Selected quad for the lemma: church_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
church_n doctrine_n rome_n transubstantiation_n 3,441 5 11.1236 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A10399 Tvventy nine lectures of the Church very necessary for the consolation and support of Gods Church, especially in these times: wherein is handled, first, in generall concerning first, the name; secondly, the titles; thirdly, the nature, fourthly, the diuision of the true Church: secondly, of the visible Church ... and lastly, the application of it to all Churches in the world so farre as they are knowne to vs. By that learned and faithfull preacher, Master Iohn Randall, Batchelor of Diuinity, pastor of Saint Andrewes Hubbart in little Eastcheape, London, and sometimes fellow of Lincolne Colledge in Oxford. Published by the coppie perfected and giuen by the author in his life time; carefully preserued and adorned with notes in the margent, by the late faithfull minister of Christ, Master William Holbrooke. Randall, John, 1570-1622.; Holbrooke, William. 1631 (1631) STC 20683; ESTC S115641 423,199 550

There are 54 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

Catholike but properly and rightly it is not so Also there may be a Catholike visible Church that is all the particular parts of the visible Church beeing considered in one common Notion in the minde But it is most truly and properly affirmed of the inuisible Church for that is the Catholike Church which is holy and Apostolike which in the true sense containes onely those that are truly sanctified and built on the foundation of the Apostles doctrine Thus you see what Church to repute Catholike namely that which is generall scattered and dispersed ouer all the world and not any particular Church much lesse may any one particular man be called properly Catholike And therefore it is a vaine brag of the Papists to say that their Church is Catholike It is a particular Church For first it is not generally dispersed ouer all the world and besides there was a time when there were other Christian Churches at Ierusalem and Antioch c. before euer their Church was and therefore there was a time when theirs was not Catholike and so not Catholike now because that which is Catholike is one and the same at all times I say not in one place but those that professe the same true faith that others did are still the Catholike Church A Priest of their owne hath well answered them that so long as they were gouerned by generall Councels they might bee called Catholikes But now seeing they are gouerned by one man namely the Pope it is fitter that they be called of him Papists And so much for the second Vse Vse 3 The third Vse As this teacheth vs what Church to repute Catholike so likewise it teacheth vs what faith is to be reputed Catholike not that which one onely Church doth embrace But then you will say there is but a little Catholike faith there is scarce any one Point Catholike for in what one Point of Religion haue all the faithfull agreed I answer first Yes euery fundamentall Point was alwayes held by al the faithul els they were not faithful if they were cut off from the foundation so that howsoeuer in smaller matters as of Ceremonies and circumstances and such like some differences and some errors were betwixt those that were faithfull yet in the maine substance there was none at all Secondly I say all times are not alike for the meanes and occasions of knowledge of some fundamentall Points in that cleerenesse as they should bee knowne the light of saluation breaking out euery day more cleerely then other Therefore it is sufficient if they all beleeued the same things that we doe so farre as they did and might attaine to the knowledge of them or if they were ignorant of some yet it is sufficient that they followed the rest and did not oppose against that which they knew not but did renounce and repent of their ignorance and this their very repentance of their ignorance is an acknowledgement of such Truths as they were ignorant of By this it appeares plainely that the faith of the Church of Rome is not Catholike because none of those Points wherein they differ from vs haue been vniuersally held no nor spoken by the faithfull as Purgatory Inuocation of Saints Transubstantiation Iustification by workes worshipping of Images and such like But they will say If our faith be not Catholike Obiect then yours is much lesse Catholike being gainsaid generally by the Church for many hundred yeeres I answer First Answ it is gainsaid indeed by many that professed themselues to be of the Church but those that were truly of the Church of Christ held and maintained that in effect which wee doe as we can instance in many particulars of euery Age. For the fi●st three hundred yeeres after Christ wee can proue the Church held the same faith which we doe now And sixe hundred yeeres after Christ when Popery got the vpper hand yet still wee had some that held the same faith from time to time and it was gainsaid by whom Not by those that were truly faithfull but by those that made dissensions in the Church But if this will not satisfie them then let this controuersie be decided by that other adiunct in the Nicen Creede where it is called Catholike and Apostolike for that alone is truly Catholike which is also Apostolike and then it is cleere on our side For if the Apostles beleeued and taught as we doe as we haue and can plainely proue then our faith is Catholike and whatsoeuer Church or Persons since them haue not so taught and beleeued must not bee held Catholike nor Apostolike nor yet their faith and Doctrine Therefore our faith being Apostolike must needs be truly Catholike and howsoeuer though none had beleeued since the Apostles dayes yet we holding the fame faith with them wee must needs haue the true Catholike faith Indeed this is a reason to flesh and blood which they make when they say Where was your Church so many hundred yeeres We answer Wee euer had a Church for we euer had some that opposed them and their courses and stood for the maintenance of this faith which we professe But if neuer any since the Apostles dayes had stood for this faith which we professe yet we say and can proue that the Apostles beleeued and taught the same that we beleeue and teach therefore our faith is truly Catholike and Apostolike And therefore as the Apostles were saued by this faith so shall wee and then what matter is it if all the world had opposed it Vse 4 The fourth Vse This requires thankfulnesse in vs that being Gentiles and so in darknesse the Lord hath vouchsafed vs this light and respited vs to those times of the Gospell wherein the Church is made Cathol●ke Now wee come to the fourth Point that is That the Church is a Communion of Saints whereby two things are affirmed first that the Church that is the faithfull hath a Communion with Christ secondly that they haue a Communion one with another both which wee may see in the. 1. Iohn 1.3 that yee also may haue fellowship with vs and that our fellowship may be also with the Father and with his Sonne Iesus Christ And Rom. 12.5 So we being many are one body in Christ and euery one one anothers members First of the Communion the faithfull haue with Christ their Head which is the fourth Point We wil draw it into an obseruation and that is this namely Doctr. That all the faithfull the whole Church and euery member thereof haue a ioynt and mutuall communion with Iesus Christ he and we are brethren Heb. 2.11 It is a ioynt communion because all together doe participate therein and it is mutuall because all the faithfull partake in it in Christ and Christ with euery one of them The proofes of the Point are these 1. Cor. 1.9 God is faithfull by whom yee are called vnto the fellowship of his Sonne Iesus Christ our Lord. 1. Ioh. 1.3 That yee
They are mingled with the professors of Mahomet which is a most pestilent Religion directly opposite to the Christian faith admitting no colour of Reconciliation but if we beleeue in Christ we must reiect Mahomet and if we beleeue in Mahomet we must reiect Christ And yet the Lord I say hath shewed himselfe a Ruler in the midst of his sorest enemies preseruing his faith and Church euen whe●e Satans throne is as he did the church of of Pergamus Reu. 2.13 secondly as it is a Pestilent Religion directly opposite to Christ so consider that it generally abounds and swarmes ouerspreading a great part of the knowne world and yet in these places the Lord hath reserued a remnant that sticke close vnto him and that follow not the sway of the world as he had 7000. in Israel in the daies of Elias that had not bowed their knees to Baall Rom. 11.4 so hee hath many thousands among them that haue not bowed the knee to Mahomet Thirdly consider the pleasingnesse of that Religion of Mahomet a great inchanter of nature yet still the Lord hath preserued some that chose rather with Moses to suffer aduersity with the children of God then to inioy for a season all the pleasure that euer Mahomet could euer promise or bestow vpon them Surely we must needs acknowledge it to be a heauy iudgement of God that such flourishing Churches in Achaia Macedonia Corinth Ephesus c. should come to that miserable ruine and desolation that Mahomet should raigne amongst them so generally in Christs own Territories and let vs know that it was for their vnprofitablenes in the vse of the Gospell and other meanes of grace which God so freely offered them and let vs consider of it and feare and labour to profit by the Gospell and pray to God that the like befall not vs for our vnprofitablenesse This I say is a great iudgement of God vpon them and yet withall see how in wrath God remembers mercy and in despight of Satan Turke and Mahomet and other instruments hee plucks out some as firebrands out of the fire to be professors of his sauing faith and members of his Church and the gates of hell shall not preuaile against them And so much of the Greeke Churches both improperly and properly so called Now wee come to the Westerne and Latin Churches which are generally of two sorts some acknowledging the Pope their head as the Church of Rome it selfe and sundry others that hold communion with that Church both in Doctrine and in all or most of the corruptions thereof others renouncing his headship and refusing to communicate in the deformities corruptions and abuses of the church of Rome being therefore called the reformed Churches I shall not neede to speake of the former in euery particular looke what is said of the Church of Rome it selfe the same may be applyed to all the rest as is the mother so is the daughter Ezech. 16.44 We will deliuer her state in two obseruation First we will shew what may be said in charity and yet in truth and sound iudgement for the church of Rome Secondly what may be said in zeale and yet in truth too and found iudgement against it For the first the obseruation is this Doctr. 1 That the Church of Rome euen as now it stands may in some sense be iustly reputed and acknowledged a true visible Church consider rightly of the Note First wee doe not absolutely say it is a true Church but for ought wee see it may in some sense be iudged a true visible Church Secondly wee say not a sound Church no that wee flatly deny as vntrue but a true visible Church as a man though hee be wounded fainting and dying yet so long as there is any sparke of life in him hee is a true liuing man not a false though he be an vnsound and dying man Thirdly we make a difference betwixt the Papacy or the Popish fact●on and some better spirits in that Church which no doubt haue a righter beliefe and walke with a righter foote in the profession of the Gospell then the faction doth and these being mingled together with the rest the whole may be called a ●●ue Church for their sakes as was in our Sauiors time the Scribes and Pharises were a faction in the Church pretending Religion and the true worship of God and yet swaying all against the truth and sincerity of it in their courses Mary Simeon Anna Zachary and Elizabeth and a few more with whom our Sauiour ioyned or rather they with him as liuing member of Gods Church and should not the whole be rightly acknowledged to be a true Church because of them Doubtlesse it may and so the church of Rome may rightly be acknowledged to be a true Church in respect of some better spirits that are mixed with them and not in respect of the Papacy and Popish faction alone The reasons to proue them a true Church are these first Reas 1 they haue beene a true Church of God directly affirming euery part of the foundation and they doe not directly deny any part of it yea in outward shew of words they expressely affirme it still and therefore may truely be acknowledged a true Church That they haue beene a true Church of God is plaine enough Rom. 1.8 But yee will say that is no sound arguement that they are so still I answer that yet this is to be considered for it is a great matter that must make a congregation that hath beene a true Church to become a false one and with more charity and loue are such to be censured that are in the state of Apostacy then other congregations holding the same errors that are but onely comming on in the saith and haue not yet beene throughly possest of the true being of a Church The Church of Ephesus was fallen away from her first loue Reuel 2.5 And the Church of Sardy had a name that she loued and yet was deade Reu. 3 1. And yet God calls them true Churches still A Church in Apostacy that is falling not vtterly fallen is still a true though an vnsound and dying Church hauing been a true Church and not directly ouerthrowing the foundation so long it may be still intituled a true Church well then the church of Rome hauing bin a true church it must appeare that they in outward shew at least affirme the whole foundation and euery part thereof but this they doe they affirme the whole foundation at least in outward shew and sound of words they professe the same Scriptures and the same Creed that we do yea they professe in words the very same foundation before spoken of in the very same termes in effect Looke into the Rhemists Testament you shall see that vpon those places 1 Tim. 2.5 1 Iohn 1.7 they acknowledge Iesus Christ to be the onely Sauiour of the world and therfore they may in some sense be rightly acknowledged
corrupt too if either we respect to whom they are made to Saints and not to God alone or for whom for the dead and not for the liuing onely or how not with vnderstanding for they are in an vnknowne tongue specially their publike prayers and so as good haue no prayers at all I haue entred a foule sinke and I must needs confesse that I can finde no bottome yet if this be not enough adde heereto these aggrauating circumstances these things which were somewhat in a more tolerable manner among them before be now much worse first by the Councell of Trent for whereas before that Councell they were but priuate opinions of some men now they are the Doctrine of the whole Church and are obtruded on all professors as necessary to saluation and they condemne all that are not of their iudgement yea there is now in them a deadly hatred against the contrary truth and the professors thereof and persecutions by fire and Sword Secondly the Iesuits the Popes chiefe Agents haue and doe vse dayly all cunning deuises and malicious practises to stretch these points to the furthest straine that so they may tyrannize in euery mans conscience And also to curse and to defy all nations and persons that will not drinke of this poysonous cup Thirdly it is too apparent that they doe willingly blind themselues and for gaine fauour feare ambition and the like they doe persist in these courses against their owne consciences that condemne these things in them for as it cannot be thought that so many grosse conceipts should be swallowed downe by men of excellent gifts and vnderstanding but that they must strayne at them so the experience of many that are of that Religion the sincerest and the soberest that haue beene most ledde by Scripture and haue beene freest from faction that haue renounced and disclaimed many of these abuses and freely confessed many contrary truthes that we hould makes it plaine that among so many at least some are otherwise perswaded then they pretend yea some haue confessed so much and yet still goe on in their old courses Secondly they are foulely corrupted in their ordinary manners I know euery Church failes specially in manners exceedingly but the corruptions in manners that are in the Church of Rome are extraordinary and in a manner heathenish secondly they are such as follow vpon their Doctrine and which themselues professe to be lawfull whereas it is not so with other Churches they doe not maintaine and professe their corruptions of manners to be lawfull the Church of Rome doth take a taste of these in their equiuocation and mentall reseruation ciuill honesty abhors and condemnes these they vse and iustifie the vse of them breaking faith and promise Nature denies it they affirme and defend it that with Heretiques faith is not to be kept disobedience to superiors and maintaining others therein with them is a familiar practise whoredome is but a small sinne and the stewes a tolerable euill treasons and murthers of Kings Princes and whole states are they sinnes with them No they are meritorious workes the actors of the mare canonized for Saints Let them or any for them shew me their matches in the world bee they Turkes Iewes or Pagans or any other state that is iustly chargeable with the defence and practise of so many villanies and then I will confesse I haue dealt iniuriously with them but if they can shew me none such let them confesse that whereas many states and kingdomes and Churches haue done wickedly yet the Church of Rome doth surmount them all and let them vaile bonnet and throw away their pride state malice wilfulnes and their diuelish practises and let them humble themselues and repent in sackcloth and ashes that if it be possible their horrible euils may be forgiuen them I omit to speake of those exquisite cruelties practised vpon the poore Indians euen by the Iesuits themselues as well as by the Spaniards Oh miserable state what a bloody gouernment and a bloody Religion too whereby they haue made the very name of Christian Religion to bee abhorred euen amongst the Heathen So much for the first branch of the obseruation that the Church of Rome is exceedingly vnsound and polluted with many foule errors c. Now let vs come to the second Branch of it which is the inference of the former that therefore it is not lawfull nor safe to communicate with her It is true that there is no Church but hath some vnsoundnesse in it eyther in Doctrine or in manners or both as there is no body but hath some infirmities and diseases in it But this Church of Rome is so vnsound that take it as it is this a day maintained by the Popish faction and there is no communion to bee had with them in their Doctrine and manners without certaine danger to their owne soules Wee will proceed in the proofe hereof according to the grounds before mentioned their Doctrine and their practise being both vnsound and corrupt we may communicate with them in neyther first Gods commandement shewes it for their Doctrine being otherwise then that which Paul taught as befere is shewed they must be held accursed Gal. 1.8 9. and shall we communicate with such in matters of God and of Saluation as wee must hold accursed as enemies thereto And in the 1 Tim. 6.3 5. there is an expresse separation inioyned If any teach otherwise and consent●th not to the wholsome words of our Lord Iesus Christ from such separate thy selfe Secondly they are wilfull in their errors and therefore are to bee shaken ●ff Titus 3.10.11 Reiect him that is an Heretique after once or twice admonition c. Thirdly their sinne being idolatrous therefore they and it are to bee fled from 1 Cor 10.14 slye from idolatry 1 Iohn 5.21 keepe your selues from Idols yea the place of their idolatrous worship is not to be resorted to Hosea 4.15 though Israel play the harlot yet let not Iudah sinne Come not ye to Gilgal neyther goe ye vp to Bethauen c. Nay those that are there must come forth from amongst them and touch none of their vncleane things Esay 48.20 and 52.11 Ier. 51.8 Goe ye out of Babel c and that not only out of the litterall Babel in the deliuerance but also out of the mysticall Babel the very subiect now in hand and that with a feareful d●nunciation of Iudgement Reuel 18.4 Goe out of her my people that ye be not partakers of her sins ●● that ye receiue not of her plagues fourthly the wickedns of their liues being very great we are to withdraw our selues from them 2 Thes 3.6 which though it be not of it selfe sufficient to inforce a separation from 2 whole Church for there is more required to the forsaking of a whole Church then of some priuate men yet being added to the former it makes our separation from them very warrantable secondly the practise of the faithfull proues
vnto vs the sufficiency Scrip● Thirdly such as forbid any addition to or detraction from the Scripture Fourthly such as condemne all Doctrine taught either without or besides the Scripture Rhemists 15 Acts ● The Papists say the church may coyne new articles of faith What authority the Church hath about articles of Faith Hyper 6● Hyper 54. Secondly that the Church make any booke to bee Canonicall Scripture Which the Papists hould this confuted by diuers reasons Thirdly that the Church hath power to deuise adde diminish or alter any part of Gods worship which the Church of Rome hath done prooued by diuerse things Fourthly concerning customes The fathers iudgement concerning customes Fifthly concerning traditions How and in what sense tradition is to bee receiued Answers to the Popish tenent concerning tradititions Answer 1. Ob. Answer wherin is shewed that the Baptisme of Infants the change of the Sabbath and that so many bookes are Canonicall Scripture and are not had by tradition but proued by good consequence out of the Scripture Answ 2. Answ 3. Their proofe out of 2 Thes 2.15 Answe Answ 4. The scripture the so onely rule of saith acknowledged to bee by all Churches generally Secondly the Scripture is the onely tryall of euery truth How euery matter of substance is to be found in the Scripture Concerning Churches power in matters of circumstance and they are of two sortes one of miracles and what is to be helde concerning the same Secondly of discipline and this is of two sorts either matter of d●scipline which is spoken of before or secondly matter of ceremonies and what the church hath power to doe therein The bounds the Church is to keepe in ordaining matters of ceremony 1. 2. Vse 2. 1. The ninth generall point concerning the Church viz. the application of all that hath bin spoken to all visible Churches in christendome that I know of The generall diuision of all churches that haue beene or are since our Sauiours time into Easterne and Westērne and this according to their sc●tuation Secondly according to their language and so some be greek and some latin Churches VVhether Schismaticall or hereticall Churches may be accounted true visible Churches What a Schismatike church is Hereticall Churches First what they are and when any particular man is to be reputed an Heretike Heresies of 2. sorts first such as ouerthrow the foundation What this fundation is Resol Those that deny directly this foundation or any part thereof cease to bee Christians and are no more visible Churcher The Greeke Churches be here spoken of and what weare to thinke of them 1. of the Greeke Churches generally disperse in most at the Easterne parts of the world Ortelius 100. Ortelius 97. 98. 108. Secondly the Greeke Churches which are more particularly and properly so called and what we are to hold of them deliuered in an obseruation Doct. The mayne error of the Greeke Churches The Greeke Churches better then the Popish-Church The Papists vnchatarible censuring the Greeke Churches answered The Greeke Churches not gu●lty of Schisme from Rome The Greeke Churches neuer subiect to the Romane Church One note of the Church as the Papists account it is found in the Greeke Church viz succession of Bishops The goodnes of God in perseruing of his Churches seene in the Greeke Churches vnder the Turke The miseries of the Greeke Church vnder the Turke in many particulars in regard of their persecutions in regard of the Religion of the Turks The Religion of the Turks 1. a pestilent Religion directly opposite to Christ 2. It ouerspreadeth a great part of the knowne world 3. It is a pleasing Religion For what it was that the Lord suffered such famous Churches to come to ruine applied to vs. The Western churches and first of those that acknowledge the Pope their head as the Church of Rome and those that hold with her and what ma● be said and held of her deliuered in two obseruations The church of Rome as now it standeth may in some sense be reputed a true visible Church A differen●e betweene the papacy or the pop●sh ●action and some better spirits amongst them in regard of whom the whole may be called a true Church The popish church doth not directly deny any part of the fundation but in outward shew of words affirme it The church of Rome hath beene a true Church The Papists by their Doctrine of iustification by workes must ouerthrow the foundation they by this ouer throw Christ not directly but by consequence Quest Answ It is not so great a sin to deny Christ directly as by consequence yet hee that doth this deserueth to be cut off from Gods mercy The Church of Rome compared with the Church of Israel 2. with the Church of the Iewes in our Sauiours times With the Church of Galatia Circumcision doth as neerely by consequence cut off from Christ as iustification by workes with the of Church Sardis Baptisme a true Sacrament in Rome and rightly administred there for the substance of it Those that were Baptised in the Church of Rome were lawfully Baptised Ob 1. Answ Ob. 2. Answ The ordinati of our Ministers from the Church of Rome and yet a lawfull ordination The question where the Church was before Luthers time answered The inconuenience preuented by acknowledging that the Church of Rome may be accounted a true Church What to thinke of our fathers that liued in the Popish Church They of the Popish Chu●ch are to ●e ●ud●ed rather mis-beleeuers then vnbeleeuers The 2. Obseruation wherein is further delired what may be sayd and held further of the church of Rome The Church of Rome so corrupt that it is not lawfull to ioyne with her This that is spoken against thee is in respect of the Pope and Popish factors Corruption of the Church of Rome reduced to 2. sorts 1. matter of Doctrine reduced to 1. part of the Doctrine Foure heads 1 concerning Scriptures And their error therein Three things 1 denying the sufficiency of the Scripture 2 Per●erting the truth of the Scripture 3 Disanulling the author●ty and credit of the Scripture many wayes 1 teaching the apochrypha●l bookes to be canonicall Scripture Secondly equalling traditions of men with the written word of God Thirdly preferring the authority of the Church aboue the Scripture Two heads wherein they orre in matter of Doctrine viz concerning the direct offices of the Mediator The Papists say there bee many mediators betwixt God and man The distinction of mediators of intercession and redemption answered Two things in a Mediator To be mediator of intercession is peculiar to Christ as well as to be mediator of redemption The popish sh●ft off praying to the Saints not as helpers but as intercessor Answered The popish reason for praying to the Saints departed drawn from our desi●ing the Saints on earth to pray for vs Answered The third head wherein the church of Rome erreth in doctrine and that is concerning Images The church of Rome an abominable whore deseruing
to be diuorced and cut off as a filthy Strumpet The Popish plea for Images that they doe not worship the Image but God in and by the Image Answdred The heathen made images of the true God The resemb●ing of the inuisible God in any made Image is flat Idolatry The Papists doe worship the Image The Popish distinction giuing the lesser honor to the Image the greater to God Answered Papists giue the greater worship to the bread in the Sacrament to the wooden crosse to the Image of God and Christ The fourth head of the errors of the church of Rome in Doctrine viz. concerning Iustification The difference betweene the Papists saying we are iustified by grace and the Apostles saying so The second thing wherein the church of Rome erreth viz. in ma●ter of practice and this is twofold first in the carriage of Gods worship and this is shewed first in the generall Gods worship as it is carried by the popish faction is fitter for man yea for an Idoll then for the true and eu●●l●uing God First it is a ca●●all seruice ●ull of ●ites and Ceremonies And most agreeable to flesh and blood The Papists giue but the blood of the body for the sinne of the soule Naturall men had rather be scourged then vndertake the spirituall combate Secondly they haue a wil-worship for the most part of their owne deuising Thirdly they haue policy in their Religion for the maintenance of their outward state Secondly in the particular parts of it First in respect of the Word first it is obscured Secondly little or seldome preached amongst the Papists The people kept from the Word amōgst the Papists Secondly in respect of the Sacraments First in respect of the number of them and so those that Christ neuer ordained Secondly in respect of those which Christ did ordaine they are full of abominations as first Baptisme Secondly in the Lords supper in the very so● and hea●● Thirdly in respect of their Discipline The Papists haue scarce any thing sound in their Discipline Fourthly in respect of their prayers they are corrupt first in that they are made to Saints and not to God alone secondly in that they are made in an vnknowne tongue Things are farre worse now in the popish church in diuers respects The second thing wherin the Church of Rome erres in matters of practise viz. in matter of manners The corruptions of the Church of Rome in matter of manners are in a manner heathnish and such as they maintaine to be lawfull Particular errors of the Papists maintained 1. equiuocation and mentall reseruation 2 disobedience to superiors 3. treasons and murthers of Kings and Princes No people or state in the world matcheth the Church of Rome with the defence and practise of so many villanies as she doth defend and practise Cruelties exercised by the Iesuits vpon the Indians The second branche of the Doctrine No communion to bee had with the Church of Rome without certaine danger of our soules Vses of both branches together No reconciliation to bee dreamed on betwixt Papists and vs. They will not yeeld to vs we must not yeeld to them Our separation from the Church of Rome iustified No Schisme to separate from the Church of Rome Except 1. Answ 1 Except 2. Answ What we are to thinke of such a● continule in the Church of Rome The second part of the distribution of the Westerne churches viz the Reformed Churches 1 Why they be called Reformed Churchches First of the causes of Reformation Secondly of the manner of reformation and herein 5. things The reason why these churches are called Protestant Churches These reformed churches are more or lesse reformed Churches accounted more reformed Churches accounted lesse reformed and therrein first of the Lutheran churches and herein of 3. things concerning them First of their difference in opinion The second thing concerning the Lutheran churches viz. the tumul●s and vnnaturall contentions raised betwixt vs and them The Lutherans more bitter against vs then against the Papists And heerein first what exceptions the Papists take against vs for them Answered diuersly Secōdly what vses we are to make of these differences The third thing concerning the Lutheran churches is what wee are to esteeme of them The second sort of Churches accounted reformed viz. our owne Church The Church of England if a true and sound Church too in some good measure The whole company of Professors in England make one nationall Church And this speech iustified by 3 reasons It is a true Church Reasons to proue it to be a sound visible Church in some good measure The Separatists exceptions Except 1● Answ Except 2. Answ Aynsw 11. Aynsw 25.26 Except 1 Answ Except 2. Exept 3. Ob Answ Vse 1. for instruction diuersly We may safely communicate ioyne with the Church of England Motiues to moue to ioyne with our Church 2 things taught in this vse viz. Thankfulnes in two respects Third thing in this vse Second vse of reproofe Wherein two sorts of Aduersaries are reprooued 3. the Papists Our Church and religion is warranted against the Papists by prouing that our reli●ion is better then the religion of the Church of Rome which is proued by the call●ng out of six or seuen of the principall differences betweene them and vs. weighed by foure ballances The points which are weighed and wherby the triall is made are 1. weighed in the first ballance viz. Gods glory The second Instance weighed by the first Ballance The third Instance weighed by the first ballance The fourth Instance weighed by the same ballance The fifth Instance ballanced by the same rule The sixth instance tryed by the same rule The last instance tryed by the same rule The same things tryed in the second ballance viz. Gods Word The first instance tryed by the second rule The second instance tryed by the second rule The third instance tryed by the second rule The fourth instance tryed by the second ●ule The fift instance tryed by the second rule The sixth instance tryed by second ●rule The seuenth Instance tried by the second rule The same things tried in the third bal● The fift instance tryed by the third rule The sixt instance tryed by the third rule The 7. instance tryed by the third rule The same things tryed by the fourth rule viz. comfort of conscience The first instance tryed by the fourth rule The second instance tryed by the fourth rule The third instance tryed by the fourth rule The fourth instance tryed by the fourth rule The fifth Instance tryed in the fourth rule The sixth instance tryed by the fourth rule The seuenth Instance tried by the fourth rule Secondly this vse is for reproofe of separatists their exceptions briefly answered 1. Except Your Church hath a false constitution Answ both consequence and antecedent be false What constitution signifieth The second exception that wee haue a false gouernment and therfore a false Church Answ both consequence and antecedent be false The third exception gainst our Seruice that wee haue a false Seruice Answ Fourthly against our stinted praie●s answered The fift exception against our Ministery that wee haue a false Ministery answered The sixth exception that wee haue a false people answered
administration of the World he doth it respectiuely to his Church for the good and benefit of his chosen There being then such a neere coniunction betwixt God and the Church and the Church carrying the precedency aboue all other of Gods works that are who seeth not that the doctrine concerning the Church doth very closely depend vpon the Doctrine concerning God and therefore hauing been informed and instructed in the Doctrine concerning God it followes naturally that we now be instructed in the Doctrine concerning the Church Secondly the order is as naturall in respect of Christ in the second question for there is a more immediate and farre neerer communion betwixt the Church and Christ in particular then betwixt the Church and God in generall for Christ is the King the Church is the Subiect Christ is the purchaser the Church his possession he is the Shepheard they his Sheepe he is the Vine they the Branches he is the Head they his Body hee is their Husband and they are his Spouse and therefore except we will dis-sunder these whom God hath ioyned most neerely together after we haue spoken of Christ it followes next and immediatly that wee speake of his Church You heard in the second question that Christ was incarnate and that hee was a fit Mediatour betwixt God and Man Now in this third question we are to heare who they are for whom he was incarnate and for whose sake he doth accomplish this work of Mediation and those are the Church And therefore in respect of the Doctrine of Christ handled in the second question it followes naturally that now in this third question we doe handle the Doctrine of the Church Thirdly in respect of all the three questions compared and laid together the order is very naturall ioyne them all together and they sweetly and orderly expresse the summe of all Religion God doth saue his Church by Iesus Christ God is the Author that saues Christ is the Instrument or meanes by whom hee saues the Church is the subiect or matter to be saued God purposed to saue his Church but not without the mediation of Christ Christ came to saue the Church but not without warrant frō God the Church is saued but not without God nor without Christ but by God in Christ according to that in 2. Cor. 5.9 God was in Christ reconciling the world to himselfe where God is set downe in the first place Christ in the second and in the third the reconciled world that is the Church So you see the first branch of the Introduction the order of the questions in themselues and so our order to bee very naturall The second branch is this that the matter of the question is of great weight and importance For first the right knowledge and vnderstanding of the true Church is very profitable and of necessary vse and secondly the ignorance or mistaking of it is exceeding dangerous and hurtfull First the knowledge and vnderstanding of it is very profitable and of necessary vse and that in many respects first for direction secondly for confirmation thirdly for confutation and fourthly for consolation And first for direction for on the one side generally most men are endued with this principle that they ought to ioyne themselues to the true Church or else they can haue no saluation And on the other side generally all Heretikes and Schismatikes doe challenge to themselues the name of the Church as if they were the true Church and none else What is to be done in this vncertainty Wee must search the Word of God first learne there what the true Church of God is and that is the onely right Assembly that safely and boldly thou mayst ioyne thy selfe vnto Therefore for direction this question is very profitable Secondly for the confirmation of our faith for howsoeuer the Word and the Spirit are the best and most sufficient witnesses that the Faith wee embrace is the true sauing Faith yet our weakenesse requires also some outward witnesse to testifie the same vnto vs the best and onely witnesse in this kind is the true Church which is the Pillar of Truth Therfore we must first know what this true Church is and then finding that it doth embrace the same Faith with vs and we the same with it we are thereby certainely assured that we are in the right Faith Thirdly the knowledge of the true Church is profitable and necessary for the confuting of Aduersaries for the Papists on the one side and the Brownists on the other doe lay hard against vs that either we are no Church or at least a false Church therefore it is most necessary for vs to know what the true Church is that so we may discerne them and to iustifie our owne Church and our standing in it against all the oppositions Fourthly it is necessary for consolation and comfort of conscience for what greater comfort to a Christian soule then to know that it rests in the bosome of Gods owne Church I must first therefore know what this Church is before euer I can attaine to any sound comfort in this Case Therefore in these respects the question is very profitable and of great waight and importance Secondly the ignorance and mistaking of the true Church is exceeding dangerous and hurtfull for first many men are carelesse and wretchlesse and will not ioyne to any Church at all aske them the cause they wil answer First that there is so much difference about the Church that they know not what to make of it Secondly others would faine ioyne to the true Church but they dare not ioyne to this or that particular Church because they know not which or what is the true Church Thirdly others mistake the false Church for the true and so ioyne to the false in stead of the true and so runne headlong from God to the Diuell from truth and saluation to errour and condemnation I dare say that the very name of the Church misvnderstood hath been one of the greatest snares that euer the Diuell vsed whereby to entangle men in Popery and this one Allegation hath made more to become Papists and to continue Papists then any ten of their best Allegations and pretences besides Lastly those that doe ioyne themselues to the true Church are doubtfull of their standing whether they be in the right or not and not knowing the true Church are easily carried away to another Church that is worse or to a false Church So yee see how dangerous it is to mistake or not to know the true Church wee haue lamentable experience of these things amongst vs in these dayes some turne Papists some Brownists some become of no Religion at all euen for this that the true Church is either not knowne or not rightly vnderstood of them yea the best and most tender Consciences amongst vs are somewhat vncertaine and fearefull of their standing because they are not rightly acquainted with this
refuse to come No let vs be thankefull for it it is a pretious Iewell and let vs take heed we doe not relinquish our Calling let vs not looke backe for no man that putteth his hand to the Plough and looketh backe is fit for the Kingdome of God Vse 4 Fourthly by this we may know whether wee are of the Church of God or no. Euery one that liues in the Church pretends to be of the Church but here is the tryall Art thou called Yes Why then thou art of the Church in some sense so farre as thou art called so farre thou art of the Church If thou hast onely an outward calling thou art but an outward member but if thou haue an inward and effectuall calling then thou art a true and liuing member of it But you will say how shall I know whether I haue this effectuall calling or not I answer It is easie to know it doest thou finde Gods Spirit worke effectually in thee to cause thee to leaue thy sins to stirre thee vp to repentance and to faith and to doe good workes As thou hast a new name so hast thou by this calling a new heart and a new life and new motions and affections new courses If thou hast then thy calling is effectual else it is but a dreame The surest marke of all is thy Conscience Doth that check thee for euery knowne sinne and infirmitie And doest thou labour in truth to obey it and renounce and ouercome that sinne thy Conscience checks thee for This is the surest mark of an effectuall Calling For when the Spirit hath thus quickned and purged thee and doth instruct thee and deale effectually with thy Conscience and frames thee to obedience to it here is a sure marke of an effectuall calling If we flee the Corruptions that are in the world through lust and if we giue our selues diligently to a course of grace and sanctification if we ioyne with our vertue faith c. this makes our calling sure and our Election too 2. Pet. 1.5 9 10. And if we doe these things we shall neuer fall Vse 5 The last vse is matter of reproofe or confutation of such as deny vs and the Church wherein wee liue to be a true Church We haue a true calling and that from God to sanctification by the Word and Sacraments and by the Spirit therefore we are a true Church This they cannot deny Ainsworth and others amongst themselues confesse that they had their Calling here yea their effectuall Calling and they will not say but theirs is a true Calling therefore so is ours and so our Church a true Church Yea but say they this calling is extraordinary I answer What is extraordinary in it The meanes are ordinary as the Word preached read and conferred on the Sacraments administred and Prayers offered vp to God It is extraordinary when wee are called without meanes or by rare and strange meanes but the meanes here are ordinary therefore the calling is so too Besides many thousands in our Church haue a true and effectuall Calling The meanes is dailie powerfull through Gods mercy either to winne or to confirme not a few but many thousands therefore the commonnesse of it proues it to be ordinary Yea but say they It is so in the Church of Rome too many are called there and yet that is no true Church It is strange that they will blind themselues so wilfully and not discerne betwixt things that so notoriously differ For first in the Church of Rome few or none are conuerted here in our Church are many Secondly they haue onely a generall call to a confused notice of God wee to the particular and precise knowledge of every Article and Point of Religion needfull to saluation Thirdly they haue not the meanes the Word truly preached nor read in a knowne Tongue wee haue Therefore it is strange that they should once open their mouthes to make such an absurd comparison The second Lecture of the Church NOw in the second place wee are to speake of the titles giuen to the Church there is no great difference betwixt the name and the title of a thing for sometime the name is called the title and the title the name yet as it is with persons of great place and qualitie they haue their names and their titles too as Paul an Apostle of Iesus Christ c. Paul there is his name an Apostle c. there is his title and so it is generally with all things of any great note they haue their names whereby they are ordinarily called and their titles whereby some extraordinary or speciall matter is attributed to them and affirmed of them So in the matter in hand concerning the Saints or company of the faithfull the name Church doth propound them barely or simply to our vnderstanding The titles raise vs vp to the consideration of some further matter in the nature and state of the Church then the name doth import and therefore hauing spoken of the name now we are to speake of the titles of the Church There are many worthy and goodly titles ascribed to the Church as it is said Psalm 87.3 Goodly and glorious things are spoken of thee Oh Citie of God Many as being much variety of matter to be considered in the estate of the Church and glorious as euery title commending the grace beauty and glory of the Church after a speciall manner And the Lord doth adorne her with these many glorious titles for many causes As first to giue vs a more full and perfit view of the whole Doctrine concerning the Church no one title is able to expresse all the particulars that concerne the Church therefore the Lord vseth many that what is wanting in some may be supplied by the rest Secondly that he might expresse and set forth the greatnesse of his loue to his Church which being infinite and extended in many excellent kinds requires many and glorious titles to expresse it by It is true that none indeed though neuer so many and glorious can expresse it according to the measure of his loue but these that wee haue doe fully expresse it according to the measure of our capacity so farre as we are able and as it is fit for vs to vnderstand Thirdly because by these many glorious titles giuen to the Church the Lord would inamour vs with her loue and allure vs to her communion that wee may the more willingly and chearefully be associated and gathered vnto her and the more sweetly and comfortably repose our selues in her bosome when wee heare so many and so glorious things spoken of her I cannot relate much lesse handle all the titles affirmed of the Church only I will reduce them to certaine heads and cull forth the choise of them out of each Testament They are of two sorts First some are absolute that concerne the Church simply in it selfe Secondly some are not so absolute but respectiue which concerne the Church as i●
shall be made as white as snow Secondly here is comfort against their wants and defects and infirmities thou canst not pray nor performe any other good duty as thou oughtest yea but thou art a member of that blessed and glorious Church whereof Christ Iesus is the Head and therefore all thy wants and infirmities are couered and supplied by the perfection of Christ Thirdly here is comfort against temptation and against the Diuell and all his power for thou art a member of the true Church which is like to Mount Sion that cannot be remoued but shall stand fast for euer and euer the Gates of Hell nor all the power of the Diuell shall euer preuaile against thee the Lord for his owne glory which he hath set vpon vs will neuer see vs ouerthrowne Lastly here is comfort for vs against all the reproches of men that howsoeuer wee be as the off-scowring of the world in their vniust censures yet in Gods sight who iudgeth according to the truth wee are beautifull and glorious And therefore let this suffice to giue vs content against all the scoffes and nick-names in the world If wee bee so blessed and beautifull in Gods eyes what neede wee care though wee bee contemned in the world The fifth Vse is matter of terrour to the world that persecute Vse 5 and oppose themselues against Gods Church they know not who it is they make their force against it is euen against God and therefore they shall neuer preuaile and against the people of God the most glorious and blessed company that are And therefore first they may bee dismaied for they rush against a Rocke and kicke against the prick Act. 9. they shall neuer haue good successe yea secondly they shall be punished with the fierce and full vengeance and wrath of God because they resist the Lord and oppose his glorious and annointed Ones Vse 6 The sixth and last Vse is to reproue the peruerse opinion of the world that are blind and can see no grace nor beauty in the Church like vnto the wicked Iewes that would not see any forme or beauty in Christ Isai 53. they looke onely on the outward man and indeed there is nothing to bee seene but deformity and misery but if they could looke within there is perfect glory Yea but say they this is but your words wee can see no such glory in the Church but we can see a great deale of sinne and misery among you why doe you then face it out thus I answer we must vnderstand it with these limitations First it cannot bee discerned but with a spirituall eye and therefore the world cannot see it because they want this eye to discerne it withall Secondly it is vnderstood of the Church as they are considered in their Head Christ and not as they are considered by themselues If they consider the Church thus they shall perceiue perfect glory Christ himselfe being perfectly glorious and he couers and supplies our wants and deformities and presents vs as glorious to God his Father Thirdly it is so rather in our desires and Gods account then in actuall possession Fourthly we haue not th●s glory and blessednesse here but onely in the beginnings of it we haue some grace and some beauty and some glory here but it is to be perfected in heauen when there shall be a new Ierusalem Reuel 21.2 and then Christ shall present vs a glorious Body vnto God his Father without spot or wrinckle Ephes 5.27 which because some haue attained to already and the rest shall surely obtaine hereafter and haue some beginnings of it here already it may therefore bee iustly said in respect of some of her parts now and of all hereafter Thou art all faire my Loue and there is no spot in thee Thus you see how beautifull the Church is and blessed and glorious though the world be blind and can see no such thing in her And so much concerning the second generall Point propounded to be handled in the Doctrine of the Church The third Lecture of the Church THe third generall Point propounded to bee handled in the Doctrine of the Church is the Nature of the Church for so the order of teaching requires that when once wee doe know the name of a thing what it is called and the titles that it is graced withall then it followes that wee should search out the nature of the thing that is thus called and thus intituled For the names and titles of things may and are oft-times imparted to others But the nature of euery thing is proper to it selfe and cannot bee communicated to any thing else And therefore howsoeuer the name and titles set it forth vnto vs and make vs esteeme of it yet the nature will more fully expresse it and make vs the highlier to esteeme of it The name bearing diuers significations in ordinary method ought to bee diuided first and defined after But because the whole nature of the thing may bee aptly enough comprehended in one generall description and because the diuision hath a more neere dependance with that which followes making a ready steppe and passage thereunto we will first define therefore the nature of the Church and then proceede in the next place according to our order set downe to diuide it into seuerall kinds and branches The nature of the Church is thus described The Church of God in the true generall nature thereof is the whole company of Gods chosen both in heauen and earth where they are described by three things First by the efficient cause of their being of the Church Gods electing or chusing them Secondly by their number the whole Company Thirdly by the places where they are in heauen in earth First by the efficient cause of their being of the Church for the principall reason why any man is a true member of the true Church is because God hath chosen him to it First to saluation and glory as the end secondly and consequently to be of the Church as the means to the end Therfore the Church ofttimes is called Gods chosen Psal 33.12 Euen the people whom he hath chosen for his inheritance And in Psal 132.13 The Lord hath chosen Sion that is his Church And Rom. 8.33 The Apostle speaking of the Church calls them by that expresse name Gods chosen And hence it is that the Faith of Gods Church is called the Faith of Gods chosen Titus 1.1 And therefore they are called The first borne whose names are written in heauen Heb. 12.23 Which what is it else but to bee written in the Booke of life That is to be Gods chosen It is true that it is much more agreeable to the name of the Church to bee defined by their Calling rather then by their Choosing as in the first Lecture because they are a Company called But yet it is more agreeable to the right nature of the Church to be defined by their choosing rather then by their Calling and that
for these Reasons first many of the Church are chosen that are not yet called as Paul an Elect vessell before his conuersion and yet not called and so all the Elect before their conuersion nay many are chosen that shall neuer be called as the Angels which belong to the Church too and are a part of it And therefore the Church in the nature of it is to be described by their choosing and not by their Calling Secondly many are Called that are not chosen so saith our Sauiour and therefore if we should describe them by their Calling we should make such to be of the nature of the true Church which are not chosen and so are no true members of Christ nor shall euer enter into the heauenly Ierusalem Thirdly those which are chosen are called too their Election and chusing is the cause of their Calling and not their Calling the cause of their chusing Rom 8.30 whom he predestinated them also hee called Therefore in these respects it is fittest and most agreeable to the nature of the Church to be described by their election rather then by their Calling And so much of the first part of the Description namely the efficient Cause of their being The second thing they are described by is their number the whole company c. Which wee mus● vnderstand thus First that all that are of the Church are God chosen and none else and that all that are chosen are of the Church none excluded as who should say the whole company of Gods chosen all these and none but these Here may be an exception made for you will say Are the elect of the Church before they are Called Yes sure in the purpose and account of God though they bee not so in their owne account nor in the account of th● World though they be not as yet actually assembled to the Church yet they are in the way and first or last they shall certainely haue an effectuall Calling whereby they shall bee made actually of the Church both in faith and in their owne knowledge and account And secondly we must vnderstand that all those together make vp one Church the whole Company of God Chose●●s his Church as they are considered all together as members of one body and incorporated into one societie or Company and not as they are members apart And also so ●ll tog●●her as that all the chosen of all times and places and kinds make vp one only Church So much of the second part the number they are described by The third thing they are described by is the places where they are in heauen and in earth And so we do first fetch in all Gods Saints whether liuing or departed whether fighting on earth or triumphing in heauen As also secondly the Angels that haue kept their habitation in heauen are all comprehended together as so many seuerall parts of the Church to make vp the whole Body So yee haue the particular heads of the Description expounded and inlarged the whole company of Gods chosen in heauen and in earth Now that the holy Angels are parts of the true Church because yee shall not thinke that it is a deuise of mine owne braine yee shall see that the Apostle vseth the same words Eph. 1.10 That in the fulnesse of time he might gather together in one all things both which are in heauen and which are in earth And Eph. 3.15 Of whom is named the whole family both in heauen and in earth And Col. 1.20 To reconcile to himself through him I say all things which are in heauen and which are in earth All which places must be vnderstood not onely of the Saints departed that rest in heauen but also with reference to the holy Angels in heauen that fell not who hauing a benefit by Christ the mediator as well as wee are therefore to be seated with vs in the society and body of the Church Doctr. Now to make this matter more plaine I will draw it into an obseruation and that is this Namely That the holy Angels that kept their first estate are parts and members of the true Church as well as we are The Scripture is plaine for this First in expresse wordes secondly by necessary consequence First by expresse words Heb. 12.22 23. But ye are come to Mount Sion c. and to the innumerable company of Angels Where the Apostle speaking of the Church takes the holy Angels as Limmes of that Body and members of that Company And Reuel 19.10 The Angell tels Iohn I am thy fellow Seruant one of thy Brethren I haue the testimony of Iesus the Spirit of Prophesie I am thy fellow Seruant as who should say A fellow of the same House and Family with vs that is the Church A Brother as hauing the same Father God and the same Mother the heauenly Ierusalem that is the Church hauing the testimony of Iesus that is communicating in the same gifts and graces of the Spirit as the Spirit of Prophesie which is peculiar to the Church onely as 1. Cor. 12. So wee see by expresse Scripture that they are members as well as wee Secondly by necessary deduction and consequence First the Angels are elect 1. Tim. 5.21 and therefore they are parts of the Church Secondly Christ is their Head Col. 2.10 yee are complete in him that is in Christ who is the head of all principalities and Powers therefore they must be parts of his Body Which is his Church Thirdly the Angels peepe and prie into the misteries of our redemption by Iesus Christ 1. Pet. 1.12 therefore except we will make them busi-bodies to prie and meddle with that which they haue not to doe in which is vtterly against their wisedome and vprightnesse they must needes be parts and members of the true Church and so much of the Proofes The Reasons are these First the Church is the most excellent Reas 1 and glorious and blessed Assembly that is as wee haue shewed before the Angels therefore that excell in strength and beautie and glorie and absolute happinesse must needs be members of it Secondly the Church is that fulnesse of Christ that filleth Reas 2 all things Eph. 1.23 If the Angels be left out where is that fulnesse Thirdly it is against the bountifulnesse of Christ and Reas 3 the worthines of his obedience that any Creature should know and embrace the Doctrine of the mediation of Christ and yet not receiue benefit thereby for themselues But the chosen Angels do know and embrace it worshipping him and doing him all the seruice they could in the dayes of his flesh whilst he was working this mediation And therefore they haue benefit thereby to themselues And so consequently they must needes bee parts and members of the Church For to them are all sauing benefits peculiar and properly belonging Fourthly the euil Angels that fell away are a part of the Reas 4 malignant Church of the Sinagogue of Sathan as our Sauiour Christ giues vs
in heauen contained as well Angels as men and therefore we spake of them by themselues and proued that the Angels were a part of Gods Church as well as men then we came to speake of that part of Gods Church which consists of men and in handling this Point we propounded three things to be spoken too First to speake of that part of Gods Church consisting of men which are in heauen by themselues Secondly of those which are in earth by themselues Thirdly of both those which are in heauen and which are in earth together Concerning the first we haue spoken and shewed that Heauen is the place of receipt for all Gods chosen after their departure out of this life Now we are to speake of the second namely that part of Gods Church consisting of men which are on earth and so to proceede to the third Point And first of that part of Gods Church on earth For although there be the same chosen now in heauen which sometime were on earth and the same now in earth which sometime shall be in heauen so that the Church or Chosen in heauen doe not make a seuerall Church by themselues nor those in earth a seuerall Church by themselues but both together make one and the same Church yet because there are some particular considerations incident to that in heauen which they on earth haue not yet attained to and likewise some other particular considerations incident to that on earth which they in heauen haue already passed from therefore each of them is to be handled by it selfe and therefore hauing spoken of that part of Gods Church which is in heauen before now wee are to speake of that on earth I shall not need to define this on earth because it is apparantly defined before in the generall for if that were the whole company of Gods Chosen in heauen and in earth then this must needes bee the whole company of Gods Chosen liuing on earth Doctr. All that I will speake concerning this Point shall be contriued into one obseruation and that is this namely That God alwayes hath had from the beginning and hath now and shall haue to the worlds end a company of Chosen people vpon earth belonging to him calling vpon him beleeuing in him and worshipping him in spirit and truth You see that the obseruation consists of three parts first that God euer had secondly that he hath now and thirdly that he shall haue to the worlds end a Company c. First God alwayes had In matters of fact examples are fittest and strongest proofes this being then a matter of fact already done it is best to be prooued by examples taken out of Histories of seuerall times we will begin with the first beginning God had his Church in Paradise How prooue you that Why first there was God the Preacher secondly there was our first Parents Adam and Eue the hearers and thirdly there was the Word and Commandement Gen. 2.16 17. There is the Doctrine of saluation and the strict forme and manner of worship prescribed by God which he will bee honoured by Now what is here wanting to the full being of a true Church For here is a Pastor and a People and the Word and such a Word as is fitting for their saluation Therefore in Paradise God had his Church Also out of Paradise God still had his Church for there is still the same Preacher God the same hearers Adam and Eue the Doctrine of saluation though not the same it was before yet here is that Doctrine of saluation fitting their present state and condition a Doctrine of repentance and of punishment of sinne and specially the Doctrine of the Gospell a Doctrine of Faith in Christ Genes 3.16 The Seede of the Woman shall breake the Serpents head so here God had his Church still To passe from them to Abel there was Abels sacrificing and his Faith and there was Gods presence and acceptance as we may see Gen. 4.4 compared with Heb. 11.4 Now where these are there is a true Church Afterward in the time of Seth it is said Gen. 4 25. that then men began to call vpon the Name of the Lord that is men did then begin more zealously to worship God so here God had his Church still Let vs passe from Seth to Enoch It is said of him that he walked with God beleeued in God and that he pleased God Genes 5.24 Heb. 11.5 Now where there are men walking with God beleeuing in him and pleasing him there is a true Church So in the time of Noah Abraham Isaac and Iacob and in the time of the Patriarches God had his Church still Heb. 11.6 7 c. to the end of the Chapter there the succession of the Church in the faithfull is set downe as it were of purpose to proue this Point which we haue in hand namely that God had a Church from the beginning of the world To proue this Point further we will omit to speake of the flourishing times of the Church for of them there is no question there being then not embracers onely of the heauenly truth but professors too in great number and we will instance in those times that were most obscure when there was the least likelihood of a Church and if we can prooue that God had his Church in those times then the Point will be prooued that God hath alwayes had a Church We will therefore instance in them first at the Flood when all flesh had corrupted their wayes Gen. 6.12 and that the earth was filled with cruelty Vers 13. yet in that desperate time there was found Noah a iust and vpright man in that generation Vers 9. So God had his Church then Let vs passe from these times and come to the bondage and slauery of the Children of Israel in Egypt when Gods peculiar people were in the hands of a most prophane idolatrous and cruell Nation so that they had neither liberty nor time nor meanes of Gods true worship yet as there was a light in Goshen when palpable darknesse was ouer all the Land of Egypt besides so when all the World was ouerwhelmed with grosse ignorance sinne and error yet then God had his Church amongst the Israelites there were some Midwiues fearing God Exod. 1.21 and there were some that cryed and prayed and sighed to God and were heard of him Exod. 2.23 24. So God had his Church in those times Likewise in the dayes of Elias when the Church was brought to a low ebbe the Prophet could see no more left but himself and yet he had eyes to discerne it yet he was a true worshipper of God and so God had his true Church then if there had been no more then he 1. King 19.10 But the Lord saw seuen thousand more that were true worshippers and had not bowed their knee to Baal vers 18. In this desperate time when they killed Gods Prophets and brake downe his Altars and sought the life
of Elias yet in this very time God had his Church and a flourishing one too in his eyes though men could not discerne it Afterward in that generall Apostasie when Israel and Iudah were both fallen from God yet here is a true Church still here was one out of a Citie and two out of a Tribe to worship God Ier. 3.13 14. So in the Captiuity of Babylon when the Church is quite ouerwhelmed as it were Ierusalem was so distressed Religion defaced all turned into a miserable desolation so as there was neuer the like Is there any sorrow like vnto my sorrow saith the Prophet speaking in the behalfe of the Church Lam. 1.12 yet then God had his Church there were both teachers and embracers as Ieremy Haggai Zechariah and Daniel and many others At our Sauiours comming in the flesh when the Law and the Temple Priests and people the Church and Common-wealth were vtterly corrupted and defiled yet still God had his Church there was Zachary and Elizabeth Ioseph and Marie Simeon and Anna true beleeueres and right worshippers of God Lastly in the height of the pride of Antichrist the abomination of desolation standing in the holy place for many hundred yeeres when all the Nations in the earth were made drunke with the Cup of fornications by the Whore of Babylon the Synagogue of Rome yet God had some from time to time that lothed her golden Cup some that were not defiled with her fornications but kept themselues pure Virgins and a chaste Spouse to the Lord Iesus Christ sweetly embracing his sauing truth And so much for proofe of the first part of the obseruation That God alwayes had a Church and company of chosen people c. The second part is that as God euer hath had so he now hath a Church c. I shall not neede to speake much for proofe of this point for it cannot be denied but that blessed be God there be many flourishing Churches at this day in Germany France England and Scotland many in all these places that worship God in Spirit and Truth yea vnder Popery no doubt but there are many true Christians yea euen amongst the Turkes and Iewes and Infidels I doubt not but that there are ye● remaining some that worship God with vs no question but there are some sparkes of fire amongst those burnt ashes some polished stones of these decayed Churches some gold amongst all that drosse some that serue the Lord amongst so many thousand seruants of sinne and slaues of Sathan we haue many instances now at this day of some that liue vnder Popery and amongst the Iewes that professe our Religion So the second part is proued that God now hath his Church and chosen people The last part and shall haue to the worlds end c. Wee cannot prooue this point by examples as we did the former because it is not yet throughly fulfilled yet wee haue as sure proofes for it as examples we haue Gods own Word for it and that which God hath spoken is as sure as if it were already done and therefore the Prophets deliuer many predictions in the Preterperfect Tense as if they were already done because of the certaintie of it I say wee haue Gods Word for proofe of this point Psal 132.13 14. For the Lord hath chosen Sion and loueth to dwell in it saying this is my Rest for euer here will I dwell c. God will dwell and rest and that for euer in his Church as himselfe is for euer so his Church is for euer So Math. 28.20 I am with you euer euen to the worlds end It is more then if hee had said I wil be with you c. It is as much as if he had said thus As sure as I am actually present with you now so I will still continue vnto the very end of the world And whereas in respect of his bodily presence it was nor so because he was to ascend into heauen yet by his Spirit hee is with vs effectually to all sauing purposes Ioh. 14.16 I will pray the Father and he shall giue you another comforter that he may abide with you for euer vers 17. euen the Spirit of Truth c. And whereas there are many opposers of Gods Church men and Deuils and many times they haue a great hand ouer the Church yet they are still bridled and curbed and the Church still so protected and defended that the gates of Hell shall neuer preuaile against it that is vtterly to disanull it Math. 16.18 There are many other proofes for this Point but because we shall speake of them in the Reasons therefore we will passe to them The Reasons of the point that God euer had now hath and shall haue a Church to the worlds end are these Reas 1 First we haue Gods promise for it who is truth and cannot lie If that be too little we haue his Oath for it wherein it is impossible he should lie Psal 132.11 12. The Lord hath sworne in Truth to Dauid and will not shrinke from it saying of the fruit of thy Body will I set vp thy throne for euer He hath sworne it and will not shrinke from it that is hee will not recant which although it be typically spoken of Dauid and his seede yet in truth substance of it it is intended of Christ and his Church The same promise is renewed Ier. 33.17 18. where it is said that Dauid shall neuer want a man to sit vpon the Throne of the house of Israel And in the 20. and 21. verses it is said If yee can breake my Couenant of the day and my Couenant of the night then my Couenant may bee broken with Dauid my Seruant Giuing vs to vnderstand that his promise is irreuocable so long as there is day or so long as there is night on the earth so long the Lord will haue his Church on earth his Word and his Promise cannot be broken no saith our Sauiour Heauen and Earth may faile but my Word shall neuer faile therefore he hauing passed his Word for the continuance of his Church for euer it shall continue for euer in despight of all her aduersaries Secondly the sauing Truth and doctrine of saluation Reas 2 shall neuer perish from the earth therefore the Church that is the pillar of Truth shal neuer be abolished from the earth If the truth of God could faile then the Church might faile but that can neuer faile for still there shall be some witnesses of Gods Truth to feele the sauing power of it in themselues and to testifie it to others and therefore the Church shall neuer faile The third Reason is taken from Gods Fatherly Care ouer Reas 3 his Church euen for their owne sakes because he loues them and they are deare to him as the Apple of his eye and therefore they shall neuer be all destroyed except the Lord could forget his owne people his dearlings which is impossible Fourthly he doth preserue his Church
on earth for the Reas 4 worlds sake that must stand till the appointed time of dissolution but it cannot stand longer then the faithfull are in it for whose sake onely it is vpholden for the holy seed is the substance of the world as I shewed Isa 6.13 and therefore so long as the world stands they cannot be vtterly destroyed Fiftly the Church on earth is the Nurserie for heauen Reas 5 now in heauen are many mansions to be filled vp euery day therefore there must be a continuall supply from the Nursery on earth Sixthly there must be a continuall warre betwixt the Reas 6 seed of the Serpent and the seed of the woman Gen. 3.15 betwixt the wicked and the godly therefore as the wicked seed of the Serpent and the seed of the Woman Gen. 3.15 betwixt the wicked and the godly therefore as the wicked the Serpents seed shal be alwayes on earth so likewise the faithfull the womans seed shal be alwaies on earth too Vse 1 The vses First this shewes the antiquity of the Church that it hath been from the beginning Truth is elder then falshood righteousnesse was before sinne Gods Church is ancienter then all prophane Assemblies whatsoeuer Caine is ancient being of the malignant Church but his Parents the Church in Paradise is ancienter Eue and Adam harkened to the voice of the Serpent and so committed sinne soone after the Creation yet there was a time before their fall when they beleeued and rested on God and his Word and were righteous The Diuell is a Lier from the beginning yet Gods Truth was in the beginning before that ●ie else it could not haue been peruerted with his Lye This serues first to stop the mouth of all Gainsaiers and aduersaries of Gods Church that Charge vs with nouelty to bee a new sect and challenge antiquitie to themselues that they are the ancient and true Church which are both lies for they are the nouellists not wee We are from the beginning before they had any being so that we are more ancient then they and their religion is nouelty and a new Sect. Secondly it may serue to confirme vs in the vndoubted assurance of the Truth and of that Faith and Religion which we professe That which is most ancient is most true as being immediatly and originally from the pure Fountaine the pure hands of God himselfe who is the ancient of dayes And contrarily all Religions which are lesse ancient are from some corrupt Channels degenerate from the originall sinceritie Now our Religion which we professe is most ancient and most pure and therefore let all contrary Doctrines and Religions hide their heads and be ashamed of themselues and yeeld the preheminence of pure Truth to our Religion that is most true and rightly ancient Vse 2 Secondly as this shewes the Antiquitie of the Church so likewise it proues the perpetuity of it As it was from the beginning of the world so it shall continue by succession to the end of the world as it was before all other Congregations so it shall see the rising and fall of all other Congregations but it selfe shall continue one and the same by a continuall succession where the Fathers are gone there Children shall stand vp in their steads and so Childrens Children to the worlds end There shall bee many changes and alterations from time to time yet still there shall bee a Church in all these changes If the Church faile in Paradise it shall be found out of Paradise If Israel fall away yet Iudah shall stand If the Iewes bee cast off yet the Gentiles shal be taken in Though Popery Turcisme and Iudaisme and Paganisme abound and fill the world and are vp in Armes against the Church yet there are some corners in the world that God hath reserued to shelter his Church in wherein they shall be preserued both from their persecution and infection The third Vse Is matter of Comfort to the faithfull Vse 3 First in regard of themselues for they are the onely people of continuance that are in the world they onely are sure of their esta●e and none else It is true that the wicked may flourish a long time in great prosperitie like to a greene Bay Tree but in time and sometimes very quickly they shall vanish away like smoke and consume as the fat of Lambes and nothing shall remaine of them but the faithfull shall stand fast for euer Psal 102.28 they may be afflicted persecuted and distressed on euery side yet they shall neuer be forsaken nor giuen ouer vtterly as a prey to their enemies If the wicked murder some of them yet God wil haue some of them remaine still let persecutours draw out the blood of Gods Children as long as they will or can yet still there shal be found some that will offer themselues to their bloody hands for the maintenance of Gods Truth as some are taken away God will still send them a new supply So then it is Comfort to them in regard of themselues that they shall neuer perish Secondly it is comfort to them in regard of their posterity and of the Church after them they need not say on their deathbeds as worldlings doe What shall become of my Children and goods after I am gone they need not say so of their spirituall goods let God alone with them leaue them to him the faithfull seed shall bee preserued and vpholden by his Fatherly prouidence to the worlds end and the gates of Hell shall not preuaile against them And as for the Truth of God the Gospell and the graces of the Spirit which themselues are seized on in their life time God will dispose of them to the right heires heires of his owne begetting add raising vp he will find heires for them successiuely from age to age to the last end Then Christ Iesus himselfe shall come and hee shall stand last vpon the earth and so the Church shall be the first and the last The first Adam the first man on earth beginning the Church on earth And the second Adam the last man vpon the earth finishing it vp by his personall presence hauing continued and maintained it by his owne power from the first beginning to the worlds end And shall the Church haue an end then No though all things bee then at an end yet the Church shall not yet be at an end but as it is for euer here so it shall continue for euer in heauen too and that in a farre safer and happier and more glorious estate then euer it did in this world Psal 102.28 Vse 4 The fourth Vse is for discouragement to wicked men and Persecutors in that which they doe against Gods Church What can they doe against it roote it out as many times they say they will No doe they what they can by themselues by their Instruments they can neuer roote it out Let Kings and Rulers and Gentiles and people fret and rage and band themselues together against the Lord and
saued by before the Flood and Noah in the Flood and Abraham before the Law and Dauid vnder the Law and the Apostles whilest Christ was on earth the same saith are we and all the faithfull saued by from Christs ascension till his returne to Iudgement And therefore that is a damnable doctrine that some hold that euery man shall bee saued by his owne Religion whatsoeuer it be if he bee zealous in it no diuers Religions make diuers Churches but there is but one Church to be saued and therefore but one Truth and Religion to be saued by Vse 2 Secondly Is the Church but one Then wee should labour to maintaine the onenesse of the Church to keepe the vnitie of the Spirit in the bond of peace Ephes 4.3 Beware of factions and diuisions either of making or following them for they are the very bane of this onenesse of the Church and take heed of pride and singularitie for that is the common Mother and Nurse of dissensions and rents in the Church and doe not receiue the Word with respect of persons as when one saith I am of Paul another I am of Apollos c. What is Paul and what is Apollos but Ministers by whom yee beleeue They teach one Faith they preach one and the same Christ crucified they haue receiued one and the same ministration therefore embrace them all as one Ministry of one and the same Church What if God bestow diuers gifts on diuers persons and one more excellent then another Wilt thou abuse Gods gifts to the making of rents and factions in the Church No thou must know that thou art bound to profit the more by him that hath more gifts and to glorifie God the more for them and not to dote vpon them and maintaine Sects by them for that is not the end why God giues them but it is the malice of the Diuell that doth thus abuse them to a wrong end Vse 3 Thirdly this reprooues the Papists for they make two Heads and consequently two Churches except they will make a monster of the Church to haue two Heads and but one body Yea but say they the Pope is the Head of the Church in earth I am sure hee is not Head of the Church in heauen and therefore not Head of the Church on earth for they make but one Church and therefore can haue but one Head Some of the Iesuites hauing been pressed with this Argument and not knowing how to answer it haue affirmed that the Pope is Head of the Church in heauen so grosse and blasphemous haue they been So the Turkes and the Iewes that erect Churches of their owne and haue no fellowship with this Church they are not the true Church nor haue any part in this onenesse of the Church and whatsoeuer they are that haue no part in this Church they are none of Gods Church but of the Synagogue of Satan Fourthly this teacheth that difference in matters of circumstance Vse 4 doe not cut off from the true Church but holding one Faith with them wee are still in the vnitie of one Church First difference of states doe not cut off from the true Church though some Churches are greater some smaller though some are in their cradle others in their full age some before Christ others after Christ some purer some impurer yea though some be in heauen triumphing other some in earth fighting yet all are but one Church all are the same Wheate threshed in the floore and laid vp in the Garner and the same Gold digged out of the Mine with some drosse and tried and fined by the fire Secondly difference of times doe not cut off from the true Church before the Law vnder the Law and after the Law the first and the last Churches all are one Thirdly nor the difference of Persons Iewes and Gentiles bond and free male and female poore and rich all are one in Christ Iesus Fourthly nor yet difference of place Ierusalem Antioch Corinth England France Denmarke yea Paradise Earth and Heauen all are but one Church Fifthly nor yet difference of Ceremonies some worshipping at one time and place some in one habit some in another so long as all worship in Spirit and Truth they are but one Church Sixthly no nor yet difference of iudgement in Points not absolutely fundamentall doe not cut off from the true Church so long as all hold Christ Iesus he is the head-corner-stone that knits them all together into one building So much of the onenesse of the Church it selfe The second Note or qualitie of the Church is That it is holy Wee will draw it into an obseruation as wee did the former and that is this Namely That the whole Company of the faithfull both in heauen and in earth are a holy Company and euery part and member thereof is holy 1. Pet. 2.9 They are called a holy nation and in the fift Verse a holy Priesthood And it is said of Ierusalem that it is a holy Citie not that in heauen onely Reuelat. 21.2 but that on earth too Math. 4.5 And in Ephes 5.27 the Church is said to be holy and without blame c. And hence it is that those which are parts and members of the Church are called Saints and Saints on earth as Psal 16.3 And so the whole Congregation is called the Congregation of Saints Psalm 89.5 And their Head and Ruler is the King of Saints and they are not holy in profession onely for so are hypocrites too that are no part of the true Church but they are holy indeede they are truly sanctified therefore the Apostle calls them holy brethren Heb. 3.1 And this Holinesse is partly imputed Heb. 10.10 We are sanctified by the offering of the body of Iesus Christ And Colos 1.21 21. And partly inherent 1. Thess 5.23 Now the very God of peace sanctifie you throughout c. this is begun here but not perfected till we haue put off this body of sinne Reas 1 The Reasons of this Point are these First God the Father being most holy himselfe he sanctifies his Church and euery member of it and so makes them holy this Christ praies for Ioh. 17.17 sanctifie them with thy truth c. Iude. 1. sanctified of God the Father c. and therefore they are holy Reas 2 Secondly Christ their Head is holy and he sanctifies and makes them holy 1. Cor. 1.2 sanctified in Christ Iesus and in the thirtieth verse he is said to be their sanctification And Eph. 5.25.26 Christ gaue himselfe for his Church that hee might sanctifie it Reas 3 Thirdly the Spirit whereby they are enliuened quickened and ruled is the holy Ghost and he sanctifies them and makes them holy 1. Cor. 6.11 but now yee are sanctified by the Spirit of our God and Rom. 15.16 Fourthly the Word whereby they are gathered and the Reas 4 seed whereby they are begotten is a holy Word 2. Pet. 2.21 It is called the holy Commandement
Sauiour answers him What is that to thee follow thou mee For the exceptions made out of 1. Ioh. 3.10 where the children of God are said to bee knowne and the children of the Diuell Whosoeuer doth not righteousnesse is not of God c. And that in the 2. Ioh. 1. where the Apostle calles the Lady he wrote to Elect Lady And in the 1. Thess 1.4 knowing beloued saith the Apostle that ye are Elect of God These and such like places are thus answered that either this is spoken out of a Charitable perswasion or else it is spoken so of all because some are so for that seemeth to be the case 1. Thes 1.4 or if he had any certaine knowledge of any particulars it was by diuine Reuelation wee cannot say therefore out of a certaine knowledge that any particular man is a true member of the Church Onely this we may say that we are perswaded vpon good grounds he is so Vse 2 Secondly the Papists are here refuted for they sinne horribly in this kind in that they pray to such and such particular persons as Saints whereas many of them it is to bee feared are damned Spirits in Hell for false Teachers may be knowne by their fruits Matth. 7.19.20 Againe this refutes three other errors of Popery that do directly contradict these three branches of the Obseruation First they make Predestination to be contingent and so they say God himselfe doth not precisely know who are his for if Predestination do depend vpon mans will that if man will he shal be saued then God knows nothing till he see what man wil doe Secondly they deny certainety of saluation and so the faithfull themselues cannot know themselues to be Gods they will haue no man say certainely of himselfe that hee shal be saued and yet they will say it of others that they are saued And that is the third error which contradicts the third branch of this Obseruation in that they say the Church is alwaies visible and so generally others may know who are true members of the Church as well as themselues But we see all these errors are here refuted by this Doctrine wherein we haue taught and proued that the faithfull are onely knowne to God and themselues and to none other But if any man aske me How then shall wee loue one another and do good one to another as Brethren if we know not who are Brethren I answer we must perswade our selues of others that they are Gods vpon good grounds and good hope because wee see the fruits of faith and Repentance and loue in them so farre as can outwardly be discerned therefore we must be perswaded they are Gods and so we must loue them and doe good to them as Brethren The third Vse teacheth vs that if euery one may know Vse 3 himselfe to be Gods then euery one of vs should labour to learne this and know it for himselfe But you will say how shall we know this I answer by a due examination of thy selfe whether thou hast Gods Spirit the Spirit of Adoption which maketh vs to cry Abba Father that is which maketh vs go to God as to our father and to call vpon him as our father for that same Spirit beareth witnes to our Spirits that we are the Children of God Rom. 8.15 16. And in the 1. Cor. 2.11 12. What man saith the Apostle knoweth the things of man saue the Spirit that is in man euen so the things of God knoweth no man but the Spirit of God now we haue receiued not the Spirit of the world but the Spirit which is of God that we might know the things that are giuen vs of God The Apostle saith no man knowes the things of God that is the secrets of God but the Spirit of God Now this is one of Gods secrets to know whether we are Gods therefore hauing this Spirit wee may know our selues to bee Gods And that wee may further seale this vnto our selues let vs labour to make our Election sure vnto our selues by walking in good workes striuing against sin and working the workes of Holinesse and Righteousnesse and obedience to God which are the fruits of the Spirit of God and so shall we assure our hearts that we are Gods And so much be spoken of this last Adiunct and also of the Article Now wee come to the fourth generall Head propounded to be handled in the Doctrine of the Church and that is the diuision of the Church Now the diuision of the Church is partly of the name and partly of the thing it selfe First of the name The name is doubtfull and carries many significations yea and many contrary significations and therefore is to be diuided accordingly In the largest sense it may be applyed to any multitude or company of people whatsoeuer whether in case of Religion or not in case of Religion and the originall word both Hebrew and Greeke in the old and new Testament will beare it In the old Testament Ezek. 32.22 there the name is applyed to Ashur and his company to a company of men not in case of Religion And the same is applied Deut. 33.4 in case of Religion to the Congregation of Iacob that is to the Church of God Nay further that name is extended to those that maliciously oppose the Church of God and oppose Religion Psalm 26.5 I haue hated the assembly or Church of the wicked So that the Hebrew word in the old and new Testament beares it as well for a company not in case of Religion as for a company in case of Religion So likewise the Greeke word Ecclesia in the new Testament beares it in this generall sense as Act. 19.32 where it is applied to a disordered assembly in a case of mutiny The assembly that is the Church was out of order And in the Act. 2.47 the same word is applied to the company of Beleeuers that is to the Church of God The Lord added to the Church So wee see how this word hath been applied in the old and new Testaments to any multitude or company of people whatsoeuer either in case or not in case of Religion Yea but yet it is restrained in ordinary vse of speech and so hath been for many yeeres vnto a company of people as professing some certaine Religion whatsoeuer Religion it bee the Church is accordingly so called for there is a true Religion and euery Church that imbraceth that Religion is a true Church And againe there are false Religions and they that embrace any of them are false Churches so euery Church receiueth her denomination from the Religion she embraceth As for example we call those Iewes which are borne Iewes but those onely are of the Iewish Church which embrace the Iewish religion so that if a Iew borne doe embrace the Christian religion he is not of the Iewish Church though he be of the Iewish Nation yet he is of the Christian Church So likewise if a man bee a
outwardly discerned to the worlds end And this is it that Austen and the Fathers meane when they compare the Church to the Moone that is sometimes in an eclipse so darkened that it cannot be seene So we see we haue the consent of the Fathers too against the Papists And so much for the proofe of the Point The Reasons are many and they all strengthen one another especially the first three must be laid together else they are not sufficient apart to proue the Point Reas 1 The first Reason is this The members of the Church are sometimes very few they are alwayes few in comparison to the wicked but sometimes they are few simply in respect of themselues as in the old World when the Church was in Noahs Family Now that which few doe except it be some notorious thing or person is little obseruable to the World Reas 2 Secondly as they are few so withall for the most part they are but meane persons the poore receiue the Gospell Now that which poore and meane Ones doe is generally neglected not taken notice of except it be some notorious exploit and therefore Reas 3 Thirdly that which they doe the profession of Christ is no such notorious thing that the World regards it or takes notice of it and therefore it is not sought after except it be either by the true members that seeke to ioyne with it and they are but very few or else by persecutors and such seeke after it onely to destroy it as Herod did after Christ Matth. 2.13 not to bee members of it And hence it is that they are so hardly discerned Fourthly their Persecutors many times bring them to Reas 4 this low scantling and so it was in the dayes of Eliah the Prophet the Prophets were slaine with the sword 1. King 19.10 and that was the reason of the scarcity of the faithfull in those times And so it was in Dioclesians time all the Christians that were found were put to death their bodies were burnt and their Temples were ouerthrowne where was the face of the Church at this time Persecution had brought it to this low scantling that it was not to be discerned And this is shadowed to vs in Matth. 8.24 by the ship that our Sauiour and his Disciples were in that was couered with waues so that it was hardly to be discerned yet it sanke not so is the state of the Church of God in this world that sometimes it is couered with the waues and rage of persecutors like to be swallowed vp hardly to be discerned but yet it liues Fifthly sometimes Heresies and Schismes arise in the Reas 5 Church and they sway the world after them ouercomming the true doctrine and the communion of the Church as it was in the time when Arius with his Heresie ouer-spread the whole world in so much that the World did wonder at it selfe to see it selfe become an Arian as the Ecclesiasticall History sets it downe Where could a man say now This is the true Church whereunto I must ioyne Sixthly those that make profession to be and indeed Reas 6 are of the Church are but men and therefore sometimes fearefull and will not stand to their profession but flie away as the Disciples of our Sauiour did Matth. 26.56 they all forsooke him and fled like fearefull men where was the face of the Church then Seuenthly Counterfeits and Deceiuers are very cunning Reas 7 and will set as good a face on idolatry and superstition on hypocrisie and on the Synagogue of Satan as the Church of God can doe on the sauing faith and Religion the false Apostles can transforme themselues into the Apostles of Christ 1. Cor. 11.13 14. and Mat. 24.24 our Sauiour saith that false Christs and false Apostles shall arise and shall shew great signes and wonders so that if it were possible they shall deceiue the very elect So that the true Church shall not be so easily discerned because of these deceiuers Reas 8 Eightly the Corruption of mans heart which suffereth it selfe easily to be drawne from the truth and to content himselfe with the name and shadow of the Church and Religion when the truth and substance is gone as the Scribes and Pharisies and the Iewes did in our Sauiours time And hence it is also that the Church is brought to so low an estate sometime Reas 9 Ninthly it is from the malice of Satan his instruments for they cannot abide that the Church should flourish so much as outwardly Reu. 12.4 to 14. who draue the Woman into the wildernesse but the great red Dragon the Diuell Reas 10 The tenth reason is taken from Gods mercifull prouidence and wisedome that hides his people from the rage of the wicked he hath them in a Corner and yet is contented to let them lie hidden that they may haue a breathing time from persecutions and that their enemies may not bend their forces against them therefore oft-times there is no apparant face of a true Church but God hides the faithfull secretly in his Tabernacle from the eyes of men that their enemies may not persecute them As also thereby hee tries the faithfull whether they will walke by faith as well as by appearance for whilst there is an outward face of a true Church many wil make an outward shew of the profession of faith and religion But when there is none then here is the triall whether men will walke faithfully or no. Likewise God doth it for the iust condemnation of the reprobate he leaues them iustly without any apparant teaching or profession of better Religion to perish in their owne sinnes and ignorance flattering himselfe that he is in the right because he can see no better any where else for when they heare of no better religion then their owne they harden themselues in it and so iustly perish Lastly God hath passed his promise onely for the perpetuity Reas 11 of his Church for the being of it not for any flourishing outward estate Matth. 16.18 The gates of hell shall not preuaile against the Church to ouercome it and to destroy the being of it but any thing else they may do to it they may deface it suppresse it banish it driue it into a narrow Corner but they shall neuer ouercome it they may and doe destroy the perpetuity of the visiblenesse of it but the perpetuity of the being of it they shall neuer destroy Thus farre God hath promised and tyed himselfe and so farre we may expect and looke for it and no further So much for the reasons The Vses are these First this serues to refute those Papists Vse 1 that hold a perpetuall notorious visiblenesse of the Church Some doe not hold it therefore it refutes those that doe their Speeches are large in this kinde for they say that the Church must be as notoriously visible as any kingdome in the world and their notes of the Church as multitude succession pompe visibility headship and that at Rome
Bellarmine tendeth directly hereto and they labour to proue it with all their power and it stands them vpon for if this doth not stand the whole forme of their Church falls to the ground For whereas they say the true Church is alwaies notoriously visible and therefore their Church being so is the true Church We say and haue prooued that the true Church of God is sometime brought into such straights that the outward face thereof doth not at all or at least doth hardly appeare and therefore it will follow that if their Church haue and shall be alwayes notoriously visible then theirs is not the true Church Their exceptions bee of small moment if they be well considered I will stand but vpon two or three of the chiefe They alleage out of the fifth of Matthew and the fourteenth Verse That the Church is the light of the World now the light is alwaies seene therefore the Church is alwayes seene I answer This is spoken personally to the Disciples Ye are the light of the world and it is to be extended to the Ministers of the Gospell in regard of the Duty of Holinesse to be practised by them that they should not walke offensiuely to the World but rather to prouoke them to the practise of holinesse by the light of their good example How doth this serue then to proue the continual visiblenesse of the Church Besides I say that a Light may bee eclipsed for a time and yet be a Light still The Moone is a Light and yet not alwayes visible for sometimes it is eclipst and yet then it is as good a Light as when it is in her full brightnesse and therefore if this were to be vnderstood of the Church it doth not proue that it is alwaies visible because it is a Light Further I say that by that reason their life for that is as well if not chiefely vnderstood by the Light as vers 16. is also without error too as well as their Doctrine and that alwayes which is not so Lastly if it doe giue Light alwayes yet it is but to those that are in the house verse 15. that is to those that are members of the Church and that wee easily grant but what is this to proue the notorious visiblenesse of the Church to the world Secondly they alleage the eighteene of Matthew and the seuenteenth vers where our Sauiour saith Tell the Church and therefore there must bee alwayes a visible Church Marke saith Campian here is a remedy for a disease now the disease remaines alwaies and therefore the remedy must alwaies remaine I answer It is true it is a remedy for those that lie in such a state there spoken of and in some sense it is alwaies performed euen when two or three are ioyned together in the faith though there be no knowne visibility they may tell one another for it is not here meant that they shall appeale to Rome Their third exception is this but say they they that beleeue be they few or many must make profession of their faith else they cannot bee saued Rom. 10.10 now if they must alwayes make profession then they are alwaies seene and so the Church is alwayies visible I answer It is true they must professe alwaies and so they doe except it bee in time of their infirmity But must they do it to all the world No they may doe it among themselues alwayes though there bee but two or three of them yea and when they are many they may doe it to the eye of the World too if there bee no certaine danger in it yea though there be certaine danger in it yet if they haue a calling to it they are resolute euen to die for the profession of it and that is as much profession as is required And yet because their number is but few and that they liue in certaine places and are in this case for the most part obscure and simple men therefore it is not possible that any such generall notice should bee taken of them and those that doe heare of them or see them are vsually little mooued by their example at least they are seldome perswaded that they are the true Church and so ioyne with them Therefore there is no such perpetuall notorious visiblenesse of the Church as they would haue We will returne vpon them with these two Points and choke them with these two bones First wee aske them where the Church shall be when Antichrist comes for they themselues confesse that in Antichrists time there shall bee a desolation of the Church therefore by their owne confession it may and shall be sometimes inuisible Yea but say they ours is the true Church still though it be then obscured and we say then that Antichrist is come and our Church obscured therefore by their owne reason our Church is the true Church The second is from their Church which they haue here among vs they haue a Church here among vs here be Papists and Masses Arch-priests and Priests this themselues will not deny nay they boast of it sometimes yet is their Church visible among vs They will not affirme it at least they will not say it is visible in their sense that is that the world may take notice of it neither was it euer countenanced nor tolerated in our State so that in our sense and to vs it is inuisible and so may our Church bee to them The second Vse is for admonition to admonish vs that Vse 2 wee should not alwayes expect a glorious estate of the Church outwardly this is for earthly States and Kingdomes wee must not dreame of a temporall Kingdome here for Christs Kingdome is spirituall not of this World The Papists they say that it must be as glorious outwardly as any kingdome in the world but we must take heed that we be not carried away with shewes with the lookes of the Whore for Gods Kingdome comes not with obseruations Vse 3 Thirdly this may minister comfort to vs and may stay vs in the most desperate times that are when Satan rages most when persecutors are most bloody and deadly when the Prophets are slaine Gods Altars destroyed the Couenant forsaken when wee see hauocke to bee made of the Church faith renounced when wee see those that made great profession of Religion to hide their heads and like Starres to fall from Heauen when we see the Sunne to bee darkened and the Moone to bee turned into blood when we see Antichrist in his pride and pompe in the very Temple of God himselfe when wee see Heretikes swaying the World after them Schismatikes cutting and tearing out the bowels of their Mother the Church Nay euen in the generall Apostasie and reuolt from all Grace and Religion when there shall bee no honesty nor conscience found amongst men yet be not dismayed but rest thy selfe fully contented and satisfied with this truth that surely still God hath his Church in the World though there bee no
profession Secondly their profession must be publike or open that is it must be so publike and open that there may be notice taken that such and such men are of such a society and Religion else they are rather of the inuisible Church spoken of before And looke as their profession is more or lesse publike so the Church is to be reputed more or lesse visible Thirdly as they must publikely professe so they must ioyne together in this profession and that intends first their separation from all others whether they be of none or of a contrary and diuers Religion and secondly it intends their associating or sorting of themselues together with professors of the same Religion growing into and liuing in a louing Communion and fellowship with them Thirdly it intendes that they must doe it voluntarily and of their owne accord some ioyne for fashion some for feare some for hope of gaine and some others for the sauing of their goods and the like yet all these doe it voluntarily for the will cannot be forced yea if they doe it against their will it is a sinne to them though they ioyne to the purest Churches in the world And so much for the second part of the definition that they must ioyne together in a publike profession of Religion Thirdly that there may be a true visible Church the Religion which this Company make profession of must be the true Religion for as without the Church there is no saluation so without the true Religion there is no true Church there are diuers Religions in the world and accordingly diuers Churches yet there is but one onely true Religion which is that which is contained in the Scripture the Word of Truth and so there is but one only true Church that is that which embraceth that true Religion So that whatsoeuer Congregation vnder the Sunne doth not professe that one true Religion let them professe whatsoeuer Religion they will besides they cannot iustly bee reputed true visible Churches For the better vnderstanding of this Point I will draw it into an Obseruation and so discourse of it at large and the Obseruation is this Doctr. Whatsoeuer Company or Congregation of men doe openly professe the sauing Truth of God the same Congregation and Company is to bee held and reputed a true visible Church The truth of this Doctrine holds generally in all Congregations whatsoeuer of that quality from the greatest to the least and from the best to the worst for first whereas all and euery Professor of Gods Religion through the world doe concurre and ioyne together in the acknowledgment of the common sauing faith though not in the outward Communion of the same Ecclesiasticall Assembly and therefore all these may bee termed a true vniuersall visible Church so also euery particular Ecclesiasticall Assembly professing the same sauing Truth and ioyning together in the outward Communion of one setled Congregation and obseruing the same lawes and Orders at the same time and place may be called a true particular visible Church and that whether it be in the same Countrey and Prouince or in a Parish or in a priuate house and accordingly they are called a Prouinciall a Parochiall or a domesticall Church and each of these is a true visible Church though one be vniuersall and the other particular For Instances of all these in Scripture First for a Prouinciall or Nationall Church which is a Company of people professing the same Truth in the whole Land or Nation you may see an instance Act. 9.31 Then had the Churches Rest in Iudea and Samaria and Galile c. There were Prouinciall Churches named by the Countrey they were in as Iudea Samaria c. And in the Reuelations the second and third Chapters the seuen Churches there mentioned were Nationall Churches as Ephesus c. And 1. Cor. 1.2 vnto the Church of God which is at Corinthus c. there was a nationall Church Secondly for a Parochiall or Parish Church which is a Company of people professing the same faith in a Towne or in a Parish we shal reade of them in Act. 14.23 Where it is said that the Apostles ordained them Elders in euery Towne Thirdly for a domesticall Church which is a Company professing the same faith in a priuat house as we may reade in the Rom. 16.5 and in the 1. Cor. 16.19 of Aquila and Priscilla with the Church in their House And Colos 4.15 We reade of a Church that was in the House of Nimphas though these are rather to bee reputed inuisible Churches except they may be so openly taken notice of and so notoriously knowne as the Church that was in Priscilla and Aquila's house then they may be called Domesticall visible Churches So much for the first diuision that some Churches are either vniuersall visible Churches or particular Churches and that either in a whole Land or in a Towne or in a priuat House Secondly whereas some Churches are more notoriously knowne some lesse yet both are true visible Churches though one be more visible and the other lesse visible In the time of the Apostles it was so the Church of Rome was notoriously knowne for their faith was knowne throughout the whole world Rom. 1.8 and their obedience was come abroad amongst all Rom. 16.19 so that this Church was more visible Other Churches were lesse knowne as the Church at Cenchrea Creet which are only named in the Scripture and no Epistle written to them Now because they are onely mentioned therfore they were lesse knowne and so lesse visible yet true Churches as wel as the other Thirdly whereas some Churches professe the sauing faith more purely and sincerely others more corruptly yet each of these is a true visible Church though the one bee more pure not more true the other lesse Instances of these we haue in the second and third Chapters of the Reuelation some Churches there were more pure some more corrupt yet all true Churches Churches more pure were Smyrna and Philadelphia all commended in them nothing dispraysed Churches lesse pure were Ephesus Pergamus and Thiatira in which Churches some things are commended some things discommended Churches yet lesse pure were Sardis and Laodicea where there is nothing commended but all things dispraysed So we see that some of these profest the true sauing faith more purely some lesse purely and some more corruptly yet euery one of them was a true visible Church Fourthly and lastly whereas some Churches are growne to some Ripenesse and perfection and to some setled forme of Gouernment others are in their infancy and haue not such a forme established for Gouernment yet each of these is a true visible Church though the one be more the other lesse perfect Instances of these we haue in Scripture First for them that were more perfect as at Hierusalem where Iames was Bishop there the Church was growne to some perfection there the Apostles met and had a Consultation
this as a generall ground that the onely way whereby we are to find out the true Religion is by the true visible Church which may be true in some sense but not in this And their reach herein is to make all the Christian World to suspend thēselues vpon their Church as that being alwayes visible and so to receiue that Religion and none but that which their Church doth teach For say they there is no way to find out the true Religion but by the true visible Church but ours is the true visible Church therefore if euer you will find out the true Religion you must find it out by our Church It is not to be denied but that a true visible Church is a good meanes to find out the true Religion being assisted with the continuall presence of Gods Spirit and being furnished with the Word and Sacraments and gifts for that purpose but whereas they say it is the onely way it is not true for the Scripture hath another way and a better Ioh 5.39 Search the Scriptures saith our Sauiour for they testifie of mee Againe if this be the onely way to find out the true Religion by the Church then a man must first be well assured which is the true Church before hee can safely relie vpon her iudgement for the truth of Religion so that whereas before his care was to find out the true Religion and thereupon resolues to search it out from the true Church now his first and greatest care is to find out which is the true Church for other companies that are not may and doe bragge oft-times that they are the true Church when there is no such matter what are wee to doe in this case This Doctrine tells vs directly what is to be done where is it that the sauing truth is professed There and no where else is a true visible Church so that whereas they say the Church is the onely way for the finding out of the true Religion it is plaine as we haue shewed that the true Religion professed is the onely way or at least the chiefe way to find out a true visible Church The case is this we say the true Religion shewes forth the true Church the Papists say the contrary that the true Church shewes forth the true Religion And this that they say is true in some sense but that which we say is true in a better sense for the true Religion shewes the true Church as the cause shewes the effects but the Church shewes the true Religion as the effects shew the cause As for example the Sunne-shine is the cause of the day and the day proues that the Sunne shines Now one man may reason thus from the cause to the effect and say The Sunne shines therefore it is day another from the effect to the cause It is day therefore the Sunne shines and both say true but the first is the more forcible kind of reasoning when we reason from the cause to the effects So when I reason thus Here is the true Religion therefore the true Church here I reason from the cause to the effects and this is a more forcible and better reason then to say Here is the true Church therefore here is the true Religion which is but to reason from the effect to the cause This wee shall find to be true in the Scripture phrase where the Church is compared to a Candlesticke now what serues that for but onely to hold out the light then the sauing truth is the Light or Candle now the Candlesticke is not seene at all without the Light of the Candle in the dark night though it were of gold so in the darknes of this World the Church which is the Candlesticke if it hold not forth the sauing truth which is the Light or Candle it cannot be seene it selfe So that it is the truth of Religion that makes a true Church and the profession of this truth makes it visible then the Church is not the only way to find out the true Religion nor yet the best way but the best and safest way to find out the true visible Church is to find it out by the true Religion which they professe And so much for the reproofe of the Papists Vse 2 The second Vse is for triall Is it so that euery Congregation openly professing the sauing truth of God is a true visible Church then here is the straitest and precisest Rule to measure the being of a true visible Church by the definition containing all true visible Churches and no more Therefore look wheresoeuer the true sauing faith is profest there is a true visible Church And looke where there is a true visible Church there true sauing faith is profest for these hold in reciprocall termes so that whether wee would proue any assembly to bee a true visible Church or reproue and conuince any for a false we must lay it to this Rule so whether they professe the sauing truth of Christ or not and accordingly esteeme and iudge of them to bee true or false Churches Here certaine exceptions may bee made to this Doctrine The first exception is this What doe you say that a company professing the sauing truth makes a true visible Church Will profession onely make a true visible Church I answer No First it is required Answ that the sauing truth be amongst them indeed else they are no true Church Secondly that being amongst them it is not to bee smothered but profest Thirdly that it bee not onely outwardly profest but inwardly imbraced too at least by some of them Rom. 10.10 The second exception is this But what say you if they professe it with their lips and deny it in their liues and practise is such a Church a true visible Church I answer Answ a fearefull state are all such Churches in for God cannot bee more dishonoured his Spirit more grieued his Gospell more reproched his children more offended Satan and all Gods enemies more gratified and aduantaged then by this yet farre bee it from vs to denie them to bee a true visible Church so long as Gods sauing Truth is profest amongst them it cannot bee though there be neuer so great and generall a falling away from the practise of it but that some doe liue as they professe though they be not seene to vs. And therefore for their sakes though they bee but few and not to bee outwardly discerned it is to be reputed a true visible Church though a very corrupt and impure one The third exception But what say you of such a Church which though they professe the whole sauing faith yet they doe in certaine some crosse opinions which ouerthrow it Answ I answer wee must consider what manner of opinions these be which that Church holdes First whether they be such as ouerthrow the foundation secondly whether they bee publikely profest as the Doctrine of that Church thirdly whether they bee persisted in after they haue been admonisht by
neighbour Churches Then they are no longer to be taken notice of as true visible Churches But on the other side if they be matters of smaller moment that doe not ouerthrow the foundation then the hay and stubble shall burne 1. Cor. 3.12 15. but yet they shall remaine still a true Church Secondly if they bee greater matters errors that doe ouerthrow the foundation yet if they be not publikely profest as the Doctrine of that Church yea though they be publikely profest yet if vpon admonition of other neighbour Churches they doe recant and reforme their Errors then they are stil to be accounted true visible Churches and it is a sinne for any to forsake them being in them yea it is a sinne not to ioyne as a member to them liuing in them Deu. 12.5 at least we are to ioyne with them in cons●nt and Communion of profession The case of the Churches in the second and third Chapter of the Reuelation make the former exceptions cleere as you may see in your owne reading of them Vse 3 The third Vse is this Euery man that hath any Touch of Conscience or any grace in him is desirous to be a member of the true visible Church for that is a good pledge and witnesse to their soules that they are members of Christ Iesus Here then thou mayst learne to know whether thou art a member or no and so likewise how to become a member First therefore labour to finde out to know vnderstand and beleeue the sauing Truth of God and for this end we must heare the Word preached and conferre of it and ioyne with the godly and frequent publike Christian Assemblies and also we must pray to God for his Spirit that he would be pleased to acquaint thee with his sauing Truth and to open thine eyes that thou mayst see the right way and that he would also leade thee therein Secondly thou must labour as thou knowest it so likewise to professe it and make open shew of it to the world be not ashamed of it it is a Royall Calling if we bee ashamed of it Christ will be ashamed of vs before his Father and before his Angls in heauen and as we must not be ashamed of it so we must not be afraid to professe it it is not a matter of shame or feare to be of Gods Church but a matter of glory and comfort therefore bee not afraid of reproch persecution temptation all outward misery which wee are sure to endure if wee bee knowne to professe the sauing Truth of Christ Christ Iesus did boldly oppose himselfe against the high Priest and Pilate and the Iewes the Scribes and Pharisies and the Souldiers yea he opposed himselfe to Death it selfe and to all the powers of darknesse and to the terrors of God himselfe for thee and wilt thou bee afraid to oppose thy selfe to some few outward dangers for him Nay it is for our selues in the end for wee shall haue the glory of it yet bee wise and doe not rashly thrust thy selfe into any danger but if thou haue iust occasion and a Calling from God shunne it not for feare of men Let not thy false heart betray the truth of Christ his cause but relying vpon Gods power promise and protection stand to it resolutely and with a good Christian courage and say I am a Professor of Christ crucified and so I will continew by his Assistance euen vnto the very death though I be crucified euen as he was Thirdly we must see that our profession be not in hipocrisie for this is the Canker-worme that eates out Religion in the hearts of many professors therefore professe the Truth sincerely and in singlenesse of heart as in the sight of God who seeth and searcheth the Reynes doe it as the onely cause whereby we may and must bee saued and whereby thou lookest for thy reward in mercy at Gods hand at the last day doe it as in obedience to God to glorifie his Name and to aduance his Kingdome and to the confusion of Satan and his complices Fourthly as wee must do it without hypocrisie so we must see we practise it and that openly for our publike practise of it is our greatest and best part of our profession we must not be like those Titus 1.16 that in their words professe that they know God but by their workes deny him that is their workes stand vp against them and tell them to their faces that there is no such matter that which wee professe with our lippes wee must practise with our liues Put the case that two men bee at ods one man saith one thing another man proues the contrary by plaine and euident Arguments whether of these two is the best and greatest auoucher of the thing So it is in this he that professeth in his words onely the Truth of God and another which doth practise it in his workes which is the best and greatest auoucher of Gods Truth surely he that practiseth it in his workes Fiftly as wee must labour to doe these things our selues so we must do the best we can to draw others to it according to the Commandement of our Sauiour Christ to Peter Luk. 22.32 When thou art conuerted strengthen thy Brethren Which when I thinke on it cannot but admonish mee of my Duty and so it doth vs all that wee should labour to draw others to that good which wee our selues are partakers of Thus it was with the woman of Samaria when shee was conuerted she laboured to draw all the City of Samaria to Christ Iohn 4.28 29. Especially wee should labour with our owne families that they may serue God as Ioshua did I and my house saith he will serue the Lord. So shall we haue true visible Churches within the walls of our owne houses howsoeuer it be in the Land or Countrey or Parish where we dwell Vse 4 Lastly this should teach vs thankfulnesse for our State that the Lord hath vouchsafed so gratiously to shew himselfe to the people of this Land for many yeeres that the whole sauing Truth of God should bee knowne and professed and that by publike Authority it is countenanced amongst vs we confesse there are many sinnes in our liues defects in our state and wee mourne for them and groane vnder them and pray with sighes and teares against them and we trust God in his good time will heare vs and redresse these corruptions and abuses amongst vs yet through Gods mercy we professe the whole sauing truth and therfore we are a true visible Church of God against all Schismatikes and Papists and slanderers whatsoeuer Euery one may see and say that it is a miraculous and wonderfull of God that still this profession is maintained be thankfull for it and walke in Obedience to it and honor God for it and vse it well and pray and labour for the continuance of it to vs and our posterity to all generations The blessing is so much the greater and thank-worthy
Christs mysticall Body and by the Lords Supper we are nourished in this Body which is his Church Now all these three outward meanes are laid downe together Matth. 28.19 Goe teach all Nations baptizing them in the Name of the Father and of the Sonne and of the holy Ghost Goe that is spoken to the Apostles Teach there is the Word and Baptize there are the Sacraments one exprest the other implyed These are the instrumentall causes without vs. Now the instrumentall causes within vs are first repentance Act. 11.18 God hath granted to the Gentiles Repentance to life Secondly faith Act. 15.9 And he put no difference betwixt vs and them after that by faith he had purified their hearts And lastly and principally Gods Spirit that is the testimony of Gods Spirit in our hearts whereby we are perswaded of Gods loue and fauour 1 Cor. 2.12 We haue receiued not the Spirit of the world but the Spirit which is of God that we might know the things that are giuen to vs of God And all these sixe instrumentall meanes inward and outward are laid downe together in the second of the Acts in the case of the first Church that was planted after our Sauiours Ascension from the fourteene verse to the six and thirtie there is their Minister and the Word his Sermon Then Peter life vp his voice c. Then there are their Sacraments first Baptisme in the 38. and 41. verses Then they that gladly receiued the Word were baptized c. and the Lords Supper in the 42. and 46. verses and they continued in the Apostles Doctrine and fellowship and breaking of bread c. there are the outward causes So likewise the inward as first there is Repentance vers 37. and 38. They were pricked in their hearts then secondly there was Faith too as in the 41. and 44. verses They that gladly receiued his Word and all that beleeued c. And lastly there was the Spirit of God for in the seuenteenth verse it is said that it was prophesied before of them that God would powre out his Spirit vpon them And in the 38. verse the Apostle bids them repent and be baptized c. and yee shall receiue the gift of the holy Ghost so that they repenting and beleeuing did receiue the gift of the holy Ghost So these are the instrumentall causes or meanes of the being of the Church The next cause is the materiall cause and that is the people of God Saints by calling 1 Cor. 1.2 The members of the body of Christ 1 Cor. 12.27 Citizens with the Saints c. Ephes 2.19 As members are the matter of the body and Citizens the matter of a City so the members of Christ are the matter of the body of Christ which is his Church Fourthly the formall cause of the being of the Church and that is inward and outward that which is inward is the effectuall calling and gathering of Gods people to Christ when the faithfull are perswaded in their hearts to beleeue and obey the Gospell of Christ the outward formall cause that is their ioynt and publike profession of the sauing faith and the outward communion that they hold in the meanes of grace both for duties of piety to God and of charity each to other yee shall find both these in the case of the Church at Ierusalem Act. 2. first their effectuall calling which is their inward formall cause that is laid downe in the 37 38 41 and 44. verses they were pricked in their hearts repented baptized added to the Church c. there is their effectual calling Their outward formall cause that is set downe in the 41 42 44 45 46. verses They continued in the Apostles Doctrine and fellowship c. and had all things common c. there is their ioynt and publike profession of the sauing faith and their outward communion These are the materiall causes of the Church Lastly the finall cause of the Church which is the end of a Church and that is to bee considered in many respects first in respect of Gods glory that some of Adams seede might glorifie the Lord God here in his Church by beleeuing obeying calling vpon him and hereafter in heauen singing euerlasting prayses to his glory Rom. 9.23 That he might declare the riches of his glory on the vessels of mercy which he hath prepared to glory Secondly the finall cause of the Church is in respect of the faithfull themselues and of their saluation and glory for God will not haue all mankinde cast away as they well deserued but some he would haue of his free grace and mercy to obtaine saluation and glory by Iesus Christ 2 Thes 2.14 and to receiue the end of their faith which is the saluation of their soules 1 Pet. 1.9 Thirdly the finall cause of the Church is in respect of the truth of God that the same might be embraced and maintained and kept aliue on earth that some men might not onely know the truth but beleeue it and liue in the obedience of it and also that the Scriptures the records of truth might be safely preserued first that the body of the Scriptures might not bee mangled or torne by Heretikes secondly that the sense of the Scripture might not bee depraued by the enemies of it lastly that the Scriptures might not bee as a sealed booke but that there might bee some on earth to interpret it and to teach it and that it might be openly taught and practised on earth this is one end of Gods Church Fourthly the finall cause of the Church is in regard of the wicked that they might bee left without excuse when as the pretious truth of God is propounded to them by his Ministers and by his Church and when as they denie it as false or contemne it or at least carelesly neglect it as a vile thing not worth hearkening to that then they might iustly perish in their owne wilfulnesse Thus you haue heard concerning the causes of the being of the Church both of those that cause it directly and of themselues and also such as cause it not of themselues directly but onely as by the way being ouer-ruled by God to that end Wee will draw it into an Obseruation Doctr. we heard first that God is the efficient cause of his Church and all other causes are from him he note then is this That howsoeuer there bee many things in the world which concurre and haue a great hand in the causing and constituting of a Church yet the cause of all causes is the Lord himselfe and indeed he is all in all in it this is so in all other things that God is all in all in them specially it is so in the Church as first that being more specially respected of God than any thing else and secondly as the Church depending more neerely vpon him then any thing else in the world Ephes 4.6 the Apostle speaking there of the Church saith There is one God and Father of
Apostle speakes of that Church wherein was the vse of the Word and of the Sacrament of Baptisme as we may see in the 26. verse which are onely in vse in the visible Church And in Colos 1.18 there is Christ the head of his Church and there is the Church the body of Christ Now the Apostle speakes of that Church whereof hee was a Minister as we may see vers 25. which is a visible Church And that it may appeare that these Collections are not strained against the meaning of the holy Ghost you shall find that the Apostle in the 1 Cor. 12.27 speaking to the visible particular Church of Corinth saith plainely Yee are the body of Christ and so intends necessarily that Christ is the head of that particular visible Church And as it was with the Church of Corinth so it is too with all true visible Churches else Reuel 1.13 there the head and the body is described together there was the seuen golden Candlesticks the seuen particular visible Churches and there was also the Son of Man walking in the midst of them that is Christ the head of them And no question but the Iewish Church in the former Testament was Christs Spouse and so Christ was her Husband and consequently her Head for how often did God threaten to cast them off and to giue them a Bill of Diuorce shewing thereby that hee was the Head euen of their visible Church then much more of our particular visible Churches so that Christ proportionably is the Head of a true visible Church The Reasons of the Obseruation are these first Christ Reas 1 liuing vpon the earth was of the visible Church but not as an inferiour or a member for then some other visible member must be his head which is impossible therefore while he liued vpon earth he was the head of the visible Church Now what he was he is he was so then and therefore he is so now Secondly all power is giuen to Christ both in heauen Reas 2 and earth Matth. 28.18 and he is the head of all principalities and powers Colos 2.10 And in what respect is he the head of all but that he might be the head of the Church as the very reason is implyed Ephes 1.22 And hath made all things subiect vnder his feet and hath appointed him ouer all things Why to be the head of his Church And this is that we meane in that Article of our Faith when wee say I beleeue that Iesus Christ sits at the right hand of God that is that hee hath power giuen him to rule ouer all things specially ouer his Church to rule and gouerne it and to conuey all good things to it as the head to the body Reas 3 Thirdly he giues life to the members and holds all the body together Col. 2.19 and Ephes 4.15 16. therefore he is the head of the body Reas 4 Fourthly the Church is guided by the Lawes of Christ both for doctrine and manners therefore he must needs be the head of the Church Reas 5 Fifthly he is the Sauiour of the Church Ephes 5.23 and therfore he is the head of his Church for it is the office of the head to defend and to see to the safety of the whole body Reas 6 Sixthly he is the onely vanquisher of all the Churches Enemies and he doth so vanquish them as that he himselfe is freed from Satans and all other enemies harmes Ioh. 14.30 The Prince of this World commeth and hath naught in me yea he breakes the Serpents head Gen. 3.15 And in the Reuelation there is Michael and his Angels fighting with the Dragon and his Angels and they ouercome them Now Christ is this Michael that ouercommeth the Diuell and all the enemies of his Church therefore he is the head of his Church Reas 7 Seuenthly he giues the Spirit to his Church therefore he must needes be the head of his Church and hee giues the Spirit not onely in regard of ministeriall duties as Iohn 20.22 where he breathed on the Apostles and said Receiue the holy Ghost but also in regard of sanctification and inward graces as Act. 2.4 this he doth for euer Eph. 4.11 12. Now it is the head that conueyes Spirit and motion to the body Therfore seeing euery visible Church receiues the Spirit from Christ then he must needs be the head of them Reas 8 Eighthly and lastly hee is the King the Husband the Shepheard the eldest Brother or first borne of the Church therfore the head of the Church So much for the Reasons Vse 1 The vses are these The first Vse is matter of Refutation against the Popish Church for this is a maine point of difference betwixt vs and the Church of Rome Wee say and haue proued it that Christ is the head of the visible Church they say the Pope is the head of it and as they meane it it is worse than it seemes to be for therein they affirme a double blasphemy against God and giue two maine blowes to Iesus Christ to cut him off from being head to his Church at least they take his Crowne from his head And this they doe first in regard of the Body the Church secondly in regard of the Head Christ First in regard of the Church for they say the Pope is the head not of the Church of Rome onely for that were tolerable if hee would content and containe himselfe within his owne Diocesse neither would we much contend with him about his Bishopricke But he lookes high and gapes wide and saith like his lying father the Diuell All is mine that he is the head of the vniversall Church through the world A proud challenge easie to be made but impossible that it should bee maintained You see that it is proued to be Christs due only by right to be head of the visible Church if then the Pope wil be head either he must take it from Christ against his will and so he is plaine Antichrist as indeed and in truth he is or else he must haue it by Christs grant and this he pretends to be his Title But first he hath it not by Christs grant for Christ neuer gaue him any such matter for many hundred yeares after Christs ascension this headship of the Popes was neuer heard of Yea but say they he gaue it to Peter and so to the Pope I answer No Christ gaue it not to Peter nor yet euer meant to giue it him much lesse to the Pope First hee gaue it not to Peter for the places which they alleage to proue this point serue nothing to this purpose as Matth. 16.19 Whatsoeuer thou shalt binde on earth is bound in heauen and whatsoeuer thou shalt loose on earth shal be loosed in heauen This is spoken equally to all the rest of the Apostles as well as vnto Peter Ioh. 20.23 Whosoeuer sinnes ye remit they are remitted c. Where now is the headship of Peter ouer the whole
Church So that in Ioh. 21. where our Sauiour saith three times to Peter Feede my sheepe c. What a slight ground is this to build the headship of the Church vpon And if they aske then why Christ should thus presse it vpon Peter so often The Fathers answer them that it is onely a speciall charge binding to Duty not any vniuersall authority or iurisdiction pressed thrice vpon him for his former threefold deniall of Christ that so hee might be the more carefull for the time to come else the charge is alike to all the rest of the Apostles for shall wee think that any of them were not bound to feede the sheepe of Christ as well as he The Apostle giues this charge to all Ministers 1 Pet. 5.2 Feed the flocke of God c. Yea but Peter is the Rocke and vpon this Rocke Christ will build his Church Matth. 16.18 I answer if the Church were built vpon Peter then it was either built vpon his person or vpon his Confession but it was not built vpon his person for then when he died the Church must haue failed too Therfore the place must be vnderstood of Peters confession or of his faith or of that Christ which he confessed Christ built his Church on the confession of Peters faith because himself was the substance of his confession c. Peters confession of his faith is the Rocke in making knowne the Church But Christ himselfe is the Rocke as being the substance of that his confession so that the Church is not built vpon Peters person And if it had what is that to the Pope Vnlesse they can proue these two things First that Peter sate at Rome as head of the vniuersall Church secondly that hee intended to leaue his headship to the Pope of Rome and to none other which is a meere fancie and deuice of their owne braine for which they haue no colour So then Christ neuer gaue Peter much lesse the Pope this headship Secondly as Christ neuer did giue it so he saith expressely he neuer will giue it Luk. 22.25 26. Our Sauiour saith to his Disciples that it was enough for the Gentiles to be Lords and to raigne one ouer another but it shall not bee so amongst you saith he so that Christ checks them for hauing but a conceit of superiority so far is he from giuing it to any of them Further this being a great part of Christs glory as he is Mediator to be head of his Church hee will not giue it to any other Isai 48.11 My glory will I not giue to another And as Christ neuer gaue this nor meant to giue it to any other so no man is able to weeld or sway it no more than any one temporall Gouernor can rule all the Kingdomes in the world no this power is reserued onely to him that made the whole world and all things therein So that we see they ouer-reach in saying the Pope is the head of the vniuersall visible Church Secondly they ouer-reach as far in saying he is the head if you aske them what head they meane They will say onely a ministeriall head vnder Christ heere is some shew of modesty But aske them further what power they ascribe to him And then they bewray themselues for they say that the gouernment of the whole Church through the world depends on him that he hath power and authority to iudge and determine of all causes of Faith and Religion to rule Councells to order Bishops and Pastors to excommunicate and to suspend and to inflict other penalties vpon offenders yea whatsoeuer concerneth either preaching of Doctrine or the practice of Discipline in the Church of Christ the power of gouerning in all such causes they say lies in the Pope Is this to be a ministeriall head This is rather to be an absolute supreame head If by head they meant onely some chiefe Gouernour the name head in that sense might agree to some one man in respect of some one particular place for so the Scripture vseth the word in other cases in the 1 Cor. 11.3 The man is the womans head c. But neuer in this case for a man to be the head of the whole Church This transcendent power by them ascribed to the Pope is a great part of Christs owne power and can neuer agree to any man in the world for Christ is the onely Doctor of his Church Mat. 23.8 10. How then can the Pope determine all matters of faith and religion Is not this to make him a great Doctor yea the onely Doctor No say they for hee doth it but vnder Christ But he doth it of himselfe if the Pope in controuersies would take Christs booke and vse prayer to God for direction therein and in humility and sincere loue of the Truth would examine euery cause and so iudge there were some hope that he would doe many things well and that he would iudge rightly as in Christs stead and so honour his Master and doe good seruice to the Church But first he takes no such course but mingles with the word and vseth his owne Canons in stead of the word and he is so farre from vsing prayer to God for direction as that he presumes the truth is tyed to his Chayre and therefore that he cannot erre in any of his Sentences likewise hee is sinisterly affected to the Truth framing it to the state and practice of his owne Church and accordingly hee iudges and pronounces Secondly if he should take the former course yet his reach is not infinite hee cannot iudge rightly in all causes of faith and religion for no one man that euer was Christ Iesus onely excepted and his Apostles that was able to iudge of all Truth Therefore euery Pope in particular must be at least as one of the Apostles nay he must be as Christ is For if the Apostles could doe it yet they had fellowes Paul as well as Peter could do this But the Pope is without any fellow yea he will take vpon him to iudge of the Apostles owne Doctrine and writings so that though he pretends to be Peters successor only yet vpon the point he takes on him to be Peters Master euen to be Christ so proues himself to be very Antichrist yea and he not onely takes vpon him Christs Office but he takes his name vpon him also hee calls himselfe the chiefe Shepheard which name is proper to Christ onely 1 Pet. 5.4 What is this but to step into the throne of Christ But they except against vs and say doe you finde fault with vs for saying the Pope is the head of the Church Why you your selues make the King supreame head of the Church I answer how do we say the King is the head of the Church as they say the Pope is No but wee say the King is the head of the Church within his iurisdiction to see Gods religion maintained Answ and to see the
and to raigne ouer them and therefore he refused them to bee his Body therefore what direction soeuer Christ tenders vnto vs we must obey it and whatsoeuer is against the directions of Christ wee must defie them And secondly seeing Christ is our head therefore whatsoeuer life or direction wee haue in spirituall things wee must acknowledge the Fountaine of them that we haue them not of our selues but from him onely for of his fulnesse wee all receiue grace for grace Ioh. 1.16 and without him we are able to doe nothing Ioh. 15.5 and by him we are able to doe all things Phil. 4.13 Marke how sweetely these places agree together wee receiue all from him without him wee can doe nothing by him we are able to doe all things therefore whatsoeuer good things wee haue spirituall life or graces wee must receiue them thankfully embrace them sweetely vse them gratiously to the honor of thy head and the good comfort of thy selfe and thy fellow-members so likewise for vnprofitable members that dishonor our head wee should pray that our head Christ Iesus would either make them profitable or else cut them off and also that he would be pleased to purge from his body the noysome humours as sinne and superstition that so hee may haue a sound and a healthfull body Thirdly and lastly seeing Christ is our head therefore as he hath a gracious care for our safety so we should be as carefull to preserue and maintaine his honour and glory we should reioyce when we see his honor and glory aduanced and we should mourne and bee greeued when we see it opposed And so likewise we should bee affected with the good or harme of our fellow-members 1 Cor. 12.25 we should be carefull to bring one another to heauen and not bee carelesse whether they come thither or no. Vse 4 The last Vse is this hence wee haue a sufficient warrant that the Church of England is a true visible Church because Christ our head spirituall life and the Doctrine of Saluation is found truly in our Church But our aduersaries except against vs First say they you haue not Gods ordinances amongst you and therefore you haue not Christ to be your head We answer that they must shew vs out of Gods word that those are the ordinances of Christ which we want But say they you haue Antichrist to bee your head for you haue many things from him I answer we defy him as much as they do together with his doctrine wee defie his practises and courses if wee haue or vse any thing that he doth or hath vsed before vs first it is either no matter of substance but onely some passage or carriage or circumstance either in worship or gouernment or secondly they are such things as were vsed in purer time and Churches before Antichrist or thirdly it is of the best which that Church being in Apostacy that is hauing beene a Church and still pretending to continue the same hath reserued for still they haue some good things and professe some good truths Lastly at least it is throughly cleansed from their superstition and idolatry So that still we hauing Christ to be the head of our Church and his spirituall life and the Doctrine of saluation being found amongst vs and begetting spirituall life in many of vs we must needes bee a true visible Church And so much for this point The twelfth Lecture of the Church THe third point propounded to bee spoken of concerning the finding out of a true visible Church was touching the members of it for as I shewed you the Church being a body and that euery body consists of certaine members therefore if wee would exactly know the body we must know the members Now the members were taken either in a more generall sense including the head or else in a more strict and particular sense being considered as a diuerse thing from the head now because we would carry the matter fully before vs we tooke it in both those senses and hauing spoken of the members of the Church in the first sense where wee shewed that our Lord Iesus Christ was the head and the onely head of the true visible Church now we come to speake of the members of the Church in a more strict and particular sense being considered as a diuerse thing frō the head And thus considered the members are of three sorts First some are members by right onely and not by possession secondly some are members by possession not by right and thirdly some are members both by right and by possession First some are members of the visible Church by right onely not by possession for some members haue a good right in the body of the visible Church and the priuiledges thereunto belonging but yet are not actually possessed of them And of these there are diuers kindes irst generally all the elect of God liuing vpon the face of the earth that as yet are not called for the Church is theirs and the Word is theirs and the Sacraments are theirs and the Ministry is theirs the Lord specially intending his owne ordinances to the benefit of his chosen though indeed they themselues be notable so much as to know their own right in them much lesse are they able to reach forth their hands to claime it and enioy it yet because the Lord hath appointed them to be heires of saluation and therefore consequently hee hath appointed them a time in which hee will call them to the outward profession of the sauing faith therefore in respect of the purpose of God they are by right true members of the true visible Church though they be not as yet actually possessed of it And thus one and the same man may be at one and the same time a member of the Church malignant and Synagogue of Satan in his owne practice and profession and by right in respect of Gods purpose a true member of Christs true visible body This was the case of Saul who by his practice was of the malignant Church and persecuted the true Church of God and yet by right he was a member of the true Church of God Secondly those that are members of the true visible Church by right and not by possession are such as onely haue heard of Christ and of the Gospell and are endued with some little smatch of religion yet they are but entring into the Church onely their feet are in the Porch they are not yet come within the holy place they haue not yet receiued the Sacrament of Baptisme which is our admission into the visible Church so that after that time the Church doth acknowledge vs from thence forward to bee her children and wee acknowledge her to be our mother and so we are incorporated and become members of that body So then those that haue onely heard of Christ and of the Gospell and haue some little smatch of Religion they cannot iustly bee said to bee members by possession yet
full of wicked and vngodly men in one kinde or other The Church of Corinth may be a witnesse of all this there were carnall people 1 Cor. 3.3 there were fornicators and one in the highest degree an incestuous person 1 Cor. 5 1. so there were deprauers of the Doctrine of the Resurrection 1 Cor. 15.12 And for the Lords Supper how horribly did they abuse it 1 Cor. 11.21 yet for all this though there were such notorious offenders in it it was a true Church So likewise if you would find out false brethren you shal haue them in the Church Gal. ● 4 So for heretiks you shal haue them in the Church too 1 Cor. 11.19 there must be heresies amongst you saith the Apostle And Reuel 2.6 14 15 in the Church of Ephesus there were the Nicholaitans And so in the Church of Pergamus there were they that maintaind the Doctrine of Balaam and the Doctrine of the Nicholaitans So for Schismaticks they are in the Church too before they are separated 1 Cor. 11.18 There were dissentions amongst them Nay I will say further that Antichrist may bee a member of a true visible Church The Text intends he must be so 2 Thes 2.4 He must sit in the Temple of God diuers Diuines tyre themselues with opinions vpon this place Some say he must sit in that which was the temple of God but that answers not the meaning of the words for he must sit in that which is the Temple of God Yea but say others he may sit in that which is the Temple of God because some faithfull lye hid within it but this cannot be the meaning of it for it is meant of a visible Church as if he should say Antichrist shall sit in that which is the Temple of God that is in a true visible Church till he bee vtterly corrupt and fully discouered And no question but that many yeeres after Antichrist fate in the Church it was a true Church So that it is plaine that hypocrites and castawaies in the highest degree are may be of a true visible Church Reas 1 The Reasons of the point are these first the nature of the Gospell requires it that some members of the Church should be reprobates and castawaies for the Gospell 2 Cor. 2.16 is the sauor of death vnto death to some and to others it is the sauour of life vnto life to the wicked it is the sauour of death vnto death the sweetnesse and the comfort of the Gospell drawing them on to professe and to imbrace it for a while but the hardnesse of the practice of it makes them to giue ouer and to fal away at last and so it becomes a sauour of death vnto them Reas 2 Secondly the excellency of the Church and of a Christian profession is such that generally all men desire to bee of it and therfore euen the wicked would seeme to be such and so they ioyne to the outward Communion of the Church though they bee but Reprobates and Castawaies Thirdly it is the corruption of mens hearts to be satisfied and to rest in shadowes but leauing the substance so Reas 3 that if they bee baptized and so receiued into the Church they rest in that and go no further foolishly flattring themselues that all is well when as yet they want the substance of Baptisme and so whereas they think that they are in the way to Heauen they are in the high way to hell Fourthly it is from the subtilty and malice of the Diuell Reas 4 hee it is that sowes the Tares amongst the good Corne Matth. 13.28 he seekes aboue all the disgrace and spoyle of the Church and this he knowes he cannot doe more than by drawing the members and professors thereof into hypocrisie and wickednesse Fifthly else there should be no hypocrites at all vnlesse Reas 5 they be found in the Church For he cannot be an hypocrite vnlesse he make profession of the faith and so be of the visible Church Sixthly the visible Church consists onely of men now Reas 6 men cannot see the heart and therefore if Hypocrites ioyne to the Church she cannot disburden herselfe till she know them by their outward courses and therefore till then she is constrayned to nourish them as her owne members hence it is that reprobates and castawaies are in the visible Church Seuenthly it is for the triall of the faithfull and therefore Reas 7 hypocrites Heretiks and false Brethren are amongst them to proue them as the Apostle saith 1 Cor. 11.19 God will try vs whether we will follow him in his word or them in their heresies and fancies and therefore they are amongst vs euen as the Canaanites were left among the Israelites to proue them whether they would keepe the wayes of the Lord or not Iudg. 2.22 and Chap. 3.1.12 Reas 8 Eighthly Gods goodnesse and readinesse to all intendring to all sorts the meanes of grace is another Reason of it Matth. 22.10 all both good and bad were brought into the wedding Feast hee would haue the bad to come as well as the good that they might haue the tender of grace and hence it is that Reprobates and Castawayes are in the visible Church Reas 9 Ninthly it is so because God would haue the Arguments of his Iustice vpon hypocrites within his Church that the faithfull seeing it practised vpon them it might strike a greater reuerence of God into their hearts Matth. 22.13 1 Cor. 11.30 32. that when the wicked are punished the righteous may take warning therefore there are Reprobates in the Church Reas 10 Lastly such must be in the Church that Discipline may be exercised in cutting them off 1 Cor. 5.4 7. and 2 Cor. 2.7 8. such must be deliuered to Satan that they may bee wonne if it be possible or at least that the faithfull may be admonished by their example and may take heed by their reproaches and censures for when the wicked are punished the righteous will beware Vse 1 The first Vse teacheth vs that if Hypocrites and Castawayes may be and oftentimes are members of a true visible Church then we are not to looke for such a pure and perfect estate of a Church in this World that it should bee without hypocrites and vngodly men in it So long as wee liue here in this World good and bad Wheate and Tares are promiscuously and confusedly scattered and mingled together the vtter and thorow separation of them is respited to the end of the World It passeth the skill and power of man to doe this it is to bee done by the Angels at Christs direction when hee comes to Iudgement Matth. 13.39 40. It is true that a separation from the bad must bee endeauoured by vs here in this life so farre as they are knowne to vs and so farre as wee are able to separate But first it is impossible for vs to know all that are wicked secondly for those we doe know it is impossible also to bee quite separated from
them for then wee must goe out of the World as the Apostle saith 1 Cor. 5.10 howsoeuer some heretikes as the Donatists haue maintained that the visible Church consists onely of the elect and chosen and some of our Diuines haue vsed the same words but the heretikes meant it in one sense and our Diuines in another The heretikes intend it as they speak it and so it is not true but our Diuines meane it principally of the Church inuisible and so it is true that none but Gods chosen are members thereof and when they doe apply it to the visible Church they vnderstand it of the liuing abiding and fruitfull members of the Church and so it is true too that none are liuing members of the visible Church but the chosen but yet there may be rotten and dead members too Secondly this teacheth vs what to esteeme of such as Vse 2 make profession to be of the Church and yet their liues are not answerable to their profession shall wee say presently they are none of the Church Certainely wee must iudge of them as members at least by possession and for ought wee know they may bee members by right too It is very hard and impossible for man to iudge who is an hypocrite and who not because that though hypocrites may discerne themselues by notorious falls yet the faithfull sometimes fall as dangerously as they and therefore wee must leaue that to God who onely knowes the heart in the meane time we may safely say that they are members by possession and for ought we know by right too This is harsh in many mens eares but yet the Doctrine is true and sound and the exceptions against it are easily answered The first exception is this How can these bee members of the true visible Church and yet are not members at all of the Catholike Church I answer Yes they are of the Church to vs both because they seeme so and in charity wee are to hold them so till we see the contrary Yea but doth not the Apostle say 1 Ioh. 2.19 They went out from vs because they were not of vs. I answer this is spoken of them after their falling away but yet while they abode with them they were members by possession though not by right and it is confest of the Apostles that Iudas had obtained fellowship with them and was numbred amongst them besides visible is additum diminuens that is it addeth not to the thing but diminisheth from the strict acceptation so that the wicked reprobates and castawayes may be of the true visible Church though not of the true Church simply The second exception is this How can they bee the members of the Church the body of Christ seeing they haue not Christ to be their Head for Christ is the Head of no Reprobate I answer Yes they are members of that body whereof Christ is the Head though simply he is neither Head to them nor they members to him but he is the Head properly of the faithfull in that body and therefore proportionably he is reckoned the Head of the whole Besides the wicked pretend and counterfeite themselues to bee the members of Christ but Christ neuer pretends and counterfeites himselfe to bee their head and therefore though head and members bee relatiues yet it is so that they may be members of him in their sense and yet he no way pretending to bee their head Lastly hee is their head in that sense that they are his members that is in the shew of the world and in their owne pretence though not in his The third exception But how then is the visible Church the Kingdome of heauen for so it is called many times in the Scripture I answer First it is said so in respect of the faithfull that are in it secondly it is said so because there is the meanes to bring all euen the wicked to heauen thirdly they doe all outwardly professe to be Citizens of heauen and are so to be reputed till there be euident proofe to the contrary and then they are to be cast out Fourth exception But what if all bee hypocrites is that a true visible Church I answer It is impossible for where the Word is truly preached it cannot bee but that there are some that doe sincerely professe Secondly I say that if it were possible yet till it be discerned to be so it is to be held a true visible Church The fifth exception Yea but you confesse your selfe that though they be members yet they are not liuing but dead members and will any man say that a dead member is a member of a liuing body I answer Yes euen as a rotten branch of a tree till it be cut off is a member of the tree as well as the soundest In Reuel 3.1 the case is auouched in this very kinde the Church of Sardis is said to be a dead Church because it had dead members and yet it was a true visible Church And so they may be members by possession and by shew though they bee dead members and so by right are not members for that belongeth onely to the faithfull Thirdly this teacheth vs that we should not be rash to Vse 3 condemne a Church for to be a false Church or no Church because it hath in it many hypocrites and wicked members for you see that true visible Churches haue alwaies hypocrites in them It is true that a Church full of hypocrites may bee called and doth well deserue to bee accounted a corrupt and an vnsound Church yea but so long as there are some it and of it that do openly professe the sauing faith in sincerity though otherwise it be full of wicked men and hypocrites it cannot bee denied to be a Church yea a true visible Church though there be a thousand hypocrites to one true Beleeuer This matter concernes vs neerely for it is one of the maine Reasons alleaged by Browne and Barrow and Greeneway and the rest of the separation to proue vs to bee a false Church Oh say they your Church is a profane multitude promiscuously mingled together of good and bad all were admitted together into the Church and so you continue in it without separation I answer If it were so this might proue vs to be an impure and corrupt Church but not a false Church so long as wee haue the Word and Sacraments openly embraced and obeyed by some amongst vs wee are still a true Church though wee should bee in a miserable and fearefull estate because the wicked if they were not rooted out would bee likely at length to ouerthrow the Church But secondly wee answer It is not so For first for admission we receiue none into our Church that are professedly wicked for our baptisme is administred to none but vpon solemne protestation and promise of the profession of the sauing faith and obedience to the same Now because they are receiued into our Church being young therefore this promise
of the Sacraments and profession of Obedience to the requiring of them both that is to that which they both require are the chiefest and most infallible markes of a true visible Church I doe not say that they are the onely markes for many other are assigned and may be admitted but not vpon these properties afore mentioned for they are not essentiall nor better knowne than the Church it selfe as these are therefore these are the chiefe and most infallible markes For proofe of the obseruation looke into Matth. 28.19 Goe teach all Nations baptising them saith our Sauiour in the Name of the Father the Son and the holy Ghost c. What is the businesse our Sauiour sends his Apostles about It was to plant and erect visible Churches in the world how is that to be done Go saith he teach all nations c. First they must teach the Word there is the Word preached secondly Goe and baptize c. there is the Sacraments administred and though but one bee named as that being of most speciall use for the present dispensation of planting Churches yet figuratiuely the other is intended for so you shall find was their practice Act. 2.41 42. where it is said not onely that they did baptize but that they brake bread also there is the Lords supper too and it is not to bee thought that they went beyond their commission in this for it was the Ministers part to deliuer it and the peoples to receiue it So then here is the Word preached and the Sacraments administred and what else are they to doe vers 20. Teaching them to obserue and do c. there is at least profession of Obedience As if Christ should say Let them professe at least that they will obay you else turne away from them and shake off the dust of your feete as a witnesse against them The words are so precise for euery particular in the obseruation and that from our Sauiours owne mouth and containing such an absolute description of the office both of Ministers and people and the intendment being the erecting and settling of true visible Churches that me thinks it is as much as if our Sauiour had said Wheresoeuer these three are performed there let the World take notice of a true visible Church and so from time to time wheresoeuer there is any true Church to the worlds end And what is this but that which I have affirm'd in the obseruation that the preaching of the Word and the administration of the Sacraments and obedience of the people to that which they doe both require are the most infallible and chiefest markes of a true visible Church Another Euangelist reporting the same Commission speakes as much in effect though not in such precise tearmes Mark 16.15 16. Go ye into all the World and preach the Gospell to euery Creature he that shall beleeue and bee baptized shall bee saued c. there is the Word preached and there are the Sacraments as before and there is profession of obedience to them both for if they beleeue they must obey This point is so cleare that it needs no further proofe yet because it is a question betwixt vs and the Papists and also betwixt vs and the separation and likewise among Divines therefore wee will see further proofe of it There are other places of Scripture which auouch the same in effect yet not so pregnantly as these doe Ioh. 10.4 our Sauiour saith He goes before his sheepe that is before his people and they heare his voyce and follow him How doth Christ go before his people He goeth before them in the Word and in the Sacraments leading them in the wayes of saluation for the Word is there expresly named My voyce and vnder that the Sacraments are figuratiuely to be vnderstood And they heare it and follow him there is obedience Our Sauiour alludes to the custome of the Shepheards in that Countrey that were wont to tune a voyce to their sheepe which they hearing and knowing did all follow Now this voyce of Christ is his Word and his Sacraments are parts thereof therefore if yee aske who are the sheepe of Christ The answer is ready They that heare the voyce of Christ and follow him As who should say Where is a true visible Church The Answer is where the Word is truly preached and at least professed to be obeyed The like speech is in the 27. verse of the same Chapter So likewise in Ephes 5.26 the Apostle saith that Christ gaue himselfe for his Church that he might sanctifie it and cleanse it by the washing of water through the Word Apply these words to the visible Church then there is the Word and Water that is Baptisme and vnder that Sacrament the Lords Supper is implied and there is profession of obedience for they are sanctified and cleansed so that wheresoeuer these are there is a true visible Church Answerable vnto these assertions you shall find it by experience to haue been from the beginning looke into Paradise Gen. 2.16 17. there is the Word Gods Commandement giuen to our first Parents Yee shall not eate c. and there were the Sacraments the Tree of life verse 9. purposely to signifie and to seale vnto them eternall life if they did obey and there was also their obedience acknowledged in that they accepted of their estate and that vpon that condition If any doubt of this it is plainely laid downe Gen. ● 4 Where the woman acknowledged that they were bound not to eate of that Tree so there is their profession of Obedience So you see how it was with the Church in Paradise before the fall Now let vs see how it was with the Church out of Paradise after the fall Gen. 3.15 There was the promise of the Gospell there is the Word preached and Gen. 4.3 4. There were the Sacrifices there was Caine and Abel offering Sacrifices which were representations of Christs owne Sacrifice of himselfe and consequently of the Sacrifices of the new Testament and there was also their profession of Obedience in that they brought their Sacrifices vnto God no doubt but Adam their Father taught them the Doctrine of the Gospell and how they ought to worship God and they profest obedience to that he taught both Caine as well as Abel for then they were both members of the visible Church so heere is the Word and the Sacraments and Obedience profest to them both and so a true visible Church Likewise that in Gen. 9. from the eighth to the seuenteenth verse In Noahs time after the floud there was Gods Couenant made with Noah so there is the Word and there was the Bow set in the Cloudes there was the Sacrament and thirdly their profession of obedience too for it is a Couenant which intends obedience on Noahs part for else how is it a Couenant if it be not condescended to on both parts And so also in Abrahams time Gen. 17 4 7.10.23 in the 4. and 7. verses
God makes a couenant with Abraham there is the Word and in the 10. vers there is the Sacrament Circumcision and in the 23. verse there is Abrahams obedience He circumcised Ismael and all the males in his house So likewise when God sent to gather his people out of Egypt first hee deliuers them his Word by Moses Exo. 3.15 and 6.6 and he giues them the Sacrament of the Passeouer Exo. 12.3 and in the eight and twenty verse of that Chapter there is the peoples obedience The Children of Israel went and did as the Lord had commanded Moses and Aaron euen so did they And what was the Law and Sacrifices in the former Testament but euen as the Word and Sacraments are in the new Testament And did not the Lord require and receiue of the people a precise promise of obedience euen before hee prescribed them either Law or Sacrifices This wee may see hee did Exod. 19.5.8 God sent Moses to the people there before hee deliuered them his Law and before hee prescribed their sacrifices to know whether they would obey or not and they said they would So that vnder the Law there was the Word and the Sacraments and profession of obedience in the people and so a true visible Church And so Ioshua renewing the true worship of God Ios 1.16.18 redresseth the things amisse and brings in the Law and the Passe-ouer and the people they promise obedience in all things euen as they obeyed Moses And so in the 2 King 23.2 3 21 22 23. When Iosiah restored the Church of God First hee caused the words of the booke of the Couenant to be reade to the people in the second verse so there was the Word and in the 21. verse there the King restored the Passeouer so there is the Sacrament and in the third verse there is their obedience for the King made a Couenant with the Lord and all the people stood to it And thus likewise it was in the time of Ezra as you may read Chap. 7.8 And also in the time of Nehemiah Chap. 8. 9. they restored the Word and Sacraments and made a Couenant with God wherein they professed their obedience and so were restored to bee a true visible Church So then these must needs be the principall markes and notes whereby a true visible Church is discerned because they are not onely in the instituting of a true visible Church but also in the renewing and restoring of it when it is corrupted It is in this case as with a Campe in the field who as they are gathered at the first to their Colours and Banners so likewise if the Campe bee put to flight by the enemy the Generall hangs out and displaies his Colours and Ensignes that so they that are scattered may gather to them againe and that so they may bee a Campe as before So it is with Gods Church when it is put to the worst when it is corrupted and polluted hee displayes the Ensignes and Banners of his Word and Sacraments that so whosoeuer is fallen away may enter into Couenant againe and become a member of the true visible Church and fight vnder Gods Banner as well as hee did before Thus wee see how it was in the former Testament that these were the true marks of a true visible Church and so it is also in the new Testament I will giue you a patterne or example onely in two Churches and by them you may esteeme of al the rest The first is the Church of Ierusalem Act. 2.14 41 42. In the fourteenth verse it is said Peter lifted vp his voice c. there is the word preached and in verse 41. there is the Sacrament of Baptisme they that gladly receiued his Word were baptized and in verse 42. there is the Sacrament of the Lords Supper vnder the name of breaking of bread and there is also their profession of obedience for they continued in the Apostles Doctrine and fellowship and breaking of bread and prayer and so there was a true visible Church The second patterne is the Church of Corinth 1 Corinth 1.13 there was Baptisme and in the 1 Corinth 11.23 There was the Lords Supper and Chap. 15.1 there was the Word preached and also their obedience for the Apostle Paul preacht vnto them the Gospell which they receiued and continued in So that these are the chiefe and most principall markes of a true visible Church And where these are the Word truely preached the Sacraments rightly administred and profession of obedience to that which they doe both require there is a true visible Church of God The ancient Fathers doe acknowledge this in effect for they say that the Word preached and the Sacraments administred are the chiefest markes of a true visible Church but there must be obedience to them both for that is the Life of all and indeed euen the Papists themselues when they are out of controuersie doe grant the Word and Sacraments are the chiefest and clearest markes of a true visible Church And so much for the proofes Reas 1 The reasons of the obseruation are these First the Word and Sacraments are the causes and the definition of a true visible Church as wee have shewed and therefore must needes bee the most infallible markes of it But you will say how can the same things be the causes and definition and also the signes and markes too Yes very well As for instance the Sunne-shine is the cause and definition as also the infallible marke and signe of the Day and so the Word and Sacraments being the causes and definition of a true visible Church must needes also bee the clearest and most infallible signes and markes of it Reas 2 Secondly they must needes bee infallible markes of a true visible Church which are alwayes found wheresoeuer a Church is planted or wheresoeuer it is continued or wheresoeuer it is restored but the Word and Sacraments and obedience are found in all these therefore these are the most infallible notes of a true visible Church In the first planting Math. 28.19 and in the continuing Act. 2.41 42. and in the restoring as Ioshua's and Iosiah's times c. as we have shewed before Reas 3 Thirdly wheresoeuer Moses is taught and obeyed with his Ceremonies there is a Synagogue of the Iewes where the Alcoran is taught and Mahomet observed there is a Church of Mahometans So likewise where the Gospell of Christ is taught and his Sacraments administred and obedience yeelded to them there is a true Church of Christ Fourthly where there is good wheat sowen and thriues and comes up in the blade is not that a field of wheat So likewise where the Word is preached and the Sacraments administred and profession of obedience to them both is not this a true Church Not that profession onely makes a true Church but because as I have shewed it cannot be but whereas these are there is some that doe sincerely professe Fifthly is not shee a right
and naturall Mother that Reas 5 brings forth a Childe of her owne body and after she hath brought it forth nourisheth it with her owne milke So likewise the Church that doth beget us by the Word of Truth and nourish us with the Sacraments is not shee a true Church Sixthly every Tree is knowne by the fruites Matth. 7.16 Reas 6 17. The false prophet is knowne by his false doctrine for so the place intends if that bee a sufficient marke to know them by then true doctrine is a sufficient marke to know the true Church by Seuenthly it is Christs presence that makes a true visible Reas 7 Church therefore the Word and Sacraments outwardly representing Christs presence so as nothing else doth and so making him notoriously present make a true visible Church Lastly frō the sufficient enumeration of the parts of a true Reas 8 visible Church it must be so none are members and parts of it but the Ministers and people now the Ministers doing their duties in dispensing Gods mysteries both for preaching the Word and administring the Sacraments they are the Ministers of Christ 1 Cor. 4.1 and the people doing their dutie in obeying that they teach at least outwardly they are the sheepe of Christ Ioh. 10.4 Now which of these markes might be spared or what other are Vse 1 there that neede to bee added Therefore where these are there is a true visible Church The vses of the point are these The first vse is matter of reproofe and that of many aduersaries First it reprooues such as except and say first that other Congregations besides Except 1 the true visible Church have these markes and therefore they are not sufficient nor infallible markes I answere Answ It is true that other Congregations pretend to haue these markes as what Heretikes or Schismatikes are there that will not say they have the Truth and right faith with them this is the generall claime of them all the Scriptures are ours and for us But this is a false pretence for when it comes to the tryall it will appeare that it is but their saying not that it is so in truth for either they will refuse some part of the Scripture or else they will mangle and deprave it or else they will take the Letter for the sense as the Papists doe in the matter of Transubstantiation this is my Body and other Heretikes that because it is said He shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost and with fire therefore they baptize with fire taking the Letter of the Scripture instead of the sense of it Or else they adde somthing to the word as traditions and such like and so though they doe approue and take it in at the fore-doore yet they cast it out at the backdoore so that indeede they haue it not at all whatsoeuer they pretend we may say truly therefore that they challenge these markes but wee cannot say they are theirs but they still remaine the proper right of Gods true Church Wee know that the Divels policie and the depth of his subtiltie is to imitate apishly the courses of God that thereby hee may deceiue the more cunningly and therefore hee will counterfeit Gods owne markes and cognisance but wee must trie the Spirits 1 Ioh. 4.1 and the proofe will make all cleare for Sathan can transforme himselfe into an Angell of light and his Apostles can transforme themselues into the Apostles of Christ and his Ministers as though they were the Ministers of righteousnesse 2 Cor. 11.13 14 15. So then though these lay claime to these markes and say they are theirs yet they have no right to them it is but their vaine bragges their master Sathan himselfe alleageth Scripture and pretends it is for him but hee was shamefully discouered by our Sauiour for hee left out part of it and depraued it as wee may see Math. 4.6 7. And so the harlot Pro. 7.14 said I have peace-offerings this day I have paid my vowes therefore came I out to meete thee she pretends to pray but her intent was to play the harlot And so Zidkiah 1 King 22.24 braggs that hee had the Spirit of Prophecie when indeede it was a lying Spirit that was in his mouth So the Congregations of Heretikes and of Schismatikes lay claime to the Word and Sacraments and say they are theirs when as indeede they are not because they doe either refuse some part of them or depraue them or adde vnto them their owne Inuentions Secondly that except and say that many visible Churches haue Except 2 not these markes at least not all of them alwayes I answer yes they haue them all Answ and that alwayes in some measure more or lesse els they are not true visible Churches For the better vnderstanding hereof consider these two things first the different estate of Churches sometimes Gods Church doth thriue and flourish and then it hath all these markes without doubt Gods Word is truly preached the Sacraments rightly administred and obedience to them both is professed and yeelded and that in an high degree But sometimes a Church of God is not in such an excellent estate some are but in their beginings newly planted and so cannot haue all at once but hath euery thing in its order place first the Word is tendred to them then the people if they beleeue and submit themselues and professe obedience to it they are to be made partakers of the Sacraments First Baptisme and then the Lords Supper so far forth as it is a visible Church it hath all these marks these Church's are but in their beginnings and therefore they haue but the beginnings of these notes and markes Againe sometimes a Church is in a dying and decaying estate either by reason of Apostacie or persecution if the Church bee in a decaying state by Apostacie what shall I say to such Churches I say that so farre forth as these be true visible Churches so farre forth they retaine these markes if they be but the remainders of a Church then they haue the remainders of these markes if it bee a dying and a decaying Church then it hath dying and decaying markes So then these markes must be found in all true visible Churches according to the state of those Churches if it be a dying Church then the Word and Sacraments and Obedience are dying and decaying too but when it is quite fallen it ceaseth to be a true visible Church nor hath it these markes And so likewise in the time of persecution when the Church is so persecuted that there are none left to make open profession of the Faith and Religion of Christ yet so long as there are any that publikely suffer for the Gospell so long there is a true Church though troubled and brought low for by their suffering they professe obedience to the Gospell and though they are debarred of the publike vse of the Word and Sacraments yet the fruit and effect of them is still visible
and so they haue these notes and markes in some degree Secondly consider in what state or sense these markes are necessarily required in the Church they should be and sometimes are in the purest and soundest Churches in an high and excellent degree There is the true Word without tradition the true Sacraments none but those that Christ instituted true obedience without resistance to any part of the knowne Will of God and answerably this true Word must bee truely and soundly preecht these Sacraments onely so administred as Christ hath commanded without any addition and this true obedience truly professed without any sinister respect And this all Churches are to pray and labour for and thus it ought to bee in all true visible Churches but yet they are generally otherwise in all visible Churches in as much as all are subiect to errors and corruptions but yet so long as the true markes are found in any visible Church though they bee not so rightly and sincerely carried as they should the same is a true Church though not so pure as some others if they haue the true Word though mixt with some errors so they be not such as ouerthrow the foundation they are a true Church though more corrupt As for example the Church of Galatia embraced the true Word but not truly preached for they taught iustification by workes Gal. 3.1 2 3. and some thinke that they were then in the state of Apostacie and yet they were a true visible Church and are so called Gal. 1.2 So secondly for the Sacraments looke into the Church of Corinth 1 Cor. 11.22 to the end of the Chapter they had the Lords Supper but it was much depraued and not so sincerely administred as it ought to haue beene and yet they were a true Church and so for the Doctrine of the Resurrection a materiall point in Religion there were some that denyed it in the Church of Corinth 1 Cor. 15.12 and yet they were a true Church Lastly for profession of obedience the Church of Sardis Revel 3.3.1 had a name that she liued but was dead they were generally in the estate of Apostacie in that Church yet because they made profession of obedience though not sincerely and because some amongst them did truly professe as in the 4. ver therefore it is called a Church I speake not this to cherish any Church in the corruptions that they are in but onely to keepe vs from an vncharitable conceit of such a Church as not to esteeme it for a true Church because the Word is not so truely preacht nor the Sacraments so rightly administred nor profession of obedience so sincerely yeelded as it ought to be Thirdly they obiect and say that these are not more Except 2 knowne than the Church and so are disabled by your own rule before given from being the principall markes I answer they must be and are better known than the Church for seeing that onely is a true Church which professeth the true Faith as wee haue shewed before therefore wee must first know which is the true Faith before wee know which is the true Church and so as they must bee more knowne so they must bee first knowne I know a visible Church as a company of men not by their faith but as a Church by their faith only and their profession of it As I know a Musitian because of his Musicke not the Musicke by the Musitian And so much for reproofe of these first sort of Aduersaries that except against this Doctrine Secondly it reproueth others that obiect and say that there are other markes required as well as these as first Loue to the Brethren I answer This is a part of their obedience which they professe Secondly say they there Except 1 must bee a lawfull Ministery I answer that is presupposed and intended in the two former markes Answ when we say Except 2 that the Word must be truly preach'd and the Sacraments rightly administred Answ Yea but say they specially Discipline Except 3 that is an essentiall marke I answer That is a good marke Answ but not essentiall the Church hath a being and a wel-being Discipline is a note of the wel-being of the Church not of the true being of it for it is no part of the essence of the Church and so it is excluded from being a necessary marke of a true Church because it is not essentiall I confesse where that Discipline wants that God calls for in his Word that so farre that Church is an imperfect Church but yet not a false Church As a man sicke of the Palsey his sinewes are weak his hands tremble his ioynts are not soundly knit together this is a crazed and diseased man not a false man So that Church that wants Discipline is not well and soundly tied together in the ioynts and so is an imperfect Church not a false Church I speake not this as I said before to cherish any Church in their corruptions for they are to labour against them but yet let vs iudge charitably and not say Such a Church is a false Church when indeed it is but a bad Church Thirdly and lastly there are other aduersaries here reproued that obiect against this Doctrine and they are the Papists They obiect and say that these markes are not the principall but others are more required than these and that as better markes They alleage foure first Antiquity secondly Succession thirdly Multitude lastly Vnity or Consent These are strange markes of a true Church First for Antiquitie can that find me out the true Church then it would follow that euery ancient Church were a true Church and so the Church amongst the Turks should be a true Church because it is ancient therefore it is Antiquity of truth not of place or people Look what Church maintaines the ancient Doctrine of truth that is the true Church so that antiquitie separated from the truth is no note of a true visible Church Caine and Satan were ancient yet no true Church but ioyne this note with the Truth The true Word preach'd which is one of our notes and then it is a true marke Secondly for Succession What succession of Bishops or of men that sit in one Chaire Is this a Note without the Word or with it If they say without the Word that is fals●●f with the word then still they run vpon our notes and markes of the Church for wee say that Succession of true and sound Doctrine is a special Note of the Church Succession of it selfe is no Note it is as if a man should say This is my Horse because this is my Bridle as if his Bridle would not serue any other Horse Thirdly for multitude they make that a Note of the Church but it is quite contrary for generally the true Church is the fewest in number and for the most part the greater number are the worst and by this Rule in Christs time the Scribes and Pharises and Iewes were
the true Church and Christ and his Apostles must be Heretikes Lastly for vnitie and consent that is no Note vnlesse it be vnity and consent in the faith and sauing truth of God so that still all their Notes runne vpon this maine point of Faith and sauing Truth which is our Note For how doth the Church of Rome know her selfe to be a true Church Surely by the Word whereby they proue that shee was once a true Church that is the ground of all So that their Notes of Antiquitie Succession Multitude and Vnitie or Consent came in but to second that prouing by these that therefore she is so still because by the Word it is proved first that she hath been a true Church and so that she cannot erre doe they not labour by all might and maine to proue it by the Word that so their Church may be yeelded to be Catholike so that still they iustifie their Church by the Word as well as they can as that being indeed the onely witnesse to iustifie any Church by Also if an heresie arise how doe they disproue it but by the Word principally So that still the Word by their owne practice whatsoeuer for a shift and for contention-sake they professe is the best and truest witnesse of a true or a false of a Catholike or Hereticall Church yea they themselues put these very things into the definition of a true visible Church that is the VVord and the Sacraments and Profession and that chiefly as Bellarmine therefore by their owne confession we that haue these markes are more certainely a true visible Church than they that haue any other markes whatsoeuer So much for the reproofe of these aduersaries that except against this Doctrine Vse 2 The second Vse is for confirmation to vs that our standing is good in this Church because wee haue the true markes of a visible Church I say not that we haue a pure Church free from all corruption we must pray against the corruptions of it but I say we haue a true Church for we haue the VVord as truly and sincerely preached in our Church as in any Church and so we haue the Sacraments rightly administred and if I should grant that any thing were miscarried by the wearing of a Garment or such like thing yet it hurts not the thing it selfe And so for Obedience it is true that many doe not professe obedience but rather prophanenesse and yet some there are that doe professe truly and sincerely Therefore let vs not doubt of our standing but that it is good and let vs praise God for these good meanes and labour to profit by them lest God take them from vs and giue them to others that shall bring forth better fruits than wee haue done And so much bee spoken of the Notes and Markes whereby a true visible Church is discerned The fourteenth Lecture of the Church WEe haue spoken as you may remember concerning the Church visible first of the Definition of it secondly of the causes of it thirdly of the memhers of it fourthly of the notes and markes of it Now wee are to speake in the fifth place according to the order set downe of the gouernment of it And it followes orderly for when we haue seene what this Church is and the causes whereby it is and the members whereof it consists and the notes and markes whereby it is discerned from all other companies then it followes orderly to know in the next place what gouernment this Church hath first whether it hath any at all and secondly if it haue any to know what gouernment this is that is the point then wee are to speake to namely Church gouernment A point in my iudgement that in regard of it selfe needs not to be so exactly looked into and precisely stood vpon now as heretofore but yet in regard of many vnhappy differences and inconueniences that haue risen about it and beene occasion●d by it in the Church of God therefore to satisfie the Consciences of some that are weake and to stoppe the mouthes of others that are clamorous humourous and peruerse and to maintaine peace and vnity in the house of God and to iustifie the State of all reformed Churches professing the sauing faith of Iesus Christ that howsoeuer they differ from one another in the matter of Church-gouernment as some haue many faylings and sore blemishes in their Gouernment yet all are true Churches of God I say in these respects I know not any one point of Religion not fundamentall so necessary to bee throughly sought into and aduisedly and duely to bee considered of Therefore in this regard I purpose to speake of it as God shall enable mee That which I purpose to speake concerning this point I will reduce to these heads First I will speake of the harmes and euils that haue beene raised and that haue happened by this question of Church-Gouernment secondly I will shew what is meant by Church-Gouernment thirdly I will shew how needefull it is in the Church Fourthly whether there bee a precise Rule left by the Apostles for this Gouernement Fifthly if there bee not then what is to bee done in this case Hee that resolues mee in these points resolues mee of all that can bee spoken concerning Church-Gouernment Wee will beginne therefore with the first point The harmes and euils that haue been raised vp in Gods Church hereby Infinite are the euils which this matter of Church-Gouernment hath occasionally bred and brought forth in the Church of God I say occasionally not of it selfe for the thing in its owne nature is holy and good and therefore naturally can yeeld no such bad fruits but occasionally as being abused by the malice of Satan and the corruption of mans heart hence it is that it brings forth such bad effects The fault is partly in the Gouernours and partly in the gouerned First the Gouernors sometimes when they bee proud and hauty contemning their inferiours striuing with equals aspiring to the highest places as is euident in the Papall gouernment And some tokens of bad Gouernours the Scriptures giue vs as Couetous giuen to filthy Lucre abusing their places and Authority to their owne priuate gaine negligent and carelesse like Gallio in the Acts making no conscience of the faithfull execution of their Office Secondly there are faults in those that are Gouerned some ambitiously seeking for higher places than they are fit for some are enuious maligning and spiting their superiours some are sensuall despising Gouernment some are ill-tongued speaking euill of those in Authority some are obstinate and rebellious resisting their orders and proceedings and will not endure their necke vnder any yoke Lastly some are humourous and peeuish denying that power set ouer them to bee lawfull labouring for innouations and changes and new platformes of gouernment of their owne deuising contrary to that already established These and the like Aduantages hath the enemy from time to time wrought vpon
as by his direction are established we are free indeed from sinne that it should not raigne ouer vs and we are free from Satan that he cannot condemne vs and we haue a freedome from the Law that wee are not subiect to the curse of it but yet we are still bound to doe that which the Law commands and so to obey our Gouernours and to submit our selues to outward Gouernment onely we are free from them in our Consciences that they should not be Lords ouer that Yea but say they wee are a Law vnto our selues wee need not any Rulers A proud allegation from a presumptuous spirit who is there amongst vs that hath made any triall of his heart for obedience to God but is guilty to himselfe that he is dull and backward and needs reproofes and admonitions and censures and all too little to keepe him within the compasse of obedience the humble soule feeles such a rebelliousnesse within it selfe that it cryes out not to God onely but to man too O I am a miserable sinner I pray yee looke to mee watch ouer me reprooue me exhort me censure me terrifie me with shame and punishment for my sinnes for my rebellious heart must be so bridled or else it will breake forth outragiously into sinne Wee know what the Apostle said of himselfe Rom. 7. That he was sold vnder sinne Therefore this comes from a proud spirit in them to say they haue no need of Gouernment because they are a law vnto themselues We see the inconueniences that it breeds in particular men what would the inconuenience be to the whole body if it were suffered in generall surely much more as it was with the Israelites when there was no King in Israel so would it be in the Church if there were no outward Gouernment euery man would doe what he lift Secondly it reproues those that hold Church-gouernment Vse 2 as an indifferent thing they thinke it no great matter whether there be any or not it may bee or it may not be say they and yet the Church may doe well enough But these are sufficiently disproued by the former inconueniences that follow where no Gouernment is And had this been the mind of Christ and his Apostles they would neuer haue taken such precise order for it in euery Church And surely the Churches that maintaine this Doctrine are not the Churches of the Saints for in all the Churches of the Saints God is the Author not of confusion but of peace and order 1 Cor. 14.33 and so likewise that particular member that maintaines it is no sound member of Gods Church Vse 3 The third vse is for reproofe of those that hold outward Gouernment essentially necessary to the Church as if the Church without this could haue no being at all I for my part desire and would gladly go as farre as I see Christ and his Apostles haue gone before me and where they stay there would I stay too I find that the Church can neuer be long nor well without Gouernment but yet it may be sometimes without it and yet bee a true Church It is true of the inward Gouernment for where that is not it is not possible that the Church should haue any being at all but it is not so of the outward Therefore we must rightly distinguish betwixt the inward and the outward Gouernment otherwise we shall run into many absurdities First the inward is meerely spiritual the outward is for the most part bodily that is such as affects the eare or the eye or some other parts onely it is thus farre spirituall in regard of the end it aimes at that is to make vs spiritually minded Secondly the inward is proper to God and reserued to him onely the outward though it be from God too yet it is committed to the administration of men Thirdly the inward is peculiar to the faithfull and elect alone God rules in their hearts and consciences iustifying and sanctifying them and none others the outward is common to all that professe themselues to be members though they be hypocrites Fourthly the inward is the highest and principall the outward is but a seruiceable dispensation fitted to the inward Fifthly the inward seconds the outward and makes it effectuall and fruitfull the outward doth but leade vs by the hand as it were to the inward I note this difference the rather because many men doe clamorously exclaime that Christ is robbed of the one halfe of his Kingdome when that outward forme which they pretend is not obserued And this is the Brownists exception You say they deny Christ to be your King because you owne not his Discipline which he hath prescribed I am 〈◊〉 the Apostle Gods Kingdome consists no● of meates 〈◊〉 drinkes and of outward Rites but of righteousnesse and peace and ioy in the holy Ghost the principal part of God Kingdome is when hee rules by his Spirit in the hearts of his children and therefore if there were any such Discipline prescribed by the Word as they pretend yet wee should not lose the one halfe of Christs Kingdome though it were not obserued Happily it is not knowne to them that doe not obserue it and then it is no Rebellion if it be knowne by them the sinne is much the greater if it bee not obserued But yet Christ may still exercise his Kingdome in the hearts of many members of the Church by his Spirit though this were wanting The case may seeme to bee well paraleld by our outward and inward worship in prayer the outward worship is but an appurtenance to the inward for the inward may be true without the outward And so Discipline is rather an appurtenance to Gods Kingdome than the Kingdome it selfe so that we see that Gods Church may be without Discipline though it cannot be well nor long without it where outward Gouernment is wanting the Church may bee defectiue and maimed yea halfe dead in outward shew at least and yet a true Church still Ye● but are not the Word and the Sacraments parts of the outward Gouernment and they are necessary to the very being of the Church ●herefore some part of the outward Gouernment is essentiall to the Church I answer That they are not necessary to themselues but by accident because they 〈…〉 to the inward as that it cannot be without this And besides the Word and the Sacraments are not so much of the outward Gouernment of themselues but rather the carriage and manner of vsing of them is of the outward gouernment Lastly I answer they are simply necessary as they are the causes and gathering of the Church but not as they are parts of outward gouernment As Moses his message and gathering of the Israelites to the Lord was one thing his gouerning of them another So that the Word and Sacraments must be considered in both these respects and so in respect of gathering the Church they are simply necessary not in respect of gouerning of it So
Angells and there wee shall liue continually praising and glorifying God there we shall haue fulnesse of ioy and pleasures for euermore Psal 16. To conclude therefore let vs not debase our selues to sinfull and vile and slauish courses but let vs labour to walke in some good measure answerable to such great and high priuiledges as these are The Twentieth LECTVRE of the CHVRCH THe last point we spake of was concerning the priuiledges of the Church not humane such as Kings and men endowed the Church withall but diuine such as God endues the Church withall and therein wee handled two points first that there are such priuiledges belonging to the Church secondly what these Priuiledges are there is something to be added to the last point namely what they are For there are two speciall priuiledges something questionable aboue the rest each of them subiect to mistaking and the mistaking of them is and hath beene the cause of much error The first is concerning the infallible guidance of the Church by the Spirit of truth and thereupon ariseth this question whether the Church may erre or no The second Priuiledge questionable is concerning the necessity of being a member of the Church if euer wee will attaine saluation and thereupon ariseth this question whether any can be saued out of the Church or no These are the two points which I purpose to handle at this time The first is concerning the infallible guidance of the Church by Gods Spirit wherupon ariseth this question whether the Church may erre or no And because error is a generall name affirmed as wel of matters of obedience as of knowledge of bad māners as well as of false doctrine therfore in plaine and large termes it shall be propounded and handled thus whether the Church may erre either in manners or doctrine or in both or in neither to open the way to the disclosing of the point wee are to vnderstand rightly these words Church and Error First concerning the word Church for whereas sometimes it signifies the whole Company of Beleeuers liuing on earth somtimes some one visible Congregation professing the Faith of Christ the state of the question is not of both alike but we must vnderstand it far otherwise of the one then of the other For whereas in the first sense it containes Beleeuers onely and all of them together it must needs haue some speciall Priuiledge aboue particular Congregations at least for some kinde of Error Euery Beleeuer hath a Priuiledge in that respect aboue an vnbeleeuer therefore all together much more so that if it bee possible that one or two might be seduced to Error yet that all of them together should bee so it is impossible And whereas in the second sense the Church consists of Hypocrites as well as true Beleeuers yea sometime all or most of Hypocrites therefore the Church taken in this sense must needes bee more subiect vnto Error then in the former sense Secondly concerning the word Error The Word of God prescribes euery true and right way and euery swaruing from that is therefore called Error whether it be in Doctrine or manners because it is a going from that true and right way which the Word of God doth teach vs And though Error properly signifie a swaruing from the Truth whether on the right or on the left hand yet it comprehends ●gnorances too that is their not attaining to some heauenly Truthes these Errors are of diuers kindes especially foure First some are either fundamentall or in smaller matters Secondly some are either of obstinacy or of infirmity Thirdly some are either finite and for a time others are for euer Fourthly some are either generall or particular First some are either fundamentall or in smaller matters fundamentall Errors are such which being held doe race the very foundation he that erres in this manner cuts himselfe off from Christ and cannot be saued such was the Error of the Church of Gal●tia in Gal. 5.2.4 where they ioyned the workes of the Law with Christ in the matter of Iustification and therefore the Apostle tells them in the 2. verse that if they were circumcised Christ should profit them nothing and vers 4. yee are abolished from Christ whosoeuer is iustified by the workes of the Law is fallen from Grace Other Errors are of smaller moment as when men hold the foundation but yet erre in building on it and such notwithstanding these errors may bee saued 1 Cor. 3.12 to 15. the Apostle saith that some build hay and stubble vpon the Foundation but shall this turne to their damnation No themselues shal be saued saith hee but what without Repentance No for in the 13. verse it is said The day shall declare it because it shall bee reuealed by Fire and the Fire shall trie euery mans worke of what sort it is that is the Day or Light of Gods Truth shall dispell this darkenesse and the Fier of Gods Spirit shall purifie and purge away these errors from them so that they must repent of these errors But then yee will say what difference is there betwixt those that erre in the foundation and those that erre in smaller matters for they that erre in the foundation shall be saued too vpon their Repentance It is true but yet there is great difference betwixt them for first they that erre in the foundation are seldome and hardly reclaimed not one amongst a hundreth but they that erre in smaller matters are vsually and easily reclaimed for if the foundation bee ouerthrowen all must bee reared vp a new but if any thing that is built vpon it be amisse it may be easily amended yea those that erre in smaller matters cannot chuse but bee reclaimed as hauing the foundation and therefore cannot possibly perish Secondly those that erre in the foundation must repent particularly of that error and must also embrace the contrary Truth else hee cannot be saued But those that erre in matters of lesse moment though they doe not repent of their error in particular Nay though they do not know them for who knowes his errors yet if they repent in general of them they shall find mercy pardon from God so that we see there is a great difference betwixt these Secondly some errors are either of Infirmity or of Obstinacy Of infirmitie as when wee are either by negligence Ignorance Ouersight weakenesse as being taken tripping in a snare against our knowledge and against our purpose and holy desire or by other occasions such the Apostle speakes of Gal. 6.1 Brethren if a man be suddenly fallen into any offence yee which are spirituall restore such a one c when as they see it not to bee an error or if they doe see it to be so yet they haue some weake desire and labour against it but yet the assault is so strong and their corruption so great that they cannot ouercome it this is an Error of Infirmitie Some errors are of obstinacy that is
when as the Partie knowes the right and yet willingly declines from it and these that thus erre are so far from striuing against their Error that they rather striue against a manifest Truth to maintaine their Error such an Error the Iewes are taxed for by Stephen Acts 7.51 and by Paul himselfe Acts 28.26 where he applies a place out of Esay to them shewing their obstinacie that in seeing they did see and not perceiue c. so that this is an error of obstinacy for a man to know the Truth and yet willingly to decline from it Thirdly some are finite and for a time onely some finall and for euer for a time onely and vpon better Aduice they change their minde such was Peters deniall of Christ Matth. 26.75 for which hee presently repented and went out and wept bitterly Againe some are finall and for euer as when men liue and dye in sinne without any Repentance at all at least without any true and sound Repentance such was the sinne of Iudas in betraying Christ he died desperately in it without any true Repentance Mat. 27.3 5. Lastly some Errors are particular some are generall and each of these in two respects first in respect of the persons that erre secondly in respect of the things they erre in for when as one or two or some few men in a Congregation are tainted with Error here is a particular Error in respect of the persons as it was in the Church of Corinth when as but some of them denied the Resurrection and not all 1 Cor. 15.12 But when as all or the greatest part in a Church erre this is a generall Error in respect of the persons An Instance of this wee haue in the Iewes when as they did all cry out against our Sauiour Christ Crucifie him Crucifie him So secondly in respect of the things erred in as when a man or a Church erres onely in one or in few things this is a particular Error in that respect so did the Church of Pergamus Reuel 2.14 I haue a few things against thee But when a man or a Church erres in all or the most things this is generall also in respect of the things they erre in as the Church of Rome at this day erres in all or the most things and so their Error is generall in that respect as also in respect of their persons Now to apply all this to the subiect of the question whether the Church may erre in all or in any of these respects or no If wee vnderstand the Church in the first sense for the whole Company of Beleeuers liuing on earth in this sense the Church may be said to erre first in matters of smaller moment not in the foundation Secondly of Infirmity not of obstinacy Thirdly at least onely for a time not for euer Fourthly particularly not vniuersally either in respect of the persons or of the things But if wee vnderstand the Church in the latter sense of one particular Congregation in this sense the Church may erre in all these which that I may the more largely and distinctly without Confusion deliuer and you apprehend receiue it plainely in these Obseruations The First is this That the Church militant the whole Company of Beleeuers on earth howsoeuer it hath many excellent Priuildges by the Spirit of truth yet it is not so exempted from Error but that it may and doth oftentimes erre both in Doctrine and manners I shall not neede to handle Errors in manners by themselues and Errors in Doctrine by themselues for each of these are transgressions against the Word Wil of God and they are both damnable and each alike may take hold of the Church 1 Cor. 13.12 The Apostle Paul speaking of himselfe being then a sound yea a principall Member of the Church of Christ acknowledgeth ingenuously much Ignorance that hee knowes little to that hee should know he knowes but in part Now Ignorance being an Error in a generall sense as wee heard before then we see that the Apostle willingly vndergoes the Imputation of Error and if he bee in Error who can looke to escape And therevpon it followes by necessary consequence that he erred in manners too for wee cannot bee obedient in that wee doe not know so that as his knowledge was imperfect so was his loue and obedience too But for errors in manners it is far plainer in Rom. 7.22 23. where the Apostle acknowledgeth that there was a Law in his members rebelling against the Law of his minde and leading him captiue vnto the law of sinne c and this was not his infirmity alone but it is the infirmity of all the Faithfull the Spirit stirres them vp to doe good yea but saith the Apostle Galat. 5.17 the flesh lusteth against the Spirit and the Spirit against the flesh and these are contrary one to another so that you cannot doe the same things you would And our Sauiour giues an Inckling of this to his Disciples in a kinde of Parable Ioh. 13.10 where he faith He that washed is needeth no ●●ue to wash his feete c. which though it be spoken in a negatiue sense as shewing that nothing needes washing in them but their feete yet it is affirmatiue in force shewing that none is so cleansed and purified but that still hee hath foule feete that is hee hath still sinne and error in him and these must be cleansed and washed away or else he can haue no part in Christ Iesus as in verse 8 So likewise for error in manners the Apostle Iames 3.2 saith In many things wee sinne all there all are included and that not in one kinde onely as n● a diuided sense as if one should offend in one thing and another in another thing but in a compounded sense not one or many but all sinne and that not in one or few things but in many And for further confirmation of the Truth hereof it is elsewhere negatiuely deliuered as in the 1 King 8.46 There is not a man that liues and sinnes not now lay these two together and we shall see that none is exempted from error in manners So for Error in Doctrine Rom. 3.4 where it is not onely affirmed in generall of all and of euery one in particular that euery man is a liar that is that he erres in some of his Apprehensions of the Truth but the Apostle doth likewise so derogate the holding of the whole Truth entirely and incorruptly from man that he appropriates it to God alone so that it is as possible for man to bee God as not to bee deceiued So that the Doctrine is cleare that the Church militant that is the Company of Beleeuers liuing on earth may and oftentimes doe erre both in Doctrine and manners So much for proofe of the point out of Scripture Reas 1 The Reasons of the point are these First mans frailtie The members of the militant Church true Beleeuers they are but men and therefore naturally louing darkenesse
and the Anabaptists are here refuted that hold this error that they offend not in manners surely this is a farre higher straine then euer the Apostles attained to for they erred all in manners they all forsooke Christ and fled Matth. 26.56 but this was before the comming downe of the holy Ghost vpon them but did they so afterward yes euen after they had receiued the holy Ghost they erred in manners Iohn the Disciple whom Iesus loued would haue worshipped the Angell Reu. 19.10 and againe euen after admonition hee would haue done the like in Chap. 22.8 and so very likely hee did it after Repentance too And so wee see that Peter was reproued to his face by Paul for his sinne Galat. 2. If this bee so in the greene tree Alas Alas What shall it bee in the dry when Peter and Iohn and the rest of the Apostles haue had their falls shall any Puritan in the world bee so shamelesse as to boast of perfection This point shall neede no further Refutation all Gods Children from the first to the last will ondemne this Assertion by their owne contrary clamentable experience in the whole race of their liues I mention this the rather because some papists Anabaptists and familists are infected with this presumption at this day Vse 3 Lastly this serues for the Refutation of Papists that challenge to their Church and head the Pope an Immunity yea an impossibility of erring in Doctrine as if it must of necessity be true whatsoeuer they hold whereas this wee are able to shew how that they haue erred from themselues in many things holding one thing this yeare another thing the next and one contrary to the other so that except two contraries may bee true they must needes erre in the one or in the other but of this more shall bee spoken hereafter Thus wee haue seene the first point handled at large that the Church militant howsoeuer it hath many excellent priuiledges yet it is not so exempted from Error but that it may and oftentimes doth erre both in Doctrine and manners Now let vs come to the second Obseruation and Doct. 2 therein see how the Church may not erre The Obseruation is this That the Church militant is so guided by the Spirit of Truth that though it be subiect to error yet it cannot erre fundamentally obstinately finally and generally First not fundamentally Psal 62.2 he is my strength and my saluation and my defence therefore I shall not much bee moued that is fundamentally nor obstinately Psal 19.13 Lord keepe me from presumptuous sinnes nor finally Psal 55.22 the Lord will not suffer the righteous to fall for euer he may fall but not for euer nor generally in all her parts but still some are reserued that haue not bowed their knee to Baal 1 King 19.18 these two finally and generally are neuer found in the true members of the militant Church haply they may erre fundamentally and obstinately but neuer finally and generally Psal 37.24 though he fall yet shall he not bee cast off which if it be vnderstood of our outward preseruation here as the Text seemes to intend it then much more of our preseruation from sinne and error that though wee doe fall yet not finally for euer And Psal 125.1 they which trust in the Lord are like mount Syon which cannot bee remoued but standeth fast for euer And this is cleared by our Sauiours owne mouth Matth. 16.18 vpon this Rocke will I build my Church and the gates of hell shall not ouercome it hee saith not shall not touch it but onely not ouercome it And Psal 102. last verse the Children of thy Seruants shall continue and their seede shall stand fast in thy sight So then the Church militant though haply it doe fall fundamentally and obstinately yet it cannot fall finally and generally The Reasons First it is Christs promise that the Reas 1 Gates of hell shall not ouercome it Matth. 16.18 if there were no other reason this were sufficient Reas 2 But secondly the Church is built vpon a Rocke Mat. 16.8 and therefore cannot fall Matth. 7.25 Reas 3 Thirdly Christ God and man knits and vnites vs and if God knit the knot who shall vnknit it Reas 4 Fourthly Chirst prayes for vs that we may not fall Luk. 22.23 and hee cannot be denied Reas 5 Fiftly the vnchangeablenesse of Gods Loue he admits none to bee of the Church militant but whom hee loues Now whom God loues once he loues to the end Iohn 13. Reas 6 Sixtly the presence of the Spirit is another Reason of it Ioh. 16.13 the Spirit of Truth is continually present with them inlightning quickning directing perswading and reclaiming them from sinne and error whereunto if wee adde the sufficiency of the Scripture for all matters both for life and doctrine what other direction can wee haue or how can wee erre finally and generally Reas 7 The last Reason is drawen from Gods Loue and Care of his owne heauenly Truth which if it be not beleeued at all it is much disparaged and if it be beleeued any where then surely it must be in the Church which is the Pillar and Ground of Truth therefore still the Truth is aliue at least in some of the Church so that the Church cannot fall finally and generally for then the Truth must fall too Vse The vses are these The first vse is for matter of comfort to the faithfull that howsoeuer if we be left to our selues wee are weake and darke and blind prone to sinne and error and vntoward to grace and goodnesse yet wee see Gods Grace is sufficient for vs to keepe vs in his holy Faith vnto the end It is true that in regard of our selues wee are like silly sheepe ready to be a prey to the Beare and the woolfe yet wee haue an heauenly sheepherd our Sauiour Christ and he hath still an Eye on vs and lookes after vs and rather then we shall be quite lost hee will bring vs home on his owne shoulders Luke 15. Satan may and does seeke to deuour vs and to swallow vs vp quicke but God hath set him his stint so that neyther altogether nor for euer hee can preuaile against vs Iohn 10.28.29 Christ knowes his sheepe and hee will giue them eterternall life and they shall neuer perish c. If wee be ignorant of any point God will reueale it if wee be doubtfull God will resolue it if wee be out of the way he will admonish and reclaime vs wee shall heare a voyce behind vs saying This is the way walke in it c. Esay 30.21 The second vse is for reproofe of the Papists and Vse 2 Lutherans which hold that the very chosen may fall away and that finally which cannot be held without blasphemy for by this they wrong God making his election to be a meere casuall thing depending on mans goodnesse and perseuerance therein so likewise it is an exceeding wrong to the faithfull for if they may
fall away finally after true conuersion what peace or quietnesse can they haue to their consciences but still they will be fearing and suspecting and distasting their estate So much for the second Note The third note of obseruation is this that no particular Doct. 3 visible Church since the Apostles times but may erre and that fundamentally and obstinately and finally and generally and so cease to be a true visible Church I take my scantling since the Apostles times because the churches in their times had the Apostles to be members of them who being infallibly guided by the Spirit could not possibly so erre and therefore the churches in their times could not finally nor generally erre But the point is vndoubtedly true of all other particular churches that they may erre fundamentally obstinately finally and generally and so cease to be true visible churches examples will cleare it there is no Church but hath erred in some kinde both vnder the Law and before the Law yea and in Paradise as also in Christs time yea euen the churches whereof the Apostles were members had their errors but some churches may erre and others haue erred fundamentally and finally too Take the Church of Ephesus for an example that once was a true Church of God and called a golden Candlesticke and a Piller of Truth 1 Tim. 3. yet it erred in the Apostle Iohns time yea it is now vtterly and finaly falne away from Christ to Mahomet and is vtterly cut off from Christ the foundation but it may be said that the church of Ephesus may recouer againe and so her fall is not finall I d●ny not but that it may be recouered through Gods prouidence at the last yea but that is vncertaine and therefore for ought wee know her fall is as well finall as fundamentall and that which was her case may be the case of any other particular church and surely shall be if they walke in her steppes Reuelat. 2.5 The like wee finde in many other Primitiue Churches how many famous churches are falne away that were true visible churches in those times some to the Arians heresie some to the Donatists some to the Nouatians c. The lamentable estate of the Iewes Gods owne people proues this point without exception they are vtterly cut off from the foundation Christ Error like a gangrene sometimes ouer-growes all but some may say when may a church be said to erre thus seeing though some may erre yet happily not the rest I answer then a church may be said to erre either when an error is embraced of all in generall or specially of those that are the Pastors and guides and carry the chiefe face and port of the Church with them which error if it be generall in all or the chiefest Articles of faith and that after admonition they persist in it and condemne all other churches that hold otherwise Then is that church degenerate into a faction against the Church and except some amongst them impugne their vntruthes and these in some answerable number or of some good place and quality in the Church or in some knowne manner that notice may be publikely taken of it such a Church ceaseth to vs to be a true visible Church but if there be such opposers in these vntruthes onely and yet they hold with the factions in opinion in some other truthes fundamentall the Church for their sakes may be falsely reputed by all that know that opposition a true visible Church The reasons of the point are these The same reasons that proue that the Militant Church may erre hold directly for proofe of the first part of this obseruation that a particular church may erre and often doth erre for if it be so in them being all certainely chosen much more in these being all called but few chosen which also well considered will proue the latter part of this obseruation that is they may erre fundamentally and finally too for in euery particular visible church there are some few of Gods chosen else it can bee no true church Now these few dying still the Truth and the Church where God in his Iudgement forsakes decayes more and more loosing one truth after another and one faithfull person after another till at last few or none are left not enough in number at least in port and place to beare the name of such a visible church Secondly God tyes himselfe and his grace and saluation to no one particular place and therefore hee may take it from one particular church and giue it to another that may bring forth better ffruits The first vse is for instruction to all particular Churches to teach them to walke warily and carefully examining themselues by the Word whether their courses be agreeable thereunto and praying for the Spirit to enlighten them and let them take heede of the doctrines and inuentions of men if any error arise presently let them oppose and suppresse it If any doubt let them goe vnto the Law and to the Testimony If there be any difficulty let vs pray for the Spirit hee is the best expounder and God hath promised to giue the Spirit to them that aske him so though wee may erre yet wee shall not erre finally and generally Let not any Church presume of it selfe though it be neuer so pure for as good Churches as they haue falne and they may yea and without great heed they are in as great danger of corruption and so proceeding of a finall fall and desolation Neither let any man do at on the Church be it neuer so glorious as if it were an infallible Oracle and the ground of our faith and saluation rather search the Scriptures if the Doctrine of a Church be agreeable vnto them imbrace it and build on it not so much because of the Church which may erre and haply will deny that afterward which it once affirmed but because of the Scripture which is alwaies constant to it selfe and vnchangeable If the Scribes and Pharises teach out of Moses chaire that which is Moses Doctrine beleeue them else beleeue them not The second vse is for confutation of the Papists that say their Church cannot erre for howsoeuer they propound it as for the Church in generall that that cannot erre yet indeede they plead onely for their owne Church for they say that other Churches may erre but we say that their church may erre and that fundamentally and finally too and surely it is not far from it yea the Papists themselues in this confute themselues For first they confesse themselues that they may erre for so say some of them that they erre by excommunication when they doe it without sufficent cause others of themselues say that they erre in canonizing of Saints when they canonize some for Saints in heauen which are diuells in hell Secondly they confesse that Councels may erre too and thirdly that their Popes may erre too and lastly that their people may erre and therefore that the whole Church
the world is more subiect to aduersaries oppositions then they are for such is the condition euen of the best and happiest estates that can be attained to in this life that they consist of sweete and sower mingled together and commonly they which haue the most sweete one way haue the most sower another So is the estate of the Church a comfortable estate the best and happiest that this life can yeeld in respect of many excellent priuileges belonging to it and yet no estate so maligned spited at by so many and so sore aduersaries as the Church is the wisdome of God hath so framed and appointed it as for the tryall of our patience and obedience to see if wee will receiue euill at the hands of God as well as good so also to draw vp our loue affections to the meditation and desire of a further and better state in heauen where there is all sweet no sowre perfection of good and happinesse without any mixture of any euill Now the present estate of the Church being thus compounded of sowre as well as sweet of many dangers as well as of many priuileges It is needfull therefore first for mee to speake of secondly for you to learne the one as well as the other first for mee to speake of them for hee is a deceitfull Merchant that in setting forth his Commodities to saile shewes onely the best and conceales the worst So if I should acquaint you with the Priuileges onely and not with the aduersaries too I should be a deceitfull handler of the Word and mysteries of God Secondly it is needful for you to learne both that you may know what to trust to if euer you come within the walls of the Church not to dreame all of priuileges and comforts but make account aforehand to meete with aduersaries and crosses and oppositions of sundry kindes I speake not this to dismay any from ioyning to the Church though this hath beene one speciall meanes to discourage many but I speake this to stirre vp your spirits and to fit and frame you before-hand for the tryalls that God hath appointed you for that so you may fight that good fight of faith against all your aduersaries that which I shall speake concerning this matter I will deliuer in these fiue points First I wil shew that the Church of God hath many aduersaries to oppose it so long as it is in this world Secondly I wil shew what these Aduersaries are Thirdly I will shew the dealing of these Aduersaries against Gods Church Fourthly I will shew what is the dealing of the church the faithfull against her Aduersaries And lastly I will shew the courses and dealings of God both how he carries himselfe to the Aduersaries and also how he carries himselfe to his Church And hauing spoken of these particulars I shall haue spoken sufficiently of this point And first of the First that the Church of God hath many Aduersaries to oppose it The point offers it selfe in a plaine and direct obseruation and therefore so we will take it and so proceed in the handling of it And the obseruation is this That the Church of God so long as it is in this world is alwayes incountred and assaulted with many aduersaries that seek to disquiet their peace and hinder their good proceedings Marke the parts of the obseruation First I say they are Aduersaries there is their quality they are Aduersaries full of hatred Secondly I say they are many Aduersaries there is their number Thirdly I say that they encounter and assault the Church there is their worke Fourthly I say they doe alwayes assault it there is their diligence Lastly I say they seeke to disquiet their peace and hinder their good proceedings there is their end I shall not neede to make a curious Application of any proofes to euery one of these particulars though I doubt not but that many of the places brought for proofe would affoord it It will be sufficient that I proue the maine matter plainely and directly Therefore for the proofe of this obseruation see it first in a shaddow Mat. 8.24 where Christ and his Disciples are in a Ship vpon the Sea and this Ship is troubled with Tempests and ouerflowed with waues Now although this be but a story and that there be no intendment in the place to be applyed to this yet vnder this is fitly shadowed out the estate of the Church in this life Imagine the Sea to be the world and the ship to be the Church and the tempests and waues to bee assaults and incounters that the Church is subiect vnto and the Winds to bee the Aduersaries of the Church And then we shall see in this shaddow the obseruation bee plaine that no ship is more tossed in the Sea with Winds and tempests hindering their course and indangering their estate then the Church is beaten against by the assaults and oppositions of aduersaries troubling their peace and hindering their good proceedings See it more plainely in a Comparison of Gods owne Making and applying Cant 2.2 where the Church is compared to a Lilly amongst thornes Now the Lilly is a tender yet a glorious plant so glorious that Christ prefers it before Salomon in all his Royalty but the thorne is a shrubbed Plant rough and full of Pricks And the Church so long as it is here is a Lilly among thornes hath many aduersaries continually vexing it like so many pricking thornes in her sides euen on euery side round about her See it also in a Parable of our Sauiours making Mat. 13.25 c where the Church is compared to wheate among Tares as the wheate is among tares so the Church is among her Aduersaries the seede of the wicked And as the Tares hinder the growth and take away the Iuce from the good Corne so the wicked disquiet the Church and seeke to hinder and keepe her downe from growing And how long shall they do this why till the Haruest vers 30. that is till the end of the world vers 39. Then so long as the Church shall bee in this world shee shall be encountred and assaulted with many Aduersaries that shall seeke to suppresse it as the Tares the wheate See it yet more plainely in a vision Reu. 12. which is not a bare and empty vision like a Dreame but a beholding of things as in deede and truth they are In the first vers there is a woman cloathed with the Sunne and hauing the Mo●ne vnder her feete that is the Church of God In the third verse there are her Aduersaries a Red Dragon Red with wrath against the Church there is but one Aduersary named but he hath many heads and hornes that is many complices and retinues In the seuenth verse there is their work the Dragon and his angels fought against Michael and his Angels that is against the Church And in the fourth vers there is their end to deuoure the Childe that is to hinder all good
be beleeued besides the Word Gal. 1.8 Reas 6 Lastly the practice of the faithful is answerable to this both of teachers and learners the Teachers they haue referred the people still for certaine proofe of the truth to the Scriptures Esa 8.20 to the law and to the testimony if they speake not according to this Word it is because they haue not light in them Acts 10.43 to him giue all the Prophets witnesse saith Peter to Cornelius referring the truth hee taught to be tryed by the Scripture and so this hath beene the practice of the learners Acts 17.11 12. The men of Berea seached the Scriptures to try whether the things were so as Paul had taught them and yet Paul was a principall member of the Church and in his Doctrine hee was specially guided by the Spirit more then euer any Church was since and the Bereans are commended for this and not accounted curious So that the Teachers and the Learners haue still referred themselues for the tryall of the truth to the Scriptures and not to the Church and therefore the authority of the Scripture is greater then the authority of the Church Yea Obiect but you will say so the Scriptures are vsually referred to the censure of other Scripture and yet that is no proofe that therefore one Scripture is of greater authority then another how then doth this proue that the Scripture is of greater authority then the Church I answer Answ yes It proues the first ponit of the obseruation plainely that is that the Church is not aboue the Scripture which is the maine controuersie Nay if it be well considered it proues the second point of the obseruation that the authority of the Scripture is greater then that of the Church I say it proues it as sufficiently though not at the first sight so plainely for still in euery kinde there must be one highest which all the rest must settle vpon else there will be no stay at all but we shall runne on infinitely and without end now the Scripture or the Church is the highest thing in this kinde whereon we are to rest for they cnanot be equall then the Scriptures must needs be highest and if they be referred to any at all it must be to themselues for there is none greater nor higher as in the matter of an oath Heb. 6.13 to 16. men sweare by him that is greater then them selues But God sweares by himselfe because there is none greater to sweare by So likewise the Church is referred to the Scripture for trial because the Scripture is higher then the Church but Scripture is referred to Scripture because there is none higher to be referred to nor there cannot be two highests in one kinde for that is against nature and reason too and therefore when the sayings of the Church are referred to the approbation of Scripture it is the referring of them to an higher and so the authority of the Scripture is greater then the authority of the Church The vses are these The first is matter of refutation Vse 1 against the Papists that vsually disparage the holy Scriptures and set them downe too low and doat on the Church aduancing it too high their reach therein is not so much the loue they beare to the Church it selfe but that thereby they might exalt themselues and their owne Church and that their faith might be reputed the onely true sauing faith because their Church teacheth it So that God and his Word must goe downe that they might be lifted vp but if it be true that the Church were aboue the Scriptures yet except they can proue their Church to be the only true Church of God which they are neuer able to doe it helps not their cause It is strange to see and heare what monstrous and blasphemous speaches and positions many of them haue deliuered to this purpose as that the Scripture is of no more authority without the approbation of the Church then Esops Fables Oh horrible blasphemie there are some others of a better kinde that are more modest that say that the Scriptures are to be fitted to the times and the sense thereof is to be altred as the times alter others there are that say that the Churches are not bound to take the Scriptures as true without the allegation of the Church and that the Church hath authority to reiect or allow Scripture and that yee may know that by the Church they meane their Romish church and by that the Pope hearken how blasphemously they ascribe vnto him all power in heauen and in earth that hee may dispence against the Apostles and their Canons and against all the commandements of God in the old and new Testament c. Here the world may see that the church of Rome is that whore of Babilon an impudent and shamelesse strumpet that sets such a brasen face and belches out such whorish filthy blasphemies against God and his Word the very naming of these positions is refutation enough for them in any Christians iudgements To come to their best positions in this controuersie Position 1 First the Church say they is supreme Iudge in all controuersies of Religion but yee see by this obseruation that it is not so God is higher and the Scripture is higher the Spirit indeede is the Iudge and the highest Iudge speaking openly and plainely in in the Word and secretly in the minde and heart of euery beleeuer 1. Ioh. 2 20 27. you haue anoyntment from that holy one and know all things And againe the same anoynting teacheth you of all things Obiect yea but say they are not men sent to the Priests to enquire at their mouhes Mal. 2.7 and is not the Priest the highest Iudge then Answ I answer What are wee to goe to the Priests for for the Law not for their owne Iudgement whereto if they speake wee are to receiue it yet not because it is their saying but Gods Law but happly they can deliuer no other but Gods Law that is flatly contradicted verse 8. where the Prophet saith that they are gone out of the way and haue caused many to fall by the Law yea but say they the high Priest was the Iudge as wee may see Deut. 17.8 12. But hee was to iudge according to the Law as we may see in Vers 11. so that except they will arrogate more to themselues then the messengers of the Lord of hoasts did vnder the law they cannot be Iudge nor Iudges of the Scripture The second position of theirs is this Position 2 That whatsoeuer the Church saith we must take it as a Law and obey it It is true that whatsoeuer the Church saith according the Law and Word of God we must obey it not otherwise The Scribes and Pharises were to bee obeyed as they sate in Moses chaire that is as they taught his Doctrine Matth. 23 2 3. but if they transgresse and bring in the precepts of men and their owne traditions
as sometime they did then is their Doctrine vayne and to be reiected Marke 7 7 8. so that it is plaine that the Church is to bee beleeued and obeyed so long as they goe according to Gods Word but when they swerue from that they are no more to be beleeued Esa 8.20 to the Law and to the Testimony if they speake not according to this Word it is because there is no light in them except they speake according to the Scripture they are but darke and blind guides no light in them at all and that which is pretended to the contrary Matth. 18.17 is directly vnderstood of Church Censures which yet are not simply authenticall in themselues but as they are proceeded in Christs name Ver. 20. that is according to his order else there is no danger in it Iohn 9.34 Their last Position is this Position 3 which is directly against this obseruation namely That the authority of the Scripture depends vpon the authority of the Church In which grosse assertion they first dishonour God exceedingly as who should say man is to bee beleeued before God at least that God should not be beleeued but because of man Besides whence had the Scripture its authority in the writers of it from God or man Surely from God he is the author himselfe of Scripture 2. Timothy 3.16 euery Scripture is giuen by Inspiration from God then it must haue its authority from God who is the author of it Againe who giues vs faith the Church No it is the worke of God Iohn 6.29 Therefore that wee beleeue the Scripture to be Scripture or any booke of it to be Scripture it is wholly from God himselfe who workes Faith in vs to beleeue it Well Ob say they it is of God indeed that the Scriptures haue their authority but yet by meanes of the Church Answ I Answere It is true as the Church is the propounding witnesse thereof but not as enduing it with authority for that is from God alone and it is a great dishonour to him to giue any part of it to any other Secondly as it dishonours God so it disgraceth the Scriptures making them inferior to the Church whereas indeed they are the cause of the Church and subiecting them to the arbitrement of man whereas all our faith and discerning and thoughts are to be framed by direction from Scripture Ob. But they except and say It is no disgrace to the Scriptures that the Church is thus aduanced no more then it was to Christ that his Apostles gaue witnesse to him Answer I Answer yes for they make the Church aboue the Scripture in this case but the Apostles were witnesses of Christ as his vnderlings and Disciples They reply But the Protestants doe magnifie euery one himselfe as much as we doe the Church Answer I Answer No for euery one of vs beleeue that we are in the right because we goe by the right rule of the Scripture and the Spirit and so farre as the Church goes by that rule we will follow her as soone yea sooner then any particular man Thirdly this weakens and indeed ouerthrowes Religion setting it vpon man a ground weakeand insufficient whereas Religion must stand vpon Diuine authority else it is not sound Fourthly it spoiles the faithfull of their surest comfort which is this that God is the author of their faith and not man Fifthly it bereaues the Church of her maine hould and defence against the aduersary for whiles she saith the Religion which she professeth is true because shee saith so her selfe she layes her selfe open to the scoffes insultations of the aduersary For by that reason euery Religion wil be a true Religion seeing the professors thereof will say It is true as well and as confidently as the Church whereas if she say her Religion is true because God saith so in his word and so prooues it this is sufficient to stop their mouthes or else to leaue them without excuse Vse 2 The second vse is for Instruction teaching vs how to carry both our selues towards the Church and towards the Scriptures that is with an euen hand as our Sauiour said of tribute money giue vnto Caesar that which is Caesars and vnto God that which is Gods So must we giue vnto the Church that which is the Churches and vnto the Scripture that which is the Scriptures First esteeme of the Scripture as Gods owne Word 2 Pet. 1.21 22. able to make vs wise to saluation and perfect to euery good worke 2 Tim. 3.15 16 17 Secondly esteeme of the Churh as the Piller that is as the keeper and vphoulder of the truth 1. Tim. 3.16 not that light but a witnesse of that light Iohn 1.8 she is to inquire search propound expound pronounce teach approue iudge according to Scriptures themselues and not otherwise she is as the woman of Samariah that propounded the Messiah to the men of the city and brought them to him but when they heard him they say now we beleeue not for thy saying but we haue heard him our selues and know that this is indeed that Christ Iohn 4.42 So the Church propounds and brings vs to the Scripture but when we looke into it and heare it speake then we beleeue But ye will say how then do we know which is Scripture or how shall we know that the contents therein are true and of God I Answer First wee shall know it from the Scripture it selfe as the Sunne is knowne by his owne light so the Scriptures are knowne by their owne light God speaking and shining in the Scripture Doe wee then beleeue the Scriptures because the Church saith they are Scripture No but because the Scriptures themselues say so 2 Tim. 3.16 Secondly we shall know them by the Spirit working in vs together with the Word and perswading vs that they are true 1 Iohn 5.6 Thirdly they are made knowne to vs by the miracles whereby they were first confirmed Iohn 20.30 31. Fourthly wee know them by the testimony of the Church that is that congregation that truly professeth the sauing faith of Christ So that first not euery company that professe themselues to be the Church but professing the sauing faith are to be beleeued And secondly not whatsoeuer the Church saith is to bee beleeued but that which she saith by the euidence of the Scripture it selfe and interpretation of the Spirit And thirdly that which is so beleeued is not chiefely to bee beleeued because she saith so but in a second place aftre the Word and Spirit And fourthly not formally or essentially but instrumentally as an outward instrument onely Fifthly and that which shee doth say so shee speakes not infallibly but with some faylings errors and imperfections mans corruption still bewraying its selfe euen when he is much inlightned Sixthly that which she speakes without error is not absolutely to be beleeued because the Church saith it but conditionally because shee speakes according
yet of his owne by possession and feeling and therefore euery man must haue iudgement of his owne too for faith without iudgement is blinde presumption And must I not rest on my faith in that sense And why not on mine owne iudgement too that is on Gods Iudgement which he hath endued my minde and soule withall Obiect 6 Lastly it is obiected This is strange say they wee heare them confesse that euery man though he be neuer so much inlightned yet he is subject to error and yet euery one of them assures himselfe hauing one Answ no more warrant then another that hee is in the truth I answer so farre as wee haue full assurance that wee are in the truth that is in matters fundamentall so farre wee doe acquit all the faithfull from being subiect to error finally and therefore this is no strangenesse at all And so much concerning this point The fiue and Twentieth LECTVRE of the CHVRCH COncerning the power of the Church we haue heard that it reacheth to persons and things for so we diuided it for plainenesse sake concerning Persons we haue done concerning things we haue entred into them and shewed that the things wherin the Church hath power are either matters of substance or matters of circumstance matters of substance and that either touching Scripture or besides Scripture touching Scripture and that either touching the authority or sense of Scripture Of these two last points wee haue spoken namely concerning the power of the Church touching the authority and sense of Scripture Now wee are to speake of matters besides Scripture which is the last point concerning matters of substance that is the point we are now to speake to matters beside Scripture for though in deede and in truth there is nothing to be held in matters of substance in Religion but what is sufficiently warranted by the Word either expressely or at least by sound consequence and deduction yet because some haue fondly imagined and confidently auouched that such things there are and that it is in the Churches power to ordaine them and because some churches haue vsurped and incroached vpon more authority in this case then euer was granted or comitted to them from God therefore in handling the authority of the Church this point also amongst the rest is needfull to be spoken vnto Matters of substance in Religion are of two sorts some concerning faith teaching vs what to know and beleeue others concerning obedience prescribing vs what to do and practise in each of these the Church hath a great hand where the light of Scripture goes before and where shee followes the Doctrine thereof accordingly but where the Scripture is silent in any thing of either or both these kindes there the Church must be silent too and not desire to speake Wee will deliuer the matter plainly by way of obseruation and that is this namely Doct. that the Church hath no power to decree and ordaine any matter of substance in Religion eyther for faith or for obedience without or besides the Scripture The places that prooue this point are of diuers kindes for plainenesse sake wee will reduce them to these heads first some places ascribe this authority to God alone the second sort commends vs to the sufficiency of the Scripture in it selfe the third sort condemne all adding to Scripture and the last sort condemne all Doctrine so taught The first that ascribe this authority to God alone they are these Iames 4.12 there is one Law-giuer which is able to saue and to destroy and what is it to ordaine matters of substance in Religion but to giue Lawes Lawes I say of the highest kinde such as we must liue and be saued by and who is it that giues these Lawes hee onely that is able to saue and to destroy for so the Law-giuer is there described which being peculiar to God alone hee alone must be the Law-giuer Now the Lawes that God hath giuen are contained in the Scriptures which are therefore called the Word of God because therein God hath deliuered his minde and meaning therefore besides those in Scripture no other Lawes are to be ordained for matters of substance in Religion another proofe of this kinde wee haue Matth. 23.8 10. Be not called Doctors and be not called Master for one is your Doctor and Master and who is that but Christ himselfe Now what is it to be our Doctor and to be our Master It is to teach vs what to beleeue and what to doe that wee may be saued therefore Christ being our onely Doctor and Master he alone is to teach and direct vs in matters of Saluation And in Ioh. 1.18 The Office of reuealing God to man is appropriated to Christ hee onely declares him and the reason is there implyed because he onely came out of the bosome of the Father and therefore he onely knowes the minde of his Father and therefore consequently he onely being of ability and authority to declare it so that whosoeuer takes vpon him to reueale any part of the minde of God hee must shew that he comes out of Gods bosome else hee neither must nor can speake in this businesse that Christ himselfe hath already reuealed that is that which is contained in the Scripture Now that we may know that this Rule is inuiolably to be obserued wee must know that all which euer had to deale in matters of saluation were precisely tyed and and confined to this scantling both teachers and hearers Teachers they must teach nothing in this kinde but what Christ in his Word hath first taught The Apostles and in them all Ministers are forbidden to teach any thing but what Christ commands them Matth. 20.28 that and nothing besides that yea the holy Ghost Christs speciall and chiefe Deputy on earth hee is to receiue of Christ and to shew that to the people Iohn 16.14 15. he shall receiue of mine and shew it vnto you And the Text saith in the 14. verse that he shall glorifie Christ in this as who should say if hee teach ought besides it were a dishonour and disparagement to the Lord Iesus much more if any other should doe so and so the hearers they are tyed to this scantling too for so it was prophesied before Deut. 18.15 The Lord thy God will raise vp a Prophet vnto thee like vnto me from among you euen of your brethren vnto him yee shall hearken And this Prophet is Christ as the Apostle Peter proues Acts 3.17 And this was after confirmed by a voyce from heauen Matth. 17.5 This is my welbeloued Sonne in whom I am well pleased heare him And it is the marke of Christs owne sheepe that they will heare his voyce Iohn 10.6.27 and his onely and not a strangers that is whatsoeuer is spoken not according to the voyce of Christ in the Scripture So much for the first sort of Scriptures The second sort that proue this point are such as commend vnto vs the
proportion in like cases Christ himselfe when hee came to teach saluation spake nothing but from the father Iohn 12.49 50. and whatsoeuer the Spirit doth teach hee receiued it from Christ Iohn 16.13 If Christ doe tye himselfe to teach those things and nothing but those things hee receiued from the Father and the Spirit nothing but those things he receiued from Christ then I hope the Church hath not greater liberty in respect of the Scripture then Christ in respect of his Father and the Spirit in respect of Christ Therefore as Christ spake nothing besides that hee heard of his Father and the Spirit nothing but that hee receiued from Christ so by proportion the Church is to speake nothing in matters of saluation besides Scripture Reas 6 Sixthly the Church is to do nothing heerein but by direction and assistance from the Spirit and as it is horrible presumption to say the contrary so the Papists themselues sometimes ingenuously confesse that the Testimony o● the truth consists in the holy Ghost and the Prelates iointly so that it is not in the Church alone without the Spirit And what doth the Spirit teach the Church any new Doctrines or Reuelations No but that which Christ hath reuealed before If ye compare Iohn 14.26 with Iohn 16.13 14 15. you shall finde that the holy Ghost whom Christ promiseth to send shall teach all things that Christ hath taught which be●ng the same which is in the Scripture then the Spirit teacheth the Church nothing besides Scripture And so the Church is able to decree nothing besides the Scripture because shee is able to doe nothing without the Spirit Lastly when things are decreed by the Church are Reas 7 we to receiue them hand ouer head or vpon tryall and examination If ye say ha●d ou●r head without examination that were a gracelesse speech and vtterly vnlawfull being against the rules of the Word 1 Thess 5.21 Trye all things 1 Iohn 4.1 Trye the Spirits If then they must be receiued vpon tryall and Examination how must they be tryed and by what rule Eyther by the Iudgement of the present Church or by the Scripture If ye say by the Church that were to make her Iudge in her owne cause then it must bee examined by the Scripture as the men of Berea did Paules Doctrine Act 17.11 they searched the Scriptures daily whether the things were so as he taught So the things the Church decrees must bee tryed by Scripture and if that cannot approue them as being not there found they are to be reiected and the authority of the Church in imposing them to be disclaimed So we see in reason that the Church hath no power nor authority to decree anything or matter of substance in Religion ●yth 〈◊〉 faith o● for obedience without or besides Scrip●●● The ●irst vs● 〈…〉 of reproofe of sundry Popish practises and positions not to name all For indeede if this point be well vnderstood it razeth and ouer throweth the very foundation of Popery Here then we see first that the Church cannot coyne any new Articles of faith why is any man so gracelesse to doe so yes the Papists doe so And howsoeuer many of them will not seeme to fauour it in word yet their practise makes them guilty of it Pope Pius the fourth propounds a Creede and tyes his children the Papists to it wherein after hee had set downe the twelue articles contained in the Nicene Creede he addeth twelue more of his owne concerning traditions Purgatory c. And these hee will haue acknowledged and vndoubtedly beleeued as the former and is not this to coyne new articles of faith Ob. But say they why may not we doe so as well as you that haue your articles of Religion and all reformed Churches haue their seuerall confessions wherein there are many things besides those in the Creede and yet professed and beleeued Answ as well as they I Answer It is not a like comparison for we though we doe beleeue many things that are not in the Creede yet wee beleeue nothing besides Scripture and that which is soundly proued by Scripture is to be beleeued as well as that in the Creede But theirs are such for the most part as haue little or no shew of Scripture for them but are matters besides Scriptures which they obtrude on the people meerely or at least principally by the authority of the Church But hath the Church then no authority about Articles of Faith newly to be made I Answer No But onely as thus if any article hath beene neglected obscured and layen hidden in former times the places of Scripture whereon it is grounded being not well vnderstood then the Church hath power to declare and publish it vpon the better vnderstanding of such places as it is proued by And this is not to make new articles of faith but to reuiue and renew those that were before and that not beside the word but with and by the word This may be cleared by an Instance The article of Iustification by Faith had lyen hidden for many yeeres before Christ came but when Christ and his Apostles came they reuiued it and yet made no new article of it but the same that was taught from the beginning of the world to come neerer home After that this doctrine was againe obscured lay hid for many yeeres till it pleased God to raise vp Luther and others which brought it forth to that cleare light that it was in in the Apostles times And is this to make new articles No but to reuiue and to bring to light that which had lyen hid a long time And thus far the Church may goe and no further The second Position is this that the Church cannot make any booke to be Canonicall Scripture which is not so of it selfe For this is to ordaine and decree matters of substance in Religion besides Scripture But do the Papists doe this yes they doe and therefore are here to bee reproued for it as being vtterly vnlawfull for them so to doe For first the number of Canonicall bookes are certaine as themselues confesse and therefore no authority can admit more Secondly if the Church hath power to make bookes that are Apocrypha Canonicall then also shee hath power aswell to reiect some that are Canonicall for hee that hath power to build hath also power to destroy And what were this but for the Church to mayme and mangle the Booke of God as shee list her selfe what an horrible wrong were this to God Thirdly the sheepe of Christ heare his voice they doe not make or frame it Lastly as a Gold smith takes a peece of gold and tries it whether it bee right or counterfeit by the touch stone and before he finds it to be true Gold he doth not make it true Gold for if he finde it to be counterfeit all the Gold smiths that are cannot make it true so must the Church cry which are Canonicall
bookes by the Scripture and not make any so of her selfe for this she cannot doe The third Position is this That as the Church cannot make any booke Canonicall which is not so of it selfe for she hath no power to deuise adde diminish or alter any part of Gods worship outward passages of Gods worship are much in her power as we shall see hereafter but that she may ordaine any part of his worship besides Scripture or affixe remission of sins or other supernaturall effects to the obseruations and ceremonies which she deuiseth all this is but will-worship hatefull to God and expresly forbidden Col. 2.23 Intolerable hath beene the presumption of the Church of Rome in both these For first they haue ordained besides Scripture Images satisfactons new Sacraments new intercessours new propitiatory sacrifices and sundry other parts of Gods worship and seruice Secondly euen to ceremonies of their owne deuising as to crossings processions ringing of Bels pennance and such like they haue ascribed forgiuenes of sinnes driuing away of Deuils and such like gracious effects wherein consists no small part of Gods worship The fourth point is concerning the customes of the Church custome we know preuailes much in matter of practice and many times they are very approuable and not to be varyed from but vpon good occasion yet in matters of Religion yeelding to customes hath bred much inconuenience as wee see amongst vs profaning the Sabbath by playing and walking in the streets and in the fields after the exercises is growen to such a custome as that men thinke it no sinne and so in other things And to speake plainely customes are but a carnall motiue apt to ouer sway the naturall man but of themselues besides Scripture they are no spirituall motiues to the true Beleeuer The ancient fathers tye vp customes in Religion thus short that they must be agreable to the truth so that where truth and customes agree there they are to be admitted else to be reiected Now what is truth Our Sauiour saith Gods Word is truth Iohn 17 17. then if there be any customes in matters of Religion besides the Scriptures which are the truth they must be abolished euen by the Iudgement of the Fathers whom the Papists would seeme to alleadge for these things yea but say they the Apostle Paul alleadgeth custome 1 Cor. 11.16 but how doth he alleadgeth them Against contentions because contentions are against the Word of God so that custome besides Scripture is nothing worth The last point is for matter of traditions Traditions are one mine Piller of Popery and if they leaue them once they will quickly leaue their Religion too Now if we vnderstand traditions in a general sense It intends the whole Doctrine of Saluation which from time to time hath beene deliuered from the fore fathers to the children of the Church And so we willingly embrace traditions as being the Doctrine contained in the word and so the speeches of many of the ancients are to bee expounded and doe make for traditions But in the particular sense as the Popish Church intends them that is vnwritten verities and matters besides Scripture then so there is no building on them If they be verities it is more then we know and being vnwritten we haue no warrant to receiue them to his point we say first eyther there were no such traditions at all or secondly if there were yet they were needlesse considering the sufficiency of the Scripture thirdly if they were needfull yet they were vncertaine lastly if they were certaine yet certainely they were but the words of men and not certainely the word of God First eyther there were none at all I meane for matter of substance yes say they for substance ye haue something by tradition as the Baptisme of Infants the change of the Sabbath and that so many bookes are Canonicall Scripture c. We Answer wee haue not these by tradition for they may sufficiently be proued by good consequence out of the Scripture As first for the Baptisme of Infants we haue the example of our Sauiour in Marke 10.14 And secondly for the Canon of Scripture we haue that place 2 Tim. 3.16 the whole Scripture is giuen by Inspiration from God c. yea but what place in the word saith that so many bookes are Canonicall I Answer euery booke beares witnesse of it selfe and this place of them all that they are Canonicall Thirdly for the change of the Sabbath we haue Reu. 1.10 where it is called the Lords day so that we haue Scripture enough for these things to satisfie an humble minded man that is not contentious Secondly if there were any such yet they were needlesse for supposing the sufficiency of Scripture which we haue proued before what neede vnwritten traditions besides Scripture Indeed before the Word of saluation was committed to writing It was needfull that it should be deliuered by word of mouth from man to man but the word being now written and hauing beene now written these 1610. yeeres and as much written as euer shall be what haue we to doe with traditions besides Scripture Thirdly if they were necessary yet they are vncertaine for how shall I know that the Apostles deliuered ought by tradition or that the Churches after them be they either de facto or de iure For that which is alleadged from the Apostle in the 2 Thess 2.15 keepe the Instructions yee haue bin taught eyther by word or by Epistle whereupon they say the Apostle left traditions and Epistle I Answere these words doe not imply any diuersity in the things he taught but onely in the manner of deliuery looke what he preacht he writte And whatsoeuer can be alleaged for the Churches after them is but the testimony of man we must know it by history and what certainety is there in that to repose my Saluation vpon Lastly if they were certaine yet all this while they were but certaine the traditions of men and certainely not the Word of God And therefore here is the damnable presumption of the Papists that they by name call them the Word of God vnwritten equall them both in authority to binde the conscience in necessity to be beleeued and obeyed with the written word common sence and reason which is endued but with the least touch of Religion will easily decide this controuersie If we adde heere to determination of councels consent of fathers decrees of Popes and other patches and faynings of Popish Religion the conclusion must be this that either there were none such or if there were they were not beside Scripture but according to it or else if they were besides Scripture then they were no matter of substances nor Saluation nor to be receiued as such The second Vse is for Instruction to teach vs what Vse 2 it is that our faith must be framed by and what euery truth is to be tryed by And that is
the Scripture the written Word of God and nothing else The Scripture is the onely rule of Faith and of obedience what it teacheth must onely be beleeued and what it commands must onely be obeyed and nothing else as necessary to saluation And generally all Churches acknowledge the Scripture to be the canon yea the Popish Church to his day retaines the name though they cast it out at the backgate yet at the foregate they take it in the Canon that is as much to say as the rule Now what is to be done with a rule All things are to be fitted to it and not it to any thing Carpenters and Masons they fitte their tymber and stone to the rule and not the rule to the tymber or stone so then the Scripture being the rule whatsoeuer is to be beleeued or obeyed must be squared by it and looke how much it comes short or goes beyond or misseth on this hand or that of the rule so much it comes short of true sauing faith and obedience and so much wee goe out of the way of Saluation therefore cast away all other measures as crooked traditions customes c. and sticke fast onely to this rule as to the perfect square of all Religion we must put nothing to Gods Word nor take ought there from this the Lord himselfe commands Deut. 4.2 and 5.32.35 Secondly as this is the rule of faith so it is the tryall of euery truth the Scripture is the onely touch stone of truth if Paul teach the truth it must be tryed by the Scriptures Act 17.11 Let heathen men bring their Paganisme the Turcks their Alcoran the Iewes their Talmud the Papists their Catechismes councels customes and traditions to this touchstone and this this will shew them all to be starke counterfeits very drosse and filth not worthy to be once looked after much lesse to bee esteemed the pretious golden truth of God that soules should be saued by Lastly yet mistake not as to thinke that all matters of substance and saluation were expresly in the word that is by name and in so many words as we are to apprehend it but at least by consequence and to be deducted by sound and sanctified reason applying it to the circumstances of the Text and to the analogy of faith And so we haue finished those things that concerne matters of substance Wee come in the next place to matters of circumstance and these are of two sorts either miracles or discipline either miracles for indeed it is a part of the power of the Catholique visible Church as it containes altogether from the Apostles themselues downe to our times for with them it was an ordinary thing to doe miracles Matth. 10.1 Our Sauiour gaue them power against vncleane Spirits to cast them out c and Marke 16.17 and 1 Cor. 12.9.10 to another is giuen the the guifts of healing to another the operation of great workes by the same Spirit And it was very necessary at the first planting of the Gospell that they should haue this power for the confirming of their office and authority that planted it but now there is no vse of miracles their Doctrine and writings being sufficiently confirmed already and therefore that power is restrained and what Church soeuer challengeth this power may iustly be censured for Anti-christian spoken of in the 2 Thes 2.9 Secondly or Discipline and that is of two sorts either matter of Gouernement or matter of Ceremonies of the first wee haue spoken already of the second wee will speake a word by Ceremonies we vnderstand the time place and gesture to be obserued in Gods worship and seruice we will contriue the whole businesse into this obseruation Euery particular visible Church hath power from God to ordaine some outward Rites and Ceremonies for the outward carriage of Gods worship within that Church or Congregation Marke the parts of the Note Doct. First I say euery visible Church for the inuisible not being contained within the bounds of any one setled outward state can haue no such orders Secondly I say particular for besides that a generall visible Church cannot so be properly assigned to a place and if it were yet being of so large an extent as commonly it is it cannot be brought within the compasse of the same outward Rites Thirdly I say hath power from God to ordaine Ceretaine Rites Fourthly I say for the outward carriage of Church businesse for they haue nothing to doe with the Inward man Fifthly I say they must be within that particular Church for one Church is not to prescribe another what they should doe except their case be very like and that there be a willingnesse in the Receiuer So the Note is cleare we come to the proofes Acts 15.1 2. In the Church of Antioch there was a matter in question as touching Circumcision an outward Ceremony the Apostles being then at Ierusalem were by the consent of the Church of Antioch consulted withall about it and accordingly they deliuer their iudgement in the 23. verse c. And therein shew their power and consequently the power of the Church after them for the causes being perpetuall the course must be perpetuall too and they shew their power both in disanulling some Ceremonies as Circumcision vers 10. as abstaming from meat offered to Idolls and blood verse 20. which were certainely things in their owne nature indifferent as the Apostle shewes of meats 1 Corinth 8.8 And yet all this they did with the assistance of the holy Ghost verse 28. and that onely in things needfull as in the same verse and this they did not so much for the thing it selfe but for the auoyding of offence And so in the 1 Cor. 11.2 c. where the Apostle mentions the ordinances which hee had deliuered them already which are generally vnderstood of matters of order and decency and the circumstances make it plaine enough for after verse 3 c. he deliuers them other ordinances keepe which hee had not deliuered them before concerning the vncouering of the mans head and the couering of the womans head which were things indifferent in themselues yet for comlinesse sake hee doth there inioyne them and verse 20 c. hee deliuers certaine other ordinances concerning the outward carriage of Gods worship in the Lords Supper as their tarrying one for another eating before c. verse 33.34 And whereas many other things were out of frame with them he promiseth in the end of 34. verse to order the rest at his comming to them where it is cleare that the ordering of things concerning the outward carriage of Gods worship is in the power of the Church it selfe for still the Rule holds that the disease continuing alwaies requires a continuall reamedy from time to time So in the 1. Cor 14.26 40. The Apostle would haue all things done decently and in order hee giues them this generall rule for matters of Ceremony and they must draw particulars accordingly
and this Rule holds as well for the Church now as then there being the same necessity there must also be the same power So the point is plaine that euery particular visible Church hath power from God to ordaine certaine outward Rites c. The reasons to proue this point are these First some Reas 1 Ceremonies are necessary in euery Church no Religion can possibly be carried without some outward Rites and Ceremonies Now who shall ordaine these but themselues as best knowing their owne State As in a priuate family who shall ordaine orders for it but those of the Family Secondly no Rights are vniuersall to hold euery Reas 2 where in all Churches no that is impossible because diuers Churches are of diuers states and therefore euery Church must haue power to ordaine Ceremonies for themselues Thirdly no Ceremonies are perpetuall in one and the Reas 3 same Church euery Church in time differing from it selfe by the change of occasions and states and then the Ceremonies which they had before are not fit for them now and therefore still they must haue power to ordaine as their state shall require Lastly if a particular Church hath not power to ordaine Reas 4 certaine Rites the Church vnder the Gospell is inferior to that vnder the Law For that was prouided for in this kinde by the Lord himselfe and that in particular But the Church now is not so prouided for of him If any say it is let them shew where therefore it must needes be that hee giues the Church now power to prouide for themselues in this kinde The vses are these First this teacheth the Church to Vse 1 take the benefit of this authority that God hath giuen them but you will say the Church is ready enough to take their liberty herein and therefore they had need to be bounded and bridled that they goe not too farre eyther for multitude vnprofitablenesse superstiton or the like The limits and bounds therefore that euery Church is to containe themselues within in ordaining Ceremonies are these First they must doe nothing that is opposite to Gods Word Secondly they must haue no opinion of Gods worship placed in them as the Surplice and the Crosse if the Church so inioyne them it makes them vnlawfull If they haue beene abused so heretofore by the Papists that is not their sinne now take away the abuse and the things may still be imposed and put in practice Thirdly wee must haue an eye to doe all to Gods glory 1 Cor. 10.31 Fourthly they must be done without scandall or offence as much as possibly may be the Church must be wary heerein for though all things be lawfull yet all thing are not expedient 1 Cor. 10. 23 32. Fifthly all things must be done to edification 1 Cor. 14 26. Lastly all things must be done decently and in order 1 Cor. 14.40 as in Exod. 28.40 Aarons sonnes must haue Coats and Girdles and Bonnets made them for glory and beauty which being the end that the Lord in the Legall Ceremonies did ayme at it must needs be our end also in the like cases and thus the Church may safely ordaine Ceremonies The last vse is to teach vs that if we liue in a Church where such things are ordained that are not simply vnlawfull we must take heed that we resist not this power or the things thereby ordained Bridle thy selfe from dislike specially from refusall yet yeeld with some perswasion of conscience take such a course whereby thou mai'st obey the Magistrate and the Church and yet not offend the weake heerein is wisedome yet rather obey the Magistrate though with offence for heere disobedience is the greater sinne and so takes away the sinne of offending the weake and indeede in this case I giue none offence because my hands are bound and I haue no liberty to doe otherwise but what if a man be not perswaded of these things What is then to be done must hee separate from the Church No first they must labour to be better informed secondly they must resolue to beare with a great deale rather then to make a rent in the Church thirdly suffer thy selfe to be ouerborne in things indifferent by the authority of the Church till thou be'st able to proue it simply vnlawfull or to shew that there is greater scandall in the vse of it then in disobeying the voyce of the Church and of the Christian Magistrate I know that it is sinne to disobey the Christian Magistrate except I know that God commands the contrary Now in these indifferent things I doe but feare I doe not know that God commands the contrary to that which my conscience is doubtfull of now shall I runne into a knowne sinne because I would auoyde a sinne onely feared So much shall serue for this point And so wee haue finished the eyghth point concerning the power and authority of the Church The sixe and twentieth LECTVRE of the CHVRCH YOu may remember that 9. points were propounded to be spoken to concerning the Church whereof we haue already handled 8. of them And now wee are to speake of the ninth and that is the application of all that which hath been spoken to all visible Churches in Christendome that I knnow of those Congreagtions that professe not Christianity we meddle not with The Pagans that professe heathenish Religion no Christian the Iewes that professe the Law and not the Gospell the Turks that professe that abominable Idoll Mahomet and not the Sonne of God Iesus Christ these wee haue here nothing to doe with they are vtterly excluded from the outward name of a Church as being assemblies quite of another kinde they haue no Christ not somuch as in outward profession and therefore are no Church at all It is the Christian assemblies that is those that professe the faith of Christ crucified that wee are heere to speake of you shall vnderstand that the Doctrine concerning the Church whereof I haue spoken hath been so plainely and fully deliuered that if it be rightly vnderstood it will easily apply it selfe to all Christian Churches in the censure of those that are Religious Iudicious but yet because diuers Christian Churches are of diuers conditions differing one from another as well in time as in place and because the chiefe reach of this whole discourse both in teacher hearer is this to see how we may iustifie our standing in the present state of this Church of England therefore for your better direction both to helpe your iudgement concerning other Churches and to settle your resolution touching the goodnesse and soundnesse of this Church that we liue in I will endeauour God willing to make application of that which hath beene spoken as to all Churches in generall so more particularly to this Church of ours The generall diuision of all Churches that eyther are or haue beene since our Sauiours time is two-fold First according to their situation and so some are Easterne and the
a true visible Church I grant that they come very neere the roote of faith and ouerthrow the foundation almost to the very ground by the Doctrine of Iustification by workes which error if they would reclaime few or none of vs would doubt but that they are a true visible Church yet this ouerthrowes Christ not directly but by consequence by consequence they doe because if mans merits iustifie then Christs merits alone doe not iustifie vs but directly they doe not for still they beleeue in Christ their onely Sauiour and they say that it is Christs merits that makes them merit they are not so grosse in this point as they were yet still they are grosse enough ouerthrowing the foundation by consequence yet still by consequence onely not directly and therefore still they may be reputed a true visible Church but ye will say is it not as dangerous against a mans saluation to deny Christ by Consequence as to deny him directly to shut him out at the backe-doore as at the foredore I answer It is not so great a sinne yet I say hee that doth this deserues in Gods Iustice to be cut off from Christs mercy as well as the other especially if hee see the consequent but if hee see it not it is not so foule a sinne as to deny Christ directly he that directly denies the foundation whether hee see it or not is in certaine state of Damnation but he that denies it by consequence and sees it not but yet doth firmely beleeue in Christ so farre as he knowes and is willing in reuerence and humility to learne more and to obey better and doth daily repent and beg mercy of God for his failings the Lord doth ordinarily either inlighten such an one and so bring him to repent or else doth forgiue him his ignorances and so saue him So that hee that denies Christ directly is in certaine state of damnation vnlesse he haue a part●cular repentance for that sinne but he that denies Christ by consequence if he confesse his ignorances and weaknesse to God and craue pardon of them and labour for more knowledge may be saued though they haue not this particular repentance for that sinne And that this is the case of many thousand poore simple soules that heretofore haue beene and now are contained in the besome of the Church of Rome no man of any bowells of charity can suspect So much for the first reason The second reason is taken from the comparison of Reas 2 the Church of Rome with other Churches in the same state compare her to the Church of Israel in Exod. 32.6 There they fell to Idolatrie worshipping the Calfe and yet they were a true Church still and in Numb 25.3 9. compared with the 1 Cor. 3.8 we see that they ioined themselues to Baalpeor and committed fornication with the Moabites thus they were very bad and yet a true Church still Looke further into the time of Ieroboam that set vp the Calues and made all Israel to sinne so that God threatned to giue them vp for the sinne of Ieroboam 1 King 14.16 and so in Ahabs time in the 1 Kings 16.30 Ahab the Sonne of Omri did worse in the sight of the Lord then all that were before him and so a time was when there was no passe-ouer in Israel for many yeeres and yet they were a true visible Church still So likewise compare it with the estate of the Church of the Iewes in our Sauiours time it was in the state of Apostasy and yet a true Church the Scribes and Pharises retaining some notable truthes were still to be heard Matth. 23.3 and yet their Leuen to be taken heed of Matthew 16.6 so that though they had many corrruptions yet they were a true visible Church The Church of Galatia retained circumcision whereby all profit and benefit by Christ is vtterly m de voide that is by consequence The Apostle saith Galat. 5.2 that if we be circumcised Christ shall profit vs nothing and yet this was a true Church still and I dare say that circumcision doth as neerely cut off from Christ as Iustification by workes by consequence they do both ouerthrow the foundation And so the Church of Sardis that had but a name to liue and was dead Reuel 3.1 was yet a true Church Now if all these were true Churches that were thus corruped why may not the Church of Rome though it be Idolatrous and haue many other foule corruptions be in some sense reputed a true visible Reas 3 Church The third Reasen is drawne from the Confession of many euen of our best Diuines as Luther Caluin Zanchey Morney and others that were most fierie and fierce against the Romish Church hating their abominations with as perfect hatred and detestation as any and yet they confest her to be a true Church though a corrupt Church though a dying Church though her life hung but by a thred this they haue confest of her I alleadge this not so much a Reason to prooue but rather as a qualification to mitigate the odiousnesse of this Speech in the eares of many which doe greatly reuerence the iudgement of these fathers and yet cannot endure to heare that the name of a true Church should be afforded to Rome Reas 4 Lastly their Baptisme is true Baptisme and therefore they are a true though an vnsound visible Church for the truenesse of the Church and of Christs Sacraments by them administred do necessarily inferre each other wheresoeuer there is a true Sacrament rightly administred for the substance of it there is a true Church But Baptisme in the church of Rome is rightly administred for the substance of it and therefore the church of Rome is a true church The error of rebaptization of such as haue beene baptised by Heretiques did arise from the want of the due consideration of the very like point in those things So much for the reason Vse 1 The Vses are these first then this teacheth vs that those were lawfully baptised that haue beene baptised in the Church of Rome and that the Baptisme wee receiued from them is lawfull Baptisme But some except and say that they that are Baptized in the Church of Rome are baptised into their faith I Answer No but they are Baptised into the Faith of the Trinity And this is the singular wisedome and mercy of God to keepe them sound in that that is for the substance of Baptisme though otherwise they are generally corrupt But ye will say It is intended by them into their faith I Answer first that their intent is so as being perswaded their faith is the true Christian Faith And secondly I Answer the Ministers intent makes not the Sacrament answerable to it but it is Gods worke and he makes it to a faithfull receiuer effectuall to the Vse 2 right vse that he hath ordained it vnto Secondly it iustifies our ministry against the Brownists and the Papists
that say wee haue no true Ordination we Answer that we had our ordination from the Church of Rome at the first and that being a true visible Church therefore we haue a lawfull Ministery Vse 3 Thirdly this may serue for satisfaction to that question which the Papists aske vs where was your Church before Luthers time did he erect a new church No he erected no new church but by his Ministry brought many faithfull out of their impure and vnsound Church into a more sound and pure Church not onely for matters of ceremonies for then he had beene a Schismatique to separate from them but for matters of substance so that this point well considered preuents a number of inconueniences which wee should runne into if wee should fall into that heate of zeale as to deny them to bee a true visible Church Vse 4 Fourthly this may comfort vs in respect of our fathers that haue liued in the Popish Church what shall we thinke of them that they liued in no true visible Church and therefore could not be saued far bee it from vs no we are perswaded that they liued in a true Church and that many of them where sound in those times and now saued they attained not to that high straine of Iustification by workes I would faine know whether they did not doe that they did ignorantly or whether they did challenge or disclaime their merits on their death beds many at the point of death disclaime their merits now though that point now is more stiffly defended by the Popish faction then euer it was much more did they doe it then Now to disclaime all their owne merits at their death is not that both repentance of former errors if any in that kinde and faith in Christ alone too If any beleeue in Christ crucified in truth of heart though hee hold but by the hemme of his garment shall he perish Surely no. Vse 5 Lastly this teacheth vs to vse charity towards them of the Popish Church in censuring of their estate we are not rigourously and rashly to call for fire from heauen vpon them as the Disciples would haue Christ haue done on the Samaritanes No yee know not what Spirit ye are of saith our Sauiour wee must not rashly Iudge them to bee vnbeleeuers but rather mis-beleeuers And so much for that point what in charity and yet in truth maybe said for that Church The seuen and Twentieth LECTVRE of the CHVRCH HAuing entred into the last point concerning the matter of the Church namely the application of the Doctrine of the Church to all Churches that we know in the world After we had diuided them according to their scituation and language into the Easterne and Westerne the Greeke and Latin Churches we beganne with the Easterne and Greeke Churches and so proceeded to the Westerne and Latin Churches And of them I tould you that some were vnder the yoke of the Pope and haue him to bee their head Others haue shooke off that yoke and head-shippe and are therefore called the Reformed Churches Concerning the Church of Rome that which is spoken of her may be applyed to her Adherents as is the mother ●o is the daughter as I haue said Now for the Chu●ch of Rome I propounded these two obseruations to be spoken to first what might be-spoken in charity for her and yet in truth and sound iudgement too and of that we haue spoken Secondly what in zeale and yet in truth and sound iudgement too may be said against it And that is it which wee are now to speake to what may be said in zeale and yet in truth and sound iugement against her A point very needfull to be well cleared and rightly vnderstood for whereas we haue deliuered in the former obseruation that the Church of Rome in some sense may rightly be reputed a true visible Church ' Euery one will be ready to except against it and say why then haue ye● forsaken it why doe ye not still hould communion with her what iust exception can yee alledge for your separation from her For Answere to which exception Doct. 2 I will propound in the second place this obseruation namely that howsoeuer the Church of Rome in some sense may be reputed a true visible Church yet it is maruellous vnsound and corrupt and exceedingly corrupt with many foule abuses errors and abhominations yea so corrupt as it is not lawfull nor safe for vs to communicate with her The Obseruation ye see consists of two branches the former is the ground of the latter auouching that shee is polluted with many foule abhominations the latter is an inference from the former that therefore it is not safe nor lawfull to ioyne with her The whole obseruation is to be vnderstood of that Church specially in respect of the Popish faction the Pope and his Darlings for as when wee spoke in charity for them acknowledging that in some sense they are to be reputed a true visible Church it was intended of some that were of better Spirits amongst them that are sounder in some chiefe points of Religion and that are not so obstinate in their errours as the rest So now that we come to speake in zeale against them that they are so foulely polluted that it is not safe to ioyne with them It is intended in respect of the Pope and his chiefe Darlings and factors called the Popish faction neyther is this any wrong to the Church that we so speake of the whole body in generall tearmes because the Church and faction are there mingled together in that Body as when wee come into a Barne floore and see a great deale of chaffe in the same heape with good wheat we may speake fauourably of the wheate and say there is good corne and we may speake disgracefully of it too and say it is but light stuffe We will begin with the first part of the obseruation that condemnes her corruptions And we will reduce all her corruptions to these two sorts First matter of Doctrine secondly matter of practice And though these be much incident one to the other yet for playnnesse sake we will distinguish them God willing as well as wee can First for Doctrine the point is this The Doctrine of the Church of Rome as it is at this day vnderstood and maintained by the Popish faction is very vnsound and corrupt full of grosse and abhominable errors they haue changed the truth of God into a lye light into darknesse and the Gospell of Christ the comfortable Doctrine of grace and faith into the erors of Antichrist and the damnable Doctrine of workes and merits and of mans traditions We wil not speake of all her corruptions in doctrine that were too much only we will shew it in some chiefe particulars that briefely we wil reduce them to these foure heads The first is error in Doctrine concerning the Scripture the second is concerning the direct
eight and Twentieth LECTVRE of the CHVRCH WE haue as ye haue heard made our diuision of Churches into the Easterne and Westerne Churches and we haue made an end of our discourse concerning the Easterne And haue entred into the discourse concerning the Westerne And these wee shewed were of two sorts first some that receiue and acknowledge the Pope to bee their head as the Church of Rome and other her accomplices secondly some that refuse to communicate with her at least in her abuses and are therefore called the Reformed Churches Concerning the former we haue spoken of them all in the name of the Church of Rome for what is said against her is said against them as is the mother so are her daughters Now therefore we come to speake of those that renounce the head-ship of the Pope and refuse to communicate with the Church of Rome And are therefore called the reformed Churches for whereas the Church of Rome was sometime a true and sound visible Church but in processe of time did degenerate and staine her selfe with sundry corruptions and abuses both in Doctrine and practise as hath beene shewed It pleased God to inlighten the minds of many godly and learned diuines amongst them that they saw and discerned these corruptions and withall stirred vp their hearts to oppose openly against them both by preaching and writing Now those congregations that by these mens labours were called out of Babylon and embraced a purer profession did thereby gaine the name and title of reformed Churches as leauing the Church of Rome as a deformed Church still wallowing in her owne corruptions but themselues hauing recouered in some sort the ancient Beauty and Integrity of the ancient time and sounder Churches Now to make the way plaine before vs wee will speake first of the causes of this Reformation secondly of the manner of it first for the causes of this Reformation they were waighty and necessary many notorious errors and grosse abhominations both in Doctrine and manners as before we haue shewed possessing the whole body of that Church yea the head and all such as the Christian world hath oft complained of and the godly had groned sore vnder the burden of them for many yeeres and could beare them no longer so then they had waighty causes for this Reformation Secondly the manner of the carriage of it was approouable and good they did nothing herein for the substance of the businesse but that which might well beseeme Gods people and whereof they had many commendable presidents of other godly men in like cases For first they gaue notice to that Church that such and such corruptions were amongst them secondly they made proofe out of the Scriptures the onely Iudge in matters of Religion that they were corruptions thirdly they besought the guides and Gouernors of the Church as they tendred Gods truth and glory and the peoples Saluation for some speedy redresse of these things fourthly they denounced Gods Iudgements against them if they did not reforme and that was their vtter ruine both here and for euer if they did not hearken vnto them fifthly after all these meanes vsed and after long expectation of some good euent and yet nothing d●ne finding no amendment but that indeede matters did waxe worse and worse that old burthens were continued new imposed that were worse their admonitions reiected errors corruptions stiffely maintained the seekers of reformation hated reproached persecuted excōmunicated and the like finding no redresse they left them gaue them ouer as our Sauiour commanded his Apostles so they shooke off the dust of their feete against them As if they should haue said vnto them after this manner Doe you serue what gods yee will wee and our Congregations will serue the Lord doe yee worship God as yee list your selues we will worship him after his owne will reuealed in his word seeing we cannot procure a generall redresse of these corruptions amongst you wee must and will redresse them in our selues what could these men doe more then they did or what fault iustly can be charged on these proceedings The Papists deride and scoffe at this reformation and deny it to be any reformation at all but rather say they it is an Innouation made by Heretikes but till such time as they can proue the truth of God in his Word to be heresie they shall be neuer able to conuince this for an hereticall Innouation as they falsely and maliciously slander it but in despight of their malice it must be acknowledged and stand good for a godly and Religious reformation of things amisse another manner of reformation then that of the Papists in the Councell of Trent wherein though some things were well and commendably redrest yet the whole Tenor of that reformation runnes on this promise that the authority of the Pope be no way impeached the Councell would haue some reformation but yet so as the Popes authority may not be m●ddled withall wheras that very authority is partly one of the chiefe corruptions it selfe and partly th● mai● occasion and ground of all the rest at least it is th● 〈◊〉 hinderance that the rest is not reformed 〈◊〉 ●●at except that be reformed there can be no sound and through reformation at all so that there is great difference betwixt their reformation and ours For wee square all by the rule of Gods Word they by the authority of the Pope So much of the reformed Church in generall There is also another Title that these Churches are stiled with and that is Protestant Churches the reason of that name is this vpon the first sounding of the Gospell by Luther in Germany there was great stirre and much adoe among the people and not onely there but generally in all places some embracing the Doctrine of Luther others still continuing in the Popish Religion the Emperour and the States consult together how to pacifie these tumults many meetings they had and many Decrees they made against it one Decree more famous then the rest was made at Spier in Germany Anno 15 29. where it was enacted by the States of the empire that men should not abolish the Masse nor make any further change in Religion till there should be a generall Councell to determine these differences which because the people should not thinke they would delude them they promise to call it within a conuenient time within a yeere or thereabouts This Decree was much distastfull to those Princes and States that had ingaged themselues with Luther in this worke of reformation and therefore they made a generall protestation against it to this effect That howsoeuer they did vnfainedly affect the peace of the State both in Church and Common-wealth and would willingly satisfie the Emperor in all that lawfully they might yet because that reformation in hand was Gods owne worke it must not tarry mans leysure for God was to be obeyed before man and therfore they were bound in
conscience to proceede in it as they had begunne whatsoeuer Decrees of men were to the contrary notwithstanding if any trouble did ensue of it it was not their sinne nor any fault in the cause but in mens ill dispositions that would abuse so good a cause to their bad purposes vpon this very protestation it was that then presently and euer since not onely there but generally in all places these Princes and States and all other men and Churches approuing the reformation were called Protestants The name we for our parts do neither greatly approue nor much dislike yet seeing it was imposed vpon so good an occasion that is that Princely and Christian resolution to hold out zealously for God and his Religion against all Decrees and threatenings of man wee see no harme in it and so are well enough content to beare and weare his Title And so much be spoken in generall concerning the reformed Protestant Churches Now we are to descend to a more particular handling of these Churches and so to the maine marke which all this while we specially aimed at of these reformed Churches some are more some are lesse reformed and each of these either for Doctrine or Discipline for some are more reformed in Doctrine then others but lesse in Discipline some are more disciplined then others yet their Doctrine is not so sound as theirs whose Discipline is faulty The Churches in Geneua France and Holland and others of that mould both for Doctrine and Discipline are thought by some the best reformed and yet I heare that the Brownists deny euen Geneua to be a true Church but first I see not but that they may say as much and as iustly against their aduersaries as their aduersaries against them Besides if it be proued that those which are lesse reformed be true Churches it will necessarily follow that these are so much the rather and therefore we need not to bestow time and paines to proue them to be true Churches Those that are accounted lesse reformed are as some thinke the Lutheran Churches The Lutheran Churches are lesse reformed for Doctrine first we will speake of the Lutheran Churches they are so called because they maintaine certaine priuate opinions that Luther held or at least is pretended to haue held contrary to the iudgement of other reformed Churches for our better vnderstanding I will speake first of their difference in opinion from vs Secondly of the tumults that haue risen betwixt vs and them by reason of these differences And thirdly I will shew what wee are to esteeme of these Churches notwistanding these differences And first of their difference in opinion they are first more easie and fauourable in matter of Images then wee are though they worship them not besides they teach that the elect may vtterly fall away from the estate of grace which we deny but the greatest and mainest difference betwixt them and vs is partly in the matter of vbiquity and partly in the matter of the Sacrament of the Lords Supper For the first they affirme that Christ euen according to his humane nature is euery where whereas we hold and teach and haue Gods Word for it that since his ascention his body is contained in one certain place namely in heauen Acts 3.21 So in the Sacrament they affirme that his body is really present in vnder and with the Bread and Wine we say that Christ is really there onely to the faithfull Receiuer and onely Sacramentally and Spiritually and not bodily as Iohn 6.63 These two be matters of very dangerous consequence such as if they were throughly prest they would giue a shrewd blow to the ouerthrowing of the truth of Christs humane nature for if Christ haue a true body then it cannot be but in one place at once I am not heere to discusse these points but onely as falling in by the way haply heereafter I may haue some fit opportunity to speake of them more fully onely let it suffice for the present that these their opinions nor any of them doe directly deny the foundation nor any part thereof So much for their opinions Secondly the tumults and vnnaturall contentions raised betwixt vs and them by reason of these differences they are growne to a great heighth very bitter and vncharitable on both sides wee are bitter enough against them but they as men of fiery spirits are maruellous bitter against vs as bitter as against the Papists yea they are more bitter against vs then they are against the Papists I cannot thinke or speake of these things but with griefe of heart therefore I will suppresse them in silence it had beene best if they had neuer beene broacht but now that they are it is best to bury them in silence and perpetuall obliuion but yet seeing there are such dissentions I will first shew what exception the Papists take against vs for them Secondly what vse we are to make of them For the first the Papists reioyce greatly at it it is meat and drinke to them that we are thus together by the cares and they insult ouer both parties alleaging it as a firme exception that therefore the reformed Churches are no true Churches and their Religion no true Religion this is a very malicious but yet a very weake consequence it is a malicious practice of theirs to build vp themselues on other mens ruines yet when all is done others ruines will make but a weake and sandy building First wee will answer to the men and then to the matter first to the Papists we answer what if there be dissention betwixt vs what get they by that Indeed if they agreed with them in all things that they oppose vs then it were some exception but the maine difference betwixt the Lutherans and vs is in the matter of vbiquity and consubstantiaton wherein they are as opposite to them as to vs and therefore they haue little vantage by that Besides if dissention betwixt vs make vs to be no true Church then they are no true Church for the Papists themselues are at as great dissention and as bitter one against another as euer wee were and that not only of old but euen at this day the Iesuits and Secular Priests maintaine a mortall hatred betwixt them And therefore if this be a sufficient exception against vs It is so also against them and therefore wee answer them with Chirst in the Gospel Hypocrite first pul out the Beam out of thine owne eye c. Mat. 23.2 First let them purge their Church of their owne dissentions and differences and then let them charge ours Secondly wee answer to the thing or matter it selfe that consent doth not alwayes proue them to be a true Church that doe consent nor that to be a true Religion that is consented in neither doth dissent alwaies proue them to be a false Church that doe dissent in some things nor that a false Religion that is in some things dissented in First
consent proues not alwaies a true Church nor a true Religion for then the Iewes should be a true Church and their Religion true because they all consented to crucifie Christ and with one voyce cryed Crucifie him crucifie him here is consent and yet in the bloodiest matter that euer was in the world And so on the contrary Peter Paul and Paul and Barnabas should be of a false Church and a false Religion because they dissented and contended sharply but this was nothing to ouerthrow the truth of their Religion nor of the Church they were members of yea we see oft times that the worst matters are carried with the greatest consent and the best with great dissention as it is in the body that is the soundest body that striues most to expell hurtfull humours so that is the soundest Church that is most exercised with bickerings against the aduersaries of the Truth and in the true Church it is needfull that there should be dissentions and heresies that those that are approued may be knowne 1 Cor. 11.18 19. So much be spoken for the Papists exceptions which they take against vs for this dissention Now secondly wee are to shew what vse we are to make of these dissentions and differences surely though wee will not name them yet wee may make many good vses of them and first this should stirre vp our bowels of compassion to mourne for the breaches of Ierusalem and to see the Lord dishonoured and his truth blasphemed and the Church miserably distracted by mens infirmities frailties and dissentions Secondly this discouers the diuells malice that cannot not endure to see the worke of God to goe on prosperously forward but sets euen the builders themselues at variance to hinder them from building and from ioyning together with one hand against the common aduersarie yea he carries them into such outrage of passion and speech that thereby their persons and cause is much disgraced before the world so that if they were censured by his outrage they may seeme rather to be of the diuell then of God Thirdly heere wee may see the corruption and weakenesse if not wilfulnesse of men that rather then they will disclaime their errors and put vp disgracefull and opprobrious speeches they passe not to set the whole Church of God on fire Fourthly hence wee learne the nature of truth that neuer comes forth but incumbred with many oppositions both within and without and still mingled with some errors and contentions euen in the chiefe professors themselues Lastly hence we learne the power wisedome and goodnesse of God so that doth restraine the rage of man and the malice of Satan that howsoeuer we differ in some points yet we agree in the chiefe as in Iustification by faith alone and howsoeuer we differ among our selues yet each of vs agree against Anti-Christ and Popery with a common hand though not so throughly as otherwise we might doe yet so as neither of vs yeeld one iot to the Papist though they expected long ere this to haue deuoured both them and vs as a prey or at least that they should haue slept in a whole skinne as wee say working vpon the aduantage of our former dissentions The third point is what wee are to esteeme of these Churches notwithstanding these errors and dissentions Surlev if we should condemne them as false Churches wee should be very vncharitable and wicked For they haue been the chiefest instrument vnder God of our calling therefore far be it from vs to deny them to bee a true Church Besides we should wrong them much for seeing they affirme directly the foundation and euery part thereof there is no colour why wee should giue such hard sentence against them therefore let vs esteeme them as brethren and acknowledge them to be Gods owne Churches and let vs commiserate their blindnesse and ignorance and let vs beare with their infirmities and let vs passe by the wrongs they offer vs and let vs blesse God for the good that is in them and let vs intreate God to open their eyes and to pacify their mindes and to reconcile these vnhappy differences that are betwixt vs and to knit our hearts together in the bond of peace that we may be all of one minde and iudgement and speake one and the same thing And so much bee spoken concerning the Lutheran Churches Now we come to speake of our own Church which hath beene the speciall reach and shall bee the finall conclusion of this whole discourse We are generally acknowledged by most Protestant Churches that we are as well reformed in Doctrine as any Church It is Gods great mercy to vs that we are so reformed in the best and weightiest things And it is no small comfort to vs that wee haue the approbation of other Churches confessing for vs that we are a true Church of God sound in the faith so that if we doe faile in discipline as they say yet the substance being sound the danger is the lesse Discipline makes onely for the Beauty of a Church but yet neyther do●h the presence of it make a true Church nor the absence of it cannot marre the life being of a true Church therfore if wee be not reformed herein as we should for some reformation we haue many points and parts of Discipline are farre better amongst vs then in the Popish Churches yet as long as our faith is sound the life and being of our Church is sound and good I will deliuer the point by way of Obseruation Doctr. and that is this The Church of England euen as now it stands though it be guilty of many saylings and weaknesses yet notwithstanding it is a true and in good measure a sound visible Church of God first I doe acknowledge many faylings weaknesses in our church that I may not bee mistaken as if I should smooth vp the State of our Church as many doe with all is well when some things are amisse or iustifie euery particular because we haue many good things amongst vs No if there be any Baal amongst vs let him plead for himselfe I wil not plead for him Secondly I say that it is not onely a true but in some good measure a sound visible Church to distinguish it from other Churches specially from the Church of Rome which in some sense as we shewed is a true visible church but very vnsound but ours is true sound too that in some good measure The want of which difference rightly obserued hath caused many vncharitable censures to passe from vs against the church of Rome from the separatists against vs Thirdly I speake of the Church of England indefinitely which seemes strange in some eares that the whole company of professors in England should be called one Church and so make a nationall Church which say they is meerely a humane inuention not warrantable by the Word but to iustifie this speech against their exception take these
reasons First where there are many particulars of one and the same kinde there must bee acknowledged by the rules of nature and reason some generall notion or apprehension wherein they all meete together to beare the name and to comprehend the nature of all As for example there are many particular persons of men being of one and the same kinde and therefore there must be one generall humane nature in which they must all meete and bee comprehended And therefore whereas we haue many Parochiall Churches in England of one and the same kinde they all may rightly be tearmed and comprehended vnder one name that is the Church of England Secondly if but two or three congregations liuing in a City or about it may be so called the Church of that City as it is very probable if we compare Reuel 2.1 with Acts 20 17. why may not therefore all Parochiall Churches of any one land bee called the Church of that land or nation Thirdly it is not against the nature and being of a Church to be nationall the Church of the Iewes was directly so vnder the former Testament the Iewes being cast off the Gentiles are come in their steade and therefore where any whole Nation of the Gentiles doe publiquely and generally embrace the sauing ordinances of God as the Iewes did I see not but that they may rightly bee called by the name of a Nationall Church why may not the Church of England be called a Church of England now as well as the Iewes were called a Iewish Church heretofore Lastly whereas I speake of our whole Church in generall that it is in some measure a sound Church it must be vnderstood in respect of the better part the whole taking the denomination from them for if it be proued true but in some parts that is in our most Religious and best ordered congregations that they are so then I hope charity will grant I am sure reason will that the whole Church may lawfully take her denomination from the better part else no part 〈◊〉 congregation can be rightly affirmed to bee a true and sound Church for it is so called properly in respect of the true beleeuing and liuing members that are therein though the greater part oft times are Hypocrites Thus we see the note is set vpright Let vs proceede to the proofes of it Reas 1 Many reasons may be alleadged to proue it three or foure shall serue the turne The reason before mentioned prouing the Greeke Romane and Lutheran Churches to be true Churches being applyed vnto vs proues vs sufficiently to be a true Church because wee affirme the whole foundation and euery part thereof But in this we haue vndertaken more that is that our Church is in some good measure a sound visible Church and therefore that is the point here to bee holden to And the first reason to proue this is from the infallible markes of a true and sound Church Wheresoeuer the Word and the Sacraments are in publique profession in vse so that the Word in some good measure is purely taught and the Sacraments rightly administred and obedience to them both accordingly professed there is a true and in some good measure a sound visible Church But in the Church of England the Word and Sacraments are in publique profession in vse so that Word is purely taught and the Sacraments rightly Administred and obedience to them both in some good measure professed And therefore the Church of England is a true and a sound visible Church For the proposition I haue handled it before in deliuering the markes of a true Church and therefore I will referre you thither for the proofe of it For the Assumption none will deny but wee haue the Word and the Sacraments and profession of obedience to them both but the Question is whether wee haue them purely or no for the measure of the soundnesse of a Church is esteemed according to the measure of the purenesse of these markes where they are more pure there is a more sound Church and where they are lesse pure there is a lesse sound Church But in the Church of England they are pure without traditions or mans inuentions therefore the Church of England in some good measure is a sound visible Church Wee are charged by the Separatists that we preach canons and mans constitutions as Gods Wor● But wee Answer These are not taught for Doctrines but onely serue for some passage and carriages touching Gods Seruice specially in Church gouernement Secondly they say we suppresse some part of Gods Word as Discipline I Answere All that we know wee teach expresly and impartially if there should be any faylings as we know there are in all Churches yet that hinders not but that they are in some good measure purely taught And so the truth still stands good that the word taught amongst vs so also the Sacraments are rightly administred amongst vs for the substance of them if there be any error in circumstance as wee know none neyther yet that doth not nullifie the action nor ouerthrow the truth of this Assumption Likewise obedience is truely professed thereunto at least by some yea by a great many too through Gods mercy And therefore the note stands firme and true that the Church of England euen as it now stands is a true and a sound visible Church Reas 2 The second reason is taken from the comparison of the visible Church with the inuisible Take it thus that faith and Religion which being truely beleeued and obeyed by the whole company of the Elect makes them the true Church inuisible the same faith and Religion being publiquely taught and learned in a visible congregation and by them professed iointly to bee beleeued and obeyed that in some good measure makes them a true and in that proportionable measure a sound visible Church for the visible Church is so called respectiuely to the Church invisible as they publiquely and ioyntly professing the same sauing faith which the inuisible in the minde and truth of heart beleeue and obey But our Church doth ioyntly and publiquely professe that faith which the inuisible Church doth truely embrace and thereby is made a true Church visible euen that whole truth that is reuealed in the Word as by our articles of faith and Religion it doth appeare which is the ioynt confession of our Church yea our very aduersaries may witnesse for vs in this Aynsworthe saith I doubt not but your Doctrine hath saued many therefore it must needs bee the same Doctrine of faith which makes the true Church inuisible And so Iohnson acknowledgeth that very many amongst vs are true Christians by that knowledge and faith which here they haue attayned vnto only setting them a part from the constitutions of our Church and if any man elsewhere in the world doe truely beleeue and obey that faith which we professe who can deny him to bee a member of the true inuisible Church Our Church
therefore professing to beleeue and obey the same sauing faith which the inuisible Church doth truely beleeue and obey and which is of some amongst vs truely beleeued and obeyed therefore our Church must needs be a true a sound visible Church The third reason is drawen from the effects of the Reas 3 Doctrine and ministery of our Church and is thus framed That Church whose Doctrine and ministery by Gods blessing is so effectuall that ordinarily it workes sauing faith in the hearts of the hearers is a true and in some good measure a sound visible Church But the Doctrine and ministery of the Church of England by Gods blessing is so effectuall that ordinarily it workes sauing faith in the hearts of the hearers And therefore the Church of England is a true and a sound visible Church The Proposi●ion is proued Rom. 10.17 faith comes by hearing and hearing by the Word of God where the Apostle proues that ordinarily the Word is powerfull to beget faith in the ●earers being preached by such as are sent of God Verse 15. and therefore our ministery doing the same is a true ministery sent of God and so our Church a true and in some good measure a sound Church of God But our aduersaries except against vs that our Ministers are not sent nor haue a lawfull calling from God I Answer the place proues that such whose Doctrine and Ministery doe ordinarily worke faith are sent of God but such are ours and therefore they are sent of God And that our ministers haue a lawfull sending shall God willing bee shewed hereafter They except againe and say that in their assemblies there are many more conuerted then in our Churches Answ I Answer was there any of these assemblies such that in any one of them ordinarily there were such effects If there were then that assemblie was a church but if it were extraordinary then the exception is nothing to this purpose But they except againe that others conuert also by conference and disputation and that out of a visible Church Answ I Answer doth not that argue that such men embrace the sauing faith at least in profession and therefore when this is done by an ordinary ministery in a visible congregation doth it not hence follow that such an assembly dot at least in profession hold the sauing faith is so a true and in some good measure a sound visible Church But the Doctrine and Ministery of our Church workes such effects and that ordinarily as by daily experience appeares And therefore our Church is a true and in some good measure a sound visible Church But say they It is not ordinary in our churches but onely extraordinary as it is amongst the Papists I Answere what is ordinary That is ordinary which is vsually done and that by such meanes as are ordained for that purpose But this is done by our Doctrine and ministery which are the meanes ordained to beget faith and is ordinarily and vsually done not now and then in one or two but it is done dayly and many experiments confirme it as any may be an eye witnesse of it that liues amongst vs Besides when a man is conuerted to God out of the office of the ministery as by conference disputation c that they acknowledge to bee ordinary else this is a meere cauill not opposing our Proposition but where one is so wonne many are wonne by our Ministeries and therefore to deny this to be ordinary amongst vs which oftentimes produceth such effects and yet to alledge the other as an ordinary meanes which yet is but seldome so effectuall is not ingeniously nor sensibly much lesse charitably done Sure I am if that be ordinary then ours is much more there being an especiall promise to our publique labours herein And therefore these reasons considered It follows that our Church is a true and a sound visible Church The vses are these first for instruction Secondly for reproofe The vses for instruction are these first Is it so that the Church of England is a true and a sound visible Church Then this teacheth vs that lawfully safely it may be communicated withal without dishonour to God or iust offence to any of the faithfull or danger to our owne soules or scruple of conscience And this we must not onely know but wee must practise it all those that liue within this land and so haue opportunity to be members of our Church they may and must come and ioyne in communion with vs and repaire to our assemblies and heare our Ministers and professe obedience to our faith God requires this Deut. 12.5 ye shall seeke the place which the Lord thy God shall chuse out of all your tribes to put his name there and there to dwell and thither thou shalt come and as God commands it so his children haue practised it as Dauid Psal 26 5 6 8 I haue hated the assembly of the wicked I will wash mine hands in innocency oh Lord compasse thine Altar Oh Lord I haue loued the habitation of thine house and the place where thine honour dwelleth And so the faithfull that were newly conuerted Act. 2.42 continued in the Apostles Doctrine and fellowship and breaking of bread and Prayers And in the 47. It is said the Lord added to the Church from day to day such as should be saued And therefore such as be not ioyned to our Church must resolue to ioyne and those that are already ioyned must continue their communion with her And there are also many particular motiues to induce to it which I alleadge not as reasons to proue directly that necessarily we must ioyne but they may serue onely as perswasions to a man well affected and not carried away with preiudice that hee may safely communicate with our Church First if there were no other motiue but this it were sufficient we hould the foundation The second motiue is this we haue the whole Doctrine of sauing faith taught amongst vs and in some good measure truely profest if any Church can teach any one substantial article of sound Religion that we professe not then we may more colourably be forsaken but seeing it is not so there is no iust cause or pretence but that they may communicate with vs whither would they goe we haue the words of eternall life as Peter said to our Sauiour Iohn 6.68 Thirdly we haue a powerfull Ministery to exhort reproue comfort c. to beget faith where it is wanting to increase and confirme faith where it is begun to perswade men to holy obedience and to renounce their sinnes and to make restitution of wrongs and to bee sound in Religion and to hunger and thirst after rightousnes and to bee zealous for Gods glory and for all good duties And therefore wee are ●o communicate with this Church where the ministery is thus powerfull and if we forsake her it were iust with God to giue vs ouer to our former errors
of Iustification The fourth Instance is concerning Christ our onely Aduocate against other Intercessors Say with vs that Christ alone presents our suits to God and makes them auaileable with God and that he is to be called vpon as our onely Intercessor and then we giue him the due honour of his place office of Mediatorship Ioh. 14.13 For his Intercession is a speciall part of that office as well as Redemption wherein if he be acknowledged to bee as we make him our alone Intercessor he is much magnified But if others be ioyned with him as they make it hee is much disparaged as being not sufficient of himselfe but needs others helpe or at least in that office being but of smaller moment such as the Saints might mannage well enough And so not Christ onely but God the Father also is much dishonoured that would put his owne Sonne to that which meaner persons might doe as well as hee The fifth Instance is concerning the spirituall worship of God against Images Let vs worship God as we teach onely in Spirit and Truth without an Image and he is rightly and truely worshipped being serued as he is a most glorious Spirit free from any matter or forme or outward apprehension and impossible to be expressed by any sensible Representation whatsoeuer But worship him in or by an Image as they teach and practise and we cannot but defile our selues and in some sort the Lords great maiesty to our selues by many grosse carnall bodily and materiall thoughts and imaginations wholly mis-beseeming the purity of Gods nature being and maiesty as if hee were a carnall bodily or manly God then which nothing can bee more contrary to his nature and will and so not more derogatory to his glory The sixth instance is of our Communion against their Masse Celebrate the memoriall of Christs death as we doe in the holy Sacrament of the Lords Supper and the Sacrifice of Christ once offered by himselfe on the crosse is thereby aduanced and acknowledged to bee a most perfect and sufficient expiation by it selfe of all our sins hereby it is only remembred and shewed according to the institution but not repeated But celebrate the death of Christ in the Popish Masse which the Papists themselues hould to be a propitiatory Sacrifice for the quicke and the dead and how can Christ once sacrificed be more disparaged The last instance is concerning the carriage of the meanes of Saluation in open sight and playne dealing amongst vs that all may looke into them with their owne eyes against their carriage of all in a cloud and shaddow and hukermucker Let Prayer be made in a knowne tongue and wee honour God not with lips onely but with vnderstanding too but let it be made in an vnknowne tongue as it is in Popery and we dishonour God babling and prattling to him we know not what Let the Scripture bee free and common to all that euery one may reade and vnderstand and the Lord is glorified in the comfort knowledge faith and obedience of many But let the Word bee kept from the people and then they cannot know God and so cannot honour him let men haue an explicite faith to vnderstand and beleeue particularly for themselues all things necessary to saluation and they shall glorifie God in giuing a reason of the hope that is them 1 Pet. 3.15 But if they be content with an implicite faith onely to beleeue as the Church beleeues they shall dishonour God in their blindnesse and ignorance and hardly shall the Lord be glorified in their Saluation God is iealous of his owne glory and so must all that professe his name and the more iealous we are of that and zealous for it the more truely Religious we are If wee bee out of our wits saith the Apostle we are it to God 2 Cor. 5.3 So we see in these seuen instances that our Religion is full weight in this ballance of Gods glory and the Religion of Popery too light not worthy to be tryed in this Beame The second ballance wherein we will try our Religion and theirs in these seuen instances is in the ballance of Gods Word for it is not enough to ayme at Gods glory in our owne intention but after his direction for hee cannot be truely glorified but so as himselfe teacheth in his word That is the best and true Religion of God tha● is most agreeable to Gods Word and that is the worst that most disagrees with Gods Word Leuit. 18.4.5 ye shall doe after my iudgements and seeke mine ordinances And Iohn 5.39 Search the Scriptures Mat. 15.9 In vaine they worshipme teaching for doctrine mens precepts And 1 Ioh. 4.5 he that knoweth God heareth vs c where is Gods Religion to be found but in Gods book As the Iewes religion is found in their talmud the Turkes in their Alcoan But the religion professed in our Church is most agreeable to Gods Word and the Religion of Popery is not agreeable thereto therfore our Religion is the true Religion That ours is most agreeable to Gods Word not theirs see it in the first instance The sufficiency of Scripture and the absolute authority it hath aboue the Church and traditions this is agreeable to that in the 2 Tim. 3.16 17. for the whole Scripture is giuen by inspiration from God and is profitable to teach to conuince to correct and to instruct in righteousnes that the man of God may be absolute being made perfect vnto all good workes And Iohn 10.27 my sheepe heare my voyce and I know them and they follow me and 5. Verse they will not follow a stranger but flye from him for they know not the voyce of strangers For that which the Papists alleadge for the Church that shee is to bee heard Matth. 18.17 It is to be vnderstood subordinately to the word that is so farre as the Church is aduised by God in his Word and for that which they alleadge for traditions out of the 2 Thes 2.15 keepe the instructions which ye haue beene taught eyther by word or by Epistle by word and Epistle are meant one and the same thing onely the manner of deliuery was diuers sometimes by word sometimes by Epistle And seeing the authority of the Church aboue the Scripture and traditions bee each of them a disparagment to the word except the word should disparage it selfe which no wise man can imagine there is no seeking for any warrant for them within the word The second instance Gods free grace against mans free will Our Religion teacheth according to Gods Word Phil. 2.13 that it is God which worketh in vs both the will and the deed And 2 Cor. 3.5 that we are not sufficient of our selues to thinke any thing as of our selues but our sufficiency is of God And Ier. 31.18 Conuert thou me And there is no colour of any one direct place to the contrary in all the Scripture There are some
had from them yet it was before Anti-christ there be many speeches in the fathers of it but we retaine it not as the Papists doe idolatrously no the imposers protest against that but for an ancient custome And that we may see they retaine it not for superstition they haue turned it out of the Sacrament of the Lords Supper for it was vsed in that Sacrament too so that though it be retrayned in the Church yet not as an idolatrous or superstitious ceremony Fourthly they except against our Ministery and say that we haue a false ministery and therefore a false Church I Answer Our Ministery is a true Ministery and ●ustifiable if we looke into all parts of it we will iustifie it against them better then they can iustifie theirs against vs But say they your ordination whence had yee it but from the Pope I Answer First eyther it was extraordinary in Luther and others and so they being thus called might ordaine others or secondly else it was ordinary from the Popish Church as the Sacrament of Baptisme is true amongst them and so acknowledged by the separatists so is ordination They hould that those that are Baptised amongst them are lawfully Baptised and by the same reason we hould that they which are ordayned Ministers amongst them haue a lawfull ordination Then for their guifts let any Church shew better guifts then it hath pleased God to bestow on our Ministers Then looke into the exercise of their guifts It is true that we haue many idle backs and slow bellies that will not labour but that is their personall fault But we haue many publique exercises and many Ministers that are extraordinary painfull in preaching reading visiting the sicke c. Lastly looke into the effect of our ministery and wee can shew the scale of our ministery in many that are called and that ordinarily by our publique ministery and therefore our ordination is good Lastly they except that we haue a false people and therefore a false Church they say our people were profanely gathered and liue prophanely in our Church for their gath●ring I haue Answered before for their liuing prophanely I Answer that doth not make a false Church I haue shewed that there are more Hypocrites in the Church then true beleeuers yea but say they these are openly wicked and yet are admitted into your Church and to your Sacraments I Answer though they be wicked in their liues yet they are not so in their profession and therefore there is no fault in vs if vpon their profession of repentance and obedience we admit them to the Sacraments the fault is that they are not cast out for their open notorious sinnes by them that haue authority and not that vpon profession of repentance they are admitted to the Sacraments So that we see that all that they can except against vs is for petty matters or else they bee personall faults and therefore not to be charged vpon the whole Church for there is none of these faults but may be redrest and by this Gouernment which is in our Church if they be not it is mens personall sinnes for by law there should bee a learned ministery and that those which sinne openly should be cast out of the Church c And therefore let not this be charged on our Church we haue many abuses in our Church as well as in other Churches and we are to intreate God to sweepe them out but yet wee are not thereupon to be condemned for a false Church Thus ye see that our note stands true against all the exceptions both of the Papists and the separatists namely that the Church of England euen as now it stands is through Gods mercy not onely a true but a sound visible Church FINIS Matth. 28. Ruth 3.11 First the order of the question is naturall First in respect of God in the first question ●econdly in re●ect of Christ Thirdly in respect of all the three questions together The matter of the question is of great importance First for direction Secondly for the confirmation of our faith Thirdly for the confuting of Aduersaries Fourthly for consolation The ignorance and mistaking of the true Church is exceeding dangerous in foure respects Foure generall points concerning the Church 1. The name Vide Field lib. 1. p. 12. 15. 16. Musculus 555. Bullinger 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 intends three things Foure divisions of callings First generall and particular Secondly extraordinary and ordinary Thirdly out●ard and in●ard Fourthly effectuall and not effectuall Calling not effectuall fiue wayes The second generall thing concerning the Church are the titles Many titles giuen her for three reasons The titles are of two sorts First absolute without reference to any thing else First a garden Secondly a spring or foun●aine Thirdly a chosen generation a royall Priesthood a holy nation a peculiar people set at liberty Two sorts of titles which concerne the Church are respectiue as it hath reference to some other thing else and these are of fiue sorts First such as are giuen to the Church in respect of God and they are First Gods Mountaine Secondly the Citie of God Thirdly the house of God Fourthly the Temple of God Fifthly the people of God Secondly such as haue reference to Christ and they are First his loue Secondly his sister Thirdly the spouse of Christ Fourthly a Queene Fiftly his sheepe Sixthly his body Seuenthly My Beloued is mine and I am his Eighthly Christ Thirdly such as are giuen with reference to the faithfull and these are First the Tower of the flocke Secondly the Mother of vs all Fourthly such as are giuen with reference to the world in gener●ll and these ●r● first th● s●bstance of the World secondly the ioy of the whole earth Thirdly a Lilly amongst thornes Fifthly are such as haue reference to the truth of God and these are First the pillar and ground of truth Secondly a Candlesticke The Church of God shadowed in the law by the sanctuary or tabernacle in eight things Vide Piscat in Exo. 25. The glory of the Church in foure things First in the profession Secondly in her practice Thirdly in her order Fourthly in her vnitie The third generall thing concerning the Church is the nature of it Vid Reynolds Thes p 642. and Rhem. Ves●●m 1. Tim. 3 10. Th● nature of the Church described by three things First by the efficient cause Secondly by their number Thirdly by the places where they are The holy Angels are part of the true Ch● prooued and 〈…〉 doctrine That Christ is Mediator for the Angels and how The Angels fall was personall The Angels haue their part in Christs mediation in foure things in respect of things done to vs which redound to them And in diuers things done more directly to themselues That part of Gods Church and chosen which consists of men and they are partly in heauen partly in earth First those that are in heauen Secondly those which are in earth Hyper.
either more or lesse pure Fourthly they are more or lesse perfect Exception 1. Exception 2. Exception 3. The Church of England a true visible Church Eleuen Considerations to moue vs in England to be thankefull for the truth of God amongst vs and they shew the greatnesse of the blessing The second thing considerable in a true visible Church are the causes of it And they be of two sorts The second sort of causes haue first spoken of and they of two sorts Of this diuers Of this diuers The first sort of causes handled such as cause the Church directly and these are foure taking the Church in a comparatiue sense Taking the Church absolutely there are siue The efficient cause The instrumentall cause First outward Secondly inward How all the three persons haue a hand in causing the Church The Church of England iustified to be a true Church against the Separation The Church of England hath the meanes of saluation and of a Church Obiect You want d●scipline Your Ministers haue not a true Calling You haue your Calling from the Church of Rome You haue no couenant betwixt you and God Obiect You want the successe of the meanes It is ordinarily effectuall The first thing considerable in a visible Church the members of it In it first of the head And in it three things Corpus adaequatum Sit Christus Christiani caput Aug. lib. 3. cont Petil. c. 42. Reinolds confer 5. The blasphemy the Church of Rome doth run into in saying the Pope is the head of the Church The blow they giue to Christ therein in two respects First in regard of the body the Church The Pope is Antichrist Christ neuer gaue the headship of the Church to Peter Papists plea for the headship of the Pope answered Places alleaged by them for this answered as Mat. 16.19 And Ioh. 21.16 17. And Mat. 16.18 Christ saith He neuer will giue it None is able to weeld and sway it Secondly in regard of the Head Christ The power and authority that is giuen to the Pope proueth that he cannot be a ministeriall head as is pretended but rather a supreame head The Pope is made the Doctor yea the only Doctor of the Church The Pope doth what he doth of himselfe and not as vnder Christ for he taketh not the course prescribed by Christ in that he doth The Pope taketh vpon him to iudge the Apostles doctrine and so to be Peters Master and so proues himselfe to be Antichrist The Pope takes Christs name vpon him viz. Chiefe Shepheard Obiect You make the King head of the Church The word Head of the Church to be warily vsed because not found in the Scripture Christ the Head of the Church is visible Matter of comfort to the Church many wayes The second thing considerable in the third thing touching a visible Church viz. the members thereof in a more strickt sense and they are of three sorts The first sort and of the diuers kinds The second sort And of this two sorts The third sort Hyper. method 574. Additum diminuens A Church cannot be denied to be a true visible Church though there be an hundred hypocrites in it to one beleeuer The Brownists obiection of our Church being a prophane multitude answered diuers wayes Obiect You let wicked ones continue in your Church without separation Hyp. 577. 580. c. Bernard against Brownists 1034. where the assemblies are bad there the good must separate but where the assemblies be good there the bad must separate The fourth generall thing considerable in a visible Church viz. the Markes of it Reasons why there should be Markes of the Church Two qualities of these Markes to make them legitimate The first quality and It is attended with three other tha● 〈◊〉 subordinate to them The second qual●●●● of these markes Vrsin 582. Vogel 727. Caluin inst lib. 4 cap. 1 sect 10. in Acts 2.42 Non secùs ac belli duces vt dissipatum clade aliqua exercitum recolligant signa militaria vel accensos ignes ex edito loce conspiciendos proponunt quo pedem referant quotquot ex clade dispersis palantes vagantur Morn de eccles p. 27. Morney ●6 29 One sort of excepters against this doctrine and their exception Two considerations necessary Bernard against Separat 122. 123. ●●Second sort of excepters against this doctrine and their exceptions Third sort of aduersaries to this doctrine viz. the Papists and the Markes they alleage and answers to them Bellar. de eccles mili p. 184. 188. The fifth thing considerable in a visible Church viz gouernment Vid. Pol●● 426 459. And in it fiue things handled First the harmes and euils that haue been raised in the Church of God occasionally by Church-gouernment Second thing in Church gouernment what is meant by it The third thing considerable in Church-gouernment viz how needfull it is Reasons and that of some sorts First sort of Reasons Second sort of Reasons Third sort of Reasons Fourth sort of Reasons Fiue differences betwixt the inward and outward gouernment of the Church 〈…〉 The fourth thing considerable in Church-gouernment viz. whether there be any prescript forme of Church Gouernment in euery particular set downe in the Word What the Scripture saith herein deliuered in two positions The first drawn into an Obseruation Two extremes to be auoided Second thing considerable in this fourth point of Church-gouernment viz. that there is not any one particular forme of Church-gouernment for euery particular set downe in Scripture The fifth thing considerable in Church-gouernment The whole forme of Church-gouernment consisteth of three principals First the dutie or actions to be done in Church-gouernment and they are sixe principall Vid. separat s●bis● 137. The second duties to be done Vid. Zegred 120. The third sort of duties to be done The fourth sort of workes to be done Church censures Reasons of this How to proceed ●● this The 〈◊〉 duty● The sixth duty The second principle whereupon Church-gouernment consisteth viz. the Persons or Officers that are to performe this duty generally Church-officers must haue two things First they must be qualified with a competent measure of gifts Secondly they must be lawfully appointed to such offices Particularly What these Officers are First Bishops First their name Secondly their office consisting in two things First in ordaining Ministers The obiection that the Apostles did ordaine as Apostles not as Bishops and Timothy and Titus as Euangelists not as Bishops answered Secondly in redressing things amisse Secondly Presbyters Their office first generally Secondly more particularly Thirdly Doctors Fourthly gouerning Elders Fifth deacons Philip preached and baptized rather as hee was an Euangelist than a Deacon Sixthly widdowes Eighthly the christian Magistrate wherein first that hee is a Church Officer Secondly wherein this office consisteth First generally Secondly particularly in fiue things The third pillar whereupon the Church-gouernment consisteth viz. the Rules and Lawes by which the Gouernours are to be directed And they are reduced to three heads
What things are to be warranted Warrants for the cautions conditions and carriage of the businesse are First more principall Secondly infer●our warrant Second head and in it fiue Rules The second Rule That is vncomely in one place which is decent in another What is to be reputed decent Order extends it selfe to two things First to things to be done Secondly to persons The third Rule Three wayes how peace is indangered The fourth Rule Three wayes how this rule is broken The fifth Rule The third head and that is the end And there be two kinds of them Two graces necessary for this First wisedome Secondly love When this Rule is swerved from Instances in divers duties Proofes are here vsed because omitted before The sixth generall things concerning the Church viz. the priuiledges of it In this head two points handled 1 handled by way of obseruation Reasons 2 things handled viz. the priuiledges of Church and they be of two sorts 1 humane 2 di●r these ●uers sorts generally of two sorts 1. In respect of others both friends and enemies 2. In respect of themselues 1 temporall priuiledges 2. Spirituall priuiledges these● of two sorts 1 common to all the members 2. proper to the true Beleeuers and these of two sorts 1. matters of present possession of diuers kindes 4 The workes God doth for the faithfull 2. matters of future certainties 2. other speciall priuileges added and intreated on 1. concerning the infallibe guidance of the Church by Gods Spirit and so whether the Church can erre or no either in manners or in Doctrine or in both or in neyther Errors of foure sorts 1. what a fundamentall Errors is Errors in smaller matters what they be Difference btw●eene them that erre in the foundation and them that erre in smaller matters The second thing is concerning the necessity of being a member of the Church if euer wee will attaine saluation and so whether any may be saued out of the Church or no. Extra fidem Ecclesiae Morn 451. The seuenth generall head in the doctrin of the church viz. the aduersaries and opposites of it This handled in 5. point ● Th● 〈…〉 that the Church of God hath many Aduersaries to oppose it deliuered in a Doctrine Sti●ting vp to many duties The second point what these aduersaries are and they are many 2. sort 3. sort 4. sort 5. sort 6. sort 7. sort 8. sort 9. sort 10. sort 11. sort 12. sort Vse 3. The third point which is how these Aduersaries oppose vs. The matter they strike at 1 against the persons of professors 2 against their profession The manner of their opposition ● secretly 2. open● 3. The means or weapons wherby they fight against Gods Children 1 carnall reasons and therein 2. Religious pretences and herein 1. Scriptures 2. that they are the Church 3. miracles 3. more grosse dealing The 4. point how the Church is to carry her selfe to her aduersaries 2. things to be done that we may be able to make a good fight What is to be done in it and therein 2. things The 2 worke to be done 2 thing how it is to be done The 5 point how the Lord carrieth himselfe to his Church and their aduersaries How God is with the saith full in many respects How God is against the enemies his Church many waies Vse 2. The 8. generall head of the Church viz. the power and auhority of it And in it 3. things to be spoken vnto 1. that there is a power 2. point what manner of power it is and in it things asserted 1 that it is not humane but diuine How we may know when the Church speakes true or false Two things asserted that power of the Church is not temporal but spirituall The 3. thing asserted that the Power of the Church is limited and scantled within the bounds of the Word The 4. thing asserted that the power of the Church is the greatest power on earth Kings are vnder the power of the Church though they be aboue the persons that exercise it The 3 point is what it is that the Church haue power in it is double 1. ouer persons and that 1 either as members either not come in to admitte Who are to be admitted The Act and meanes of admission This not to be renued vpon any falling away How far the Magistrate may compell Or to repell them Or secondly as come in to keepe them in or cast them out Or thirdly ouer members as Officers to choose or refuse place or displace Secondly the Church hath power ouer things and these either matters of substance as touching the Scripture and therein first touching the credit of the Scripture And herein whether the authority of Church bee greater then the authority of the Spripture Bellarmy de Verbo Dei interpret 246. The blasphemous speeches of the Papists concerning the Scripture without the approbation of the church The Church of Rome is that whore of Babilon The best positions of the Papists in this controuersie Answered How the Church is to be beleeued and obeyed Answered Reasons against it Reply How we must esteeme of the Scriptures How we must esteeme of the Church 4. Wayes how we may know the scripture to be the Scripture 6 Rules concerning our beleeuing what the Church saith of the authority of the Scripture The second thing the Church hath power in about the Scripture is th● sense of it and how farre it hath power therein Hieron in Epist ad Gelat cap. 1. Reprouing first the opinion of the Papists The Scriptures speake and haue a voyce How the Church is the mouth of the Scripture The Scripture not dumbe Secondly their practice first in regard of the vulgar latine translation imposed by them as the authenticall Text. Secondly in that all their Expositors are slaues and vassalls to their Church Thirdly in regard of the oath which generally all Papists rec●ue concerning the exposition of the Scripture The Fathers doe all generally concur and yet misse in the right expounding of the Scriptures Fourthly in that they rely vpon the iudgements of Councells and the Pope● in case the Church dissent First other mens and the Churches expositions are to be examined by vs. Ob. Answer 1. Rectract lib. cap. 18. Secondly in framing expositions of our owne we must come not as masters to teach but as schollers to learne to the Scriptures Directions to walke and be ruled by when wee seeke the sense of the Scripture they are of three sortes 1 some before wee come to expound the Scripture they are 7. Things to be obserued in the businesse it selfe How we may consulie with Gods Spirit What is the analogie of faith Things to be doue after Diuers obiections against this doctrine Ob. 2. Ob 5. Of the authority of the Church in matters besides the Scriptures and what is to be held therein The places that proue this are of foure sorts First such as ascribe th●s authority to God alone Secondly such as commend