after and not above carnall and worldly Reason with the Scripture in measuring out to themselves the saving Gospel and take not it up after Christ simply and unmixedly as Christ hath taught it and put the impresse of his authority upon it Coloss 2. 8. The other that for prevention of corruption by this secular learning the Converts of Ephesus while the Apostle was yet resident among them and consequently consenting with them burnt their bookes of curious Arts which though some will have to be understood of conjuring books yet I cannot assent to them because this cursed rather then curious Art was proper and almost peculiar to the more Eastern people Jewes Samaritans Aegyptians and Babylonians the Greeks very little or not at all studying it but placing all their wisdom in the Arts whereof I have been hitherto discoursing and these were Greeks that burnt the bookes of those curious Arts which they studied Act. 19. 19. If then any conclude that the H Ghost at any time doth so much abase and deface an Ordinance of God Let him also conclude this kind of learning and disputation to be ordained of God for the confirming and promoting of the Gospel A third Reason to prove that God hath not ordained this Sophisticall or Philosophicall learning to be instrumentall for the promoting of the Gospel may be drawn from experience it self That which we never find to be blessed but still blasted of God to the hurt both of the Churches that have been admirers and followers of Sophisticall teachers of the Gospel and of such teachers also cannot be the Ordinance of God for he alway accompanieth and breaths his blessing in greater or lesser degrees upon the due execution of his own Ordinances But God hath never blessed but still so blasted and brought to nought naught c. the use of this philosophicall and philosophastrous learning Ergo It is not of Gods ordination I mean to be intermingled with spirituall and Evangelicall Doctrines For hence alone we banish it not denying it to be usefull in naturall and morall things as I have before granted That it hath been so blasted as intermingled with Gospel-doctrines experience it self evidenceth Trace we down from the very primitive age of the Gospel Church untill our times Gods operations in the Gospels and Churches wâ—xings and wainings and we shall find his blessing to have been upon the pure preaching of the Gospel his curse upon the mixings and medleys of mâ—ns wisedom with it Begin we with the Apostles times when theâ—e went forth acting only by the authority of Christs mission and according to the rule of his Commission the very Devills became subject to them and Satan fell as lightning before them at the sound of the Gospel which they had charge to preach alone and ground upon the authority of the Scripture alone while this charge was faithfully put in execution whole Nations either after the other yea the whole world almost came to be discipled to Christ God working mightily with them by many signes and wonders to make their Ministry succesfull But when anon there entred into the Churches rightly grounded and stablished false Apostles of the Jewes that preached a legall and naturall righteousnesse that reason and naturall con-conscience could suggest if the Law of Moses had been silent as necessary to be joyned with the Gospel-righteousnesse of Faith to Justification And on the other side there arose out of the Churches of the Gentiles some of themselves that spake perverse things seeking to introduce the like naturall righteousnesse out of the Ethicks of the Philosophers and to maintain their Doctrines mainly if not wholly by Aristotles dialectick subtleties And both these began to be favoured by wanton wits within the Churches Now the Lord turned his hinder parts to them on whom erewhile the light of his countenance shined the glory of the Gospel became more and more clouded the Churches rended and torn in pieces abounding more with Apostates than with Christians indeed as may be largely manifested from the New Testament if there were need From the Apostles time discend we to the next ages or age after the Apostles and I find not among the Writers of note any one much studious of Philosophy much lesse spoyled with it Clemens Alexandrinus only excepted and he enough moderate in the use of it But shortly after him sprung up Origen a great and copious Writer in his youth beyond his age hopefull but in his maturity carryed with full sails to the study of secular Arts and with such successe that Hierom in his Catalogue of Ecclesiasticall Writers renders him in such learning unmatchable by any going before or following him as one thorowly seen in all the differing opinions of all the severall sects of Philosophers a notable Logician and Disputer and fully read in all the Liberall Arts and as remarkable for the practical part as the Theory of all Now from a man so accomplisht in so many perfections as some term them would possibly be expected a greater successe of his preaching and writing than ever Paul attained because so much more learned then Paul But the case proved contrary Out of his brain thus filled issued errors and heresies as thick as hail-stones from the Clouds Nothing of Scripture Law or Gospel could escape his depravation and a Religion he set forth like Mahomets Alcaron a meer galleymaufry of Heterogeneous fancies some Jewish some Heathenish and some in shew at least Christian compounded and confounded one with the other so that there could not be a fouler abhomination then such a Religion Why because he had attained so much secular learning not so but because he wrought with untempered morter mixing Philosophy and Christianity together which close as sweetly as light and darknesse Hence was it that all the Churches at length exploded him for an Heretick and his writings as Pseudo-Christian and Hierom so wounded his reputation among the learned and godly for writing somewhat in the praise of him that with all his palliating and recanting hee could not fully repayr it to his dying day Yea the stinch of him hath offended all the godly Divines of our Reformed Churches notwithstanding his antiquity that they reject him From the pen of one Beza we may know the mind of the rest who calls him hominem impuram sometimes and sometimes hominum impurissimum an impure or a prophane man yea the prophanest of men for prophaning Scriptures Gospel Religion and all other sacred things that he medled with At no long distance after Origen lived Tertullian who finding the Church by the evill Artifice of Origen and other Philosophicall Christians like him over spread with heresies applies himselfe to seek the cure thereof And a principall means he prescribeth hereunto is a fast adhering to the doctrine of Christ all other authority in divine things being rejected It is not lawfull for us saith he to bring in any thing of faith or worship out of our own will or
Gospel let him be accursed Gal. 1. 8. saith the Holy Ghost but whether Mr Baxter doth in this Treatise bring us another Gospel his Doctrine in the Examination thereof will manifest 4 I would that this his Treatise did speak him out to be so strictly and tenderly conscientious as his friends proclaim him I should then either in person have made recourse to him to communicate my thoughts to him or written in another tone in the spirit of meeknesse to him to have received fuller satisfaction from him if my impotency could not have ministred some information to him But we shall find in what he writes many things that may work in us a jealousie of the sincerity of a sanctified Conscience in him I shall here mention some generals leaving the rest untill we come to except against the particulars One thing that occasioneth this jealousie is the want of ingenuity truth and simplicity in his Assertions For one instance hereof we need not step further then to the title of the work where he affirms it to be published especially for the use of the Church of Kederminster in Worcestershire Can any man that hath but glanced an eye on the surface of humane literature think him to mean as he speaketh Either we must conclude that he hath the very spirit of all Philosophicall and Metaphysicall learning which he breaths forth as effectually upon his Disciples as Knipperdoling did the Holy Ghost upon his Anabaptists or else his Church for the greatest number of its members is not in a capacity of understanding him That his Church by his presidency in it is on a sudden become a Najoth in Ramah every Saul that comes neer it doth philosophari if not prophetare so that ex ejus Ludo tanquam ex equo Trojano innumeri principes exiêre Pauls Princes I mean Princes in secular wisedome and learning 1 Cor. 2. 6. 8. else if his people have no such inspiration above other Churches surely the most of them stagger at the first word in the title of the Book understand not the tenth part of his sacred subtle distinctions but in most things that he saith he is to them a Barbarian and they to him Nay Mr Baxter is not a novice he knowes where and for what mouths to chew his morsels and to whom to give them to be chewed It was especially for the nimble wits and logicall Teachers of the Churches that this broth was boyled as I shall shew more fully afterward that having misled the leaders he might by them mislead their flocks also 2 And as little ingenuity and truth is there in him where he quoteth some whom he against his stomach cals Orthodox Divines and from some locutions and fragments of their sentences concludes them to be of his Judgement when he knowes their Doctrine about Justification to be so diametrically opposite to his as hell to heaven and Antichrist to Christ so that if they be Orthodox himselfe must needs be Hetorodox This he well knowes but his ingenuity and single-heartednes hides it and pretends the contrary 3 Is not his face Ferry-man-like one way and his motion another when the whole tenor of what he writes is not to set up any new opinion but to erect again and put life into that cursed Heresie of the Papists Justification by Works yet to hide his purpose from them that see not or will not see he sometimes solemnly professeth before God that it is no affectation of singularity that drew him to this Judgement at other times falls foul with the Papists telling us that no advantage is to be given to the Papists in this Doctrine of Justification when himselfe all the while is ploughing their field and strengthening their hands to the offence of all the truly wise and godly what hypocrisie sembling and dissembling is this Why doth he acquit himselfe of that which no man chargeth upon him What understanding Reader of him can harbour one thought of his bending to singularity It is plain to every eye that is open that he walks not solitary but hath thronged himselfe into the communion of the Holy Mother Church and fellowship of all her Saint Popish Schoolmen Monks Fryers and Jesuites That his study is to lay an odium implicitely and in the dark upon us I mean not onely all the Orthodox Divines but also all the Reformed Churches that have been or now are that they are all guilty of singularity seperation and Apostacy in departing from the Romish Synagogue in the Doctrine of Justification therefore hath he spread his nets to catch as many as he can to carry them back into Babylon againe Let Mr Baxter have as he hath a confident and swelling opinion of his owne abilities but let him not so abuse all others as if star-like their light must be totally dazled at the approach of his supposed sun-beams Wretched England if all her Seers are become blind and none can discern Christ from Antichrist even in his mystery Nay let him know that there are many which see and detest what he hath written no lesse then if it had been sent by the Popes own Legate to beguile Ingenuity truth and sincerity would have acted another way Mr Baxter if he had been seasoned therewith would have plainly acknowledged that he had examined the Controversie between us and the Papists about Justification that as far as his comprehension can reach he finds them in the truth and us erroneous and then should have alledged the Scriptures and other Arguments which they produce for the establishing of their Tenents and the Exceptions which in the Reformed Churches have been made against such Arguments and shewed the invalidity of those Exceptions in no wise answering or weakning the Popish Reasons by means whereof his judgement and conscience force him to side with them and not with us Thus candour and conscience would have wrought upon him for he cannot deny but that both he closeth with them in the same conclusions and that all the Scriptures Arguments and distinctions scarce any excepted which he brings for the promoting of such Conclusions are taken from the Papists and have been answered over and over a hundred times by our Divines Therefore to set forth his Assertions as new and to annex his Reasons for the confirmation thereof as now first heard of argues intolerable impudency in his daubing and dissembling To have dealt thus candidly and conscientiously would have excited many learned and holy men to a lovely conference with him which now contemn him as a seducer and seduced but if this had been done where should the crooked Serpent and working of Satan and Deceivablenasse of unrighteousnesse which still accompany that Man of sin and those that beare his marke have appeared 2 Thess 2. 9 10. 4 And his doublenesse and liegerdemain is no lesse exercised in that thorow-out his Treatise he is ever and anon sparkling his fire-brands against the Antinomians thereby secretly instilling into his unwary Readers that it
argument with Mr. Baxters set forth by Osorius not as this man under the name of a Protestant but ingenuously professing himself a Papist Among other I may as fitly apply these passages of Mr. Fox to Mr. Baxters work as he did it to the popish Bishop Si quisquam alius preter Osorium c. If any other man save Osorius had published this Book saith he but I say were it not that some unexceptively learned and godly Divines did thorow I know not what mistake favour and even patronize this Tractate Diceremei aperté atque in os Pestem publicae Christianorum saluti labem Religioni graviorem majorem D. Paulo Scripturis Prophetis injuriam inferre neminem unquam potuisse quam his libris ostenditur i. e. I would tell openly and to his teeth that no man ever could bring in a more grievous plague to the common safety of Christians or blemish to Religion or greater injury to St. Paul the Scriptures and Prophets then is held forth in this Book And p. 4. Ita sentio c. Philosophum tâ— quidem satis Platonicum Rhetorem non male Ciceronianum video at Theologum vero parum mihi Crede Evangelicum neque ad Causam ipsam justitiae Christianae perorandam satis exercitatum i. e. This is my opinion c. in the frame of this work I see thee a Philosopher enough Platonicall and a Rhetorician not much beneath Cicero but a Divine little seasoned with the Gospel and unfurnished to treat of that Christian Righteousnesse that tends to justification And pag. 11. while he disputeth and teacheth us many things of righteousnesse and justification there is nothing for us to learne that comes home to the matter not a mite that may further but very much that may hinder salvation And pag. 6. he likens him to Celsus Antipho mentioned by Origen who when they wrote most eagerly against the eruth callâ—d their Books 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a word or treatise of truth so this man entitles his Book A discourse of Justifying Righteousness I had almost said Aphorisms of Justification at ita ut nihil contra Veram Justitiam vel justificationem dici possit hostilius i. e. But so that nothing can be spoken more hostilely or hatefully against true righteousnesse and justification All this is no lesse true of and pat unto Mr. Baxters than B. Osorius his work But much more pernicious in Mr. Baxters because he hideth his poyson under the name and pretence of an Orthodox and Cathedrall Divine and a great Antagonist to Popery But of the matter of the work I have delivered my judgment before and shall have occasion to examine it when I come to the bulk of his Treatise Only at present I transmit the Reader that would in a breviary find what the substance of his Doctrine is to the second part of this Answer Chap. 16 17 and neer the end of Chap. 22. where he may read in how many particulars he holds the same Tenet with the worst and transcends in many things the more moderate of the Papists yea of the very Jesuits Here I shall speak only of the form and artifice of the work upon what foundation he hath laid by what pillars he supports his own assertions and with what Engins and Machinations hee oppugneth the sacred truth and judgment of all Orthodox Divines whom he makes his adversaries In all this he followeth his Masters the Schoolmen and Jesuites baulking the Scriptures and laying maximes of Philosophy and carnall or at least humane Reason as the foundation of his whole building walls and pillars it up with sophisticall Arguments Distinctions quodlibâ—tary subtleties raising every where dust and vapours to cloud and darken the Sun of truth that he may have the opportunity with his ignis fatuus to toll men out of the safe and sure way into the boggs and most excrementitioâ—s parts of Popery Indeed sometimes he quotes Scriptures in heaps as they were prepar'd to his hands by Fryars and Jesuits and lets them out without measure or tale telling us that he will stand to and be tryed by the Scriptures but scarce at any time vouchsafing to make known what hee would diduce thence and how and many times not affording the labour to name the words and then hyeth back to his Sanctuary St. Sophistry again declaring both at how cheap a rate he valueth the sacred word not deigning either to cite the words or at best to tell us what he thinks he hath found in them when contrariwise if he cite any thing out of the heathen Philosophers or their followers the Popish Doctors unnamed he is very busie to presse and improve it to his advantage and withall that his meaning is to be tryed by the boon sonns of the unholy Catholick Church therefore turns us over to them for our in formation what may be gathered from the Scriptures produced himselfe passing by it as a thing already done to his hands by them Now because the main strength of Mr Baxter and his leaders in fighting against the verity of the Gospel consisteth in this subtle and unscripturall way of disputation it shall not be impertinent to digresse a while in discussing what force there is in sophisticall or to use milder words Logicall Philosophicall and Metaphisicall argumentations to confirm or infirm Evangelical Doctrines In Natural Moral Civil and Oeconomical questions they may be I acknowledg very usefull Yea Logick in its sober and moderate use applyed as an instrument to assist in the contexture and retexture of Scriptures to finde out the sense and meaning thereof and further as by discreet joyning of Gospel positions together it helpeth to elicite sure and sound conclusions not at all drawing the question out of its own sphere the Scriptures to be judged and concluded by the nicities and quiddities of other besides Scripture-learning may be profitably used in Evangelicall questions But neither Logick it selfe beyond this nor Philosophy or the Metaphysicks at all have any force to prove any thing in Gospel-matters I know what to expect for such a discourse upon this subject I shall be jeered at to be the Fox in the Fable that being without a tayl to lessen his shame in a generall counsell of Foxes made an Oration declayming much against the discommodities which Foxes had by their tails and labouring to perswade them all to rid themselves of such a discommodity that he might make the shame common and then not the whole but a share of it only would be his Gal. 6. 14. 1 Cor. 2. 2. Be it so I neither arrogate nor usurp to my self the praise of humane learning In reference to salvation and justification God forbid that I should glory in any thing but in the Crosse of Christ or should determine to know any thing save Christ and him crucified To plead my righteousness before God and against Satan the simplicity of the Gospel plenarily furnisheth and contenteth me leaving it to Mr.
in name but as void of the truth and power of Christianity as are the very Pagans that never heard of Christ I come now to speak of the fatall if I may so term it and almost totall ruine of the Church and Gospel Towards the end of that which is called the Primitive Church and of them which are dignified with the name of the ancient Fathers of the Church As the Saracens invaded the Eastern Churches so a most stupendous and barbarous people not onely unchristian but also inhumane the Goths and Vandals made incursions upon these Western Churches with one swelling tide carrying all at once before them and made impression into Italy it self and seizing on Rome made it their imperiall City and reigning over or at least molesting all those nations which in this western part of the world were then termed Christians made it their work for more then a hundred years not only to raze out the very being of christianity from the earth but also all polite learning filling all things and places with their barbarism which also in length of time they accomplished almost to the utmost Now when at length by the valour of Carolus Magnus they were discomfited and wholly driven out of these christian Lands after their subversion there sprung out of the Barbarism which they left behind them a Barabarian sect of Divines more pernicious to Religion then the Goths Vandals had been In a general term they are usually called Schoolmen or School-Doctors These like the Babel-builders erected upon other foundations and of other materials a Babel-Church with such barbarous slime in stead of cement and morter as was never before used since the first building of the old Babel who exauctorating Christ and his Gospel from having any soveraignty in matters of Religion and permitting them but now and then to peep for their advantage canoniz'd Aristotle the most subtle but untill then the least regarded of all the sects of Heathen Philosophers to be their ipse dixit chose Peter Lombards sentences to be their Text themselves to be the Commentators The matter of their Commentary a Miscellane partly of the excrements of their own brains partly of moralities legalities formalities and partly of superstitions idolatries and heresies borrowed some from the Jewes some from the Heathen and the rest from Hell it self The Language in which all is set forth no Language but being cought out in syllabical barbarous and bombastical sounds of their own coining would better fit the bellowing of a beast than the utterance of men or if the utterance of men more beseeming Conjurers and Charmers than Divines The God whom they serve and sacrifice unto in all is not Christ but Antichrist whose commands and decrees assoon as they have received they must and will with all their Hyperborean conjurations of ghastly words defininitions argumentations and a cell or hell full of distinctions maintain them to be from heaven though they smell of nothing but hell it self Nimble work-men leaving a glory upon their disputes when they meet with sublunary matter with a subject not above the comprehension of natural reason but such whereof all men have an idea or image within their Synterisis or natural conscience but when they meet with Gospel-doctrine that makes men wise to salvation blinder than Balaam that saw less than his Asse which hee rode upon These have erected and held up many hundred years a religion which can save none but damneth all that cleave strictly to it and they have this peculiar vertue that they have still waxed wors and wors the second generation more impure than the first and the third than the second and so lineally every generation almost until now save that in these last times they have attained so much of the subtlety falshood and impiety of Satan that there is scarce a possibility of receiving a further addition If then any man will read how far the humane Learning of which I am speaking may be helpful to propagate maintain the truth of the Gospel let him but look back to the fruit of these sophistical Doctors Labours these many hundred years last past and by that which hee seeth he shal be able to answer himself viz. that it hath been and is powerful to deface and subvert utterly the whole truth and salvation of the Gospel in relation to their Disciples that rest upon their Learning and Precepts for look what of Religion worship and ordinances there is in the Popish Church the praise of it redounds to philosophy and sophistry the main instruments of laying its ground-work and the sole instruments unless ye will annex to it the fire and fagot and tyrannical inquisition for the maintenance thereof Having seen how great a corruption and how long a desolation of the truth of Religion there hath been while Sophistry was made its perfidious Advocate We are now in the next place to consider how the same truth of Christian Religion thrived when delivered out of the captivity of and communion with this secular Learning After the long holding of the purity of the Gospel in unrighteousnes by these Theologasters it pleased God to raise up to himself for the reformation of his Church men of his own choise and gifted with a measure of the Spirit answering so great a work to which they were deputed as Luther Zuinglius and many other learned and godly men some their contemporaries some their followers These restored the Scriptures to light again which had been many hundred years buried in darknes and preached again the true and clear Gospel which had been long also clouded with mens inventions traditions and superstitions What success this their Ministry had cannot be unknown to them that know any thing of the history of those times Disciples came in by thousands and ten thousands unto Christ being totally revolted from Antichrist Whole Kingdoms Nations Dukedoms that ere while worshipped the Beast now fell flat at the feet of Christ to submit to his Scepter And this not as constrained by the command of their Magistrates or Laws but even while Magistrates and Laws slept yea when Magistrates and Laws persecuted with Fire and Sword all that went this way even then the Kingdom of heaven suffered violence and the violent tooke it by force i. e. by an unresistible conviction of the word and wonderful operation of this Spirit upon their souls they were carryed out in contempt of all dangers and persecutions to receive the Lord Jesus Christ purely revealed in his righteousnes beawty and salvation to them So that in few years maugre all the malice of the Pope Emperour Kings Princes World and Hell Christ might be even seen reigning in the midst of his Enemies and whole Lands at least great multitudes of many Lands which were darknes became light in the Lord even so farr as we see the Protestant Religion at this day propagated If it be demanded here how it came to pass that the word and truth of
himself in the Title of the book their unworthy Teacher not one of their Teachers so that his purpose is to deliver a general rule for all Churches His congragation to take upon trust from him and other Congregations from their Teachers what they themselves cannot reach to see in its own evidence i. e. such doctrines as they themselves by their own light and knowledg cannot tell whether they be white or black true or false from Heaven or from Hell And to do this is lesse absurd and more necessary then many imagin Mr. Baxter is scarce yet beginning to discover himself therefore we have yet Bona Verba from him we hear him speaking modestly afterward vires acquirit eundo we shall when once he is hot in his discourse hear him speak in the full of the mouth here only he saith less absurd and more necessary than some imagin But who knows not his meaning to be that for the people thus to pin their Faith to the sleeves of their Teachers specially to such profound Teachers as Mr. Baxter is so far from being absurd as that it is necessary I suppose he meaneth to salvation though some imbegin otherwise Here I would demand not of Mr. Baxter for I desire not familiarity with him while such an Aphorist but of any knowing man indulgent to him when he saith less absurd and more necessary than some imagine whom can he mean by those some but the Protestant Churches and Divines who at all times with one consent have cryed out against the absurdity of this doctrine in their disputations against the Papists And if so what doth he less therein than pronounce the Popish Doctrine herein necessary and the doctrine of all the Protestants in opposition to it a meer imagination But it may be objected that the Papists lay down this doctrine of Implicit Faith or believing upon the authority of the Church or their Teachers for a continual rule to the people But Mr. Baxter proposeth it but as a temporary rule useful only for a season Therefore the difference between him and them is considerable For so much may be gathered from Mr. Baxters words to take upon trust from your Teachers what you cannot Yet reach to see in its own Evidence It is but while they are yet weak while they cannot yet reach c. But when once they are strengthened and have attained to see truths in their own evidence thenceforth they are to take up such doctrines upon their own evidence not upon trust from their Teachers any longer I answer This difference is but supposed not reall For if we compare his words here with that which he hath written in the next Section of this Epistle before and with the whole frame and current of of his disputes throughout his whole book we shal find that he doth equally with the Papists labour to settle the people in an implicit faith to believe as the Church believeth still For in the former Sect he that knoweth best his own congregation acknowledgeth it to be in the number of those the greatest part whereof is uncapable af understanding such controverted points as are treated of in his book He saith not only that they understand them not but also denyeth them to be in a capacity to be brought to the understanding of them viz. in their own evidence therefore they must still hold them upon trust from their Teachers Besides if we look to the frame of his Disputes in this Treatise we shall find him concurring with the Papists in his indeavours to keep the people in a perpetuall incapacity to understand such Doctrines in their own evidence For what else can he mean by seeing a point of divine doctrine in its own evidence but one of these two things to see it in the evidence and cleer testimony of the word by which God hath set it forth or to see it in the evidence of Sophistical learning and disputes by which Mr. Baxter and the Sophisters whom he followeth pretend themselves to set it forth But by neither of these will Mr. Baxter or the Popish Sophisters if they can hinder it suffer the vulgar people to know any Evangelicall truth in its own evidence Not by the evidence of the Scriptures by which God hath cleered up and so plainly revealed the fundamental truths of salvation that even babes and sucklings may in good measure comprehend them Mat. 11. 25. 1 Cor. 1. 26. For here with his Masters the Romish Sophisters hee raiseth vain and distracting questions making difficulties where the wisedom of God hath left none and so puzling weak and tender consciences that even what before they had attained by the pure and simple light of the word seeing now such a thick fogg of doubts interposed they think themselves to have lost what light once they had and so sink into sadness and despair concluding it utterly unattainable What zeal Mr. Baxter hath thus not only to match but also to exceed all the locusts of Rome in darkning such truths as Christ hath in Scripture left cleer and open to all shining in the very Sun-beams of the Gospel we shall find in examining the following parts of his Treatise So that in this respect he hinders as much as in him lyeth his Kederminsterians from seeing the truth of Christ in its own evidence Nor by the latter Mr. Baxters sophistical way of quenching under a pretence of confirming Gospel-truth can the vulgar ever attain to know them in their own evidences not only because this humane Learning hath no power to search into them but also because it is not to be expected that illiterate men should ever attain any depth in this learning For if it be true what is generally held by Mr. Baxter and his side that without great acquaintance with school-learning the marrow of Divinity can never be effectually pierced into and what a great Scholler once told Erasmus that one of these School-Doctors John Scotus can in no wise be understood under nine years study at the least and what a 3d affirmeth that a man must have Aristotles Metaphysicks ad unguem before he can be capable of understanding one sentence of Scotus Farewell then all hope of saving knowledg ever to be attained by unscotified miserable idiots in its own evidence or by the Ministeriall help of such Teachers as have crept here below upon the Doctrine of Christ his Prophets and Apostles and not had so much time and patience as Mr. Baxter hath bestowed in the sublimated study of Aristotle Scotus and their fellows But what if Mr. Baxter herein speak the same things may some say with the Church of Rome and the same in opposition to the judgment of all the Reformed Churches yet this doth not certainly prove that it is savouring of error which he here delivereth except it be manifested that he speaketh against the Scriptures Doth the word any where forbid us to take up points of Faith on the credit of our Teachers though we
put a difference betwixt mid-day and mid-night It is plain by what light by what argument It is the thing in question and none untill Mr. Br. ever held forth this assertion in these his expressions Yet it must be plain viz. because he hath said it so plain as a New world created in Mr. Br. fist he that can see what is not may see it We deny both the righteousnes which is by Christ to be a legall righteousnes and our own qualifications to be the terms and grounds upon which he is made to us Righteousnes And let the world judg whether he shew himself a Christian Teacher or an Antichristian Imposter who having promised a confirmation of his strange and before unheard of doctrine brings nothing but flourishes of words to charm fools not one argument or Scripture to satisfie the wise and conscientious Himself seeth the grosnes and palpablenes of his delusions and left his Reader should stay in his meditations upon it to see it also he hasteth to annex a fourth Conclusion very plausible to them whom he hopes to beguile wherupon as on a Cross he naileth the picture of an Antinomian to crucifie him that with this pleasant spectacle he may divert his Readers eyes from the nakednes and nothingnes of what went before to the beholding of a new object set before him To affirm therefore that our Evangelicall or New Covenant Righteousnes is in Christ and not in our selves or performed by Christ and not by our selves is such a monstrous piece of Antinomian Doctrine that no man c. ut supra Which is as much as if he had said to his Reader if upon the bare authority of my words when I have no one good Argument to prove them thou wilt not become a rank Papist I will register thee for an Antinomian and make thee out to the world such a Monster that all shall abhor thee as unsufferable With this Thunder-bolt he knows he shall shake into an Ague all those that Nicodemus-like are Disciples of Christ but secretly for fear of the Jewes Should they be suspected of the least tang of Antinomianism they should never more have a good look from the Scribes and Pharisees But he is not forth with an Antinomian whom Mr. B. so termeth If Pythagoras his transmigration of souls into new bodies were Canonicall I should conclude that the ghost of one of those ghostly Fathers of the Councell of Constance had crept into Mr. B. body They to make John Huss odious painted an ugly Devill in paper and crowned John Huss therewith when they carried him to the stake to be burned at the view whereof the people exulted in his death as if they had seen some Witch or rather young Devill burned So deals Mr. B. here with them which are truly Evangelical inures upon them the black brand of Antinomianism so to make truth in their mouth hatefull as well as the persons But is it decreed that they are all Antinomians that hold and that it is a monstrous piece of Antinomianism to hold that our Evangelicall or New Covenant righteousnes is in Christ not in our selves performed by Christ and not by our selves If so I much question whether there will be found any one save Mr. B. alone in all the Reformed Churches that are or have been but must bear the imputation of a monstrous Antinomian I will not be over confident of Socinus Arminius Grotius and their followers because I take them not for members but troublers of the Reformed Churches For my part I know no difference about this point between the Orthodâ—x and Antinomians Both consent 1 That our Gospel-righteousnes which worketh effectually to our Justification is in Christ not in our selves save by imputation 2 That our Gospel or New Covenanâ— righteousnes in reference to our sanctification is in Christ radically but in us by derivation and influence actually to sanctifie us 3 That our faith repentance obedience holines good works though flowing from Christ himself into us are the Gospel or New Covenant Righteousnes not by which we are justified but by which we are sanctified And let Mr. B. or any of his Disciples produce that Orthodox man that ever called this doctrine Antinomianism or that hath not shunned the contrary doctrine as Popish and Antichristian Yet Mr. B. finding himself bound by promise to prove many things as was said before that his fallacious dealing might not be too notorious and shamefull he chooseth one of the many leaving the rest untouched to speak something to it as he had said though not to prove it And in that which he saith there is nothing to confirm his own assertion but a meer reviling abusing abasing of them that assert the contrary under the false imputation of Antinomianism And here he comes upon the stage like Hercules Furens who in a Phrensie taking his Wife and Children to be a Lioness and her Whelps falls upon them fiercly with his Clubb and envenomed Arrows untill he had utterly destroyed them So Mr. B. in somewhat a like fit not finding reall Antinomians but making in his fancy imaginary Bug-bears and phantasms of them curseth them with Bell Book and Candle for saying that Christ hath fulfilled the conditions of the New as well as of the Old Covenant and that our Evangelical righteousnes is not in our selves but in Christ At the supposition of such assertions which none ever laid down in these terms the man is in a rage beats the wind and flings dust in the Aire cryeth Blasphemy heresie impiety and enumerates Absurdities upon absurdities arising from such doctrine all which I am not at leizure to transcribe it being all superfluous and not to the purpose but may be read at large pag. 111 112 113 of his Tractate More proper shall it be for me here to make out Mr. B. either willing or unwilling mistake herein and then all his absurdities will â—ither vanish into winde or return upon himself First then as we deny not Faith in the Lord Christ to be instrumentall to apprehend to our selves Christ for our justification and a declarative evidence to our own souls that we are actually justified by him as before hath been granted so we affirm it to be hereticall and popish doctrine which Mr. B. doth here pag. 111 deliver in asserting repentance obedience submission c. and afterward all other vertues and good works to be conditions of the New Covenant viz. by which as by our Gospel righteousnes we are and without which preceding we cannot be justified For all these in Mr. B. sense as Austin from the tenor of the Gospel saith Non precedunt justificandum sed sequuntur justificatum are not the precedents but fruits of justification 2 We affirm Repentance Obedience Charity c. and all good works which the Gospel requireth to be originally and materially the works and duties of the Law Nature and naturall conscience it self suggesting to every of us both the rest and withall in
then reviving him with the precious comforts of the Gospel to prescribe unto God the same method or to conclude the same to bee the method of God in his operations upon all in converting them The rending whirlwind doth not alway goe before the quickening beams of the Sun of Righteousness To the third if he mean that they taught that Justification by Faith in the Gospel promises might be sound and effectuall though no sanctification but all allowed impurity of life should follow the assertion and doctrine implies a contradiction for there can be no living Faith in the promises that is not fruitfull in good works And herein they declared themselves no lesse Anti-Gospellers then Antinomians But if hee meane that without all such extream horrors of the Law a man may be truly justified by Faith in Christ notwithstanding all his former loose and impure life and so the Publicans and Harlots enter into the Kingdome of God before the self-righteous Pharisees this is not Antinomistick except Pauls doctrine also be such Rom. 4. 5. 2. As for those opinions charged in these latter times with Antinomianism by many the 1 2 and last cannot be excused Onely to give the Assertors their due whatsoever of doctrinal truths to be beleeved or of Moral duties to be practised are expressed both in the Old and New Testament they were conscientious to submit themselves thereunto yet not for the authority of the Law or Old Testament but of the New only The third can bee justly charged with Antinomianism no farther then as either the Maintainers of it were in other points Antinomists or in respect of the foundation which they laid to maintain it which was the abrogation of the Law and old Testament The Law of the Sabbath being one part therof which must stand or sink with the rest But as they denyed the lawfulness of all discrimination or difference of daies by way of Morall or Ecclesiastical or Apostolical order for the more orderly and profitable celebration of publick Assemblies and the ordinances of Christ in publick Communion calling it Will-worship and Superstition This error they drew from the Petrobusians and Anabaptists not from the Antinomians that had been before them As to other questions about the authority of the Sabbath first now of the Lords day what relation they have either to other whether the observation of them be of Natural or Positive right If of Moral and Natural right by what express authority it is altered from the last to the first day of the week If of Positive right whether it began from the Creation or from the Law given upon Mount Sinai Whether the fourth Commandement hath any thing in it Typical now vanished in Christ Or whether wholly Moral and binding for ever how far it did or did not bind precisely to a day not this day of 7 Whether it were of Moral Righteousnes or else only of Moral order Whether the holyness of the 7th be now wholly translated upon the first day of the week By what authority the observation of the seventh day ceased and of the first day of the week was instituted to succeed Whether by virtue of Christs Resurrection or by some express command of Christ and where that command is to bee found Or else by Apostolical appointment And then whether in respect of order or of the aforegoing authority of Gods Commandement about the Sabbath or else by the appointment and consent of the Churches in or after the Apostles times These and many other the like questions Mr. Baxter knoweth to have been in agitation between both the greater and the lesser Divines and Members of the Reformed Churches adhuc sub judice Lis est Onely some within the Church of England ever since a Tractate came forth upon this subject from one Dr. Bownd Anno Christi 1595. seem to fix the observation of the Lords day upon more strict grounds and to bind it to more precise termes then the other Reformed Churches beyond the seas admit or many of the solid Divines have approved But of this there is no proper occasion here given to dispute This assertion therefore any further then hath been specified I doubt not but Mr. Baxter himself will discharge of Antinomianism The 5. 7. Mr. Baxter himself will not have to be ranked among Antinomian errors confessing the former to be the judgement of many learned and godly Divines of singular esteem in the Church of God pag. 53. Ap. pag. 12. The latter hee pronounceth to be the Common Judgement viz. of Churches and Divines therefore of ignorance accused of Antinomianism pag. 68 of his Aphorisms The fourth gives us cause to accuse them of some audaciousnes in teaching the Holy Ghost to speake and pertinaciousness in binding themselves to phrases and words even to the declining of the language of the Holy Ghost in Scriptures To be justified by Faith and to bee justified by Christ or our being found in Christ being ever both in Canonical and Ecclesiastical Writings taken as Equipollent terms until in these few last years Mr. Bax. and some of his fellows irradiated from Rome and by the doctrine of Socinus and Arminius have broached another a new and unheard of interpretation of the phrases For whether we say we are justified by Faith wee were formerly understood to affirm our Justification by Christ to whom our Faith hath united us or by Christ it was understood by Christ apprehended by faith Neither manner of Locution therefore was to be rejected as opposing the other The sixth I take to be a fancy if they understand Gods seeing and knowing in generall without restriction troubling the brains of men with a strife about words without substance God seeth no sin unpardoned upon his people we acknowledge In reference to Judgement and Vengeance hee hath seen them all upon Christ and punished them upon Christ so that he no more sees sinne in beleevers to take vengeance of them for it But it were our loss and misery if God should not at all and simply see sinne in us How then should he purge it from us and us from it He is the Husbandman of his Vineyard sees and cuts out every canker from his Vines seeth and pareth off every unprofitable sprigg from the branches by meanes whereof fruitfullnesse followeth where else there must ensue barrennesse and rottennesse Some Divines therefore thus distinguish that Gods seeing of sin may be considered as either in Articulo providentiae so he seeth all sinns of all men alike to dispose of them to his glory or in Articulo Iustificationis so he seeth the sinnes onely of the unjustified Ier. 18. 23. Forget not their iniquity neither blot out their sin from thy sight but the sinnes of the justified are forgotten and blotted out of his remembrance and sight as the constant phrase of Scripture affirmeth no more to be imputed If they mean onely in this latter sense they erre not By that which hath been
sinns against the Gospel as well as against the Law Though I have spoken of all these enough of each in its proper place within this Tractate yet somewhat for the fuller Clearing of my meaning may be said here also The first and second I shall for brevity join in one as of no small Cognation As farr as I hold and have declared my self to hold them 1 I have also manifested in due place how they are or seem at least to be grounded upon the Scriptures 2 They are expresly and boldly asserted by many of the most Conspicuous Divines in piety and Learning that any of the Protestant Churches have enjoyed ever since the Reformation 3. And that without the Contradiction or exception of any Church or Orthodox Writer for well nigh a hundred yeares made against it A great and probable Argument that it was the Common Judgement of all the Churches 4. Mr. Rhaeterfordt in his Exercit. Apolog holds it forth not as the private opinion of some particular men but as the Common Judgement of all the Churches And the Remonstrants take it as such For so I remember they oft argue in their Apol. and elswhere Justificatio est purus putus Actus in Deo immanens c. not that they express what Arminius his judgment and theirs after him is in this point but that from this as a conclusion which they knew common to and would not be denyed by any Protestant their Argument would stand firm against them Neither know I any one of the Protestants that hath written against them excepting against it 5 I never read any to make me dissent in judgement from these Worthies that hath given his reasons against it save Mr. Br. alone and he handles the question like a man spoyled with Philosophy and vain deceit as the Apostle termeth the use of exotick learning in purely Gospel matters after the traditions of men and Rudiments of the world not after Christ Col. 2. 8. And his nakedness in such his arguing is enough discovered by a learned Writer whose worth I shall still honour but have not so much as an Ambition ever to match * Mr. Kendal He tells us indeed that Dr Downham hath written against it as delivered by Mr. Pemble But I could not get the book to see his reasons nor know I any thing which he hath written but as I have heard from others Besides I have been told that some of the late Reverend Synod disrelished the doctrine but cannot finde that any one of them hath published his reasons for such a disrelish And Charity will not permit me to harbour the lightest imagination that any of those grave Divines culld and selected out of the whole Nation for their eminency in godliness and learning should without any means used for information and conviction exercise a Tyranny over the Consciences of their lesser brethren to force them into an implicit Faith to beleeve as themselves beleeve specially when doing it they shall put out that which they think at least to be the light of the word in their conscience and in consenting with them without hearing a reason they shall dissent from others whom their Modesty will confess to be of no less deservings in the Church who have given their reasons Yet still I hold 1 that those Scriptures which treat of Justification by Faith do all relate to the transient justification which no man partakes of till he beleeveth 2 That no man is personally justified but onely in Christ the publike person till he be by Faith united to Christ That righteousness and life so discend to us from the second Adam as sinn and condemnation from the first As by the offence of one judgement came upon all to condemnation so by the Righteousness of one the free gift came upon all to Justification of life Rom. 5. 18 19. In Adam the publike person we were all represented he was all and we all considered in him God saw us in all our individuall persâ—ns in him though we through Adam saw it not so that Aâ—am sinning we all sinned in him and became dead in law and guilty of condemnation before God as if we had been then being and actually sinning Nevertheless as to our selves we were not personally sinners and guilty untill we had a personall being in and from Adam So in Christ satisfying Gods justce for sinn the Elect were all represented as in a publike person satisfying in him by him and so all in him and by him justified and absolved in all their individualls from sinn and condemnation before God Nevertheless we are not personally so justified untill we have a personall being and new being in Christ and from Christ 3. That this Transient Justification is a justifying or being justified before God passed at Gods Tribunall set up in mans Conscience from which he pronounceth absolution to a poore sinner denying himself and resting upon Christ alone for Mercy So that now and never untill now he hath boldness to pierce by Faith into the Holiest and plead his righteousness before him that sitteth on the Mercy-seat Thus our justification which was before in God and in Christ is not at all derogatory to the justification which is by Faith but onely prevents that this latter may not be derogatory to the praise of Gods Grace and Christs merits which have completed all without our subserviency for us and thus God is all seen to be all and our boasting excluded This hitherto is my judgement untill I shall be better instructed Tu si quid novisti rectius istis Candidus imperti And at length if it shall be granted to be an error yet it cannot be Antinomism being a deviation not from the doctrine of the Law but of the Gospel It was not the judgement but malice of Mr. Br that gave it this brand of ignominy 3 To the free absolute and unconditionall Justification I need not to Apologize for my self at all It is to the truly pious of the Ministery to whom my words are directed who among other have given this evidence of your godlinesse that ye have not forsaken your first Faith by declining to Popery or Arminianism what others judge of me is to me a small thing saith the Apostle of such I weigh it not But ye no doubt teach that the very promulgation of Justification runs upon no other condition but Faith alone and upon Faith not as a quality or vertue but instrumentall to apply the righteousnesse of Christ to Justification that works and the universall conditionall Justification which Mr. Br. hath learned of his Masters are to be excluded In this your doctrine is one and the same in sense and substance with theirs that affirm Justification to be unconditionall And it is indifferent to me to deliver the same truth in their words or yours Onely I find that they make use of both the former and this Conclusion as strong Fortresses against Popery and Arminianism which causeth Mr.
cursed opinions so that we find him in stead of a Gemm bringing forth a Cockatrice-egg which if it be not destroyed in the shell will ruine himself and many others It is an infirmity that hath made impression in points lesse momentous upon some persons of great note in the Church I shall mention one Hierom in stead of the rest In his works as they are set forth by Erasmus Tom. 1. there is a Book intituled Catalogos Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum in which Hierom mentioning Tertullian and not being able to deny his falling into Montanism he thus at least minceth his fault Invidia contumeliis Clericorum Romanae Ecclesiae ad Montani dogma delapsus est saith he i e. through the envy and reproaches which he suffered from the Clergy of Rome he declined to the opinion of Montanus Erasmus in his Scholia upon these words thus writeth Vt favit Hieronimus ingenio Tertulliani c. i. e. See how Hierom favoured Tertullians wit almost excusing him for falling into the faction of the Montanists laying the fault upon the envy and reproaches of the Roman Priests So farr Erasmus He might have further added so farr he delighted in Tertullians wit that he did not only excuse him but also was carried by the pleasing stream of his wit and learning into the very dregs of Montanism as deep as Tertullian himself So shall wee finde him discovering himself at the full in his first Book against Jovinian as Erasmus himself in his Antidote prefixed thereunto doth hint but the work it self makes it notoriously plain It contents not that good Monk Father there to produce as his own all Tertullians arguments except he also delivers them for the most part in Tertullians very words so that there were not wanting such as excepted against him as a very Montanist I speak not to lessen the worth of those two ancient Writers but to manifest in these two great and sublimated Wits when the Genius of one man so conspireth with anothers as to delight abundantly it is as the Loadstone and iron to draw to follow into falshood as well as truth except there be interposed much of the spirit of grace and meeknes and so high an esteem of the Word that the mind explodes all other learning as base in comparison of it No marvail then if Mr. Baxter having immixt himself into whole troops of Schoolmen Jesuits and others of the same Scholastick train with himself hath been carried away in the crowd captive to their basest errors Some would marvail rather how there should be found in England any Divines professing antipathy to Rome applauding the very worst piece of Romes Herisies as soon as Mr. Baxter hath breathed upon and blessed it But the case is the same Mr. Baxter well knew in what water to angle that he might catch he perceived that the Doctrine of Justification for these fifty years hath been too little preached in England That since the heat of controversie betwixt us and the Papists about it abated this Doctrine sounded in few Pulpits which before sounded in all that the Pia fraus as they termed it prevailed every where a godly deceit to with-hold from the people the knowledg of the libertie which they have by Christ lest they should turn it into licentiousnesse That as this pions fraud passed from hand to hand among the Ministers many of them while they were deceiving were themselves deceived and verily thought it the right art of profitable preaching to hold out the Law and keep in the Gospel to wash the utter part of the cup and platter leaving that which is within full of guilt and corruption Hence it came to pass that the Law by many was turned to a two-fold use like the sword of Achilles to Tilephus to wound first and then to heale to cast down and to erect again to kill and make alive to damn and then to save also First it was so brandished for conviction that all men by the light and curse thereof might be compelled to see themselves under sin and condemnation and then held forth as a soveraign remedy against damnation and means of salvation such repentances for sin such degrees of contrition and reformation prescribed out of the Law which being practiced pardon of sin and eternall life must needs follow Thus man was made not only his own condemner but his own Saviour also his evill works in transgressing the Law pursuing him with vengeance and his returning by repentance to good works in strict obedience to the law restoring him to life salvation In mean while Christ was left in a corner to look upon all but without interposition of his operation or Passion Sometimes indeed much might be heard of the riches of Gods Grace of the efficacy of Christs merits to save the chief of sinners so that the people might even see the door of heaven open to them but in conclusion the Preacher as if he had been deputed to the office of the Cherubims Gen. 2. ult to keep the way of the tree of life with his flaming sword turning every way affrighted the poor soules from all hope of entring crying procul hinc procul ite prophani no prophane or unclean person hath right to meddle with this Grace No first they must have such heart-preparations purifications and prejacent qualifications before they draw neer to partake of mercy must first cleanse and cure themselves and then come to Christ afterwards must be cloathed with an inherent Righteousnesse first and then expect to be cloathed upon with a Righteousnesse imputed Such hath been and still is the Doctrine delivered in many Congregations within this Nation I neither fain nor aggravate It is that whereof my self not without griefe have been oft an ear-witnesse and that from the mouths of very zealous Ministers And I fear the Lord hath a controversie against the Ministry and will more yet obscure and vilifie many of them for their obscuring of his grace and his Christ Now when so many of them were by the tide of their own judgments moving before not a little in Mr. Baxters way no marvail if they have admitted him among themselves to hoyse the sailes and carry them hastier and further than they before had purposed specially when all the way along and thorowout his whole Treatise he deals with them as Elisha did with the Syrians telling them that he is leading them to Dothan to Hierusalem holding their eyes and wits suspended until he hath brought them into the streets of Samaria of Rome it self 2 King 6. 8 c. This I thought fit to premise of the Author the next thing promised was touching the work it self Whether we consider the matter or the artifice of it I cannot in generall otherwise give a livelier character or description thereof than in the words of Mr. Fox in his Tractate De Gratiâ gratis Justificante against Osorius and others where he gives his censure upon a book of the same
explained as Christ is our legall Righteousness Explication This assertion so odious to those that understand not its grounds is yet so clear from what is sayd before that I need no more to prove it For first I have cleared before that there must be a personall righteousnesse besides that imputed in all that are justified And that secondly the fulfilling of the conditions of each Covenant is our Righteoesnesse in reference to that Covenant But Faith is the fulfilling of the conditions of the New Covenant therefore it is righteousnesse in relation to that Covenant I do not here take Faith for any our single act but as I shall afterward explain it Mr. Baxter verifieth the Proverb Noscitur ex comite qui non cognoscitur ex se The affections of the man may bee discerned by his company with whom he is as it were in a confederacy The Holy Ghost pronounceth of the Jews once degenerated into the manners and false-worships of the Canaanits that they were no more children of Abraham but that their birth was of the land of Canaan their father was an Amorite their mother a Hittite when once they had taken the pattern of their Religion from the Amorites and Hittites and diverted from the Word of God and steps of their own Progenitors Abraham Isaac and Jacob and the following Patriarcks and Prophets Ezek. 16. 3. What should we account lesse of Mr. Baxter whom wee finde deriving his Religion from the Papists and their associates the Arminians in contempt of Scriptures and the godly Divines of the Reformed Churches His former assertions That beleevers are still under the curse of the Law after they are in Christ That their Justification is but conditionall both before and after their believing That none is in any sense justified before he believeth That Justification is a continued act during onely so long as we continue fulfilling broken off when we break and repaired when we return to the fulfilling again of the supposed conditions thereof That it is not compleated before the end of our life or as Mr. Baxter out-stripping most of his Masters will have it not before the day of Judgement These all hee cannot deny to be Doctrines held in common by the Jesuits and Arminians and I could were there need alleage the very words of Bellarmine and other Jesuits and of Arminius Corvinus Episcopius Grevinchovius the Apology of the Remonstrants and in most of these even Socinus himselfe whose not onely matter but also their very words Mr. Baxter hath transcribed into our language in the delivery of those Tenents Here againe hee doth in this Thesis lay downe a conclusion before more then hinted at wherein Bellarmine Socinus and Arminius fully agree that Faith is our righteousnesse even Faith it self our Evangelicall righteousnesse viz. to Justification that it is so far from being an error to affirm it that it is a truth necessary for every Christian to know He acknowledgeth it in the Explication to be an assertion odious to some Rational men would therefore expect great strength of Arguments to prove it And what brings hee Nothing but his own Authority which to us is of equal and but of equal authority with theirs from whom hee hath taken it up It is clear saith he from what is said before No lesse clear I acknowledge then the face of a man in a mud-wall for a Looking-glasse 1. I have cleared before saith he besides that imputed that there must be also a personall Righteousness in all that are justified This is not denyed that there must bee such a personall Righteousnesse but that where it is it is there proper and effectuall to Justification is no better cleared then hath been said How the second thing was before cleared by him I referre to that which hath been said of both sides about it If the casting of dust and dirt into the eyes may be properly called clearing of them in this and in no other sense doe I acknowledge the thing to bee cleared by what Mr. Baxter hath before said Where he laies down this caution I doe not here take Faith for any one single act but as I shall afterward explain it he might have spared the labour to tell us so For wee see what himself seeth that so to take it would bee a ruinating blow to the most of the foregoing and following doctrines about Justification conteined in this his book But he goeth forward thus B. Quaest In what sense is then Faith said to be imputed to us for Righteousnesse if it be our Righteousnesse it self Answ Plainly thus Man is become unrighteous by breaking the Law of Righteousnesse that was given him Christ fully satisfieth for this transgression and buyeth the prisoners into his own hands and maketh with them a New Covenant That whosoever will accept of him and beleeve in him who hath thus satisfied it shall be as effectuall for their Justification as if they had fulfilled the Law of Works themselves A Tenant forfeiteth his Lease to his Landlord by not paying his Rent he runnes deep in debt to him and is disabled to pay him any more Rent for the future Whereupon he is put out of his house and cast into prison till he pay the debt His Landlords sonne payeth it for him taketh him out of prison and putteth him in his house again as his Tenant having purchâ—sed house and all to himself He maketh him a new Lease in this Tenor that paying but a Pepper-corn yearly to him he shall be acquit both from his debt and from all other Rent for the future which by his old Lease was to be payed Yet doth he not cancell the old Lease but keepeth it in his hands to put it in suit against the Tenant if he should be so foolish as to deny the payment of the pepper-corn In this case the payment of the grain of pepper is imputed to the tenant as if he had payed the rent of the old Lease Yet this imputation doth not extoll the pepper corn nor vilifie the benefit of his benefactor whoredeemed him Nor can it be sayd that the purchase did onely serve to advance the value and efficacy of that graine of pepper But thus a personall Rent must be payd for the testification of his homage He was never redemeed to be independent and his own Land-lord and Master The old Rent he cannot pay His new Land-lords clemency is such that he hath resolved this grain shall serve the turn Doe I need to apply this to the present case or cannot every man apply it Even so is our Evangelicall Righteousness or Faith imputed to us for as real Righteousnes as perfect obedience Two things are considerable in the debt of Righteousness The value and the personall performance and interest The value of Christs satisfaction is imputed to us in stead of the value of a perfect obedience of our own performing and the value of our Faith is not so imputed But because there must be some personal
are or shall be justified and saved To the sixth I shall reserve my answer untill I come to examine the forequoted places of Master Baxter together with his impetuous and fiery dispute against it Append. pa. 76. and thence forward unto pa. 98. where wee shall find him combating against this opinion with as much gallantry and possibly with no lesse successe than the Dragon fought against Michael In the interim I doubt not thence after the question rightly stated to maintain the position as our Divines most eminent in the reformed Churches have taught it to be the sacred and sound Doctrine of the Gospell as free from Antinomism as the contrary assertion of Master Baxter is full of Popery The examination of the things conteined in the eighth and ninth I shall leave to their proper place particularly to be examined because they have a multitude of particulars congested in them requiring particular answers From all that hath been said upon this point wee may take up two observations in reference to Master Baxters dealing therein 1. That there is no truth and sincerity in his pretence of fighting against the Antinomians truly so called throughout this his Tractate For he medleth not at all with their erroneous Tenents But contrariwise that he useth meer fraud to inure the odious Term of Antinomism upon the choice and most pretious Doctrines of the Gospel delivered by Christ and his Apostles and taught and defended by the most able and most faithfull Ministers of Christ in all ages to make both the pure Gospel and the defenders thereof to stink in the nostrills of unread and unwary men subtlely concealing the names of those worthies which have taught and maintained these truths lest their light and glory should bring his Doctrines contrary to theirs into suspition first then to examination and lastly to an abhomination among men How much more candour do we find in his fellowes the Arminians or Remonstrants These in all their Tenents wherein they dissent from the Protestant Churches do not load the contrary opinion with the imputation of Antinomism but throughout their Apology ever and anon ingeniously confesse of that which they hold Contra quod fere hactenus creditum est in these and in words equipollent acknowledging still their opinions to be wholly against the judgement of the best Churches and Divines before them Master Baxter it seems hath more of the serpent in him than they had therefore followes the steps of our English Arminians rather than those in Holland before them For as these blasted the sacred truths which they opposed with the name of Puritanism so doth this man with the name of Antinomianism to make them odious A trick which the old Pharisees had learned of their Father Jo. 8. 44. and propagated to their sonns the Papists to besmear the Doctrines of Christ with the infamous titles of Schism Nazarism Heresie Who then will lay it as a fault to their Children in our times if they doe also Patrizare Secondly that he hath the like fraudulent design in mingling with the truths of the Gospel which he brandeth with Antinomism the dreams of Colyer Spriggs Hobson and other Ranters if indeed these be such for I have not read them giving the same brand to these as to the former by this feat endeavouring to instill into the mindes of them that will be deceived 1. That all the hereticall and blasphemous Doctrines which these men teach are Antinomian 2. That the truthes which the one side teach against Antichrist and the Blasphemies which the other side vent against Christ are of one Nature and the former to be no lesse abhorred than the latter Now if the Pamphlets of these men be so abhominable as Master Baxter affirmeth and others also that are both able to judge and faithfull to give their judgement have told me for I acknowledge my self never to have been so ill at leisure to spend two hours in reading what any or all of them have written he dealeth unjustly to yoake them together with those tenents which he falsely accuseth of Antinomism yea with those that are rightly fathered upon Antinomians indeed For granting that they hold some Tenents of the Antinomians yet this neither argueth that all their heresies and blasphemies are so many peeces of Antinomism Nor yet that the Antinomians speaking the same things with these in the points proper to their sect do also close with them in their abhominable Doctrines that are totally alien from the Antinomists Tenents Else because Master Baxter joineth with the Jesuits in the Doctrine of Justification by works we might conclude that in all points he is a Jesuit holdeth not onely lies equivocations and mentall reservations but also murthers Massacres Seditions Powder treasons and all other practices devised in hell it self to be Meritorious works if done to the advancing of Romes interest And because he holdeth the very Act of believing to justifie with the Socinians therefore he is in all other the most blasphemous of their assertions against Christ and his blood a Socinian also or on the other side that the Jesuits and Socinians are in all things because in some things of the same judgement with Master Baxter Were it the truth of Christ which Master Baxter goeth about to propagate he would doubtlesse seek the propagation of it in Christs Spirit and Christs way When we see such serpentine windings and crookednesse in his disputes who can but judge that it is the work of the Old Serpent about which he is imployed Neither the truth of Christ nor Christ which is the truth have any such impotency in them as to need any deceits and shifts for their support When Mr. Baxter yea when all the Jesuits have raised all their mists of Sophistry Sycophancy contumely c. as thick as the smoke from the bottomlesse pit to dim the beams of Gods grace shining forth in the Sunne of Righteousnesse not one Raie thereof shall be thereby diminished it shall hide the pure light of the Gospell onely from them that perish whose eies the God of this World hath blinded 2. Cor. 4. 3 4. No one Soul shall be thereby beguiled save those onely that were made to be taken and destroyed 2 Pet. 2. 12. A large Catalogue more of the Antinomian Tenents are set forth by Master Anthony Burgess affixed to his Lectures against them Which he saith he hath gathered from Luthers works against them I will not question his faithfullnesse in collecting them whether Islebius and his Disciples directly maintained such Doctrines or whether Luther in prosecuting them enumerates these as absurdities that would follow upon their Doctrine whether they are imaginary or reall opinions of any sect of men the most of them are detestable But I find not that either Master Burgess or Mr. Bax can name any one creature under the Sun that hath declared by words or writing that he held them If they can we shall joyn with them as dissenters from and excepters against
also concurreth with it to blesse it even it alone to this end Here to determine peremptorily whether of these acts of God his qualifying of faith for or his commanding it to this use is more and lesse direct or proper to the end or whether they are coordinates thereunto I fear may proceed more from a headie rashnesse then from the modesty of Christian wisdome especially because I take justifying faith to be more then a naturall or morall virtue which Mr. Baxter possibly will deny viz. an infused habit qualifyed by God himself that infuseth it with this peculiar property to cleave unto Christ and receive him But by the way it shall not be impertinent to shew in some particulars what mentall Reservations Mr. Baxter hath in his words not easily appearing to a cursory reader 1. When he saith B. Faith justifyeth as it is the fulfilling of the condition of the new Covenant His meaning is that it only so far justifyeth as it fulfilleth the condition But throughout our whole life according to his principles we are but fulfilling have not fulfilled the condition of the new Covenant therefore throughout our whole life we are but in justifying not justifyed And then consequently if it be true what most of our Divines conclude that in the next life there shall be no use of faith because vinon and fruition are proper to that state beleevers shall not be justifyed at all because the condition was never fulfilled 2. When he saith B. Because God hath commanded no other means nor promised justification to any other therefore it is that faith is the only condition and so only thus justifyeth The reader that doth but catch here a little and there a little of his doctrine would think him by what he here findeth no lesse Orthodox in the point of Justification then Luther or Paul himself that he explodes all works all inherent righteousnesse from bearing the least part with faith unto justification whereas contrariwise he speaks not here of the faith of Gods stamping but of his own coining of a faith that brings in all good works that is it self all good works to justification attributes no more to faith then he doth to any other part of our inherent righteousnesse nor any thing to faith it self as usefull to justifie but as it is our whole inherent righteousnesse or at least a part of it as partly by that which hath been but principally by that part of his treatise which remains to be examined appeareth The rest of this Section I let passe without examination I come now to the fift and last Section of his Explication pag. 230. B. 5. That faiths receiving Christ and his righteousnesse is the remote and secondary and not the formall reason why it justifyeth appeareth thus We finde verifyed in Mr. Baxter that of the Poet Dolus an virtus quis in hoste requirat having professed open warre against the doctrine of all the Protestant Churches yea of the Gospell of Christ he manageth it more by stratagems then by valour We finde him here perverting in stead of rightly stating the question thereby to get advantage to answer what he will and to what he pleaseth The question controverted between us and the Papists first and in these latter times the Arminians also is not whether Gods instituting of faith in Christ or else the acting of faith so instituted be the one the formall and the other the remote reason why it justifyeth But whether faith so instituted of God to be the mean or instrument of our Justification doth justifie by vertue received from Christ its object or else by its own vertue as it is a good work or as it is an act of righteousnesse performed in obedience to Gods commandement That which they maintain is that faith justifyeth by vertue of its object Christ denying the Papists work and the Arminians act If Mr. Baxter did labour more for truth then for victory we should not finde in him so much fraud and so little of sincerity It is not Christs but Antichrists kingdome that is maintained by the pillarage of shifts and sophisms Let him not astonish the poor Saints of Christ with words that they cannot understand obscuring the truth with needlesse terms of art his poor flock of Kederminster for whom he affirmes himself to have compiled this work are in all probability as well acquainted with the formall and remote reason why faith justifyeth as they are with Hocus Pocus his Liegerdemain In this point let him either confute the assertion of our Divines or maintain the adversaries assertion here he doth neither directly but beats the aire and makes a great noise to little purpose Yet let us see how well he proveth his own assertion B. Suppose Christ had done all that he did for sinners and they had beleeved in him thereupon without any Covenant promising Justification by this Faith would this Faith have justified them By what Law or whence will they plead their Justification at the Bar of God This supposition is not full there must be another supposition antecedaneous to this supposition A true supposition that will shew the invalidity of this feigned one Suppose that upon a foregoing Covenant between the Father and him Christ hath done all this for his elect whom he knoweth by name and so Christ in their names hath given and God hath taken full satisfaction for all their offences and hereupon Christ hath received in their behalf a full acquittance and discharge Who now shall lay any thing to their charge It is God that justifieth Rom. 8. 33. under this supposition they are for ever freed from pleading at Gods Bar They have there an Advocate to plead for them Jesus Christ the righteous and he is the Propitiation for our sins 1 Joh. 2. 1 2. Sits at the right hand of God with the effectuall Oratory of his pretious bloud making intercession for us Rom. 8. 34. so the supposition of Mr. Baxter extends no further then this if without any Covenant promise of Justification by Faith in Christ could they by beleeving in him have had the beeing and comfort of Justification within their own souls Unlesse God had by some other way ratified and sealed this benefit to them I acknowledge they could not yet had their justification been still nothing the lesse firm before God in Christ But now by the promise of the New Covenant through Faith they have the sweetnesse and joy thereof in themselves also B. But suppose Christ having done all that he did for us that he should in framing the New Covenant have put in any other condition and said whosoever loveth God shall by vertue of my satisfaction be justified would not this love have justified No doubt of it I conclude then thus The receiving of Christ is as the silver of this coin the Gospel promise is as the Kings stamp which maketh it curraut for justifying If God had seen it meet to have stamped any thing else it
unlesse it be consented unto in calculum fidei non venire opera sed prorsus Idem ibid. §. 18. separanda esse i. e. that works have nothing to do in the borders of faith to justifie but must be wholly separated from it and proceeds that the Law and faith are here opposed Therefore because works are required to the righteousnesse of the one ergo sequitur ad hujus justitiam non requiri it follows therefore that they are not required to the righteousnesse of the other and further in the same place Herein the Gospell differs from the Law quod operibus non alligat justitiam sed in sola dei misericordia collocat that it binds not righteousnesse to works but placeth it in the sole mercy of God And Fides sine operum adminiculo c. Faith without any proppage of works resteth wholly upon mercy And that wherewith he concludes this Section That the righteousnesse by which we are justifyed is not ushered into our possession by works nec operando nos eam consequi sed vacuos accedere ut eam recipiamus i. e. not that we attain it by working but come with our hands empty of all works to be filled with it With those agreeth Ph. Melanchthon Evangelium offert remissionem per imputationem justitiae vitam aeternam sine conditione legis aut operum nostrorum i. e. the Gospell offers remission by the imputation of righteousnesse and eternall life without condition of the Law or our works Again Vulgo imaginantur homines Evangelium esse promissionem conditionalem at ab hac imaginatione abducendi sunt i. e. Men must be drawn off from that vulgar imagination that the Gospell is a conditionall promise And upon Rom. 4. Credens est salvus sola fide sine operibus Neque nostra obedientia aut causa est aut conditio propter quam accepti sumus coram Deo i. e. He that beleeveth is saved by faith only without works Neither is our obedience either a cause or a condition for which we are accepted before God So Zanchius in Hos 2. 21. Notandum est hanc esse simplicem Evangelicam sine omni conditione promissionem Hic nihil exigit Deus sed simpliciter promittit quod velit ipse c. This is a simple and Evangelicall promise which is without all condition where God requireth nothing but simply promiseth what he pleaseth As for Luther it is superfluous to cite him being every where so full both in the positing and confirming of this doctrine let but his Sermon upon Tit. 3. 5. be read he shall be there found calling it devillish doctrine and the teachers thereof Hypocrites who teach salvation to be far off and not already attained and to be sought for by works concluding Quicunque salutem non ex mera gratia per fidem ante omnia opera c. whosoever receives not salvation out of meer grace by faith before all works he shall never be saved I had a purpose to have annexed the Testimonies of some more of the Chieftains against Antichrist but there is no need Mr. Baxter for his part is not a Zizca warreth not by other mens eyes seeth and knoweth against whom he levelleth is not ignorant that all especially the more antient and unsophisticated worthies of all the Churches speak the same things and in the same tone with these against the Papists Neither was it my purpose to deal at all in this passage with Mr. Baxter but to shew the vanity of some Pharisaicall Cabalisticall Sophisticall but little Scripturall and Theologicall Rabbies who with Anti-evangelicall spirits partly to set up again a Babell or Babylon of works as a mount against Antinomianism as they term the liberty and purity of the Gospell and partly in a prostrate devotion wherewith they sacrifice to every Barbarism and Aphorism of exotick arts to which they must submit though it be to the denying of the whole word of God for fear they should not be reckoned Scholars are ready to gallop after Mr. Baxters Sophisticall Lectures into the very Lateran of Rome not knowing whence they run nor whither whose company they leave and whose they follow such levity and giddinesse hath taken their head-pieces that as having gotten a professed Protestant Divine to lead them into the worst sink of Popery they run with head and shoulders thronging who shall be foremost so no doubt if under the profession or misprision of a Jesuite Paul himself should descend to preach again and maintain the Doctrine of the Gospell in all its verity power and purity and not in a dialecticall phrase they would throw it back in his face as Jesuiticall and devillish For without such lightnesse and emptinesse it were impossible for them to be so suddenly and easily whirled into an applause of an assertion so grosly and palpably Popish and Damning by a peevish veneration of the learning and holinesse of the Penman thereof As if among the Jewish Scribes and Pharisees and Popish Monkes and Jesuits there were not to be found in depth of Learning and strictnesse of Legall righteousnesse many to whom this man may possibly serve and but serve as a shaddow But it sufficeth here to have manifested that the Doctrine of Mr. Baxter is totally the same in this particular with the doctrine of the Jesuits Or if in any respect we shall find it in what remains to be examined not wholly the same I doubt not but in every such difference which we shall meet with to demonstrate that it is far worse then theirs Or if it be not so let him produce any one knowing man within any of the Protestant Churches except he will make the Concision of Socinians and Arminians the true Protestants that hath ever taught or held this doctrine CHAP. III. The first Argument for Justification by Works drawn from Scriptures examined The Scriptures cited prepared to Mr. Baxters hand by the Papists and the Protestants answer to all the Arguments drawn from those Scriptures by the Papists by him concealed and the abhorrency of those Scriptures from the conclusion which they are brought to prove demonstrated HAving in part supplyed what Mr. Baxter would have buryed here in silence some of the Scriptures and Arguments from Scriptures which are brought by the Protestants to remove works from having concurrence with faith in the businesse of justifying let us now examine the Scriptures which he quoteth to prove their cooperation with faith to justifie Here as I said we meet not with words but figures partly therefore because he maintains the same assertion with the Papists partly because the Scriptures which he quoteth are all such as the Papists have urged before him against us so that he hath taken them up at the second hand as they were collected to his hand by the Fryers and Jesuits himself not expressing how he would argue from those Scriptures I conceive it is his desire that we should understand he means so to argue
1 If we look strictly to the words Mr. Baxter must hence argue only that our confession is a condition of Gods faithfulnesse as if God either cannot or will not be faithfull except we confesse But let us give Mr. Baxter the largest advantage that he can claim in the meaning of the words that God is positively and not hypothetically or conditionally faithfull and that of his faithfulnesse he will forgive and cleanse if we confesse In this sense then whereas the Apostle speaketh affirmatively not negatively if we confesse he will forgive not if we confesse not he will not forgive I do 2 Demand whether confession be so a condition of forgivenesse that whosoever confesseth shall be forgiven This Mr. Baxter will not affirme without his caeteris paribus whereof the Text speaks not a word expresly or implicitely for him and if he conclude negatively he concludes not from the Text but his own fancie Obj. But if you deny forgivenesse upon confession made you deny what the Text affirmeth and so fight against the word it self denying what it clearly affirmeth Answ True if we deny it to them to whom the Text grants and promiseth it But the Apostle speaks here not to the unjustifyed and unforgiven but to the Sants forgiven and justifyed already and the Emphasis of the proposition or promise is in the word we if we that are in Christ confesse God will hold faithfull in keeping Covenant with us and forgive So that this is a consolation to the Saints against all their dayly infirmities They have a priviledge above all the world besides If they sin they have an advocate with the Father c. through whom when they confesse and bewail their sins the grace of God will by his Spirit testifie and seal to their consciences the forgivenesse of them 3 To descend without the Text to Mr. Baxters conditio sine qua non there must be more then a grain of salt to make his assertion savory that without confession there is no forgivenesse For if by it he mean that of the Apostle Confession with the mouth he shall exclude many thousands from justification whom the Scripture excludeth not 4 I grant to Mr. Baxter that some of our Divines have affirmed though I fear somewhat rawly and inconsiderately that confession is a condition sine qua non of forgivenesse yet far from Mr. Baxters sense viz. with these three limitations whereof Mr. Baxter will not endure the test 1 Of the forgivenesse which is by the new Covenant or as it is declared and sealed up to our consciences Not of the forgivenesse which was laid up in the hands as laid up in the hands of Christ and ours in him before we beleeved or confessed 2 Such a condition as is not in the same relation with faith as Mr. Baxter makes it the very naming whereof they detest as absolutely contradicting the nature and authority of the Gospell 3 Such a condition as explodes the caeteris paribus sensu composito of Mr. Baxter so that though they speak somewhat of Mr. Baxters words yet they are at a defiance against his sense and meaning How and in what sense they will have it a condition is no place here to treat It hath been a digression to say any thing of it because it is utterly besides the Text to which alone here I was to speak B. Act. 8. 22. Repent of this thy wickednesse and pray God if perhaps the thought of thy heart may be forgiven thee This Scripture I passed by in the former heap of his quotations as possibly a mistake in the quotation but finding it here again and afterward in a third place I see the man means as he quoteth and cannot enough marvell what he can fish from this Scripture to prove any thing of mans works a condition of justification If the word If here make or argue a condition it must be on Gods not on mans part that man must repent and pray upon condition that God will forgive else not if forgivenesse be not the causa sine qua non of repentance and prayer But this is nonsense to have God upon terms if he will have any duty from us He must therefore mean on the other side God will forgive upon condition of prayer and repentance But how he will perswade this Scripture to say it is past my capacity to comprehend Here is no promise himself grants there is but an half-promise of forgiving on Gods part Append. pag. 79. and nothing mentioned as a condition on mans part But contrariwise duties of naturall righteousnesse commanded or counselled to a naturall man upon such cold encouragement as the Scripture affords to the carnall devotions of carnall men carnally performed If perhaps the thought of thy heart may be forgiven If Mr. Baxters Assertions be but so sound as his Arguments neither will serve for good Bell-mettall B. Act. 3. 19 Repent and be converted that your sinns may be blotted out c. How far repentance is a condition hath been discoursed of and discussed already B. Act. 22. 16. Arise and be baptized and wash away thy sins calling on the name of the Lord. Is then Baptism a condition so necessary that without it there is no washing away of sin And must the Popish Tenent be found writren in Mr. Baxters Calender with red letters Sacramenta opere operato conferunt gratiam or doth Baptism prove ineffectuall to all that do not cannot call upon the name of the Lord Then whether Mr. Baxter be more against himself or against the Protestant Churches who can decide More modestly speaks even Bellarmine which makes the desire of receiving the Sacraments a condition of justification expelling from forgivenesse them that desire them not this man rigorously and cruelly shakes into condemnation those that do not because they have not opportunity to receive them though their desire be unfeigned or if he doth not so this Scripture proves not Baptism to be the condition sine qua non As for calling upon the name of the Lord I have before spoken to B. 1 Pet. 4. 18. If the righteous be scarce saved where shall the wicked and ungodly appear I should be in a Labyrinth of doubts how he would argue hence for himself were it not that elsewhere he explaineth himself in his book thus If the righteous be scarce saved by all their strivings how shall they be saved that strive not at all We deny not the duty of striving in holy things yea of striving for salvation though in Mr. Baxters sense we deny it Yet the meaning of this Text as appears by its dependence upon the verse precedent is If the corruptions and unbelief of heart be so great in the very Saints and beleevers that they must passe through the purifying fire of Gods judgments more and more to perfect them before they be made vessels of honour in the Kingdome of glory or that they need the scourge of Gods correction to whip them back
all hearts witnesse for him that no good will to Popery in generall provoked him to trouble the Church with his doctrine I will not judge But if good will to this part of Popery that consists in justification by works unto which if all the rest garbage of Popery be compared it is insufficient to counterpoise it in mischief did not provoke let him shew what hath provoked him to it Is it in hatred to the Papists that he hath laboured so stoutly to maintain their Kingdome Is not this the pillar of all Popery and if this be demolished what is there of all their heresies but will fall after 3. As to his sincerity in this businesse in following conscientiously his judgment I know I finde in my self the heart is deceitfull above all things and desperately evill who can finde it out I search only my own not anothers heart that is out of my orb and beyond my fathom But I should give the more credence to Mr. Baxter speaking of his own sincerity in this businesse did I not see him forsaking the fountain and digging to himself cisterns deriving from every puddle of Papists Arminians Socinians and Atheists both his tenents and all fallacious Sophistry to maintain them leaving the pure word of God and tossing it either from him or for himself at his pleasure 4. As for his prayer if presented to God after his own principles as an Act helping to justifie him and no further through the mediation of Christ then as the same mediation take efficacy as to him from his own works and worth no marvell if the justice of God flung it back as dirt in his face and left him to that de luding spirit which worketh by those false Apostles whom he had studied so many years having spent but a few days upon the Scriptures as himself confesseth So the Pharisee after his praying departed from the presence of God unjustifyed unregarded Such devout Protestations may possibly take impression upon the weak and ignorant But Satan in the vizzard of an Angell of light and Satan in his own ghastly visage is to them that are strong in the faith the same Satan and alike shunned Besides when men rest not satisfyed with the sacred truth of the Word but will as it were rake the very dung of Gods enemies for quaintifies of knowledge which the Word hath not if they are blacked no marvell for their delight is to dwell with Colliers And God hath threatned to send them strong delusions that they should beleeve a lie c. 2 Thes 2. 10 11 12. Yeelding them up to waxe worse deceiving others being themselves deceived or self-deceivers 2 Tim. 3. 13. He promiseth some proofs of what he saith and one argument he puts in this explication thus B. If faith justifie as it is the fulfilling of the condition of the new Covenant and obedience be also part of the condition then obedience must justifie in the same way as faith But both parts of the Antecedent are before proved An Herculean Argument as soon may a man wrest the Club out of Hercules his hand as make void the conclusion which is inserred by this Argument If my eye discerneth colours upon condition it look diligently upon them and my hand doth inrich me upon condition that it stretcheth forth it self to receive a Princes beneficence and my heel be put into the same condition with my eye and my hand then my heel doth discerne colours in the same way with my eye and enrich me in the same way with my hand But both parts of the Antecedent are as firmly proved before as the both parts of Mr. Baxters antecedent Ergo the conclusion is as very a blank as Mr. Baxters If Mr. Baxters oft saying of the same thing doth prove the thing to be true then this cannot be denyed to be a truth For who can number the times that he hath kissed and spit in the mouth of this Ashteroth Condition setting it up cheek-mate with Christ himself in justifying us For Thes 56. he yoaks together Christ and faith in the same way of causality to justification and here and every where faith and obedience or works so that Christ faith and works are collaterals in justifying how as they meet together in this one Great Colossus condition or causa sine qua non Christ is the condition even in his satisfaction and faith is the condition and works is the condition so that Condition it seems by him justifyeth more then works or faith or Christ for neither works alone nor faith alone nor Christ alone doth justifie But this mouth-almighty Condition when like Bel and the Dragon she hath eaten up and swallowed into her bowels Christ faith and works doth of and by her self alone justifie such a Justifyer and such a Justification I should speak more seriously if Mr. Baxter had ministred to me more serious matter whereof to treat Chaffe is wont to be exposed to the winde when the Wheat as more substantiall is allotted to a more substantiall handling The rest of his Arguments which he brings in other Theses I shall examine by themselves CHAP. VI. The fift Argument answered and the dispute of St. James Cap. 2. opened and the Reasons drawn thence to prove justification by works refuted THe former was Mr. Baxters great Argument the fift in number is like to it yet not so much hugged and honoured by him as the former because that was his own born of his own brain This he takes up as fully formed by the Papists to his hand and use so that he is not to have the entire honour of it but every petty Monk and Sacrificer will challenge his part therein This is indeed their great and sole Argument against the Protestants The rest they bring is unworthy the hearing This therefore Mr. Baxter here that the Popish cause may stand and ours fall Atlas-like puts his shoulder and whole strength under to support B. Thes 75. pa. 292. The plain expression of St. James should terrifie us from an interpretation contradictory to the Text and except apparent violence be used with his Chap. 2. 21 24 25. c. it cannot be doubted but that a man is justifyed by works and not by faith only Eusebius Hierom. I mean not here to seek an evasion by pleading that this Epistle in the primitive times of the Church before the controversie about justification by faith or by works and faith was in agitation was questioned by some and denyed by others to be of divine authority Or that * Erasmus Luther Musculus Cajetan a Cardinall of the Romish some great Divines of these latter times have not received it into the Canon or that among those that embrace it as Canonicall it is much disputed what James is the Authour of it For besides the Syriac interpreter that weakly attributes it to James the brother of John who in the cradle of the Church was slain with the sword by Herod Act. 12.
upon what terms salvation runneth under the Legall or old Covenant B. Rev. 22 14. Blessed are they that doe his commandements that they may have right to the tree of life and may enter in by the gates into the City The doing of Christs commandements heer is the same which Heb. 5. 9. is called the obeying of Christ and the meaning of both is there explained Faith which Christs commandement calls for gives right to the tree of life and to all the priviledges of the new Hierusalem B. Ja. 1. 22. 23. 24. 25. What he would infer from the three former of these verses hee saith not and I dream not Any other three verses in the whole Bible might have been quoted as pertinent to his purpose as these as far as my dull brain can comprehend To the 25. if by the Law of Liberty he understands the Law of the Old Covenant or of the Decalogue and by blessed everlasting salvation as he erewhile termed it then hee prescribes salvation hence to bee sought by the Law and not by Christ by the covenant of works not of grace and so the salvation of man shall stand or fall upon these terms as hee doth or doth not forget to doe all that is commanded in the Law and Christ must not be at all looked after heer is no mention at all of him and thus to argue is worse than Popish even Jewish But if he understand by the Law of Liberty the Gospel then hath it the same sense with the former Scriptures teacheth us to seek salvation in a Gospel way as a free gift from free grace as children of liberty whom the son hath made free and not as children of bondage by works He that doth thâ—s shall be blessed in this his deed Some of our Expositors I know expound it another way yet not with but against Mr. Baxter B. Ma. 5. 1. to the 13. To this enough hath been sayd a little before in this Chapter B. Especially Mat. 5. 19. 20. The former verse runs thus Whosoever therfore shal break one of the least of these CoÌ„mandments and teach men so to do the same shal be least in the Kingdom of Heaven But whosoever shall do and teach them the same shal be great in the Kingdom of Heaven Christ here speaketh of Teachers under the Gospel And the sense as may be gathered from the precedent verses is this Whosoever under a pretence of the liberty of the Gospel shall take to himselfe or instill into others a licentiousnesse to break the Commandements of the Law or to neglect any of that holiness and righteousness which is the matter of the Law that man shal be an instrument of little yea of no use in the Gospel Church But whosoever shal so learn and teach Christ as in and thrrough him to take into his owne and presse upon other mens affections and practise all the duties of holiness and righteousnesse which the Law requireth in a Gospel way this man shall be an instrument of great good in the Gospel Church as one that hath learned and teacheth Christ to salvation and to sanctificâ—tion also If this in its substance be not the meaning of this Scripture I know not the meaning of any one Text of Scripture The latter which is the 20. verse is read in these words Excâ—pt your Righteousnesse exceed the righteousnesse of the Scribes and Pharisees ye shall in no case enter into the Kingdome of Heaven True Theirs was their owne Righteousness the Righteousnesse of works which could never satisfie for or expiate their unrighteousness Except we trample this as dung in respect of confidence in it to put on Christ for righteousness who hath both satisfied and expiated we shall never enter into the spirituall Priviledges of the Kingdome of Grace much lesse into the joyes of the Kingdome of glory What is there in either of these verses to promote Mr. Baxters salvation by Works B. Mat. 7. 13. Enter ye in at the strait gate for wide is the gate and broad is the way that leadeth to destruction and many there be that go in therat But strait is the gate and narrow the way that leadeth to life and few there be that find it And will Mr. Br. take up the broad and vulgar way of expounding this broad and that narrow gate and way That by the broad way and wide gate are to be understood the way of prophaneness Atheisme Lust Luxury Carnall security c. and by the strait Gate and narrow way strictnesse of life and conversation unless he ride in this common Rode there is nothing to be found that will square with his purpose But that this interpretation is wide from the scope of Christ will appeare 1. by comparing Luke with Mathew who Luke 13 24 thus renders the words of Christ Strive to enter in at the strait Gate for many shall seeke to enter in and shall not bee able Whence it appeares that both these Gates and Wayes are such as men seek to enter into life by And was there ever that man so mad so void of the naturall light of reason and conscience that did strive to enter into life by Prophanenesse Lust Atheisme and impure living Doth not the Apostle tell us that the most stupified among the Heathen do so far know the judgement of God as to know these things to be worthy of death Rom. 1. vers ult â— When it is said of the narrow way and gate few there be that finde it if it should be understood of the strictness of Morall holinesse and righteousnesse it might well be said few there are that enter by it but to say few there be that finde it is not agreeable to reason For who is there that findes it not The very Light of nature teacheth all men this naturall way to life by the strictnes and perfection of their naturall and morall righteousness And this is the greatest beam in their eye blinding them that they cannot see the straight and effectuall way indeed What then is the strait gate and narrow way to life wherof Christ heer speaketh Let Christ himselfe interpret himself I am the way I am the door by mee if any man enter none can come to the Father but by me Jo. 10. 9. and 14. 6. The way into the holiest i. e. into heaven consecrated or new made for us through the vail of Christs flesh saith the Apostle Heb. 10. 19. 20. or let Mr. Br shew that the Gospel owneth any other way to life This is the way that few find when Peter had seen and spoken but of a glimpse and glance of it Blessed art thou Simon Bar-jona saith our Saviour for flâ—sh and bloud hath not revealed it to thee but my Father which is in heaven Mâ— 16. None can enter into it except the Father draw him Jo 6. 44. Except he be taught and have learned of the Father ver 45. And great striving must there be against ouâ— own wisedome before we can
Quere It is his doctrine that teacheth a soul-cozening Faith a Faith made up of a fardle of works and rags of our own righteousness as in his larger definition of justifying Faith he hath described it CHAP. XIII Mr. Baxters calumnie that this doctrine doth harden the Papists in their Popery and give occasion to many learned Protestants to turn Papists answered HIS fifth Quere hath no shew of weight in it deserving an examination savouring more of the Spleen than of the judgment of the Author Nevertheless though it declares only the stomach and indignation of the man against the truth rather then any strength in his hand to hurt it yet because it is formed for the deceiving of the simple and unwary upon whom sounds oft times take no less impression than actuall strokes to prevent damage to such I shall examine whatsoever may seem materiall in it as I have the rest B. pa. 329. 5. Lastly Is not this excluding of sincere Obedience from Justification the great stumbling-block of Papists and that which hath had a great hand in turning many learned men from the true Protestant Religion to Popery That by obedience he meaneth all morall qualifications and works as they are vertues and works we have before learned from his own words so his meaning is that the Doctrine of Paul and the Churches which follow him viz. Justification by Faith and not by works is guilty of the damnable and pernicious evills which he here chargeth upon it These evills are two 1 It is the great stumbling-block of the Papists 2 It hath carried back many learned men from the Protestant Religion to Popery To both these I shall speak in order 1 Of its hardning the Papists in Popery Is it not the great stumbling-block to Papists saith Mr. Br. I answer 1 Was not Christ and that in this very point of justifying the ungodly by an imputed righteousness without any inherent righteousness of their own a stone of stumbling and a rock of offence to the Jewes as which they were so offended that to their eternall ruine they reject the Gospel and salvation of Christ unto this day Rom. 9. 32 33. 1 Cor. 1. 23. 1 Pet. 2. 8. What then must Christ be anathematized Nay but let the truth of Christ stand and man be the lyar the transgressor It is scandalum acceptum non datum an offence taken not given And blessed is he who soever shall not be offended in or at Christ Mat. 11. 6. Lu. 7. 23. But if any will be offended and dash the Lord Christ admonisheth him of the danger Whosoever shall fall on this stone shall be broken but on whomsoever it shall fall it will grind him to powder Mat. 21. 44. 2 And as sound a reason is it that our doctrine of Justification hinders the Papists from turning Protestants as was that of some Statists that complained against the Church of Geneva that they hindered the conversion of Papists in those parts by forbidding dancing and the like grave consideration by some great Politicians in England that the forbearing of Bull and Bear-baiting and other sports on the Lords day hardned the Papists of Lancashire in their Popery When Religion is made a meer piece of policy and to have in it at the best no more than a dress of dreggish formality or morality no marvail if such dirty and unspirituall means are made use of to spread it 3 But how deep doth this effect lurk in its cause so that only this one mans sagacity can smell it out That the Papists in the least things will not turn Protestants except we in the worst turn Papists For this Article of Justification is the greatest of all the questions controverted between us and the Papists All the rest not ingredients of or meerly relating to this may the Papists continue in if not of malice or wilfulnesse with a possibility of salvation They are but wood hay and stubble built upon the foundation the very builders whereof may be saved but so as by fire saith the Apostle But a Trentified Papist by the coherent judgment of the best Divines cannot be saved because hee holdeth not the foundation sure and pure but mixeth mans works with the grace of God in Christ to Justification And their judgment is grounded upon the authority of the Apostle Yee are faln from grace Christ is become void or forfeyted to you whosoever are justified by works An ardent love to Romes shavelings out of doubt possesseth Mr. Br. that he doth not only wish himself as did the Apostle but would make himself and all us accursed that they might be not saved but damned with us For if they reject all other their errors and practically retain but this one by it they forfeyt all the salvation of the Gospel 4 Nay contrariwise as long as this Article of the Gospel was diligently preached and stoutly maintained in the Protestant Churches and that not with quiâ—ks and quidities of humane Art but by the nervous arguments of Scripture alone so long the Kingdom of Antichrist more and more decayed and they which were before marked up as slaves to that rivall of Christ brake the fetters and came in by thousands and ten thousands taking the Kingdom by a holy and violent force But since the time this Doctrine hath been less preached and patronized the Reformed Churches have been still in a languishing and the Antichristian Kingdom in a growing condition as Mr. Br. himself so great a Reader and so fully acquainted with the Ecclesiasticall Histories must necessarily grant And why hath this stop to the promoting of the Gospel befaln the Churches but that the Lord Christ doth herein declare his offence taken against us for not making him our all that hee also ceaseth so victoriously as in former times to vouchsafe his presence among us 5 But since Mr. Br. is leapt home to them and many foot beyond many of the more moderate sort of them in the point of justification by works and so hath removed the slumbling-block let him speak by experience how many of them are come in to him to be his Proselytes rejecting the Papacy and other their Popish errors Or whereas his Friends the Arminians have in this and many other of their Tenents so many decads of yeers closed fully with them where is the confluence of Papists to them seen that shaking off their former opinions and practices profess themselves Converts A Cardinals Hat perhaps hath been sent or a fat Bishopprick promised to some of the most deserving men among them in relation to the Romish Cause to allure them to further and higher deservings of this kind But the holy Mother Church I warrant you sticks where she was If shee should permit but one stone of her Fabrick to be loosed it might cause a crack in the whole This part of the Quere I shall therefore upon these Considerations leave as reasonless and examine the next whether there be any more reason in it
an opinion that he and the Papists his Masters have the whole body of the Scriptures on their side to prove Justification by works But that the Protestants can only catch here and there a sentence of Scripture that hath a seeming and scarce a seeming to speak for them It is a Maxime of Mr. Br. himself that men are seldom bold with Scripture to force it but they are first bold with Conscience to force it pag. 297. Yet here he is bold not only to force but to stifle Scriptures When himself quoteth a Scripture to maintain his Popish Justification see how he improves it in the same page If it were but some one phrase dissonant from the ordinary language of Scripture I should not doubt but it were to be reduced to the rest But when it is the very scope of a Chapter c. no whiâ— dissonant from any other Scripture I think he that may so wrest it as to make it unsay what it saith may as well make him a Creed of his own let the Scripture say what it will to the contrary Lo what a mountain he can make of a mole-hill and bring all Scriptures into the belly of one making that one of what dimension he listeth all the rest to say what he commands them when he is to plead for the Papists But here when he is â—o produce what the Protestants have to urge against the Papists what mincing and mayming doth he use forcing the whole body of the Gospel into a Cherristone it is but here and there a sound without substance that they beguile themselves with Did the man as he pretends seek to apprehend to himself and sincerely to make out unto others Scripture Tâ—uâ—h we should find him faithfully alledging what the Churches of Christ have cited against Antichrist His false dealing herein declares his hatred of the Truth that he will not have the Scriptures shine upon it in their full splendor that it may not be known and embraced Nay we have the main body of the New Testament speaking for us specially almost all the Doctrinal part of the Epistles to the Romans Galathians Ephesians Colossions Hebrews all the four Evangelists specially St John as I have before shewed A breviate of Scriptures which our Divines have urged to this purpose I have before given and it would be useless here to rehearse 3. Even these few Scriptures which he quoteth affirm that man is justified by Faith without the deeds of the Law that if he were justified by Works he had whereof to glory and boast himself that if they which are of the Law be heirs Faith is made void and the promise of no effect That it is of Faith that it may be of Grace that it is by Grace through Faith not of Works Were there nothing else is there not a strong appearance of Contradiction in these Scriptures to Mr. Brs. doctrine that we are justified by Faith and Works together 4 But see we how he evades these Scriptures and all other Testimonies of the Apostles viz. That his dispute is what is the Righteousness which we must plead against the Accusation of the Law or by which we are justified as the proper Righteousness of the Law and this hee well concludeth is neither works nor faith but the Righteousness which is by Faith i. e. Christs Righteousness But St. James his question is what is the condition of our Justification by this Righteousness of Christ whether Faith only or Works also so farr Mr. Baxter Must not Mr. Br. needs be happy that hath learned so perfectly that which he cals else-where the Papists Feat of making the Scriptures a nose of wax and turning them into his own complexion Let any one now alledg against him that of the Apostle Gal. 1. 8. If Paul or an Angell from heaven shall preach to you any other Gospel than what you have received let him be accursed Cannot he as prettily and solidly shift the Curse from him and retort it upon the denouncer as he doth these Scriptures upon the alledgers True may hee say but I am not Paul nor an Angell from heaven therefore the Curse cannot fall on me Nay I have made Paul to preach another Gospel since his death thatn what he preached in his life Therefore Paul is accursed As good grounds hath he for this as his former arguing But let us see whether his interpretation of these Scriptures be so solid as pretty To that of James I have spoken before therefore shall say little here Onely I cannot omit how unsufferable his audacious confidence is that he thinks it enough to say without shewing or endeavouring to shew it from the Context or otherwise this is the meaning of Pauls and that the scope of James his dispute No such immodesty is oft there to be found in the very Jesuits Socinians and Arminians They when they go about to pervert in stead of expounding any Scripture labour stoutly from the Context and from a seeming Coherence of other Scriptures to make such a perverting exposition either probable or plausible This man doth all pro Imperio Sic volo sic jubeo c. I say it what man or Angell dares to deny it Doth hee think all the world to be his Diocess that he may force what he hath or saith he hath upon his Kederminsterians upon the consciences of all men an implicit Faith that all must believe when and because he saith it Is the infallible spirit gone out of Zedechiah 1 King 22. 24. or out of Bellarmine or Arminius inâ—o him Or doth he execute the office of the Popes Legate speaking to us only that which is decreed in his unerring Chair or hath hee gotten a monopoly of Socinus his Right Reason which is infallible what else can hee alledg that his word must be taken for a Law without dispute Or is it indeed because he finds Gods word will yeeld him no succour therefore he must proprio Marte militare act in his own name because God is not with him So indeed it seemeth for neither God nor reason nor any thing els but a high conceit of himself will be accessary to his reasonless Conclusions viz. that James his question is what is the condition of our Justification by Christs Righteousness when James in his whole dispute there neither expresly nor implyedly utters a word of Christs righteousness or if Mr. Brs Jesuito-Arminian condition nor any thing that can easily be reduced to Christ himself Or where doth Paul dispute only of the righteousnes proper to justification and not also of the way and means by which this righteousness may be applyed to us and made ours Or in which of his quoted Scriptures or any other of the Apostles writings when he excludes works doth he exclude Faith also from its subserviency to justifying Such peremptory dreams of a haughty brain cannot be more fitly answered than with contempt and â—ilence Thus should I do were it not in respect to some
through the Redemption which is in Jesus Christ and by their very receiving of him should obtein power to become the sonns of God notwithstanding all their former pollutions without all prejacent qualifications in them to purchase so great a Redemption Such was the doctrine preached to them and in the embracing and professing of this Doctrine and their Faith in Christ the alone redeemer they were first admitted into Christ gathered into Churches and so continued a while stablished in this truth with the joy of the Holy Ghost abounding in them The persons against whom he disputeth were chiefly if not onely the False Apostles of the Circumcision who also professed the Faith of Christ and preached it not the unbeleeving Jewes for these should not have had any such audience from the Churches But such as went out from the Apostles and the Church that was at Hierusalem to preach Christ Act. 15. 24. Such as came from James Gal. 2. 12. Such as boasted themselves to be of Câ—phas to hold forth the doctrine of Peter 1 Cor. 1. 12. Such as preached Christ of envie strife and contenâ—iâ—n not sincerely but under the luâ—e of so holy a name to take the advantage to deceive Phil. 1. 15 16. Who not labouring to gather Disciples to Christ out of infidelity as the Apostles had done entred into the severâ—ll Churches before stablished by the Apostles troubling them with words subverting their souls teaching them that they must be circumcised and keep the Law of Moses els they could not be saved Act. 15. 1. 24. And these were of the Sect of the Pharisees which beleeved Act. 15. 5. Emissaries out of those Many thousands or rather Myriads of the Jewes at Hierusalem which beleeved yet were all zealous of the Law Act. 21. 20. Had the Apostles dispute been against such as had apostatizâ—d from the profession of Christ and against such unbeleevers as had seduced them from trusling on Christs imputed to rest upon their own inherent righteousness for justification iâ— had not been besides the purpose to have it his question as Mr. Br saith whether it be Christs righteousness or our own righteousness that we must plead against the accusations of the Law But seeing both the seduced and seducers with whom he dealeth were such as professed faith in Christ as their justifier and Saviour and questioned onely whether Faith alone or els their righteousness works also together with Faith were required to inright them to Christs righteousnes and salvation it had been impertinent if not ridiculous to have made it his question what the proper righteousnes is by which we are justified For this had been to decline and not to prosecute the question between him and them They would have granted him all that he concluded without the least dammage to their Cause Therefore his question was principally By what means we come to partake of the righteousness of Christ to Justification 2 Let the Apostle himself give his Testimony what his principall question was For he better knew his own minde than Mr. Br or my self And first in his Epistle to the Romans having for an introduction to the question in the three first Chapters proved both the Jewes with all their legall and the Gentiles with all their naturall righteousness and unrighteousness to be under sin guilt and condemnation he no sooner in the third Chapter begins to speak of the mean of their recovery Christ Jesus but he annexeth also by what means we come to have right in him In both which he no less Contradicteth Mr. Br than if he had seen before what Mr. Br hath written so many ages after Or the former he affirmeth that we are justified as by Christ so by the Redemption which is in Jesus Christ as he was set forth to be a propitiation or expiatory sacrifice for our sinns Rom. 3. 24 25. Not as Mr. Br before so stoutly Contended as he is our Lord i. e. in his sense our Lawgiver Of the latter that it is faith alone that makes this redemption and Propitiation ours to Justification namely Faith in his bloud Faith without the deeds of the Law Faith which excludeth without works which include boasting ver 25 27 28. And this faith in the death of Christ without works without deeds cannot include in it Morall works and righteousness unto Justification as Mr. Br would extort from it elsewhere by making Christ as our Lord and Lawgiver the object of Justifying Faith At length he Concludeth ver 30. that both in them which have some seeming and plausible qualification of righteousness and works and in them that have it not it is not that righteousness of their own but Faith which Justifieth And that this Faith is no less effectuall to the justifying of them that unto that very day have been ungodly than of them which from their very birth have seemed to be holy to the Lord. So much is Comprehended in those words of the Apostle It is one God which Justifieth the Circumcision by faith and the un-circumcision through Faith In these words is included the whole State of Pauls question The Apostle writing to the Church that was at Rome Consisting of beleeving Jewes and Gentiles endeavours to heal the divisions Close the breaches and settle a sweet union and Communion between them This he applyeth himself unto first in that great and fundamentall point of Christianitie viz. Justification by Christ in which they dissented Both Jewes and Gentiles acknowledged Justification and salvation to be by Christ alone but in this they differed The Jewes Confined this salvation by Christ to themselves alone that to them onely he was promised that they alone were qualified and in a capacity to receive him and the benefits that are by him That he came to be the Saviour of his own hallowed people that had waited for him not of the common and unclean Pagans that were aliens from the Common wealth of Israel and strangers from the Covenant of promise To this purpose they boasted of their Naturall Faederal and personall righteousness and holines qualifying them for the Justification which is by Christ of all which the Gentiles were destitute Their naturall Righteousness and holiness that they were Jewes by nature and not sinners of the Gentiles the seed of Abraham the holy stock to whom and whose seed the promise was made Their Faederall holines That they alone of all nations were in Covenant with God and did bear the badge and seal of the Covenant Circumcision in their Flesh by which they were distinguishd from all other people as holy to God when all other Nations under the Sunne were an abhomination in his sight Their Legall holiness that they had the Law Word and Oracles of God Committed to them all other Nations being left without Law without God and without hope in the world Their personall and Actuall righteousness that in reference to this holy Law of God they had walked exactly kept it from their youth