given to a particular Church of Brethren as such primo per se then it would be found in every particular Church of Brethren For a Quatenus adomnia valet consequentia Obj. 4. But it is an usuall tenent in many of our best Divines that the government of the Church is mixt of a Monarchy an Aristocracie and a Democracy In regard of Christ the head the government of the Church is soveraigne and monarchicall In regard of the Rule by the Presbytery it is stewardly and Aristocraticall in regard of the peoples power in elections and censures it is Democraticall which argueth the people have some stock of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 power and authority in the government of the Church Answ In a large sense Authority after a sort may be acknowledged in the people As 1. when a man acteth by counsell according to his own discerning freely he is then said to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Dominus sui actus So the people in all the acts of liberty which they put forth are Domini sui actus Lords of their own action 2. The people by their acts of liberty as in election of officers and concurrency in censure of offenders and in the Determination and Promulgation of Synodall acts they have a great stroke or power in the ordering of Church affairs which may be called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or potestas a POWER which many times goeth under the name of rule or authoritie but in proper speech it is rather a priviledge or liberty then authoritie as hath been opened above in Chap. 3. For no act of the peoples power or liberty doth properly bind unlesse the authoritie of the Presbytery concur with it 3. A third argument whereby it may appear that the Elders of a particular Church are the first subject of authoritie in that Church is taken from the like removall of other subjects from whence they might be thought to derive their authoritie as was used before to prove the Church of Brethren was the first subject of their own libertie in their own Congregation The Elders of Churches are never found in Scripture to derive their authority which they exercise in their own congregation either from the Elders of other Churches or from any Synod of Churches All particular Churches and all the Elders of them are of equall power each of them respectively in their own Congregations None of them call others their Rabbies or Masters or Fathers in respect of any authoritie over them but all of them own and acknowledge one another as fellow Brethren Matth. 23.8 9 10. And though in a Synod they have received power from Christ and from his presence in the Synod to exercise Authoritie in imposing burthens such as the holy Ghost layeth upon all Churches whose Elders are present with them Act. 15.28 for the Apostles were Elders in all Churches yet the Elders of every particular Church when they walk with the brethren of their own Church in light and peace they need not to derive from the Synod any power to impose the same or the like burthens upon their owne Churches For they have received a power and charge from Christ to teach and command with all authoritie the whole counsell of God unto their people And the people discerning the light of the truth delivered and walking in peace with their Elders they readily yeeld obedience to their Over-seers in whatsoever they see and hear by them commended to them from the Lord. 3. Now we come to the third branch of the third Proposition which was this That the Church of a particular congregation Elders and Brethren walking and joyning together in truth and peace are the first subject of all Church-power needfull to be exercised within themselves whether in the election or ordination of officers or in the censure of offenders in their own body The truth hereof may appear by these Arguments 1 In point of ordination From the compleat integritie of a Ministers calling oven to the satisfaction of his own and the peoples conscience when both the Brethren and the Elders of the particular Church whereto he is called have put forth the power which belongeth to them about him As when the Brethren of the Church have chosen him to office and the Presbyterie of the Church have laied their hands upon him and both of them in their severall acts have due respect to the inward ministeriall gifts whereunto God hath furnished him he may then look at himself as called by the holy Ghost to exercise his talents in that office amongst them and the people may and ought to receive him as sent of God to them What defect may be found in such a call when the Brethren exercise their lawfull libertie and the Elders their lawfull authority in his ordination and nothing more is required to the compleat integritie of a Ministers calling If it be said there wanted imposition of hands by the Bishop who succeedeth in the place of Timothy and Titus whom the Apostle Paul left the one in Ephesus the other in Crete to ordain Elders in many Churches Tit. 1.5 Ans Touching ordination by Timothy and Titus and upon pretence of them by Bishops enough hath been said by many godly learned heretofore especially of later times The summe cometh to these conclusions 1 That Timothy and Titus did not ordain Elders in many Churches as Bishops but as Evangelists Timothy is expresly termed an Evangelist 2 Tim. 4.5 And Titus is as clearly decyphered to be an Evangelist as Timothy by the characters of an Evangelist which either Scripture holdeth forth or Eusebius noteth in his Ecclesiast histor lib. 3. cap. 37. Gr. cap. 31. Lat. Not to be limited to a certain Church but to follow the Apostles finishing their work in planting and watering Churches where they came They did indeed ordain officers where they wanted and exercised jurisdiction as the Apostles did in severall Churches yet with the rest of the Presbyterie and in the presence of the whole Church 1 Tim. 5. But for the continuance of this office of an Evangelist in the Church there is no direction in the Epistles either to Timothy or Titus or any where else in Scripture 2. Conclusion Those Bishops whose callings or offices in the Church are set forth in those Epistles to be continued they are altogether Synonyma with Presbyters Tit. 1.5 7. 1 Tim. 3.1 to 7. 3. Conclus We read of many Bishops to one Church Phil. 1.1 Act. 14.23 and Chap. 20.17 28. Tit. 1.5.7 but not of many Churches much lesse all the Churches in a large Diocesse to one Bishop 4. Conclus There is no transcendent proper work cut out or reserved for such a transcendent officer as a Diocesan Bishop throughout the New Testament The transcendent acts reserved to him by the Advocates of Episcopacie are Ordination and Iurisdiction Now both these are acts of Rule And Paul to Timothy acknowledgeth no Rulers in the Church above Pastors and Teachers who labour in
be also betrusted by the civill State with the preservation and protection of the Lawes and Liberties peace and safety of the same state and shall meet together in a publike civill assembly whether in Councell or Camp they may there provide by civill power according to the wholsome lawes and liberties of the countrey Ne quid Ecclesia ne quid Respublica detrimenti capiat If King Saul swear to put Ionathan to death the Leaders of the people may by strong hands rescue him from his fathers unjust and illegall fury 1 Sam. 14.44 45. But if Saul persecute David though as unjustly as Ionathan yet if the Princes and Leaders of the people will not rescue him from the wrath of the King David a private man will not draw out his sword in his own defence so much as to touch the Lords anoynted 1 Sam. 24.4 to 7. To conclude this Corollary touching the subjection of churches to the civill State in matters which concern the civill peace this may not be omitted that as the Church is subject to the sword of the Magistrate in things which concern the civill peace so the Magistrate if Christian is subject to the keys of the Church in matters which concern the peace of his conscience and the kingdome of heaven Hence it is prophesied by Isaiah that Kings and Queens who are nursing fathers and mothers to the church shall bow down to the Church with their faces to the earth Isai 49.23 that is they shall walk in professed subjection to the Ordinances of Christ in his Church Hence also it is that David prophesieth of a two-edged sword that is the sword of the Spirit the word of Christ put into the hands of the Saints who are by calling the Members of the Church as to subdue the nations by the ministery of the Word to the obedience of the Gospel Psal 149.6 7. so to binde their Kings with chains and their Nobles with fetters of iron to execute upon them the judgement written that is written in the Word Psal 149. v. 8 9. 3. A third Corollary touching the independency of churches is this That a church of a particular Congregation consisting of Elders and Brethren and walking in the truth and peace of the Gospel as it is the First subject of all Church-power needfull to be exercised within it selfe so it is independent upon any other Church or Synod for the exercise of the same That such a Church is the first subject of all church-power hath been cleered above in the opening the third Proposition of the first subject of the power of the keys And such a church being the first subject of church-power is unavoidably independent upon any other church or body for the exercise therof for as hath been said afore the first subject of any Accident or Adjunct is independent upon any other either for the injoying or for the imploying the having or the using of the same 4. A fourth Corollary touching the independency of churches is That a Church fallen into any offence whether it be the whole church or a strong party in it is not independent in the exercise of church-power but is subject both to the admonition of any other church and to the determination and judiciall sentence of a Synod for direction into a way of truth and peace And this also ariseth from the former discourse For if clavis errans non ligat Ecclesia litigans non ligat that is if Christ hath not given to a particular church a promise to binde and loose in heaven what they binde and loose on earth unlesse they agree together and agree in his name then such a church is not independent in their proceedings as do fail in either For all the independency that can be claimed is founded upon that promise What yee binde on earth shall be bound in heaven what yee loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven Matth. 18.18 On that promise is founded both the independency and security and parity also of all churches But if that promise be cut off from them they are like Samson when his haire was cut off weak and subject to fall under other men and yet they fall softer then hee did hee fell into the hands of his enemies but they fall under the censure of their friends As the false Prophet recanting his error did acknowledge so may they Thus was I wounded in the house of my friends Zach. 13.6 In the house of a neighbour-neighbour-church or two I was friendly smitten with a brotherly admonition which like a precious oyle did not break mine head and in the house of a Synod of churches I was friendly yea brotherly censured and healed 5. A fifth and last Corollary arising from the former discourse touching the independency of churches may be this Though the church of a particular Congregation consisting of Elders and Brethren and walking with a right foot in the truth and peace of the Gospel be the first subject of all church-power needfull to be exercised within it selfe and consequently be independent from any other church or Synod in the use of it yet it is a safe and whole some and holy Ordinance of Christ for such particular churches to joyn together in holy Covenant or Communion and consolation amongst themselves to administer all their church affairs which are of weighty and difficult and common concernment not without common consultation and consent of other churches about them Now church-affaires of weighty and difficult and common concernment wee account to be the election and ordination of Elders excommunication of an Elder or any person of publick note and employment the translation of an Elder from one Church to another or the like In which case we conceive it safe and wholsome and an holy ordinance to proceed with common consultation and consent Safe for in multitude of counsellers there is safetie as in civill so in Church affairs Prov. 11.14 And though this or that Church may be of a good and strong constitution and walk with a right foot in the truth and peace of the Gospel yet all Churches are not in a like athletick plight and they will be Ioath to call in or look out for help as much or more then others though they have more need then others yea and the best Churches may soon degenerate and stand in as much need of help as others and for want of it may sink and fall into deep Apostasie which other Churches might have prevented had they discerned it at first It is also wholsome as tending to maintain brotherly love and soundnesse of doctrine in Churches and to prevent many offences which may grow up in this or that particular Church when it transacteth all such things within it self without consent It is likewise an holy ordinance of Christ as having just warrant from a like precedent The Apostles were as much independent from one another and stood in as little need of one anothers help as Churches do one of
another And yet Paul went up to Ierusalem to confer with Peter Iames and Iohn lest he should run in vain in the course of his ministery Galat. 2.2 And though in conference the chief Apostles added nothing to Paul ver 6. yet when they perceived the Gospel of the uncircumcision was committed to Paul and Barnabas as that of the circumcision to Peter Iames and Iohn they gave unto one another the right hand of fellowship ver 9. Now then it will follow by just proportion that if the Apostles who are each of them independent one of another had need to consult and confer together about the work of their ministery to procure the freer passage to their calling and to their doctrine then surely Churches and Elders of Churches though independent one of another had need to communicate their courses and proceedings in such cases one with another to procure the freer passage to the same And if the Apostles giving right hand of fellowship one to another did mutually strengthen their hands in the work of the ministery then the Elders of Churches giving right hand of fellowship to one another in their ordination or upon any fit occasion cannot but much encourage and strengthen the hearts and hands of one another in the Lords work Again something might be added if not for confirmation yet for illustration of this point by comparing the dimensions of the new Ierusalem which is a perfect platform of a pure Church as it shall be constituted in the Iewish Church state at their last conversion The dimensions of this Church as they are described by Ezekiel Chap. 48.30 are according to Iunius twelve furlongs which after the measure of the Sanctuarie which is double to the common is about three miles in length and as much in breadth But the dimensions of the same Church of the Iews in Revel 21.16 is said to be twelve thousand furlongs Now how can these two dimensions of the same Church stand together which are so farre discrepant one from another For there be a thousand times twelve furlongs in twelve thousand furlongs The fittest and fairest reconciliation seemeth plainly to be this that Ezekiel speaketh of the dimensions of any ordinarie Iewish Church of one particular congregation But Iohn speaketh of the dimensions of many particular Iewish Churches combining together in some cases even to the communion of a thousand Churches Not that the Church of the Iews will be constituted in a Nationall and Diocesan frame with Nationall officers and Diocesan Bishops or the like but that sometimes a thousand of them will be gathered into a Synod and all of them will have such mutuall care and yeeld such mutuall brotherly help and communion one to another as if they were all but one body If any man say Theologia symbolica or parabolica non est argumentativa that arguments from such parables and mysticall resemblances in Scripture are not valid let him enjoy his owne apprehension and if he can yeeld a better interpretation of the place let him wave this collection Neverthelesse if there were no argumentative power in parables why did the Lord Iesus so much delight in that kind of teaching and why did Iohn and Daniel and Ezekiel deliver a great part of their prophesies in parables if we must take them for riddles and not for documents nor arguments Surely if they serve not for argument they serve not for document But furthermore touching this great work of communion and consociation of Churches give us leave to adde this caution A Caution To see that this consociation of Churches be not perverted either to the oppression or diminution of the just libertie and authoritie of each particular Church within it self who being well supplied with a faithfull and expert Presbyterie of their own do walk in their integritie according to the truth and peace of the Gospel Let Synods have their just authoritie in all Churches how pure soever in determining such 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as are requisite for the edification of all Christs Churches according to God But in the election and ordination of Officers and censure of offenders let it suffice the Churches consociate to assist one another with their counsell and right hand of fellowship when they see a particular Church to use their libertie and power aright But let them not put forth the power of their communitie either to take such Church acts out of their hands or to hinder them in their lawfull course unlesse they see them through ignorance or weaknesse to abuse their libertie and authoritie in the Gospel All the liberties of Churches were purchased to them by the precious blood of the Lord Iesus and therefore neither may the Churches give them away nor many Churches take them out of the hands of one They may indeed prevent the abuse of their liberties and direct in the lawfull use of them but not take them away though themselves should be willing The Lord Iesus having given equall power to all the Apostles it was not lawfull for eleven of them to forbid the twelfth to do any act of his office without their intervention Neither was it lawfull for the nine who were of inferiour gifts to commit the guidance and command of all their Apostolick administrations unto Peter Iames and Iohn who seemed to be pillars And that not onely because they were all one as well as another immediately guided by the holy Ghost but because they were all equall in office and everie one to give account for himself unto God It is the like case in some measure of particular churches yea there is moreover a three-fold further inconvenience which seemeth to us to attend the translation of the power of particular churches in these ordinary admninistraons into the hands of a Synod of Presbyters commonly called a Classis 1. The promise of Binding and Loosing in way of Discipline which Christ gave to every particular church as hath been shewed is by this means not received nor injoyned nor practised by themselves immediately but by their Deputies or Over-seers 2. The same promise which was not given to Synods in acts of that nature as hath been shewed in the Chapter of Synods but in acts of another kinde is hereby received and injoyned and practised by them and by them onely which ought not to be And which is a third inconvenience The practice of this power of the keys only by a Synod of Presbyters still keepeth the Church as under nonage as if they were not grown up to the full fruition of the just liberty of their riper yeers in the dayes of the Gospel For a mother to bear her young daughter in her arms and not to suffer it to go on its own feet whilest it is in the infancie is kindly and comely but when the Damosell is grown up to riper yeers for the mother still to bear her in her arms for fear of stumbling it were an uncecessary burthen to the mother and a reproach to the Virgin Such is the case here The community of churches according to the Hebrew phrase is as the Mother each particular church is as the Daughter In the old Testament while the Church was in her nonage it was not unseasonable to leave the whole guidance and bearing thereof in the hands of their Tutors and Governours the Priests and Levites and in the community of the nationall courts But now in the dayes of the new Testament when the churches are grown up or should be grown at least to more maturity it were meet more to give the Church liberty to stand alone and to walk upon her own legs and yet in any such part of her way as may be more hard to hit right upon as in her Elections and Ordinances and Censures of eminent persons in office it is a safe and holy and faithfull office of the vigilancy of the community of churches to be present with them and helpfull to them in the Lord. And at all times when a particular church shall wander out of the way whether out of the way of truth or of peace the community of churches may by no meanes be excused from reforming them again into their right way according to the authority which the Lord hath given them for the publike edification of all the severall churches within their Covenant Soli Christo 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This is licensed and entred according to Order FINIS
THE KEYES Of the Kingdom of HEAVEN AND Power thereof according to the VVORD of GOD. BY That Learned and Judicious Divine Mr. IOHN COTTON Teacher of the Church at Boston in New-England Tending to reconcile some present differences about DISCIPLINE Gen. 13.7 8. And Abraham said unto Lot Let there be no strife I pray between thee and mee for we be Brethren Gen. 45.24 And Joseph said to his Brethren when they were going the third time out of Egypt See that yee fall not out by the way Acts 7.26 Sirs yee be Brethren why do ye wrong one to another Eph. 4.15 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Published By THO. GOODWIN PHILIP NYE LONDON Printed by M. Simmons for Henry Overton and are to be sold at his Shop entring into Popes-head Alley out of Lumbard-street 1644. TO THE READER THE greatest commotions in Kingdomes have for the most part beene raised and maintained for and about Power and Liberties of the Rulers and the Ruled together with the due bounds and limits of either And the like hath fallen out in Churches and is continued to this day in the sharpest contentions though now the seate of the warre is changed who should bee the first adequate and compleate subject of that Church-power which Christ hath left on earth how bounded and to whom committed This controversie is in a speciall manner the lot of these present times And now that most parties that can pretend any thing towards it have in severall ages had their turns vicissitudes of so long a pessession of it and their pleas for their severall pretences have beene so much and so long heard it may wel be hoped it is neere determining that Christ wil shortly settle this power upon the right heires to whom he primitively did bequeath it In those former darker times this golden Ball was throwne up by the Clergy so called alone to runne for among themselves And as they quietly possessed the name 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Clergy and of the Church appropriated to themselves so answerably all manner of interest in power or cognisance of matters of the Church was wholly left quitted to them whilst the People that then knew not the Law having given up their soules to an implicite faith in what was to be beleeved did much more suffer themselves to be deprived of all Liberties in Church affaires this royall donation bestowed by Christ upon his Church was taken up and And placed in so high thrones of Bishops Popes Generall Councell c. not onely farre above these things on earth the people but things in Heaven also we meane the Angels and Ministers of the Churches themselves in so great a remotenesse from the people that the least right or interest therein was not so much as suspected to belong to them But towards these latter times after many removalls of it downe againe and this as the issue of many suits againe and againe renued and removed and upon the sentence even of whole States as oft reversed It hath now in these our dayes been brought so neere unto the people that they also have begunne to pleade and sue for a portion and legacy bequeathed them in it The Saints in these knowing times finding that the Key of knowledge hath so farre opened their hearts that they see with their owne eyes into the substantialls of Godlinesse and that through the instruction and guidance of their teachers they are enabled to understand for themselves such other things as they are to joyne in the practise of They doe therefore further many of them begin more then to suspect that some share in the Key of power should likewise appertain unto them It was the unhappinesse of those who first in these latter times revived this plea of the peoples right to erre on the other extreame as it hath ever beene the fate of truth when it first ariseth in the Church from under that long night of darknes which Antichristianisme had brought upon the world to have a long shadow of errour to accompanie it by laying the plea claim on their behalf unto the whole power that the Elders set over them did but exercise that power for them which was properly theirs which Christ had as they contended radically and originally estated in the people only But after that all titles have been pleaded of those that are content with nothing but the whole the finall judgement and sentence may possibly fall to be a sutable and due proportioned distribution and dispersion of this power into severall interests and the whole to neither part In Commonwelaths it is a Dispersion of severall portions of power and rights into severall hands joyntly to concurre and agree in acts and processe of weight and moment which causeth that healthfull 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and constitution of them which makes them lasting preserves their peace when none of al sorts find they are excluded but as they have a share of concernement so that a fit measure of power or priviledge is left and betrusted to them And accordingly the wisedome of the first Constitutors of Common wealths is most seen in such a just ballancing of power priviledges besides also in setting the exact limits of that which is committed unto each yea and is more admired by us in this than in their other Lawes and in experience a cleare and distinct definement and confinement of all such parcells of power both for the kind and extent of them is judged to be as essentially necessary if not more than what ever other statutes that set out the kinds and degrees of crimes or penalties So in that Politie or Government by which Christ would have his churches ordered the right disposall of the power therein we humbly suppose may lie in a due and proportioned allotment and dispersion though not in the same measure and degree into divers hands according unto the several concernments and interests that each rank in his Church may have rather than in an intire and sole trust committed to any one man though never so able or any one sort or kinde of men or officers although diversified into never so many subordinations under one another And in like manner wee cannot but imagine that Christ hath been as exact in setting forth the true bounds and limits of what ever portion of power he hath imparted unto any if wee of this age could attain rightly to discern it as hee hath been in ordering what kinde of censures and for what sinnes and what degrees of proceedings unto those censures which wee finde hee hath been punctuall in Now the scope which this grave and judicious Author in this his Treatise doth pursue is to lay forth the just lines and terriers of this division of Church-power unto all the severall subjects of it to the end to allay the contentions now on foot about it And in generall hee layes this fundamentall Maxime that holds in common true of all
Elders with them or direct them where to procure such to come unto them The like course is wont to be taken when sundry Christians coming over from one countrey to another such as are come over first and are themselves full of company direct those that come after them and assist them in like sort in the combination of themselves into Church order according to the rule of the Gospel Though the Apostles be dead whose office it was to plant gather and multiply Churches yet the work is not dead but the same power of the keyes is left with the Churches in common and with each particular church for her part according to their measure to propagate and inlarge the kingdome of Christ as God shall give opportunity throughout all generations CHAP. V. Of the subject to whom the key of Authority is committed THe key of Authoritie or Rule is committed to the Elders of the Church and so the act of Rule is made the proper act of their office The Elders that rule well c. 1 Tim. 5.17 Heb. 13.7.17 The speciall acts of this rule are many The first and principall is that which the Elders who labour in the Word and Doctrine are chiefly to attend unto that is the preaching of the Word with all Authoritie and that which is annexed thereto the administration of the Sacraments or seals Speak rebuke and exhort saith Paul to Titus with all authoritie Tit. 2.15 And that the administration of the seals is annexed thereto is plain from Matth. 28.19 20. Go saith Christ to the Apostles make Disciples and baptize them c. If it be objected private members may all of them prophecie publiquely 1 Cor. 14 31. and therefore also baptize and so this act of Authority is not peculiar to preaching Elders Ans 1. The place in the Corinths doth not speak of ordinarie private members but of men furnished with extraordinary gifts Kings at the time of their first Coronation give many extraordinary large gifts which they do not daily poure out in like sort in their ordinary government Christ soon after his ascenfion poured out a larger measure of his spirit then in times succeeding The members of the Church of Corinth as of many other in those primitive times were inriched with all knowledge and in all utterance I Cor. 1.5 And the same persons that had the gift of prophesie in the Church of Corinth had also the gift of tongues which put upon the Apostle a necessitie to take them off from their frequent speaking with tongues by preferring prophesie before it 1 Cor. 14.2 to 24. So that though all they might prophesie as having extraordinary gifts for it yet the like libertie is not allowed to them that want the like gifts In the Church of Israel none besides the Priests and Levites did ordinarily prophesie either in the Temple or in the Synagogues unlesse they were either furnished with extraordinatie gifts of prophesie as the Prophets of Israel or were set apart and trained up to prepare for such a calling as the sons of the Prophets When Amos was forbidden by the high Priest of Bethel to prophesie at Bethel Amos doth not alledge nor plead the libertie of any Israelite to prophesie in the holy Assemblies but alledgeth onely his extraordinarie calling Amos 7.14 15. It appeareth also that the sons of the Prophets that is men set apart and trained up to prepare for that calling were allowed the like libertie 1 Sam. 19.20 Answ 2. But neither the sons of the Prophets nor the Prophets themselves were wont to offer sacrifices in Israel except Samuel and Eliah by speciall direction nor did the extraordinarie Prophets in Corinth take upon them to administer Sacraments If any reply That if the Prophets in the Church at Corinth had been endued with extraordinarie gists of prophefie they had not been subject to the judgement of the Prophets which these are directed to be 1 Cor. 14.22 Ans It followeth not For the people of God were to examine all prophesies by the Law and testimonie and not to receive them but according to that rule Psal 8.20 Yea and Paul himself referreth all his Doctrine to the Law and Prophets Act. 26.22 And the Bereans are commended for examining Pauls doctrine according to the Scriptures Act. 17.11 12. 2. A second act of Authoritie common to the Elders is they have power as any weighty occasion shall require to call the Church together as the Apostles called the Church together for the election of Deacons Act. 6.2 And in like sort are the Priests of the old Testament stirred up to call a solemne Assembly to gather the Elders and all the inhabitants of the land to sanctifie a Fast Joel 1.13 14. 3. It is an act of their power to examine if Apostles then any others whether officers or members before they be received of the Church Rev. 2.2 A fourth act of their rule is the Ordination of officers whom the people have chosen whether Elders or Deacons 1 Tim. 4.14 Act. 6.6 5. It is an act of the key of Authoritie that the Elders open the doores of speech and silence in the Assembly They were the Rulers of the Synagogue who sent to Paul and Barnabas to open their mouthes in a word of exhortation Act. 13.15 and it is the same power which calleth men to speak to put men to silence when they speak amisse And yet when the Elders themselves do lie under offence or under suspition of it the Brethren have liberty to require satisfaction in a modest manner concerning any publick breach of rule as hath been mentioned above out of Act. 11.2 3 c. 6. It belongeth to the Elders to prepare matters beforehand which are to be transacted by themselves or others in the face of the Congregation as the Apostles and Elders being met at the house of Iames gave direction to Paul how to carry himself that he might prevent the offence of the Church when he should appear before them Act. 21.18 Hence when the offence of a brother is according to the rule in Matth. 18.17 to be brought to the Church they are beforehand to consider and enquire whether the offence be really given or no whether duely proved and orderly proceeded in by the Brethren according to rule and not duly satisfied by the offender lest themselves and the Church be openly cumbred with unnecessary and tedious agitations but that all things transacted before the Church be carried along with most expedition and best edification In which respect they have power to reject causlesse and disorderly complaints as well as to propound and handle just complaints before the Congregation 7. In the handling of an offence before the Church the Elders have authoritie both Jus dicere and Sententiam serre When the offence appeareth truly scandalous the Elders have power from God to informe the Church what the Law or Rule and will of Christ is for the censure of such an offence And when the
and peace to such churches as through want of light and peace lye in error or doubt at least and variance so they have power by the grace of Christ not only to give light and counsell in matter of Truth and Practice but also to command and enjoyn the things to be believed and done The expresse words of the Synodall letter imply no lesse It seemed good to the Holy Ghost and unto us to lay upon you no other burthen Act. 15.27 This burthen therefore to observe those necessary things which they speak of they had power to impose It is an act of the binding power of the keys to bind burthens And this binding power ariseth not only materially from the weight of the matters imposed which are necessary necessitate praecepti from the word but also formally from the authority of the Synod which being an Ordinance of Christ bindeth the more for the Synods sake As a truth of the Gospel taught by a Minister of the Gospel it bindeth to faith an obedience not only because it is Gospel but also because it is taught by a Minister for his callings sake seeing Christ hath said Who so receiveth you receiveth me And seeing also a Synod sometime meeteth to convince and admonish an offending church or Presbyterie they have power therefore if they cannot heal the offenders to determine to withdraw communion from them And further seeing they meet likewise sometimes for generall reformation they have power to decree and publish such Ordinances as may conduce according to God unto such reformation Examples whereof wee read Neh. 10.32 to 39. 2 Chron. 15.12 13. For the second question How far the Fraternity or the Brethren of the church may concurre with the Elders in exercising the power of the Synod The Answer is The power which they have received is a power of liberty As 1. They have liberty to dispute their doubts modestly and Christanly amongst the Elders For in that Synod at Jerusalem as there was much disputation Act. 15.7 so the multitude had a part in the Disputation v. 12. For after Peters speech it is said the whole multitude kept silence and silence from what to wit from the speech last in hand amongst them and that was from Disputation 2. The Brethren of the church had liberty to joyn with the Apostles and Elders in approving of the sentence of James and determining the same as the common sentence of them all 3. They had liberty to joyn with the Apostles and Elders in choosing and sending messengers and in writing Synodall Letters in the names of all for the publishing of the sentence of the Synod Both these points are expressed in the Text v. 22.23 to 29. Then pleased it the Apostles and Elders with the whole Church to send chosen men and to write Letters by them See the whole church distinguished from the Apostles and Elders and those whom he called the whole Church v. 22. he calleth the Brethren v. 23. The Apostles and Elders and Brethren c. But though it may not be denyed that the Brethren of the church present in the Synod had all this power of liberty to joyn with the Apostles and Elders in all these acts of the Synod yet the authority of the Decrees lay chiefly if not only in the Apostles and Elders And therefore it is said Act. 16.4 That Paul and Silas delivered to the Churches for to keep the Decrees that were ordained of the Apostles and Elders So then it will be most safe to preserve to the Church of Brethren their due liberties and to reserve to the Elders their due authority If it be said The Elders assembled in a Synod have no authority to determine or conclude any act that shall binde the Churches but according to the instructions which before they have received from the Churches Answ Wee do not so apprehend it For what need Churches send to a Synod for light and direction in ways of truth and peace if they be resolved afore-hand how far they will go It is true if the Elders of Churches shall conclude in a Synod any thing prejujudiciall to the truth and peace of the Gospel they may justly expostulate with them at their return and refuse such sanctions as the Lord hath not sancited But if the Elders be gathered in the name of Christ in a Synod and proceed according to the rule the word or Christ they may consider and conclude sundry points expedient for the estate of their Churches which the Churches were either ignorant or doubtfull of before As for the third Question whether the Synod have power to injoyn such things as are both in their nature and their use indifferent We should answer it negatively and our reasons be 1. From the pattern of that precedent of Synods Act. 15.28 They laid upon the Churches no other burthen but those necessary things necessary though not all of them in their own nature yet for present use to avoid the offence both of Jew and Gentile of the Jew by eating things strangled and blood of the Gentile and Jew both by eating things sacrificed to Idols as Paul expoundeth that Article of the Synod 1 Cor. 8.10 11 12. and Chap. 10.28 This ea ing with offence was a murther of a weak brothers soule and a sin against Christ 1 Cor. 8.11 12. and therefore necessary to be forborn necessiâ—ate praecepti by the necessity of Gods Commandement 2. A second reason may be from the latitude of the Apostolicall commission which was given to them Mat. 28.19 20. where the Apâ—stles are commanded to teach the people to observe all things which Christ had commanded If then the Apostles teach the people to observe more then Christ hath commanded they go beyond the bounds of their commission and a larger commission then that given to the Apostles nor Elders nor Synods nor churches can challenge If it be said Christ speaketh only of teaching such things which he had commanded as necessary to salvation Answ If the Apostles or their successors should hereupon usurpe an authority to teach the people things indifferent they must plead this their authority from some other commission given them elsewhere for in this place there is no foot step for any such power That much urged and much abused place in 1 Cor. 14.40 will not reach it For though Paul requiring in that place all the duties of Gods worship whether Prayer or Prophesying or Psalmes or Tongues c. that they should be performed decently and orderly he thereby forbiddeth any performance thereof undecently as for men with long hayre and women to speak in open assemblies especially to pray with their hair loose about them And though he forbiddeth also men speaking two or three at once which to do were not order but confusion yet he doth not at all neither himself injoyn nor allow the Church of Corinth to injoyn such things as decent whose want or whose contrary is not undecent nor such orders whose want or
contrary would be no disorder Suppose the Church of Corinth or any other Church or Synod should enjoyn their Ministers to preach in a gown A gown is a decent garment to preach in yet such an Injunction is not grounded upon that Text of the Apostle For then a Minister in neglecting to preach in a gown should neglect the commandment of the Apostle which yet indeed he doth not For if he preach in a cloak he preacheth decently enough and that is all which the Apostles Canon reacheth to In these things Christ never provided for uniformitie but onely for unity For a third reason of this point and to adde no more it is taken from the nature of the ministeriall office whether in a Church or Synod Their office is stewardly not lordly they are Embassadours from Christ and for Christ Of a Steward it is required he be found faithfull 1 Cor. 4.1 2. and therefore he may dispense no more injunctions to Gods house then Christ hath appointed him Neither may an Embassadour proceed to do any act of his office further then what he hath received in his Commission from his Prince If he go further he maketh himself a Praevaricator not an Embassadour But if it be enquired Whether a Synod hath power of Ordination and Excommunication we would not take upon us hastily to censure the many notable precedents of ancient and later Synods who have put forth acts of power in both these kinds Onely we doubt that from the beginning it was not so and for our own parts if any occasion of using this power should arise amongst our selves which hitherto through preventing mercie it hath not we in a Synod should rather chuse to determine and to publish and declare our determination That the ordination of such as we find fit for it and the excommunication of such as we find do deserve it would be an acceptable service both to the Lord and to his Churches but the administration of both these acts we should refer to the Presbytery of the severall Churches whereto the person to be ordained is called and whereof the person to be excommunicate is a member and both acts to be performed in the presence and with the consent of the severall Churches to whom the matter appertaineth For in the beginning of the Gospel in that precedent of Synods Act. 15. we find the false teachers declared to be disturbers and troublers of the Churches and subverters of their souls Act. 15.24 but no condigne censure dispensed against them by the Synod An evident argument to us that they left the censure of such offenders in case they repented not to the particular Churches to whom they did appertain And for Synodicall ordination although Act. 1. be alledged where Matthias was called to be an Apostle yet it doth not appear that they acted then in a Synodicall way no more then the Church of Antioch did when with fasting and prayer they by their Presbyters imposed hands on Paul and Barnabas and thereby separated them to the work of the Apostleship whereto the holy Ghost had called them Act. 13.1 2 3. Whence as the holy Ghost then said 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so thereupon Paul styleth himself 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rom. 1.1 And this was done in a particular Church not in a Synod CHAP. VII Touching the first Subject of all the forementioned power of the Keyes And an explanation of Independency WHat that Church is which is the first Subject of the power of the keyes and whether this Church have an independent power in the exercise thereof though they be made two distinct Questions yet if candidely interpreted they are but one For whatsoever is the first Subject of any accident or adjunct the same is independent in the enjoyment of it that is in respect of deriving it from any other subject like it self As if fire be the first subject of heat then it dependeth upon no other subject for heat Now in the first subject of any power three things concur 1. It first receiveth that power whereof it is the first subject and that reciprocally 2. It first addeth and putteth forth the exercise of that power 3. It first communicateth that power to others As we see in Fire which is the first subject of heat it first receiveth heat and that reciprocally All fire is hot and whatsoever is hot is fire or hath fire in it Again Fire first putteth forth heat it self and also first communicateth heat to whatsoever things else are hot To come then to the first subiect of Church-power or of the power of the keyes The substance of the doctrine thereof may be conceived and declared in a few Propositions Church-power is either supream and soveraign or subordinate and ministeriall Touching the former take this proposition The Lord Jesus Christ the head of his Church is the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the first proper subiect of the soveraigne power of the keyes He hath the key of David He openeth and no man shutteth He shutteth and no man openeth Revel 3.7 The government is upon his shoulder Isa 9.6 And himself declareth the same to his Apostles as the ground of his granting to them Apostolicall power All power saith he is given to me in heaven and earth Matth. 28.18 Go ye therefore c. Hence 1. All legislative power power of making of Laws in the Church is in him and not from him derived to any other Jam. 4.12 Isa 33.22 The power derived to others is onely to publish and execute his Laws and Ordinances and to see them observed Mat. 28.20 His Laws are perfect Psal 19.9 and do make the man of God perfect to every good work 2 Tim. 3.17 and need no addition 2. From his soveraign power it proceedeth that he onely can erect and ordain a true constitution of a Church-estate Hebr. 3.3 to 6. He buildeth his own house and setteth the pattern of it as God gave to David the pattern of Solomons Temple 1 Chron. 28.19 None hath power to erect any other Church-frame then as this Master-builder hath left us a pattern thereof in the Gospel In the old Testament the Church set up by him was Nationall in the New Congregationall yet so as that in sundrie cases it is ordered by him many congregations or their messengers may be assembled into a Synod Act. 15. 3. It is from the same soveraigne power that all the offices or ministeries in the Church are ordained by him 1 Cor. 12.5 yea and all the members are set in the body by him together with all the power belonging to their offices and places as in the naturall body so in the Church 1 Cor. 12.18 4. From this soveraigne power in like sort it is that all gifts to discharge any office by the officers or any duty by the members are from him 1 Cor. 12.11 All treasures of wisdome and knowledge and grace and the fulnesse thereof are in him for that end Col. 2.3 and v. 9 10. Joh. 1.16
5. From this soveraigne power it is that all the spirituall power and efficacie and blessing in the administration of these gifts in these offices and places for the gathering and edifying and perfecting of all the Churches and of all the Saints in them is from him Mat. 28.20 Lo I am with you alwayes c. Col. 1.29 1 Cor. 15.9 The g od pleasure of the Father the personall union of the humane nature with the eternall Son of God His purchase of his Church with his own blood and His deep humiliation of himself unto the death of the Crosse have all of them obtained to him this his highest exaltation to be head over all things unto the Church and to injoy as king thereof this soveraign power Col. 1.19 Col. 2.2 9 10. Act. 20.28 Phil. 2.8 to 11. But of this soveraigne power of Christ there is no question amongst Protestants especially studious of Reformation Now as concerning the Ministeriall power we give these following Propositions I. Propos A particular Church or Congregation of Saints professing the faith TAKEN INDEFINITELY FOR ANY CHVRCH one as well as another is the first subject of all the Church-offices with all their spirituall gifts and power which Christ hath given to be executed amongst them whether it be Paul or Apollos or Cephas all are yours speaking to the Church of Gorinth 1 Cor. 3.22 not as a peculiar priviledge unto them but common to them with any other particular church And theirs was such a Church of whom it is said That they came all together into one place for the communication of their spirituall gifts 1 Cor. 14 23. And Paul telleth the same church that God hath set the officers and their gifts and all variety of members and their functions in his Church 1 Cor. 14.28 where it is not so well translated Some God hath set some in his church for hee hath set all but speaking of the members of the church v. 27. he proceedeth to exemplifie those members in v. 28. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and which God hath set in his Church that is which members Apostles Prophets c. For though the Relative be not of the same gender with the Antecedent before yet it is an usuall thing with the pen-men of the new Testament to respect the sense of the words and so the person intended rather then the gender of their name and to render the Relative of the same gender and case with the Substantive following so here 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. In the new Testament it is not a new observation that we never read of any nationall church nor of any nationall officers given to them by Christ In the old Testament indeed we reade of a Nationall church All the tribes of Israel were three times in a yeer to appeare before the Lord in Jerusalem Deut. 16.16 And he appointed them there an high Priest of the whole nation and certain solemne sacrifices by him to be administred Lev. 16.1 to 29. and together with him other Priests and Elders and Judges to whom all appeals should be brought and who should judge all difficult and transcendent cases Deut. 17.8 to 11. but wee reade of no such nationall church or high Priest or court in the new Testament And yet we willingly grant that particular churches of equall power may in some cases appointed by Christ meet together by themselves or by their messengers in a Synod and may perform sundry acts of power there as hath been shewed above But the officers themselves and all the Brethren members of the Synod yea and the Synods themselves and all the power they put forth they are all of them primarily given to the severall churches of particular Congregations either as the first subject in whom they are resident or as the first object about whom they are conversant and for whose sake they are gathered and imployed II. Propos The Apostles of Christ were the first subject of Apostolicall power Apostolicall power stood chiefly in two things First in that each Apostle had in him all ministeriall power of all the officers of the Church They by vertue of their office might exhort as Pastors 1 Tim. 2.1 teach as Teachers 1 Tim. 2.7 rule as Rulers 2 Tim. 4.1 receive and distribute the oblations of the Church as Deacons Act. 4.35 yea any one Apostle or Euangelist carried about with him the liberty and power of the whole Church and therefore might Baptize yea and censure an offender too as if he had the presence and concurrence of the whole Church with him For we reade that Philip baptized the Eunuch without the presence of any Church Act. 8.38 And that Paul himself excommunicated Alexander 1 Tim. 1.20 and it is not mentioned that hee took the consent of any Church or Presbyterie in it It is true indeed where he could have the consent and concurse of the Church and Presbyterie in exercise of any act of church-power he willingly took it and joyned with it as in the ordination of Timothy 2 Tim. 1.6 with 1 Tim. 4.14 and in the excommunication of the incestuous Corinthian 1 Cor. 5.4 5. But when both himself and the person to be baptized or ordained or excommunicated were absent and distant from all churches the Apostles might proceed to put forth their power in the administration of any church act without them The amplitude and plenitude of power which they received immediately from Christ would beare them out in it As my Father sent me saith Christ to wit with amplitude and plenitude of soveraigne power so send I you with like amplitude and plenitude of ministeriall power Joh. 20.21 2. Apostolicall power extended it self to all churches as much as to any one Their line went out into all the world Psal 19.4 compared with Rom. 10. And as they received commission to preach and baptize in all the world Mat. 28.19 So they received charge to feed the flock of Christs Sheep and Lambs which implyeth all acts of Pastorall government over all the Sheep and Lambs of Christ Joh. 21.15 16 17. Now this Apostolicall power centring all church-power into one man and extending it self forth to the circumference of all churches as the Apostles were the first subject of it so were they also the last Neverthelesse that ample and universall latitude of power which was conjoyned in them is now divided even by themselves amongst all the churches and all the officers of the churches respectively the officers of each church attending the charge of the particular church cōmitted to them by vertue of their office and yet none of them neglecting the good of other churches so far as they may be mutually helpfull to one another in the Lord. III. Propos When the church of a particular congregation walketh together in the truth and peace the Brethren of the church are the first subject of church-liberty and the Elders thereof of church-authority and both of them together are the first subject of all
church-power needfull to be exercised within themselves whether in the election and ordination of officers or in the censure of offenders in their own body Of this Proposition there be three Branches 1. That the Brethren of a particular church of a Congregation are the first subjects of church-liberty 2. That the Elders of a particular church are the first subjects of church-authority 3. That both the Elders and Brethren walking and joyning together in truth and peace are the first subjects of all church-power needfull to be exercised in their own body Now that the key of church-priviledge or liberty is given to the Brethren of the church and the key of rule and authority to the Elders of the church hath been declared above in Chapt. 3. But that these are the first subjects of these keys and first the church the first subject of liberty may appeare thus From the removall of any former subject of this power or liberty from whence they might derive it If the Brethren of the congregation were not the first subject of their church-liberty then they derived it either from their own Elders or from other churches But they derived it not from their own Elders for they had power and liberty to choose their own Elders as hath been shewed above and therefore they had this liberty before they had Elders and so could not derive it from them Nor did they derive it from other particular churches For all particular churches are of equall liberty and power within themselves not one of them subordinate to another Wee reade not in Scripture that the Church of Corinth was subject to that of Ephesus nor that of Ephesus to Corinth no nor that of Cenchrea to Corinth though it was a church situate in their vicinity Nor did they derive their liberty from a Synod of churches For we found no foot-step in the pattern of Synods Act. 15. that the Church of Antioch borrowed any of their liberties from the Synod at Jerusalem They borrowed indeed light from them and decrees tending to the establishment of truth and peace For upon the publishing of the decrees of that Synod the Churches were established in the faith or truth Act 16.4 5. and also in consolation and peace Act. 15.31 32. but they did not borrow from them any church-liberty at all 2. Now the second branch of the Proposition was That the Elders of the church of a particular Congregation are the first subject of rule or authority in that church or congregation over which the Holy Ghost hath made them over-seers 1. From the charge of rule over the Church committed to them immediatly from Christ For though the Elders be chosen to their office by the church of Brethren yet the office it self is ordained immediatly by Christ and the rule annexed to the office is limited by Christ only If the Brethren of the church should elect a presbyterie to be called by them in the Lord this will not excuse the Presbyters in their neglect of rule either before the Lord or to their own consciences For thus runneth the Apostles charge to the Elders of Ephesus Act. 20.28 Take heed to your selves and to the whole flock over which the Holy Ghost hath made you over-seers 2. The same appeareth from the gift of rule required especially in an Elder without which they are not capable of election to that office in the church 1 Tim. 3 4 5. He must be one that is able to rule well his own house or else how shall he order the church of God The like gift of rule is not necessary to the admission of a member into the church as to the election of an Elder If a private brother be not so well able through weaknesse in prudence or courage to rule his own house it will not justly debarre him from entrance into the church but the like defect will justly debar a man from election to the office of an Elder Neither hath God given a spirit of rule and government ordinarily to the greater part of the body of the brethren and therefore neither hath he given them the first Receit of the key of Authoritie to whom he hath not given the gift to employ it If it be objected How can the brethren of the Church invest an Elder with rule over them if they had not power of rule in themselves to communicate to him Ans They invest him with rule partly by chusing him to the office which God hath invested with rule partly by professing their own subjection to him in the Lord we by the rule of Relatives doth necessarily inferre and preferre the authoritie of the Elders over them For in yeelding subjection they either set up or acknowledge Authoritie in him to whom they yeeld subjection Ob. 2. The body of the Church is the Spouse of Christ the Lambs wife and ought not the wife to rule the servants and stewards in the house rather then they her Is it not meet that the keyes of Authoritie should hang at her girdle rather then at theirs Answ There is a difference to be put between Queens Princesses Ladies of great Honor such as the Church is to Christ Psal 45.9 and Countrey huswives poore mens wives Queens and great persons have severall offices and officers for every businesse and service about the house as Chamberlains Stewards Treasurers Comptrollers Vshers Bayliffs Groomes and Porters who have all the authoritie of ordering the affairs of their Lords house in their hands There is not a key left in the Queens hand of any office but onely of power and libertie to call for what she wanteth according to the Kings royall allowance which if she exceed the officers have power to restrain her by order from the King But countrey huswives and poore mens wives whose husbands have no Officers Bayliffs or Stewards to oversee and order their estates they may carry the keyes of any office at their own girdles which the husband keepeth not in his own hand Not because poore huswives have greater authoritie in the house then Queens but because of their poverty and mean estate they are fain to be in stead of many servants to their husbands Obj. 3. The whole body naturall is the first subject of all the naturall power of any member in the body as the facultie of sight is first in the body before in the eye Answ It is not in the mysticall body the Church in all respects alike as in the naturall body In the naturall body there be all the faculties of each part actually inexistent though not exerting or putting forth themselves till each member be articulated and formed But in the body of the Church of Brethren it is not so All the severall functions of Church power are not actually inexistent in the body of Brethren unlesse some of them have the gifts of all the officers which often they have not having neither Presbyters nor men fit to be Presbyters Now if the power of the Presbytery were