learned persons of the Latin Communion now agree in that Doctrine if the Church of England in her first reform'd Rituals gave as clear an Assignation to his particular Office to the Person ordain'd as either the Greek or Roman Church do at present and finally if real Heresy or Schism cannot annihilate Episcopal Sacerdotal power The consequence of all must be That our Orders are still good and valid and the Establish'd Church of England so far at least a true and sound Member of the Catholick Church of Christ And now it were no difficult Matter to retort the Objection against our Adversaries and prove the invalidity of their Orders upon the Principles and Practices of their own Church For 1. They tell us That it 's the Intention of the Priest not the Form or Matter of Institution that makes the Sacrament So that tho a Man be ordain'd a Priest or a Bishop with all the Ceremonies of the Pontifical and by a Bishop with those very words now made use of in the Exhibition of the Vessels yet if the Bishop minds not what he 's about or intend not to do what the Church intends the Ordain'd remains still without either Character or Power by which means if one Bishop has but once fail'd in the Collation of Orders they run down for ought they know in infinitum without any due Consecration and since humane Frailties are so many and the Artifices of Hell so incessant and prevailing as we must needs have a great many Doubts naturally grow upon us concerning the Intentions of those whole lives we see Extravagant and Impious so from thence we necessarily deduce an Infinity of Uncertaintys If this Conceipt were only the Caprice of some wild Head it were the less considerable But it 's the determination of their oraculous Council of Trent Si quis dixerit in Ministris dum Sacramenta conficiunt conferunt non requiri intentionem saltem faciendi quod facit Ecclesia Anathema sit Sessio 7. Can. 11. that If any shall say there is not required in Ministers while they Consecrate and dispence the Sacraments an Intention at least of doing what the Church does Let that Person so saying be accurs'd And the Annotators upon the Plantin Edition of that Council refers us to the Decrees of Eugenius the 4th in the Florentine Council where we are taught That the Sacraments are perfected by three things By outward Signs Omnia Sacramenta tribus persiciuntur videlicet Rebus tanquam Materia Verbis tanquam Forma Persona Ministri conferentis Sacramentum cum intentione faciendi quod facit Ecclesia quorum si aliquod desit non perficit Sacramentum Instruct ad Armenos Conc. gen T. 13. p. 535. as the Matter by Words as the Form and by the Person of the Minister dispensing the Sacrament with an intention of doing that which the Church does of which three things if any one be wanting there can be no Sacrament It were an easie work to confute this Opinion as being both Unscriptural and Irrational Sacramenta ministrari possunt à bonis à malis à fidelibus infidelibus infra Ecclesiam extra quia si dispensari possint tantum à bonis nullus esset certus de susceptione Sacramenti cum nullus fit certus de bonitate Ministri sicut nec de propria ita oporteret semper iterari malitia unius praejudicaret alienae saluti Lindwood Constit prov l. 1. tit 7. gl pro quibus citat B. Thom. Edit Oxon. 1679. Intra Catholicam Ecclesiam in Mysterio Corporis Sanguinis Domini nihil à bono majus nihil à malo minus perficitur Sacerdote quia non in merito Consecratis sed in verbo perficitur Creatoris virtute Spiritus Sancti Decreti p. 2. c. 1. Qu. 1. citat ex Augustino contra Epist Parmen l. 2. and how it thwarts the Doctrine of some great Men of your own may be seen by those Passages in the Margin but as they assert it it is Argumentum ad Homines the consequence of which we know well enough the Truth we shall leave them to make good as well as they can But if we look upon Consecration to Church Offices only as an Holy Ordinance but no Sacrament We may then challenge the Church of Rome as introducing a Nullity in their Orders by so notorious a deviation from the Examples of Christ and his Apostles from the Methods of the Ancient Vniversal Church and from their own Authentick Constitutions to prove which Crime of theirs we may recur to those Authorities before insisted on From which we learn That Imposition of Hands was the only Essence of Orders that their modern Ceremonies are meer Innovations and as by them us'd shameful Corruptions of the first Institution For tho' we allow that Power to the Governors of every true Christian Church to add some significant Ceremonies to a Divine Ordinance provided they are neither Indecent Superstitious nor Troublesome and therefore might pass by that addition of touching the Consecrated Vessels among other little Fooleries of that Church Yet since they have fixt the Essence of that Ordinance in that touching of those Vessels and have made Imposition of Hands rather an impertinent Formality than a matter of Necessity as may appear from that of Gregory the Ninth In fragmentis Decretalium we cannot but conclude that they have gone beyond all bounds of Just Ecclesiastical Authority For in that Decree as it 's plain that Imposition of Hands is made a meer non-essential Circumstance so it infers a Power in persons Ordain'd to execute their Functions in all parts Presbyter Diaconus cum ordinantur Manus impositionem tactu corporali â—itu ab Apostolis introducto recipiunt Quod si omissum fuerit non est aliquatenus iterandum sed statuto tempore ad hujusmodi Ordines conferendos cautè supplendum quod per errorem extitit praetermissum Concil general T. 11. p. 384. c. 52. Epist ad Archiepiesc Lond. In margine vero decretalium melius legitur Lugdunensem as occasion requires without it for it lays no prohibition on them and yet orders the supplying of all defects only at Canonical times the Interstices of which are long enough to admit various exertions of Diaconal or Sacerdotal Power Nor does the Gloss upon this part of the Canon Law help the matter at all though it be clog'd with a Superfaetation of Notes For tho' the first be That a Deacon and Presbyter ought to be Ordain'd by Imposition of Hands the second that that manner of Ordination is deduc'd from Apostolical example Nota 1. Quòd Presbyter Diaconus per manus Impositionem debet Ordinari Item Nota. Quòd Ordinatio Sacerdotis Diaconi introducta est exemplo Apostolorum Item nota quòd idem est in parte quod in toto Item Quòd duo imperfecta faciunt unum perfectum Decretal Greg. l. 1. Tit. 16. c. 3. gl p. 282.
as once mention'd Cum in Universâ Ecclesiâ unam Sacramentorum administrandorum rationem essentialem materiam nimirum formam statuere necesse est nec in Graeca illius portione alia quam manus Impositio queat assignari Indubie sequitur in Latinâ eandem quoque essentialem esse reputandam ibid. but Imposition of Hands and his Inference from all is very remarkable and much against the now prevailing Tenet of the Roman Church That since it 's necessary there should be some one Essential Rule or Method of dispensing Holy Orders in the Vniversal Church and that there can be no other Matter of Orders assign'd in the Eastern parts of that Church but only Imposition of Hands it must follow without Dispute that even in the Latine Church the same exclusive of all other Ceremonies is Essential to them And to this Opinion of his methinks that of St. Chrysostome agrees very well who tells us in plain terms This is Ordination The Hand is laid upon the Man but God Operates the whole 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chrys in Act. Ap. Hom 14. and it 's Gods Hand which touches the Head of the Person Ordained if he be Ordained Regularly If then all this be true if we have indeed the concurrence of so large a part of the Catholick Church as the Greek is and that the Form of words us'd by them is no more Demonstrative of the Order to be conferr'd than ours in the Church of England was at the beginning of the Reformation we can be no more deny'd to have a Regular Succession of Church Officers than they And we may suppose such Considerations mov'd St. Clara P. Walsh and others of the Roman Communion to allow our Orders as full and valid to all intents and purposes But that we want a Power to offer other Sacrifices than those of Praise and Thanksgiving is a Want no more intolerable in our Priests or Presbyters than it was in the Apostles themselves And I have not yet heard of any Catholick Tradition that either our Saviour us'd those words Receive thou Power to offer Sacrifices c. to any Apostle or that the Apostles us'd it to any of those whom they afterwards Commission'd to Preach the Gospel 5. Our Orders then being valid as to to their Essentials notwithstanding that great Pretended defect it will follow that all that Charge laid upon our Church of Heresy and Schism can no way render them imperfect or ineffectual And if the Roman Doctrine of the Indelible Character be true those who assert that must for their own sake defend our Church especially since it 's apprehended by some as we observ'd before that a denial of the Indelible Character would irrecoverably ruine the Sacrament And such indeed was the Doctrine of the Ancient Church in which the Hereticks and Schismaticks are with all Severity prohibited to ordain any or to Administer Sacraments yet if they would still without fear of Ecclesiastical Censure presume to do such things their Actions were good and in full force Antiquity so concurring with that Common Law Maxime Quod fieri non debet factum valet That which of it self or so and so circumstatiated ought not to be done yet when it is once done stands good and irreversible I wonder not indeed that Baptism tho given by Hereticks should be approv'd in the Church of Rome since they allow Lay-men Women Persons unbaptiz'd nay Jews or Turks to baptize in cases of necessity But in so doing they seem much to forget a standing Rule of their own That none can give that to another which he never had himself For as I remember they tell us That Baptism is one of those Sacraments which imprint an indelible Character Yet such is the Doctrine of their great Aquinas They deny indeed that any can give Holy Orders except Bishops but He who is once made a Bishop must continue so to his lifes end nor can the Irregularity of his Conversation nor any Schism created by him in the Church nor any Heresy invested or propagated by him take away that Episcopal Power personally invested in him howsoever the Exercise of that Power may be restrain'd by Civil or Ecclesiastical Constitutions and consequently those capable of Orders who are consecrated by such Bishops are really Deacons Priests or Bishops according to the particular Character impress'd on them So we may find Arrian Bishops Ordaining others of equally Heretical Sentiments with themselves which Persons so Ordain'd if at any time they abjur'd their Heretical Pravity were receiv'd into the Orthodox Church and admitted to exercise the same Offices they were formerly assign'd to without Re-ordination To this purpose we read in the Answers to the Orthodox publish'd among the works of Justin Martyr That the Crime of an Heretick returning to the true Faith if it had been only some false Opinion 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Resp ad Orthod 14. was to be rectified by a change of Judgment if it were an Error in Baptism by Confirmation if in Orders by laying on of Hands which laying on of Hands was no Reordination but only a particular Ceremony whereby the laps'd in time of Persecution as well as those who had fallen into Heresie Laymen as well as Clergy Men were readmitted into Catholick Communion So Dionysius of Alexandria in Eusebius tells us That it was an Ancient Custom 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Euseb Hist Eccl. l. 7. c. 2. that such should be receiv'd into the Church by Prayer with laying on of hands and Aurelius Bishop of Carthage determining concerning the Schismatical Dotanists orders That seeing it was not lawful to iterate that which was to be given but once 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Conc. gen T. 2. p. 1083. if they heartily renounced that Error they may be receiv'd into that one Church the Mother of all Christians by laying on of hands And the same care is taken in the Eighth Canon of the first Council of Nice which is plain it self and so interpreted by Balsamon Zonaras and Aristenus and farther illustrated by our Learned Beverege The same is attested on the part of the Latin Church August cont Epist Par. l. 2. c. 13. Anastasii 2. Epistola ad Anast Imp. de Acacio Acacianis Conc. gen T. 4. c. 7. 8. by St. Austin in his answer to the Epistle of Parmenian the Donatist and by Anastasius the Second of that Name Bishop of Rome in an Epistle to Anastasius Emperour of Constantinople The care taken was only this That the persons should be qualified according to the Canons of the Church in that case provided and that the Persons ordaining should be really Bishops which things being secured the Ordain'd upon Readmission to Catholick Communion retain'd their Offices and Powers still To conclude this then If Orders be no Sacrament in a strict sense if the Essence of them consist only in Imposition of the hands of Bishops if the Greek and Antient Latin Church and the most
quam Sacerdotes efficiuntur cum neque per secundam Manuum Impositionem fiant Presbyteri ut vidimus nec per tertiam cum illa in fine ordinationis factitari solet Merb. de Sacr. Ord. D. 6. g. 52. since it 's certain they are neither made so by the second laying on of Hands the Exhortation annex'd to which as I observ'd before supposes the Priestly power already given nor yet by the third which is only us'd in the Conclusion of Ordination From all which it seems very probable That let our Ordination be never so Imperfect since we really use some Words at the instant of Imposition of hands and those very pertinent and authentick that Ordinance is at least more compleat in our Church than in theirs who lay on hands indeed but declare nothing at all either of their Reason for it or their Meaning in it 4. The greatest Bigots of the Roman Communion never charge the Greeks tho they account them Schismaticks for the most part with want of a lawful Priesthood yet their Rituals are certainly by Roman rules as defective as ours can be imagin'd In that Church He who was a Deacon before and now to be ordained Priest being brought according to prescription before the Bishop or Patriarch 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Pontific Gr. de Consecr Presbyt the Patriarch makes the sign of the Cross three times upon his Head when he fixing his eyes upon the Holy Table and kneeling on both knees on the step the Chancellor calls aloud Silence Then the Patriarch holding his right hand upon his Head speaks aloud so that all may hear The Divine Grace which always makes sound those things that are weak and compleats what 's imperfect promotes N. N. the most reverend Deacon to be a Priest Let us therefore pray for him that the grace of the All-Holy Spirit may descend upon him Then again signing him three times and laying his hand upon his head when the Deacon has said Let us pray the Patriarch repeats that Prayer softly O God who art without beginning and without end c. After this follow the general Intercessions which when they are ended or while they are repeating the Patriarch laying his hand again upon his head as before Prays to God to fill him with the gifts of his Holy Spirit that He may be capable of doing all things belonging to his Function I need not insist upon other Ceremonies the Person ordain'd having receiv'd his Character before Where it 's observable that as the Greek Church assigns the Office no otherwise but as the Church of England does viz. by giving notice to the People what Order the Person is Consecrated to so the Greek Church differs much from that of Râ—me in the form of the Words used which argues their opinion of the no necessity of such a set Form and consequently that Orders are no Sacrament as that word Sacrament is understood in the strictest Sense by Ecclesiastical Writers Yet Habertus is so far from supposing any deficiency in the Greek Church that in Effect He charges the Church of Rome with Innovation for he tells us Traditionis potius quam Scriptorum Authoritate constat Pont. Gr. obs Hab. 1. That the words us'd upon touching the Vessels are rather built upon Oral Tradition than upon the Authority of any good Writers He refers us to several Testimonies of the Greek Fathers of greatest Reputation given to this Form Originally us'd in their Church He observes that the Church of Rome objected nothing to the Greek Rituals in the Florentine Council He shews that Ordination and Laying on of hands when apply'd to Men set apart for the Service of the Church are the same thing That therefore in their Ecclesiastical Writers 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 all signifying Laying on of hands are all indifferently us'd for Ordination He alledges that of the Writer De Ecclesiastica Hierarchia That the Imposition of the Bishops hands 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. 5. gives both the Character and Authority of a Priest and gives us withal such an Instance of the Indulgence of the Roman See to those of the Greek Communion in Italy as must either prove their full satisfaction with the Grecian Priesthood or else that the Roman Bishops have very little care of their good It 's the Decree of Vrban the Eighth Let the Protector of the Greek Nation provide that some Eastern Bishop consecrated after the Greek manner reside at Rome to perform Divine Offices Caret Protector ut Graecus aliquis ex Oriente ritu Graeco consecratus Episcopus Romae sit ad Divina Officia atque Ordinationes ritu Graeco peragendas qui quae ad Caeremonias ritus Orientalis Ecclesiae faciunt docere alumnos possit ipse per omnia fervet Jurent queque Italo Graeci statum Ecclesiasticum ac sacros Ordines usque ad Presbyteratum ritu Graeco suscepturos quandoque ubi Superioribus visum fuerit Ibid. and to Ordain according to the Graecian Rites who may be able to teach Novices those things which belong to the Rites and Ceremonies of the Eastern Church and may observe them exactly himself and let the Greeks living in Italy give Oath to take the Ecclesiastical Life and Holy as Orders upon them according to the manner of the Greeks as far as the Order of Priesthood when and where their Superiours shall think fit Which is not only a fair attestation to the validity of the Grecian Orders but seems to imply the Greeks dissatisfaction with the Roman Hierarchy and a strange kind of Condescension in the Universal Bishop to recede from his own Rights and to give leave to a suppos'd Schismatical Clergy to increase and thrive within his Jurisdiction And Romanists have sufficient reason to acquiesce in this Liberty of theirs if what Father Goar in his Notes upon the Euchology informs us be true That Imposition of Hands is not only an Adjunct of Holy Orders Neque enim Comes est solùm adventitia non Integrans tantum ex decentia requisita sed intrinseca omnino necessaria essentialis Materia quâ adhibitâ sicut olim Apostoli prout in eorum Actis Scriptis legimus Diaconos Presbyteros Episcopos creârunt absque illâ pariter nullum in sublimiores Hierarchiae Ecclesiasticae gradus successores Episcopi possunt evehere Goar in Euch. p. 256. or meerly adventitious not only an Integral part or a thing requir'd for Decencies sake but that it 's wholly the Intrinsical necessary and Essential Matter of them by which as the Apostles of old created Deacons Presbyters and Bishops as appears by their Writings and the History of their Acts so without that the Bishops who succeed them can raise no Man to Superior Orders in the Sacred Hierarchy And as he tells us afterwards If we examine the Euchology never so strictly we shall find no other matter of Orders so much