that whatsoeuer vse vnder the Law was proper to the Iewes Sabbath wherein now vnder the Gospell both Iew and Gentile haue interest remaynes yet proper to the Lords Day that succeeded thereto And in that respect this Day differs from all other Dayes being obserued not for policie and order only but for diuine institution and the religious vse whereunto it is appropriate that is to bee a memoriall First of the Creation as hath beene said because after our sixe dayes worke we rest on it being the seuenth as God did from the workes of the Creation Secondly of the Redemption because on it the Lord arose and perfected that worke and thirdly to be a signe of our sanctification namely that God who hath chosen and sanctified vs to be his people and whom we worship is God the Creator who in sixe dayes created the World and rested the seuenth and God the Redeemer who rose on this Day and hauing abolished sinne and death did bring in righteousnesse and life and God the holy Ghost by whose power hee did rise and by whose power we hope also to be raised againe Vnto this holy and religious vse this Day is appropriated whereunto no other Day besides can bee applyed That to conclude the Church hath power to appoint times for the publike worship of God and to appoint such a kind of worship as shee thinketh most expedient to bee vsed on these times for edification although shee hath no power to make the obseruation of any time a point of Gods worship or to appropriate thereto any part of his worship Finally to end this point of the power of the Church when the people are conuened in the ordinarie place and at the times appointed the Scripture hath not set downe whereat the Pastour should beginne how hee should proceed and wherewith hee should close vp this Seruice as whether hee should beginne with singing of Psalmes or praying or reading or preaching and when hee prayes with what petition he shall beginne what he shall subioyne next and so forth what order he shall obserue in baptizing and celebration of the Supper in Marriage in censuring of notorious offenders by Excommunication in Absolution and to bee short in all such other points of Doctrine Discipline and Diuine Seruice there is nothing particularly prescribed Although the substance of all be in the Word yet the order disposition forme and manner are left to be determined by the Church Many of which points are of farre greater moment then any of the Articles concluded at Perth Thus much for the power of the Church We come now to the extent of this power It is certaine that this power cannot reach to any thing essentiall or materiall in the worship of God but to the decencie and order only which is to bee obserued for edification in the circumstances aboue specified Let all things bee done decently and in order saith the Apostle The things themselues that are to be done are partly specified in that same Chapter where this rule is giuen and in the word else-where they are fully and particularly expressed and not left to be prescribed according to the will and iudgement of the Church but by this Precept a power is giuen only to the Church to prescribe the decent manner forme and order how they should be done And so to determine the circumstances which are in the generall necessary to bee vsed in diuine worship but not particularly defined in the Word So by warrant of this Precept the Church hath no power to forme new Articles of Faith new Precepts of Obedience new Petitions of Prayer new Sacraments or new Rites and Ceremonies such as Salt Oyle Spittle Chrisme Ashes holy Water Lights and innumerable such other things which cannot be reduced to any circumstances that in the generall are of necessary vse wherein the Church of Rome abusing her libertie hath laid vpon the Christian Church a burthen of Rites no lesse intollerable then the Legall Ceremonies yea and haue imposed them to bee obserued not onely as things belonging to policie and order but as parts of diuine worship which we of the reformed Church reiect esteeming all that to bee will-worship which men impose to be obserued as necessarie points of the seruice of God which himselfe hath ordayned in his Word Further because the Ceremonies and circumstances left to the determination of the Church cannot alwayes be one and the same by reason of the diuersity of Ages Times People and Nations touching them no constant Law can bee set downe as is acknowledged in the one and twentieth Article of the Confession of our Faith confirmed by Parliament but altered they may be and altered they should be when necessitie requires In which case Charitie sayes Caluine can best iudge what is most expedient Hanc si moderatricem patiemur salua erunt omnia The power of the Church being thus limited it is without controuersie that the Canons made by her touching the circumstances that in the generall are necessary for the worship of God ought to bee obeyed so long as they stand vnchanged or abrogated not because they contayne in them any substantiall or materiall part of Religion or that they haue in them any diuine Authoritie as the Commandements of God which in conscience bind to obedience but because in them an order is established tending to vnitie and peace whereby confusion scandall and Schisme is eschewed and because the power of the Church whereby these Lawes are made is the Ordinance of God and confirmed by the authoritie of his Word commanding vs to obey them that are set ouer vs in the Lord the Canons of the Church must be obeyed for reuerence of the Ordinance and Commandement of God which is the onely direct and immediate obiect of our conscience and the religious band that tyes vs to the obedience of euery humane ordinance for conscience sake But because many excuse their disobedience with a pretext of conscience I will shortly set downe the rules of conscience that by the Word of God we are obliged to follow in our actions The first is whatsoeuer is commanded or forbidden in the Word expresly or by necessary consequence ought to be obeyed The next is whatsoeuer is commanded or forbidden by the Lawes and Ordinances of our Superiours Ciuill or Ecclesiastique the same if it be not contrarie to Gods Word should be obeyed by reason of his expresse command Obey them that haue the rule ouer you and submit your selues Heb. 13. And againe Submit your selfe to euery ordinance of man for the Lords sake 1. Pet. 2.13 To this appertaynes lawfull customs hauing the force of a Law where there is no written Law Thirdly touching things that are free and are neither determined by Ciuill nor Ecclesiasticall Constitutions we haue this rule Let euery man stand fully perswaded in his owne minde that he may doe or omit that which hee intends without the offence of God or his Neighbour but
Rebellious to beare down the Truth his Maiesties Authority the Power of the Church and all that loue Order follow after peace To obuiate this his seditious and malicious purpose it was not onely expedient but necessary that this answere should bee made which by the grace of God shall giue such satisfaction to all good and vpright hearted men as they shall preferre the iudgement determination and lawfull Constitutions of the Church to the singularitie of their owne and other priuate mens opinions order to confusion peace to contention and vnitie to schisme aswell for the feare of God who hath giuen power to his Church to set downe Lawes for order and decencie and hath commanded vs to submit our selues thereto as for obedience to the sacred will of our most gracious Souereigne at whose instant and earnest desire these Articles being found lawfull were concluded and are now commanded to bee practised When Dauid would haue gone out against Absalon hee was stayed by the people who esteemed his life more worth then a thousand of theirs So should euery good Christian esteeme of the loue and fauour of the Prince towards the Church Salomon sayes that the wrath of a King is the Messenger of Death and like to the roring of a Lion which a Wiseman will pacifie and not prouoke and that his fauour is as the cloud of the latter raine and as the dew vpon the grasse The truth of this is manifest in the Stories of the Church what comfort the fauour of Constantine the Great did giue to the Christian Church may be seene by the barbarous and cruell persecutions of the Emperours that went before The euils troubles and calamities that the Church of England endured in the dayes of Queene Marie declared what benefit they enioyed by King Edward her Predecessor and Queene Elizabeth her Successor The beastly crueltie and massacres vsed in France vnder the Gouernment of the Predecessors of Henrie the Great hath made manifest to the World what wracke and misery the discontentment and offence of Princes and how great blessing and felicity their loue and fauour produces to the Church of God within their Dominions What need wee to goe further then the Scriptures for examples to this purpose therein wee see that as the Church decayed vnder wicked and idolatrous Gouernours so did it euer reuiue and flourish vnder religious and godly Kings We stand much vpon the offence of people and esteeme greatly of their fauour wherein I will not say we doe euill but should wee put their fauour and offence in ballance with the fauour and offence of him whom God hath annointed and appointed to be the nursing Father of this Church In whose loue we haue found by experience and daily findes greater benefite and good for the aduancement of true Religion then can bee expected from many thousands of our best Professors let be at their hands who in Religion like nothing well but contention whereby they make their aduantage one way or other as they are inclined delighting to fish as the Prouerbe is in troubled waters It is often obiected that the chiefe cause of our yeelding at Perth to the fiue Articles was the respect we had to the fauour of the Prince and the feare of his wrath against my selfe in particular it is falsly obiected by the penner of this Pamphlet that I confessed we had neither Reason Scripture nor Antiquitie for them yet to diuert the Kings wrath from the Church yeelding was best The truth is at that time I spake only of kneeling at the receiuing of the Communion and said no more then I haue set downe in print in that Treatise which I published for kneeling in the last words of the first Section of the first Chapter and in the first Section of the second Chapter at the beginning this was That neither Scripture Antiquitie nor Reason doe enforce any necessitie either for lying sitting standing or kneeling at the Sacrament and that all these gestures being indifferent I held it most expedient to yeeld and not to striue with our gracious Souereigne for a matter of that nature repeating this Verse Cedere maiori virtutis fama secunda est Illa grauis palma est quam minor hostis habet This I said at that time and so yet I thinke that to eschue the Prince his offence and to keep confirme and increase his loue and fauour towards the Gospell and the Church was a respect and cause great enough wherefore we should haue yeelded vnto his Maiesties desire in matters indifferent against the lawfulnesse whereof nothing hath beene or can bee obiected which is not and may not be easily answered Against the expediencie the feare of scandall was and is all that could be pretended which if wee were peaceably disposed might haue beene and yet may be very easily remoued and therefore such a feare ought neither to haue impedite our yeelding at that time nor our obedience now We are exhorted by the holy Ghost to feare God and obey the King Where obedience to the Prince may stand with Gods feare it ought to bee preferred by euery good Christian to all other respects and especially by the Pastors of the Church who should as lights goe before others both in doctrine and example chiefly when peace and vnitie may bee procured and preserued in Gods house by our obedience For vnitie wee should bee ready to lay downe our liues as well as for veritie which Dionysius Bishop of Alexandria writing to Nouatus affirmed saying Oportuerit etiam pati omnia ne scinderetur Ecclesia Dei erat non inferior gloria sustinere martyrium pro eo ne scindatur Ecclesia quà m est illa ne idolis immoletur Immo secundum meam sententiam maius hoc putâ— esse martyrium ibi enim vnusquisque pro sua tantùm anima in hoc verò pro omni Ecclesia martyrium sustinet That is to say It behoued thee to haue suffered all things that the Church of God should not haue been rent it had bin no lesse glorie to haue sustained martyrdome for this that the Churches vnitie might haue beene preserued then for refusing to sacrifice vnto Idols Yea in my minde this is a greater martyrdome for in that euerie man suffereth for his owne soule onely but here hee suffers martyrdome for the whole Church This was the iudgement of that holy Father who esteemed it a glorious martyrdome to suffer for the vnitie of the Church Contrariwise the Donatists did glorie in this that by their sufferings they entertained Schisme and diuision confirmed the hearts of the simple and supeâ—stitious in their errours acquired to themselues the renowne of Martyrs and thereby brought vpon the Church the imputation of persecution To whom S. Augustine answers That they complained most vniustly that they were persecuted by the Church because the Church was more heauily persecuted by them and thereupon in the eleuenth Tractate vpon S. Iohn sayes Albeit Ismael was cast out
of Rome to wit out of Spaine one out of Egypt eleuen out of Calabria one out of Dalmatia one out of Carthage one and out of France one so in the first generall Councell at Constantinople there were numbred an hundred and fiftie Bishops whereof only two or three are found to be out of all the Occidentall Nations In the first Councell of Ephesus there are numbred two hundred Bishops and only three out of the Occident In the Councell of Chalcedone were three hundred Bishops whereof of the Occidentall Countreyes only foure or fiue In the second generall Councell of Constantinople an hundred sixtie fiue Bishops and of these only ten or eleuen out of the Occident Now albeit in the Occidentall Empire there were many large Kingdomes and Prouinces wherein Christian Religion was professed yet these Councels notwithstanding the absence of such ceassed not to be acknowledged as generall or if this might be esteemed a iust cause to annull a Church Assembly what a doore should be opened to the Arrians Macedonians Nestorians Eutychians to reiect the Decrees of these famous Countreyes by the which their Heresies were condemned Lastly the obedience giuen by the Pastors of these Dioceses which you alledge to haue beene neglected testifieth their consent to the Acts and that they haue ratified them for their owne parts PP The generall Assembly the highest Iudicatorie Ecclesiasticall within this Realme hath euer after exhortation made by the last Moderator lited and lawfully elected a new Moderator according to diuers Acts continuate Custome and Practice of this Church The which Presbyters haue beene so regarded that the conuention holden at Perth by his Maiesties missiue the last of Feb. 1596. although frequented by his Maiesties presence with a great number of the Nobilitie Barones and Burgesses with the Commissioners from euery Presbytery was for the defect aforesaid no further acknowledged to bee a lawfull Assembly then the generall Assembly holden at Dundy the yeare following 1597. declared the same to be a lawfull extraordinary Assembly Neuerthelesse no Moderatour was lawfully elected in this Assembly but the place vsurped by him who had practised against the matter there proponed and not as yet determined and consequently who ought to haue beene secluded from any authoritie in respect of the preiudice committed by him ANS In this as in all the rest almost of their exceptions against the Assembly there is a false rule laid whereby to try the lawfulnesse thereof To wit the Acts and Custome of the Church of Scotland vnder Presbyteriall Gouernment which must not rule vs now seeing the true forme of Church-gouernment now restored is much different from the estate of these times It is true that when the Church was gouerned by a paritie of Ministers they choosed a Moderator by suffrage though without any warrant or example eyther out of Scripture or Antiquitie but being compelled thereto of necessitie in regard of that forme of Gouernment wherein no man had any ordinary prerogatiue aboue or before others but now the forme of Gouernment being altered and each man knowing his owne roome and station we are not tyed to obserue that custome but ought rather to follow the Constitutions and practice of the Primitiue Church which was ruled by the same forme of Episcopall Gouernment that now is established in this Land And it is manifest that euer while the Pope of Rome did tyrannically arrogate vnto himselfe and his Legats Presidencie in all Councels this course was obserued that eyther the Christian Prince himselfe when he was present was President as Constantine the Great in the first Councell of Nice and Constantine called Pogonatus in the third Councell of Constantinople or else by the Prince his permission and appointment the Bishop Metropolitan or Patriarch of greatest authoritie in these bounds where the Councell was holden who was alwayes acknowledged President except he himselfe were indited or condemned of Heresie then by the Emperours appointment and not by Election of the Councell a President was appointed as in the first Councell of Ephesus Cyrillus Bishop of Alexandria was appointed President by Theodosius the Emperour because both the Patriarchs of Constantinople and Antiochia who were of chiefe authoritie in these bounds were fauourers of the Nestorian Heresie which was there condemned And if we looke through the whole Ecclesiasticke History wee shall find this euer to haue beene the order yea in that Apostolike Councell Act. 15. according to the iudgement of the most learned both old and new Writers the Apostle Iames was there President as Bishop of Ierusalem Eusebâ—li 2. cap. 1. Theophil in Act. 15. Lyranus ibidem Dionysius Carthusianus ibid. Whittakerus de Concil Quaest. 4. And so is it probable out of the Text because hee pronounced the sentence in the conclusion of the action which is the speciall dutie of a Moderatour and according to the words of his sentence are the Synodicall Letters written to other Churches This exception therefore of not lyting or electing a Moderator being grounded vpon a Custome or Constitution now abolished in the place whereof hath succeded the commendable order alwayes obserued by the Primitiue Church in her purest times is not to bee respected and the example yee bring to qualifie this exception out of that Assembly at Perth Anno 1596. is not only insufficient to proue but likewise in many points false First because in the Acts of the Assembly there is no mention made of any exception taken against the Election of the Moderator Secondly that Assembly was acknowledged to be a lawfull Assembly by an expresse Act in the same Assembly Thirdly it was called extraordinary not for any exception taken against the Election of the Moderatour but because of the time and place to wit that the time and place appointed by the former Assembly was preuented vpon an extraordinary occasion by his Maiesties missiue Fourthly by the Assembly that followed at Dundy Anno 1597. it is acknowledged to be a lawfull Assembly without the addition of extraordinarie as appeares by the Acts thereof Session 7.14 Maij. PP By order established Acts standing in force and continuall Custome free of all Controuersie and Quarrell all and euery one of the ordinary members of a generall Assembly hauing place and power to vote or capable of moderation are and should bee authorized with lawfull Commissions from inferiour Assemblies viz. Presbyteries Burgesses and Vniuersities according to the Act made Anno 1573. Neuerthelesse the Bishops a great number of Noblemen and Barones and some Ministers hauing no lawful Commission presumed to carry themselues as lawfull members of the said Assembly ANS Because that which heere is summarily said is at greater length set downe in the Articles following I referre the Answer to that place PP Whereas the proceeding of the Assembly ought to bee free without preoccupation either with terrours or allurements this Assembly was preoccupyed with Sermons Letters Harrangues with allurements on the one side and terrours on the other ANS This
In the thirteenth Councell of Toledo there sate and subscribed sixe and twentie Dukes and Earles In the fifteenth Councell thereof there sate and subscribed seuenteene Earles In the sixteenth there sate and subscribed sixteene Senators of whom the King sayes in his speech Quos huic Concilio nostra sereniâ—atis praeceptio vel opportuna inesse fecit occasio I might bring a large Catalogue of examples but these are sufficient to proue that which we haue in hand to wit that the number of Commissioners sent by his Maiestie iâ— warranted by the practice of all good Christian Princes in most ancient Synods yea it is certayne that Monarchs and Princes had euer these priuiledges vntill that the Popes tyrannie increasing did bereaue them of their right and exclude them from all Church assemblies And looke wee to the custome of our owne Church many Counsellours and Noble men haue had vote in Assemblies in name of his Maiestie In the Assembly holden at Edinburgh Anno 1563. Decemb. 25. besides the Superintendents Ministers and Commissioners of the Churches and Prouinces there were present nine Lords of the Counsaile Earles and Barons and because thereafter the Regent his Counsaile and Nobilitie did not assist the Assemblies so frequently as before an earnest Petition was made by the whole Assembly conuened in Edinburgh Anno 1573. March 6. to the Regent his Counsaile and Nobilitie to giue their presence and concurrence with the Church in their proceedings because such had beene the practice in Assemblies from the beginning of the reformation The truth whereof is manifest by the inscriptions set before the Acts of many assemblies wherein the Counsaile and Nobilitie are euer distinguished from Bishops Superintendents Ministers and Commissioners of Prouinces and Churches In the generall Assembly holden at Edinburgh Anno 1573. August 6. it was appointed Sess. 1. as followes Because it is vnderstood that certayne of the Nobilitie of this Realme and secret Counsaile are to repayre to this Assembly Therefore these whole Brethren ordaynes that the whole Nobilitie and Counsailors with the Commissioners of Townes Prouinces and Churches hauing power to vote shall sit within the inner barre of the Tolbuithe and all others without In the Assembly holden at Edinburgh Anno 1567. were present ten Earles and Lords of Baronies about the number of three and fiftie besides the ordinarie Commissioners of Townes and Churches Likewise in the Assemblies holden Anno 1563. Decemb. 25. Anno 1566. Iun. 25. Anno 1567. Iul. 21. Anno 1567. Decemb. 25. 1568. 1569. 1570. c. the Earles Lords and Barons are distinguished from Commissioners of Churches Prouinces and Townes And in the Assembly at Edinburgh 1563. Decemb. 25. the Lords of secret Counsaile with the whole Brethren of the Assembly appointed Master Iohn Woodlocke Superintendent of the West Moderator So as wee see the practice of our owne Church hath euer esteemed this free that his Maiestie at his pleasure or Regents in his minoritie should choose what number of Commissioners they liked PP At Edinburgh in Iuly 1568. it was ordayned that Barons should be chosen Commissioners in Synodall Assemblyes At Dundie in March 1597. after the full establishment of Presbyteries it was appointed in presence of his Maiestie that Barons should be chosen Commishioners with consent of Presbyteries and that one Baron onely should bee directed out of the bounds of a Presbyterie Neuerthelesse in this Assembly the Noble men and Barons had neither Commission according to the old act nor according to the new In the yeere of God 1568. it was ordayned that Burgesses should be chosen Commissioners by the Counsaile and Church Session of their Burge coniunctly And in the yeere 1597. that they should be chosen with consent of the Presbyterie Item that euery Burghe haue power to direct but one Commissioner except Edinburgh to whom it was permitted to direct two Neuerthelesse in this Assembly neither of the said Articles were obserued ANS The acts alleadged for choosing Commissioners of the Barons and Burghes were neuer so precisely kept in our Church as to exclude any of them that came thither without Commission from Presbyteries But such regard was euer had to Noble men and Barons of any note that if they were present they had their places with the first were allowed to giue their aduise and voyce in euery matter proponed and had thankes giuen them that vouchsafed their concurrence this is euident by all the Registers of our Assembly and so well knowne as none can deny it It grieues the Lybeller and the rest of that Sect to see the Nobles and Barons so ready at his Maiesties call and that that which sometimes serued them to good purpose in their tumultuous meetings is turned against themselues to wound them And by all good order in Church Assemblies none of the Lâ—iâ—all sort ought to haue place except they be called by the Prince his letters or assured by the Bishops to giue authoritie to the acts concluded Reade in Concilio Turracenens act 13. about the yeare 517. and Concil Tolet. where the order of Councells is set downe which order is pâ—efixed to the first Tome of the Councells yee shall finde this cleare For that which he sayes of the Commissioners of Burghes let this bee added That otherwise then by the Counsell of their owne Burghe they were neuer chosen which wee referre to the Townes themselues that know it PP At Montrosse 1600. it was statuted and ordayned that none of them who shall haue vote in Parliament in the name of the Church shall come as Commissioners to the generall Assembly nor haue any vote in the same vnlesse they be authorized with Commission from their owne Presbyteries to that effect This Act was neuer repealed no not at the pretended Assembly holden at Glasgow but by the same Assembly they stand countable to euery generall Assembly for their proceedings Howbeit the Presbyteries were spoyled of their authority in many things at the said pretended Assembly Yet of the power of election of Commissioners they were not spoyled neyther is there any other order of Election of Commissioners and Constitution of the members of the Assembly set downe by any Act of our Church then was established Anno 1597. Neuerthelesse in this Assembly they not only presented themselues without Commission but sate as Lords ouer-ruling it they had practised the Ceremonies against the established Laws before they were proponed to the Assembly they ought therefore to haue beene secluded and sharply censured but they vsurped the place both of Iudge and partie ANS This Act of MoÌ„trosse Assembly was past when these caueats were deuised to restrayne the immoderate power of Bishops in the Church and was yeelded vnto for satisfying the importunity of such as opposed to their restitution and keeping them quiet in the time but the Bishops now beeing restored by the Assemblies of the Church and by Acts of Parliament to the exercise of that lawfull power and Iurisdiction which euer they had in the Church that
Act nor any other of that nature cannot preiudice them And that Bishops should haue their Commissions from Presbyters men inferiour to them in degree it is so absurd as the like hath not beene heard in any Age. But the Libeller is in a dreame and thinkes no Act nor any order established to be of force that hee himselfe hath not approued Where hee sayes that there was neuer another Constitution of the members of the Assembly set downe by any Act of our Church then that at Dundy 1597. it is most false for in Edinburgh 1568. in Iulij there is another Constitution wherein the members of the Assembly are diuided in two sorts some are appointed to bee ordinary and perpetuall as Superintendents and Commissioners for visitation of Churches others mutable are Commissioners of Churches Townes and Prouinces The first needeth no speciall Commission to euery Assembly but being once admitted to the Office were euer acknowledged thereafter as ordinary and speciall members of the Assemblies The second were changed from Assembly and behooued to produce a new Commission before they were admitted Yea in the Assembly holden Anno 1568. at Edingburgh the first of Iulij it was ordayned that no Minister should haue voyce in Assemblies generall nor leaue their Parishes to attend thereat vnlesse they be choosed by their Superintendents as men knowne able to reason and of knowledge to iudge in matters But for the Bishops themselues they haue alwayes bin reputed ordinary members of the Assembly and were euer first called in the Rolles as is to be seene through the whole Registers In Anno 1563. Iul. 28. Sess. 4. it is ordayned that euery Superintendent should compeare the first day of the Assembly vnder such a paine not as idle Spectators but as hauing speciall interest and power the same is euident by another Act at Edingburgh 1568. Iulij 1. And by a third Act at Edingburgh in March 1573. And by the admonition sent by the Regēt his grace wherby the Bishops are specially admonished to be present at all Assemblies or to be reputed vnworthy of the office And in the Assēbly at Edinburgh A. 1575. Aug. 6. albeit there were present sixe Bishops to wit Glasgow Dunkeld Galloway Brechin Dumbline and the Isles and two Superintendents Angouse and Lowthian yet because certaine others were absent it was thought good that they should be called and the absents noted Yea after that the Iurisdiction of Bishops beganne to be quarrelled in the Assembly 1579. Iul. 7. Sess. 9. this Statute was made that followes ABout the Bishops and Commissioners of Countreyes who absent themselues from generall Assemblies at the time appointed the Church hath ordayned the Act made August 12. 1575. to be executed against them and that same Act to be vnderstood not onely of Bishops hauing office of Visitation appointed to them by the Church but also of such as haue not the said office Likewise when some Bishops were prohibited to exercise the power of Visitation their presence not the lesse was thought necessary in al Assemblies and they counted ordinary members thereof neither was that Statute euer repealed by any Assembly afterwards but euen Anno 1587. after the Prerbyteries were erected the Bishop of Saint Andrewes was summoned to compeare for his absence from the generall Assembly by all which it appeares that the Bishops had no need of any commission for sitting and giuing voyce in Assemblies PP At Saint Andrewes in April 1582. It was thought expedient that Presbyteries should not be astricted to send their Moderator in Commission but whom they iudged fittest for the purpose that constant Moderators should bee constant members of the generall Assembly is a forged clause forged in an Act of a pretended Assembly holden at Linlithgow the yeare of God 1606. The which Assembly neyther the Church then did nor will the Bishops now stand to neuerthelesse in this Assembly some Moderators of Presbyteries voted without Election and only by vertue of the forged clauses of the Act fore said if any Presbytery directed their Moderators in Commission vpon ignorance and errour hauing respect to the fore-said clauses afore-said their ignorance and errour is no lawfull consent It is in the meantime to be remembred that the present Moderators are not of the qualitie of these constant Moderators but of a new Edition set out at Glasgow viz. they are the Bishops Deputies placed by them in Presbyteries ANS This reason will not inferre a nullity Presbyteries ye◠say were not astricted by the Act of Assembly at Saint Andrewes 1582. to send their Moderators in Commission Ergo the Moderators ought not to haue come notwithstanding of their Commissions from the Presbyteries there is no consequence heere for it is as if I would reason The Presbytery of Saint Andrewes was not astricted to haue sent Master Iohn Carmichael to the Assembly Therefore he ought not to haue had voice therein notwithstanding of his Commission Any man sees the inconsequence But here ye◠adde foure things First that the Act of Linlythguow 1606 bearing that constant Moderatours should bee constant members of the generall Assembly was forged Next that the Bishops will not stand to this Assembly now more then the Church did at that time Thirdly that some Moderatours came to this Assembly without Election by vertue of the said Act and the Prebyteries that directed them 〈◊〉 the same vpon ignorance and errour which is not a lawfull consent Fourthly that the present Moderatours are not of the quality of these constant Moderatours but of a new Edition set out at Glasgow viz. the Bishops Deputies in Presbyteries I answere to the first that there is no trust to be giuen to you in this businesse wherin I haue better reason to be beleeued speaking for worthy and reuerēd men whose fame was neuer blotted then such an one as you are that did not feare to deny the authority of our Souereigne Prince in his owne presence and immediately after forsweare it to the Brethren Master Iames Nicolsone now with God did moderate that Assembly at Linlythguow a man for his Wisdome Knowledge and Holinesse in greater reputation then that thy calumnies can touch him All the conclusions thereof were penned by himselfe at least by his aduice and to haue made a greater aduantage then that conclusion could bring with it would not haue altered a sillable in any Act nor forged or foysted in any clause as thou speakest The Scribe of that Assembly was Doctour Henry Philip yet Minister at Arbrothe whose truth and fidelity to speake nothing of his Learning Prudence and other gifts is as well knowne as is thy perfidie and presumptuous rebellions for which now thou liuest in Exile And if thy sayings or the speeches of the like of thee might call such mens honestie in question it should not goe well If I seeme more bitter in this Answere to the Reader then I am accustomed let him consider that he who neither spares dead nor liuing great nor small must
particular members of the Church in â—he Church representatiue This his Assertion being duâ—â— examined will bee found false â—or the greatest part â—ouching the persons whom he alledgeth to haue sworn â—nd as to their reall obligation it is friuolous for no man 〈◊〉 bee really bound by an assertory oath but onely the â—erson that sweares But passing by this I answer That when the King and Church sweare the Confession of â—aith by that Oath they did neither abiure any of the â—rticles concluded at Perth neither did oblige themselues to maintaine and obey the contrary for it is maniâ—est by the limitations set downe in the beginning of the Oath that all these particulars were excluded And they 〈◊〉 sweare to continue in the Discipline of the Church of â—cotland generally â—nd to defend the same all the dayes of â—heir life were so farre from tying themselues to conâ—inue in the obedience of euery particular ordinance touâ—hing indifferent and alterable things that by the contraâ—â—â— â—he â—ne and twentieth Article of the Confession of â—aith aboue rehearsed they stood obliged to obey euery alteration that should be concluded by the Church The Church representatiue did sweare in that Article to alter all such constitutions when it should be needfull and the particular members of the Church sweare to obey her will and ordinance in the points altered and changed For to obey the Discipline in generall is to obey euery thing that the Church by the power giuen her of God appointeth to bee done or not done for order and policie So for any nouation that is made neither hath the King nor the Church representatiue violated their Oath nor haue the inferiour members beene loosed and freed from their oathes but in giuing obedience to the points of Discipline concluded by their Superiours they made their oathes and promises good which otherwise by their disobedience they should haue transgressed As to the Oath which as you say the Bishop of Ely now Bishop of Winchester affirmeth his Maiestie twice to haue giuen for maintaining that forme and manner of Gods worship established by the Lawes of both Kingdomes you might easily haue perceiued that he did not by the forme which he mentioneth vnderstand these indifferent points of policie wherein some little disconformity there is and cannot but be in regard of the different estate of our Church and theirs but by that forme her vnderstood that same fashion and manner of worshipping God as is prescribed to vs in his Word is proponed in the seuerall Confessions of our Faith which is one and the same both with them and vs. So you depraue that reuerend Fathers speech and craftily insinuate his Maiestie to be guiltie of periury in that by his Highnesse most lawfull and earnest desire the alteration of these indifferent things hath beene wrought but yee should know that these are but things accessory to the essentiall forme of Gods worship whereunto his Maiesty did sweare at his Coronation which to this day constantly he hath maintained and will by the grace of God for many yeares after yea euen vntill that temporall â—rowne bee changed with that eternall Another defence ye alledge is vsed by the Pastors and â—rofessors that liue obedient to the Laws of the Church They haue not violated their Oath they say because the â—ubstance of Religion is kept and onely some indifferent â—oints altered And to this yee make three replyes First â—aying That we sware to keepe the same forme of worâ—hip that was vsed in the Church of Scotland and specially in the vse of the Sacraments Secondly That the Oath was in a matter of Religion which is not changeable as are the Statutes of Republiques and Corporations Thirdly Put the case yee say the points innouated were matters indifferent yet seeing they were once abiured for their abuse they may not be receiued againe except either we could prooue that our oath in the beginning was vnlawfull or that our former formes are become vnlawfull not expedient for edification of the Church oâ—â—esse edificatiue then the ceremonies presently vrged â— answere to the first That the forme of worship vsed in the Church of Scotland is not altered for still we hold that forme of worship which is prescribed to vs in the Word defended receiued by many notable Churches and Realmes and particularly contained in the Confession of our Faith As for the gesture and kneeling and those other circumstances of times and places where the Sacraments may be ministred in cases of extremity there is no man being in his right wits that will thinke the forme of Gods worship consisteth in such things or that they are any part thereof Your second reply we admit and affirme according thereto That the matter of Religion whereto we sware is not alterable nor can it bee changed And that the points questioned being of their owne nature indifferent are excluded from the Oath and are no part of the matter thereof To your third reply I answere That wee haue not receiued any thing againe in our Church which euer was damned and abiured for their abuse for in the negatiue part of our oath wherein Papistrie is abiured there is no mention of kneeling nor of the commemoration of Christs benefits vpon the fiue anniuersary dayes nor is any of the other three Articles euer touched It is true that Popish dedication of dayes to other Creatures and the obseruation of them with an opinion of necessitie or that they were any part of Gods worship are abiured in that Confession and that also wee haue condemned in the Acte made at Perth concerning the obseruation of these times but to make commemoration of the benefits that our Sauiour by his Birth Passion Resurrection and Ascension hath brought vnto vs we neuer held it vnlawfull nor did count it a matter of abuse Therefore it is not necessary that either our oath be proued vnlawful or our former formes it sufficeth that they bee prooued lesse edificatiue or not so expedient for the time because they are abused by the people to superstition and prophanenesse as afterwards we will make cleare in their owne place Where yee say That it was confessed in the Assembly that they were not expedient for our Church and that the same were yeelded vnto for holding of some externall inconueniences a matter now denied yee say as importing tyrannie because you confesse you haue this only by report and it is the nature of all your sort to be too credulous we passe it In the meane time wee will not deny that to some they appeared very inexpedient for diuers respects of the which the chiefe were the discredit they feared to incurre with their people that did esteeme the condemning of the abuse of these ceremonies to haue been an absolute reiecting of them as ceremonies idolatrous which neuer was done by any prudent or wise Pastor another respect was because simple ones that had not learned to make distinction betweene circumstances and the substance
thing ye haue said that holy dayes were and might bee lawfully kept vnder the Law without any particular warrant from God But put the case that the same might not haue beene done vnder the Law it followes not that the Christian Church hath not libertie to appoint dayes and times for religious exercises without particular direction For vnder the Law God not only set downe the substance of his worship but all the circumstances also as the persons in particular by whom the place where and the times when he should be worshipped so fully as little or nothing was left to the abitrement of the Iewish Church and as yee say these times were so ceremonious that the greatest part of the externall worship consisted in Ceremonies vnder the Gospell it is not so for in the Gospell the substance of these Ceremonies and of the worship of God is perfectly set downe but the circumstantiall Ceremonies of time place persons and formes which are no part of the worship but pertinences only are left to bee determined by the Church according to the generall Rules of Order and Decencie It is true because the Iewes had one place only appointed by God for his worship to wit the Temple and Tabernacle whereunto the people could not resort at all times therefore to their owne election was permitted the appointing of other commodious places for their Synagogues And now vnder the Gospell there is one onely Day of diuine Institution to wit the Lords Day whereunto to tye the worship of God is a Iudaicall Pedagogie against the Christian libertie and practice For the time is now come that from one new Moone to another and from one Sabbath to another all flesh shall come and worship before God Isa. 66.23 According to the which Prophesie the Apostolike and Primitiue Church did not only conuene on the Lords Day to worship God but on such other times as they thought commodious to obserue Saint Paul taught often on the Iewish Sabbath and at Ephesus daily for the space of two yeares in the Schoole of one Tyrannus Saint Augustine testifies that in some Churches they conuened daily not onely to preaching praying and Lectures but to the celebration of the Sacrament also Epiphanius in his Epitomie or Abridgement of Christian Faith affirmeth Apostolos instituisse synaxes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is The Apostles to haue instituted their holy meetings for diuine Seruice on Wednesday Friday and the Lords Day Soâ—rates witnesses that on these dayes through the whole World for the greatest parâ— the holy mysteries were celebrated Hereby it is manifest albeit the Church was tyed to worship God solemnly and publikely on the Lords Day that yet they were not tyed to that Day only but that all dayes weâ—e sanctified by Christ that the Church might chooâ—e and deâ—ermine of them for the Seruice of God as she pleased So to conclude the Church vnder the Gospeâ—l hath power without any particular warrant of Goâ— keeping the general Rules of Pietie Charitâ—e and Decencie to dedicate times and places and set downe formes and orders for the worshâ—p of God The Ceremonies in the Iewes Câ—urch were not only Circumstantiall but Mysticall for the greatest part and a part of diuine worship it selfe such as the Church vnder the Law and vnder the Gospell hath no power to institute but the Ceremonies vnder the Gospell are meerely Circumstantiall for the greater part not Mysticall and a part of the worship it selfe but onely accessorie thereto these the Christian Church hath power to appoint And such are the fiue dayes of old obserued by the Primitiue Church and now restored againe in our Church and such were the dayes of Purim and the Feast of Dedication which were not obserued as a part of religion instituted by God but only for commemoration of Gods benefits bestowed vpon his people in these times PP The obseruation of Anniuersary dayes pertayned to the Ceremoniall Law but so it is that the Ceremoniall Law is abolished Ye confirme the Antecedent by the reasons following First The Anniuersary Dayes were distinguished from the Morall Sabbath many were the preheminences of the ordinary Sabbath aboue the Anniuersary dayes Secondly The Apostle cals them weake beggerly rudiments Gal. 4.9.10 The elements of the world Col. 2.20 Shaddowes of things to come Col. 2.16 17. The Apostle sayes not the obseruation of Iudaicall dayes but simpliciter the obseruation of dayes serued to the people of God for a typicall vse and rudiment of Religion If the obseruation of some anniuersarie dayes was prescribed to the Iewes as elements and rudiments for their instruction it followes that the obseruation of anniuersarie dayes is of it selfe a rudimentarie instruction Otherwise the Apostles reason will not hold Thirdly Dayes and Meates are paralelled therefore as it is Iudaicall to esteeme some meates cleane and some vnclean so to esteeme one day holier then another is Iudaicall Fourthly To substitute other dayes in place of the Iewish as a Christian Pasche and Whitsonday for the Iewish is to substitute rudiments to the Iewish and not to chase them away Fiftly The Iewish anniuersarie dayes were not onely abrogated as shaddowes of things to come but as memorials of by gone benefits In euery respect all their anniuersarie daies are abolished Therefore in euery respect they belong to the Ceremoniall Law ANS These arguments yee vse to prooue the obseruation of anniuersarie dayes to be ceremoniall I answer them one by one First where yee say that anniuersarie dayes in the Law were distinguished from the morall Sabbath if ye will of this conclude that the anniuersarie dayes were not morall but typicall I will not deny it But if yee conclude anniuersarie daies to be therefore simply ceremoniall I say it followes not and that your argument is a caption à dicto secundum quid ad dictum simplicitèr The obseruation of a weekely day amongst the Iewes was not onely morall but a typicall shadow of things to come Is the Lords Day then because it is weekely not onely morall but also typicall But perhaps ye reason thus Anniuersarie dayes are eyther ceremoniall or morall but so it is they are not morall ergo To this I say that your diuision is not full nor perfect for there be anniuersarie dayes that are naturall as the Aequinoctiall and Solstitiall Others that are ciuill as dayes of Markets and Weapon-shewings c. And there be dayes Ecclesiasticall which are neyther morall nor mysticall but meerely circumstantiall to the worship whereunto they are appoynted To the second I answer that anniuersarie dayes are not called by the Apostle Elements and Rudiments otherwise then the New-Moones which are monethly dayes and Sabbaths which were weekely dayes And therefore if the Aposâ—le had called dayes Shadowes by reason of their yeerely reuolution he could not haue concluded that Sabbaths and New-moones were Shaddowes It is neither the weekly nor monethly nor anniuersarie reuolution that made these dayes
Worship For albeit the Lords Day be consecrated to the Worship of God yet the Worship is not tied to it but from one Sabbath to another and from one New-Moone to another all flesh may appeare before the Lord. That which ye speake of diuiding Christs actions and the appointing of mysticall dayes is partly foolish and partly false Is it not a folly to thinke that the actions of Christ ought not to bee diuided and seuerally remembred in Lectures and Sermons seeing the Spirit of God hath diuided them in this Storie and that it is impossible at once to remember them all And it is false also because for rememberance of them no day is appointed to bee kept mystically as a part of the worship but only circumstantially for order and commoditie which kinde of obseruation is not a superstitious wil-worship but a lawfull determination of commodious times for the worship of God belonging to the power and policie of the Church PP It is thirdly obiected that Paul kept the Feast of Pentecost Act. 20. 1. Cor. 16. I answere it was the Iewish Pentecost c. ANS If it was the Iewish Pentecost then Saint Paul did not only obserue an Anniuersary Day but such also as was legall and abrogated by the Gospell and such as hee discharges the Church to obserue Yet I hope yee will not say that his obseruation was Superstitious or Pedagogicall because he obserued it not as a necessary part of Gods worship prescribed in the Law in respect whereof only it was Pedagogicall but as a fit circumstance and opportunitie for the worke of his Ministerie like as he did often obserue the Iewish Sabbaths which was not onely lawfull but in those times verie expedient to be done by him Hereby it is manifest that the obseruation of dayes is not condemned by the Apostle as a Iewish Rite because Anniuersarie Monethly or Weekly but because it was conioyned with opinion of necessitie and vsed as a Legall worship therefore although vpon the Iewish Sabbath or vpon their Pentecost diuine worship was performed as the Euangell preached the Sacraments celebrated Prayers publikely conceiued c. If these things were done without any mysticall relation or respect had to the day but only because the time was opportune and happily fit for Gods Worke the exercise was lawfull and could not bee condemned So wee finde in some churches that on eueryday the sacrameÌ„t was ministred that on the Iewish Sabbath they had an ordinarie Fast and no well aduised Christian did euer thinke these to be vnlawfull by reason of the day For if to the cleane euery thing be cleane all dayes are cleane and sanctified to euery lawfull exercise of the man who is himselfe made cleane by the bloud of Christ Consequently euery day whether it be Weekly or Anniuersarie is cleane and sanctified by Christ to the exercise of any part of his Worship which shall bee thought meete by the Church to be performed to his honour and the edification of her selfe The Legall Sabbath and Pentecost which were abrogated could not make the Euangelicke Worship which was performed on them by the Apostles vnlawfull farre lesse can the Lords Day such as the Christian Pasche and Whitsonday are or any other day of the Weeke Moneth or Yeare which were neuer legally obserued make the Doctrine Prayers and Sacraments administred on them vnlawfull and superstitious To conclude I finde in this Obiection a Solution to all your Arguments for here I find that there may be a lawfull obseruation of dayes which are abrogated let be of dayes which are not discharged so the obseruation bee not legall with opinion of necessâ—tie or of any mysterie in the time but Euangelicall with knowledge of our Christian libertie and for opportunitie of time onely which both may bee lawfull and expedient So Saint Paul keeped many Sabbaths and the Pentecost whereon Saint Peter also conuerted three thousand by his first preaching This is the obseruation for which only we stand against which ye haue neuer concluded a contradictory but either against the Legall of the Iewish or superstitious of the Gentiles So all your Arguments fall vnder one forme of Caption which wee call ignorantia Elenchi when a contradiction seemes to bee where there is none because the tearmes in the apparant contradiction are not taken in the same sâ—nse PP It is fourthly obiected out of the Epistles of Polycarpus and Polycrates extant in the Historie of Eusebius and out of Beda following Eusebius that the Apostles kept the Feast of Easter Answ. Beda was but a Fabler and a follower of fabulous Reports Eusebius was a little better c. ANS Thus it pleaseth your pride to disdaine these ancient learned and holy Writers because they crosse your Nouelties by the truth of Antiquitie not vnlike the Painter of whom Sadeel writes Qui cum gallum gallinaceum infeliciter pingeret verum gallum á tabula abigebat Hauing drawne a Cocke vnskilfully that his errour should not bee perceiued he chased away the liuing Cocke that stood by him so the Papists forbid the vse of Scriptures that their Errors should not be discouered Nouators cannot sustain the authority of the Ancients But ye make mention of Polycarpus Epistle extant in Eusebius and in Eusebius there is no Epistle of Polycarpus onely Irenaeus in a Letter that hee sends to Victor mentions him The Epistles of Polycrates yee affirme to bee counterfeit and vpon what reason Because ye say that it is said in the Epistles that Saint Iohn bore on his fore-head pontificale petalum that is the golden plate or the High Priests Mitre Polycrates ye thinke would not haue written so because Scaliger sayes that no man will grant that eyther Iohn or Iames did beare it who vnderstand that none of Christs Apostles was a Priest and that it was lawfull to none but the High Priest to beare the golden plate It is true that Polycrates in propertie of speech would not haue written so but what is more frequent amongst the Ancients then by such flowers colours of Rhetorick to describe the Euangelick Ministers amoÌ„gst whom such as Polycarpus Thrasias and others by him named Iohns authoritie was as great as was the High Priests aboue the inferiour vnder the Law Therfore to distinguish him froÌ„ them Polycrates attributes to him the name and ornament of the High Priest So Tertullian de Baptismo distinguisheth the Bishop from the Elder and the Deacon calling him the High Priest Dandi quidem habet ius summus Sacerdos qui est Episcopus dehinc Presbyteri Diaconi Shall wee esteeme this Treatise of Tertullian counterfeite because hee calleth the Bishoppe an High Priest This is too weake a warrant whereon to build an improbation against so strong a partie as Eusebius PP The Bishop of Elie in his Sermon takes needlesse paines to proue the Antiquitie of Easter but when he proues it to be Apostolicall he shoots short his eldest Antiquitie is the counterfeit Epistles
A TRVE NARRATION OF ALL THE PASSAGES OF THE PROCEEDINGS IN the generall Assembly of the Church of SCOTLAND Holden at PERTH the 25. of August Anno Dom. 1618. Wherein is set downe the Copy of his MAIESTIES Letters to the said ASSEMBLY Together with a iust defence of the Articles therein concluded against a seditious Pamphlet By Dr. LYNDESAY Bishop of Brechen PROV 24.21 My Sonne feare thou the Lord and the King and meddle not with them that are seditious IOHN MORRIS LONDON Printed by William Stansby for Ralph Rounthwait dwelling at the signe of the golden Lyon in Pauls Church-yard 1621. TO THE REVEREND AND GODLY BRETHREN The PASTORS and MINISTERS of the Church of SCOTLAND AS in our Church blessed be God touching the truth of Doctrine there is no controuersie so there is no doubt deare brethren but in the controuerted points of Policie wee would soone agree if wee did consider what is the power of the Church in these matters the extent of her power and the obedience that is due thereto therefore concerning these I haue thought meeâ— to vse this short Preface vnto you Albeit all things necessarie to the worship of God and mans saluation bee eyther expressely or by necessarie consequence contayned in the written Word yet the particular circumstances of persons by whom place where time when and of the forme and order how the worship and worke of the Ministrie should be performed are neither expressely nor by necessarie consequence set downe in the Word but for determination of these some generall rules are giuen according to the which the Church hath power to define whatsoeuer is most expedient to be obserued and done for the honour of God and edification This is a prerogatiue wherein the Christian Church differs from the Iewish Synagogue as is manifest in euery one of the particulars aboue expressed First as touching the persons in the Iewish Church they who were imployed in the Ministrie were particularly designed to bee Leuies Tribe In the Christians Church neither Family Nation nor People is separated for the worke of the Gospell but the qualities graces and gifts of men meete for the sacred seruice are onely set downe and it is in the power of the Church to trie the persons particularly in whom these graces and gifts are and accordingly to elect them And albeit the function wherevnto they are called be diuine yet the bounds within which and the persons towards whom the same must be exercised is limited by the Church which hath diuided national Churches in Prouinces Dioceses and Dioceses in Parishes so as both the election of Ministers and the limitation of their jurisdiction is from the power of the Church This the Apostle calls the measure of the Canon which God did measure out to him beyond the which he did not reach in his Apostleship and such a rule and measure should euery Pastor in the Church haue beyond the which hee ought not to passe entering vpon other mens labour As the Apostles had their measure distributed to them by God so now euerie Pastor hath his bounds designed by the Church Secondly vnder the Law albeit the Iewish Church had libertie to build Synagogues for their ordinarie meetings on the Sabbath to prayer and reading of the Law yet the place where the chiefe and solemne worship of God was performed was first the Tabernacle and the Temple both built by Gods owne speciall direction and hauing the principall parts of his worshippe so appropriated to them that in another place the same might not be performed But as vnder the Gospel men shall neither worship God in this mountaine saies our Sauiour nor in Ierusalem but the true worshippers shall worship him in truth and spirit the Christian Church hath power according to that Apostolicall Rule Let all things be done decently and in order to make choice of a place conuenient within the bounds of each Parish for the meeting of the faithfull to performe all the points and parts of Gods worship and â—his place being built and dedicated to the worship of God may not bee condemned neglected nor profanâ—d but freqâ—ented and kept for religious vses Not that wee estâ—â—me that there is any more holinessâ— in it then in another place or that Gods presence and so his worship is anâ—â—xed more to that place then to another but to the end religious Seruice may be performed decently and in order this is done Thirdly vnder the Law the chiefe parts of Gods worship were astricted to certaine set times festiuities lawfully could not be performed on other daies but vnder the Gospel omnis dies Domini est omnis hora omne teÌ„pus habile est diuino cultui as Tertul. in his book de Baptismo witnesseth and Esay prophecied in his 66.23 From one Sabbath to another and from one New-moon to another shal all flesh appeare before me saith the Lord. Thus the Apostles ceassed not to teach daily in the Temple from house to house the Doctrine of Christ. S. Paul taught in the Schoole of one Tyrannus for the space of 2. yeres daily and as one of the Greeke Editions hath it from the fifth houre to the tenth On the Iewish Sabbath which is our Saturday he taught often in the Iewish Synagogues And Epiphanius records that Christians kept their conuentions on Wednesday Friday and Sonday by Apostolical tradition and example S. Augustine affirmes That in his time men receiued the Sacrament euerie day Our owne Church besides the Lords day hath appointed other houres and times for diuine Seruice in great Townes as houres for Morning and Euening Prayer euery day for Preaching and interpretation of Scripture such other times as they hold to bee conuenient Thus is it manifest that the Church hath power to appoint other set times besides the Lords day for his seruice as wel by the liberty which God hath giueÌ„ to his Church to come and worship before him euery day as by the practise of the Apostolicall and Primitiue Churches Yea further the Church hath power to appoint religious exercises and certaine speciall parts of diuine Seruice to be performed in the times which shee thinkes most expedient for edification So hath our Church bin accustomed to appoint particular Scriptures to be interpreted vpon the daies so called of Exercise and by the first Booke of Discipline euery Pastor is ordained to teach in his Congregation on the Sondaies at afternoones certaine heads of the Catechisme Likewise to minister the Sacrament of the Communion vpon the first Sondaies of March Iune Septemb. December It was the custom of the Church of Geneua in the daies of I. Caluin to celebrate that holy action vpon the day of the Natiuitie which wee call Yule and vpon Easter day which we call Pasche The ground of this power is first the abolishing of the New-moones Festiual daies and Sabbaths by the coming of our Sauiour in whom
hee that doubts is damned for whatsoeuer is not of Faith is sinne Rom. 14. These are the rules of conscience set downe in the Word concerning which it is to be obserued that the first rule is absolute and the second and third subiect to it The Lawes of men and their opinions must be tryed and iudged by the Law of God for as the Apostle sayes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is We must obey God rather then men As for the priuate iudgement of euery mans conscience it is subiect to both the two former rules That the iudgement of our minde must giue place to Gods Law no man doubts And that it ought to giue place vnto Constitutions Ciuill or Ecclesiastical no man should doubt that knowes how God by his Word hath ordayned that euery soule should be subiect to superiour powers It may be obiected What if wee doubt whether the thing commanded in the law of man bee lawfull and expedient may wee obey thus doubting seeing the Apostle sayes that Whatsoeuer is not of Faith is sinne Vnto this the answer is easie first touching the lawfulnesse of that which is commanded in a Law no man ought to doubt except hee bee able to proue euidently that the Law is vnlawfull by the Law of God which if hee doe hee must follow the first rule and rather obey God then men Next as for expedience Rom. 14 The things committed to the iudgement of our conscience and which according to our faith and perswasion wee ought to doe or omit are not things determined or concluded by any diuine or humane Constitution but such things as are free and indifferent which a man may freely elect or reiect doe or leaue vndone without transgression of any Law Diuine Ciuill or Ecclesiasticall In such things the Apostle willeth euery man to follow that which hee thinks most expedient for edification and eschuing of scandall Where a man hath not a Law his iudgement is the rule of his conscience but where there is a Law the Law must be the rule As for example before that Apostolicall Canon that forbad to eate bloud or strangled things euery man might haue done that which in his conscience he thought most expedient according to the circumstances of times places and persons In presence of the Iewes hee might haue abstayned from these things if in his heart hee thought it most expedient for eschuing their offence Contrariwise in presence of conuerted Gentiles he might haue eaten if hee esteemed that by his abstinence they would haue taken offence and doubted of their Christian libertie but after the making and publication of the Canon that inioyned abstinence the same was to rule their consciences And therefore after that time albeit a man had thought in his owne priuate iudgement that to abstayne from these things was not expedient because some by his abstinence might haue taken offence as before yet in that case he ought not to haue eaten because now the will of the Law and not the iudgement of his owne mind was the rule of his conscience Neither was hee now to respect the scandall because it was remoued by the Law for by obedience to a lawfull Ordinance no man giues scandall and if any take offence both the cause and occasion thereof is the peruersnesse onely of the person offended Tertullian saith well Res bona neminem offendit nisi malam mentem that is A good thing such as obedience can offend no man but an euill minde which must bee reformed by good information and not by disobedience which confirmeth errour and causes rebellion Caluin in his 363. Epist. written to Oleuian giues many reasons wherefore the comfort of the Sacrament ought not to be refused to the sicke in time of extremitie and declares that in his owne iudgement he thought it expedient not to refuse the same yet he subioynes Scis frater alium esse apud nos morem fero quia non est vtile contendere that is Yee know Brother wee haue another custome I beare with it because I thinke not good to make contention Here Caluin preferreth the custome of Geneua to his owne iudgement and will leaue that vndone which he thought expedient to be done rather then by doing it and infringing the custome of the Church to make contention What then shall wee doe ill that good may come of it for is it not euill to omit that which we thinke expedient to bee done and that ought not to be refused to the end good may come of it namely peace preserued and contention eschued To this I answer The euill which the Apostle forbids is a thing simply vnlawfull in it selfe and not that which in one respect may be expedient and in another inexpedient As to giue the Sacrament to the sicke is expedient for their comfort but to giue it contrary to the order of the Church is not expedient In things of this nature Ex duobus malis minus eligendum est that is Of two euils the least must be chosen It is euill to refuse the comfort of the Sacrament to the sicke but it is worse to giue it against the custome of the Church and make contention I must therefore in this case choose the least euill and not giue the Sacrament because thereby the greater euill being eschued the lesse ceasseth to bee euil and becommeth good It is doubtlesse an euill thing to cast our goods in the Sea but it is worse to lose our liues Here the least euill is to bee chosen for the eschuing the greater and in that respect it ceasses to be euill Thus the rule holds in all things of this quality when that which is euill is not vnlawfull and vnhonest but vnexpedient and vnprofitable And so to returne Caluine for this cause preferres the custome of Geneua to his owne iudgement in a matter of expediencie for it is euer more expedient to obey a Law and keepe a lawfull Custome then to doe a thing thought more expedient if it cannot be done but by an open breach of the Law because thereby the Law must be brought in contempt priuate opinion preferred to publike authoritie and so confusion contention and Schisme brought in and order peace and vnitie shoot to the doore To conclude in matters of expediencie where a Law is set downe if wee make not the Law the rule of our obedience and conscience but our owne priuate opinions and conceits then must we with the Anabaptists disproue and condemne all sorts of Gouernment and liue like lawlesse Libertines euery man following his owne conceite whereunto it is certaine the peruersenesse of our nature carryes vs that is alwayes prone to rebellion and therefore easily drawne thereto with any shew of reason pretext of conscience and religion which the Penner of this pestilent Pamphlet considering intends with Lyes Calumnies Falshoods craftie Cauillations Threatnings and Terrours of Oathes Promises and Subscriptions to deceiue the simple stirre vp the Seditious confirme the
gouernment was altered and the insolent domination of Prelates hath entered in by vnlawfull meanes amongst vs Popish Rites and superstitious Ceremonies haue followed and are like to preuaile vniuersally ANS The former gouernment is not altered that is either corrupted or abolished as you insinuate but is perfited by accession of the ancient order which hath beene euer in the House of God since the Apostolicall times and was embraced at the reformation in Anno 1560. and continued in our Church in the persons of Superintendents and Bishops till the yeare of God 1581. after that time it was borne downe till the yeare of God 1598. then it beganne to bee restored and hath entred in amongst vs by the conclusions of generall Assemblies and Acts of Parliament which none but lawlesse Libertines will esteeme vnlawfull meanes nor the function thereby established an insolent domination but the licentious who delight in confusion and detest order The Rites and Ceremonies which haue followed shall be better cleered by the grace of God from Superstition and Popery then this Pamphlet of yourâ— from Schisme and Heresie PP They haue verified in their persons their common tenent No Ceremony no Bishop ANS The tenent is true for where there is no Ceremonie there can be no externall worship of God more then a bodie can bee without dimensions and consequently where there is no Ceremony there can be no Church no Bishop no Pastor PP The liberty granted to our Church to indict and hold generall Assemblies from yeere to yeere and oftener prore nata was the chiefe bulwarke of our Discipline this bulwarke was broken downe to the end a more patent way might be made for their exaltation ANS So long as this liberty preserued the ancient Discipline and Gouernment of the Primitiue and Reformed Church in the persons of Super-intendents and Bishops it was a good bulwarke but when it was licentiously abused to ouerthrow that which it had formerly maintayned and to stop the way whereby it might be lawfully restored againe the licentious abuse was to be restrayned and order taken that it should not impede but further the worke for the which it was appointed PP When vote in Parliament the Needle to draw in the thred of Episcopall authoritie was concluded to the great griefe of the sincerer sort many protestations were made that no alteration in Discipline or Diuine Seruice was intended ANS That the Church which hath euer represented the third Estate of the Kingdome was restored in the persons of Bishops according to the fundamentall Lawes to haue vote in Parliament could bee a griefe to none sincerely affected either to the Weale of the Countrey or Church and as protestations were made that no alteration tending to corruption either in Discipline or diuine Seruice was intended so none hath followed but such as tendeth to the confirmation and perfection of both PP Many cautions and limitations were made to bound the power of the Minister voter in Parliament ANS The limitations and cautions which were agreeable to reason and might stand with the power of the person voter in Parliament according to Law haue beene inuiolably obserued PP They were ordayned to bee countable to the generall Assemblies for the manner of their entrie and behauiour in this new Office but like Bankrupts not being able to render account they laboured that no account should bee made at all that is that there should be no ordinary generall Assembly to take account ANS No man can bee lawfully ordayned to bee countable to these of his entry and behauiour in his Office who professe themselues enemies to the Office it selfe Such were the generall Assemblies which ye call ordinary consisting for the greatest part of the sincerer sort to whose great griefe you say the power to vote in Parliament was concluded reason therefore would that to such a Iudicatory no account should haue beene rendered at all Not because they were bankrupts as you calumniously alledge but for the professed enmity and iniquity of the Iudge whereof his Maiesty hauing proofe before when the ancient Gouernment of Bishops was abolished did now prudently prouide that no generall Assembly should be conuocate without his Highnesse speciall licence lest thereby the restitution of that Gouernment intended by his Maiestie and happily begun before his Maiesties preferment to the Crowne of England might in his absence bee crossed and ouerthrowne by the which prouidence of his Maiesties wisdome that plot was preuented and your purpose disappointed Hinc illae lachrimae and this is that causeth you to rage and raile PP Some few extraordinary Assemblies haue beene conuocated of late yeares at their pleasures and for their purposes and according to their deuice constituted as they thought good wherein they procured or rather extorted with terror and authority a sort of preheminencie aboue their Brethren ANS If ye call these extraordinary Assemblies which by his Maiesties License and Authoritie were conuocated the Councell of Nice and the most famous Councels of the Church must bee counted extraordinary And in these Assemblies no preheminence was granted to Bishops but such as Bishops had euer in the Primitiue Church and such as the Super-intendents and Bishops had before in our owne reformed Church which beeing lawfull in it selfe needeth neither by authoritie to be procured nor by terror extorted from godly prudent and peaceable Brethren PP They were Lords in Parliament Councell Session Exchequer Lords of Regalities Lords of temporall Lands Presenters to Benefices Modifiers of Ministers stipends grand Commissioners in the high Commission was it wonder then if so great Commanders commanded the Assemblies constituted as is said and carued to themselues a spirituall Lorship when c. ANS The power authoritie and credit which was expedient for the time to be in the persons of some Bishops was neither imployed nor needed to be imployed to command these Assemblies which were constituted of the most graue and godly brethren of the Church who against Law and conscience would not haue beene commanded either by Prince or Prelate Neither in these Assemblies did they carue to themselues any spirituall Lordship for they acknowledge no man to haue spirituall Lordship ouer the Church but the man the Lord Iesus him they preach the Lord and themselues the Seruants of the Church for him PP When their worthy brethren were banished imprisoned confined or detayned at Court that they might the more easily effectuate their purposes ANS Their worthy brethren I may truely say were banished imprisoned confined and detayned at Court sore against their wils who wish that good brethren then had beene and now were lesse addicted to singularitie of opinion and more inclined to the peace vnity of the Church And that they would put difference betwixt indifferent things in Discipline and doctrinall points and consider that in the one we must stand for veritie and in the other for expediencie which changeth with times places and occasions That the forme of gouernment
yee approue this prouision as yee seeme after to doe seeing a Law standeth in our Church neither reduced nor abrogated against your opinion why is your patience turned into passion your wel-grounded reasons into vnreasonable raylings And considering at the Assembly in Perth the grounds whereupon the Law was made were esteemed by the votes and iudgements of more then double your number better then any answere or reason brought on the contrary why are yee ashamed peaceably to incline thereunto laying aside all preoccupyed opinions PP Wee are able to prooue that no Ecclesiasticall Law hath beene made in any free and formall Assembly for the alteration by-past or presently intended either in Gouernment or Ceremonies ANS What you are able to proue we know not but vntill the time the probation be made and the Church which made the Lawes being better informed alter or abrogate them it it is the duty of euery good and peaceable Christian to giue obedience thereunto except they bee manifestly damned in the Word as impious for there can be no peace nor vnitie in a Church where there is not a Conformitie obserued according to Lawes for if one shall follow the Law another his owne opinion contrary to the Law and the third some conceit different from both what can follow but contention and confusion in the Church PP The ratification of ciuill Lawes alreadie made or to bee made cannot rectifie the Eccesiasticall so long as we are able by good reason to impugne their authoritie and to euince the vicious constitution the informall and vnlawfull proceedings of those Assemblies where the said Ecclesiastical Lawes are said to haue beene made ANS That which is right needeth not to be rectified such the Estates of Parliament haue found the Canons of the Church which they haue ratified but yet forsooth so long as you are able to impugne their authoritie euince them to be vicious informall vnlawfull So long neither can the authoritie of the Parliament nor Church make them to haue force but all must be suspended vpon your skill and learning to proue and improue as you list Whereof this smelleth whether of plaine sincerity or of Papall Supremacie let the Reader consider PP Put the case that no exception might bee made against the Law his Maiesties prouision permitteth vs to perswade others with well grounded reasons ANS If no exception might bee made against the Law what well grounded reason can be vsed to perswade the contrary His Maiesties prouision is as farre contrary to the permission here alledged by you as light to darknes for although his Maiestie wish these who are contrary minded to preasse by patience and well grounded reasons to perswade all the rest to like of their iudgement yet hee permitteth them not to perswade others to resist to the authoritie to breake the Law of the Countrey to stirre vp Rebellion and Schisme which you by this Pamphlet doe only intend but by the contrary willeth them in these words which you purposely omit To content themselues soberly and quietly with their owne opinions not resisting to the authoritie nor breaking the Law of Countrey neither aboue all stirring any Rebellion or Schisme c. but to possesse their soules in peace If such licence were granted as you alledge was giuen by his Maiesties prouision there should neuer bee any setled order in Church or Common-wealth a doore being opened to seditious spirits to disturbe all with such perswasions and disswasious as are vsed in this Pamphlet PP The verity of our Relations and validity of our Reasons we referre to the tryall of euery Iudicious Reader making conscience of his Oath Promise Subscription and Purity of his Profession ANS If the Iudicious Reader holding the puritie of his Christian Profession lay aside all other preiudice and be not moued with these Pannicke terrours of Oathes and Promises which he neuer made and of Subscriptions which hee neuer gaue he shal try and find the greatest part of your Relations to be vttered out of passion whereby the sincerity of the truth is corrupted and in your Reasons such validity as sophisticall captions and cauillations can afford A TRVE NARRATION OF THE PROCEEDINGS of the generall Assembly holden at Perth and begun the 25. day of August 1618. Opposed to the Libeller his Discourse thereof in the Pamphlet lately Published TO the end the true causes of this meeting may be vnderstood wee must draw the occasion thereof somewhat further off then the Proclamation mentioned by the Libeller So it is That his Maiestie at his late beeing in this Kingdome did propone to the Bishops and principall Ministers who were called to meete at S. Andrews for that effect the tenth of Iuly 1617. the fiue Articles now concluded desiring they might be receyued in this Church and an alteration made of the other customes that obtained before in these points This proposition was made by his Maiestie himselfe in the Chappell of the Castle where then his Maiestie remained Vpon the hearing whereof humble petition was made by the Bishops and Ministers there assembled that they should bee permitted to conferre amongst themselues vpon the said proposition before they gaue any answer Which being graunted they went and met together in the Session house of the Paroch Church where after mature deliberation it was concluded they should put vp one common Supplication to his Maiestie for libertie of a generall Assembly to aduise and take conclusion in these poynts It being signified vnto them at the same time by the Archbishop of S. Andrewes that his Maiesty would take this for a shift and not content with the Supplication vnlesse assurance were giuen that the same Articles should be yeelded vnto in the Assembly Answer was made by the whole number That howsoeuer they could not preiudge themselues of their free voyces in an Assembly by graunting the said Articles before-hand considering they were matters in themselues lawfull and of a nature indifferent as they could not thinke but the whole Church would bee readie to giue his Maiestie satisfaction therein so for themselues they would doe what lay in them for passing the same And this they all desired the said Archbishop in their names to answer But hee denying to promise any thing in the behalfe of the Ministers in regard of the seditious protestation they had against their promise at least a number of them penned to be giuen in the next Parliament Maister Patricke Galloway was by them desired to make the said answere and concurre with the Bishops in the foresaid supplication for a generall Assembly Thus all returning to the saide Chappell petition was made in humble forme to his Maiestie by the Archbishop in the name of the whole That they might be permitted to meete in an Assembly where the said Articles should receiue the answer which was fit His Maiestie replying that hee could not suffer these Articles which hee counted both lawfull and profitable for the Church to bee cast in the
the resolution we take at this time touching the Articles propounded will giue to the world a testimonie what manner of men wee are whether such as rule their proceedings by iudgement or are carried head-strong with conceits and opinions that wee bee nor misse-led by ignorance for that is the fault of many amongst vs wee inquire not of matters nor take paynes to vnderstand what hath beene the iudgement of the most wise and learned but follow vpon trust the opinions we haue beene bred with and of such as we affect to helpe this I say I will with your patience spend some time in the question of Ceremonies see what warrant they haue and how they should bee appointed then from the generall descend to speake of our particulars touching which I shall freely deliuer my owne minde and so conclude First then concerning Ceremonies howsoeuer some haue imagined them to bee superfluities which might well bee spared and that the Church of Rome hath made the very name of them hatefull aswell because of the multitude of them wherewith she oppressed Christians as for the ridiculous choice she made of most of them are such things as without which no publike action either Ciuill or Ecclesiastique can be rightly performed To this purpose a Politike Writer hath said well That as the flesh couereth the hollow deformity of the bones and beautifieth the bodie with naturall graces so Ceremonies such specially as ancient custome hath made reuerend couer the nakednesse of publike actions and distinguish them from priuate businesse that otherwise should not bee so well knowne The neglect of this in any State breedes confusion and with confusion the ruine and abolishment of the State it selfe whereof the examples were easie to be giuen in the Romane Republike and others if that were our subiect But wee are speaking of Church-Ceremonies concerning which no man will deny this generall truth That in euery publike dutie which God craues at our hands there is besides the matter and forme wherein the substance of the dutie consists a certaine externall forme required to the decent administration of the same As for example God hath commanded his Word to bee preached and the holy Sacraments to be ministred Baptisme by the Element of Water and in a prescript forme of words such as you know wee vse and the Sacrament of his blessed Body and Bloud in the Elements of Bread and Wine with certaine mysticall words added thereunto heere is the dutie to bee done and the substance of it yet for the ministration of the same in a due and decent manner there is place time and other circumstances moe required The substance of the dutie God hath giuen vs in the Word from which we may not goe but for these things that belong to the outward administration Ecclesiasticall wisedome hath to define what is conuenient what not Neque tamen permisit Dominus vagam effrae namque licentiam sayes Caluine sed cancellos vt ita loquar circūdedit That is God hath not giuen his Church an illimited power to establish what Ceremonies she lists but hath enrayled her authoritie within borders which she may not passe and these are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Let all things bee done honestly and by order Honestly that is after a good fashion in a decent sort and to the right ends namely the aduancement of Gods honour and the edification of his Church This is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Then they must be done 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by order that is appointed with deliberation and by such as haue the authoritie to ordaine them and being once appointed and concluded by Constitutions they must bee kept and performed by all that are subiect to the same This as one speakes well is that great Ecclesiasticall Canon by which all other Canons must bee squared this is the true Touch-stone of trying Ceremonies and the ballance wherein all Church Orders must be weighed The Ceremonies of the Church must be decent and comely without vanitie without all meretricious brauerie not superfluous but seruing to edification They must also be done to Gods honour and not be idolatrous or superstitious Generally in the Church all things must be done in order and no confusion be either of persons or proceedings for order hath proceeded from the Throne of the Almightie This fabricke of the World that wee see is vpholden by it States and Kingdomes are maintayned by it and without it nothing can flourish or prosper And if Order should haue place in all things sure the Church of God should not be without Order for our God whom wee serue is the God of Order and not of Confusion as the Apostle speakes These things will be easily condescended vpon I meane that religious duties cannot bee performed without externall Rites that these Rites should bee qualited as I haue said established by Lawes and after they are established obeyed by such as are subiect Si enim velut in medio positae singulorum arbitrio relictae fuerint quoniam nunquam futurum est vt omnibus idem placeat breui futura est rerum omnium confusio This is Caluines saying in the fourth Booke of his Institutions and tenth Chapter which Chapter I would earnestly recommend to your reading for these matters chiefly In such generals it may bee wee all agree but when wee come to particulars Tanta moribus hominum inest diuersitas tanta in animis varietas tanta in iudicijs ingenijsque pugna Such is the varietie of mens minds and opinions that scarce shall they euer bee brought to agree vpon any one thing For the Ceremonie which to one will seeme decent and comely will to another appeare not to be so Now in this case what is to bee done Some would haue vs search into the Apostolike times examine what then was in vse to bee done and follow that But this cannot well be the rule seeing the Apostles haue not deliuered in writing all that they did and diuers of the formes vsed by them which by occasion wee haue recorded are vnfit for these times and inconuenient such as the assembling of people in close and secret meetings their Christnings in Riuers the ministring of the Lords Supper after meate 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Church-Feasts the abhorring of leuened Bread abstayning from Bloud and that which is strangled the arbitrary maintenance of Ministers and other more particulars which to bring againe in vse were to alter and change in a sort the state of Christianitie it selfe So it being to vs vncertaine what the formes of the Apostles were in euery thing and the dissimilitude of their times and ours being so great they giue no sure direction that send vs to seeke the resolution of our differences in matters of this nature from them Reade Beza his eight Epistle written to that Reuerend Bishop Edmond Grindall then Bishop of London and you shall finde this to bee his iudgement His words are Scio duplicem esse de Ecclesiarum
instauratione opinionem sunt qui Apostolicae illâ— simplicitati nihil adijciendum putant ac proinde quicquid Apostoli fecerunt faciendum quicquid autem succedens Apostolis Ecclesia ritibus primis adiecit semel abolendum existiment There are some sayes he who thinke that we should adde nothing vnto that first Apostolike simplicity but doe in euery thing according as they did And that whatsoeuer the succeeding Ages added in matters of Rites should be all abolished Because his answere and discourse is somewhat long I will remit you to the place and giue you the heads of it only first therefore he sayes that the doctrine of the Apostles is in it selfe so exact and perfect as we ought not to derogate nor adde any thing vnto it but next for the Rites and Ceremonies of the Church wee must not thinke so because the Apostles at the first could not set downe euery thing that was expedient for the Church and thereupon they proceeded by little and little and in such Rites as they instituted they had a speciall respect to the time places and persons wherof many were afterwards by the Church worthily abolished Hauing said this hee concludes Itaque quicquid ab Apostolis factitatum est quod ad ritus attinet nec statim nec sine aliqua exceptione sequendum existimo And Caluine whom I often name for the authority which he deseruedly carries with all Reformed Churches in the tenth Chapter of his fourth Booke of Institutions which place I formerly quoted hath to the same purpose these words In his quae cultum Numinis spectant solus Magister est audiendus quia autem in externa disciplina ceremonijs non voluit sigillatim praescribere quid sequi debeamus quòd istud pendêre à temporum conditione praeuideret neque iudicaret vnam omnibus saeculis formam conuenire confugere hic oportet ad generales quas dedit regulas vt ad eas exigantur quaecunque ad ordinem decorum praecipi recessitas Ecclesiae postulabit And after a few lines Prout Ecclesiae vtilitas requirit tam vsitatas mutare abrogare quà m nouas institueâ—e ceremonias Ecclesiae licitum His iudgement is that the power of adding altering innouating and appointing Ceremonies remaynes with the Church to doe therein as shee in her wisedome shall thinke meete And certainly there is no other way to keepe away differences for matters of Rites and Ceremonies but this That euery man keepe the custome of the Church wherein he liues and obserue that which is determined by the Gouernours thereof For in things indifferent wee must alwayes esteeme that to bee best and most seemely which seemes so in the eye of publike authoritie Neither is it for priuate men to controll publike iudgement as they cannot make publike Constitutions so they may not controll nor disobey them being once made Indeed authoritie ought to looke carefully vnto this that it prescribe nothing but rightly appoint no Rites nor Orders in the Church but such as may set forward Godlinesse and Pietie yet put the case that some be otherwise established they must be obeyed by such as are members of that Church as long as they haue the force of a Constitution and are not corrected by the authoritie that made them Except this be there can bee no order and all must be filled with strife and contention But thou wilt say My conscience suffers mee not to obey for I am perswaded that such things are not right nor well appointed I answere thee in matters of this nature and qualitie the sentence of thy Superiours ought to direct thee and that is a sufficient ground to thy conscience for obeying But may not Superiours erre May not Councels decree that which is wrong This no man denyes and if they decree any thing against Scripture it is not to be obeyed for there that Sentence holds good Melius obedire Deo quam hominibus But if that which is decreed be not repugnant to the Word and that thou hast no more but thy owne collections and motions of thy conscience as thou callest it how strong soeuer thy perswasions bee it is presumption in thee to disobey the Ordinance of the Church And of this wee may bee sure whosoeuer denyes obedience to Church Ordinances in rebus medijs the same will not sticke to reiect Gods owne Word when it crosses his fancie Et videant isti sayes Caluine qui plus sapere volunt quam oportet qua ratione morositatem suam Domino opprobent Nobis enim satisfacere istud Pauli dâ—bet nos contendendi morem non habere neque Ecclesâ—as Dei With such a sentence I close all that I purposed to say of Ceremonies in generall Now hauing shewed you that Rites are necessary in a Church the qualities they should haue and obedience that must bee giuen vnto the Constitutions of the Church once being made I come to the particulars desired of vs to bee receiued these must bee seuerally considered because they are not all of the like respect some of them strike vpon the duties of our calling enioyning the practice thereof in places and at times where vsuall solemnitie cannot bee kept as to administrate Baptisme in priuate houses in the case of necessitie and the Communion to these that are sicke and in dying Others of them prescribe the obseruation of certayne things not in vse with vs as the confirming of Children and the keeping of some Festiuities throughout the yeere And there is a fift Article that requires our accustomed manner of sitting at the Communion to be changed in a more religious and reuerend gesture of kneeling ye shall not expect to heare all that may be said or is at this time expedient concerning these neither the time nor the strength of any one man I think will suffice to say all without interruption I know I speake to men of vnderstanding and my intent is to say no more of them then may serue to iustifie the aduise which I minde with Gods helpe to giue vnto you I begin with the Communion to the Sicke because this Article passed in the late Assembly with some limitations which his Maiesty disliked The mind that is offended hardly interprets any thing well so fared it in this matter The delay of our answere to the rest of the Articles mooued his Maiestie to call our grant of this Article scornfull and ridiculous I was bold in a priuate Letter to shew there was a mistaking and iustifie that which was done neither should I speake any more of it but that it hath beene complayned that some of our Ministerie beeing earnestly entreated by certaine sicke persons for the comfort of that Sacrament since that time haue denyed the same To iustifie therefore that which then was inacted I say shortly that by our calling wee are directly bound to minister vnto men in the last houre all the helpes and comforts wee possibly can the naturall terrours of death and fearefull doubts of conscience
which at that time commonly perplexe men require this at our hands therefore Visitation of the sicke is earnestly commended to Ministers in their admission that they bee readie to attend the sicke person and as his estate craues minister comfort vnto him by preaching the promises of grace and mercie to all penitent sinners Why this Sacrament that is the seale of Gods promises and a speciall meane of binding vp our Communion with Christ should bee denyed to such as desire the same in that time there can be no reason Howbeit saluation depends not vpon the Sacrament and that they vse it superstitiously that giues it for a viaticum to the dying the end of a man cannot but be the more comfortable and his death accompanyed with the greater contentment and tranquilitie of minde when his desire is satisfied in this point For this is to bee considered that it is not to all that die nor to all that are sicke but to such onely whose recouery is desperate and vrgently desire the comfort of this Sacrament that the same is appointed to bee ministred Of which purpose Caluin deliuers his opinion in his 52. Epistle in these words De Coenae administratione censeo libenter admittendum esse hunc morem vt apud aegrotos celebretur communio quum ita res opportunitas feret Nec magnopere repugnandum esse quin maleficis detur qui plectendi sunt si quidem postulent ad receptionem satis comparatos esse appareat hac tamen lege vt sit vnà communio hoc est vt panis in coetu aliquo fidelium frangatur And in his 361. Epistle answering some one that had moued him in this matter he beginnes on this manner Cur coenam aegrotis negandam esse non arbitror multae graues causae me impellunt as you may see in the place Bucer Bullinger and Zepperus are of the same iudgement and the last of these three putting the case that none is by this sicke man disposed to communicate sayes Quod ne sic quidem priuandus est communione aegrotus You may see his reasons in the twelft Chapter of his first Booke De Politia Ecclesiastica Our owne Church hath practised the same in former times as was qualified in diuers particulars at the last Assembly So where the reformed Churches haue approued it and wee our selues by our owne practice now to stand against it when by a speciall Canon it is appointed to bee done cannot but bee thought obstinate disobedience I come to the Article of Baptisme This craues that in the case of necessitie when a child without hazard may not bee brought out of doores it bee lawfull to the Minister to baptise in a priuate house It was not long since a custome amongst vs that no Minister would baptise except vpon the ordinarie day of teaching this same being complayned of in the Assembly that was kept at Holy Rood-house in the yeare 1602. an Ordinance was made that whensoeuer a Parent should require baptisme to his child the Minister should not deny it without delaying to the ordinarie day of preaching The question was then of the Time now it is of the Place Whereabout this you all know that in the institution of Baptisme the Lord Iesus hath not tyed vs to any place but his command binds all men to bee baptized And wee that are Ministers by our calling are obliged to baptise howsoeuer wee doe not thinke Baptisme absolutely necessary vnto saluation and the child that wants it vpon a necessitie ineuitable nothing preiudiced that way yet if the occasion present there is no doubt but the Minister hath a necessitie lying vpon him to baptize although time place and other circumstances required for the due and solemne administration be not concurring But this yee will say fosters the Popish opinion of the necessitie of Baptisme Let Buce◠answer it To with-hold Baptisme for want of the due solemnities sayes hee opens a doore to the Deuill to bring in the contempt of Christs Ordinance and our whole redemption by him We haue a Commandement to baptize and this to vs is a necessary duety which we may not leaue vndone As for inconueniences we must meet them as wisely as we may by doctrine and diligent catechizing but in no sort neglect the Commandement that is giuen Yee shall haue Caluin his iudgement also in this matter being asked Vbinam baptismus recte administrari possit He answers Fas non est administrare baptismum nisi in coetu fidelium non quidem v◠templum requiratur sed vt vbiuis numerus aliquis fidelium conueniat qui Ecclesiae corpus efficiat Yee haue this in his 185. Epistle And thus much for Baptisme The third Article is of Confirmation to be giuen to children when they are come to the yeares of discretion and that is one of the most ancient customes of the Christian Church from the dayes of the Apostles it hath continued and with them it began Neither is there any thing more profitable for it helps children to bee seasoned with the principles of true Religion layes a good foundation for the better direction of their whole life preserues the seede of the Church sound makes children more diligent to learne and Pastors and Parents more carefull to instruct them The neglect of this dutie hath done much harme in the Church and the restitution of that good custome which Caluin in the fourth Booke of his Institutions earnestly wishes could not but bring with it an exceeding great benefit It was in substance agreed vnto in the Assembly at Abirdene but two things his Maiestie found deficient in the Act One that there was no mention of laying on of hands vpon the child confirmed Another was that the performance of it was not restricted to the Bishops care And for this last it is cleare by all Antiquitie that the power of Confirming appertayned euer to Bishops Not that Confirmation is a Sacrament of greater dignitie then Baptisme as the Papists teach these were the thoughts of ignorance but as S. Hierome speakes The Church thought fit that seeing Baptisme is giuen by Presbyters lest children should be ignorant of the spirituall superioritie of Bishops ouer them they should attend the receiuing of Confirmation by their hands so this was done for the honour of Prelacy as he speakes Now if any man will enuy this honour to Bishops it is a silly and poore enuy for it encreases their charge and burthen and if the conscience of their dutie make them not carefull of it in this profane and irreligious age the honor or credit it can bring them will neuer worke it Touching imposition of hands let Saint Augustine tell vs what it meanes Hee in his fift Booke De Baptismo contra Donatistas cap. 23. sayes Quid est manuum impositio nisi oratio super hominem that is to say What is imposition of hands but a prayer vpon the man that hands are laid vpon In all personall benedictions from
in these matters only but in others that yee hate more But I feare it be the purpose of many to rubbe this way vpon his Maiesty the imputation of tyrannie for what Christian King did euer determine in Ecclesiasticall matters any thing without aduice of his Clergie And to impose Lawes vpon the Church without their consent were as much as to say the King imposes things vnlawfull for if they be lawfull Why will wee be dissenting Brethren his Maiestie is styled Defender of the Faith and hath it by desert aswell as by inheritance It were a peruerse course for vs to make it seeme otherwayes When Iesuites and Papists of all sorts are by their infamous writings belying his Maiestie and traducing his Highnesse fame onely because he opposes them for the defence of the common Faith if wee should furnish them matter of new obloquie by our rebellion we could neuer be excused of vile ingratitude Rests but one obiection that I haue heard which I will not omit They say the English Church hath beene seeking of old times to haue vs wonder their gouernment and vpon this some haue called our yeelding vnto a conformitie in these points with them a betraying of the libertie of our Church and Kingdome This reason is so euill grounded that though we should conforme with them in euery outward Rite obserued not onely by them but by the whole Church of Christ long before it was so infected with Poperie it would not inferre the dependance of our Church vpon theirs but that there is that harmony and conformitie amongst vs which ought to bee amongst all the reformed Churches both in Doctrine and Discipline And for our part in maintayning our right yee may remember not long since when that Noble man was absolued in England who was excommunicate by vs wee ceassed not to complaine vntill a new command was giuen that hee should receiue from vs a new absolution If matters should come thus to be contested for which is not to bee expected wee should not bee found neglectful either of our Church or Country But what is this we are iealous of We liue vnder a King that loues the kingdomes honour more then we all there offers not one occasion wherein his Maiestie failes to expresse his naturall affection towards his country Euen now that Mischant sometimes one of your number and vnworthy to be named did vomit forth his spite and vnnatural malice against the whole Nation And how did his Maiestie resent it As I haue beene aduertised he did solemnely declare That albeit much had beene said against his Maiesties owne person and nothing omitted in that kinde which the Deuill could inuent yet all that did not so much grieue him as that Mischants taxing of his Country and Nation He is not worthy the name I will not say of a Christian but of a Scottish man that will not if need be lay downe his life to meet his Maiesties affection I know yee are ready enough to make your protestations this way but beleeue me he shall neuer hazard willingly his life for his Prince who stands against his pleasure in so iust demands I will say no more for I haue wearied both you and my selfe out of a desire to giue satisfaction to you all How freely and plainly I haue spoken ye are my witnesses with what an affection towards the Churches good God hee knowes Brethren wee haue made too much businesse about these matters The Kingdome of God consists not in them but in righteousnesse and peace and ioy of the holy Ghost Away with fruitlesse and contentious disputings Remember the worke wee are sent for is to build the Church of God and not to destroy it to call men to Faith and Repentance to stirre them vp to the works of true pietie and loue and not to make them thinke they haue Religion enough when they haue talked against Bishops and Ceremonies If wee shall goe about this carefully and all of vs striue in our places by fruitfull preaching honest liuing and a wise gouerning to approue our selues vnto the consciences of our people wee shall shortly finde matters in a better estate then wee haue seene and be all of vs an acceptable people to the Lord our God which that it may bee God for his Christs sake grant to vs all Amen THe Sermon ended the Archbishop of Saint Andrewes came to the Table at which his Maiesties Commissioners Noble men and other members of the Assembly were sitting and calling for the ordinarie Clerke of the Assembly was answered That Master Thomas Nicholson who formerly serued the Church in that place had dimitted his office in fauour of Master Iames Sandelands Aduocate This he notified to the Assembly as that which hee had vnderstood before and shewed that the said Master Iames was a man sufficiently qualified for the place of good report and one that by his aduocation and pleading might further the particular businesse of Ministers before the Session He desired the Assembly to consider what was fittest to bee done and aduise whether they would receiue the said Master Iames in the others place or not The voyces of his Maiesties Commissioners the Noble men Bishops and diuers of the Ministers being asked they all without exception agreed to his receiuing And the said Master Iames being recalled for while the voyces were asked he was remoued had an oath ministred vnto him for his diligent and faithfull discharge of that seruice The Libeller obserues here first That seates being appointed for Noble men Barons Burgesses and Bishops with the Doctors the Ministers were left to stand behinde them as if their part had onely beene to behold Then sayes that the choosing of Master Iames Sandelands to be Clerke was done without formall voting or lite But to that first although it might bee replyed in a word that the care of placing seates was onely in the Magistrates hands of the Burghe where the said Assembly was kept and that the neglect thereof if any was cannot be thought purposely done yet because no diligence was omitted on the part of the Magistrates and the seates conueniently enough placed according as the house could beare wherein the said meeting was kept wee must thinke this complaint proceeds of too much pride and sawcinesse The man cannot abide to heare of degrees in the Church and places according to degrees but he must haue patience Presbyters must now content to sit and stand behind the Bishops according to the degrees of the old Christian Councels for the time of confusion is expired and Church men must learne now to liue orderly That there was not a lite for election of the Clerke hee must remember that the dimission made by the former was in fauour of Master Iames onely and that the Assembly had not so much adoe to choose a Clerke as to aduise if they would accept him in whose fauour the dimission was made Concerning which point the voyces of the most that could bee obserued
to bee present being asked enough was done for making good his reception in the place specially considering the Commissioners to the Assembly were not then knowne nor a roll made whereby to call them that had voyce particularly But this is his curiositie who gladly would find a fault euen where none was committed The said Master Iames Sandelands being admitted command was giuen to all that had enteresse in the said Assembly to giue in their commissions to him before the next sitting and nomination was made of certayne for the Conference according to the order kept in other Assemblies in which besides the Bishops Noble men Barons and Commissioners of Burrowes the most wise and learned of the Ministrie were named indifferently without any respect had of their opinions and priuate inclinations At this time it was moued by one That the libertie of the Church might bee kept in the choosing of a Moderator which the Archbishop of Saint Andrewes repressed saying to the proponer That he did not expect him to be a troubler of the Church and the businesse thereof and that the Assembly was met within the bounds of his charge wherein so long as he serued he trusted none would vsurpe at which he kept silence and streight wayes arose another who asked whether all the Noble men and Barons present should haue voyce or not and if the whole Ministers that were met there should haue voyces also The Archbishop of Saint Andrews answered that the order obserued in former Assemblies should here be kept and no Ministers haue voyce that lacked a commission But as for Noble men and Barons who were come thither vpon his Maiesties missiues he trusted none there would denie them voyce specially since in the Assembly that proceeded at Saint Andrewes it was one of the reasons they made for differring the conclusion of matters That none of the Noble men or Barons were then present to assist the proceedings of the Church It was desired also that the Articles to bee entreated might bee extended in such forme as his Maiestie desired them to passe and that some might be set apart to collect the reasons that should be proponed for or against the Articles that the whole Asâ—embly might haue the cleerer information To this it was answered that the conference was to consider of these things and what might serue best to prepare matters for the whole Assembly It appeared that their drift was to perturbe the Assembly with such motions in the beginning therefore the Archbishop requiring them to keepe silence commanded his Maiesties letter which was presented by Doctor Young Deane of Winchester and directed to the Assembly to be publikely read the Tenor of which Letter wee haue thought meete here also to insert His Maiesties Letter to the ASSEMBLY IAMES Rex RIght reuerend Fathers in GOD Right trustie Cousins and Coumsellors and others Our trustie and welbeloued subiects We greet you well Wee were once fully resolued neuer in Our time to haue called any moe Assemblies there for ordering things concerning the policie of the Church by reason of the disgrace offered vnto Vs in that late meeting at S. Andrewes wherein Our iust and godly desires were not onely neglected but some of the Articles concluded in that scornfull and ridiculous forme as We wish they had beene refused rather with the rest Although at this time Wee suffered Our selfe to be intreated by you Our Bishops for a new Conuocation and haue called you together who are now conuened for the selfe-same businesse which then was vrged hoping assuredly that you will haue some better regard of Our desires and not permit the vnruly and ignorant Multitude after their wonted custome to ouersway the better and more iudicious sort An euill which we haue gone about with much paines to haue amended in these Assemblies and for which purpose according to Godâ— Ordinance and the constant practise of all well gouerned Churches in all ages Wee haue placed you that are Bishops and ouerseers of the rest in the chiefest roomes You pleade much Wee perceiue to haue matters done by consent of the Ministers and tell Vs often that what concernes the Church in generall should be concluded by the aduise of the whole neither doe Wee altogether dislike your purpose for the greater consent there is amongst your selues the greater is Our contentment But We will not haue you to thinke that matters proponed by Vs of that nature whereof these Articles are may not without such a generall consent be enioyned by Our authoritie This were a misknowing of your places and withall a disclayming of that innate power which We haue by Our calling from God by the which We haue place to dispose of things externall in the Church as We shall thinke them to be conuenient and profitable for aduauncing true Religion amongst Our Subiects Therefore let it be your care by all manner of wise and discreete perswasions to induce them to an obedient yeelding vnto these things as in dutie both to God and Vs they are bound And doe not thinke that We will be satisfied with refuses or delayes or mitigations and We know not what other shifts haue beene proponed for Wee will content Our selues with nothing but with a simple and direct acceptation of these Articles in the forme by Vs sent vnto you now a long time past considering both the lawfulnesse and vndeniable conueniencie of them for the better furthering of pietie and religion amongst you And it should haue rather becommed you to haue begged the establishment of such things of Vs then that We should thus neede to be put to vrge the practise of them vpon you These matters indeede concerneth you of the Ecclesiasticall charge chiefly Neyther would Wee haue called Noble-men Barons and others of Our good Subiects to the determining of them but that We vnderstand the offence of Our people hath beene so much obiected wherein you must beare with Vs to say That no Kingdome doth breed or hath at this time more louing dutifull and obedient Subiects then We haue in that Our natiue Kingdome of Scotland and so if any disposition hath appeared to the contrarie in any of them the same We hold to haue proceeded from amongst you Albeit of all sorts of men yee are they that both of duetie were bound and by particular benefits obliged to haue continued your selues and by your sound doctrine and exemplarie life kept others in a reuerend obedience to Our commaundements What and how many abuses were offered Vs by many of the Ministrie there before Our happie comming to this Crowne though We can hardly quite forget yet We little like to remember Neither thinke We that any Prince liuing could haue kept himselfe from falling in vtter dislike with the Profession it selfe considering the many prouocations that were giuen vnto Vs But the loue of God and his truth still vpheld Vs And will by his grace so doe vnto the end of Our life Our patience alwayes in forgetting and
that is passed I haue liued to see this day a generall Synod once more of the Church of Scotland called by the authority and expresse command and pleasure of our Souereigne Lord the KING which is the only true and best meanes indeed vsed in all Ages for extirpating of all Sects Errors Heresies for the planting of truth and good order in the Church of Christ. And I pray God that all things at this meeting may by the direction of Gods good Spirit by your wisdomes be so carryed that you abridge not your selues and posterity of so great◠blessing and procure that not only these things which are now required but that other things more difficult bee enioyned and enforced vpon you vpon strict penaltie by Supreme Authority And therefore I desire as I am sent to that purpose with the Apostle Titus 3. to put you in remembrance that you bee subiect to Principalities and powers and that you bee obedient and ready to euery good worke to put you in remembrance that by the great blessing of Almightie God you haue to doe with so wise so potent so religious so learned a Prince the matchlesse Mirror of all Kings the nursing Father of his Church that he whose Wisedome and Authoritie is in the composing of all differences both Ecclesiasticall and Ciuill so much required respected and admired not only by his owne people of his other Kingdomes but by all good Christians of forrein Nations throughout the Christian world may not seeme to be neglected by you his natiue Subiects at home and you especially of the Ministerie who ought to be examples and patternes of obedience vnto others you whom he hath so infinitely obliged by his so great bountie and constant loue To put you in remembrance that as with no small disreputation vnto his Maiestie and diminution as it were of his Princely authoritie in the iudgement and sight of the World whose eyes are bent vpon these proceedings he hath granted you so long time by your Christian and godly endeuours with your seuerall flockes whom you are to leade not to be led by them to remoue as you promised both to his Maiesty being here amongst you and againe confirmed at your last generall Synod all those scandals which might be taken by the more ignorant and vnaduised sort of your people to whom all innouations though to the better may seeme at the first somewhat strange so that now you would bee carefull as much as in you lyeth to take away that more dangerous and open offence and scandall which by your delay and refusall of obedience you shall cast vpon the sacred person of our Soueraigne Lord the King the most constant and Zealous Protectour and Defender of that Faith and Truth which wee all professe and for the which he hath suffered such open gaine-saying of the Aduersaries thereof the limbes of Antichrist as if he◠who hath laboured so much to exalt the glorie of thi◠Nation farre aboue all his Predecessours in the eyes of the World now going about most of all to humble vs vnto our God and in performance of the act of greatest deuotion according to his owne example to bring vs vnt◠our Knees did in so doing any way vrge his Subiects to any thing which might sauour of Superstition or Idolatrie To remoue the scandall from those who are in authority amongst you and are set ouer you in the Lord who by their dutifull obedience vnto God and their Soueraigne haue alreadie both by their Doctrine and practise commended those things which now are required of you to b◠both lawfull and expedient To take away that scandal and aspersion which by the seeming reasons of your former refusall or delay you haue cast vpon others so glorious reformed Churches as if the holy Ghost and Spirit◠reformation had beene giuen onely and solely rested vpon you To remoue that notorious and publique scanda◠which by the fierie and turbulent spirits of some fe◠priuate men lyeth heauie vpon the feruent and zealou◠Professours of the glorious Gospel of Christ as if the also were disobedient vnto Magistracie and in this did seeme to ioyne hands with the maine vpholders and pillars of Poperie It hath wounded the Spirits of good men to heare it often spoken Nec dicatur vtinam ampliùs Gathi in plateis Aschelonis Nay to see it in Print that Herod and Pilate were now reconciled againe if not Contra Christum Dominum yet contra Christum Domini Lastly to preuent that lamentable miserie and calamitie which God in his iustice might bring vpon this Church in that you regarded not the blessed time of your visitation and despised the long suffering and great goodnesse of God and of so bountifull and gracious a Soueraigne And so to conclude for to stand now vpon the particulars were but actum agere and you need no gleanings after so plentifull an haruest or the light of a Candle being inlightned by the cleare beames of the Sunne with that of Naamans seruants 2. King 5. vnto their Lord and Maister Father if the Prophet had commanded thee a greater matter shouldest thou not haue done it c. So right reuerend Fathers and Brethren in Christ if our most gracious Soueraigne Lord who hath done so much for you had commanded you greater things so long as they might stand with the will of God and in no waies be repugnant vnto the same for in that case indeed the Apostles rule holds inuiolably true 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That we must rather obey God then men should you not haue beene readie your selues and by your Doctrine and practise haue induced others to obedience much more then when he requireth of you but these few necessarie things necessary and expedient for the glorie of God for the aduancing of pietie amongst you for the honour and due satisfaction vnto our Soueraigne Lord the KING for the happy establishing of order peace vnion and loue amongst your selues and in these vnited Kingdomes Therefore let me beseech you in the bowels of Christ to giue all their due Quae Caesaris Caesari quae Dei Deo And as Constantine the Great as Eusebius hath it wrote vnto his Churchmen that troubled his peace and other weightie affaires with their contentious humours So let me intreat you in the behalfe of our CONSTANTINE Qui dum regat iubet Date illi dies tranquillos noctes curae molestiarum expertes That so he may with much ioy and contentment of heart yet once more as hee proposeth if not often visit your coasts and those places which his soule so loueth And that this poore Church and his natiue Kingdome may be made euer more and more happie by his comming and long peaceable and prosperous reigne And GOD and Men say Amen vnto it Amen Amen This Speech hee deliuered most grauely and with great affection to the contentment of all good and wise men And how falsly the Libeller charges him with bringing
in the Puritane and Papist like Herode and Pilate conspiring together we leaue it to the Reader to iudge Thus ended the first Session of that Assembly The second Session of the Assembly was differred to the morrow after and the Conference warned to meet at three of the clocke in the afternoone IN the Conference after Prayer made for a blessing to that meeting his Maiesties Letter was read againe to put them in minde that were conuened of the businesse in hand at what time the Archbishop of Saint ANDREWES did remember them of the proceedings that had beene kept in these matters since his Maiesties first Proposition of them at Saint-ANDREWES The promises made at that time to his Maiestie for passing the said Articles the delay made in the preceding Assembly vpon pretext of satisfying the simple and ignorant sort touching the lawfulnesse of them Hee told them also of the offence which his Maiestie had taken at that delay the seuererer course that was intended against the disobedient Mininisters and the mitigation which was procured by the humble intercession of himselfe and others and hereupon besought them earnestly to doe as became wisemen for howbeit as he perceiued against the aduice giuen in the particular Synods they were come thither almost all of them who were disposed to resist the conclusion intended and that they supposed to carry matters by voyces without regard what reason would craue of them they would deceiue themselues in that case and finde their numbers too weake if they did not hearken and submit themselues to reason And in the end shewing them the end of their sitting apart was to consider by what meanes matters might most easily be brought vnto a point hee said that there appeared but two wayes one whereof was by disputing the Articles which was likely to consume a long time and breed irritation rather then any contentment else The other was by a calme and wise consultation to consider how the said Articles might bee receiued in all the Churches with least offence and conclude the same specially since they had promised in the last Assembly to resolue themselues and others of the equitie of the points required and which they like best he desires them to choose The greater part esteeming that such as were contrary minded would neuer receiue satisfaction vnlesse matters were first reasoned and that it should bring a sore imputation vpon the Assembly to conclude any thing which had not beene first debated by arguments vrged the disputing of the Articles which was of the rest condescended vnto Then it being proponed if they would take the said Articles in order or beginne with the most controuerted they agreed vniformely to treate of kneeling at the receiuing of the holy Sacrament in the first place hoping that satisfaction being giuen in that Article the lesse scruple should be made of the rest So according to the order two were named to dispute that Arcicle to wit Doctor Henrie Philip and Doctor William Forbes for the one side and Master William Scot and Master Iohn Carmichael for the other these two last named after a graue protestation made of their vnwillingnesse to be heard opposing to any matter for the which his Maiestie seemed so earnest excused themselues by the necessity of the Commandement and their owne resolutions which they held to bee well grounded wishing that no offence might be taken at their speeches which they should be carefull of and say nothing but with that reuerence which become them in so honourable an hearing And then adding that the contrary order had beene long time kept in this Church with great profit and the comfort of many good Christians if now any would preasse to abolish that which had beene in force and draw in things not yet receiued they should bee holden to prooue eyther that the things vrged were necessary and expedient for our Church or the order hitherto kept not meet to be retayned And for this purpose they alleadged a passage of Master Hooker in his Preface before the Bookes of Ecclesiasticall Policie wherein hee craues that such as seeke the reformation of Orders Ecclesiâ—sticall in the Church of England should content themselues with the Opponents part and bee subiect to prooue these two things mentioned It was replyed that the difference of their case and ours was great for there a few priuate men desired the Lawes publikely established to bee inuerted and it was good reason that such should bee put to their confirmation of what they proponed but heere the Prince that by himselfe had power to reforme such things as were amisse in the outward policie required to haue the change made And therefore it concerned them to bring reasons why his Maiesties Propositions ought not to bee granted This they declined for a great while still protesting the reuerence they beare to his Maiesties commandements and without mentioning that which they would not oppose in Thesi they wished this question to be reasoned Whether kneeling or sitting at the Communion were the fitter gesture It was answered that the question could bee no otherwayes proponed then thus His Maiestie desires our gesture of sitting at the Communion to be changed into kneeling Why ought not the same to be done If it could bee shewed by the Word or by any necessary consequent deduced out of the same that his alteration craued ought not to bee granted because impious or vnlawfull that should bee enough humbly to decline the desire which wee doubted not his Maiestie would accept well and if otherwayes they could bring no argument to the contrary a necessitie lay vpon vs to obey An houre or more was spent in such speeches they declining still to giue any argument and offering themselues to answere such reasons as any man would propone for the alteration desired whereupon the Archbishop of Saint Andrewes said that if none would reason hee would put the Articles to voyces Then they proponed that reasoning should bee publike and in face of the whole Assembly it was replyed that nothing should be in conference concluded to the preiudice of the Assembly alwayes matters must first be brought to some point in the conference and thereafter proponed to the whole number who should be heard to reason of new if he listed Hereupon they resolued to fall into the dispute and first Master Iohn Carmichael brought an Argument from the custome and practice of the Church of Scotland which had beene long obserued and ought not to bee altered except the inconuenience of the present order were shewed and the desired gesture qualified to bee better It was answered that how euer the Argument held good against the motions of priuate men yet his Maiestie requiring the practice to be changed matters behoued to admit a new consideration and that because it was the Prince his Priuiledge that had the conseruation and custodie aswell of the Church as of the Common-wealth to call in question Customes and Statutes which he perceiued to breed
Edinburgh and the forming of the booke of Common Prayers and extracting of the Canons of the Church And thus ended this Conference Thursday the 27. of August THat day being an ordinary day of preaching a Sermon was made by the reuerend Father in God William late Bishop of Galloway against which the Libeller excepts three manner of wayes First saying that his Doctrine was farre contrary to that which he had taught before the Estates of Parliament Anno 1606. Secondly that hee set at nought the ancient order of our Church sometime highly commended by himselfe extolling the new light and thirdly that he presumed to teach them a new kind of Catechisme vnder whom he himselfe might be yet catechised To all which seeing he is now at rest this much may be truely replyed in his behalfe That howeuer his opinion in these matters of the externall gouerment were sometimes other his Doctrine was neuer contrarie to that which at any time he professed and preached but these men haue beene so accustomed in feeding the eares of people with matters belonging to order neglecting the substantiall points of Religion which are Faith and Repentance as they dreame of no other Doctrine but that and counts the alteration of iudgement in these points of outward discipline a sort of Apostasie and falling from the truth And where he is said to set at nought the ancient order of our Church it is a false and impudent lye for neither he nor any else that seeme most earnest for receiuing these Articles did euer contemne the orders and rites formerly established but while as they stood in force reuerently practised them and were obedient to the ordinances of the Church made thereabout but the circumstances of things now being changed and these times requiring other fashions and manners wee thinke without the despising of these they may be well admitted and as commendably vsed as euer the other were For the third of presuming to teach them by whom he might be catechized because this is spoken in despight I passe it with this answere That his Sermons and workes left behind him which will continue with the posteritie will witnesse against all their malice that hee was inferiour to none of the Opposites in preaching yea in many degrees superiout to them all But to returne to our purpose the Assembly being not in full number to take some conclusion in the businesse for which they were conuened after inuocation of the Name of God it was declared vnto them that by the labours of the Conference in their priuate meetings the Articles proponed by his Maiestie were brought and reduced into that forme as it rested for the Assembly to consider whether or not the same should be receiued in our Church and to moue them the rather to condescend his Maiesties resolution to haue the Articles receiued was declared and how no other answere could satisfie but granting of the said Articles They were likewise remembred of their promises made to his Maiesties selfe at Saint Andrewes and in the last generall Assembly and had the lawfulnesse and indifferencie of these matters at length of new exponed vnto them Neither was any of their common pretexts left vnanswered place being giuen to all that would reason against any one of the Articles to doe the same And while some of them insisted by long speeches to haue a continuation made of matters to another Assembly and a supplication sent to his Maiestie for some longer delay his Highnesse Commissioners hauing vrged a present answere they were desired to cease and not to trifle time with vnnecessary speeches seeing matters should receiue decision before they went forth of doores And so some few making shew to reason in the contrary were permitted to speake till they had no more to say and had their reasons answered to the full The Libeller sayes the libertie was granted to a few and that the reasons were checkt and borne downe with authoritie but how contrarie this is to the truth wee leaue it to bee answered by such as were present And now when they haue set downe in writing all that then was said or possibly they can inuent Let the Reader iudge if by the answeres giuen their obiections be not sufficiently confuted Doctor Lindsay his answere being posed on conscience to declare his iudgement touching kneeling at the Sacrament is maliciously mutilated His declaration was this as all the Assembly can testifie in whose presence it was giuen On my conscience I neither know Scripture reason nor antiquitie that enforceth kneeling sitting standing or passing as necessary but thinke them all indifferent and therefore that any of them may bee lawfully vsed when it is found expedient And considering nothing to be more expedient for the weale of our Church then to keepe peace with our gracious Soueraigne and not to contend for such matters I iudge yeelding to his Highnesse desire to bee the onely best When all the reasoning was ended his Maiesties Letter was againe read to the end the Assembly might see his earnestnesse about the same matters And because of a Pasquill cast in in the Pulpit of Edinburghe the Sunday before which was deliuered to the Archbishop of Saint Andrewes the penners whereof had warned the Ministers not to yeeld to the Articles giuing them promises of satisfaction for their stipends in case they should be taken from them and to fight in the defence of theÌ„ that cause He disswaded them to leane vnto such suggestions or be moued with them for that they would proue nought in the end as the experience of the seuenteene dayes worke might teach them And added which he is not ashamed of nor will denie That were there no other to take imployment against these Mutiners and seditious persons he could wish that he were honoured therewith These are the great blasts and â—errours which the Libeller mentions otherwaies they can take exception at nothing iustly that then was vtttered As matters were then proponed to be voted one of that number gaue in writing some particular reasons for disswading the grant of the said Articles which they haue now writ and imprinted in this Pamphlet which beeing suspected as the Libeller speakes to be some seditious protestation the Preferrer thereof was aduertised to take heede to his doing and giue in no Libels which hee did not set his hand vnto This while he offered himselfe to doe the Archbishop of Saint-Andrewes beeing loath to bring him that way in danger tooke backe the said Writing and desired the Clerk of the Assembly to reade the same And when they were perceiued to containe no matter of moment or any new thing which had not beene before talked of they were cast by as not deseruing any consideration Thus the question was made Whether they would receiue or refuse the Articles Here the Libeller peruerts the question and sayes it was this Whether yee will consent to the Articles or disobey the King which is a question of his own
is repeated in other words in the twelfth exception For the Libeller making a great muster of Arguments to inferre his nullity commits many tautologies PP No others ought to be chosen members of the priuie conference but such as are authorized with Commission to be members of the Assembly neuerthelesse the pretended Moderator did nominate for the priuie Conference such as hee pleased before the Commissions were deliuered and consequently not duly informed who were the iust meÌ„bers of the Assembly According to the rule Totum est maius sua parte The Assembly is greater then the CoÌ„ference according to another rule Turpis pars omnis toti non congrua It is an absurd Conference that disagrees from the whole Assembly Neuerthelesse in that Assembly some few named by the pretended Moderator not chosen by the Assembly not only according to the custome of the priuie Conference concurred with the said Moderator for preparing and digesting of matters to be proponed in due order but tooke vpon them to reason vote and conclude the matters properly belonging to the whole Assembly ANS Against the priuie Conference there are foure exceptions made first that others were nominate then these who were lawfull members of an Assemblie That this is false shall bee cleered hereafter when wee speake of the lawfull members of an Assembly The second that they were nominate by the Moderatour to this I answere hee vsed no other forme in the nomination of them then hath beene heretofore vsed in all other Assemblies for the priuie Conference was neuer chosen by suffrages but the Moderatour did nominate such of all parts of the Countrey as were thought most meete and so was done heere In the yeere of God 1579. in an Assembly kept at Edinburgh and another in Anno 1580. at Dundy this forme of nomination beeing quarrelled it was reasoned voted and concluded that the Assessours of the priuy Conference should bee nominate by the Moderatour and therefore in the next Assembly after the names of the Assessours it is added All these were nominate by the Moderatour Thirdly it is obiected that they disagreed from the whole Assembly Answere The euent prooued otherwise for that which was thought good by the Conference was concluded by the whole Assembly Fourthly that the Conference tooke vpon them to reason vote and conclude matters before they came to the Assembly Answere The end wherefore the priuy Conference is institute is to prepare matters for the Assembly by cleering the points by reasoning declaring what in their iudgements and opinion was meetest to bee done without preiudice of the Assembly it selfe and so was it done in this priuie Conference PP It hath beene the commendable care of godly Emperors and their honourable Deputies in generall Councells to prouide that nothing bee done violently nor extorted by terrour but that time and libertie bee granted for reasoning vpon matters proponed and that the Booke of God be laid open for finding out the Truth Agatho writing to the Emperour Constantine aduised him to grant free power of speaking to euery one that desires to speake for his faith which he beleeueth and holdeth That all men may euidently see that no man willing or desirous to speake for the Truth was forbidden hindred or reiected by any force-threatnings terrour or whatsoeuer else might auert them from so doing Conforme to this aduice the Emperour answered as followeth By God Almighty we fauour no partie but shall keepe our selfe equall to all no way making necessitie in any point Neuerthelesse in this Assembly the necessitie of yeelding was inforced vnder no lesse pangs then the wrath of Authoritie imprisonment exile depriuation of Ministers and vtter subuersion of the estate and order of this Church such as by the prouidence of God had their mouthes opened to reason were checkt quarrelled rebuked boasted interrupted and for their discouragement it was plainly professed That neither the reasoning nor the number of voters should carry the matter away The party defender was forced to pursue The collecting and putting in order of the Reasons of either side was refused ANS It is obiected here That necessitie of yeelding was enforced contrary to the example of Constantine who protested he would â—auour no party but keepe himselfe equall to all no way making necessitie in any point To this wee answer first The cause is different for the question to be debated in that Councell of Constantinople was a substantiall point of Doctrine in it selfe not subiect to his Imperiall power controuerted betwixt the Greeke and Latine Church concerning the twofold will in Christ and because hee being a Grecian himselfe it might haue beene thought hee would fauour more the Greeke Church therefore he purges himselfe of partialitie referring the whole matter to the decision of the Councell according to the Scriptures But here the question is of no substantiall point of Doctrine but of matters indifferent not particularly determined by Scripture but depending vpon the Prince and Churches pleasure to haue them practised or not In which the Prince might by his owne authoritie impone a necessitie vpon all his Subiects to obey the same except they could shew euident proofes out of the Scripture that the same were absolutely vnlawfull And in case of disobedience hee might iustly threaten them by his authoritie Yet all these particular terrours and threatnings which yee mention with the wrath of Authoritie imprisonment exile depriuation c. were directed onely to such as without reason should bee found obstinate and refractarie who by reason ought not onely be threatned but punished For if men will not regard authoritie but doe as their conceit which some falsly call conscience leades them if neither the Prince his command nor acts of Synods can bind them to obedience may not these threatnings yea ought they not to bee vsed towards them as it hath euer beene the practice in all Councels And to meet you with your owne example which yee alledge that same Constantine who protests he would impose no necessitie in any point in that selfe-same Synode perceiuing the obstinacy of Macarius Bishop of Antiochia and his followers Stephanus Polychronius Constantius and others not onely threatned them bitterly but likewise in presence of the Synode presently caused to depriue Macarius of his Bishopricke by taking his Episcopall cloake from him and did cast him and his Associates forth of the Councell by the necks Ceruicibus eijcâ—entes foras as the words are Vide Concil Constantinop 3. Act. 8.9 15.16 Binni Annotat. Then yee say yee were threatned by the vtter subuersion of the Estate and order of the Church And is it not lawfull to lay before your eyes the danger that may follow vpon your disobedience for looke all the Letters and harrangues of the godly Emperours the generall Councells and such as were speciall persons therein yee shall finde them euer lay before the eyes of such as were conuocated as the speciall motiues that might serue to induce them to condescend
bee answered sometimes as he deserues Now where yee say that the Bishops will not stand to that Assembly now more then the Church then did I doe not conceiue whom ye call the Church except ye thinke a handfull of mutinous persons such as your selfe to be the Church otherwise the Ministers generally in all the parts of the Countrey did consent and obey the Acts of that Assembly And what if the conclusions taken therein yet stands vnrepealed by other Assemblies that haue followed the Bishops doe all acknowledge and stand to For it is the Law of the Church that rules them in matters of outward policie and all other peaceable Ministers yee and the like of you stand to no Law but the will of your owne minds Thirdly where ye say that some Moderatours were sent Commissioners by the Presbyteries vpon an ignorant conceit that they were bound by the Act of Linlythguow so to doe ye qualifie no part of this by any particulars and if ye did it would be replyed that in euery cōuention that is permitted for exercise through the Land the fittest and choysest of a number is appointed to moderate And that whether the moderation lay vpon them or not their Brethren would haue elected them and no others to haue bin Commissioners to that Assembly Lastly where ye tell vs scoffingly that the present Moderators are of a new edition to wit the deputies of Bishops yee must know That your changeable Moderators were of that new edition yee speake of for in no age was it seene euer before this that indifferently euery man was taken in his course to rule and preside without consideration had of his gifts and qualities And these we haue now are such as the Christian Church euer had vsed to keepe order in their meetings conuentions PP The Assessours to his Maiesties Commissioners the Nobilitie Barons Bishops Burgesses and Moderators imposed vpon Presbyteries with some Ministers voting without warrant being substracted from the number of the affirmatiue voters the negatiues will not bee found inferiour in number to the affirmatiues authorised with Commission And suppose inferiour in number yet not in weight for the negatiue voters adhered to the iudgement of the Church heard no reasons for the nouelties proponed were not ouercome with perswasions or terrours as was the affirmatiues ANS It hath beene sufficiently proued that there was neyther Nobleman Baron Burgesse nor Bishop but had as good warrant to vote as any of the negatiues therefore should not be substracted from the number of the affirmatiue voters This yee perceiue and flie to another shift according to your custome Yee graunt your number were fewer for so they were by moe then another halfe but their weight yee say was greater for with them as ye alledge there was three great ouer-weights in the ballance First they had no feare Secondly they were not ouercome with perswasion And the third they adhered to the iudgemēt of the Church It is true indeed that neither the feare of inconueniencies and euills which might haue ensued to the great hurt of the Church and hinderance of the Gospel did moue them nor could reason whereby the change was manifestly proued both lawfull and expedient perswade them but to the iudgement of the Church as ye call it they adhered with out regard of good or euill without respect to right or wrong And this is the Idoll which they still adore Now let vs consider this iudgement whereunto they adhered The iudgement of our Church touching ceremonies and circumstances to bee vsed in the worshippe of God is two-fold There is one that is particular the other is generall The particular iudgement determineth and defineth what ceremonies in particular the Reformers thought expedient to be receyued and reiected The generall declares what the Church and euery Christian should esteeme beleeue and hold touching the particular order and policie which is set downe for the vse of ceremonies and circumstances to be obserued in the worship of God The former iudgement is expressed in the first Booke of Discipline and some few Acts of the generall Assemblies cited afterward by your selfe This other we haue in the one and twentieth Article of the Confession of Faith about the end thereof and in the seuenth Chapter of the second Booke of Discipline both which are afterwards cited in the examination of your Discourse where yee professe your selfe to discusse the oath And it is that iudgement whereunto the Swearers did oblige themselues by their oath In this it is declared expresly That no order nor policie in ceremonies can be established for all times ages and places but that it is temporall and may and should be changed when necessitie requires This is the generall and constant iudgement of the Church whereunto the negatiue Voters were bound by their oath to haue adhered which they did not That other whereunto they adhered as yee alledge is onely temporall and subiect to change according to the opportunities and occasions of times places and persons For if by occasion of any of these circumstances the obseruation which was profitable at one time become hurtfull at another and that which serued for reformation breedes and fosters corruptiō profanenesse or superstition it is the constant and generall iudgement of the Church that it should bee changed and altered which formerly was obserued And to apply this to the purpose in hand It is notoriously knowne That sitting at the Communion which at the reformation was iudged most conuenient to abolish the opinion of transubstantiatiō bread-worship makes the Sacrament now to be contemned and profaned by the common sort of Professours That the want of diuine exercise on the fiue holy-dayes hath almost buried in obliuion the inestimable benefits of our redemption the superstitious obseruation of these times not the lesse continuing still in our Church That the withholding of Baptisme from infants in times of necessitie and the holy Supper from others at the houre of their dying hath beene the griefe of many good Christians Lastly that great ignorance is crept into the Church by the neglect of the catechising of young children and for lacke of a particular triall of their profiting in knowledge at the Visitations of Churches And vpon these and the like considerations who sees not that alteration in these poynts was expedient Adde to this our conformitie with the greater part of the reformed Churches which is to be prefered much to the singularitie of any priuat opinion or custome of persons and Churches Then the shewing of an vnnecessarie vndutifull and vnchristian opposition and contradiction to the most religious Prince on earth who for the glorie of God and the edification of his Church did vrge this alteration In this if his Maiestie had beene gain-stand without right or reason what euils and inconueniencies might haue ensued it is not easie to say Ye afterwards call it a matter vncertaine and depending vpon Gods prouidence but wee are not to prie in
these secrets and ought to follow his reuealed will who hath commanded vs to feare him and obey the King This obedience should euer be performed where it may stand with the feare of God These things haue not beene considered by the Negatiue voters And euidently shew that their pretext of adhering to the particular iudgement of the Church whereunto in such cases they ought not to haue adhered is no other but a faire excuse and spacious vaile to couer their wilfull opposition to his Maiesties will and the well of the Church which in the estimatioÌ„ of euery prudent and peaceable Christian must eleuate the authoritie of all their voyces and make the same of no weight PP The affirmatiue voters authorized with Commission either had their Commissions procured by their Bishoppes or else were mercenarie Pensioners or Plat-seruers for augmentation of stipends or gapers for promotion or of suspect credit for benefit receiued or hoped for or had subscribed other priuate Articles in priuate more dangerous then the present Articles or had beene threatned priuatly by their owne Diocesian Bishops with deposition or were not well informed in their iudgement for lacke of full and free reasoning or were circumuented with promises made to them by their Bishops that they should not be vrged with the practise if they would onely consent to make an Act to please the King or were terrified with the publique threatnings before mentioned Iudge therefore whether these votes should be pondered or numbered ANS That he may be seene a perâ—it man in the art of Calumniation hee heapes tenne calumnies together in one Section whereunto in the order they are proponed I answer first he sayes the affirmatiue voters had their Commissions procured by their Bishops This is so false as nothing can be more vntruely said for all the Bishops in their Synods kept before that Assembly hauing acquainted the Ministers that a supplication would be sent to his Maiestie for libertie to conuene a generall Assembly and exponed the necessitie of their admitting the Articles warned them to chuse the most wise learned and peaceable of their number to bee their Commissioners if so the libertie craued were obtayned but left the persons to be named by themselues in their meetings at their Exercises vpon which aduertisement it is true That certaine of your factious sort employed all their meanes to procure Commission to themselues and such others as they knew would be of their minde and preuayled so farre as verie few of the Ministrie possessed with your humor were absent from the Assembly And to manifest your falshood in this particular It is notoriously knowne that at S. Andrewes one day beeing appoynted for chusing Commissioners of that Exercise the whole number of Ministers conuened albeit neither before that time these tenne or twelue yeares past nor since diuers of them were euer seene eyther at Exercise or Synods Notice whereof being giuen to the Archbishop of S. Andrewes who was at that time in the Citie by certaine that feared a trouble might fall out amongst them in the nomination he comes himselfe to their meeting and declared how hee and all that were present perceiued they were come that day onely by pluralitie of voyces to chuse their Commissioners And howbeit they might iustly be excluded from bearing Commission or giuing any voice in the choyce of them that should bee sent who at other times vouchsafed not their presence to the Brethren lest it should be said afterwards that the choyce of their Commissioners were not free he willed them to name whom they thought meetest And his owne voyce beeing first desired he named for two Maister Iohn Carmichaell and Maister Alexander Henrysone whom hee knew to bee set both of them against the Articles that they might haue place to reason and giue voyce in the Assembly So farre hee was from plotting and preparing voyces to beare forth that businesse And as he vttered in the Assembly at diuers times vpon occasion since wee haue heard him solemnely protest that he did neuer open his mouth to solicite or perswade any to stand for receyuing the Articles but left euery man to his owne iudgement to doe and say as hee should finde the force of reason to moue him And yet had it beene so that the Bishops had named them and procured their Commission there should nothing haue beene done against the custome of the primitiue Church for no Presbyters were euer admitted to sit in Councels except they had been authorised by their Bishops as we shewed before And during the space of many yeares after our reformation while the SuperinteÌ„dents ruled Church affaires no Minister might come to the generall Assembly except they had chosen and named him as was qualified before out of their owne Assemblies This is our reply to the first The second calumnie is That the affirmatiue Voters were mercenarie Pensioners If hee had set downe their names and shewed whose Pensioners they were wee should haue easily shewed that though they were Pensioners yet they were not mercenarie men One may safely enioy a benefice conferred vpon him by his Prince or some noble Personage in regard of his former seruices yet be no mercenarie And they may be mercenaries who enioy no pension at all for euen the disposition of a man wil make him iustly to be counted such Neither to my knowledge was there in that Assembly any one that had pension of his Maiestie Maister Patrick Galloway excepted whom before yee scoffingly termed a man of many pensions But ye are not I hope so farre past shame as to say that hee enioyes any of his pensions how few or many so euer they be vpon paction or promise to be yeelding vnto euerie thing that his Maiestie should be pleased to propone to the Church yea it is knowne that in these same matters he alone did more then ye all to haue diuerted his Maiestie by humble aduise and perswasion from vrging them further And tooke the boldnesse to propone his reasons in writing against the Festiuities and the Article of kneeling which his Maiestie was graciously pleased to Answer by himselfe for his better satisfaction These fiue and fortie yeares or aboue he hath liued a Minister in the Church of Scotland and was his Maiesties owne Chaplaine during the most of that time And for his labours and continuall trauels taken for the benefit of the Church deserued better reward then all the pensions hee enioyes But when this age is gone his iust praise in despight of you all shall continue with the posteritie If I pleased I could reply that the chiefe of your Sect hath a pension of his Maiestie of greater worth then all his put together and enioyes it with preiudice of many poore Ministers and for no merite at all except it be merite to worke his Maiestie perpetuall vexation and keepe the Church with his conceits in continuall trouble And I could tell you in a word that it is more fitting to be
his Maiesties pensioner then the pensioner of any Burgesses wife or Ladie in the Countrey such as many of you are and were not your purses filled by this meanes we should not be troubled with your vnrulinesse These things you must patiently heare for they are truths seeing yee forbeare not to lye of men more worthie beyond all comparison then is your selfe Your third calumnie is That they were Platseruers for augmentation of stipends this is an euident vntruth The Commission for stipends expired in the Moneth of Iuly before that Assembly and further hope of augmentation they could not haue where yee shall suffer this to be told you that the negatiue voters had greater benefit by that Commission then the affirmatiue And that according to your manner you gaue good attendance all that time and many hopes of good behauiour till your businesse was effected Howbeit since diuers of you haue turned your Cloakes as wee vse to say Albeit the benefit is not lost for it was not to you done or for any of you but to the Churches at which ye presently serue Ye say fourthly That they were gapers for promotion But how doe you know that Who made you a Iudge of your Brethren Is this pietie to iudge of mens hearts and affections at your pleasure None of you forsooth like to haue promotions and I warrant you would flie into deserts to hide your selues if ye knew your selues to be sought to be placed in high roomes but what meanes then your continuall resort in the chiefe Townes with the neglect and contempt of your owne cures at home Yee professe not to loue the World yet none followes it so much Ye may not endure domination yet will play the Lords ouer Kings and the consciences of euery man and think while as ye declame against ambition wealth and worldly honour that yee are not perceyued euen then and by that meane chiefly to hunt after these things Ye say fiftly That they were of suspect credite and I beleeue it well with you they were so Nay yee might say more ye suspected they were Reprobates for it is a thing familiar to your Sect to pronounce of mens saluation and condemnation as they fancie And yet that Booke which they say some of you haue made vp to note therein the names of the holy Societie is not the Booke of Life The credite of that Register is not committed vnto you Sixtly They had subscribed ye say other priuate Articles more dangerous then the present I conceiue your meaning to be of the Articles offered vnto them that enter in the Ministrie If yee haue not seene them ye shall know that these Articles bind such as enter to the obedience of the present discipline and of all and whatsomeuer acts and constitutions that shall be lawfully made hereafter by the Church in matters of outward policie and order whereunto I will not say the falshood but the inconstancie of some of your number gaue the occasion who after they had promised to liue peaceable and obedient to the Church within a few dayes hauing gotten what they sought for became more turbulent and vnquiet then any Seuenthly They had beene threatned you say priuately with deposition by their owne Diocesian Bishops And wil ye qualifie this of any one person wee shall grant all your informalities But this is so vntrue as yee neuer shall bee able to doe it Eightly They were not well informed in their iudgements for lacke yee say of full and free reasoning Here ye construe other men by your selfe and some of your side who being asked the reason of their negatiue voyce answered That they had neuer studied the question well yet that they followed the example of learned and godly men with whom they had rather erre ignorantly then follow the Bishops with some shew of reason And one of your negatiue Voters professed publiquely in the Assembly That he saw no euident reason against the lawfulnesse of the Articles yet he would refuse them because his deceassed father did mislike them These were the best informations that the most of your negatiues had as to the affirmatiue Voters when yee or any man shall aske them they will giue reason sufficient for their iudgement Ninthly they were circumuented with promises yee say made to them by their Bishops that they should not be vrged with the practice if they would only consent to make an act to please the King But you should haue named the Bishops that made such promises for your saying deserues not that credit It is true that when some of you acknowledging the matters to be lawfull in themselues complayned only of precipitation and that time was not giuen them to resolue it was answered by some in priuate That if they would ceasse from their businesse and professe so much in publike which in conference they acknowledged of the lawfulnesse of the Articles time should bee granted vnto them before the practice were vrged But this they obserued not and did to the contrary what they could and this I hope was no circumuention of any man nor were any of the affirmatiue voters carryed by these promises for what they voted vnto without any scruple they haue since that time practised Your tenth and last calumny that they were terrified with publike threatnings hath been answered before And now when ye desire your Reader to iudge whether the voices should be pondered or numbered I trust it hath not appeared by any of your alleadged motiues that there is such cause on the other side if your negatiue voters had equalled the affirmatiue in number they might haue beene iustly reiected first for the open preiudice they had committed in preaching and publike condemning the Articles that they knew were to be reasoned as impious Papistical and Idolatrous I know yee will oppose to this the preiudice you mentioned before committed by the affirmatiue voters in the practice of the Ceremonies before they were established But what they did in this was by the aduice of the chiefe Ministers in the Kingdome without condemning the former practice of the Church and vnder protestation that if the Church did not find the Articles fit to bee receiued their practice should not tye them in after-times seeing they acknowledged the indifferencie of all these matters Next the chiefe reasons which your negatiue voters gaue at any time were the hazard of their credits amongst their flockes and of feare to be reputed inconstant if they should yeeld at the sudden to that which they had so openly condemned and what are their reasons being well sifted but reasons of selfe-loue and a care to maintaine your popular estimation which is nothing so much to bee regarded as is his Maiesties satisfaction Therfore to end this purpose whether ye regard the weight or the number of voyces the affirmatiues were superior in both PP In omnibus causis pro facto accipitur id in quo quis alium terrefacit quo minus fiat In this
Assembly the affirmatiue voters confessed that they assented not simpliciter to the Articles proponed as knowne truths but onely to auert the wrath of authoritie standing in their owne iudgement against them and not for them in respect of the estate of this Church Hence it may be cleerly seene that their votes were only affirmatiue in respect of their feare but negatiue in respect of their iudgement and dutifull affection to this Church ANS None of the affirmatiue voters approued the Articles for knowne verities for when wee speake of knowne verities we vnderstand the verities defined in Scripture such as are the points of our faith which no man ought to call in question but that any man did giue his voice otherwise then his iudgement led him yee will hardly perswade vs much lesse that any man would openly professe this for that had beene little better then the resolution of Medea in the Tragedie Video meliora proboque deteriora sequor As to the feare yee so oft mention it was a feare not contrarie to the dutifull affection we owe to the Church nor repugnant to the iudgement which they had that were moued therewith but a feare commendable flowing both from their affection and iudgement for they feared no particular hurt to their owne persons or punishment to haue beene inflicted vpon themselues but to irritate so gracious a King and a Prince so carefull of the good of the Church and to bring the Church into an vnnecessary trouble by the obstinate refusing of lawfull Articles this wee hope all good men feared and still feare And certainly whosoeuer lackes this feare are not fit to serue in a Church and more vnfit to determine of Church-matters PP Other informalities may be obserued but these are sufficient to prooue the nullity of this pretended Assembly whereby the established estate of this Church is so far preiudged or rather simple people for their facility indangered if they vpon the pretended authority of this Assembly shall aduenture to make defection from their former profession confirmed by so many and well aduised Assemblies and blessed by the experience of Gods great loue in his best benefits or to violate their solemne Oath and Subscription The pretender may as safely professe that hee will alter his profession or violate his Oath and Subscription suppose there had beene no Assembly at all But to detayne simple people in their begunne reuolt it will be cryed out and inculcate that some few persons and to make them odious they will be called Mal-contents Troublers of the Estate Seditious persons and what not for the which contumelies and reproches account must be made one day that they may not nor should not iudge vpon the nullity of the Assemblies It is true by way of Iurisdiction or Superordination as they call it no priuate man should presume so to doe for that iudgement belongs to another free and lawfull Assembly but by the iudgement of discretion euery Christian man ought to iudge how matters of Religion are imposed vpon him and by what authoritie If thou mayest not discerne as a Iudge thou mayest discerne as a Christian. If yee shall admit indifferently whatsoeuer is concluded vnder the glorious name of an Assembly then may wee be brought to admit not only the English Ceremonies but also Lutheranisme and Papistrie If Ministers giue way to their Parochiners to practise the obtruded Ceremonies at their pleasures If sworne Professors intangle themselues againe with the superfluities whereof the Lord hath made them free let the one and the other take heed how they defend themselues from the iust challenge of back-sliding and the rest of the inconueniences that may ensue on their change ANS This Libeller being now to conclude the Nullity which he intended to proue paines himselfe to mooue the People Ministers Professors and all to disobedience of the Acts concluded and where the authority of the Assembly might draw men to condescend hee labours to shew them that euen the iudgement of the lawfulnesse of Assemblies in some sort doth belong to euery Christian which if it should not he laies downe certaine inconueniences that thereby might grow vpon them all to which I answere that this Assembly being conuocated in the Name of God assisted in the proceedings thereof by his blessed Spirit and all the Informalities obiected being now sufficiently cleered we are perswaded euery true Christian whether he be Minister or Professor will submit his iudgement and affections both to the conclusions taken therein And if any will still oppose thēselues thereto we doubt not to cal them troublers of the Estate seditious Persons Schismatickes louers of Diuision and direct Enemies to the Weale and peace both of the Church and Kingdome That ye would bee called such men ye might well prophesie seeing ye be priuy to your owne intentions but where ye adiect that account must be made one day of such contumelies and reproches I would but aske you whether yee doe thinke to passe free in the Day of that account and not be brought to your answere for calling the Seruants of Christ mercenarie men and thereby implying his Maiestie your Souereigne to be another Balak in giuing the wages of iniquitie to hirelings for condemning all that are obedient to the voyce of the Church in these matters as men periured and without all conscience and diuers others your malicious speeches vttered in this Pamphlet or if you thinke it no fault to make a rent in the body of Christ which is his Church which it appeares euidently ye are only about The answeres following will cleere to all men that the estate of our Church is no way preiudged by any Act concluded in the Assembly at Perth and that the obedience thereof will not inferre a defection from our former profession But that distinction of two-fold iudgement serues little to this purpose for howbeit lawfully euery man may inquire of things concluded and for his owne information seeke out the grounds and warrants thereof yet whithersoeuer his iudgement incline hee must render himselfe obedient to the Constitutions of the Church in which he liues And there is a great difference betweene decerning and discerning though eyther yee or your Printer hath mistaken it for it belongeth to the Iudge to decerne and Christians as ye say euen in their priuate callings may discerne but this their discerning will neuer free them from the subiection of Lawes imposed especially in matters of this nature for wee are now vpon order and policie onely And except ye could shew some euident place out of the Word or bring a necessarie demonstration to warrant your contrarie iudgement your disobedience will euer be faultie The authoritie of the Church must yeeld to the written Word but the iudgements of priuate men to the authoritie of the Church Otherwise we should open a doore to all confusion neyther could there be order in a Church if euery man should bee permitted to follow his owne conceit and doe
as his priuie iudgment did leade him This our Church wisely foreseeing in an Assembly kept at Edinburghe anno 1583. 10. Octob. statuted and ordained That no Act concluded by a generall Assembly should bee called in question by any particular brother nay not in another generall Assembly except some iust cause might be seene for the change thereof And if it be not lawfull to call any of the constitutions of the Church in question much lesse to impugne by writ and print the same so maliciously as you haue done I omit the vnseemely match which yee make of English ceremonies and Lutheranisme with Papistrie for this is your malice against the English Church which it becomes you to reuerence and of whom if ye did loue the truth of God ye would haue spoken more honorably PP If the Parliament by acts authorize matters effected with such informalities and nullities matters of themselues so contrarious to our profession their ratification of a vicious thing cannot be a rule to a christian mans conscience But it is to be hoped that the Lord shall so dispose the hearts of Statesmen to the loue of the truth quietnesse of the Church and Country and peace of mens consciences that no vnreasonable burthen shall be knit vpon the members of Christs Body by any deed of theirs vnder the name of a benefit to the Church Inuito beneficium non datur ANS Since the time that Kings and Princes became Christian it hath alwayes beene the custome that Synodicall Decrees were authorized by their Lawes not that the allowance or authoritie of Ciuill Lawes is made a rule to a Christians Conscience but that the externall man might thereby bee tyed to the obedience of these things which the Church hath found to be agreeable to the Word of God that is the only rule of conscience and it is to bee hoped that God shall so dispose the hearts of the whole Estate to the loue of his Truth and the Peace and quietnesse of his Church that refractarie and turbulent persons such as ye are shall bee restrayned of your vnbridled licentiousnesse and kept vnder the obedience of the Church and the Orders by her lawfully established which howsoeuer ye that loue to liue after your owne mindes call an vnreasonable burthen all true and peaceable Christians will esteeme a benefite to the Church and bee thankfull vnto God for the same PP Consider three things first the Nullity of this Assembly Secondly thy owne Oath and Subscription how it admits or abhorres this change suppose the Assembly had bin lawfull Thirdly if the particulars offered can be made lawfull or expedient by any Assembly whatsoeuer ANS We haue considered all these three as ye desire and finde the reasons proponed by you for the Nullitie of this Assembly to be Nullities in themselues Next that the Oath and Subscription by you mentioned admits the change concluded and does not abhorre it the same change being a part of the Oath which we all gaue as in discussing of the Oath shall be cleered Thirdly that the particulars concluded are things lawfull of their owne nature indifferent and most conuenient for this time in regard the generall Church who hath the place and power of determining the expediencie of Rites and Ceremonies hath interposed their authority to the same which in the estimation of Wisemen is sufficient to make them bee compted such An answere to the Articles presented to the Assembly AVGVST 27 and quotations added by the Pamphleter for confirmation PP FOr so much as we haue beene debarred of accesse and from hearing the proceedings of the Conference their Reasonings Consultations and Aduisements about the Articles proponed to this gâ—nerall Assembly whereof all and euery one of them so neareâ—â— touches vs in our Christian resolution and offices of our Mâ—nistry in most humble manner wee present to your consideration the particulars hereafter specified in the feare of God inâ—reating your fauourable answere to the same ANS Neither he who presenâ—ed the Articles nor they who penned them can affirme truely that they were absent from the Conference and none were debarred who were desirous to be present The truth is after long and modest reasoning and graue deliberation when all had beene heard both in prâ—uate at the Conference and in publique before the Assembâ—y and all doubâ—s and obâ—ections had beene proponed answered and satisfied these or the like Artâ—cles were presenâ—eâ— not for resolutiâ—n of those by whom they were proponed who were already setled in this resolution not to be 〈◊〉 but to perâ—urbe the mindes of these who were prepareâ— to vote and conclude and so to bring all in question againe that before had beene discussed and therefore were iustly reiected by the Moderator as malicious and crafty delatorie exceptions as shall bee manifest by the answeres following made to them not as they were presented to the Assembly but as they are proponed here with your Additions Qâ—otations and Confirmations The first Article PP THe Articles proponed if they be concluded they doe innouate and bring vnder the slander of change the estate of this Church so aduisedly established by Ecclesiasticall Constitutions Acts of Parliament approbation of other Churches and good liking of the best reformed Christians without and within this Kingdome and so euidently blessed with happy successe and sensible experience of Gods greatest benefits by the space of fiftie eight yeares and aboue so that wee may boldly say to the praise of God That no Church hath enioyed the truth and puritie of Religion in larger libertie And vpon some such considerations it pleased his gracious Maiestie to continue the Church of England in her established estate as may bee seene in the Conference at Hampton Court and Thomas Sparke his booke written thereupon Ipsa quippe mutatio etiam quae adiuuat vtilitate nouitate perturbat quapropter quae vtilis non est perturbatione infructuosa consequenter noxia est saith Augustine Epist. 118. that is Euen a change that is helpefull for vtilitie perturbeth with the noueltie Wherefore consequently a change that is not profitable is noysome through fruitlesse pertuâ—bation Rather a Church with some fault then still a change it is said in the Conference at Hampton Court Answere to the first Article IF the estate of our Church did consist in circumstantiall alterable Ceremonies the change of these might import a â—hange of her estate But such points and ceremonies as were concluded by the Assembly at Perth haue the like reâ—ect to the estate of the Church that ornaments and veâ—â—ures haue to the body seruing onely for commoditie orâ—er and decency to bee kept in the worship of God And herefore when occasion requireth as a change should bee made of apparell and may bee made without alteration of â—he constitution and health of the body So the change of Ceremonies necessary for the time doe not innouate and bring vnder slander of change the estate of the Church as Augustine saith Epist 86. Vna fides
for parts of Gods worship instituted by himselfe as ye vrge sitting at the Table in the Sacrament of the Supâ—er or when it is vrged â—hat they be reiected and excluded â—rom the worship of God as simply vnlawfull and which may be vsed without breach of some diuine Ordinance as â—ou will haue kneeling and the commemoration of Gods â—nestimable benefits â—pon the fiue Anniuersary dayes the â—ebration of â—he Sacraments in cases of necessity in priuate places and the examination and blessing of yong Children â—y the Bishop in his Visitation â—he contentious maintenance of such points against the order of the Church can neither stand with Pietie nor Charitie nor with the Apoâ—tolicall Rules Whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne Giue no offence neither to the â—ew nor to the Grecian nor to the Church if God Let all things be done honestly and in order The fourth Article PP They giue way to humane â—nuentions and bring the wrong key of mans wit within the house of God whereby â—oves and â—rifling Ceremonies in number and force are mulâ—iplyed as mens wits are variable to inuent Who requireth those things at your hands ANS The determination of the circumstantiall Ceremonies belonging to the formes times places and persons by whom where when and how God should bee worshipped concluded by the Assembly at Perth giue no way to humane inuention nor bring within the house of God any key but that which God hath giuen to his Church for pieâ—y and edification and for establishing of order and decencie to beâ—â—ed â—n his worship which things God requireth at our hands The fift Article PP The admitting of some openeth the doore to the rest the multitude of such make vs inferiour to the Iewes in two respects First Their Ceremonies were all diuine Secondly In number fewer then rituall Christians do obserue betwixt the Pasche and Pentecost Gerson complayneth Quod multitudine leuissimarum ceremoniarum vis omnis Spiritus sancti quem in nobis vigere oportuit vera pietas sit extincta that with the multitude of friuolous Ceremonies true pietie was extinguished and the force of the Spirit which ought to bee powerfull in vs. Iewell Apollog p. 116. Sed quamuis hoc neque inueniri possit c. Aug. Epist. 119. Howbeit it cannot bee found how they are contrary to the faith yet they presse downe Religion it selfe with seruile burthens so that the estate of the Iewes is more tolerable who howbeit they did now acknowledge the time of their liberty are subiect notwithstanding to the burthens of the Law not to the presumptions of man Quanto magis accedit cumulo c. Confess Orthodox cap. 27. that is The more that the heape of Rites and Ceremonies in the Church increaseth the more is derogated not onely from Christian libertie but also from Christ and his faith learned graue men may like better of the single forme of Policie in our Church then of the many Ceremonies of the Church of England Epist. before Basilicon Doron ANS Some Ceremonies must bee admitted otherwise neither order nor decencie can be obserued in the worship of God and the admission of such as be lawfull and profitable is not â—he cause of introducing vnnecessary burthens but when â—he Church extendeth her libertie beyond the bounds assigned thereto of order and decency and moderateth not the â—se of her power according to the â—â—ostolicall Rules of pieâ—â— and charity 1. Cor. 10. â—1 Whatsoeuer yee doe doe all to the â—lory of God 1. Cor. 14.26 Let all things â—e done to edification Rom 14.10 Let 〈◊〉 therâ—ore follow after the things which make â—or peace and things wherewith one may edifie another Gal. 5. â— Stand in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made you free and â—e not intangled againe with the 〈◊〉 of bondage When â—hese rules are noâ— looked to and thereby the power of the Church moderated and keened within the limits of circumstantiall things belonging only to the manners times and places of diuine worship wâ—ereof some of necessitie must be determined and appointed to bee vsed in the worship of God vnnecessary burdens are laid vpon the Church as it was in Papistrâ— Against this abuse the complaints of Gerâ—on and Augustine are directed which ye shall neuer be able to apply truly against the Ceremonies determined and conâ—luded at Perth which are all within the compasse of the Apostolicall Canons and concerne only circumstantiall â—hings and there be farre more learned and graue men who â—ike better of them then of our former order as after shall be cleered in the dispute The sixt Article PP Matters of that nature bring ineuitably with them disputations diuisions contentions as may be seen in all Churches where such coales of contention get entrie The Pascha of the Primitiue Church c. ANS It is not the nature of the matters but the nature of contentious persons that for such matters take occasion to make question and strife The seuenth Article PP They hinder edification for how much time and zeale shall bee spent vpon the in-bringing and establishing of these as much leisure and oportunity Satan getteth to sow and water the tares of Athâ—isme Schisme Popery and Dissention Consider the senâ—â—nce following Let vs proceed by one rule that we may minde one thing c. ANS This is a prophetical Article easie to bee diuined by these who had already concluded by their opposition and contradiction to hinder the peaceable in-bringing therof to open a gate of dissention wherby Satan might enter to sow the tares of Schisme Atheisme and Popery in the Church yet obedient and peaceable Pastors haue in their Congregations brought in practice all these things without losse of time or trauell And Satan Schisme Atheisme and Popery had bin debarred and the work had pleasantly and profitably gone forward had the rest concurred with them according to the golden senteÌ„ces following First Let vs proceed by one rule that we may mind one thing Secondly Let vs follow the truth in loue Thirdly Giue no place to the Deuill Fourthly Let no root of bitternesse spring vp to trouble you Fiftly Fulfill my ioy that yee bee like minded hauing the same loue being of one accord and one iudgement that nothing bee done through contention or vaine glory but that in meeknesse of minde euery man esteeme other better then himselfe Sixtly Doe all things without murmuring and reasoning The eighth Article PP They bring a sensible blot either vpon the happie memory of our godly and wise Predecessors in so farre as wee depart from that reformation so wisely brought in appointed established by them or else vpon our selues by resuming againe of dangerous superfluities without reason reiected by them for weighty and necessary causes Magnum est hoc Dei munus c. Beza Epist. to Master Knox. This is a great benefite of God that yee brought into Scotland true religion and good order the bond that retayneth doctrine at one time So I
beseech and obtest that yee retayne these two together so that yee remember that if the one bee left the other cannot endure long and againe he saith Quam recte illud quod disciplinam c. How well was that done that yee conioyned doctrine and discipline together I beseech you and obtest that yee goe forward lest it happen to you which is befallen to many that could not make a progresse hauing stumbled in the very entry Yea somtime were not willing which â—s most lamentable ANS Distingue tempora conciliabis Scripturas What ouâ— Predecessors did being agreeable to their times was well done and is approued of vs and by their example in these alterable ceremonies and circumstances wee should likewise conforme our selues to our times by reiecting or receiuing or of new ordayning what wee find to bee 〈…〉 edification according to the power giuen by God to the â—epâ—â—sentatiue Church both to make Constitutions for the gâ—od behauiour of all her members in their vocation as 〈…〉 abrogate and abolish all Statutes and Ordinances coâ—câ—â—ning Ecclesiasticall matters that agree not with the 〈◊〉 c. as is affirmed in the Booke of the Policy of our Chuâ—ch cap. 7. registred amongst the Acts of the generall Assembly Anno 1581. The 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or good order of the Church of Scotland which Beza praiseth as the band whereby doctrine is preserued and which hee exhorteth to retayne carefully is the vse of this Ecclesiasticall power in censuring of manners called in the 74. Epist. Dâ—scipline and in the 79. Good order which being lost hee saith The doctrine cannot bee long preserâ—ed This hee proueth First by the nature of the thing it selfe Quis enim leges sâ—tis recte seruari nisi constitutis earum custodibus vindicibus posse sperarit Who can hope that Lawes can bee well enough kept except keepers and auengers of them bee appointed Here hee compareth the doctrine to the Lawes good order and discipline to the auengers and keepers of the Lawes Secondly hee proueth the same by experience Et ipsa saltem stultorum Magistra experientia earum gentium exemplo docet quibus certum est hodie ob hoc ipsum potissimum erratum quod corrigi populi non sustinent Euangelium ad iudâ—cium potius quam ad misericordiam promulgari that is Experience it selfe the Schoole master of Fooles by the example of these Nations teacheth this wherein it is certayne this day that chiefly for this errour namely That the people will not suffer themselues to bee corrected that the Euangell is preached amongst them rather for iudgement then for mercy Here it is manifest that by the good order and discipline the points in controuersie belong not But yee no sooner heare good order or discipline commended but presently yee imagine that your table gesture of sitting at the Sacrament the abolition of Holy-dayes and celebration of the Sacrament in priuate places in cases of necessitie c. are meant as if without these Ceremonies and obseruations the doctrine could not bee preserued for how was it preserued in Geneua where they sit not at table but stand or passe at the receiuing of the Sacrament where the fiue Holy-dayes are not discharged but Christmasse and Pasche solemnely kept and the Sacrament ministred on them Caluine holdeth in cases of necessity That Baptisme may be ministred in coetis aliquo in some meeting without a Temple That the Communion should bee giuen to the sicke and wisheth that the examination of children with the ancient forme of blessing were restored in the reformed Churches whereby it is manifest that the discharge and abolition of these things is not in the iudgement of Caluine and Beza the band wherby doctrine is retayned but the discipline which consisteth in censuring of manners which you both here and in discussing of the Oath following take for the order and policy that consisteth in alterable Ceremonies And by the ambiguitie of the word doe purposely deceiue your Reader The ninth Article PP They set loose the filthy mindes and mouthes of fleshly liuers to triumph against the most sound Professors and to rejoyce in their rotten opinions and restored opportunities of sensuall obseruations of guising gluttony carelesse c. ANS The sacred exercises of sound doctrine appointed to be vsed on the fiue Anniuersarie dayes restoreth not but most powerfully abolisheth the opportunities of sensuall obseruations rooteth out rotten opinions and stoppeth the mouthes of fleshly Libertines not to triumph against sincere Professors The tenth Article PP They are declared by this Church to bee contrary doctrine as may bee seene in the first second and third Chapters of the first booke of Discipline in these words Wee iudge that all doctrine repugnant to the Euangell should bee vtterly suppressed as damnable to mans saluation c. By contrary doctrine wee vnderstand whatsoeuer men by Lawes Councells or Constitutions haue imposed vpon the consciences of men without the expresse Commandement of Gods Word as keeping of holy dayes commanded by men the feast of Christmasse and other feasts c. ANS The iudgement and declaration of our Church touching this point is very sound For whatsoeuer is imposed by men or by Ecclesiasticall Constitution vpon the conscience to bee obserued as parts of diuine worship that is not expresly or by necessary consequence contayned in the Word is contrary to the wholsome Doctrine as the Papists did the obseruation of Christmasse and other festiuall dayes which the reformed Churches and the Assembly the present opinions of the Presbyteries particular Churches of the Realme but receiued a free and voluntary Commission to vote as they should bee mooued and perswaded by the motiues and reasons proponed at the Assembly otherwise they had met with preiudice And therefore what they concluded according to their Commission was not obtruded vpon the Churches against their will but according to their wills contayned in the Commission The twelfth Article PP The Commissioners of Presbyteries here assembled vnderstanding the alienation of them from whom they receiued commission from these Articles can by no warrant oblige their vnwilling Presbyteries and Congregations to their votes Ecclesiam dissentientem inuitam obligare quis potest Who can binde a Church dis-assenting and vnwilling ANS If the Commissioners had come to the Assembly without a free and vnbounded Commission to reason vote and conclude in their names they could not by their votes and conclusions haue bound the Churches and Presbyteries from whom they come if they had after dis-assented But the generall and vnlimited Commission giuen to the Commissioners to reason vote and conclude with this expresse clause Firme and stable holding and for to hold whatsoeuer their Coommissioners should conclude in their names obliged the Presbyteries and Congregations by whom the Commission was giuen And here I marke a contradiction betwixt this Article and that which ye affirme in discussing of the Oath pa. 30. Namely that the Oath of the
Church representatiue giuen An. 1596. did oblige them all who were liuing to the maintenance of the puritie of Religion in Doctrine and Discipline Heere yee acknowledge that the Church representatiue hath power to oblige all liuing within the iurisdiction therefore yee cannot allow of â—his Article according to your grounds The thirteenth Article PP There stand in force diuers Acts of Parliament in fauours of our present order Iacob 6 Parl. 1 cap. 8. Iames 6. Parl. 8. cap. 68. cap. 69. Item in the first Act of Parliament Anno 1592. ANS None of the Acts of Parliament here cited is contrary to â—he alteration The fourteenth Article PP The Ministers of this Church by order of the same printed and inserted before the Psalme Booke at their admissions respectiue promise in the presence of God and of his Congregation assembled to abhorre and vterly refuse all Doctrine alledged necessary to saluation that is not expresly contayned in the olde and new Testament c. Item to submit themselues to all admonitions secretly or publikely giuen ANS Against this promise nothing was concluded by the Assembly at Perth but how this promise is performed by these who disobey the Ordinances thereof let them aduise with their owne conscience The fifteenth Article PP The Subscribers of the Confession of Faith by their oath therein contained promise and sweare to continue in the obedience of the doctrine discipline of this Church to defend the same according to their vocation and power all the dayes of their liues c. And to abhor and detest all contrary religions but chiefly all kind of Papistry in generall euen as they are now damned by the Church of Scotland but in special the Popes fiue bastard Sacraments whereof Confirmation is one with all Rites and Ceremonies and false doctrines added to the Sacraments without the Word of God his absolute necessity of Baptisme c. which Confession is come to the eyes of the World in print and solemnly renued in the Couenant celebrated in the generall and prouincial Assemblies Presbyteries and Church Sessions in the yeere of God 1596. and how shal any man be heard to speak against that whereunto he hath formerly sworne and subscribed For the better vnderstanding of this last Article I will set downe a short discussion of the Oath ANS There is nothing that the Subscribers of the Confession of faith did by their oath oblige themselues to obserue and defend that is contrary to any of the Articles concluded at Perth and no man should bee heard to speake contrary to that whereunto hee hath formerly sworne subscribed And therefore they who haue sworne subscribed in the 21. Article of the Confession of faith confirmed in Parliament Anno 1567. That no policie and order in Ceremonies can bee appointed for all ages times and places but that they may ought to be changed when necessity requireth should not now bee heard affirming the contrary in this Pamphlet that they may not bee changed wherein ye contradict your oath and perswade others to doe the same Of the which oath the discussion set downe by you is a glosse that destroyeth the Text as shall by Gods grace bee made manifest by the examination thereof which followeth The Examination of the Oath discussed BEfore the Penner of this Pamphlet begins to discusse the oath he sets downe the articles controuerted then fiue seuerall obligations whereby as he alledgeth our Church is obliged to exclude and abhorre the particular actes concluded at Perth Thirdly he considers the Oath which is the chiefe of the fiue obligations Keeping his order wee shall seuerally examine his sayings concerning them And first touching the articles controuerted he sayes thus PP The Religion Doctrine and Discipline receiued beleeued and defended by the Church of Scotland namely the publike ministration of Baptisme and the Lords Supper sitting at the Table in the act of receiuing the bread and the wine of that Sacrament The obseruation of the Lords day and the examination of Children for the first time at the ninth yeare of their age for the second at the twelfth for the third at the fourteenth excluding and abhorring priuate Baptisme priuate Communion kneeling in the act of receiuing the Supper Holy dayes or Feasts of Christmas Passion Resurrection Ascension and sending downe of the Holy Ghost were brought in at the reformation of Religion and enioyed euer since in manner and forme as followeth Answ. The Libeller hath forgotten to exclude Confirmation but since it is vnderstood wee answere to the rest First That the solemne ministration of the Sacraments appointed by the Church especially the act of the assembly holden at Edinburgh Anno 1581. which forbiddeth the ministration thereof in priuate houses excludes not the ministration thereof in priuate places when as necessitie vrges cases of 〈…〉 PP 〈◊〉 Obligations whereby wee are bound to exclude the â—onclusions of the Assembly at Perth and to obey defend and maintaine the contrary are first The vniforme iudgement of the Church condemning the one and allowing the 〈◊〉 Secondly Ecclesiasticall Canons publike confessions and solemne protestations of lawful assemblies Thirdly actes of Parliament ratifying the Constitutions of the Church Fourthly The prescription of 59. yeares and fiftly the Oath and subscriptions of the whole Estates of the Realme By all these bands the Church in generall and euery member thereof in particular are obliged to sit at the Communion and to reiect kneeling with the obseruation of the fiue Holy dayes and other things concluded in the Assembly at Perth ANS Yee are not able to produce any warrant for the vniforme iudgement of the Church nor Canon of Assembly nor act of Parliament nor confession of faith nor publike protestation which either condemnes the points concluded at Perth as vnlawfull to bee vsed in the worship of God or establisheth the contrary as things necessary that cannot be altered in no time succeeding And as for your 59. yeares practise it cannot change the nature of things indifferent and make these formes and circumstances which are of themselues alterable become necessary and vnchangeable yea by the contrary the prescription of a long time giues iust cause often of alteration because either the things practised which at the beginning were profitable become hurtfull or that which was conuenient in the time preceding becommeth inconuenient or because the same things are abused to superstition and prophanenesse or because an opinion is bred by long custome of necessitie This I make manifest by the one and twentieth article of the Confession of our faith confirmed in the first Parliament holden by his Maiesty anno 1567. Decemb. 15. which ye affiâ—me your selfe to haue sworne and subscribed The words of the article are these about the end thereof The other end of generall Councels was for good policie to bee constituted â—nd observed in the Church whereas in the house of God it becommeth all things to be done dâ—cently and in order not that wee
thinke that any policie and order in ceremonies can be appointed for all ages times and places for as Ceremonies such as men haue deuised are but temporall so may and ought they to bee changed when they rather foster superstition then that they edifie the Church vsing the same Likewise in the seuenth chapter of the second booke of Discipline registred amongst the acts of the generall Assembly anno 1581. we haue two conclusions to the same purpose set downe in these words The finall end of all Assemblies is first to keepe the Religion and Doctrine in puritie without error and corruption Next to keepe comlinesse and good order in the Church For this orders cause they may make certaine rules and constitutions pertaining to the good behauiour of all the members of the Church in their vocation Secondly they haue power also to abrogate and abolish all statutes and ordinances concerning Ecclesiasticall matters that are found noysome or vnprofitable or agree not with the time or are abused by the people Hereby it is euident that seeing the matters controuerted are but matters of circumstance forme and ceremony as afterwards shall be proued that neither the Church in generall nor any member thereof in particular did or might lawfully binde themselues by oath subscription or any other obligation not to change or alter their practise and customes touching these things for all they that subscribe the Confession of faith and the second booke of Discipline did sweare that they thought these things should and might be altered when necessitie required This answere being made to the first foure Obligations we come to the Oath about which yee spend many words and before yee begin moue the question following PP Quaeritur if one or moe Preachers or Professours in the Church of Scotland standing to the Churches former iudgement and able to defend the same by good reason at least seeing no warrant in the contrary may dispense with the said Oath and follow the pluralitie of Preachers and Professors dispensing with the same in the Assembly Or what power may compell the alteration of iudgement and loose the said Oath in any case aforesaid ANS The former iudgement of our Church whereunto wee did binde our selues by our oathes was that no policie nor order in ceremonies could be appointed for all ages times and places and that the same might and ought to bee changed vpon great causes and weightie reasons as is euident by the former answere To this iudgement of the Church the Assembly at Perth adhered and according thereto altered some customes touching circumstantiall ceremonies formerly vsed in the Church vpon good and great reasons neither did that Assembly loose the said Oath or dispense with it in any sort but hath confirmed it by their owne practise Wherefore I answere That euery Preacher and Professor in our Church should stand to the former iudgement thereof whereunto he bound himselfe by his Oath when he did sweare to the Confession of faith and that no power can compel the alteration of iudgement or loose the said Oath in any case And that he who sware That he did thinke that no policie and order in ceremonies can be appointed for all ages times and places but that the same may and ought to be changed when necessitie requires Did neuer nor could sweare without breach of this Oath that the ceremonie of sitting at the receiuing of the Sacrament esteemed by our Church at the reformation most conuenient but not necessarie could bee appointed for all ages times and places and that it might not nor ought to bee altered in any case by the contrary all who swore to the Confession of faith did sweare That the policie and order of sitting at the Sacrament was such as could not be appointed for all ages times and places and that it might and should be changed when it did not so much edifie the people in pietie as foster prophanenesse and superstition And this sitting fosters in all these that practise it with a superstitious conceit and opinion that the same was instituted by our Sauiour as a point of diuine worship and by his exemplary practise commended to the Church for an essential or integrant part of the Sacrament which yee maintaine in this Pamphlet Now leauing this to bee considered by such as are not partially affected but loue the truth and hate contention I proceed to the Oath which yee consider first in the persons takers of the same Secondly in the matter whereto they sweare Thirdly in the forme and manner whereby they are bound And fourthly by the force and effect of that forme for making sure mens particular deeds Touching the persons yee say this PP The Persons takers of the Oath are Christians come to perfect yeares and free persons who did not only know in generall the doctrine and discipline whereto they bound themselues by their oath but in particular the points controuerted as followeth First That in the yeare of God 1581. it was concluded that the Sacraments should be solemnely ministred and not in priuate houses Secondly That in the yeare 1560 it was declared by the Church that Christ sate with his Disciples at Table when hee instituted the Supper and that sitting at Table was the most conuenient gesture to this holy action Thirdly That Confirmation was to be abhorred as one of the Popes fiue bastard Sacraments Fourthly That the keeping of Holy dayes such as the Feast of Christmas imposed vpon the consciences of men without warrant of Gods word was condemned by preaching and corrected by publique censures of the Church ANS I will not answere you as iustly I might that the first booke of Discipline whereby the most of these constitutions are warranted was neuer knowne to our common Professors nor acknowledged by our Church to haue the authoritie of Ecclesiasticall Canons but I say The Assembly at Perth hath decreed nothing to the contrary thereof For first Touching the administration of the Sacraments we fully agree to the ordinance made anno 1581 to wit That the Sacraments should bee solemnely ministred and not in priuate houses The occasion of making this ordinance was a misorder that fell out in the persons of two Ministers namely Master Alexander Mure Minister at Falkland and Master Alexander Forrester Minister at Trenent as is cleare by the narratiue of the act which is relatiue only to the celebration of Mariage and the ministration of the Sacraments extra casum necessitatis where without any vrgent necessitie order may be kept But our question is whether in extraordinary cases the Sacraments may be ministred extraordinarily in priuate houses as they were in the Primitiue Church by the Apostles and in the beginning of the reformation by the Preachers of the Gospell In these and the like cases there is no act of any Assembly that determines what should bee done Therefore put the case our Church had sworne and subscribed that ordinance yet hath shee done nothing contrary to her oath
Doctrine and Discipline whereunto the Swearers did oblige themselues by their assertory and promissory Oath By the Gospell it is not certaine That our Sauiour and the Apostles did sit at the Supper and albeit he had sitten yet sitting is no more commanded to be obserued in that sacred action then the vpper chamber where he sate or the night season when the Supper was celebrated or the sex and number of the Communicants who were twelue men and no women or the qualitie of the element which was vnleauened bread or the order finally after Supper All these howbeit they be certaine yet none of them are esteemed exemplary far lesse can sitting which is vncertaine be esteemed such And for the rest of the points Neither kneeling at the Communion nor the administration of the Sacraments in priuate houses when necessitie requires nor the commemoration of Christs inestimable benefits on certaine set times of the yeare nor the triall of yong childrens education by the Bishop at his Visitation none of these I say are either expresly or by necessary consequence forbidden in the Gospell nor are hey condemned by many notable Churches and Realmes nor abiured in the Confession of our Faith confirmed by actes of Parliament and so cannot be counted the matter of this Oath But to remooue all scruple that may arise touching the matter of this Oath It is true That in the promissorie Oath the Swearers thereof binde themselues to continue in the Doctrine and Discipline of the Church of Scotland and to defend the same according to their vocation and power all the dayes of their liues vnder the paines contained in the Law and danger both of body and soule in the day of the Lords fearefull iudgement Heere touching the Doctrine praised be God there is no controuersie amongst vs all the doubt concerneth Discipline and that is remoued also if it be taken only for that which is reuealed in the Gospell or receiued beleeued and defended by many notable Churches and Realmes or that which is set downe in the Confession of Faith as is already declared But because the Discipline of the Church may be extended beyond these limits and made to comprehend all Ecclesiasticall constitutions and determinations of generall circumstances formes and ceremonies belonging to the worship of God and the decent ordering of his house let vs consider this point more particularly If by the Discipline of the Church in the words of the Oath that part of Ecclesiasticall policie bee meant which concernes the censuring of manners in which sense it is taken in the order set downe before our Psalme bookes and in the seuenth hâ—ad of the first booke of Discipline intituled of Ecclesiasticall Discipline and in the second booke wheresoeuer it is mentioned and by all Ecclesiasticall writers most frequently Then it is certaine that the fiue Articles controuerted belong nothing to the Discipline wherein the Swearers binde themselues by their oath to continue to their liues end But if therby be meant the whole policie of the Church in which sense it is sometimes taken though rarely then first it containes all the precepts of policie prescribed in the Word in which precepts there is no determination concerning these articles as before we said Next it comprehendeth all the ordinances of the Church touching formes ceremonies and order to be obserued in Diuine Seruice and in the exercise of Ecclesiasticall Censures according as the circumstances of time place and persons In this part of Discipline it is true that all the controuerted points are contained But as I shewed before it is manifest by the limitations of the matter of the Oath that this part of the policie is excluded for it is neither expressely nor by necessary consequence contained in the Word nor is it receiued beleeued and defended by many notable Churches and Realmes nor is there any thing concerning it set downe in the Confession of Faith confirmed by actes of Parliament onely this generall wee haue that no constant order and policie can be set downe in ceremonies and that constitutions made by men may and ought to be altered when need requires Furthermore in the booke of Policie that was published after the Oath anno 1581 and subscribed by sundrie Ministers there is no mention made of these fiue Articles now in question In the first booke of Discipline penned anno 1560 there are some conclusions set downe touching sitting at the Sacrament the abolition of Holy dayes dedicated to Saints in Popery and the Feast of Christmas imposed vpon the consciences of men as also the administration of Baptisme vpon ordinary dayes of preaching for remouing the Papisticall opinion of absolute necessitie and if by the discipline mentioned in the Oath yee vnderstand the conclusions of Policie set downe in that booke and hold that the Swearers did by their Oath oblige themselues to obey all the conclusions thereof to their liues end then I demand what is the cause that yee and your followers do not only refuse to obey but improue and impugne the most principall point of policie set downe in that booke namely the office of Bishops whose prouision jurisdiction power and election are particularly described in the first head of that booke vnder the name of Superintendents But because the booke is rare and not at euery mans hand I will draw out of it onely some few things touching the jurisdiction and power of the Superintendents that the posterity may see what was the judgement of their Predecessors the Reformers of Religion touching the Office-bearers and gouernment of the Church And to beginne with the bounds of their jurisdiction the same is set down with this Title The names of the places of residence and seueral Diocesses of the Superintendents INprimis the Superintendent of Orknay his Diocesse shall be the Iles of Orknay Caâ—thnes and Strathneuer his residence in the Towne of Kirkwall The Superintendent of Rosse his Diocesse shall comprehend Rosse Sutherland Murray and the North Iles called the Skie and Lewes with their adjacents his Residence the Chanonrie of Rosse The Superintendent of Argyle his Diocesse shall be Argyle Kintyre Lorne the South Iles Arrane and Boote with their adjacents and Lowhaber His Residence in Argyle The Superintendent of Abirdene his Diocesse betweene Die and Spae containing the Shirrefdomes of Abirdene and Banff His Residence in old Abirdene The Superintendent of Brechin his Diocesse the whole Shirrefdomes of Mernis and Angouse with the Brae of Marre to Die His Residence in Brechin The Superintendent of Fife his Diocesse the Shirrefdomes of Fife and Fotthringham to Striuiling and the whole Shirrefdome of Perth his Residence in Saint Andrewes The Superintendent of Edinburgh his Diocesse the Shirrefdome of Lowthian and Striuiling on the South-side of Forth wherto is added by the consent of the whole Church Merse Lawderdale and Weddale his Residence in The Superintendent of Iedburgh his Diocesse Tauiotdale Liddisdale Tueddale with the Forrest of Ettrick his Residence in The
Superintendent of Glasgow his Diocesse Cliddisdale Renfrow Monteith Lennox and Cunninghame His Residence in Glasgow The Superintendent of Dumfreis his Diocesse Galloway Carrick Niddisdale Annandale with the rest of the Westdales his Residence in Dumfreis These were the bounds of their Iurisdiction their Office is described as followeth The function and power of the Superintendents THey must not be suffered to liue as idle Bishops hitherto haue done neither must they remaine where gladly they would but they must be Preachers themselues Charge and command shall be giuen them to plant and erect Churches to sett order and appoint Ministers as is prescribed in their Countries After they haue remained in their chiefe Towne three or foure monethes at the most they shall enter in Visitation in the which they shall not onely Preach but examine the life diligence and behauiour of the Ministers as also they shall trie the estate of their Churches and the manners of the People They must further consider how the poore are prouided and the youth instructed they must admonish where admonition needs and redresse such things as by good counsell they are able to appease Finally they must note such crimes as be hainous that by the censures of the Church the same may bee corrected After all this the order of election of Superintendents is set downe which we haue more largely before the booke of our Psalmes in meeter This being one of the chiefe points of policie concluded in that booke how is it that yee haue dispensed with your oath hereabout And by what power is your oath loosed concerning this head Shall men bee tyed by the Oath to the ceremonies prescribed in that booke and not to the substance of the policie to alterable circumstances and formes of actions and not to the power of gouernement whereby they should be disposed and ordered What can be answered to this by him that vrges the Oath for the controuerted points consisting in ceremonies gestures and circumstances for the indifferent Reader iudge But because it is true that one mans fault excuses not another leauing you to your consciences we answere for our selues according to the one and twentieth article of the â—onfession of our Faith That we thinke no policie nor order in ceremonies can be established to endure for all ages times and places and that whatsoeuer things are appointed by men they are all temporall and may and ought to be changed when necessitie requireth Hereupon we say That no man 〈◊〉 by the Oath oblige himselfe to obey and defend that part of Discipline which concerneth these alterable things all the dayes of his life but onely that discipline which is vnchangeable and commanded in the Word Yea we further affirme that euery man who sware to the discipline of the Church in generall by vertue of that oath standeth obliged not only to obey and â—eâ—end the constitutions of the Church that were in force at the time of making his oath but also to obey and defend whatsoeuer the Church thereafter hath ordained or shall ordaine to be obserued for edification comlinesse and deâ—encie whether thereby the former constitutions bee established or altered and abrogated euen as they who sweare to obey the gouernment of a Kingdome or Citie are by their oath not onely obliged to obey the present Actes and â—awes but all which shall afterwards bee made for the Common-wealth howbeit the former be thereby discharged as when Lawes are made for exportation and importation of goods for weights and measures for fishing cutting of woods for peace for warre and whatsoeuer constitutions they bee that are made such as haue giuen their oath of obedience are thereby tyed to reject the former and obey the later I conclude this with the doctrine of that learned Diuine Master CALVINE Instit. lib. 4. cap. 10. sect â—0 God would not saith hee in externall ceremonies and discipline prescribe particularly what we ought to follow because he foreâ—aw that to depend on the condition of times neither â—id he iudge â—ne forme agreeable to all ages Heere then saith he we must flie to the generall rules which God hath giuen that according to them may be defined whatsoeuer the necessitie of the Church requires to be appointed for order and decencie Finally seeing God hath set downe nothing of those matters expressely because they are not necessary to saluation and are diuersely to bee applyed to the manners of euery age and for edification of the Church it is lawfull as the vtilitie of the Church shall require as wel to change and abrogate these that haue been in vse as to appoint new ceremonies I confesse indeed that we should not runne rashly and vpon light motions vnto nouation but what may hurt and what may edifie Charity can best iudge which if wee admit to bee moderatrix all shall be in safetie and goe well Thus farre Caluine whereby he doth manifest that the Church hath power to change and innouate as necessity requireth all the particular ordinances shee maketh of things alterable and they who in generall haue sworne to obey the Discipline of the Church are all bound by their oath to kneele at the Communion to obserue the fiue Holy dayes and to obey all the rest of the Articles concluded at Perth That which yee afterwards subjoyne touching the forme and force of the Oath we approue onely we wish you to consider seeing it is a part of Ecclesiasticall Discipline as well to change and abrogate ceremoeies in vse as to appoint new That yee by all these forcible formes of the Oath which cannot be loosed are obliged to follow the Church in the alterations shee makes and to defend and obey the Actes and Constitutions that concerne the same and that all who disobey in their owne persons or by their exemplary practise and perswasions induce others to disobey and rebell to the disgrace of their Mother the Church and the breaking of the bond of peace whereby the vnitie of the Spirit is conserued doe assuredly lye tyed vnder the fearefull cords and chaines of periury except they seriously repent The Libeller hauing ended his foure Considerations propounds some defences vsed by them who submit â—hemselues to the Actes of Perth whom contumesiously 〈◊〉 calleth Temporizers and to other Defences maketh his owne Replies First saith he they make themselues freed 〈◊〉 the Oath because the nouation was made by the King 〈◊〉 the Church their Superiours vnto this he giueth a 〈◊〉 answere 〈…〉 that this nouation could not bee â—â—wfully made by the King because hee himselfe did â—weare the Confession of Faith Next that the Church â—ould not make any such nouation because all of the Church did sweare the Oath either personally or really â—ersonally all who subscribed the Confession of Faith â—hich he reckons to haue been the generall assemblies of 〈◊〉 Church Synods Presbyteries Schollers passing their â—egrees and Burgesses when they obtained their Liberâ—â—es Really Children sweare in the persons of their Paâ—ents and all the
of Religion might take thus abused by people vnto superstition this is one pregnant reason wherefore the alteration should haue beene made As to that which they speake of the credite of Pastors the same ought not to be maintained by â—ostering an errour in the hearts of people namely that the Ministers taught that which they neuer taught or at least should not haue taught As by example that the obseruation of the fiue Holy dayes to the commemoration of Christs benefits is vnlawfull This I am assured was ne-neuer done by any well aduised Preacher for it had bin a condemning of the Primitiue Church and all the Reformed Churches now in the world Likewise to haue taught that kneeling in the acte of receiuing the Sacrament is vnlawfull were to haue contradicted the best and most learned Diuines we haue Beza saith of it Speciem habet piae ac Christianae venerationis ac proinde olim potuit cum fructu vsurpari That is to say kneeling at the Sacrament hath a shew of holy and Christian worshippe and therefore of old might haue been fruitfully vsed Whereby yee see he condemneth not simply the ceremonie but witnesseth that there was a time when the same did edifie and profite Caluine before him called it Cultum legitimum that is a Lawfull adoration being vsed in the action of the Supper and directed to Christ. Petrus Martyr saith Multi piè genua flectunt adorant that is Many in receiuing the Sacrament doe bow their knees religiously and adore Christs flesh Paraeus speaking of the same gesture esteemes it an indifferent ceremonie And that which so great and learned Diuines iudged to bee lawfull what are we to condemne Next I answere That the credite of the Pastours should not be maintained with the discredit of the Prince amongst his Subiects for if they who should be patternes of reuerence and obedience to others shall in their owne persons withstand the lawfull desires godly intention 〈…〉 〈◊〉 〈…〉 wee become 〈…〉 the contrary This is an high 〈…〉 we contrauene our oath 〈…〉 â—n the contrary â—herafter 〈…〉 â—ath â—s â—uritanisme If sincere and 〈…〉 â—â—albe still â—ursued for their constanâ—◠〈◊〉 their â—rofession and the conscience they make of 〈…〉 â—oe we not expone the whole Nation to a woâ—ull â—engeance and perpetuall ignominy ANS Our assertory Oath touching the Articâ—es controâ—erted condemneth those onely in the guilt of periury who hold that policy and order in ceremonies may not be altered when necessity requireth and being altered ought not to bee obeyed And indeede it is a profound point of infernall policy not only by an exemplary practise of disobedience against the lawes of Ecclesiasticall Discipline to contrauene the Oath in your owne Person but also vnder pretext of constancy of Profession and conscience of the Oath to perswade others for feare of periury to periure themselues Whereby yee both expose your selues to the fearefull iudgement of Gods vengeance and drawe others with you to the same perdition Your sophisticke cauillations whereby yee intend seditiously to proue the vnlawfulnesse of the Articles concluded at Perth shall now bee answered and the truth cleared to the satisfaction of all men who are not contentious An answere to the arguments brought against kneeling in the act of receiuing of the holy Communion PP IT hath been the vniforme and constant order of this Church since the Reformation that the Communicants should receiue the Sacramentall elements of Bread and Wine sitting at the Table In the second head of the first booke of Discipline are set downe these words The Table of the Lord is then rightly ministred when it approacheth most neere to Christs owne action But plaine it is that at that Supper Christ Iesus sate with his Disciples and therefore we doe iudge that sitting at that Table is most conuenient to that holy aâ—tion In the generall Assembly holden in Decemb. 1562 it was ordained That one vniforme order should be obserued in the ministration of the Sacraments according to the order of Geneua And in December 1564 It was ordained That of time and confirmed by oathes and subscriptions as is euident by the former deduction It is notwithstanding expedient to descend further in opening vp the vnlawfulnesse of kneeling First as it is a breach of the Institution Secondly as it is a breach of the second Commandement Thirdly as it is without the example and practise of the ancient Church Fourthly as it disagrees from the practise of the Reformed Churches ANS After yee haue laid downe your grounds some for sitting and some against kneeling yee subioyne the tenor of the acte concluded at Perth but most corruptly as we haue noted in the margine and then yee forme this argument That which hath been established by so many lawes Ciuill and Ecclesiasticall by so long custome and prescription of time and confirmed by oathes and subscriptions we may not lawfully alter But so it is that sitting at Table in the acte of receiuing hath beene established by lawes customes long prescription of time and confirmed by oathes and subscriptions A man that had heard the proposition only would expect some great matter in the assumption belonging to some article of Faith or precept of obedience set downe in Gods Word and all resolues in an indifferent ceremonie of sitting at the Sacrament But yet to make simple people beleeue that it were some necessary or substantiall point of Religion that might not be altered ye make a great shew of lawes customes c which being examined shall vanish as smoake before the winde And where yee beginne with a strong alleageance that it was established with so many lawes Ciuill and Ecclesiasticall I aske you first by what Ciuill lawes Yee say so many yet in your deduction whereby you affirme the assumption to be euident yee cite not one law neither can yee albeit yee are not ashamed to say so many For your Ecclesiasticall lawes yee cite first the words set downe in the second head of the first booke of Discipline the Table of the Lord is then rightly ministred c. These words are not a law for that booke of Discipline was neuer receiued nor confirmed either by the Ciuill or Ecclesiasticall estate some of the Nobility subscribed it but others who had the chiefe authority as Master Knox complaines in his History reiected the same calling it Deuout imaginations Next yee cite the ordinance of the generall Assembly 1562 appointing the order of Geneua to be obserued this Act cannot establish your sitting for in Geneua they stand or passe as they Receiue and sit not at Table The last Acte which yee cite in anno 1564 ordaineth Ministers in the ministration of the Sacraments to vse the order set downe in the Psalme book In that Act there is no mention of sitting and by the order set downe in the Psalme bookes that may be meant which before was called the order of Geneua How soeuer it be there is no particular law for
sitting no Ciuil law at all and none Ecclesiasticall but this onely one which is generall Your second probation is That sitting is established by so long a custome and prescription of time Who would not when he heares so long looke at least for a three or foure hundred yeares and all this length of time yee can alledge to is since the yeare of God 1560 not halfe an age before which time kneeling was in vse many hundred yeares on the Lords day and on other dayes in the weeke euer since the first Institution as afterwards shall be proued with better reasons then any yee can bring for the necessity of sitting This long custome and prescription for kneeling yee esteeme to be of no moment albeit it was a gesture instituted by God but for sitting a gesture instituted by man yee count eight and fifty yeares a long prescription So men esteeme their owne Dwarfes to be Giants Nostrum sic nanum Atlanta vocamus The last argument wherein yee glory most is that sitting is confirmed by oathes and subscriptions This is a childish and false alledgeance for there was neuer oath nor subscription giuen in our Church that by any consequence can import a confirmation of sitting or of any other indifferent alterable ceremonie for all times following Seeing no man is astricted longer vnto the obseruatioÌ„ of it then the Ecclesiasticall Constitution stands which being altered by the Church that made it their oath and subscription bindes them to obserue that which in stead of the former is ordained to be receiued This is manifest by the Constitutions set downe in the seuenteenth chapter of the booke of Discipline receiued and confirmed in the generall Assembly holden at Glasgow the 24. of Aprill anno 1581 the tenor whereof followes The finall end of all Assemblies is first to keepe the Religion and Doctrine in purity without errour or corruption Next to keepe comlinesse and good order in the Church for this orders cause they may make certaine rules and câ—nstitutions pertaining to the good behauiour of all the members of the Church in their owne vocation They haue power also to abrogate and abolish all statutes and ordinances concerning Ecclcsiasticall matters that are found noysome and vnprofitable and agree not with the time or are abused by the people And after a few words it is subioyned That it appertaines to the Presbyteries to cause the Ordinances made by the Assemblies Prouinciall and generall to be kept and put in execution Hereby it is manifest that when the Church alters indifferent thing in policie that they who are astricted by their oathes to obey the Discipline of the Church are tyed both not to practise these things which the Church hath discharged and to obserue these things which the Church in stead thereof hath established to be done Whereupon I conclude That so many as haue sworne and subscribed after the forme contained in the Oath to continue in the obedience of the Discipline of the Church are all obliged by their subscriptions now not to sit but to kneele at the Communion because the Church hath found it meete that sitting should bee interchanged with kneeling Thus I haue answered your reasons lawes customes subscriptions and oathes which yee bring for sitting I come to consider the ordinances made as ye alledge against kneeling where first yee alledge an Act made in the Assembly 1591 that an Article should bee formed and presented vnto his Maiesty and the Estates for order to be taken with them who giue or receiue the Sacraments after the Papistical manner but by Papistical maner is meante the giuing of the Sacrament by a Masse Priest and the receiuing the same after the order of the Romane Church which may be cleared by an Act of the Assembly anno 1565. Decemb. â—6 Sess. 2. The â—enor wherof is this Persons reuolting from the profession of the Gospell by offering their children to be baptized after the Papisticall maner or by themselues receiuing the Sacrament of the Altar after admonition shall bee excommunicate if repentance interuene not This sheweth what is meant by giuing or receiuing the Sacrament in a Papisticall manner for it was neuer our Churches meaning to censure these that receiued the Sacraments after the manner of the Reformed Churches in France England or Germany where many of our people haue receiued the Sacrament of Christs bodie kneeling Nor did our Predecessors euer condemne their customes and esteeme sitting necessary albeit for the estate of our Church they held it in the beginning to be most conuenient Next yee say That in the Kings Confession of Faith c. are these words contained We detest the ceremonies of the Romane Antichrist added to the ministration of the Sacraments and we detest all his rites signes and traditions This argument were good if yee did proue kneeling to be a rite or ceremony added to the Sacrament by the Roman Antichrist But we know this ceremony to be diuine and not Antichristian a ceremony allowed by God to bee vsed in his worship for he hath said expresly in his Word Vnto me all knees shall bow and againe In the name of Iesus euery knee shall bow Neither will yee euer be able to proue the vse of this ceremony in receiuing the Sacrament to be Antichristian or to haue been instituted by the Antichrist of Rome for albeit Honoriâ—s ordained that the people should kneele at the eleuation and circumgestation of the Hoste to those who are sicke yet he made no constitution for kneeling at the receiuing of the Sacrament and there is as great difference betweene the eleuation in the Masse and the pompous circumgestation of the Hoste and the celebration of the Sacrament as is betwixt an idolatrous and superstitious inuention of man and a lawfull act of diuine worship Therefore to conclude the answere of this Section vnto the argument propounded by you I oppone this Euery indifferent alterable ceremony the innouation and abrogation whereof is thought expedient by the Church may be lawfully altered notwithstanding of any lawes customes oathes or subscriptions formerly made for obseruation therof for a time But sitting at the Sacrament is an indifferent alterable ceremony the innouation and abrogation whereof is thought expedient by the Church Ergo Sitting at the Sacrament may be lawfully altered notwithstanding of any lawes customes oathes or subscriptions formerly made for obseruation thereof for a time The Proposition is manifest by these Constitutions which we haue cited out of the seuenteenth chapter of the booke of Discipline confirmed in the Assembly 1581 and subscribed by many of the Ministry Yea the very nature of alterable ceremonies is such that to the obseruation of them no man is longer astricted then they stand in their integritie without change but if for any corruption and abuse or for some greater or better respect they be altered by the Church the obligation for obseruing of them ceases and bindes no more As to kneeling which the Assembly hath
the act of faith and contemplation the heart may bee lifted vp yet that eleuation of the heart requireth not the most humble and reuerent gesture of the bodie as kneeling In the ancient Church they were not accustomed to kneele when they made confession of their faith but to stand as Christian souldiers Our act insinuateth such a meditation and lifting vp of the heart as is vsed in actions of deuotion such as prayer and thankesgiuing which are practised by all who giue obedience to the act or doe worthily communicate But put the case that by the act no such thing were ordained expresly yet vpon this antecedent which yee vse namely wee are not ordained by any act of our Church to pray at the receiuing this conclusion will not follow Therefore we may not pâ—ay at the receiuing For wee are not ordained by any act of our Church expressely to discouer our heads in the act of receiuing May wee not therefore discouer our heads But any shew of reason is good enough to deceiue simple people PP But let the words be interpreted of mentall prayer euen mentall prayer is not the principall exercise of the soule in the act of receiuing the sacramentall Elements the minde attending on the audible words the visible Elements the mysticall actions and making present vse of them men should not be diuerted from their principall worke and meditation vpon the analogie betweene the signes and the things signified ANS The meditation vpon the analogie betweene the signe and the thing signified cannot be the principall worke of the soule it being nothing else but the consideration of the similitude that is betweene the natuall vse of the signes and the spirituall vse of the thing signified Namely that as the Elements seâ—ue to nourish the outward man so the body and the bloud of Christ hath a vertue to nourish the inward man and by eating and drinking the Elements are applied to feede the body So by faith the body and the blood of Christ are applied to feed the soule Such a meditation an Hypocrite and Reprobate may haue at the Table therefore it cannot be the principall worke of the minde which distinguisheth the worthie from the vnworthie Receiuer When we heare and reade the Word the principall work of our mind should not be a meditation vpon the forme of the characters the sound of the letters the coniunction of them their sounds in the syllables the syllables in the words or the force and vertue of the words to signifie the matters but the chiefe work of our mind should be to conceiue vnderstand and consider rightly what is spoken So when we come to the Sacrament the chiefe employment of our minde should not be to consider the proportion that is betweene the naturall vse of the Elements and the spirituall vse of Christs body and blood but a meditation and spirituall action correspondent and analogicke to the externall sacramentall actions As therefore the principall externall sacramental actions are to take eate and drink reuerently the symbolick Elements the bread and wine so the principall worke of the soule correspondent by analogie thereto is to remember the sacrifice of Christ the breaking of his body and shedding of his blood to consider the benefit that we haue thereby to put our confidence therein and for all to praise and magnifie his name with thankfulnesse This worke and meditation is proper to the worthy Receiuers and stirreth vp in the soule that most reuerent estimation and affection towards our Sauiour with an humble submission of our minds vnto him which we call adoration whereof the outward testimonie and signe is the humble and reuerent gesture of the body prescribed in the act which is also a gesture most conuenient for prayer So this gesture prescribed in the act doth not only attend the prayer vttered by the Pastor and conceiued by the people in the act of receiuing but is proper to that which is indeed the chiefe and principal exercise work of the mind in al worthy receiuers PP The soule may send forth in the meane time some short eiaculations and darts of prayer to heauen to strengthen her owne weakenesse and returne to her principall worke of meditation and application of the benefits represented These short eiaculations of the minde are onely occasionall as a Christian feeleth his owne present estate and are incident to all our actions both ciuill and religious in the act of receiuing our earthly food in going on the way in hearing the Word If a man bee moued inwardly when he heareth that the Word was made flesh shall he kneele as they doe in the Romane Church If a man should kneele at euery inward motion of the minde when hee heareth the Word what confusion would there be in the Congregation ANS The verball prayer vttered by the Pastor and the mentall conceiued by the people in the act of receiuing is not an eiaculation but necessary to be vsed in the action by the worthy Receiuers for no man can receiue the body and the blood of Christ worthily without a spirituall hunger and thirst after the righteousnesse and life that is in him which spirituall appetite and desire being declared by the Pastor in these or the like words when he deliuereth the bread Grant Lord that by the vertue of thy body which we receiue we may haue life eternall and be raised vp at the last day And when hee deliuereth the Cup Grant Lord that by the vertue of thy blood which we receiue we may be purged from our sinnes and filled with thy Spirit And the Receiuers conceiuing and confirming the same by saying with their mouthes as the custome was in the ancient Church or in their hearts Amen They send not vp occasional eiaculations but necessary and ordinary prayers such as the nature of the action requires Therefore as I said before although occasionall secret prayers may be offered to God without any externall gesture or with such as the worshipper thinks meetest for the time yet these which are purposely conceiued in the ordinary and solemne act of diuine worshippe should be presented to God with such a gesture as is conforme to the order prescribed and receiued in the Church PP A man looking occasionally to a Crucifixe may remember Christ and send vp some ejaculations shall hee therefore kneele The three children prayed mentally no doubt when they were brought before the golden Image but lawfully they might not kneele before it ANS Here yee affirme againe that which yee falsely alledged before namely that the Sacrament or any other creature differs not in the case of adoration from the Papists Images and therefore as it is vnlawfull to kneele before the Crucifixe or Nebuchadnezzars golden Image albeit wee may pray mentally before them so is it vnlawfull to kneele and pray at the Sacrament that is hauing the sacramentall elements before vs or obiect to our senses This comparison is odious false for there is no
preached Rom. 15. We kneele not when wee giue almes These improper and metaphoricall sacrifices are not acts of adoration The Paschall Lambe was slaine in the manner of a reall sacrifice and yet notwithstanding this immolation they kneeled nor at the eating of the Paschall Lambe The Sacraments of the old and new Testament were alike in representation signification and exhibition ANS Howsoeuer the sacrifices aforesaid be metaphoricall as yee say and no proper sacrifices yet they are spirituall sacrifices which men are accustomed to offer with kneeling Although wee kneele not when we giue almes yet we kneele when we pray praise The sacrifice of the Passeouer and other sacrifices vnder the Lawe although when they were eaten in priuate houses they did not kneele that eat them because it could not be done conueniently for the reasons oft recited yet it appeares when they were offered on the Altar which was the publike act of Gods worship that they bowed their knees So Micheas Cap. 6. vers 6. and Saint Luke saith in his first that when Zacharie was offering Incense all the people continued praying which they did not without kneeling or some other externall rite of adoration Where yee affirme that the Sacraments of the old and new Testament were alike in representation signification and exhibition it is true as touching the matter represented but the manner was as farre different as the shaddow is from the expresse and perfect image of the thing it selfe The sacrifices of the olde Testament were but shaddowes of Christ our Sacraments by reason of the Word annexed to them and the doctrine of the Gospell whereby they are cleerely expounded are viue and perfect images of Christ and of the benefites wee haue by him therefore they are to bee celebrated with greater adoration and deuotion both externall and internall then the sacrifices vnder the Law because our deuotion and adoration should be proportioned to the measure of our knowledge and faith An Answere to the Section entituled Kneeling not practised in the ancient Church PP THE two former breaches are sufficient of themselues howbeit kneeling were otherwise warranâ—ed by the practise of the Church c. ANS I am assured if kneeling be warranted by practise of the ancient Church no good Christian will thinke for the friuolous reasons adduced by you that they committed any of these breaches But you labour to proue that the ancient Church did not practise it for yee say that when the Arrians denyed Christs true diuinitie the Orthodoxe Church who acknowledged his diuinitie kneeled not in the act of receiuing which had beene expedient if the same had beene lawfull vnto which I answere That there be many things expedient to be done which notwithstanding are not done nor ought to be done not because they are vnlawfull in themselues but for some other respect as some custome receiued or some order formerly established which vpon euery apparant expedience is not to be altered for example It was expedient because of the same heresie to haue kneeled at all times when publike prayers were offered to Christ or to the Father in his name yet on the Lords day which was the most solemne time of worship the ancient Church kneeled not at publike prayer not because it was vnlawfull in it selfe to haue kneeled but because there was an order receiued in the Church that on the Lords day the people should stand and not kneele Next when yee say that the ancient Church did not kneele at the receiuing of the Sacrament and will prooue it by this that it was the custome of the Church to stand in the time of publike prayer all the Lords dayes in the yeere and on euery day from Easter to Pentecost because of the ioyfull memory of Christs resurrection for say yee this Sacrament being a matter of great ioy far lesse would they kâ—eele at the celebration of it To this I answere That if the order of the Church could haue permittâ—d kneeâ—ing the nature of the action although 〈◊〉 bee a matter of great ioy would haue sorted â—ell enough with this humble gesture In the 17. of Genâ—â— 16. God promised to Abraham that hee would â—â—esse Sarah and giue him a sonne by her and make her the mother of many Nations and Kings to come of her the Text saith in the next verse that Abraham fell vpon his face and laughed Here yee see a matter of great ioy which made Abraham to laugh ioyned with a gesture of greater humilitie then bowing of the knee is The bowing of the body and the knee is not as your Master of table gesture and ye here affirme the gesture onely of an humble Penitentiar but it is the gesture also of these that giue thanks So the Leper gaue thanks Luke 17.16 And of these who ioyfully sing prayses to God Psalm 1â—8 vers 2. And of these who pray as our Sauiour Luk. 22.41 who kneeled and prayed though â—e was no Penitentiar And of these who offered their gifts to God Mich. 6.6 And of these with whom God talked either immediately as he did with Abraham Gen. 17.3 or mediately as by Mayses to the people of Israeâ— Exod. 12.27 And of these that were astonished at the works of God or his Word 1. King 18.39 1. Cor. 14.25 To be short if Abraham when he did onely receiue the promise of the blessed seede fell on his face Gen 17.17 how much more ought the faithfull bow their knees when they receiue the performance of this promise euen the blessed Seede himselfe from the hand of God in this spirituall Banquer So it is not the nature of the action that will enforce the gesture of standing to haue been vsed in the Sacrament rather then at prayer but the custome and order of the Church only which if ye were able to produce as well for standing at the Sacrament as at praying on the Lords day your argument were strong but that yee shall neuer doe except ye grant according to the truth that the Sacrament is an act of reall adoration In that case Tertullians testimony which you cite would aduance your cause mightily who sayes De geniculis adorare nefas ducimus Two or three testimonies of Eusebius Chrysostome and Tertullian for standing on the Lords day at the Table or Altar when the Sacrament was receiued will not proue a constant and vniuersall practise of that gesture Neyther is the example of the Abissines and Muscouites who stand to this day able to counterpoyse the practise of the vniuersall Church for the space of foure or fiue hundred yeeres preceding their dayes wherein they kneeled at the receiuing Nor are you able to prooue that the gesture of kneeling was brought into the Church by the error of Transsubstantiation as ye confidently affirme in the last line of this Section For Honorius as wee sayd before did not decree kneeling to bee vsed at the receiuing of the Sacrament but at the eleuation and circumgestation which was a superstitious and
Christianae venerationis ac proinde olim potuit cum fructu vsurpari That is Kneeling at the receiuing of the Elements hath a shew and forme of holy and Christian adoration and therefore of olde might haue beene vsed profitably Petrus Martyr Class 4. locus 10. Sect. 49. 50. IN Sacramento distinguimus symbola à rebus symbolis aliquem honorem deferimus nimirum vt tractentur decenter non abijciantur sunt enim sacrae res Deo semel deputatae quo verò vel res significatas â—as promptè alacriter adorandas concedimus inquit enim Augustinus hoc loco Non peccatur adorando carnem Christi sed peccatur non adorando Adoratio interna potest adhiberi sine periculo neque externa suá naturá essct An Answere to the reasons vsed by the penner of the Pamphlet against the Festiuall DAYES PP FRom the beginning of the Reformation to this present yeere of our Lord 1618. the Church of Scotland hath diuers wayes condemned the obseruation of all Holy-dayes the Lords day onely excepted In the first Chapter of the first Booke of Discipline penned Anno 1560. the obseruation of Holy-dayes to Saints the feast of Christmas Circumcision Epiphanie Purification and others fond Feasts of our Lady are ranked amongst the abominations of the Romane Religion as hauing neither commandement nor assurance in the Word It is further affirmed that the obstinate maintainers and teachers of such abomination should not escape the punishment of the Ciuill Magistrate The Booke aforesaid was subscribed by the Lords of secret Counsell ANS This Booke was neuer authorised by Act of Counsell Parliament or by any Ecclesiasticall Canon and Iohn Knox as we said before complaines of some in chiefe Authoritie that called the same Deuote imaginations yet let vs giue vnto it the Authoritie which yee require the same will not serue your purpose For in the explication of that first head which yee cite we haue these words which yee haue omitâ—â—â— In the Bookes of old and new Testaments We affirme that 〈…〉 necessarie for instruction of the Church and to make 〈…〉 of God perfect are contained and sufficiently expresses By the contrarie doctrine waâ— vnderstand whatsoeuer men by Lawes Counceâ—s or 〈…〉 imposed vpon the conscâ—ences of men 〈…〉 expresse commandement of Gods word 〈…〉 c. By which worâ—s 〈…〉 the obâ—eruation of dayes here coÌ„demne◠〈…〉 the 〈◊〉 Church and 〈…〉 as our 〈…〉 But such 〈…〉 of men â—s a necessitie point of Diuine 〈◊〉 This obseruation vrged vpon the peopâ—e of God and practised 〈◊〉 opinion of necessitie and 〈◊〉 was vtterly to be abolâ—shed And to banish this opinion together with the superstitious Idolatrie and prophanenesse which was otherwise conioyned of banqueting drinking playing quarreâ—ling and such like 〈…〉 was thought expedient that on these dayes the people should be 〈…〉 from their ordinarie labours and that no 〈◊〉 â—eruice should be done in places where there 〈…〉 a dayly Exercise of Religion as well because of the 〈◊〉 of 〈◊〉 to informe people â—oucâ—ing the lawfull obseruaâ—â—on of dayes and the eschewing of their Idolatrous and superstitious abuse as because it appeared that extraoâ—dâ—narie Exercises on these dayes would rather foster supersâ—ition then edifie people in true godlâ—nesse Neither could there better order be taken as matters then stood but our Church did neuer presume to condeme religious Exercises vpon these dayes which now the Assembly at Pâ—rtâ— hath appointed for that had beene to condemne both the Primitiue Church and all the Reformed Churches now in the World who practised the contrarie And all the exceptions Acts and complaints made to Authoritie against Holy-dayes were rather against dayes dedicated to Saints or against the prophane and superstitious obseruation of Christmas which we call Zule or serued to maintaine the order taken by the Church for the same as shall bee made manifest in the particulars alledged by you PP In the generall Assembly holden at Edinburgh Anno 1566. the latter Confession of Heluetia was approoued but with speciall exception against some Holy-dayes dedicated to Christ These same very dayes that now are vrged ANS By this exception the Assembly did not condemne the iudgement and practise of the Heluetian Church as vnlawfull superstitious or prophane but onely declared that by their approbation they did nothing preiudiciall to the order and policie of their owne Church PP At the Assembly holden Anno 1575. complaint was made against the Ministers and Readers beside Abirdene because they assembled the people to Prayer and Preaching vpon certaine Patrone and Feastiuall dayes ANS This complaint was made for the contempt and breach of the order of the Church and the offence which people might take thereat not for the religious Exercise vsed at the time PP Complaint likewise was ordained to be made to the Regent vpon the Towne of Drumfreis for vrging and conueying a Reader to the Church with Tabret and Whissell to reade the Prayers all the Holy-dayes of Zule or Christmas vpon refusall of their owne Reader ANS This was a iust complaint because the Fact was not onely contrarious to the order of the Church but superstitious and prophane also in it selfe PP Item An Article was formed to be presented to the Regent crauing that all dayes heretofore kept holy in time of Papistrie beside the Lords day such as Zule day Saints dayes and other like Feasts might be abolished and a ciuill penaltie appointed against the obseruers of the said dayes ANS In this Article wee must vnderstand by Dayes not the Time it selfe materially for that cannot bee abolished but the superstitious cessation from labour on these dayes with an opinion of necessitie and the profane excesses of banquetting playing c. which the Act of Perth hath also condemned PP In the Assembly holden in April Anno 1577. it was ordayned That the Visitor with the aduice of the Synodall Assembly should admonish Ministers preaching or ministring the Communion at Pasche Zule or other like superstitious times or Readers reading to desist vnder the paine of depriuation ANS This Ordinance was made to withdraw people from the superstitious opinion they had of these times as is manifest by the wordes Or other like superstitious times and this our Pastors are also ordayned still to rebuke PP Dedicating of Dayes was abjured in the Confession of Faith penned Anno 1580. an Article was formed in the Assembly 1581. crauing an Act of Parliament to bee made against the obseruation of feast-dayes dedicated to Saints and setting out of Bone-fires ANS The dedicating of dayes abiured in the confession is in these words We abiure his to wit the Popes canonization of men calling vpon Angels or Saints departed worshipping of imagery reliques and crosse dedicating of Churches Altars Dayes Vowes to creatures c. What is here dayes dedicated by the Pope are abâ—ured but the fiue dayes concluded by the Church to be kept were not dedicated by the Pope but obserued long before his vsurped authoritie
a profitable change without losse therefore hee who makes this change according to the Proclamation is not spoyled of his liberty but maketh vantage by the right vse thereof Here it shall not bee amisse to recite Zanchius opinion in this purpose who defending their opinion that esteeme the words to contayne a command moues a doubt and answers it after this manner Verùm enimuerò videtur cum hac sententia pugnare c. That is But this fights against their opinion that hold the words to be a command that it was euer lawfull to Gods people to assemble themselues on other dayes beside the Sabbath to heare Gods Word to bee present at Prayers to offer Sacrifices and such other things belonging to outward worship which farre lesse can bee denyed to vs and therefore beside the Lords Day other dayes are instituted in the Church ad feriandum ab operibus seruilibus to rest from seruile workes if not for the whole day yet for the morning time He answeres Facilis est horum conciliatio sicut opera diuini cultus praeponenda sunt operibus seruilibus ita haec sunt omittenda quando illis vacandum est c. that is These things may be easily reconciled as the workes of Gods worship are to bee preferred to seruile workes so these must be omitted when those are to bee performed And a little after We sinne not against this precept sayes hee when wee ceasse from our seruile labour to waite on Gods worship quoties ordo Ecclesiae aut necessitas postulat so often as the order of the Church and necessitie requires This is Zanchius iudgement vpon the fourth precept of the Law in the sixe hundred sixty two page of that Worke. And if a precept cannot impede the appointing of solemne times for the worship of God farre lesse can a permission The Muscouites saying that it is for Lords to make Feasts and abstaine from labour is true yet amongst them Festiuall Dayes are obserued That the Citizens after diuine Seruice on these Dayes betake themselues to their labour wee doe not reproue because it is agreeable to their policie PP It may be obiected that Constantine the Emperour made a Law that none but the Prince may ferias condere erect an idle day The Prince then may enioyne a day of cessation Answ. The Lawes of the Cod. are not Rules of Theologie A Prince may not enioyne cessation from Oeconomicall and Domesticke workes but for weapon-shewing exercise of Armes defence of the Countrey or other publike workes and affaires But that is not to enioyne a day of simple cessation but to enioyne a politicke worke in place of the Oeconomicall ANS Though the Lawes of the Cod. bee not Rules of Theologie yet where they are not contrary to Scripture they are good Rules of Gouernment to Princes and of obedience to Subiects That the Prince may enioyne a day of cessation from seruile worke for the worship of God is not only not contrary but most agreeable to Scripture The Festiuall Dayes of Purim kept by the Iewes were confirmed by the Decree of Queene Esther Esth. 9.32 It is written in the Booke of Ionah the third Chapter and seuenth verse That ye the Decree of the King of Niniue and his Nobles a Fast was proclamed The Feast of Dedication graced with the presence of our Sauiour was instituted by Indas Machabaeus and the people 1. Mach. 10. And if the King may command a cessation from Oeconomicall and priuate workes for workes ciuill and publike such as the defence of the Crowne the liberty of the Countrey c. What reason haue yee why hee may not enioyne a day of cessation from all kind of bodily labour for the honour of God and exercise of Religion Is hee not custos vtriusque tabulae If the one may be done as yee grant for the weale of the politicall body much more may and should the other bee done for the weale of the Mysticall especially when the order of the Church so requires PP ANS 〈…〉 dayes agrees with Pâ—etie and Charitie but to enioyne the obâ—eruation of a weekly day besiâ—es the Sabbath were against Chaâ—â—tie Euâ—â—tie Is this a good Argumentâ— The Câ—urch may not doe that which is vnlawfull therefore shee may not enioyne that which is lawfull or this The Kâ—â—g may neyther banish not put to death an honest and peaceable Subiect therefore he may not execute a Traytor or banish a seditious man This kinde of reasoning is more then childish PP I say further that the poore Crafts-man cannot lawfully bee commanded to lay aside his Tooles and goe passe his time no not for an houre let be for a day And yet farther that he ought not to be compelled to leaue his worke to goe to diuine Seruice except on the day that the Lord hath sanctified ANS This is a strong argument confirmed with the great authoritie of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I say further But what say yee to that which is ordayned in the first Booke of Discipline out of which yee tooke your first argument in this dispute of daies In the ninth Chapter thereof we haue these words In euerie notable Towne we require that one day beside the Sonday be appoynted to Sermon and prayers which day during the time of Sermon must be kept free from all exercise of labour aswell to the Maister as to the seruant When yee discussed the oath yee cited the ordinances of this Booke as poynts of Discipline sworne vnto and subscribed If it bee not lawfull to commaund and compell a man to goe to diuine Seruice except vpon the Lords day why did yee sweare in the assertorie oath that it was lawfull But yee will say I sware not that he might be compelled but if he may be lawfully commanded to cease from his labour during the time of diuine seruice he may be as lawfully compelled to obey the coÌ„mand Necessitie ye know excuses the breach of the Sabboth it selfe But the precepts of this Booke ye vse or vse not as they may serue to your purpose Such of them as yee allow must all be obserued vnder the paine of periurie others that are contrarie to your opinion must be reputed reiected as vnlawfull PP It is the priuiledge of Gods power to appoynt a day of rest and to sanctifie it to his honour as our best Diuines maintaine c. If the speciall sanctification of a day to an holy vse depends vpon Gods commandement and institution then neither King nor Church representatiue may make a Holy day ANS Dayes are sanctified and made holy as are places two manner of wayes some places were made holy by annexing to them a peculiar worship instituted by God which lawfully could not be performed in another place such were the Tabernacle and the Temple which were also holy by reason of the typicke and mysticall signification wherewith they were clothed by diuine institution These places did appertaine to the worship not as mere circumstances
onely but as essentiall parts and properties thereof The worship which consisted in sacrificing paying of vowes obseruation 〈…〉 to serue aâ— circâ—msâ—ances but by reason also oâ— their mystiâ—ke signification and of the worshâ—p appropriated vnto them which mâ—ght not aâ— another tâ—me be lawâ—ully performed Other times were onely holy by reason of the vse or dâ—uine worship performed on them and not for any mysterie or solemne worshâ—p appropriated to them such as these which were appointed for solemne humiliation in the day of calamitie After the first manner our Diuines hold That it is onely proper tâ— God to make times and places holy but after the second manner it is a prerogatiue and libertie of the Church to make places and times holy by dedication of them to the seruice of God So the feast of Purim and Dedication were made Holy-dayes by Mordecai Indâ—â— Maâ—chabâ—us and by the Church So times are appoynted by our Church for Morning and Euening Prayers in great Townes houres for preaching on Tuesday Thursday c. Houres for weekely exercises of prophecying which are holy in respect of the vse whereunto they are appoynted And such are the fiue dayes which we esteeme not to be holy for any mysticke signification which they haue either by diuine or ecclesiasticke institution or for any worship which is appropriated vnto them that may not be performed at another time but for the sacred vse whereunto they are appoynted to be employed as circumstances onely and not as mysteries This ye know to be the iudgement and doctrine of our best Diuines yet yee presse to refute it in the Section following PP The obseruers of dayes will say they count not their anniuersary dayes holier then other daâ—es but that they keepe them onely for order and policie that the people may be assembled to religious exercises Ans. The Papists will confesse tâ—at one day is not holier then another in its owne nature no not the Lords day But they affirme that one day is holier then another in respect of the end and vse and so doe we They call them Holy-dayes and so doe we They vse â—â—em as 〈◊〉 sâ—gnes of sacrâ—d mysteâ—ies wherof tâ—ey carrie the names as Natiuâ—tâ—e Passion Ascention c. and so doe wee ANS Antiquum obâ—inâ—â— yee keepe still your old cusâ—ome for bâ—fore yee did â—xteâ—uate the Idolatrie of the Papists in adoring Images that with some appearance yee might prooue these that kneele at the Sacrament to be guiltie of the same abomination and now ye trauell to extenuate their superstition in obseruing dayes that yee may inuolue vs in the same impietie Yet our act in the beginning sayes Wee abhorre the superstitious obseruation of the Festiuall dayes of the Papists Thus we professe our disagreement from them in this poynt which they also acknowledge Bellarmine in the tenth Chapter of his third Booke De cultu Sanctorum rehearses the Doctrine of Luther and Caluine to which wee adhere and reproues the same as erronious in these wordes Tertiò docent dies determinatos ad feriandum non debere haberi caeteris sanctiores quasi mysterij aliquid vel piam significationem continerent sed solum haberi tanquam determinatos Disciplinae ordinis ac politiae causa ita vt cum hac determinatione etiam consistat aequalit as dierum in hoc nos accusont quasi habeamus discrimen dierum Iudaico more He sayes that we teach the dayes appoynted for holy exercises not to bee holier then others or to be esteemed as if they contayned any mysterie or diuine signification but onely as determined for discipline order and policie with which determination the qualitie of dayes may consist And hee sayes that we accuse them for putting difference amongst dayes after the Iewish manner which is the doctrine indeed of our best Diuines Against this Bellarmine setteth downe this proposition Festa Christianorum non solùm ratione ordinis politiae sedetiam ratione mysterij celebrantur suntque dies festi verè alijs saenctiores sacratiores pars quaedam diuini cultus that is The Festiuities of Christians are not onely kept for order and policie but also by reason of a mysterie and the Festiuall dayes are more holy and sacred then other dayes and a part of diuine worshippe This is the Papists opinion which wee with all the reformed Churches abhorre as superstitious and idolatrous But yee take part with Bellarmine against the Doctrine of Luther and Caluine labouring to prooue that the reformed Churches obserue these dayes not onely for discipline order and policie but for memoriall signes of sacred mysteries as Papists doe PP The presence of the Festiuitie putteth a man in minde of the mysterie howbeit he haue not occasion to be present in the holy Assembly ANS It follows not of this that we obserue the dayes for signes of sacred mysteries because they put vs not in minde of Christs birth passion c. as ceremonies significant or sacramentall signes instituted by God or the Church for that effect but as circumstances onely determined for celebration of the religious action whereby the commemoration of these benefits is made And there is nothing more vsuall then by considering the circumstances of times places and persons to remember the actions and businesse whereunto they are destinate PP We are commaunded to obserue them in all poynts as the Lords Day both in publique Assemblies and after the dissoluing of the same ANS This is manifestly false for the Lords Day is commaunded to be obserued of necessitie for conscience of the diuine Ordinance as a day sanctified and blessed by God himselfe These are commanded to be obserued onely for ecclesiasticall order and policie and doe not oblige men in conscience to obedience but for eschewing scandall and contempt Secondly the Lords Day is to be obserued as the Sabbath of IEHOVAH that is not onely for a day wherein we are appointed to rest to God but as a day whereon God himselfe did rest after the Creation So it is obserued as a remembrance and resemblance of Gods rest Thirdly the Lords Day is obserued as is the Lords Supper this in remembrance of his death that in remembrance of his resurrection Fourthly the Lords Day is obserued as a pledge of that rest wherein hee that enters shall rest from his labours as God hath done from his And fiftly we obserue the Lords Day as a perpetuall signe betweene God and vs to signifie and declare that the God who hath sanctified vs to be his people and whom wee adore as IEHOVAH the Father who created the World in sixe dayes and rested the seuenth IEHOVAH the Sonne who redeemed the World and rising that day to life abolished sinne and death and brought life and immortalitie to light and IEHOVAH the Holy Ghost who on that day descended vpon the Twelue Apostles sanctifying them and the whole World by them with the truth of Gods Word In none of these fiue poynts doe we obserue
the Festiuall dayes as the Lords Day PP It is lest free to teach any part of Gods Word on the Lords day but for solemnitie of the festiuall solemne Texts must bee chosen Gospels Epistles Collects Psalmes must bee framed for the particular seruice of these dayes and so the mysticall dayes of mans appointment shall not onely equall but in solemnities surpasse the morall Sabbath appointed by the Lord. ANS If by the solemnitie of the Festiuall yee vnderstand the honour done to the Day wee deny that wee are appointed to choose any Text or frame our Doctrine and Exhortations thereto but if by the solemnitie of the Festiuall yee vnderstand the coÌ„memoration of the benefits made on these daies it is true that euery Minister is ordayned to choose pertinent Texts and frame his Doctrine and Exhortations thereto But vpon this yee will neuer conclude that these dayes which yee falsly call mysticall doe not onely equall but surpasse the morall Sabbath in solemnitie for the whole solemnitie hath onely respect to the benefits which on these times are remembred and no respect at all to the Time The solemnitie not being obserued for the Time but the Time for the solemne remembrance of these benefits The Lords Day otherwise is not onely obserued for the diuine seruice that is performed thereon but the same seruice and publike worship which may bee omitted on all the sixe dayes must be performed on the Lords Day because God hath appointed it to be sanctified with these holy Exercises PP If they were instituted onely for order and policie that the people may assemble to religious exercises wherefore is there but one day appointed betwixt the Passion and the Resurrection Wherefore fortie dayes betweene the Resurrection and Ascension and ten betweene the Ascension and the Pentecost Why follow we the course of the Moone as the Iewes did in our moueable feasts making the Christian Church clothed with the Sunne to walke vnder the Moone as Bonauentura alludes Wherefore is there not a certayne day of the Moneth kept for Easter aswell as for the Natiuitie Does not Bellarmine giue this reason out of Augustine that the day of Natiuitie is celebrated onely for memorie the other both for memorie and for Sacraments ANS Saint Augustines opinion alleadged by Bellarmine is not receiued by the reformed Churches as the reason moouing them to obserue these times for they expresly deny that they keepe these times for any mysterie or Sacrament that is in them but onely for order and policie which directeth all things to bee done to edification and allowes vs to make choyce of such circumstances as are most meet to promoue the spirituall businesse whereunto they are applyed And this is a kinde of Christian prudence and dexteritie for who knowes not what moment there is in the opportunity of Times and Places to aduance actions Now because no times can be found more conuenient for a solemne commemoration of the Birth Passion c. then these which are either he same indeed by reuolution or in coÌ„mon estimation they follow in this the iudgement of the primitiue Church esteeming it pietie to prefer vnitie with the Catholike church in things indifferent and lawfull to the singularitie of any priuate mans opinion or the practice of any particular Church The allegation of Bonauentura his allusion in such a graue point is ridiculous for if the Sunne and the Moone bee taken mystically as they are in the Reuelation in this case the Church clothed with the Sunne that is with the light of the Gospell walkes not vnder the Moone that is according to the opinions and fashions of the world but treading these vnder foote followes the rules of order and decency for edification If by the Sunne and Moone these two Planets be vnderstood which God created for signes seasons dayes and yeares So long as the Church is militant on earth shee must vse the benefiâ— of these Creatures in the determâ—nation of times for all her actions PP If the Anniuersary commemorations were like the weekely preachings Why is the Husband-man forced to leaue his plough at the one and not at the other Why did not Master Galloway curse the people for absence from the one aswell as from the other ANS I answere Although the circumstance of Time whereon the Anniuersary commemoration is made differs not in holinesse or any mysticke signification from the weekly dayes of preaching yet it differres in frequency and raritie for the dayes of weekely preaching doe returne and to astrict the Husband-man to leaue his plough so often were against equitie and charitie but the times of these commemorations being so rare to wit three seruile dayes onely in the yeare and the exercise so profitable Reason would if the Husband-man willingly did not leaue his plough at these times that by authoritie he should be forced aswell for his owne benefit as for eschuing scandall and contempt And Master Galloway had reason to curse these who for contempt and with offence of their Brethren absented themselues from the Sermons of Christs Natiuitie Lastly the difference of the seruice on these dayes from the weekely and ordinary makes them not to differ in holinesse or mysterie from the weekely dayes more then the difference in seruice which is performed on the fift of August and fift of Nouember makes these two dayes to bee mysticke or more holy then other times PP To make solemne commemoration of Christs Natiuitie vpon any other day then vpon the putatiue day of his Natiuitie would be thought a great absurditie ANS If yee haue not fallen into this absurditie yee must grant that yee neuer made in your time any solemne commemoration of Christs Natiuitie And I verily beleeue that in this omission yee haue many companions by whose negligence God hath beene defrauded of the honour due to him for this benefit and the people lacked instruction in a principall Article of Faith This Article is the ground of all the rest for as Chrysostome sayes If our Sauiour had not beene borne he had neither suffered nor risen againe from the dead and thereupon he calls the day of this commemoration Metropolim omnium Festorum Euen for this it was expedient that a certayne time of the yeare should haue beene appointed for this commemoration which otherwise would haue been neglected and as yee say thought absurd But to returne to your Argument The commemoration of Christs Natiuity is no more astricted to the 25. of December then to any other time for although the 25. of December by ordinance of the Church bee dedicated to that religious seruice yet the seruice is not astricted to the time as the seruice of the Iewish festiuities which lawfully might not be performed on any other dayes then the festiuall The commemoration appointed by our Church to bee made on these fiue dayes may lawfully be performed at other conuenient times although on these dayes the same must not bee omitted For the seruice ar I
haue said is not appointed for the Time but the Time is appointed for the worship So it is not absurd to remember Christs Natiuitie so oft as occasion is offered with all conuenient solemnitie as it may serue to his honour and the edification of the Church Thus wee haue seene that according to the Doctrine of the reformed Churches Anniuersarie dayes are and may bee obserued though not for any mysterie or holinesse that is in them more then in other dayes but for order and policy onely Against this all the Reasons which Bellarmine or yee haue brought or can inuent shall neuer preuaile more then the barking of a dogge against the Moone PP ANS The conclusion agreeth not with the premisses for if it be Gods souereigâ—tie to make or ordayne a thing to bee holy how may the Church make a thing holy by appointing an occasionall feast or fast as yee grant shee may doe The instinct of nature and that command out of Ioel is a generall warrant onely The particular calamitie or benefit wherefore a fast or feast should be proclaymed is not expressed neither is the time particularly determined whereupon the solemne festiuitie or fast should be kept but the one is left to the estimation and the other to the determination of the Church So by that warrant libertie is giuen to the Church to consider and define the causes for the which a fast should bee proclaymed and to determine the time when the same should be obserued and to separate that time from common businesse and consecrate the same to the spirituall exercise of preaching hearing praying fasting c. as our Church hath vsed to doe very often Now if the Church hath power vpon occasionall motiues to appoint occasionall fasts or festiuities may not shee for constant and eternall blessings which doe infinitely excell all occasionall benefits appoint ordinary times of commemoration and thanksgiuing Ye say that this hath no warrant but yee speake without warrant for there is as great warrant to appoint such dayes as is for any other point of Ecclesiasticall policie touching the determination of times places formes and order to be obserued in the worship of God according to these generall gâ—ounds Let all things bee done to the glorie of God 1. Cor. 10. to edification 1. Cor. 14. with order and decencie 1. Cor. 14.16 The whole policie of our Church touching the vse of these circumstantiall things is ordered by these rules and according to these did our Church in the first booke of Discipline which yee cite often ordayne for the purpose now in hand That in euery notable Towne a day beside the Sonday should bee appointed weekely for Sermon that during the time of Sermon the day should be kept free from all exercise of labour as well by the Master as by the seruant That euery day there be either Sermon or prayers with reading of the Scriptures That Baptisme be orderly ministred either on the Sonday or after Sermon and the dayes of prayer That at foure seuerall times of the yeere the Sacrament of the Lords Supper be ministred viz. on the first Sonday of March on the first Sonday of Iune first Sonday of September and the first Sonday of December That in euery towne where Schollers are and learned men repaire a certaine day euery weeke be appointed for the exercise of Ministers in prophecie And the said booke affirmes The dedication of times and houres for such generall and particular exercises of the Word and Sacraments and Prayer to appertayne to the policie of the Church If the Church hath power after this manner to appoint times for Doctrine and diuine Seruice and Doctrine and diuine Seruice for times as the doctrine of the Catechisme on Sonday at afternoone reade the 9. Chapter of the said booke it cannot be denyed but the Church hath also power to appoint a certaine time day and houre for commemoration of Christs Natiuitie Passion c. For what more power had our Church at that time to appoint the Sacrament to be ministred the first Sondaies of March Iune c. then she hath now to appoint a Sermon to be made of Christs resurrection vpon Easter day and a Sermon of the sending downe of the holy Ghost vpon Whitsunday and does not the light of Nature teach vs that rare and great benefits should be remembred with more then ordinary thankefulnesse Hereby it is cleere that it is not the Lords soueraignty onely to make or ordayne a thing to be holy but it is a prerogatiue that God also hath giuen to the Christian Church But to the end this matter may be fully cleered it is to be obserued as we said before that times are made holy and places two manner of wayes so things are made holy either by some inherent qualitie of holynesse or by consecration of them to holy vses After the first manner Angels and men were made holy in the creation sinners are made holy by regeneration and sanctification of the holy Ghost and of this holynesse God onely is the author Next things are made holy by consecration of them to holy vses which vses are either mysticall or politicall The consecration of things to holy mysticall vses as of water in Baptisme to be a signe of the bloud and Spirit of Christ the elements of Bread and Wine in the Supper to be the Sacrament of his Bodie and Bloud the Sabbath to bee vnto the Iewes a memoriall of the Creation a type of signification and a badge of their profession the Temple the Altars the Sacrifices and Priests to bee shaddowes of things to come all these and such like are made and ordayned holy by God but the consecration of things to holy vses for policie as for maintayning religion or for order and decency to be obserued in the worship of God is not onely Gods prerogatiue but a priuiledge and liberty granted by him to the Church for example to build and consecrate places to be Temples houses to bee Hospitals to giue rent lands money and goods to the Ministry poore to appoint Vessels Vestures Instruments for the publike worship as Tables Table-clothes Napkins Basens Cups and Lauers for the holy Sacraments these things and the like are made holy by the dedication and consecration of men After this last manner the Church hath power to consecrate the fiue Anniuersary dayes to the commemoration of our Sauiour his benefits to separate them from all other ordinary workes and so to make them sacred and holy dayes It was I grant a part of Idolatry to proclaime a holy day vnto the golden Calfe or to any Idol or Creature as ye affirme but it will not follow that it is Idolatry to proclaime a holy day for the honour and worship of the true God And as it was one of Ieroboams sins to despise the Festiuities appointed by God for his worship and instead of these to ordaine a Feast after the deuise of his owne heart so if we should
thinks Yet to confirme his opinion yee say that Iustine Martyr mentions no Holy day but the Lords Day What then Hee had not the occasion yet Tertullian who flourished but fortie yeares after him in the second booke directed to his wife hath these wordes Quis denique solennibus Paschae abnoctantem seeurus sustinet And in his booke De Praescriptionib aduers. Haereticos mentions one Blastus whom hee calls an Heretike for maintayning that Pasche should bee kept on the 14. day of the Moone as the Iewish custome was Tertullian flourished in the yeare of our Lord 183. and speaking thus of Pasche not as of a new Constitution but as of a custome long before receiued in the Church does confirme the Bishop of Winchester his iudgement That in all lâ—kelihood this obseruation was Apostolique By Apostolique I meane not a doctrinall point which is to bee obserued as a substantiall part of diuine worship or a condition necessary to saluation but the imitation onely of an Apostolique practice concerning order and policie neither doe I meane such a practice as is expresly set downe in Scripture and vniuersally obserued through the world such as the Lords Day is for such a practice hath the strength of a diuine Precept but I vnderstand such a practice as albeit it be not recorded in Scripture to haue beene done by the Apostles themselues or the Churches in their time yet the same being vniuersally receiued in the world and obserued since the Apostles dayes is most probably presumed to haue beene practised in their times and allowed by them And in this the Lords Day differs from Pasche and the other three dayes mentioned by Saint Augustine that the Lords Day hath not onely the vniuersall and perpetuall obseruation of the Church since the dayes of the Apostles but also the practice of our Sauiour his Apostles and the Church in their times expresly recorded in Scripture The other haue onely an vniuersall and constant practice of the Church since the Apostles time which not the lesse ought to be preferred to any priuate or late particular custome And to returne to the Act of Perth it ordaynes none of these dayes to be kept for Diuine and Apostolique but onely that on them once in the yeare a solemne commemoration be made of the benefits of our Redemption and therefore the Reasons ye bring to proue that these dayes are not Apostolique impugne no wayes the lawfullnesse of the act Where yee say that the obseruation of the Passion day hath brought into the church set dayes of fasting condemned by our Diuines I aske you how yee doe proue that affirmation It is enough yee haue said it But to conclude this point I doe verily thinke That to fast and pray at some set times were lesse offensiue to God then to bee often feasting and surfetting pratling and lying traducing our Brethren and condemning the good order and policie of Gods Church PP If it had beene Gods will that the seuerall acts of Christ should haue beene celebrated with seuerall solemnities the holy Ghost would haue made knowne to vs the dayes wheron they were done Secondly if the actions of Christ aduance the dayes wherein they were wrought as Hooker sayes or consecrate them as Bellarmine sayes they ought to be knowne otherwise it will fall out that we shall keepe the dayes holy that were neuer aduanced nor consecrated by Christs action on institution But so it is the day of Christs Natiuitie is hid from mortall men ANS It is true that if it had beene Gods will to haue aduanced and consecrated the dayes of Christs Natiuitie Passion c. by annexing to them some particâ—lar exercise of Religion such as the festiuall dayes of the Iewes had and clothing them with some mysticall signification the holy Ghost had made the dayes knowne otherwise they could not haue beene obserued But from the beginning we haue declared according to the iudgement not of Bellarmine but of our best reformed Churches and Diuines that these dayes are not kept for any relation that the worship hath to them as if by Christs actions or institution they were to be honoured with some religious exercise but for order and policy only as the most meet and oportune occasions in the iudgement of the primitiue Church and in our estimation most meet for testifying our conformitie with her and with the whole Christian world euer since The long discourse and dispute which yee subjoyne to proue the time of Christs Natiuitie to be vncertayne because it is not contradictoriâ— to the Act made at Perth and the practice thereof in our Church I passe it as superfluous Onely to your last words of the Section I answere PP Nay let vs vtter the Truth December Christmasse is a iust imitation of the December Saturnall of the Ethnicke Romanes and so vsed as if Bacchus and not Christ were the God of Christians ANS This protestation yee might haue made and craued licence if your custome were to lye but to the purpose If Christmasse hath beene thus abused I am sure the abuse hath not come by preaching on that day and the exercise of diuine worship thereon for that wee haue lacked these 57. yeares by-past in our Church yet riot profanenesse surfet and drunkennesse hath not beene wanting What hath beene the cause hereof and by what meanes the abuse may be best remedied wise men will easily consider PP It is commonly obiected That wee may aswell keepe a day for the Natiuitie as for the Resurrection of Christ. We haue answered already That Christs day or the Lords Day is the day appointed for remembrance of his Natiuitie and all his actions and benefits aswell as for the Resurrection Next the one is morall and weekely the other is mysticall and anniuersarie The Lords Day it selfe is no longer to vs mysticall but morall sayes Willet and therefore Pasche day is a mysticall Sabbath and anniuersarie whereas the Lords Day it selfe should be onely morall ANS The answere which yee haue already made is already confuted The Lords Day is generally appointed for remembrance of all his actions therefore none of his actions may or should bee remembred at any other set time This consequence is not necessary for then we may not remember his actions in the morning and euening Lectures wee may not remember them in Sermons Exercises on weekly dayes nor may wee remember them in Catechizing the people Your next answere is That the day of the Natiuitie is mysticall This is contrarie to that which yee cited out of Saint Augustine pag. 68. Ille celebratur ob memoriam solùm ideo semper die vigesimo quinto Decembris at iste celebratur ob memoriam Sacramentum But I pray you How proue yee obseruation of the day of Natiuitie to bee mysticall because it is anniuersarie yee say If this be your Argument for I finde no other here it is not good for in the reuolution of time there is no mysterie
doctrine and worship in vnlawfull in it selfe but by reason of the time which is an indifferent circumstance Non est verus Apostoli interpres sed verè dogmatistes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 PP That which lawfully hath beene abolished by ciuill and Ecclesiasticall Lawes and by consent and vniforme practise in the contrarie without interruption and beyond the prescription of time allowed to things moueable put the case that Holy-daies were things moueable and indifferent and hath beene borne downe by Sermons of all the most reuerend Preachers since the reformation corrected with censures and abiured by publique oathes of Preachers and Professours cannot lawfully be receiued and put in practise againe ANS Your assumption must be this But to make commemoration of the inestimable benefits of our redemption vpon the fiue anniuersarie daies hath beene abolished lawfully by ciuill and Ecclesiasticall Lawes c. This assumption is false in all the parts of it for first as we haue shewed the obseruation ordayned by the Act at Perth was neuer abolished by Ciuill or Ecclesiasticall Lawes nor yet by consent and vniforme practise of the contrarie Onely the superstitious obseruation of these dayes with opinion of necessitie as a part of diuine worship and the profane abuse thereof with excessiue banqueting playing and carroling was condemned Secondly to your prescription of time in things moueable I answer that circumstantiall ceremonies belonging to Religion are alwaies alterable and neither can bee abolished nor established by prescription for if prescription had force in such things then the space of 1200. yeares during which time these fiue dayes were obserued vniuersally throughout the whole Christian world shoâ—ld haue greater force to establish the obseruation of them then the abrogation of seuen and fiftie yeares in durance onely Continuance of time does not establish without change such things but giues occasion to alter them rather when the alteration makes for the honour of God the edification of his Church and auoyding corruption Thirdly the Sermons of reuerend Preachers condemned onely the superstitious and profane obseruation of these dayes and not the obseruation made by the Primitiue and by the reformed Churches in our time which is the obseruation onely commaunded by the Act of Perthe Fourthly If any were censured it was not for any fault in the action it selfe but for transgression of the Ecclesiasticall order and the scandall which might haue followed thereupon as the censures which wee now vse against these that refuse to performe the diuine seruice appoynted to be done on these times are not inflicted for any fault that is in omission in regard of the time but onely in regard of the order and policie of the Church which being contemned giues offence to the simple and breaks peace and vnitie Fiftly we neuer abiured with oathes publique or priuate the obseruation now required the dedication of dayes imposed vpon the conscience with opinion that they are sanctiores sacratiores alijs diebus pars diuini cultus we detest and abiure for nothing can be imposed vpon the conscience but by the precept of God onely The Canons of the Church in matters indifferent doe not oblige the conscience ratione rei praeceptae quasi pars sit aliqua diuini cultus sed ordinis politias causa tantum So the Canons of the Church made for obseruation of these fiue dayes bindes not the conscience to the obseruation thereof as a part of diuine worship and as the commaundement of God bindes vs to the obseruation of the Lords Day for it is the will of God that on the Lords Day we be religiously exercised and therefore our obedience in that point is a part of his worship but to be exercised in Gods publique worship on another day is not Gods expresse will yet it is his will that we should heare the Church and obey her ordinances in all things that tend to edification and serue for good order whereof God is the Author To conclude seeing the obseruation of these fiue daies as the same is prescribed in the act at Perthe is neither contrarie to any Law Ciuill or Ecclesiastique nor condemned by the practice doctrine and censures of our Church nor abiured by oathes And therefore may lawfully be restored receiued and put in practise againe by our Church PP Hooker and Sarauia vrged for maintenance of their ceremonies Law custome prescription and craues that the impietie and vnlawfulnesse of their ceremonies be proued or else let the Non-conformists conforme May we not plead after the same manner for our former order so long established that they proue it was impious and vnlawfull before we make a change ANS Ye may not pleade because the change is alreadie made in a lawfull Assembly which had power to abrogate all Statutes of Ecclesiasticall matters that are found noysome vnprofitable disagreeing with the time and abused by the people as is set down in the confession of Faith and seuenth Chapter of the Booke of Discipline concluded anno 1581. Such were the acts made before concerning Holy-dayes for first they were noysome in that they were not conforme to the practise of the Primitiue Church or yet of the later reformed and so in that poynt did break vnitie Next vnprofitable because they fostered prophanenesse and superstition in the hearts of the people who by want of information of Doctrine did superstitiously or prophanely obserue these dayes Thirdly they agreed not with this time wherein it was expedient that the religious Commemoration of the benefits of Christ should be restored iurâ— postliminio for it is not enough to dispossesse idolatrie and superstition the violent eiecters and occupiers of the possessions of true Religion but she ought to be restored to the old right and priuiledges of times and places lawfully and wisely dedicated to her before Last of all the discharge of diuine Seruice on these daies was come into abuse amongst the people the preciser sort counting it a part of Gods worship and obedience to his will not to doe seruice vnto God on these dayes and the profane taking thereby occasion to be more licentious And therefore it was needfull in a manner to restore the obseruation of these times PP Our Oath by it selfe bindes more then Law Custome and Prescription farre more when it concurres with them The assumption is euident by that which I haue set downe in the beginning ANS The assumption is alreadie considered I answere to the oathe Lawes Customes Prescription and Oathes in order and policie touching indiffereÌ„t alterable things such as these are binde a man no longer to the obseruation then the order remaines vnchanged Your Oath bound you to the gouernement of Superintendents set downe in the first Bookâ— of Discipline from which yee esteeme your selfe absolued because that gouernement was altered by that new Booke of Discipline confirmed in the generall Assembly anno 1581. a yeare after the Oath was set forth Now the order set downe in the same first Booke
of Discipline touching the abolishing of Holy-dayes anno 1560. is altered by the late generall Assembly holden at Perthe and by the same Reason whereby yee esteeme your selfe absolued from the gouernement of Superintendents yee should thinke your selfe freed of the act touching the abolishing of Holy-dayes which yee would doe if ye were not contentious PP If Zanchius approued the abolition of Holy-Dayes in some Churches where they were because they had been polluted and grossely abused much more would he and other Diuines knowing the truth of our case thinke it vnlawfull to reinduce them amongst vs. ANS It is true that in the Churches of Bearne Mattins and Euening-Song were abolished for the abuse thereof in Poperie and not many yeares since there was great contention before these Churches could be induced to receiue Morning and Euening Prayers in stead of them So the Popes cursing was abolished out of the Church of Geneua and great contradiction made as Beza testifies in Caluines life before excommunication could be established in place therof yet I hope neither Zanchius nor your selfe will thinke that the reinducing of these was vnlawfull although formerly excluded If Zanchius vnderstood the case of our Church as I haue set it down a little before how we haue not reinduced the Popish obseruation of dayes but made choice of these times for special seruices to be performed on them with a speciall direction to Ministers to rebuke superstition and licentiousnesse both he and other Diuines would approue the constitution of our Church and condemne this your seditious Pamphlet whereby the simple are abused and the peace and quietnesse of our Church disturbed The iudgement of the Reformed Churches of Holy-daies PP OF the ancient Church I haue spoken before Some excuse the Ancients with good intention because to winne the Gentiles they conuerted their dayes into Christian Holy-daies Others excuse them with the circumstance of time that dwelling amongst Pagans they made profession before their eies of Christs birth passion c. by obseruing such dayes But the wisdome of their intention hath proued folly as the seuenth reason maketh manifest The like circumstance of time is not offered therefore we may not be excused ANS Before the penner of this Pamphlet bring the iudgement of the reformed Churches some reason he must pretend for his credâ—te why he reiects the doctrine and practise of the reformed Church which stands wholly in his contrarie First he sayes that he hath spoken before of the Ancient Church But what hath he spoken before that they obserued Easter-day by custome and not by tradition this is all What argument hath he brought against their doctrine against their religious custome and practise of this poynt He sayes some excuse them with their intention Who be these he is ashamed of their names and so he may be for where there is no fault to make an excuse is a sort of calumnious and secret accusation But for their intention who did acquaint him with their intention In Tertullian Chrysostome Ierome Ambrose Augustine and others who all make mention of these dayes there is not so much as any coniecture to bee found for that intention In the end he concludes that the intention of the Ancients hath proued folly and this he sayes is manifest by the seuenth reason because the obseruation of these daies hath beene abused to superstition But so hath the Lords Day beene so hath the Word so haue the Sacraments beene abused and all the other parts of Gods worship Shall therefore the intention of the Holy-Ghost and his wisdome in prescribing these meanes to the Church be esteemed folly They who abuse the good intention of God and his Church to their owne damnation are fooles indeed but Wisdomâ— is iustified of her owne children And although the winning of the Gentiles was one good end wherefore the Ancients obserued these dayes yet their principall end was the honour of God and edification of his Church These ends doe still remaine and iustifie the obseruation of these dayes by the reformed Churches which no man that loues the honour of God and the weale of his Church will condemne PP It is grosse ignorance to say that Holy-dayes were so many hundreth yeares before Papistrie for Papistrie hath been in the Church euer since the daies of the Apostles yea the mysterie of iniquitie was working in their times The errours of the Orthodoxe Church were the beginnings of the Papistrie at length they grew to a great masse So howbeit the whole lumpe was not formed till the Antichrist came to his full strength yet many particulars were entered before and like brookes came into the great riuer As the Antichrist was borne and did grow in yeares so did Papistrie ANS Here ye insinuate that the obseruation of the fiue Daies in the Primitiue Church was Papistrie or else this Discourse is idle But Papistrie it could not be before it was receiued and confirmed by the Pope so in these dayes it was not Papistrie formally And if it were not an errour of the Orthodoxe Church but a lawfull order as at length we haue proued it was neyther materially nor formally Papistrie The obseruation of these dayes with a superstitious and idolatrous worship is Papistrie Such was not the obseruation of the Primitiue Church and such is not the obseruation of the Reformed But as the lawfull obseruation vsed in the Primitiue Church was abolished by the introduction of a superstitious and idolatrous worship in Papistrie so is the superstitious and idolatrous obseruation in Papistrie abolished in reformed Churches by the restitution of the lawfull and religious obseruation vsed in the Primitiue Church which of all reformations is the most perfect and profitable Iehu abolished Idolatrie of the Heathen but he restored not the true worship of God therefore his reformation was imperfect But the reformation made by Ezechias and Iosias was perfect because Idolatrie was not onely abolished but the true worship of God established in place thereof This was not so sufficiently prouided for at our reformation in this poynt for the want of Pastours and is well supplied by the Act made at Perth PP As for the reformed churches except our neighbor Church they haue abandoned daies dedicated to Saints ANS Now yee come to the iudgement of the reformed Churches And here I wish the iuducious Reader to obserue whether ye bring either the iudgement of any reformed Church or of any learned Diuine that consents with you in opinion namely that the obseruation of the fiue anniuersarie dayes with the lawfull exercise of true Religion is a Iudaicall Pedagogie a rudimentarie instruction and a superstitious wil-worship And to the end all that ye say may be exposed to the view of the World I shall set all fully downe which yee bring to this purpose First where ye alledge that all the reformed Churches haue abandoned the dayes dedicated to Saints In this their practise is no way contrarie to the Act made at
Perth for by it no day is ordained to be kept which is or was dedicate to any Saint except vnder the name of Saints yee reprehend him who is the most holy Next the exception ye make of our neighbour Church is calumnious and false It is a calumnie that they obserue any day dedicated to Saints All the dayes which they obserue are dedicated to the honour of God either for the inestimable benefits that by our Sauiour he hath bestowed vpon the World or in regard of the blessings that haue come to man by the Ministrie of his seruants and Saints And it is false that all the reformed Churches except they haue refused the obseruation of these dayes For Bullinger in his Commentary vpon the 14. to the Romans affirmes that the Church of Tigurie obserues the Feasts of the blessed Virgin of S. Iohn the Baptist of Magdalene of Stephen and of the Apostles PP Some admit dayes dedicated to Christ some two some fiue but not with the full consent and liking of the learned but either forced by the authoritie of the Magistrate or wilfulnesse of the people or because remaining in the middest of their enemies they are not permitted otherwise to doe ANS They in Geneua who obserue the day of Natiuitie and Easter approue the practise and order of the Church of Heluetia who obserue all the fiue and there is as great reason why on the other three dayes the Passion Ascension and sending downe of the holy Ghost should be remembred as the Natiuitie and Resurrection If by the learned ye vnderstand these whom ye doe afterwards name Farellus Viret and Caluine I am perswaded no man will thinke that either they or any other such Pastors of the Church would haue bin forced to practise that which was vnlawfull in it selfe and a superstitious will-worship either by Magistrate or People PP Farellus and Viret remooued all Holy-dayes out of the Church of Geneua as Caluine testifies The same decree which banished Farellus and Caluine out of Geneua brought in other Holy-dayes They were all againe abrogate except the Sabbath day Howsoeuer after came in the keeping of Pasche and the Natiuitie ANS The iudgement of Caluine touching the abolition of the Festiuall dayes in Geneua may be seene in his 118. Epistle where he professes that it was done se inscio ac ne optante quidem And a little after subioynes Ex quo sum reuocatus hoc temperamentum quaesiui vt Christi Natalis celebraretur vestro more alijs autem diebus extraordinariae supplicationes tabâ—rnis mane clausis fierent à prandio ad suas operas res agendas quisque abiret And albeit in that place he confesses that the abrogation of the Festiuall dayes did not grieue him yet he protests as followes Hoc tamen testatum esse volo si mihi delata optio fuisset quod nunc constitutuÌ„ est non fuisse pro senteÌ„tia dicturum If Caluine had thought as ye doe that December Christmas is a iust imitation of December Saturnall of the Ethnicke Romanes and that the obseruation of the rest of the Festiuall dayes had beene a superstitious kinde of Will-worship and a Iudaicall Pedagogie he would neuer haue consented to the keeping of that Natiuitie and would not only haue abolished the holy dayes by his suffrage if the same had beene in his option but also testified to the world his dislike of them by his Pen and writing But that all may see how different his iudgement is from yours he concludes with these words Nec tamen est cur homines adeo exasperentur si libertate nostra vt Ecclesiae aedificatio postulat vtâ—mur quemadmodum nec vicissim praeiudicio esse morem nostrum aequum est By these words it is manifest that in Caluines iudgement the obseruation and abrogation of these dayes consists in the power and libertie of the Church and that the obseruation of them in it selfe is not vnlawfull but a thing indifferent to be vsed and not vsed as the edification of the Church requires which iudgement wee imbrace and follow PP Caluine was so farre from liking of Holy dayes hee was slandered of intention to abolish the Lords Day ANS His Doctrine shewes the last to bee a calumnie his practise and iudgement declares that hee did not mislike the obseruation of the dayes vsed in the Primitiue and other reformed Churches PP The Belgike Churches in their Synode holden at Dort Anno 1578. wished that only the Lords Day might be celebrated Luther himselfe in his Booke De bonis Operibus set forth Anno 1520. wished that there were no Feast Dayes amongst Christians but the Lords Day And in his Booke to the Nobilitie of Germany he sayes Consultum esse vt omnia festa aboleantur solo dic Dominico retento ANS This wish Luther and the Belgike Churches conceiued out of their miscontentment at the number corruptions and superstitions of the Festiuall dayes besides the Lords Day as ye doe The late Councell holden at Dort Anno 1618. did celebrate the Feast of Christs Natiuitie most solemnely for the space of three dayes so the practise of these Churches and of Luther shewes that they agree in iudgment with vs touching the obseruation of the fiue dayes PP Howsoeuer forreine Diuines in their Epistles and Councels speake sometimes sparingly against Holy dayes when their aduice was sought of Churches newly risen out of Poperie and greatly distressed they neuer aduised a Church to resume them where they were remoued ANS If forreine Diuines had esteemed the obseruation of these fiue dayes a Iudaicall Pedagogie a rudimentary instruction a superstitious wil-worship as ye doe they had spoken no more sparingly thereof then they do of other like things in the Papisticall Church Where yee say that they neuer aduised Churches to resume them who had once remooued the same Caluine in his one and fiftieth Epistle aduises the Monbelgardens not to contend against the Prince for not resuming of all Festiuall dayes but only such as serued not to edification and were seene to be superstitious such as the Conception and Assumption of the blessed Virgin In festis non recipiendis sayes hee cuperem vos esse constantiores sic tamen vt non litigetis de quibuslibet sed de eis tantum quae nec ad aedificationem quicquam factura sunt supertitionem prima ipsa facie prae se ferunt c. And in the end of the Epistle answering one Obiection which is frequently vsed in our Church he saies Quod autem vos terret offendiculorum periculum si quam nouam agendi formam receperitis quae non sit nostris Ecclesiis vsitata id quidem meritò facitis Sed quia non eò ventum est perfectionis quin optemus adhuc progredi hic timor vos impedire non debet ab ijs ritibus admittendis quos alioqui non liceat penitus improbare What these Ceremonies were whereof he speakes ye will find in the same Epistle to wit
non ad 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sed ad pecâ—liarem Dei beneficiorum commemorationem de communi consensu in Ecclesia Christiana instituere non arbitramur simpliter esse illicitum that is Besides this Sabbath which returneth euery seuenth day wee iudge it not simply vnlawfull by common consent of the Church to institute other dayes not for wil-worship but for a speciall remembrance of the benefites of God PERKINS on the fourth Chapter to the Galatians ECclesiasticall obseruation of time is when set dayes are obserued for orders sake that men might come together to worship God These dayes are eyther dayes of thankesgiuing or dayes of humiliation take the example of the Iewes Ester 9.26 Who obserued yeerely the Feast of Purim for a memory of their deliuerance In like manner they obserued the Feast of Dedication and it seemes that Christ was present at Ierusalem as an obseruer of this Feast Iohn 10.22 And thus for orders sake to obserue certayne dayes of Solemnity is not forbidden WILLET in his six-fold Commentarie vpon the fourteenth to the ROMANS THe Apostle reproues them for the superstitious obseruing of dayes such as then the Iewes practised and now the Papists but to obserue such Holy dayes as God hath appointed such as the Sabbath and others for order and policie not for Religions sake is not within the Apostles reprehension Item The Apostle speakes of the Iewes Festiuals wherein they did clogge their consciences and one iudged another not of the Lords Day which is of Christs appointing and of other Festiuals for Order and Policie and not for a part of the Seruice of God to bind the Conscience An answere to the dispute intituled OF CONFIRMATION and of Bishopping Wherein the Pamphlet penner pretends to impugne the third Article concluded in the Assembly at Perth touching the triall of young childrens education the tenor whereof followes FOr as much as one of the most speciall meanes for staying the encrease of Popery and setling of true Religion in the hearts of the people is that a speciall care be taken in triall of young children their education and how they are catechized which in time of the primitiue Church was most carefully attended as being most profitable to cause young children in their tender yeares drinke in the knowledge of God and his Religion but is now altogether neglected in respect of the great abuse and errors which crept into the Popish Church by making thereof a Sacrament of Confirmation Therefore that all superstitions built thereupon may be rescinded and that the matter it selfe being most necessary for the education of the youth may be reduced to the primitiue integritie it is thought good that the Minister in euery Parish shall catechize all young children of eight yeares of age and see that they haue the knowledge and bee able to make rehearsall of the Lords prayer Beliefe and ten Commandements with answers to the questions of the small Catechisme vsed in our Church And that euery Bishop in his Visitation shall censure the Minister who shall be found remisse therein And the said Bishops shall cause the said children to be presented before them and blesse them with prayer for the encrease of their knowledge and continuance of Gods heauenly graces with euery one of them In the narratiue of this Act the Sacrament of Confirmation is counted amongst the abuses errors and superstitions which crept into the Papistical Church in stead of the profitaâ—le catechizing that the primitiue Church vsed for the tâ—iall of youâ—g childrens education therefore the first part of the dispute wherein the Pamphleter intends to prooue that Confirmation is not a Sacrament contayning nothing that is contrary to the Act shall be passed by In the second part of the dispute intituled Bishopping he contends that the Sacrament of Confirmation and imposition of hands is not proper to Bishops but common to all Presbyters This contention is idle for the Sacrament of Confirmation and imposition of hands being refuted in the former dispute by himselfe and condemned by the Act why should hee striue to haue that common which neither he nor we esteeme to be lawfull But to the end all occasion of debate about this matter might be preuented the Assembly at Perth ordayned that the Bishop after examination should blesse the young children with prayer and purposely omitted the ceremonie of imposition of hands as a thing indifferent to bee vsed or not vsed as the Bishop should thinke most meet Albeit in the primitiue Church this blessing was alwayes giuen with imposition of hands as Caluine affirmes Instit. lib. 4. sect 4. wishing that it were restored to the first integritie in the reformed Churches Yet the Pamphleter to make simple ones beleeue that euery thing concluded in that Assembly was erroneous hee giues out that the Sacrament at least the ceremonie of Confirmation was there allowed and appropriated to Bishops PP We haue abjured Episcopall gouernment and therefore we cannot lawfully admit Episcopall Confirmation giuing and not granting their office were lawfull and that they haue gotten a lawfull calling by the Church to the said office Thirdly that we were free of our oath and fourthly That Confirmation were to be allowed whether as a Ceremonie or as a Sacrament yet it is damnable presumption to appropriate vnto themselues the dutie that belongs to all Pastors ANS If by the Ceremonie or Sacrament of Confirmation yee vnderstand the miraculous imposition of hands vsed by the Apostles or yet the bastard Sacrament of Confirmation vsed in Poperie whereby Bellarmine whom yee afterwards cite sayes That the Lord would honour Episcopalem dignitatem neither of these are allowed by the Act nor appropriated to Bishops Therefore your whole dispute following being directed onely against these two points is idle superfluous But if by Confirmation ye did vnderstand according to the meaning of the Act the dutie which Bishops should performe in trying at their Visitation the diligence of Pastors in catechizing young children and in causing them bee brought before them to bee examined and blessed this part of Episcopall gouernment yee haue not abjured but haue approued by your assertorie oath and obliged your selfe to maintayne and obey by your promissorie oath if so bee yee did sweare to the Policie set downe in the first booke of Discipline Anno 1560. as yee haue often professed For the wordes in that booke touching this point of Bishops dutie are these After the Superintendents haue remayned in their chiefe Townes three or foure moneths at the most they shall be compelled vnlesse by sicknesse onely they be retayned to re-enter in their Visitation In which they shall not onely preach but also examine the life diligence and behauiour of the Ministers as also the order of their Churches and manners of their people They must further consider how the poore are prouided for and the youth instructed By these wordes it is manifest that it was not a thing common to euery Pastor to visite Churches
as the Papists fancie which cannot be once named without the injurie of Baptisme but it should be a catechizing of children whereby they should giue account of their Faith before the Church And the best manner of catechizing were this That a forme should be penned for that vse contayning the summe of all the heads of our Religion and expounding them familiarly vnto which Faith and Religion the vniuersall Church of the faithfull should agree that the child being ten yeares old should present himselfe to the Church to giue a confession of his Faith bee demanded vpon euery Article and made to answere seuerally to euery one and if hee were ignorant of any point or did not well vnderstand the same he should be instructed Thus he should in presence of the Church and vnder the testimonie thereof make profession of that onely true and sincere Faith wherewith the Congregation of the faithfull worships God If this discipline were in vigour at this time the slouth of some Parents should bee corrected that securely neglect the instruction of their children as a thing not appertayning vnto to them which then without a publike shame they could not leaue vndone a greater consent should bee amongst Christian people in Religion and the ignorance of many should be nothing so great some would not bee so hastily carried away with new and strange opinions and in a word all should haue a methode of Christian Doctrine This was the minde of the most learned and worthy Diuine that hath liued in this last age wherewith let the Reader iudge if the Ordinance of Perth bee not agreeing An answer to the last head intituled Of the Administration of the Sacraments in priuate places TO the end the last Controuersie touching the administration of Baptisme and the Supper of the Lord in priuate houses may bee the better discussed wee shall premit some few grounds for cleering the question First The publike actions of Christian Religion are not tyed to any certayne time or place by diuine Institution but may bee lawfully performed at any time and in any place when necessâ—ty requires Secondly That the publike actions may be lawfully performed a publike Minister a lawfull Assembly and the forme prescribed in the Word must necessarily be kept Thirdly Howbeit some hold that Baptisme ministred by a priuate person is valide and effectuall yet no man can hold truely that it is lawfully ministred by such a person Fourthly Although the Communion Elements bee duly consecrated by a publike Minister in a most solemne and lawfull Assembly yet if he apply them only to his owne priuate vse or to so me other particular person making no distribution according to the Institution the action is not lawfully performed Fiftly The lawfull Assemblies wherein the publike actions may be performed are eyther ordinary or not ordinarie The ordinary are not defined in the word particularly but are left to bee determined by the Church which according to the generall Rules of Christian Policie hath deuided the Christian people in sundry Congregations called Parishes whose meeting in the ordinary times and places appointed are the ordinary Assemblies wherein the publike actions of Religion should be performed ordinarily Sixtly The Assemblies that are lawfull but not ordinary are the meetings of two or three at least in the Name of Iesus Christ wherein he hath promised his presence to heare their Prayers and approue their lawfull actions of piety In such Assemblies the Word hath beene preached and Baptisme ministred as in the 16. of the Acts the Master of the Prison and his Family were baptized by Paul The Husband the Wife and a Seruant make a Family where there be no more The Family of Priscilla and Aquila are called a Church This Pamphleter affirmes with Saint Augustine Paulinus Esychius Theophylactus and others That our Sauiour at Emaus did celebrate the Sacrament to the two Disciples with whom he communed in the way There the whole Assembly were but three whether the Sacrament was ministred or not at that time this is certaine as many as hold that the same was celebrated must also hold that three make the bodie of a Church wherein the Eucharist may be lawfully ministred and if the Eucharist much more Baptisme which was ministred by Philip to the Eunuch where there was no Christian Assembly conuened Yet doubtlesse he was baptised in presence of his Seruants who were witnesses to the action For Baptisme would be ministred in presence of some witnesses and the Eucharist cannot be lawfully ministred without some communicants Although a Temple bee not necessary at Caluine sayes in the 185. Epistle yet the Infant should be baptized in coetu aliquo Si enim infans clam baptizetur nullis adhibitis testibus illud neque respondet ordini à Domino posito neque Apostolorum exemplo Likewise that there may bee a Communion conueniat coetus aliquis ex cognatis familiaribus vicinis saies Caluine These grounds being warranted by Scripture and by the Ancients first wee shall set downe the Acts of the Assembly which yee labour to refute next your Refutation and Answere thereto The Acts concluded at Perth touching priuate Baptisme and Communion THe Minister shall often admonish the people that they deferre not the baptizing of Infants any longer then the nexts Lords Day after the Childe bee borne vnlesse vpon a great and reasonable cause declared to the Minister and by him approued As also they shall warne them that without great cause they procure not their Children to be baptized at home in their houses but when great need shall compell them to baptise in priuate houses in which case the Minister shall not refuse to doe it vpon the knowledge of the great need and being timely required thereto then Baptisme shall be administred after the same forme as it should haue beene in the Congregation And the Minister shall the next Lords Day after any such priuate Baptisme declare in the Church that the Infant was so baptized and therefore ought to bee receiued as one of the true Flocke of Christs Fold Item If any good Christian visited with long sicknesse and knowne to the Pastor by reason of his present infirmity vnable to resort to the Church for receiuing of the holy Communion or being sick stall declare to the Pastor vpon his coÌ„science that he thinks his sicknes to be deadly and shall earnestly desire to receiue the same in his house The Minister shall not deny to him so great a comfort lawfull warning being giuen to him vpon the night before and that there be three or foure of good Religion and conuersation free of lawfull impediments present with the sicke person to communicate with him who must also prouide a conuenient place in his house all things necessary for the reuerend administration thereof according to the order prescribed in the Church PP In the ninth head of the first Booke of Discipline it was thought expedient that Baptisme should be ministred vpon
the Eunuch and the Centurion No man will denie but in the infancie of a Church a priuate Baptisme may be tollerated but we speake of a Church constituted c. The Lord appoynted a precise day of Circumcision which might not be preuented It was no wonder if they had not euer opportunitie of a solemne Conuention there is no precise day set downe for Baptisme c. The Church ought to be assured of the Baptisme of such as are reputed fellow-heires with them c. ANS That the Church may be assured of the Baptisme of the Childe it is ordained in the Act of Perth That the Minister shall the next Lords-day after any such priuate Baptisme declare in the Church that the Infant was so baptized and therefore ought to be receyued as one of the true Flocke of CHRISTS â—olde In a constituted Church Baptisme should not be ministred ordinarily but according to the constitutions of the Church but extraordinarie cases cannot be subiect to ordinarie constitutions more in a constituted Church then in the Infancie of it And that which is lawfull to be done in the Infancie of the Church is yet lawfull to be done in a constituted Church ratione reipraeceptae diuinae institutionis And it is vnlawfull onely ratiâ—ne ordinis in regard of the order appointed by the Church from which cases of necessitie are alwaies excepted Also that which might haue beene tolerated in the infancie of the Church for necessitie must euer be lawfull in the like case for it was not the infancie of the Church that made the toleration lawfull but the necessitie Where ye thinke that the Iewes were more strictly obliged to circumcision then Christians are to Baptisme because a certain day was appointed for it and to Baptisme there is no day prefixed in the Word Wee know by the Law that he who is not obliged at a certaine day to pay his debt may be charged to pay it at all times and therfore when God layes sicknesse on a child a charge is giuen by God instantly to the Parent to performe his duetie PP The Lords Supper ought to be publique We haue a spirituall vnion with the whole Church but because it is not possible to celebrate a sacramentall communion with the whole Church militant the Lord hath appointed vs to celebrate a sacramental coÌ„munion with some particular Church We that are many are one bread and one bodie because wee are partakers of one bread 1. Cor. 10.17 We cannot then bee one body sacrameÌ„tally except we be pertakers of one bread Other Feasts may be priuate in priuate houses but the Lords Supper ought to be publique 1. Cor. 11.12 When yee conuene to eate tarrie one for another 1. Cor. 11.33 Synaxis a word signifying as much as Synagogue was one of the names giuen of olde to this Sacrament ANS As with the whole Church Militant we haue a spirituall Communion so haue we an Euangelicall and Sacramentall Communion for as we are partakers of the same spirit so are we partakers of the same Word and Sacraments The Bread is one which all receiue and the water one wherewith all are baptised Sacramentally for they are clothed with the same sacred mysterie of signification exhibition and obsignation of saluation in Christ crucified When the Apostle sayes 1. Cor. 10.17 Because the bread is one we who are many are one body for we are all partakers of one bread he speaks not of our Communion with a particular Church onely but with the Catholike and by one bread he meanes not one bread mateâ—ially in number for one bread in number materially none but one particular person can receiue The bread which I receiue materially is not the same that thou receiuest but the Sacrament is one and the same in number To bee short wee haue no more a Sacramentall communion with these in the Parish with whom wee communicate then wee haue with the whole militant Church who are all partakers of the same Sacraments And thus as we haue a spirituall so we haue a sacramentall Communion with them It is true that our communion in the Word and Sacraments is not visible but with some particular Church and therefore as it is lesse or more publike so is it lesse or more visible yet we doe euer celebrate a Sacramentall communion with the whole Church when the action is lawfully performed The other places which yee cite 1. Cor. 11.22 Haue yee not houses to eate and drinke in and Vers. 33. When yee convene to eate tarry one for another of which yee gather that other feasts may be in priuate houses but the Lords Supper should be in publike These places I say are relatiue to the ordinarie meetings of those times which were often in priuate houses Caluine in his 363. Epistle to Oleâ—ian answers this obiection Neque verò Paulus dum Corinthios admonet domum suam cuique esse in qua comedat bibat coenam excludit à priuatis aedibus tunc neque fidelibus patebant templa nec permissum erat noua extruere sed tantùm à communibus epulis discernit spirituale mysterium ne cum illis misceatur that is When Paul admonishes the Corinthians that euery one hath his owne house wherein hee may eate and drinke he does not exclude the Lords Supper from priuate houses for in those dayes Temples were not patent to Christians neither had they libertie to build new Churches but hee discernes onely the spirituall mysterie from their common feasts and will not haue it to bee mixed with them So the mysterie was called Synaxis because it was euer celebrated in some Conuention lesse or more ordinarie or extraordinarie PP It is a badge of our publike profession it ought therefore to be publike ANS It should not onely be publike but most solemne ordinarily And in cases of necessitie when the same is ministred by an ordinarie Pastor to two or three assembled in Christs name it ceases not to be publike PP The Communion was sent to the sicke in the time or mediately after the action in Iustine Martyr his time It became afterwards to bee reserued for the vse of dying persons c. Some put the Eucharist into the mouthes of the dead lest they should want their voyage victuall Yet in all Antiquitie we reade not that the Communion was celebrated at the sick-mans bed-side ANS The corruptions that haue flowed of mens erroneous conceit of the Sacraments should not take away the lawfull vse of them when necessitie requires As to the sending of the Sacrament to the sicke it was a custome of the ancient Church which Beza allowes and where the Communion was daily at least weekely celebrated in the ordinarie Congregation as that was the custome of those times it was not necessarie to celebrate the Communion at the sick-mans bed-side PP Clinicall Communions haue not onely bred and still doe foster the opinion of absolute necessitie but also of Opus operatum of a preposterous confidence
in the last voyage victuall of coldnesse in the publike seruice of God when we are in health of distrust of our saluation if wee want it at that time Caluine sayes Difficillimum est hic cauere ne alios superstitio alios ambitio vana ostentatio ad petendum sollicitet ANS Albeit Caluine thinks that Superstition Ambition and vaine glorie may follow the practice of giuing the Communion to the sicke yet hee concludes not as yee doe For in the same Epistle a little before the wordes which yee cite hee sayes Cur coenam aegrotis negandam esse non arbitrer multae graues causae me impellunt that is Many great and weightie reasons moue mee to thinke that the Communion ought not to be denyed to the sicke Hee saw incâ—nueniences might follow thereon therefore hee addes Iudicio opus esset ac delectu ne quibus daretur nisi in magno vitae discrimine that is Prouidence and discretion would bee vsed in this that it should bee giuen to none but those that are in extreme danger of their life Where yee alleadge Clinicall Communion to haue bred the opinion of absolute necessitie before yee said that it was bred by misse-constructing of the wordes in Iohn 6. by Saint Augustine yet wee finde this custome of giuing the Communion to the sicke to haue beene at least two hundred yeares before Saint Augustines time How proue yee now that the practice bred the opinion yee coniecture it was so A good and lawfull custome could no more haue bred it then the truth of Christs words in Saint Iohn 6. The opinion certaynly was bred by some misse-construction as yee say and the way to remoue it is neither the deleting the wordes out of the Text nor the discharging of a lawfull and comfortable practice of Religion but the right interpretation of the words of our Sauiour and the clearing of the Churches custome PP They say the sicke should not bee left destitute of comfort This reason arises of the opinion of necessitie as if there were no other meanes to comfort the sicke or as if the comfort of the publike Communion endured onely for the present time and not for the time to come ANS The reason arises not of the opinion of necessitie but of expediency for albeit there bee other meanes to comfort the sicke yet why should hee want this that is one of the most powerfull and ought to bee iterated as oft as it is expedient although the comfort once thereby receiued endureth for euer PP There is a faire occasion offered Iam. 5. of priuate Communion and yet there is no mention made of it in that place ANS In that place Saint Iames sets downe the meanes whereby the sicke may bee restored to health whilest the gift of healing was yet in the Church The Sacrament was not any of these meanes therefore of it no mention is made PP If the vow and desire of Baptisme may supply the want of Baptisme then may also the vow and desire of the Eucharist doe the like ANS The desire and wish of Baptisme and the Supper is not sufficient without participation when and where they may be had PP Some Diuines condescend thus far that the Communion may be sent to the sick in the time of the publike action But Tilenus sayes Whatsoeuer necessitie be pretended scarce any sufficient cause can be rendred wherfore the publike action should passe in priuate because the Ordinance of God is of supreme necessitie The comforts of the infirme ministred out of order does rather foster the publike infirmitie of the Church then heale the priuate infirmitie of the sicke ANS Beza in his Questions thinkes that the Sacrament should be sent to the sicke Caluine holds that it should bee celebrated at the sickmans bed-side so both agree in this that it should be giuen to the sicke And Caluines saying Epist. 363. may serue for an Answere to that which yee alledge out of Tilenus Quamuis nulla sit legitima coena nisi communis quae tamen aegrotis dabitur quia priuata non erit adulterina non censebitur Nam certe partem vel appendicem esse constat publicae actionis that is Albeit no Supper is lawfull but that which is common yet that which is giuen to the sicke because it shal not be priuate is not to be counted vnlawful for it is eyther a part or a pendicle of the publike action To conclude to deny a necessarie comfort vnto the sick which may bee ministred without breach of any diuine order cures not the publike infirmitie of the Church but grieues the sicke and fosters in these who are in health a base opinion and contempt of the Sacrament I will subioyne to all this Caluines iudgement touching these matters CALVINE Epist. 184. INprimis autem obseruandum est cùm istud Sacramentum complectatur sacram solennem introductionem in Ecclesiam Dei sitque testimonium coelestis nostri municipatus in quem adscribuntur illi quos Dominus adoptat sibi fas non esse ministrare Baptismum nisi in coetu fidelium Non quidem vt Templum requiratur sed vt vbiuis numerus aliquis fideliâ—m conueniat qui Ecclesiae corpus efficiat c. Oportet igitur infantem baptizari in coetu aliquo c. Etiamsi exiguus sit illorum numerus Oro Deum vt rectum illum zelum ipsis adaugeat quem iam contulit vt se suos Deo Patri consecrent Domino nostro Iesu Christo. EPIST. 51. DE Coenae administratione ita censeo libenter admittendum esse sentio hunc morem vt apud â—grotos celebretur Communio quùm ita res oportunitas feret hac tamen lege vt sit vera Communio hoc est vt panis in coetu aliquo fidelium frangatur EPIST. 361. CVr Coenam agrotis negandam esse non arbitrer multae graues causae me impellunt Video interea quà m procliuis in multos abusus sit lapsus quibus prudenter seduloque occurrendum esset Nisi enim sit Communio perperam deflectitur à sacra institutione Christi Conueniat ergo aliquis coetus oportet ex cognatis familiaribus vicinis vt fiat distributio ex mandato Christi Deinde coniuncta sit actio cum mysterij explicatione Nec quicquam fiat à communi Ecclesiae ratione diuersum EPIST. 363. ETsi pridem meam de Coena aegrotis administranda sententiam rogasti optime frater c. Scio rem in disceptatione versari quia non desunt vtrinque rationes Mihi verò non est propesitum nunc eas sigillatim excute re neque tempus suppetit Ex natura quidem fine vsu mysterij probe mihi colligere videor non esse tanto bono priuandos qui vel diuturno morbo laborant vel de vita periclitantur Ad fidei confirmationem valet tesseram accipere quasi ex Christimanu quacertiores fiamus nos in eius corpore censeri carne eius sanguine pasci in spem aetâ—rnae Vitae Itaque coenae perceptio nos ad obeundas spirituales pugnas instruit Iam si pius quispiam è mundo migrandum sibi videat quia fieri non potest quin oppugnetur vexetur multis tentationibus meritò se armari cupiet ad sustinendos conflictus An eripiendum est singulare adiumentum quo fretus ad luctam alacrius descendat victoriam obtineat Iam prohiberi quo minus liceat profiteri testatum facere pietatis consensum cum Ecclesia durum est ac mali ex ampli siue quis in lecto diu iaceat siue morti sit vicinus Atque coena sanctae inter filios Dei vnitatis est Symbolum Quamuis breuiter rem attigerim agnoscis tamen quibus rationibus adductus aegrotos non esse arbitror à Communione arcendos Neque tamen ea de causa velim turbas mouere Scis in hac Ecclesia alium esse morem Acquiesco quia vtile non esset contendere c. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The power of the Church The power of the Christian Church in electing Pastors Numb cap 3. 1. Tim. 3. 2. Cor. 10. Their power in câ—nsecrating places Act. 15.21 Deut. 12.4 1. Cor. 14.40 The power of the Church in appointing times to Gods worship Leuit. 23. Act. 5. Act. 19. Act. 13.14 Epitom de fide Catholica Epist. ad Ianuar. 118. Caluin 361. Epist. Bellar. de cultâ— sanctorum lib. 3. cap. 10. The Church hath power to determine generall circumstances necessary for Godâ— worship The Lawes that the Church makes in their matters are alterable The obedience due to the Ordinances of the Church The rules of Conscience Act. 5.29 In matters of expedience where a lawful Ordinance is set downe the same ought to be the rule of our conscience Euseb. Hist. Eccles. lib. 6. cap. 34. Aug. Epist. 118. * This was the protestation that should haue beene presented to the last Parliament Psal. Booke pag. 6. Iude 3. 1 Cor. 1â— Caluine Sozom. l. 1. c. 9. Nic. l. 8. c. 14. 3. Tom. Con. 1. p. 6. * Ep. 184. Ep. â—1 Ep. â—61 Ep. 363. Inâ—â—itut â—ib â— cap. 2â— Sect. 4. 13. A consideration of the Discipline whereunto the Swearers did oblige themselues Now Bishop of Couentrâ— and â—ichfield The second Reason Epist. 119. The third Reason The fourth Reason The fift Reason The sixt Reason The seuenth Reason The eighth Reason