BOOKS Printed for Fincham Gardiner 1. A Perswasive to Communion with the Church of England 2. A Resolution of some Cases of Conscience which respect church-Church-Communion 3. The Case of Indifferent things used in the Worship of God proposed and Stated by considering these Questions c. 4. A Discourse about Edification 5. The Resolution of this Case of Conscience Whether the Church of Englands Symbolizing so far as it doth with the Church of Rome makes it unlawful to hold Communion with the Church of England 6. A Letter to Anonymus in answer to his three Letters to Dr. Sherlock about church-Church-Communion 7. Certain Cases of Conscience resolved concerning the Lawfulness of joyning with Forms of Prayer in Publick Worship In two Parts 8. The Case of mixt Communion Whether it be Lawful to Separate from a Church upon the account of promiscuous Congregations and mixt Communions 9. An Answer to Dissenters Objections against the Common Prayers and some other parts of Divine Service prescribed in the Liturgy of the Church of England 10. The Case of Kneeling at the Holy Sacrament stated and resolved c. In two Parts 11. A Discourse of Profiting by Sermons and of going to hear where Men think they can profit most 12. A serious Exhortation with some important Advices relating to the late Cases about Conformity recommended to the present Dissenters from the Church of England 13. An Argument to Union taken from the true interest of those Dissenters in England who profess and call themselves Protestants 14. Some Considerations about the Case of Scandal or giving Offence to the Weak Brethren 15. The Case of Infant-Baptism in Five Questions c. 16. The Charge of Scandal and giving Offence by Conformity Refelled and Reflected back upon Separation c. 1. A Discourse about the charge of Novelty upon the Reformed Church of England made by the Papists asking of us the Question Where was our Religion before Luther 2. A Discourse about Tradition shewing what is meant by it and what Tradition is to be received and what Tradition is to be rejected 3. The Difference of the Case between the Separation of Protestants from the Church of Rome and the Separation of Dissenters from the Church of England 4. The Protestant Resolution of Faith c. A DISCOURSE Concerning a GUIDE IN Matters of Faith With respect especially to the ROMISH pretence of the necessity of such a one as is infallible LONDON Printed for Ben. Tooke at the Ship in St. Paul's Church-yard and F. Gardiner at the White-horse in Ludgate-street 1683. THE CONTENTS THE Question Whether a Man without submitting his judgment to an infallible Guide on Earth may arrive at certainty in Matters of Faith p. 1. The Moment of this Question p. 2. The Temptations to a belief of the negative part of it Sloth and vitious Humility p. 2. The Resolution of the Question in six Propositions p. 3. Propos. 1. The True Faith and the Profession of it never failed yet nor shall it ever fail in all places 3 4 5. Propos. 2. Wheresoever God requires Faith he gives means sufficient for the obtaining of it 5 6. Propos. 3. Whatsoever those means are the Act of Assent is ultimately resolved into each Mans reason 6 7 8. Propos. 4. No true reason directeth to an infallible Guide on Earth 8. This is proved by several Considerations Consid. 1. God did not set up such a Guide amongst the Israelites 8 9. Consid. 2. God hath no where promised such a Guide to Christians 9 10. Either directly 10 11 12. Or by consequence 12 13. Consid. 3. God hath not given direction for the finding of such a Guide which he would have done had he designed the setting of him up 13 14. Consid. 4. We cannot find out such a one by the strictest enumeration 14. For 1. This Guide is not the Church diffusive of the first Ages 14. Nor 2. The Faith of all the Governours of all the Primitive Churches 14. Nor 3. An Universal or General Council 14 15 16 17. Which whilst the Reformed deny they do not assume to themselves such Authority in their Synods 17 18. Nor 4. Is this Guide any present Church pretending to declare the sense of the Churches of former Ages 18 19. Nor 5. Is this Guide the Bishop of Rome 20. This is shewed by the following Arguments Arg. 1. The Romanists themselves are not at agreement about his Authority 20. Arg. 2. The infallible Guidance of it is denied in the publick form of the Popes Profession 21. Arg. 3. His Plea for this Guidance as Successor of St. Peter is insufficient 21. Arg. 4. The Writings of the Popes manifest their Ignorance and Fallibility 21. Both in lesser matters 22 23. And in Matters of Faith 23. Particularly Pope Vigilius erred in a Matter of Faith 23 24. And Pope Honorius 24 25 26. Arg. 5. There seems not in the constituting such a Guide either necessity or fitness 26. Propos. 5. The Reformed especially those of the Church of England refuse not all Ecclesiastical Guidance though they submit not to any pretended infallible Guide 26 27 28 29 30. Nor doth our Church pretend to immediate illumination in Matters of necessary Faith 30 31. Nor doth it exalt private reason to the prejudice of just Authority 31 32. But the Vnlearned have more of the just Guidance of Authority in it then in the Church of Rome it self 32. Propos. 6. Though Ecclesiastical Authority is a help of our Faith yet the Scripture is the only infallible rule of it 32 33. This Proposition is handled in three Assertions Assert 1. A Man without a Papal Guide may know which are the true Canonical Books 33 34. Assert 2. He may also find out the necessary Articles of Faith contained in those Books 35. The necessary Doctrines are therein contained 35 36. The sense of the words in which they are delivered may be found out without submission to such a Guide 36 37 38 39 40 c. Assert 3. A submission of our unprejudiced Assent to the Holy Scripture as the Rule of Faith is the true means to Vnion in Faith in the Christian Church p. 42. ERRATA PAge 2. marg l. 5. for affirmative r. negative p. 16. l. 13. for Abots r. Abbots p. 17. l. 10. for doubts r. doubles p. 18. l. 21. for Christian Ancient r. Ancient Christian. p. 19. l. 19. for them r. it p. 20. l. 27. blot out the Comma betwixt Mauritius and Burdin p. 22. l. 13. for Salvations r. Salutations p. 23. l. 2. after this add refuse matter It. l. 12. for nomina r. nomine p. 24. l. 3. after of add an l. 25. for rigour r. vigour p. 26. marg l. 3. for Consid. 5. r. Arg. 5. p. 36. marg put p. 583. after Critique p. 38. l. 1. for Council r. Counsel p. 40. l. 6. for relectance r. reluctance A DISCOURSE Concerning a GUIDE IN Matters of Faith THE design of this Discourse is the Resolution of the following Query Whether a
require this belief for to all the Gospel is not preached and where it is preached there are Infants and Persons of Age so distempered in Mind as to remain unavoidably Children in understanding And though the same Sum of Doctrines is generally necessary to Salvation yet the Creed of all Men is not of equal length seeing they have unequal capacities But wheresoever there is a particular Society of Men who call themselves a Church yet err actually in the necessary Articles of the Faith it is certain they were not forced into that error for want of external means For the Just Judge of the World would never have required Unity in the Faith upon pain of his Eternal displeasure if he had not given to Men Power sufficient for such Unity No Tyrant on Earth has been guilty of such undisguised injustice as that is which maketh a Law for the punishment of the Blind because they miss their way The Artâ—cles of Christian Religion come not to the Mind by natural reason but by Faith and Faith comes by hearing or reading and where these means are not offered a Man is rather an Ignorant Person than an Unbeliever Wherefore our Saviour told the perverse Jews that if the Messiah had never been reveal'd to them they had not been answerable for the Sin of Infidelity But that since he was come to them and by them despised their Infidelity was blackned with great aggravation The means then are sufficient wheresoever the end is absolutely required but whatsoever those means are the Act of Assent is to be ultimately resolved into each Mans Personal reason For no Man can believe or assent but upon some ground or motive which appears credible to him He could not believe unless he had some reason or other why he believed When all is done said Mr. Thorndike Men must and will be Judges for themselves I do not quote the saying because it is extraordinary but because that Learned Man said it who was careful to pay to Authority its minutest dues If a Man believes upon Authority he hath a further reason for the believing of it He is not willing to take Pains in examining that which is proposed to him or he thinks himself of less Ability in understanding than those from whom he borrows his Light If he desireth another to judge for him his choice is determined by the Opinion he hath conceived of him Every Man has his reason though it be a weak one and such as cannot justify it self or him Something at last turns the Ballance though it be but a Feather This the Romanists own as well as the Reformed till it toucheth them in the case of a new Convert To induce a Man of another particular Church to embrace their Communion they submit these weighty points to his private Judgment What is a True Church and which are the marks of it What is the Roman Church And whether the marks of the True Church do only belong unto the Roman What Men or what Books speak the sense of that Church They tell us That the Light of a Man 's own reason first serves him so far as to the discovery of a Guide Also that in this discovery the Divine Providence hath left it so clear and evident that a sincere and unbyassed quest cannot miscarry But when once this Guide is found out the Man is afterwards for all other things that are prescribed by this Guide to subject and resign his reason As if it were not as difficult to judge of such a Guide as of his direction It seems the Roman Church is like a Cave into which a Man has Light enough to enter but when once he is entred he is in thick Darkness But how subservient soever our reason may be to our Faith The means which God hath given us towards the certain attaining of it is not the Authority of any infallible Guide on Earth This will not be disbelieved by those who weigh well the following considerations First God did not set up such a constant infallible Guide among the Jews though at first he gave Assurance to them by Miracle that Moses had received his Commission from him and had brought to them the Tables which he had Written for their direction with his own finger Some of the Sanedrim were of the Sect of the Sadduces who erred in the Fundamental point of a future State Most of them erred in the Quality of the Messiah not considering their Scriptures so much as their Traditions And of the errors of the Levitical Priesthood there is in the Old Testament frequent mention and great complaint And the Prophet Malachy as soon as he had said The Priests lips shall preserve Knowledge he adds this reproof but ye are departed out of the way It is true the Israelites were by God directed in difficult cases to an Assembly of Judges But they were not Judges of controversies in Doctrine but in Property To their sentence the People were to submit as to an expedient for Peace though Judgment might be perverted or mistaken It must be also confessed that God spake to them by the Oracle of Vrim and that the voice of it was infallible But its answers concerned not the necessary Rudiments of the Mosaick Law but emergencies in their civil affairs those especially of Peace and War But if we admit that there was under Judaism a living infallible Guide it does not thence follow that it must be so under Christianity For their small precinct the People of which were thrice in a year to come up to the Temple was much more capable of such a judge than the Christian Church which is as wide as the World Also the new Revelation is more clear and distinct than the old one was and stands not in such need of an Interpreter Secondly God hath no where promised Christians such a judge He hath no where said that he hath given such a one to the Christian Church And seeing such a one cannot be had without Gods supernatural assistance the most knowing amongst Men being subject both to Error and to Falshood it is great arrogance whilst the Scripture is silent to say he is in being And to affirm that if there were not such a Guide God would be wanting in means sufficient for the maintenance of Peace and Truth is presumptuously to obtrude the schemes of Mans fancy upon God's Wisdom He can Govern his Church without our methods Now God hath no where promised such a judge to Christian Men though he hath promised help on Earth and assistance from Heaven to Men diligent and sincere in their inquiries after Truths which are necessary for them There are two places of Scripture which are by some taken for Promises of such a nature though they were not by the Divine Wisdom so intended Of these the First is that which was spoken by Christ unto St. Peter The Gates of Hell shall not
The same course was taken with the Remonstrants in the Synod of Dorâ— Wherefore Protestants ought not to detract from the Authority of general Councils whilst they assume to themselves so great a Power in their particular Synods The force of this Objection is thus removed Every Church hath Power of admitting or excluding Members else it hath not means sufficient to its end the order and concord of its Body Every particular Church ought to believe that it does not err in its definitions for it ought not to impose any known error upon its Members But though it believes it does not err it does not believe it upon this reason because God hath made it an infallible Guide but rather for this because it hath sincerely and with Gods assistance followed a rule which is infallible And upon this supposition it imposeth Doctrines and excludeth such as with contumacy dissent from them 4. This Guide is not the present Church declaring to particular Christians the sense of the Church of former Ages How can this declaration be made seeing Churches differ and each Church calls it self the true one and pretendeth to the Primitive pattern The Church of Rome hath on her side the suffrages of all the Councils and Fathers the first the middle the last if Campian the Jesuite may be believed On the other hand Monsieur Larroque hath Written a Book of the Conformity of the Protestant Churches in France with the Discipline of the Christian Ancient Church taking it for granted that their Doctrine was Catholick And we likewise pretend both to the Doctrine and Discipline of it All of us cannot be in the right The Roman Church without any proof calleth her self the Church Catholick and she pretendeth to conveigh to us the sense of the Ancient Fathers and Councils which sense was that they understood formerly by the word Tradition And in this sense a Romanist said of Pope Honorius that he had broken the rule of Tradition But how can we esteem that Church a faithful representer of the sense of the Ancients whilst the Reformed consult the Ancients with equal ability and find a contrary sense in them Whilst the Church of Rome by a kind of Ecclesiastical Coinage stampeth Divine Authority upon Books esteemed by the Councils and Fathers to be Apochryphal Whilst it hath forged decrees of Popes and like a deceitful Gibeonite rendred that which was really new in appearance old and mouldy on purpose to promote imposture How doth it give us the sense of the Ancients when it owneth what it formerly disowned as Canonical the Epistle to the Hebrews When it taketh away the Cup which Pope Gelasius called a grand Sacrilege When it now rejecteth the Communicating of Infants which in former times was esteemed by many a very necessary point When a former Pope Gregory condemns the Title of Universal pastor as Anti-Christian and a latter insists upon it as the choicest flour in the papal Prerogative When St. Austin and from him the very Breviary shall expound Christs promise of being always with his Church of the presence of his Divinity and of his Spirit and not of his Body And Pope Innocent the third shall interpret them as meant also of his corporal presence And if the Roman Church falsifyeth written Tradition how shall we trust her for Oral And how and at what time did that Oral Tradition remove from Greece to Rome where the Greek Church which it alloweth to have been once possessed of the true Tradition is accused of Heresie At the same time I suppose that the Chappel of the Virgin removed from Nazareth to Loretto This principle of Oral Tradition is most uncertain to their Judges and to those to whom they offer it it is most obscure It is a principle on which they can serve a purpose in justifying novel Doctrines as Oral Traditions not known to any but the Roman Church which pretendeth to the custody of them 5. God hath not set up any one Person in the Catholick Church in the Quality of an unerring Guide in the Christian Faith The Bishops of Rome who pretend to this Prerogative do but pretend It is a tender point and the Pope's Legates in the Council of Trent were enjoyned to give forth this Advertisement that the Fathers upon no account whatsoever should touch it or dispute about it They who examine it will soon reject it as false and useless And 1. Whether the Pope be or be not the Guide the Men of the Roman Communion are exposed to dangerous uncertainty For it is not yet determined amongst them whether they are to follow the Pope with or without or against a Council Yet a Pope hath owned a Council which deposed other Popes and by decree set it self above them or rather vindicated the superiority due to it Thus Martin the fifth received the Papal Mitre from the Council of Constance after it had deposed Gregory the twelfth Benedict the thirteenth and John the twenty third Again there have been by the account given us in their own Historians more than twenty formed Schisms in that Church two or more Popes pretending at the same time to the infallible Chair and each of them not being without their followers and giving Holy Orders And at this time there is risen an Apologist for Mauritius Burdin or Gregory the eighth though he was ejected by the Roman Church which received Gelasius into his place Burdin being disliked by them as a Creature of Henry the Emperour This Schism saith St. Bernard distracted that Church and gave it a wound only not incurable And Baluzius professeth that it was then difficult to understand which of the two Gregory or Gelasius was the Legitimate successour of Pope Paschal Now how useless to them is the pretence of a Guide when they want some other Guide who should tell them which of the pretenders they may securely follow Secondly the Popes themselves in their Solemn Profession suppose themselves liable to the misleading of the People even in Matters of Faith For having owned the Faith of the Six general Councils They further profess themselves and others to be subject to an Anatâ—ema if they advance novelty contrary to the aforesaid Evangelical Tradition and the integrity of the Orthodox and Christian Faith Thirdly If the Pope challengeth this Power of infallible Guidance he must lay claim to it by his succeeding of St. Peter in the Chair Apostolical But then by equal reason the successors of each Apostle may challenge the office of an infallible Guide For the Power which Christ gave to St. Peter he gave to the rest It was not special And for the Bishops of Antioch who first succeeded St. Peter they have a much fairer pretence than those of Rome The Truth is Hierusalem was properly the Mother-Church Though Rome was the Imperial City and if by this means the Popes had not