been already said Obs 8. Mr Stilling fleet is not well pleased with such as lay any weight upon the former ground mentioned viz Christ's being obliged there unto by his office as mediator King Lord of his house would have them rather proving that Christ hath determined a forme of Governement then that he ought so to have done Therefore we shall shew that Christ hath so done indeed And what the Apostles did at his command or by vertue of the commission he gave unto them will easily be granted to be equivalent But to passe this Christ himself hath laid down the maine ground foundation of a species of governement in Math. 18 ver 15 16 17. For there he is setting down a course for the removing of scandalls that will fall out among his Disciples followers ordering the matter so that when privat meanes will not gaine the offending brother more publick meanes must be used he must be brought unto the Church judicature that Church judicature hath power to excommunicat him if so be he heare them not as to the removing of the scandall It is true many parties endeavour to presse these words for their own use but it will not hence follow that therefore these words are incompetent to determine any one forme for if this ground be relevant much of the scripture should become incompetent to determine matters of faith doctine because severall parties labour to wrest the same to their own judgment It would be tedious here to examine the clames of all parties unto this place the present work is only to deal with Mr Stillingsleet therefore only his notions concerning this place must be examined Concerning this place then he giveth his judgment 2. part cap. 5. § 8. first he taketh the trespasses mentioned to be matters of private offence injury not matters of Scandall his grounds are these 1. The parallel place Luk. 17 ver 3. is to be understood of privat injuries because it is in the power of each privat person to forgive them Ans. So said Erastus before him but after narrow search it will be found that the forgiving mentioned in the Text Math. 18. is a desisting from any further prosecution of the bussinesse a forgiving which must not be granted untill the brother be gained But whether the offending brother be gained or not all private injuris must be forgiven him none must keep up a Spirit of revenge against him And therefore these trespasses must be matters of Scandall which unlesse the offending brother be gained must be prosecuted untill the yondmost step be used 2. He sayeth It appears from the next words of Peter ver 20. This is another of Erastus's shifts But for answere It will not appear till Mr Stillingfleet first cleare that there is such a connexion betwixt these verses as will undoubtedly demonstrat that one purpose is to be understood in Both. But commentators shewe the matter to be otherwise indeed there is nothing that can so much as ground a probability of such a connexion here unlesse it be these words Then came Peter to him but whosoever shall look on Luk. 8 v. 19. shall have the like thus Then came to him his mother c. And yet this was not immediatly after what was said before as will appear when compared with other Evangelists And so since it is not certaine that this was immediatly after the former purpose no reason can be given to evince the identity of these purposes 3. He sayeth If it were meant of any scandalous sin it might so fall out that matters of scandal should be brought before the Church when only one person knowes it Ans. It is not said that every such scandall or trespasse whereof only one is conscious should be brought in publick but that more noture scandalls ought to be brought before Church judicatures when more privat admonitions will not gaine the offender But 2. This inconvenience will recurre upon himself in the case of privat offences But next as to the word Church he sayes It is a select company called together to hear the whole cause this was agreable to the jewish practice pudefacere coram multis delictum publicare to this the Apostle alludeth 2 Cor. 2 v. 6. this is the reproof before all 1 Tim. 5 v. 20. Ans. 1. The word Church is not usually so taken in the New Testament the Hebrew words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Old Test. do alwayes import a company imbodied in a stated way as a fixed congregation either for governement or Worship Mr Leigh in his Critica sacra sayeth that among the Grecians chiefly the Athenians from whom it came it was used for a multitude called together by the command of a Magistrat 2. Christ sayeth tell the Church 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so directeth them to a fixed standing company 3. That pudefacere coram multie being the same with 2 Cor. 2 6 the censure of many confirmeth this For that censure was by a Church judicature conveened in the name of the Lord Iesus to take course with a scandalous person 1 Cor. 5. Againe 4. No commentator taketh the words so only Grotius other Erastians put such a glosse upon them 5. Christ's scope is to have the offending brother gained not to have matters of fact which are questionable cleared 6. If this be the meaning of the word Church what shall be the sense meaning of these words Let him be unto thee as a heathen man a Publican He answereth Tho meaning is look upon him as an obstinat refractary creature meddle no more with him then with a heathen a publican And is this all the punishment which the offender must meet with Who gave privat men this power to passe such a sentence But 2. This must be a Church sentence because it is added Whatsoever you shall binde on earth shall be bound in Heaven c. To this he replyeth That the meaning is it is an evidence that his sin is bound upon him that he is lyable to punishment But how is his sin bound upon him or how is he made lyable to punishment There must be something done on earth which God must ratify in Heaven on earth there is none to do any thing but either the pursuer himself or the select company It cannot be the pursuer for that were a dreadful intolerable slavery to subjecte every man to the lust of his enemy pursuer If it be the select company how or whence have they this power If they be cloathed with authority then are they a judicature this is the thing pleaded for And thus it appeareth that scandals are here understood that this Church is a Church judicature notwithstanding of all which Mr Still hath said to the contrary which is but the very same which others had said
before him which was sufficiently answered by worthy learned Mr Gillespy in his Aarons rod blossoming though he will not so much as once take notice of his replyes The ancients did so understand the place particularly Orig. Tract 6. in Mat. But that it may be cleared how there is a foundation here laid down for a way of removing of scandals by Church officers in communi associated together in a judicature so how there is a way laid down for presbyterian Government let those particulars be considered 1. From the beginning of the chapt the Lord is speaking of scandals first of scandals given as is clear v. 6 8 9. after he hath used some arguments to presse his followers to beware of that evill he cometh v. 15. with an 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which may be rendered but if thy brother to another case about the same purpose or head viz. to cleare this question what shall be a christians carriage when his neighbour stumbleth or offendeth him by his unchristian carriage in his ordinary walk So Galvin Aretius others so he is speaking of reall scandals for 1. They are Brethren or Church members with whom this course must be taken 2. The offending brother is to be rebuked or convinced of his fault 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 importeth such a convinceing as ' is for sin Ioh. 8 9 46. so the LXX use it Lev. 19 17. where sinnes scandals are spoken of 3. He sayes if he hear thee not if he repay thee the wrong he hath done or if he be reconciled 4. Then he is gained now 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Stillingfleet himself confesseth is used for conversion turning others from sin 1. Cor. 9 19. 1. Pet. 3 1. compared with Iam 5 20. Hence 2. It would be considered that the Christian's scope in this bussinesse should be to gaine the man's soull for this cause he is to assay all calme peaceable gaineing private meanes to bring the offending brother to conviction acknowledgment of his fault so first speak to him alone then take some others with him to be witnes both of his Christian carriage towards him in desireing to have him gained of his unwillingnesse to be gained that so they may bear witnesse of both unto the Church judicature 3. When privat means do not worke he is to be delated unto the Church judicature for the person offended must tell the Church What Church He must tell that Church unto which the witnesses will be usefull that is a judicature for to that witnesses have a relation That Church which is able to convince if any do it That Church whose sentence is the last remedy Thâ—… Church which hath power to binde loose That Church which hath power to binde loose with a promise of the ratification of what they do in heaven That Church which hath the keyes Mat. 16. power authoritatively to pardon retaine sinnes Ioh. 20 23. That Church which hath power to pronunce that sentence after which the man is to be looked upon as a heathen a publican 4. And when this Church judicature can not get him convinced they must passe a sentence upon him this sentence is the sentence of excommunication as learned Mr Gillespy hath abundantly shewed Aaron's rod. book 3. c. 2. 3. Hence it is clear 5. That here is set downe the way of taking away Church scandalls by inflicting Church censures And this by Christ's appoyntment is not to be done by any one person but by the Church officers in communi collegiatly for it was never heard of to this day either in sacred or prophane writtings that one man was called a Church or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And this is a good basis for Government yea for presbyterian Government or the Government of the Church communi consilio presbyterorum here there is not only a foundation for graduall appeals as himself confesseth here though part 2. cap. ult § 8. he would say that presbyterians found their subordination of courts Upon the principles of humane prudence for Church censures for the lawfull use of excommunication as he confesseth also But also for the species or modell of Government Or for the manner of the constitution of the judicatures which should excommunicat take notice of Church scandalls for it is called the Church so cannot be meaned of a prelat who is no where so called and yet arrogateth to himself all the power of jurisdiction But Mr Stilling fleet hath two arguments whereby he endeavoureth to prove that Christ did never intend to institute any one forme of Government in the Church part 2. c. 4. § 4. 5 6. c. This is a great undertaking and his arguments must needs be very strong but whether so or not the reader may judge The summe of the first is this If there be any such institution of Christs as a standing law it must either be expressed in direct termes which cannot here be showne Or deduced by a necessary consequence and no consequences can make new institutions but only apply one to particular cases And then the obligation of what is drawne by a necessary consequence must be expressed in scripture Ans. It hath been showne that the practice of the Apostles was for a forme of Government and from their practice a law may by necessary consequence be drawne considering their place office how they were sent forth to plant Churches to set up officers to appoynt unto each of them their proper work c. And for this cause were endued with extraordinary qualifications assistence confirming their commission by many signes wonders And this carryeth an obligation in its bosome There hath been showne also a standing law of Christ's from which a forme of Governement may be deduced a standing law about the removing of scandals which will found a species of Governement by Church officers in common as well as appeals Church censures excommunication from thence there is an obligation for the one as well as for the rest 2. But if all this will not satisfie let Mr Stilling fleet satisfie himself with the standing obligation of the moralitie of the first day Sabbath he shall with all satisfie himself as to the standing obligation of the moralitie of a species of Church Governement He can produce no law for the first day Sabbath but a law deduced by necessary consequence without any obligation expressed in scripture concerning that which is so drawn by consequence if this be enough in the case of the first day Sabbath why not also in the case of Governement If he say in the bussinesse of the Lord's day there was only an application of an institution to a particular case It is Ans. So is it in the matter of Church Governement for there was a law for a Governement in genere this law drawn by consequence from the
6. Mary Elizabeth in the space of Thirty years waâ—… grounded upoâ—… occasioned by that which is contained in this oath for by vertue of this oath these severall Kings Queens took upon them to alter change as they thought good this is ordinaryly seen in supreme powers when they begin to usurpe So that it is a sad truth which Calvin hath in his câ—…mment on Amos. cap. 7. v 13. hâ—… sacrilegium c i. e. this sacrilege rageth prevaileth with us because they cannot keep within lawfull bounds but they think they cannot reigne unlesse they take away all the authority of the Church become the heigh est judges as well in doctrine as in all the spirituall government Therefore the devil gave to Amaziah this counsell a mediocrity should therefore be keeped because this desease hath alwayes been in princes that they would make religion how according to their owne lust pleasure And this is a part of the Cesario-papatus the state papacy of which Wigandus in his 13 cvill complaineth viz. That they set up a new forme of religion And now seing doolfull experience proveth how ready princes Magistrats are to goe beyond bounds to arrogat to themselves more then is allowed is it fit for Ministers or Christians to blow at that coale of ambition by asserting in words as much as they desire They do not much value the glosses which any may devise afterward to cover the shame of their nakednesse were it not better to hold back such as run too willingly of their own accord to the ruine of religion the interests of Christ It cannot then be saife for any to have a hand in setting up a state Antichrist to the ruine destruction of the Church of Christ And though the gracious disposition of the prince should be otherwise set he should not abuse his power to the hurt of religion yet no thankes to his sycophants who ascribe such power to him as if put into act would ruine religion the Church of Christ which of its own nature tendeth thereunto if it meet not with accidental stops whatever may be said of the power of the supr Mag. concerning determineing appoynting what religion shall be publickly professed within his dominions yet this power agreeth not to him byvertue of his supremacy in Church matters but by vertue of his supreme Magistraticall power by which he is to have a care of all publicke things But this supremacy in Church matters is a far other thing for it giveth intrinsicke Architectonicke power in Church matters this agreeth only to the Lord Jesus who is the alone head of the Church therefore it cannot be said to belong unto the supreme Magistrat 7. By this oath they should grant that the civill magistrat as such should be a Church member because he who hath a chief hand in Church affaires cannot but be a Church member he who is a chief member in Church judicatories cannot but be a Church member He who hath Church power cannot but be a Church member he whose commissioners Ministers are in Church administrations must certanely be a Churchmember Now all these they give unto the King not as a Christian but as a King for they annex them unto the crown and make them part of the royall prerogative But this cannot be assented unto for then every heathen Magistrat should be a Church member because a heathen Magistrat is a Magistrat as essentially as a Christian Magistrat Christianity addeth no Magistratical power it maketh not one more a King or a magistrat then he was it only qualifieth inableth him for the right administration or execution of the power but addeth no new power Moreover magistracy hath nothing to do either with the matter or with the forme of Church member shipe reall grace union with Christ maketh one a member of Christ's mysticall body serjous profession of the true religion maketh one a member of the visible Church but magistraticall power honour dignity hath no interest here no such thing commendeth a man to Christ. 8. By taking of this oath they should have said that the civil magistrat as such is a Church officer because as he is in possession of the crown of the royal prerogatives thereto annexed he hath the disposall of the externall governement of the Church No nationall Synod can hold without him none of their acts hath the power of canons without him He hath power by his commissioners civil ecclesiastick persons to excommunicat depose suspend ministers c. But this cannot be granted for then 1. Heathen magistrats should be Church officers 2. Such as are not Church members should be Church officers 3. Women should be Church officers for such may be Magistrats 4. Then no magistrats should be chosen but such as have the qualifications requisite in a Church officer 5. There is no ground or reason which can be given for this 6. There should be no Church officer but such as are mentioned in the gospell among all the Church officers mentioned in the gospell there is not one word of him 9. By taking of this oath they should say Not only that the supreme magistrat as such is a Church officer but that he is a Church officer of the heighest degree the supreme Church officer next under Christ for he is put above all the ordinary Church officers who act only in subordination unto him pastors Doctors are but his commissioners have their power from him must be accountable to him in their administration But certanely this cannot be true for then 1. This must be also affirmed of a heathen for a qua tali ad de omni valet consequentia 2. It is not credible that Christ should have appoynted such an eminent Church officer who was to continue unto the end of the world never shew us how he should be called nor what his qualifications should be nor the way of his ordination nor his work 3. Then women children might be such eminent Church officers 4 Or none should be supreme Magistrats but such as are fit for such an eminent Charge in the Church But both these are false 10. By taking of this oath They should lay the foundation of a lasting confusion betuixt Church state God hath been pleased in all ages to set clear distinct limits bounds to each of those that they might not be confounded or mixed together In the old testament there was a clear difference be â—…uixt the two so in the new testament Divines writting against Erastus have made it clear that they are distinct toto genere both in the fountaine of their power in the subject matter in the manner of working in the nearest end designed many such like so that it is needlesse to say any thing of it here Now in asserting this supremacy they should lay the ground of this
is a new obligation added ariseing from the oath Had not the Covenants oaths which the children of Israel swore concerning morall dutyes the law the worshipe of God an additionall tye obligation Ier. 50 5. Ios. 24. Deut. 29 3. By this meanes this author would take away this piece of God's worship service of vowing swearing unto him for it must either be about things necessary or about things indifferent But he will have no oath or vow made about things necessary because sayes he that is needlesse nor will he have any oath or vow made about things indifferent as shall be seen afterward so if he speak truth there ought to be no vowes or oaths at all 4. But why may not people look even to the Covenant obligation in things determined by the word Doth not God lay the breach of Covenant oftentimes unto the charge of his people doth not this say that they were bound to look to their promises obligations It is true that oaths Covenants should not be the only ground upon which to plead the lawfulnesse of such or such things yet these promises vowes Covenants ought to have their own secondary place So then it is a poor thing to say that such as plead for the standing force obligation of the Covenant must suppone that Episcopacy is a thing indifferent for by this same reason they must suppone also that the other great duties which are engadged to in that Covenant relating to true religion a holy life from which himself sayeth Pag. 37. no power on earth can loose to which they are indispensably tyed are of an indifferent nature which were most reasonlesse absurd 5. This is a hard case unto which this author would bring the Covenanters viz. That either they must quite the obligation of the Covenant or else say that all those particulars sworne to in the second article which is the article he mainely instanceth are but matters of indifferency and consequently say that not only prelacy in it's height as Hierarchicall but poperie heresie schisme every thing which is contrary to sound doctrine the power of godlinesse are matters of indifferencie But would he say so in his own case If one who had taken the oath of alleagiance or fidelity to his lawfull prince or the oath de fideli administratione in some office or other should afterward alledge that these bondes did not binde him for either the matter there obliged to was a thing indifferent if so he was not bound to wrong his liberty or else duties antecedent to the oath then the oath hath no force on him he is no way perjured though he crosse a hundered of those oaths Now what will this author reply in this case hath he not as it is usuall for such as pleaâ—…d for error in seeking to wound the Covenanters killed himself what evasions he findeth out for subjects to reject all the bondes of oaths imposed by superiours every one seeth And whether in so doing he doth his Maj. good service Acteth the part of a loyall subject and faithfull casuist any may judge But to proceed in the examination of the case set downe 4. Let this also be given unto this Author though it may not be granted he will not gaine his cause for let it be supponed that Episcopacy is a thing indifferent will it thence follow that the Church may not determine in a matter of indifferencie concerning Church government without the supreme Magistrat's expresse consent Whether is the Church or the Magistrat the fittest judge of that government which best suiteth the Church tendeth most to edification is most expedient whether are the Churches that live under the Turk more able to judge of the most expedient edifying way of Church government or the Turk himself If he reply That he speaketh of Christian Magistrats It is answered That heathens are as essentially Magistrats as Christians are that text Numb 30. groundeth no more an analogy for Christian Magistrats then for heathens And if that be a law then he would remember that non est distinguendum ubi lex non distinguit that Christians may be subjects unto heathen Magistrats is beyond all question And therefore if this argueing hold good a Christian Church living under the Turk might not vow to maintaine and follow such a forme of Church government as they judged most agreeable to the word of God most advantagious for the ends of government because forsooth it were a prejudging of the right of the great Turk their superiour If he reply that the case is altered because of the Turk 's granting liberty unto these Churches to do in these things as they think meet Ans. Then the Turk is a better friend unto the Church then the Christian Magistrat it were better for the Church to be under the Turk then under a Christian Magistrat 5. Let all this be yet granted by way of supposition he will not gaine his poynt for their oath in this Covenant doth not prejudge the right of the superiour because they sweare only to endeavour in their severall places callings such such alterations what incroachment can this make upon the superiours right May not a wife or a doughter sweare in their places according to their callings to endeavour the alteration of such or such a thing in the family yet never attempt it without the consent of the parent or husband May not here oath be lawfull binde hâ—…re to use all faire lawfull meanes to move incline the parent or husband there unto So that what ever he be pleased to say of the way of Scotland their carrying on that businesse in which how sowlely he erreth may be showne hereafter were it granted to him will make nothing against the Covenant concerning the obligation of which is the difference now Till then he make it appear that the Covenant as worded did directly prejudge the right of the superiour his alledgiance is frivolous groundlesse 6. This might be granted to him also which yet cannot be done his cause gaine no advantage that for this reason Because that place Numb 30. Exponed accord-to his owne glosse commentary maketh for the Covenanters every way For. 1. They had no open dissent declared It is true there is mention made of a proclamation declareing it unlawfull to enter into that Covenant but Mr Crofton in his Analepsis Analephthe Pag. 120. sayeth that it was not regular being done without the advice of his Councell who are vailed by the session of Parliament sheweth also how it was a breach of privilege But as to that this may satisfie That as that proclamation did not anull the act but only prohibite it so it did not concerne them in Scotland Now if the parent or husband hold his peace the oath is confirmed requiritur sayeth doct Sanders de jur prom obl
Earle of Glencarne Hugh Campbel sheriff of Aire were sent unto the Queen regent in name of the congregation to deprecat her anger that was going out against them among other things they requeested her to minde her promises But she answered That princes should performe their promises no further then they see it for their own advantage Unto which they replyed that if so They would passe from their alleagiance obedience acknowledge her no more for Queen It was such a thing as this which did animate the congregation to with stand the Queen regent the fenches because as sayeth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 they had to fight with an â—…iable cruel adversary which made light of all equity right law promises faith oaths so that upon every small gale of hope of advantage they annull both their words their deeds therefore there is no agreement to be made with them nor no peace till one of the parties be quite destroyed overthrown or else all the strangers be put out of the land So that they must resolve either to overcome or to die And hence it was that a little thereafter when there was a treaty there could be no peace concluded because the reformed congregation being so often deceived could not beleeve their promises any more The CONCLUSION THus reader thou hast a clear view of the present state condition of the Church of Scotland the true grounds upon which she is now suffering Thou seest how the wayes of Zion do mourn how the Lord hath covered her with a cloud in his anger how he hath violently taken away his tabernacle as if it were of a garden he hath destroyed his places of the assembly caused the solemne feasts sabbaths to be forgotton in Zion how he hath cast off his altar abhorred his sanctuary given up into the hand of her enemyes the walls of her palaces so that she is now made to cry out is it nothing to you'all yee that passe by behold see if there be any sorrow like unto my sorrow which is done unto me wherewith the Lord hath afflicted me in the day of his fierce anger All who passe by clap their hands at her they hisse wag their head saying is this the city that men call the perfection of beauty the joy of the whole earth all her enemies have opened their mouth against her they hisse gnash their teeth they say we have swallowed her up certanely this is the day that we looked for we have found we have seen it And therefore they are consulting to cut her off that she may no more be a nation But which is worse The anger of God is gone out against her he hideth his face testifieth his displeasure against her her câ—…s And in so doing just righteous is he for she hath rebelled against him It is the Lord who hath given her to the spoile to the robbers even he against whom she hath sinned for she would not walk in his wayes neither be obedient unto his law therefore hath he poured upon her the fury of his anger the strength of battell it hath set her on fire round about yet she knew it not it burned her yet she laid it not to heart Therefore let no man think whatever apologie any make in her behalf that she or they do intend to quarrell with the most high for any of his dispensations towards her Nay he is just righteous in all his wayes yea though he should punish her yet Seven times more it would become her to put her mouth in the dust to be silent to bear the indignation of the Lord because she hath sinned against him And as yet she must say that whatever wrongs her enemies are doing to her how ever unjustly she be suffering at their hands yet the righteous God is doing her no wrong but punishing her lesse then her iniquities do deserve so that as to his dealing with her she hath no cause to complaine for it is of the Lord's mercy that she is not consumed because his compassions faile not And yet it cannot but be expected that such as have tasted of the cup of affliction themselves have resisted unto blood striveing against sin c have known by experience what refreshing hath been in the known sympathy of neighbour Churches in the day of their tryall temptation will minde make conscience of this Christian duty of sympathy towards the poor Church of Scotland now when her enemies are the chief prosper have spread out their hands upon all her pleasant things when her gates are desolat her priests sighe It cannot be thought that such Churches as owne Christ for their head husband can look upon a poor bleeding sister Church which was once decked with ornaments when her head and King took pleasure in her habitations but now is striped naked exposed to shame to the scorne contempt of her enemies not have their eyes affecting their heart Shall it be thought that there are any of the reformed Churches who Esau-like can look on the day of their sister in the day that she is become a stranger that can rejoyce over her in the day of her destruction or speak proudly in the day of her distresse or look on her affliction in the day of her calamity or lay hands on her substance in the day of her calamity or stand in the crosse way to cut off these of hers that escape or deliver up those of hers that did remaine in the day of distresse Nay it is hoped that as the elect of God holy beloved they have put on bowells of mercies kindenesse have learned to have compassion to love as brethren to be pitifull so cannot forget the afflictions of his people in those Islands but do bear them on their heart when they have accesse unto the throne of grace say spare thy people o Lord give not thine heritage to reproach that the heathen should rule over them wherefore should they say among the people where is their God Seing it is the desire of that poor afflicted Church that all would cry unto their God her God that he would turne from his hote wrath displeasure turne to her with healing under his wings That he would heale her backslideings and love her freely and that untill he be pleased to turne from the fiercenesse of his anger his people may be blessed with Christian patience submission under the mighty hand of God helped to hear the voice of the rode who hath appoynted it to turne unto him who smiteth that he may binde up heale that which he hath brokenâ—… That the iniquity of Iacob may be purged the finite of all this may be to take away sin at length his heart may turne within him his repentings may be kindled together that
confusion yeeld that a Church as a Church should be 〈◊〉 commonwealth a commonwâ—… 〈◊〉 ipso that it is a commonw shoud be a Church because a supreme governour in Church matters hath reference unto a Church a supreme governour in civil matters hath reference unto a commonwealth so make the supreme governour of the commonwealth upon that account that he is such a supreme governour the supr gov of the Church then â—…o ipso that he is the supreme governour of the commonwealth he should have reference unto the Church so a Church should be a commonwealth a commonwealth a Church which is most false Moreover this new commission court is another speaking evidence of this mixture flowing from this supremacy for in that court Church officers meddle with civil matters state officers meddle with Church matters both do so as they are such such officers as his Maâ—… commissioners and therefore they could not assent unto this That which Luther sayeth in responso ad Melanth de ceremonijs cited by Voetius ubi supra pag. 174. Is worth the marking Seing it is certane that these administrations are distinct viz. the ecclesiastick and politick which Satan did confound by Popery we must watch and see that they be not againe confounded and if we suffer this we should be guilty of sacrilege and we must rather choise to die then sinso see further what he citeth out of Olevianus pag. 179. and 180. 11. By taking of this oath they should grant that the magistrat as such is a propper competent judge in Church matters a propper competent judge of ministers of their doctrine of other Church matters because it was upon this ground of faithfull ministers their declineing of the King 's his councell their judgement in Church matters that the Parliament 1584. Did grant unto the King this supremacy It was intended for this end that he might have power to call convent judge sentence Ministers for the faithfull discharge of their duty exoneration of their consciences as their lawfull formall competent judge in Church matters though under the notion of treason sedition Moreover he is made propper judge of what is the best forme of Church Government of what is the best constitution of a Church judicature what are the most sit lawfull acts conclusions or canons of Synods he is made propper judge in matters deserving excommunication suspension deposition all these are Church matters Now the falshood of this is so satisfactorily discovered by divines that none can be blamed for refuseing an oath which would import an assenting unto these things as truths Sure every Magistrat is not fit for such matters should no other be a Magistrat but he who is fit for such questions Where is there any precept or precedent for thiâ—… What need is there then for Church Officers for Church matters if the civil Magistrat may do all see learned Voet polit Eccles pag. 146. Arg. 12. yea if they had taken this oath they had condemned their worthy predecessours who took their hazard declined the judgment of the civil Magistrat in Church matters should justifie the severe sentences of imprisonment consinement banishment which passed against them should assent unto the lawfulnesse of all these acts which established iniquitie tyranny by law And how could they have done this with a good conscience 12. By taking of his oath they should grant that Ministers in the discharge of their Ministeriall function were not under Christ immediatly but under the Magistrat for as his commissioners they sit in the high Commission court are accountable to him for their mal administration so are immediatly under him as their immediat superiour Master But this they could not grant Seing 1. As was said these two powers are toto genere distinct so there cannot be a subordination amongst them 2. There is no warrand for Ministers receiving of instructions from the Magistrat 3. Nor for any civil Pope more then for a Church Pope 4. Ministers in scripture are said to have immediat relation unto commission from God not from the Magistrat therefore they are called priests of God 2. Chron. 13 9 12. Men of God 2. Pet. 11 2. Tim. 3 17. And are commissionated from Christ Luk. 10 2. Mat. 20 2. 21 34 25. 22 2 3 10. 24 45. Isa. 6. v. 8 Ioh. 20 21. Gal. 1 1. not from the Magistrat They acte in the name of Christ by power from him 1. Cor. 5. But there is enough spoken to this by judicious Wallaus others writting against Vtenbâ—…gard other Erastians which will abundantly justifie the refuseing of this oath see further learned doct Voetius de polit Eccles. pag. 145. Arg. 10. 13. By the taking of this oath thus tendered they should grant that the supreme Magistrat is exempted from subjection unto the Ministery of the messingers of the Lord for if Ministers in their Ministeriall function acte as commissioners from him as accountable to him then in the same administration they cannot be above him a commissioner in the particular wherein he is a commissioner cannot be over him whose commissioner he is But this they could not grant because there is no warrand for this exemption Kings of old were not exempted from rebukes all are commanded to obey such as are set over them Heb. 13 17. no King is excepted Emperours have submited unto discipline Therefore they could not take this oath 14. By taking of this oath they should yeeld unto many palpable into lerable incroachment made upon the liberties privileges of the Church of Christ Which could not be done without great sin iniquity As 1. That there could be no Church judicatories or assemblies without his warrand or expresse consent for in the act concerning the acknowledging of the royall prerogative among other things annexed to the crown this is one the conveening of his subjects this is explaned Act 4. Where it is ordained that none of his subjects conveen for holding of Assemblies to treat Consult determine in any matter ecclesiasticke And upon this ground doth the act concerning the nationall Synod goe And upon this ground did King Iames take upon him to prorogate assemblies either to definite or indefinite times as he thought good Now no faithfull Minister or Christian could assent to this Because 1. Whatever may be said upon the grounds of prudence at some times yet when the bussinesse is spoken to as a case of conscience according to the rule of the word this is true that though the Church be in the commonwealth yet she is a distinct society from the common-wealth hath power from Christ to hold her own meetings Assemblies for her own government as she did while she was under heathen Emperours in the dayes of the Apostles 2 It hath been showne
before what is the judgment of the Church of Scotland in this particular in their preface to the confession of faith 3. There is no expresse command either for seeking or having his expresse consent The reformers of the Church of Scotland never once thought of this but as oft as conveniently they might as necessity urged they keeped Assemblies not only without the consent of the supreme Magistrat but oftimes against their will thinking it their duty to Assemble for the relief of the Church ay untill some difficulty were laid in their way which they could not win over untill some phisicall restraint or some what equivalent were laid upon them 5. It would neither be fit nor saife for them to condemne the worthies who stood so zealously for the truth keeped that Assembly at Aberdeen which occasioned their banishment 2. That the power of convocating indicting of Synods Assemblies doth belong only unto the Magistrat The act for the National Synod doth abundantly cleare this But to assent to this were a palpable wronging of the Church which hath intrinsick power for this needeth not goe out of her self to seek it The Synod which did meet 〈◊〉 15 was not indicted by any civil Magistrat The Church should then be in an irremediable case when the civil Magistrat is an enemy but God hath provided meanes for the saifty preservation of his Church Even when the higher powers are but small friends unto her as oftimes it falleth out see the judicious learned doct Voet de Pol Eccles Pag. 184. Quaest 5. 3. That the power of delegating unto assemblies doth belong to him alone so as he may appoynt all the constituent members thereof according as he pleaseth as the Act for the nationall Synod sayeth he doth that by vertue of his supremacy But this were a grosse wronging robbing of Churches of their power privilege of delegating such as they think fit according to the Example of Antioch sending Paul Barnabas to that Synod Act 15. the practice of the Church in all ages see Voet ubi supra Pag. 187 Quaest. 7. 8. Yea if so the persones delegated should vote in his name not in the name of Christ or of the Church the meeting should not be a pure Church meeting but either wholly politicall or else politico-ecclesiasticall 4. That he might dissolve Church assemblies Synods when he pleaseth for the fore mentioned Act for the Nat. Synod warrandeth them to meet only at such times as he pleaseth But this were a great wrong done unto the Church privileges See Voet. ubi supra Pag. 190. Qâ—… 13. 14. Synods should be no helps unto the poor Church if they might sit no longeri what ever necessity might urge then his Maj thought good to suffer There is no warrand for any such dependence of Church judicatories upon the civil Magistrat's discretion If Christ hath allowed Synods to his Church for determineing in Church affaires he hath allowed them to sit untill they finish the bussinesse for which they did assemble Yea if they should yeeld to this they should condemne the assembly at Glasgow 1638. which did sit untill they had ended their bussinesse notwithstanding of a command to dissolve 5. That his presence or the presence of his commissioner is necessary unto each nationall assembly for the Act of Parliament ratifying the Act for the nationall Synod sayeth expresly that without the presence of the King or of his commissioner no nationall Synod can be keeped But 1. there is no law of God for this 2. The Synods in the primitive times were held without his presence 3. There were many generall assemblies held in Scotland without his presence 4. The Magistrat as such is no constituent member of the Synod therefore his presence is not necessarily requisite see Voet ubi supra Pag. 188. Quaest. 9. 5. If there be such a necessity for his presence at nationall Synods he must not be absent from lesser assemblies thus there shall be no Church judicature held without his presence which were most absurd See what the learned famous Voetius sayeth to this pol. Eccles. Part. 1. Pag. 199. 200. 6. That Ministers have no proper decisive fuffrage in Synods because the forecited Act sayeth That matters are to be setled only by their advice So that in their Synod they are only the King's counsellers conveened to advise consult a power only to advise is no decisive fuffrage so the Act concluded is the deed of the supreme Magistrat following their advice is not their deed Now this is most absurd destructive to all Synods of all their power thus it should be far worse with Synods now when Magistrats are Christians then when they were heathens Moreover there is no warrand for his having with the rest of 〈◊〉 the commissioners a voice in those Synods far lesse for his having the whole power It is clear that as a Magistat he can have no suffrage or voice in these Synods for then heathens who are no way qualified for such a bussinesse should have it likewise Yea if it were so all the determinations of Synods should be civil Acts no Church Acts being done by one who is no Church officer yea nor a Church member as such let be a Church judicature This was Episcopius the Arminian his judgment in disput de jure Magistratus circa sacra Thes. 16. viz. that he may convocat assemblies choose members prescribe lawes unto them the way of prâ—…cedour aske the suffrages either peremptorily enact or approve what is done that it may passe into a law see Voet. ubi supra pag. 191. Qâ—… 16. 7. That the judicatories of the Church be prelimited for nothing may be enacted by the nationall Synod which is contrary to his Maj. royal prerogative or to the lawes of the land so sayeth the Parliaments ratification of the Act for the nationall Synod But what if iniquity be established by a law what if Christ's royall prerogatives be taken from him given to the King shall the Church in her judicatories do nothing for the truth shall she give no testimony against these usurpations shall the lawes of the land the King's prerogatives be her Cynosura what use shall be made of the word of God then where is there any such caution or limitation given to the Church But enough of this 8. That Church judicatories may not so much as consult debate about any Act matter or cause but what shall be allowed approved by his Maj. or his commissioner for these are the very words of the Act of Parliament But who can assent unto this intolerable jncroachment destructive of all Church judicatures making them no judicatories at all but a company of men conveened for giving advice But where was there ever the like of this Church judicature The nameing of those things is sufficient to discover their vanity see