in the second Temple The last way how God revealed himselfe in the second How the Lord revealed himselfe by the poole Bethesda Temple was by the poole Bethesda when the Angel came downe at certaine times to stirre the poole then whosoever after the first troubling of the water stepped in he was cured of whatsoever disease Ioh. 5. 4. It was not the Angell that cured them here for it is a true Axiome of the Schoolemen pars natur a non potest super are naturam An Angell cannot worke a Miracle an Angell is but a part of nature therefore hee cannot worke a miracle which is above nature It was Christ himselfe who wrought the miracle it was hee What Angell wrought this Miracle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 who loosed the prisoners Psal 146. Mattir is so to loose the bound that they have use both of their hands and feete to leape as freely as the Grashopper doth which hath legges to leape upon the earth Levit. 11. 21. So the diseased were loosed that they might leape and goe streight upon their owne feete By Angell here some understand the power of God who useth his Angels as his ministers to worke many things below here and therefore the Seventy put God in place of the Angell as Eccles 5. 6. Say not before the Angell that it was an errour But the Seventy translate it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for the Chaldes use to ascribe the worke of God to his ministers the Angels But it is better to ascribe this miracle here to the Angell of the covenant Iesus Christ Tertullian saith that the operation of the fish-poole being now to cease and to loose the vertue of it our Saviour curing him who had beene long diseased being at the poole gave thereby an entrance to all sicke persons to come unto him as if he should have sayd he that desires to be whole let him not come to the poole or expect the comming downe of the Angell for when he commeth he healeth but one but come unto me and I shall heale you all The conclusion of this is seeing wee have a more Conclusion cleare manifestation of the will of God by Christ than they had under the Law let us beware to offend him now He that despised Moyses law Heb. 10. 28. dyed without mercy under two or three witnesses of how much sorer punishment shall we be thought worthy of if we treade under foot the Sonne of God EXERCITAT VIII Of the necessity of the Word written Ioh. 20. 31. But these are written that yee might beleeve GOd thought it necessary after that he had taught his Church by Word next to teach her by write There is a twofold necessity The first is called an absolute necessity the second of expedience Againe Necessitas absoluta expedientia Gods revealed will was necessary to all men as a cause but his written word was necessary as an instrumentall Scriptura est necessaria 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 verbnm 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The word considered essentially or accidentally cause and this word is considered eyther essentially or accidentally Essentially for the written word this written and unwritten word differ onely as a man naked and cloathed for there is no change in the nature Simile and substance here And that we may the better underderstand the necessity of the writing of the word wee must distinguish here the states of the Church First The estate of the Church considered three wayes shee was in a family or oeconomike Secondly she was Nationall dispersed through the countrey of the Iewes Thirdly she was Ecomenicall or Catholicke dispersed through the whole world So long as shee was in a family and the Patriarches lived long to record to the posterity the word and the workes of God then God taught his Church by his word unwritten But when his Church began to be enlarged first through Iudea then through the whole world then he would have his word set downe in write because then the Fathers Why God would have his word written were not of so long a life to record to the posterity the word and the workes of God Againe he did this to obviat the craft of the Divell and the counterfeite writings of the false Apostles It was necessary then that the word should be written God revealeth himselfe most surely to us by his word that the Church might have a greater certainety of their salvation See how farre the Lord commendeth unto us the certainety which wee have by the Scriptures above all other sort of revelation 2 Pet. 1-19 We have also a more sure word of prophesie here the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 certainety of the Scriptures is preferred to the transfiguration in the mount Secondly the Apostle Gal. 1. 8. preferreth it to the revelation made by Angels If an Angell should come from heaven and teach any other Gospel let him be accursed Thirdly Christ himselfe preferred the certainety of it to Moyses and the Prophets If one should come from the dead and teach us Luke 16. 31. The Church of Rome then doth great wrong to Christians The Church is not the last resolution of our faith when they would make the last ground and stay of Christian faith to be the Church onely But wee are built upon the foundation of the Prophets and Apostles Ephe. 2. 20. the Lord when he dwelt betweene the Cherubims he set the Candlesticke upon his right hand and the table with the shewbread upon his left hand to teach us that the Scriptures are to be preferred still to the testimony of the Church and that wee must rest upon their testimony primariò Whether is it an Article of our faith to beleeve that Quest the Scriptures are the Word of God or not Some things are both de fide de verbo fidei as Ans Christ is Emmanuel Secondly somethings are de verbo Something 's de fide de verbo fidej somethings de verbo fidej but not de fide primario somethings neither de fide neither de verbo fidej fidei but not de fide primariò as Paul left his cloake at Troas Thirdly somethings are de fide but non de verbo fidei which are the conclusions drawne from the canonicall word by consequence And these are eyther drawne from the word generally as this that the Scriptures are the word of God for this is evident from the whole word generally and although this be a principle in it selfe which ought first to be beleeved yet in my conception and manner of taking up it is a conclusion arising from that majesty and Divine character which is in the word it selfe or the particular conclusions drawne from the word They are de fide non de verbo fidei as when a man concludeth his owne particular justification from the word as I Iames am justified est de fide mea and not a part of the canonicall word
have indevoured brethren according to my meane measure of knowledge to make a little path unto you to encourage you and to let you see what profit you may have by this kind of studie and how it may serue you in your ministerie and if ye reap any benefit by it be thankefull to the God of heaven the Father of lights from whom all good things descend and then to my Noble Patron my Lord Keeper who doth incourage me much to go on in this kinde of studie And now when we have made some progresse in this first Schoole and have attained to some measure of knowledge see that your knowledge turne not like the waters of Iordan that run into the dead Sea but let them be like those waters which come from the Sea and returne to the Sea againe let them returne to the praise of him who gave them Next when ye Eccles 1. 7. are in the Schoole of grace that ye may understand the Spirituall meaning of the holy Scriptures acquaint your selves with prayer Elias was a man subject to the like passions as wee are yet he prayed Iam 5. 17. and the Heavens were opened and gaue raine so although ye be men subject to the same passions to which others are subject yet if yee pray earnestly to the Lord he will open the heavens and send downe that Spirituall raine upon you and fit you for the Schoole of your calling And here ye must be carefull Ier. 2. 8. to studie the Law of the Lord and to handle it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 diligently Ieremiah borroweth this speach from those who are trained in the warres and they are said Tractare bellum ye must be skilfull and trained before ye enter into this calling that being entred Num. 31. 27. in it ye may begin to turne the key of knowledge to open the Scriptures to your hearers so that ye may have store both of new and old to bring forth when your Lord and Master shall set you over his houshold to give his servants their meat in due season And at last he will say unto you ye have beene faithfull over Matth. 25. 23 a few things I will make you ruler over many things Lectio stata juvat varia delecta Seneca Your Loving brother in the Lord IOHN WEEMSE The first Table containing the inscriptions of the particular Exercitations in this Booke EXERCITAT I. Of the excellency of Divinity above all other Sciences and Arts. Pag. 1. EXERCITAT II. What use reason hath in Divinity p. 11 EXERCITAT III. That the end of Divinity here consisteth rather in practise than in contemplation p. 20 EXERCITAT IIII. Of Adams knowledge before the fall p. 25 EXERCITAT V. How the Law is said to be written in the heart of man after the fall p. 32 EXERCITAT VI. Of the seven Precepts given to Noah p. 40 EXERCITAT VII Of the divers wayes how God revealed himselfe extraordinarily to his Church p. 43 EXERCITAT VIII Of the necessity of the Word written p. 61 EXERCITAT VIIII Of the singular prerogatives which the secretaries of the holy Ghost had who wrote the Scriptures p. 65 EXERCITAT IX Arguments proving the Scriptures to be divine p. 76 EXERCITAT X. In what language the Scriptures were written p. 88 EXERCITAT XI Of the style of the Scriptures p. 101 EXERCITAT XII That the Hebrew Text is not corrupted p. 109 EXERCITAT XIII That no canonicall booke is perished p. 117 EXERCITAT XIIII That the points were not originally with the Letters from the beginning p. 124 EXERCITAT XV. Of the meanes which God hath used to make the Scriptures plaine unto us as Of Translation of Scriptures p. 131 Of the Translation of the Seventy p. 143 Of the Vulgar Latine translation p. 152 Of paraphrasing of Scriptures p. 158 Of interpretation of Scriptures p. 162 EXERCITAT XVI Of the division of the Scriptures p. 163 EXERCITAT XVII Of the division of the Psalmes p. 166 Of the inscriptions of the Psalmes p. 168 EXERCITAT XVIII Of the division of the Law in haphtaroth and parashoth p. 173 EXERCITAT XIX Of the sense of the Scriptures p. 177 The Table of the places of Scripture cleared in this Booke the first number sheweth the Chapters the second the Verse and the third the Page Genesis ca. ver pag. 2 24 161 3 1 138  21 160 4 26 159 9 4 41 12 5 161 22 17 133 31 4 92 32 26 160  32 40 34 30 103 36 24 86 37 7 48 47 25 125 48 7 106  17 4   5 40 3 161  37 Ibid Exod. ca. vers pag. 1 8 130 3 2 44 4 24 Ibid 10 17 103 11 5 29  10 2  12 2 12 11 134  34 1 13 19 160 16 15 134 17 21 50 21 8 128 24 8 180  9 146 28 30 51  43 89 31 12 113   114   115 33 13 28 Leviticus cap. ver pag. 5 1 103 7 27 41 17 7 45 19 23 35 Numbers cap. vers pag. 16 30 138 19 20 103 21 14 120 24 3 139 20 11 167  55 55 27 21 45 Deutero cap. vers pag. 4 27 103 11 12 2 16 3 2 22 24 103 25 16 161 37 26 134 0 11 80 Ioshua cap. vers pag. 8 12 128 13 22 138 14 15 137 Iudg. cap. vers pag. 7 15 162 16 17 70 20 18 54  23 56 1 Sam. cap. vers pag. 6 6 134 14 19 55  37 54 15 4 161 16 6 69 18 10 74 20 20 182 21 25 103 23 2 54  9 Ibid  12 52 26 12 27   48 28 8 50 2 Sam. ca. vers pag. 3 29 71 5 33 53 6 6 134 7 12 182  19 Ibid 2 43 27 23 8 137  10 27 1 King ca. vers pag. 3 5 62 4 32 120  29 26  33 120 10 18 30  22 31 21 20 55 22 35 103  49 128 2 King 4 27 68 8 10 128 9 11 73 18 26 92 1 Chron. 3 5 88 11 11 137 13 3 53  36 166 17 2 69 29 29 121 2 Cron. 29 30 167 33 19 122 Ezra 2 63 59 4 2 128 Nehem. 7 65 59 8 8 124 Esth 9 32 99 10 2 78 Iob. 4 6 104  18 140 12 20 101 13 1 47 23 9 160 24 20 29 28 28 22 Psal 7 12 105 14 10 Ibid 18 42 127 22 12 179 41 13 166 45 1 72  2 32 47 30 166 74 3 103 78 25 2 81 5 93 86 13 138 103 7 28 114 1 39 116 6 138 118 19 169  22 ibid  25 ibid 119 9 6  16 169 121 1 ibid  8 29 137 2 119 Prover 1 4 138  22 Ibid 4 3 130 13 23 51 16 10 57 19 7 128 23 26 128 25 1 121 31 4 128  29 5 Eccles 3 4 128 7 22 38 12 12 74 Cant. 4 5 159 Esay
〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 104 μ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 131 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 135 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 175 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 u74 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 105 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 131 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 139 ν 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 139 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 104 ο 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 134 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 141 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 48 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 135 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 45 ῶ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 28 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 126 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 137 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 139 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ibid 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 100 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ibid 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 28 ◠〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 101 σ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 181 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 99 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 177 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 162 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 100 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ibid 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 181 Ï„ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 176 Ï… 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 135 φ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 45 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 72 An alphabeticall Table of the principall distinctions and chiefe matters contained in this Booke A Action of the will twofold 20. action of the mind twofold 84. Adam his knowledge before his fall 25 the measure of his knowledge 26 he gave fit names to all the creaturis 30. Adam compared with the most excellent men 28. 29 Analogie of faith twofold 179. Angels appeared in the likenesse of men but not of women 45. they appeared more glorious than a man ibid what Angell stirred the poole 60. Apostles considered two wayes 70. they are set in order before the Prophets 82. Arabick translation addeth postscripts to the Evangelists 150. the errour of the Arabicke postscrips Aristophanes keper of Ptolomens librarie in Egypt 144. Ark not alwayes with urim and thummin 54 they turned their faces to the ark when they asked counsell ibid. it was not in the second temple 59 they sang psalmes when it was carried to the temple 168. 169. Assurance twofold 14. B Beginning of things twofold 79. Booke signifieth a relation by word or writ 120 no canonicall booke lost 117 no booke in the scripture wanteth any essentiall part 118 bookes necessarie for the church albeit lost yet they were found or written again ibid. Blood not to be eaten a precept given to Noâ—h 41. how this precept is to be understood ibid. why the apostles forbid to eat it 42. Breastplate distinguished from Vrim Thummim 51. the letters made not up the answer ibid. the forme of it 52. C Canaan a land blessed of god 2. Chapters and verses not cited by the ancient fathers 176. at the first called titles and the verses were called chapters ibid. Characters in which the scriptures were written first 88. the Samaritan Character and why so called ibid. why Esdras changed the character 89. diverse characters 91. Christ useth the helpe of reason against the Sadduces 16. he excelled Adam in all things 32. the true Salomon 174. the end of the law the prophets ibid. Church compared to Canaan 2. taught by tradition 4. how the pillar of truth 84 not the last resolution of our faith 62. her estate considered three wayes 61. Conscience what 35. a twofold act of the conscience ibid. it is called a painted thing in the Syriack 36. the diverse sorts of conscience 36 37. the good conscience not made up by the light of nature since the fall 37. when the bad conscience accuseth 38. how the bad conscience bindeth a man and how long 39. the conscience gods herauld 38. Conclusions drawne from the first and second principles how they differ 35. conclusions of practise drawne from practicall principles 21. D David came nearest to Adam in prudencie 31. he wrote two books of the psalmes and set them in order 166. Daniel compared with Adam 31. he excelled in the interpretation of dreams ibid Defect threefold 117. Divinitie compared to manna 1. the excellencie of it above all sciences and arts 1 2. compared with Metaphysickes 6. with the mathematicks and physicks ibid. with the lawyer and the physitian ibid. with morall philosophie ibid. and 7. with grammer and rhetorick 8. it rectifieth all other sciences 9. Dough of Egypt called the bread of the poore 2. Dreams whether more excellent then visions 49. the prophets had the dreams with the interpretation of them 48. the difference of them ibid. why god taught his prophets by dreames 49. E Egypt watered with the feet of men 2. it resembleth the world ibid. the people of god vnderstood not the language of it 93. Elephant hath no proper name in the hebrew 30. it is circumscribed by other words Esdras wrote none of the books over againe which were written before the captivitie but onely set them in order 119. F Faith the daughter of divinitie 5 the farther it goeth from sense and reason the more distinct lesse vniversall 4. how faith sense and reason apprehend things 3. the articles of faith taken generally or speciallie 63. Fast of the Iewes for the translation of the bible in greeke 146. Feast of tabernacles the last day the greatest 174 that day the Iewes read three parashoth ibid. Salomon blessed the people that day ibid. Christ the true Salomon taught the people that great day of the feast ibid. G Gate of knowledge foure fold 26. Generation three fold 15. God appeared immediately or mediately by an angell 45. hee appeared in the likenesse of an old man 26. the name god put to expresse any great thing 27. H Haphtorah the originall of it mistaken 157. Hebrew tongue the originall 92. the dialects of it 93. many words in the Hebrew haue a contrarie signification 103. Hedge fourefold 129. Hellenismes and grecismes how they differ 104 Hereticks labour to ground their heresies on the scripture I Iewes orientall and occidentall 109. faithfull keepers of the scriptures 110. bad interpreters ibid. the fable of the grecizing Iewes concerning the translation of the Seventy 146. they would write no language but in Hebrew letters 111. Ignorance damnable 64. ignorance of infirmitie ibid. Iohn why called a divine 75. he saw Christ three wayes 43. Ioseph came nearest to Adam in oeconomie 31. Ioseph put for the whole Iewes 93. Instruments of musick the Israelites kept them in captivitie 119. Interpretation the necesseitie of it 162. words vnknowne to the Iewes in the old testament interpreted 132. Iustin martyr of a philosopher became a divine 7 he standeth for the translation of the Seventie 143. K King wrote a copie of the law 118. Knowledge of the prophets kept by reading 66. Korahs posteritie died not with him 176. they wrote some of the psalmes ibid. L Language originall the Hebrew 89 90. Languages that haue affinitie with the Hebrew 93. and know in what language any book is written 99. Latine words made Greeke Latine translation vide translation Law or physicke whether more
came nearest to him in somes things Salomon came nearest unto him and in some things Daniel in some things Ioseph but Christ the second Adam excelled them in all In the knowledge and sight of God and his attributes Moyses came nearest to him Exod. 33. 13. Teach mee thy A comparison betwixt Moses and Adam wayes that is thy attributes So Psal 103. 7. He made knowne to Moyses his wayes that is his attributes for hee subjoyneth the Lord is mercifull and gracious slow to anger and full of compassion and he chideth not for ever here his wayes are his attributes Moyses came nearest to Adam in this knowledge Salomon in the knowledge of the politickes came nearer to Adams knowledge than Moyses did Moyses sate A comparison betwixt Salomon and Adam all the day long to judge the people Exod. 18. and hee stoode in need of Iethro's counsell to make choyse of helpers but Salomon could have found out all these things by himselfe without the helpe of another Salomon begged wisedome of God and it was granted unto him he desired wisedome to be his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to be president of his counsell and to be his assister or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to be his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to rule happily Wisedom 9. 4. Salomon came nearest to the knowledge of Adam in the Politickes and he is preferred to the wisest within the Church as to Heman and Dedan 1 King 4. 3. and to the wisest without the Church as to the Egyptians As he came nearest to Adams knowledge in the Politickes Salomon came neerest to Adams knowledge in the Politicks so likewise in the knowledge of naturall things for as he wrote from the Cedar of Lebanus to the Hyssope that grew out of the Wall 2 King 4. 33. that is as Iosephus explaineth it he wrote parables and similitudes taken from every one of these kinds and Tertullian saith well Familiare est sacris scriptoribus ut sublimiores veritates explicent per sensibilia nam idem qui est author naturae est author gratiae It is an usuall thing to the holy writers to illustrate heavenly things by earthly comparisons for he that is the God of nature is also the God of grace Salomon wrote from the tall Cedar to the small Hyssope that groweth out of the wall that is from the greatest to the smallest then he passeth by none of them for it is the manner of the Hebrews to marke The Hebrewes marke the two extreames and leave the midst for brevity the two extreames and to leave the midst for brevities cause as Num. 6 4 from the kernell to the huske here the Scripture omitteth the wine which is the midst betwixt the kernell and the huske Another example Exod. 11. 5. And all the first borne of the land of Egypt shall dye from the first borne of Pharoah that sitteth upon the throne unto the first borne of the maidservant that sitteth behind the Mill. The Scripture omitteth the midst here the rest of the people for shortnesse and expresseth onely the two extreames the highest and the lowest A third example Iob 24. 20. The wombe shall forget him and the wormes shall feede sweetly upon him the birth and the grave the two extreames include the whole life So Psal 121. 8. The Lord shall keepe thy going in and going out that is all thy wayes So Salomon writing of the two extreames the tallest and the least includeth all the rest Now if Salomon had such knowledge of these naturall things much more had Adam Adam had such knowledge of the creatures that he Adam gave fit names to the creatures knowing their qualities and nature gave them fit names in the Hebrew expressing their natures he was a good nomenclator to give every thing the right name Plato in Cratillo sheweth that he who giveth the right name to a thing must know the nature of it very well but since the fall men impose wrong names to things as they call light darknesse and darknesse light When hee gave names to the creatures hee gave To what things Adam gave names and to what he gave no names not names to these creatures in particular that had not principium individuationis in se and which differed not something in subsistence from others as all hearbes of the same kind and trees and stones of the same kind he gave not a name to every one of them in particular but gave one name to them all of the same kind but these who differed not in essence but in the manner of their subsisting to these he gave diverse names as hee called himselfe Adam and his wife Eve And wee are to observe that there are many names which Adam Adam gave names to many things which are not found now in the Scripture gave to the creatures in the first imposition which are not found in the Scriptures now the Elephant the greatest beast upon the earth yet it hath no proper name given to it in the Scripture it is called Behemoth Iob 40. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 dens eboris compositum ex 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 dens 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ebur 15. and the teeth of the Elephant are called Shenhabbim the teeth of Ivorie but not the teeth of the Elephant and usually the Scripture expresseth onely the word teeth as 1 King 10. 18. he made a Throne of teeth but not of the teeth of the Elephant because the Elephant was not so knowne to the Iewes therefore the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 cornua dentis Ezek. 27. Scripture doth onely circumscribe this beast and the hornes of it but Adam gave the greatest beast a proper name when he imposed names to the beasts When Adam imposed names to the beasts he imposed proper names to them not circumscribing them Adam gave proper namer to the creatures as the Scripture doth now for our capacity example Shemamith with the hands of it takes hold on kings houses 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Seemeth to be Simia and Solomon sent for such 1 King 10. 22. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 because this word is a hard word to be understood and may signifie eyther a Spyder weaving with her hands or else 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Monkie with a long tayle for kings are delighted in their palaces with such when they see them hung by the hands because wee cannot take up the nature of this beast by the name alone therefore the Scriptures by the effects and properties of it describeth it more at large for our capacity but Adam at the first imposed the simple name These names which Adam gave to the beasts at the Names which Adam gave were perfect names first were most perfect names therefore yee shall see other languages to keepe some footesteppe still of the first imposition as 1 King 10. 22. Tukkijm are called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Peacoks the Talmud calleth
part of the Law and the Apostles in the councill Act. 15. forbiddeth them to eate any thing that was strangled whereby they meant the ceremoniall part of the Law Whether are we to take these precepts as ceremoniall or as morrall Quest The most of these are morrall precepts and the Answ same which are set downe againe in the Law For when the Apostles biddeth them abstaine from fornication Act. 15. It is the same that is forbidden in the fourth See Beza Act. 15. precept given to Noah not revelare turpitudinem and to interpret here fornication for eating of things sacrificed to Idols seemeth to be a strained sense for that is forbidden already by the first precept to Noah And to uncover the nakednesse according to the phrase of the Scripture is meant of bodily pollution and not of spirituall fornication Now besides these morrall precepts set downe by Of eating of blood see more in the appendix of Command 6. the councill they interlace this ceremoniall precept de suffocato forbidding to eate things strangled and they give the reason wherefore the Gentiles should abstaine from these Act. 15. 21. For Moyses is read in their Synagogues every Sabbath as if Iames should say they Why the Apostles forbid to eate blood or things strangled professe not onely the morrall Law but also the ceremoniall Law yet therefore yee Gentiles shall doe well to abstaine from these things which may give them offence The Iewes respected these precepts most because they were kept in the Church even from Noahs dayes The Hebrewes adde further that there was no other precept given untill Abrahams dayes then God added the precept of circumcision and afterwards taught them to separate tithes The Lord taught his Church in her infancie this God at the beginning taught his Church by tradition and not by write wayes by traditions and not be write and even as parents teach their children the first elements by word Simila and afterwards by write so the Lord taught his Church first by word and then by write The conclusion of this is The Lord never left his Conclusion Church without his word to direct her before the fall he spake immediatly to Adam and Eve taught them In the second period he taught them by these seven precepts In the third period by the Law written and in the fourth period by the Gospel EXERCITAT VII Of the diverse wayes how God revealed himselfe extraordinarily to his Church Heb. 1. 1. God who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in times past unto the Fathers by the Prophets GOd manifested himselfe to his Church first by prophesie secondly by the holy Spirit thirdly by God revealed himselfe to his Church foure wayes Vrim and Thummim and fourthly by the poole Bethesda First by prophesie There were sundry sorts of prophecie Sundry sorts of prophecie 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the first was lepi face to face to Moyses onely This sort of prophesie was the highest degree of revelation and it drew nearest to that sort of vision which we shall get of God in the heavens He manifested himselfe to Moyses face to face and hee knew How the Lord manifested himselfe to Moses him by his name that is not onely by the face as Princes know many of their Subjects but he knew him inwardly and liked him this was notitia approbationis Moyses saw God face to face yet he saw not the essence of God for hee dwelleth in a light inaccessable Iohn saw Christ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Iohn saw God three manner of wayes First in his incarnation he saw God dwelling amongst men in the flesh here Secondly in his transfiguration upon the Mount Thirdly in the Spirit upon the Lords day Rev. 1. 10. Although Iohn lay in the bosome of Christ and was his beloved Disciple yet he saith No man hath seene God at any time the onely begotten Sonne which is in the bosome of the Father he hath declared him Ioh. 1. 18. When God spake to Moyses he spake to his underderstanding Differences betwixt the revelations made to Moses and to the rest of the Prophets immediatly A man hath a right eare and a left eare the understanding is like the right eare and the phantasie is like the left eare hee spake to Moyses Differ 1 right eare to his understanding but when he spake to the rest of the Prophets by some shapes and visible formes he spake first to their left eare Moyses saw no visible shapes nor formes except onely in the entry of his calling when he saw the bush burning Exod. 3. 6. and the Angell comming to kill him in the Inne Exod. 4. 24. and when he saw the paterne of the Tabernacle in the Mount Heb. 9. but usually God manifested himselfe to his understanding Secondly the other Prophets were astonished and weakned at the sight of God Dan. 8. 27. and I Daniel Differ 2 fainted and was sicke certaine dayes and I was astonished at the visions So Ezekiel fell upon his face when the Lord revealed himselfe unto him Chap. 3. 27. But Moyses was never affrayd at the sight of God but thrice First when he was to enter in his calling when he saw the bush burning Exod. 3. 2. Secondly at the giving of the Law Heb. 12. 21. Thirdly in the Inne Thirdly Moyses needed not such preparations before he prophesied as some of the other Prophets did Elisha Differ 3 before he prophesied called for a Minstrell to settle his passions that he might be the more fit to receive his prophesie 2 King 3. 15. But Moyses needed not such a preperation So Paul when he was ravished to the third heaven this knowledge which he got was intellectuall and it was neyther by the sight nor by the phantasie and whether the soule was in the body here tanquam in organo vel tanquam in sede onely it may be See Iunius de purgatorie doubted The second sort of prophesie was by vision as when Moyses saw the bush burning this was presented to him when he a was awake this was the meanest sort of revelation 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The third sort was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 when something Visio 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 was presented to their phantasie in a dreame These visions which he shew to the Prophets sometimes they were of things which really existed as Zacharie saw Iosuah the high Priest and Sathan standing at his right hand Zach. 3. Sometimes of things that might be and was not as Zacharie saw two women carrying an Ephath Zach. 5. 5. and sometimes of things that were not nor never could be as the monstrous beasts showne to Daniel and to Iohn in the revelation When the Lord revealed himselfe to the Prophets The Lord appeared to his Prophets sometimes immediately and sometimes by an Angell in these visions sometimes he spake mediatly to them by an Angel As Exod. 3. 2. God is sayd there
not erre in judgement But this reason is faultie many wayes First in the derivation of the names for he deriveth Vrim from the root jara which 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a radice 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a false derivation to exclude the radicall letter for there is duplex Mem here and Aleph is excluded 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth to teach whereas it is derived from or to give light So he deriveth thummim from the root A man which signifieth to beleeve whereas it commeth from tamam to make a thing perfect The seventie translate these words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as yee would say manifestatio veritas And so doth Hierome But this they doe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and they respect more the end here wherefore they were put into the brestplate than their proper significations For as Vrim properly signifieth brightnesse and figuratively 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 because that which maketh all things manifest is the light Ephes 5. 13. and this Thummim properly signifieth perfection so figuratively in things spirituall it signifieth verity The Seventy looking to the figurative signification translate them this wayes Secondly put the case that Vrim and Thummim signified doctrine and verity yet it will not follow that the Highpriest might not erre for by these were signified not what sort of men they were but what sort of men they ought to be Prov. 16. 10. A divine sentence is in the lippes of the King and his mouth transgresseth not in judgement Here is a clearer place that the King of Spaine cannot erre in judgement than that the Pope cannot erre in judgement if yee will take words as they stand But the meaning of the words is a divine sentance ought to be in the lippes of the King and then his mouth will not transgresse in judgement So these two are set in the brestplate of Aaron to teach him his dutie but they were not notes of his infallibility And if by Vrim they would inferre his infallibility in judgement so by Thimmim they may inferre his holinesse of life and so none of the Popes were profane and wicked men Thirdly this brestplate served not for a triall of his doctrine but onely for foretelling of the doubtfull events of things for their doctrine was to be tryed by the law and by the testimony Esa 8. Fourthly if Vrim and Thummim signified verity and The High priests might erre judgement then it should follow that none of the Highpriests could erre but wee know that Vrijah the Highpriest in the time of Achaz brought the paterne of the Altar of Damascus and placed it in Ierusalem 2 King 16. 6. And Caaiphas erred when he condemned Christ to death Lastly let this be granted that the Highpriest under the law could not erre therefore that eyther Peter or the Pope his successor as they alledge could not erre it will not follow For this priviledge not to erre belongeth to none but to Iesus Christ of whom the Highpriest was a type who had both Vrim and Thummim purity of doctrine and perfection of life How long did the gift of prophesie endure in the second Quest Temple The gift of prophesie endured under the old Testament Answ untill the time of the Macedonian Empire When How long the gift of prophesie indured under the old Testament Alexander the great did raigne Nehemiah maketh mention of one Iaddus the Highpriest Neh. 12. 7. who met Alexander when he came against Ierusalem Now See Shinlerus in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 if there had beene none who were infallibly directed by the Spirit of God at this time who could have put this into the canonicall Scripture it being historicall therefore there behoved to be one at this time who had the spirit of prophesie and was one of the masters of the great Synagogue who did this and then the Sunne went downe upon the Prophets Micah 3. and the gift of prophecie ceased Thse gift of prophesie was bestowed anew againe in The gift of Prophesie given under the new Testament the second Temple under the new Testament Ioel. 2. I will powre out my spirit upon all flesh and your young men shall see visions c. This gift lasted in the Church till the second Temple was destroyed The Iewes by a certaine kind of Kabbala called gematrja observe upon Hagg. 1. 8. it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 written there ekkabhda I will be glorified because the word wanteth the letter 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the end of it which letter standeth for five they say that the want of this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sheweth the want of five things in the second Temple which were in the first The Arke the mercy seate and Cherubims Secondly the fire from Heaven Thirdly the majesty of Divine presence called shekena Fourthly the holy Ghost And fiftly Vrim and Thummim But this rabbinicall observation is most impious and serveth The Iewes cabbalisticall observation blasphemous to overthrow all the whole New Testament to deny Iesus Christ and to condemne his Apostles and Evangelists as though they had not the gift of the holy Spirit when they wrote during the time of the second Temple and this is contrary to the very scope of the Prophet Hagg. 1. 8. Goe up into the mountaine and bring wood to build this house and I will take pleasure in it and I will be glorified saith the Lord and Hagg. 2. 9. The glory of the latter house shall be greater then the former and in this place will I give peace saith the Lord. Whether were the Arke the Vrim and Thummim and Quest the holy fire in the second Temple or not Although there was greater spirituall beauty in the Answ second Temple than in the first yet the second Temple The Arke was not in the second Temple wanted this typicall Arke the Vrim and Thummim and the fire therefore it is but a fable of theirs who Iosephus ant lib. 14. say that Titus after he had destroyed the second Temple brought the Arke to Rome in his triumphes but the Arke was never seene in the second Temple and Iosephus who was an eye witnesse of Titus triumphes sheweth that it was onely but the table of the shew-bread which Titus carried away in his triumphes and is seene yet pictured there The Vrim and Thummim were not in the second Temple but the graces signified by them But it may be sayd Nehem. 7. 65. and Ezra 2. 63. That Object they should not eate of the most holy things untill there stood up a Priest with Vrim and with Thummim It is the manner of the Scriptures to expresse the nature Answ of the Church under the New Testament by figures The new Testament expresseth things sometimes under types of the old Testament and types which were under the Old Testament so by Vrim and Thummim which were in the first Temple to expresse the perfection of the Priests which should be
but an application arising from it Fourthly something are neyther de fides nor de verbo fidei Secondly we may answer to this whether the word written be an article of our faith or not The articles Articles of our faith taken generally or specially of our faith are eyther taken generally or specially generally for all that is contained in the Scriptures or may be deduced by way of consequence from the Scriptures then it is not an article of our faith to beleeve the canon of the Scriptures Secondly specially for that which is contained in the Creede for the Creede is the substance of that which is contained in the Scriptures and then it is an article of our faith to beleeve the Cannon of the Scriptures The Scriptures of God are considered essentially The Scriptures considered essentially or accidentally or accidentally Essentially as they proceede from God accidentally againe as they were written by such and such men As they proceede from God we must beleeve them to be true and to be the meanes of our salvation for saving truth is onely from God But if we consider them but accidentally as they are written by such and such men then it is not an article of our faith to beleeve them for it maketh not to our salvation primariò to know that they were written by such and such men When the books in holy Scripture carry the names of those who wrote them as the bookes of Moyses carrie his name if a man should deny these bookes to be written by Moses then be ignorant altogether of the matter contained in them then his ignorance were damnable and the denyall of them hereticall they Ignorantia damnabilis negatio haretica have Moses and the Prophets Luk. 16. But if the writer of the booke be not set downe in the Scripture if a man should deny such a man to write it he should not be reputed as an hereticke for that and to be ignorant that such a man wrote it this Negatia est haerètica per accidens sed igneratio non est damnabilis were not damnable ignorance Example it is holden that Paul wrote the Epistle to the Hebrews now if a man should deny that Paul wrote this Epistle he were not to be holden a hereticke for that neyther were his ignorance damnable A man may be ignorant of this or that booke and yet be saved and many were saved before the bookes were written and now many are saved who cannot reade the Scriptures But when a man doubteth of the order and number Ignorantia hic est infirmitatis negatio est haeritica per accidens of the bookes in the Canon this argueth but his unskilfulnesse and infirmity and the denyall of the number and order of these bookes is but hereticall by accident and the ignorance is not damnable When we beleeve such a booke to be written by such Quest a man whether beleeve we this by a justifying faith or by an historicall faith When we beleeve that such a man wrote this booke Ans this is but an historicall faith and this we have by the Church but that which is dogmaticall in this booke that we must beleeve out of the word it selfe we being illuminate by the Spirit The conclusion of this is Seeing God hath revealed Conclusi his will in his word written to us and remitted us alwayes to the law and to the testimony Esay 10. 8. Ioh. 5. 49. search the Scriptures therefore those who leave the Scriptures and make choyse of traditions they forsake the fonntaine of living waters and digge Cisternes to themselves that can hold no water Ier. 2. 13. EXERCITAT IX Of the singular prerogatives which the secretaries of the holy Ghost had who wrote the Scriptures 2 Pet. 1. 21. And the holy men of God spake as they were moved by the holy Ghost THe holy men of God who were inspired by the holy Spirit to write the Scriptures First they Prorogative 1 were immediatly called by God Gal. 1. 12. For the Gospel which I preached I received it not of man neyther was I taught but by the revelation of Iesus Christ they had not their calling from man but immediatly from God They had their calling intuitu Ecclesiae 1 Cor. 3. 2. sed non Vocatio vel est intuitu ecclesiae inter ventu eccle interventu Ecclesiae that is God ordained these offices for the good of the Church and it was for the Church cause that he appointed them but they had not their calling from the Church But Preachers now have their calling both intuitu Ecclesiae interventu Ecclesiae There Immediata suppositi virtutis is immedietas ratione suppositi immedietas ratione virtutis the first is when the person is immediatly separated by God to such a calling the second is when the graces and calling are immediatly given by God When Ministers are called they have their gifts immediatly from God and so they have their calling there interveneth no suppositum or midst betweene God and them but for the appointing and designing of them to such places that they have from the Church But the Apostles were called immediatly both ratione suppositi vÃrtutis they had their gifts immediatly from God neyther were they designed to such and such plaees as the Ministers are now The Prophets and Apostles were immediatly called by God and therefore Matthias was chosen by lot to be an Apostle because the lot is immediatly directed by the hand of God but Preachers now should not be chosen by lot Zeno the Emperor tempted God in this case laying a paper upon the Altar that God might write in the paper the name of him who should be Bishop of Constantinople but Flavitius corrupting the Nicephorus Lib. 2. Sexton of the Church caused him to write in his name and so was made Bishop of Constantinople But Moyses learned from the Egyptians and Daniel from the Chaldeans therefore it may seeme that they Object had not their calling immediatly from God They had the learning of humane sciences and trades Answ from men as Paul learned from men to be a Tent maker The Apostles and Prophets learned their humane Sciences and Artes from men but not their divine knowledge so Moyses learned these humane sciences from the Egyptians Daniel from the Chaldeans but their knowledge as Prophets Apostles imediatly was froÌ„ God Although they had their divine knowledge immediately from God yet they were to entertaine it by reading Simile As the fyre that came from heaven upon the Altar The Prophets know ledge was kept by reading Dan. 2. 9. and 1 Tim. 4. 13. was miraculous yet when it was once kindled they kept it in with wood as wee doe our fire So the Prophets knowledge was preserved by reading as ours is Their second pretogative was the measure of knowledge Prerogative 2 they had in matters Divine Their knowledge far The measure of
not this tongue So Psal 114. 1. they departed from a people of a strange language or a barbarous 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 people they called them all barbarous whom they understood not and because the Iewes understood not the Aegyptian tongue therefore Ioseph made him to speake to his brethren by an Interpreter Genesis 42. 23. The Cananitish language was a daughter of the Hebrew The Cananites language a diolect of the Hebrew tongue or rather one with the Hebrew tongue and this we may perceive by the names of the townes men and places which were imposed to them by the Cananites as Iericho Salem Kiriath-arba Kiriath-Sepher Beth-dagon so the names of men Melchizedeck Adonibezek Abimelech And if the Cananitish tongue had not beene all one with the Hebrew how could the Patriarches have kept conference with those in Canaan and made their Bargaines and Contracts with them this is cleare also by the example of Rahab who could speake to the Spyes and they understood her and so Ioshua to the Gibionites The Lord would have this tongue continued amongst the Cananites because the Hebrewes were shortly to inhabite that land and to converse with the Cananites for a while untill they had rooted them out There is some of the Old Testament written in the Some of the Old Testament written in the Chaldee tongue Chaldee tongue which hath great affiance with the Hebrew and some of it written in the Syrian dialect as Iob which the Idumeans used and it differed little from the Hebrew tongue but it differed much from the Syrian language now but more from Arabia Ismaelitica which the Turkes speake now in Asia and Africa There are some words found in the Old Testament which are Egyptian Gen. 41. 43. Some Phaenitian as Chabbul 1 King 9. 13. Some Persian words as Pur Esth 9. 24. and some moabitish There is one verse in Ieremy originally written in the One Verse in Ieremie originally written in the Chaldee tongue Chaldee tongue Ier. 10. 11. whereas all the rest of that prophesie is written in the Hebrew tongue The gods that have not made the heaven and earth even they shall perish from the earth and from under these heavens The reason why this verse was written in the Chaldee tongue was this because the Iewes now were to be carried to Babylon and when they should be sollicitated there to worship their gods they should answer them in their owne language cursed be your gods for they made neyther heaven nor earth That of Daniel and Ezra which is written in the Chaldee tongue was transcribed out of the roules and registers Something 's taken of the registers of the Chaldeans and insert in the Scriptures of the Chaldeans and insert in the bookes of God but that which the holy Ghost indited originally to Daniel and Ezra was written in the Hebrew tongue the rest was borrowed but out of their registers as first Nebuchad-nezzers dreames Dan. 2. So Nebuchad-nezzer setteth up a golden image Cap. 3. So Nebuchad-nezzers dreame Cap. 4. and Belshassers visions Cap. 5. all these were written in the Chaldee tongue the seventh Chapter is onely excepted it is written also in the Chaldee tongue although it was originally endited to Daniel because it is a more cleare exposition of the monarchies revealed before to Nebuchad-nezzer and Belshasser and set downe in their owne Registers in the Chaldee tongue but the eight Chapter and the rest are wholly written in the Hebrew tongue which were indited immediatly by God to Daniel and not transcribed out of their registers as the rest were So that part of Ezra which is written in the Chaldee tongue is but transcribed and written out of the decrees and letters of the Kings of Media and Persia from the eleventh verse of the fourth Chapter to the seventh Chapter The Chaldeans and Persians used to register and keepe a Chronicle of all their memorable deedes and what befell them and so of their visions and dreames and they caused to write them and interpret them so did the Persians Esth 9. 32. and Daniel wrote these visions in the Chaldee tongue and he set them downe for the good of the Church that they might understand that their conditions should be under the Heathish Kings The holy Ghost borrowed somethings first from Something 's in the Scriptures borrowed from the Heathen History the Poets and secondly from the history of the Heathen and the Secretaries of the holy Ghost insert them in the Booke of God From the Poets as Paul borrowed from Aratus Menander Epimenides or Callimachus some verses and inserted them in his Epistles So the Scriptures borrow from the history which were eyther Heathenish or Iewish Heathenish againe were of two sorts eyther Chaldean or Persian Daniel borroweth from the Chaldeans So from the history of the Persians as that memorable history of the deliverance of the Iewes under Haman was first written in the Persian language Esth 9. 32. and he who wrote the Booke of Esther borrowed the history out of that booke These things which are borrowed from the Something 's in the Scripture borrowed from the Iewish History Iewish history as the facts of those registrate in the Bookes of the Maccabees Heb. 11. So Iude out of the prophesie of Enoch borrowed the history of the strife betweene Michael and the Divell about the body of Moyses So the Apostle Heb. 11. out of the traditions of the Iewes borroweth that Esay was cut with a saw under Menasse So there are sundry proverbiall speeches in the Talmud as Cast out the beame which is in thine owne eye and then thou shalt see chearely to cast out the mote that is in they neighbours eye Matth. 7. 5. So it is easier for a Camell to goe thorow the eye ef a Needle Matth. 19. 24. So it is hard to kicke against prickes Act. 9. 5. Some of our Divines to prove that the Apocryphall Bookes are not Canonicall Scripture use this midst because they are not cited by the Apostles in the New Testament but this is false for the Apostle citeth them Heb. 11. And Scaliger in his Eusebianis proveth out of Georgius See Scaliger Euseb Pag. 245. Cyncellus that the Apostle citeth many testimonies out of the Apocryphall Bookes and out of the traditions of the Iewes As Matthew that Salmon maried Rahab Salmon his genealogie is set downe 1 Chro. 2. but not whom he maried this Matthew had by tradition Matth. 1. 5. Things in the Heathen history which are not necessary to be knowne to the Church the Scripture passeth by them and remitteth us to Heathen History and saith still The rest are they not written in the bookes of the Chronicles of Iuda and Israel and when the knowledge of them is necessary to the Church it borroweth them out of the Heathen history and inserteth them in the booke of God These things which were written out of the Iewish Heathen sentences were sanctified by the
with the first Verse of the fortieth Chapter and all the rest should be included in a parenthesis As we have spoken of the stile of the Scripture in generall so let us observe the stile of some of the writers in particular Esayes stile differed much from the stile of Amos he being a Courtiour and he but a Neat-herd So the stile of Ezekiel differed from the stile of the rest of the Prophets he calleth himselfe The Sonne of man not because it is a Chaldee phrase but because of the excellent visions which he saw therefore he is called the Sonne of man that is an excellent man as Iesus Christ in the New Testament is called The Son of man that is an excellent man So this is peculiar to Iohn the Evangelist to call Christ the Sonne of God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for the Chaldees and the Talmud usually call him so Iohn opposed himselfe to Ebion and Cerinthus two Iewes who denyed the divinity of Christ wherefore he hath usually the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1 Ioh. 7. 5. which was frequent in the Chaldee paraphrast and read often by the Iewes So there are some things peculiar to Paul for hee useth some words according to the manner of the speech in Tarshish and Cilicia as Collos 2. 18. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in their language signifieth insidiose alteri praeripere palmam So 1 Cor. 4. 3. Mans day according to the phrase of Tarshish is put for the time of judgement because they had some appointed times for judgement The Conclusion of this is here we may admire the Conclusion wisedome of God who gave most excellent gifts to his Secretaries for the edification of his Church Moses was a man of a slow speech and of a slow tongue and Aaron God gave excellent gifts to his Secretaries for the good of his Church must be his spokesman Exod. 4. Yet Moyses was mighty in words and deeds Act. 7. 22. It is sayd of Paul that his bodily presence was weake but his letters were weighty 2 Cor. 10. 11. By his preaching he converted many from Ierusalem to Illiricum Rom. 15. 19. but by his letters hee converted moe both in Europe Africa and Asia such Paul converted moe by his writing than by his preaching was the majesty and grace in his writing that they acknowledged it to be from the Lord. EXERCITAT XII That the Hebrew Text is not corrupted Psal 119. 140. Thy word is very pure therefore thy servant loveth it THe Church of Rome that they may advance the authority of the vulgar Latine translation which they The Church of Rome maketh the vulgar Latin translation to be canonicall have made canonicall doe labour to disgrace the originall Text the Hebrew and Greeke holding that they are corrupt in many things Master Iames Gordon our Country man observeth Controvers 1. Gordonij cap. 9. foure distinct periods of time The first period he maketh to bee the Iewes Synagogue before Christ came in the flesh he granteth that all this time the Hebrew Text was not corrupted by the Iewes The second period of time he maketh to be from the ascension of Christ untill the dayes of Hierome and Augustine and he saith that in this second period the Iewes went about to corrupt the translation of the Seventy because the Christians then began to use arguments taken out of that translation against them as Iustine Martyr testifieth writing against Tripho The third period he maketh to be after the death of Saint Hierome untill the time that the Talmud was composed and set together and then he saith there arose great contention betwixt the Orientall and Occidentall Iewes the Orientall Iewes were those who dwelt upon the East side of Euphrates in Babylon Media Persia those What Iewes were called orientall and what occidentall Peter called the Church at Babylon 1 Pet. 5. 13. The Occidentall Iewes were those to whom he wrote Scattered abroad in Pontus Galatia Cappadocia Asia and Bithynia 1 Pet. 1. 1. because of the diversity of their reading and corruptions in the Text. He saith that the Iewes met at Tiberias Anno 508. and there set downe the Points and made their Masora to obviat this that no more corruption should enter into the Text. The fourth period he maketh to be after the Iewes had met at Tiberias they decreed that none should use any copy but such as were corrected by the Masoreth and so from this time he freeth the Text from corruption but hee laboureth much to prove that the Hebrew Text was corrupt before and that the vulgar Latine is sound and free from corruption which was translated by Saint Hierome under Pope Damasus and so continued in the Church of Rome The Iewes to whom The Oracles of God were committed The Iewes kept faithfull the booke of God without corruption Rom. 3. 2. therefore it was called Their Law Ioh. 8. 17. would they have corrupted their owne Evidents Augustine calleth the Iewes Capsarios nostros who faithfully kept the booke of God and reserved it unto us without corruption he saith Dispersos esse Iudaeos infideles ut testarentur Scripturas esse veras The unbeleeving Iewes were scattered through the world that they might testifie the Scriptures to be true and shall wee thinke that the Iewes would have corrupted the Text The Iewes numbred the Verses Words and Letters of the Bible who have numbred the words letters and verses of the Bible and R. Zaddias hath numbred the letters words and verses and summed up all the verses at the end of every booke and they have observed that all the letters are found in one verse Zeph. 3. 8. as also foure of the finall letters they carry such respect to the Law that if it but fall to the ground they institute a fast for it The superstitious Iewes at this day are so carefull to They would write no language but in Hebrew letters keepe the letters and words of the Law that they will have neither Chaldee Syriacke nor Hebrew words wrirten but in Hebrew letters and it greeved them when they saw in Origens Hexupla Hebrew words Vide Guiliel Scâ—ickardum de jure regio 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 written in Greeke Characters when they saw the copie which was presented to Alexander the Great having the name Iehova still written in Golden letters they were much greeved at it and when they see any thing changed in our copies now in disdaine they call it Hhomesh pesul she l gelahhim that is Pentateuchus rasorum Monachorum the Pentateuch of the shaven Monkes The Iewes after the death of Christ were dispersed among many Nations and they never met together againe and albeit they would have corrupted the Scripture how could they have falsified all the Copies Bellarmin maketh this objection to himselfe Some Bellarm. lib. 2. Cap. 2. De verbo dei men will say that the Hebrew Text was corrupted after the dayes of Saint
none of these Bookes should perish which are canonicall That fable of Esdras then is to be rejected lib. 4. The fable of Esdras rejected cap. 4. 23. So cap. 14. 21. to the 24. verse he sheweth how the booke of God was lost in the Captivity and that Esdras the Scribe by holy inspiration wrote it all anew againe but this is false see we not how Daniel read out of the prophesie of Ieremie how long the captivitie should last Dan. 2. 9. The booke of God then was not lost in the captivity and written anew againe by Esdras but onely he set the bookes in order after Esdras wrote nothing of the Scriptures but onely set the bookes in order the captivity nihil ad 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 fecit sed ad 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Hee did nothing in correcting the booke of God but onely set it downe in order But we reade often times in the Scriptures of many Bookes wanting now which were extant before as the Bookes of the battels of the Lord Num. 21. 14. By this it cannot bee inferred that any canonicall Ans booke is perished for this word Sepher signifieth a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 relation as well by word as by write Secondly although wee grant that it was a written booke yet it will not follow that it was a holy Booke Thirdly although we grant that it was an holy booke yet it will not follow that it was a canonicall booke The bookes of the Chronicles of the Kings of Iuda and Israel were but civill records and belonged nothing to the canon of the Scriptures Some things written by the Prophets not as they were Prophets Secondly some bookes that were written by the Prophets were not written by them as they were Prophets Salomon wrote of Hearbes Trees and Plants 1 King 4. 33. But what bookes were these They were but bookes of things which were under the Moone and of things corruptible and because they served not for the edification of the Church afterwards therefore the Hezekiah buried Salomons bookes of physick Lord suffered them to perish Suidas saith that the booke which Salomon wrote of Physicke was affixed upon the gate in the entrie of the Temple and because the people trusted too much in it neglecting the Lord as Asa put his trust in the Physitians 2 Chro. 13. therefore Hezekiah caused to pull away this booke and bury it And the Talmud saith that Hezekiah did two 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 memorable things First Ganaz Sepher rephuoth Abscondit librum medicinarum He hid the bookes of Physicke which Salomon had written And secondly Cathath nahhash hannehhushoth shegnashe Moshe Comminuit aeneum 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 serpentem quem fecerat Moses He brake the brasen Serpent which Moyses made Salomon spake three thousand Proverbes 1 King 4. 32. yet of all these Proverbes scarce eyght hundred are put in the Canon Some of these Proverbes the servants of Hezekiah King of Iuda copied out Prov. 25. 1. And as they saw the King their master bury Salomons booke which he knew was hurtfull to the Church so those servants copied out these Proverbes which were profitable Salomons Proverbs and Songs which were not profitable to the Church perished for the Church whereas the rest perished So Salomon wrote a thousand and five Songes of all which Songes the Lord made choyse but of one to be insert in the Canon which is called the Song of Songes or canticum 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 est utriusque numeri quae vel quod canticorum quae Salomonis rather then canticum canticorum quod Salomonis it was the most excellent Song of all Salomons Songs rather then the excellentest Song compared with other Songes But all bookes written by thē for the whole Church none of them are perished as the Prophesies of Nathan Ahija and Iddo For Burgensis observeth well upon 1 Chro. 29. That the first booke of Samuel is holden to be written by Samuel himselfe So the second Booke of Samuel and the second booke of the Kings were written by Nathan and Gad who lived with David and Salomon and wrote untill the death of Salomon then Iddo and Ahija wrote the historie following of Ieroboam interlacing somethings of Salomon and Rehoboam 1 Chron. 29. 29 Now the acts of David the King first Object and last behold they are written in the booke of Samuel the Seer and in the booke of Nathan the Prophet and in the booke of Gad the Seer with all his reigne and his might and the times that went over him and over Israel and all the Kingdomes of the Countries But these words cannot be understood of the bookes of Samuel for wee reade not in these bookes what David did abroad in these Countries therefore some other bookes must be understood here written by Gad and Nathan which are not extant Not onely the things which David did in Israel are Ans set downe in the booke of Samuels but also the things which he did abroad in other Countries as against Zoba King of Hadadezzar against the Moabites and against Tobh King of Hemath And where it is sayd over Hieron in Esa 13. all the kingdomes of the countries it is the manner of the Scripture as Hierome marketh by the whole Countries to understand the next adjacent countries whereof it speaketh and therefore in the originall it is Haaratzoth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Of that earth 2 Chro. 33 19. The prayer of Manasseh and how God Ob. was intreated of him and all his sinne and his trespasse and the places wherein he built high places and set up groves and graven images before he was humbled behold they are written among the saying of the Seers or Hosai But in the whole booke of the Kings there is no mention made of his affliction or of the cause which mooved him to repent or of his prayers which he made to God in time of his affliction then this booke of the prophet is not now extant So the acts of Baasha Zimri and Omri are they not written in the Bookes of the Chronicles of Israel 1 Kings 16. 5. 27. But nothing concerning their actes are found in the bookes of the Kings or in the Chronicles therefore those bookes are perished when the Scriptures remit us to those bookes it giveth us to understand that these bookes are worthy to be trusted as written by the Seers of God neyther doth the Scripture cite them as it doth some short sentences out of the Heathen Poets The Apostle saith of those Poets that they sayd the truth Tit. 1. 13. But the Spirit of God remitteth us to these bookes that we may be fully instructed by them in the whole truth of the Acts of those Kings First we must know that there were many Prophets Answ who prophesied whose prophesies were never written as the prophesies of the children of the Prophets and the prophesies of those who prophesied from the Some
prophesies of the Prophets were not written dayes of Eli to David as some of Asaph Heman and Ieduthun Secondly all the things which were written by the Seers were not written by them as Seers Salomon wrote many things which he wrote not as a Prophet and so did David Thirdly many things which Something 's written by the Prophets profitable for the Church then but not profitable now they wrote then as Seers and were profitable to the Church for that time were not profitable for the Church now and the Spirit of God remitted them then to the civill records and to some prophesies which were then extant but are perished now because now they were not necessary for the Church but all these things which the Lord endited to them by his Spirit and which he thought to be necessary for his Church to be the Canon and rule of our faith all those the Lords watchfull eye hath kept and preserved that none of them are perished The Conclusion of this is The bookes of Emperours Conclusion and Kings are lost yet the Lord hath kept the register of the little Kings of Iuda and Israel both in whole and in parts although they were but Shepherds and banished men And the Church would rather spend her best blood then shee would part with that pretious Iewell or any part of it therefore they called those who delivered the booke of God to the persecuting Tyrants Traditores EXERCITAT XIIII That the points were not originally with the Letters from the beginning Neh. 8. 8. So they read in the Booke the Law of God distinctly and gave the sense and caused them to vnderstand the reading of the Law WE have showne that the Scriptures are not corrupt and that no essentiall or integrall part is wanting in the holy Scriptures Now it resteth to show that the Points the accidentall ornaments were not from the beginning The Iewes who are faithfull keepers but bad interpreters of the Scriptures interpret these words Nehe. 8. 8. after this manner vaijkreu bassepher betorath They read in the booke of the Law this they expound to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the litterall sense which Ezra gave Mephorash distinctly that is adding the Points and distinctions Veshom Shecel Apponentes intellectum and gave the sense that is he added 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Targum or paraphrase to it Vajabhinu bammikra and caused them to understand the reading of the Law 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is he added the Kabbala But this is a false Glosse Ezra read the Law to them gave them not onely the grammaticall sense but also the spirituall and true meaning of the words he neither added points nor Targum or Kabbala to it The points were not then from the beginning as may be seene by these reasons following The first reason is taken from the Samaritan Character The Iewes acknowledge that the letters of the law Reason 5 which they have now are not the ancient Characters in which Moyses wrote the Law But to these ancient Characters there is no vowell subjoyned as we may see in the forme of the Shekell set downe by Arias Montanus Beza and Villalpand upon Ezekiel The second reason is taken from the first exemplar Reason 2 of the Iewes which they kept in their Synagogues and they have most exactly written and rouled up this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 booke which is the cheefe booke in their estimation and whereof they account more then of any other Hebrew Bible yet there is neyther Poynt nor Accent in this booke but onely Consonants This may be seene also in their ancient billes of divorce wherein are neyther Points nor Accents Therefore the Points were not from the beginning The third reason is taken from the names of the Reason 3 Points and Accents which are Chaldee names therefore they were imposed after the captivity But they who maintaine that the Poynts were from Object the beginning say that this reason holdeth not for the names of the Moneths are Chaldee names imposed after the captivity and yet the Moneths were from the beginning So the Points may be from the beginning although the Chaldee names were given to them after the captivitie As the Moneths were from the beginning and had Answ Chaldee names given unto them after the captivity so the value of the Points were from the beginning but the figures and the names of the Points were set downe a long time afterwards The fourth reason is taken from the translation of the Reason 4 Seventy for when the Seventy read the Hebrew Text wanting the Points they differed very farre from the Hebrew in many things The difference of their reading arose from this because the Hebrew Text wanted 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 baculus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 lâ—ctus the Poynts Example Gen. 47. 31. and Israel bowed himselfe gnal rosh hamitta upon bis beds head But the Apostle followeth the translation of the Seventy translating it He bowed upon the top of his rod Heb. 11. 21. So 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Volumen 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 caput cranium Psal 40. 7. for Megilla the Seventy read gilgoleth in capite libri for in volumine libri because they wanted the Points and the Apostle followed this reading The fift reason is taken from Ketibh volo keri when Reason 5 the words are written one way and read another This 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 diversity of reading and writing arose because the letters wanted the Points from the beginning this made them to reade one way and write another way The Chaldee Arabian and Assyrian language which Reason 6 are but daughters proceeding from the Hebrew tongue have no Points therefore it is not probable that the Hebrew Text had Points from the beginning The seventh reason is taken out of the Talmud They Reason 7 write that Ioab killed his master because he taught him to read Zacar Masculus for Zecer Memoria and so made 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 masculus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 memoria him to spare the females of the Amalekites whereas hee should have blotted out their memorie and killed them all Now if the points had beene from the beginning then Ioabs master could not have taught him to have read Zacar for Zecer The Points were not from the beginning then but found out afterwards by the Masorath There were three sorts of teachers amongst the Iewes The first was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 who gathered the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 vel traditions of the Fathers together such were the Pharisees The second were the Sopherim afterwards called the Masoreth these observed the letters and words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the reading The third sort were the Midroseth the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Cabbalists who expounded the Scriptures allegorically The Scribes were from Moyses time who taught the people to reade the Law because the Law wanted the Points and Christ calleth these The
error of this Syrack and Arabiack postscript Arabick say that this Gospel was written in Hebrew first whereas it was written originally in Greeke Secondly that the Arabick calleth Matthew an Apostle whereas he was an Evangelist The Postscript of the Evangelist Marke in the Syriack The postscript of Marke in the Syriack and Arabiack Translationes is this Absolutum est Evangelium Sancti Marci qui loquutus est Evangelizavit Romae That is here endeth the Gospel of S. Marke which he spake and preached at Rome The Arabick hath it thus Finitum est exemplar Marci quod scripsit in ditione romana occidentali in vrbe Romana anno duodecimo postquaÌ„ dominus noster Iesus Christus carne in Caelos ascendit quarto anno Claudij Caesaris That is here endeth the exemplar of Marke which hee wrote in the province of westerne Rome in the City of Rome it selfe twelve yeares after our Lord Iesus Christ ascended into heaven in the flesh in the fourth yeere of Claudius Caesar But this Postscript is not probable for Marke lived The errour of these two postscripts in the Church of Alexandria in Egypt therefore it is more probable that he wrote his Gospel there than at Rome The Postscript of Luke in the Syriack is this Scriptum The postscript of Luke In the Arabiack and Syriack Translation est Alexandriae magnae quindecem annis a Christi ascensione It was written in the great City of Alexandria fifty yeares after Christs ascention The Arabick is Scriptum est graece in civitate Macedonia vigesimo secundo anno post ascensionem Domini in caelum vigesimo quarto anno Claudij Caesaris This Gospell was written in Greeke in the City of Macedonia twenty two yeares after the Lords ascension into the heavens the twenty fourth yeare of Claudius Caesar Here we may see the difference betwixt these two The error of these two postscripts Postscripts the Syriack saith it was written in Alexandria in Egypt and the Arabick saith it was written in Macedonia in Greece what credite then should wee give to these Postscripts The Postscript of Iohn the Syriack is Iohannes Evangelista hoc Evangelium edidit Graece Ephesi That is the The postscript of Iohn in the Arabiack and Syriak Translation Evangelist set forth this Gospel in Greeke at Ephesus the Arabick is Iohannes filius Zebedaei vnus ex duodecem Apostolis scripsit idgraece Incolis Ephesi anno post ascensionem domini in Caelos tricesimo imperante Nero. Iohn the son of Zebedaeus one of the twelve Apostles wrote this in Greeke to the inhabitants of Ephesus thirty yeares after Christs ascension in the reigne of Nero. The Syriack translation is read in Syria Mesopotamea Chaldea and Egypt and it was sent first in to Europe by Ignatius Patriarch of Antioche These who translated the Bible in latter times were The latter Translaters of the Bible Popish or Orthodoxe eyther Popish or Orthodoxe Popish the Latine translation established by the councill of Trent Vatablus Arias Montanus Pagninus and Isiodorus Clarius By the reformed as by Munster Ecolampadius by Leo Iuda who dying before the worke was finished Bibliander and Conradus Pellicanus finished it and then they are called Biblia Tigurina And lastly by Iunius and Tremellius Of the Vulgar Latine translation VVHen light arose to them who sate in darkenesse and in the shadow of death to the Protestants who lived before in Popery they began to search the originall Text and to looke into the fountaines the Hebrew and Greeke and they charged the adversaries to bring their proofes out of the originall Text in their disputations with them The Church of Rome to obviat this made a decree The Church of Rome decreed that the Vulgar Latin translation should be the originall in the Councill of Trent Anno. 1546. that the Vulgar Latine should be holden for the originall which was as base a change as when Rehoboam changed the golden Sheilds in the Temple into Sheilds of brasse 1 King 14. 27. So have they changed the originall into the Vulgar Latine translation and made it authenticke which in many places is corrupted After that they had inacted that the Vulgar Latine should be onely the touchstone to try all controversies and that they should use it in their readings and disputations then Sixtus Quintus the Pope tooke great paines about the correcting of this Vulgar Latine Pius the fourth and Pius Quintus had done something before in the correcting of this Vulgar translation but it was Sixtus Quintus that finished it Anno 1590. So Forty foure yeeres betwixt the act of the Councill and the finishing of the Latin translation that there were forty foure yeares betwixt the Act made in the Councill and the finishing of the translation Bishop Morton saith that the Canon Law forbiddeth that a child shall be baptized before it bee borne yet they will make this Vulgar translation to be originall and authenticke before it be finished and perfected by the Popes And what will they say here wanted the Church an authenticke translation all this while untill it was concluded in the Councill of Trent When Sixtus Quintus had taken all this paines in correcting the vulgar Latine and had proclamed it as authenticke by his Bull and cursed them who held otherwise yet Clemens the eight came afterwards and Clemens the eight corrected the vulgar translation corrected many things which were left uncorrected by Sixtus Quintus and he set out a more perfect Edition than that of Sixtus Quintus and there was great difference betwixt these two Editions as Docter Iames the Overseer of the Library of Oxford hath marked in his booke which is intituled De Bâ—llo antipapali These were not errors in the Print as some would salve up the matter but they are materiall differences as may bee seene in that booke by conferring their translations We may demand of the Catholickes whether did the Councill make this translation Authenticke which was not Authenticke before or did they onely declare it to be Authenticke Some of them say that the Councill Diverse â—udgements of the Catholicks concerning the vulgar Latin translation promulgated it to be Authenticke and that the Lord so directed the hand of the first Translator that he erred not in these things that the Councill was to approve afterwards But Bannes the Iesuite saith that it is of Pag. 537. greater authority that is approved by the Church than that which was immediatly written by these who were infallibly directed by the Spirit but can there be any greater authority than to be infallibly directed by the In â—oâ—is theologicis lib. 2. cap. 14. Spirit Canus holdeth that they were immediatly and infallibly directed by the Spirit who translated the Scripture first into the vulgar Latine And Gretserus goeth further and sticketh not to say that Theodosion who translated the Bible into Greeke erred not in his Defensionâ— Bellarm. contra
may be seene before in the postscripts added to the Syriacke translation Secondly they charge him that he tooke away the Calender for the reading of the Gospel upon holy dayes but neyther the Hebrew Calender nor the Syriacke Calender are Divine Scripture and that use for which they say this Calender served for reading of the Gospel upon holy dayes was onely used in the westerne Romish Churches but not in the Easterne Churches Thirdly they say that he committed Plagium in stealing his translation from Guido Fabricius and setting it out under his owne name but what diligence he used in translation of the Syriack he who wrote his life testifieth And will any man thinke that he who was a native Iew borne and trained up in these tongues was so ignorant that he had no skill but that which he did steall from another and Gretserus addeth that first he was a Iew and then he became a Monke thirdly a Calvanist or Hugonite and lastly that hee returned to his vomite againe and dyed a Iew. But that yee may perceive what a Railer this was who spared neyther the living nor the dead I will set downe a memorable proofe of his death he who wrote Apophthegmata morientium the notable sayings which sundry uttered at the last houre of their death relateth this of him When they demanded of him what confession hee would make of his faith he sayd Vivat Christus pereat Barabbas Whereas the rest of the Iewes cryed Vivat Barabbas pereat Christus this he sayd to signifie that he renounced Iudaisme and tooke him onely to the merites of Christ Was this to dye like a Iew the Name of this worthy man should smell to us as the Wine of Lebanon Hos 14. 7. Of a Paraphrase THe second way how God maketh the Scripture plaine unto us is by paraphrasing it which goeth in a larger circuit of words than a translation doth and this is called tirgam a Paraphrase An Ecphrasis is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an exposition of this Paraphrase The first Paraphrase was the Paraphrase of Ionathan the sonne of Vzziel who paraphrased the great Prophets thirty yeeres before Christ both plainely and without Allegories but upon the small Prophets hee runneth out more upon Allegories The seeond Paraphrase was the Paraphrase of Onkelos otherwise called Rabbi Aquila adding Nun and changing a into o as Aquila Onkelos as Bonarges Bannarges It was hee who translated the Old Testament into Greeke also he paraphrased the five bookes of Moyses ninety yeeres after Christ not long after the destruction of the Temple The third Paraphrase was Targum Hierosolymitanum upon the five bookes of Moyses most fabulous and most impure but because Targum Ionathan was in great request among the Iewes and not so fabulous as this Targum the Printers amongst the Iewes put these two letters Tau Iod before that Paraphrase to make the Reader beleeve that it was Targum Ionathan Ionathans 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Paraphase for these two letters stand both for Targum Ionathan and for Targum Hierosolymitanum Lastly Rabbi Ioseph Caecus paraphrased Cetubhim or the written bookes All these Paraphrases if yee will respect the language were eyther in the Babylonian or Hierosolymitan tongue three in the Babylonian and Turgum Hierosolymitanum in the Hierosolymitan tongue These Paraphrases where they paraphrase against Paraphrases when they are blasphemous are to rejected Christ are to be detested Exam. 1. Gen. 4. Incaeptum est nomen domini profanari but Targum Hierosolymitanum paraphraseth it blaspemously In diebus illis coeperunt Idola colere fecerunt sibi Deos erroneos quos cognominabant de nomine Sermonis domini And here he implyeth Christ who is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sermo dei This paraphrase is blasphemous against the Sonne of God and therefore to be detested Example 2 Can. 4. 5. Thy two breasts are like two young Roes Targum paraphraseth these two Roes to be two Messiases the one the sonne of Ioseph the other the sonne of David the one Poore and the other mighty that is a blasphemous Paraphrase and therefore to bee detested Example 2. Iob. 23. 9. He paraphraseth it this wayes Michael is upon his right hand and Gabriel upon his left hand Michael is upon his right hand and he is fire and Gabriel is upon his left hand and he is water and the holy creatures are partly fire and partly water This Paraphrase is blasphemous because it maketh the Sonne of God but a Creature and matcheth Gabriel with Michael Secondly where these Paraphrases are fabulous they Paraphrases when they are ridiculous are to be rejected are to be rejected Example 1 Gen. 3. 21. The Lord made coates of skin for Adam and Eve Targum Hierosolymitanum paraphraseth it this wayes The Lord made glorious cloathes which he put upon the skin of their flesh that they might cover themselves Example 2. Gen. 32. 26. Dimitte me quia ascendit aurora The Paraphrast maketh this to be one of the seven Angels who stand before the Lord singing continually holy holy Lord of Hoasts and he maketh this Angell to be cheefe of the Quire Example 3. Exod. 13. 19. And Moyses tooke the bones of Ioseph with him Targum Hierosolymitanum paraphraseth it thus Ascendere fecit Moses vrnam ossium Iosephi ex intimo Nili abauxit secum Hence the Talmudists make a great question how they could finde this Chest of Ioseph being sunke so deepe in the flood Nilus and they flye to their shift of Shem hamphorash and R Bechai upon this saith that Moyses tooke a plate and wrote 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 upon it and sayd ascende Be◠meaning Ioseph who was called Bos Dei Deut. 33. 17. did cast this plate into Nilus saying O Ioseph thy brethren which are redeemed are waiting for thee and the cloud of glory is waiting for thee if thou wilt not goe up with us now wee are free of our oath Example 4. Deut. 28. 18. Decaudicabat debiles Hee cut off the taile or the weake of the hoast but Targum Hierosolymitanum paraphraseth it this wayes sed accepit eos Amalek amputavit loca virilitatis corum projecitque sursum versus coelum dicens tolle quod elegisti meaning that part which was commanded by the Lord to be circumcised they threw it up into the heavens in contempt and spite against the Lord. Example 5. 1 Sam. 15. And he numbred them Battelahim but Targum paraphraseth it thus He numbred them by the lambes For Telahim is called lambes also and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 they say that Saul would not number the people for feare of a plague upon him and his people as it fell out afterwards upon David and his people therefore he caused every one of them to bring a lambe and he numbred all the lambes and so he knew the number of the people such Iewish fables as these the Apostle willeth us to take heede of Tit. 1. 14. But where
fifty two weeks then they read one Parashah for every Sabbath and in the last Sabbath of the yeare which was the twentie third of Tishri they read that Parashah called Latitia legis which beginneth Ioshu 1. And the next Sabbath they began beresith againe at the first of Genesis These Parashoth were subdivided into so many parts and there were sundrie who read these parts upon the Sabbath hee that read the first was called Cohen the Preist hee repeated the first part of the Section and then rose up Caizan or Cantor who did sing the same part which the Priests had read then there rose up in the third place a Levite and he read his part Fourthly there rose up an Israelite and hee read his part and at last it came to Maphtir and hee read the last part of the Haphtorah he was called Maphtir because when 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 cessare in hiphil dimittere that part was read the people were dismissed and so the Latine Church said Ite missa est In the weeke dayes they read upon the second and the fift day of the weeke some part of those Parashoth but not the whole and the Pharisee meant of these two dayes when he said I fast twise in the weeke Luk. 18. 12. The Greeke and Latine Fathers never cite Chapters as we doe now Augustine in his booke of retractations Cap. 24. saith not I have written to Genesis 3. but this wayes I have written to the casting out of our parents out of paradise And Gregorie in his Prologue upon the first of the Kings saith I have expounded to you from the beginning of the booke unto the victory of David Who divided the Scriptures first into Chapters it is not certaine they were divided of old two manner of wayes first they divided them into 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 titles for so they called the greater parts and then into Chapters as into lesser parts others againe divided them into Chapters as into greater parts It is holden that Musaeus presbiter Ecclesiae Massiliensis divided them first into titles Genebrard Chronologia and subdivided them into Chapters According to this first division Matthew had sixty three titles and three hundreth and fifty five Chapters So Luke according to the ancient division had forty eight titles and three hundreth and forty eight chapters He who began this latter division into Chapters is holden to be Hugo Cardinalis according to this division Matthew hath twenty and eight Chapters and Luke twenty and foure c. Lastly it was divided into verses this division into Pesuchim or verses the Masoreth found out first amongst the Iewes The Greekes called them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Scaliger calleth them Commata and Robertus Stephanus calleth them Sectiunculas and some hold that it was hee that found them out first amongst us EXERCITAT XIX Of the sense of the Scriptures THere is but one literall sense in the Scriptures which is profitable for doctrine for reproofe for correction for instruction in righteousnesse 2 Tim. 3. 16. To make divers senses in the Scripture is to make it like that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which Anaxagoras dreamed of making Quidlibet ex quolibet Augustine writing to Vincentius justly derideth the Donatists who constructing August Epist 48. these words Cant. 1. 7. Tell me o thou whom my soule loveth where thou feedest where thou makest thy flocks to rest at noone They gathered out of them that the Church of Christ was onely in Africa by their allegoricall application Origen was too much given to these allegories and therefore he missed often the true sense of the Scriptures These who gathered divers senses out of the Scripture doe little better with them than Esope did with an inscription written in a pillar of Marble in which were written these seven letters 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Esope first read them thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 id est abscedens gradus quatuor fodiens invenies thesaurum auri But Xanthus his master finding as he had spoken a great treasure of Gold and giving nothing to Esope for his conjecture kept all to himselfe therefore Esope read them another way thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 id est qui tollitis dum ahitis dividite quem invenistis thesaurum auri But when Esope got nothing in a rage he read it thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 id est redde Regi Dionysio quem invenisti thesaurum auri The Iewes hold that there is a literall sense in every Scripture and a mysticall sense the literall sense they call Dabhar katon rem parvam and the mysticall sense they call it Dabhar gadol rem magnam the literall 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sense they call it peshath sensum nudum and the mysticall sense they call it darash and most of the Schoolemen hold that there is a double sense in the Scriptures Latomus the Papist saith Theologiam crassam versari circa literalem sensum theologiam subtiliorem versari circa mysticum allegoricum sensum and they call the literall sense panperem grammaticum and the allegoricall Divitem theologicum the rich and theologicall sense But we must strive to finde out the literall sense of the Scriptures or else we shall never come by the true meaning The literall sense is that which the words beare eyther properly or figuratively therefore he sayd well who sayd bonus grammaticus bonus theologus for we can never come to the true meaning and sense unlesse the words be unfolded A figurative literall sense is eyther in verbis vel in rebus eyther in the words or in the matter In verbis in the words as Luk. 13. 32. Herod is a Foxe Psal 22. 12. The princes of Israel are Buls of Basan in these words there is but one sense So Let the dead bury the dead Luk. 9. 50. Dead in soule bury the dead in body here is but one sense but where the words in one sentence have diverse significations then they make up divers senses as judge not that yee be not judged Mat. 7. 1. the first is judicium libertatis the second is judicium Iudicium libertatis potestatis potestatis When we search to finde out the literall sense of the Scripture that cannot be the literall sense of it which is contrary to the analogie of faith which is eyther in credendis or in faciendis If it be contrary to the articles of our faith or any of the commandements then that cannot be the literall sense as Rom. 12. 20. If thine enemy be hungry give him meate if he thirst give him drinke for in so doing thou shalt heape coales of fire upon his head Here to feede the enemy and to give him drinke are to be taken literally because they are commanded in the sixt Commandement but to heape coales of fire upon his head must be taken figuratively because according to the letter it is contrary to the sixt