faculties as it were to a finite nature The place where Christ fits at the right hand of his Father in respect of his Humanity is in heaven because where that is there it is also inwardly glorious in it selfe and hath in it self Luke 24. 51. Mark 16. 19. Hebr. 4. 14. Act. 1. 11. 1 â—eâ— 3. 22. as in a subject his power and worketh by that power within the spheare of it finitenesse not severally from the word but with it and in it He is at the right hand of God in the heavens Ephes 1. 20. in the highest places Heb. 1. 3 8. above Col. 3. 1. This his Soveraignty is a consequent following on his Ascension into Heaven Look as Kings are crowned in the chiefe Cities of their Kingdomes and keep their residence in their Palaces neere unto them so it was decent that our Saviour should be crowned in this heavenly Jerusalem and keep his residence as it were in his heavenly Mansion There Christ sitteth at the right hand of God where he appeareth for us where he maketh intercession for us But Christ appeareth for us in Heaven Heb. 9. 24. and 8. 4. and in Heaven he maketh request for us and from Heaven we 1 Thess 1. 10. Isai 66. â— expect the Lord Jesus Phil. 3. 21. God is infinite Heaven is his throne and the earth his footstoole but the humanity of Christ is finite and not every where present Christ is ascended above these visible heavens above them and without them but he sitteth at the right hand of the Father in the highest heavens above them not without them So the Cherubims were over the Arke Ephes 4. 9 10. Heb. 9. 5. of the Covenant and yet they stayed upon the Arke as the place Heaven is one thing heavenly glory another 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Exod. 25. 21 22. Heb. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Sept. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 est id quod 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 seu 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in coelo est Heb. 9. 23. Heb. 8. 4. Ita coelum dicitur 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Mac. 3. 39. Job 22. 12. Sept. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 16. 19. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Isai 33. 5. Sept. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 al. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1 Cor. 15. 20. corpora 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ephes 2. 6. Ephes 6. 12. and 2. 2. Joh. 3. 11 12. Ignat. Epist 11. Psal 68. 34. When a finite nature is in heaven it is not in earth Christ is not so supra omnes coelos ut sit extra illos non in eis extraterras tamen quia mundum bunc reliquit Eidem carni duplex isque contrarius existendi modus tribui non potest sc localis illocalis seu physicus hyperphysicus as earth and earthly misery Heb. 11. 13. Joh. 14. 2. But whilest we say Christ is in heaven his presence in earth in the Church in the midst of his enemies is not excluded For the same Christ who is man is also God and every where Christ in his body is in the heavenly and triumphant Church absent from the earth by his infinite Deity he is present together in the earthly militant and heavenly But concerning his Body we may truly conclude because he is in heaven therfore it is not every where for Christ cannot be said to be made every where in the heavens without a contradiction no more then to be made infinite within limited bounds of being This being taken for granted that heaven can signifie nothing but a place limited for the extent of it Christ as God and man hath power of rule over all things by the essence of his Deity he is every where by the essence of his humanity now he is in heaven but he ruleth every where by the ministeries of his domination Where as man at the right hand of the Father there he is said to be as man in respect of place and if where he sits as ruling there also he be in all places in his body he is also in his body out of his body then which nothing is more absurd Christ is received into Heaven and sitteth at the right hand of God by a mediatory action which he executeth according to both natures the word working what pertaineth to the word and the flesh what appertaineth to the flesh Christ is Mediatour as God and man and glory hath redounded unto him as God and man and living in this glory he ruleth and governeth his Church as God and man He ascended into Heaven in his humanity he sitteth at the right hand of God as Mediatour in respect of both natures he worketh together with the Ministers of the word by his divine and every where present efficacy The first thing implied by Christs sitting at the right hand of the Father is the filling of his humane nature with supernaturall gifts of knowledge power c. and whatsoever doth any way pertain to the administration of his office God his God hath annointed Psal 45. 7. Heb. 1. 9. him with the oyle of gladnesse above his fellowes In respect of us these gifts may be called infinite but simply they are not because they are things created the effects and works of the holy Spirit Joh. 3. 34. Isa 11. 2. Men sura est divisio quaedam donorum at in Christo plenissima copia ubertas Ephes 4. 7. Rom. 12. 3. 1 Cor. 12. 8 11. So 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Labor immensus Ov. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 dolor immensas Senecae dicuntur Joh. 1. 16. Non deplendo aliquidex ipsius neque immeâ—sitate neque dimensione sed implendo nostraÌ„ indigentiam ab ipso absolutely they are finite comparatively infinite He received the Spirit above measure that is the whole Spirit all the gifts of the holy Spirit in higher degree then any creatures men or Angels in full abundance That is said to be done in measure which is done sparingly moderately in proportion for he that gives bountifully or largely doth not measure or number what he giveth but powreth out copiously as we say from the full heape or with both hands And that which is plentifull aboundant full is said to be above measure not that simply and absolutely it is infinite but in comparison By that which is given and not by measure not that which is infinite but that which is whole and entire is signified And of his fullnesse we all receive grace for grace we so receive of his fulnesse that his sufficiency is no whit diminished our want is filled by him but his fulnesse is not emptied by us The Sunne is not greater if it be beheld of many not the lesse if of fewer the same is true of the righteousnesse of Christ imputed The Sunne doth not decay by motion an Angell is not wearied with the service of God Christ man is not wearied with the care of the Church nor his store and plenty wasted with that which he doth
John the Baptist put over his hearers to Christ Joh. 1. 26 27. Luke 3. 16. Mark 1. 7 8. Matth. 3. 11 12. Christ invites men to the Kingdome of Heaven that is the Evangelicall Government of the Church as future at hand but not yet present Matth. 4. 17. Mark 1. 15. Nay after he was risen from the dead although he professe openly and plainly to his Disciples that all power was given unto him in Heaven and earth and he command them to preach the Gospell to every creature Matth. 28. 18 19. yet he gives them a charge to tarry at Jerusalem to waite for the accomplishment of the promise concerning the solemne sending of the holy Ghost and to be endued with power from above Luk 24. 49. as if they were designed before but then to be inaugurated and by extraordinary gifts many hearing and beholding openly to be approved The dayes immediately following the death and resurrection of Christ were the dayes of the Churches widowhood wherein she sate for a while destiture and comfortlesse and barren having neither power to beare nor to bring forth children But within ten dayes after Christ the Lord the Bridegroome of the Church had ascended from earth to Heaven in glory the holy Ghost came downe upon the Apostles in visible shape in token that Christs Church was now betrothed unto him and had received strength to conceive and bring forth and breasts replenished with plenty of Milk to nourish and feed her children This was as the Solemnization of the Marriage and then did the barren begin to rejoyce that she should be the mother of many children From this time properly the New Testament tooke its beginning The nature of this Testament stands principally in three things 1. In the kinde of Doctrine plaine full and meerly Evangelicall 2. In freedome from the curse of the Law and freedome from Legall Rites 3. In the amplitude and enlargement of the new Church throughout all Nations of the world It may be described the free Covenant which God of his rich grace in Jesus Christ incarnate crucified dead buried raised up to life and ascended into Heaven hath made and plainly revealed unto the world of Jew and Gentile promising to be their God and Father by right of Redemption and Christ to be their Saviour to pardon their sinne heale their nature adopt them to be his Sonnes protect them from all evill that may hurt furnish them with all needfull good things spirituall and temporall and crown them with everlasting glory in the world to come if they repent of their iniquities beleeve in Christ and through or by Christ in him and walk before him in sincere constant and conscionable obedience which he doth inwardly sease by the witnesse of the holy Spirit who is the earnest of their inheritance in the hearts of the faithfull and ratifie and confirme by outward seales universall plain easie and perpetuall The Author of this Covenant is God in Jesus Christ for none can make these promises but God none can make them good but his Highnesse Therefore the Lord doth evermore challenge this unto himself that he is the maker of the Covenant And as it is Jer. 31. 1 31 32 33. called our Covenant in respect of the conditions required Zech. 9. 11. So it is called the Lords Covenant because he hath made and will establish it If ye can break my Covenant of the day and my Covenant of the night c. Then may also my Covenant be broken Jer. 33. 20 21. with David my servant Christ also as Mediatour is both the foundation and Author of this Covenant as he is appointed of the Father Lord and King advanced at the right hand of God to give repentance and remission of sinnes unto Israel and as Testatour Heb. 9. 16. he hath confirmed the Covenant by his death But of this in the next Chapters God is both the Author of this Covenant and one partie confederate Fathers we know seldome frame Indentures thereby to bind themselves what they will doe for their children if they will be obedient but by right of Fatherhood they challenge of them their best service Lords and great personages seldome indent with their free servants what preferment they shall expect after some terme of service and attendance but if they look for reward they must stand at their courtesie But our Lord and Master to whom we owe our selves by right of Creation who might take advantage against us for former disobedience is content to undertake and indent with us and by Indenture to bind himself to bestow great things and incomprehensible upon us if we will accept his kindnesse and bind our selves unto him in willing and sincere obedience If you demand a reason of this dealing none can be given but the meere grace and rich mercy and love of God Thus saith the Ezek. 36. 22. Lord God I doe not this for your sakes O house of Israel but for mine holy Names sake I will cause you to passe under the rod and I will bring you into the bond of the Covenant c. And ye shall know Ezek. 20. 37. that I am the Lord when I shall bring you into the Land of Israel c. And there ye shall remember your wayes and all your doings wherein 42. 43. you have been defiled and ye shall lothe your selves in your own sight for all your evils that you have committed And ye shall know that I am the Lord when I have wrought with you for my Names sake not according to your wicked wayes nor according to your corrupt doings Man can doe nothing of himself to procure his spirituall good In spirituall things it fareth with him much what as with a child new borne into the world which being naked can neither provide cloathes nor being provided and laid by him can put them on for man destitute of all spirituall goodnesse can neither move to helpe himself untill it be freely bestowed nor manage and wield it well when it is of grace vouchsafed without direction and assistance from God And there is as little worth or dignity in man to move God to promise him help as there is ability in man to procure help There is nothing in man to move God to shew mercy but only misery which might be an occasion but can be no cause either why mercy is promised or salvation granted If man had not fallen from grace and state of Innocency God had never sent his Sonne to redeeme him nor shewed mercy reaching to the pardon and covering of his iniquity If he had not lost himself Christ had never come to find and restore him if he had not wounded himself he had not been healed and repaired of grace Man then is a subject on whom God bestowes grace and in whom he works it and his mâ—sery an occasion that the Lord took of manifesting his mercy in succouring and lifting him up out of that distresse but the free
lapsus peccati statu alijsque peccatis excepta sola impenitentia considerantur c. Sicut fidelibus quatalibus fructus impetratae gratiae proprié obtingit ita infidelibus rebellibus qua talibus gratia impetrata non est c. pag. 312. The second sort of Divines distinguish the sufficiency and efficiency of Christs death In respect of the worth and greatnesse of the price he died for all men because it was sufficient for the redemption of every man in the world if they did repent and believe and God might without impeachment of justice have offered Salvation to every man in the world upon that condition if it had been his pleasure In the efficiency as every man or any man hath fruit by the death of Christ so Christ died for him But this is not of one kind some fruit is common to every man for as Christ is Lord of all things in heaven and earth even the earthly blessings which infidels injoy may be tearmed fruits of Christs death Others proper to the members of the visible Church and common to them as to be called by the word injoy the Ordinances of grace live under the Covenant partake of some graces that come from Christ which through their fault be not saving and in this sence Christ died for all that be under the Covenant But other fruits of Christs death according to the will of God and intention of Christ as Mediatour be peculiar to the sheep of Christ his brethren them that be given unto him of the Father as faith unfained regeneration pardon of sinne adoption c. and so they hold Christ died efficiently for his people only in this sence namely so as to bring them effectually to faith grace and glory Now let us come to examine what the Scriptures teach in this particular The Apostle writeth expressely that by the grace of Heb. 2. 9. God Christ tasted of death for all men or distributively for every man Some referre this to the sufficiency of Christs death but all men cannot be referred to man-kinde considered in the common masse or lapse for the words must be understood of the death of Christ as it was suffered in time and not as it was decreed of God and of men considered as at that time But at what time Christ suffered mankind could not be considered as in the transgression of our first Parents The Jewes were of opinion that Christ the Messiah was promised a Saviour to them only How to impetrate Salvation No but to be applied as in Covenant Now to beate downe their pride the Apostle saith Christ tasted of death for all sc both Jew and Gentile who stood in relation by virtue of the Covenant as the Jewes did So that the Apostle speakes of the application of Christs death which is not absolutely common to all and every man in the world and by every man is meant every man who heareth receiveth and is partaker of the fruit and benefit of Christs death offered in the word of reconciliation every man who is under the new Covenant as it is propounded of God in the Gospell and accepted of them But every man under the new Covenant as he is under the Covenant is partaker of the fruit benefit of Christs death That the passage is to be understood of them that apply and possesse the fruit of his death is manifest by divers reasons from the verses precedent and subsequent The world to come verse 5. may well be that all or every man for whom Christ tasted death but that world to come is that happy age which the Prophets did foretell should begin at the comming of Christ whose accomplishment or fulfilling we expect as yet Beza an not in Heb. 2. 5. Corvin in Mal. cap. 29. § 1. Heb. 2. 10 11. 13 Isa 53. 10. Heb. 2. 16. They for whom Christ died are in the same Chapter described to be one that is of the same nature and spirituall condition with Christ to be his brethren such as trust in God the children of God given unto Jesus Christ the generation or posterity of Christ as the Prophet speaketh whom Christ tooke by the hand and lifted up from their fall the seed of Abraham But these things agree to them only that possesse the fruits and benefits of Christ for whom he died by way of application If the maintainers of universall redemption consider their owne grounds it will be hard to fit this Text to their purpose or rather from them the former exposition may be confirmed For either by all men they must understand mankind in the common lapse as fallen in Adam and then Christ by his death hath restored them into the favour of God they stand actually reconciled they be regenerated and if they die before by actuall sinne committed in their owne person they fall from that estate are undoubtedly saved or they must understand all men considered as obstinate impenitent rebellious unbelievers And then Christ died for all and every man as obstinate impenitent and unbelievers which I cannot find that any of them hath or dare affirme or by all men they must understand all beleevers who apply and possesse the benefits of Christs death which is that we affirme They say how truly I dispute not his dominion over all men that they are bound to obey him and live unto him is grounded upon his dying for every one But if that be granted is it not necessary that his death should be applied to every one in some sort at least made knowne unto them in the word of life For men are bound to obey and live unto Christ as they will grant not because he hath impetrated righteousnesse and salvabilitie but because he hath entred into Covenant with them made knowne unto them the way of life imparted unto them his blessings and they have accepted of the condition and received him to be their Saviour And these words By the grace of God I should thinke import more to them then that velleity or common mercy or generall affection of doing good which Armin. and Corvin make naturall and as they teach God beareth towards them that he hateth Corvin in Molin cap. 29. Sect. 2. which was the cause why he gave Christ to die for all men even that free grace and love whereby he quickens them that were dead in trespasses and saveth them that believe Ephes 2. 5. As for the particle All or every one examples are usuall in Scripture where it is used with fit limitation though neither all precisely nor the most part be signified and that confessed by all sides But what need paralell places to prove it may be when the circumstances of the text shew it must be limited and they that most presse universall redemption are enforced to acknowledge a limitation in this matter It is objected that the holy Ghost speaketh generally in the beginning of the Chapter What is man But how to frame any Heb.
Gentiles in the place of the Jewes and is to be understood of the world opposed to the Jewish Nation That world concerning whom the Lord had spoken before to Abraham saying In thy seed shall all the Nations of Gen. 12. 3. and 18. 18. Psal 2. 8. and 22. 27 28. Isai 11. 9 10. Psal 72. 11. the earth be blessed That world which the Prophets foretold should be added to the Church and given to the Messiah This world I say which God hath promised to blesse and adde to the Kingdome of the Messiah he hath reconciled unto himselfe to wit as they are blessed in Abrahams seed actually and effectually This is the Priviledge of the New Testament that God was Synod ubi supra Illi hoc loco per vocem Mundi intelligantur ad quos sermo reconciliationis pertinet in Christ reconciling the world unto himselfe as is most apparent in the words next following and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation and by the sentence it self God was in Christ But what is proper to the times of the New Testament cannot be attributed to every man in the world even those that sate in darknesse and the shadow of death before the light did shine upon them The reconciliation here mentioned is actuall effectuall particular reconciliation purchased by Christ published by the Apostles to the world of Jew and Gentiles and received Meritum Christi subordinatur gratiae dilectionis generali ex ea enim fluit ordinatio hujus medii c. non enim ut vellet nostri misereri fecit Christus sed ut salva justitia nostri misereri posset Stegma pag. 54. Rom. 5. 9 10. by them in the Covenant of grace For it is explained by the non-imputation or remission of sinnes at least as one part or branch of reconciliation which is a transient act conferred in time and inferreth a change of state and condition in the partie justified or reconciled and of other reconciliation betwixt God and man the Scripture speaketh not And it is to be observed that the Apostle saith not Christ hath purchased that God is reconcileable or actually reconciled on his part as if before he were irreconcileable but God was in Christ reconciling the world unto himself where the world is the subject or matter of reconciliation which is changed in respect of state or condition now received into actuall favour whereas heretofore it lay under wrath In another place the Apostle puts reconciliation by the death of the Sonne of God and justification by Christs bloud for the same where justification cannot be taken for possibility of justification but for actuall justification by faith in the bloud of Christ wherewith Salvation is joyned whereby we are acquitted from the guilt and punishment of sinne and so the justified or reconciled are opposed to sinners ungodly and enemies In respect of vers 6 8. our antecedent state we were enemies when In Scriptura ut saepè res dicitur quod paulò antè fuit ut coeci vident surdi aâ—diunt claudi ambulant Matth. 11. 5. esurientes qui prius miserè victitabant in solo sterili â—sal 107. 36. Joh. 9. 17. leprosus qui jam mundus est Matth. 26 6. Virgo quae jam nupta Matth. 10. 35. baculus qui est serpens Exod. 7. 11. publicanus qui est Christi discipulus Matth. 10. 3. discipulum Christi qui eum reliquit Joh. 6. 66 Sic contra saepè in sacris literis res describitur qualis â—utura est non qualis nunc est Ephes 5. 20. Ita Christi oves dicuntur qui tunc adhuc erant lupi Joh. 10. 16. Dei filii qui tum aâ—huc erant filii diaboli Joh. 11. 52. Tarn exercit l. 2. Job 3. 2. 561. reconciled to God by the death of his Son but by reconciliation we are received into grace and of enemies made friends and sons In these passages we cannot find reconciliation put for reconcileablenesse nor predicated of all the world nor all the enemies of God nor in any other Scripture For though all were enemies before reconciliation yet all enemies are not reconciled but they that be converted to the faith Thus we are taught in the word of truth to distinguish the state of the Gentiles living in their infidelity without God from the state of the Gentiles reconciled But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were farre off are made nigh by the bloud of Christ c. And that he might reconcile both unto God in one body by the crosse having slaine the enmity thereby Eph. 2. 13 16. And you that were sometimes alienated and enemies in your minds by wicked works yet now are reconciled Col. 1. 21. Now scil the Messiah being exhibited they are reconciled and their sins pardoned the promise of mercy pertaining to them as well as to the Jewes when formerly abalienati à foedere promissionum they were not reconciled And when in the precedent verse he saith that it pleased the Father by him scil Christ to reconcile all things unto himselfe whether they be things in heaven or things in earth he speaks of actuall reconciliation not reconcileablenesse and all things must be limited as that signification of the word and scope of the place doth necessarily require The sentence is diversly interpreted some think it not absurd to extend it simply to all things without exception but especially to reasonable creatures Angels and men Others think it must necessarily be restrained to creatures of a certaine kind and interpret it of Angels and men reconciled one to another who were formerly separated by mans disobedience Others restraine it to the faithfull in heaven and earth and expound it of Vorst in Col. 1. 20. Sch Eph. 1. 10. the Church and men in Covenant who are received into favour and reconciled by the death of Christ laid hold on by faith But to interpret it simply of all men penitent impenitent believers infidels obstinate separated from God by their evill works is directly contrary to the Text and hath scarce a second Author No man is to be excluded from seeking the benefit of reconciliation but from the benefit it self the Apostle excludes them that be not in Covenant and in the state of grace to whom only this spirituall blessing doth pertaine And in the same manner this and the like words are to be limited in other places Eph. 1. 10. Rom. 11. 32. And this they must not deny if they would be at one with themselves for they say all men are under a new Covenant and received into favour and that pardon of sin is promised unto all that shall continue in that Covenant and not transgresse against it Arm. respon ad Art 13 14. so that to consummate happinesse there is need of continuance only in the state which evermore hath effectuall communication conjoyned And restitution into the state of grace and actuall reconciliation if they be not one thing they
Covenant how they differ viz. eight wayes p. 32. Christ more darkly revealed in the Covenant of promise and why ib. Covenant of promise when it began and how long it continued 36. The degrees of it ib. the parts of it 43. who contained under it 45. the Covenant of promise whether made in Adam with every infant that should be born into the world p 46. Covenant of grace as manifested to Abraham p. 47. what peculiarly to be observed therein ib. the grand promises of it 53. the temporall promises 54. Covenants personall family-Covenants and nationall p. 52. Covenant with Abraham how confirmed p. 90. All are not in Covenant in one manner p. 91. Covenant of grace under Moses till the return out of the Captivity p. 92. Covenant of works whether made with man fallen 93. Obscurity among Divines in differencing the old Covenant and new 95. Covenant made with Israel particularly explicated and what Moses brought to the further expressure of the Covenant of grace 122. Gods Covenant with David 143. c. In this Covenant Christ more cleerly manifested then before 144. The things promised in this Covenant 146 147. The condition of it 149. The execution of this Covenant 150 151. c. In this Covenant some things promised absolutely some conditionally 152 153. Two things to be considered in this Covenant 154. Covenant made with Israel after the Babylonish Captivity 156. c. The promises of this Covenant 158 159. c. In what sense this Covenant may be called new 161. Wherein this Covenant exceeded the former which God made when he brought them out of Egypt 161 162 163. Of the new Covenant or Testament and how God hath revealed himself therein 194. See New Testament D DOubting what the right course to take with him that doubts whether he should beleeve because of his former transgressions 226 Dead to what purpose invitations made to them that are dead in sins 244 Death inflicted on none but sinners or him that beareth the person of a sinner 276 Debt a two-fold paying of a debt 290 Decree of God to punish sin the reason of it 276 E ELect are in grace with God in respect of Ordination and appointment though after brought into grace by Christ by actuall collation and communication 292 Examination of our selves necessary p. 87. a meanes to attain and preserve uprightnesse 188 Exhortations to all import not a generall purchase of salvation for all 208 209. they are usefull both to them that have received the truth and to them that have not 209. to what purpose exhortations and invitations are to perswade men to believe that have no power 247 Externall blessings more esteemed of under the Covenant of promise and why p. 34 F FAith why not expressely required in the Covenant of nature p. 12. Faith which the righteousnesse of nature presupposeth how it differs from the faith required in the Covenant of grace p. 12. Faith the alone cause on our part required of justification and salvation 18. In what sense it is imputed for righteousnesse 63. Three divers opinions of orthodox Divines about the imputation of Faith 64. 65 66 Faith hath not the place of our righteousnesse but doth answer in our participation of Christ to that which is the ground of our being partakers of Adams sinne 67 68. Though faith be commanded in the law it followeth not that being justified by faith we are justified by the works of the law 114. Faith whether that Christ as be died to impetrate remission of sin for me in particular be the object of justifying faith 227. Faith justifying is not without an apprehension of mercy in Christ to be obtained but implyeth not an apprehension of mercy in the pardon of sin already obtained 227 Faithfull all of the same faith with Abraham 91 Father though the same work be done by Father and Son yet a difference in the manner of working 268 Fathers before Christ and Christians in the time of the Gospell under the same Covenant for substance 26 Fellowes how the faithfull are called Christs fellowes 311 Fellowship with the Saints a signe means of uprightnesse 188 Fulnesse of grace of two sorts 311 G GIving doth not alwayes import an act of grace p. 61 Gospell why meet that the promise should goe before it 32. Grace bestowed more plentifully under the Gospell how to be understood 35. Gospell in what sense called everlasting 37. How faith is said to come by the Gospell seeing it was commanded in the law 113. The law as given to the Jewes not opposite to the Gospell ib. Gospell strictly taken or the new Testament when it took its beginning 197 198. Good that the intellectuall nature is capable of is double 313 Graces how given by the hand of the Apostles how by Christ 320 Guile of our spirits how to finde it out 187. c. how to take up our selves for it 192 H HAnd right hand what it signifieth in Scripture 303 Head how Christ is the head to his body 318 Heart a double heart what 185. signes of a good heart ibid. Heathens some remainders of Gods Image in them and many temporall blessings vouchsafed them whence it coÌ„meth to passe 13 Heaven The fathers that died before Christ had not that perfect state in heaven that now they have we are presently possessed of and in heaven they did expect their redeemer 35 36. The Kingdome of Heaven not expressely mentioned in the old Testament 132 Heavenly things wrapt up under earthly in the old Testament 33 Humane nature of Christ most highly exalted 305. Christ as man hath a prerogative above every creature 214. He is set above all principality and power and dominion and what signified hereby 214. He hath a power above every creature 215. The man Christ is King of heaven and earth 216. yet this power is not infinite simply ibid. Humanity of Christ whether to be adored 321 I IEhovah what it denoteth 123 Jewes why made a nationall Church 92. they had a double vail â—ver their eyes 120. An illustrious type of election in them 33 Incarnation of Christ whether necessary to goe before its effects and benefits 28. Incarnation of Christ the day of his coronation and espousals 294 Impute what it signifieth in Scripture 60 61. Imputation of a good thing three wayes 62. Imputation and reputation how differ ib. Certain corollaries about imputation See Faith 62 Infants holy by Covenant 52 Integrity see Vprightnesse the necessity of it 80 81 82 83. It sets a faire glosse upon the meanest actions 83. The effects and fruits of it 85. Meanes to attain it 86 87 88. How a Christian is to stir up himself to attain Integrity 88 89 c. Impotency of man such that he can neither move to any thing of himselfe that is good nor manage grace when vouchsafed 199. Impossible how that which is impossible may be an object of Gods desire and approbation 245. Innocent whether an Innocent person ought to suffer
and receiving of the Sacraments oblige themselves to the condition required and thus all members of the visible Church be in Covenant With others God doth make his Covenant effectually writing his Law in their hearts by his holy Spirit and they freely and from the heart give up themselves unto the Lord in all things to be ruled and guided by him And thus God hath contracted Covenant with the faithfull only The first sort are the people of Rom. 2. 28. God outwardly or openly having all things externall and pertaining to the outward administration The second are the people of God inward or in secret whom certainly and distinctly the Lord only knoweth Experience hath confirmed it that in the dayes of the Gospell the Church of Christ hath sometimes been shut up within narrower bounds and limits sometimes it hath spread it selfe over the face of the earth more gloriously and so much was plentifully foretold in the Scriptures that such as lived in the times of that great apostasie and falling from the faith might not be offended at it What the state of Gods Church shall be in these latter dayes time will manifest more certainly then we can yet define but some Divines are of opinion that the bounds thereof shall extend further and the glory thereof be greater then ever heretofore And this is not improbable for when the Apoc. 11. 15. seventh Angel sounded there were great voices in heaven saying The Kingdomes of this world are become the Kingdomes of our Lord and of his Christ and he shall raigne for ever and ever which accordeth with that of Daniel Behold one like the Son of man came with the Dan. 7. 13 14. clouds of heaven and came to the Ancient of dayes and they brought him neere before him And there was given unto him dominion and glory and a Kingdome that all people nations and languages should serve him his dominion is an everlasting dominion which shall not passe away and his kingdome that which shall not be destroyed CHAP. II. Christ the Mediatour of the New Testament for whom he died and rose againe CHrist Jesus incarnate is the Mediatour of the new Testament a reall Mediatour a fit middle person betwixt God and man a Mediatour and Testatour both who hath confirmed the Testament with his bloud But seeing the Covenant is made in Christ and Christ died in some sort for them that be under the Covenant it will not be out of place first to shew for whom Christ died and rose again and then how Christ is the Mediatour of the New Testament and what is the exaltation and Prerogative of the new above the old Covenant in that respect Touching the first there be two main opinions of Divines The first sort hold that he died for all and every man with a purpose to save But in the explication of their Tenent they adde Corvin in Mol. cap. 28. Sect. 1. 4. 20. 1. That Christ died for all men considered in the comman lapse or fall but not as obstinate impenitent or unbelievers Christ died not say they for Cain and Judas as such or as they should perish nor for Abell and Peter as faithfull in respect of the impetration of Salvation but without difference for them considered Resp ad Epist Minist Walak pag. 51. Armin. Worst part Secunda necess Resp Synod declar sent remonst circa Art Sect. de morte Christi Thomson diatr. cap. 4. Corvin in Mol. cap. 27. Sect. 4. cap. 12. Sect. 25 26 27. in the common state and condition of the fall and sin 2. That Christ died for all men in respect of the impetration of Salvation but the application thereof is proper to believers 3. That Christ died not to bring all or any man actually to Salvation and make them partakers of righteousnesse and life but to purchase salvabilitie and reconciliation so farre as that God might and would salvajustitia deale with them upon termes of a better Covenant which might well stand allthough it should be applied to no man no man should be reconciled or saved by Christ God should have no Church on earth or Saint be crowned with glory in heaven 4. That Christ hath purchased salvabilitie for all men but faith and regeneration he hath merited for none because God is bound to give that which Christ hath merited of him although it be not desired or craved Exam. Censur Cap. 8. pag. 95. Cap. 7. pag. 87 Respons ad specul 11. 107. Other poâ—itions they hold which â—ang not together nor agree Exam. Cens with that which hath been mentioned as that God neither would nor could by right condemne any man for the sinne of Adam and that Originall sinne so called is properly neither sinne nor punishment And then if Christ died for mankind in the common lapse he died for them that never had sinned nor deserved punishment Againe they teach that all Infants whether of believing Corvin in Mol. cap. â—8 Sect. 13 14. or Infidell parents dying without actuall sinnes committed in their owne person are restord into the favour of God regenerated and saved and that because God hath taken all mankind into the grace of reconciliation and entred into a Covenant of grace Arm. Resp ad ad Art 13 14. with Adam and all his posterity But then Christ died for all mankind in respect of impetration and application both and by his death hath actually reconciled all mankinde unto God merited actuall regeneration for them and purchased Salvation if after they be possessors of these spirituall blessings they doe not fall from them and shake them off by impenitency and infidelity For Adam and Eve excepted mankind cannot be considered in the Armin in Perk. pag. 4. common lapse but as infants only Further they affirme that Infants have refused grace in their parents grandfathers ancestors by which act they have deserved to be forsaken of God which how it can stand with their generall position or that last mentioned I cannot conceive Lastly they teach that Christ died for the impenitent and unbelievers for thus they reason If Christ died for all whom he came to save and came to save unbelievers as his words are I came not to judge but to save then he died for unbelievers How they accord these things I cannot finde but if we take things as they lay them downe it will plainely follow that Christ died for all mankind in respect of impetration only and that he died for them in respect of impetration and application both that he hath not actually reconciled them unto God and that he hath purchased actuall reconciliation that he died not for the impenitent or unbelievers in respect of impetration and that in respect of impetration only he died only for such And all this can hardly be reconciled with that they have in their Script Synod declar sent Rem circa Art 2 Gratia haec impetrata est peccatâ—ribus quatenus in communi
doth give life and sence to the body and not the whole Trinity If the speciall Offices of Christ be considered severally much more if all of them be considered joyntly it will evidently appeare that both natures must necessarily concurre in the formall execution of them For he cannot worthily performe the office of the chiefe Doctor of the whole Church and heavenly Prophet nor execute the office of an eternall high Priest that is offer a Sacrifice truly propitiatory daily heare the prayers of all his people and present them before God nor exercise kingly power and authority in heaven and earth who worketh to the forme of meere humanitie or onely as he is man When in those offices there must be a divine excellencie and efficacie The end of personall union is the administration of his office Qualis substantia personae tâ—â— liâ— operatie qualis operatio talis substantia and the personall union of two natures in Christ had not been necessary unlesse both had concurred as a formall beginning to that worke For every agent necessarily worketh according to and by its forme whence it followeth either that the person of the Mediatour doth not consist of two natures or both natures of Christ as proper formes doe necessarily concurre to the proper works of a Mediatour because the proper operations must be conjoyned in one worke of a Mediatour as both natures are joyned and united in one person There is one God saith the Apostle and one 1 Tim. 2. 5 6. Mediatour between God and man the man Christ Jesus adding the man Christ to shew that in him were both natures that is he was God and man in one person and so a fit middle person or Mediatour And man may be taken personally not naturally it being most usuall to name the whole person of Christ from either 1 Cor. 2 â— nature as he is called the Lord of glory when his person is understood And so in this place the man Christ that is that person Iaâ— animad in Bell. contr l. 5. 6. 3. not 11 12. who hath that nature by which he is truly called man and of that appellation there may be divers weighty reasons more amongst the rest this that the Apostle would encourage us to put our trust and confidence in him as being our elder brother By voluntary dispensation Christ is Mediatour as God incarnate and not by nature as God And according to that dispensation Christ Joh. 17. 3 and 14. 1. 1 Joh. 2 1 2. is Mediatour to the Father who is personally called God sometimes in this respect and distinguished from Christ as Mediatour and Christ is our Advocate to the Father but never represented in Scripture praying to the Son or holy Spirit but the Father only which dispensation is carefully to be observed from which we must not depart upon any vain speculation which humane curiosity might suggest A Mediatour must be a middle person equally distant and equally drawing nigh to both parties betwixt whom he doth mediate Bellarm. de Christ l. 5. c. 2. §. Praeterâ—a Ille solus est verè medius inter Deum hominem cum utriusq naturam habeat And thus Christ God incarnate is a fit middle person for he draws as neare to the Father as God as to us as man and is as farre distant from God as he is man as he is from us as God and he comes as neare to the Father as he departeth from us and comes as neare to us as he doth to the Father But Christ as a just man is not so a middle person for he comes not so nigh to the Father as just as he doth to us as man nor is so farre distant from us as just as he comes nigh to us as man Then as Mediatour he should be joyned to the Father in will only but in nature dis-joyned and be distant from man not in nature but in quality only then should he be Mediatour not as substantially one with the Father but only as he is united to him in will If it be alleadged that if Christ be Mediatour as God incarnate then he is Mediatour to himselfe because he is God and then also he should differ from himselfe because a Mediatour is a middle person We answer it is not necessary a thing should differ from the Iun. ibid. cap. 5. not 1 3 5 15. extreames according to all that in respect whereof it is of a middle condition but it is sufficient if it differ in some thing from one and in some thing from another as is before explained So the Son of God incarnate by voluntary dispensation differeth not only from the Father and the holy Ghost but from himselfe as God only scil as man he differeth from himselfe as God and as God from himselfe as man The whole Trinity being offended with us for sin was to be pacified but the Scripture teacheth Christ was our Mediatour to the Father and we must silence our conceits and learne of God what to believe And assuredly if the Father be reconciled the whole Trinity is reconciled And further it may be added that he who according to absolute essence or nature is the partie offended may according to voluntary dispensation sustaine the person and doe the office of a Mediatour and so Christ was primarily a Mediatour to the Father for us and by consequence and secundarily to the whole Trinity and so to himselfe as God It is further objected if Christ be Mediator according to his divine nature then all three persons in Trinity be Mediatours but this is a meere deceit for the divine nature is taken essentially for the divine nature common to Father Son and holy Ghost or personally for the divine essence considered distinctly in the Father Son and holy Ghost In the latter sence we say Christ according to his divine nature is our Mediator as he was incarnate and did assume our nature unto his divine person and not the Father or the holy Ghost But then it will be said he was inferiour to the Father In office it is true by voluntary dispensation he is inferiour but in nature Iun. ibid. not 13. he is equall to the Father and nothing hinders but one equall to another in nature may by voluntary and free choice under-take Phil 2. 6 7. an office of inferiority Being in the forme of God he humbled himselfe The Scripture teacheth expressely that God the Father Joh. 1. 18. 3. 16. 3. 13. Rom. 5. 8. Ephes 1. 7. Col. 1. 14. 1 Joh. 1. 7. â— 1. 4. 10. Act. 20. 28. gave his only begotten Son to death for us and the only begotten or proper Son of God according to both natures and in both states is said to administer his office the property of either nature observed as also the only begotten Son of God is said to descend from heaven to earth for our sakes and to suffer death for us
and to have done and suffered other such things and that by the bloud of his Son we are reconciled to God the Father This office of Mediation Christ hath performed First as the great Doctour of his Church by revealing unto us the way to life even 1 Cor. 2. 7 8 9. the last full and perfect will of God concerning mans salvation the wisdome of God in a mysterie even the hidden wisdom which God ordained before the world unto our glory which none of the Princes of this world knew Such things as eye hath not seen eare hath not heard or ever entred into the heart of man to conceive Such as the naturall inquirie of Angels could never Mat. 11. 27. Joh. 1. 1â— have discovered No man knoweth the Father but the Sonne and he to whom the Sonne hath revealed him No man hath seen God at any time the only begotten Sonne which is in the bosome of the Father he hath declared him He only it is that openeth the bosome of his Father that is who revealeth the secret and mysterious counsels and the tender and compassionate affections of his Father unto the world He is said to be a teacher sent from Joh. 3. 2. God and to be the Lord which speaketh from heaven and the doctrine which he taught an heavenly doctrine even great Salvation The woman of Samaria could say I know when the Messiah cometh he will tell us all things And our Saviour professeth Heb. 12. 25. Joh. 3. 12. Heb. 2. 3. Joh. 4. 25. Joh. 15. 15 to his disciples All things that I have heard of my Father I have made known unto you And in this the new Covenant is lifted up above former expressions of the same Covenant for substance For God who in sundry times and in divers manners spake in times past unto the Fathers Heb. 1. 1. ver 3. by the Prophets hath in these last daies spoken unto us by his Sonne who is the brightnesse of his glory and the expresse Image of his person that is he in whom the glory and Majesty of the Father Col. 1. 15. otherwise invisible and inconspicuous doth shew forth it selfe and that which is hid in the Father as in a ring is manifested as on the seale And as God is manifested in Christ so was he manifested and made knowne by Christ In Christ are hid Col. 1. 3. Ephes 3. 9 10. all the treasures of wisdome and he hath made knowne the manifold wisdome of God The discovery of misery and sin is that which sweetens mercy and gaines it esteem and therefore as the mercy of God was plentifully unfolded so was the Law laid open and sin discovered by our Saviour more fully then it had been in the old Testament that as sin abounded mercy might abound much more And where the maladie appeares hideous and desperate there is need that we be well acquainted with the soveraigne remedie and hence as the doore of the Law and curse is cast quite open that men might throughly know themselves so Christ in his person natures office and benefits is lively deciphered that when men feele themselves lost in themselves they might runne unto him for righteousnesse grace life and salvation Secondly Christ hath satisfied offended justice and answered whatsoever the Law had against us The word satisfaction the Scripture hath not but the thing signified thereby is plainly noted by the phrases of Redemption Expiation Reconciliation and many such like every where in Scripture Justice did release the debtour or the punishment of the person offending but would not simply release the punishment of the offence or pardon the fault without satisfaction If then the guilty be spared the surety must suffer punishment It is here questioned whether God could not pardon sin without satisfaction or satisfaction be absolutely necessary the decree and pleasure of God so to have it excepted Many sound orthodox and learned Divines hold the affirmative Martin de pers Christi lib. 1. Sect. ex mundi redempâ— p. 154 155. because justice is essentiall to God and it is a righteous thing with God to render tribulation to them that afflict and that every transgression receive a just recompence 2 Thess 1. 6. Heb. 2. 2. Rom. 1. 32. Exod. 34. 7. And if recompence be just it is injustice to let sin goe unpunished The Lord testifieth that he that justifieth the wicked is an abhomination to his highnesse and he will not doe what he abhorreth in others Prov. 17. 15. Isa 5. 23. God cannot but love his Image and so he cannot but hate the corruption of it and severely punish that which is dissentanie from it This seemes to be engraven in the heart of man by nature that God is just and that sin cannot be done away without satisfaction and hence come those many fond devices amongst the Heathen Lex non est aliquid internum in Deo aut ipsa Dei voluntas sed voluntatis quidameffectus Lactant. de 〈◊〉 Dei cap. 19. Index peccatis veniam dare nâ— potest quia voluntati servit alienae Deus autem potest quia est legis suae ipse disceptator judex quam cum poneret non utiâ— ademit sibi omnem potestatem sed habet ignoscendi licentiam Senec. Occidere contra Legem nemo non potest servare nemo prâ—ter te to pacifie offended justice they were ignorant of the true God and how his wrath and displeasure was to be appeased but assured of this that he was offended by sin and that without satisfaction the sin could not be expiated or done away For these and such like reasons many have thought that it is absolutely repugnant to divine justice to pardon sin without satisfaction Others and those learned and orthodox are of opinion that the necessity of satisfaction depends upon the will and pleasure of God and that God by his absolute power salva justitia might have pardoned sin without satisfaction For God might out of his absolute soveraignty not have punished Adams sin both because it was against himselfe not others to whom he is tied to doe justice and especially for that the demonstration of his revenging justice springeth not from the necessity of his nature but from his voluntary disposition as well as the giving life perpetuall to obedience for a certaine space performed For with-draw that voluntary Covenant who doubteth but that had the creature kept his innocency a thousand yeares God was free to have annihilated him Also God is able were he pleased to shew his power to turne it to his glory which mens impotency not attaining being also forbidden by the Law of their Superiour maketh them that they cannot alwaies with justice forgive even that wherein themselves are trespassed If God of his absolute power cannot pardon sin without satisfaction then not to punish sin is simply a thing impossible or God in so doing should be deficient or inconformable to the rule of his will but to let