whole state and condition of the church in all ages In which stories the practise of the church is plainely reported to haue ben such as thereby the Primacie of Peters successour may seeme to all men sufficiētly declared For perusing the ecclesiasticall stories with writinges of the fathers besyde many other thinges perteining hereto we finde these practises for declaration of this speciall auctoritie and power First that bishops of euery nation haue made their appeale in their weighty affaires to the Pope and allwayes haue sued to the See Apostolike as well for succour and helpe against violence iniuries oppressions as for redresse of other disorders Also that the malice of wicked persons hath ben repressed and chastised of that auctoritie by excommunication eiection and expulsion out of their dignities and romes and by other censures of the church Furthermore that the ordinations and elections of bishops of all prouinces haue ben confirmed by the Pope Beside this that the approuing and disalowing of councelles haue perteined to him Item that bishops wrongfully cōdemned and depriued by councelles by him haue ben assoiled and restored to their churches againe Lastly that bishops and patriarkes after longe strifes and contentions haue at length vpon better aduise ben reconcilied vnto him againe First Appellations the Pope for the appellation of bishops to the See Apostolike beside many oher we haue the knowen examples of Athanasius that worthy bishop of Alexandria and lighte of the worlde who hauing susteined great and fundry wronges at the Arianes appealed first to Iulius the Pope and after his death to Felix of Chrisostome who appealed to Innocentius against the violence of Theophilus of Theodoritus who appealed to Leo. Neither made bishops onely their appeale to the Pope by their delegates but also in certaine cases being cited appeared before him in their owne persons Which is plainely gathered of Theodoritus his ecclesiasticall storye who writeth thus Eusebius bishop of Nicomedia who was the chiefe pillour of the Arianes and they that ioyned with him in that factiō falsly accused Athanasius to Iulius the B. of Rome Iulius folowing the ecclesiasticall rule commaunded them to come to Rome and caused the reuerent Athanasius to be cited to iudgement regulariter after the order of the canōs He came The false accusers went not to Rome knowing righte well that theire forged lye might easely be deprehended In the cause and defence of Ihon Chrysostome these bishops came from Constantinople to Innocentius the Pope Pansophus B. of Pisidia Pappus of Syria Demetrius of the seconde Galatia and Eugenius of Phrygia These were suters for Chrysostome He him selfe treated his matter with Innocentius by writing In his epistle among other thinges he writeth thus Least this outragious confusion runne ouer all and beare rule euery where write I pray you and determine by your auctoritie such wicked actes done in our absence and when we withdrewe not our selues from iudgement to be of no force as by theire owne nature truly they be voied and vtterly none Furthermore who haue committed these euilles put you them vnder the censure of the church And as for vs sith that we are innocent neither conuicte neither fownde in any defaulte nor proued gyltie of any crime geue commaundement that we be restored to our churches agayne that we may enioye the accustomed charitie and peace with our brethren Innocentius after that he vnderstoode the whole matter pronounced and decreed the iudgement of Theophilus that was against Chrysostome to be voyed and of no force This whole tragedie is at large set forth by Palladius B. of Helenopolis in vita Ioannis Chrysostomi who lyued at that tyme. By this appeale of Chrysostome and by the whole handeling of the matter and specially by the purporte of his epistle to Innocētius the superioritie of the Pope is euidently acknowleged And so is it plainely confessed by Athanasius and the bishops of Egipte Thebais and Libya assembled in councell at Alexandria by these wordes of their epistle to Felix Vestrū est enim nobis manum porrigere etc. It is your parte saie they to stretche forth your helping hāde vnto vs because we are committed vnto you It is your parte to defende vs and deliuer vs it is our parte to seeke helpe of you and to obey your commaundementes And a litle after For we knowe that you beare the cure and charge of the vniuersall church and specially of bishops who in respecte of their cōtemplation and speculation are called the eyes of our lord as alwaies the prelates of your See first the Apostles then theire successours haue done Theodoritus that learned B. of Cyrus besyde the epistle he wrote to Leo for succour and helpe in his troubles in an other that he wrote to Renatus a priest neare about Leo sayeth thus Spoliarunt me sacerdotio etc. They haue violently robbed me of my bishoprike they haue caste me foorth of the cities neither hauing reuerenced myne age spente in religiō nor my hoare heares Wherefore I beseche thee that thou persuade the most holy Archebishop he meaneth Leo to vse his apostolike auctoritie and to commaunde vs to come vnto your councell or consistorie For this holy See holdeth the rudther and hath the gouernement of the churches of the whole worlde partly for other respectes but specially for that it hath euermore cōtinewed cleare frō stintche of heresie and that none euer sate in it who was of contrary opiniō but rather hath euer kepte the apostolike grace vndefyled In which wordes of Theodoritus this is chiefly to be marked that the holy See of Rome as he sayeth hath the gouernement of the churches of all the worlde most for this cause that it was neuer infected with heresie as all other churches fownded by the Apostles were For which cause that See hath euer hitherto of all christen nations and now also ought to be hearde and obeyed in all pointes of faith For that See though it hath failed sometymes in charitie and hath ben in case as it might truly saye the wordes of the gospell spoken by the foolishe virgins Matth. 25. our lampes be without lighte yet it neuer failed in faith as Theodoritus witnesseth and S. Augustine affirmeth the same Which speciall grace and singulare priuiledge is to be imputed vnto the prayer of Christ by which he obteined of God for Peter and his successours Euill lyfe of the B. of Rome ought not to seuer vs frō the faith of the churche of Rome that their faith shuld not fayle Therfore the euill lyfe of the bishops of Rome ought not to withdrawe vs from beleuing and folowing the doctrine preached and taughte in the holy churche of Rome For better credite hereof that is earnestly to be considered which S. Augustine writeth epistola 165. where after that he hath rehearsed in order all the Popes that succeded Peter euen to him that was Pope in his tyme he sayeth thus In illum ordinem episcoporum etc. In to that rewe of
bishops that reacheth from Peter him selfe to Anastasius which now sitteth in the same chaier if any traitour had crepte in it shuld nothing hurte the church and the innocent christen folke ouer whom our lord hauing prouidence sayeth of euill rulers what they saye vnto you Matth. 23. doo ye but what they doo doo ye not for they saye and doo not to the intent the hope of a faithfull person may be certaine and such as being set not in man but in our lord be neuer scattered abroade with tempest of wicked schisme And in his 166. epistle he sayeth our heaueÌ„ly Maister hath so farre forewarned vs to be ware of all euill of dissension that he assured the people also of euill rulers that for their sakes the Seate of holesom doctrine shuld not be forsaken in which Seate euen the very euill men be compelled to saye good thinges For the thinges which they saye be not theires but gods who in the Seate of vnitie hath put the doctrine of veritie By this we are plainely taught that albe it the successours of Peter Christes vicares in earth be fownde blameworthy for euill lyfe yet we oughte not to dissente from them in doctrine nor seuer our selues from them in faith For as much as notwithstanding they be euill by gods prouidence for the suertie of his people they be compelled to saie the thinges that be good and to teache the truth the thinges they speake not being theirs but gods who hath put the doctrine of veritie in the Seate or chaier of vnitie which singulare grace cometh specially to the See of Peter either of the force of Christes prayer as is sayde before or in respecte of place and dignitie which the bishops of that See holde for Christ as Balaam could be broughte by no meanes to curse that people whom God would to be blessed And Caiphas also prophecied because he was high bishop of that yere and prophecied truly being a maÌ„ otherwise most wicked And therfore the euill doinges of bishops of Rome make no argument of discrediting their doctrine To this purpose the example of Gregorie Nazianzene may very fittely be applied of the golden syluerne and leadden seale As touching the valewe of metalles golde and syluer are better but for the goodnes of the seale as well doth leadde imprint a figure in waxe as syluer or golde For this cause that the See of Rome hath neuer ben defyled with stinking heresies as Theodoritus sayeth and god hath alwaies kepte in that chaier of vnitie the doctrine of veritie as Augustine writeth for this cause I saye it sitteth at the sterne and gouerneth the churches of the whole worlde for this cause bishops haue made their appellations thither iudgement in doubtes of doctrine and determination in all controuersies and strifes hath ben from thence alwayes demaunded Now that the B. of Rome had alwayes cure and rule ouer all other bishops specially of them of the East for touching them of the West church it is generally coÌ„fessed besyde a hundred other euideÌ„t argumentes this is one very sufficient that he had in the East to doo his stede three delegates or vicares now commonly they be named legates And this for the commoditie of the bishops there whose churches were farre distaÌ„t froÌ„ Rome The one was the bishop of Constantinople as we finde it mencioned in epistola Simplicij ad Achatium Constantinopolitanum The seconde was the bishop of Alexandria as the epistle of Bonifacius the seconde to Eulalius recordeth The third was the bishop of Thessalonica as it is at large declared in the 82. epistle of Leo ad Anastasium Thessalonicensem By perusing these epistles euery man may see that all the bishops of Grece Asia Syria Egite and to be shorte of all the Orient rendred and exhibited their humble obedieÌ„ce to the B. of Rome and to his arbitremeÌ„t referred their doubtes coÌ„plaintes and causes and to him onely made theire appellations Of the B. of Rome his punishing of offenders by censures of the church and otherwyse CorrectioÌ„s from the Pope as by excommunications eiection deposition and enioyning penance for transgressions we haue more exaÌ„ples then I thinke good to recite here They that haue knowledge of the ecclesiasticall stories may remeÌ„ber how Timotheus B. of Alexandria was excommunicated with Peter his deacon by Simplicius the Pope Nestorius B. of Constantinople by Celestinus Theophilus B. of Alexandria with Arcadius the Emperour and Eudoxia the Empreresse by Innocentius for their wicked demeanour toward Chrysostome How Dioscorus B. of AlexaÌ„dria was deposed though the whole secoÌ„de Ephesine councell stoode in his defence how Peter B. of Antioche was not onely put out of his bishoprike but also of all priestly honour How Photius was put out of the Patriarkeship of Constantiple into which he was intruded by fauour of Michael the Emperour at the sute of his wicked vnkle by Nicolaus the first Lib 3. epist 13. For proufe of this auctoritie the epistle of Cyprian which he wrote to Stephanus Pope in his tyme against Martianus the B. of Arelate in Gallia maketh an euident argument For that this Martianus became a maineteyner of the heresie of Nouatianus and therewith seduced the faithfull people Cyprian hauing intelligence of it by Faustinus from Lions aduertised Stephanus of it and moued him earnestly to directe his letters to the people of Arle by auctoritie of which Martianus shuld be deposed and an other put in his rome to th' intent sayeth he there the flocke of Christ which hytherto by him scattered abroade and woonded is contemned may be gathered together Which S. Cyprian would not haue written had the B. of Rome had no suche auctoritie CoÌ„firmations by the Pope For the Popes auctoritie concerning confirmation of the ordinations and elections of all bishops many examples might easely be alleaged as the request made to Iulius by the 90. Ariane bishops assembled in councell as Antioche against Athanasius that he would wouchesafe to ratifie and confirme those that they had chosen in place of Athanasius Paulus Marcellus and others whom they had condemned and depriued Also the earnest sute which Theodosius the Emperour made to Leo for coÌ„firmation of Anatolius and likewise that Martianus the Emperour made to him for confirmation of Proterius bothe bishops of Alexandria as it appeareth by their letters written to Leo in theire fauour And as for Anatoliê° Leo would not in any wise order and coÌ„firme him onlesse he would first professe that he beleued and helde the doctrine Vide Leonis epis 1â— which was conteined in Leo his epistle to Flauianus and would further by writing witnesse that he agreed with Cyrillus and the other catholihe fathers against Nestorius For this if nothing elles could be alleaged the testimonie of holy Gregorie were sufficient to make good credite Who vnderstanding that Maximus was ordered bisshop of Salonae a citie in Illyrico without the auctoritie and confirmation of the See Apostolike standing in doubte least
desyre eueÌ„ so to be tried But vvhy throvv you avvaye these balance and being so earnestly requyred vvhy be ye so loth to shevv forth but one olde doctour of your syde ye make me beleue ye vvould not haue the matter comme to tryall etc. 26 VVhat thinke ye is there novv iudged of you that being so long tyme requyred yet can not be vvonne to bring one sentence in your ovvn defence Fol. 26. I protest before God bring me but one sufficient authoritie in the matters I haue requyred and aftervvard I vvil gentilly and quietly conferre vvith you farther at your pleasure VVherefore for as much as it is goddes cause if ye meane simply deale simply betraie not your right if ye maye saue it by the speaking of one vvorde The people must nedes muse some vvhat at your silence and mistrust your doctrine if it shall appeare to haue no grovvnde neither of the olde councelles nor of the doctours nor of the scripture nor any alovved example of the primitiue churche to stand vpon and so fiften hundred yeres and the consent of antiquitie and generalitie that ye haue so loÌ„g and so much talkte of shall comme to nothing For thinke not that any vvise man vvill be so much your frend that in so vveighty matters vvill be satisfied vvith your silence Here I leaue putting you In the ende of the 2. ansvver to D. C. fol. 27. eftsones gently in remembraunce that being so osteÌ„ and so openly desyred to shevv forth one doctour or Councell etc. in the matters a fore mencioned yet hitherto ye haue brought nothing and that if ye stand so still it must needes be thought ye doo it conscientia imbecillitatis for that there vvas nothing to be brought You saye vve lacke stuffe to proue our purpose In the reply to D. Coles last letter fol. 43. O vvould to God your stuffe and oures might be layed together then shuld it sone appeare hovv true it is that ye saye and hovv faithfully ye haue vsed the people of God Me thinketh bothe reason and humanitie vvould Fol. 44. ye shuld haue ansvvered me sumvvhat specially being so ofteÌ„ and so openly required at the least you shuld haue alleaged Augustine Ambrose Chrysostome Hierome etc. VVhereas a man hath nothing to saye it is good reason he kepe silence as you doo You knovv that the matters that lie in question betvveÌ„ vs haue ben taught as vve novv teache them Fol. 53. bothe by Christ him self and by his Apostles and by the olde doctours and by the auncient generall Councelles and that you hauing none of these or like authorities haue set vp a religion of your ovvne and built it only vpon your selfe Therefor I may iustly and truly â—â—â—nclude that you novv teache and of long tyme haue taught the people touching the Masse the Supremacie the commen prayers etc. is naught For neither Christ nor his Apostles nor the olde Doctours Tertulliane Cypriane S. Hierome S. Augustine S. Ambrose S. Chrisostom etc. euer taught the people so as you haue taught them Not vvithstanding your great vavvntes that ye haue made ye see novv ye are discomfyted Fol. 62. ye see the field is almost lost vvhere ar novv your crakes of doctours and councelles VVhy stampe ye not your bookes vvhy comme ye not forth vvith your euidence Novv ye stand in nede of it novv it vvill serue and take place if ye haue any Fol. 65. As I haue offred you oftentymes bring ye but tvvo lines of your syde and the field is yours Fol. 110. Hilarius sayeth vnto the Arians cedo aliud Euangelium shevv me some other gospell for this that ye bring helpeth you not Euen so vvill I saye to you Cedo alios doctores shevv me some other doctours for these that ye bring are not vvorthy the hearing I hoped ye vvould haue comme in vvith some fressher bande It must nedes be some miserable cause that can fynde no better patrones to cleaue vnto I knovv it vvas not for lacke of good vvill of your part ye vvould haue brought other doctours if ye could haue fovvnd them Fol. 112. O Master Doctour deale simply in Gods causes and saye ye haue doctours vvhen ye haue them in dede and vvhen ye haue them not neuer laye the fault of not alleaging them to the defence of your doctrine in your recognisaunce Fol. 114. But alas small rhetorike vvould suffise to shevv hovv litle ye haue of your syde to alleage for your selfe In the conclusion of the replyes to D. Cole fol. 129. Here once againe I conclude as before putting you in remembrance that this long I haue desyred you to bring forth some suâ—â—â—â—ent authoritie for prouf of your partie and yet hitherto can obteine nothing VVhich thing I must nedes novv pronounce simply and plainely because it is true vvith out if or and ye doo conscientia imbecillitatis because as ye knovv there is nothing to be brought THE PREFACE TO Maister Iuell THIS heape of Articles which you haue layde to gether Maister Iuell the greater it ryseth the lesse is your aduantage For whereas you require but one sentence for the auouching of any one of them all the more groweth your number the more enlarged is the libertie of the answerer It semeth you haue conceiued a great confidence in the cause and that your aduersaries so it liketh you to terme vs whom God hath so stayde with his grace as we can not beare you coÌ„panie in departing from his catholike churche haue litle or nothing to saye in their defence Els what shuld moue you both in your printed Sermon and also in your answeres and Replyes to Doctour Cole to shew such courage to vse such amplification of wordes so often and with such vehemencie to prouoke vs to encounter and as it were at the blast of a trumpet to make your chalenge What feared you reproche of dastardnes if you had called forth no more but one learned maÌ„ of all your aduersaries and therefore to shew your hardynesse added more weight of wordes to your proclamatioÌ„ and chalenged all the learned men that be a lyue In the sermoÌ„ fol. 46 Among cowardes perhappes it serueth the tourne some tymes to looke fiercely to speake terribly to shake the weapon furiously to threaten bloudily no lesse then cutting hewing and killing but amoÌ„g such we see many tymes sore frayes foughten and neuer a blowe geuen With such bragges of him self and reproche of all others Homer the wisest of all poetes setteth forth Thersites for the fondest man of all the Grecians that came to Troye Goliath the giaunt so stoute as he was made offer to fight but with one Israelite 1. Reg. 17. Eligite ex vobis vituÌ„ descendat ad singulare certamen Choose out a man amongst you quoth he and let him come and fight with me man for man But you Maister Iuell in this quarell aske not the combate of one catholike man
only but as one suer of the victory before proufe of fight cast your gloue as it were and with straunge defyaunce prouoke all learned mē that be a lyue to campe with you Now if this matter shall so fall out as thouerthrowe appeare euidently on our syde and the victory on youres that is to witte if we can not bring one sentence for proufe of any one of all these articles out of the scriptures aunciēt councelles doctours or example of the primitiue churche yet wise and graue men I suppose would haue lyked you better if you had meekely and soberly reported the truth For truth as it is playne and simple so it needeth not to be set forth with bragge of high wordes You remember that old saying of the wise Simplex veritatis oratio the vtteraunce of truth ought to be simple But if the victory loth I am to vse this insolēt word were it not to folow the metaphore which your chalenge hath dryuen me vnto fall to our syde that is to saye if we shalle be hable to alleage some one sufficient sentēce for proufe of some one of all these articles yea if we shall be hable to alleage diuerse and sundry sentences places and authorities for confirmation of sundry these articles In this case I wene you shall hardly escape amōg sober mē the reproche of rashnes among humble men of presumptiō among godly men of wickednes Of rashnes for what can be more rashe then in so weighty matters as some of these articles import so boldly to affirme that the contrary where of may sufficiētly be proued of presumption for what can be more presumptuouse then in matters by you not thoroughly sene and weighed to impute ignoraunce and vnablenes to auouche thinges approued and receiued by the churche to all learned men a lyue Of wickednes for what is more wicked then the former case standing so to remoue the hartes of the people from deuotion so to bring the churche in to contempte so to set at nought the ordinances of the holy ghost As you folow the new and straunge doctrine of Theodorus Beza and Peter Martyr the prolocutours of the Caluinian churches in Fraunce whose scolar a long tyme you haue ben so you diuerte farre from that prudencie sobrietie and modestie which in their owtward demeanour they shewed in that solemne and honorable assemble at Poyssi in September 1561. as it appareth by the oration which Beza pronunced there in the name of all the Caluinistes In which oration with humble and often protestation they submitte them selues if cause shall so appeare to better aduise and iudgement as thoug they might be deceiued vttering these and the like wordes in sundry places If we be deceiued we would be gladde to know it Item For the small measure of knowledge that it hath pleased God to impart vnto vs it semeth that this transubstantiation etc. Item if we be not deceiued Item In case we be deciued we would be gladde to vnderstād it etc. But you Maister Iuell as though you had readde all that euer hath ben writtē in these pointes and had borne a waye all that euer-hath ben taught and were ignorant of nothing touching the same and none other besyde you had sene ought and were hable to saye ought saye meruelouse confidently and that in the most honorable and frequent audience of this Realme that you are well assured that none of your learned aduersaries no nore all the learned men a lyue shall euer be hable to alleage one sentence for any one of these Articles In the sermō fol. 49 and that because you know it therefor you speake it least happely your hearers shuld be deceiued Likewise in your answere to Doctour Coles first letter you saye speaking of these Articles you thought it best to make your entre in your preaching with such thinges Fol 6. as where in you were well assured we shuld be hable to fynde not so much as any colour or shadow of Doctours at all Where in you withdraw your self from plainenesse so much as you doo in your presumptuouse chalenge from modestie For being demaunded of D. Cole why you treate not rather of matters of more importāce then these Articles be of which yet lye in question betwixt the churche of Rome and the protestantes as of the presence of Christes body and bloud in the Sacrament of Iustification of the valew of good workes of the sacrifice of the Masse and of such other not vnwitting how much and how sufficient authoritie maye be brought against your syde for proufe of the catholike doctrine there in least all the world shuld espye your weakenes in these pointes you answer that you thought it better to begynne with smaller matters as these Articles be because you assure your self we haue nothing for cōfirmation of them Thus craftely you shifte your handes of those greater pointes wherin you know scriptures councelles doctours and examples of the primitiue churche to be of our syde and cast vnto vs as a bone to gnaw vpō this number of Articles of lesse weight a fewe excepted to occupie vs withall Which be partly concerning order rather then doctrine and partly sequeles of former and cōfessed truthes rather thē principall pointes of faith in th'exact treatie of which the aunciēt doctours of the churche haue not imployed their studie and trauaile of writing For many of thē being sequeles depending of a confessed truth they thought it needelesse to treate of them For as much as a principall point of truth graunted the graunting of all the necessarie sequeles is implyed As in a chayne Epist ad Gregoriū fratrem which comparison S. Basile maketh in the like case he that draweth the first lynk after him draweth also the last lynke And for this cause in dede the lesse number and weight of such auncient auctorities may be brought for th'auouching of thē And yet the thinges in them expressed be not iustly improued by any clause or sentence you haue sayde or vttered hytherto Verely M. Iuell if you had not bē more desyrouse to deface the catholike churche then to set forth the truth you would neuer haue rehearced such a long rolle of articles which for the more part be of lesse importance whereby you go about to discredite vs and to make the world beleue we haue nothing to shew for vs in a great part of our Religion and that you be to be taken for zelouse men right reformers of the churche and vndoubted restorers of the gospell As touching the other weighty pointes whereupon almost only your scoolemaisters of Germanie Suityerland and Geneua bothe in their preachinges and also in their writinges treate you will not yet aduenture the triall of them with making your matche with learned men and in the meane tyme set them forth by sermōs busyly among the vnlearned and simple people vntill such tyme as you haue wonne your purpose in these smaller matters Thus you seme to folow a sleight
Innocētius Zosimus and other auncient fathers what better reason haue they to kepe the infantes from the cuppe then the Anabaptistes haue to kepe them from theire baptisme If they allege their impotencie of remembring our lordes death the Anabaptistes will lihewise allege their impotencie of receiuing and vnderstāding doctrine that Christes institution in this behalfe semeth to require Thus th' aduersaries of the churche them selues doo agnise that the vse of the cuppe in the Sacrament perteineth not to all of necessitie So haue they neither godly charitie to ioyne with the churche neither sufficient reason to impugne the churche And although herein we could be content infantes not to be spoken of yet it maye easely be proued that the communion vnder bothe kyndes hath not euer ben generall And as we doo not cōdemne it but confesse it might be restored agayne by th'auctoritie of the churche lawfully assembled in a generall councell vppon mature deliberation before had and a holesome remedie against the inconueniences thereof prouided euen so are we hable to shewe good auctoritie for the defence of the one kynde now vsed in the churche And because M. Iuell beareth the world in hand nothing can be brought for it of oure syde some places I will allege here that seme to me very euidently to proue that the vse of bothe kyndes hath not alwayes ben thought necessary to all persons and that the communion vnder one kynde hathe ben practised and holden for good within the six hundred yeres after Christ that he would so faine bynde vs vnto Proufes for communion vnder one kinde Here maye be alleaged first the example of our lord him selfe out of the 24. chapter of S. Luke which is spoken of before where it is declared that he gaue the Sacrament to the two disciples at Emaus vnder the forme of bread only which place ought to haue the more weight of auctoritie in a catholike mannes iudgement because it is brought by the councell of Constance and also by the councell of Basile for proufe of the communion vnder one kynde That it was the Sacrament the auncient doctours doo affirme it playnely and the wordes cōferred with the wordes of our lordes supper doo agree and that it is not nedeful of oure owne head to adde thereto the administration of the cuppe as oure aduersaries doo by their figure synecdoche it appeareth by that those two disciples declared to the twelue Apostles assembled together in Ierusalem how they knew our lorde in fractione panis in breakinge of the breade to them which can not be taken for the wine and as sone as they knewe him in breaking of the breade he vanished awaye from theire syght er that he tooke the cuppe in to his handes and blessed it and gaue it vnto them as it appeareth euidently ynough to S. Augustine to Bede and to all other that be not willfully opinatiue Agayne what nede is it to vse violence in this scripture and ioyne vnto it a patche of oure owne deuise by so simple a warrant of a figure sith that according to the minde of the learned fathers Christ gaue here to the two disciples not a piece of the sacrament but the whole Sacrament as it is proued by th'effecte of the same and th'effecte presupposeth the cause For saint Augustine confesseth by that Sacrament of breade so he calleth it De cōsensu Euangelistarū li. 3. ca. 25. Vnitate corporis participata remoueri impedimentum inimici vt Christus posset agnosci that thereby they were made partakers of the vnitie of Christes bodye that is to saye made one bodye with Christ and that all impediment or lette of the ennemie the deuil was taken awaye so as Christ might be acknowleged What more should they haue gotten if they had receiued the cuppe also Here might be alleaged the place of the Actes in the 2. chapter where mention is made of the communion of breakinge of the breade the cuppe not spoken of which the heretikes called Waldēses dyd confesse that it must be vnderstanded of the Sacrament in confessione ad Vladislaū and likewise the place of the twentith chapter and specially that of the seuen and twentith chapter of the Actes Where Chrysostome and other fathers vnderstād the breade that saint Paul in perile of shipwracke tooke gaue thankes ouer brake and eate to be the holy Sacrament It is not to be merueiled at albe it S. Paul deliuered to the Corinthians the institution of oure lordes supper vnder hothe kyndes that yet vppon occasion geuen and when condition of tyme so required he ministred the communion vnder one kynde sith that with out doubte he tooke that holy mystery vnder one kynde for the whole Sacrament as we perceiue by his wordes 2. Cor. 10. where he sayeth Vnus panis et vnum corpus multi sumus omnes qui de vno pane participamus One breade and one body we being many are all that doo participate of one breade Where he speaketh nothing of the cuppe And likewise by his wordes where he speaketh disiūctiuely as the greke and the true latine texte hath Quicunque manducauerit panem 1. Cor. 11. vel biberit calicem domini indignê reus erit corporis et sanguinis domini Who so euer eateth the bread or drynketh of the cuppe of our lord vnworthely he shall be gylty of the bodye and bloude of our lorde Whereon dependeth an argument of the contrary that who so euer either eateth this bread worthely or drinketh this cuppe worthely he eateth and drinketh righteousnes and lyfe For thys purpose we haue a notable place in the hebrew gospell of S. Matthew which S. Hierome sayeth he sawe in the librarie of Caesarea and translated it This place is cited by S. Hierome in his booke de ecclesiasticis scriptoribus in Iacobo fratre domini The wordes touching the communion that S. Hierome rehearseth agree thoroughly with those of S. Luke 24. chapter Matthaeus sic refert Dominus autem etc. Matthew reporteth thus When oure lorde had geuen his shrowde vnto the bishopes seruant he went to Iames and appeared vnto him for Iames had made an oth that he would not eate breade from that howre he dranke of the cuppe of our lorde vntill he saw him raysed from the dead It foloweth a litle after Afferte ait dominus mensam panem Statimque addit Tulit panem benedixit ac fregit dedit Iacobo iusto dixit ei frater comede panem tuum quia resurrexit filius hominis à dormientibus Bring the table and set on bread quoth our lorde and by and by it is added he tooke bread and blessed it and brake it and gaue it to Iames the iust and sayde vnto him my brother eate thy breade for the sonne of man is risen agayne from the dead No man can doubte but this was the Sacrament And wine was there none geuen for any thing that may be gathered For it is not likely that S. Iames had
them safest of all And in an other place Ad Enodiū epist 102. Si propter eos solos Christus mortuus est qui certa intelligentia possunt ista discernere penè frustrà in Ecclesia laboramus If Christ sayeth he dyed onely for them which can with certaine or suer vnderstanding discerne these thinges concerning God then is the labour we take in the churche in maner in vayne God requyreth not so much of vs how much we vnderstād as how much we beleue and through belefe how much we loue And when we shall all appeare before Christ in that dredfull daye of iudgement whe shall not be requyred to geue an accompte of our vnderstanding but faith presupposed of our charitie Now though the people knowe not the Latine tonge and albeit it were better The benefite of prayer vttered in a tonge not vnderstāded they had the Seruice in their owne vulgare tonge for the better vnderstanding of it yet as it is for as muche as it cōsisteth in maner all together of the scriptures that great profite cometh bothe to the reader and to the hearer of it Origen sheweth at large in the twētith homilie vpon Iosue Because it were ouer long to bring all that he sayeth there to this purpose the summe of the whole may thus be abbridged First that the heauenly powers and angelles of God which be with vs haue great lyking in our vtterāce of the wordes of the scripture Though we vnderstād not the wordes we vtter with our mowth yet those powers sayeth he vnderstand them and thereby be inuited and that with delite to helpe vs. And speaking of the powers that be within vs to whom charge of our soules and bodies is committed he sayeth that if the scriptures be read of vs they haue pleasure therein and be made the stronger toward taking heede to vs yea and that if we speake with tonges and our spirite praye and our sense be with out fruite And there he alleageth to that purpose the cōmon place of S. Paul to the Corinthiās calling it merueilouse and in maner a mysterie shewing how the spirite prayeth the sense being with out fruite After this he declareth the euill powers and our ghostly ennemies the deuill by our reading and hearing of the scriptures to be dryuen from vs. As by enchauntements sayeth he snakes be stayed from doing hurte with their venyme so if there be in vs any serpent of contrary power or if any snake waite priuely to mischiefe vs by vertue of the holy scripture rehearsed so that for wearynesse thou tourne not awaye thy hearing he is put awaye S. Augustine confirmeth the same doctrine where he sayeth In prologo Psalmorum psalmus daemones fugat angelos in adiutorium inuitat The psalme read deuoutly or heard putteth deuilles to flight and prouoketh angels to helpe At lenght Origen shewing how by meate or drynke we fynde remedie for sore eyes though we feele no benefite forthwith in eating or drynking he concludeth his speciall parte of the comparison with these wordes In this wise we must beleue also of the holy scripture that it is profitable and doth good to the soule etiamsi sensus noster ad praesens intelligentiam non capit although presently our sense doo not atteine the meaning or vnderstanding because our good powers by these wordes be refreshed and fedde and the cōtrary that is our aduersarie powers are weakned and put to flight At lenght making obiection to him selfe on the behalfe of his hearers as though they shuld laye this doctrine to his charge for excuse of taking further paynes in preaching and expounding the scriptures to them therto he answereth and sayeth No no we haue not sayd these to you for that cause neither haue we vttered these thinges to you for excuse but to shewe you in Scripturis sanctis esse vim quandam quae legenti etiam sine explanatione sufficiat that in the holy scriptures there is a certaine power or strength which is sufficient for one that readeth it yea without any expounding of it This sufficiencie he referreth I thinke to the procuring of the good powers to helpe vs and to the dryuing awaye the malice of the euill powers our ghostly enemies that they hurte vs not I trust wise godly and stedfast men who be not caryed about with euery wynde of doctrine will be moued more with the auctoritie of Origen a man allwayes in the iudgemēt of all the christē worlde accōpted most excellētly learned thē with the scorning of Caluine who speaking of the auncient latine Seruice vsed in England and Fraunce sayeth In Institutionib ad Ecclesiā ex sono non intellecto nullus penitus fructus redit that of the sownde not vnderstanded no fruite at all retourneth to the churche vsing that word of dispite that might better be spoken by a mynstrell of his pype and taburrette then by a preacher of the diuine Seruice Neither hereof with any milder spirite speaketh his disciple and subminister Theodore Beza the hote minister of the deformed churches of Fraunce Confessionis ca. 4. Sectiōe 16 Quaecunque preces ab aliquo concipiuntur eo idiomate quod ipse non intelligat pro Dei ludibrio sunt habendae What prayers so euer be made sayeth he of any man in a tonge that he vnderstādeth not they be to be taken for a mockery of God Who so euer here alloweth Caluine and Beza condemned of the churche must condemne Origen for this point neuer reproued nor touched of any that haue not spared him where so euer they could charge him with any errour If all prayers made in an vnknowen tonge be a mocking of God as Beza sayeth then were the prayers vttered by miracle in the primitiue churche with tonges which the vtterers them selues vnderstoode not after the mynde of Chrysostome a mocking of god for I see nothing whereby they are excluded from his generall saying and vniuersall propositiō Verely this teaching of Beza is not sownde I wene if he were out of the protection of his deformed churches and cōuented before a catholike bishop to geue an accompte of this doctrine he would steppe backe and reuoke that rashe saying agayne For els he shuld seme to graunt that God gaue at the begynning of the church the gifte of tonges to be mokte withall which were very absurde and blasphemouse S. Paul wisheth that all the Corinthians spake with tonges but rather that they prophecied If our newe maisters condemne the Latine Seruice in the Latine churche for that the people vnderstand it not thereof must it folowe that the English seruice so much of it as consisteth of Dauides psalmes which is the most parte be also cōdemned The like may besayde of other nations For how many shall we fynde not of the people onely but also of the best learned mē that vnderstand the meaning of them in what tōge so euer they be set forth S. Hilarie cōpareth the booke of psalmes to a
substance which was crucified and shedde foorth for vs. Thus to the humble beleuers scripture it selfe ministreth sufficient argument of the truth of Christes body and bloude in the sacrament against the sacramentaries who holde opinion that it is there but in a figure signe or taken onely Againe we can not fynde where our lord performed the promise he made in the syxth chapter of Iohn The bread which I wil geue is my fleshe which I will geue for the lyfe of the worlde but onely in his last supper where if he gaue his fleshe to his Apostles and that none other but the very same which he gaue for the lyfe of the worlde it foloweth that in the blessed Sacrament is not mere bread but that same his very body in substance For it was not mere bread but his very body that was geuen and offred vp vpon the crosse If the wordes spoken by Christ in S. Iohn of promise that he performed in his holy supper The bread that I will geue is my fleshe had ben to be taken not as they seme to meane plainely and truly but metaphorically tropically symbolically and figuratiuely so as the truth of our lordes fleshe be excluded as our aduersaries do vnderstand them then the Capernaites had not had any occasion at all of their great offence Then shuld not they haue had cause to murmour against Christ as the Euāgelist sheweth The Iewes sayeth S. Iohn Stroue among them selues Cap. 6. saying how can he geue vs his fleshe to eate And much lesse his dere disciples to whom he had shewed so many and so great miracles to whom he had before declared so many parables and so high secretes shuld haue had any occasiō of offence And doubteles if Christ had meant they shuld eate but the signe or figure of his body they would not haue sayde Durus est hic sermo this is a hard saying and who can abyde to heare it For then shuld they haue done no greater thing then they had done oftentymes before in eating the Easter lambe And how could it seme a hard worde or saying if Christ had meant nothing elles but this the bread that I will geue is a figure of my body that shall cause you to remember me To conclude shortely If Christ would so haue ben vnderstanded as though he had meant to geue but a figure onely of his body it had ben no nede for him to haue alleaged his omnipotencie and almighty power to his disciples thereby the rather to bring them to beleefe of his true body to be geuen them to eate Hoc vos scandalizet doth this offende you sayeth he what if ye see the sonne of man ascende where he was before it is the Spirite that geueth lyfe c. As though he had sayde ye consyder onely my humanitie that semeth weake and fraile neither doo you esteme my diuine power by the great miracles I haue wrought But when as ye shall see me by power of my godhed ascend in to heauen from whence I came vnto you will ye then also stand in doubte whether ye-may beleue that I geue you my very body to be eaten Thus by signifyyng his diuine power Christ confownded their vnbeleefe touching the veritie and substance of his body that he promysed to geue them in meate What occasioned the fathers to vse these termes really substantially corporally c. These places of the scripture and many other reporting plainely that Christ at his supper gaue to his disciples his very body euen that same which the daye folowing suffered death on the Crosse haue ministred iust cause to the godly and learned fathers of the churche to saye that Christes body is present in this Sacrament really substantially corporally carnally and naturally By vse of which aduerbes they haue meant onely a truth of being and not a waye or meane of being And though this manner of speaking be not thus expressed in the scripture yet is it deduced out of the scripture For if Christ spake plainely and vsed no trope figure nor metaphore as the scripture it selfe sufficiently declareth to an hūble beleuer and would his disciples to vnderstand him so as he spake in manifest termes when he sayde This is my body which is geuen for you Thē may we saye that in the sacrament his very body is present yea really that is to saye in dede substantially that is in substāce and corporally carnally and naturally by which wordes is meant that his very body his very fleshe and his very humaine nature is there not after corporal carnal or natural wise but inuisibly vnspeakeably miraculousely supernaturally spiritually diuinely and by waye to him onely knowen And the fathers haue ben driuen to vse these termes for more ample and full declaratiō of the truth and also for withstanding and stopping obiections made by heretikes And because the catholike faith touching the veritie of Christes body in the Sacrament was not impugned by any man for the space of a thousand yeres after Christes being in earth and about that tyme Berengarius Berengarius first beganne openly to sowe the wicked sede of the sacramentarie heresie which then sone confuted by learned men and by the same first author abiured and recanted now is with no lesse wickednes but more busely and more earnestly set forth againe the doctoures that sythēs haue written in defence of the true and catholike faith herein haue more often vsed the termes a fore mentioned then the olde and auncient fathers that wrote within M. Iuelles syx hundred yeres after Christ who doubteles would no lesse haue vsed thē if that matter had ben in question or doubte in their tyme. And albeit these termes were straunge and newe as vsed within these fyue hundred yeres onely and that the people were neuer taught for syx hundred yeres after Christ as M. Iuell sayeth more boldly then truly and therefore more rashely then wysely yet the faith by them opened and declared is vniuersall and olde verely no lesse olde then ys our lordes supper where this Sacrament was first instituted Here before that I bring in places of auncient fathers reporting the same doctrine and in like termes as the catholike churche doth holde concerning this article least our opinion herein might happely appeare ouer carnall and grosse I thincke it necessary briefly to declare what maner a true bodie and bloud of Christ is in the sacrament Christ in him selfe hath but one fleshe and bloud in substāce which his godhed tooke of the virgine Mary once and neuer afterward lefte it of The fleshe and bloud of Christ is of double consyderation But this one fleshe and bloud in respecte of double qualitie hath a double consideration For at what tyme Christ lyued here in earth among men in the shape of man his fleshe was thrall and subiecte to the frailtie of mannes nature synne and ignorāce excepted That fleshe being passible vntil death the souldiers at the procurement of the Iewes
crucified And such maner bloud was at his passion shedde foorth of his body in sighte of them which were then present But after that Christ rose againe from the deade his body from that tyme forward euer remaineth immortall and liuely in dāger no more of any infirmitie or suffering much lesse of death but is become by diuine giftes and endowmētes a spirituall and a diuine body as to whom the godhed hath communicated diuine and godly properties and excellencies that ben aboue all mannes capacitie of vnderstanding This fleshe and body thus considered which sundry doctours call corpus spirituale deificatum a spirituall and deified body is geuen to vs in the blessed sacrament This is the doctrine of the church vttered by S. Hierome in his commentaries vppon th'Epistle to the Ephesians where he hath these wordes Lib. 1. ca. 1. Dupliciter verò sanguis caro intelligitur vel spiritualis illa atque diuina de qua ipse dixit Caro mea vere est cibus sanguis meus verè est potus Et nisi manducaueritis carnē meam sanguinem meum biberitis non habebitis vitam aeternam vel caro quae crucifixa est sanguis qui militis effusus est lancea that is The bloud and fleshe of Christ is vnderstanded two waies either that it is that spiritual and diuine fleshe of which he spake him selfe My fleshe is verely meate and my bloud is verely drinke And excepte ye eate my fleshe and drinke my bloud ye shall not haue lyfe in you Or that fleshe which was crucified and that bloud which was shedde by pearcing of the souldiers speare And to the intent a man shuld not take this differēce according to the substance of Christes fleshe and bloud but according to the qualitie onely S. Hierome bringeth a similitude of our fleshe as of which it hath ben in double respecte sayde Iuxta hanc diuisionem in sanctis etiam diuersitas sanguinis carnis accipitur vt alia sit caro quae visura est salutare Dei Luc. 3. alia caro sanguis quae regnum Dei nō queant possidere 1. Cor. 15. According to this diuision diuersitie of bloud and fleshe is to be vnderstanded in sainctes also so as there is one fleshe which shal see the saluacion of God and an other fleshe and bloud which may not possesse the kingdom of God Which two states of fleshe and bloud seme as it appeareth to the vnlearned quite contrarie But Saint Paul dissolueth this doubte in the fiftenth chapter of his first epistle to the Corinthians saying that fleshe of such sorte as we beare about vs in this lyfe earthly mortal fraile and bourthenouse to the soule can not possesse the kingdom of God because corruption shal not possesse incorruption But after resurrection we shal haue a spirituall gloriouse incorruptible and immortall flesh and like in figure to the gloriouse body of Christ as S. Paul sayeth This corruptible body must putte on incorruption and this mortall immortalitie Then such fleshe or our fleshe of that maner and sorte shall possesse the kingdom of God and shal beholde God him selfe And yet our fleshe now corruptible and then incorruptible is but one fleshe in substāce but diuerse in qualitie and propertie Euen so it is to be thought of our lordes fleshe as is afore sayde The due weghing of this differēce geueth much light to this matter and ought to staye many horrible blasphemies wickedly vttered against this most blessed Sacrament Now whereas M. Iuell denyeth that Christen people were of olde tyme taught to beleue that Christes body is really substantially corporally carnally or naturally in the Sacrament I doo plainely affirme the cōtrarie Yet I acknowledge that the learned fathers which haue so taught would not thereby seme to make it here outwardly sensible or perceptible Hom. 83. in Matt 60 ad popul Antiochen For they confesse all with Saint Chrysostome that the thing which is here geuen vs is not sensible but that vnder visible signes inuisible thinges be delyuered vnto vs. But they thought good to vse the aforesayed termes to put awaye all doubte of the being of his very body in these holy mysteries and to exclude the onely imagination phantasie figure signe token vertue or signification there of For in such wise the Sacramentaries haue vttered their doctrine in this pointe as they may seme by their manner of speaking and wryting here to represent our lordes body onely in deede being absent as kinges oftentymes are represented in a Tragedie or meane persones in a Comedie Verely the maner and waye by which it is here present and geuen to vs and receiued of vs is secrete not humaine ne naturall true for all that And we doo not atteine it by sense reason or nature but by faith For which cause we doo not ouer basely consyder and attende the visible elementes but as we are taught by the councell of Nice lifting vp our mynde and spirite we beholde by faith on that holy table put and layde so for the better signification of the real presence their terme sowndeth the Lambe of God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that taketh awaye the synnes of the worlde And here saye they we receiue his pretiouse body and bloude 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to saye verely and in deede which is no other wise nor lesse then this terme really importeth And touching these termes fyrst Verely or which is all one Really and substantially me thinketh M. Iuell shuld beare the more with vs for vse of the same sith that Bucer him selfe one of the greatest learned men of that syde hath allowed them yea and that after much writing against Luther in defēce of Zuinglius and Oecolampadius by him set forth and after that he had assured him selfe of the truth in this article by diuine inspiration as most constantly he affirmeth with these wordes In responsione ad Lutherū Haec non dubitamus diuinitus nobis per scripturam reuelata de hoc sacramento We doubte not sayeth he but these thinges concerning this sacramēt be reueled vnto vs from god and by the scripture If you demaunde where this may be fownde in the actes of a Councell holden betwen the Lutheranes and Zuinglianes for this very purpose in Martine Luthers house at Wittenberg in the yere of our lord 1536. you shal fynde these wordes Audiuimus D. Bucerum explicantem suam sententiam de Sacramento corporis sanguinis Domini hoc modo Cum pane vino verè substantialiter adest exhibetur sumitur corpus Christi sanguis Et sacramentali vnione panis est corpus Christi porrecto pane verè adest verè exhibetur corpus Christi We haue heard M. Bucer declare his mynde touching the sacrament of the body and bloud of our Lord in this sorte With the bread and wyne the body of Christ and his bloud is present exhibited and receiued
occupied a place at the table visibly by his diuine power there he helde his body in his haÌ„des inuisibly In expositione psal 13. For as S. Augustine sayeth ferebatur manibê° suis he was borne in his owne haÌ„des where nature gaue place and his one body was in mo places then one Verely non est abbreuiata manus domini the hande of our lord is not shortened his power is as great as euer it was And therefore let vs not doubte but he is able to vse nature finite infinitely specially now the nature of his body being glorified after his resurrection from the dead And as the lyuing is not to be sought among the dead so the thinges that be done by the power of God aboue nature are not to be tryed by rules of nature And that all absurdities and carnall grosnes be seuered from our thoughtes where true christen people beleue Christes body to be in many places at once they vnderstaÌ„d it so to bee in a mysterie Being in a mysterie Now to be in a mysterie is not to be comprehended in a place but by the power of God to be made present in sorte and maner as him selfe knoweth verely so as no reason of man can atteine it and so as it may be shewed by no examples in nature Whereof that notable saying of S. Augustine may very well be reported Aug. epis ad VolusianuÌ„ IteÌ„ Ser. 159. de tempore O homo si rationem à me poscis non erit mirabile exemplum quaeritur non erit singulare that is O man if herein thou require reason it shall not be marueilouse seeke for the like example and then it shall not be singuler If Goddes working be comprehended by reason sayeth holy Gregorie it is not wonderouse neither faith hath meede Gregorius in homil whereto mannes reason geueth proufe Iuell Or that the priest did then holde vp the Sacrament ouer his head Of the Eleuation or lyfting vp of the Sacrament ARTICLE VII OF what weight this ceremonie is to be accompted catholike ChristeÌ„ men whom you call your aduersaries M. Iuell knowe no lesse then you Verely whereas it pleaseth you thus to ieste and like a Lucian to scoffe at the sacramentes of the church and the reuerent vse of the same calling all these articles in generall thâ—… highest mysteries and greatest keyes of our religion without which our doctrine can not be maineteined and stand vpright vnderstand you that this a sundry other articles which you denye and requyrâ—… proufe of is not such ne neuer was so estemed The priestes lifting vp or shewing of the Sacrament is not one of the highest mysteries or greatest keyes of our Religion and the doctrine of the catholike churche may right well be maineteined and stande without it But it appeareth you regarde not so much what you saye as how you saye somewhat for colour of defacing the churche which whiles you go about to doo you deface your selfe more then you seeme to be ware of and doo that thing whereby among good christen men specially the learned you may be a shamed to shewe your face For as you haue ouer rashely yea I maye saye wickedly affirmed the negatiue of sundry other articles and stowtely craked of your assurance thereof EleuatioÌ„ of the sacrament so you hauâ—… likewise of this For perusing the auncient father writinges we fynde record of this Ceremonie vsed euen from the Apostles tyme foreward Saint Dionyse that was S. Paules scholer sheweth that the priest at his tyme after the consecration was wont to holde vp the dredfull mysteries so as the people might beholde them His wordes be these according to the greke Ecclesias hierarch cap. 3. Pontifex diuina munera laude prosecutus sacrosancta augustissima mysteria conficit collaudata in conspectum agit per symbola sacrè proposita The bishop after that he hath done his seruice of praising the diuine giftes consecrateth the holy and most worthy mysteries and bringeth them so praysed in to the sighte of the people by the tokeÌ„s set forth for that holy purpose On which place the auncient greke writer of the scholies vpon that worke sayeth thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 loquitur de vnius benedictionis nimirum panis diuini eleuatione quem Pontifex in sublime attollit dicens Sancta sanctis This father speaketh in this place of the lifting vp of the one blessing that is to saye of the one forme or kynde of the sacrament euen of that diuine breade which the bishop lifteth vp on high saying holy thinges for the holy In saint Basiles and Chrysostomes Masse we finde these wordes Sacerdos eleuans sacrum panem dicit Sancta Sanctis The priest holding vp that sacred bread sayeth Holy thinges for the holy In Saint Chrysostomes Masse we reade that as the people is kneeling downe after th' example of the priest and of the deacon the deacon seing the priest stretching forth his handes and taking vp that holy bread 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ad sacram eleuationem peragendam palam edicit attendamus to doo the holy eleuation speaketh out a lowde let vs be attent and then the priest sayeth as he holdeth vp the sacrament holy thinges for the holy Amphilochius of whom mention is made afore in the lyfe of S. Basile speaking of his wonderouse celebrating the Masse among other thinges sayeth thus Et post finem orationum exaltauit panem sine intermissione orans dicens Respice domine Iesu Christe etc. And after that he had done the prayers of consecration he lyfted vp the bread without ceasing praying and saying Looke vpon vs lord Iesus Christ etc. The same saint Basile meant likewise of the Eleuation and holding vp of the sacrament after the custome of the OccideÌ„tall churche Cap 27. in his booke de Spiritu sancto where he sayeth thus Inuocationis verba dum ostenditur panis eucharistiae calix benedictionis quis sanctorum nobis scripto reliquit Which of the sainctes hath lefte vnto vs in writing the wordes of Inuocation whiles the bread of Eucharistia that is to witte the blessed sacrament in forme of bread and the consecrated chalice is shewed in sight He speaketh there of many thinges that be of great auctoritie and weight in the church which we haue by tradition onely and can not be auouched by holy scripture Of shewing the holy mysteries to them that be present in the sacrifice In epist ad Ephes Sermon 3. in moral the olde doctours make meÌ„tion not sildom S. Chrysostom declareth the maner of it saying that such as were accompted vnworthy and heynouse synners were put forth of the churche whiles the sacrifice was offered whiles Christ and that lambe of our lord was sacrificed Which being put out of the churche then were the vailes of the aulter taken awaie to th'entent the holy mysteries might be shewed in sight doubteles to styrre the people to more deuotion reuerence and to the
and bloud as our lord sayde For although thy sense reporte to thee so much that it is bare bread and wyne yet let thy faith staye thee and iudge not thereof by thy taste but rather be right well assured all doubte put a parte that the body and bloud of Christ is geuen to thee Againe he sayeth thus in the same place Haec cum scias pro certo explorato habeas qui videtur esse panis noÌ„ esse sed corpus Christi item quod videtur vinum non esse quanquam id velit sensus sed sanguinem Christi ac de eo prophetam dixisse panis cor hominis confirmat firma ipse cor sumpto hoc pane vtpote spirituali Where as thou knowest this for a very certainetie that that which semeth to be wyne is not wyne albeit the sense maketh that accompte of it but the bloud of Christ and that the prophete therereof sayde bread strengthneth the hart of man strengthen thou thy selfe thy harte by taking this bread as that which is spirituall And in 3. Catechesi this father sayeth Panis Eucharistiae post inuocationem sancti Spiritus non amplius est panis nudus simplex Sed corpus etc. The bread of the Sacrament after prayer made to the holy ghost is not bare and simple bread but the body of Christ Now sith that by this doctours plaine declaratioÌ„ of the catholike faith in this point we ought to beleue and to be verely assured that the bread is no more bread after coÌ„secration but the very body of Christ and the wyne no more wyne but his pretiouse bloud though they seme to the eye otherwise though taste and feeling iudge otherwise and to be shorte though all senses reporte the contrary and all this vpon warrant of our lordes word who sayde these to be his body and bloud and that as he teacheth not in the bread and wyne And further sith we are taught by Eusebius Emisenus in his homilies of Easter to beleue terrena coÌ„mutari transire the earthly thinges to be chaunged and to passe againe creaturas conuerti in substantiam corporis Christi the creatures of bread and wyne to be tourned in to the substaÌ„ce of our lordes body and bloud which is the very traÌ„substantiation Transubstantion In Liturgia And sith Chrysostom sayeth Panem absumi that the bread is consumed awaie by the substance of Christes bodye And Damascen Lib. 4. de orthodoxa fi c. 14. In Mar. 14 bread and wine traÌ„smutari supernaturaliter to be chaunged aboue the course of nature and Theophylact the bread transelementari in carnem domini to be quite tourned by chaunging of the elementes that is the matter or substance it consisteth of into the fleshe of our lorde and in an other place In Matth. 26. ineffabili operatione traÌ„sformari etiamsi panis nobis videatur that the bread is traÌ„sformed or chaunged into an other substantiall forme he meaneth that of our lordes body by vnspeakeable working though it seme to be bread The treatises of these greke vvriters haue ben set forth of late by one Claudius de Sainctes Finally sith that the greke Doctours of late age affirme the same doctrine among whom Samona vseth for persuasion of it the similitude which Gregorie Nyssene and Damascen for declaration of the same vsed before which is that in consecration such maner transubstantiation is made as is the conuersion of the bread in nourrishing in which it is tourned into the substance of the nourrished Methonensis like S. Ambrose would not men in this matter to looke for the order of nature seing that Christ was borne of a virgine besyde all order of nature and sayeth that our lordes bodye in this Sacrament is receiued vnder the forme or shape of an other thing least bloud shuld cause it to be horrible Nicolaus Cabasila sayeth that this bread is no more a figure of our lordes bodye Cap. 27. neither a gifte bearing an image of the true gifte nor bearing any description of the passioÌ„s of our Sauiour him selfe as it were in a table but the true gifte it selfe the most holy bodye of our lord it selfe which hath truly receiued reproches contumelies stripes which was crucified which was kylled Marcus Ephesius though otherwise to be reiected as he that obstinatly resisted the determination of the Councell of Florence concerning the proceding of the holy ghost out of the sonne yet a sufficient witnes of the Greke churches faith in this point affirming the thinges offred to be called of S. Basile antitypa that is the samplers and figures of our lordes bodye because they be not yet perfitely consecrated but as yet bearing the figure and image referreth the chaunge or transubstantiation of them to the holy ghost donec Spiritus sanctus adueniat qui ea muter these giftes offered sayeth he be of S. Basile called figures vntill the holy ghost come vpon them to chaunge them Whereby he sheweth the faith of the Greke church that through the holy ghost in consecration the bread and wine are so chaunged as they maye no more be called figures but the very bodye and bloud of our lord it selfe as into the same chaunged by the comming of the holy ghost Which chaunge is a chaunge in substance and therefore it may rightly be termed traÌ„substaÌ„tiation TransubstaÌ„tiatioÌ„ which is nothing elles but a tourning or chaunging of one substance into an other substance Sith for this point of our religioÌ„ we haue so good auctoritie and being thus assured of the infallible faith of the churche declared by the testimonies of these worthy fathers of diuerse ages and quarters of the worlde we may well saye with the same churche against M. Iuell that in this Sacrament after consecration there remayneth nothing of that which was before but only the accidentes and shewes without the substance of bread and wyne And this is a matter to a Christen man not hard to beleue For if it please God the almightie Creator in the condition and state of thinges thus to ordeine that substaÌ„ces created beare and susteine accideÌ„tes why may not he by his almighty power coÌ„serue and kepe also accideÌ„tes without substaÌ„ce sith that the very hethen philosophers repute it for an absurditie to saye primam causam non posse id praestare solam quod possit cum secunda that is to saye that the first cause whereby they vnderstand God can not doo that alone which he can doo with the secoÌ„d cause where by they meane a creature And that this being of accidentes without substance or subiecte in this SacrameÌ„t vnder which the bread not remaining the bodye of Christ is present maye the rather be beleued it is to be consydered that this thing tooke place at the first creatioÌ„ of the world Basilius hexaemeroÌ„ hom 6 Damas li. 2. cap. 7. Paulê° Burgensis Gene. 1. after the opinion of some Doctoures Who do affirme that that first light which was at
serche of the truth By these places it is made cleare and euident that these names figure image signe token sacrament and such other the like of force of their significatioÌ„ doo not allwaies exclude the truth of thinges but doo onely shewe and note the maner of presence Wherefore to conclude this matter that is somewhat obscure to senses litle exercised the figure of the body or the signe of the body the Image of the body doth note the coouertnesse and secretnes in the maner of the exhibiting and doth not diminishe any whitte the truth of the presence So we doo accorde with M. Iuell in this article touching the forme of wordes but withall we haue thought it necessary to declare the true meaning of the same wich is contrary to the doctrine of the Sacramentaries Iuell Or that it was lawfull then to haue xxx xx.xv.x or .v. Masses said in one church in one daie Of pluralitie of Masses in one church in one daye ARTICLE XIII AS M. Iuell here desceÌ„deth by diuerse proportions and degrees from .xxx. to .v. first by taking awaie .x. the third parte of the whole and then .v. from the reste three tymes So it might haue pleased him also to haue taken awaie three from lyue the last remanent and so to haue lefte but two in all Which if he had done then shuld we so haue made vp that number as in this audiâ—e he might not other wise doo in regarde of his owne free promisse but allowe our accompte for good and sufficieÌ„t For that number we are well able to make good And what reason hath moued the auncient fathers gouernours of the churche to thinke it a godly and a necessarie thing to haue two Masses in one churche in one daie the same reason in cases either hath or might haue moued them and their successours after them likewise to allowe three or fouer Masses and in some cases fyue or mo Now if that rekening could duely be made of our parte M. Iuell perhappes would then saye as coÌ„monly they saye that confesse their errour in numbring that he had mistolde him selfe Albe it here it is to be marueiled that he appointeth vs to proue a number of Masses in one churche in one daie that vtterly denyeth the Masse and would haue no Masse in any church any daie at all And standing in the denyall of the whole so peremptorely as he doth it may seme straunge that he shuld thus frame this Article For what reason is it to chalenge vs for proufe of so great a nuÌ„ber sith he taketh awaie all together It appeareth that being not vnwitting how good proufes we haue for the Masse it selfe he thinketh to blanke vs by putting vs to the proufe of his number of xxx xx.xv.x or .v. Verely this kinde of meÌ„ fareth with the church much like vnto stroÌ„g theeues who hauing robbed an honest welthy man of all his moÌ„ney saie afterwardes vnto him vncourteously ah carle how camest thou by so much olde golde Lydford lavve vsed by the gospellers Or if it like not them to be compared with theeues in regard of the Rome they haue shuffled them selues into they may not vnfittely be likened to a Iudge of the Stemerie at Lidford in Deuonshire who as I haue heard it commonly reported hanged a felone among the Tynners in the forenoone and sate vppoÌ„ him in iudgemeÌ„t at afternoone And thereof to this daye such wrongfull dealing in a coÌ„mon prouerbe is in that countrie called Lidford lawe Sith that you M. Iuell and your felowes that now sitte on the benche require of vs the proufe of mo Masses in one church in one daie as it were a verdite of twelue men of equitie and right ye shuld haue heard our verdite er ye had geuen sentence and condemned the Masse Pluralitie of Masses in one church in one daye Now touching the number and iteration of the Masse first we haue good and auncient auctoritie for two Masses in one church in one daie That eloquent and holy father Leo the first writeth thus to Dioscorus bishop of AlexaÌ„dria Volumus illud quoque custodiri vt cuÌ„ solennior festiuitas conuentuÌ„ populi numerosioris indixerit ad eam tanta multitudo conuenit quae recipi basilica simul vna noÌ„ possit Sacrificij oblatio indubitanter iteretur ne ijs tantuÌ„ admissis ad hanc deuotionem qui primi aduenerint videatur ij qui postmoduÌ„ confluxerint non recepti CuÌ„ plenum pietatis atque rationis sit vt quoties basilicaÌ„ in quae agitur praesentia nouae plebis impleuerit toties sacrificiuÌ„ subsequeÌ„s offeratur This order we will to be kepte that when a number of people coÌ„meth to church together at a solemne feaste if the multitude be so great as maye not well be receiued in one churche at once that the oblatioÌ„ of the Sacrifice hardely be done againe least if they onely shuld be admitted to this deuotion who came first they that come afterward maye seme not to be receiued for as much as it is a thing full of godlynesse and reason that how oftetymes the church where the seruice is done is filled with a newe coÌ„panie of people so ofteÌ„tymes the Sacrifice there eftesones be offered By this father whoÌ„ the great General Councell of Chalcedon agnised for supreme gouernour of the churche of Christ and honoured with the singular title of the Vniuersall Bishop it is ordeined that if anywhere one churche could not conuenieÌ„tly holde all the people together at one time they that came after the first coÌ„panie shuld haue their deuotioÌ„ serued by hauing an other Masse celebrated againe And least perhappes some might doubte wether that were laufull so to be done or no or be cause theÌ„ some doubted thereof as now likewise some seme to doubte of it to put the matter out of doubte he sayeth assuredly Sacrificij oblatio indubitanter iteretur Let them not sticke to iterate or doo againe the oblatioÌ„ of the Sacrifice that is to saie let the Masse be celebrated againe indubitaÌ„ter without casting perill without sticking staggaring or doubting In that epistle he sheweth two great causes why mo Masses then one maye be done in one churche in one daie The one is least the aftercoÌ„mers shuld seme reiected noÌ„ recepti not receiued the other is that the one parte of the people be not defrauded of the benefite of their deuotioÌ„ â–ª As him selfe sayeth Necesse est auteÌ„ vt quaedaÌ„ pars populi sua deuotioÌ„e priuetur si vnius tantuÌ„ Missae more seruato sacrificiuÌ„ offerre non possint nisi qui prima diei parte conuenerint It must nedes be that a parte of the people be berefte of their deuotioÌ„ if the custoÌ„ of hauing one Masse onely kepte none maye offer the sacrifice but such as came to church together in the morning or first parte of the daye Now the people may neither be reiected whoÌ„ God hath chosen nor sparkled abroade whom our lord
the Apostles them selues it doth right well appeare how so euer M. Iuell assureth him selfe of the contrary and what so euer the deuill hath wrought and by his ministers taught against the sacrifice of the Masse that priestes haue auctoritie to offer vp Christ vnto his father That Christ offered him selfe to his father in his last supper and that priestes by those wordes Doo this in my remembraunce haue not onely auctoritie but also a speciall commaundemēt to doo the same and that the figure of Melchisedech and the prophetie of Malachie perteineth to this sacrifice and maketh proufe of the same let vs see by the testimonies of the fathers what doctrine the Apostles haue lefte to the churche Eusebius Caesariensis hath these wordes De demōstrat Euāgeli lib. 1. cap. 10. Horrorem afferentia mensae Christi sacrificia supremo Deo offerre per eminentissimum omnium ipsius Pontificem edocti sumus We are taught sayeth he to offer vnto our supreme God the sacrifices of Christes table which cause vs to tremble and quake for feare by his bisshop highest of all Here he calleth Christ in respecte of his sacrifice Gods bishop highest of all bisshops the sacrifices of Christes table he calleth the body and bloud of Christ because at the table in his last supper he sacrificed and offered the same and for that it is his very body and very bloud imaginatiō onely phantasie and figure set aparte he termeth these sacrifices as cōmonly the auncient fathers doo horrible causing trembling and feare And where as he sayeth we haue ben taught to offer these sacrifices to God doubteles he meaneth by these wordes of Christ Doo this in my remembraunce this is my body which is geuen for you this is my bloud which is shedde for you Clement in his eight booke often cited speaking of the sacrifice offered by the Apostles commonly addeth these wordes secundum ipsius ordinationem or ipso ordinante Whereby he confesseth it to be Christes owne ordinance That Christ sacrificed him selfe at his supper Hesychius affirmeth with these wordes Quod Dominus iussit Leuit. 4. vt sacerdos vitulum pro peccato oblaturus ponat manum super caput eius iugulet eum coram Domino Christum significat quem nemo obtulit sed nec immolare poterat Ioan. 10. nisi semetipsum ipse ad patiendum tradidisset Propter quod non solum dicebat Potestatem habeo ponendi animam meam potestatem habeo iterū sumēdi eam sed praeueniens semetipsum in coena Apostolorū immolauit quod sciunt qui mysteriorum percipiunt virtutē That our lord commaunded sayeth he the priest which shuld offer a calfe for synne to put his hand vpon his hedde and to sticke him before our lord it signifieth Christ whom no man hath offered neither could any man sacrifice him excepte he had delyuered him selfe to suffer For the which he sayde not onely I haue power to laye downe my soule Ioan. 10. and I haue power to take it agayne But also preuenting it he offered vp him selfe in sacrifice in the supper of the Apostles which they knowe that receiue the vertue of the mysteries By these wordes of Hesychius we learne that Christ offered and sacrificed his body and bloud twise First in that holy supper vnbloudely when he tooke bread in his hādes and brake it etc. Without diuision of the sacrifice for it is but one and the same sacrifice And afterward on the crosse with shedding of his bloude and that is it he meaneth by the word preuenting And at the same very instant of tyme which is here further to be added as a necessary point of Christen doctrine whe must vnderstād that Christ offered hem selfe in heauen inuisibly as concerning man in the sight of his hauenly father and that frō that tyme foreward that oblation of Christ in heauen was neuer intermitted but continewed allwaies for our attonement with God and shall without ceasing endure vntill the ende of the worlde For as S. Paul sayeth Heb. 9. Iesus hath not entred into temples made with handes the samplers of the true temples but into heauē it selfe to appeare now to the cowntenance of God for vs. Now as this oblation and sacrifice of Christ endureth in heauen continually for as much as he is rysen from the dead and ascended in to heauen with that body which he gaue to Thomas to feele bringīg in thither his bloud as Hesychius sayeth and bearing the markes of his woondes and there appeareth before the face of God with that thorne prikte naileboared sperepearsed and other wise woonded rent and torne body for vs whereby we vnderstand the vertue of his oblation on the crosse euer enduring not the oblation it selfe with renewing of payne and sufferaunce continewed so we doo perpetually celebrate this oblation and sacrificing of Christes very body and bloud in the holy Masse in remembraunce of him commaunded so to doo vntill his comming Wherein our aduersaries so foolishly as wickedly scoffe at vs as though we sacrificed Christ agayne so as he was sacrificed on the crosse that is in bloudy maner But we doo not so offer or sacrifice Christ againe but that oblation of him in the supper and oures in the Masse is but one oblation the same sacrifice for this cause by his diuine ordinaunce lefte vnto vs that as the oblation once made on the crosse continually endureth and appeareth before the face of God in heauen for our behalfe continewed not by newe suffering but by perpetuall intercession for vs So the memorie of it may euer vntill his second comming be kepte amongest vs also in earth and that thereby we may apply and bring vnto vs through faith the great benefites which by that one oblation of him selfe on the crosse he hath for vs procured and daily doth procure Now for further proufe of the offering and sacrificing of Christ of those wordes of our lord Doo this in my remembraunce to recite some testimonies of the fathers First Dionysius Saint Paules scoler and bishop of Athenes writeth thus Ecclesias hierarch cap. 3. Quocirca reuerenter simul ex Pontificali officio post sacras diuinorum operum laudes quòd hostiam salutarem quae super ipsum est litet se excusat ad ipsum primò decenter exclamans Tu dixisti Hoc facite in meam commemorationem Wherefore the bishop sayeth he reuerently and according to his bishoply office after the holy prayses of Gods workes he excuseth him selfe that he taketh vpon him to offer that helthfull sacrifice which is aboue his degree and worthynes crying out first vnto him in seemely wise lord thou hast cōmaunded thus saying Doo this in my remembraūce By these wordes he confesseth that he could not be so hardy as to offer vp Christ vnto his father had not Christ him selfe so cōmaunded when he sayde Doo this in my remembraunce This is the doctrine touching this article that S. Paul taught his scolers which M.
which celebrateth it may sufficiently be proued by an hundred places of the fathers the matter being vndoubted two or three may suffise First Chrysostom writeth thus in an homelie vpon the Actes In Acta homil 21. Quid dicis in manibus est hostia omnia proposita sunt bene ordinata adsunt angeli adsunt archangeli adest filius Dei cum tanto horrorè adstant omnes adstant illi clamantes omnibus silentibus putas simpliciter haec fieri Igitur alia simpliciter quae pro ecclesia quae pro sacerdotibus offeruntur quae pro plenitudine ac vbertate absit Sed omnia cum fide fiunt What sayest thou hereto the hoste is in the priestes handes and all thinges set forth are in due order The Angels be present the Archangels be present the sonne of God is present Whereas all stād there with so great feare whereas all they stand there crying out to god and all other holde their peace thinkest thou these thinges be done simply and without great cause Why then be those other thinges done also simply bothe the thinges which are offered for plentie and abundaunce God forbydde but all thinges are done with faith Saint Ambrose in his funerall oration made of the death of Valentinian the Emperour calling the Sacrament of th'aulter the holy and heauenly mysteries and the oblation of our mother by which terme he vnderstandeth the church sayeth that he will prosecute the godly soule of that Emperour with the same This father writing vpon the 38. Psalme exhorteth priestes to folowe Christ that as he offered for vs his bloud so priestes offer sacrifice for the people his wordes be these Vidimus principem sacerdotum etc. We haue sene the prince of priestes cōming vnto vs we haue sene and hearde him offering for vs his bloud Let vs that be priestes folowe as we can so as we offer sacrifice for the people though weake in merite yet honorable for the sacrifice etc. That the oblatiō of the Masse is profitably made for others S. Gregorie witnesseth very plainely homilia 37. expounding the place of S. Luke cap. 14. alioqui legationem mittens ea quae pacis sunt postulat Elles he sendeth forth an ambassade and sueth for peace Hereupon he sayeth thus Mittamus ad Dominum legationem nostram flendo tribuendo sacras hostias offerendo Singulariter namque ad absolutionem nostram oblata cum lachrymis benignitate mentis sacri altaris hostia suffragatur Let vs send to our lord our Ambassade with weeping geuing almose and offering of holy hostes For the hoste of the holy aulter that is the blessed Sacrament offered with teares and with the mercifull bountie of our mynde helpeth vs singularely to be assoyled In that homilie he sheweth that the oblation of Christes body in this Sacrament present which is done in the Masse is helpe and cōfort not onely to them that be present but also to them that be absent bothe quycke and dead which he proueth by examples of his owne knowledge Who so listeth to see antiquitie for proufe hereof and that in the Apostles tyme bishops and priestes in the dredfull sacrifice offered and prayed for others as for euery state and order of men and also for holesomnesse of the ayer and for fertilitie of the fruites of the earth etc. Let him reade the eight booke of the constitutions of the Apostles set forth by Clement Iuell Or that the priest had then auctoritie to applye the vertue of Christes death and Passion to any man by the meane of the Masse Of the application of the benefites of Christes death to others by meane of prayer in the Masse ARTICLE XIX THe vertue of Christes death and passion is grace and remission of synnes the appeacing of Gods wrath the recōciliation of vs to God delyueraunce from the deuill hell and euerlasting damnation Our aduersaries imputing to vs as though we sayde and taught that the priest applyeth this vertue effecte and merite of Christes death to any man by the meane of the Masse either belye vs of ignoraunce or sclaunder vs of malice Verely we saye not so Neither doth the priest applye the vertue of Christes passion to any man by the meane of the Masse vvhat applyeth the priest vnto vs in the Masse He doth but applie his prayer and his intent of oblation beseching almighty God to applye the merite and vertue of his sonnes death the memorie whereof he celebrateth at the Masse to them for whom he prayeth It is God and none other that applyeth to vs remission of synne the priest doth but praye for it and by the commemoration of his sonnes death moueth him to applye So as all that the priest doth is but by waye of petition and prayer leauing all power and auctoritie of applying to God which prayer is to be beleued to be of most force and efficacie when it is worthely and deuoutly made in the Masse in the which the priest beareth the person of the whole churche and offereth his prayer in the sacrifice wherein the churche offereth Christ and it selfe through Christ to God Which his prayer and deuout seruice he besecheth to be offered vp by the handes of Angelles vnto the high aulter of God in the sight of the diuine maiestie Sermon◠de coena Domini Of what strēgth prayer made at the Masse is the holy bishop and martyr S. Cyprian witnesseth where he sayeth In the presence of this Sacrament teares craue not in vayne and the sacrifice of a cōtrite harte is neuer denyed his request Or that it was then thought a sounde doctrine Iuell to teache the people that the Masse ex opere operato That is euen for that it is sayde and donne is able to remoue any parte of our sinne Of opus operatum vvhat it is and vvhether it remoue synne ARTICLE XX. IN dede the doctrine vttered in this Article is false and derogatorie to the glorie of our Sauiour Christ For thereby the honour of Christes sacrifice whereby he hath once satisfied for the synnes of all shuld be trāsferred to the worke of the priest which were great wickednes and detestable blasphemie And therefore we will not requyre M. Iuell to yelde and subscribe vnto this Article For we graunt this was neuer thought a sounde doctrine within syx hūdred yeres of Christes Ascensiō nor shall be so thought within syx thousand yeres after the same of any man of sounde beleefe Neither hath it ben at any tyme taught in the catholike churche how so euer it liketh our aduersaries to charge the scolasticall doctours with the sclaunderous reporte of the contrary For it is Christ onely and none other thing that is able to remoue our synnes and that hath he done by the sacrifice of his body once done vpon the crosse Of which sacrifice once performed vpon the crosse with shedding of his bloud this vnbloudy sacrifice of the aulter which is the daily sacrifice of
the churche cōmonly called the Masse is a samplar and a commemoration in the which we haue the same body that hanged on the crosse And whereas we haue nothing of our selues that we maye offer vp acceptable to God we offer this his sonnes body as a most acceptable sacrifice beseching him to looke not vppon our worthynes our acte or worke but vpon the face of Christ his most dere sonne and for his sake to haue mercie vpon vs. Hovv the Masse is vaileable ex opere operato And in this respecte we doubte not this blessed sacrifice of the Masse to be vaileable and effectuall ex opere operato that is not as M. Iuell interpreteth for that the Masse is sayde and done referring opus operatum to the acte of the priest not so but for the worke wrought it selfe which god him selfe worketh by the ministerie of the priest without respecte had to his merite or acte which is the body and bloud of Christ Which when it is according to his commaundement offered vp to god is not in regard of our worke but of it selfe and of the holy Institution of his onely begoten sonne a most acceptable sacrifice to him both for quicke and deade where there is no stoppe nor lette to the cōtrarie on the behalfe of the receiuer The dead I meane such onely as through faith haue recommended them selues to the redēptiō wrought by Christ and by this faith haue deserued of God that after their departure hēce as S. Augustine sayeth this sacrifice might profite them But to speake of this matter more particularly and more distinctly the terme Masse maye be taken two wayes Masse taken tvvo vvayes Either for the thing it selfe which is offered or for the acte of the priest in offering of it If it be taken for the thing it selfe that is offered which is the body of Christ and is in this respecte of the scolasticall doctours called opus operatum no man can iustly denye but that it remoueth and taketh awaie synne For Christ in his fleshe crucified is our onely sacrifice our onely price our onely redēption 1. Cor. 6 et 7. Tit. 2. Apoc. 14. 1. Ioan. 2. In 3. cap. ad Romanos whereby he hath merited to vs vpon the crosse and with the price of his bloud hath bought the remission of our synnes and S. Iohn sayeth he is the propitiatiō for our synnes So Oecumenius sayeth Caro Christi est propitiatorium nostrarum iniquitatum The fleshe of Christ is the propitiatiō for our iniquities And this not for that it is offered of the priest in the Masse specially but for that he offered it once him selfe with sheddīg of his bloud vpon the crosse for the redemption of all Which oblation done vpon the Crosse is become a perpetuall and continuall oblation not in the same maner of offering but in the same vertue and power of the thing offered For since that tyme the same body of Christ appearing alwaies before the face of God in heauen presenteth and exhibiteth it selfe for our reconciliation And likewise it is exhibited and offered by his owne commaundement here in earth in the Masse where he is both priest and sacrifice offerer and oblation though in mysterie and by waie of commemoration that thereby we may be made partetakers of the reconciliation performed And so it is a sacrifice in very dede propitiatorie not for our acte or worke but for his owne worke already done and accepted To this onely we must ascribe remission and remouing of our synnes If the terme Masse be taken for the acte of the priest in respecte of any his onely doing it is not able to remoue synne For so we shuld make the priest gods peere and his acte equall with the passiō of Christ as our aduersaries doo vniustly sclaunder vs. Yet hath the Masse vertue and effecte in some degree and is acceptable to god by reason of the oblation of the sacrifice which in the Masse is done by the offerer without respect had to Christes institution euen for the faithfull prayer and deuotion of the partie that offereth which the scoole doctours terme ex opere operantis For then the oblation semeth to be most acceptable to god when it is offered by some that is acceptable Now the partie that offereth is of two sortes The one offereth immediatly and personally the other offereth mediatly or by meane of an other and principally The first is the priest that consecrateth offereth and receiueth the Sacrament who so doth these thinges in his owne person yet by gods auctoritie as none other in so offering is concurrent with him The partie that offereth mediately or by meane of an other and principally is the churche militant in whose person the priest offereth and whose minister he is in offering For this is the Sacrifice of the whole churche The first partie that offereth is not alwayes acceptable to God neither alwaies pleaseth him because oftentymes he is a synner The second partie that offereth is euermore acceptable to God because the churche is alwayes holy beloued and the onely spoose of Christ And in this respecte the Masse is an acceptable seruice to god ex opere operantis and is not without cause and reason called a sacrifice propitiatorie not for that it deserueth mercie at gods hand of it selfe as Christ doth who onely is in that principall and speciall sorte a sacrifice propitiatorie but for that it moueth god to geue mercie and remission of synne already deserued by Christ In this degree of a sacrifice propitiatorie we may put prayer a cōttite harte almose forgeuing of our neighbour etc. This may easely be proued by the holy fathers Origens wordes be very plaine In Leuit. Hom. 13. Si respicias ad illam commemorationem de qua dicit Dominus Hoc facite in meam commemorationem inuenies quòd ista est commemoratio sola quae propitium faciat Deum If thou looke to that commemoration whereof our lord sayeth Doo this in my remembraunce or in commemoration of me thou shalt fynde that this is the onely commemoration that maketh god mercifull Saint Augustine sayeth thus Nemo melius praeter martyres meruit ibi requiescere vbi hostia Christus est sacerdos scilicet vt propitiationem de oblatione hostiae consequantur Sermone 11. de Sāctis No man hath deserued better then the martyrs to reste there where Christ is bothe the hoste and the priest he meaneth to be buried vnder the aulter to the intent they might atteine propitiation by the oblation of the hoste But here to auoyd prolixitie in a matter not doubtefull I leaue a number of places whereby it may be euidently proued that the Masse is a sacrifice propitiatorie in this degree of propitiation bothe for the quicke and the dead the same not being specially denyed by purporte of this Article And this is the doctrine of the churche touching the valour of the Masse ex opere operato whereby no
corpus meum quod comedetur resuscitabo eum Non enim alius ipse est quà m caro sua c. He that eateth the fleshe of Christ hath lyfe euerlasting For this fleshe hath the word of God which naturally is lyfe Therefore sayeth he that I will raise him in the last daie For I quoth he that is to saye my body which shall be eaten shall raise him vp agayne for he is no other then his fleshe c. No man more expressely calleth the Sacramēt by the name of God then S. Bernard in his godly sermon de coena Domini ad Petrum presbyterum where he sayeth thus Comedunt angeli Verbum de Deo natum Comedunt homines Verbum foenum factum The angels eate the Word borne of God men eate the Word made haye meaning hereby the sacramēt which he calleth the Word made haye that is to witte the Word incarnate And in an other place there he sayeth Haec est verè indulgentia coelestis haec est verè cumulata gratia haec est verè superexcellens gloria sacerdotem Deum suū tenere alijs dando porrigere This is verely an heauenly gyfte this is verely a bountifull grace this is verely a passing excellent glorie the priest to holde his God and in geuing to reache him forth to others In the same sermō speaking of the meruelouse sweetnes that good bishopes and holy religiouse men haue experience of by receiuing this blessed Sacrament he sayeth thus Ideo ad mensam altaris frequentius accedunt omni tempore candida facientes vestimenta sua id est corpora prout possunt melius vtpote Deum suum manu ore cōtrectaturi For this cause they come the oftener vnto the bourd of the aulter at all tymes making their garmentes that is to saye their bodyes so white as they can possibly as they who shall handle their God with hand and mowth An other place of the same sermon for that it cōteineth a holesom instruction besyde the affirming of our purpose I can not omitte I remitte the learned to the Latine the English of it is this They are meruelous thinges brethren that be spoken of this Sacrament faith is necessarie knowledge of reason is here superfluous This let faith beleue let not vnderstanding require least that either not being fownde it thinke it incredible or being fownde out it beleue it not to be singuler and alone And therfor it behoueth it to be beleued symply that can not be serched out profitably Wherefore serche not serche not how it maye bee doubte not whether it bee Come not vnto it vnreuerently least it bee to you to death Deus enim est quanquà m panis mysteria habeat mutatur tamen in carnem For it is God and thoug it haue mysteries of bread yet is it chaunged into fleshe God and mā it is that witnesseth bread truly to be made his fleshe The vessell of election it is 1. Cor. 11. that threatneth iudgement to him that putteth no difference in iudging of that so holy fleshe The selfe same thing thinke thou o Christen man of the wyne geue that honour to the wine The creatour of wine it is that promoteth the wine to be the bloud of Christ This farre holy Bernard Here let our aduersaries touching this Article consyder and weigh with them selues whether they be Lutheranes Zuinglianes or Geneuians what english they can make of these wordes vsed by the fathers and applyed to the Sacramēt in the places before alleaged Dominus Christus ▪ Diuina essentia Deus Seipsum Verbum Dei Ego Verbum foenum factum Deum suum The number of the like places that might be alleaged to this purpose be in maner infinite Yet M. Iuell promyseth to geue ouer and subscribe if any one may be fownde Now we shal see what truth is in his word In the weighing of this doctrine of the churche litle occasion of wicked scoffes and blasphemies against this blessed sacrament shall remaine to them that be not blinded with that grosse and fond errour that denyeth the inseparabilitie of Christ but affirmeth in this mysterie to be present his fleshe onely with out bloud soule and godhed Which is confuted by plaine scriptures Christ raysed from the dead now dyeth no more Rom. 6. He suffereth him selfe no more to be diuided 1. Cor. 1. Euery sprite that looseth Iesus this is Antichrist 1. Ioan. 4. Hereof it foloweth that if Christ be verely vnder the forme of bread in the Sacrament as it is other wheres sufficiently proued then is he there entier and whole fleshe bloud and soule whole Christ God and man for the inseparable vnion of bothe natures in one person Which matter is more amply declared in the Article of the adoration of the sacrament Or that the people was then taught to beleue Iuell that the body of Christ remayneth in the Sacrament as long as the Accidētes of the bread remayne there with out corruptiō Of the remayning of Christes bodye in the sacrament so long as the accidentes be entier and vvhole ARTICLE XXII THese fiue articles here folowing are Scoole pointes the discussiō whereof is more curiouse then necessary Whether the faithfull people were then that is to saye for the space of six hundred yeres after Christ taught to beleue concerning this blessed Sacrament precisely according to the purporte of all these articles or no I knowe not Verely I thinke they were taught the truth of this matter simply and plainely yet so as nothing was hydden from them that in those quiet tymes quiet I meane touching this point of faith was thought necessary for them to knowe If sithēs there hath ben more taught or rather if the truth hath in some other forme of wordes ben declared for a more euidence and clearnesse in this behalfe to be had truth it selfe alwaies remayning one this hath proceded of the diligence and earnest care of the churche to represse the pertinacie of heretikes who haue within these last syx hundred yeres impugned the truth herein and to meete with their peruerse and froward obiectiōs as hath ben thought necessary to finde out such wedges as might best serue to ryue such knotty blocket Yet this matter hath not so much ben taught in open audience of the people as debated priuatly betwen learned men in scooles and so of them set forth in their priuate writinges Wherein if some perhappes through contention of wittes haue ben either ouer curiouse or ouer bolde and haue ouershotte the marke or not sufficiently cōfirmed the point they haue taken in hāde to treate of or through ignoraunce or fauour of a parte haue in some thing swarued from reason or that meaning which holy churche holdeth it is great vncourtesie to laye that to our charge to abuse their ouersightes to our discredite and to reproue the whole churche for the insufficiencie of a fewe Now concerning this Article whether we are able to auouche it by such authorities as M.
Iuell requireth or no it shall not greatly force The credite of the catholike faith dependeth not of olde proufes of a fewe newe cōtrouersed pointes that ben of lesse importaunce As for the people they were taught the truth plainely when no heretike had assaulted their faith craftely The doctrine of the churche The doctrine of the churche is this The body of Christ after due consecration remayneth so long in the Sacrament as the Sacrament endureth The Sacrament endureth so long as the formes of breade and wine continewe Those formes continewe in their integritie vntill the other accidentes be corrupted ad perishe As if the colour weight sauour taste smell and other qualities of bread and wine be corrupted and quite altered then is the forme also of the same annichilated and vndone And to speake of this more particularly sith that the substance of bread and wine is tourned into the substance of the body and bloud of Christ as the scriptures auncient doctours the necessary consequent of truth and determination of holy churche leadeth vs to beleue if such chaunge of the accidentes be made which shuld not haue suffised to the corruption of bread and wine in case of their remaindre for such a chaunge the body and bloud of Christ ceaseth not to be in this Sacrament whether the chaunge be in qualitie as if the colour sauour and smell of bread and wine be a litle altered or in quantitie as if thereof diuision be made into such portions in which the nature of bread and wine might be reserued But if there be made so great a chaunge as the nature of bread and wine shuld be corrupted if they were present then the body and bloud of Christ doo not remaine in this Sacrament as when the colour and sauour and other qualities of bread and wine are so farre chaunged as the nature of bread and wine might not bear it or on the quātities syde as if the bread be so small crōmed into dust and the wine dispersed into so small portiōs as their formes remaine no lenger thē remaineth no more the body and bloud in this Sacramēt Thus the body and bloud of Christ remayneth in this sacrament so long as the formes of bread and wine remaine And when they faile and cease to be any more then also ceaseth the body and bloud of Christ to be in the Sacrament For there must be a conuenience and resemblaunce betwen the Sacraments and the thinges whereof they be sacraments which done awaie and loste at the corruption of the formes and accidents the sacraments also be vndone and perishe and consequently the inward thing and the heauenly thing in them conteined leaueth to be in them Here because many of them which haue cutte them selues from the churche condemne the reseruation of the Sacrament Of reseruation of the Sacrament and affirme that the body of Christ remayneth not in the same no longer then during the tyme whiles it is receiued alleaging against reseruation the example of the Paschall lambe in the olde lawe Exod. 12. wherein nothing ought to haue remained vntill the morning and likewise of manna I will rehearse that notable and knowen place of Cyrillus Alexandrinus Ad Colosyriū Arsenoiten Episcopū citat Thomas parte 3. q. 76. his wordes be these Audio quòd dicant mysticam benedictionem si ex ea remonserint in sequentem diem reliquiae ad sanctificationem inutilem esse Sed insaniunt haec dicentes Non enim alius fit Christus neque sanctum eius corpus immutabitur Sed virtus benedictionis viuifica gratia manet in illo It is tolde me they saye that the mysticall blessing so he calleth the blessed Sacrament in case portions of it be kepte vntill the nexte daie is of no vertue to sanctification But they be madde that thus saye For Christ becōmeth not an other neither his holy body is chaunged but the vertue of the consecration and the quickening or lyfe geuing grace abydeth still in it By this saying of Cyrillus we see that he accompteth the errour of our aduersaries in this Article no other then a mere madnes The body of Christ sayeth he which he termeth the mysticall blessing because it is a most holy mysterie done by consecration once consecrated is not chaunged but the vertue of the consecration and the grace that geueth lyfe whereby he meaneth that fleshe assumpted of the word remayneth in this sacrament also when it is kepte verely euen so long as the outward formes continewe not corrupte Or that a Mouse or any other worme or beaste maye eate the body of Christ Iuell for so some of our aduersaries haue sayd and taught What is that the Mouse or vvorme eateth ARTICLE XXIII VVhereas M. Iuell imputeth this vile asseueratiō but to some of the aduersaries of his syde he semeth to acknowledge Iuell cōtrarieth him selfe that it is not a doctrine vniuersally taught and receiued The like may be sayde for his nexte Article And if it hath ben sayd of some onely and not taught vniuersally of all as a true doctrine for Christen people to beleue how agreeth he with him selfe saying after the rehearsall of his number of Articles the same none excepted to be the highest mysteries and greatest keyes of our religion For if that were true as it is not true for the greatest parte then shuld this Article haue ben affirmed and taught of all For the highest and greatest pointes of the catholike Religion be not of particular but of vniuersall teaching Concerning the matter of this Article what so euer a mouse worme or beaste eateth the body of Christ now being impassible and immortall susteineth no violence iniurie no villanie As for that which is gnawen bytten or eaten of worme or beaste whether it be the substaunce of bread as appeareth to sense which is denyed because it ceaseth through vertue of consecration or the outward forme onely of the Sacrament as many holde opinion which also onely is broken and chawed of the receiuer the accidentes by miracle remayning without substance In such cases happening contrary to the intent and ende the sacrament is ordeined and kepte for it ought not to seme vnto vs incredible the power of God consydered that God taketh awaie his body from those outward formes and permitteth either the nature of breade to retourne as before consecration or the accidentes to supplye the effectes of the substance of breade As he commaunded the nature of the rodde which became a serpēt to retourne to that it was before when God would haue it serue no more to the vses it was by him appointed vnto The graue autoritie of S. Cyprian addeth great weight to the balance for this iudgemēt in weighing this matter who in his sermon de lapsis by the reporte of certaine miracles sheweth that our lordes body made it selfe awaye from some that being defyled with the sacrifices of idols presumed to come to the communion er they
To conclude the being of Christes body in the Sacrament is to vs certaine the maner of his being there to vs vncertaine and to God onely certaine Iuell Or that Ignoraunce is the mother and cause of true deuotion and obedience MAister Iuell had great nede of Articles for some shewe to be made against the catholike churche when he aduised him selfe to put this in for an Article Verely this is none of the highest mysteries nor none of the greatest keyes of our Religion as he sayeth it is but vntruly and knoweth that for an vntruth For him selfe imputeth it to D. Cole Fol. 77. in his replyes to him as a straunge saying by him vttered in the disputation at Westminster to the wondering of the most parte of the honorable and worshipfull of this realme If it were one of the highest mysteries and greatest keyes of the catholike religion I trust the most parte of the honorable and worshipfull of the realme would not wonder at it Concerning the matter it selfe I leaue it to D. Cole He is of age to answere for him selfe Whether he sayde it or no I knowe not As he is learned wise and godly so I doubte not but if he sayde it therein he had a good meaning and can shewe good reason for the same if he may be admitted to declare his saying as wise men would the lawes to be declared 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so as the mynde be taken and the word spoken not alwayes rigorously exacted August de Trinit lib. 1. cap. 4. Haec mea fides est quoniam haec est catholica fides This is my faith for as much as this is the catholike faith THE CONCLVSION EXHORting M. Iuell to stande to his promise THus your Chalenge M. Iuell is answered Thus your negatiues be auouched Thus the pointes you went about to improue by good auctoritie be proued and many others by you ouer rashely affirmed clearly improued Thus the catholike Religion with all your forces layd at and impugned is sufficiently defended The places of prouses which we haue here vsed are such as your selfe allowe for good and lawfull The scriptures examples of the Primitiue church aunciēt Councelles and the fathers of syx hundred yeres after Christ You might and ought likewise to haue allowed Reason Traditiō Custome and auctoritie of the Church without limitation of tyme. The maner of this dealing with you is gentle sober and charitable Put awaye all mystes of blynde selfe loue you shall perceiue the same to be so The purpose and intent towardes you right good and louing in regard of the truth no lesse then due for behoofe of Christen people no lesse then necessary That you hereby might be enduced to bethinke your selfe of that wherein you haue done vnaduisedly and stayde from hasty running forth prickte with vaine fauour and praise of the world to euerlasting damnation appointed to be the reward at the ende of your game that truth might thus be tryed set forth and defended and that our brethren be leadde as it were by the hāde from perilous erroures and dāger of their soules to a right sense and to suertie Now it remaineth that you performe your promise Which is that if any one cleare sentēce or clause be brought for proufe of any one of all your negatiue Articles you would yelde and subscribe What hath ben brought euery one that wilfully will not blindefold him selfe may plainely see If some happely who will seme to haue both eyes and eares and to be right learned will saye hereof they seene heare nothing no marueill The fauour of the parte whereto they cleaue hauing cutte of them selues from the body the dispite of the catholike religion and hatred of the church hath so blinded their hartes as places alleaged to the disproufe of their false doctrine being neuer so euident they see not ne heare not or rather they seing see not Matt. 13. ne hearing heare not Verely you must either refuse the balance which your selfe haue offred and required for triall of these Articles which be the scriptures examples councelles and doctours of antiquitie or the better weight of auctoritie sweaing to our syde that is the truth founde in the auncient doctrine of the catholike church and not in the mangled dissensions of the Gospellers aduisedly retourne frō whence vnaduisedly you haue departed humbly yelde to that you haue stubbernly kickte against and imbrace holesomly that which you haue hated damnably Touching the daily Sacrifice of the Church commaunded by Christ to be done in remembrance of his death that it hath ben and may be well and godly celebrated without a number of communicantes with the priest together in one place which you call priuate Masse within the compasse of your syx hundred yeres after Christ That the communion was then sometymes as now also it is and may be ministred vnder one kynde Of the publike Seruice of the church or commō prayers in a tonge not knowen to all the people That the Bishop of Rome was sometyme called vniuersall bishop and both called and holden for head of the vniuersall church That by auncient doctoures it hath ben taught Christes body to be really substantially corporally carnally or naturally in the blessed Sacramēt of the aulter Of the wonderous but true being of Christes body in mo places at one tyme and of the Adoration of the Sacrament or rather of the body of Christ in the Sacrament we haue brought good and sufficient proufes alleaging for the more parte of these Articles the scriptures and for all right good euidence out of auncient examples councelles or fathers Concerning Eleuation Reseruatiō Remayning of the Accidentes without substance Diuiding the hoste in three partes the termes of figure signe token etc. applyed to the Sacrament many Masses in one church in one daye the reuerent vse of Images the scriptures to be had in vulgar tonges for the common people to reade which are matters not specially treated of in the scriptures by expresse termes all these haue ben sufficiently auouched and proued either by proufes by your selfe allowed or by the doctrine and common sense of the churche As for your twelue last Articles which you put in by addition to the former for shewe of your courage and confidence of the cause and to seme to the ignorāt to haue much matter to charge vs withall as it appeareth they reporte matter certaine excepted of lesse importance Some of them conteine doctrine true I graunt but ouer curiouse and not most necessary for the simple people Some others be through the maner of your vtterance peruerted and in termes drawen from the sense they haue ben vttered in by the church Which by you being denyed might of vs also be denyed in regard of the termes they be expressed in were not a sleight of falsehed which might redounde to the preiudice of the truth therein worthely suspected Verely to them all we haue sayde so much as to sober quiet and godly
wittes may seme sufficient Now this being so what you mynde to doo I knowe not what you ought to doo I knowe right well I wishe you to doo that which may be to your owne and to the peoples soule helth that being by you and your felowes deceiued depende of you to the setting forth of the truth to the procuring of a godly concorde in Christes church and finally to the glory of God This may you doo by forsaking that which perhappes semeth to you truth and is not that which semeth to you learning and is but a floorishe or vernishe of learnig that which semeth to you cleare light and is profounde darknes and by retourning to the church where concerning the faith of a christē man is all truth and no deceite right learning Ioan. 1. and the very light euen that which lightneth euery man coming into this worlde which is there to be fownde onely and not elles where for as much as the head is not separated from the body O that you would once mynde this seriously M. Iuell As for me if either speaking writing or expending might further you therto I shuld not spare tonge nor penne nor any portion of my necessary thinges were it neuer so dere I would gladly powre out all together to helpe you to atteine that felicitie But ô lord what lettes see I whereby you are kepte from that good Shame welth of your estate your worldly acquaintance besyde many others But Syr touching shame which alwayes irketh those that be of any generositie of nature if you call your better philosophie to counsell you shall be taught not to accōpte it shamefull to forsake errour for loue of truth but rather willfully to dwell in errour after that it is plainely detected As for the welth of your estate which some assure you of so long as you maineteine that parte I can not iudge so euill of you but that you thinke how fickle and fraile these worldly thinges bee and how litle to be estemed in respecte of the heauenly estate which remaineth to the obedient children of the church as the contrarie to the rebelles Apostates and renegates Touching your acquaintance what shall the familiaritie of a fewe deceiued persons staye you from that felicitie which you shall acheue with the loue and frendship of all good men of whose good opinion onely ryseth fame and renome Luc. 15. and also with the reioising of the Angels in heauen This your happy chaunge the better and wiser sorte of men will impute to grace mightely by gods power in you wrought Genes 1. 2. Cor. 4. which sundreth light from darknes and maketh light shyne out of darknes Neither shall they iudge that inconstancie where is no chaunge in will but onely in vnderstanding Where the will remaining one alwayes bent to the glorie of God the deceiued vnderstanding is by better instruction corrected and righted there is not inconstancie to be noted but amendment to be praysed Neither shall you in this godly enterprise be alone Many both of olde tyme and of our dayes haue gone this waye and haue broken the yse before you Eusebius of Caesarea in Palaestina Beryllus of Bostra in Arabia and Theodoritus of Cyrus in Persie who forsooke haynouse heresies against Christ and by grace retourned to the catholike faith againe So haue done in our tyme Georgius wicelius Fridericus Staphylus Franciscus Balduinus and many mo Thus hauing called to my mynde the consyderations that are like to withholde you from yelding to the catholike faith frō retourning to the church and from performing your promise I fynde no bandes so strong to kepe you fast in the chayer of pestilence which this long tyme you haue sitten in that through Gods grace working humilitie and denyall of your selfe in your hart whereof I spake in my preface you shuld not easely loose and be in libertie where you might clearly see the light spredde abroad ouer the whole Church and espie the darknes of the particuler sectes of your newe gospell which you lyued in before But all this notwithstanding peraduenture your hart serueth you to stande stowtly according to the purport of your chalenge in the defence of the doctrine you haue professed and for which you haue obteined a bishoprike thinking great skorne to be remoued frō the same by any such meanes as these to you may seme And now perhappes you enter into meditation with your selfe and conferēce with your brethren to frame an answere to this treatise and by contrary writing to fortifie your negatiues Well may you so doo But to what purpose I praye you Well may you make a smoke and a smooder to darken the light for a tyme as men of warre are wont to doo to worke a feate secretly against their enemies But that can not long continewe The smoke will sone vanishe awaye the light of the truth will eftesones appeare Well may you shutte the light out of a fewe houses by closing dores and windowes but to kepe awaye the bright sunne frō that great Citie which is set on high vpon a hill doo what ye can Matt. 5. therein all your trauaill your deuises and endeuours shall be vaine and frustrate As iron by scowring is not onely not consumed but kepte frō ruste and canker and is made brighter so the church by the armures and hostilitie of heretikes is not wounded but through occasiō strengthened styrred to defence and made inuincible When it is opressed then it ryseth when it is inuaded then it ouercometh When by the aduersaries obiections it is chekte and controlled then it is acquitted and preuaileth Wherefore talke preache and write against the doctrine of the church whiles ye will ye shall but spurne against the stone where at ye may breake your shynnes and be crushed to pieces Matt. 21. Act. 9. the same not moued Ye shall but kicke against the pricke Ye shall but torment youre owne conscience condemned in your owne iudgement Tit. 3. as witting that ye resist the church and for the lyfe to come encreace the heape of euerlasting damnation All the reward ye shall wynne hereby is the vaine fauour of a fewe light and vnstable persons by you deceiued Whom the blastes of your mutable doctrine shall moue and blowe awaye from Gods floore the church Matt. 3. like chaffe the good and constant people remaining still like weighty and sownde wheate The argumētes and reasons you shall make against the doctrine of the church may happely persuade some of the worldly wise who be fooles in Gods iudgement as the reasons of them that haue commended infamouse matters Phauorinus Synesius Glaucus apud Platonem Cornelius Agrippa Erasmus haue persuaded some Of whom one praised the feuer quartane an other drōkennes an other baldnes an other vnrighteousnes and in our tyme one ignorance and an other foolishnes Which by the authours hath ben done onely for an exercise of wittes and rather to the wondering then corrupting of
the Readers Would God of all the writinges of your sect against the catholike faith which be no lesse besyde reason and truth the intent were no worse the danger ensuing no greater And as for commendation of those vnsemely and vnworthy thinges those Rhetoricians haue not brought good and true reasons but onely a probabilitie of talke right so for confirmation of your negatiue diuinitie and of many newe straunge and false doctrines you haue no suer proufes but shadowes colours and shewes onely that perhappes may dasell bleare eyes and deceiue the vnlearned but the learned wise and by any wayes godly wise will sone contemne the same For they be assured how probably so euer you teach or write that the church allwayes assisted and prompted by the holy Ghoste the spirite of truth in pointes of faith erreth not and that against truth allready by the same spirite in the vniuersall church taught and receiued no truth can be alleaged As he is very simple who being borne in hande by a Sophister and driuen by force of sophisticall arguments to graunt that he hath hornes thinketh so in dede and therfore putteth his hande to his forehed So who so euer through your teaching fall from the catholike Church into the errours of our tyme from the streightnes of Christian lyfe into the carnall libertie of this newe gospell from deuotion into the insensibilitie which we see the people to lyue in from the feare of God to the desperat contempte of all vertue and goodnes hereby they shewe them selues to be such as haue vnstable hartes which be geuen ouer to the lustes of their fleshe which haue no delite ne feeling of God which like Turkes and Epicures seeking onely for the cōmodities and pleasures of this world haue no regard of the lyfe to come But the godly sorte whose hartes be established with grace who pant and labour to lyue after the spirite continually mortifying their fleshe whose delite is to serue God vvho be kepte and holden vvithin the feare of God though they geue you their hearing and that of constraint not of vvill yet vvill not they geue you their lyking nor consenting Wherefore M. Iuell seing we haue performed that which you haue ouer boldly sayde we were not able to doo seing for proufe of these Arcicles we haue brought more then you bare your hearers in hande we had to bring seing you perceiue your selfe herein to haue done more then standeth with learning modestie or good aduise seing in case of any one clause or sentence for our parte brought you haue with so many protestations promysed to yelde and to subscribe vnto vs seing by performing your promise you may do so much good to the people and to your selfe seing nothing can be iustly alleaged for keping of you from satisfying your promise and retourning to the church againe seing so great respectes both of temporall and of heauenly prefermentes inuite you and call you from partes and sectes where you remayne with most certaine danger of your soule to the safe porte of Christes church seing by so dooing you shuld not doo that which were singular but common to you with many others men of right good fame and estimation finally seing if you shall as allwayes for the most parte heretikes haue done continew in the professiō of your vntrue doctrine and trauaill in setting forth erroneouse treatises for defence of the same you shall gaigne thankes of no other but of the lightest and worst sorte of the people and persuade none but such as be of that marke we trust you will vpon mature deliberation in your sadder yeres chaunge the counsell which you lyked in your youth we trust you will examine better by learning the newe doctrine which you with many others were drawen vnto by swea of the tyme when by course of age you wanted iudgement we trust you will call backe your selfe frō errours and heresies aduisedly which you haue maineteined rashly and set forth by word and write busyly and therein assured your selfe of the truth confidently Thus shall your errour seme to procede of ignorance not of malice Thus shall you make some recompence for hurt done thus shall you in some degree discharge your selfe before God and men thus shall you be receiued into the lappe of the church againe out of which is no saluation whether being restored you may from hence forth in certaine expectation of the blessed hope Tit. 2. leade a lyfe more acceptable to God to whom be all prayse honour and glorie Amen A TABLE OF THE ARTICLES VTTERED AFFIRmatiuely against M. Iuelles Negatiues OF Masse vvithout a number of others receiuing the Communion vvith the priest at the same tyme and place vvhich the gospellers call priuate Masse Folio 9. Of Communion vnder one kynde Fol. 31. Of the church Seruice in learned tonges vvhich the vnlearned people in olde tyme in sundry places vnderstoode not Fol. 50. Of the Popes Primacie fol. 75. Of the termes really substantially corporally carnally naturally fovvnde in the Doctours treating of the true being of Christes body in the blessed Sacramēt Fol. 96. Of the being of Christes body in many places at one tyme. fol. 104. Of the Eleuation or lyfting vp of the sacramēt fol. 109. Of the vvorshipping or adoration of the sacramēt fol. 111. Of the reuerent hanging vp of the sacrament vnder a Canopie fol. 121. Of the remaining of the accidentes vvithout their substance in the Sacramen◠fol. 123. Of diuiding the sacrament in three partes fol. 128. Of the termes figure signe token c. by the fathers applyed to the sacrament fol. 129. Of pluralitie of Masses in one church in one daye fol. 138. Of images fol. 145. Of the peoples reading the Bible in their ovvne tonge fol. 153. Of secrete pronouncing of the Canō of the Masse fol. 161. Of the priestes auctoritie to offer vp Christ to his father fol. 164. Of the priestes saying Masse for an other fol. 172. Of applicatiō of the benefites of Christes death to others by meane of prayer in the Masse fol. 173. Of opus operatum vvhat it is and vvhether it remoue synne fol. 174. Of calling the sacrament lord and God fol. 176. Of the remayning of Christes body in the Sacrament so long as the accidentes be entier and vvhole fol. 182. VVhat is that the Mouse or vvorme eateth fol. 184. VVhat this pronoune Hoc pointeth in the vvordes of consecration fol. 185. VVho are the sacramentes of Christes body and bloude the accidentes or the bread and vvyne fol. 185. Of the vnspeakeable maner of the being of Christes body and bloude vnder the formes of bread and vvyne fol. 186. A TABLE OF THE CHIEFE pointes in these Articles vttered The number shevvth the leafe a the first syde b the second syde of the leafe etc noteth the matter further prosecuted in that as folovveth ATTICLE I. NO Masse priuate in it selfe but in respecte of circumstances 9. a. The terme Priuate in respecte of the Masse
tonge 153. b. Fiue considerations vvhy the scriptures are not to be set forth for all sortes of people to reade them vvithout limitation 154. a. Some through holynesse of lyfe may vnderstand the scriptures vvithout learning 157. a. The Gospellers diuided into contrary sectes 157. b. Fridericus Staphylus 158. a. Protestantes vvhereof so called 158. b. Protestantes diuided into xx sectes 158. b. Valdenses Adamitae Begardi Turelupini etc. sectes 158. b. A proclamation of Ferdinando and Elizabeth against the translation and hauing of the Bible in the Spanish tonge 159. a. VVhat partes of the scriptures perteine to the people to knovve 159. a. No translation of the Bible into any vulgare tonge euer allovved by publike auctoritie of the church 159. b. That S. Hierom translated the vvhole Bible into the Dalmatike tonge it semeth not sufficiently proued 159. b. Vlphilas an Arian bishop first inuented letters for the Gothes and traÌ„slated the Bible into their toÌ„ge and brought them to the heresie of the Arians moued through ambition 159. b. Fiue nations of fyue sundry tonges coÌ„fessed Christ in this Iland in Bedes tyme. and to them all the Latine tonge vvas coÌ„moÌ„ for studie and reading of the scriptures 160. a 16. The maner of pronouncing the ConsecratioÌ„ in the Greke and Latine churches diuerse 161. b For vvhat cause the Canon is pronounced secretly in the Vvest church after the mynde of Carolê° Magnus 163. a. Vvhat persons the primitiue churche excluded from presence of the Sacrament 163. b. 17. Threefold oblation of Christ 164. b. Proufes for the oblation of Christ to his father in the daily Sacrifice of the church out of the scriptures 165. b. Testimonies of the fathers alleaging scripture for this oblation of Christ to his father 166. 167. etc. The oblatioÌ„ of Christ in the Masse and that in the supper one and the same and to vvhat intent 167. b. The oblation spoken of by Malachie must be vnderstanded of the dayly sacrifice of the church onely 168. b. A manifest place for the priestes offering vp of Christ to his father out of S. Cyprian 169. a. The same proued by sundry auncient fathers 170. etc. 18. The priest receiueth not the Sacrament for an other 172. a Proufes for the oblation of the body and bloud of Christ to be done for others then for the priest onely that offereth or sayeth Masse 172. b. For vvhat persons and vvhat thinges Masse is sayd that holy sacrifice offered and prayers made proufes out of Chrysostom Ambrose Gregorie Clement 172. 173. 19. Vvhat applyeth the priest vnto vs in the Masse 173. b. Of vvhat strength prayer is made at the Masse 174. a. 20. Christ onely remoueth synne 174. b. Hovv the Masse is vaileable ex opere operato 174. b. Masse taken tvvo vvaye 175. a. Hovv and in vvhat sense the Masse is a Sacrifice propitiatorie 175. a. b. In vvhat degree the Masse is vaileable ex opere operantis and may be called a sacrifice propitiatorie 176. a. Sundry Sacrifices propitiatorie in some degree 176. a. 21. Sacrament tvvo vvayes taken 176. b. In vvhat sense the Sacrament called lord and God 179. a. Proufes out of the fathers for calling the Sacrament lord and God 179. 180. etc. A holesom lesson touching the blessed Sacrament out of S. Bernard 181. a. The inseparabilitie of bothe Christes natures in vnitie of person duly consydered taketh avvaye occasion of many vile and vvicked scoffes and blasphemies against the b. Sacrament 181. b. 2. The doctrine of the Sacrament vvithin these last six hundred yeres more amply clearly and subtely haÌ„dled then before in quiete tymes to meete vvith the obiections of heretikes 182. b. The doctrine of the church concerning the remaining of Christes bodye in the Sacrament 183. a. Reseruation of the Sa cramen 183. b. 23. M. Iuell contrarieth him selfe 184. a. The body of Christ susteineth no violence iniurie ne villanie 184. b. Vvhen a Mouse eateth the Sacrament either the nature of breade retourneth the body of our lord done avvaye or the accideÌ„tes supply the effectes of the substaÌ„ce 184. b 24. The benefite of the Geneuian communion 185. b. 25. The bread and vvine by consecration chaunged into an other more excellent substance leaue to bee and therefor neither be they the Sacramentes of the bodye and bloud of Christ 186. a. That the formes of bread and vvine remayning be the Sacramentes it folovveth by sequell of reason 186. a. VVhere manifest scripture vvanteth sequell of reason vsed by S. Basile against heretikes 186. a. 26. Christes bodye is in the Sacrament it lyeth not there hidden vnderneath it neither is it there as in a place but after maner vnspeakeable and to God onely knovven 187. a. Liber hic Anglicano idiomate conscriptus ab eximio Doctore Theologo Anglo D. Thoma Hardingo examinatus est diligenter à viris doctis probis Anglicani idiomatis peritis Qui mihi attestati sunt catholicam fidem religionem quae grauissimè in Anglia oppugnatur hac tempestate solidè eruditè streuuè in eo propugnari magnum fructum popularibus Angliae hominibus allaturum Ita attestor Iudocus Tiletanus Doctor Theologus Praepositus Walcurien haereticae prauitatis inquisitor