proper visible Church of Christ to which the goverment Ecclesiasticall of iâ—â—â—â—fe doeth alwayes of right appâ—rtaine Ecclesia in the new Testament is taken Ciuilly and originally for a * Act. 19 3â—.39.40 particular Assembly of Citizens in one certaine publike place about matters of the Common wealth Ecclesia in the new Testament is taken Religlouslie for a Church Properly in the next and neerest proportion aunswering to the Originall ciuill vse thereof This is a Particular Visible Ordinary Congregation of Christians meeting for religious Ecclesiasticall actions exercises And this is the only true Visible Church of Christ hauing from him the Spirituall power of order gouernment in it selfe ordinarily The proper Ministers thereof are the onely true ordinarie Ministers of Christ This we read of in the Scripture in 2. respects Definitly This is some certaine known “ Mat. 18 1â— Revel 21. Col. 4.16 Gal. 1.2 â— Thes â— 14 â— Cor. 16.1 19. 2. Cor 8.1 Rom. 16.4.16 particular Congregation in some certaine particular place which we may go vnto consult with and obey Indefinitlie where is vnderstood This or That or * Mat. 3â— â— c. 1. Cor. 12.11 Mat. 6 33. Isa 2.1.2 3. â— Pet. â— 5 any other particular ordinary Congregation in a proportion more remote or further of Such is the Inuisible or Intelllgible Church absolutly Catholike that is the number of †Ephe. 3.10 15 21. and â— 27 all Gods Elect both in Heauen and in Earth Figuratiuely by a Metaphore Such is a holy well ordered Christian “ Rom. 16.5 â— Cor. 16. â—â— familie resembling as it were a very Church though in deed it bee but a part of a true and proper Church Synecdoche viz. of the Visibilitie when the Church it self that is the whole cannot but only some parts of it may be Visible or Sensible at any time to any one man that needeth the vse of it Such is the Catholike Militant Church which is * Mat. 16.18 1. Cor. â—2 28 properly an Inuisible Intelligible Church as it is considered whâ—ly togeather that is as it is one Church Societie as when only the “ Act. 15.4 â—â— People of a particular Congregation hauing Ministers yet without and beside their Ministers are called the Church Whereby it is evident that no Catholike or Vniversall Church Visible is any where in all Christes New Testament to bee found and therefore in no wise is such a Church to be allowed Neither yet any Nationall or Provinciall or Diocesan Church Only a particular ordinarie Congregation is heere found and so is to be held properly and only a true visible Church of Christ Moreover heereby it appeareth and it is likewise to be noted Note III. that the nature and office of a Bishop also is not of one maner but of divers It is as the former word Church very ambiguous and must be likewise necessarily distinguished Bishops of six sortes Six sortes of Bishops have ben and are known in the world 1 1. A Parishionall Bishop who is a Pastor of one ordinary Congregation only Such are all the Bishoppes mentioned any where in the New Testament and also in writers within the space of 200. yeares after Christ 2 2. A Diocesan Titular Bishop who was Bishop of a Diocese in title and in name only in Ecclesiasticall governement having no more power then any other coÌ„mon Pastor He differed not in any essentiall part of the ordinary Pastorall Office but was only President or Moderator coÌ„stantly yet by his fellow Pastors free consent over the Pastors of a Diocese Such perhaps first of all was “ Ann. 190 Iulianus the tenth Bishop of Alexandria In whose time first * Euseb 5.9 mention is made that there were divers Churches in that Citie and he Bishop of them The first sorte of these Bishops we wholy allow The second we do not simply deny They were not much vnlike to the Bishops now lately appointed in Scotland 3 3. There is a Diocesan ruling Bishop He had more power then any of the rest of the ordinarie Pastors though yet not any sole power to rule in his Diocese It may be this began at Alexandria with “ Ann. 260. Dionysius the thirteenth Bishop of that place which seemeth to be Ieroms meaning where he * Ierom ad Evagr. saith that some prioritie in Bishops continued there from Marke to Heraclas and Dionysius At Heraclas it is probable was a period of one sort and with Dionysius began another Prioritie of Order 1. Pariâ—hionall 2. Diocesan 3. Maioritie of rule Diocesan Prioritie of order in one Bishop over a Parish that is one particular compleat Congregation seemeth to haue continued exclusively from Marke vnto Iulianus over a Diocese from Iulianus to Heraclas inclusively and then Maioritie of ruling in the Diocese to haue begun with Dionysius the next Successor after Nothing letteth vs but that thus we may probably thinke Seeing thus Eusebius and Ieroms relation shall well agree How soever it was this is certaine that neither the one nor the other was knowne before these times heere expressed 4 4. A Diocesan Lord Bishop was he who ruled ordinarilie in his Diocese by his sole power This grew vp from the former by litle and litle But it seemeth not to haue ben established in Ambrose Ierome Augustines time though soone after we doubt not it tooke place over the Churches 5 5. A Patriarchall Bishop and they were first 4. in number Of which kinde the Archbishop may be reckoned also viz. at Rome Antioch “ Or els Cae sarea Concil Nic. 1. Can. 7. Ierusalem Alexandria They began by mens voluntarie regarding the Bishops of those principall Cities aboue other sometime before the Nicene Councell But they were by an ordinance established first in that Councell Howbeit yet they were not Lords over the Churches till a long while after In the first Councell of Constantinople an other Patriarch was established at Constantinople 6 6. A Catholike or Vniversall Bishop * Bonifacius was the first began at Rome about 600. yeares after Christ Who also hath had his growinges and increasings and was not perfect Antichrist till some ages after Now all these latter that is the 3.4.5 6. sort are at least Besides the Scriptures yea they are cleane Contrarie to the first which hath place and allowance in the Scripture And therefore these are plainlie contrary to Gods word vtterlie vnlawfull Wherefore also the “ As namelie that in D. Bilsons perpet gouernment pag. 260. coÌ„mon accompts and Catalogues of the succession of Bishops from the Apostles times to our dayes are very deceiptfull and false When as al these are called by one name indifferently Bishops without distinction yet their Offices are exceeding divers and no way like Yea these later directlie contrarie to the first as hath ben said Against this it is * D. Bilson in
ordinarie Churches each of them a competent Congregation Which we do observe further neere the end of our handling the 2. Assertion afterward Moreover likely also it is in these cruell persecuting Cities that so great a multitude of Christians did not long keepe togeather but many of theÌ„ did quicklie disperse and scatter them selves abroad into other quarters and Countries whereby the whole number there became smaller as we may see they did at * Act. 8.1 Ierusalem by reason of Stevens persecution c. immediatlie after the great and suddaine increase of the Church there All which being considered it is plaine yet still that in the greatest Cities or wheresoever els the Apostles appointed and left true and proper Visible Churches particular constant CoÌ„gregations Which further alfo appeareth by those many and distinct Churches of a Gal. 1.2 1. Cor. 16.1 Galatia of b 2 Cor. 8.1 19 23. Macedonia of c 1 Cor. 16.19 Asia of d 2. Cor. 8.24 Achaia of e 1. Th. 2.14 Gal. 1.21 Iudea of f Act. 9.31 Galile Samaria of g Act. 15.41 Syria Cilicia of h Act. 14.23 Lycaonia Pisidia Likewise by those many Churches of the i Rom. 16.4 Gentiles and the Churches of the k 1 cor 14 33 Saints the Churches of l 1 Cor 11.16 God the Churches of m RoÌ„ 16.16 Christ and n 2. Cor. 8.18 11.28 1. Cor. 4.17 Reve. 2.23 Act. 16.5 1 Cor. 14.34 3. Ioh. 6. Rev. 22.16 All Churches All these in number were not onlie one but manie proper distinct Churches Each of them being severallie but one particular constant CoÌ„gregation Wherevnto most fitlie agreeth that iniunction and commandement of our Saviour Christ touching a Visible Church where he instituteth the externall spirituall power thereof saying o Mat. 18.17 Tell the Church or Congregation If he heare not the Church let him be vnto thee as an Heathen and a Publicane Where he must necessarilie be vnderstood of a particular Congregation Which may be told and spoken vnto onely As also that description of a Visible Church which our publike Authoritie in England teacheth “ Artic. 19. viz. A Visible Church is a Congregation of faithfull people where the word of God is preached and the Sacraments ministred c. Doct. Bilson also where he saith * D. Bils against the Seminaries lib. 2. p. 170 The Church is never taken in the New or old Testament for the Priestes alone but generallie for the whole Congregation of the faithfull In Act. 20.28 The Church is taken for the People And it is “ Lib 3. Pa. 70. Math. 18.17 The whole multitude of the faithfull where he and they the Offender and the Offended live The 3. point here to be marked serving also for proofe of our Proposition before is a generall and sure Maxime in Divinitie viz. The true and proper Visible Churches of Christ both heeretofore now and heereafter though manie in number yet all are but one in nature forme and Constitution And each of them hath simply one and the same spirituall or Ecclesiasticall power immediatlie from Christ not derived from any other to governe it selfe withall To which purpose the Scripture often speaketh of the Visible Church indefinitelie as of onelie * Math. 22.2 c. 1. Cor. 12.13 Mat. 6.33 1. Pet. 2.5 Isa 2.1 2 3. 1. Tim. 3.5 one Because in Nature and Forme and in the true Constitution as also in the spirituall power thereof it is only one Yea it saith also in plaine termes that there is “ Ephe. 4.4 1. Cor. 12.13 one Body where is ment the Church But it is to bee vnderstood that it is one in nature and power as I said Which must of necessitie be so because Christes * Math. 18.17 Institution of a visible Churches externall spirituall governement before noted must belong equally to every true and proper Visible Church Wherefore also the nature forme Constitution of everie one must be the same that this is which heere Christ signifieth in Matthew Which evidentlie was a particular Congregation as before wee observed To which purpose also one of our Adversaries * Hooker lib. 3 pag. 132. a famous Schole-divine sheweth that by cleere and vndeniable reason the governement Ecclesiasticall belongeth to everie Visible Church properly so called And the practise of the Apostolike Churches doeth iustifie and confirme it Which being ordinarie particular Congregations each of them did or might by their Ministers and them selves in presence consenting * Act. 14.23 2. Cor. 8.19 choose Elders and “ 1. Cor. 5.4 5. Mat 18 17. excommunicate offenders Neither certainly did Christ ever institute or the Apostles practise divers kindes or formes of Visible Churches Neither let they any to have greater or lesser spirituall power then other But they appointed one forme and one power for the Churches questionles everie where and alwayes Therefore they all though being many in number yet were and are one in nature and forme and power every-where and for ever Whence now it followeth by a necessarie and vndeniable coÌ„sequence that these 3. Conclusions insuing are likewise certaine and true 1. Every particular ordinarie Congregation of faithfull people in England * Iâ—râ— Divine By right from God is a true proper Visible Church 2. Everie such Congregation heere and everie where is indued with power immediatly froÌ„ Christ to governe it selfe Ecclesiasticallie or fpirituallie 3. Everie true and proper Visible Church everie where is but one ordinarie or constant Congregation only And then no one Church consisteth neither can consist of many ordinarie distinct Congregations Wherfore no Diocesan Chuch is ordained or allowed by Christ no Provinciall no Nationall and so likewise no Vniversall visible Church with an externall governement correspondent to the same as the Catholikes heretically do holde A Catholike an Heretike A Vniversal Militant Church I deny not but a Vniversal or Catholike Visible Church with correspondent governement I do deny and so likewise the rest Now heere thus we do for this reason because it is not possible if there be indeed one Vniversall Church properly or where there is a Nationall Church or Provinciall or Diocesan that there the particular ordinarie CoÌ„gregations are or can be esteemed so many true and proper Churches These can not stand togeather with any of the former Everie of those is directlie contrarie to these Seeing these in such case are properly but Members and partes of the other and not in them selves proper and intier Churches Which yet in the places of Scripture * before cited the H. Ghost doth plainlie affirme Where if he speake not properly who doth Pag. 19.20 Or what is in Divinitie a proper speach if the coÌ„tinuall phrase of the H. Ghost in Scripture be not proper Note And surely to this point if we marke it well doth all our present Controversie come that is to sett downe What
is a Visible Church of Christ truly and properly Seeing each true Visible Church hath evermore from Christ power and right of governement in it selfe as before is noted Let this therefore be well declared what is a true Visible Church and we shall soone agree We affirme that every particular ordinarie Cōgregation is and ought to be allowed for such a Church And heerevpon do we stand I am not ignorant of the common and vulgar phrase of speach among men both ancient and of late both vnlearned and learned who have vsed to call everie of those other a Church as a Diocesan Church a Provinciall a National and also a Vniversall Church meaning it seemeth that everie of these may be trulie and rightlie called a Visible Church But this is only the custome of speach among men And * Mos trium literatum tyrannus Bez. Annot. in Luc. 23.17 Custome is a Tyrant as a Reverend Father saith well It is no warrant nor ground for any thing in Religion The word of God alone must suffice vs heerein Yea we consider not what advantage we give the Heretike Catholikes against vs by acknowledging a Catholike Visible Church It followeth from this necessarilie that there is ought to be on earth a Catholike or Vniversall governement Ecclesiasticall This is a Conclusion wherevnto M. Hooker setteth down expreslie * Hook 3. Sect 1. both the Proposition and Assumption viz. Everie Visible Church Pag. 132. truly and properly so called ought to have a correspondent Ecclesiasticall governement But there is a Catholike or Vniversal Visible Church on earth Pag. 126. and 132. To which Premisses everie childe now can quicklie adde the Conclusion Ergo There is and ought to be on earth a Catholike or Vniversall governement Eccle siasticall And I am perswaded that this oversight or error among vs hath caused Thousandes to turne Catholikes that is members of Antichrist and enemies to the true Churches and servants of Christ For if there be properlie one Visible Church and governement Ecclesiasticall throughout the world then this must be in some one place eminently For some whither we must go when Christ biddeth vs Tell the Church Now there is no place in all the world so likelie as Rome is to be the Visible seat and spring-head of the Vniversall governement of the Catholike Church if in deed there be any Therfore most easilie mē are drawen to be Roman Catholiks whē this is not denyed that there is a Catholike Visible Church Which selfe same advantage we give also to our Pontificall Hierarchie in England against the true estate and due governement of Christes Visible Churches heere For while we grant them whether by error or by oversight that there is may be truly and properly a Diocesan Visible Church they will easilie conclude that then there may ought to be a correspondent Diocesan governement Which as before I observed overthroweth quite the proper being and governement of each particular or Parishionall Church But we because Christ and his Apostles throughout all the New Testament have appointed every were allowed the Parishionall Assemblies as to be cleerely absolutly distinct in themselves so to be Visible Churches truly properly and withall a correspondent Ecclesiasticall governement to be in each of them as before hath bene shewed therefore heerevpon do we stand this do we vrge that the Institution of Christ and the Apostles practize ought to be a rule for Christian Churches as every where so heere in England vpon this do our Consciences rest assuredlie Because as before I said who is it that may presume to ordaine any forme of a Church save Christ only Especiallie overthrowing that forme of a Church and governement which Christ hath ordeyned as these Diocesan and Provinciall Churches with their proper Ministers do Ecclesiae nomine armamini contra Ecclesias dimicatis You arme your selves with the name of the Church and fight against the true Churches In this place I can not forget how some thinking thēselves deepe Politicians do imagin that they see our Groūds to be directlie against a Monarchie or Kingly State For this Ecclesiasticall governement being Popular say they it wil require the Civill governement also to becom conformed to it Also they thinke it can never bee menaged without trouble and tumult First we absolutelie denie that any manner of Ecclesiasticall Governement requireth the Civill Governement to becom conformed to it This is a most false conceite The bounds of either Governernement are distinct and cleerlie severed the one from the other albeit each doth ayd succour the other But what should I reason heereof This their insimulation is against none other then Christ him selfe and his blessed Word wherein he hath instituted no other state of a Church Visible but a particular Congregation only Shall we impugne and accuse the true Church of Christ Nay shall we accuse Christ him selfe and his Gospell that heerein he yeeldeth vs not the true right or best forme of a Church And therefore we will of our owne heades devise and constitute a better God forbid that any Christians should so do and wilfully maintaine this doing also But they think this maner of governement will becom tumultuous and troublesom in the State and so it will proove hurtfull to the Prince I would demaund why thinke they that the Church government as we desire it will be troublesom tumultuous They will answere because we require of necessitie that Elections of Ministers and Excommunications c. must be Popular Which can not but bring with them commonly tumult and much trouble if not confusion and perill to manie Wherevnto I replie that this were verie true in deed viz. much trouble and tumult would commonly follow and perhaps perill to divers if we desired or sought for popular Elections of Diocesan Bishops Such as we read of finde to have ben vsed in many places vnder Christian Princes from 300. yeres after Christ hitherward for a long time As for example at Antioch Alexandria Rome Constantinople c. In these and other Cities verie great stirres tumultes and confusions among the People have risen in deed not seldom times even in and about such their Elections The Ecclesiasticall Histories are full of examples to this purpose But such running togeather of a whole Citie or Dioces such voice-giving of such multitudes of people we desire not neither do we any wayes allow it It was a corrupt remainder in deed of the Peoples auncient free voice-giving to the Election of their Parishionall Pastors or Bishops For such all ordinarie Bishops and Pastors were primitively in the Apostles dayes and such every where they were left by them as before we have shewed Every ordinarie Bishop then I say was only of a Parish as the Ancients call it that is of one particular Congregation only and no greater And so their Elections were accomplished by the free consent and voyce-giving only of the People of each of these
particular ordinarie Congregations or Parishes Now it is true indeed we acknowledge we allow and do desire such Elections and Excommunications by the People Neither is this to bee reckoned anie Popularitie which can be either prejudicious to Princes or tumultuous in it selfe No it can not be an inconvenient order but most reasonable for any place or people in the world Namely seeing we do expresly hold this assertioÌ„ no otherwise and we hartilie pray that it may bee noted but as it is grounded on 4. Circumstances Power Circumstances wheron the fitnes of the Peoples coÌ„sent staÌ„deth 1 1. In regard that it is as we are well assured a Divine order and ordinance instituted for each Church by Christ and his Apostles the trueth whereof we hope hath evidently appeared in this 2 2. Reason last handled Considering that we allow the Peoples consent and voice-giving in Elections Excommunications c. to be done only by the Christian People of one Parish that is of one particular ordinarie Congregation only and by no greater nor larger number of People by any meanes as before hath bene likewise shewed 3 3. Considering that in the maner heereof we hold this only to be necessarie ordinarie that the Ecclesiasticall Guides there apart froÌ„ the People do first by themselves prepare and determine the whole matter namely in such sort that the People may not neede to do ought afterward but only Consent with them and freelie signifie their consent it it 4 4. If anie where it should fall out that this People thus guided being so few will yet presume to be in their Church-Elections c. vnrulie and violent then the Princes next dwelling Officers of Iustice may and ought to make them keepe peace and quietnes Which thing how easie it is for the meanest of them to do the simplest may perceaue All which verilie being well considered this Ecclesiasticall Governement questionles is most reasonable yea necessarie And it is childish without all wit to cry out against vs as our Adversaries do Popularitie Anarchie and Enmitie to Princes for this our so wel grounded and so approved an assertion Another thing is heere to be well remembred that M. Hooker and M. Tooker the noble Patrons of Pluralities and Nonresidencie are vtterlie defeated in this their purpose The former * Hook lib. 5. sect vlâ—im maketh this his Reason for them because it is a mistaking saieth he to thinke that the particular Congregations are by Gods ordinance so many distinct proper Churches For as he holdeth there is but one Visible Church properlie and the same Vniversall thorough the whole world As for particular Congregations they are not properlie so many Churches neither distinguished at all by God but only by men And therefore everie Minister is a Minister properlie to the Whole Church but by men according to discretion only is limited to this or that Congregation there to have maintenance made sure to him by Law there to teach till men see it fitt to imploy his giftes in another Benefice or elswhere All which because they are meerly Mens ordinances by men they may be disposed and dispensed with againe as to those in authoritie seemeth good And so both Pluralitie of Livings and Nonresidencie from the same shal be both lawfull and honest This is the effect and drift of his reason And even on the same foundation also buildeth D. Tooker Yea only this ground he hath and none other Where nothing els needeth answere but this his assertion * Fabrike of the Church pag. 45. DistinctioÌ„ of Parish Churches is of meere positive law not of Divine For my part I would graunt this Reason to be in deed sound and good for their purpose and not only for that but also singular and most pregnant to set vp the Romane Papacie too if this their Foundation were not manifestlie contrarie to Gods word But before it hath ben shewed to be cleerer then the light that DistinctioÌ„ of Parishes in some sort that is of particular Churches is by Gods own ordinaÌ„ce in the Apostles Writings and not by the meere positive law of men Wherefore this is evident to be a most vngodly and shameles Defence pleading for or excusing that wretched sinne of soule-murdering Nonresidencie as if it were a thing allowable and not simplie evill It can not excuse this sinne to alleadge that Plurified men may haue their 2. Benefices neare togither perhaps within halfe a myle a myle or 2. myle the one of the other This will not helpe them any more then a man can be excused who taketh keepeth two wives at once though yet by the one he be not drawen farre away from the other Gods law disalloweth that former no lesse theÌ„ this latter Yea I avow There have ben who haue kept two wives at once honester men and more approved of God theÌ„ any Minister now in England having 2. Churches or Charges lying howsoever And yet I acknowledge to have two wives at once is simply against Gods worde Well yet this will not satisfie some neither will they yeeld that every particular Congregation of Christians should be allowed for a distinct and a proper Church Visible and so to inioy their owne Ecclesiasticall governement within themselves Albeit against it they have no reason vnles perhaps this only If it were so they will say yet will not thereby all things becom perfect Somewhat notwithstanding will bee wanting or amisse oftentimes How then shall this be holpeÌ„ or amended Not by Archbishops or Diocesan Ruling or Lord-Bishops I answer Somewhat wil be amisse alwayes in whatsoever Ecclesiasticall governement vpon earth Nevertheles there is no need nor good vse of these nor of anie Ecclesiasticall Vnwritten Traditions in Christes Churches We believe and know Gods Written word to bee sufficient Speciallie seeing these are so directlie contrarie to the only true forme and nature of Christs Visible Churches in his word as hath bene shewed A greater Ecclesiasticall governement then the Churches wee know none There is nothing without the Church above it viz. Ecclesiasticallie and spirituallie Seeing each Church hath her power and governement as before is declared immediatly from Christ Yet it is true beside the Magistrates honorable assistance verie oft there is great and singular yea sometimes in a sorte necessarie helpe to bee had by Synodes Which are meetings of choyse men out of many Churches and these are lesser or greater as occasion requireth Whose counsailles advises and determinations are most expedient and wholesome alwayes But touching any certaine GovernemeÌ„t by Synodes or necessarie imposing of their Synodall Conclusions Decrees or Canons vppon Churches without their particular free consentes this seemeth to be a meere Humane ordinance I can not finde it either expreslie or by necessarie consequence in any part of Christes Testament Thus writeth heereof the Reverend M. Whitaker * Whitak de Concil pag. 44. Quod omnes atttngit ab omnibus
their assignation from Christ if they be not surcease that presumption * Pag. 339. If the name of Diocesan Bishop were new and lately invented by men the losse thereof were not great yea retayning the name they must be knowen to be of men and not of God Heerevnto accordeth D. Sutcliffe in his booke intituled O. E. against N. D. where he refuting the calling of the Iesuites saith thus “ D. Suâ—â—liffe or O. K. against N. D. pag. 110. It is not enough to say that they have a rule and learning and live orderly but they must have their Office and calling allowed by Christ Iesus if they meane to take vpon them the office of Pastors Teachers and Governors in Christes Church Wherefore either let them shew themselves to have a lawfull calling or let them not thinke much to be thrust out as intruders We doe not find either in the Epistle to the Ephesians chap 4. or the first Epistle to the Corinthians chapt 12. any such extravagant Friars Thus do both these learned men and our no great friends maintaine with vs singularly The Scriptures perfection even in these outward Ecclesiastical matters Yea further considering the Scriptures phrase maner of speach perpetually signifying that there is not only One Visible Church of Christ properly but Many in number in the world nor only one in a Nation or Province but many as before * Pag. 19. 20. we have declared therefore one of these viz. the B. of Wint. is to be well observed how he avoucheth the holy Scriptures perfection also even for the phrase and maner of speach and how vnlawfull a thing he holdeth it to be to vse any †〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 new wordes for religious matters other theÌ„ the very Scripture vseth Thus generally he affirmeth though he applieth it to another point theÌ„ now we speak of Saith he “ The full redemption of man by c. Pag. 41. What I reade in the word of God that I beleeve what I do not reade that I do not beleeve In Gods causes we may not easily leave Gods wordes and with a new kinde of speach make way for a new kind of faith We must learne from God what to beleeve not by correcting or inverting his words teach him how to speake This religious strictnes even touching the words of Scripture is indeed I graunt to be held religiously and perpetually vnderstanding the words to be such as either the Scripture it selfe vseth or may be necessarie consequence be proved and allowed from the very Scripture But now how vniustly are we vsed by them yea how vnchristianly when toward vs they will stand to nothing of all this and yet forsooth all must go still on their side The very Papistes do see and acknowledge this that I say viz. both that these grounds of the Scriptures absolut perfection in all Ecclesiasticall matters whereon we exactly do stand are the true and right principles of the Protestants Religion also that the Diocesan L. Bishops The only true Protestants do and must needes turne away from these principles deny them when they deale with vs and must ioyn plainlie with the Catholikes in their answers if they will maintaine themselves Thus say they when one obiected that * Neâ—ves from Spaine Holland The Puritans as they falsely and maliciouslie call vs would certainly be extinguished if the Queene should live any nomber of yeares Tush saith an other you are deceaved Nay much more possible and likely it is that the Puritan shall overcom the Protestant then the contrarie For that the Puritan buildeth directly vpon the Protestants first grounds in Religion and deduceth thereof cleerely and by ordinary consequence all his conclusions Which the Protestant can not deny by Divinity but only by Policie and humane ordination or by turning “ The Catholikes Supplication An. 1604 hath the like pag. 17. to Catholike answers contrary to their owne principles And it is hard for any man sincerely to be a Protestant but that he will easily passe also on more or lesse to be a Puritan And only they in effect will be against them who are interessed in the other side as Archbishops Bishops Archdeacons Canons Notaries Registers Civill Lawyers and the like for not leesing their Commodities c. This do the very Papistes discerne and confesse Wherewithall they prophesie also as it were if the Protestants Religion be not rooted out that the Puritanes profession will finally prevaile both against the common Protestants and the Catholiks also Which som with vs much fearing and vngraciously striving against when they could not endure * Scottizing Genevating for Discipline pa. 31. our hope of one Darius comming to build vp the Temple of God among vs they made it no lesse then a Treasonable mind in vs when we could not conceale in deed such a hope that we had long agoe of this Princes after-comming Wherefore also they maintayned Seminarie Priestes very Traitors in deed publikly to taxe this our most Christian Noble Darius whom God hath of his singular mercy now sent vnto vs as a Puritan King saying “ Quodli pag. 26 27. The Puritans have Princes none at all vnlesse it be one on their side Their malice was thus mooved because they were not ignoraÌ„t of the Kings most holy religious Confession of his faith made long since and published to the view of the world as no other Kinge in Christendom hath don and altogeather agreeable to our Profession Where * Confess of faith At Edingburg Ann. 1580. he detesteth all Rites Signes and Traditions brought into the Church without or against the word of God Promising and swearing by the great Name of our Lord to continue in the obedience of the doctrine and discipline of the Church that is in Scotland and shall defend the same according to his vocation and power all the dayes of his life Which also of late againe he hath in effect renued and confirmed and that even then when there was doubt how his future subiects in England would entertaine his comming Thus lately writeth our worthy gracious King admonishing his Sonne the noble Prince “ Basilicon dôroâ— pag. 43. The doctrine and discipline preserve in puritie according to Gods word †Pag 7. The whole Scripture is dited by Gods Spirit thereby as by his lively word to instruct and rule the whole Church Militant to the end of the world * Pag. 6. The first part of mans service to his God which is Religion that is the worship of God according to his revealed will it is wholy grounded vpon the Scripture “ Pag. 5. Frame all your affections to follow precisely the rule there set downe * Pag. 15 1â— By Superstition I meane when one restraines himselfe to any other rule in the service of God then is warranted by the word the only true square of Gods service The forme established