Selected quad for the lemma: church_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
church_n communion_n particular_a schism_n 3,730 5 9.9397 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A41790 A sigh for peace, or, The cause of division discovered wherein the great Gospel promise of the Holy Ghost, and the doctrine of prayer with imposition of hands, as the way ordained of God to seek for it, is asserted and vindicated, as the interest and duty of Christs disciples in general : in answer to a book intituled A search for schism / by Tho. Grantham ... Grantham, Thomas, 1634-1692. 1671 (1671) Wing G1548; ESTC R39437 69,616 172

There are 8 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

A Sigh for Peace OR The Cause of Division Discovered WHEREIN The great Gospel Promise of the Holy Ghost and the Doctrine of Prayer with Imposition of hands as the way ordained of God to seek for it Is asserted and vindicated as the Interest and Duty of Christs Disciples in general In Answer to a Book Intituled A Search for Schism By Tho. Grantham a Servant of Christ Gal. 5. 7 8 9. Ye did run well who did hinder you that you should not obey the truth This perswasion cometh not of him that calleth you A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump I have confidence in you through the Lord that you will be none otherwise minded but he that troubleth you shall bear his burthen whosoever he be Wherefore love the Truth and Peace Zech. 8. 19. Printed for the Author 1671. The Epistle Dedicatory To the Church of Christ in London with the General Assembly of Messengers Elders and Brethren occasionally meeting together to consider of the Affairs of the Churches of Christ Salutation c. Brethren WHen I consider how much it is your desire and the desire of the Churches in general that brotherly concord peace and truth might possess the room of all our divisions in affection judgment and practise and particularly in the fourth principle of Christianity And how many Prayers are daily made to God for so great a Blessing And that hopeful way we lately seem'd to be in to lay hold of the thing which hath been so long desired And therewithal that most unhappy obstruction of our hopes as ye know arising from one who should rather have been a restorer of the antient path which many have forsaken and so a healer of the breach which hath been made by its being neglected Who being in reputation for Wisdome having therewithal great opportunity and I am perswaded really intended to do the Church of Christ much good Even then by a little solly following his own Councels doubtless through Satans malice who envied our good hath made himself and his enterprises obnoxious and our wound more grievous I say when I considered these things I could not pass them over without a Sigh even this which here I present unto you saying in my heart Why hath the Lord done this Which was no sooner conceived but I was immediately satisfied that the Lord was jealous for his holy way which had been gr●sly prophaned by an hypocritical conformity thereunto And true for ever is that word Hosea 14. ult All the wayes of the Lord are right and the Just shall walk therein But the Transgressor shall fall therein And certainly as our Brethrens resusing to seek the Lord after the due order at the first so this prodigious hypocrisie at the last may too truly be called Perrez Ecclesia at this day Thou Lord art righteous thou knowest the Hearts of the children of men and hast discovered the hidden things thereof and hast pleaded the cause of thy precious though much abused Truth Even so Lord let our iniquities be ever corrected but yet in mercy forgive us our Trespasses But what shall we say shall we now no more go about this dreadfull work to bring the Ark the fourth principle of Christianity I mean to its proper place in the Churches or rather some irregular Churches to their due reverence unto it If it seem good in the eyes of the Lord let his servants still convene to consider of this matter perhaps we shall find grace in his sight for there is hope that we shall one understand another and with one consent seek and serve the Lord God of our Fore-Fathers And this I am the more induced to believe or hope for from not only the great desire which I yet find to be alive in the hearts of Christians generally that peace in this matter might be upon Israel But also from the great forwardness which I found in the Searchers themselves to consent unto certain Proposals for Peace the first of which is this That it be granted and professed on all sides by the formerly divided parties That that laying on of Hands Heb. 6. 2. is one of the Principles of Christs Doctrine and a part of the foundation This Proposition being considered it may appear that there wants but a step as it were to unity in the truth it self and so to a lasting Peace one with another And methinks it should be no impossible thing for us to agree about the particular service intended Heb. 6. 2. unless a spirit of perversness be mingled amongst us Towards the clearing of which difficulty something is said in the sequel which I desire may be considered Why the Searchers should so much declaim against you as if you unchurched all Church●s but your selves I can see no reason having never understood that you did at any time by any agreement deliver such a Doctrine Nor is it so much your business to meddle with unchurching any body as to keep your selves from corruption in Doctrine and Manners Indeed the point of Communion with those who reject or oppose your Faith and practice in the case depending hath been much debated and resolved in the Negative èspecially touching the Table of the Lord but this is so far from being an Argument that you deny them to be Churches of Christ that it plainly Argues you own them for such but yet such as for their rejecting or opposing some truth of God are therefore uncapable of present communion with those that religiously observe the truth by them rejected and opposed For if you deem them to be no Churches at all what need any debate be had Whether it be orderly or safe to communicate with them at the Lords Table Now that persons may be allowed the Appellation of Christians and so of the Church of Christ and yet as the matter may be circumstanced concerning them ought to be held at some distance in respect of present Communion with other Christians or Churches implies no absurdity but is rather very necessary I hope the ensuing discourse will demonstrate Something also I have said in vindication of the Messengers Office which I perceive to be much questioned by some I confess my self nothing so fit a person to plead this cause as some other However if that which I have done may give occasion to any other to do more or more effectually in this point I shall think my pains well bestowed I commit all that I have said to the blessing of God and the Consideration of his Churches Your Brother and Servant Tho. Grantham To the Authors of the BOOK Intituled A Search for Schism Brethren WHen we consider how God is able to effect good things for his people by contrary wayes even by turning the unkindness of Brethren into means of preservation to the family Gen. 50. 20. we are made even against hope to believe in hope that the product of your doings in your Search and the Epistle prefixed may be good although its procedure in respect
or Congr●●tions of Christ as are free from these corrup●ions I will descend to those grounds which ●re more familiar to us and then see how it ●ay reach the case depending between the ●earchers and their Brethren And first from Acts 15. 2. It appeareth that ●here was not only great disputation but dissention also in the Primitive Churches about matters of Doctrine which word dissention doth imply the discontinuance o● communion between Paul Ba●n●bas with those which did adhere to them and that part of the Church which were zealous for Circumcision and the Law And yet we do not finde that they did one unchurch another but used the most effectual means tha● might be to put an end to the strife And very remarkable it is that though the Assembly a● Jerusalem did plainly determine the point o● Doctrine yet did they forbear their censure against the persons who erred in that case 〈◊〉 chusing to exercise all Longanimity rather then severity knowing that their power was given more for Edification● then for destroying any mans attainments in the paths of Christianity Howbeit when this lenity would not effect th● Reformation of the ill manners of those corrupters or depravers of the Gospel then di● the Apostle lay greater weight upon them wh● would not cease to trouble the Churches Gal. 5. 12. Nor is there any reason to doubt but that the Judaizers had generally been held at some distance in point of Communion or privileges in the Churches before Paul wrote to the Gallatians For seeing that Epistle written by Paul Si●vanus and Timotheus did impower the Church at Thessalonica to note such as dis●beyed it with a note of di●inction from the rest of the Christians who conform'd themselves to its directions Then doubtless that Epistle Acts 15. written in the ●ame of the great Assembly at Jerusalem did every way as much impower all Churches to put ●he like note of distinction upon all that did not ●hey the same which note of distinction howso●ver it might lie as a bar against their present Communion yet did it not destroy their Bre●her-hood 2 Thes 3. 14 15. So that it is further evident that a people ●ay be esteemed Brethren in Christ or a Church 〈◊〉 Christ and yet justly be denyed communion ●●th other Churches or Brethren in Christ For ●he matter in short lyeth thus As a Brother is 〈◊〉 member in respect of that Congregation or ●hurch to which he is immediately related ●o a particular Congregation is but a member in respect of the Church universal As therefore a man may be called a Christian Brother and yet justly for some cause be denyed present communion with his fellow Brethren So a Congregation may be accounted a Church of Christ and yet justly be denyed communion by her Sister Churches and chiefly when she is such a Church as causes divisions and offences contrary to the Doctrine which the Primitive Churches received from the Apostles All which being considered may well serve to satisfie our Brethren that we commit no absurdity in refusing to communicate with them though we grant them the Appellation of the Church of Christ and Brethren in particular as before we have said Having shewed that al● manner of Divisions which happen in the Church are not properly against her they being after a sort rather nec●ssary for her Reformation then to bring he● to desolation when corruption in Doctrin● or manners have made in vasions upon he● Though it must needs be granted that eve● those divisions are accidentally against th● Church and that as for other causes so chiefly for that they are a scandal to the World and a stumbling to weak Christians It behoveth that we briefly shew what we mean by divisions which are properly against the Church and they are such as these 1. When both parties contending strive to set up some sinful thing or their own devices 2. When they divide about that which is not necessary but indifferent only 3. When the point in question is not so much the thing sought for as revenge upon the persons against whom the controversie is held Those and such like tend only to the ruine of Churches having no tendency at all to Edification The first of these shewed it self among the Corinthians when they strove to set up men some this man and others that and this in opposition one unto another 1 Cor. 1. 12. Which folly hath been the overthrow of Congregations where mens persons have been admi●ed and truth neglected The second is rebuked Rom. 14. But why dost thou judge thy Brother or set at nought thy Brother meaning for things indifferent Therefore who art thou that judgest another mans Servant to his own Master he stands or falls yea he shall be holden up for God is able to make him stand The third is detected Gal. 5. 15. for whatsoever the question was this was their sin they did bite one another Thus men may hold the truth in unrighteousness and without Charity preach Christ meerely of envy to add thereby some affliction to the bonds of their brethren Those kind of divisions in the ages bordering upon the Apostles became the Heathens sport and the Christians shame upon their ●pen Theaters Let us therefore now return to consider the Nature of that distemper which hath befallen our body about the fourth principle of Christ his Doctrine Heb. 6. 2. The Searchers have declared it to be the sin of Schism and the part distempered to be only the Congregations under the practice of Laying on of Hands as is evident from the whole Contexture of their search and the directon of the Epistle prefixed to it as if there were nothing amiss in this matter on their part who if I may so speak have made and defended a Schism in the principles of the Doctrine of our Lord and there withall divided themselves from a principle thereof And this word SCHISM is taken by the Searchers not in a mild sense such as wherein it may be taken by propriety of Speech to signifie division in some lower consideration as the word is translated 1 Cor. 1. 10. But they have hoysed it in their application of it to the Congregations professing the fourth principle to the most extream signification even that of Sedition yea to such a degree as if we unchurched all Churches but our selves As if it were a light matter to brand all those Churches for Schismaticks But they should have considered that bare abstaining from communion chiefly at the Table of the Lord which is all that hath been done generally if so much have been done and that upon such immergent occasion as hath at least in the time of hot contention been given for it is far from being sufficient to bear them out in this their rash charge against their Brethren Seeing our Saviour himself puts a bar for coming to the Altar while differences between Brother and Brother only remains undecided which being duly
considered may justly cause the sober Christian to be afraid of such a communion as I perceive the Searchers would hand ov●r head involve us into Now what hath been done by some particular persons among us in respect of Church-rendings or unchurching other Churches through ignorance or preposterus zeal as I do not perfectly know so I will not in any wise go about to justifie But sure I am it is no good ground for you to asperse all our Congregations with such mens actions no more then the like preposterous actions by some among you for such there hath been both particular persons and Congregations will justifie us to fasten the like reproach upon you which hitherto we have not done nor intend to take the advantage of your procreation to do it now And what though there hath been during the time of these contentions and oppositions a distinction in communion between the Congregations aforesaid held to be needful at least in some things wherein Christians communicating one with another cannot be very comfortable without unity in their Doctrine and practice yet sure this hath been done generally without contracting the guilt of Schism on either side in respect of all such as in the midst of all these dissentions have maintain'd the great engagement of Charity towards one another And for those that have not so done it s justly feared the guilt hath been as great on the one side as on the other This distinction in communion hath been held I presume by all wise Christians rather of necessity then for any delight they have had in it partly for that the truth in question would otherwise have been slighted as a thing but at most indifferent And there is no readier way to destroy any truth then to let it pass with such an estimation And partly for that contention would ever have been rising between Members of the same particular community and no means remaining to pacifie those divisions For what pious Pastor of the Church can justifie his admitting some to the Lords Table without imbracing nay though opposing the fourth principle of Christianity and yet with the same breath deny another that liberty The truth is this disparity in judgment and practice must admit of one thing out of two at least so long as the Spirit of contradiction worketh viz. either that the parties dissenting may sit down in distinct Congreations without the offence or grudging one against another or else it must admit of dispencing with most of the principles of our Religion one by one till indeed we have none left intire as will appear by singling them apart and yielding to each opinionist the plea which our Brethren do use in the case depending which in effect is this Why should we not sit down at the Lords Table with you Seeing we own all the principles of Christs Doctrine as you do which yet I fear c. except the fourth and as touching that we say and believe that the Laying on of Hands in Heb. 6. 2. is a principle of Christs doctrine and a part of the founlation yet we deny that Laying on of Hands which you hold to be that principle This plea being admitted a second comes and pleads thus Let us build with you for we own all the principles of Religion Heb. 6. 1,2 as you do except that of Faith and yet we say Faith is a principle according to Heb. 6. 1. but we deny that faith which you say is there meant to be that principle A third comes and says we have right to sit down in communion with you for we do own all the principles Heb. 6. only the Doctrine of Baptisms which you say is there meant we deny to be a principle of Christs Doctrine and do say that it is your own innovation or tradition yet we own the Doctrine of Baptisms A fourth pretends they own all the principles c. only that Resurrection of the dead which we say is a principle of Christianity they term an Humane innovation yet they profess to believe the Resurrection Finally there comes others and professes that they own all the principles of Gods Oracles He● 6. c. but withall they deny with Origen that eternal judgment which we hold and say that there shall be an universal Salvation and yet they own with him a judgment which is eternal And upon these pretensions they demand the priviledges of Christians among us in all things Now admitting laying on of Hands as we hold to be as undoubtedly a principle of Christs Doctrine as any of the rest as that is our case Let our Brethren resolve us how we shall dispense with them in rejecting and opposing that principle and yet do nothing at all to the prejudice of any other principle or part of the Foundation Certain it is as before we have hinted there is no Artifice of Sathan so likely to wear out this or any other truth as to make it subject to the wills of men viz. to admit men to the same degree of Estimation and fitness for communion in the Church though they deny this truth as if they owned it And whilst our Brethren are labouring with all their might to bring the fourth principle of Christs Doctrine to this state of subjection others are as busily tampering with the Doctrine of Baptism and have prevailed to the great reproach of those Christians who have suffered themselves and the truth to be thus abused Open opposition though too bad yet is more advantagious to the truth then such pretended friendship for truth being opposed hath strength and Authority to withstand its greatest Adversary But if once subtil men creep into the Church under a specious pretense of waiting for the knowledge of such truths as they have a design to overthrow these prove the greatest prophaners and subverters of the ways of God in the world And what devourer shall we be able to keep out that hath but craft to get in if once this door of dispensing with principles of Religion be opened Assuredly had those persons Acts the 10. the remission of whose sins was evidenced from Heaven very eminently been admitted to communion without submitting to the Baptism of Repentance for remission of sin as Peters question can any man forbid water that these should not be Baptized which received the Holy Ghost seems to intimate that some such thought might possibly dart it self into the breasts of some It had certainly made nul● that ordinance almost totally for who doth not now a-days presently suppose himself to be baptized with the Spiri● Our Brethren demand of us whether those qualifications which gives right to B●ptism do not give right to the Lords Table The answer is easie for Faith and Repentance as they say gives right to Baptism but not so for the Lords Table for though Baptism be no qualification for it self yet it is a very necessary qualification for the Lords Table But that we may reach the utmost that can
tendency of your 19th demand as if it would follow that because there were some sinfully suffered in some Churches of old who taught Gods people to commit fornica●ion and to eat meats effired to Idols and to hold 〈◊〉 community of Women a thing so beastly as scarce fit to be named therefore we may not withdraw from such Churches as suffer such things Now when yet its evident that the Lord charges those sins so deeply upon those that suffered those Abominations that without speedy Repentance their Church-state must be removed But surely our Brethren cannot be ignorant that the Lord commends such of the Churches in Asia as could not bear but uncharched those that were evil who said they were Jews and Aposties and were not but were the Synagogue of Sathan and how vehemently ●he reproves those that did not thus separate from such evil workers whether Congregations or particular Members for sure there is but one Law for few or for many in this case True it is That God had mercy for great offenders upon repentance and there must be admoniton before they be spewed out of the mouth But what will this avail their case who being intreated and exhorted to turn from the errour of their way and diligently taught concerning the truth yet persist in their opposition The slight exposition which the Searchers gives us of 2 John 7. 9. Verses is no more to be commended as I conceive then their Adversaries unwary syllogism from thence Seeing it is not all that confess that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh that hath fellowship with the Father and the Son For that is the sense of the Searchers or else they must tell us how many of Christs Doctrines or teachings must be owned as necessary to mens communion with God and Christ which will puzzle the Searchers as much as any body else their flourishes and reflexions against others notwithstanding Nor need we say much to our Brethrens demands which they ground on a supp●sition of the truth of our opinion considering what we have said already for if that we hold b● the truth it is such a truth as may not be dispensed with or neglected without manifes● danger to the rest of the principles of Religion as hath been shewed It shall therefore now suffice for the tryal of the consciences of ou● Brethren in this matter that we appeal t● them touching the like service in another case namely the Laying on of Hands in the Ordination of Officers in the Church which some o● them will have to be that principle Heb. 6● though others of them reject that as erroneous s● that our Brethren had lit●le cause to upbraid u● about some differing apprehensions about the end of that Ministration sith themselves are divided both about the end and the principle it self I say put case now that some among you should deny the Layng on of Hands on Officers to be instituted of God and tell you it is an innovation of man to say no worse and that you have no command from God for it and thereupon they bring all the Arguments against you which you devise against us And not only so but they carry on all the Affairs of the Church without any regard had to that orderly way of ordaining men to Office by prayer with the Laying on of Hands Only because it s your humour to have men so ordained therefore in condescention to your weakness and that they may the better bring you off that usage they permit you once twice or thrice c. to preach up such a thing in their Congregations Do you now make so little conscience of that Laying on of Hands which you practice and that as a part of the Foundation say some of you as that you could maintain a free and chearful communion with such persons Howsoever you may shuffle in this case considering the liberty which you encline to in the other yet surely were you free from that temptation you would find no small difficulties to hold such communion with those who should not only make void but even despise for 't is no better that wholsome and Divine order which God hath left for the Government of his House As for general Assemblies which are ordained for general Controversies and which through the blessing of God are the best expedient under the Sun for composing divisions in the Churches Here the liberty of Christians should be yea must be maintain'd though they differ right much in their opinions in matters of Religion and therefore we have indeed very Christianly admitted the Searchers to such our Assemblies knowing well that not only the Christians in the ages bordering upon the Primitive but even the Apostles of our Lord did allow Christians of very different perswasions freely to deliberate on things propounded in such Assemblies But yet we little thought that our Brethren would have abused us in the sight of the World for this our Christian respect towards them as if we were inconsistant with our principles in such our condescentions unless we also communicate with them at the Lords Table Surely this kind of dealing is unlikely to effect the peace and concord of our too much divided Congregations For my part I could heartily wish that all the Congregations of Christians in the World that are baptized according to the appointment of Christ Math. 28. 19. Mark 16. 16. Acts 2. 38. would make one Consistory at least some times to consider of the matters in difference among them For if this be not admitted there is no means under Heaven remaining as I conceive to heal their divisions and consequently to obtain that peace which should rule in the hearts of all Gods people because they are thereunto called in one universal body And herein I conceive an union in the main may be held though in our particular communities for the avoiding otherwise inevitable inconveniencies we are constrained to hold some distinctions For it is one thing to forsake the Church of Christ and another to cease communicating with such a particular Congregation as in the time of Reformation will needs stay behind in the steps of irregularity The first can be no other than Schism sith there can be no cause to forsake the Church of God though there may be cause to forbear communicating with some particular Members or Congregations thereof The other is so far from Schism that it is more truly called Reformation nor doth it follow that because we efuse to communicate with our Brethren in rheir irregular proceedings in the matters of Religion that therefore we reject them in those principles of truth which they do religiously observe and zealously profess neither is our distinguishing our Congregations from theirs so much a separation from them as a Reformation of our selves so that the 10. and 11. demands of the Searchers might well have been spared sith as things stand among us they are not only unnecessary but I fear may prove very pernicious to
unlawfully was punished by separating the persons so coupled the Children also was put away as well as the Wives which howsoever it might stand with the state of the Jewish Church and perhaps was necessary in respect of their Terrestrial Inheritances and the policy of their Nation yet surely it would be great cruelty for men professing Christianity to turn their Wives and Children out of doors who both by the Law of Nature and Nations have as clear a right to all Temporal or Domestical priviledges now as the Husband himself in any Nation whatsoever Finally sith God hath grievously punished this sin of marrying contrary to his positive Laws in that case provided for his peoples good chiefly in things pertaining to the worship and service of God let all Christians therefore stand in aw and sin not but commune with their own hearts in this behalf least they provoke the Lord to plead against them by his judgments for his eyes are upon the ways of men to render to them the fruit of their doings Chiefly those who sin presumptuously for such do reproach the Lord as it is written Numb 15 30 31. In the next place on ching bloud and ●hings strangled we know the wisdom of God hath forbidden the eating thereof to Noah and his Sons for ever And when men had generally forgotten the Lord he severed Abraham and his seed to be his heritage and gave them this Law to observe among others which Law he hath established in the Churches of the Gen●●les in those right needful decrees which doth declare the repeal of the Cerimonial Law and gives continuance to what was generally necessary upon the delivery whereof the Churches were established in that F●ith by which a man is justifyed and not by the works of the Law True it is that which g●e●h into the man defileth not a man and consequently bloud doth not defile any man by eating thereof But disobedience which proceedeth from an unlawful desire to that which God hath forbidden and so cometh out of the man that defileth a man so then not the fruit which Adam did eat but the sin which he committed defiled him and the same will defile his Posterity if they covet and take the thing which God hath forbidden The Doctrine of our Churches about Apparel is this that the adorning of Christians ought not to be that of plating the hair wearing of Gold nor costly array with Rings and toys as the humour of phantastick persons in City or Country commonly leads them But that instead thereof moderation modesty and yet decency according to the state and condition of persons respectively should be observed on all sides that so Christians might be examples to others even in these matters And what though some person or persons in the Church be more than ordinary set against the vain fashions of our days and sometimes lets their zeal go a step too far is this so offensive to our Brethren that they can no way bear this without such a publick reprehension I fear in so doing they may have done the Church more disservice then those whom they inveigh against What the Searchers should mean about these matters being made the Ess●ntials of Communion I cannot imagine unless they would have us to suffer men to sin in these cases without being called upon to reform and in case of obstinacy to be withdrawn from by the Church as disorderly persons that they may learn to be ashamed yet we mean not that they should be accounted as enemies but admonished as Brethren and surely if this be their meaning that offenders in these cases must be let alone in their sins we should in so doing loose the order and in time the Essence of Churches For suppose now a gallant of the Times should desire to be Baptized and to walk in Communion with the Searchers only he tells them they must give him leave to marry out of the Church and allow him the liberty to transgress the Apostolical decrees in eating bloud and things strangled and meats offered to Idols and therewithall that he may wear Gold and tread the steps of the Gallants in matters of Apparel c. Would the Searchers now admit such a person into their Communion if not then they make these things as necessary to church-Church-communion as we do And certainly that which is ground sufficient to keep men out of the Church will justifie a Church in withdrawing from such if they refuse to reform To give evidence by Oath to terminate strife among men we have not one Congregation in England that I can hear of doth oppose it indeed some particular persons are doubtful in that matter because of our Saviours words Swear not at all and therefore it was very unnecessarily put to publick observation as an Essential of our Church-Communion What the Searchers do suggest against some as denying that Christ took flesh of the Virgin Mary is I confess a matter of great importance And sure I am many of our Congregations never heard of such a thing till the Searchers became their informers nor do I think there is so much as one Congregation in England that holds such a thing for particulars no man may speak however upon this occasion I can do no less then protest against that Opinion as a most dangerous conceit nothing inferiour to theirs that deny that glorious and blessed person to be God by Nature for as the one denies his Manhood the other denies his Godhead and so between them we have little left to fix on for our Redemption and Salvation And as I have shewed my dislike to these conceits to say no more at present so I hold it requisite to protest my Faith in this case as I have been taught and as I have believed and as I trust I shall hold fast unto the end That Faith which I have learned and is the Faith of our Churches generally is this First That the Lord Jesus the Saviour of the World is God by Nature and therefore of one substance with the Father as touching his Godhead He is called the only begotten of the Father The express image of his Fathers person The true God and Eternal Life The Lord Almighty It is he by whom the Worlds were made Without him nothing was made which was made He is that very Lord who in the beginning laid the Foundation of the Earth and the Heavens are the work of his Hands He is the Alpha and Omega the first and the ●●st He is said to be before all things and by ●im all things consist He is the I A M who ●eing in the form of God thought not robbery ●o be equal with God He is God over all bles●ed forever Amen I conclude then that he of ●hom these things are spoken is doubtless God by Nature ● This Lord Jesus the Saviour of the World is man 〈◊〉 Nature He was made lower then the Angels 〈◊〉 took not on him the Nature of Angels but
〈◊〉 seed of Abraham He is of one substance with ●is Church touching his Manhood and for ●hat cause he is not ashamed to call them Bre●●ren As they are partakers of flesh and ●loud he also himself likewise took part of the ●●me He was made of a Woman raised up 〈◊〉 the fruit of Davids Loins according to the ●●esh He is Davids Son called frequently a ●an and the Son of man He had the pro●erties and infirmities of man in all things sin ●xcepted This his Birth Growth manner of Life and Death do declare I conclude then he of whom these things may be said is man by Nature The short is this Jesus the Saviour of the World was before al● things and he that made all things therefore he i● God by Nature Jesus the Saviour of the Worl● was born in time and suffered death or was slain 〈◊〉 therefore he is man by Nature Yet more shortly This Jesus is Immanuel or God-Man in on● Person The Third Part. SHeweth that our Brethrens rejecting and opposing the fourth principle of Christs Doctrine enforceth a distinction in Communion at least in part between them and th● Churches which walketh in the Religious observatio● of it and that all divisions which happen in th● Church are not properly but accidentally again●● her as also that it is no absurdity to refuse to communicate with a people who may be allowed the appellation of a Church As it must ever be granted that a Kingdom divided against it self is brought to desolation and is very true when apply'd to the Church of God where Divisions are as Epidemical as in ●ny Societies of men whatsoever So also it must be denyed that all manner of divisions which happen within the pale of the Church ●re property against her self For seeing it cannot be denyed but that she may be and hath been corrupted divers ways ●●om her first integrity both in respect of the ●orm and power of godliness even hence is en●orced a necessity that ●he be reformed Where●pon divers worthy men in all ages have laboured 〈◊〉 restore the decayed parts if Christianity as well as to ●oot out such things as ●ave been obtruded by innovation And surely ●hat was the duty of some was more or less ●he duty of all and consequently the sin of ●●ch as put not their shoulder to the work ●eh 3. 5. But much more theirs who not on●y would not do it themselves but hinder and ●iscourage them that would Saying in effect 〈◊〉 the corrupt part of the Church of old did in the days of the Prophet Jer. 44. 16 17. As for the word which thou h●st spoken unto us in the name of the Lord we will not hearken unt● thee but we will certainly do as we have done 〈◊〉 and our Fathers c. Putting the mark of Antiquity upon their own ways and the note o● novelty upon the Doctrine of the Prophet o● God Something like to which is that saying of the Searchers where they tell us They ca● well remember when Laying on of Hands was no● esteemed a Fundamental Doctrine which yet 〈◊〉 have reason to question when I consider tha● themselves do hold and say they ever di● hold Laying on of Hands He● 6. to be 〈◊〉 part of the Foundation And I think non● of its Assertors ever had less esteem o● it then they Neither doth the Moderation of its Assertors in the point of communion which it seems they held with thos● that did not receive that Doctrine for som● time after themselves had owned it argue● that those who received ●he Doctrine of Layin● on of Hand did not esteem it the same whic● now they do Sith reason wills that when an● part of the Church of God attains to th● knowledge of any principles of truth which by the corruption of the times hath been obscured they should exercise all long-suffering an● forbearance to see if by any means the contrary minded may be enlightned But now if after all endeavours used and patience extended some part of the Church remain wholly av●r●e to Reformation and that in such weighty matters as the principles of Religion it cannot be reasonable nor is it Scrip●ural that those whom God hath enlight●ed should be bound to continue with the ●bstinate in their by-paths but must at length ●eclare themselves in manner of speech like ●hat of Joshuah If it seem evil to you to serve 〈◊〉 Lord in this principle of his Doctrine chuse 〈◊〉 what you will do but as for us we are resolved ●●rein to serve the Lord Agreeable whereunto 〈◊〉 that direction of the ●ord to the Remnant ●hat held to the truth with ●heir whole heart Jer. 15. ●9 Let them return to thee 〈◊〉 return not thou to them ●hence I note four things considerable to ●ur present occasion 1. That the parties here spoken of were ●oth of the Church of God 2. That there was a difference between ●●em touching some necessary part of Religi●● 3. That the Lord allows this division and ●●courageth the continuation of it on the part of those that served him perfectly or according to his Word 4. That the Church-state of neither part is as yet taken wholly away or destroyed And therefore hence I infer this conclusion That in a time of the●● Churches defection in the principles or any necessary part of Religion there may lawfully be held a distinction in communion between th● part defective and that which is sound or reformed and ye● the Church state of neither wholly destroyed And b● how much the principles 〈◊〉 points of Faith are greater or l●sser by so much thi● distinction is to be maintain'd with greater or les● severity This I might confirm by the consideration of the state of the Jewish Church under thos● great distractions which happen'd among the● sometimes about principles of truth referring immediately to the Majesty of Heaven Hos 11. 12. And otherwhiles about those which being neglected would greatly impair the power o● godliness among men Iud● 19. 20 chu● I● which distractions the Faithful laboured as i● were in the very fire to reform the part distempered without destroying their Church-state Judg. 20. and 21. Chapters Jer. 17. 12. to 17. during which combustions there must needs be a demur in the point of communion between the parts contending as may ●asily be gathered from their bitter and sangui●●ry conflicts if our very reason did not con●ince us But leaving the many and convincing Allega●●ons which might be brought from the state of the Jewish Church who were not denyed ●hat Appellation though under such defile●ents as rendred them unfit to Celebrate the ●oly Rites and Mysteries of the Law and ●herefore consequently very unfit for commu●ion with those who withstood their polluti●ns which may sufficiently satisfie reasonable ●en and therefore the Searchers themselves ●hat it is no absurd thing to grant a pe●ple the Ap●ilation of a Church and yet hold them uncapable 〈◊〉 communion with such of the Churches
the peace of our Churches Let me now conclude with a free Word to the Brethren of both perswasions And that is to beseech you to consider one another as Brethren and not as Adversaries and as Brethren to put on Charity one towards another and chiefly you that are zealous for the principle under debate the more you walk in the truth the more it concerns you to shew forth your works with meekness of wisdom and to abound in that gift of the Spirit which hopeth and believeth all things which doubtless will teach you to believe this of your Brethren in general that if they saw the truth as you do they would be nothing less zealous for it then your selves and consider in the mean time as they are erroneous in our judgments and certainly erroneous they are so we seem to be to them And though the consequence of their rejecting one principle of Religion do indeed endanger the rest yet let us believe that if they were awar of this they would abhor such an opinion as doth so prejudice the Doctrine of Christ Our Brethren do err it is true but they err with a conscience void of errour because as may be hoped they know not that they err Now Charity suffereth long and is kind is not puffed up against any that zealously serve the Lord though perhaps they err from many of his Precepts Charity is not the companion of that excess of indiscreet zeal which abounds in some men for it knoweth that temperance is as necessary in our zeal as mercy is in judgment violent Spirits seldom or never doth the Church service without disservice And let us consider that the truth we stand for hath no need of our passions to defend it no it s own authority will support it against the strongest opposition therefore let your moderation appear to all men To the Brethren on the other side Let me thus speak beware that you despise not your Brethren especially you that are men of parts because you being taken for Brethren of high degree must now if you own the truth which you have opposed seem to be abased You that have been Instructers of the simple must now learn of Babes or at least such things as pertains to Babes Whereupon if you ask your consciences I am perswaded you or at least some of you have met with such reasonings as once a Wise man met with upon an occasion like to this when he reasoned with his friend after this manner Because others are gone before is it a shame for us to come after or is it not rather a great shame not at all to go after them Aug. Confess l. 8. c 8. And let it be considered how upon the discovery of the right manner of Baptizing for men had forsaken the way of God both in the subject and manner of that Ordinance there was found a kind of necessity for Christians of ancient standing as it were to begin again And yet some then as you now was by no means to be prevailed with but would at least have the way of baptizing left to every mans liberty as you would have the 4th principle and now the Lord hath pleaded that cause when no other endeavour could prevail for those that stumbled at that truth are in a manner wholly extinct in this Nation whilst those that imbraced it are blessed with great encrease And what shall befall you if to your disobedience you shall add pertinacity a little time may determine By that which hath been said you may perceive Brethren how the case stands betwen us gladly would we have communion with you in all Christian priviledges but your willful want as of some may be feared of one principle of Christian Religion and therewithall your endeavours to deprive our Churches of it as is too evident to be denyed puts a stop to that which is so much desired and how it shall be obtain'd is the business for time to determine and O that the set time were come Mean while we must leave the Searchers and their search our selves and our Sigh to him that will cause all the Churches to know that it is he that searcheth the heart and tryeth the Reins and will give to every man according as his work shall be A Defence of the Offices of Apostles and of the continuance thereof in the Church till the end FOr men to strain more at the Word Apostle as some do at the word Bishop then at the work or Office signified thereby is no other thing as I conceive then groundless humility or hypocritical subtilty seeing it is evident that those Titles are as lowly as any that can be given to sute with the matter thereby intended The first signifying a Messenger or one sent the other an Overseer Wherefore that I may avoid this humour I will not fear to call old things by their old names and therefore shall call the Officers of the Church by the same names which the wisdom of God hath given them not to make them proud but rather humbled and to be as a Memento concerning the work which by their Office they stand engaged to do Nor shall we need at this time to say much of the Officers of the Church generally but only of the Office of Apostles or messengers this because some of our Brethren do not only doubt but endeavour to make others doubtful also whether God hath given to his Church ANY Apostles or Messengers to succeed the Primitive Apostles as a constant Ministery in the Church to the end of the World And albeit we say that the Apostles have Successours as well as Bishops c. yet our meaning is not that there are any that succeed them in all respects for there was in the Office of the chief Apostles something ordinary ●nd fixed and something extraordinary and ●emporary the latter was first their immediate ●ission Secondly they ●earned their Doctrine ei●her from the Sacred Lips ●f the Lord Christ or by ●●fallible Revelation and were not taught it ●y man as Timothy and ●ther their successours ●ere Heb. 2. Great sal●ation which at the first began to be spoken by the Lord and was confirmed to us by them that heard ●im That which we have heard which we have ●●en with our eyes which we have look'd upon and our hands have handled of the word of Life tha● which we have seen and heard declare we unto you 1 John 1. 1 5. But I certifie you Brethren th●● the Gospel which was preached of me was not afte● man for I neither receive● it of man neither was taught it but by the Revelatio● of Jesus Christ Gal. 1. 11. Thirdly They were t● lay a Foundation and t● propose a form of Doctrin● for other Teachers to buil● on and to keep as their pattern and a Standard by which to trie others Doctrine an● Spirits 1 Cor. 3. 10. as a wise Master builde● I have laid the Foundation and another
sufficient that they were deceivers yet he never makes that an Argument at all but goes about to vindicate his Apostleship as being nothing inferiour to those Transformed-Apostles sith he was not a whit behind the very chiefest Apostles The same consideration may be had of that place Rev. 2. 2. Thou hast tryed them which say they are Apostles and are not and hast found them Lyars For had there been no more Apostles but the chief Apostles there had been no need to try whether these were Apostles of Christ or not for still their very saying they were such had without more ado proved them Lyars and like as if any should arise and say I am Christ the Saviour of the World his very saying so were the greatest evidence that the same is a deceiver But why so verily because there is only one Lord Jesus our Saviour whom the Heavens must retain till the times of the resti●ution of all things even so if there were not a succession of Apostles it were one of the easiest things in the World to discover a false Ap●stle Finally The Gospel must be preached in all the World for a witness to all people and then shall the end come Math. 24. 14. which supposes the being of a ministery whose work it is to preach To all Nations even to the end of the world Rev. 14. 6. The Angel a definite for an indefinite number messenger or Messengers must preach the everlasting Gospel immediately before great Babylon fall It followeth then that though darkness hath much prevailed since the first publication of the Gospel yet a ministery shall go forth even the messengers of the Gospel by whom the earth shall be enlightned And here let it be noted that the preacher or preachers of the everlasting Gospel hath not a Gospel to confirm with Signs and Wonders but a Gospel to preach to every Nation Kindred Tongue and People even the same that was preached by our Lord and confirmed to us by them that heard him The sum of that which we have said is this That as God hath given to his Church a fixed Ministery of Bishops Elders Pastors c. to take the care of particular Congregations so he hath given her a travelling ministery or unfixed in respect of particular Societies or Congregations to whom it appertains by virtue of their Office to take all occasions to cause the Light of the glorious Gospel to shine unto such as sit in darkness to plant Churches to confirm and settle them in the Faith and Order of the Gospel To visit and comfort those which have believed through grace Go ye preach the Gospel to every creature Jesus Christ who was preached among you by US even by me and Silvanus and Timotheus Thanks be to God which maketh manifest the savour of his knowledge by VS in every place And when they had preached the Gospel to that City and taught many they returned again to Listra and to Iconium and Antioch confirming the souls of the Disciples For this cause have I sent un-unto you Timotheus who is my beloved Son and faithful in the Lord who shall bring you in remembrance of my wayes which be in Christ as I teach every where in every Church let us go again and visit our brethren in every City where we have preached the Word and see how they do And Lo I am with you alwayes even to the End of the World When we say the messengers of the Gospel are unfixed ministers Our meaning is not thereby to deny but that for the more convenient mannagement of the great Affairs of the Gospel they may divide themselves into divers parts and so may be called the messengers of such Countreys as with whom they most frequently converse of the Gospel of Christ Gal. 2. 9. when James Cephas and John perceived the grace which was given to me and Barnabas they gave unto me and Barnabas the right hand of fellowship that we should go to the Heathen and they to the Circumcision In Asia we read of seven messengers and these related to seven Churches in seven principal Cities in that Country yet it may not be doubted but there were many Congregations and scattered Disciples in Country Villages and so many Elders also yea and that in those very Churches which are particularly nam'd for in the Church of Ephesus which is the first of the seven we find divers Bishops or Elders before John wrote from Pa●mos Acts 20. 17 28. It is true the Ancients call these seven Angels or messengers Bishops or chief Ministers But then we know by Bishops they commonly mean such as had the charge of many particular Congregations Thus they make Timothy a Bishop yet confess him to be a preacher of the Gospel from Ephesus unto Illiricum and throughout Hellas in Achaia Titus they make Bishop of Creet yet such an one as preached the Gospel in all that Country They also make Silvanus Bishop of Thessalonica but the Scripture as we have seen calls him an Apostle as well as the rest Now whether it be more safe to call those travelling Ministers of Christ Bishops after the manner of men or Apstoles after the manner of the Scripture is the business for the sober and unprejudiced Reader to consider FINIS * The breach of the Church * And then why not the like for all Disciples where ever they came no man can render a good reason * And yet it is true which Paul saith Gal. 1. 11 12 15 16. for the substance of the Gospel was revealed to him before Ananias came at him * Which they said to me they did alwayes grant or else I had nor mentioned it in this book Tertul. de resur c. 8. Cip. ep ad Jubi Jerom. ad Lucif Euseb l. 6. ● 42. Erasm paraph. in Heb. 6. 2. Diodate Annot. on Heb. 6. 2. Tindale in 2 Tim. 1 6. The opinion of the University of Basil The opinion of the Rhem. Gen. 4. 19. Gen. 9. 4. Lev. 17. 13 14 15. Acts 15. 29. * Which seldom can be done without division by reason of Pride on the one hand and Ignorance on the other * 1 King 18 21. * For it cannot be thought but that Jeremiah had some that stood with him ver 11. * It is not so much an errour as the pertinacious continuance in an errour that destroyeth the Church-state of those that are under the appellation of Christians by true Baptism according to Mat. 28. * The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 here used is rendred by Montanus Seditione And so it is by our Transl●tors in Gal. 5. 20. which being considered must needs supose at least a demur in point of Communion Hence let the Christians of this age learn Moderation Moderation Moderation 2 Thes 1. 1. Division against unsufferable errours and corruptions are not against the Church but for the Church * Which how untrue that is their own Search doth testifie for there they confess that we own them for Churches at some turns they say but surely to let go this taunt what we confess them to be at any time we confess them to be at all times and that is a Church of Christ though irregular in point of Constitution * Let no man here object prayer and hearing the word which as they are of necessity antecedent to our Membership so they are of perpetual use in the Church * Ex ore judicium * At least some of of you * Math. 28. 19 20. Gal. 1. 1. * 2 Tim. 1. 13. * And yet it is true that Paul was taught the knowledge of some of the principles of Religion by Ananias Acts 9. 6 17 18. Acts 22. 16. * I. e. as a Concomitant not as a part of their Office If the Church have not a Ministery of Messengers then none are bound by virtue of Office to preach to the Nations Acts 6. 2. Gal. 2. 9 10. Mark 16. 16. 2 Cor. 1. 19. 2 Cor. 2. 14. Acts 14. 21 22. 1 Cor. 4. 17. Act 14. 36. Math. 28. 20. * See the Old Trans