Selected quad for the lemma: church_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
church_n	heathen_a	let_v	publican_n	2,742	5	10.9981	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
B20727	The keyes of the kingdom of heaven and power thereof according to the word of God / by Mr. Iohn Cotton ...	Cotton, John, 1584-1652.	1644 (1644)	Wing C6437	60,953	71

is not the key of the kingdome of heaven but the key of the bottomelesse pit Rev. 9.1 But this word whatsoever is here put in the Neuter Gender not in the Masculine whomsoever to imply both things and persons Things as sins Persons as those that commit them For so when our Saviour speaketh of the same acts of the same keys Ioh. 20.21 he explaineth himself thus Whose sins soever yee remit they are remitted and whose sins soever yee retain they are retained Whatsoever you binde on earth is as much therefore as whose sins soever you retain on earth and whatsoever you loose on earth is as much as whose sins soever you loose on earth Now this binding and loosing of whatsoever sins in whosever commit them is partly in the conscience of the sinner and partly in his outward estate in the Church which is wont to be expressed in other terms either in foro interiori or in foro exteriori As when in the dispensation of the Ordinances of God a sinner is convinced to lie under the guilt of sin then his sin is retained his conscience is bound under the guilt of it and himself bound under some Church-censure according to the quality and desert of his offence and if his sin be the more hainous himself is shut out from the communion of the Church But when a sinner repenteth of his sin and confesseth it before the Lord and if it be known before his people also and then in the ministery of the Doctrine and Discipline of the Gospel his sin is remitted and his conscience loosed from the guilt of it and himself hath open and free entrance both unto the promise of the Gospel and into the gates of the holy communion of the Church 5. The fifth point to be explained is To whom is this power of the keyes given The Text saith To thee Simon Peter the sonne of Jona whom Christ blesseth and pronounceth blessed upon his holy confession of Christ the Sonne of the living God and upon the same occasion promiseth both to use him and his confession as an Instrument to lay the foundation of his Church and also to give him the keys of his Church for the well ordering and governing of it But it hath proved abusie Question How Peter is to be considered in receiving this power of the keys whether as an Apostle or as an Elder for an Elder also he was 1 Pet. 5.1 or as a Believer professing his faith before the Lord Jesus and his fellow Brethren Now because wee are as well studious of peace as of truth wee will not leane to one of these interpretations more than to another Take any of them it will not hinder our purpose in this ensuing Discourse though to speake ingenuously and without offence what we conceive the sense of the words will be most full if all the severall considerations be taken joyntly together Take Peter considered not onely as an Apostle but an Elder also yea and a Beleever too professing his faith all may well stand together For there is a different power given to all these to an Apostle to an Elder to a Beleever and Peter was all these and received all the power which was given by Christ to any of these or to all of these together For as the Father sent Christ so Christ sent Peter as well as any Apostle cum amplitudine plenitudine potestatis so far as either any Church-Officer or the whole Church it selfe was capable of it John 20.21 So that Austin did not mistake when he said Peter received the keys in the name of the Church Neverthelesse wee from this place in Mat. 16.19 will challenge no further power either to the Presbytery or to the Fraternitie of the Church then is more expresly granted to them in other Scriptures Now in other Scriptures it appeareth First That Christ gave the power of retaining or remitting of sins that is the power of binding and loosing the whole power of the keys to all the Apostles as well as to Peter Joh. 20.21.23 Secondly It appeareth also that the Apostles commended the rule and government of every particular Church to the Elders the Presbytery of that Church Heb. 13.17 1 Tim. 5.17 And therefore Christ gave the power of the Keys to them also Thirdly It appeareth farther that Christ gave the power of the keys to the Body likewise of the Church even to the Fraternitie with the Presbytery For the Lord Jesus communicateth the power of binding and loosing to the Apostles or Elders together with the whole Church when they are met in his Name and agree together in the censure of an offender Mat. 18.17 18. If an offender saith he neglect to heare the Church let him be to thee as an Heathen or a Publican that is let him be excommunicated Which censure administred by them with the whole Church he ratifieth with this promise of the power of the keys Verily I say unto you whatsoever you shall binde on earth shall be bound in heaven and whatsoever you shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven In which place howsoever there be some difference between Classicall and Congregationall Divines what should be meant by the Church Tell the Church whether the Presbytery or the Congregation yet all agree in this and it is agreement in the truth which wee seek for That no offender is to be excommunicated but with some concurse of the Congregation at least by way 1. Of consent to the sentence 2. Of actuall execution of it by withdrawing themselves from the offender so convicted and censured Now this consent and concurse of the Congregation which is requisite to the power and validitie of the censure we conceive is some part of the exercise of the power of the keys So that when Christ said to Peter To thee will I give the keys of the kingdome of heaven If Peter then received the whole power of the keys then he stood in the roome and name of all such as have received any part of the power of the keys whether Apostles or Elders or Churches Or if he stood in the roome of an Apostle onely yet that hindreth not but that as he there received the power of an Apostle so the rest of the Apostles received the same power either there or elsewhere and the Presbytery of each Church received if not there yet elsewhere the power belonging to their office and in like sort each Church or Congregation of professed Believers received that portion also of Church-power which belonged to them CHAP. II. Of the Distribution of the Keys and their power or of the severall sorts thereof THe ordinary Distribution of the keys is wont to be thus delivered There is clavis 1. Scientiae A key of knowledge and a clavis 2. Potestatis key of power and the key of power is 1. Ordinis Either a key of order or a key of 2. Jurisdictionis Jurisdiction This distribution though it goe for current both amongst

word and doctrine but rather Pastors and Teachers above them The Elders saith he that rule well are worthy of double honour but especially they that labour in word and doctrine 1. Tim. 5.17 5 Conclus When after the Apostles times one of the Pastors by way of eminencie was called Bishop for order sake yet for many yeers he did no act of power but 1 With consent of the Presbyterie 2 With consent and in the presence of the people As is noted out of Eusebius Ecclesiast Histor lib. 6. ca. 43. Gr. ca. 35. Lat. Cyprian Epist lib. 3. Epist 10. lib. 1. Epist 3. Casanb adversus Baronium exercitat 15. num 28. When it is alledged out of Hiereme to confirm the same that in the primitive times Communi Presbyterorum consilie Ecelesiae gubernabantur It is a weak and poore evasion to put it off with observing that he saith Communi Presbyterorum consilie not authoritate For 1. No authoritie is due to Presbyters over the Bishop or Pastor no more then to the Pastor over them They are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 fellow-Elders and coequall in authoritie And 2. when Hiereme saith The Churches were governed by the common counsell but all with it else it might be said the Bishop governed the Churches with the common counsell of Presbyters to wit asked but not followed And that would imply a contradiction to Hieronus testimonie to say the Churches were governed by the sole authoritie of Bishops and yet not without asking the common counsell of the Presbyters For in asking their counsell and not following it the Bishop should order and govern the Churches against their counsell Now that the Churches were governed by the common counsell of Presbyters and against the common counsell of Presbyters are flat contradictories 2. For a second Argument to prove that the Brethren of the Church of a particular congregation walking with their Elders in truth and peace are the first subject of all that Church power which is needfull to be exercised in their own body It is taken From their indispensable and independent power in Church censures The censure that is ratified in heaven cannot be dispensed withall nor reversed by any power on earth Now the censure that is administred by the Church of a particular congregation is ratified in Heaven For so saith the Lord Iesus touching the power of Church censures Matth. 18 17 18. If the offender refuse to hear the Church let him be to thee as a heathen and a Publican Verily I say unto you Whatsoever ye shall bind onearth shall be bound in Heaven and whatsoever ye shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven Against this Argument from this Text many objections are wont to be made but none that will hold Object 1. By Church in Mat. 18.17 is not meant the Christian Church for it was not yet extant nor could the Apostles then have understood Christ if he had so meant but the Jewish church and so he delivereth their censure in a Jewish phrase to account a man as an Heathen and a Publican Answ 1. The Christian Church though it was not then extant yet the Apostles knew as well what he meant by Church in Mat. 18.17 as they understood what he meant by building his Church upon the Rock in Mat. 16.18 It was enough the Apostles looked for a Church which Christ would gather and build upon the confession of Peters faith and being built should be indued with heavenly power in their censures which they more fully understood afterwards when having received the Holy Ghost they came to put these things in practice Answ 2. The allusion in the Church-censure to the Jewish custome in accounting a man as an Heathen and Publican doth not argue that Christ directeth his Disciples to complain of scandals to the Jewish Synagogues but only directeth them how to walk towards obstinate offenders excommunicate by the Christian church to wit to walk towards them as the Jews walk towards Heathens to wit denying to them religious communion and as towards Publicans with-holding from them familiar civill communion for so the Iews said to Christs Disciples Why eateth your Master with Publicans and Sinners Answ 3. It is not credible that Christ would send his Disciples to make complaint of their offences to the Iewish Synagogues For first Is it likely he would send his Lambs and Sheep for right and healing unto Wolves and Tigres Both their Sanhedrim and most of their Synogogues were no better And if here and there some Elders of their Synagogues were better affected yet how may it appear that so it was where any of themselves dwelt And if that might appear too yet had not the Iews already agreed That if any man did confesse Christ he should be cast out of the Synagogues Joh. 9.22 Object 2. Against the argument from this Text it is objected That by the Church is meant the Bishop or his Commissary Answ 1. One man is not the Church If it be said one man may represent a church the reply is ready one man cannot represent the Church unlesse he be sent forth by the Church but so is neither the Bishop nor his Commissary They not for them but they come unsent for like water into a Ship chiefly for the terror of the servants of Christ and for the incouragement of the prophane And though some of Christs servants have found some favour from some few of Bishops men of more learning and ingenuity yet those Bishops have found the lesse favour themselves from their fellow-Bishops Answ 2. The Bishop ordinarily is no member of the Church of that congregation where the offence is committed and what is his satisfaction to the removall of the offence given to the Church Answ 3. The new Testament acknowledgeth no such ruler in the Church as claimeth honour above the Elders that labour in word and Doctrine 1 Tim. 5.17 Object 3. To tell the Church is to tell the Presbyterie of the Church Answ 1. We deny not The offence is to be told to the Presbyterie yet not to them as the Church but as the guides of the church who if upon hearing the cause and examining the witnesses they finde it ripe for publike censure they are then to propound it to the Church and to try and cleer the state of the cause before the church that so the church discerning fully the nature and quality of the offence may consent to the judgement and sentence of the Elders against it to the confusion of the offender and the publike edification of them all who hearing and fearing will learn to beware of the like wickednesse Answ 2. The Church is never put for the Presbyterie alone throughout the new Testament though sometime it be put expresly for the Fraternity alone as they are distinguished from the Elders and Officers Act. 15.22 and therefore Tell the Church cannot be meant Tell the Presbyterie alone Object In the old Testament the Congregation is often put for the