for the reducing of Offenders to Repentance and not a setting up a Judg of Controversies in Matters of Faith for all Mens infallible Direction As for that Promise John 16. 13. When the Spirit of Truth is come he shall guide you into all Truth It was made to all the Apostles and seems to be made to them only as appears by the Circumstances of the Discourse Chap. 14. 25 26 28. Chap. 15. 26 27. Chap. 16. 4 6. Or if it be to be extended to their Successors so far as it is so it must be extended to all their Successors as it was made to all the Apostles And so it will make all them Infallible likewise if it doth make any of them Infallible and not their Successors in the Church of Rome only or the Popes and Bishops there by a particular Priviledg But now suppose the Church of Rome were Infallible who is it in that Church that is Infallible Is it the Pope alone or is it a General Council called by him or is it both together or the Council confirmed by a Pope or the Council alone In this they do not agree among themselves As for the Pope's own Infallibility his Pretentions are considered already And if a Council be not Infallible unless called and confirmed by the Pope who is yet in himself Fallible how can the Calling or Confirmation of a Fallible Pope make a Eallible Council Infallible or will two Fallibles put together make one Infallible As for the Infallibility of a Council alone in it self if the greatest or major part of Christian Pastors are not Infallible but may fall into the grossest Errors as all will allow then how shall a General Council be Infallible which is to represent the whole Church and in which things are to be carried by the Rules of the major part which may err Unless it can be proved that the major part of Christian Pastors which are grosly erring singly by themselves when they come together shall be indued with so much Wit and Honesty that they shall suffer themselves to be governed and over-ruled by the lesser part that do not err But what Promise or Security have we for all this As for Mat. 18. 20. Where two or three are gathered together in my Name there am I in the midst of them If that proves an Infallibility in the Persons so gathered together it proves the Infallibility of every Assembly of Christians gathered in Christ's Name as well as of a General Council And therefore it would prove too much whereas indeed it is a Promise of Christ's gracious Presence and not of an Infallible Guidance And that suspended upon condition of being gathered in Christ's Name acting for his Glory according to his Rule by his Command and Commission As for that Place Acts 15. 28. It seemed good to the Holy Ghost and to us to lay no other Burden upon you c. It is only a Declaration of the present Case and not a Promise for the Future It is true that this Council was guided by the Holy Ghost and was Infallible but it doth not follow that other Councils shall For the Apostles who were all Infallible were the chief Actors in this Council and therefore its Determinations were Infallible which cannot be said of those of any other Council where there is not the same reason And now as to the Infallibility of a General Council suppose it were granted how shall we certainly know when a Council is truly General Or suppose such an one and Infallible when it sits yet how will that satisfy the pretence of the necessity of a living Judg in the Church at all Times for the ending of Controversies unless such a Council did always sit Which we know there did not in the first Ages of the Church when there were many Heresies and Differences and we know hath not done in several Ages and we see doth not now at this Time. If they say we may read the Determinations of Councils that are in Writing and that will suffice us So we may do the Determinations of the Articles of Faith in the Scriptures which yet they say is not sufficient without a living Judg to give their Sense And if the Scriptures are not sufficient without a living Judg then neither are the Definitions of Councils that are in Writing For the Definitions of Councils left us in their Books are as much a dead Writing as the Scriptures and can as little help themselâ—â—â— and we see there is as much difference about the Sense of them So that if there must be a living Judg and a General Council must be 〈◊〉 then there must be a Council still sitting For if the written Determinations of a former Council will serve the turn then they must give up the Controversy of the necessity of a living Judg. And if it can be proved that the Scriptures are a sufficient Rule without such Determinations and sufficiently 〈◊〉 in all things necessary then though it be but a dead Rule yet it will do the deed as well as the dead Determinations of a dead Councill And so all the Controversy will run into that aboâ—â— the sufficiency and clearness of Scripture which has been considered in the beginning and to his Controversy about the Infallibility of a General Council for a living and visible Judg will be wholly superseded and useless Yet after all if all these Difficulties could be got over about an Infallible Pope or Council yet that would not signify very much to the common People unless their particular Bishops and Curats may be supposed to be Infallible likewise to give them an Infallible account of an Infallible Pope or Councils Definitions or unless every particular Person may go himself to the Pope or Council for rcsolution in all Cases Which they know cannot be done for the common People cannot read all their Determinations in Print or Writing or if they could would as little understand them as they do the Scriptures and so must need a living Infallible Judg nearer at hand to give them Infallible direction or else they may still be deceived for want of one if the want of one must needs make them liable to deceit so that they must have Infallible Curats likewise to preserve them from danger of being deceived If they say the Curats may inform them of the true meaning of the Definitions of Councils and Popes and that they may be sufficiently certain of this without their being Infallible which is the only thing that can be said then it seems there may be Certainty without Infallibility And then why may not the Protestant Bishops and Ministers though they were not Infallible as certainly inform the People of the true meaning of the Scriptures So that if the Scripture be a sure and plain Rule of Faith so that it may be understood without the Infallibility of those that read it then the Protestant People who have not Infallible Teachers may yet have as much certainty
Confusions and therefore there is such an one This is to argue from our own Fancies what God should do and not what he has done And they might as well conclude the Being of an Universal Infallible Judg over all the World in Temporal Matters for the Peace of the World which yet we see is not appointed as such an one over the Church for the Peace of the Church But it is not to be expected that all Differences in Religion should cease in this World for there must be Heresies 1 Cor. 11. 19. As there were Heresies even in the Apostles Times though they were Infallible which is an Argument that Infallibility in any if it were is no certain means to prevent Heresies or Divisions If Men be modest and humble and teachable God hath provided sufficient means for their direction in the plainness of the Rule which he has given in all things necessary and appointing Guides for their direction in doubtful things if they will follow their instruction But if Men be governed with Prejudice and Passion they would not hearken to an Infallible Judg if there were one And Christ the Judg of all will take an account of such Men in due time when the Great Judgment-Day shall come Then the Tares shall be gathered together and bound in bundles to be burnt and the Wheaâ— shall be gathered into the Barn Mat. 13. But this Judgment in the mean time is to be suspended till that Day shall come But that Men may judg for themselves in some things without an Infallible Judg our Adverâ—aries themselves are fain to allow For how else 〈◊〉 they judg in the Controversy about the Infallible Judg himself whether there be such an onâ— or 〈◊〉 and who it is and of the Scriptures and Reasons that are brought to prove it And if they may judg of this Controversy and of these Scriptures and Reasons without an Infallible Judg then why may they not also of others which are as necessary and of other Scriptures and Reasons in other Points which are as plain as they And then there is no need of an Infallible Judg at all As for the pretended Infallibility of the Church of Rome for the qualifying it to be such a Judg If the Church of Rome be infallible then it must be so either as it is a Christian Church and because it is so And then all Christian Churches would be Infallible likewise and not that only Or as it is an Apostolical Church planted by the Apostles if it were so and then all the Churches that were planted by the Apostles would be so likewise and this would give no particular priviledg to the Church of Rome Or as it hath continued down a succession of Pastors from the Apostles by whom there is a safe conveyance of Apostolical Doctrine and Tradition to the present Age But if this be so then all the Churches that have had such a Succession will be Infallible likewise as well as the Church of Rome as the Grecian Church which hath had the like Succession and upon this Principle the Church of England may come in for a share too But indeed this proves the Infallibility of no particular Church at all because of the uncertainty of Tradition therein notwithstanding such Succession which may arise from many Causes No more then it did the Infallibility of the Jewish Church notwithstanding that it had a continual Succession of the Priests and Pastors as much as the Church of Rome or any other Church whatsoever can pretend unto And therefore we are not to have respect to any Church Pastor or Pastors as Infallible nor to bind up our Judgments to them as such upon the account of any such Succession Aaron was called to the High Priesthood immediatly by God himself but was he therefore infallible or were the People bound to follow him when he made an Idol Exod. 32. Vriah was a Priest by an uninterrupted Succession from Aaron was he therefore Infallible or to be followed when he overturn'd the Service of God and Introduc'd Idolatry into the Temple Caiaphas the Chief Priest was so by an uninterrupted Succession for 1500 Years ought he therefore to be followed when he condemened Jesus Christ for a Blasphemer or were the Resolutions of the Council where he was President Infallible when Jesus Christ was declared worthy of Death The Pharisees sat in Moses Chair and the Disciples are bid observe and do whatso 〈◊〉 they said unto them ought one therefore with them to have rejected Jesus Christ By that word therefore whatsoever he doth not mean every thing without limitation but whatsoever was agreeable to the Law of Moses So that they were to judg for themselves what was or what was not so agreeable Mat. 16. 6. It is foretold that ravening Wolves should arise from among the Bishops of the Churches Doth their Succession of Orthodox Bishops oblige the Sheep of our Lord therefore to follow them as Infallible The Son of Perdition was to sit in the Temple of God but was he therefore Infallible or to be followed in his Revolt If the Church of Rome be then Infallible and yet not so upon the former Accounts Is it then by reason of its Relation to its first pretended Bishop St. Peter who was Infallible and by reason of his dying there and his leaving his Priviledges to his Successors of that See But though St. Peter was Infallible how doth it appear that this was more than a personal Priviledg and in which therefore he was to have no Successor As the Infallibility of the rest of the Apostles was a personal Priviledg and in which they were to have no Successors As for St. Peter's Headship over the Church and that of the Bishops of Rome as his Successors it is refuted in the foregoing Chapters But if the Church of Rome be Infallible none of these ways and yet is so then must it not be by virtue of some particular Promise by which Infallibility is annexed to the Church But where is that Promise As for the Apostles calling the Church The Pillar and Ground of Truth 1 Tim. 3. 15. If it proves any thing it proves the Infallibility of the Church of Ephesus and not that of Rome For the Apostle speaks of that Church in which Timothy was Bishop which was the Church of Ephesus But indeed it signifies the Churches Duty and not her Performance and may be likewise applied rather to Timothy himself than to the Church As for that saying Mat. 18. 17. Tell it unto the Church If that proves the Infallibility of a Church it proves the Infallibility of every Church And so the Church of Rome will get nothing particularly by it for the Direction is given to every particular Member in case of Scandal offered by him to his Brother And whither is such an one to make his Complaints but to the Church of which he is a Member And indeed it is only an Institution of Church-Discipline in every Church
faithful to her Bridegroom As for our parts we are fully perswaded that the Holy Ghost may speak as good Sense and as intelligibly in the Scriptures as any of them in their Writings or as the Church can in hers and that it was his Design to do so And therefore we doubt not but it is done plainly and fully in all Points necessary to Salvation and also as to the Controversies between the Church of Rome and us that enough may be plainly gathered from them And where there is any obscurity either it is in lesser Matters or in prophetick Visions or only ariseth by accident by reason of the distance of time wherein the Holy Scriptures were written the variety and change of Customs the difference of Dialects or Forms of Speech or some such other Causes which are incident to all ancient Writings and especially of the Eastern Countries And either it may be cleared up by the same means which we may use as well as they or else it must for what I know remain so yet to us both for the exercise of our farther industry It is the Scripture then that we build our Faith upon and guide our selves by though we do not refuse any help to the understanding of it And we are not afraid that our common People should read it but do exhort them to it For we do not desire to retain any Doctrines or Works of Darkness and therefore we are very willing that all should be brought to the Light. It is the Scripture that we love and whilst we love the Scripture we do declare it that we cannot be very fond of Rome A plain simple view of Scripture is sufficient to keep us out of the ways of Romish Delusion And such a view is presented to the Reader in this little Treatise in a Method fitted to the most vulgar Capacity Let us but stick to the Scripture or written Word which the Church of Rome is really most dreadfully afraid of and then we are out of danger The Scripture we know from whence it is but as for their Traditions many of them we know not whence they are They pretend they come from the Apostles but we have nothing else but only their own word for it For we cannot perceive the Apostolical Image and Superscription upon them Nor would they then ever contradict the Apostolical Writings as we are well assured they do many of them Tradition indeed alone doth but open a Gap to whatsoever bold and confident Men may obtrude that have subtilty enough to set off a Thing a little plausibly But let us hold fast the written Word and we shall not fear to be intangled with those new Doctrines which are the obtrusions of crafty and ambitious Men to make an advantage by which the face of Christianity comes to be quite marred and all Religion comes to be indangered And read but this little Treatise then and compare Doctrine and Text and then see who is in the right the Church of Rome or We For see if their Doctrine and the Holy Text be not at variance the one with the other And if so the Church of Rome must excuse us if we leave their Doctrine and follow the Text. Beware of false Prophets which come to you in Sheeps Cloathing but inwardly they are ravening Wolves ye shall know them by their Fruits Do not believe every Spirit but try the Spirits whether they are of God. If the Blind lead the Blind they will both fall into the Ditch Heresies will arise in the Church and the Devil will sometimes transform himself into an Angel of Light to deceive whom he can deceive Therefore see with your own Eyes and beg the holy Anointing to teach you A Table of the Popish Errors refuted in this Treatise Of the Holy Scripture and Traditions Chap. I. THat all saving Truth is not contained in the Holy Scriptures but partly in them and partly in unwritten Traditions pag. 1 II. That the Scripture is obscure 12 III. That it is not for the Common People to read the Scripture 15 Of the Church IV. That the State of the Church is always visible 20 V. That Multitude is a Mark of the Church 25 VI. That temporal Happiness is a Mark of the Church 29 VII That Miracles are a Mark of the Church 32 VIII That St. Peter was Head of the Church under Christ and the Pope is so as his Successor 36 IX That the Pope hath power over Kings and can absolve Subjects from their Allegiance and that Ecclesiastical Persons are exempted from the Secular Jurisdiction 44 X. That the Church of Rome is Infallible and the Judg of Controversies to whose Judgment all are bound up 49 Of Prayer and Worship XI That Prayers and Divine Service is to be celebrated every where in Latin in a Language unknown to the People 61 XII That it is good and Profitable to pray to Saints and Angels 65 XIII That Images and Relicks are to be venerated or worshipped 81 XIV That the Clergy may not Marry 91 XV. That the Vow of Poverty is laudable and that Mendicant Friars are in a State of Perfection 94 XVI That the Vow of Blind Obedience is laudable 98 Of Satisfactions Indulgences Purgatory and Praying for the Dead XVII That Persons are obliged partly to satisfy the Justice of God for their Sins themselves Christ having not satisfied for all the Punishment due to them 100 XVIII That some Persons may satisfy over and above what is needful for themselves and that their satisfactions may serve for others being put into the Treasury of the Church to be dispenc'd by Indulgences 108 XIX That there is a Purgatory after this Life for the expiation of the Sins of those that are not sufficiently purged here and that the Souls there detained may be help'd by the Masses and good Works and Prayers of the Living 115 Of Justification and Pardon of Sin. XX. That Justification consists in the infusion of Grace 123 XXI That for the obtaining of Pardon of Sin Auricular Confession to the Priest is necessary 128 Of the Merit of Good Works and Works of Supererrogation XXII That good Works are truely and properly meritorious of Eternal Life 123 XXIII That Men may do Works of Supererrogation above what the Law requires and may have superabounding Merits more than themselves need which may be profitable to others 139 Of Baptism XXIV That Baptism is absolutely necessary to Salvation so that those who die without it are liable to condemnation 143 Of the Lord's Supper XXV That after Consecration there remains no more of Bread and Wine in the Sacrament but that it is transubstantiated into the very Body and Blood of Christ 149 XXVI That in the Sacrifice performed in the Mass the self-same Christ is contained and offered that offered himself in the Cross and that this Sacrifice is truely propitiatory for the Sins of Quick and Dead 159 XXVII That the Host is to be worshipped with Divine Worship 166
Doctrine that was delivered in the Promises of the Old Testament concerning the Messiah And for the same reason there was no necessity that Miracles should be wrought by our Reformers it being their Business not to teach any new Doctrine but to restore what was already taught and formerly confirmed by Miracles And it is moreover to be observed that neither our Saviour nor his Apostles did insist upon Miracles alone as the only Test of the Truth of their Doctrine but in conjunction with the Predictions and Prophecies of the Old Testament which were fulfilled in our Saviour's Person and in his Works and Doctrine as may appear by our Saviour's own method which he took for the conviction of others Luke 24. 25 26. where he appeals to all that the Prophets have spoken concerning himself And by his referring them to the Scriptures for their information John 5. 39. And so St. Peter corroborates the Testimony of the Resurrection of Christ with David's prediction of it Acts 2. 22 24. And refers likewise to the Prophecies of the Old Testament as the most sure Rule 2 Pet. 1. 16 17. And St. Paul in his preaching said none other things than those which the Prophets and Moses did say should come Act. 26. 22. So that the Jews were to receive our Saviour and his Doctrine not barely upon the account of his Miracles but as in conjunction with the Doctrine and Prophecies of the Old Testament and so as having all the concurrent Characters of a Divine Revelation And we have much less reason now to receive any Doctrine from any Persons or Church upon the account of any Miracles wrought or pretended to be wrought by them unless it be likewise conformed to the Doctrine of the Scriptures already delivered and confirmed by which it is to be tried We are also forewarn'd in the Scriptures that it may please God sometimes to permit Signs and Wonders to be wrought for the trial of Men whether they will adhere to the True Doctrine already delivered and sufficiently confirm'd And the false Prophets and Teachers shall make use of such Methods to propagate their false Doctrines Therefore this can be no proper Mark or Character of a true Prophet true Doctrine or a true Church Thus Deut. 13. 1 2 3. If there arise among you a Prophet or a Dreamer of Dreams and giveth thee a Sign or a Wonder And the Sign or Wonder come to pass of which he spake unto thee saying Let us go after other Gods which thou hast not known and let us serve them Thou shalt not hearken to the words of that Prophet or that Dreamer of Dreams â—or the Lord your God proveth you to know whether you love the Lord your God with all your Heart and with all your Soul. Mat. 24. 24 25. False Christs and false Prophets shall arise and shall shew great Signs and Wonders that if it were possible they shall deceive the very Elect. Behold I have told you before Is not this a fair warning 2 Thess 2. 9. That wicked One viz. the Son of Perdition his coming shall be after the working of Satan with all Power and Signs and lying Wonders This is the very Mark and Livery of the Son of Perdition Rev. 13. 13 14. And he doth great Wonders viz. the Beast that had Horns like a Lamb so that he maketh Fire come down from Heaven on the Earth in the sight of Men and deceiveth them that dwell on the Earth by the means of those Miracles that he had power to do in the sight of the Beast And some it seems shall be deceived thereby For the Spirit speaketh expresly that in the latter Times some shall depart from the Faith giving heed to seducing Spirits 1 Tim. 4. 1. The so many pretended Miracles of the Romish Church then give us cause of suspicion that all is not right It is for them to pretend to Miracles that want other confirmation of their Doctrine but when we preach only the Doctrine already confirm'd we do not need them Gal. 1. 8. But though we or an Angel from Heaven preach any other Gospel unto you than that which we have preach'd unto you let him be accursed It is in vain to alleadg Miracles to confirm a false Doctrine for it is not the preaching or apparition of an Angel is enough to recommend it and if not so then not any other Miracle So that we are to try the Doctrines now not by Miracles but by its consonancy to and correspondency with the Doctrine of the Scriptures already establish'd And we must judg of the Miracles themselves by the Doctrine and not the Doctrine by them And as we are to judg of the Doctrine so we are to judg of the Church that teacheth it And have cause to suspect Miracles now as the Marks of Deceivers who we are foretold shall pretend to them than to take them as Tests of true Doctrine or Marks of the true Church It is the Character of the Pharisees never to be contented with the Miracles that have been sufficiently wrought but still to expect more Mat. 16. 1. But we are contented with the Miracles already wrought by our Saviour and his Apostles And since we teach no other Doctrine than what was taught by them we may say of good right that their Miracles are our Miracles and that they authorize our belief So that we shall think not one jot the worse of our selves now for want of this Mark nor one jot the better of the Church of Rome for its pretending to it CHAP. VIII That St. Peter was supreme Pastor and Governour under Christ and had a primÌ„acy of Dominion over the Church and that the Pope is so as his Successor Catechism Roman par 1. de 9. Artic. Symbol §. 11. THis is the main Foundation of all the glorious Pretences of the Bishop and Church of Rome Upon this it is that they arrogate so great Authority to themselves over all the Churches of Christ throughout the World and over all their Members The Roman Church is defined to be the Mother and Mistress of all Churches Fourth General Council of Lateran Can. 2. Council of Trent Sess 7. Can. 3 c. And the Roman Bishop defined to be the Vicar of God and Christ and the Successor of St. Peter and to have the supreme Pastorship over the Vniversal Church Council of Trent Sess 6. de reformat cap. 1. Sess 15. cap. 7. But the very Foundation of all that St. Peter had such an Headship and Rule over the whole Church above the rest of the Apostles is overthrown by many Texts of Scripture Mark 10. 42 43 c. Jesus called unto them and said Ye know that they which are accounted to rule over the Gentiles exercise Lordship over them and their great Ones exercise Authority upon them But so shall it not be among you but whosoever will be Great among you shall be your Minister and whosoever of you will be Chiefest shall be
Christ for the edifying of the Church Ephes 4. 11 12. He gave some Apostles and some Prophets and some Evangelists and some Pastors and Teachers for the perfecting of the Saints for the Work of the Ministry for the edifying of the Body of Christ till we all come in the Vnity of the Faith c. But not one word of such an Office as that of supreme Pastor or universal Sovereign over all Which we may be sure he would not have omitted if such an Office had been so necessary to the aforesaid Ends as is pretended CHAP. IX That the Pope hath power over Kings to Excommunicate and Depose them and can give Power to resist Soveraign Princes and can absolve Subjects from their Allegiance And that all Ecclesiastical Persons are exempted from the Jurisdiction of Secular Courts The 3d General Council of Lateran Cap. 27. 14. The 4th of Lateran Can. 3. de Haereticis Can. 43. Council of Lions Ann. 1245. Council of Constance Sess 17. Council of Trent Decret de Reformat Cap. 12. THis vast and exorbitant Power being founded upon the Pope's Headship over the Church which is refuted before there needs no new Arguments here for the confutation hereof For it is not pretended that the Pope hath a proper and direct temporal Soveraignty but as a necessary Consequent to and appendix of his Spiritual and for the promoting the Ends thereof The Pope can change Kingdoms take them from one and give them to another as the soveraign spiritual Prince if this be necessary to the Salvation of Souls Which are the words of Bellarmiâ—◠〈◊〉 Rom. Pontif. lib. 5. cap. 6. So that the same Arguments produced before to refute the spiritual Soveraignty serve also to overthrow the temporal and more strongly this having only relation to the former and inferr'd from it by far-fetch'd Consequences without the least intimation from Scripture And the exemption of all Ecclesiastical Persons from the Temporal Power is grounded likewise upon the same Papal Headship For he being supposed to be their supreme Governor and Soveraign is to take cognizance of all Causes that have relation to them as their proper Judg. And this being the Consequent of such a Principle the Principle being overthrown the Consequence must also fall with it And then there remains no other Power upon Earth to which the Clergy are to be subject as their supreme Governor under God and Christ but soveraign Princes and States in their several Dominions But yet this pretended Exemption of the Clergy may be likewise farther confuted from the following Texts Rom. 13. 1 2. Let every Soul be subject unto the higher Powers meaning the supreme Civil Authority whatsoever it is whether Emperor King c. in their several Dominions Here 's an universal Assertion respecting all Persons under such Authorities and no exemption of any For there is no such Power lawfully constituted but of God The Powers that be are ordainded of God. Wherefore he that resisteth the Power resisteth the Ordinance of God and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation So that there is no Power whatever that can absolve Subjects from their Allegiance to the supreme Magistrate or free them from his Jurisdiction lawfully constituted For he beareth not the Sword in vain 't is his part to bear and wield and Sword of Justice For he is the Minister of God to execute Wrath upon him that doth evil and to punish Offenders And therefore Ecclesiastical Persons as â—ell as others if they do evil against the Laws of God and a lawful Government are liable to the just execution of punishments inflicted by such Governours But it is well known that the Republick of Venice was put under an Interdict for having began a Process against an Abbot and a Canon who were notoriously criminal and punishable 1 Pet. 2. 13 14. See also St. Peter ' s Judgment Submit your selves to every Ordinance of Man for the Lord's sake whether it be to the King as Supreme or unto them that are sent by him for the punishment of evil Doers and for the praise of them that do well He doth not say Submit your selves to me as the supreme Head of the Church neither saith he Submit your selves from time to time to my Successor in Rome but submit your selves to the King as Supreme And how could he more manifestly teach subjection which all Persons of whatsoever Condition and Quality should render unto him For he makes no exception of the Clergy but this Epistle is directed to them as well as others See Chap. 5. Tit. 3. 1. See here again to the same purpose St. Paul Put them in mind to be subject to Principalities and Powers and to obey Magistrates Who were these that Titus was to put in mind to be subject but those who by St. Paul's direction were committed to his care and teaching among which we find the Elders and Bishops of the Churches Chap. 1. 4 5. these were some of those then whom Titus was to put in mind to be subject Aaron was Elder Brother to Moses and chief Priest yet nevertheless he was subject to Moses and called him his Lord Exod. 32. 21 22. And Moses said unto Aaron What did this People unto thee that thou hast brought so great a Sin upon them viz. of the Golden Calf of which they spake And Aaron said Let not the Anger of my Lord wax hot thou knowest the People that they are set on mischief And Numb 12. 11. Aaron said unto Moses Alas my Lord lay not this Sin upon us wherein we have done foolishly and wherein we have sinned for he and Miriam had murmured against Moses The chief Priests were subject to the Kings of Israel For which you need but read the Books of Kings See one Example hereof to which no reply can be made 1 King. 2. 26 27. Vnto Abiather the Priest said King Solomon Get thee to Anathoth unto thine own Fields for thou art worthy of Death but I will not at this time put thee to death because thou bearest the Ark of God before David my Father c. So Solomon thrust out Abiathar from being Priest unto the Lord. But now under the New Testament saith Cardinal Bonaventure the Temporal Rule is subject to the Priesthood and Popes may now degrade Kings and depose Emperors as this hath often come to pass But wherein is the difference and where is the proof of this impious Assertion St. Paul pleadeth his cause before Felix a secular Judg and doth not except against the Jurisdiction of the Court Acts 24. And so again before Festus Acts 25. But now the meanest Priest and the poorest Monk of them all where he can refuseth to appear before the secular Judges And it is a received Maxim The Pope ought to judg all the World and be judged himself of no Body Distinct 40. Can. Si Pape At last St. Paul appeals unto Cesar Acts 25. 10 11. Then said Paul I stand at Cesar
' s Judgment-Seat where I ought to be judged being a Roman So he acknowledges Cesar's Jurisdiction Yet to the Jews I have done no wrong as thou very well knowest though I were liable to their Courts If I be an Offender or have committed any thing worthy of Death by the Roman Laws I refuse not to die so he readily submits himself to the Trial of their Laws and to the Sentence to be inflicted according to them But if there be none of these things whereof they accuse me no Man may deliver me unto them to be punished by them I appeal unto Cesar the Roman Emperor as my proper and lawful Judg. And is not this a plain acknowledgment then of Cesar's just Authority But saith Bellarmine he was constrained to appeal unto Cesar because the Gentiles and Jews would have mock'd him and with good reason if he had appealed to St. Peter who was his Soveraign Prince and Judg. Recognet lib. de sum Pontif. de Cleâ— lib. 1. cap. 30. Is not this prettily said of so great a Cardinal CHAP. X. That the Church of Rome is Infallible and that it belongs to her to judg of the Sense of Scripture so that all Persons are bound up to her Judgment and Definitions Catech Roman part 1. de 9 Art. Symbol §. 18. Council of Trent Sess 4. Decret de Edit usu Sacr. libr. THis is contrary to all those Texts of Scripture that allow a Judgment of Discretion to every private Person in Matters of Religion whereby they are at liberty to judg for themselves and to try and examine the Doctrines which they are taught whether they be true or false or whether revealed by God or no. As 1 Thess 5. 21. Prove all things hold fast that which is good How must we prove all things if we must take them upon trust without examination from any Person whatsoever 1 John 4. 1. Beloved believe not every Spirit but try the Spirits whether they are of God because many false Prophets are gone out into the World. So that we are not to give up our selves by an Implicit Faith to be led by any Persons whatsoever that pretend themselves Guides but examine their Doctrines before we receive them And here 's no referring of Christians to an Infallible Judg to whose Sentence and determination all are bound to submit which the Apostle ought in all reason to have done if such an one had been constituted in the Church and not to leave it to every Man 's private Judgment to examine these things as he doth 1 Cor. 10. 15. I speak as to wise Men judg ye what I say The Apostle implies a Capacity and Power in private Men to judg and discern of the Doctrine proposed And though he was guided by an Infallible Spirit yet he doth not expect that Men should blindly submit to his Doctrine but requires them to make use of this Power of discerning in themselves Acts 17. 11. The Bereans are commended for searching the Scriptures daily to know whether those things were so or no which were delivered by the Apostles themselves Gal. 1. 8. Tho we or an Angel from Heaven preach any other Gospel unto you than that which ye have received let him be accursed This plainly supposeth that Christians may and can judg in themselves when Doctrines are contrary to the Gospel and that they ought to do it and not blindly rely upon on any one no not an Apostle or Angel from Heaven 1 Pet. 3. 15. Be ready always to give an Answer to every Man that asketh you a Reason of the Hope that is in you Christians must understand and judg of the Grounds of Faith themselves Mat. 7. 15 16. Beware of false Prophets which come to you in Sheeps-clothing but inwardly they are ravening Wolves Ye shall know them by their Fruits How should they beware of them if they cannot discern or judg of them and their Fruits We have warning given us of seducing Spirits that shall be in the latter Days 1 Tim. 4. 1. And how can it be but Men will be in danger of giving heed to them if they must not judg for themselves or cannot discern their Doctrines Mat. 15. 14. They be blind leaders of the Blind And if the Blind lead the Blind they both fall into the Ditch The Leaders of the People you see were blind And the People that follow blind Leaders shall perish with them This is a fair warning to us not blindly to submit to the guidance of any So that there is no other way but for the People themselves by a diligent and serious perusal and study of the Scriptures to judg for themselves what the right Sense and Interpretation of them is and what Doctrines are true or false not refusing the assistance of their Spiritual Guides who are appointed for their direction herein yet not giving up themselves unreservedly or unlimitedly to any as Lords of their Faith. If there were a Judgment of Authority vested in any Person or Persons in the Christian Church which might impose upon all and to which all were bound in their Judgments to submit why is not this Infallible Judg referred to by the Apostles How is a judgment of discerning allowed to every private Person which is inconsistent therewith But for Men to judg for themselves is indeed a natural Right belonging to Men as Men and as rational Creatures And no Man can judicially embrace the True Religion unless he be permitted to judg whether that which he embraces be the True Religâ—on or no. And supposing the Scriptures plain in all Things necessary to Salvation as hath been proved Chap. 2. so that every Man of ordinary capacity after competent Instruction in Matters of Religion may arrive to a sufficient understanding of all those â—hings that are so he may judg of them as well for himself as any Man or company of Men can judg for him For every Man can judg of what is plain And therefore 't is reasonable that those things which are plain to every Man should be left to every Man's judgment And there can be no necessity of an Infallible Judg to guide or determine him therein The Civil Magistrate or Judg only determines Mens Practice and outward Actions or disposeth of some of their Goods and Properties And that there should be such an one besides a Law or Rule is needful in Civil Government for the regulating Mens outward Actions and Properties But he doth not prescribe to our inward Sense and Judgment which is the thing that this Infallible Judg in Religion is pretended to do to whose Judgment Men must not only submit their Practice but their Judgment Which is quite a different thing from the former and therefore there is no parity of Reason from one to the other If they say It is needful that there should be such a Judg in the Church for the determining and ending of all Controversies and for the preventing and repressing of Heresies and
contrary to all those places before which assert the perfection and sufficiency of Christ's one Offering made on the Cross Besides there can be no Propitiation made by any Offering without the destruction of the Offering in the stead of him for whom the Offering is made But now in the Sacrifice of the Mass there is no destruction of the Offering as our Adversaries themselves allow Heb. 9. 22. Almost all things are by the Law purged with Blood and without shedding of Blood there is no remission But now in the Mass there is no shedding of Blood for they say That is an unbloody Sacrifice And how can that be a Sacrifice for Propitiation and Remission then An unbloody undestroyed Sacrifice and yet a propitiatory Sacrifice cannot stand together but are inconsistent And the Apostle argues vers 25 26. That it was not needful that Christ should offer himself often as the high Priest entreth into the holy Place every Year with the Blood of others quite contrary to what the Church of Rome pretends which teacheth that Christ doth offer himself often by the hands of the Priest in the Mass the very self-same Offering too that he offered himself upon the Cross for then must he often have suffered since the Foundation of the World. Offering and Suffering are join'd together so that if there be an Offering there must be a Suffering and if there be no Suffering of Christ in the Mass then there can be no Offering But now saith the Apostle Once hath he appeared in the end of the World to put away Sin by the Sacrifice of himself And as it is appointed to all Men once to die but after this the Judgment so Christ was once offered when he suffered and died as a Sacrifice to bear the Sins of many and unto them that look for him he shall appear the second time without Sin or suffering for Sin unto Salvation So that the time of Christ's Suffering is past and so therefore is the time of his Offering to put away Sin by the Sacrifice of himself And there is no more Offering of Christ to be to the end of the World because there is no more dying or suffering The propitiatory Sacrifice of the Mass then is a meer vain pretence Neither hath Christ instituted a Priesthood upon Earth to offer such a Sacrifice as is pretended for he himself is the only Priest Heb. 7. 23 24. They truly under the Law of Moses were many Priests because they were not suffered to continue by reason of death But this Man Jesus Christ because he continueth for ever hath an unchangeable Priesthood That is The Levitical Priests were a number of Men succeeding one another by which Succession provision was made for the continuation of the Priesthood which otherwise must have expired through the mortality of the Priests But Christ hath no Successor in his Priesthood which does not pass from him to any other for that is the meaning of the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 here rendred unchangeable because he himself is not mortal but continueth for ever So that as he continues for ever so he continues the only Priest for ever Vers 25. Wherefore he is able also to save them to the uttermost that come unto God by him seeing he ever liveth to make intercession for them The Salvation which he works is not by virtue of any new Sacrifice or the repetition of what he hath offered but by virtue of his Intercession which is founded upon the Sacrifice which he offered on Earth He ever living to make this Intercession thereby obtains and applies to us the infinite Merit of his Death without the repetition of the Sacrifice for our Salvation And it is the Spirit of Christ which he hath obtained by his Sacrifice and Intercession to be his Vicegerent now upon Earth in his absence that by his Grace enables us to believe and so applies to us the benefit of our Saviour's Death without which ten thousand Sacrifices repeated would be of no value to us It is to be observed that while the Chief Priest was in the Sanctuary there was never any Sacrifice offered Levit. 16. But now Jesus Christ is in Heaven prefigured by the Sanctuary Heb. 9. Therefore whilst Christ is in Heaven there is no other true and proper Sacrifice to be offered for now the Offering is ceased The Sacrifices now are Prayers and Praises which Christ hath made all his People Priests so far as to offer these Spiritual Sacrifices 1 Pet. 2. 5. Rev. 1. 6. and Rom. 12. 1. the Sacrifice of Christians consists in offering themselves to God by an holy Life and not in offering Jesus Christ who having offered himself over upon the Cross is now at the right Hand of God where he makes intercession for us but is never more to be offered for us As for Melchisedeck's pretended Offering of Bread and Wine which they say did but typify the Offering of Christ under the Species of Bread and Wine in the Sacrament and so is to be continued by it Gen. 14. 18. 'T is plain that he brought forth Bread and Wine not to offer to God but to refresh Abraham's Men. What he did as a Priest was in his priestly blessing of Abraham The Apostle makes not the least mention of his Offering when he compares him with Christ but makes Christ to be of his Order upon other accounts Besides tho Christ himself be a Priest after the Order of Melchisedeck yet it is plain before that Christ had no Successor in his Priesthood but is the only Priest himself after this Order From 1 Cor. 10. 16 17 18 19 20. it cannot be inferred that in the Sacrament there is an Altar and Sacrifice as there was among the Jews and Heathens but only that they who partake of the Lord's Supper have as truly Communion with him and thereby do testify their Communion with him and owning his Religion as they who fed upon the Sacrifices of the Gentiles that were offered to Devils did thereby testify their Communion with Devils The Comparison is made not between the things themselves which are in themselves of a different Nature but between the Actions of the Men and their signification which is the same in both sides and bears the same construction CHAP. XXVII That the Host is to be worshipped in the Sacrament with Divine Worship and to be solemnly carried about and shewed to the People to be worshipped Council of Trent Sess 13. Chap. 5. Can. 6. WE do not deny but that Christ may be lawfully adored and worshipp'd by us in the time of the celebration of the Lord's Supper but this doth not serve the turn of the Church of Rome which defines that Adoration be given to the Sacrament That the Sacrament is nevertheless to be adored because it was instituted to be received And the Adoration is not fix'd in the Person of Christ as separate from the Host but as making one Object of Worship together with it
those that pretend to the Reformation But we are not at all surprized at it or moved to think e're the worse of the Reformation from the Church of Rome because we don't agree in some things amongst our selves For we are foretold that so it should come to pass Rom. 16. 17. Mark them which cause Divisions It implies that Divisions there would be And 1 Cor. 11. 9. For there must be Heresies that they which are approved may be made manifest Heresies are some of the Works of the Flesh Gal. 5. 20. And therefore as long as the Flesh is so predominant with many it is no wonder that there should be Heresies which are the Works of it If Christianity at first could not prevent it we can have no expectation that the Reformation should do it 2 Pet. 2. 1. There were false Prophets among the People even as there shall be false Teachers among you who privily shall bring in damnable Heresies even denying the Lord that bought them And they doing it privily it may not be presently discerned neither till after some tract of time But say they You have not the means of Vnity among you for you want a Judg of Controversies which is absolutely necessary in a Church and therefore there are so many Heresies and Divisions among you But this pretended means of Unity is refuted before in the Chapter of the Infallibility of the Church c. where it is proved that there is no such thing or means appointed We have as much the means of Unity as the Primitive Church had which was as much as God thinks fit to appoint in the Church They had infallible Teachers to teach them the Doctrine of God and we have the Doctrine which was taught by these infallible Teachers recorded in the Scriptures which is of the same use to us as it was to them But neither they nor we have an infallible Judg to dermine our Assent nor can have unless you will put out the Eyes of humane Nature But every one is left to judg for himself by the Rule of the Doctrine delivered God hath given us a plain Rule as hath been proved and is ready to assist us with his Spirit in all things necessary to our Salvation if we be humble and teachable And then we should do well enough without an infallible Judg. But yet these means were not effectual in the Primitive Church to prevent Divisions and Heresies because Men did not use them aright for all Men will never be so sincere and honest and diligent as they should be though they were sufficient to have done this if Men had used them as they ought And therefore how can we expect now they should be of better success The Church of Rome indeed pretends to such a means of Unity which we prove that Christ never appointed viz. An Infallible Judg of all Controversies But then as they pretend to that which they think is a greater means of Unity so one would think that they should have a greater Unity too among themselves But is it so indeed Is there nothing but Unity in the Church of Rome Are there no Divisions or were there never any Schisms Hath this pretended Judg of Controversies determined and put an end to all Controversies No he neither hath done it nor dares attempt it But we agree say they in all the fundamental Points In what Is not the Doctrine of the Infallible Judg a fundamental Point it self And do they all agree in that and who this is And if they did so do we agree in the same Rule of Faith the Holy Scriptures And why is not our agreement in the same Rule of Faith as good as their agreement about the Infallible Judg But they all agree likewise that Protestants are in the wrong And we all agree as much that Papists are in the wrong So that if this Point of agreement signify any thing here we are even with them But do they agree among themselves in other things No no more than Protestants do among themselves but have differences the same or as great as any Protestants can have whatsoever they be And notwithstanding the decisions of their pretended infallible Judg they do as much differ in particular Doctrines in the sense of those decisions which are for the determining of the sense of Scriptures as the Protestants do about the sense of Scripture without the decisions of such a determining Judg Therefore we think it very reasonable that the Church of Rome should do as our Saviour directs when they cry out so much upon our Divisions that they would first pull out the Beam out of their own Eyes and reconcile all Differences at Home and then they shall see the more clearly to cast out the Mate out of their Brother's Eye Which they can never do whilst the Beam is in their own or at least I hope we shall never go to them to do it FINIS This Chapter should have come in after Chap. XI That there are some Places more Holy than others and that it is a Work of Piety to go in Pilgrimages to them Bellarm. de Cultu Sacris lib. 3. cap. 8. THis is to revive Judaism again For God dwelt among the Jews indeed in an appropriate manner in the Temple of Jerusalem where were the Symbols of his Presence The Temple was God's House and therefore an Holy Place because God was there peculiarly present Thither were all the Males of the Children of Israel to resort three times a Year and there alone offer their Sacrifices and Oblations to God And the Place made the Worship acceptable to God which was offered there so that the Worship was not so acceptable to God which was performed in other places for the Presence of God sanctified the Place and made it Holy and that sanctified the Worship and gave value to it and therefore it was more acceptably performed there than in another Place But now under the Gospel there is no such Holiness of Places because there is no such symbolical Presence of God in one place more than in another for God's Presence is no longer confined to any one Place but he equally accepts the Worship that is devoutly offered him all the World over John 4. 21 23 24. Woman believe me the Hour cometh when ye shall neither in this Mountain nor yet at Jerusalem worship the Father as the peculiar and appropriate Place of his Worship as if he were more especially present there than in any other Place or would better accept the Worship performed there than in any other Place For now all such religious distinction of Places for Worship shall be taken away But the Hour cometh and now is when the true Worshippers shall worship the Father in Spirit and in Truth for the Father seeketh such to worship him as well in one place as another And such devout Worshippers shall be acceptable to him in any Place Mal. 1. 11. For from the rising of the Sun unto
Grace to the outward Circumcision nor yet to the Water of Baptism The use of these Sacraments was not to work that Grace which they had before but to be a solemn Engagement to them to perform their part of the Covenant and to confirm the Promise of God to them And therefore we find also Faith required before Baptism can be administred Acts 8. 36 37. What doth hinder me says the Eunuch to be baptized And Philip said If thou believest with all thine Heart thou mayest Faith is pre-required before Baptism and therefore is not wrought by the Sacrament of Baptism We find indeed that upon the solemn profession of their Faith by their admission of the Sacrament of Baptism there were sometimes greater measures of the Spirit poured out upon some Acts 19. 5 6. But it was in consideration of their Faith which went before Baptism that these Measures of the Spirit were given to them Their Baptism was only a testification of their Faith Ephes 1. 13. After ye believed ye were sealed with the Holy Spirit of Promise So when Baptism is called the Baptism of Repentance it is not because Repentance was wrought by it but because it was a Sign and Testification of it and farther engaged to it We therefore also find that Justification and Salvation are every-where in the Scripture ascribed to Mens Faith and Repentance and not to the Sacraments as they would be if the Sacraments were the proper and immediate Causes of that Grace by which we are justified and saved Thus Rom. 1. 17. The Just shall live by Faith. And so Gal. 2. 20. I live by the Faith of the Son of God. And this Faith and so all Grace and Holiness is wrought by the Spirit by means of the Word Rom. 10. 17. Faith comes by hearing and hearing by the Word of God And John 3. 8. As the Wind bloweth where it listeth and thou hearest the sound thereof but canst not tell whence it cometh or whither it goeth so is every one that is born of the Spirit God oftentimes in an imperceptible manner conferring his Grace and not confining it to the Sacraments So that the Sacraments do not give but only seal to us the Promise of Grace and Life 1 Pet. 3. 20 21. In the Ark of Noah a few that is eight Persons were saved by Water The like Figure whereunto even Baptism doth now save us But by Baptism I mean not the putting away the filth of the Flesh or that the outward Act of washing the Body serveth to this Salvation which God doth not lay on any outward Ceremony otherwise than as it is an Act or Exercise of our Faith and Obedience But the Answer of a good Conscience towards God in the Covenant of Baptism when a Person being ask'd doth really and faithfully engage and promise to believe in and give up himself to God the Father Son and Holy Ghost and to renounce the World the Flesh and the Devil Baptism is but the celebration of this saving Covenant and it is covenanting sincerely that is the Condition of Salvation and washing is but the Sign As Rom. 2. 25. Circumcision verily profiteth if thou keepest the Law but if thou be a breaker of the Law thy Circumcision is made Vncircumcision So it may be said of Baptism with respect to the Gospel It is not any Sacrament in it self that gives Grace or Justification or acceptance with God but thereby the Benefits promised are sealed to them that perform the Conditions Thus vers 28 29. He is not a Jew whom God will accept and justify who is one outwardly only in the Ceremony Neither is that Circumcision acceptable which is only outward in the Flesh and therefore 't is not the external Sacrament which gives the Grace but he is a Jew justified and accepted of God that is one inwardly and Circumcision is that of the Heart in the Spirit and not in the Letter or Ceremony whose Praise is not of Men but of God. The like may be said of the Christian and his Baptism So Gal. 5. 6. For in Christ Jesus neither Circumcision availeth any thing nor Vncircumcision nor the outward washing of Baptism neither but Faith which worketh by Love. 'T is this and nothing else that avails to the Christian's Salvation But if the Sacraments themselves did work Saving-Grace the same might be as well affirmed of them It is said indeed Rom. 6. 4. We are buried with him by Baptism into Death that like as Christ was raised up from the Dead by the Glory of the Father even so we should also walk in Newness of Life The meaning of which is this that we by our Baptism enter into a Profession Engagement or Undertaking to give over all Sin and to live a new regenerate Life in conformity to the Death and Life of Christ This Profession was represented and signified by their going down into the Water and being as it were buried in it and then rising out of it again It is not Baptism which works this Grace of Mortification but that proceeds from our believing Reception and hearty submitting our selves to the form of Doctrine delivered to us by the Spirit of Grace in the Gospel vers 17. And it is by the Spirit that we are enabled to mortify the Deed of the Body Rom. 8. But Baptism testifies and represents our Profession and Engagement to do it It is said also Gal. 3. 27. As many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ his Spirit and Nature and are become his Members There being baptized into Christ signifies those that have sincerely consented to that baptismal Covenant of which the outward Baptism was a Badg and Profession It was not by virtue of their Baptism but by 〈◊〉 of their Faith which they professed in their Baptism that they became Members of Christ Vers 26. Ye are all the Children of God by Faith in Christ Jesus According to John 1. 12. To as many as received him to them gave he Power to become the Sons of God even to them that believed in his Name So John 3. 5. Except a Man be born of Water and the Spirit c. It is the Spirit 's Regeneration which is asserted and which is only mentioned vers 8. But this spiritual Regeneration was represented by the Water of Baptism So Tit. 3 5. The washing of Regeneration that is Regeneration signified and sealed in Baptism or which is to the Soul as a laver or washing is to the Body to cleanse it from Sin. So Ephes 5. 25 26. Christ loved the Church and gave himself for it that he might sanctif◠it and cleanse it with the washing of Water by the Word It is the Regeneration it self which is there intended by the washing of Water which is said to be wrought by the Word because by the means of the Word we are cleansed from the filth of Sin as the filth of the Body is cleansed by the washing of Water But yet this Regeneration is signified and represented in Baptism and there all do make a profession of it ERRATA PAge 52. line 5. read Judiciously P. 67. l. 19. r. is directly P. 81. l. 3. r. what words P. 84. l. 3. r. beneficial P. 104. l. 30. r. God is said P. 118. l. 20. r. yet He. P. 123. l. 9. r. with them P. 140. l. 24. r. in to the understanding P. 145. l. 23. r. from these words P. 147. l. 21. r. rite P. 152. l. 16. r. even after P. 168. l. 32. r. throw on Advertisement of some Books lately printed against Popery 1. A Modest Enquiry Whether St. Peter were ever at Rome and Bishop of that Church 2. The Fallibility of the Roman Church demonstrated from the manifest Error of the Second Nicene and Trent Councils which assert That the Veneration and honorary Worship of Images is a Tradition Primitive and Apostolical 3. A Demonstration that the Church of Rome and her Councils have erred by shewing that the Councils of Constance Basil and Trent have in all their Decrees touching Communion in one kind contradicted the received Doctrine of the Church of Christ 4. A Treatise of Traditions Wherein is proved That we have Evidence sufficient from Tradition 1. That the Scriptures are the Word of God. 2. That the Church of England owns the true Canon of the Books of the Old Testament 3. That the Copies of the Scripture have not been corrupted 4. That the Romanists have no such Evidence for their Traditions 5. That the Testimony of the present Church of Rome can be no sure Evidence of Apostolical Tradition 6. What Traditions may securely be relied upon and what not The Second Part.