priests the sonnes of Aaron Josh 21.13 and now it rebelled against Joram because he had made such innovations in Religion and forced the people to idolatry as is expressed 2. Chron. 21.10 11. which no marvell though the Levites were least able to endure It is much indeed that one citie alone should venture upon such an attempt but perhaps the kings absence whilest he was in Edom and the discontent of the people yea perhaps some correspondence they might have with the Philistines who ere long invaded the land 2. Chron. 21.16 17. gave them hope of abettors and how they sped in the conclusion the Scripture expresseth not Vers 24. And Joram slept with his fathers and was buried with his fathers in the citie of David Before his death there was a prophesie in writing delivered him from Elijah the Prophet 2. Chron. 21.12 which threatned both his people his children his wives and his own body and immediatly what was threatned came to passe for first the Philistines and Arabians brake into Judea took the kings house made spoil of his goods and slew or carried away all his children save the youngest onely and then afterwards the Lord smote him with a grievous disease in his bowels which left him not till his guts fell out and being dead he was obscurely buried in the citie of David but not in the sepulchres of his Ancestours the kings of Judah and that without the lamentations and solemnities that had been used in other princes funeralls 2. Chron. 21.16 All the time of this kings reigne another king of the same name reigned in Israel to wit Joram the sonne of Ahab his brother in law And Ahaziah his sonne reigned in his stead He is elswhere called Jehoahaz 2. Chron. 21.17 and Azariah 2. Chron. 22.6 He was the youngest sonne of Joram for all the elder sonnes were slain or carried away by the Philistines 2 Chron. 21.17 In S. Matthews catalogue of the kings of Judah it is said Matth. 1.8 that Jehoshapoat begat Joram and Joram begat Ozias and so this Ahaziah who succeeded Joram and Joash who succeeded Ahaziah 2 Kings 11.2 and Amaziah who succeeded Joash 2. Kings 12.21 and was the father of Ozias are quite left out but this I conceive was onely because the Evangelist resolving to distribute the Ancestours of Christ into three severall ranks according to the three great changes that had happened in the state and finding just fourteen in the first rank from Abraham to David he laboured to reduce the other ranks to the same number too as knowing that equall numbers are a help to the memory and so to make just fourteen generations in that rank also from David to the captivitie he leaves out Ahaziah Joash and Amaziah and them perhaps rather then others because they were the next from Ahab by Athaliah the daughter of Ahab and wife of Joram Vers 25. In the twelfth yeare of Joram the sonne of Ahab king of Israel c. Yet chap. 9.29 it is said that he began to reigne in the eleventh yeare of Joram king of Israel which is because the yeare of Ahaziahs reigne did concurre with the latter end of the eleventh and the beginning of the twelfth yeare of Joram king of Israel Vers 26. Two and twentie years old was Ahaziah when he began to reigne c. In the 2. Chron. 22.2 it is said that he was two and fourty years old when he began to reigne we may reconcile this thus that he was two and fourty years old when he began to reigne alone by himself but that he was made king also when he was but two twenty years old his father yet living but then that must be granted which is before noted upon 1. Kings 22.42 to wit that Asa also was made king in his fathers life time and indeed because this answer may have some strong objections made against it therefore others do rather reconcile these two places thus to wit that those words in 2. Chron. 22.2 Fourty and two years old was Ahaziah when he began to reigne must be understood of the continuance of Omries pedigree who was great grandfather to this Ahaziah Omri reigned as sole king six years 1. Kings 16.23 Ahab two and twenty 1. Kings 16.29 Ahaziah his sonne two 1. Kings 22.51 Joram twelve 2. Kings 3.1 And thus Omries stock continued fourty and two years and therefore it is said that Ahaziah who was of that stock by his mother Athaliah in his two and fourtieth yeare began his reigne But this answer methinks is more unsatisfactory then the other the words in 2. Chron. 22.2 will hardly bear such an interpretation And his mothers name was Athaliah the daughter of Omri king of Israel That is the grandchild of Omri the daughter of Ahab the sonne of Omri vers 18. Vers 27. He was the sonne in law of the house of Ahab That is the sonne of Ahabs sonne in law to wit the sonne of Joram by Athaliah Ahabs daughter yet perhaps even he also by his mother Athaliahs perswasion married a daughter of the house of Ahab though by another wife Joash was born who succeeded him in the throne chap. 12.1 Vers 28. And he went with Joram the sonne of Ahab to the warre against Hazael the king of Syria in Ramoth Gilead Toward the latter end of his reigne Joram king of Israel undertook the recovery of Ramoth Gilead out of the hands of Hazael then king of Syria which Ahab his father had formerly attempted with ill successe and Ahaziah the king of Judah his sisters sonne joyned with him in that expedition as Jehoshaphat had formerly done with Ahab Vers 29. And king Joram went back to be healed in Jezreel of the wounds which the Syrians had given him at Ramoth c. That is Ramoth Gilead having wonne the town and then manned it strongly leaving the chief of his army there behind him with his captains of whom Jehu was the chief he withdrew himself to Jezreel to be cured of the wounds which he received in this siege of Ramoth Gilead See the note chap. 9.14 CHAP. IX Vers 1. ANd Elisha the prophet called one of the children of the prophets and said unto him Gird up thy loins c. That is prepare thy self and go with speed the excution that was to be done by Jehu upon the house of Ahab was to be dispatched presently whilest Jehu had the army with him at Ramoth Gilead and Jehoram was gone from thence to Jezreel and therefore the prophet that was to give him his commission was sent with such speed which may also be the reason why aged Elisha went not himself but sent one of