they chalenge then to forgiue that punishement or some parte thereof which the lawes did prouide whereof they were the makers or executours themselues and consequently to remitte suche punishement as might ensue for the lacke of fulfilling thereof There is no temporall Prince but he may by his Princely Prerogatiue pardon any seueral fault coÌ„mitted either against his owne person or the coÌ„mon wealth that is to say discharge the offeÌ„der of the paine which by law he should suffer And why should we think it straunge that those meÌ„ to whome by expresse woordes of Christ more preheminence is giuen for their iurisdiction spirituall then to any Prince aliue is geuen by law or nature for their ciuile Regiment why should we thinke it straunge that they shoulde pardon or release the paines and penalty appointed by the Ghostly Father or prescribed by the lawe or due to the sinne it selfe by Goddes iustice if there were no lawe for the case or order taken of the Church past And that it is the temporal punishement onely which they meane to pardon by their Indulgencies it may be euident both by that we haue sayde before and also by the woordes of course in most Indulgencies in which lightly you see this clause De poenit entijs iniunciis we assoile them from their enioyned penaunce or from the penaunce of so many dayes or yeares as may be seene plainly in the holy Councell of Lateran and in the Decrees hoth of innocentius the thirde and fourth The sinne it selfe is not measurable by times and yeares Can. 62. De peniten remission cap. quod auâ—em for it is a simple and indiuisible acte or affection of minde or man as oure schooles speake in suche matters and therefore a man can not be assoiled from parte of his sinne and bound in the other parte but he that forgiueth the gilte and faulte of sinne which the Prophet calleth iniquitateÌ„ peccati he releaseth no dayes nor yeares Psal 31. but he forgiueth the very faulte it selfe Neither is ther any eternall punishement which can be eased by any nuÌ„ber of dayes wer they neuer so many Take you froÌ„ an infinit endlesse thing how much you list it shal be eternall still Then it is onely temporall punishement which before God and the world is limited by certaine proportion of the wickednes commâ—tted and of that satisfaction which Goddes iustice requireth at the handes of the party penitente which can be released by dayes or yeares Pardoning for dayes aÌ„d yeares is onely meant of the punishemeÌ„t for sins in parte or in whole And therefore the Popes or Bishopes Pardons onely forgiue temporall punishement enioyned or at the least due for aunswere of Gods righteousnes to be enioyned Wherein also the Magistrates of the Church haue suche care and consideration that they remitte not so muche as any one daye of enioyned penaunce or deserued punishment but by recompence of the lacke of mans satisfiyng with some portion of Christes abundant desertes applied by the vse of their Keies to the reliefe of suche as doo lacke and for their zeale and deuotion are not vnwoorthy to receiue benefite by the singular treasure of the common wealth to helpe them in their priuate neede But for this matter looke for more towarde the ende of this Booke And now vpon the foresayd declaration lette this be as it were agreed vpon and let the Aduersaries wel vnderstand this to be the meaning of the Catholike Church that an Indulgence or pardon is nothing ells but a remission in parte or in whole of the bonde of that punishment which is enyoned or deserued VVhat a pardoÌ„ is after the mortall sinnes be remitted Goddes iustice being otherwise for the sayde sinnes recompensed by the common treasure of Christ and his Sanctes satisfaction which is applied vnto the parties vse by the Keyes of iurisdiction graunted to suche as Christ made the Stewards of his houshold the disposers of his mysteries For the Church of God and her Pastours though they be mercifull and inclined to remission rather then rigoure yet they take not vpon them neither in the sacrament of Penaunce to remit sinne and damnatioÌ„ neither out of the sacrament to release any paine or parte of punishment enioyned without recompence therof by Christes copious redeÌ„ption and the communion of holy workes that is betwext the head and membres of this mysticall bodie of Christ Payn due for sinne maye remayn after the sinne be forgeueÌ„ Perchance some Protestant wil here call vs backe and require proufe that there should be any payne or temporal correctioÌ„ remayning for those persons which haue their sinnes forgiueÌ„ by God in the sacrament of Penaunce or otherwise by the onely faith of the partie penitent as he maye perhapps surmise If he list to be satisfied in this case let him turne backe and take a short view of the woorkes of God since the beginning and there consider well whether God him selfe hath not coÌ„monly visited his children receiued to mercie with some correction aunswerable in respect of his iustice to the greuousnes of the crime forgiuen Who is so frowarde or so rude but he maye well discerne betwixt the fault of oure firste Father the punishment of euerlasting daÌ„nation deserued there by His sinne was one thing his deserued punishment an other thing his sinne was disobedience his punishmeÌ„t correspondent to that was euerlasting death Yet when so euer one of these two is forgiuen the other must needes be forgiuen also be cause he can neither be subiect to damnation whose sinne for which damnation was ordeined is forgiuen neither his fault be forgotten whose euerlasting perishing is prouided which is the reward of sin But now Cap. 10. both these being at once throughe Christ remitted to Adam as we reade in the booke of wisdoÌ„ who perceiueth not that he was for all that long afterward subiect to teÌ„poral death and many other miseries both of this life the next being only punishmeÌ„ts appointed by God for the ful satisfyng euen of those sinnes which were forgiueÌ„ him Looke at the Prophete Dauid 2. Reg. 12 whether God corrected him not with temporall scourge after he had expresselie forgeuen hym by the warrant of the Prophete Nathan his greuouse sinnes Exod. 32 Consider the case of all Goddes electe people howe sharpely they were visited for sinne Num. 12. after it was in them pardoned Marcke whether Marie Moyses his sister was not punished and separated seuen dayes as it wer for penance after her brethern had procured her pardoÌ„ at Gods handes Thus hath God of respecte not onely to mercie but also partely to iustice so alwayes pardoned that he hath had coÌ„sideration of iudgment and righteousnes Nowe whome should the Church folow in remitting of sinnes but him by whose power and warrant she doth remitte sinnes Seeing God then him selfe after he hath by his owne means and absolute power pardoned manens faultes and discharged
plenarie Indulgence it shall discharge you of the bond of al the dayes or yeares appointed whiche you haue not before the receit of the said Pardō accomplished And this is exceeding plaine for the two first kindes of punnishmentes which we saied were ioyned for satisfaction by the Churches lawes and by the Confessours prescription For as they stood vpon daies and yeares so the remission of the same must needs keepe the like forme For which cause you shal often see expressed De Poenitentijs iniunctis in the Indulgēce And that forme of graunt remissiō was vsed alwayes in Gods Church De Poen iniūctis For S. Cypriā did remit a great peece somtims De poenitētijs iniūctis of the enioyned penāce whē he gaue peace to such as fell in time of persecution long before they had fulfilled their prescribed penance And so did S. Paule to the Corinthian that had committed incest and so doth Nice Councell prescribe to Bishops that they shoulde or might at the least Humanius Can. 11. deale more gentlie with those that denyed theyr fayth in the persecution of Licinius and that they might pardon them before if they saw cause though seauen yeares penaunce was prescribed vnto them In which places that the Churche now calleth a Pardon or Indulgence Hovv pardons vvere termed in the Primitiue Church 2. Cor. 2. was termed somtimes donare aliquid in persona Christi to geue or graunte something to the offender in Christes person and so called S. Paule it sometimes it was called Dare pacem as S. Cyprian termeth it in many places of his works sometimes it was called Humanius agere To deale gentlie with sinners or to shew vnto them humanitie and so doth Nicene and Ancyran Councels terme it Licebit etiam Episcopo humanius circa aliquid cogitare Can. 11. Cap. 5. It shal be lauful for the Bisshop to deale more curteouslie with them saith the holy Councell Whereby we see this pardoning of enioyned penāce is an auncient vsage and counted most holie of al the Churche whereof we make this assured ground and foundaciō of our Pardons An assured argument for pardons and for the truth of them we make this argument S. Paule did remitte enioyned penance in Christes person S. Cyprian and all the Bishopes of Affrike did remitte penaunce enioyned Nicene Councell giueth licence to Bishops to remitt penaunce prescribed by the law Therefore the Pope by theyr example in the person of Christ may remitte enioyned penaunce and therefore may laufully geue a pardon The payne prescribed by the lawe he may release because he is the principall executour of the law the penaūce appoynted by the inferiour priest in cōfession he may likewise remit because that which is prescribed by thinferiour may by good reason be vpon cōsyderations altered by the superiour especially where the Magistrate hath good meanes to prouide that neyther the Cōmon Wealth suffer dāmage thereby nor the party to whom it doth pertein to be loosed or bond in penance receiue any losse therby By like authority also doth a Pardō chāge somtimes a sharper lōger pain enioyned into som more gētle penāce more fitte needful works for the time and state then being as his power that is the chief gouernour may be exceding beneficiall to the world in suche cases which euer ought to be practised for edifiyng neuer for destructiō For it is to be cōsidered that the high Pastor vsually graūteth no releasse of the debt of good works or the bond of deserued punishmēt but by prescriptiō of some other holy work to be accōplished before the party obteine the benefite of his remissiō As whē a penitēt hath enioyned hym to punish his body by cōtinual fasting or lōg peregrination or other exceding much tēporal paine according to the grieuousnes of his desertes the freedome of a Pardon oftentimes turneth the said due paines enioyned in to some easier woorke of christiā charity yet being much more to glorye of God and beneficiall to the Church as the time standeth then the other could be Ita Vrbanus 2. in Synod Claremōt As when the Turke or other ennemies of Christianity doe inuade any Christian Kingdome it is more beneficiall to put to our helping hand in the withstanding his crueltye eyther by resisting him in oure owne persons or contributing any peece of oure goods towardes the same then any priuate Penance that may cōcerne our persons Therefore the gouernours of the Churche often to moue the people to suche necessary deuotion geueth them a releasse of all paine due for theyr sinnes or at the least of the bond of their enioyned penance onely vpon respect of some smal furtherance in suche a good and godly purpose The like they doe also often to sette forward other works of charity to the benefite of Gods people as for the relieuing of Hospitals of Churches of highe wayes and such like Sometimes againe they extend their power which Christ gaue them to edify his Church and encrease religion and deuotion in the people as when they geue pardon for so many dayes to suche as shall receiue the blessed Sacrament faste and praye that heresy may ceasse in the Church that the enemies of Christianity may not preuaile that Infidels Iewes and heretiques may be conuerted and Schismatikes knitte them selues obediently to the felowshipe of Christes fold So doth the Pope for the encrease of zelous deuotiō and aduancing Gods honour geue dayes of remission or full pardon to suche as shall vsually haue meditations of Christes passion and death by certaine holy praiers appointed or by visiting places in which there be seen some liuely steppes memories and expresse tokens of Christes miraculous workes or his Sanctes Thus to helpe vppe the dulnesse of praying and seruing God in oure dayes he geueth grace and pardon to such as shall frequent the Churches at the times of their dedication or on certaine principall Feastes there eyther to be confessed and receiue the holy Sacrament or els to ioyne in prayer and deuotion with other the faithful people that thither at those dayes haue principal recourse Hereof we haue example not onely in the story of the institution of the solemne Feaste of Corpus Christi but also in the great generall Councell holden at Lateran Can. 62. For this cause also the like maintenaunce of holy prayer by which the Church of God most standeth hath he mercifully and with singular wisdome giuen a pardon of certaine dayes or yeares to suche as shoulde deuoutly occupie suche beades bookes or praiers in al which thinges orderly giuen and reuerently receiued I see not what cā be reprehended of any but such as are offended with all workes and wayes of mercy charity and deuotion The power and iurisdiction is proued lawfull the causes why he shoulde exercise his authority herein be very vrgent and Goddes honoure with the peoples commodity exceding well respected all thinges here doo edifie and nothing at
I speak of the discharge of the bond thereof or some portion of the same nowe before the partye doe passe hence which is a great deale more proper to the Churches power and more easy to be brought to passe then when the penitents soule is alredy in iudgment there to which place the Churches iurisdictioÌ„ as som suppose doth not extend If the simple vnderstand me not let him marke my meaning by an example The paines of Hel can not neither by God nor maÌ„ ordinarily be holpen or released after man be in the same but the debt of Hell which is due for euery mortall sinne is discharged alwayes at oure repentaunce in so muche that the priest in the sacrament of Penaunce with the sinne euer remitteth the bonde of Hell and preuenteth Gods iudgement in the same So if Purgatorie coulde not at all belong to the iurisdictioÌ„ of the Church nor no person therein yet in the life of the party som peece of the debt therof or all may be released afore hande whiles the party is in the power of the Church her discipline And so it must needes be at euery time that the Church pardoneth the party of all satisfactioÌ„ or any portioÌ„ therof recompensing the same by application of Christes satisfaction and his Sanictes For the bonde of Purgatorie riseth as I haue saied vpon some satisfaction and penaunce to be fulfilled or doone in this life the which being here either by oure paines accoÌ„plished to the satisfying of Gods righteousnes or otherwise pardoned there is no debt or bonde of purgatorie at al the which is so caÌ„celled by the Churche oure Mother that it caÌ„ not be required of God oure Father And this moued alwaies the Church of God diligeÌ„tly to prouide of her teÌ„der mercy towarde her louing Children that they should neuer departe oute of this life in any det of penaÌ„ce knowing well that the residews not satisfied here should be required at their haÌ„des afore God in the next life And therfore though many yeares of penance wer prescribed to al suche as did notorious crimes yet ther was made euer lightly a prouiso that at the houre of theire extremity they should haue peace and pardon and the Churches blessing in the holy sacrament and so depart free from bonde of the Churches discipline and as farre as in her laye might be also discharged of the temporall scourge in the next life as no doubt they were if there remayned no other impediment in them selues So doth Nice Councel moste mercifully prouide Can. 12. lib. 3. Epist 17 and so doth Cyprian and other fathers of the primitiue Church that sawe in their highe wisdom the temporall paine to come muche to hang on the parties satisfactioÌ„ and the bond of the Churches enioyned penaunce And euen at this daye prouision is also made that no penance be giuen but vpon condition of his recouerie to any man that lyeth at the extremitie of death least he should depart hence Epist 180 Ligatus bound as S. Augustine termeth it wherby the debt of his eioyned satisfaction might be required in Purgatorie And nothing in the world proueth more the Churches doctrine of Purgatorie and Pardons then doth the continual coÌ„corde and most agreable practise of these holy actes of binding and loosing iustly vsed in her gouernment How the practise of pardons of these late hundreth yeares differeth from the vsage of the primitiue Church and in what sense suche greate numbers of yeares and dayes be remitted by the Popes pardons The eigth Chapter BVT here we must note some diuersitie in giuing Pardons preuenting Purgatorie paines betwixt the primitiue Church of olde oures of these latter hundreth yeares which did moste iustly rise vpon the alteration of mens maners and state of thinges For in the primitiue Church the enioyned penance was so large for euery mortal crime that it might seme very answerable to the nature of the fault And doubtles it maye not otherwise be thought but the spirite of God did limitate satisfactioÌ„ by the Canons as agreable in all pointes to the debt of sinnes forgiuen which God required for answer of his iustice And therefore when they gaue a Pardon of the enioyned penaunce there could be no great doubt but the penitent being in zeale and deuotion qualified thervnto was therwith fully pardoned of Purgatorie the bonde of al paines to come in the next life But now of dayes when penaunce and large satisfaction oure nature declining euer to the woorse and deuotioÌ„ continually decaying is not enioyned according to the olde Canons and but a smal signe thereof remaining only in secret satisfactioÌ„ which is not of it selfe in this exceding flow of sinne ani thing agreable to the faultes committed in this case to remitte onely the enioyned penance were not enough commonly to preuent Purgatorie paynes or to discharge the penitent of all satisfactorie correctioÌ„ to come Wherby the Châ—rch by instigation of Gods spirite dealeth so much more mercifully now theÌ„ before because the people had neuer so muche neede to hang on pardon as wheÌ„ their sinnes be greatest and their recompeÌ„se least Neuer the lesse suche is the frowardnes of oure time that they had rather take away penaunce contemptuously then haue it released by the power of God laufully For the great infirmitie of this world was this manifould remission vsed yet the meeknes of the Church which by the motioÌ„ of God she applieth her selfe vnto for the distresse of these dayes and for the sinners sake is yet most of sinners now commonly conteÌ„ned of very many that haue ful great need therof as mere folly laughed at Yet the Church for her childrens relief bestoweth mercy still and a great deale lesse it is to offend on that side then the other as no doubt the holy Ghost guiding her affares she standeth vpright on both sides She seing therefore that the remission of the enioyned penance coulde not discharge vs of the bonde of transitorie payn to come being sure that it is nolesse lawful to remitte the paynes due by the CanoÌ„s as enioyned effectually by the CanoÌ„s she giueth now pardoÌ„s not onely de iniunctis poenitentijs but also de iniungendis of suche penaunce as by the nature of the faulte before God or by the decrees of Councells should or had wont to be enioyned For ther is no maÌ„ that hath in penaunce prescribed either of fasting or praying or suche like a thousand or moe yeares And yet it is knowen that many suche pardons are and haue bene giuen long Neither coulde the debt of Purgatorie wholly be discharged now as it was of olde by the pardoÌ„s of the primitiue Church in which onely ther was remissioÌ„ of the penance appointed because al penance thought nedefull was then appointed except ther were releasing also sometimes of all the penaunce or a great peece of the penaunce that should by lawe and reason haue bene enioyned Hovv the great number of
sinnes which was giuen to the Apostles was not bestowed on thē in respect of their priuate persons but as they were publike officers and that therefore the like authoritie is common by Christes graunt to all priestes of Christes Church who in this matter are the Apostles successours The fifth Chap. IF I had here to doe onelie with the learned it were enough that is alreadie proued for the power and preeminence giuen to the Apostles in remission of sinnes thereupon to ground most assuredly the like right in the same cause to perteine to all Bishoppes and priestes of Christes Churche But we studie to helpe suche as can not by this so farre consider that the power giuen to his Apostles or to any of them is one eternall power not ceasing in their persons An ignorante reason of the simple manteined by heretiques agaynst priesthod but during in their succession to the worldes ende For I haue my selfe mette with many suthe as coulde be cōtent as they said to acknowledge vpon so playne scripture the singular priuilege giuen to the Apostles and therupon if thei might haue had av Apostle they would not haue sticked to haue made their confession and sute to him for the remission of theire sinnes but because I had not the like woordes of Christe spoken to all priestes particularlye they thought it was no reason that any such chaleng shoulde be made for thē nor any suche charge to be giuē to others to confesse their sinnes vnto them This simplicitie of the common sorte or rather this rude frowardnesse risinge vpon contempt and disobedience to Gods Churche is mainteyned euen of the more learned sorte who haue charged them selues in all behauiour to be so populare and so plausible that euen against knowen order of thinges they will draw backe from the light of trueth with the common rude and vnlearned reasons of the people For Iohn Caluin Caluin a man borne to seditiō the Churches calamitie mainteineth the madnesse of the multitude by this reason The Apostles saith he had the holy Ghost wherof our priestes haue no vvarrant But enquire of them whether they haue the holy Ghost if they sae yea demaunde of them further whether the holy Ghost maye erre if thei confesse that the holy Ghost can not erre then they proue them selues not to haue the holie Ghoste because it is well seen that they may erre and doe erre both in loosing binding manie otherwise then Goddes sentence will alowe But briefly to satisfie all sides in this case I shall declare the like power to be left by Christes meaning to all Bishopes priestes no lesse then to the Apostles them selues to whome Christ then presently spake that both the peoples lacke of vnderstanding may be corrected the false and craftie conueiance of their captaine may be to his shame and the Diuels plainely disclosed First this is playn that what so euer Christe after his resurrection or before did institute for the cōmoditie of the people weale of the whole Churche The povver geuen to the Apostles ceassed not by their death but cōtinueth still in the Church that did not decay in the persons of them to whome Christ presently spake the wordes for elles all sacramentes had ben ended and all gouernement ceassed at the death of them to whome in person the charge was first geuen by Christe For example Christ in his institutiō of the holy Sacrament of the aultar spake onely to his twelue and to those present persons he onely sayd presently hoc facite 1. Cor. 11. doe this yet in their persons the Church was so instructed and all priestes so authorized that the same some raigne worcke hath vpon that warrant ben truely practised of the Church and by vayne imitation folowed by thier Aduersaries euen till this daye And in deede the verie woordes of the institution did importe no lesse for it is sayde Mortem Domini annunciabitis donec veniat You shall sette forth Christes death till his comming whiche coulde not be if the ministerie had decayed with their persons to whome Christ spake So the charge both of preaching and baptising was geuen to a fewe chosen men then present but that all the worlde might perceiue that of his wisdom and carefull prouidence the charge and authoritie perteined to the gouernours of the Church for euer no lesse thē to them whom he then called to that function he added I wil be with you to the ende of the worlde Meaning that they should exercise that office in his name and assistance to the day of iudgment Math. vlt Which in theyr own persons was not true but in their successours And for this cause it is no doubt but what authoritie so euer Peter had alone aboue the residewe of his felowe Apostles that the same is by all reason to be deriued from him to al his successours and that caused Chrysostome to saye that Christe shedde his blood to winne the sheepe which he committed to Peter and his sucessours to feed where Christ in person presentlie spake but to Peter alone yet because he knewe the like gouernement was both necessary after Peters death as well as in his time and no lesse by Christes appointment to be continued in the Church after as before the Doctours doubted not to enlarge Christes woorde vttered to Peter alone to all them that succeeded in the same roome Vpon these most strong groūds euerie man plainly may argue the like power yet to be in the Churche of God in euery case euen as Christ did institute at the beginning Reasons for the continuance of the ministerie of Priests when he gaue the Charge to the Apostles first For looke what forme of gouernement and order of the Churche was thought vnto his wisdome to be best then the same must needs be best now I speake for the substance of things for by diuersities of time and person some alteration may rise in the circumstances therfore if it were good at that time that one should be the general Vicare of Christ and pastour of al the sheepe for which he shed his blessed bloud it is good yet also if some had authoritie then to consecrate Christes bodie some haue the same power till this time if some then must needes baptise and preache other some must nowe also doe the same finallie if certaine then had commission by Christe and the holie Ghoste geuen them to remitte sinnes and therewith power by his woorde both to pardon and punnish to bind and to loose it must by force of the foresaid argument necessarily be induced that some at this daie must haue the like office For els Christ could not continue the same power and offices in the Churche which he for the Churches sake did first institute and which he compted of his heauenlie wisdome moste necessarie for the Churches gouernment Christ mainteineth all the functions by him instituted euē til this da◠in his Church But
I thinke no man hath yet so shakeÌ„ of shame and feare of God that he dare holde that Christe was not hable to mainteine all power rule and iurisdiction with all kind of functions whiche he instituted for the benefite of the people till the worldes end both him self and the holy Ghost promised to be present for that purpose til the general iudgemeÌ„t And that those functions were necessary for his euerlasting coÌ„moÌ„ welth his soleÌ„ne institutioÌ„ careful prouisioÌ„ of them doe declare that he meneth no lesse to establish the same which he theÌ„ instituted not only the foresaid reasoÌ„s but the saing of S. Paul doth proue Ephes 4. He gaue vnto the Church som to be Apostles som to be prophets some to be Euangelists some to be pastours and Doctours and al this to the worke and maintenance of the ministerie for the perfiting of the Saincts aÌ„d vpholding of Christes body til the time of the acknowledging of Gods Sonne Thus doth Christ prouide for his deare Church in al maner of seruice office euen til the last day Wherby it is most cleare that the power of remission of sinnes being once geueÌ„ to the Church caÌ„ neuer ceasse whiles man of his continual frailty ceasseth not to sinne That which was then coÌ„pted a necessarie refuge remedy for sinnes coÌ„mitted can not nowe perish in the worlde where sinne is a great deale more rife and the remedie more needful But to conuince them plainlie that thinke contrary Ioan. 20. Thomas had like povver to other thoâ—gh he vvere absent vvhen Christe spake to them let them tell me whether Thomas being not theÌ„ present as the Euangelist saith and therefore the woordes not vttered to him in person let them shewe me whether he had not afterwarde by force of that institution power also to remitte sinnes If he had as by reason I am sure they can not denie as ful preheminence and power to doe al things that then Christ charged his ten Disciples which were present to doe in his name then the power of remission of sinnes was not so streightlie limited as the woordes might seme to be vttered by which no doubt a Sacrament was instituted to take force in the Church both then and afterward to the worlds end not that any man may of his owne head vpon force onelie of Christes commission geuen at the time to his Apostles take that high function vpon him but that he which ordinarilie shal be called by receiuing of grace and the holy Ghost in externall Sacrament by laying on of handes of Priesthoode may likewise vpon his owne flock and cure exercise that office no lesse then those holie men might after Christes calling therevnto occupie the same worke of binding and loosing of suche sheepe of Christes fold as to them were committed And so did S. Thomas who then was not there so did S. Mathie who then was no Apostle so did Barnabas so did Timothie and Titus who were ordered by S. Paule Lib 1. de Poenit. Cap. 16. and so did Paule him selfe of whom S. Ambrose saith that he did remitte sinnes without al derogation to Christ The good studiouse Reader must marke wel then that al these holy functions or passing preheminencies are not geuen to the priuate persons in respect of them selues neither of Peter nor of Paul nor any other but they are bestowed vpon them for the vse of the Churche which dieth not in their persons and therefore must be honoured with the same offices by other after they be dead by perpetual succession that shal neuer cease De doct Christ lib. 1. c. 18. And that caused S. Augustine and other holie Fathers to say the keies were geuen to the Churche and authority to remitte sinnes to baptise and to enioyn penance not because the whole Church by gathering al her Children together A fond reason must geue sentence vpon euery sinner or els the Priestes iudgement to be nothing as some foolish seditiouse heades haue now to the disturbance of the worlde deuised but because it is our common wealth and house of faith which is so bewtified in her ministers with al kinde of Sacraments and good orders for the gouernment of her children and because al meÌ„ may see it was the earnest loue careful prouidence for this his spouse and not the persons of the Apostles in respect of them selues which moued his wisdome to the iustitution of such perpetual offices in the Church Herevpon therefore and in consideration that the keyes of opening and shutting heauen by binding and loosing mans sinnes shall euer remaine for the vse and honour of the Churche the saied holie S. Augustine hath these woordes Li. 1. c. 18. De doct Christ Claues dedit Ecclesiae saue vt quae soluerit in terrae soluta essent in coelo quae ligauerit in terra ligata essent in coelo Christe deliuered the keyes to the Churche that who so euer shee loosed in earth should be loosed in heauen and what so euer shee bound in earth shoulde be bounde likewise in heauen Li. 1 2. cont Donatist And Optatus his equall striuing with the Donatistes for all holie giftes which Christ bestowed vpon his Churche chalengeth all other Sacramentes and namely the keies for the Catholique and vniuersall Churche from the parte of Donatus the heretike as in the right of Peter He saith exceeding pithelie Claues datae sunt Petro ☜ non haereticis and afterward Cathedram Petri quae nostra est per ipsam caeteras dotes apud nos esse probamus etiam sacerdotium The keyes are geuen to Peter aÌ„d not to heretiks by the chair of Peter whiche is oures we proue all other giftes of the church to be ours yea eueÌ„ priest hode This he hath in sense in diuers places by which we see the iurisdictioÌ„ power geuen to the principal Apostle yet to remaine and by it all other the Churches notable preheminences whiche he calleth Ecclesiae dotes The douries of the Churche through his whole discourse against the Donatists So doth Epiphanius attribute the power of penaunce and pardon to the Church likewise not only in baptisme whiche he calleth the moste perfect penance but also afterwarde vppon the parties relapse in which case the heretikes called Cathari Cathari affirmed that the Churche had no authoritie to pardon them any more Against which pernicious sect he saith if any man fall after his baptisme the Churche will not be vnmerciful to him Lib. 2 ToÌ„ 1 haeres 59. Dat enim reuersionem post poenitentiam poenitentiam For shee geueth him leaue to returne and hath penance after penance By whiche he noteth that the Churche hath two Sacraments for remission of sinne the one is baptisme which he termeth perfect penaÌ„ce Cap. 6. with S. Paul to the Hebrews And S. Augustin doth cal it in his Enchiridion Cap. 64. Magnam indulgentiam a grauÌ„d pardon and afterwarde the
Churche hath an other kind of remission whiche Epiphanius calleth poenitentiam post poenitentiam But of these two more shal be said anon After this sorte Lib. 4. de Sap. ca. 30 doth Lactantius ascribe to the true Churche confession penance and profitable healing of our wounds and suche sores as be founde in our soules By al which euery man may conceiue casely that this honour and commission of priesthod for the remissioÌ„ of our sinnes did not decay with the Apostles appointed by Christe nor shal cease till Christes coÌ„ming to iudge the worlde But he that listeth to see in what office and by whom she holdeth this singular honour of remission of sinnes he shal find not onelie the Apostles who were called by Christ but al other Bishoppes also that succeede them in the Churche to be her ministers herein Gregorius wherof let him read the xxvj Homelie of S. Gregorie perteininge almoste wholy to that purpose I will repeat a few wordes onely out of it committing the rest to the diligence of the Reader Libet intueri saith he illi Discipuli ad tanta ouer a humilitatis vocati ad quantuÌ„ culmen gloriae sint perducti Ecce non solùm de semetipsis securi fiunt sed etiam alienae obligationis relaxationis potestatem accipiunt principatumque superni iudicij sortiuntur vt vice Dei quibusdam peccata retineant quibusdam relaxent Ecce qui districtum iudicium Dei metuunt animarum iudices siunt et alios damnant vel liberant qui semet ipsos damnari metuebant Horum profecto nunc in Ecclesia Dei Episcopi locum tenent ligandi atque soluendi authoritatem sumunt Grandis honor sed graue pondus est istud honoris It is my meaning nowe to beholde to what marueilouse honour the Disciples of Christe be exalted whiche before were called in their base state to great burden and troubles For nowe they be not onelie in assurance of their owne state but they haue obteined power of binding and releasing other and the verie soueraigntie of heauenlie iudgemente that in Goddes owne steede they may some mans sinnes release and other offences reteine Loe those that once feared the straict sentence of Goddes owne iudgemente are made the iudges of other mens soules to coÌ„demne or deliuer where they list Bishops are in the roomes of the Apostles that before doubted of them selues And nowe truâ—lie in these mens roomes are the Bishoppes of Goddes Church and receiue the authoritie of binding and loosing and their owne state of regimente High surely is their Chair but greater is their charge S. Gregorie said so farre But Sainct Augustine shall make vppe this matter with woordes of suche weight that I trust euerie man shall see the trueth and almost feele the grossenesse of falsehoode thereby He writeth thus vppon this verse of the Psalme Eructauit Psal 44. The Catholike Churche hath continual successioÌ„ in lauful ministerie whiche is the xliiij in number with him Pro patribus â—uis nati sunt tibi filij constitues eos Principes super omnem terram In place of thy Parentes thou hast children born thee them thou mayest make the Princes of the vvhole earth The Apostles did begette thee they were sente them selues they preached in their owne persons and finallie they were thy Fathers But could they alwayes corporally abide here And though one of them saied Phil. 1. I would gladly be dissolued and be with Christ yet for your sake I couÌ„ted it more necessarie to tarie in flesh Thus he said But how long coulde his life last He might not remaine til this daie muche lesse for the time to come What then is the Church desolate after the departure of her parents God forbid In steed of thy parentes thou hast sonnes saith the text What is that to say Marie the Apostles sent by Christ are as Fathers and for them God hath raised vp childern or sonnes which be the holy Bishops of the world For at this day the Bishoppes that be throughout al Christendome how rose thei to that roome The Church calleth them Fathers and yet shee did begette them and shee placed them in the roome of their Fathers Non ergo te putes desertam quia non vides Petrum quòd non vides Paulum quòd non vides illos per quos nata es de prole tua tibi creuit paeternitas pro patribus tuis nati sunt tibi filij constitues eos principes super omnem terram Doe not therfore thinke thy selfe desolate because thou seest not Peter because thou hast not Paul ☜ because thou hast them not nowe present by whome thou wast borne of thy owne issue Fatherhode is growen to thee and for thy Fathers thou hast brought foorth sonnes them shalt thou make the rulers ouer al the earth Thus muche out of S. Augustine By whom you may perceiue the great prouidence of God that euerlastingly vpholdeth the ordinance of his Sonne Christ Iesus as wel now by the children borne from time to time in the Churches lappe as bâ—fore in the spring of our faith by the Apostles sent and appointed in person by Christ him selfe And here you must note Note that not only Bishops who succeede the Apostles in al kind of power and regiment but also all other inferiour Priestes to be compted with them as successours in ministring diuerse sacramentes as baptisme penance the reuerend SacrameÌ„t of the Aultar and suche like but looke what power either Apostle or Bishop hath in remission of sinnes in consecrating Christes body in baptising the same hath the whole order of holy priesthod by the right of their order may practise the same vpoÌ„ such as be subiect vnto them in al cases not exempted for reasonable causes by such as haue further iurisdictioÌ„ ouer the people Whereof I will not now talk particularly the lerned of the order know the limits of their charge coÌ„mission better then I caÌ„ instruct theÌ„ the simpler sort must seek for knowledge of their duty by the holy Canons of CouÌ„cels decrees of Bishops made for that purpose I can not now staÌ„d theron meaning at this present only to defend the holy Order chaleÌ„ge for it such right as the scripture and Christes own word geueth which in this coÌ„tempt of vertue and religioÌ„ is most necessary for al men to consider Therfore vpon our large discours for this last point I now deducte the particulars to this summe which may staÌ„d for a certaine mark as wel for the good to discern the truth as for the Aduersaries to shoote at whiles they liue Al power euery iurisdiction or right of Christes church remaineth as amply in as ful force streÌ„gth at this day shal til the worlds end so continue as they were by Christ grauÌ„ted first in the persoÌ„s of the Apostles or other instituted But the power of remissioÌ„ of sinnes was geueÌ„ proprely in expresse termes to the
daies or yeres be to be vnderstand in the form of Indulgences And this is the Churches meaning in giuing so many daies and yeares as be often times expressed in pardons in titles of prayers or vse of certaine saÌ„crified creatures made holy by Gods woorde and praier Of which because we see not the originall and because by vnlawfull practise of Printers or writers the grauntes of diuerse Bishopes for multiplication of the yeares may be ioyned togteher againste the meaning of the giuers there may be some forged not authentical yet we will not staÌ„de in that point because it is certen that such be in deed graunted diuers times by them that haue lawfull authoritie in the Church The vndoubted seÌ„se wherof though euery man may easely vnderstand by the premisses yet fully to opeÌ„ the case which is now so common in moste mens mouthes and not well coÌ„sidered of many ☜ Looke howe many dayes or yeares a man may deserue to be punished in this life if his sinnes were to the vttermost taxed the apointed penance of the Church fulfilled so many yeares maye the gouernours of the Church remit and forgiue by a PardoÌ„ But many a man may and God knoweth often tymes doth committe so many greuouse offences continue so long in sinne liue so wantonly and so carelesly in all maner of wickednes eueÌ„ to his lifes ende almost that being coÌ„uerted by Christes grace and so deparring hence in his fauoure as it often through muche mercy falleth he must needes be in exceding great debt for so long a life so euel spent And I thinke if you call him to account for all his coÌ„mon dayly offences This is ouer coÌ„mon a case in the vvorld for all his dayes vnthriftily wasted for euery of his idle woordes for euery of his vain thoughtes for so many occasioÌ„s of good works omitted which he ought haue doen for often felowship in other mens misdedes besides his owne all this wil rise to a great debt in a mans case that neuer required in all his time effectually to haue his debtes forgiueÌ„ him and therefore he must needes stand much bound euen for his veniall trespaces which though they deserue not of their nature damnation eternall yet being not remitted they binde man to transitorie punnishment according to the number time and weight of them But now if you sitte on the audit of the greater matters of this mans conscience where euery of his sinnes deserued by the Churches limitation for correction onely after they be remitted nere hand seuen yeares penaunce and some many moe where he hath doone nothing ells all his euell and long time but heaped sinne vpoÌ„ sinne where infinite sacrilege boldly hath bene committed where his fleshe was neuer satisfied of moste vnlawfull lustes where his minde was euer full of greedy gain wher his handes or harte were alwaies imbrued with innoceÌ„t bloud were no parte of his mind or body hath bene free from what iniquity you can name in all this corrupt case of many a maÌ„s life De comâ— punc rordis lib. 2. where no good workes that I may may vse S. Chrysostoms woordes are found by which ther may be any hope of release where there is abundance of all sinnes without any satisfaction in this lamentable state of a life so euell spent howe manye yeares penaunce if it were possible for the partye to liue so long were he by the Churches iudgemente Note vvel this case by the weight of his wickednesse or by Christes iustice to be chardged withall Surely if his life were not onely a thousand yeares for so long almost did some of the olde fathers line but if it were ten thousand yeares he coulde not satisfie for so muche temporall paine and debt of sinnes as reason law and Goddes iustice woulde and well might charge him withall though the great debt of euerlasting damnation by Christes grace were mercifully remitted in the priestes absolution at his confession before Therefore whether the party liue or die he is in debt for suche penaunce if rigour were shewed as so greate sinnes deserued And if he liued ten thousand yeares he were bounde in his life time and in his body to accomplishe as he might the due penaunce for his desertes if he die streight vpon his repentaunce he is no lesse bounde by suffering paine and punishment in the next world to fulfill the same For Gods iustice leeseth no right because maÌ„ leeseth his life Neither is it necessary for the due paiment of that greate debt of so many yeares that the paine of purgatorie shoulde endure so long or so many yeares as had bene necessarie for the accomplishing of his penance in this life For the might the force the hougenes the excesse and the nature of the paine in the next worlde is so fearfull and so great Super psal 37. as S. Augustine ofteÌ„ noteth that a great deale lesse time sufferance of the same is answerable to much more in the worlde this present life For what comparation is ther betwixt a dayes fasting here and a dayes punishmeÌ„t in purgatorie better it were surely to suffer a huÌ„dred yeares suche penaunce as the Church prescribeth in this mortall life that hath in it much wordly ease and comforte for the release of the enioyned paine then to abide one daye or weke in so greuous a torment as the holy Doctours and all the Churche holdeth Purgatorie to be Therefore to forgiue suche a greuous sinner in the latter ende of his life receiued to mercy as we haue now spoken of a thousand or two thousand yeares of penaunce is as muche in effecte and nature of the termes as to remitt and release him of so much punishment or the debt and bonde of so much punishment in Purgatorie as is proportionall and correspondent to so many dayes or yeares of penaunce as the peniteÌ„t in this life was bound vnto by the Canons of the Churche or the iust enioyning of his Ghostly Father OrigeÌ„ in Num li â— Hom. 11. For the Pardons measure the matter not by the limites of Purgaâ—orie the bondes borders or way of limitatioÌ„ wherof the Church knoweth not but by the yeares and times of penaunce prescribed to sinners by the holy Canons vpoÌ„ the bond wherof Gods iustice temporal in the next world doth as I haue proued muche depende To be shorte then and plain to giue a pardoÌ„ of a thousand or two thousand yeares or moe yf the graunte goeth so is as muche to saye as to forgiue so muche punishment as might be aunswerable for so greate penaunce not fulfilled in this life As if I wer behind with the Church indebted to God hard before my death of a huÌ„dreth dayes fasting in which case I caÌ„ not recoÌ„pence if my Bishope then or the chiefe heade of al the Ecclesiasticall Hierachie doo forgiue me twenty of the sayd dayes then my punishmeÌ„t shal be so muche lesse in Purgatorie not by
earnest vnfained teares proceding of loue deuotioÌ„ haue purchased many one a pardoÌ„ Peter wept bitterly loued hartely therfore he was restored to grace and mercy after Christ had punished as in way of penaÌ„ce his thre denialls with a triple demaunde of his loue as though he had doubted of his harte towardes him as S. Hilarie S Cyrill other doe interpreet it Super Ioan vlt. he not only gaue him a pardon of al that was past but made him his substitute in earth and chiefe pastour of al his flock If it staÌ„d thus therefor with the party penitent then the Popes Pardon shall vndoubtedly be beneficiall vnto him otherwise either not at al or els nothiÌ„g so muche as they seeme to sounde For althoughe it be an olde saying quòd indulgentiae tantum valent quantum sonaÌ„t that Indulgences be of as greate force and valour as the forme of their woordes doe importe yet that is not otherwise to be vnderstand then there wher ther may seeme iuste cause of graunte to the geuers and not euill disposition in the receiuers Adrianus For as Adrianus that once was Pope him selfe reasoneth If the Magistrates of the Church may not without iuste cause giue dispensation concerning vowes othes fastes mariages or suche like nor dispose the teÌ„poral treasures of the Churche without reasonable cause then may not surely the Bishopes be lauyshe of the treasure of Gods House which is muche more pretious wherof there can be no man partaker that is an vnprofable meÌ„ber of the body Neuer the lesse the causes of geuing indulgences may be more or lesse reasonable according to the state and varietie of thinges which to the wisdom of Gods Vicar in earth is best seeÌ„ whom Christ so ruleth in that case that he maye be most beneficiall to his holie houshold in so muche that it is not to be doubted but in these dayes and in this greate contempt of deuout and religious exercises the mouing onely of the people to prayer to holy peregrinations to the obedieÌ„ce of the Church may be a sufficieÌ„t cause why ther should be to prayers sayd vpoÌ„ books or beads sanctified creatures for suche pourpose annexed great remissioÌ„ The thinges that heretikes doo hat must most be reuerenced For look what thinges be most condemned of Heretikes those thinges must Christian men be induced to reuerence with moste singular zele religioÌ„ Neither caÌ„ therebe any thing in the world so necessary for vs christiaÌ„ meÌ„ of these times that be so voide of good workes as by deuotion entier zele to ioyn with our elders that in the holy coÌ„munioÌ„ of SaÌ„ctes we may be partakers of their vertuous deedes The ende of the Popes pardoÌ„s And that is the very ende of al the Popes PardoÌ„s to make vs in oure lacke of satisfaction for oure sinnes felowes and coparteners of the abundaÌ„ce that was in Christ first and then by him in oure holy brethren departed before vs. VpoÌ„ all which it is very plaine that euery man can not beneficially receiue the fructe of a Pardon this at least being requisite in euerie man that listeth to attein benefite therby that he be in state of grace and in earnest intent to continue in the knotte of Christ his Church Thus he must nedes be qualified that vvil take benefite by a pardoÌ„ with loue and liking of the holy workes of his christian brethren and accomplishing at least that small work which commonly now is ioyned to the Pardon for encrease of christian deuotion The continuance of which deuotion that more and more decayeth maketh the Pardons to be more coÌ„mon at this day and of late years then they were in the primitiue Church when moste men in the springe of christian religion and feruoure of faith sought to satisfie exactly the debt of the penance or ells which was a common case theÌ„ recompensed it by Martyrdom though S. Gregori the first of that name more then nine hundred yere since Vide cronica PaÌ„dalio Lutherani in the ordering of the stations at Rome is knoweÌ„ to haue geuen pardons for yeares or dayes in like fourme as now is vsed And cleare it is that the thing it selfe being founde lawfull and no Protestant aliue caÌ„ euer be hable to shew me the first vser thereof much lesse that it was euer controlled by any man that euer was compted Catholike it maye be measured according to the necessitie of the time and so as the Church may be moste edified And thankes be giuen to God the effecte of the loue of Indulgences and the contrarie issue of the contempt therof doe well proue the Churches good meaning therein For if you viewe both parties well you shall perceiue more profitable deuotion more christian charitie more furtherance of common wealthes causes in that side that feareth paynes for their sinnes with the Prophet Dauid euen after they be remitted and therefore seeke for all meanes moste humbly by mans ministerie to receiue mercie in one yeare you shall see in these deuout persons more fructes of repentaunce then in a whole old mans life can be found in all the other side that contempteously disdayn or scornfully deride the most profitable vsage both of penaunce and Pardons in Goddes Churche Therefore in so great proufe of the benefite that procedeth from this kinde of remissions for so Alexander the thyrde aboue foure hundreth yeares since termed Pardons vsed then to be giuen in Dedication of Churches and vpon moste assured groundes Vide tit de poeniten remis that it well agreeth both with Goddes woorde and practise of the primitiue Church and neuer condemned of any but of suche as be them selues worthely condemned of other greate heresies and errours the Magistrates will shewe mercy still in Christes behalfe and all the holy Bishopes succeding laufully the Apostles of Christ will giue peace and benediction to suche as humblie aske it at their handes Math. 10. and if the parties be worthie their peace by Christes promise shall rest vppon them if they either contemne it or be vnworthie of it then no harme doone it will returne to the giuers again Treuly that holy peace which Christ gaue to the Apostles at his coÌ„ming in to them at his departure from them â—oan 20. and ells as he entered vpon any holy action signified nothing ells but an agreement and peace of mans soule with God and did no doubt purge theÌ„ from their dayly infirmities which we call Venial sinnes and the bonde of all paine as it may be thought due for the same that in the presence of Gods maiesty sinne might cesse the parties appere cleane afore his face that had no spot of sinne in him selfe at all as by the sayed peace yet giueÌ„ to the worthy receiuers by holy Bishops ministerie Bishops blessyngs some lâ—ke effecte doth surelie ensue I vse this terme of peace wheÌ„ I speak of pardoÌ„s not because they are precisely meant
penaunce and punishment what neede we to doubt but ther now be many meanes made in this happy society of Saintes so to remitte the bonde of satisfaction to some that Gods iustice may be answered againe by other of this happy houshold in the abundance of their holy workes which the Church holdeth moste holily for to be a perfecte and euerlasting treasure to satisfy Gods righteousnes procure mercy to the needy which by loue zele and deuotion doe deserue the same If God remitted of old temporall paine vnto his people at the calle of Moyses and Aaron and for his Child Dauides sake that was dead what will not he mercifully forgiue by our highe priestes procurement whose pardons and punishments Christ hath solemly promised he would ratify and allowe in heauen aboue What wil he not doe in respect of the paines and abundant passioÌ„s of his owne childe Iesus that hath yet in the Catholik Church his death so duely represented for the remission of our dayly debtes What can be denied to the intercession of so many Sainctes to the chast combate of so many Virgins to the bloudy fight of so many Martyrs to the stout standing of so many Confessours What mercy may not the Churche craue and doubtles obteine for any of her children either in penaunce in this worlde or in paine in the nexte that hath in her treasure such abundance of satisfaction first in oure heade Christ Iesus throughe whose gracious workes al other mens paynes are become beneficiall either to them selues or their brethren and then in the store of all holy Sanctes trauailes not yet wasted in procuring mercy for others besides moe wayes of grace and remission that oure Mother the Church hath in redinesse to relieue her children that doe continue in her happy lappe and in the society of her communion with humble submission of them selues to the powers ordeined of Christ for the gouernment of their soules with request for this pardon at their handes to whome be giuen the bestowing and disposing of the inestimable treasure of so blessed a ministery Would God euerie man could feele Psal 132. how happy a thing it is to dwell as brethren together in the house of God vnder the appointed Pastours of that familie in which onely Goddes favoure is euerlastinglie founde that they might therewith be partakers of all their workes that feare God and might haue some sense and taste of that holy oyntment of Goddes Spirite and gifte of his grace that first was vpon the heade of this householde our Maister Christ Iesus and then dropped downe abundantly to his bearde euen to the very bearde of Aaron whereby as S. Augustin saieth the holy Apostles be signified In Psal 132. and by them it ishued downe to the hemmes of Christes coate and imbrued all the borders of his garmentes that euery one of the felowship might receiue benefite and feele the verdure thereof Quoniam illic mandauit Dominus benedictionem vitam vsque in seculum For in this happy felowship only oure Lorde bestoweth his manifoold blessings and life for euer more Amen Tractatus iste de defensione legitimae potestatis authoritatis sacerdotij in remittendis peccatis de necessitate coÌ„fessionis sacerdoti facieÌ„dae et de indulgentijs lectus excussus approbatus est per viros Anglici idiomatis sacrae Theologie peritissimos vt tutuÌ„ vtile existimem eum praelo committi cuulgari Ita Iudico Cunerus Petri Pastor Sancti Petri Louanij 20. Aprilis Anno. 1567. THE CHIEF CONTENTS OF BOTH THE parts of this Treatise with the Preface ioyntly ALmose purgeth not mortal syns but venial 367. Apostles had power geuen to remitte and punish sinnes 20. 50. The same power ceassed not in the Church by their death 79. 85. Reasons to proue the continuance thereof 81. 95. BAptisme denied by Protestants to remit sinne 146. Bishops are in the Roomes of the Apostles 91. By what scripture they chalenge Iurisdiction 23. 295. Their high state 692. They may graunt pardons 260. 269. They may absolue none but their owne subiects 273. Bishops blessings 275. The lameÌ„tacioÌ„ of the auncieÌ„t ChristiaÌ„s for their banished Bishops Preface Bynding Loosing 196. 286. 288. Caluin and others blasphemous heresies against Christs priesthod 10. Caluinists agree with the Nouatians against the Sacr. of penance 116. Cathari the Heretikes 88. 115. Christ a priest in his humanitie cap. 1. He executeth his priesthod in his Church by maÌ„s minist 82. See Min. ConfessioÌ„ of mortall sinnes to a priest proued necessary 173. 187. 190. 262. It hath beÌ„ vsed in al lawes 168. 213. why it is accoÌ„pted burdenouse 188 The comfort of coÌ„science receiued thereby 249. 160. The euils like to ensue for want thereof 162. Distinct coÌ„fess of secret sins 226. 199 what grouÌ„d it hath in Scripture 195. General coÌ„fessioÌ„ sufficeth not 204. what a general coÌ„fessioÌ„ auail 206. CoÌ„fessioÌ„ could neuer haue beÌ„ established by the power of maÌ„ only 246. It is not grouÌ„ded vpoÌ„ posit law 155. It was vsed before LateraÌ„ Coun. 236 Considerations to remoue the impediments of CoÌ„fession 188. 216. 245. S. Ambrose satte on CoÌ„fessioÌ„s 239. S. Bede sheweth examples of Confession vsed in England 233. PeniteÌ„tiaries appointed See pena Confession necessary before the receiuing of the B. Sacrament 209. DIffereÌ„ce of the Ciuil Magistrat and the minister of a Sacram. 74. 202. Difference of purgingth eleprouâ—e in the old lawe and remitting sinnes in the newe lawe 179. DiffereÌ„ce of Baptisme aÌ„d penauÌ„ce 197 Dissease of our time 238. Effect of sacram is wrought by God 108. See ministery Euchar. 56. 209 ExcoÌ„municatioÌ„ vsed by the Apost 301. The form therof vsed by S. Paul 357. External Sacraments 157. 165. FIguratiue speaches neuer vsed in institution of Sacraments 53. GOD punisheth more for sin because we punish not our selues 324. Grace in two significations 99. Grace ioyned to external elemeÌ„ts 39. HEresie infecteth daungerously eueÌ„ wher she killeth not Preface Hurt that ryseth therby to yowth lb. VVho be in most dauÌ„ger of heresy 113. Heretikes vsurpe vnlaufully Catholiks roomes 96. Heretikes neuer list brag of their auncestours 114. Their practises in corrupting scripture 53. 194. Heretiks deniyng the Sacr. of penaÌ„ce 221. IVrisdiction 167. 291. Exercised by the Apostles 301. Indulgence See Pardon KEies of heauen 65. 70. 266. LIklyhod of the lamentable state to come 163. Loosing See binding MAns ministery ys no derogatioÌ„ to Gods honour 112. 130. 193. The ministery of euil men 98. The work of God and maÌ„ go ioyntly together in sacraments 175. The practise of God for confirmation of mans ministery 182. Master of the sentence his errour 177. Matrimony a Sacrament 57. Ministerie of man euer vsed in remitting of sinnes 5. 165. Contempt therof Pref. 18. 29. 181. Monkes in S. Dionise tyme. 241. NEctarius his fact concerning confession discussed 213. Nouatus described 117. NouatiaÌ„s aÌ„d protestaÌ„s coÌ„pared 150. 289 ORder a Sacrament 57. Grace geuen in the same what yt is 99. Othe required by Nouatus of his adherents 120. PAin due for sinne may remayn after sinne ys remitted 283. Three kindes of punishment for sinne 309. Pardon grace Indulgence 261. Pardon what yt is 281. The true meaning of pardons 277. VVho may graunt them 377. How Luther fumbled at first to deface them 258. How farre the ProtestaÌ„ts haue proceded since 259. Pardons were neuer graunted to remit deadly sinne without the sacrament of Confession 265. Pardons for nombre of daies and yeares howe they arise 306. 336. VVhat pain they remit 315. Howe pardons were termed in the primitiue Church 317. An argument for pardons 306. 318. They be not alwaies beneficial 361. They discharge not men from doing good works 364. VVhat he must doe that hath receiued pardon 367. The ende of pardons 371. Two things in a pardon 391. Moyses and Aaron procured pardoÌ„ Christe gaue pardon 350. S. Paule gaue pardon 359. whether pardons exteÌ„d to purgatory paines 3â—3 Penaunce is a sacramen 150. 184. An argument to proue it 153. Diuerse waies of sacramentall penaunce 156. The necessitie therof Praeface 190. Penaunce appointed not only for cautele but for satisfaction 312. How it standeth with Gods iustice to pardon a man of his deserued penance 395. The comfort of that sacrament 160. Penitentiaries appointed to heare CoÌ„fessions 226. Pope slauÌ„dered for geuing pardoÌ„s 264 He neuer remitteth deadly sinne by pardon only 265. what he forgeueth 294. Power to remit or punish sinne what ground it hath 22. 30. 63. Power geuen to priests that was neuer geuen to Angels 73. Practise of priesthod in remitting sins taken for a ground of faith 45. 1â—2 Priest being but man may remit sinne committed against God 40. The ignorantes reason against priesthod maintened by Caluin 77. Priesthod of the old lawe and newe compared 178. 346. Protestants professe otherwise then they teach secretly 147. Their congregation is barren of all Gods giftes 134. Their selues refuse the right of all holy actions 135. Their practise in corrupting scripture 52. 144. 194. 297. The fruict of their doctrin 186. 207. See Nouantians Purgatorie pain why it is suffred 326. REmission of sinnes ioyned to external Ceremonies in al ages 165 Ordinary remission of deadly sinne after Baptisme is only by the sacrament of confess Prefac 190. Remission of sinne by sacraments is more certen then the woorking of miracles 126. It standeth wel with Gods honour 112. 12â— SAcraments ordeyned for good causes 157. Moe sacraments theÌ„ one instituted for remission of sinnes 152. 27â— Sacramens euer vsed 1â— Ministers of sacram in Schism Prâ— Satisfaction an vsual woord in the doctours 304. Canonical satisfaction 302. Satisfaction of Saints 399. Scripture peruerted in the woords of Sacraments 52. Shame ioyned to sinne by Gods ordinance 248. Remedies for sin after Baptism 222. Mortall sinne howe it is remitted See Remission Venial sin how remitted 206. 274. Spiritual exercises 3â—8 Succession of ministery in the Catholike Church 77. 89. No maÌ„ succedeth God in any fun 1â—6 Christ resigneth his roome but not his right 137. TItles geuen to priesthod 42. Treasure of the Church 407. VNction a sacrament 57. 143. The Protestants glosse against extream vnction dissolued 144. FINIS
A TREATISE MADE IN DEFENCE of the lauful power and authoritie of Prâ—esthod to remitte sinnes Of the peoples duetie for confession of their sinnes to Gods ministers And of the Churches meaning concerning Indulgences commonlie called the Popes PardoÌ„s By William Allen M. of Arte and Student in Diuinitie Iudae 1. Vae illis qui perierunt in contradictione Core Wo be vnto them that perished in the disobedience and contradictioÌ„ of Cores LOVANII Apud Ioannem Foulerum Anno D. 1567. To the Christian Reader I haue bene asked earnestly at sundry times aÌ„d places as most meÌ„ now a dayes be either studious to know or curious to controlle whether a priest beâ—ng but a mortall man myght withoute derogation to Gods soueraigntye and wythout hygh presumption take vpon him to remitte sinnes theÌ„ whether there â—e any necessitie to coÌ„fesse and distinctly vtter al secrette greuous crymes as well of dede as woorde and wyll vnto hym that should be proued to haue power to remitte synnes And lastly whether ther were any good meanyng or sufficient grounde in Scriptures Councelles Doctours or reason of the vsual Indulgences that be limited by remission of yeres and dayes Therefore fully to satisfie suche as moued me first herein to whom I am for â—ust causes merueilously muche beholden and to helpe other whome by the law of ChristiaÌ„ love in suche cases I wil charge my selfe continuallye to serve I haue put in writing the Catholik Churches meaning touching the same maters and made it my laste Lentes woorke I haue not do on it in deed so brieflye aâ— was required at my handes because I caÌ„not with safty froÌ„ the Aduersaries of truth coÌ„ueygh my selfe in so lytle room wheâ— the cause is so large and yet thoughe iâ— seme long perchance it shal not seme tediouse because I haue not only diuided iâ— into chapters where the readers at euery turnynge and ioynt of the cause may rest them selues but also seuered the treatise of pardons from the rest that who so euer doubt not of the other articles before may if they liste reade it alone thoughe for the better vnderstanding of euery peece the wholl myght more profytably be perused to gether whereby the necessary sequele and dependeÌ„ce of truthe may fully be seen as in the sleight coursinge ouer matters it can not wel bâ— doen. Fare well Gentle reader and submitte thy iudgement to the Catholike Churche as most humbly in all poynts I doe myne Faultes in the printing Page Line Fault Correction  19. 20. to the geuen to be geuen put out and in the next line 71. 21. Grerie Gregorie 75. 12. cafes cases 170. 12. none these none of these 174. 16. vvhen vvas vvhen any vvas  175. 11. forgeuen is forgeuenesse  214. 5. publist publik  221. 3. gra grace  266. 9. in this base in this case  295. 13. he vva he vvas  Margent 48. ontempt Contempt REgiae Maiestatis Priuilegio concessum est Guilielmo Alano Anglo Magistro ArtiuÌ„ vt librum inscriptuÌ„ A necessary Doctrine of the office of a Priest c. Per Typographum aliquem iuratum imprimere ac impunè distrahere liceat Datum Bruxellis 26. April 1567. Subsig Prats THE PREFACE CONTEININGE A iuste complaint of the disobedieÌ„ce that now is towardes the spiritual gouernours and of the pitiful lacke of suche necessarie reliefe of our soules as by them wee shoulde haue with the argument of the treatise folowinge BEcause the vniust clayme chaleÌ„ge of any power not geuen doth highly displease God froÌ„ whoÌ„ only al preheminence of maÌ„ procedeth no doubt al priestes and Bishopes who haue so loÌ„g practised pardoning and punishing of sin if they hold not the right of that excelleÌ„t function by Gods own graunt they haue buyld this many hundreth yeares towardes hel can neither auoyde the heauy indignation of God in whose office and prerogatiue they haue vniustly intermedled not yet marueile at their disdayne amoÌ„gest men seing it is sayd Eccl. 20. that the vsurper of power is woorthely hated Qui potestateÌ„ sibi â—umitiniustè odietur But if that most high holy order do by good right reason by the son of God Christ Iesus his own warraÌ„t special coÌ„mission occupy the seate of iudgemeÌ„t erected in the Church for the gouermeÌ„t of our souls neadful search of our secret sins theÌ„ it staÌ„deth lameÌ„tably with the disobedient captayns of this coÌ„teÌ„pt through whose coÌ„tinual call to seditioÌ„ so many haue beÌ„ caried away froÌ„ that obeysaÌ„ce that is due to the soueraing power geueÌ„ to gods aÌ„noited They remember well such is theyr exercise in the woord how the disdayne of Moyses Aarons prelacy ouer the people that theÌ„ God chose to be his peculiar moued his maiestie to so great indignatioÌ„ that he droue downe Core al his coÌ„federacie to the depth of hel both bodie soule theÌ„ selues a lyue al the people looking on their fal so fearful The example had beÌ„ of lesse respect if his heuy hand had stayed vpoÌ„ the principal of that prowde sort but it did not for ther perished by straunge fire of the accessaries to that Schisme two hundreth fiftie moe And the grudge alas of the people not ceassing so God sent fier froÌ„ heaueÌ„ wasted xiiij m. vij c. of theÌ„ at oÌ„ce And al this saith Moyses Vt sciatis quia blasphemauerint Dominum that you may be well assured Iosepus saith that DathaÌ„ aÌ„d Abyron perished at the openinge of the earth aÌ„d Cores by the fier aftervvard amongst those that offered incense Lib. 4. c. 2 Antiq. that they blasphemed oure Lord God So nere dooth the coÌ„tempt of Goddes ministers touche his owne person that in disdaine of the one there is accompt made of most horrible blasphemy of the other This Cores as Ioâ—ephus writeth was a man that had a cast in talke to please the people as the seditious often haue and this was a great flowre of his perswasioÌ„ of the people to seditioÌ„ disobedieÌ„ce as holy writ reporteth Cur eleuamini sup populuÌ„ Domini It is sufficcieÌ„t for our purpose that the whol multitude is sanctified and the Lord is in theÌ„ why do you exalt your selues aboue the people of God Thus said the seditious against Gods priestes theÌ„ now truly both the people the preacher do pipe Cores note of our eleuamini in euery play pulpit neuer hauing in mind their lameÌ„table fal whose steppes they like so wel to folowe Mary I caÌ„ not tel wel whether the cases be coÌ„parable though I nothing doubt but oures is much woorse De sacer lib. â— For. S. Chrysostome sayth that the disobedieÌ„ce of Dathon and the rest of that confederacie rose rather vpon the affectation of so high a function wyth admiration of their dignitie then vpon any contempt of that power in which the priestes of God were placed but the dishonoure and the derogation that now is doen to the much
fal on theÌ„ that must passe this life either not christened or elles fast bounde in sinne And what passing sorowe will it be for their faithfull frendes Of olde the pastours did in times of heresy ofteÌ„ for a sake their flock but novve the floâ—k hath forâ—aken their pastours which shal not haue their company in eternal rest and ioy Thus far sayd he for proof that the Pastoures should not forsake their flock thus say we nowe where the flocke haue forsaken their pastours the lacke is lyke in both But ours is so much woorse because it was procuted willingly theirs the more of excusable because it was both born necessity lamented christianly Neither may we think our selues here much to be relieued by them that pretend the like practise of such thinges as nowe we lack Note For the euer augmented the sorow 〈◊〉 iust dolour of the faithful Much it is God knoweth to want their Pastours priestes so dear with them for most part all the due of Christianity but to susteine in stead therof a kind of apishe imitation of such holy functions which in deed by what pretence of holynes so euer it be vsed is alwayes hath bene accompted most detestable that is the great calamity which wasteth most in al tempesteous times of Gods religioÌ„ For the only vse acquaintance familiarity of this false face or resemblance of trueth holy actions of the Church driueth many into a kind of conteÌ„tacioÌ„ rest in such things as theÌ„selues other wise do abhor or at least turneth away their earnest appetite desire of those matters Ther is no necessitie that should driue any man to take any sacrameÌ„t at an he retikes hande sauing only tâ—e sacraments of baptisme and penaunce and that not vvithoute necessitie vhhich only is in present peril of death which no maÌ„ caÌ„ without peril of damnation misse It is not yet ment hereby that euery sacrament is frustrat alwayes that be by such made or ministred although for moste they be so profaned that they be not onely nothing beneficial but also damnable both to the geuer receiuer but my meaning is that eueÌ„ those sacrameÌ„ts which be of necessity that by Gods special mercy thei may be receiued of such as be not otherwise coÌ„petent ministers where the present peril of any mans life forceth therevnto that eueÌ„ then wheÌ„ they may be beneficiall to other that without schism cal for the sacrameÌ„ts yet they shal be daÌ„nable vnto theÌ„selues For hereof let euery maÌ„ be bold that taketh vpoÌ„ him any ministery in scism disorder that so ofteÌ„ as he hath practised it so often hath he prouoked Gods ire towardes himself procured as much â—s in him lyeth his indignation to al ytâ—re partakers therof S. Basil the great â—omplaineth hereof very much in his â—ayes by these wordes Epist 70. in the doctrine of impiety aÌ„d wickednes the churches babes be now brought vp For how caÌ„â—t be otherwise Baptisme is ministered â—y heretikes they helpe forth such as passe hence they kepe visitation of the sicke they haue comfortinge of the soâ—owful they take on them the ease of such as be burdeyned in all cases and to be short The hurt of heresie to youth they minister the mysteries of holy communioÌ„ so that in time though the libertie of Christes religioÌ„ be restored againe the youth shal take such likinge in heretikes practises to whom by loue and custome they are so fast knit that it will be hard to reduce theÌ„ home to truth againe Thus farre spake S. Basil of his dayes and right good cause haue we no lesse to coÌ„playne of ours They were thaÌ„ incumbred with Arians and we with a legioÌ„ of newe deuises and bold practisioners of such high heaueÌ„ly functioÌ„s as neither by God nor maÌ„ they are rightly orderly called vnto The benefit that vve receiue by our nevv ministers By these nowe only our soules seme to liue but by these alone we surely dye euerlastingly In al which great desolation of Christian coÌ„fort all spiritual functioÌ„s this were some solace if eyther the older sort could coÌ„sider what they haue lost or the poore children which are nurced in these novelties might learne what they lacked The Author intent in this bookâ— My meaninge is therfore to moue al partyes to the necessary care heed of the matter by the treatise folowing trusting that some one or other of my good brethren who all be to me most deare will awake at my earnest call and consider of the matter deapely howe it fareth wyth him and other touchinge theyr soules since the sacrament of penance hath bene banished and the priesthood of Gods Church spoyled of iuridictioÌ„ right in remission of sins to help him in so necessarie fructeful aduise of him selfâ— other whoÌ„ in such cases I meane always to serue I wil seek out the grouÌ„d of this authority that hath bene so longe practised of the priest honoured of the people to the singular glory of God the notorious encrease of vertue weale publik of the whole Christian world that both the good catholike may haue reasonable prouf of the which to his immortal weal he hath so loÌ„g both loued reuereÌ„ced in Christes ministers also the coÌ„teÌ„ners of so heaueÌ„ly power may learne in huÌ„blenes of hart to like feare that excelleÌ„t functioÌ„ which by pride they did before vnaduisedly disproue If it may please any man that is doubtful of this article which is so necessari to be knoweÌ„ to consider giue good atteÌ„dance to the whole course of my talk I promise him as afore God who wil sharpli iudge al sinister endeuours in causes of his honour that I wil deal sincerly in al poynts faythfully I wil not couer my selfe nor the light of the cause in cloud of words neither by any artificial sleight as new doctours now a daies ofteÌ„ doo circuÌ„ueÌ„t the sense of him that is most simple such indiffereÌ„cy shal be vsed euery where in trial of the truth that I wil seme for his sak to doubt of the matter my selfe Though in deede so God saue me in my commoÌ„ sense so god speare me for my sinnes I can neuer mistrust any poynt of that fayth in which I was newe borne and baptised But that notwith standing I wil not spare to rippe vppe that which men most reproue in Goddes Church and ministers that all the disobedient children may see howe free they be froÌ„ falshood farre froÌ„ the beguiling the flock of Christe to them coÌ„mited to kepe we will cal the high magistrates though yt be exceding vnsemely for subiectes to accoÌ„pt of their gouernmeÌ„t the principall pastour must giue a reason of his pardons awnswer for the limitatioÌ„ of his indulgences by yeares dayes and tymes both he and all other Bishops shal be accomptable for such graue censures exercised vpoÌ„ mens soules wyth them
all inferiours priestes must be posed for searchinge the secretes of our coÌ„sciences for releassing maÌ„s misdedes eÌ„ioyning penance requiring satisfactioÌ„ for syns Thus bold wil we be with trueth the rather therby to deface falshod And al this in that order that may in lest roome conteyne most matter wyth both breuity light so much as so depe large a cause caÌ„ beare froÌ„ al coÌ„tentioÌ„ I will so far refrayn that eueÌ„ the aduersaries them selues of Christes trueth and doctrine albeit they be persons infamous by lawe consent of all natâ—oÌ„s shall not yet without meane resonable moderatioÌ„ be touched or talked of requiring of them this curtesie againe that they reprehend nothing in this discourse pryuilie which they can not nor dare not awnswer to opeÌ„ly A reasonable request And of my louing brethreÌ„ that be Catholike I must farder require one thing the sute is for theÌ„ selues that when in a maner they sensibly feele the truth they would not refuse to folowe the same that by outeward worke they may declare theire inward wil. Herof I am now more careful for that I see heresy falshood to be of the couÌ„tenaÌ„ce colour that it is ofteÌ„ liked before yt be beleued wher gods trueth for terrour bitternes that it beareth is not always folowed wher it is wel knowen trusted But surely trueth is not profitably vnderstanded til it be willingly practised Therefore who soeuer acknowledged in his coÌ„science the power of Gods Church ministery for the remission of sinnes vseth not humbly coÌ„fession of his sinnes that that power may redound to his saluatioÌ„ he is so much farder from God by how much more he knoweth the right way to come to God Mans wil must in al such cases of terror difficultie geue ouer to Gods ordinaÌ„ce whose coÌ„maÌ„dementes though they seme to the worldly burdenous yet to the good ghostlie De doctrina Christiana Cap. 41. paucis amaÌ„tiâ—us sayth S. Augustin they are sweet and exceding pleasant And this let euerie maÌ„ assuredly know that who soeuer coÌ„pteth confession so heauy he neither feeleth the weight of sinne nor yet sufficieÌ„tly feareth the appoynted payn for the same Al these vntowardly affections the sinne and the worlde haue planted in vs all lette vs seke by loue and zeale of Gods truth and ordinance to amend ioyne with me gentle Reader I besech thee in prayers that our endeuours may please God profite his people THE FIRST part of this Treatise of the lauful power and authoritie of Priesthode to remit sinnes and of the distinct confession of sinnes to a Priest That Christ did forgeue sinnes not onely by proper power and nature as he was God but also by ministerie as he was a man and as he was a Priest and head of the Church and that vpoÌ„ that grouÌ„d the Priests power in remitting sinnes in the Church doth stand The first Chapter CHrist Iesus the Sonne of the liuing God being euerlastinglie of the same substance power and nature that his Father and â—he holy Ghost be of as being truelie â—quall and one God with them both woorketh mightelie al things in heaueÌ„â—nd in earth ioyntlie with them both and therefore by excellencie of power propertie of nature and by ful and perfect dominion ouer his owne creature he remitteth mans sinnes by the same soueraigne right that they doe Who being thus in al excellencie equal with God hath notwithstaÌ„ding vouchsafed of his singular bountifulnesse ioyned with maruelous humility Ad Philip 2. to abase him selfe to the receiuing of our nature in which now he hath wrought the same things in earth by seruice sute and commission which before he onelie did by might and maiestie of his owne power procure Euen the self same God that by wil and coÌ„maundement might moste iustlie both haue punisshed and pardoned whoÌ„ he list of loue and wisdome infinite continuing alwaies in like excellencie as before became the minister of our reconcilement to God In which state he offereth sacrifice as a Priest for sinne he vseth sacraments for the remission of sinne he prayed to God his Father for the sinfull he is made the head of the Churche the gouernour of the Churche and the iudge of the Church Al which functions perteine to our Sauiour in respect and coÌ„sideration of his humaine nature according vnto whiche power is geuen him of the Father through the holie Ghost to practise the same And what so euer in holy scripture is red to be exercised of him through the might of Gods Spirit by the vertue of his annointing by the finger of God by the sending of the Father by power receiued from aboue by priesthod prayers or sacrifice by the name of the Sonne of man of the head of the Churche or iudge of the liuing dead what so euer is in this sorte said to be done it is not otherwise lightly ment but in respect of Christes humanitie by whiche and in which he woorketh the same not as by the propre and natural power or force thereof but as by iurisdiction receiued of the blessed Trinitie and imployed vpon the sonne of man for the procuring of saluation to his people wherof he is become in our very nature the head Therefore no Christian man may doubt Note vvel the grouÌ„d of the cause but as our Sauiour by the omnipotent power of his Godhead might and did forgeue sinnes to the penitent so likewise that as he was Priest and the sonne of man he might by the right of his office vnction and ministery in the vertue of the holie Ghost remitte sinnes also And for that cause principallie in the Prophet Esay it is said Cap. 61. Spiritus Domini super me eò quòd vnxerit me ad annunciandum mansuetis misit me vt mederer contritis corde praedicareÌ„ captiuis indulgentiam clausis apertionem The Spirit of the Lord vpon me because he hath annointed mee and sent mee to signifie vnto the meeke that I should heal the coÌ„trite in hart to preach pardon to the prisoners and freedome to the closed Luc. 4. The which place of the prophet our Sauiour applied vnto himself in the Churche of Nazareth and is to be vnderstaÌ„ded only of preaching Cap 11. 12. li. 1. de Trinit and pardoning by the holie vnction of the Spirit of God his Fathers calling And therfore it must needs according to S. Augustines iudgement concerne the shape of his seruice manhod takeÌ„ on him in which he preached so that yet it pleased him to affirm that his doctrin was not his own but his Fathers that sent him healed the coÌ„trite in hart which is nothing els but to forgeue sinnes to the penitent after such a sort that it might wel appere to be receued practised by the vnction of the Spirit of God sending of his Father wherby the Son of man might doe that as Gods minister in his manhoode
can be no default who was well able to geue and in deede did giue the holie Ghost In the holie Ghoste there can be no lette nor lacke whose power is infinite and his verie propriety to remitte sinnes Al things then standing on so safe and sure groundes the giuer the gift and the receiuer competent and fullie answerable eche to other on euery side let the disconteÌ„ted ioyne in argument let him alledge why the Priest so authorised by Christe and so assured of the holie Ghost may not either pardon or geue penance Neuer man auouched that he exercised the high actioÌ„ vpoÌ„ his own authoritie but that he may not as a minister and seruaunt practise it vppon the warrant of Christ present power of the holy Ghost that no faithful person can affirm nor any reasonable man stand in Some holy writers vpon this text of S. Iohn in which the order of Christes authorishing his Apostles for the remissioÌ„ of sinnes is described do dispute of the differeÌ„ce of geuing the holy ghost then to his Disciples afterwarde on whitsonday some note the external ceremonie that our Maister vsed when he gaue them the holy Spirite whiche was by breathing on them that suche outwarde actions might bothe be an euidence to them of that excellent gift which they inwardlie then receued Grace ioined to external elements aÌ„d vvhy and should further be an euerlasting instruction to the Church that Gods grace gifts be ofteÌ„ ioyned to external elemeÌ„ts for the solace of our nature that deliteth to haue our outward man schooled as well as the inward man nourished These and many things moe be of profitable remembrance and consideratioÌ„ but not so much to our purpose Therfore let vs see whether the iudgement of the holy Fathers do not wholy help our present cause by prouing the Priests ministerie through the holy Ghostes authoritie that our declaration staÌ„ding on the plaine wordes of scripture with their vndoubted sense may obtein inuincible force against the aduersaries and woorthy credite of the true beleuers Hovv Priestes being but men mâ—ie remitte sinnes coÌ„mitted agaiÌ„st God We wil make our entrance first with S. Cyril who debating with himselfe vpon the incomparable authoritie and power geuen to the Apostles for remission of sinnes standeth first as in contention with him self and with Christes wordes how it may be that they being but meÌ„ shuld forgeue the sinnes of our soules being sure of this that it is the proprety only of the true and liuing God to assoile vs of our sinnes against whom only al sinnes be proprely committed And therefore being not of stomake as men be now a daies to deny that which Christes wordes so plainly doe import he made answere that the Apostles were in deed deified made as you would say partakers of Gods nature to woorke Gods own office in the world Cap. 5â— lib 12. In Ioan. interpre TrapezuÌ„ Qua igitur ratione saith he diuinae naturae dignitatem ac potestatem discipulis suis saluator largitus est Quia certè absurdum non est pecâ—ata remitti posse ab illis qui spiritum Sanctum in seipsis habeant Nam cùm ipsi remmittunt aut detinent spiritus qui habitat in eis remittit detinet By what meanes did our Sauiour giue vnto the Apostles the preheminence power of Gods own nature Surely because it agreeth very well that they should remit mans sinnes that haue in them selues the holy Ghost For when they assoyle or reteine sinnes it is the holy Spirit that dwelleth in them whiche by their ministerie doth remitte or reteine sinnes Thus he I marueil not nowe Lib. 6. cont Iul. why this same Father termeth the Apostles somtimes Protectores curatores animaruÌ„ corporuÌ„ Titles geuen to priesthod the protectours and curers both of bodies and soules it is not straÌ„ge why S. Ambrose should cal the whole order of priesthod OrdineÌ„ deificuÌ„ De Sacerdot Neither that he should terme officiuÌ„ Sacerdotis munus spiritus Sancti The Priestes office to be the function of the holy Ghost No I doe not wonder at some of our forefathers that in the admiration of Gods Maiestie which they saw to be so present in the execution of so high an office they did simplie and plainlie terme the principall Pastours of the Churche halfe Gods and not mere men not hauing respect to their persons whiche be compassed with in firmities as other the sinfull sort of people in the worlde be but casting eye vpwarde to the holie and excellent functions whiche they practised by the spirite of God which dwelleth in them and deifieth their persoÌ„s to make them of habilitie to exercise the works of God But S. Ambrose helpeth our matter with a long discourse al I wil not now report for the present purpose thus he saith disputing against the NouatiaÌ„s for the assertioÌ„ of priestlie dignity inassoyling our sinnes Qui SpirituÌ„ sanctuÌ„ accipit sol uëdi pecâ—aâ—a potestateÌ„ et ligandi accipit Cap. 2. li. 1 De Poen sic eniÌ„ scriptuÌ„ est Accipite Spiritum sanctuÌ„ quoruÌ„ remiseritis peccata remittuÌ„tur eis quoruÌ„ retinueritis reteÌ„ta sunt Ergo ê™ soluere peccatuÌ„ non potest non habet SpirituÌ„ sanctuÌ„ Munus spiritus sancti est officium sacerdotis ius autem spiritus sancti in soluendis ligandisque criminibus est He that receiueth the holy Ghoste hâ—â— meaning is in the taking of orders receiueth therewith the power to bind loose For so is it writen Receiue you the holy Ghost whose sinnes you do forgeue they are forgeueÌ„ them whose sinnes you do reteine they are reteined Therefore they which can not forgeue meÌ„s offeÌ„ces thei haue not the holy ghost that is to say thei haue not the gift of the holy ghost which is geueÌ„ to the officers for th executioÌ„ of their functioÌ„ in Christes behalfe for the gift of the holy Ghost is the office of the Priest the proper right of remission of sinnes staÌ„deth in the holy Ghost Thus wrote S. Ambrose against the heretikes of his time both toucheth and ouercoÌ„meth all the falshode of our daies against the ministerie of man which so ioyneth with Gods Spirit in al these diuine functions that it can not without blasphemie and special contempt of God be contemned Contra Pelagianos Manichaeos Donatistas passim But I remember S. Augustine the Churches great Capitaine against her aduersaries of those daies did euer in disputation against the Pelagians and other like ennemies of faith make the greatest accompt of victorie and their ouerthrow when they were driuen to denie that which euer before had bene not onlie acknowledged of al men for truth but also had ben vsed as a grauÌ„ted truth ground and principle for the notable euidence thereof to the impugning of other falsehodes For there can be no doubt but that whiche our holy Fathers did vse without controling and contradiction euen
of their aduersaries to impugne their Aduersaries withall there is no doubte but that it hath in it selfe exceding muche light and force of truth as a thing hauing so litle need of proofe that it may be made and taken for a probation of other matters that be doubtefull and vncertaine Practise of priesthod in remitting sin vsed for a grouÌ„d of faith in argumeÌ„t The matter which we haue now in hand is of that sort For the authoritie and power practised of Priests in the vertue of the holy Ghoste hath euer ben in it self both so plaine and so firme that the holy Fathers haue vsed it as a ground to proue against heretikes of Eunomius and Macedonius secte the Godhead of the holy Ghost the third person in Trinitie S. Bernard is to yong good man to name amongest these old fathers of our new Church els perdie with the vertuous his words souÌ„d ful sweetly Thus saith he to proue the equalitie of the holy Ghoste with the Father and Sonne Sicut in nobis interpellat pro nobis Serm. 1. Pentec it a in patre delicta donat cum ipso patre vt omnino scias quòd remissionem peccatoruÌ„ spiritus sanctus operatur Audi quod aliquando audierunt Apostoli Accipite spiritum sanctum quorum remiseritis peccata remittuntur eis In English thus Like as in vs he maketh sure for vs so in the Father he pardoneth sinnes with the Father and that thou maist vnderstande that the holy Ghost worketh remissioÌ„ of sinnes heare that which the Apostles once heard receiue you the holy Ghost whose sinnes you doe forgeue thei are forgeuen Thus he And S. Ambrose his auncient to proue the holy Ghost to be God allegeth that he remitteth sinnes by the Priests ministerie which he could not in anie wise doe if he were not in al points equal and omnipoteÌ„t God with the Father and Sonne Let vs see saith he whether the holy Ghost doth pardon sinnes and he answereth himself thus Sed hinc dubitari non potest Lib. 3. de Spirit S. Cap. 19. cum ipse Dominus dixerit accipite spiritum sanctum quorum remiseritis peccata remittuntur ecce quia per spiritum sanctum peccata donantur homines autem in remissionem peccatoris ministerium suum exhibent non ius alicuius potestatis exercent It is thus much to say There can be no doubt hereof seing our Lord said receiue you the holy Ghost whose sinnes you doe forgeue they shal be forgeuen loke ye that by the holy Ghost sinnes be forgeuen men doe but exercise their seruice and ministerie and claime not the right of power and principalitie therein And S. Basill vppon this assured ground frameth in ful fourme against Eunomius this argument Lib. 5. Dominus sanctis Apostolis insufflans inquit accipite spiritum sanctum quorumcunque dimittetis peccata dimittentur eis si ergo nullius est peccata dimittere nisi solius Dei dimittit autem spiritus sanctus per Apostolos Deus ergo spiritus sanctus Our Lord breathing on the Apostles said take ye the holy Ghost for whose sinnes so euer you shal pardon they be pardoned therefore if it be the oÌ„ly property of God to forgeue sinnes and the holy Ghost so doth by the Apostles Ergo the holy Ghost is truelie God Thus you perceiue that the ground of this our faith and assertion was of olde accompted so sure that it was a singular aide and fortresse of faithe against the vnfaythfull attemptes of moste wicked persons in diuerse ages The onelie practise that Priestes did vse by the Sacramente of penance to pardonne sinnes was a full proofe that the holy Ghost was God by whose authoritie and propre power they did alwaies since Christes word was spoken remitte the same The which being true as it can not be false that is so agreeable both to scriptures and to all our Fathers faith the Heresie of our time must needs directly impugne the vertue and power of Gods own spirit For as the proofe of mans ministery in this foresaid function induceth the true and euerlasting Godhead of the holie Ghost by whom they practise that power so the denial thereof and robery of Priesthoode of this their moste iust claime doth directly spoile God of his honour and of the euerlasting right that he hath in remission of sinnes oÌ„temp of mans ministeri is conteÌ„pt of Gods authoritie So whiles these good men seeke to abase man vniustlie they blaspheame God highly and together with mans ministerie they bring vnto vtter contempte Gods owne authoritie But for the Readers case and more light of our cause I ioyne thus in argument with them againe vppon the second parte of Christes own woordes and action had in the authorising of his Apostles what soeuer the holie Ghost maye doe in this case by the proper power of his Godhead that maye the Apostles and priestes doo by seruice ministerie throughe the power of the holie Ghost but the holie Ghost properly rightly doth remitt sinnes therfore the Apostles doe rightly and truely remitt sinnes by their ministerie in the said holie Ghost All partes of this conclusion stande vppright and feare no falshod they be guarded on euery side by Christes action by woordes of scripture by the doctours plaine warrant and by al reason with all which whosoeuer is not contented but wil needes extinguere spiritum extinguish Goddes spirite 1. Thes 5. and violently take from the Church the greatest comfort of all mans life that in this infirmitie of our flesh standeth in moste hope by his gifte in remission of sinnes for which especiall cause the said spirite was mercifullie breathed vpon the Apostles peculiarly before the more common sending of the same from heauen aboue if al this reason and iust demonstration of trueth wil not serue them I wil chardge them with this graue coÌ„clusioÌ„ of S. Augustine vttered partly agaynst the Nouatians especially against the desperate that would not seeke for Gods mercie by the Churches ministerie in the sacrameÌ„t of penaunce To be brief I wil speake it in English Cap. â—3 Enchir. who so euer he be that beleueth not mans sinnes to be remitted in Goddes Church and therfore despiseth the bouÌ„tifullnes of God in so mightie a work if he in that obstinat mind coÌ„tinue til his liues end he is giltie of sinne against the holie Ghoste in which holy Ghost Châ—ist remitteth sinnes The power to remitte sinnes is further proued to be giuen to the Apostles by these woordes of Christ Whose sinnes you doo forgiue cet by the doctours exposition of the same and by conference of other woordes of scripture of the like sense The Fourh Chap. HOwe the priestes of Christes Churche haue defended their right and calling for remission of sinnes as wel by the commission that Christe firste receyued of his Father afterward bestowed vpon them as by the assured receiuing of the spirite of God from Christes blessed breath
men make of the Apostles spirite woorde and writing that they haue cōdemned the whole vse therof as superstitious Holy Orders not helping thē selfes by figures but by opē force Grace is giuen to Timothy as in a sacrament when he tooke orders of Paule 1. Tim. 4 the Apostle sayeth so much in expresse termes yet this grace and the whole sacrament of Orders these holy men reiecte Matrimonie Matrimonie to S. Paule is a great sacrament of oure ministers not misliked so farre as concerneth their fleshly coniunctiō which they onely lust after Ephes 5. but grace they list not receiue thereby least it should be a sacrament wherby the vnitie of Christ and his spouse the Church which in no sauce they can abide might be fullie represented and signified These felowes therfore that dare be so bold to disturbe al the orders and sacramentes of Goddes Church and to mainteine their phantasies dare brast the sacred bandes of expresse scriptures in such poyntes as doo directly touche the whole policie of oure Christian common wealth and ordered wayes of oure saluation euen in those which Christ moste carefully left to be practised for the vse of his louinge flocke by the warrant of woordes moste playne what shal wee saye to such bolde and impudent faces that thus dare doo and yet which I more merueyl at in this their vncurtesie and moste vnhonest dealing will not sticke to crie and call vpon Goddes woorde as thoughe they did that by scripture the contrarie whereof they expressly find in scripture And truely where they be not holpen by the verie woordes vaine it shall be for them to stand with vs and with all oure Fathers and with the practise of al nations and with the verie expresse iudgment of the Church of God it shal not boote them I say in their dark ignorance and infinitie pride to stand with vs hauing so many helpes for the true meaning and the expresse text of the woorde for oure selues and side Sometymes where it maie appeare that the woordes and outwarde face of scripture serue not oure assertions so playnly as the holy traditions of Christes Church doo there they cal vpō vs with infinite clamoures to abide the iudgment of the woorde which they would be thought to esteme aboue al mans meaning But whither wil they now runne thincke you where al oure sacramētes stand vpō euident woordes more thē woordes vpon the verie expresse notorious actiō of Christ him selfe all instituted sincerly to be practised of the Churce after his departure hēce al cōmended in knowen termes of greatest most efficacie that could be not by way of preaching in which he vsed sometyme figures not at suche tyme as he vsed other then common knowen speach but after his resurrection when he now vttered no more parables as he did before Matt. 13. Marc. 4. that suche as sawe should not see and such as were of vnderstanding might not vnderstand but did open vnto his dearest their senses that they might vnderstand scriptures and more carefully expressed his meaning for the instruction of his holy Disciples to the better bearing of that charge which he ment to leaue them in after his departure whither wil these men I say where they see al thinges so enuironed with trueth whither wil they flye The scriptures be playnly ours the doctours thei dare not claime reason is against them ther is then no waye to beare it oute but with boldnesse and exercised audacitie Yet here we wil assaye by the notorious euidence of this one cause that we now haue in hande to breake their stonie hartes to the obedience of Christes Church and woorde for whose faith if they haue seen great light and force of argument allready and shall yet see much more I truste they will not still withstande the knowen trueth Al woordes then of institution of sacramentes being literaly to be taken thinges of so great charge not otherwise to be vnderstanded then are both by act and woord of Christe sincerely vttered we neede not doubt but the fourme of Christes sentence in which he giueth the Apostles power to remitt sinnes is plainely to be taken in that common sense as the same by woordes importeth and therefore that by force thereof they maye remitte sinnes And yet to make more proofe to satisfie all men I wil ioyne to these woordes of oure Sauioure that most properly concerne the sacramente of penaunce other his woordes touching oure principall conclusion not vnlike wherby in cōferēce of the like sainges together which our Aduersaries doe alwayes as they would seeme wel to allow trueth may trie it selfe Therefore as our Maister here saieth vnto them whose sinnes you shal forgiue they be forgiuē And whose sinnes you reteine they be also reteined euen so said he twice before vnto the Apostles expressing in other woordes almoste the same meaning and sense once to them altogether in the xviij of S. Matthew an other tyme before that in the xvi of the same Gospel to S. Pecer alone To them in general thus saith Christ If thy brother haue committed any offence towards thee go to him and admonish him priuately betwixt him and thy selfe If he take it wel thou hast then wonne thy brother if he regarde thee not take one or twoo with thee that in the mouthes of two or three wittnesses euerie vvoord may stande if he regarde not them neither then make complainte of him to the Churche that is to saye as S. Chrysostome expoundeth it Super hūc locū to the Gouernours of the Churche and if he will not obeye the Church thē take him for no better thē a Heathē and a Publicā And streight vpon these woordes De fide operib cap. 3. least any mā should sette light by the Churche or rulers thereof Christ added sayth S. Augustine a wonderfull terrour of her seuere authoritie saing Amen dico vobis quaecunque alligaueritis super terram erunt ligata in coelo quaecunque solueritis super terram erunt soluta in coelo surely I saye vnto you what thinges soeuer you binde in earth it shal be bounde in heauen And what soeuer you loose in earth it shal be loosed in heauen This text is cleare for the Churches claime in remission of sinnes thoughe it properlie perteine rather to the outwarde power iudiciarie and courte of external iudgment for open crimes and notorious contemptes then for the sinnes of the people that be secrette and onely subiect to power practised in the sacrament of penaunce which nowe lightly is closse and onely vttered in secret to him that hath charge of his soule Neuer the lesse if the priestes of God haue receiued power to loose and bynde which is to pardon and punishe open notorious crimes and contemptes whiche towchinge the giltinesse of the faulte doth no lesse perteine to the proper power of God then the absoluinge of secrette sinnes doth then without question they
Apostles Ergo the same remaineth stil in Gods church WhervpoÌ„ it is clear that the Priests at this day haue as ful power to forgeue sins as the Apostles had And this ArgumeÌ„t of the coÌ„tinuance of al offices rights of the Churche is the most plainest rediest way not only to help our cause now takeÌ„ in haÌ„d but vtterly to improue al false doctrines detestable practises of heretikes A certain truth to ouercom falsehod by For thei must here be examined diligeÌ„tly what coÌ„mon welth that is or what church that is in which Christ doth preserue the gouernmeÌ„t geueÌ„ to the Apostles Where it is that the power not only of making but also of practising al Sacraments hath coÌ„tinued stil What company of ChristiaÌ„ people that is wherin the Apostles Doctors preachers ministers through the perpetual assistaÌ„ce of Gods Spirit be continued for the building vp of Christes bodie which is the number of faithful people What Church that is whiche bringeth foorth from time to time sonnes to occupie the roomes of their fathers before them It is not good Reader the pelting pack of Protestants It is not I say and they know it is not their petie congregations that hath till this daie continued the succession of Bishops by whom the world as S. Augustin saith is ruled as by the Apostles and firste Fathers of our Religion Surely our Mother the Churche hath ben long baren if for her Fathers the Apostles who died so long since shee neuer brought foorth children til now to occupie their roomes and great lack of rulers if shee haue made her only contemners to be her owne gouernours No no these fellowes hold not by her but they hold against her Esai 1. Heretiques vsurp vnlaufully Catholiques roomes these sitte in no seat Apostolike but they by all force dishonour the seat Apostolike these are not they qui pro patribus nati sunt tibi filij but these are the sonnes quos enutriuisti genuisti ipsi spreuerunt te If you ask of these men how they holde they seeke no Fathers after whome they maye rightly rule they seke no large rew of predecessours in whose places they may sit they aske no counsel of Gods Church by whose calling they should gouerne but they make a long discourse of statutes and teÌ„poral lawes to couer their ambitious vsurpatioÌ„ that in greate lacke of Christes calling their vniuste honour may be approued by mans fauoure Therby let them holde their teÌ„poral dignities their landes their lyuelyhodes their wiues also if they can obteine so much at the common wealthes handes but their spiritual functions their ministering of sacraments their gouernaunce of oure soules and what elles so euer they vsurpe without the warrant of Goddes Church the longer they exercise them the farther they be from saluation and the nerer to eternall woe miserie But to come to our purpose it is our Church Catholike in which all holy functions haue bene practised after Christes institution euer since his AsceÌ„sion vp to heaueÌ„ And therfore this principal power of remitting and reteining sinnes muste needes be continued in the Church by her ministers and priestes as it was begonne in the Apostles before An answer to suche as deny this power to passe from the Apostles to all other priestes because many of them being euel men may be thought not to haue the holy Ghost whereby they should effectually remit sinnes The Sixth Chap. AND to Caluin or other of his secte that require the like vertue force of the holy Ghostes assistaunce in al men that take vpon them to remitte sinnes as was giuen to the Apostles who firste receiued that power I aunswer that the same gifte of the holy Ghoste is yet in the ministers of the same Sacrament no lesse then in the Apostles For thoughe they had more plentiful sanctification whereby they were in all their life more holie and more vertuous then lightly any other eyther priestes or lay men were after them yet the giftes of the holy Ghost touching the ministerie and seruice of Goddes Church which were not so muche geueÌ„ them for their owne sakes as for the vse of the common wealth and for the right of practising certayne holy functions requisite for the peoples sanctification as they were imployed vpon them so they were also giuen to diuers that were neyther good nor vertuous and therfore lacked that which properly is that grace of the holy Ghost that is called of our schoole men gratia gratum facieÌ„s such a grace as maketh man acceptable to God Therefore the holy Ghost breathed vpon the Apostles then by Christ and giuen yet to priestes in their ordering by Bishopes is a gifte of God and a grace of the holy Ghost not whereby euery man is made vertuous Grace geueÌ„ in the sacrameÌ„t of Order vvhat ye ys or conning or happy before God but it is a gifte onely of God whereby man is called aboue his owne nature and dignitie to haue power and authoritie to doo and exercise any function in Goddes Church to the spiritual benefite of the people which is not onely not alwayes ioyned to vertue and holy knowledge but is ful often by calling due to them which are most wicked persons without any impaire of their authoritie And these kind of giftes and graces of the holy Ghost be called graâ—iae gratis datae certayne giftes giuen to men for no desertes of their persons but freely for the vse of other men to whome they be beneficial euen there where they be hurteful to the bestowers In which sense S. Paul numbreth a greate sorte the fourth to the Ephesians Eph. 4. Cap. 12. and the first Epistle to the Corinthians and he calleth theÌ„ not onely the graces of the spirite but also the diuisioÌ„s of functions and ministratioÌ„s as the gifte of working miracles the gifte of tunges the gift of prophecieÌ„g the gifte of preaching and so furth all which being the giftes and graces of the spirit for the Churches edifiyng Cap. 2. and of S. Peter being called the holy Ghost in the Actes yet they were giuen to euil men often as well as to good without al impairing of Goddes honour yea with the greate encrease of Goddes glory that euen by the wicked is able to woorke his wil and holy purpose for the benifite of his elect And in this sense the spirite of God breathed vpon the Apostles was a gift of the holy Ghost whereby man should remitte by lauful power of God the sinnes of the people Whervpon Theophilact sayeth that In 20. Cap. IoaÌ„ potestatem quandam donum spirituale dedit Apostolis vt remittant peccata ostendens quod genus spiritualium donorum eis dederit inquit quorum remiseritis peccata remittuntur eis that is to say Christ gaue to his Apostles a certayne povver and spirituall gift vvherby they might remitte sinnes For he shevved what power of the spirite it was that he breathed on them when he
sayd whose sinnes you doo forgiue they be forgiuen If our Aduersaries be ignorant of these thinges which be so common in schooles of diuinitie yet me think they shoulde remember that S. Paule did not dissalowe the authority nor power of preaching in such as were euil men Philip 1. and taught for emulatioÌ„ and not of sincere zeale of the Gospel and that Christ him selfe stopped not suche as caste oute diuelles in his name and therfore were not without the gifte of woorkinge miracles Matt. 7. thoughe he professed that many of them at the day of iudgment chalenging some right of heauen vpon that acte shoulde not be receiued to glorie and howe the gifte of prophecie was common in the olde testameÌ„t not onely to the wicked but to suche as willingly woulde deceiue the people Ioan. 11. And Caiphas he prophecied by the Spirite of God as by force of his office being yet in purpose to woorke wickednesse against Christ him selfe for whose trueth he then by force of the spirite prophecied But of the Sacramentes of Goddes Church euery one that they may be ministred beneficially to the receiuing in much wickednes of the giuer God vvorketh the good effect of sacrameÌ„tes euen by euill meÌ„ there is no man can be ignorant For it is a rule and a principle moste certen that God woorketh his will in them by the ministerie of men bee they neuer so euell For elles they were mannes sacramentes and not Gods And we coulde not be certen neither of oure Baptisme neither of right receauing of Christes bodie in the holy Sacrament of his aultar nor of any other spiritual benefite that we now by mannes ministery receiue in the Churche Muche comfort it were for all Christian people to haue suche gouernours ouer their soules and suche disposâ—rs of Goddes mysteries as woulde and coulde in all sinceritie and faithfulnes woorcke Goddes woorcke and that woulde alwayes vse the highe power giuen vnto them to edifie and neuer to destroye and that they so woulde doe 1. Petri 4. both S. Peter and S. Paule doe often exhorte them But neither the miserie of mans sinfull nature can suffer that nor oure wickednesse can deserue so muche Galat. 2. S. Peter him selfe was reprehensible in his gouernement therefore lette vs not marueile that other which be not of so full spirite as he was either may committe thinges worthy of reprehension amongest the good or subiecte to the malicious slaunder of the euill And surely for our matter being of suche importaunce Priestes had nede to be careful in their office priestes had neede most carefullie to studie how to practise so high a function which is so proper to Goddes owne iudgment and heauenly courte For thoughe by Christe they haue vndoubtedly recieued commission power in the vertue of the holy Ghost when they tooke holy orders to forgiue and remit sinnes yet cursed be they by Goddes owne mouth if they doe it eyther negligently because it is the worke of oure Lorde or with affectation of pride Pharisaical dominioÌ„ as though they were Lordes of the Sacramentes and Christian religion Ierom. in â—6 Matt. and not ministers or seruitours of Christe in his Churche Wherof it semed that S. Ierome in his dayes had some cause to coÌ„playne nothing reprouing their authoritie but correcting the abuse of their authoritie PenauÌ„ce in those dayes was giuen greater then the fault required or remissioÌ„ of sinnes was so hardly obteyned that it semed to S. Iereme that their austeritie grew to some spice of Pharisaical regiment Matt. 23. that woulde lay importable burdens on other mens neckes and not touche any at al them selues Whervpon he taketh occasion to aduertise them that euery power of remission and the office of absolutioÌ„ was properly Gods and theirs but by ministery And therfore that their mercy iudgement ought to be tryed and measured by his sentence and not his by theirs These thinges were to be admonished and reprehended then but now the disease lyeth on the other side and they offend rather in ouer muche lenitie For as both be contemned of the wicked so ther is almost amongst the good none left but loosing now a dayes when meÌ„ had rather be bouÌ„de in sinne theÌ„ bound in penance for sinne Therfore the office of binding and loosing requireth truely good knowledge much discretion zeale and stowtnesse in Goddes quarell For as it is most highe so surely it is moste harde and burdenous It pitieth my harte to see it so litle estemed but muche more that it should be lesse estemed throughe their ignorance or euil life to whome the keyes of remission be committed The keye of remission and reteining sinnes they had of God in their Orders but discretion knowledge vertue with other qualities mere for the exercise of that office they must by prayer and industrie obteyne lest whilest they profite other men to saluation they become reprobate them selues 1. Cor. 9. as S. Paule sayd of him selfe in case of preaching But in deede it is not so commendable for vs as the case standeth now nor so nedefull to prie into the priestes bosoms or to vewe their lackes in ministering of this sacrament of penaunce which if any be doo lightly redounde to their owne harmes and not so much to myne or to any other which vse their office to our owne saluatioÌ„ For though for councel and comfort and suche other respectes a discrete and learned man were rather to be wished for then a woorse yet being assured that the partie is called by Godes Church to the function and hath iurisdiction ordinary or graunted extraordinarilie by the appointment of lawfull superiours if by schisme and excommunication or otherwise he be not suspended from the practise of the sayd functions I neede nothing to doubt for his other lackes but muche more for myne own insufficiencie by default of iust examination of my conscience or lacke of contrition or some other like want in my selfe why the fruâ—te of the priestes absolution can not be surely deriued vnto me as elles if it were not my owne default it should by force of the sacrament vndoubtedly be For this I dare be bold to saye â—ack of the fruict of any sacrament ys for most in the râ—ceauer not in the minister that the lacke of the appointed fructe of any Sacramente aryseth a thousande tymes oftner by the vnworthynesse of the subiect and him that receiueth the Sacrament then vppon any lacke of the giuer and minister thereof and namely in this SacrameÌ„t of the Churches discipline it chanceth more often For as S. Basile saith Questione â—5 regul contract Potestas remittendi peccata non est absolutè data sed in recipientis obedientia in consensu cum eo qui animae ipsius curam gerit sitaest The power of remitting sinnes is not absolutely without condicion giuen but it standeth in the obedieÌ„ce of the penitent and in his agreement with him
thirtene hundreth yeares since thoughe they be so modeste Heretikes neuer list to bragge of their auncetours that lightly they list not crake of their auncestours yet we wil not defraude them of that glorie nor helpe our cause by dissimulatioÌ„ of their great antiquitie It is their pusillanimitie I knowe that they wil not ofteÌ„ in distresse of their doctrine call for ayde of their forefathers who were doubtlesse very auncient and many of them within the first sixe hundred yeares In other causes vigilaÌ„tius Vigilantius might helpe in some Iouinian Iouinianus woulde atteÌ„d vpoÌ„ theÌ„ Manes Manes might doe them often highe pleasure Iulianus Iulianus thapostata a prince for their purpose Simon Magus Simon Magus one of the Apostles age would stande by them surely if our Aduersaries had harte they woulde well nere winne of vs by antiquitie And truely I can not dissemble with theÌ„ in this cause that now is in hande they haue one patrone against vs of yeares verie auncient of reason much like vnto them selues Nouatus Nouatus is his name of whom the folowers were called of the Church Nouatians Epipha in haere but them selues liked to be called Cathari Cathar that is to say cleane and vndefiled persons Their opinion was that suche as did fall into any mortall sinne after Baptime could not by any man or meanes be affoiled thereof and for that they disalowed the Churches whole practise of mercie and remission of sinnes in the SacrameÌ„t of penaunce nothing disagreing from Caluin that condemneth the saing of S. Ierome In Institut In cap. 3. Esay as sacrilegious where he writeth that penaunce is as a second boord of refuge whereby after shipwrake a man may be saued Neither did Nouatus deny but him selfe might haue mercie and giue pardoÌ„ after mans fall but the Church could not therein meddle as he thought without singular iniurie to Christ and his only prerogatiue And that he ioyneth in this matter fully with our meÌ„ that they maye take more coÌ„forte on him you shal perceiue by Socrates one of the writers of the Tripartite history Vide Cassiod li. 8. hist triÌ„pâ—rt ca. 9 The Caluinists agree vvith Nouatus against the sacrament of penance who saith thus Nouatus scribebat Ecclesiis ne eos qui Daemonibus immolauerant ad Sacramenta susciperent sed inuitarent quidem ad poenitentiam remissioneÌ„ verò Dei relinquerent potestati cuius solius est peccata remittere Nouatus wrote his letters to diuers Churches that they shoulde not admitte any man to the Sacramentes that had done sacrifice to Diuelles but that they should only moue them to doe Penaunce and coÌ„mitte to God the remission of their sinne who onely can forgiue mans offences And therefore though in some other point Nouatus did ouerpricke his Children yet herein they fully mete in one Epiphanius writeth that he denied saluation to those that did fall to greuous crimes after their Christendom and therewith did hold that there was but one penaunce Ita Caluinus which was done in Baptime and after that the Church to haue none How haÌ„dsomly he defeÌ„ded this errour and vnmercifull heresie ye shal see anone by S. Ambrose who lernedly folowed and chased him or his folowers in an whole worcke writen for that purpose In the meane tyme it were good for the more credite of the man and his cause to note with the ancient doctours of his dayes his conditions his comming vppe his proceding and practises Nouatus described Epist 8. lib. 2. S. Cyprian who was moste molested with him and knewe him best geueth him this praise Nouatê° was a maÌ„ that delighted much in nouelties and newes of insatiable auarice a furrious rauin with pride and intolerable arrogancie almost puffed past him selfe knoweÌ„ and taken of al Bishoppes for a noughtie packe coÌ„demned by the common iudgement of al good priestes for a faithlesse heretike curious and inquisitiue them to betraie for to deceiue allwaies ready to flatter in loue neuer faithful nor trusty A fit felovv to be a minister a match euer fired to kindle sedition a whirle winde aÌ„d storme to procure the shipwrake of faith and to be shorte an aduersarie to tranquillitie and an enemie of peace These were his conditions then Epist ad FabianuÌ„ ex en Mary long before that his fal to heresie S. Cornelius wryteth that he was possessed in his youth with an euill spirit for which he had to doe great while with coniurours and that he lacked all the holy solemnitie of Baptisme and confirmation and consequentlie the Spirite of God whiche by them he shoulde haue receiued and therefore tooke orders againste the lawe vppon sinister fauour and afterwarde by vnlauful artes attempted to get a bishopricke with greate othes protesting that he woulde not be a Bishoppe if he might But when in dede he coulde not atteine to that holy dignitie which he so inwardlie and intolerablie gaped for he fell in despite of Goddes Church to heresie that he might get that without order which he could not obteine in the righte manner of the Churches making And for that purpose he procured three base Bysshoppes out of a straunge and remote parte of Italie who neyther knewe the case the man nor his manners and them throughe ignorance he beguiled and by force caused them to consecrate him Bishoppe by the coulour whereof for true imposition of handes was it none sodeynlie he appeared as a newe creature and a Bishoppe of a straunge stampe apparuit Episcopus velut nouum Plasma sayeth Cornelius And for this attempte one of the poore Bishops did greate penaÌ„ce the other two were deposed In the meane tyme this mocke Bishope vendicabat sibi euangeliuÌ„ calleÌ„ged the worde of the Lorde for him selfe Lib. 3. haereticaruÌ„ FabularuÌ„ Cap de Nouat denied him self to be a prieste because he woulde not giue to the people as Theodoritus saith in their extremitie the remedie for their sinnes which is nothing elles but to giue them absolution which worke he could neuer abide To be shorte he was so inceÌ„sed against his laufull pastour superiour the holie Bishop of Rome An oth for a nevve visitation that in the deliuerye of the blessed SacrameÌ„t to the people he would force theÌ„ to take an othe by the blessed body which they had in theyr handes ready to receiue that they should stick to him and forsake the Bishop of Rome Cornelius Lib. 6. cap. 33. All these thinges in sense hath Eusebius of Nouatus the first patron of the Protestantes doctrine concerning the impugning of the Churches title in remissioÌ„ of sinnes of which her right he would haue robbed her in pretence of maintenaunce of Goddes honoure Whereby he also abrogated the whole Sacrament of penaunce Vide August de haeres hâ—r 3â— This falshod thoughe it were streight with the author condemned in a greate Councell holden at Rome and afterwarde
beloÌ„g do they dishonor God or els was it not alwaies grauÌ„ted to some meÌ„ for the glorie of God That Eliseus could see the hart inward thoughts of Giezi his seruauÌ„t which is Gods onely propertie 4. Reg. Cap. 5. did it dishonour God or rather wonderfully augmeÌ„t his glorie The passing preemineÌ„ce that Peter the rest receiued when they were hable by laying on of haÌ„des to giue the holy ghost caÌ„ it not be practised without the dishonoure of God Act. 8. or elles was it not principally geuen to them to set furth the glory of God This was so great power that it was muche more astonied at of the beholders theÌ„ either working of miracles or remitting sinnes in so much that SimoÌ„ the sorcerer who was so gloriouse before that he called him selfe the power of God would haue geuen the Apostles money largely that vpon whom so euer he had practised the like laying on of handes he might receiue the holie Ghost also Then if the power of geuing the holie Ghoste or power of geuing grace which both Peter Paule practised in a visible Sacrament 2. Tim. 4 by a solemne Ceremonie in the sight of al the world by laying on of their haÌ„des if thâ—s passing worke moste proper to God I dare saye of al other actes that be exercised in Christes name in the Church doth not onely no whit abase Gods excelleÌ„cie but was purposely instituted to honour the maiestie of God in the face of all people to set oute the glorie of his house how dare any man for feare of Godes highe indignation controlle the worke of Christ in remitting mans sinnes by such a visible sacrameÌ„t as to the honour of God is most coÌ„uenient to our saluatioÌ„ most necessary If they wil not let priests remit sinnes for feare of offeÌ„ding god dishonoring his name theÌ„ let them not baptise not preach not teache not doe miracles not geue the holy Ghost not correcte faultes not geue orders nor doe any other functions For these euery one be no lesse proper to God then remission of sinnes O heresie most shamefull that then goeth about to dishonour God most when she moste pretendeth Gods honour whereof she is so tender and so carefull that she hath barred his own spouse of his blessed bodye Heresie vnder pretense of Gods honour hath robbed his spouse of her treasurs of remission of sinnes of the Spirite of God of all sacraments of all holy Ceremonies of memories of miracles of holy functions and to be shorte of al giftes and graces and all this for Goddes honour so honorable it is for Christ to be the King of so beggarlie a common wealth as they make of the Church such glorie it is for Christe to haue his onely spouse robbed of the treasures of his giftes and graces so comelie it is for Christ to haue such sacrameÌ„tes as neither conteine him selfe nor his grace so woorthy a thing it is for Christe to haue ministers that vpon his owne warraÌ„t can neither pardoÌ„ nor punishe mans misdeedes Psal 8â— Gloriosa dicta sunt de te Ciuitas Dei Glorious things haue ben reported of thee thou Citie of God and how art thou now so barraine so contemptible that thy honour must needs redound to the dishonour of him by whom al thy honour onely standeth But I ceasse to pursue the Churches ennemies nowe in mine owne woordes I will rather ioyne with the holy Fathers for their ouerthrowe whose not onelie reason and sufficient answere to this their vain Replie fouÌ„ded on the pretence of Gods honour but also their onely name and authoritie shall sufficientlie beate doune these mens boldnesse Ambros de poen lib. 1. ca. 2. S. Ambrose in this case is most plaine and standeth with the Nouatians as I doe now with the Zuinglians euen in the very same Argument in these woordes Sed aiunâ— se Domino deferre reuerentiam cui soli remitteÌ„dorum criminum potestatem reseruent imo nulli maiorem iniuriam faciunt quà m qui eius volunt mandata rescindere I reade rather refindere then refundere or coÌ„fundere for he reproueth Nouatus that he did diuide the gift of â—hrist vvhiles he graunted povver to bind and not to loose commissum munus refindere nam cùm ipse in Euangelio suo dixerit Dominus Iesus accipite Spiritum sanctum quoruÌ„ remiseritis peccata c quis est ergo qui magis honorat VtruÌ„ qui mandatis atteÌ„perat an qui resistit Ecclesia in vtroque seruat obedieÌ„tiam vt peccatuÌ„ alliget laxet that is to saie These Nouatians say that they denie penance or power to remitte sinnes in earth in respect of the maintenance of suche honour as is due to god to whome onelie they will reserue the pardoning of mans sinnes But in deed none doe so much iniury to Gods glorie as those which breake his commaundementes and make a diuision of that charge and commission whiche he geueth For seing our Lord Iesus his own mouth spake these words Receiue ye the holy Ghost whose sinnes you doe forgeue they be forgeueÌ„ and whose sinnes you holde they be holden Who in this case more honoureth God He that obeyeth his commaundement or he that resisteth the same The Church obeyeth in both as wel in binding as in loosing Thus there And a litle after Looke to whom this charge was geuen that person may laufully with Gods good leaue vse the same And therefore the Church may laufully both bind and loose ☞ heresie and her attendants can rightly doe neither This right is only committed to Priests and therefore the Churche rightly chalengeth that authoritie because shee hath lauful Priests and so heresie can not doe because shee hath not the Priestes of God in her cursed congregation Thus said S. Ambrose for the answere of the Nouatians in his daies and so say I now in the Churches behalf against the like affected ennemies of Christes honour which whiles they in face of scripture and Gods word would seeme to defende they are become sworne aduersaries of his honour and open contemners of his coÌ„maundementes and holy ordinance Marke vvel S. Ambrose his reasoÌ„s agaiÌ„st the NouatiaÌ„s to serue for our time S. Ambrose here taketh it for a ground that it is Gods ordinance that Priests should remit sinnes he is bold to cal the contrary doctrine heresie he maketh a principle of this that it neuer dishonoureth God that man should doe that which God geueth him either commaundement or commission to doe in his behalfe he taketh it for a knowen truth that as the Churche of God hath true and laufull Priestes so shee may by them vpon Christes warrant both loose and bind and contrariwise that heresie may wel enough geue ouer that right of remissioÌ„ of sinnes because shee hath lightly no lauful Priests by whom shee may practise the same And surely it is a merueilouse force of truth or rather the might
of Gods prouidence that driueth Heretikes to disdaine destroy and dissanul the graces and manifolde giftes of Christes Churche that impugning them where the very right of such holy actes do lie they may plainly confesse and to their shame acknowledge that they haue none such them selues nor caÌ„ by Gods warrant chalenge any such giftes whiche with al their might they would wholy if they could together with Gods spirite and Churche extinguish Alas into what misery hath this forsakeÌ„ flock wilfully cast them selues and their adherentes whiche can forsake Gods house vbi mandauit Dominus benedictionem vpon vvhiche God hath bestovved his blessing The nevve congregatioÌ„ is barrain of al Gods giftes and abide there where by their owne confession there is no Priesthode no Penance no host no sacrifice no remission where they can let of sinnes no grace in Sacramentes nor no gift of the holy Ghost Al other heresies lightly by force of the Fathers doctrine and iudgement lost either their Priesthod because thei had no way out of the Churche to make Priests Aduersus Luciferianos as S. Hierome writeth of Hilarie the Deacon or els the vse function of Priesthode by reason the works of God can not be orderlie nor benificially vsed out of the house of God and yet they euer claimed to them selues not onely the order but for moste part all other functions that by Christe and his Churche were annexed to that order but ours wherein they passe all their forefathers in a maner willingly giue ouer the whole profession freely without compulsioÌ„ deny them selues with Nouatus to be Priestes denie to sacrifice denie to enioyne penance denie to geue the holy Ghoste either by imposition of handes or by Chrisme Protestants do of them selâ—es renounce the right of al holy actions of Christian religion or by any other solemne right of Goddes Church To be short take nothing froÌ„ these fellowes that belongeth to Christianitie for they wil geue al ouer them selues But briefly to conclude vppe the answere to their reason founded vppon Nouatus his principle touching Gods honour thus I say That neuer derogateth to Gods honour which is agreable to Gods ordinance but that Priests should remitte sinnes is the ordinance of god as is declared therefore the vse thereof doth not derogate any whit to gods honour Againe as great works and as propre to god as remission of sinnes was practised by the Apostles yet is vsed by the Bishoppes of holie Church without al dishonour of God geuing the holy ghost and gods grace by laying on of handes Ergo Remission of sinnes may be also practised of Priests without al iniurie to god his onely right therein For further prouf of the foresaid matter it is declared that neither Christe nor his euerlasting Father nor the holie Ghost doe giue ouer vnto man or resigne the power of remission or anie other holie function of the Churche but doe themselues coÌ„tinually worke al those graces by mans ministerie and seruice The eighth Chap. FVrthermore wee muste here consider that what woorke so euer God appointeth man to exercise in his Churche either in remission of sinnes or giuing grace of Gods Spirit or what other holy actioÌ„ so euer may in his name be don for the benefite of the people by the ministery and seruice of man either by the meanes and meditation of anye other instrumental cause No man doth succeed God in anie diuine function we must learne that in these workes so wrought either by maÌ„ or through other creatures God doth not resigne his right to the waies and and woorkers thereof and giue ouer the whole title that is due to himself in the said diuine actes For then in deed mans practise should derogat to Gods power and he should as it were succeed God in the right of his propre power and euerlasting inheritance which only to surmise as Heretikes doe were mere foly Christ is by euerlasting right made the head of the Church Christ resigned his room but not his right and he resigneth not this office to any mortal man For if he did then the partie that should by his grauÌ„t occupie for a season the same dignitie were his successour should hold in like right the same office as he did before But that notwithstanding he hath made his substitute vicegerent by whom in his corporal absence he ruleth now the Church as he did before in his owne person not geuing ouer his preheminence and supream power therein but nowe practising that by an other whiche afore he exercised him selfe in his own person It had ben a great derogation to Christ that Peter should haue bene Christes heir and successour for then Christ had lost the perpetuitie an other man gouerning after him in like right and preheminence as he had before But for Peter to rule the Church vnder him in his steed as by his euerlasting right with coÌ„mission from him that holdeth that soueraigntie for euer by whome so euer the Church shal be ruled til the worlds end in earth this I saie is no derogation to God nor his Sonne Christ Iesus at al but it muche proueth that Christe accordinge to his manhoode is the heade of the Churche for euer because by man in earth he ruleth the same til his comming againe the which man though he be his Vicar and Vicegerent yet he is not his Successour Psal 44. S. Augustin did trimly allude to the vse of the old Law coÌ„paring the ministers of Gods Church to the yonger brethern who were charged to marie the elder brothers wife wheÌ„ he died without isshue in whose name they did practise the worke of mariage therfore could not cal their childreÌ„ by their own names but by the name of their elder brethreÌ„ For as thei raised seed to their brother for their brothers honour so the Priests that haue taken vppon them as it were in mariage to gouern Christ his Church to bring foorth childreÌ„ not in their own names but in the name of their elder brother her departed husband As when they bring foorth children in Baptisme as through the wombe of the Church they bring them not foorth as for them selues in their own names but in the name of Iesus Christ being thâ—ir elder brother euen so it is in remission of sinnes also in whiche case Christ resigneth not his authoritie Yet the Protestantes briÌ„g forth in their seuerall congregations children not for Christ but for Caluin caluinists and for Lâ—ther LutheraÌ„s as though he lacked that power him selfe but practiseth that mightie woorke by the ministerie of man whiche before he excercised in his own person And as the baptising not in the name of Peter nor Paule nor Apollo but in the name of Christ the first husbande of the Church after whome the Children be called Christians not Petrians or Paulians doth muche sette foorth the honour of the eldest spouse so it proueth
they wil seme to acknowledge the forgeuenes of sinnes thereby and I thinke by the ministerie of man to thoughe in their priuate scholes yea and in their open blasphemous bookes the whole packe of Protestauntes and Zuinglians deny that sacrament also to remitte sinnes The protestantes iniurious to the povver of remissioÌ„ of sinnes in Baptisme also both acknowledging that children may be saued and be receiued to heaueÌ„ with out it and auouching that sinne remayneth still in the childreÌ„ after their Christendome thoughe God will not impute the same vnto them for the hinderaunce of their saluation Which false doctrine is the grounde of their more subtil opinions touching onely faith imputed iustice and other their pelting paradoxes concerning mans iustification which I can not now stande vpoÌ„ Would God the ignorant sorte of their folowers coulde see through the dunghil of this confuse doctrine ProtestaÌ„ts professe opeÌ„ly othervvyse theÌ„ they teache secretly as Epicurus did For these haue euer besides the florishe of their faith that they make abroad amongst fooles aÌ„ other more improbable which they kepe for the stroÌ„ge ones at home that will no more be offended to heare the Turkishe then the Christian faith And so had the Epicure as Tullie teacheth For pleasure of the minde gatherd by contentation and contemplation of heauenly thinges was his chiefe God and extreme ende of his endeuoures abrode but his dearlings at home had the pleasure of the bodilie lustes and wantonnesse for th ende of all goodnesse Well but I wil reason with theÌ„ vpoÌ„ the grounde of their owtward and publike professioÌ„ that Baptisme is a sacrameÌ„t in which truly sinnes be remitted by the ministerie of men without al dishonour of God seeing it was Gods own ordinauÌ„ce apoyntmeÌ„t But heare S. Ambrose againe I pray you encontering in this matter with oure mens maisters Ibidem Cur baptisatis saith he si per hominem peccata dimitti non licet in baptismo vtique remissio peccatorum omnium est Quid interest vtrum per poenitentiam an per lauacrum hoc ius sibi datum sacerdotes vendicent vnumin vtro que ministerium est sed dices quia in lauacro operatur mysterioruÌ„ gratia Quid in poenitentia The mynistery for remissioÌ„ of sinnes al one in Baptism and penaunce non Dei nomen operatur Why doe they baptise if man may not remit sinnes for surely in baptisme all sinnes be remitted and what difference I besech you whether priestes chalenge this gifte to be theirs in baptisme or in penaunce The ministerie of man is like in both But you wil replie perchauÌ„ce that in baptisme the grace of the ministeries woorketh And what woorketh I praye you in penaunce Doth not Goddes name bring all to passe there also Thus he But here good Reader marke diligeÌ„tly in this doctours woordes as also in other the like of al auncient fathers that penaunce is not here taken for any vertue either morall or theologicall which is in a priuate man when he ameÌ„deth or changeth his purpose Sacramentall penance and repeÌ„tance ys not all one or former euil life to the better wherof there was some shade amongst the heathen and is now both commeÌ„ded in scripture and giuen man by Christes grace not onely afore the receiuing of the sacrament of Baptisme if the partie were in case of actual dedly sinne but also goeth alwayes as a necessarie preparatiue before sacramentall confession and is called in oure tonge properly repeÌ„taunce this doctour therfore speaketh not of this kind of peniteÌ„ce but of a publik act of the Church touching the reconciliation or reparing of mans state defiled after his baptisme by greuous crimes in which by the priestes iudgement the sinnes committed be either pardoned or punished And this must not be called repentaunce onely or the amendment of life as Heretiques doo terme it to confound the distinct doctrine of Gods trueth and Sacramentes but it is an external and visible action appoynted by Christ in the xx of S. Iohn to reconcile sinners by the forme of absoluing which the Church vseth in the name inuocation of God for that purpose VVhat sacramentall penauÌ„ce is And therefore hauing the grace of God and remission of sinnes ioyned vnto it by Christes promise it must needes be a sacrament as Baptyme is which all the fathers doe insinuate when they make penance to be one prescribed ordinaunce of Christ to forgiue sinnes by no lesse then Baptine is Neither was it the preaching of the gospell nor the inward sorowfullnesse or repentaunce of former sinnes Nouatus denied not repeÌ„taÌ„ce but the sacrament of penauÌ„ce and so doe the protestants that Nouatus did condemne but it was the sacrament of penaunce and acte of absolution by the priestes ministerie which he so much abhorred and ment wickedly to remoue For which cause as he was iustly coÌ„demned of heresie by the Romain and Nice CouÌ„cells so were you maister Protestauntes both then in them and since in youre maisters wiclif Luther Caluin and the like accursed by Goddes Church and councels The doctours therefore as I haue sayd ioyne lightly in talking of remission of sinnes Baptisme and penaunce and sometime extreame vnction also that you neede not doubt but they toke them all three for sacramentes working remission of sinnes For they doe not talke of inward repentaunce but of an action soleÌ„ly exercised in Gods Church wherof the preist as you heare by S. Ambrose and S. ChrysostoÌ„ is the minister And therefore Epiphanius saieth that the Church hath two penauÌ„ces one after another insinuating therby the duble act of the Church and sacrament Heres 38 Lib. 4. whereby sinnes be remitted As S. Augustin also saieth by the Nouatians quòd poenitentiam denegant that they denie penaunce By which penaunce â—ap 30. de Sap. Lactantius teacheth vs also a way to discern the true Church from the false as in which there is both confession and penaunce for the healing of mans frayltie Whereby it is euident that this penaunce which they speake of was an vsuall ceremonie and holy sacrament of the Church whereby sinnes were remitted Which trueth S. Cyril vttereth most playnly for oure purpose In 20. Io. treating thus vpon the wordes of institution of this sacrament Cùm ipsi remittunt aut detinent spiritus qui habitat in eis per ipsos remittit aut detinet fit autem id duobus modis primùm Baptismo deinde Poenitentia WheÌ„ the priestes remit sinnes or reteine them the holy Ghost which dwelleth in them doth remit or reteine by them which is doen two maner of wayes first in Baptisme and then afterwarde in penaunce Serm. de Baptis Christi S. Cyprian also saide that the holy Ghost woorketh remission of sinnes whether it be in baptisme or by other sacramentes Wherby he clerely vttereth his meaning that there should be moe sacramentes then one instituted by Christ for that purpose In all which congruity of Gods
holy woorking by diuers sacramentes the remission of sinnes we conclude against Heresy that the priests power herein derogateth no more to God nor our Sauioure in the sacrament of penaunce then it doth before by baptisme or after by extreme VnctioÌ„ in none of al which as I haue proued before Christe vvoorketh the effect in al sacraments though man minister them Christe doth resigne his power and proper iurisdiction to the priestes but continuing euerlastingly in like preheminence and power as before woorketh his grace and remission of sinnes in al these Sacramentes by the priestes seruice and ministery that it maye be yet as truely as in his life tyme saide and so shall be to the worldes ende Christ baptiseth Christ shriueth assoileth aÌ„d aÌ„nointeth sinners for remission of their offences althoughe Iesus doth none of these now nor much did in his life tyme but his Disciples then and his Disciples nowe doo the same holy actions in his name To coÌ„clude this mater I argue thus It is no dishonoure to God for the priest to remitte sinnes as well originall as actual of al sortes and grauitie in the sacrament of Baptisme by the Protestantes own confession nor by extreme vnction by the warrant both of scriptures and doctours ergo remission of sinnes is not vnlawful nor dishonorable to God to be giuen by the priest in the solemne sacrament of Penaunce And further I ioyne with them thus The woord of God is much more playne expresse for the priestes warraÌ„t to remit sinnes in Penaunce then in baptisme but they may lawfully doe it in Baptisme ergo they may doo it no lesse lawfullie in Penaunce Compare the woordes of institution of them both and iudge your selues of your indifferencie and sincerity by what right you may remoue the one and reteine the other Nouatus and the ProtestaÌ„ts of our tyme coÌ„pared I pray God you seeke not shortly to baptise vs onely by your preaching as you now will onely absolue vs by the same But truely I thinke you be in the case that S. Ambrose tooke Nouatus your forefather to haue bene in not onely for that that he sayeth Nouatus where he listed woulde admit power to priestes of remissioÌ„ Vbi supra But where he listed not there the grace giuen to them must be dishonoure to God So that of thinges equally commended by scripture and commuanded by God the good man muste haue choice for his toothe not onely in this point I nowe compare oure choice men but muche more in that which foloweth in the saide S. Ambrose of all Nouatians whome he trippeth pretily with this terme delicati mei my delicate gentlemen saith he with their lustie lookes and swelling harts caÌ„ not abide in their bruaery to looke vpon a poore caitiffe weping for his sinnes abundantly apparelled mourningly in sadde and sorowful companie and so furthe And this surely is the disease of oure dayes The disease of this time whiche hath not onely infected the vnfaythfull but also hathe made these holy thinges lothsom euen to the better sorte of Goddes people So much is mans will and pleasure pampered where Goddes woorde and writing shoulde be onely folowed For the necessarie bearing with suche frayltie euen of the good almoste generally the Church of God hath sought and allowed muche more gentle remedies then the worlde had wonte full gladly to beare for theire greuous sinnes And therefore the maner and order of Penaunce hath bene diuers in sundry Ages and countries Diuers vvayes of sacramentall poeniteÌ„ce somtimes solemne which could be but once taken in all a mans life somtymes not solemne but yet open and publike which might be iterated as often as mans mortall sinnes so required other tymes priuate onely betwixt the priest and the penitent Which is now vsed and long hath bene in a maner generally throughe the whole worlde Of al which diuersities we wil not now intreate nor for oure matter the consideratioÌ„ of them is very needfull seing that in all sortes and in euery of the sundry formes of dooing penaunce this is a moste firme principle that the penitent had remission of sinnes for which he did penaunce no otherwise but by the ministery of the priestes Therfore the substance of the mater being one of the diuersity of vse and circumstances which may be according to the tyme and maners of men altered we neede not much to care Baptisme was once vsed with solemnitie at two or three principal feastes of the yere for the time so required then and the conditioÌ„ of the people yet the same sacrament of Baptisme ministered now priuatly as occasioÌ„ serueth by the birth of euery child is of the same force and grace now that it was then Wherin to reprehende the wisdome of Goddes Church that is assuredly ruled by the Spiritte of God is ouer muche wantonesse of will and sedition not tolerable That remission of mans sinnes hath bene ioyned often both in the lawe of nature and Moyses to some external ceremomonies and sacrifices whereof in the old lawe Priestes were the appointed ministers The Ninth Chap. LET no man External sacramentes ordeined and maÌ„s ministerie vsed for good causes vpon consideratioÌ„ of these thinges either reprehend or marueile at the counsell and ordinaunce of God that he being haâ—ie to gouerne his creatures and amend or correcte pardon or punishe euery mans misdeedes by him selfe without all helpe and seruice of any other his subiect natures that it pleaseth his wisdom for all that to forgiue sinnes no otherwise in his Church but by external orders ioyned to mans ministerie in sundry sacramentes In sober consideration of these thinges mans reason may well be satisfied if he can conceiue that it is the honoure and estimation of our kinde with almighty God oure maker that he gouerneth not oure affaires onely by him selfe in his owne person but also that we be ruled and led in the wayes of Goddes will by one an other that the maiestie of God which moste appereth in regiment and in remitting of sinnes in correcting of vice and iudgement might be clerely seen in our kinde amongst our selues to oure comforte and Goddes no disgracing nor dishonoure at all And therefore S. Augustin saith of the like doubt of some in his dayes whiche would not be taught by maÌ„ In prefa de doct Christ but by Gods owne Spirite Abiecta esset humana coÌ„ditio si per homines hominibus verbum suuÌ„ Deus ministrare nolle videretur Quomodo enim veruÌ„ esset quod dictum est Templum enim Dei sanctum est quod estis vos si de humano templo Deus responsa non redderet Mans state were to base if God would not that his woorde shoulde be ministered by one man to an other For how shoulde this truelie be spoken the temple of God is holy the which temple you are if God gaue not answers by mannes temple This is one greate respecte surelye especially since the
second person in Trinite toke vpon him oure nature by whome the worthines of mankind is much increased more fit then euer before to serue ech other as in the workes that be diuine properly by nature belonging to God him selfe Note wel this An other respecte why we should by externall sacrameÌ„tes mans ministery receiue grace remission of sinnes is the singular respect had by God of oure infirmitie as wel of minde as bodie For the minde requireth in her assured deseruing of damnation some external token by which she may haue good cause to hope of mercie and grace For whâ—â— I know and assure my selfe that original sinne is remitted by Baptisme when I haue once receiued the same then I am in no further doubt of my selfe nor any damnation for that sinne which by the promise of God I haue learned shall be washed awaye therby as by an external instrument in which he conueieth that henefite to my soule if my selfe by indispotion and vnaptnes doo not hinder the assured fruct therof So where after Baptisme mannes life is often defiled by greuous sinnes The coÌ„fort receiued by the sacrament of penaunce and God highly displeased therfore what an infinite treasure is it and how greate a coÌ„forte to haue an assured help therof wrought so by maÌ„s ministery in a visible action that I may knowe sauing for mine owne lacke of conuenieÌ„t disposition my sinnes to be forgiuen and Goddes mercy and fauoure to be obteined againe We may conceiue easly what a passing comforte it was to the parties that hearde sensibly by the outwarde woordes of Christes owne mouthe thy sinnes be forgiuen thee For thoughe the sayd persoÌ„s beleuing in Christ and lameÌ„ting for their sinnes past might haue had some hope of remission by Christ thoughe he had sayed no suche thing vnto them yet he that perceiueth not what comforte of conscience what inwarde ioy of minde what reioising of the spirite they must needes haue that had Christes testimonie and blessing in playne terme for the same purpose he seeth nothing at al. As for my selfe good Christian Reader I am not so free from sinne wo is me therfore nor so voyde of mannes affection but as often I heare in the sacrament of penaunce the priest who to me then is Christ in ful power of pardoning saing the woordes of absolution ouer me me thinke truely I heare the swete voice of Christ saing with authority thy sinnes be forgiueÌ„ thee Wherof no mortall man shal euer forbid me to take hope and singular trust of remission of sinnes with the passing comforte that theron ensueth All these that are without Christes folde seeke not to heare this voice for all their loade of sinne from the heauenly and inteare ioy whereof they be as farre as from the conceiuing of the felicitie to come in heauen it selfe But let them assure them selfes that Christ writeth with his holy finger al their sinnes though to Christ they wil not now confesse them The euels vvich vvyll grovve in vvaâ—t of sacramental penance whiles they refuse the power of remissioÌ„ that he both had hath in earth to the worldes ende without which outwarde solemne acte of penaunce man should either dispaire of Gods mercy and liue in feare intolerable of euerlasting perishing which ofteÌ„ fal to timerous consciences or elles which is now of dayes more common men would lyue in such passing presumptioÌ„ and vayne securitie of heauen that they would neuer till the very last breath of their euel tyme either be sory for sinne or seeke to doo any good worke at al. This time shal testify with me herin and the very diuersitie that is betwen these oure corrupte conditions and the holy studies and endeuours of oure forefathers shall testifie but the dayes that yet are to come muste needes most feele the smarte of it when these that now haue the direction of other mennes steppes shal be gone A greate liklyhod of the lamentable state to come by whom for old discipline wherein they were brought vp some signes remnantes of vertue be continued in the worlde For when they be spent and oure yonkers that neuer heard of the Churches discipline but haue had their ful swinge in sinne with the instruction of a moste wanton doctrine shal be the principall of the people if this diuision so long coÌ„tinue which God forbidde into what termes shal trueth and vertue be then brought Me thinke I see before hand the lamentable state of thinges and in a maner beholde the fructe of our onely faith of this bolde presumption of Goddes mercy of remouing the discipline of penaunce of refusing the onelie ordinaunce of God for remission of oure mortall sinnes Euel are we now but a thousande partes woorse shal they be then which in long nouseling in this naughty learning of liberty shall be in perpetuall woe and haue no feele nor sense thereof And all this muste needes followe vppon the lacke of these outewarde actes and externall wayes of pardoning and punishing offences appointed either for mannes present comforte and solace or elles to kepe in awe the wantons of the worlde by the rodde of outeward discipline which in the Church hath euer especially bene obserued in the sacrameÌ„t of penaunce It were to tedious further to declare how these external means of woorking inwarde grace and remission of sinnes be necessary for the outewarde maÌ„ External sacrameÌ„ts meet for the outevvard man which is sometimes refreshed other whiles bridled by thinges answerable as well outewardly to the body as inwardly to the minde It is needlesse also to treat at large how it is necessary for the one and visible common welth of Christes Church to agree together in all partes therof and be notoriously knoweÌ„ from all other sectes and sortes of peoples that doo not professe Christes name by the outewarde practise of all holy functions by which God hath promised to giue grace remission and sanctification to all his faithfull subiectes All these coÌ„siderations with many the like may serue and satisfy the quiet peaceable children of Christes Church that haue learned to rest in Christes ordinaunce thoughe the causes thereof be not to them opened As for other that are euer doubting and neuer setteled in their faith that alwayes be learning and yet neuer attein to knowledge 2. Tim. 3. that had rather vnderstand much then beleue a litle such felowes I must not so much instruct as by the scriptures and examples of allages controlle and confound if I may Let them therfore be charged SacrameÌ„tes alvvaies vsed for remissioÌ„ of sinnes that God hath not onely vsed froÌ„ the creatioÌ„ of maÌ„ to bring vp al people that serued him in some especial wayes of outward woorshipping but hath also these many worlds deliuered maÌ„ froÌ„ original actual sins by external sacrameÌ„ts sacrifices Aug li. 6. coÌ„tra Iul. cap. 3. SacrameÌ„tes in the lavve of nature not without the priestes especiall
procurement ministery therin What did circumcisioÌ„ instituted by God in the lawe of nature commaÌ„ded to AbrahaÌ„ his seede coÌ„tinued so many ages euen til Christes lawe tooke place Did it not after a sorte remitte sinnes Was it any other thing but an external worke in the face of the worlde Was it not ministered by man Did it derogate any thinge to the honoure of God which by him selfe for his owne glorie and name sake was ordeined And afterwarde in the lawe of Moyses which did drawe nerer vnto Christian vsages by many actions of sacrifices and solemne rites instituted purposely to represent and foreshew the state of our present Church Sacramentes in the lavve of Moyses there we haue playne profe of certayne outward orders instituted for procuring remissioÌ„ pardoÌ„ of sinnes not without especial mentioÌ„ of the priestes ministery in euery of the sayd actions Wherof S. Paule speaketh to the Hebrewes in these woordes Cap. 9. Omnia penè in sanguine mundari ac sine sanguinis effusione non esse remissionem That all thinges were in a maner cleÌ„sed by bloude and that no remission could be had without bloude Leuit. 17. For so in the xvij of Leuiticus they were charged to absteine from drinking of bloud because sanguis animalium pro piaculo est the bloud of beastes stode for an expiation and cleansing of sinnes And therfore Cap. 4. amoÌ„gst the diuers orders of sacrifice mencioned in the sayde booke of their ceremonies ther be diuers expresse wayes by sacrifice to purge mennes sinnes some for the priestes sinnes other for the Princes the third for the coÌ„mon peoples offences And one way for their sinnes committed of ignoraÌ„ce an other for crimes wittingly done Finally som for thoughtes and other some for euell deedes with many moe diuersities as you may see in the saied booke In all which it is euer expressed that the priest is not onely the minister in the saide sacrifice as needes he must be but also with offering of the sayed oblations for sinne that he must make prayer especiallie for the offenders and euery of them seuerally that God may pardon them of that sinne for which they offer their sacrifice For allwayes after the forme and maner of offering be prescribed according to the diuersity of the peoples offences it is added Rogabitque pro eo sacerdos pro peccato eius dimittetur ei And the prieste shal praye for him and for his sinne and it shal be forgiuen him And againe Agat poenitentiam pro pecâ—ato offerat de gregibus agnam siue capram orabit que pro ea sacerdos pro peccatis eius Let the soule doo penaunce and offer a kidde of the flocke or an ewe lambe and so the priest shall praye for that soule and the sinnes therof All which doth not onely conuince that Goddes wil was that remission of sinnes shoulde be had by external sacrifices penaunce and oblatioÌ„ and that not otherwise but by the priestes mediation CoÌ„fession vsed to the priest euen in the olde lavve but also that there was an order euen then often in the olde law that maÌ„ should vtter his sinnes with the greuousnesse therof and circumstances that according to the difference of the faultes the diuersitie of sacrifices and expiation might be vsed and that the priest seuerallie might praye for the remission thereof In all which dooing I will not now dispute whether a carnall Iewe that then had no further respecte but to the present obseruation of those commanded Ceremonies and sacrifices did obteine therby remission of sinnes by which the soule is recoÌ„ciled to God or elles only a fredoÌ„ from some temporall punishment due to the same by lawe amongst the people or otherwise by Goddes appointmeÌ„t but most sure it is that the spirituall sorte which from those sacrifices did not seperate but include Christes bloud August suê‘ Nu. 25. et Leo serm 3. de nati Domini in respect wherof all their sacrifices had their force thoughe not so ful as oures nowe haue nor with so ample promisse of Goddes grace yet sure it is that they by faith in Christ and yet not without those obseruatioÌ„s which it was necessarie that they shoulde then kepe were sanctified and purged verilie froÌ„ their sinnes External elements be not taken a vvay by the nevv lavve but more grace ys put to them nor without the ministerie of the priest whose prayer and sacrifice was requisite for the same purpose Neither were all externall wayes of Goddes worship and remission of sinnes abrogated by the Gospell as some doe falsly fayne but to the external elementes that now eueÌ„ in the newe law be instituted for grace and remission of sinnes Gods fauoure is giueÌ„ graunted a great deale more fully sanctification more plentifully For ells let vs with penauÌ„ce reiect baptisme al other wayes of Gods seruice that be not oÌ„ly internall separated wholy froÌ„ outward elementes of water bread wine impositioÌ„ of haÌ„ds oyle such like which if they dare not do how caÌ„ they auouch that God remitted not sinnes by externall sacrameÌ„tes or not by the haÌ„des of priesthod seing without the order none these holy actes caÌ„ be duely ministred Seing then that almighty god of his passing wisdoÌ„ careful prouideÌ„ce towards maÌ„ hath remitted sinnes in al ages as by the ministerie of maÌ„ in outewarde soleÌ„ne ceremonies as by circuÌ„cisioÌ„ in the lawe of nature by the same in Moyses gouernmeÌ„t besides many other sacrifices vsed coÌ„manded for diuers sinnes actual both greater lesse how caÌ„ it be otherwise but there should be sacrameÌ„tes ordeined in the newe law first for remitting of original sinnes other of al sortes at our first entraunce into Christes house theÌ„ an other for more greuous actual offeÌ„ces coÌ„mited by relapse after Baptisme For ells the lawe should not fully in figure foreshew the trueth great grace of oure sacrameÌ„tes to come wherof lightlie by Gods appointment it did beare a plain expresse reseÌ„blaÌ„ce But besides these forsayd sacrifices Iudiciarie povver for remissioÌ„ of sinnes prefigured in the old lavve in which sinnes were after their maner remitted there was an other vsuall acte practised by the priestes which did more properlie prefigurate represeÌ„t our sacrameÌ„t of penaunce the priestes authoritie in the newe law coÌ„cerning the iudgemeÌ„t of oure soules the exact discussing of oure misdeades For neither circuÌ„cisioÌ„ nor sacrifice of olde had any face of power iudiciarie therefore could not exactly represent oure priestes power giueÌ„ theÌ„ by Christ for the iudgmeÌ„t of our sinnes But the autority giueÌ„ theÌ„ in the law to discern shut vp separate the leprous vnclean persons froÌ„ other the clean of the people did plainly represent our sacrameÌ„t of penaÌ„ce whervnto by the doctours it is ofteÌ„ reseÌ„bled wherin order is takeÌ„ the xiij xiiij of Leuiticus Leuit. 13. 14. the
cui dictum est Quae solueritis in terra erunt soluta nisi quod ait Dominus soluite illum sinite abire what doth the Church then to whom it was said what so euer you loose it shal be loosed Marie shee doth that vvhich our Lorde saied loose him and lette him goe Wherin S. Augustin meaneth nothing els but that Christ is the principall agent and that he proprelie doth geue life to the soule the Prieste for all that being his seruant and minister therin and therefore by nature is a later agēt in the same woorke whiche els as I haue proued ioyntly perteineth to them both for that the effect of a Sacrament commeth not to any man til it be receiued excepte it be in certaine cases of necessitie where the parties can not obteine the external vse of the appointed elemente though they earnestlie desire the same But how the olde Priests office touching the Lepers of the law representeth our Sacrament of the Priests ministerie in the newe Testament how farre oures whiche is the trueth excelleth that whiche was but a shadowe of oures Sainct Chrysostome dooth excellently declare and therewith fullie may put out of doubt all men that our Priestes proprelie woorke remission of sinnes as Ministers in the same Diuine action and not as declarers or approuers of that effecte whiche before was wrought by God him selfe Thus he saith De Sacer. Lib. 3. Corporis lepram purgare seu verius dicam haud purgare quidem sed purgatos probare Iudaeorum sacerdotibus solis licebat at verò nostris sacerdotibus non corporis lepram verùm animae sordes non dico purgatas probare sed purgare prorsus concessum est Quamobrem meo iudicio Priests of the olde lavv did but discerne the lepre of the body Priests of the nevv lavv purge the filth of the soule qui istos despiciunt contemnuntque multò sceleratiores ac maiori supplicio digni fuerint quà m fuerit Dathan vnà cum suis omnibus That is to saie To purge the leprosie of the bodie or elles to saie as it was in deede not to purge but to discerne who were cleane was graunted onely to the Priestes of the old law but it is fullie graunted to our Priests not to purge the bodily leprosie nor to shew who are cleaner purged but verelie to purge the very filth of mans soule Therfore by my iudgement who so euer doe contemne or dispise them they are muche more wicked and more worthy punnishmēt then the disobedient Dathan with al his cōpanie Thus saith this holy Father with many woordes moe which were worthy al consideration and remembrance in this case if the matter were not so abundant that it may not suffer ouer long abode in one place least iniurie be done to other braunches of the cause no lesse necessary to be knowen for ful vpholding the truth thereof Now vpon al this foresaid declaration it may be wel vnderstanded that our Aduersaries haue smal reason in reprehending the ordinance of God who is proued in all ages and diuersities of lawes to haue geuen grace and remission of sinnes not only by externall elementes and actions of diuerse ceremonies Sacramentes and sacrifices but also euer to haue dispensed the said benefites by mans seruice and ministerie without al dishonour of his personage or diminishing his own propre interest and right therein And so much more hath he vsed in the newe lawe of the Gospel the ministerie of the Priests and external sacramentes to the procuring of the saied benefites by howe much more our law our sacramentes our sacrifices and our Priests be glorified and preferred in respect of the olde Chrisost ibidem and haue the more abundant blessing of the spirit and Christes bloud whiche by these conduites most largely flowe to al mens soules that despise not the blessed benefite thereof Yet if they wil not be satisfied herewith Spiritual contemners of mans ministerie because thei surmise our new law to be so spiritual that man may looke for nothing at mans handes but al immediatly of God and his spirite for by him they wil be taught the meaning of the scripture by him they wil be baptised by him they must haue remission and absolution and at length they are become Anabaptists and refuse to obey Prelates of the Churche and Princes of the world because by God they will onely be ruled and punnished for their offences In Prolog li 1. de doct Christ Against such proud cogitations as S. Augustine tearmeth them God hath purposely to teach humility and obedience one to an other both in temporal causes and especially in spiritual matters perteining to mens sinnes and soules he hath say for the nonst not onely instituted these waies of baser creatures vsed in the sacramēts to atteine his grace by but also hath made man the maister almost and executor of his meaning in the same whose seruice he vseth so much for our saluatiō that he sticked not to sēd his most chosen dearest euen of those daies of grace and plentifulnesse of the spirit to be instructed by man and made ready for his ministery no otherwise but by man A strange thing surely and to be wel noted for this purpose Note the practise of God for the cōfirmation of mans ministerie not onely of our Aduersaries for their confusion but of the good studiouse Readers for their instruction howe that Paule being prostrate and miraculoussie called by Iesus Christes owne voice was yet sent by Christ him selfe to confirm the authoritie of his Priestes to Ananias of him to receiue as well instructions as the Sacramentes of the Churche for his incorporation to the faithfull Act. 9. and remission of all his sinnes past And againe that Cornelius Ibid. 10. though his prayers were hearde and his almes acceptable to God and an Angell sent vnto him to declare the same whiche was a signe of high reputation was yet charged to goe to Peter of him not onelie to receiue the Sacramentes but also by his instruction to learne what to beleue what to hope and what to loue saieth Sainct Augustine The Eunuche Ibid 8. might by God him selfe in his owne countrie haue bene schooled or sanctified and yet it pleased his Maiestie so to vse the matter that by Philip bothe the sense of scripture and the Sacramente of Baptisme should be vnderstanded and receiued at once So hath God in all ages confirmed the authoritie of his holie Priestes and Ministers so hath he euer checked by his own holy examples the presumptuous temptation of man who euer hath disdained mans office ministerie for his own saluation Therfore let no mā marueil why Christ hath geuē authoritie to man to forgeue sinnes seeing he hath from the beginning not remitted ordinarily otherwise then by mans seruice nor any waie els for the most part but by external actes of ceremonies sacraments and sacrifices that we may learne thereby humility
earnestly As no maÌ„ ordinarily caÌ„ be saued without baptism so can no man that euer after Baptisme coÌ„mitteth deadly sinne be saued without sacrameÌ„tal coÌ„fession or the earnest desire seeking for the same This may seme sharp to some but this wil proue true to al coÌ„temners of Gods ordinaÌ„ce For wheÌ„ so euer God worketh his giftes grace amoÌ„g meÌ„ by ani ordinary means apointed for that purpose it is great sinne to seeke for the same either without it or to presume to haue it at Gods haÌ„ds otherwise theÌ„ he hath prescribed But the sacrameÌ„t of penaÌ„ce coÌ„fession made to the priest is the appointed meanes that God vseth in his Church for remissioÌ„ of mortal sins therfore who so euer thinketh to haue remissioÌ„ immediatly at Gods hand he shal first be voide of his purpose then further be charged of high presuÌ„ption conteÌ„pt of his wil ordinaÌ„ce The remission of original sins as proprely perteineth to God as of mortal sinnes yet because Christ hath instituted a Sacrament as an instrument and meanes to conuey that singular benefit to man he that woulde nowe claime the same immediatly at Goddes owne hand and therfore neglecteth the Sacrament of Baptisme or would minister it to himselfe without the Priests office he should neuer obteine remission of his original sinne but add to that high presumption and disobedience of Gods commaundemente whiche of it selfe without original sinne were damnable And yet me thinke I heare alreadie the sound of the deceitful voices of our Preachers It is Christes bloud that remitteth sinnes Matth. 11. Come to me all ye that be heauy loadeÌ„ and I shal refresh you Esai 43. I am he saith the Lord that putteth away thy sinnes with a thousand suche like as though Christes bloud did not stand with Christes ordininances and Sacramentes as though they came not to Christ that kepe the way of his wil and sacramentes to come vnto him as though God did not remitte those simes which in his name and in his sacramentes and by his appointed minister be remitted Protestant say plainly wilt thou refuse baptisme because Christes bloude washeth awaye originall sinnes If thou darest not openlie so preach althoughe couertly thou may chaunce so inteÌ„de If remission of sinnes in baptism may staÌ„d vvith Gods honour to maye ye in the sacr of penaunce Math. ix how darest thou deceiue the people and drawe theÌ„ from penaunce and confession because Christes bloud doth remitte sinnes For if the one sacrameÌ„t maye staÌ„d with the honoure of God and with all those places that thou bringest so deceitfullie out of scripture why maye not the other seeing both are proued alike to be instituded of Christ For the same selfe sauioure which sayd Come to me ye that be loaden and I shall refreshe you he and no other said excepte you be borne of water and the holy ghost Ioan. â— ye can not enter into the kingdom of heaueÌ„ The same God that sayde Esai 43. I am he thaâ— putteth awaye thy sinnes saieth nowe to the Apostles and priestes whose sinnes you doe forgiue forgiuen be they Ioâ—n 20. Psal 105. The same Spirite of God that saied in the prophet CoÌ„fesse your selues to the Lord Iaco. 5. for he is good sayd now againe in the Apostle confesse youre sinnes one to aÌ„other Origin himil 2. super per leui Beda soper hunc locum that you may be saued By which he meaneth not as Origen venerable Bede and other doo declare so much brotherlie acknowledging for counsell or other causes the greife of minde eche man to his felowe as he doth the order of sacramental confessioÌ„ to be made vnto Goddes priestes as it may wel appeare by the circumstaÌ„ce of the letter For there he had willed them to sende for the priestes of the church to annoile them and streight after addeth this alleadged texte of confession and prayng ouer the sicke The heretikes practise in misvsing Godes vvoord The which place the Heretikes saw to sound so many waies as wel towardes the sacrament of extreme Vnction as the sacrameÌ„t of confessioÌ„ both which they haue vnworthelie abandoned that they thought it not amisse either to denie the Apostles authoritie the whole epistle as no peace of holy scripture as Luther other did or ells which was after thought more handsom conueiance to corrupt the texte write in steade of send for the priestes of the Church thus cal the elders of the congregation For they thought it might sounde euel to haue in one sentence priestes Church consession remission of sinnes realease of paines sor sinne aÌ„noiling prayng ouer the sik and so furth But that thou maist see The necessitie of Confession standeth not on positiue lavves but by Christes institution good Christian Reader the necessitie of confession the better that it is not groweÌ„ to suche a generall practise and opinion of necessitie vpon any charge geuen by man or positiue lawes marke well with me that it dependeth directly vpon Christes owne woordes whose sinnes you doo forgiue they be forgiuen and whose sinnes you doo reteine they be reteyned And therefore sacramentall confession to be of Christes institution For if Christ gaue power to priestes to forgiue or to reteine mens sinnes then there must needes be some subiect to their power and iudgemeÌ„t ells in vain were so large a coÌ„missioÌ„ of binding and loosing mens sinnes if the right of the power did not necessarily charg al men that haue suche sinnes to be subiect to their binding and loosing Therefore this is a cleare cause that in the verie same woordes that the power was deliuered to them the bonde of obedience was also prescribed to vs. So that after that daye no sinnes mortall could ordinarilie be loosed but by them and that sacrament which in their ministerie he then did institute And that is yet more euident by the second parte of Christes senteÌ„ce where he sayeth whose sinnes you doe reteine they be reteined The which woorde retinere Hilar. super hunc locum by S. Hilarie signifieth noÌ„ soluere or noÌ„ remittere to reteine is as much as not loose or not to forgiue Whervpon by Christes expresse woordes it ensueth that whose sinnes the priest doth not forgiue they be not forgiuen and therefore that euerie maÌ„ being giltie of deadly sinne in his coÌ„scieÌ„ce is subiect to the priestes iudgmeÌ„t by the plaine termes of Christes owne woordes Mary we must wel note that the priest hath in other sacramentes namely in Baptisme a right in remitting sinnes both original and actual but there in the graund pardon of al that is past he is not made a iudge or a correcter Marke the difference betvvixte the priestes office in remitting sinnes by baptisme and penaunce because the Church can not practise iudgment or exercise discipline vpon the penitentes for any thinges doone before they came into the houshould and therefore can appoint the partie no
Quem mortalia crimina post Baptismum commissa premunt hortor prius publica poenitentia satisfacere ita sacerâ—otis iudicio reconciliatum communioni sociari si vult non ad iudicium condemnationem sui Eucharistiam percipere sed secreta satisfactione solui mortalia crimina non negamus I exhorte euery man saieth this holy doctour that is burdened after his baptisme with mortall sinne to satisfie for the same by publike penaunce and to be reconciled by the priestes iudgement and to be restored to the communion of Sainctes if he meane to receiue the holy Sacrament not to his iudgement and condemnation And I deny not in this case but deadly sinnes may be remitted by secrette satisfaction Thus he By whose woordes you see in what a damnable state moste men now of dayes stand seeing that who so euer receiueth the Sacrament of Christes body and bloud besore he be reconciled by a priestes sentence and assoiled of his sinnes he doth receiue it to his euerlasting damnatioÌ„ Vnto whose iudgemeÌ„t I ioyne S. CypriaÌ„ in this same matter complaining very earnestly vpon certayne Conuersies in his dayes that would aduenture vpon Christes body and bloude Serm. de lapsis aute exomologesim factam criminis ante purgatam conscientiam sacrificio manu sacerdotis Besore their sinnes be confessed and their coÌ„sciences purged by sacrifice and the Priestes hande Al these thinges might be at large declared and confirmed further by the iudgemeÌ„t of most auncient Fathers but because I haue bene very long and enough already may seme to be sayde for suche as by reason wil be satisfied and a great deale more then any Protestant wil aunswer vnto and also the scriptures theÌ„ selues giuing the priest so plainl power of binding and reteining as weâ— as of remitting and loosing will doo more with these that haue charged them selues with the belief of nothing that is not in expresse writing of Gods woord then the vniforme consent of al ages and the moste notable persons in the same In respect of their humour therfore I wil not say much more for this pointe then I haue sayed onely my meaning now is for the Catholiques comforte to repete a fewe suche euident sentences out of most authentique authors by whom we may take a taste not onely of their meaninges which is much for the matter but especially of the Churches practise in al ages most couÌ„tries christened since the Apostles time which I accoÌ„pt the most surest way to touche and trye trueth by that by the example of al our forefathers euery man may willingly learne to submit him selfe to the senteÌ„ce of suche as God hath made the iudges of his soule and sinnes That confession hath euer bene vsed of al mortal sinnes in al couÌ„tries and ages since â—hristes time it is proued by the witnesse of moste learned fathers with an aunswer to suche thinges as oute of the fathers be sometimes obiected to the contrarie The eleuenth Chap. I am the longer in this approued trueth because I remember what S. Chrisostom saieth Dâ— sacerli 2. And I see by these dayes that it is very true which he writeth Multa arte opus esse vt qui laborant Christiani vltrò sibiipsis persuadeant sacerdotum curationibus sese submittere That it is a pointe of highe wisdom and conning to bring to passe that Christian men which are sicke in soule would persuade them selues to submitte in all causes them selues to the priestes curing For in deede in Nectarius his predecessours dayes ther was suche an offence arose to the simple sorte and such a Trageady in Constantinople Church by the noughty facte of a Deacon there An aunsvver to a certaine storie alleaged by the aduersaries against CoÌ„fession that their Bishoppe was gladde to make the state of penaunce whiche then was often publiste euen for priuate sinnes to be a great deale more free then before Whervppon the people tooke occasion of suche liberty and licentious life that when their common Penitenciarie by the commandement of Nectarius was remoued they were exceding loath to confesse or doo iuste Penaunce for their sinnes att all Thughe that good man condescending to the peoples weakenes ment neuer to take away that whole order wherein he had no authority because it is no politike prouision but Christes institution but onely that the penaunce should not be publike except the party listed of those sinnes which were to the saied Penitenciarie confessed in secrette Which facte of his thoughe perchaunce it was necessary for that tyme yet it was not allowed of the Writers of the same History Lib. 9. ca. 35 tripar histor as a thing sayeth Sozomenus that broughte muche dissolute life and alteration of the peoples manners in to the Churche Yet oure aduersaries are in such distresse for the maintenaunce of their contrary assertion against holie Confession that they be not ashamed to alleadge this mans doubtfull example Whiche if it were good and to be folowed yet made yt nothing against priuate shrifte which they call nowe auricular confession or if it did make againste the whole Sacrament euery way ministered yet it coulde not of reason be folowed being but one Bishoppes compelled acte and that disalowed euen of the reporters them selues and proued to be euel by the practise of all Churches christened to the contrary And sure it is that S. Chrysostome who succeded Nectarius had much a doo to bring the people made more licencious by the foresayd graunt to the distincte numbering of all their sinnes to the priest Sermon de paenit coÌ„fess againe which he knewe to be necessary by Christes institution and therefore in exhorting them to confession he speaketh much of bashfullnes which the people had in vttering their sinnes and of feare of vpbraiding of suche thinges as they had confessed to the priestes and of comming furth as it were to a publike stage to open their offences as the vse was in his predecessours dayes Of al which thinges and other impedimeÌ„tes of confession this doctor doth discharge the penitents by awarranting them that priuate confession which is made without witnesse and to him that shall no laye any thing confessed to theire chardge or open it to the worlde is enough thoughe the open order vsed before he counteth the more perfect and better wherin he saieth that Iob was not a shamed to confesse his faultes before the worlde muche lesse Christen men shoulde be abashed to open them selues to God not meaning so by confession made to God as thougâ—e he discharged them of opening their sinnes in the close consistorie of the priestes iudgment which he in deede did not but he meaneth Magister quaâ—to seÌ„tentiaruÌ„ as the Maister firste aunswered and other schole men of greate and exacte iudgement after him that in steede of publike confession made in the face of the Church secrette opening to the priest who occupieth there the seate of God and therefore would
much more theÌ„ must we now vse the same where it is more required where Christ hath instituted a Sacrament to that ende to remit sinnes committed by relapse after Baptisme Mat. 3. Mar 1. And in dede the custom of Iohn the Baptist proueth that there was a kind of confession necessarie or at the leaste conuenient before the institutioÌ„ of this SacrameÌ„t For the EuaÌ„gelistes doo say Baptizabantur ab eo in Iordane confiâ—entes peccata sua men were baptised of him in Iordan and made coÌ„fession of their sinnes So that Iohn may seme to haue prepared the way to Christes doctrine and Sacramentes not onely by his baptisme but also by the vsing of the people to confesse their faultes and yet it is not necessarie that his vsage of penaunce should be of like force or should conteyne an exact confession of euerie sinne as the institution of Christ afterward did include no more theÌ„ this batism may be thought to be fully answerable either in maner of vsage or force efficacy to the holy sacrameÌ„t of Baptisme by Christ instituted for the office of the new lawe And in an other place the sayd S. Basil treateth how yong Nons and holie sacred Virgens shoulde confesse Questione 100. them selues And in an other place he admonisheth all men to be circuÌ„spect in choice of their ghostlie father by whose sentence sinnes ought with singular discretion to be iudged or examined Whereby it is most manifeste that coÌ„fession to the priestes was vsed and compted necessarie in his dayes Nicephorus later then he Niceph cartophilax ad Theodos but a learned Greke writer declareth also vnto Theodosius a moncke that the power of binding and loosing sinnes was committed to Bishopes by oure merciful Lorde Christe Iesus in so much saith he that once all men came and confessed their secrete sinnes to them by whome they either receiued pardon or were put backe But nowe throughe the encrease of Christian people and great tediousnes of the worke they haue coÌ„mitted this busines much what to religious persons such as he of tried coÌ„ditions for to be most profitable to others Thus saith he in sense These therfore many other do testify for their Church in what soleÌ„ne vse sacramental Confession hath euer ben wherin we haue the lesse need to stand loÌ„g seing the same History that our Aduersaries doe somtime alleadge plainely reporteth that not only in the Church of Constantinople but also in the west Churches Penitentiaries appointed to heare Confessions and namely at Rome alwaies since Nouatus the Heretiks false opinion touching penance rose a vertuous Priest sadde secreat and wise was appointed to heare the sinnes of al men and was called the Penitentiarie then as he and the like of that office be called yet We call them Confessours of olde in Grece they were named Spirituall maisters or Fathers as we now terme them in our Mother tongue Ghostlie Fathers also Qui secundùm vnius cuiusque culpam indicebant mulctam Who saieth Sozomenus according to euery mans faulte prescribed due penance Which penaÌ„ce though it were often openlie done by the confessours appointment yet the sinnes were not knowen for whiche the penance was prescribed For the confession was secreat or auricular as we call it now as is plaine by the Historie elles the Prieste of that office should not haue bene charged with secrecie and silence though the confession sometimes was also open where the penitents deuotion or desire so required as it may be yet For it is no mater for the substance of the Sacramente whether it be publike or priuate And it is the condiscending to the peoples weaknes that that should be so secreat generally which often in old time hath ben opeÌ„ And yet I think no man was euer coÌ„pelled by any precept of the Church to coÌ„fesse in the publik face of the Church his sinnes that were coÌ„mitted secretly Epist ad Episc Piceni Campaniae See this place at large by and by folovving hereafter Though in Leo the great his daies there was a custome not allowable that men were forced to geue vppe a libell openly of all their sinnes Which rigorous custom the saied holy Father afterward abrogated Neuer the lesse the penance was of olde often publike the fourme wherof appeareth in S. Ambrose in Tertullian who both haue written seueral bookes De Poenitentia PoeniteÌ„tes in S. Augustine in sundrie places and in this present Historie of Sozomenus And loÌ„g after their daies there were some that were called Poenitentes PeniteÌ„ts which were barred from the holy CoÌ„munion the secrets sone raigne holy of the blessed mysteries of the Masse so long as their prescribed penaÌ„ce indured besides fasting almose other like penalties enioyned And especially in LeÌ„t time there wer of these deuout publik Penitents as appereth by diuerse orders of the seruice in the Church appointed agreeing to theÌ„ who lightly were seperated till the celebrating of Christes supper passioÌ„ in the holy daies next before Easter Wherof yet in most Churches ther remaineth a smal signe by disciplin geueÌ„ to the people with rods on the same daies But now these many yeres the peoples feablenes considered there is no publike Penance geuen nor receiued in the Sacrament muche lesse open Confession made of any secret crimes the Churche being well assured that this Auricular Confession fullie aunswereth Christes institution and agreeth also with the often practise of the Primitiue Church herein though the Heretikes and some of their faultours as Beatus Rhenanus B. Rhenanus or who els so euer wrote the Preface that commonlie is annexed to Tertullian deny the same And truely seing their wanton pleasure is not to beare secreat Confession I dare sai thei caÌ„ much lesse away with publike Penance or Confession which is a thousand times more burdenous But now if you would coÌ„ferre with the Fathers of al ages and of euery notable Church touching this Confession to Gods Priests you may beginne if you list euen at this day and driue vppe both the truth of the doctrine the perpetual practise thereof euen to the Apostles time Sess 14. Cap. 5. de Confess Ca. 3. â— In the late holie Councell holden at Trent bothe the doctrine is confirmed declared with al grauitie and also the Aduersaries of that Sacrament and the misconstruers of Christes woordes of remission to pertaine to preaching of the Gospel and not to the very act of absolution De Sacrament Poeniten be by the consent of al Catholike states of the Christian world accursed excommunicated It was at Florence also decreed in a most notable generall assemblie of both the Latin and Greke Churche that as well the whole Sacrament of Penance as that especiall part which is called Confession was of Christes institution In the great Councel holden at Lateran Can. 21. Omnis vtriusque sexus there is so plain charge geuen to euery
Christian to coÌ„fesse his sinnes either to his own ordinary Parochian or to some other Priest that hath by him or otherwise authority and iurisdiction ouer the Penitent that Protestants affirme albeit very falslie that Confession was first instituted in the said Councel and this was more then three hundreth yeares since And foure hundred yeares before that in a Prouincial Councel kept at Vormacia Can. 7. there is a Canon made coÌ„cerning the qualities of the Priests that are constituted to be CoÌ„fessours Penitentiaries where it is commaunded that they be such Qui possunt singulorum causas originem quoque modum culparum sigillatim considerare examinare that can particularly trie out and examine the causes of euery offeÌ„der the manner and grouÌ„d of their faultes Which decree is borowed woord for woorde almost Can. 102. out of the last Canon of Constantinople Councel called the sixth general whiche was long before all the foresaid Synodes Their discourse is long vpon the Priests dutie which should siâ—te on confessions whoÌ„ they instruct by these woordes Oportet qui facultateÌ„ absoluendi et ligandi à Deo receperunt peccati qualitatem speculentur et peccatoris promptitudinem ad reuersionem vt sic medicamentum admoueant aegritudini aptum ne si de peccato sine discrimine staâ—uant aberrent à salute aegrotantis Those that haue receiued of our Lord power to loose and binde must trie out the qualitie of euery fault and the readinesse of the offender to returne to vertue that they may prouide a medicine meet for the malady least if they should without distincte knowledge of their sinne geue iudgemeÌ„t they should erre in prouiding health for the sick person By which Councell keâ—t in Constantinople you may easelie gather that neither Confession was euer omitted by lawe nor the common Penitenciarie long abrogated out of CoÌ„stantinople Churche And when I name these decrees of so many general Councels in diuerse ages I doe not only cal them generally to witnes for my cause which were enough seeing euery determination there passeth as by the sentence of the holy Ghoste and Christes owne iudgemente of whose presence such holy assemblance is assured but I appeale to euery holy Bisshop Vvhat it is to allege a general Councel Priest and Prince of the world that agreed to the same and were there assembled euery of which was of more experience learning and vertue or at the least of more humility then all our Aduersaries aliue But now if you go to trye other the learned writers of all times for the practise of this point then our labour shal be infinit but our cause more strong our Aduersaries soner confounded I need not for that practise name the learned Schoolmen of excellent capacitie in deepe mysteries because they were so late and because Heretikes can not denie but they are al vndoubtedly against them and euerye one for vs Thomas Aquinas is oures Dionysius is oures I meane the Carthusian If any man doubt of S. Bernard lette him reade the life of Malachie whom he praiseth for bringing into vre the most profitable vse of Confession In vitam Malach. in the rude partes of Ireland S. Bede is proued before Super 5. ca. Iacob not only to haue allowed confession to the Priest but to haue expounded S. Iames woordes of Confession for the sacramente of Penance and vttering our sinnes to Gods Ministers And he recordeth that in oure Countrie of England before his daies S. Bede sheweth examples of CoÌ„fession to a Prieste vsed in England Cap. 25. Confession was vsed to a Priest Whereof as also of Penance and satisfaction there is an exaÌ„ple or two in the fourth booke of his Ecclesiasticall Historie of oure Churche Before him S. Gregorie so well liketh and knoweth this practise of sacramental Confession In Prasprali Gregorij that in his Pastorall he prescribeth the Priestes of Gods Church many wayes howe to seeke out the diseases of their peoples soules and according to the variety of the same to admitte or put backe to pardon or to punnish De â—oen dist 6. Cap. de Sacer. S. yea so plaine he is in this matter that he chargeth the Priest to be exceding grieuously punnished that in any case shall vtter the Penitentes confession or anye parte thereof Againe farre aboue these holy Leo and Great amending the hard custom that in some places of Italie and Campania Epist 80. was vsed touching publik confession of priuate sinnes he saieth Reatus conscientiarum sufficiat solis sacerdotibus indicari confessione secreta Quamuis enim plenitudo fidei videtur esse laudabilis Vide euÌ„dem ad Theodor. Iuli. â—orens qua propter Dei timorem apud homines erubescere non veretur tamen quia non omnium huiusmodi sunt peccata vt velint in poenitentiam ea publicari remoueatur tam improbabilis consuetudo ne multi à poenitentiae remedijs arceantur dum aut erubescunt aut metuunt mimicis suis facta sua reserare quibus possint legum constitutione percelli Sufficit enim illa confessio quae primùm Deo offertur tunc etiam sacerdoti qui pro debitis confitentium precator accedit Tunc enim demum plures ad poenitentiam potuerunt prouocari si populi auribus non publicetur conscientia confitentis Yt is enough Mark the reasons of this holy Father for auricular confession that the gilt and offences of mans conscience be opened to the Priestes alone in secreat Confession For though the feruoure of faith be verie laudable which is contente for Gods sake to be ashamed before man yet because the sinnes of euerye man be not such that the penitent woulde gladlie vtter openly let so reprobable custome be abolished least many be holdeÌ„ from the remedies of penance whiles either they are ashamed or feare to opeÌ„ their deedes to their ennemies by whome they might by order of lawe be punnished For that confession is sufficient which is made first to God and then to the Priest also who wil be an intercessour for the sinnes of them that confesse For then might moe be prouoked to penance if the secreat conscience of the confessed be not published to the eares of the people Thus saieth S. Leo a man of that time and credite as our Aduersaries would wish Let them say now that priuate confession began in Lateran Councel ConfessioÌ„ vsed before Laterane Councel as vvel as the receiuing of the B. Sacrament because that thing which euer was counted and vsed as necessarie was there decreed for the ameÌ„ding of the peoples slouth to be done euery yeare once at the least before they receiued the blessed Sacrament As truely may they say that the Euchariste and receiuing thereof was begon in the same Councel and by the very same Canon For as ther is charge that euery maÌ„ should be confessed so there is commaundement geueÌ„ that euery man shal receiue once a yeare the
sinnes in the sacrament of penaunce but also for the correcting or giuing pardon by supreame Iurisdiction oute of the sayde Sacrament Now then let Caluin or his auncieÌ„t Luter come furth and deny all spiritual Iurisdiction of holy Bishoppes couching temporal punishement or release of paines appointed for sinne let them writhe the plain place both of binding and loosing to the preaching of the Gospel as their fashion is rather then they woulde graunte this soueraignty to the Church of Christ lette them say Marci 1â— that Christ wheÌ„ he whipped out the vnlawful occupiers of merchandies in the teÌ„ple did nothing els but preach the Gospel let them hold that this was a sermoÌ„ not aÌ„ act of iurisdictioÌ„ Lucae 5. wheÌ„ he said to diuers thy sinnes be forgiueÌ„ thee or when he with power terror gaue to Iudas the sop Ioan. 13. by which it is thought that he excoÌ„municated him gaue him vp wholly to the deuel separated him froÌ„ the coÌ„pany of the Apostles froÌ„ his Church For theÌ„ the deuil eÌ„tred into him he weÌ„t out as the gospel saith But say maister Luther was this the power of preaching onely or an exercise of most highe Iurisdiction geuen him of his Father euerlasting as he wa the heade of the Church No no vaine felowes this is no preaching which you would haue onely to be the Churches property that you might being voyd of al other authority in Gods Church compare with his Apostles in youre prating because your glory amongst the people standeth on your glase tunges Cores had a tikling tung and Moyses tung was tied yet God gaue sentence on his seruaÌ„tes side reueÌ„ged the disobedience of the coÌ„trary No no I tel you if al the Bishopes priestes of the Christian worlde were as rude simple in their preaching as you think your selues eloqueÌ„t yet their onely IurisdictioÌ„ and Maiesty of their power assisted by Christ perpetually by whom it was giuen theÌ„ shal beare you downe your vaine name of preaching the woord And God be thaÌ„ked beside the right of the cause ther be in the Church many that are honourred with the gifte of true preaching to whoÌ„ God giueth the woord in deed with great vnspeakeable force eÌ„crease of the trueth daily decay of your vain shade of preaching His name be blessed for euer that hath giueÌ„ such a guard to his Church that Hel gâ—tes nor the eloqueÌ„ce neither of maÌ„ nor Angel shall preuaile against her The Appstles aÌ„d Bishopes haue euer besides the preching of the Gospel punished meÌ„s sins aÌ„d practised iudgmeÌ„t vpoÌ„ meÌ„s soules both in binding aÌ„d loosing The fyth Chapter CHrist theÌ„ hauing not oÌ„ly the preaching of that Gospel to punish pardoÌ„ by but iurisdictioÌ„ also to giue disciplin to release the same in that he was made the supreame gouernour of all Christian people did communicate both these functions at once and gaue the Magistrates of the Church not onely by preaching to threaten or exhorte meÌ„ to vertue or promise them release of their sinnes by onely faith as men haue now plained the way to heauen but also by force of their regiment to giue greate penaunce as we haue proued great pardon againe as to their wisdoms and for the Churches edifiyng may seeme moste conuenient Of this great power of Christ coÌ„municated to his Apostles we haue practise as well for punishing sinners as pardoning them For vpon this soueraigne iurisdiction it rose that the Apostles mightely ministered iustice vpon offenders as well by afflicting their bodies with enioyned long fastes and large almoses as by excommunication and other meanes Which thing who so euer wel weigeth in the manifolde examples of Goddes woord they shal not wonder that the holy Bishops of Christes Church may geue a pardoÌ„ of penaunce enioyned For by this authority did S. Peter who first receiued the keies of Iurisdiccion and power ouer the Church Act. 5. kill both Ananias and Saphira his wife which is as greate a bodily punishement for sinne as may be By this authority did he excommunicate Simon the Sorcerer By this power did S. Paule offer to reuenge disobedience 1. Cor. 4. By this did he threaten to come to the faithfull with a rodde of discipline 2. Tim. 1. By this he prescribed to Timothy whome he consecrated Bishope how he should heare accusatioÌ„s behaue him self in rebuking sin 1. Tim. 2. correctioÌ„ of diuers states By this power did he mightely deliuer vppe some to Sathan bodely vexatioÌ„ By this power did he strike blinde Elimas the witche Act. 13. released him at his pleasure againe By this power haue holy Bishopes excoÌ„municated mighty Emperours suspeÌ„ded many froÌ„ the sacramentes disgraded diuers spiritual meÌ„ froÌ„ their functioÌ„s interdicted whole realms to be short by this power hath the Church of God prescribed a due punishmeÌ„t for euery deadly sinne iustly respecting the greuousnes thereof coÌ„tinuaÌ„ce therein As we may see in the peniteÌ„tial book of Theodorus Bede the canoÌ„s wherof be traÌ„slated into the book of decrees Vide decret Iuo par 15. which is the 15. intitled De poeniteÌ„â— namely in the most auncieÌ„t CouÌ„cel of Ancyre which was holden well near xiij C. yeres sitheÌ„s in the most pure time of ChristiaÌ„ religioÌ„ wheÌ„ I trow our Aduersaies dare not say that the faith was corrupted Cap. 1. cap. 2. There the Priestes DeacoÌ„s the releÌ„ted in persecutioÌ„ wer suspeÌ„ded froÌ„ the executing of their seueral functioÌ„s such as supt in the teÌ„ples of Idols Cap. 4. sacrificed to false gods wer charged beside absteining froÌ„ the sacrameÌ„ts Cap. 15. with three yeres penaÌ„ce those that coÌ„mitted brutish sins vnnatural Cap. 20. should doo xxv yeres penaÌ„ce for adultry vij yeres penaÌ„ce for womeÌ„ that destroied their birth Cap. 21. x. yeres for murtherers vij if it be not voluÌ„tary if it he wilful Cap. 22. til that end of maÌ„s life for superstious southsaiers or dream reders or sorcerers Cap 23. witches v. yeares Finally for rape x. yeres were prescribed The like wer made for diuers crimes in the CouÌ„cel of Nice Cap. 24. But it is inough that we know though the eternall paines deserued by dedly sins be forgiueÌ„ with the sins theÌ„ selfs that yet ther remaineth for the satisfiyng of gods iustice som teÌ„poral scourge to preueÌ„t which the church enioineth payne for faults remitted that both Gods mercy be folowed in the remissioÌ„ of their syns hys iustice partly answered in punishmeÌ„t of the same the which der of deserued pain being not here fulfilled or released it must in an other world be answered And therfore s Austine saith of the Churches vsage in prescribing penaÌ„ce thus Cap. 65. Enchir. Sed neque de ipsis criminib ê™libet magnis remitteÌ„dis in S. Ecclia dei desperaÌ„da eÌ„ miÌ„a ageÌ„tib poeniteÌ„tiaÌ„ secunduÌ„ moduÌ„ sui
cuiusque peccari et ê™a pleruÌ„que dolor alterius cordis occultus eÌ„ alteri rectè coÌ„stituuÌ„tur ab ijs ê™ Eccliae pÌ„sunt teÌ„pora poeniteÌ„tiae vt fiat eÌ„t satis EccliÌ„ae in quae peccata remittuÌ„tur EueÌ„ for sins being neuer so greuous greate we may not despaire of gods mercy nor of remissioÌ„ to be had in the Church mary alwaies presupposed that the offeÌ„ders must do penaÌ„ce according to the quaÌ„tity greuousnes of their offeÌ„ces And because ofteÌ„ it chaÌ„ceth that the sorow of maÌ„s hart wherin much staÌ„deth is vnknoweÌ„ to other meÌ„ it is very resonable that the Church should limite their penauÌ„ce by her gouernours to be accoÌ„plished in certayne times appoynted seasons for the aunswer of the Churches right in which onely all sinnes be remitted as out of her lap none at all be forgiueÌ„ for any benefite to the partie So saith this doctour of publike penaunce And of secret satisfaction which now is more vsed after confession leste any maÌ„ should feare that that were not sufficient to satisfie for the remnaÌ„t of debt due for mortal sins forgeueÌ„ thus faith the authour of the booke de ecclesias dogm set furth wyth S. Augustines name De ecclesiasticis dogmatibus Cap. 53. Sed secreta satisfactione solui mortalia crimina non negamus Neyther we doe denie but mortall sinnes maye be loosed by secret satisfaction Fear not the worde satisfactioÌ„ as though it derogated any thing to the redeÌ„ptioÌ„ which is in Christ Iesus It is here in many places of S Augustines woorkes most common SatisfactioÌ„ an vsuall vvord in the doctours and no lesse vsed of al Catholik writers since Christs time who knew right well that the fructes of Christian penaunce done in the vertue force of Gods grace doe applie Christes satisfaction effectually to our benefite and not remoue the vse thereof from vs. But they haue a faith so solitary now a dayes that it will alone apprehende what ye list and reache so farre into Christes iustice that her fautors shall haue no need of christian woorkes or fruitful repentance Now to this ende haue we saied all this that the faithful may vnderstand perfectly what the Pope may by right remitte through his Pardon and Indulgence Note vvel For looke what the officers of Gods Church may bind that without all doubt may they vpon good coÌ„sideration release againe Therefore if they may enioyne penance for yeres and dayes both openly out of the Sacrament and also in priuate satisfaction after Confession then may they release certaine daies and yeares of the same penance whiche was prescribed before For loosing and binding pertaine by reason law and Christes own graunte as to one acte of iurisdiction that the one being laufull Hovv the pardons for daies and yeares do rise the other must needes so be also If the Church be of right power and authoritie to prescribe penaunce of seuen yeares she hath the like right to remitte vpon iust respect eyther all those yeares or some part of the same especially hauing meanes otherwise to supply the lacke of satisfactioÌ„ of Gods iustice in the party peniteÌ„t And therefore I ioyne in argument and open reason with our Aduersaries thus To geue pardon in most coÌ„mon and catholike sense of that woord is to release some parte or all the enioyned penaunce for sinnes remitted But the Pope because he is the principall gouernour of Gods Church may release any penaunce enioyned vpon iust consideratioÌ„s ergo the Pope may laufully geue Pardons The Minor wherein the Aduersaries may perchance geue back I proue thus That which was bound by the Churches or Popes authority may be laufully loosed by the same authority agayne because Christ hym selfe ioyned in hys graunte both these actes together they are proued to be propre to one iurisdction But the Church by the Decrees of Bishops CouÌ„cels hath apoynted such penauÌ„ce so many yeres of correction for sundry faults therefore the same Byshops or suche as be of the like authority when they see occasion may remit the penauÌ„ce of the sayd yeres or som part of it by limitation of dayes or seasoÌ„s as the state of the peniteÌ„t requireth or the time it self doth moue them And thys argument shall be vnmoueable except they reiect wyth the Popes Pardons all maner of discipline as well of excommunication as other lesser satisfactions whereof we haue allready spoken as in deede to maynteyn theyr falshod they must nedes doo as also they shall be enforced to reproue both the holy Councell of Nice all the holy Fathers the generall practise of the Church wyth them the expresse scriptures in whych the woorthy fructes of penaunce sharp disclpline Math. 7. 1. Cor. 11. Heb. 13. Mat. 16.18 1. Tim. 1. iudging our selues obedience to our Prelates bynding reteyning of synnes excoÌ„municatyng deliueryng vp to Sathan be so often coÌ„mended It must nedes be a miserable doctrine of these Protestants whiche can not be vpholden but by so shamefull shiftes and when we driue them into suche straites in a matter where they think most may be said for them selues and least for our defence where shal they stand in our plain causes in which almoste our Aduersaries confesse vs to haue the vantage of Antiquitie and the preheminence of al the Councels in the world But surely I think falshod hath so litle hold in al matters that it staÌ„deth only vpright whiles the contrary is not seen or not vnderstanded which shee seeketh euer by al meanes shee may to couer keepe close For the night shee loueth and in darkenes shee deliteth Doe but open the true sense of anie Article by them impugned and it is more then halfe proued and the ennemies without argument vpon the sight of truth in a maner discomfited So it fareth with them in our present cause which they haue long toyled and troubled in the mist of their phantasies and vpon false interpretation disgraced amongst the simple sort that thing which in this sense as Gods Churche that hath the ruling of the mater taketh it is so sure and so cleare in it selfe that I thinke they shal neuer be hable with honestie to speak against any one parcel therof That there be diuerse wayes of temporal punnishment remaining after sinnes be remitted euery of whiche wayes may be in some cases released in parte or in whole by the Pardons of Popes and Bisshops The sixth Chapter ANd yet to geue more light to the matter the greater ouerthrow to falshod let vs driue the cause forwarde and weigh with our selues the whole state of thinges in this order First that there be three wayes of punnishment of mans sinnes after they be released in the sacramente of Penance besides the fruites of repentance which maÌ„ chargeth himself withall Of three sortes of punnishments teÌ„poral besides the punnishment appointed for offences by the ciuill or temporall lawes whereof I nowe speake not the
all destroy all thinges doe stande by good reason nothing can be reproued either with reason or good religion That not onely the penaunce enioyned in the sacrament or otherwise by canonical correction but also suche paine as God him selfe prouideth for sinne may be released by the Popes Pardōs and that Purgatory paines may especially be preuented by the same remissions The seuenth Chapter BVT now because some may by course of oure matter looke that I shoulde declare whether the Popes Pardons may release any whit of that paine which God him selfe putteth the penitent vnto after his sinnes be forgiuen I must somwhat stand hereon the cause is weighty and much misliked of the Aduersaries and some other perchance to that see not so farre into the matter as they should doe before they geue any iudgement thereof That the gouernours of the Church should remitte Canonical correction and priuei satisfaction with the bonde of penaunce either enioyned or els which by the lawes spiritual might be enioyned many will confesse But that their power should reache to the remitting of that paine which Goddes hande hath laied vpon the offender for temporal correction that they vnderstande not Truely for this they muste be instructed first that the temporal punishment which God taketh on sinners that be penitent thoughe it standeth by the lawe of nature God punisheth vs for sin the more because vve punish not ourselues and was practised of God him selfe before any mans lawes were made for punishement of sinnes yet now it riseth principally vpō lacke of punishing of oure selues or the accomplishing of suche penaunce as the Churche of God prescribeth For if the Church punnishe her Childrens faultes by sharpe discipline doubtles it satisficeth Goddes righteousnesse and he wil not punishe bis in idipsum twise for one faulte Num. 1. or if man earnestly and sufficiently iudge him selfe God hath promised by S. Paul that he wil not iudge him also that is to say that he will not correcte him with more heauy discipline of this life or the life to come for that signifieth this worde iudicare 1. Cor. 11. as the Apostle him selfe doth interprete it Then it foloweth that the bonde of any temporall punishement to be inflicted by God him selfe doth not now binde man otherwise then for lacke of necessary discipline to be taken in this life and therefore that Purgatorie bindeth no man but in respecte of satisfying Gods iustice which was not aunswered here before either by our selues or by the Churches correction and enioyned penaunce Consider secondly that he that fully is discharged of the bonde of satisfaction in this life whether it be by iust accomplishing of his due and deserued penaunce or by remission of Goddes Church and aunswering otherwise his lacke therein the same person must of necessity be also discharged of Purgatorie and al paine in this life which els God would haue enioyned for sinne because this debt of Purgatorie rose vnto the penitent for the aunswer of Gods iustice and lack of payment in this life the which being discharged to the honoure of God and the relief of the party there remaineth no bonde of paine to come For debt is discharged properly either by remitting it freely or by paiment iustly and I speake rather of Purgatorie then of other paines enioyned by God in this life Purgatorie is neuer suffered but for satisfying for sinne only vvher other paines of this life may be for other causes because that is euer appointed to man onely as a recompense of Goddes iustice and as a due correction for sinne remitted when of al other paines in this world whether it be sicknes or death no man can assuredly say that this or that bodyly punishement came vpon any man as a correction for his sinnes onely or as a purgation of his life past For somtimes such thinges folow the necessity of our corrupted nature sometimes they be for our proofe exercise and sometimes for other causes But those kinds of punishmētes which God layeth vpon man onely for correction and satisfying for his sinnes neuer fal vpō him after he be either iudged by his owne teares or the Churches sufficient satisfaction enioyned or els vpon reasonable causes remitted The like afflictions may continue in any person after the bonde of them be remoued or may be giuen afterward but for the satisfaction of his owne sinnes or any debt proceding thereof they be not because the debt is discharged in so much that I dare be bold to say if any man were sicke by Goddes appointmēt for that cause only to satisfy for his sinnes remitted before in the sacramēt that he should streight recouer vpon the discharge of the debt which he did owe to God for his iustice if that infirmity wer for no other cause but that onely as it may be for many mo whereof no man can easely iudge And therefore not onely Christ him selfe as I shall declare hereafter but Aaron also healed in the old lawe the infirmities of thousandes which came vpon them onely for temporall punishment of sinnes And in the sacrament of extreme vnction the Apostle S. Iames affirmeth that oure Lorde shall vpon the priestes prayer lifte vppe the penitent or ease him of his sicknes Which may seme to be meant only or chiefly of that sicknes which commeth vpon the party by Gods hande as a punishment of those sinnes which be remissible in the sacrament or suche like means lib. 3. de sacerdot As S. Chrysostom sheweth also a passing power in the ministers of Goddes Church saying that they may kepe mans soule from perishing and may charge him with more easie paine euen at his passing hence besides that they may ease his bodyly infirmitie also by their holy prayers in the acte of extreme vnction in this sense speaketh he thereof But as I sayde because no man can well iudge when man is afflicted onely for temporal discipline or satisfaction or when for other purposes to vs vnknowen the Church of God that vseth highe wisdom and moderation in al thinges medleth not directly in pardoning by her iurisdiction any such bodyely aflictions as God chargeth man with al in this life which may be to the forsakē as a beginning of their eternal damnatiō as S. Augustin saith as well as a tēporall correctiō therefore not effectually remissible in the Church But the bonde of Purgatorie that I saye in the Churche may be released and is released at euery tyme that man worthely receiueth a full and plenarie remission of all penaunce enioyned and due to be enioyned by the lawe of the Churches decrees I doo not speake nowe of the deliuery of any person from the paines of purgatorie which already is actually there or for the Churches power in releasing of their paynes It is another thing to release Purgatorie paynes and to preuēt purgatorie after they be in the course of Goddes iudgment for the same I am not so farre yet but
twenty dayes I saye of Purgatorie paines but by so muche as in force of satisfaction there is answerable to twenty dayes faste here So that the Church measuring her mercies by the yeares of penaunce deserued by the lawe in this life or ells where taketh effecte not only in this life where there caÌ„ not be so many dayes in oure shorte time but especially in preueÌ„ting Purgatorie paynes where there maye well be punishmeÌ„t answerable in a very shorte time to all the dayes prescribed by the measures of the lawe and discipline of oure present dayes in the worlde And yet I talke not nowe of taking or deliuering any maÌ„ out of Purgatorie so muche sooner as so manie dayes release doth importe when he is in it alreadye but I meane as I ofteÌ„ saye for the simples sake of him that is yet aliue and in the Churches iurisdiction and therefore may haue by the Keyes of the Churche a pardon of his debtes either all or parte to preuent the paynes of Purgatorie or to discharge the debt therof before that terrible daye come when it shall be actually required And in this sense vndoubtedly are the greate number of yeares and dayes to be taken which be exceding necessary to procure mercy in these euell times wherin we may beholde the pitiful waaste of christian workes euery where and litle penance to be done no not of the better sort of ChristiaÌ„ people As for the other disobedieÌ„t children that euery way laugh their Mother to scorn whether she vse seueritie of discipline or lenitie in remission they haue no parte neither of the Churches blessing nor of the holy workes of Sanites nor of Gods owne peace and pardon Oure Lorde giue them the grace of repentaunce that they may haue a taste either of the Churches discipline or of her mercie and leuitie It is proued as wel by sundrie examples of the olde Lawe as by Christs owne often facte and his Apostles that enioyned or deserued punishement may be released by the gouernours of the Church in their Pardons The Ninth Chapter SOme may here marueile perchaÌ„ce that such power should be giuen to mortal men as to remitte suche great portion of penaunce as by iustice ought to be enioyned or such a number of yeares as are oppointed for satisfaction and correction of former misdedes thereby to remoue from the party the heauy hande of God prepared for iudgement who would not wonder much hereat if they considered that the debt of hel paynes and eternity of punishement which incomparably excedeth many thousand yeares might by the priestes office and alwayes is in the due execution of the sacrament of penaunce fully remoued from the party peniteÌ„t And wher mercy putteth away deserued damnation there may muche lesse force of grace turne away the punishement of Purgatorie being but transitory and equiualent onely to the penaunce of a number of yeares prescribed Pristhod in the nevve lavve of more povver to purchase mercy them in the olde In which case if the Church of God should haue no preheminence now after the incarnatioÌ„ of Christ since which time the wayes of mercy towards mankinde must needes be muche enlarged oure state and gouernement should be much inferiour to the regiment and to the priesthod of the olde lawe which truely did in al thinges but as a shadowe and figure resemble the Maiesty of our Churches preheminence especially there where mercy and grace were to be shewed which came by Christ Iesus Behold theÌ„ some steppe of this more excellent power giuen to oure chiefe priestes Moyses and AaroÌ„ procured mercy aÌ„d pardoÌ„ for the people in the persons of Moyses and Aaron who are noted in the booke of Exodus and Numbers meruelously to haue procured Goddes mercy sometimes by force of sacrifice prayer singular zeale to haue released some great portion of the paines and punishment which God him selfe by his owne mouth determination had layed vpoÌ„ the people With what meruelous confideÌ„ce of his office pity of the afflicted sorte did one of theÌ„ crye out vnto God to hold his hande and pardon the people after they had deserued so greate punishment for worshipping the golden Idol of the Calfe in wildernes Lorde saith Moises this people hath coÌ„mitted an horrible sinne and they haue erected golden Goddes Forgiue them this sinne Lorde or ells if thou wilt not dashe me oute of thy booke toe which thou haste writen This gouernoure and this priest prayed not after a commoÌ„ sorte for pardon of the peoples punishement but he claimeth it with confidence in a maner requireth it as by his iurisdiction office Suche was the force of prayer priesthod before Christes spirituall soueraignty was honoured in the world otherwise then in a figure And yet God in a maner was at that point with them then that he would pardon and punishe at their pleasures For when the sinne was exceding greuous he maketh as it were means to Moises that he should not stay him nor his Anger from punishing of the offenders Let me alone Moyses saith oure Lorde and suffer me to be angrie Ibid. Num. 12. So when his sister Mary was punished by a leprosie for enuiyng at her brothers auhority he cried vnto oure Lorde and said Lorde God heale her againe of this disease and of his mercy so he did enioyning onely vnto her seuen dayes separation Aaron also procured pardon for the people by the like force of this prayer and priesthod when by sedition the people had highly offended God Num. 16. yea he did as it were limite moderat Goddes appointed punishement that his wrath should extend no farther but to the destruction of a certaine number For wheÌ„ God saide vnto Moyses and Aaron departe you heÌ„ce from amongest this people for euen now I wil consume them VpoÌ„ which woorde streight the destruction began and grew very sore a flame of fier pitifully consuming them But Aaron out of hande with his incense ranne to that parte where the plague of Gods ire wasted most and there censed vpp towardes heauen and earnestly requested for the people and so placing him eueâ— iust betwixt those that were slaine and the residewe that were aliue the wrath and indignation of God ceassed But it were to long to make rehersal of all suche punishementes as God hath afflicted his people withall for sinne and yet hath bene either wholy put of or much thereof abated by these priestes euen of the olde lawe when they had no warrant promise ne commission in sacrameÌ„t or other wise other to binde or loose as by iurisdiction or any otherwise but by their praiers where oures of the newe lawe and testament haue expresly receiued a full power and commission concerning the same Therefore now in the new law in the dayes of grace where mercy and iudgemeÌ„t be met together Psal â—4 trueth and peace haue ioyned we shall find expresse exaÌ„ples of iustice iudgemeÌ„t on the one
in that actioÌ„ of gening peace coÌ„moÌ„ to Christ his Apostles but because I see the olde Fathers lightly cal that peace which we now call Pardoning Math. 10 perchance they did allude to that which Christ willed his Disciples to bestowe on euerie hoâ—shold for a kind of blessing Which no doubt was some great benefite so grâ—at that our Maister signified vnto theÌ„ that many should be vnwoorthie of it that the fructe therof should redunde to theÌ„ selues Which caused both Bishops of olde for S. Augustin maketh mention thereof to giue their blessinges De Ciui Dei li. 22 Cap. 8. and euerie man humbly to require the same on their knees wherby surely some spiritual grace was receiued and remissioÌ„ either of Venial trespaces or paine due vnto former sinnes giuen Lett apishe Camites here mocke and mow at their Mother as they customably doe whiles the obedient children the discrete and deuout of Goddes Churche thinke it an highe point of wisdome onely to consider the maruelous direction of oure forefathers wayes in the doctrine of discipline and awe of Goddes religion That the Bishops being the highest ministers of Gods Church and namely the Pope as the principall of the rest may only lawfuly giue PardoÌ„s and in what sense the soules departed may be releiued by the same The eleuenth Chapter OF the necessary disposition of theÌ„ that should effectually receiue benefite by the Pardons of the Church and of the right intent of theÌ„ that should giue the same we haue already sufficiently spoken And now perchance some may think it necessary that it should be opened briefly in whoÌ„ this authority of releasing the paines enioyned for sinne doth principally coÌ„sist Whereof I shal with better will bestowe a fewe woordes because we shal haue occasion thereby to open the common sense of a whole Councel both learned and godly touching the matter of Pardons in the iudgement whereof assuredly proceding from the Holy Ghost we may with saftie take oure rest Of the lawful minister therefore of these remissions VVho be the lavvfull ministers in giuing pardons the scripture in precise termes prescribeth nothing though the power of binding and loosing wherevpoÌ„ the matter standeth is proued properly to be an acte of the Keye namely of iurisdiction and externall regiment which agreeth not to the simple priests hauing no further iurisdiction but in the secret court of mans conscience Wherevpon as also by the vsage of al ages and by the prescriptioÌ„ of the law it is proued that Bishops onely or such as haue their authority for the executioÌ„ of their office may laufully giue remission of satisfactions apointed for sinnes remitted Neither were it conuenient that the release of deserued penaunce should be had of euery inferiour priest lest the discipline of the Church should so become coÌ„temptible the release therof being made common to so many And it is the highe prouidence of God that the way to remitte deadly sinnes which is of necessity to our saluation should be neare vs in euery place and by the common ministers of the Church at al times to be obteined VVhy the inferiour priests caÌ„not giue pardons where the remission of the Churches discipline being often more necessary to be fulfilled and neuer or very seldom necessary to be wholly released should not be so easely obteined but hardly had at the handes of a fewe and them of excellent authoritie and reuerence in Gods Church And not onely that but also the natur of the act of pardoning doth wholy chaleng this function to the higher Magistrates of Christes CoÌ„mon Wealth For it standeth not only vpoÌ„ the remission of debt but also vpon recompense or repaying againe the bond therof by the common treasure of the whole houfhold of the faithfull which can not be by reason dispensed and bestowed vpoÌ„ any man that lacked by any but suche as are principall stewardes and rulers of some whole portion of the saide family as Bishops lawfully succeding the Apostles are knowen in this case to haue receiued the Keyes of Christes kingdom and the dispensing of his holy mysteries and therefore may iustly dispose the treasure of Christe and his Sainctes satisfactions to the benefite of the faithfull in whose lardge cures it canne not otherwise be thought but there be the merites of diuers holy and blessed men layed vp in store before God for the relief of their brethren which may be disposed at the Bishops wisdome to such namely as be of his owne charge and regiment But of particular parishes it can not be certen that ther should alwayes be some sufficiency of abundant satisfactions to remaine without decay for the continual bestowing vpon some of the saied smal circuite and that is it which the schole diuins say in particulari ecclesia merita non sunt indeficientia merites of Sanctes be not vnspendable in particular Churches But the communion of Sanctes being the generall benefite of the whole common wealth of Christes Churche continueth for euer by the abundance of many holy workes which may satisfy for other mens sinnes according to the dispositioÌ„ of such as be the gouernours and guides of our soules that the ouerplus and abundance of one sorte may euer relieue the lackes of an other sort as S. Paule speaketh in the like matter And yet the Bishops them selues haue not in this case so full power and prerogatiue No Bishop hath so great preemineÌ„ce in giuing PardoÌ„s as the pope hath and vvhy being but rulers of portions of Christes Church as he hath whom Christ appointed to be his owne Vicare throughe his whole dominion For as Christ the heade of the whole body is anoynted far more plentifully then al his brethren so doubtles he that occupieth his seate of iudgemeÌ„t through out the whole earth to whom not only the affaires of al priuate men but also the confirmation and gouernemeÌ„t of all his brethren Bishops of what dignity so euer they be doth belong Vppon whome Christ hath layde the fundation of his Churche and to whome he seuerally gaue the Keies of heauen with most ample authority both to loose and binde feede and gouerne al the shepe of his folde It is this man no doubt that hath the ful treasure of the holy coÌ„munion of Sanctes to bestowe with meruelous authority ouer mans soule with wonderful might in binding and exceeding grace and mercy in loosing This is the maÌ„ of whome S. Bernard saith Ad Eugenium alluding to Iosephes preheminence in Pharos house consâ—ituit enim Dominum Domus suae Principem omnis possessionis suae He hath made this man the Lorde of al his house and the Prince of his whole possession This man therefore representing Christes owne person throughe the whole Churche and hauing the cure and regiment of euery one of Christes sheepe may moste lawfully 2. Cor. 2. donare aliquid in persona Christi showe mercy to any man in Christes behalfe none being exempted from
his iurisdiction nor any of the Churches treasure restreined from his disposition But because I can not ground this my meaning better then vpon a general Councell I will reporte the decree of the most holy assembly holden at Lateran more then three hundreth yeares synce vnder Innocentius the thirde by which not onely this doctrine of Pardons is approued but also the superfluity therof and suche disorder as was therein throughe couetousnes of euill persons or lacke of authority in the giuers is corrected with a declaration who be the onely lawfull ministers in such remissions of enioyned penaunce Thus goeth the decree Cano. 62. Quia per indiscretas indulgentias atque superfluas quas quidam Ecclesiarum Praelati facere non verentur claues Ecclesiae contemnuntur poenitentialis satisfactio eneruatur decernimus vt cum dedicatur Basilica non extendatur Indulgentia extra annum sine ab vno solo siue a pluribus Episcopis dedicetur ac deinde in anniuersario dedicatiouis tempore quadraginta dies de iniunctis poenitentijs indulta remissio non excedat intra hunc quoque dierum numerum indulgentiarum literas praecipimus moderari quae pro quibuslibet causis aliquoties conceduntur cùm Romanus Pontifex qui plenitudinem obtinet potestatis hoc in talibus moderamen consueuerit obseruare That is to say Because the keyes of the Churche be contemned and sacramentall satisfaction is much weakened by certaine indiscrete and superfluous Indulgences the which certaine Prelats of Churches ar ouer bold to bestowe we decree that hereafter at the dedication of any Chapel no Pardon be giuen more then for one yeare whether it be dedicated by one Bishop or moe and then that ther be no remissions afterwarde in the yearely celebrating of the said dedications more thē of fourty dayes of enioyned penaunce The like also to be obserued in al other common instrumentes by which for other good causes and holy purposes Pardons shal be giuen seing the Bishope of Rome him selfe who hath the fulnesse of power herein vseth customably so to moderate the letters of Pardons that procede frō him By which holy Councel you may perceiue not only that the Bishops of Goddes Church may giue Pardons but that the Bishope of Romes right is much more ample in this case thē theirs can be and especially how carefull the Church euer hath bene to purge al corruption of doctrine or vsage crepte into the world through the disorder of mans mis behauioure and howe wicked the endeuours of some euil disposed persōs be who ceasse not vnhonestly to attribute that to the Church of Christ which she hath euer sought to redresse in the euel maners of them that haue disgraced the doctrin of trueth and made contemptible the moste profitable practise of holy thinges by their misvse of the same But he that list fully to see how litle the Catholike Church liketh the abuse of wicked men in these matters and yet how seuerely she accurseth al the cōtemners of this holy function in the right vse thereof Conciliū Trident. Sess vlt. let him reade the Decree of the last general Councell touching as wel the vse of holy pardons as the earnest consideration had of reforming all disorder therein and he shal fully be satisfied in this article if he haue learned so much as to giue ouer the preiudice of al priuate opinions to the common iudgement of Gods Church Being now thus farre in oure matter that it is well knowen the Bisshopes of Goddes Churche principally to haue this binding and loosing by the keye of their iurisdiction to be exercised in the open courte of the Church and that the power of the Bishop of Rome not only by speciall priuiledges giuen by Christ but also by lawe and prescription of all antiquities passeth in this pointe as in all other gouernment the termes or seuerall limites of all his brethren it shall not be needfull to dispute whether the Key of iurisdiction onely separated from the Keye of order proper to priesthod be sufficient to giue remission of enioyned penance by Commonly it is holden that as excommunication and other like actes of iurisdiction maye be exercised by the Bishops Legates or Substituts being no priestes or by them selues being elected Bishops and yet neither consecrated nor ordered euen so may Indulgencies be also profitablie graunted Wherof I will not now talke because it is not muche materiall seing commonly they be not graunted otherwise but of Bishops neither so ofte of other as of the Pope neuer any otherwise but by his or other bishops authoritie by whom so euer that functiō is executed But this I knowe will be required rather at my handes VVether the Popes Pardons doe extend to purgatorie and hovv the course of the matter giuing occasion thervnto how farre the limites of the Popes iurisdiction who hath the soueraigntie herin doth extend and whether the benefite of any Pardon may perteine to any person that is alreadie appointed to suffer in his soule the paines of the next life and is at this present in the course of Goddes correction in Purgatorie and finally whether the graunt of an Indulgence maye release them there of some peece or all their paynes as it might haue doē whiles they were in this present life To all this I aunswer bressy that the Pope may doe it lawfully wherof ther can be no more doubt then there is of the other of which we haue made so plaine argument already though in the waye and means of appliing the Churches remission or the Sanctes satisfaction vnto them there maye be some diuersitie not suche as maye any thing hinder the trueth of the cause which of al catholik mē is most certēly agreed vpon but such as may styrre vppe mās industry in the moderate searche of Goddes trueth and mysteries For the soules departed and being assured to be saued must needes be of the same body mystical and felowship of Saintes that the faithful be of aliue and therfore thei may according to their aptnes more or lesse be profited by the holy workes and satisfaction of their heade and felow membres because in euery lawfull Pardon there is made by the keyes of iurisdiction and application of Christes holy merites and his Saintes in that respecte as they be satisfactory to the vse of their inferioure members that doo lacke that wherein the other doo abunde Whervpon it standeth with plaine reason and meaning of Goddes woorde touching binding and loosing that the soules in Purgatorie shoulde somtimes be partakers of this blessing no lesse then other that be yet liuing For the deniall of which catholike assertion Leo the tenth accursed and condemned Luther by his letters patentes as euer since his memory hath bene condemned most woorthely of all good men continuing in the vnity of Christes Church In bull◠condem Luth. Mary whether the Indulgencies take place so often vpon the deade as vpon the liue that is not
so wel knowen because the persons departed be not in case to make them selues more apte to take benefite thereby then they were at their departure heÌ„ce And therefore if they were not with singular zele and deuotion so qualified in the end of their life they can not now any whit a better their owne case or otherwise dispose them selues to atteine the fructe of those singular remissions And more then that no Indulgence is lightly graunted but vpon the fulfilling of some appointed worke of piety and the departed not hauing alwayes in this life suche frendes as will accomplishe coÌ„petently the worke prescribed by the Pardon nor him selfe now in case to doe the same he often misseth the benefite of the Churches remission which els he might haue had by the meaning of the giuer Wherevpon it seemeth to some to be no surer how farre the departed may be relieued by the Keyes of the Churche then it is of other holy suffragies and good workes either of priestes or priuate persons all which doe assuredly relieue them that be in Purgatorie but without any limitation of benefite which wholly ys vnknowen vnto the liuinge without speciall reuelation in what state they stande And therefore vpon this consideration the learned diuines doo teache that the Pope doth and lawfully maye applie vnto the soules departed by his keies some parte of the Churches treasure which consisteth of Christes satisfaction other his Sanctes by which the departed as they haue need and be in competent termes to receiue benefite by the merites of their heade or felowes maye be released from some parte of their paines but yet they will not charge any man with necessitie of beleuing that the Pope or Churche shoulde vse mere iurisdition ouer them that be in an other worlde To be playne for the peoples vnderstanding the meaning is In a pardon ther be tvvo thinges that in a pardon there are two thinges the one is a sentence of absolutâ—on definitely pronounced vpoÌ„ any person penitent the second is the recompence of the debt of sinne remitted by the sayde absolution through the application of â—he Churches treasure by the power of the officiers Keyes Both these two iointly can neuer be exercised vpon any person not subiect thoughe the one maye Absolution can not properly be giuen nor fructfully to any man not subiect to the giuers regiment but the application of the treasure maye be made by the Keyes to procure mercie for them that be not vnder their power but that is not by proper iurisdiction but by aide of requeste made by iust offers why the partie should be receiued vnto mercy In this sense then the Pope absolueth no maÌ„ departed absolutely but only offereth in the person of Christ for the releife of him that is in Purgatory to God his mighty iudge ther the abuÌ„dante price of Christs passion the satisfaction of Saints And no doubt for his reuereÌ„ce and representing Christes person he is more often hearde then any priuate man offering onely his owne almose and prayer for the soule departed And for that cause in this sense the Popes Pardon worketh onely per modum suffragij as by aide of sute and not by regiment or iurisdictioÌ„ which many suppose doth not extende past the compasse of this worlde and therefore that he can not exercise the act of binding or loosing which be proper to his power and gouernement ouer any in the next life thoughe to make sute for them before God he may apply some portion of Christes copious redemption and Saintes satisfaction by the vse of his keyes which there make forcible intercessioÌ„ thoughe they caÌ„ not giue iudiciary absolution And all this that the foly of many men so muche wondereth at is nothing ells but to set before God the Father the death of his owne Sonne and his grace in all Sainctes for to procure mercye for their poore brethren in miserie in the nexte life as the like is doone with greate pietie in many other holy actes of religion continually practised in the Churche for the mutuall helpe one of an other And indeed the Church hath vsed these many yeares to put this clause in suche Indulgencies as did in any parte concerne the departed per modum suffragij as Sixtus the fourth Innocentius the eigth and now of late both Pius the fourth and the fifte and all other lightly in the like grauntes Wherby it is playne that we are not charged by the Church further to beleue then that the Pope may assuredly release the departed of some parte of their paines or al by the way of suffrag and sute as other holie workes of christianitie applied vnto them by their brethren aliue may doo For yt were no reason that priuate persons should as it were coÌ„municate and sende vnto them their fastes almose and prayers for the release of their paine and he that representeth Christes person should not in Christes name and the whole Churches applie vnto them some parte of the common wealths treasure to sue for their deliuery and helpe to satisfie for them in their lackes This therefore they call a Pardon per modum suffragij as by way of aide of request Which doctrine is most true in it selfe and agreable to the practise of the Churche and fourme of Indulgences alwayes vsed and may assuredly reliue suche as departed hence in grace zele of Gods house which I compt disposition enough in the partie and haue frendshippe in the worlde of suche as for their sakes will be content to accomplishe the apointed worke of the Pardon A declaration of the Churches meaning touching the coÌ„mon treasure which is said to remaine in her store for the recoÌ„peÌ„se of suche enioyned penaunce as she releaseth by her Pardons with the conclusion of the whole matter The twelueth Chapter BVT now if you aske me here how it staÌ„deth with the iustice of God thus to forgiue the payne and debt of satisfactioÌ„ which either God or the Churche enioyneth for the recompense of the former sinnes especially seeing the catholike Church doth holde that it perteineth to Gods iustice no lesse to punishe sinnes with some temporall scourge after it be forgiuen then it doth perteine to his mercie to forgiue the saide sinne and the debt of euerlasting damnation Now if it stande not with his iustice to lett a sinner escape wholly without correction or satisfaction then it may much more appere to be against his iustice also that any power of man shoulde remitte and release that bonde of satisfaction which Goddes iustice required and was to the offender enioyned For the answer and perfecte vnderstaÌ„ding of this doubt it is to be knoweÌ„ and well weyghed that in deede no release coulde be had of suche enioyned penaunce or deserued payne for sinnes past if Goddes iustice were not otherwise recompensed and the lacke of the parties punishment supplied againe by the abundance of satisfaction made by Christ vpon the Crosse euery droppe of whose innocent
bloude and stroke layde vpon his blessed body were hable of the infinite inestimable worth and force thereof to satisfie for all debt due to all the sinne in the world whether it be death and euerlasting daÌ„nation or temporall paine and purgatioÌ„ By which abundant price of his passion and copious ransome the Churche for whose sake this precious price was payed dooth not onely holde her selfe to be redemed from death and damnation and so saued by Christ her heade for he is the Sauioure of his body saith S. Paule Epâ—res 4 but she holdeth the ouer plus as a man woulde saye of so abundaÌ„t copious and infinite redemption to be a tresure in the house of God to relieue her childrens lackes to release their paynes to worke with them in satisfyng for ther sinne and to work mercy for them also for lacke of satisfyng for their offences that want being founde in oure penaunce towardes the recompensing of oure euill life past may be supplied by the treasure of Christes death that remaineth yet of full force and strength to be applied vnto vs in such oure necessities as shall be thought meete vnto Christes Vicar generall in earth and other his holy apoynted ministers 1. Cor. 4. with whoÌ„ as S. Paule saith he lefte the bestowing of Goddes mysteries For althoughe the holy precious treasure of Christes paine and satisfaction be of it selfe sufficient to relieue the lackes of all men without exception not onely of those which shall be saued â— Epist Cap. 2. but also for the damned and for the whole worlde saith S. Iohn yet no man may be so hardy to claime the benefite therof otherwise theÌ„ through suche meanes as he hath apointed and by the ministery of such men as he hath placed ouer his household and family to giue the children meat and susteinaunce in due season not as they shall niordinatly craue it but as he shal discretly find to be meet for them Therefore where this wise stewarde of Christes holie houshold to whom he gaue the keyes of the treasure and susficient authoritie to feede and gouerne his whole flocke where he shall orderly iudge the offender meet and of good congruytie worthie of grace and mercie ther he maye pardon and recompense the residue that can not be fulfilled of the partie penitent with soome peece of that inestimale treasure of Christes redemption which remaineth in the Church impossible to be wasted and so shall remaine to the vnspeakable benefite of the faithful And suche a perfecte knot their is now since Christes incarnation of euerie member in Christes mysticall body which is the Church and compaine of faithfull with him being the heade of the saide body that his merites workes suffering and satisfaction may well be applied to serue and supplie all wantes of eche member therof Yea more then that the holy suffering and tribulation of holie Sanctes as of oure Blessed Ladie Christes mother SatisfactioÌ„ of Sainctes and the holie Apostles with numbers of constant Martirs Confessours and Virgins helpe to supplie oure lacke also encrease the huge treasure of the Churche for the satisfying for oure sinnes which yet notwithstanding as they were meritorious to the sufferers be fully rewarded by the glorie of Christes kingdome and eternall felicitie which farre excedeth not onely the merites of all Sanctes but sufficiently rewardeth the incoÌ„parable huÌ„ility obedieÌ„ce of Christ to his Father in suffering death vpon the crosse though his workes as they be satisfactorie for vs are not yet answered in vs nor caÌ„ not be til the worlds end And for Christ in this case our aduersaries perchaunce would not muche sticke with vs but for the remaines of Sanctes satisfactioÌ„ they caÌ„ not abide And if S. Paule in expresse woordes did not vtter this my meaning concerning the trauaile of holie Sanctes for Christes bodie which ys his Churche the litle holy ones of these daies wold haue spurned at these kind of speaches for feare of dooing iniurie to Christ of whose honoure the good men make theÌ„ selues so tender Colos 1. These woordes then doth S. Paule vtter of his trauaile taken for the Churches sake Now I doo reioice in my passions or tribulations taken for youre sake and I fulfill those thinges that doo waÌ„t of Christs passions in my owne fleshe for his bodie which is the Churche Thus said S. Paule Wherby you see that not onely the want of one meÌ„ber maye be supplied of the head of the body but that eche member may helpe the infufficencie of an other member Whereby for all that we maye not conceiue that there is any lacke or insufficiencie on Christes parte or passion which was so full and abundant of it owne valure that by it selfe alone without the helpe of all mans merites or other creatures it was a sufficient price for the sinnes of all the worlde moe if moe might be But the lacke that this his passion was not in effecte so forcible and so fully in al mens cases was the want of some paynes and passion in his body the Churche by which she and euerie of hers were bounde to conforme them selues vnto Christ by taking paynes in their fleshe and suffering together with Christ their heade For so long Christes passion wanteth his due effecte in vs thoughe it were neuer so full and sufficient in ti selfe as we do not conforme oure selues to his paine and tribulation taken for vs. Therefore though Christ in his owne person suffer now no more yet he doth suffer and dayly shall suffer till the worldes ende in diuers meÌ„bers of his holy bodie as the heade saith S. Augustine suffereth when the finger aketh as Christ him selfe charged S. Paule that he persecuted him Act. 9. when he onely molested his members And so long as the Churche militant trauaileth here in earth so long hath Christ oure Maister somwhat to suffer to make his passion effectuall in suche as shall be saued and in that sense some peece of his passion in euerie of the faithfulls bodies must be supplied By al which holy paines of the head him selfe principally of the holy members of his bodie who wrought not onely for them selues but expresly meaÌ„t to benefite other by their works as the Apostle confesseth of him selfe we neede not to doubt but the lacke of manie a poore member of this blessed incorporation is duly supplied and the wante of worke satisfactorie in some recompensed by the aboundance of paines and penaunce of others For this is the blessed case of suche as be in the Churche of God in the felowshipp of the faithfull in the knotte of those members whereof oure Sauioure is the heade that is to saie in the holye communion of Sanctes in which as some doo lack so other som by Christs gifte doo abunde and are hable to procure mercie for the needie and to satisfie God for their poore brethrens sinnes 1. Cor. 8. And yet all this intercourse
and augmenteth Christes euerlasting honour and moste iuste title in remission of sinnes that til this daie no lesse now in absence by the seruice of his Priests then before when he was present by his owne woord and will sinnes be in his name and faith fullie remitted yea euen the very function of preaching the Gospel which they saie is meante by remitting of sinnes although they say most foolishly therein and against the common sense of al the Fathers yet euen that functiō is Christes still though it be vsed of man in earth And they that are most tender in outward woordes of Gods honour will yet seme to occupie that his proper function without al derogatiō to his right therein But in deed their preaching which is their remissiō of sinne is not the power of God to saluation but it is his permission for our great punishment The lauful doctrin of Christes church is truely no lesse the propre woorke of Christ then is forgeuenesse of sinnes yet it is without controling of Nouatians and Heretikes exercised by mans ministerie in earth S. Augustine saith hereof thus Christus est qui docet De discipli Christiana ca. vlt. Cathedram in coelo habet schola ipsius in terra est schola ipsius Corpus ipsius est It is Christ which teacheth and he hath his pulpit in heauen and his schole in earth and his schole is his body the church Christ doth not then resigne vppe his office of preaching no more thē he doth his authoritie of pardoning no man succeeding him in either of the roomes but occupieth both vnder him in his Churche It is proued that it dishonoureth God no more that man shoulde remitte sinnes in penance then it doth to forgeue sinnes in Baptisme and extrem vnction which is his inheritance for euer the whiche Churche holdeth by him as a schole to teache truth in as a courte and iudgement seate to pardon or punnish sinnes in Thus he But to beare doune the Aduersaries of truth fully we wil ioyne with them touching the sacrament of extreme vnction the sacrament of Baptisme and such other in which they can not nor doe not denie concerning one of them but mā without al derogatiō to Gods honour remitteth sinnes And how can it here seeme strange that in the sacrament of penance God shoulde by mans office remit mortal crimes seing it can not be denied but God vseth not onelie mans ministerie but also the external seruice of bare and base water which is much inferiour by nature and dignity to a Priest or any other man to take away sinnes both original and actual in the sacrament of Baptisme in which sacrament seing as wel the Priest is the minister as the water an instrumēt wherby God remitteth al sinnes be they neuer so many and grieuouse whether they be cōmitted by our owne acte or by our Fathers ofspring why doth it dishonour God any more that the Prieste shoulde be the minister of remission in the Sacramente of Penaunce then it doth by as greate an office almost in remitting of sinnes in the Sacramente of Baptisme Againe Cap. vlt. read the Epistle of S. Iames and you shall finde the Priest made a Minister the oyle an instrument in the extremitie of sicknesse to forgeue sinnes howe muche more then is the Priest without anie imparing of Gods power the woorker vnder him of our reconciliation and pardoning in the Sacrament of Penance in which especiallie the grace of God is geuen aboue all other Sacramentes to that onely end and purpose I may be more bold to vse this comparing of sundrie Sacramentes together because not onelie Sainct Ambrose refuteth the Father of this fonde heresie by the same reason but also because most of the Doctours of the Church do cōfesse that she euer had these waies to remitte mans sinnes by without all derogation to Christes soueraigntie herein of whome onelie shee holdeth her right as well in the Sacramēt of Penaunce as in Baptisme or extreme Vnction S. Chrysostom saith Neque enim solùm cùm nos regenerant De Sace◠lib. 3. sed postea etiam condonandorum nobis peccatorū potestatem obtinēt infirmatur inquit inter vos aliquis Accersat presbyteros ecclesiae Neither haue Priests power in baptisme only but afterward also thei haue good autority to forgiue our sinnes Is any mā feble amongst you saith he Call for the Priests of the Churche lette them saie prayers ouer him and annoynte him with oyle and the praier of faith shal saue the sick ād if he be in sinnes they shal be forgeuen him But this sacrament instituted by gods word and Christes authority vsed of old and wel knowen to al the Fathers is nowe become nothing in our building Sinne is now a daies so fauored that no sacrament may be abidē for the release therof The very expresse words of scripture can take no place where flattering of wickednes and phantasie ruleth to the contrarie There be some that affirme this annoylinge to haue bene a miraculouse practise to take away the diseases of the sick and therfore that it did decay with the working of other the like miracles which after the spring of our religion were not vsual Ita Caluinus The Protestantes glose against extrem vnction dissolued But that is a fōd glose For I aske of them whether the people then christianed were instructed or rather commaunded to call for the Apostles or others to heale them miraculouslie of their diseases Or whether all Priestes had the gifte of woorking miracles in the Primitiue Churche If they say yea touching the first poynt then as wel were they charged to sende for them to reuiue them after theye were deade because the Apostles so could doo when they sawe occasion and so did by some But that is playne absurde and false that euer Apostle gaue in charge to any man muche lesse to make a general precepte as S. Iames here doth to seke after miracles for that were to tempte God And for the setconde they are not so vnreasonable to aunswer me that all priestes could woorke miracles which is a seueral gifte of the Holy ghost from the power of their ministerie and therfore S. Iames would not haue charged the sicke persons to haue called indifferently for priestes to heale them miraculously the gifte of miracles being not common to them all nor perpetually promised to any one of them al. Againe I would knowe of them whether ther was any miraculous healing that had the remission of sinnes ioyned vnto it or to the external creature by which they healed any person If they saye yea then it foloweth that the priestes might by the office of that creature heale a man of his sinnes which they affirme to be blasphemie and dishonoure to God But to what absurditie so euer you bring them they will not confesse mortall men in externall sacramentes to remitte sinnes In the sacrament of Baptisme they will not stand with me openlie for