is corrupted so as wee may not build vpon it that thereby they might bring their Latin Bible into credit as most authentical and yet that they might make the sentence of their Church the rule of faith the most learned of al that Church hold that the Latin Bible is also corrupt so indeede they couertly renounce all scripture that the sentence of the Church may obtaine the chiefe stroke Secondly in teaching that the authoritie of the Church in regarde of vs is aboue the Scriptures because wee knowe not the sense thereof but by the Church Thus putting downe the true and principall ground of Scripture that they might more easily set vp their own dotages The second ground concerneth the sufficiencie of scripture and is this The Scripture of the Prophets and Apostles is a perfect rule of faith and manners It is of all things to be beleeued or done to saluation 2. Tim. 3.16 The Scripture is profitable to teach improue correct instruct in righteousnes to make the man of God absolute yea perfect in euery good worke If it make him perfect in al kind of teaching it is also able much more to make euery man perfect to all the duties of his calling Gal. 1.8 If an Angell should teach otherwise that is diuerse or besides though not contrary to that which is taught hee shall bee accursed many doctrines indeed of Artes and other things are diuers and besides it but the meaning is that no doctrine of saluation must be brought no not besides it therfore the bookes of the Prophets and Apostles containe a perfect rule Many things which cannot bee found in scripture may be supplied by tradition Ans. Traditions can neuer settle the conscience for though diuerse of them are found in the writings of the fathers yet they were subiect to error and so might and did erre in them Aduersaries of this ground to bee contended with First all men by nature Iob. 22.14 Who say to the Almightie Departe from vs for wee desire not the knowledge of thy waies yea our common Protestants who in iudgement acknowledge this rule yet in their life they leaue it and take the leaden rule of naturall reason sense sight and feeling and few there be that liue by faith Secondly the Romish Church for first they make the written word a thing ruled by setting vp another Rule saying that there are two kindes of Scripture The first is inward written in the heart of all Catholikes which is the vniuersall consent of the Church The second is outward written by the Prophets and Apostles an inken scripture say they and a dead letter without the former Whereas the cleane contrarie is true the true rule being the scripture of the Prophets and Apostles and the other in the heart in this life but an imperfect patterne drawne according to the former Secondly they ouerturne the ground in ioyning to the written word vnwritteÌ„ traâ—â—tions so making it but half a rule and indeed as good no rule but where are these traditions In the writings of Fathers they say But how shall we know them to be scripture Because the Fathers say so But how shall wee know they say true Here must they flie to man whereof yet no man can assure vs. Thirdly in teaching that the true sense of scripture cannot be found without the Churches determination and so indeede make it no rule because a right rule both ruleth it selfe and is plaine to rule other things also The third ground is There is one true God By one I meane one in number not two 1. Cor. 8.6 To vs there is but one God that is to the Church to vs that looke to bee saued which is plaine by this reason for there can be but one infinite and if there were two or moe Gods there should be two or moe infinites which is impossible Aduersaries to this ground First the common Protestant who in iudgment holdeth one God yet in heart and life he setteth vp two or moe some riches some pleasure some one sinne or other for where a mans heart is there is his God Paul saith some make their bellie their God and that the Diuell is the God of the world Secondly the maine Enemie is the Popish Church which in word holdeth one God but diuers waies set vp diuers gods As first the Pope himselfe who by their reformed Canon law is to iudge all and to be iudged of none Who maketh himselfe a forgiuer of sinnes and that properly yea a maker of lawes to binde conscience aswell as Gods lawes which is horrible blasphemie Secondly the Virgin Mary whom they make a Goddesse as Christ a God as Christ a King so her a Queene as he a Lord so her a Ladie yea they set Christ below her whom they desire to commaund her sonne by the right of a mother yea and in some of their reformed Seruice bookes they trust in her for saluation Thirdly the Saints whom they pray vnto wherein they attribute vnto them the knowledge of the secrets of mens hearts and omnipresence for they must also be in all places which are things proper vnto God alone The fourth ground is that God is all sufficient in himselfe Gen. 17.1 I am all sufficient that is he hath in himselfe all perfection for first he taketh being from none but giueth being to all Secondly for substance he is a Spirit of perfect nature Thirdly euery way infinite in regard of time place attributes This may well be called a ground for whosoeuer placeth any want or imperfection in God denieth God and maketh him no God Aduersaries hereof First the common people who conceiue a God made all of mercie without his iustice Secondly the Papist who robbeth God of his perfection two waies first they attribute an imperfect iustice vnto him namely such a one as may be satisfied by mans satisfaction Secondly an imperfect mercie whereof our own merits must make a supplie teaching that indeed Christ must make vs iust but we must make our selues more iust and merit saluation The fifth ground is There be three in heauen the Father Sonne and holy Ghost and thâ—se three are one God 1. Ioh. 5.7 How can it be that three are one God Ans. It is a mysterie which the ancient Church answered thus They be three in person and one in substance so wee also say they be three in manner of subsisting but one in nature and Godhead Three they be distinguished in person the Father not being the Sonne nor the holy Ghost and so in the other persons 3. subsistences in one nature Ioh. 17.2 This is life euerlasting c. This is a grouÌ„d because wee must worship one God in three persons neither can wee aright thinke of God out of the Trinitie Aduersaries of this ground First Heretikes innumerable whose memorie is accursed as Arians of former and later times denying the Godhead of Christ. Secondly the Turke and Iew
that euer Christ appointed a Crucifixe to bee a signe of his presence or that God willeth their Images to bee signes of his presence Thirdly the Chaire of Estate is a signe only in the Kings absence for himselfe being present the ciuill worship is performed to himselfe but Christ is neuer absent from his Church and yet in his presence they set vp an Image to remember him by Thus that Church being an open Idolater must not bee ioyned with for she is not ioyned to Christ any longer but is a professed harlot neither iâ— it so indiffereÌ„t as some think to finde saluation there as well as by our Religion The fifth ground is Matth. 4.10 Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God and him only shalt thou serue That this is a chiefe ground needes no proofe and therefore wee will consider first the meaning secondly the aduersaries against whom wee must contend To know the meaning the words going before will affoord vs some direction wherein Satan hauing moued Christ to fall downe and worship him with bodily worship only and requiring not the maine worship due to God but a little bowing of the bodie betokening that he was the disposer of the kingdomes of the world this Christ denieth him with this reason ratified by Scripture that it is a worship and seruice proper to God and to bee tendred to him onely Secondly the words themselues are to bee weighed By worship is properly signified bodily worship in a bodily gesture the meaning then is thou shalt with thy bodie adore the Lord for so it is sutable to Satans demaund The word serue signifieth all worship due to God both inward and outward Only This word appertaineth to both the members and so to the whole sentence for else there should bee no direct deniall of Satans temptation requiring onely the former and not the latter But some will say we may serue men lawfully how then is seruice proper to God only There be two kindes of worship religious and ciuill Religious is an action or actions of reuerence and subiection whereby a man doth acknowledge the Godhead it self or the properties thereof either in God himselfe truly or in the creature falsely These properties of God are first to bee an absolute Lord. Secondly to bee Almightie Thirdly to be present in al places at all times Fourthly to heare all men in all places at all times Fiftly to know all things past present and to come yea and the hearts of men Sixtly to be giuer of all good things and the preuenter of all euill Now any action of reuerence in signification of any of these properties is a religious worship the very intent of the minde in religious worship being to ascribe either Godhead or diuine properties to the thing worshipped Ciuill or politique worship is when men performe actions of reuerence and subiection to others as acknowledging them to bee preferred aboue themselues in gifts or authoritie Thus bowing of the bodie is sometime religious when it is done to God in acknowledging his properties and sometime ciuil performed to a man in respect of his eminency in gifts or gouernment But these words of Christ are meant only of the former and not of the latter which belongs vnto man This ground thus truly conceiued affoordeth vs these two maine points of Religion first that God is to be worshipped with religious worship Secondly that all religious worship is proper to God and due to him alone Now religious worship is two-fold first inward standing in two things faith and inward obedience Secondly outward when this inward worship is outwardly testified consisting of three principall parts first in preaching hearing and reading the word secondly in receiuing the two Sacraments thirdly in prayer and thanksgiuing publike and priuate The Aduersaries hereof are the Papists who pretend the Catholike Religion but indeed ouerthrow it in deprauing the outward worshippe of God wherein the inward is testified The first part whereof standing in the preaching hearing and reading of the word they depraue first by mingling the pure word of God with mans word and writings and authorising bookes Apocryphall as Canonicall Scripture Secondly by making vnwritten Traditions Apostolicall and Ecclesiasticall as they say of equall authoritie with the Scripture Thirdly in that they teach in their Catechismes that the worship of God doth stand in obeying the Commandements of the Church as wel as the Commandements of God themselues and are necessarily to be practised vnto saluation so they worship God in vain Mat. 15.9 Fourthly in that they allow no Bible to be â—uthenticall but onely the Latin translation of Iereâ—ie renouncing both the Hebrew and Greeke fountaines and yeâ— learned Papists confesse that their Latin text iâ— corrupted and that therefore the true sense is to bee fetched from the Popes determination and from Councels and no other sense to be admitted Fiftly in that they make Images Lay mens bookes and teachers and debarre the people of the Scriptures publikely and priuately in the vulgar tongue and suffer it only to be read by them and vnto them in the Latin tongue vnknowne vnto them The second part of outward worship standing in administration of Sacraments they likewise corrupt and abolish for howsoeuer Baptisme is preserued for the substance of it in the Romish Church which as a lanterne carrieth the light it retaineth not for it owne but for the hidden Churches sake within it yet haue they abolished the Lords Supper for the substance of it first of a Sacrament they haue made itâ— reall sacrifice Secondly they haue turned the Communion into a priuate Masse where the Priest alone receiueth all and the people nothing Thirdly although in a Sacrament theâ—e must bee a distinction between the signe and the thing signified yet they make none but ouerthrow all such signification of the signes by their transubstantiation Fourthly they haue turned the bodie of Christ into a breaden God which they carrie about in boxes and worship which is as vilde an idolatrie as euer was among the Heathen not inferiour to the worshipping of Cats and Buls as gods among the Egyptians Fiftly they haue added to Christs Institution fiue Sacraments viz. Penance Confirmation Orders Matrimonie and annoynting But indeede Baptisme is a Sacrament of Penance the Lords Supper of Confirmation and further are they deceiued in the other The third part of outward worship concerneth Prayer and thankesgiuing this they ouerthrow likewise first they mocke God in praying in an vnknowne tongue not knowing what they aske much lesse seriously addressing themselues vnto the dutie which euen earthly Kings would disdaine Secondly in prayer must bee brought sense of want and contrition of heart this they cannot bring who are taught that they merit by prayer Thirdly prayer must be made in particular faith but this they make presumption Fourthly they allow praying to creatures the mediation of Saints and so denie the very substance of prayer which is to make
him such princely gifts as it is said God gaue him another heart his heart was changed in regard of other gifts than formerly he had so when Dauid was annoynted King and when Samuel had powred the horne of oyle vpon his head it is said 1. Sam. 16.13 that the spirit of the Lord came vpon him which furnished him with gifts and graces both of regeneration and regiment also In like manner the Lord tooke of the spirit of Moses and put it on the seuenty Elders Numb 11.17 whereby they were furnished with gifts of gouernment and enabled to beare rule and iudge iustly as Moses was such titles therefore as these are not ascribed vnto them without iust cause Yea how can they be fitlier called than Glories seeing there is no greater glorie in earth than to supplie Gods roome and to bee enabled with gifts for the sufficient discharge of it Hence learne that it is lawfull for Princes to beare an outward pompe in diet buildings costly apparell and troopes of men for they are dignities and their dignitie being outward in regard of men they may maintaine it by outward pompe to procure more reuerence and awe of men thereunto So Agrippa and Bernice came with great pompe and entred into the common hall which pompe is not there discommended but rather approued as by the circumstances of the text appeareth Secondly Magistrates ought especially to honour God because he especially honoureth them this must they doe by discountenancing and punishing vice and by setting vp and maintaining true religion and vertue Thirdly being in Gods place they are to execute iustice without corruption or partialitie in the face and feare of God 2. Chro. 9.7 Seeing the iudgement is the Lords let the feare of God bee vpon you take heede and doe it Deut. 1.17 Ye shall haue no respect of persons in iudgement but shall heare the small as well as the great ye shall not feare the face of man for the iudgement is Gods and herein stands a great part of their glorie Fourthly we are in all lawfull things to yeeld free subiection and obedience vnto our Magistrates and gouernours euen as vnto God himselfe whose roome they are in which duty the child oweth also to his father the seruant to his Master because they also are set ouer them in Gods stead Fifthly hence also is it lawfull for vs to giue to Princes the titles of Maiestie and Grace because it hath pleased the holy Ghost to ascribe them vnto them and by their titles to commend their persons and places vnto vs yea and to furnish them with such gifts of Magistracie as that they become not onely naked titles but iust significations of the true honour which God hath graced them withall Vers. 9. Yet Michael the Archangell when he stroue against the Diuell and disputed about the bodie of Moses durst not blame him with cursed speaking but said The Lord rebuke thee IN this verse is laid downe another reason amplifying their sin of these seducers by a comparison from the greater to the lesse and thus it standeth Michael the Archangell durst not so much as raile on the Diuell himselfe much lesse may these vpon Magistrates who are Gods and consequently their sinne is hainous who dare open their mouthes to reuile Princes and Magistrates Here one question is mooued namely whence the Apostle had this historie of the disputation betweene Michael and the Diuell concerning the bodie of Moses seeing it is not to bee found in the Scriptures I answere the substance of it is in the Scripture although though not the circumstances For in Deut. 34.6 is said that the Lord buried Moses but no man knoweth of his sepulchre till this day There is the ground of the historie the other particular concerning the contention of the Archangell and the Diuell wiâ—h this manner of rebuking is not found in the old Testament Quest. Where then had he this Ans. Either from some booke then extant among the Iewes which is not now to bee found or else from some tradition which passed amoÌ„g the Iewes from hand to hand as many things did as that 2. Timot. 3.8 where the Apostle saith that Iannes and Iambres withstood Moses the historie of which is not found in the old Testament Hence the Papists conclude that the word written is not sufficient and perfect in and of it selfe vnlesse the vnwritten word be added vnto it that is that word which is giuen by tradition both which say they make a perfect word but neither is perfect or sufficient alone grounding their opinion hence that Iude alleageth an example out of a tradition which is not found in Scripture But that is an hereticall doctrine and vntrue seeing the perfection of a thing is not to bee measured by euery thing that is wanting vnto it but by the perfect end of it for perfection is taken from the end Whence I reason thus If the written word be perfect and sufficient to the end to which it is ordained it is euery way perfect But it is perfect and sufficient to that end namely to the glorie of God in working out perfectly the faith saluation of man and is in nothing wanting for the atchieuing of this end but sufficiently teacheth all things to be beleeued and done and giueth perfect direction concerning faith and manners Ioh. 20.31 These things are written that they might beleeue and beleeuing might haue life thorough his name Rom. 15.4 Whatsoeuer things are written are written for our learning that wee through patience and comfort of the Scriptures might haue hope and therefore the word written is euery way most sufficient and absolutely perfect and neede no addition or tradition to helpe forward this end Ob. This place is a tradition and not written and many other true traditions were neuer written besides that the Church may make traditions Ans. We grant many true traditions are not in Scripture but such they are as a man may be ignorant of and not preiudice his saluation Againe the Church hath a power and hath had priuiledge to make constitutions and lawes which were to be knowne and receiued but these are such as only concerne the orderly gouernment of the Church and are not necessarie to saluation Ob. But some traditions are necessarie to saluation which are not contained in the written word and they alleage two first in Rom. 12.6 that Gods word must be tried by the rule of faith and so also by the same rule expounded This rule of faith is nothing else by their exposition but a general consent in the hearts of all true Catholikes together with the Pope assenting with them which of necessitie wee must beleeue and yet say they it is not in the Scripture and therefore some things must of necessitie bee beleeued which are not in the Scripture Ans. The rule of faith is not such a crooked rule as they would thrust vpon the world by their wicked exposition but the right rule of faith
is the plaine word of God euery way absolutely directing in all points of faith and loue 2. Tim. ◠5 Paul wisheth Timothy to keepe the true patterne of wholesome words in faith and loue which is nothing else but the testimonie of Scripture in points of faith and loue comprised in the Decalogue and Apostles Creede The rule of faith therefore in expounding Scripture is Scripture it selfe The second thing necessarie by their doctrine to be beleeued not contained in Scripture is that the Canonical Scripture is Gods word which truth is absolutely necessarie to saluation to be beleeued but cannot otherwise bee knowne or beleeued but onely by the tradition of the Church Ans. As euery other Arte and Science hath certaine principles of truth to proue all other precepts by but themselues are to bee prooued by none so also hath Diuinity the chiefe of al other Sciences of which kinde this is one principle that Canonicall Scripture is Gods word which not granted inferreth a destruction of all other diuine rules this is a truth therefore confirmed not a thing testified from some other but as a ground of it selfe Secondly in diuine matters saith goeth before knowledge which in humane things is cleane contrarie for if a man would know whether fire bee hot let him put his hand vnto it he shall haue experience of it and then he shall beleeue it but in diuine things first a man giueth credit and yeeldeth consent to the word and then hath experimentall knowledge for although faith hath his knowledge yet experimentall knowledge followeth faith Abraham beleeued aboue hope here faith went before knowledge Ioh. 7.27 If ye do the will of my Father yee shall know whether the doctrine bee of God nor no. Thus then we may conceiue it the tenour of the word of God is this Thus saith the Lord. If the question now be whether the Lord said thus or no I answere to beleeue the Church herein before God is sacriledge but herein we are first to yeeld assent vnto God and then after this experimentall knowledge will follow that Canonicall Scripture is the word of God Thirdly wee know that Scripture is Gods word by Scripture and not by the Church out of which being in humilitie taught and acquainted with the excellent matter of it and manner of writing the end the glorie of God and our owne saluation wee cannot but haue sufficient perswasion of the author of it and that it can proceede from none other but God himselfe Thus notwithstanding the allegations of the aduersaries the written word retaineth that perfection which needeth no tradition to strengthen or further it in that end to which it is appointed Now to the reason it selfe amplifying this sinne in this verse which containeth three points to be considered First the person that durst not raile Secondly the goodnes of his cause which was very iust and yet he durst not raile vpon the Diuell himselfe Thirdly the manner of his speech The Lord rebuke thee The person that durst not raile was Michael the Archangell whom some affirme to bee Christ himselfe others that he is some chiefe arch and principall Angel which opinion is more probable For first the Apostle speaketh of him as one in subiection and standing in awe not daring to breake the law of God for he durst not reuile the Diuell Secondly in 1. Thess. 4.16 The Lord Christ shall come to iudgement with the sound of a Trumpet and the voyce of an Archangell where is a plaine distinction betweene Christ who should come in the clowdes and the Archangell Thirdly Peter explaineth it speaking the same thing and saith The Angels giue not railing iudgement against them 2. Pet. 2.11 It is more probable then that by Michael was meant a principall Angell rather than Christ. Doctr. First from the person wee learne that there be distinctions and degrees of Angels there bee Angels and an Archangell Quest. Is there but one Archangell Ans. The Scripture speaking of Archangels vseth alwaies the singular number neuer mentioning more than one and where the Scripture resolueth not we are not to determine yet I condemne not those who haue probably held that there are more than one Secondly wee haue here an example of Angelicall meeknes and modestie Tit. 3.1 Put them in remembrance that they bee subiect to principalitie and speake euill of no man but shew all meeknes vnto all 〈◊〉 the contrarie practise of railing slandering and obtrecting is a propertie of the Diuell whence he hath his name Reu. 12.10 the Accuser of the brethren and the Aduersarie 2. Pet. 5 8. who is euer readie with one accusation or other to stand vp against euery man the malitious man whose malice caused him to stand vp against Iob and falsely accuse him of hypocrisie vnto Gods own face Let slanderers and backbiters of their brethren see hence whom they imitate and most liuely resemble Secondly consider the goodnesse of Michaels cause which was this It was the wil of God that Moses body should be buried in a secret place vnknown to any man to preuent and auoid al occasion of superstition and Idolatrie amōg the Iewes The Diuell on the contrarie would discouer it that so the Israelites might fall to Idolatrie before it herein the Archangell resisted him and stroue with him for the performance of the will of God and the maintenance of his true worship and yet in this good cause Michael durst not reuile the Diuel himselfe In this cause consider two things First the fight and contention betweene Michael and the Diuell Secondly the cause and occasion of it about Moses bodie In the former wee may obserue that there is a sharp and serious contention betweene good and bad Angels in which the good Angels labour to defend all that are in Christ against the rage and furie of the Diuell and his angels As Psal. 34.8 The Angels of the Lord pitch their tents round about those that feare him And on the contrarie the Diuell and wicked spirits cast about how to destroy the bodies and soules of men 1. Pet. 5. Our aduersarie the Diuell goeth about continually seeking whom he can deuoure This combat concerneth and is conuersant about either first the persons or secondly the societies of men The fight about the persons concerneth either infants or men of yeres First for infants the Diuell seeketh how to spoyle and destroy them especially those of elect and faithfull parents in regard of their weaknes and tendernes both of minde and bodie but the Angels of the Lord haue charge giuen thē to defend them against this malice of Satan As Psal. 91.12 They shall beare thee vp in their armes that is they shall bee as nurces to beare them in their armes preseruing them from danger Mat. 18.10 Despise not one of these little ones for their Angels alwaies behold the face of my father which is in heauen Secondly concerning men of yeeres the diuell and his angels striue to driue them out
First they say Iude calleth himselfe a seruant of Iesus Christ and not an Apostle but all the new Testament was penned or approued by some Apostle This hindreth not but that he was one of the Apostles who also called themselues seruaÌ„ts of Iesus Christ as Paul Rom. 1.1 and Peter 2. Pet. 1.1 Secondly by this reason the Epistles to the Philip. and Philemon as also of Iames Iohn c. might be reiected Thirdly he calleth himselfe as much as an Apostle Iude writeth of such things as the Apostles themselues had formerly foretolde vers 17. Therefore hee was no Apostle Iude liued after the Apostles Paul and Peter who with Iohn were the last of the Apostles and liuing after their decease who were the principal might very wel put them in minde of those things they had foretolde In the ninth verse hee bringeth in a profane Author concerning the strife and disputation betweene Michael the Archangell and the diuell about Moses body which cannot be found in Canonical scripture as also of Enoch the seauenth from Adam out of profane writers By this reason neither should the Epistle of Titus bee Scripture seeing Paul makes mention of the profane Poet Epimenides Titus 1.12 nor the epistle to the Corinthes where is brought in the speech of Menander 1. Cor. 15.33 nor the Actes of the Apostles where Aratus the Poet is cited Actes 17.21 This Epistle is taken out of Saint Peter from whom this Author hath borrowed both the matter and manner Therfore this Iude was no Apostle but some scholler of theirs If this were sufficient to proue this Epistle not authenticall then the whole bookes of Samuel the Kinges and Chronicles should be cast out of the Canon by the same reason which take the matter from Ciuill Chronicles Now if it be lawfull to take matter out of Ciuill Chronicles why may not one Scripture be taken out of another wee must therefore notwithstanding these weake allegations esteeme this Epistle to bee the Canonicall Scripture and the eternall word of God as our Church and the Church in all ages hath receiued it And now in the second place see how wee may come to be resolued that it is so to be allowed which wee may in this resemblance An Indenture betweene man and man is knowne to bee sufficient two waies First by the matter and contentes therin which plainly shewes an acte passed and done secondly by adding and annexing thereunto certaine outward signes and testimonies as the handes and seales of the parties the handes and names of the witnesses corroborating and strengthening the same the first is good in it selfe though not so confirmed to the parties without the second but the second is nothing without the first but if both thâ—se shall concurre and bee specified in the Indenture then it is absolutely authenticall both in it selfe and vnto the parties If this be applied to the scripture it shall be apparant to bee no lesse ratified then such an Indenture For first consider but the Contentes and matter it selfe of it it will speake the certeinty and truth of it read ouer the Epistle you shall finde the whole matter agreed vpon by the Prophets and Apostles and for the testimonie the Catholike and common consent of the Church or greatest part since the Apostles dayes hath set to her hand and seale that it is the truth of God no lesse assured then other bookes of the Canon which assent of the church though it cannot make vs yet may moue vs accordinglie to entertayne it Besides if we consider the endes as also the effects of this scripture which are the same with any part of the Canonicall wee cannot but confesse that it is the holy and sacred truth of God all of it conspiring with all the other to the aduancing of Gods glorie and furthering of mans saluation So much of the authoritie of this Epistle The second point is the Superscription which is in these words The Catholique Epistle of Iude. This title seemes to bee prefixed rather by some Scribe afterwards then by Iude himselfe first because this title Catholique was not heard of in the Church whilest the Apostles liued so as it is not so ancient as the Epistle Secondly the title seemes to bee vnfit for this and other Epistles intitled after the same manner and may be well forborne as the Epistles of Peter are called Canonicall which are no more Canonicall then others Thirdly most of the Post-scripts are vncerteine if not false as of that after the second Epistle to Timothie in which Timothie is called an elect Bishop of Ephesus and yet commaunded to doe the worke of an Euangelist 2. Timoth. 4.5 which cannot stand together to be the Bishop of one place and also vniuersally to preach vnto the whole world following the Apostles as the Euangelistes duty was and so of others This title then was not added by the Apostle but by some Scribe that copied out the Epistle it is not therefore holy Scripture as the Epistle is The third point concerning the Epistle in generall is the argument which doth exhort all Christians to constancie and perseuerance in their profession of the Gospell Secondly to beware and take heede of false teachers and deceiuers which craftely creepe in amongst them And thirdly these deceiuers are liuely set out in their colours and with them their destruction Now concerning the Epistle it selfe and the speciall partes of it Of it there be three partes first a Salutation in the 1. and 2. verses Secondlie an Exhortation from the 3. verse to the end of the 23. Thirdly a Conclusion from that to the end of the Chapter In the Salutation consider three thinges First the person that wrote this Epistle Iude. Secondly the persons to whom hee wrote to those which were called sanctified of God the father and reserued to Iesus Christ. Thirdly the Prayer ordinarie in Apostolicall salutations mercie vnto you c. Concerning the first namely the writer of this Epistle obserue three thinges first his name Iude secondly his office a seruant of Iesus Christ. Thirdly his Allyance and brother-hood being of the kindred of Christ himselfe First of his name Iude or Iudas which was the name of two of the Disciples of Christ the first was Iudas the sonne of Alpheus the brother of Iames and so neare allyed vnto Christ who was the writer of this Epistle The other was Iudas Iscariot or Iudas the traytor the sonne of Simon who could not write this Epistle because he died before Christ. In this name consider two thinges First the occasion of it and secondly the varietie of his name The occasion of this name is set downe with the reason of it in the 29. of Gen. 35. When Leah had borne three sonnes vnto Iacob shee conceiued againe and bare a fourth sonne saying Now I will praise the Lord therefore shee called his name Iudah which signifieth praise or confession so no doubt did Alpheus the father
multiplication of loue towards God and man yea towards our enemies seeing the more this is multiplied the happier is our estate yea and the condition of the Church vpon earth Vers. 3. Beloued when I gaue 〈◊〉 diligence to write vnto you of the common saluation it was needfull for me to write vnto you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once giuen vnto the Saints Here begins the second part of this Epistle which is the Exhortation reaching to the end of the 23. verse In this verse two things are contained First the causes which mooued the Apostle to write the Epistle Secondly the matter of his exhortation The causes of his writing are three First his loue noted in the word Beloued Secondly his readie and willing minde of himselfe noted in the word diligence which signifieth a carefull endeuour and studie to doe the Church good and it is enlarged by three arguments first in that he gaue all diligence and not some part onely to further the Church Secondly when hee could not speake to the Catholike church he gaue diligence to write Thirdly he writeth not of small matters but of things most weightie such as concernâ— their saluation against which seeing it might be obiected that he was not able to write of such a weightie matter hee therefore calles it common saluation to cut oft that surmise as also to shew that it is common to himselfe and the whole Church of which therefore hauing a share therein he is not ignorant The third cause in the word needfull a necessitie was laid vpon him in that he was called to bee an Apostle and so bound to further the saluation of the Catholike Church Out of these three motiues which caused the Apostle to write obserue First that euery Minister that would deliuer the word faithfully must haue three things to excite him thereto first loue towards the Church to which he is called Secondly a readie minde to further the saluation of their soules Thirdly the bond of his calling stirring him vp to faithfulnes and diligence All these three concurred in Paul first his loue appeared 2. Cor. 5.14 Secondly his readie minde was not wanting Philip. 2.17 Thirdly for his calling that vrged him see 1. Cor. 9.16 Note hence also that whosoeuer would heare the word or reade it to saluation must bring three things in his heart first a loue to the word deliuered This caused Dauid often to muse thereupon Psal. 119.97 Secondly a readie and diligent minde to receiue and reteine it this was in the Bereans Act. 17.11 and in the Galathians when they receiued Paul as an Angell of God Gal. 4.14 Thirdly a consideration of the great necessitie of hearing and reading the word Prou. 29.18 Where vision failes people perish Thirdly in this example of the Apostle all Pastors must learne diligence in all good meanes for the furtherance of the saluation of their flock for which cause they are called Watchmen because they are to watch ouer their soules Yea Sauiours Obadiah 21. to put them in minde that they are to bothe meanes of sauing men They had noâ— need then be entangled with many charges and other businesses Fourthly as the Apostle writeth of the common saluation of which he hath good experience so euery Minister must see that he haue experience in himselfe of that he teacheth others and haue a taste of that in his owne heart which he would haue others seasoned withall els his teaching shall be cold The second part of this verse is the exhortation the whole matter and substance may be reduced to three heads First that faith is a notable treasure which hath many enemies Secondly that the Saints are the keepers of it Thirdly that the office of euery member of the Catholike Church is to hold and maintaine this treasure For the first that faith is a treasure appeareth 2. Pet. 1.1 where it is called pretious faith 2. Cor. 4.7 a treasure in earthly vessels and by this that a fight is here inioyned against the enemies of it For the cleering of which consider two things first what it is Secondly who be the enemies of it against whom we must fight and them we shal ioyntly obserue with the seueral grouÌ„ds of faith For the first this faith is nothing els but the holesome doctrine of the Gospel called by Paul to Titus 1.1 the truth according to godlines So 1. Tim. 4.1 this faith which many shall denie is opposed to the doctrine of Diuels Now for our more orderly proceeding wee must consider that this doctrine of faith admitteth a distinction which Paul himselfe maketh 1. Cor. 3.11.12 Some doctrines are of the foundation without which religion cannot stand such as are set downe Hebr. 6.1 Others pertaine to the foundation but are not of it as gold and siluer built vpon the foundation It shall not be amisse here to stand a while to set downe the holesome doctrine of saluation which is fundamentall reduced by the Apostle to two generall heads Faith and Loue. The wholesome doctrine of faith containes things needfull to be beleeued The wholesome doctrine of loue containes things necessarily to be practised And both these are expresly set downe in Scripture as wee shall sâ—ew in their order Grounds of doctrine to be beleeued First That all the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles 〈◊〉 giuen by diuine inspiration 2. Tim. 3.16 All Scripture is giuen by diuine inspiration that is all the doctrine both for matter stile and words of Scripture is deliuered by the inspiration of the holy Ghost Hence it followeth that all Scripture is authenticall as hauing the authoritie from God yea and must be beleeued as if God from heauen should speake without disputation or calling any part of it into question This ground must first be laid If it be said the Scripture may be prooued by reason and by the generall consent of the Church Ans. That is vntrue for reason cannot settle the conscience to beleeue in any point But scripture telleth there is a God which reason prooueth Ans. Reason out of nature teacheth there is a God but by the word of God only I doe beleeue it inducements to faith may be brought out of nature but Gods word onely causeth true beliefe Secondly for the authoritie of the Church I beleeue not because the Church saith so but because the Scripture saith it and the Church I beleeue so farre as she consents with the word and speaketh out of it The aduersaries of this ground against whom we must fight First the Turkes and Turkish religion who denie scripture to bee giuen by inspiration and denie the bookes of the Prophets and Apostles and in stead of them stand to their Alcaran Secondly the Iewes who refuse the bookes of the new Testament Thirdly the Atheist who will beleeue nothing of all this Fourthly the painted aduersarie the Papist who vndermines this ground first saying that the Hebrew and Greeke text
greatest part who are inuocated as intercessors not onely by their prayers but by their merits in heauen Thirdly his Propheticall office is bestowed likewise vpon euery Pope who is without scripture to determine infallibly by an inward assistance of the Spirit locked vp in his breast of all matters concerning faith manners which is the proper office of him who is the proper Doctor of his Church Therefore this Romish doctrine established by the Councell of Trent is an hereticall and Antichristian doctrine making God an Idoll God which is concluded out of the place alleaged thus He that denieth Iesus to be Christ is Antichrist And againe He that hath not the Sonne hath not the Father But the Romish Church denie Iesus to be Christ and hath not the Sonne because it ouerturneth his person and oppugneth all his offices and therfore neither haue they the Father but an Idoll God and so consequently their doctrine is Antichristian and hereticall For which cause the reformed Churches haue iustly separated from them and ought euer so long as they denie this ground so to doe The 14. ground is He that beleeueth in Christ shall not perish but haue life euerlasting Ioh. 3.16 God so loued the world c. For the better handling of it consider first for the meaning what this faith is Secondly that it is a maine ground of true religion Thirdly the enemies of it For the first In this faith are two things first knowledge Secondly application of the thing knowne The knowledge is of Christ and his benefits of which some measure must be had or else there can be no faith Esay 53.11 By his knowledge shall my righteous seruant iustifie many Ioh. 17.3 This is life eternall c. And this stands with reason that the thing to bee beleeued must first bee knowne for faith without knowledge is fancie The Romane Church hath then erred which teach that there is a faith to saluation whereto knowledge is not required such a one as standeth only in an assent to the faith of the Church The second thing in faith which is the more principall is an application of things knowne namely of Christ and his benefits vnto our selues in particular And herein standeth the very substance of true faith which is not caused by any naturall affection of heart or action of will but by the supernaturall action of the minde enlightened by the spirit of God resoluing vs that Christ and his merits belong vnto vs in particular That this true particular application is required in true faith is proued by these reasons First that which wee lawfully aske by prayer wee must beleeue by a speciall faith but in prayer we lawfully aske the pardon of our sinnes in particular and life euerlasting by Christ therefore we must beleeue the pardon of our sinnes and life euerlasting by Christ. The aduersaries can denie nothing but the first part of this reason which is the very word of God it selfe Mark 11.24 Whatsoeuer ye desire when you pray beleeue yee shall haue it and it shall be done vnto you Where in euery petition of prayer our Sauiour requireth two things first a desire of things promised Secondly a particular faith of things desired standing in assurance that they shall be granted Secondly whatsoeuer the holie Ghost doth infallibly testifie to vs particularly that wee must beleeue particularly but the holy Ghost doth particularly testifie by infallible testimonie to euery beleeuers conscience his owne adoption and pardon of sinne and acceptance to life euerlasting and therefore it must be particularly beleeued Here the Papist excepteth and saith that this testimonie of the spirit of God is not certain but probable onely and a man may be deceiued in it But the Apostle Rom. 8.16 answereth this allegation The spirit of God testifieth with our spirits that we are the children of God and cleereth this testimonie of fearfulnes and weaknes in the former words where he saith it is not the spirit of feare which wee haue receiued but such a spirit as maketh vs criâ— Abba father and with a strong voyce yea and for the further assuring vs in this testimonie it is called the sâ—ale and earnest penny of the spirit in our hearts than which things what are more sure and certain ratifications among men whose testimony though it be but of two men but much more of three seale or earnest if it be sufficient confirmatioÌ„ vnto men how much more sure is the testimonie seale and earnest of the spirit of God vnto vs Thirdly that which God offereth and giueth vs particularly we must particularly receiue but God offereth and giueth vs Christ and all his benefits particularly in the Word Sacraments and therefore wee must haue particular faith to receiue him It will here be said we grant all this we must receiue Christ and his benefits in speciall but we doe it by hope as the Papists reach to hope well Ans. It is a work of faith alone Ioh. 1.12 As many as receiued him c. Who were they The next words shew euen they that beleeued on his name Againe in the Sacrament of the Supper Christ is offered as the bread and water of life to euery one in particular and therefore euery beleeuer must haue something in his soule proportionall to a hand and mouth for the receiuing and feeding vpon him which is nothing else but faith specially applying Christ and his benefits see Ioh. 6.35 Fourthly the example of beleeuers in the Scriptures prooue the same truth Abraham beleeued by a particular faith which was imputed to him for righteousnes Rom. 4.23 So also Paul Galat. 2.20 I liue by the faith of the Sonne of God who loued me and hath giuen himselfe for me Now both these are patternes and presidents for vs to follow that as they beleeued and particularly applied Christ to themselues so must we see Rom. 4.14 1. Timoth 1.16 Now froÌ„ these two namely knowledge and application followeth Confidence whereby wee trust and relie our selues vpon Christ and his merits thus knowne and applied vnto saluation which because it inseparably followeth faith is often in the Scripture put for faith it selfe I distinguish it from faith because it hath been said though falsely that it is a part of faith which indeed is a fruite and a follower of faith and the Apostle Ephes. 3.12 doth manifestly distinguish them By whom we haue boldnes and entrance with confidence by faith in him The second point in this ground is the weight of it That it is a maine ground of Religion appeareth thus If the inheritance of life saith Paul be not by faith it is not sâ—re Rom. 4.15 For if we were intitled by workes the promise should not be certaine he then that oppugneth this ground of particular faith ouerthroweth the Gospel as which cannot assure a man of saluation Secondly in the Catechisme of the Primitiue church faith in God is made one
groūd Heb. 6.1 Thirdly this ground being the most maine promise of the Gospell whosoeuer ouerthroweth it hee depriueth men of all comfort of religion The aduersaries of this ground are first the common people who for the most part professe that they are not certaine of the pardon of their sinnes they hope well because God is merciful but to be certaine they thinke it impossible as though there can bee hope and confidence where is no assurance but speciall hope alwaies presupposeth speciall faith Secondly the Papists for they condemne speciall faith for these reasons First where is no word there say they can be no particular faith but there is no word that saith thou Cornelius Peter Iohn c. shalt be saued Ans. It is true indeede there is no particular faith where there is no particular word or which is proportionall but the Minister truly applying the generall promise to this that particular man it is as much as if a mans name were registred in the scripture Secondly wee haue in substance a particular word in that God who hath giuen the promise hath giuen also a commandement to euery beleeuer to applie the same vnto himselfe 1. Ioh. 2.23 This is his commandement that we beleeue in the name of his sonne Iesus Christ which is equiualent to a particular word As a King giues a pardon to a thousand men but nameth neuer one of them yet euery of them trulie applying the pardon according to the Kings intention haue the benefit of it as surely as if all their names had bin set therein II. Obiect Many that applie the generall promise to themselues are deceiued and faile yea euery wicked man saith he beleeueth in the sonne of God wherein he is deceiued Ans. Many indeede faile in their speciall application but it is onely vnbeleeuers but they must proue that none truly can applie the promise speciallie which all true beleeuers doe III. Obiect They say In regard of God wee must beleeue but in regard of our selues we must doubt Ans. Yea in regard of our selues wee must not onely doubt but despaire yet beleeuers being found not in themselues but in Christ may proue themselues whether they are in the faith or no 2. Cor. 13.5 For whosoeuer repenteth knoweth that he doth repent We know we are of God 1. Ioh. 5.19 Ob. But all men in the world are full of doubting and how can doubting stand with certaintie of saluation Ans. Consider faith first as it is in it selfe so it is certaine Secondly as it is in vs so it is mingled with much doubting which is not of the nature of faith but contrary vnto it and yet these may and must stand together in the beleeuer for doubtings may disturbe but not destroy true faith for the Lord notwithstanding them accepteth our weak faith as perfect and our will to beleeue for beleefe it selfe where he seeth griefe conceiued for doubtings strife against them and endeuour to haue our faith increased Ob. But to beleeue pardon of our sinnes is to enter into Gods counsell Ans. That is false because pardon of our sinnes is reueiled Ob. But your Church say they abhorreth reuelation Answ. Neither the scripture nor our Church condemneth Reuelations contained in the scripture but those that are without beside or against scripture Ephes 1.7 The spirit is called the spirit of Reuelation see also 1. Cor. 2.12 As for this reuelation of pardon of sinne to the beleeuer it is contained in the scripture and is no more a prying into Gods counsell than it is for a Traytour to beleeue that he is pardoned when certaine newes of his pardon is brought vnto him from the King of whom none can say he entreth into the Kings counsell Hence we conclude that seeing the doctrine of the Papists ouerthrow this maine ground wee must take heede of ioyning our selues vnto them The 15. ground is That a sinner is iustified by faith without the workes of the Law Rom. 3.28 Wherein consider first the meaning secondlie the weight thirdly the aduersaries For the meaning three things must bee knowne First what it is to be iustified Secondly what it is to bee iustified by faith Thirdly what workes are to bee excluded from iustification Concerning the first In iustification there be three distinct actions of God first the freeing of a sinner from his sins for the merits of Christ Act. 13.39 From all things from which they could not be iustified by the law of Moses by him euery one that beleeueth is iustified that is acquited from them Paul opposeth it thus to condemnation Rom. 8.33 which is nothing else but a binding of a man to iust punishment The second action is the reputing and the accepting of a sinner as iust for the merit of Christ. Esay 5.23 Woe vnto him that iustifieth a wicked man that is not to make but accept him iust and in the Gospell Wisedome is iustified of her children that is approoued and acknowledged The third is the acceptation of a sinner to life euerlasting in Christ. For after that God hath absolued a sinner and reputed him as iust there must follow this acceptation to life which is therfore called the iustificatiō of life with the reason rendred in the same place for that like as Adams sinne is imputed vnto all by which death entred so Christs obedience imputed to beleeuers bringeth life and iustification Out of which three actions wee may gather a true description of iustification to wit It is an action of God the Father absoluing a sinner from all his sinnes for the merit of Christ accounting him as iust and accepting him to life euerlasting II. Point What it is to be iustified by faith For the cleer vnderstanding of this waighty point we must answere 2. questions First what is the very thing for which a sinner is iustified Ans. It is the obedience of Christ the Redeemer and Mediatour passiue and actiue the former standing in suffering the death of his bodie and the paines of the second death in his soule the latter in fulfilling the law The truth of this answer appeareth thus Since our fall we owe to God a double debt we breake the law and are bound to make satisfaction Secondly being creatures wee must fulfill the rigour of the law and performe what it requireth neither parcell of which debt seeing we being bankcrupts are able to pay wee flie to our suertie who must pay both for vs the former hee doth by his death being made a curse for vs and so redeemed vs from the curse Galath 3.13 the latter by perfect obedience vnto the law that so in him wee doing these things might liue in them vers 12. The second question is Seeing the obedience of Christ is the matter of our iustification and is out of our selues how commeth it to bee made ours Ans. To make it ours first God must giue it vs secondly wee must
speech for in word they professed him but in their deedes denied him liuing after their owne lusts and encouraging others in the same course Titus 1.16 And this sinne is reuiued and renewed in this our age wherein too many outwardly and in word professe Christ come to the Word and Sacraments but couertly and in their deedes denie him whose liues are very full of epicurisme and earthlines and mouthes filled with blasphemies and reproches against true obedience which of them is counted too much nicenes and precisenes These are the disciples of the old Heretiques whom without repentance the like fearefull iudgements awaite which befell them Secondly we may obserue in what regards they deny Christ namely first in regard of his Godhead by withstanding the meanes of that power of Christ whereby hauing redeemed them he would sanctifie their hearts to obedience The merit of his redemption is welcome to them but they will none of the efficacie of it which sanctifieth and reneweth the inner man subdueth sinne and quickneth the life of God in them Secondly in regard of his Lordship by denying him obedience which as to a Lord is due vnto him A Redeemer they would haue him but not a Lord so euery man would haue portion in Christs redemption but their lusts must be their Lords and they seruants to sinne and Satan but these bee those enemies that will not that he should raigne ouer them who shall be brought and slaine before him Our part then is if euer wee would finde comfort in Christ to make him our Lord his counsell is that those that are laden should come vnto him for ease but the next words are take my yoke vpâ—â— thee and if wee would haue him our iustification let him become also our sanctification Vers. 5. I will therefore put you in remembrance for as much as ye once know this how that the Lord after that he had deliuered the people out of Egypt destroyed them afterward which beleeued not THe Apostle hauing propounded his principall exhortation to contend and fight for the faith vers 3. with the reason thereof vers 4. doth here begin to answere a secret obiection which might bee made against that reason thus These seducers professe Christ and looke for saluation by him what danger then can redound if we should ioyne our selues vnto them This obiection is answered from this fifth verse vnto the twentith in all which verses hee disputeth at large that there is great daunger herein seeing their end shall be destruction the summe of which disputation is contained in this reason All such persons as giue themselues libertie to sinne shal be destroyed But these seducers giue themselues libertie to sinne and therefore shall be destroyed The former part of which reason is contained in the 5.6.7 verses and the latter from the 8. vnto the 20. The former proposition is not plainly set downe in so many words but the proofe of it onely by an induction and enumeration of examples of sinners which haue bin destroyed and they be three in number first of the Israelites in the 5. verse secondly of the Angels in the 6. verse thirdly of Sodom and Gomorrha in the 7. verse In this 5. verse are two things to bee considered first the preface in these words I will therefore put you in remembrance for as much as you once knâ—w this Secondly the first example whereby the point in hand is prooued in the words following The preface serueth to preuent an obiection which might be made by the Church reading these examples that Iude teacheth them nothing but things which they knew well enough before to which he answereth that his intent is not to teach them any new thing or any vnknowne thing but to bring knowne things to their remembrance and in it three things are to bee obserued First the Apostles practise I will therefore put you in remembrance Where note the office of all Pastors and Teachers which is not onely to teach thingâ— vnknowne but to repeate and to bring into remembrance things known before This was Peters care 2. Pet. 1.12 though they had knowledge to put them in remembrance and chap. 3.1 to stirre vp and warâ—e their pure mindes giuing vs to vnderstand that knowledge in the minde lieth as embers vnder ashes and needes daily stirring vp Which admonisheth all hearers not to be offended if they heare the same thing often seeing it is the dutie of Ministers to teach the same thing often Yea hearers which haue vnderstanding in the Scriptures must be content if they heare nothing but that which they haue bin out of the Scriptures acquainted with before seeing the Apostle thinketh it meet to teach nothing else Secondly in this preface obserue the propertie of the Church which is to know the histories and examples of Scripture Christ commanded his hearers to search the Scriptures the Apostle wisheth that the Scriptures dwell plentiously in mâ—n which exhortations no doubt stirred them vp to haue the scriptures familiar vnto them euen as Timothie knew the Scriptures of a childe The state of our times is farre otherwise for Ministers cannot say as Iude speaketh for as much as you know these things I will put you in remembrance but our people pleade and professe ignorance yea that the knowledge of the scriptures belongeth not vnto them they being not booke learned but to schollers and Ministers that liue by it But wee ought to account it a propertie of euery Saint of God who is iustified and sanctified to know the Scriptures which onely are able to make them wise vnto saluation The third point in the preface is a second propertie of the Saints namely that they once know that is they know certainly vnchangeably and once for all neuer to reuoke or alter this knowledge which first informeth vs what to thinke and iudge of those men who because of diuersitie of opinions will be of no religion nor beleeue any thing vntill it be determined by some generall Councell these want this propertie of the Saints and are plaine Atheists Secondly it teacheth vs to hold our religion certainly receiuing it once for all vnchangeably In humane things wee may often without danger chaunge our mindes and deliberate but grounds of Religion must be out of al question and admit no deliberation Now followeth the first example whereby the first part of the former reason is prooued and that is of the Israelites who wittingly and willingly sinning against God were destroyed as appeareth Numb 14. In which example consider foure things first who were destroyed the people Secondly the time when after that hee had deliuered them out of Egypt Thirdly for what cause which beleeued not Fourthly the manner of the speech For the first the persons who were destroyed were the people by which word is meant a speciall people a peculiar and chosen people the seede of Abraham Isaac and Iacob a people priuiledged aboue all people of the earth to whom belonged the
was the seuenth from Adam Here two questions are to bee answered first whence had Iude this historie seeing it is no where recorded in the Scriptures and how knew he it to be Enochs I answere two waies first he either had it and learned it to bee his by some tradition which went from hand to hand or else written by some Iew or secondly he learned it out of some booke which went vnder Enochs name then extant in the daies of the Apostles though now lost it is certaine that one of these waies hee had it Hence the Papists gather that the Iewes had vnwritten traditions and consequently all their traditions are to be obserued Ans. We denie not all vnwritten traditions of which some are true and profitable but wee renounce and denie all those traditions which are made articles of faith rules of Gods worship necessarie to saluation for all such doctrines are written in the books of the Prophets and Apostles which containe perfect direction and rules concerning faith manners of which kind the Romane Church holdeth their traditions to be this is of another kind it being no article of faith nor necessary to saluation to knowe whether Enoch writ this prophecie or no. Againe from the second answere others who are no Papists conclude that some bookes of Canonicall Scripture are perished and lost But this is vntrue for then first the fidelitie of the Church which is the keeper of these Oracles should be called in question and secondly in the bookes Canonicall extant not one sentence or tittle no not the sense of any sentence is lost how then should whole bookes come to be lost It is alleaged that the books of Salomon are most of them lost Answ. The bookes of Salomon which were lost were bookes of humanitie and Philosophie for hee writ of all beasts birds trees euen from the Cedar in Libanus to the hyssop vpon the wall the books of humane truth might faile but no part of Canonicall Scripture Ob. Mention is made in the Scripture of the bookes of the Chronicles of the Iewes or Kings of Iudah but these are perished Ans. They were politique histories as are the Chronicles of England or other Countries Ob. The bookes of Nathan Gad Iddâ— Shemaiah and other Prophets are perished Ans. All these as is though by the learned are contained in the bookes of the Kings Chronicles and Samuel Ob. This book of Enoch is lost Ans. First it is doubted whether it was a booke or no or went by a tradition Secondly if it was a booke it was no part of Scripture for Moses was the first penman of Scripture who liued long after Enoch The second question why doth the Apostle make choise of this testimonie of Enoch rather than some other Prophet Answ. Himselfe giueth two reasons First he was the seuenth from Adam it is therefore an ancient testimonie to be receiued and reuerenced for the antiquitie but withall it sheweth what is true antiquitie namely when a doctrine of religion can bee prooued from some Prophet or Apostle for this testimonie was a prophecie and therefore that antiquitie which the Church of Rome challengeth to her religion and doctrine is but counterfeit because they are not able to iustifie the maine pointes thereof from any Prophet or Apostle yea in these wherein they dissent from vs they cannot bring their proofe and descent from within the first hundred yeeres after Christ. It is then a vaine plea and false pretence of them to boast of the antiquitie of their religion The second reason is in the word prophecied for Enoch spoke not this of his owne head or motion but from God for no creature Angell or man can foretell things to come it being a prerogatiue properly belonging vnto God Ob. Yes but the learned Physition can truely foretell the death of the patient to come Ans. He doth not properly herein foretell a thing to come for the death of the partie is present in the signes and causes of it Ob. But the Diuell could foretell Sauls death 1. Sam. 28.19 To morow shalt thou be with me and thy sonnes Ans. The Diuell could not properly foretell it but might see it in the causes and signes Againe hee might speake so to Saule because God had made him an instrument for the execution of that iudgement and destruction so as God only properly foretelleth that which is simply to come and no man or Angell The second point is the testimonie it selfe Behold the Lord commeth c. In which obserue three points first the comming of the Lord secondly the iudgement of the Lord thirdly the cause of it in the 15. verse To giue iudgement against al men c. First of the party comming Behold the Lord commeth Where the Apostle speaketh in the time present which is put for the time to come which forme of speech sheweth the certaintie of Christs comming to iudgement who shall as certeinly come as if he were now alreadie comming Concerning which certaintie it may be demaunded first whence commeth this comming of Christ to be so certaine Ans. From the vnchangeable will of God which hath certainly decreed the same For he hath appointed a day in the which he will iudge the world in righteousnes And thus are all other the articles of our faith most certaine in that they are grounded on the vnchangeable will and word of God Secondly how or from whence may we know this will of God to be so certaine Ans. From the manner of propounding the doctrine of it wherein the euidence of the spirit plainly appeareth saying peremptorily the Lord commeth euidently expressing the certaintie as if it were now present And the same may be spoken of the whole scripture which in it selfe is most sure and certain because it is the most vnchangeable will of God but how do we know it so to be will some say I answere by the euidence of the spirit the authoritie puritie maiestie effect and ends of the doctrine it neede not seeke euidence elsewhere than from it selfe not from man or the Church it selfe The Romish Church confesseth it is of it selfe and in it selfe sufficiently certaine but not to me or thee except the Church say so but this is a false position The Scripture is certaine both in it selfe and vnto vs and we know it so to be though neuer a man would acknowledge it the heart seasoned with grace will make the mouth confesse it Secondly the Apostle speaking in this forme he commeth for he will come wee learne to set before our eyes the comming of the Lord Iesus to iudgement and to make account of euery present day as the day of his comming the Scriptures euery where commend watchfulnes vnto vs which is to do nothing else but to make reckoning continually of this day But some will say we cannot make account daily of it for we see it commeth not neither may we enquire into the time of it Answ. Although wee cannot exactly
not hauing the spirit of God then euery one hath power to receiue the spirit of God Ans. This is no good reason but is all one as if because a bankrout is blamed for not discharging his debts to his creditors another man should conclude that surely he is therefore able to pay them But these wicked men were blamed here first because they professed Christ but yet had not his spirit secondly because that in Adam they were the causes that they were borne without the spirit of God and so made themselues vnfit to receiue him Secondly if naturall men bee iustly condemned much more those that are worse than they as Atheists prophane persons those which contemne the assemblies and neglect the meanes of their saluation and yet looke for saluation as wel as others The Gentiles who were without the law doe the things of the law by nature Rom. 2.24 and yet many that professe the name of Christ and liue vnder the Gospell goe not so farre as those naturall men in doing the things of the law so as euen those Heathens and naturall men shall rise vp in iudgement and condemne many a professor of Christ of whom euen many come short of the Diuell himselfe who beleeueth and trembleth and yet not a few professors neither know what the Diuell beleeues neither through hâ—rdnes of heart can tremble at the iudgements of God as he can doe Thirdly those come farre short that think themselues in state good enough because they liue ciuilly and deale iustly and neighbourly as they say for the naturall man can doe this and yet shall be condemned no plea shall stand at the great day of the Lord but that which assureth of the pardon of sinne sealed vp with the blood of Christ. Let a mans outward and ciuill righteousnes be neuer so great yea if it could be equall to the righteousnes of the Scribes and Pharisies which for outward appearance was without all exception yet if hee bring not a righteousnes exceeding that he can neuer be saued Fourthly in that the naturall man is blamed for being a naturall man this ouerthroweth all merits of congruitie which the Papists boast of because a mans person not being accepted before God all his works are sinnes the worke neuer pleaseth God till the worker first please him Fifthly euery professor of Christ must strip the naturall man and become a spirituall person that is such as the spirit of God dwelleth in for first as the Father worketh our saluation by giuing Christ and his merits so must the holie Ghost by applying the same vnto vs else can we looke for no saluation Secondly as the soule giueth life to the bodie which else were dead so the spirit of God is the soule of our soules and quickneth them with new life being dead in sinne Thirdly wee can neuer know that wee are in Christ or belong vnto him but by the presence of the spirit in our hearts 1. Ioh. 3.24 Hereby we know that he abideth in vs euen by the spirit that he hath giuen vs. Quest. But how shall a man know whether hee hath the spirit or no Ans. Let him examine himselfe first whether he inwardly loue and feare God in his word of promise and threatning secondly whether he subiect his heart and life vnto him thirdly whether his heart be continually lift vp in inuocation and thanksgiuing All these are the workes of the spirit of God and they which 〈◊〉 of the spirit thus sauour and â—ffect the things of the spirit Rom. 8. Quest. But I feare I haue not the spirit how shall I obtaine it Ans. By vsing the meanes of reading the Word meditation and prayer especially Luk. 11.13 Your heauenly father giueth the holy Ghost to thâ—â— that desire him Psal. 143.5.6 I meditate in all thy workes and stretch foorth my hands vnto thee Vers. 20. But ye beloued edifie your selues in your most holie faith praying in the holy Ghost IN this verse vnto the end of the 23. are set downe some meanes whereby all beleeuers may be fitted to the maintenance of the faith and true religion vnto the which the Apostle hath in the former part of the Epistle perswaded These meanes are contained in fiue rules here prescribed first concerning Faith secondly Loue thirdly Hope fourthly Meekenes fifthly Christian seueritie the first of which is contained in this twentith verse which is that they should build themselues vpon their faith which is not barely propounded but inforced and vrged first by a motiue in this word most holy faith secondly by the meanes of it which is prayer praying in the holy Ghost In the rule note two things first that faith is a foundation secondly that the dutie of beleeuers is to build vp themselues vpon this foundation Concerning the former first is may be demanded what is here meant by faith Ans. Here by faith is not so much meant the gift of faith as the matter of it namely the doctrine of faith and religion comprised in the writings of the Prophets and Apostles in which sense it is said that the Ephesians were built vpon the foundation of the Prophets and Apostles that is vpon their doctrine Ephes. 2. The same was the rocke confessed by Peter vpon which Christ promised to build his Church and yet in the second place we must not exclude the gift it selfe for although the doctrine be a foundation in it selfe yet it is not so to vs vnlesse we beleeue it and applie it to our selues by this gift If any man aske what doctrine is this I answer the summe of it may be reduced to three heads the first whereof concerneth mans miserie by his sinne originall and actuall as also the dangerous fruits thereof The second the redemption of man from this miserie and his freedome by Christ. The third the thankefulnes which man oweth for this deliuerance and ought to testifie and expresse in newnes of life Hence learne first what is the infallible marke of the true Church whereby it may be discerned from the false and Apostaticall Church and that is the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles for this being the very foundation of the Church where it is there the Church must needes bee and this note of it selfe is sufficient to point out the true Church wheresoeuer Secondly seeing faith is the foundation of the Church and not the Church the foundation of faith beware hence of a damnable doctrine of the Popish Church which teacheth that there can be no certainty of the points of religion no nor of the Scriptures themselues but onely by the iudgement of the present Church of Rome and that Church must giue what sense soeuer she pleaseth to the Scriptures else hath it none wherein they play the part of preposterous builders laying the foundation in the top of the building Thirdly it may be demaunded how any doctrine becommeth a foundation vnto the saluation of men Answ. Properly to speake God and Christ is our foundation and
〈◊〉 for all offered whereby their sinnes are â—â—pâ—ated that shall see the Lord in the holie of holies 4. Further let any indifferent and single eye behold and consider whether those bee but trifling differences which our reuerend Reignolds hath worthily disputed both against Bellarmine in his bookes intituled The Idolatrie of the Roman Church as also against Hart both in the two principall questions concerning Peters and the Popes supremacie by which their doctrine they would make Kings and Princes but vassals and â—eodataries vnto the Pope to whom they ascribe absolute power to excommâ—â—icate Kings to discharge their subiects from their obedience and allegeance to dispense with their oathes of loyaltie and faithfull subiection and dispose of their Crownes at his pleasure which no good subiect much lesse Christian can say is a triuiall point or a little to bee yeelded vnto as also in those sixe conclusions annexed wherein hee hath substantially and learnedly determined that the saith professed by the present Church of Rome is not the Catholike faith That their Church is so far from being the Catholike Church that it is no sound member of the Catholike Church and consequently that the reformed Churches of Great Brittaine France Germany c. haue lawfully that is by warrant of Gods word seuered themselues therefrom 5. Neither may wee yeeld that to be a circumstantiall question discussed betweene our learned Whiâ—taker and Stapleton concerning the Authoritie of the holy Scriptures which they so farre debase subordinate to their Church seeing through that great booke of his neuer like to bee answered by them he grauely prooueth that the foundation of Papisticall faith is laid vpon man and not vpon God and so it is an humane faith and not diuine vnto which their whole seruice is sutable according to Durandus his description in his Rationale And lastly none but inconsiderate men would auerre either that the most learned ProtestaÌ„ts of Europe haue spent their strength and beaten their braines only for the beating of the â—yre in matters immateriall or that those who haue aâ— yet vncontroleably published that the Popish Teachers haue reuersed the whole Decalogue with the most of the Articles of the Creede and Petitions of the Lords Prayer haue differed and squared in points not essentiall or that so many zealous Martyrs many of them of very profound knowledge should giue their liues and most innocent blood for matters of shadow as is pretended rather than of substance for thus to impeach the labours of the former or staine the sufferings of the latter would scarse beseeme any but either a Papist or some speciall fauourite of theirs Thirdly to such as are of minde that a harmelesse mediation may be made me thinkes it no other but the feeding of a fancie besides that it is not harder to make them preserue and yet neither without preiudice In which point as I would not seeme too rigorous or austere well knowing how sweete is the name and yet more pleasant is peace it selfe so would I chuse an honorable warre before a dishonorable peace a free and iust dissention before a base and slauish agreement such as theirs would be For Nahash the Ammonite will make no concord with Iabâ—sh Gilead vnlesse euery mâ—n suffer his right eye to be pulled 〈◊〉 that so he may bring some shaâ—â— vpon Israel And first it seemeth to me a matter bâ—rder to bee bâ—â—ught about than Loue of my shallow 〈◊〉 can expect eâ—er to see effected both in regard of our selues as also of them for if the truth bee with vs as wee are bound to confesse both in respect of iâ— selfe and the law whereby it is established thâ—n our turnings backâ— must not reprooue vs but hauing found the old way we are to walke in it without turning aside that wee may in it finde rest for our soules The Lords counsell to his Prophet must bee our direction in this case Sonne of man goe 〈◊〉 thâ—n to them but let them câ—me to thee for to lose our hold of the truth much lesse to leâ—se any part of it â—s in exchange with falsehood were not onely a wrongfull betraying of it self but a wilful wronging of our selues and posterities whom Gods blessings for the present hath made able to â—old it entire not onely without danger but with encouragement power protection But more hopelesse or impossible rather in respect of them shall out meeting in the midway seeme to be to whomsoeuer with iudgement shall perpend these foure subsequent considerations First that their faith being not Apostolicall their Religion a false Religion their Church a false Church and their worship a false worship it will prooue not a matter of repairing as requiring lesse cost and labour but of founding their faith before they can bee raised vnto vs which how hard it is for them to bee brought vnto who are so setled in their lees and dregges for so many hundred yeeres they cannot be ignorant who know how difficult it is for a Blâ—â—kemâ—â—re to châ—â—ge his skin or a Leopard his spots for so hard is it for those who are accustomed to euill to be drawne to good Secondly that so long as the Pope holdeth his headship ouer the Church with that erroneous position that he cannot erre which hee is likely to lay downe with his Crowne and Crosier for sooner to part with them were a foule error if by much sweate some indifferent parley were coÌ„passed himselfe still remaining both partie and iudge as hee was in the Councell of Trent improbable yea impossible it were that any conclusions could on their part bee passed if on any at all propounded which any way might be derogatorie to his vsurped power and preâ—ended supremacie Thirdly their cautelous circumspection lest by any meanes the knowledge of our doctrine might perhaps bee scattered among them argueth an vtter auersation in them for euer acknowledging it which appeareth in sundry their practises 1. In that they bind the consciences of all Catholikes to a perpetuall separation from all our Ecclesiasticall assemblies in religious publike duties which is the ground of all Recusancie to which purpose they teach it to bee a sinne to heare our sermons for that were a participation with blasphemies and for prayer with vs so straite laced are they as they may not say Amen in publike or priuate suppose at their tables if any Protestant bee present 2. In that they censure most seuerely al their subiects that trauell or traffike into Protestant countries blasting them with excommunication 3. In that they haue erected in their Cities an Inquisition to examine vpon oath any forreiner or stranger whereby they ransake not onely all his carriages but euen his conscience also lest he should bring any opinion within him or instrument without him that standeth not with their minds and liking wherein not onely some little escape but euen suspition it selfe prooueth often capitall 4.
pates balde shaue the lockâ— of their beards make cuttings in their flesh as Baals Priests did the Priests of the Sonnes of Aaron may not do so If they make glorious Altars plant Groues about them the Israelites may not doe so especially in the Wildernesse but either Altars of earth which presently vpon the remouall might bee demolished and cast downe left the remainds should be abused to superstition or if of stones they must be rough and rude vnhewen vnpolished lest any beautie of them should solicite their preseruation as for groues see Deut. 16.21 If they shall in way of superstition or worship reserue any portion of their sacrifices the Lord rather then he will haue any portioÌ„ of the Paschall Lambe preserued till the morrow will haue it burnt with fire neither shall Moses bodie bee knowne where it is buried lest they should make an Idoll of it Nay which is more and as worthy the noting we may obserue how the Lord euen in ciuill things draggeth his people from their society and fellowship for first Israel is charged that they should goe no more backe to Aegypt that way so as the danger was if any by their neighbours whose countries were adiacent vnto them the which the Lord vseth all meanes to preuent both in that he willeth his people to nourish a perpetuall emnity with the Moabite and Ammonite the peace and prosperity of whoÌ„ they may neuer seeke all their daies as also to debarre them from pressing into his people he chargeth that neither of them euer enter into the congregation of the Lord to the tenth generation intending hereby that they should not rise to preferment authoritie or Magistracie among them And as for the other strangers though Israel seemed in priuate respectes to bee if not somewhat obliged indebted to diuers of them yet as it were bound to peace and to hold their hands from open hostilitie yet might they not bee admitted into the congregatioÌ„ of God vnto the third generation Besides this foreseeing that the next and most direct way whereby the heatheÌ„ might league linck in theÌ„selues with his people might bee by marriages and coÌ„tracts the Lord is very studious that all such meanes be cut off and therefore would haue the distinctions of Tribes obserued with straite prohibition that no Iew except the Leuite should marry out of his owne Tribe much lesse without his owne people whereof although I acknowledge other more main causes as the distinction of the Tribe of the Mâ—ssiah from the rest the cleare acknowledgement of his race the execution of the Lords whole regiment Ecclesiasticall and Ciuill in that policie fitted according to that distinction to their seuerall offices and possessions yet I thinke this is one included reason not to be neglected especially seeing they had straite charge against it Againe in case a seruant Iew would marry a stranger into his Masters house he was not at his departure to carrie his wife and children for they were to bee his Masters but if hee would abide still with her hee was then shamefully to come before the Magistrate and for euer renounce his libertie vntil the Iubily released him by which straite lawes the Lord would restraine euen slaues and seruaÌ„ts who for the most part are neglected from matching themselues with strangers Such another law to this purpose is recorded Deut. 21.10 that if an Israelite in warre should see a bewtifull woman taken captiue whom he did affect for his wife it was ordered by God that first all meanes should bee vsed for the alienating of his affection as that hee must haue her home a moneth before and not marrie vpon any sudden motion Secondly shee must shaue her head to make her as ill fauored in his eies as might be Thirdly she must nourish her nailes to make her yet more sordid Fourthly she must put off the garment wherin she was taken and put on base and neglected garments fit for a pensiue captiue Fifthly shee must bewaile her father and mother a whole moneth to shew how hardly and sorrowfully she was brought from her fathers house into the power of strangers and then if by al these meanes the man could not be drawn froÌ„ her loue it was permitted to him to marrie her for his wife which law letteth vs see how hardly the Lord endureth is drawne to admitte the least liberty in this behalfe How many ciuill things might I instance in wherein the Lord straitened his people that they might bee vtterlie vnlike the Gentiles in habit manner of liuing behauiour and other like circumstances otherwise in themselues very indifferent which I had heere inserted but that I must consider that I write an addition not a booke an admonition not an exposition if yet these ordinances of God himself seeme in some mens opinions too straite and not to be imitated of vs in regard of the Papists towards whom wee are not to be so seuere as so far to seuer our selues that is but the seeking of a knot in a rush and to be acute in distinguishing where God hath not distinguished and in effect to affirme either that the Idolatry of the Romish Church is not so vile and grosse as is that of other Idolaters or else seeing our people conuerse with them more then any Idolaters that to communicate with their Idolatrie is nothing so dangerous now as it was for Gods people to participate with the Idolatry of the heatheÌ„ against Gods expresse Commandement But if with any such the testimony of man be greater then the testimony of God as it is commonly with the Popish minded who flie from the Scriptures vnto men because their doctrine is from below let them looke vnto those most auncient Councels which were the purer for sixe hundred yeares after Christ and they shall finde that the Church would haue her children diametrally opposed euen on lawfull things to the Iewes and heathen of whom they were in danger to be corrupted Those were more famous of Nice which decreed that the feast of Easter should not bee kept of Christians at that time and in that manner that the Iewes did that in nothing they might agree with them That also of Bracâ—a decreed that Christians should not decke their howses with bay-leaues and greene boughes than which what can be more indifferent neither rest the same day froÌ„ their callings wherin they did nor keepe the first day of euery moneth as they did It would be too tedious and argue forgetfulnes of my selfe and no remembrance of my reader to recite the testimonies of other Councels Fathers and our owne principal Writers in this behalfe which otherwise easily had I bin carried vnto by the tenacity and stiffenes of many in this argument But to end as our Sauiour wished his hearers Beware of the leauen of the Pharisies so let euery man beware of the leauen of the Papists for what is Popish