as infected with errours crept into it in order to not foundamentall Articles of faith and to assert the quitting of these and not the Roman Church as to the sound part therof in consequence of which Protestants infer the now Roman Catholicks who perseuer in not themselues that rooted out the errours that were crept into the Roman Church to bear the infamous brād of schism thus the distinction of foundamentall and not foundamentall Articles of faith serues the Protestant Reformation and might haue weight with it if any exāple could be produced from any Christian Church preceding the Protestant Reformation that so distinguished between foundamentall and not foundamentall Articles of faith making it damnable to dissent from those and not damnable to dissent from these sufficiently proposed and indeed the going of the Children of Israel on drie ground thorow the mids of the sea the raising of Lazarus vnto life by Christ and sundry other Articles of faith which according to Protestās are not foundamentall neuertheless cannot be denyed without hurt of faith and loss of saluation Wherefore the primitiue Church taught that all Articles of faith sufficiently propounded ought of necessity to be belieued for the first Council of Nice condemned seuerall Hereticks euen for asserting errours which were not against foundamentall Articles of faith namely the Quartadecimani for celebrating the solemnity of Easter at an vndue tyme and Can. 8 made an ordinance forbidding the receiuing of certain hereticks called Cathari into communion with the Catholick Church vnless first they promised in writing that they would embrace and keep all the doctrines therof without making any exception as to foundamentall and not foundamentall Articles of faith * Aug. l. de haeresibus vbi enumerasset multas haereses quarum plures non erant cōtra Articulos fundamentales in fine tamen vniuersaliter de omnibus ait christianus Catholicus ista non debet credere Besides not one scripture testimony or one authority of ancient Father can be alledged to proue that diuine faith is consistent with one sole errour that is against any * S. Chrysos in Gal. 1. ad illud volunt subuertere Quemadmodum inquit in moneta Regia qui parum aliquid amputauerit de impressa imagine totum nunisma reddit adulterinū ita quisquis sacrae fid ei vel minimā particulam suhuerterit in totū corrumpisur idem docet Theodor. l. 4. his cap. 16. 5. Prosper Epis ad Virginem Demetr alienus inquit est à numero fidelium à sorte sanctorum qui in aliquo à Catholica veritate dissentit one Article therof For indeed euery errour against an Article of faith is an errour against faith in cōsequence of which one act of hereticall infidelity expelleth faith as darknes dissipateth light and as one sole mortall sin driueth away christiā charity and although naturall habits as they are got leasurly by frequēt acts of the same liknes ād so lost at leasure by sundry acts of contrary likenes neuertheless faith that is a diuine habit supernaturally infused is wholly lost * Io. 2. qui offendit in vno factus est omniumreus prasertion quoad incturam totius habitus gratiae charitatis qui habitus tam facilè vno peccato mortali quam pluribus deperditur 1. Cor. 6. Rom. 6. stipendium peccati mors vbl dicitur peccati in numere Tingulaeri by any one act of errour that importes a voluntary dissent from any whatsoeuer Article of faith sufficiently propounded and the reason hereof is manifest because whosoeuer so dissenteth reiecteth diuine reuelation together with the veracity of God which is the indiuisible object and consistency of diuine faith and regardeth all the Articles therof alike wherby is plainly euident that t is vnaduisedly and in vain conceiued that the Roman Church is one indiuiduall body partly sound and partly exulcerated or one indiuiduall field that in part is filled with thistles and netles and in part purged of all euil hearbs by the industry of a carefull husband man seeing that the true Church of God is inconsistent with errours against Articles of faith as appeareth by the reasons alledged and indeed the true Church is the spouse of Christ without spot or wrinckle and so shall continue to the end of the world vnder the the infallible conduct of the holy Ghost who will neuer suffer the gates of hell to preuail against her Mat. 18. in consequence of which she shall neuer lose her spousall innocency integrity and fide lity wherfore if we will auerre that the Roman Church was once the true Church of God of necessity she ought to continue so and if we will cōfess that the present Church of Rome containes all foundamentals that is all necessary requisits vnto saluation of necessity the opinion of errours crept in in order to not foundamentall Articles of faith ought to be laid aside But to whom shall it belong to distinguish the foundamentall Articles from not foundamentall and meer arbitrary not to the Pope surely and such Christiās as yeeld obediēce to his Holines because these acknowledge for foundamentall Articles what the Council of Trent hath defined nor to the ancient Church in regard that frō tyme to tyme she hath condemned and excommunicated those which dissented from any poynt of the generall faith or from generall Councils for though the Pelagians Donatists and other sectaries confessed the misteries of the Trinity and Incarnanation and other foundamentall Articles of Christian faith neuertheless they were not tolerated but anathematised by the ancient Church and by the Fathers execrated as Heretiks Yet perhaps it will be answered that the determination belong's to the vnanimous accorde of all those which in any manner confess and worship Christ But if the vniuersall consent of these were required for the making or appointing foundamentall Articles necessary to the obtaining of saluation this should be none viz The Diuinity of the son of God Because the Arians denyed it nor The Diuinity of the holy Ghost Being the Macedonians denyed it nor The blessed Trinity because the Sabellians denyed it Nor the vnion between the diuine and human nature in one diuine Person for Nestorius denyed that vnion wherby euidently appears that t is not possible for Protestāts to determinate which Articles of faith be foūdamētall and which be not foūdamētall That is to set down precisely such Articles of faith as can not be denyed without loss of saluation and such again as to deny is not damnable Howeuer it is euident enough that Protestants haueing neither vnion as to diuine faith nor communion as to the ministery of Sacraments with the Roman Church cannot make a good claim to a visible existence and perpetuall succession of Pastors as deriued from her Again their going out from that Church which they confess to haue been once the true Church of God and still to retaine requisits necessary vnto saluation argueth them guilty of
HOLY CHARACTERS CONTAINING A MISCELANY OF THEOLOCICALL DISCOVRSES THAT IS THEOLOGY Positiue Scholasticall Polemicall and Morall Built vpon the foundation of Scriptures Traditions Councils Fathers DEVIDED INTO TWO BOOKS Written by GEORGE LEYBVRN Doctor of Diuinity Bevvare lest there be any man that deceiue you through Philosophy and crafty handling according to the traditions of men according to the rudiments of the vvorld and not according to Christ Coloss 2. Of your selues shall men rise speaking peruerse thinges to dravv Disciples after them Act. 20. PRINTED AT DOWAY By BALTAZAR BELLIER An. 1662. With Priviledge TO THE RIGHT HONORABLE LORD PERCY HERBERT LORD POWYS OF POWYS c. MY LORD S. Clement in the eleuenth booke of Apostolicall constitutions writeth that Selene the great beauty of Rome in those dayes when she shewed her selfe from a high Tower vnto the people of that Citty Simon the Magician by sleight conueyances represented as many Selenes as were windowes in the same Tower Howeuer there was no more then one true Selene the rest being meer outward resemblances hauing nothing of inward substance contriu'd by naturall magicke vnto deluding the Eye-sight of the Beholders in like manner though true Theology is not diuided nor has many faces being the science of one God that shew's her selfe front the high Tower of one diuine faith which supports her neuertheless through the subtill dealings of Satan is represented with as many faces as there be new models of Christian doctrine that is as many or rather more then ages down from Christ till these dayes euery age respectiuely hauing coind new opinions in order to the mysteries of Christian Religion Heady and high-mynded schollars once they come to be blown vp with the actiuity of their own witt and thereby become inordinate a 2. Timoth. 3. erunt homines seipsos amantes louers of their own thoughts leaue the loue of truth As a troubled eye so the vnderstanding deluded with opinions which goe beyond the boundaries of nature cannot see the light of truth Mittit illis Deus operationem erroris quoniam charitatem veritatis recipere noluerunt 2. Thes 2. In regard heady schollars are carried on the wings of Pride and will not embrace the loue of truth the supream prouidence giues them vp to their heart's lust vnto vncleaness of errour that is God b Secundum S. Aug. l. 20. ciuit c. 19. Deus mittit quatenus diabolum facere ista permittit permitt's Satan to send them strong delusion vnto belieuing lies and taking pleasure therein which together with pertinacy so by degrees blind's them that they still encrease in madness till at lengh through faction sedition and schism they endeauour to ruine as it were all true Christian doctrine and Religion witness Nestorius Arius Pelagius Donatus and sundry other anciēt and modern schollars which vpon what designs of ambition c S. Austin l. de vtil cred c. 1. saith that he is an Heretick that for temporall interest either coineth or followeth new opinions and interest is needless to express through new coind Theologies haue laboured to turne the Church of God into vtter disorder and confusion As all rebellion is to ciuill so all schism is to ecclesiasticall gouernement dangerous and pernicious In the old law lest the people of God might be deceiu'd with false coyne and weights the originall Cycli and originall weights were conseru'd in the Sanctuary of the Temple and no money or weights allow'd which were not conform to the original's of the same Sanctuary Likewise that the same people might not be deluded with false coyns and weights of doctrine the chaire of Moyses by diuine dispensation was cloathed with infallibility The high Priest how wicked soeuer could not vtter wicked doctrine from Moyses chaire as appears euidently from Christs own words Mat. 23. The scribes and Pharises sit in Moyses Chaire c. From which sacred Text S. Austin l. 6. con Faus Manichae c. 29. infers thus In Cathedra Moysis mali sedentes bona dicere cogebantur Besides when God erected Moyses his Chaire Deutro 17. he promised that all definitions Decrees and decisions of matters in debate as comming from that seate should be of vndoubted truth Moreouer the children of Israël were bound to submit to the sentence of the high Priest the law condemning of pride and punishing with death those which disobeyed the commandement of the Priest that ministred to our lord and the Decree of the Judges In the new law lest Christians might be carried away with euery winde of doctrine S. Peter and his Chaire by diuine dispensation were invested into much better priuiledges then Moyses and his Chaire For our Sauiour tooke speciall care that S. Peter might not fall away from the true faith as does euidence his prayer Luc. 22. Oraui pro te Petre vt non deficiat fides tua I haue prayed for thee Peter that thy faith faile not and doubtless his prayer was effectuall according to the Apostle Hebrae 5. Exauditus est Christus pro sua reuerentia Our lord prouided for S. Peter that his faith might not faile to the end saith S. Leo ser 3. de Assumpt The head being made invincible the state of all the rest might be more sure that is the rest thereby might be strengthned and confirm'd in faith S. Peter according to S. Ambrose l. 9. Noui Testam 9.75 Tom 4. after his denying of Christ was constituted the supream Pastour of souls because it was said to him afore When thou art conuerted confirm thy Brethren neither was Christ's prayer offered in order to the person of S. Peter only but likewise in reference to his office according to the inter pretation of the best antiquity so that the effect of the same prayer will continue as long as the Church of Christ shall endure on Earth and indeed euen as Christ commaunds S. Peter to feed his sheepe Ioa. 21. soe he commaunds him to confirm his Brethren Luc. 22. but that saying of Christ Feed my sheep did not relate to the person of S. Peter onely according to all Orthodox Writers but also to the office of supream Pastour which was conferd vpon S. Peter with intent to continue it in his successours being of necessary vse in the Church wherfore Christ saying to S. Peter confirme thy Brethren ought to carrie the same interpretation and in earnest it were manifest weaknes to giue vnto the successors of Moyses greater prerogatiues as to power authority and infallibility in the gouernement of the Synagogue then to the Successors of S. Peter in the gouernement of the Church of Christ for this were to prefer the law of bondage before the law of grace In consequence of the premises the Roman faith of S. Peters successors cannot faile not to fall away from faith is a priuiledge proper to the Church of Rome that is to the Bishops of that seate as also plainly appears by the clear Testimonies of primitiue Fathers For example S. Cyprian
that is to say such as are not mēbers of Christs Church haue no right to the mysticall meate and drink which is the reall body and blood of Christ 11. The corporall and linnen clothes that couer the Altar doe signify the linnen cloath that wrapped the sacred Body of Christ when he was laid in the sepulcher Io. 19. Furthermore besides the many religious visible ceremonies God commanded to be employed in exhibition of diuine worship during the continuance of the old law Exod. 29. Christ Authour of the new law instituted sundry ceremonies and rites which be of necessity namely washing with water in Baptism imposition of hands and anoynting with consecrated oyle in the Sacrament of Order c. Yea Christ himself practised visible ceremonies for he fell on his face and prayed Io. 26. lift vp his eyes and prayed Io. 11. lift vp his hands and blessed Luc. 24. Besides when he found in the Temple which is a sensible ceremonie too deputed vnto diuine worship those that sold oxen sheep and doues c. Io. 20. he was offended to see his Fathers howse made an howse of marchandice Hereby is euidently plain that Christ when in his conference with the Samaritan Woman Io. 4. said the hower cometh and now is when the true adorers shall adore the Father in spirit and truth he did not meane that he was come to take away sacrifice Sacraments prayers Churches and all other sensible ceremonies practised in the seruice of the new law but for as much as the cited Text is often tymes alledged by ancient and moderne sectaries especially against all visible rites of christian religion it will conduce greatly to vndeceiuing the deceiued in the sense and meaning therof if they consider duely that the Samaritans were Schismaticks as Luther and Zuinglius religious men both and Priests illegally and sacrilegiously marryed against the holy Canons and vowed chastity went out from the catholick Church in the time of Henry the eight king of England and began a schism in Germany likewise as Ballev Peter Martyr Martin Bucher c. Apostat-wedded-priests also in the reign of Edward the Sixt a childe began the schism in England countenanced and supported by Bishop Cranmer specially to which Henry the eight king Edwards Father had opened a doore only so a certain Priest of the Iews called Mansses to retain and enjoy an vnlawfull wife fell from the society of the faithfull Iewes at Hierusalem and broached schism in Samaria Besides as Luther and those other afore mentioned to establish their schisms leaped * Ioseph l. 11. Antiquit cap. 8. est propriū inquit Haereticis Schismaticis transilire capita antiquarum Ecclesiarum vt suam reddant Religionem antiquissimam ouer the heads of all christian Churches then and for many ages before establish't pretending that these were not agreeing with Christ and his Apostles in the essentialls of doctrine worship and gouernment and in consequence thereof made reformation the disguised end of their leape in like manner Manasses to render his schism plausible and taking with that people he leaped ouer the Prophet Moyses to Iacob the Patriarch and ouer the Temple in Ierusalem to the Temple of the Samaritans in Mount Garizim tying thereto the sacrifice of the Iews religion vpon pretence that the said Patriarch Iacob had therin adored long before the Temple of Salomon was built or the law giuen to obtain superiority in his schism he gaue the preeminence in Church-seruice to the place wherin he began it This was the true cause that moued the faithfull Iews to abstain from the company and conuersation of the Samaritans who maintained their adoring in Garizim to be more ancient then the worship of the Iews in Ierusalem In regard of this contention about the Temple in Ierusalem and the Temple in Garizim the Samaritan woman conceiuing Christ to be some Prophet for as much as he had reuealed vnto her the secret passages of her whole life propounded vnto him a Theologicall question touching the afore said controuersy on design to be informed to which of the two publick (e) According to holy scriptures by publick solemn adoration is meant proper sacrifice namely Joan. 12. and There vvere certain Gentils amongst them that came vp to adore at the feast And Act. 8. the Euneuch came vp to adore in Jerusalem in both these scripture-places by adoration which was publick and solemn is vnderstood proper sacrifice that was offered onely in Ierusalem but all other adorations outward and inward might be vsed in any whatsoeuer place besid's Ierusalem adoration or sacrifice was tyed and confined saying Our Fathers adored in this mountaine and ye say that in Ierusalem is the place where men ought to adore that is to offer sacrifice to which Christ replying (f) The Iews and Samaritans contended about the place of sacrifice and for as much as both of them were in fault therefore Christ form'd his answere in order to both Although the Iews sacrifice was the true sacrifice neuertheless it was vnprofitable being not able to procure sanctifying grace but the Samaritans sacrifice was erroneous for they were schismaticks and adored that is offered sacrifice where God would not haue had them that is they offered sacrifice out of Gods Temple in Ierusalem and therefore Christ said to the Samaritan woman Yee adore vvhat yee knovv not said woman belieue me the houre cometh when ye shall neither in this mountaine nor at Ierusalem adore the Father c. Wherby he for'told her that the adoration or sacrifice as to both the Temples should shortly cease and be disannulled and that the true sacrifice suddenly to be instituted in room therof should not be tyed to one place or nation but should be offered in all the parts of the world according to the Prophecy of Malachias cap. 10. and instructed her with all concerning this new sacrifice signifying that is should not be a gross and carnall adoration exhibited in and by the flesh and blood of goates sheepe oxen c. as afore but that it should be a clean adoration or sacrifice containing in it selfe spirit grace and life which the others wanted yea that it should be the verity it self wherof all former sacrifices were shadowes and figures only wherefore Christ told her that the new adorers should adore the Father in spirit that is to lay should offer to God a sacrifice giuing grace and life Christ did not inculcate adoration of God in spirit to condemne adoration vnder whatsoeuer sensible rites and ceremonies but to exclude the carnall adoration or sacrifice of the Iews that wanted spirit to giue life to the soul In like manner Christ did intimate adoration of God in verity to condemne the erroneous worship of the Samaritās who albeit they did adore the true God of Israel neuertheless being Schismaticks they did not adore him in verity because they adored him out of the communion and vnity of the faithfull Iews and in the mountaine of Garizim
where God would not be adored by sacrifice this being confined to the Temple at Ierusalem Wherby followeth euidently that such as worship or adore God otherwise then he will himself be worshipped or adored doe not worship or adore him in verity or Truth Sithence God will be adored in one sole Church founded on the merits of Christ all Schismaticks and Hereticks that abandon the communion and vnity therof doe not adore God in verity vnto saluation howeuer they may flatter themselues with their mountaine of Garizim that is with their own fancied worship founded on the mountaine of pride wherfore to such worshippers may be said both according to reason and equity you adore what you know not for saluation is of one Church and such only doe pray worship and adore * Aug. in psal 130. ipse inquit in spiritu veritate orat qui in pace Ecclesiae orat in spirit and truth which pray worship and adore in peace and coÌ„munion of one catholick and apostolick Church wherunto is tyed and coÌ„fined the sacrifice worship and seruice of the new law vnto iustification of life Again though sundry Church-ceremonies be neither commanded nor mentioned (g) The Council of Trent sess 21. c. 2. declares that God hath left power vnto the Church to ordaine and institute what she shall think expedient and conducing to the reuerence of the Sacraments and the aduantages of such as receiue them wherfore Church-gouernours are called dispensers of the mysteries of God 1. Cor. 4. in the holy scriptures farther then vnto an implicite faith neuertheless they are not to be condemned for many things appertaining vnto diuine worship doe not of necessity require an express ordinance Noah built an Altar to God on which he offered a sacrifice of euery clean beast all eit he had no * Noe non iussus altare construxit vt notat S. Ambrosius warrantable authority by speciall precept Abel in like manner vnbidden offered sacrifice that was * Respexit Deus ad Abel munera eius acceptable to the diuine Majesty According to the dictates of nature God is to be worshipped Priesthood to be instituted Hosts to be immolated ministers to be deputed for exhibition of diuine scruice and speciall ornaments are to be ordained and appointed as holy signes to distinguish them from the rest of the people moreouer works of speciall commande euen executed aright are not so pleasing in the sight of God as works * Vulgare apud Theologos est dictum Deus imperat minora de maioribus dat consilium counselled only if they be done according to the rule of a discreet zeale A good work that is done in and for as much as God doth counsell the doing therof is more laudable and noble then a commanded worke because of a greater alacrity and promptitude that is required to the performance of a good work vnbidden Christ * Hierom. l. 1. con Iouia ait Christum plus amare Virgines quia sponte tribuunt quod jis non fuit imperatum bears a more speciall affection to Virgins that doe consecrate vnto him their virginity without a speciall command and indeed it is a more noble action in a man to giue an almes which he is not obliged vnto then to giue it vpon the score of an obligation Furthermore Church-ceremonies ought not to be counted * Augus Epis 40. quaes 3. dicit non esse câ—nsenduÌ„ superstitiosum omne quod christiani cum infidelibus quomodocunque habent communâ— superstitious though Pagans and other Infidells doe vse the same or the like vnto superstition for according to that argument christians should condemne vowed chastity because the Pagans had their vestall Virgins that did binde themselues by vow to a single chast life Christians should pull down Churches because Pagans built Churches christians should abolish sacrifice because Pagans offered sacrifice christians should despise all manner of prayers because Pagans vsed prayers christians should not reuerence honour and worship one true God because Pagans reuerenced honoured and worshipped many false Gods To conclude christians should not weare breeches because the Turks which be Infidells weare breeches howeuer truly according to Tertullian it is an * Pudeat inquit Tertullianus insulsos christianos quod ab Ethinicis IdoloruÌ„ suorum solemni pompa religioso gestu officio superentur exceeding great shame vnto Christians to vse less solemn pompe less ceremony and less reuerence in the seruice of the true God then is vsed by the Heathens in the worship of Idols CHAR. VI. OF BAPTISM THE CONTENTS Baptism is the sole door that openeth a passage into the Church of God The kingdom of Heauen is for euer shut against the vnbaptized that is no man can come to the clear sight of God that is not washt sacramentally afore with naturall water vnder an express invocation of the blessed Trinity de facto or in desire The sanctity of holy faithfull parents cannot render their children that dye without Baptism Heirs of Heauen coheirs and brothers of Christ Through diuine mercy those which dye without Baptism and haue nothing of any other guilt are not punisht with sensible pain after their death they are banisht the court of Heauen onely S. Austins opinion as to this point cleard Baptism ministred aright imprinteth an indelible character or marke in the soul of the baptised Anabaptism confuted Ceremonies pertaining to sacramentall baptism set down and explicated BAptism is a Sacrament of new birth or regeneration vnto iustification of life through the washing of (a) Sensible naturall water is the proper remote matter of necessity requisit to the Sacrament of baptism and accordingly the Council of Lateran haith defin'd it out of the third Chapter of S. Iohn Except that a man be born again of vvater c. and from thence is named a Sacrament of regeneration which is conform to the doctrine deliuered by the Apostle ad Tit c. 3. where he calleth baptism the vvashing of a nevv birth and indeed washing is the immediate and water the remote matter onely so that neither yee hail or snow vnless they be made fluid and thereby proper to wash are a sufficient matter of baptism naturall water vnder an expresse invocation of (b) The true form of sacramentall baptism is I baptise thee in the name of the Father son and holy Ghost which is cut out of Christs own words Mat. 28. Where is required a distinct inuocation of all the three diuine persons Wherefore Pelagius the Pope dis 4. can multi de consecra reiectes baptism administred in the name of Christ only And S. Cyprian Epis 73. ad Jubaia affirmes that the Apostles neuer baptised de facto in the sole name of Christ howeuer he grant's that S. Peter and the other Apostles named Iesus-Christ in the conferring of baptism together with the other diuine persons For example saying J baptise thee in the name of the Father and Jesus-Christ his son
impossible outward extension in order to place being an accidentall propriety only of a body cloathed with quantity as naturall Philosophy teacheth and consequently the want thereof destroieth not the nature or essence of a body as naturall Philosophy teacheth also Besides though the light of the sun be a corporeall quality neuertheless it is well nigh in infinite places at once likewise the words of a preacher are corporall things which in the same moment of time possesse the eares of all such as are attentiue to his sermon and one man walking in a Chamber where be placed sundry looking-glasses his Image appeareth in each of them at the same time in consequence of which doubtless God in the virtue of his word can put supernaturally one singular Man in many places since his figure which is some thing doth naturally occupate many looking-glasses at once Out of the premises plainly followeth that the Sacrament of the Eucharist hath a singular prerogatiue beyond all the other Sacraments of the new law in as much as it is not an effectuall instrument only to confer diuine grace which is a soueraign Antidote against the poyson of sin but it containes and giues also the Author of grace wherfore it comprehends within it self both the sweetness of inherent sanctity and the giuer therof which is all sweet being the fountaine of sweetness and sweetnes it self whereunto the faire spowse in the Canticles inuiteth saying Tast yee and see how sweet our lord is Howeuer as Manna which was a figure of this Sacrament as to Christs body did seem bitter and loathsome to the ill minded and pleasant only to the good Israelites In like manner Christs body to Christians that receiue it vnworthily is the bitterness of death vnto death and to others that eat it aright the sweetness of life vnto life so fier that purgeth gold consumes wood soe the suns light that recreat's the sound offend's the vnsound eyes so the sweet sauour of an oyntâ—â—ent that refreshes doues kill 's beetles Christians by eating Christs naturall body worthily are not vnited to him only * Eph. 5. quia membra sumus de corpore eius de car ne â—â—us de ossibus cius through faith and charity mystically but really and are flesh of his flesh and bones of his bones Eph. 5. To eate worthily vnto a naturall vnion with Christ a christian ought * 1. Cor. probet autem seipsum homo sic de pane illo edat vnde dc Sacramento corporis sanguinis Christi canit Ecclesia mors est malis vita bonis to examine himselfe afore and purge out the leauen of vice Christ hath * Nulla conventio Christi ad diabolum nulla conventio charitatis ad peccatum mortale no concord with sin nor consequently vnion with a soul that sin hath dominion ouer Christs body will not be * Luc. 23. in sindone muÌ„da in sepulchro in quo nondum quisquaÌ„ positus sit wrapped but in a pure linnen cloath that is to say in a clean heart nor will be laid in a Tombe that is not hewen out of a rock wherin neuer any laid afore As there is no agreement betwixt Christ and Belial no communion betwixt sanctity and iniquity no society betwixt light and darkness so there is noe vnion betwixt Christs body and a Christian that serue's Belial delight 's in iniquity and walkes in darkness wherfore let no Christian thinke to tye a knot of vnion with Christ if he shall put his body where allready is * L. 6. super cap. 9. Lucae ait nemo accipit cibum Christi nisâ— fuerit ante sanatus Et Aug. trac 26. in Joan. sic praecipit Innocentiam ad altare portate established Belial that is to say the deuill through mortall sin and truly Christians that * 1. Cor. 11. qui manducat bibit indignè reuâ— erit sanguinis corporis Domini vnworthily receaue the body of Christ as much as lyeth in them doe betray him to the deuill putting him in a place the deuill command's in and consequently become guilty of Christ's body and blood in as high a measure (k) According to S. Chrysostom hom de non contemnenda Ecclesia hom 8 ad popul Antioch those which receiue the Sacrament of the body and blood of Christ vnworthily doe an iniury to Christs proper person like the Iewes and Gentils that crucified him as Iudas that betrayed him to the Iewes As the children of Israel were forâ—idden Exod. 12. to cate the paschall lambe which was a figure of Christs Sacramentall body too * Exod. 12. non comedetis ex eo crudum quid nec coctum sed tantum assum igne raw or boiled butrosted only so Christians be prohibited to eat Christs body raw that is before the fire of charity hath prepared them for it or boiled namely in luxury and voluptuousness but rosted only viz. at the fire of a contrite heart inflamed with the memory of Christ * Ecce agnus Dei inquit Apostolus qui tollit peccata muÌ„di the lambe of God that was rosted in the hot furnace of affliction for the taking away the sins of the world CHAR. IX OF COMMVNION IN BOTH KIND'S THE CONTENTS Christ instituted the holy Euchariste vnder the elements of both bread and wine Christ by his institution did not oblige the Church to dispense the Euchariste vnder both kinds Christ left it in the Churches power to giue the Euchariste to lay-people vnder one or both kinds accordingly as she should think fit in order to tymes places and persons those which receiue the Euchariste vnder one sole kind haue nothing less nor such as receiue vnder both kinds haue nothing more of Christ nor of the Sacramentall grace if there be parity in the receiuers as to worthiness obiections answered Communion in both kinds is the receiuing of Christs reall body and blood vnder the two Sacramentall shapes or element's of bread and wine afrer Christ's own institution Mat. 26. Mar. 14. Luc. 22. Howeuer from thence it followeth not that communion vnder both kindes is necessary to the whole Church ioynt and separate vnto saluation for matrimony and the orders of Bishops and Priests doe challenge diuine institution neuertheless none of them be necessary to each member of Gods Church A Priest celebrating as he ought to consecrate the body and blood of Christ vnder distinct elements through distinct form's of words for as much as he then representes Christ's person supplyeth his room and offereth an vnbloody sacrifice on the Altar that is an express remembrance of Christ's bloody sacrifice offered on the cross wherein his blood was seperated from his body in consummation of the generall redemption so he ought likewise to communicate in the distinct consecrated elements but communion in order to lay-people which are no Priest's Christ hath left free (a) According to S. Austin Epis 108. Christ left power vnto
his Church to determine how the Euchariste should be ordered and indeed the Church-goucrnours are the proper ministers of Christ and the dispensers of the mysteries of God 1. Cor. 4. in consequence of which the Church has authority to constitute and appoint in order to dispensing the Sacraments what she shall judge expedient according to tyme place and persons but with that prouiso that she alter nothing pertaining to the nature or essence of them muesting his Church with authority and power to dispense and order therein so the integrity and substance of the Sacrament be not prejudiced as in prudence she might thinke fit in regard of places tymes persons and circumstances (b) Communion vnder the form of bread onely was practiced in the primitiue Church according to the best antiquity prouing the lawfullness thereof out of the 2. and 20. chapter of the Acts. For example S. Austin Epis 6. ad Casulanum S. Bede in 20. Act. and indeed many of the first Christians were Nazarits who were bound by their vow not to drink any licour of grapes pum 4. wherfore since the legall ceremonies of the old law were in force as appears by the fame chapter of the Act. doubtless those new Christians receiu'd the Sacrament of the Euchariste vnder one kinde onely Besides S. Cyprian that liu'd in the first 300. yeares l. de lapsis set's down two examples of communion vnder one kinde Again S. Hierom in epitap Paul ad Eustach e. 23. S. Austin l. 3. de consensu Euang. c. 23. affirme that Christ gaue the Sacrament of the Euchariste vnder the form of bread onely vnto the Disciples going to Emmaous Moreouer Tertull. l. 2. ad vxor l. de Orat. attest's that it was a practice or custome to take Christs body forthwith or to carrie it home and defer the taking to an other tyme. Lay-communion vnder one kind only was practised in the primitiue Ages as plainly doe euidence scripture and Father-Testimonies preseruing of the Eucharist vnder one sole kinde as spirituall prouision for sick persons which though they were Priests did nor communicate in sickness but vnder one kinde de onely namely bread (c) The custome of communicating Infants continued in Some Churches till the dayes of Hugo de S. Victor who liu'd about the yeare 1130. for l. 1. c. 2. de caeremon he affirmes that the Priest with his finger dipt afore in consecrated wine ministred the Sacramen of the Euchariste vnder the form of wine vnto Babes newly born they being able to suck Besides in the ancient Roman office cap. de Sabbato parents are admonished not to suffer their children to suck milk vntill they had communicated But now the Church for good and iust reasons hath wholy abolished that custome and a principall motiue there of was to resist the heresy which euen in those days the Bohemian Hussits had spread teaching that Infants could not be sau'd without receiuing the Euchariste and an other reason of taking away that practice was the eminent danger of prophaning so holy a Sacrament because of the great number of children and the distribution of the Sacrament vnto Infants in one sole kinde also Namely wine for albeit these could not eat the sacramentall bread yet they might suck the sacramentall wine from the Priest's finger which truly they did according to the custome of some Churches Again lay-communion * ConueniÅt omnes Doctores Caetbolici communionem sub vtraque specie fuisse in vsu in quibusdam Ecclesijs eiusque meminerunt S. Dionys cap. 3. de Eccles Hierarch S. Iustinus Martyr Apolog 2. S. Gregor l. 3. Dial. cap. 36 alijque Patres vnder both kindes was anciently practised at some tymes in seuerall precincts of particular christian Churches as doe plainly shew the writings of primitiue Fathers And S. Leo the first being supream Pastor in Church-gouernment vnder Christ by a speciall ordinance commanded publick lay-communion at Easter vnder both kindes the chiefe intent whereof was to discouer the manichean heriticks who to conceale their heresy these sectaries did foolishly belieue that there was a good and euill God and as foolishly held wine to be created by the euill God and therfore had an abhorrence of it were obserued to receiue the sacramentall bread at Easter which sole kinde was then in practice with Catholicks promiscuously Again lay-communion vnder both kind's was abrogated absolutely and vniuersally because of certain Bohemian sectaries named Hussit's that condemned lay-lay-communion vnder one kinde only teaching both kind's as necessarily required to all Christians vnto saluation In detestation of this heresie as also for other good reasons the generall Councell of Constance obliged all lay-Catholick's to communicate in one kinde and indeed the Church of God ought to exercise her authority to the crushing of all heresies in the bud Yet the Greek-Church continued lay-lay-communion in both kind's though it did not esteem both the species of the Sacrament necessary to saluation For in the generall Councill of Florence which was called with design chiefly to setle concord and vnion between that and the latine Church neither the greek or latine Fathers did except against lay-lay-communion as to the practise thereof vnder one sole or both kinds whereby it is euidently manifest that Christ hat left it in the Churches liberty to determine and appoint the distribution of the communion vnto meer lay-people in one only or both kind's as it shall think fit according to the various condition of tymes places persons and circumstances so that though in this present age lay-lay-communion be giuen in sacramentall bread alone through all the precincts of the easterne Church neuertheless it is in the power of the supreme Pastour to change that into another vsage of both kind's if he shall see as good reasons to moue him thereunto as he seeth cause to continue it vnder one sole kinde viêªt videlicet in opposition and detestation of moderne heresies First in regard of many Lutherans who beleiue that Christs body only is contained with the bread and his blood only with the wine and not all Christ entirely which is a manifest ignorance for wheresoeuer Christ's body is truly really and substantially from the day of his Resurrection there it is truly * Rom. non amplius moritur Christus aliue being impossible for Christ to die again and since the life of the flesh * Leuit. 17. anima omnis carnis in sanguine is in the blood Leuit. 17. it followeth euidently that wheresoeuer Christs body is there his blood is also and since Christ hath deuested himself of no reall thing that he once assumed and whatsoeuer he assumed was vnited hypostatically to his diuine person it is again plainly euident that wheresoeuer * S. Ambrosius vbi carpus Christi Christus est Christs body blood or soul is there is all Christ entire without separation of one part from another and albeit the words that consecrate Christs body according to their proper
signification doe constitute the body only vnder the forms of bread and the words which consecrate Christ's blood according to their proper signification doe put the blood only vnder the form's of wine neuerth eless in vertue of naturall concomitancy that is to say of the naturall connection which is between all the naturall part 's of Christ now inuested with immortality it is manifest by necessary consequence that wheresoeuer Christ's body and blood is there is all Christ vndeuided and so it is alike in the mystery of the blessed Trinity that includes three Persons really distinct though the word Father according to it's proper signification be appropriated to the first Person only notwithstanding whersoeuer the first diuine Person is who only layeth claim to the name Father taken in the proper sense there also is the second Person the son and the third Person the holy Ghost in vertue of the naturall connection that one Person has with an other Hence it is plainly euident that the Euchariste distributed vnder one kinde only ought not to be counted a lame Sacrament since one sole species contain's as much of Christ as both together to wit all Christ entirely Neither is a greater measure of grace conferred Ex opere operato that is by the Sacraments working precisely when it is taken in one sole or in both kind's the spirituall effect thereof which is supernaturall grace vnto refreshing and feeding of the soul being equally diuided to all such as receiue the Sacrament with the same worthines whether vnder one only or both kind's and all such are * 1. Cor. 10. multi vnum corpus sumus qui de vno pane participamus one bread and one body in as much as all are partakers of one bread 1. Cor. 10. which is an other effect of the Sacrament Also he that shall eate of this bread worthily which is conuerted into the body of Christ shall liue for euer 10. 6. And as * 2. Cor. 8. qui multum non abundauit qui modicum noÌ„ minorauit Et Exod. 16. filij Israel colligerunt Manna alius plus alius minus nec qui plus collegerat habuit amplius nec qui minus parauerat r. perit minus an Israëlite that gathered much Manna had nothing ouer and an Israëlite that gathered little had not the less so a Christian that receiueth the Sacrament vnder both kind's hath no more of Christ or of sacramentall grace then he that receiueth vnder one kinde only if there * Gratia sucramentalis confertur iuxta dispositiones supernaturales eorune qui recipiunt Sacramenta be parity as to the disposition of the receiuers notwithstanding all these premises it cannot be said in proper speech that he that eateth Christ's body doth drinke his blood or that he that drinketh Christ blood vnder the forme of wine doth cate his blood albeit that whosoeuer receiueth his body receiueth his blood withall and whosoeuer receiueth his blood receiueth his body withall for the reason of difference in order to the proper form of speech doth not proceed from the absence of the one and the sole presence of the other but from a different manner exercised in the conueyance of the consecrated elements * Innocentius III. ait quod quamuis dum bibitur sanguis Christi simul accipiatur eius corpus quod tamen tune non dicitur propriè â—â—aÌ„ducari vnder both of which be contained as well the body as the blood of Christ from the mouth into the stomach no man eating and thinking alike Secondly lay-communion vnder one kinde only is continued because of other modern sectaries that lay claim to a diuine precept to proue a necessary vsage of both kinds which is a manifest weakness for * Jems 6. hic est panis de coâ—le descendens sâ— quit 〈◊〉 ipso manducauevit non morictur Et v. 52. 〈…〉 si quit manducâ—â—erit c hoc pane viuet in aterâ—â—â— Rursiam qui maÌ„ducâ—t â—â—am 〈◊〉 viâ—â—t in aeternum many scripture-testion onies doe declare communion in one kinde to be enough for one obtaining eternall life and not any one doth exprosse an obsolute command to oblige the Church vnto lay-communion vnder both kinds For of all the three Euangelist's which set down the Institution of the Eucharist only S. Luk cap. as mentioneth an absolute precept given by Christ viêªt videlicet Doe this in 〈◊〉 of me but from this scripture no man ought to argue an obligation euen for consecration in both kinds and consequently much less for lay-communion vnder both kinds because the precept doth immediatly follow the consecration of the bread asone and was enjoyned afore Christ did institute the chalice and though Christ Mat. 6. after he had consecrated the chalice said drink yee all of it yet that was a precept giuen to the Apostles only which were present for S. Mark chap. 14. says And they All drank of it that is all the Apostles then sitting at the last supper Furthermore Christ by giuing the afore said precept Doe this in remember ance of mee wherby is commanded the execution of all the actions ioynt and separate that Christ then did cannot be meant vniuersally in order to all the faithfull ioynt and separate the said actions being inconsistent with meer lay-people who are not invested with power to offer proper sacrifice consecrate Christs body and ordaine Priests for the distributing the Euchariste to others which were the actions that Christ exercised and proper only to the Episcopall and Priestly function * Trident. sess 22. cap. 1. can 1. ait per verba hoc facite Christum ordinasse Apostolos Sacerdâ—tes that Christ instituted at his last supper Amongst the Apostles S. Paul 1. Cor. 11. only relateth the Institution of this Sacrament and according to his Testimonie the absolute precept Doe this in remember ance of me is giuen also before Christ consecrated the chalice and albeit that S. Paul mentioneth a conditionall precept that felloweth the institution of the said chalice to wit This doe as oft as ye drinke it in remember ance of me neuertheless as no man ought to argue according to the rules of true Logick from a condititionall proposition an vniuersall absolute so no man ought to infer from a conditionall an absolute precept vniuersally obliging the whole Church ioynt and separate and consequently there cannot be produced out of the three Euangelists and S. Paul which set down the words Christ vsed in the institution of this SacrameÌ„t any warraÌ„table ground to proue a diuine precept obliging all belieuers vniuersally to coÌ„municate vnder both kind's and although S. Iohn the EuaÌ„gelist chap. 6. doth shew an express warrant from Christ coÌ„manding as it were communion vnder both kinds in order to the whole Church joynt and separate The warrant runs thus Except ye eate the flesh of the son of man and drink his blood ye haue no life in you howeuer modern sectaries and Caluinist's especially cannot in
him that is ordained a Bishop which is the Tenet of all catholick writers that assert Episcopacy to deriue it's institution from Christ and to be an ecclesiasticall order taken in the proper sense for the Council of Tent sess 23. c. 4. can 4. doth define the Sacrament of Order to imprint a character which definition being absolute without restriction or distinction between one order and an other it doth euidently follow that all orders doe imprint a character which is a spirituall signe deriued into the soul wherby a man is muested with power to exercise certain ecclesiasticall functions in order to the ministery of the Eucharist and it matters not that the priestly is more worthy and excellent then the Episcopall character as distinct from it for the impression of a new and distinct character is not grounded in the more or less perfection and excellency of a precedent character but in the distinction of powers and abilities in reference to exercising the ministery of the Euchariste neither Matters it that Fathers and Councils when they number the Sacraments of the new law do acknowledg seuen only comprehending holy order for one for in so numbring of them they consider holy Order in (l) According to the Ancient Fathers ordination of a Bishop and a Priest is said to be one and the same that is taken in the generall sense and holy order so taken is but one Sacrament onely but a Bishop taken in the proper sense euen according to S. Hierom. Dial. con Lucif hath in the Church the preeminence which Aaron had in law of Moses and to meer Priests he giues that Degree of preeminence onely into which the sons of Aaron were inuested Besides s. Epiphan l. de Sacerdot dignit c. 6. calleth Episcopacy a Deified Order and cap. 7. assert's difference between a Bishop and a meer Priest being God exact's not the same thing 's from a Priest as from a Bishop that has preeminence aboue him a genericall signification as it containeth all it's sundry species or kinds Wherfore in as much as according to the rules of Logick what can be rightly affirmed of a thing taken in the generall sense may be also affirmed of all the sundry species contained therin it doth plainly follow that since ecclesiasticall order taken in its genericall signification is a Sacrament and doth imprint a Character euery true species therof is a Sacrament and imprinteth a Character In like manner Fathers and Councils reckoning seuen Orders they do coÌ„prehend Episcopacy vnder Priesthood And for as much as Christ had but one spouse which is the Church a Bishop and a Priest that supplieth his room and representeth his Person in the ministery ought to be married to the Church only * S. Hieron in sua Apolog con Jouin Apostoli inquit vel virgines vel post nuptias contineÌ„tes fuerunt id est absquo vxorum consortio wherfore the Apostles after they were ordained Bishops and Priests led their life 's in all godliness purity and chastity and this apostolicall practice Bishops and Priests down from them to these times haue religiously obserued S. Hierom L. in vigilantium exclaimeth against some Modern Hereticks of those times for taking such of the people only to be Priest's as had (m) According to the second Council of Carthage continency was enioyned to Bishops and Priests the ancient Fathers there assembled declaring with one accord that they ought to obserue it being the Apostles taught it and antiquity kept it Besides the first Council of Nice put forth an ordinance that Bishops Priest's and Deacons should entertaine no woman in their families except Mothers Grand-mothers sisters and Aunts making no mention of wifes From whence S. Basil Epis 17 infer's that to take wifes after the receiuing of holy Order was not permitted And indeed Clergy-men of those dayes had so great a reuerence to chastity that euen the Arian Bishop's ordain'd no man that was marryed as witnesseth S. Epiphan her 37. moreouer it was neuer permitted in the Church of Christ that a Bishop or Priest might marry as appear's by the Testimonies of ancient Fathers of the Greek Church though now this Church faln into schism differs from the Latins in opinion and practice as to such as had wifes before their ordination wiues contrary to the custome of both the Eastern and western Churches that allwaies promoted to the Maior-orders Virginia or such as were esteemed chast and pure from all carnall vncleaness and though in the primitiue times when there was great scarcity of single persons as proper and fit to be ordained Bishops Priest's Deacons and Sub-Deacons the Church-gouernours tooke of married men for the exercising those functions neuertheless these did not accompany with their wiues after their ordination but led their liues in all purity and chastity as did their wiues also according to a mutuall promise of continency and since the Priests of the old law to whom marriage was permitted as it were of necessity to multiply the people of God and who did sâ—adow only in their ministery what the Priests of the new law do really offer in their sacrifices viz. the true and reall body and blood of Christ in memory of his death and passion did abstain not only from the carnall embracement's of their wiues but also from the houses wherin they resided before they were to enter into the Temple for the performance of their spirituall functions respectruely it is most consonant as to reason that Priest's of the new law doe obserue continency together with purity and holyness Besides the vnmarried careth for the things of our lord how he may please him but he that is married careth for the things of the world how he may please his wife 1. Cor. 7. Wherfore such as leaue the world to be ordained Bishops Priest's Deacons and Sub Deacons ought to leade a single life without wifes and truly in regard therof there is less danger of dissipating ecclesiasticall goods and conuerting them to the making vp of inheritance for Clergy-mens children Furthermore Priests vnmarried are in a better condition to reproue the vices of lay-people then if they were married and for as much as they are single men they be less vnquiet contentious and troublesome to their flock not seeking to enrich children which they haue not Iouinianus and VigilaÌ„tius were the first sectaries that stood vp in defence of Priests marriages and Luther and Caluin raysed vp againe that heresy after that it had been dead and buried for many ages teaching that it is not only lawfull for Peiests to marry before but euen after their ordination These are followd by all the sectaries of the present times And knowing well that the opinion contradicteth all antiquity they labour to make it agree with the holy scriptures whence they cut out weak interpretations and form coniecturall deductions only abusing sundry text's for Example God says Gen. 1. bring forth fruit and multiply whence they very weakly
CHVRCH MILITANT THE CONTENTS God hath giuen to his Church on earth the keeping of all truth that we may not be as children wauering carryed about with euery wind of doctrine by diuine institution pastorall functiōs are of necessary and perpetuall vse in the Church vnto teaching christian faith and deciding controuersies pertaining thereto without being liable to errour God hath inuested Church-Gouernours with autority to make laws and ordinances and exacte obediēce vnto them the Church cannot lie hid priuat spirits haue nothing of power to interprete scriptures or to judge matters in debate concerning faith and religion the outward testimony of the Church is the ordinary expedient necessary to the receiuing of christian faith answeres to sundry obiections vrged by sectaries in fauour of a priuat reuealing spirit holy scriptures were neither primarily intended nor primaryly deliuered as supream Judges of controuersies in order to christian faith and religion profoundnes ' of mysteries plenteousnes and shortnes of sentences render the scriptures obscure and intricate to infer the Churches infallibility from the autority of scriptures and scriptutes infallible autority from the infallible testimony of the Church implies no circle of errour faith as to the assent thereof is resolued into the Church and not into the scriptures the four principall marks of the true Church taken joyntly agree with the Roman Church onely which is the one holy catholick and Apostolick Church that neuer deuiated from truth THe Church militant is the grownd and piller of truth 1. Tim. 3. as the foundation of an house supporteth and hindereth it from falling So the Church of God sustaineth and preserueth truth that is the doctrine of christian faith from perishing wherefore whosoeuer desireth to find out truth vnto saluation must seek it in the Church which is the certaine keeper and faithfull Guardian thereof the supream prouidence hauing put therein Some Apostles and some Prophets and some Euangelists and some Pastours and Teachers for the consummation of the Saints for the worke of the ministery and for the edification of the body of Christ vntill we all meet together in the vnity of faith and the knowledg of the son of God vnto a perfect man and vnto the measure of the age of the fulness of Christ that we henceforth be no more children wauering and carryed about with euery wind of doctrine by the wickednesse of men and crastines of Satan whereby they lie in waite to bring vs into errour Ephes 4. where the Apostle plainly asserteth pastorall function together with the office of teaching christian faith to be of necessary and perpetuall vse in the Church for the administring of Sacraments auoiding of errours and the confirming of such as shall wauer in religion and truly it cannot be conceiued as to reason probable that Christ coming into the world to be Gouernour of souls and to make vnto himselfe a glorious Church without spot or wrinckle Ephes 5. should not departing out of the world leaue necessary helps to preserue it in holynes (a) god instituted in the old law Deut. 17. à supream Tribunall consisting of Priests for the deciding of matters in debate in order to his people to the end that if inferiour Iudges should differ in iudgment or deuiate from the truth they might recur to the Council of Priests where one chief Iudge that is the high Priest was appointed to prouounce sentence and all others bound to giue obedience therto the law condemning those of pride which resisted or refused the high Priests decision in matters of controuersie again God so specially assisted the said Council with his spirit of truth that the high Priests sentence was infallible though himselfe might erre as a priuat person Wherefore Christ Mat. 23. commanded the people to doe what the Scribs and Pharisies said in regard they sate in the Chair of Moyses And S. Iohn cap. 11. ascribes not the truth of Caiphas prophesing that Christ ought to die for the safety of that nation vnto his speaking as of himselfe but to his speaking as high Priest of that same yeare which rendered him infallible in speaking in consequence of which seeing that God so directed the high Priest in the old law that he could not speake an vntruth from the Chair of Moyses it follows of necessity that Christ in his own new law of grace so specially assistes the high Priest his grand Vicar and supream head of the Church which he built on his beloued Apostle S. Peter that he cannot tell a lye from the Chair of the same S. Peter the first high Priest of the new law after Christ Wherefore the Churches supream Gouernour that succeds in that Chair cannot erre in his decrees that concerne matters of faith or generall manners notwithstanding that he were as wicked as Caiphas From hence plainly appear's the manifest weaknes of sundry sectaries which will haue the supream Priests sentence no longer to bind then hee pronounces sentence in conformity to the word of God for there is no warrantable authority saue that of the supream Pastours Tribunall which can assure vs of the diuine word for the scripture would not be belieued if it were not warranted from the infallible Chair of S. Peter Moreouer sundry sectaries say vnaduisedly that in the old law the sentence of the high Priests concerned only ciuill matters in debate and not controuersies pertaning to faith and religion for as to this point both the second book of paralipomenon and the 24. Chapter of Exodus giue clear euidence against them Besides God hath not vsed lese care in instituting the christrian Church established in a law of grace then in forming the Synagogue of the Iewes established in a law of bondage wherefore * Deus cum primum instituit Cathedrā Moysis in Deutro promisit omnes singulas eius definitiones fore veritatis infallibilis ideo Aug. l. 4. de doct chris ait Pharisaeos scribas id est Pōtisices Mosaicos iudicantes ex Cathedra Moysis non pot uisse malè definire quamuis mali essent quia ad bene definiendum cogebantur à Deo since this had diuine authority and assistance to interpret and teach the old law of Moyses as likewise to decide all controuersies concerning the Iewish religion Deut. 17. doubtless he hath not prouided in a lesser measure for the Church of Christ in order to teaching and interpreting the new law and determining all matters that might be in debate about christian religion Again Christ being about to leaue this Church in order to his visible presence for as many ages as the world shall endure was as prouident and carefull to preserue it pure from schism and heresy as was Moyses to preserue his when he was to absent himselfe from it for a shorter time but Moyses being to goe vp vnto Mount Sinai and there to abide forty dayes and forty nights onely constituted * Exod. 24. exspectate hic inquit Moyses donec reuertamur ad vos
did not adding next Cyrillus for the holy Fathers and Bishops departed and of all vniuersally which are dead from amongst vs. Where is obseruable Mr. Whites crafty dealing for in the fift catechesis of S. Cyril the words set down by him appeare not that catechesis containing only an explication of faith in order to its definition which is substance of things hoped for and a conuiction of things vnseen Howeuer the said words cited by him are extant in the first mystigogicall catechesis of S. Cyril who before he coms at those words set down by Mr. White to proue that the Hierosolymitan Church prayed for the blessed writeth thus when we offer this sacrifice afterward we make commemoration of those also who are dead afore first of the Patriarkes Prophetes Apostles Martyres that God by their prayers and intercessions may receiue our prayers But Mr. White leaueth out these words which sheweth his crafty and subtill dealing Again the words of S. Cyril that * Uerba subsequētia hac sunt maximū est animarum iuuamen pro quibus offertur obsecratio sancti illius tremendi quod in altari positum est sacrificii quod exemplo demonstrare volumus scio enim multos dicere quid iuuat animam in peccatis ex hoc mundo decedentem etiamsi in hoc sacrificio mentio fiat illius Ansi rex aliquis eos à quibus offensus est in exilium pepulerit postea vero illorum propinqui coronam aliquam conficientes pro his qui in supplicio sunt exulibus eidem regi offerrent nonne condonationem aliquam suppliciorum dederit ad eūdem medū nos pro defunctis precationes adhibemus follow the words set down by Mr. White doe preiudice his doctrine of the midle state of soules and therefore on purpose he omits those likwise The same crafty dealing he employes about S. Marks lyturgy that is of Alexandria for there he omits mentioning the precedent of which the subsequent words depend and ioynes words together which haue nothing of connexion For example the words Of our Fathers and bretheren who haue slept in the saith of Christ down to the words and moreouer of those whose memory this day we celebrate and our holy Father Marke who taught vs the way of saluation doe not containe a prayer for the Saints because the Euangelist saith expresly grant vnto them rest mindfull of the Saints that is mindfull of them through the intercession of the Saints but truly the subsequent words to wit To thesoules of all those giue rest haue no relation to the precedent commemoration Neither doe the particles of all those giue rest comprehend the Saints commemorated afore in regard that both afore and after those words is recited the angelicall salutation Aue Maria and after this is expressed in the lyturgy that the Deacon readeth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is the holy tables containing a Catalogue of all the faithfull departed afterward saith the lyturgy the Priest decently bows his body and prayeth vttering the words set downe viz To the souls of all those giue rest our supream lord that is to the souls of all those which be contained in the said Catalogue the names whereof the Deacon had read and whereas S. Marke concluds saying To their soules I say grant rest and admit them to the kingdom of Heauen that conclusion is only a repetition of the precedent prayer To the soules of all these giue rest our supream lord and God and consequently did not relate vnto the blessed Saints that had no need of such a prayer but to those named in the Deacons 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that receiued help After the like manner Mr. White dealeth in citing the Roman or S. Gregorie the greats lyturgy which is thus Remember alsoe O lord thy seruants N.N. that is such as I name or intend to pray for who haue gone before vs with the signe of faith and now rest in the sleep of peace After which words the Preist according to the rubricke there set down ioynes his hands together and prayes during a little while for the said N.N. which he nameth or intendeth to pray for * Innocentius Alexaner Sūmi Pontifices item Gabriel Albertus disertè docēt post verba illa dormiunt in somno pacis debere fieri memoriam specialē non vniuersalem vt perperam dicit Albius defunctorum parētum corū quibus missam specialster applicare voluerit sacerdos his potius credendum est quā Albio and afterward only it followeth To them O lord and all the rest in Christ we beseech thee grant a place of ease and light and peace whereby t is manifest that Mr. White weakly if not craftily goes about to proue from those words that S. Gregorie prayed for all who were baptized and departed in the communion of the Church And indeed soe it should follow that he prayed for the most blessed Virgin that is aboue intercession exceeding all the Angels in sanctity But t is great pity that the extream wantoness of Mr. Whits witt should so carry him away and soe harden his mouth and fortifie his stomack as to disgest a morsell of doctrine that by his own confession contradicts the generall practice of the whole Church Furthermore to cleare more amply all these and other obiections which sectaries commonly draw from vncertainties and intricacies of Church lyturgyes to preiudice Catholick verities there is nothing of absurdity or inconueniency if we answere them that the holy church represents therin the departure of Saints out of the world that is the exact time when their souls were remouing out of their bodyes for example in the Mass for the dead when t' is celebrated for such as died some hundred yeares afore the Church in that prayer of the offertory Our lord Iesus Christ deliuer the souls of all the faithfull departed from the paines of hell from the deep lake from the lions mouth let not bell swallow them vp represēts those souls vnto Christ as if euen then they were departing and considers them as if euen then they were in the agonie of death and therby noe lye is committed for a Priest celebrating the Mass of the fourth sunday in Aduent does truly say without lying Drop down yee Heauens from aboue and let the clouds raine the iust Send downe the lambe the ruler of the earth Because the Church therby only represents the humble supplications of the ancient Patriarks and Prophets for the accelerating of Christs preordained coming into the world as if they were present in that moment of time when those holy Fathers soe prayed And truly that glorious Emperour Charles the first by the aduice of his Ghostly Father commanded that his funerall should be celebrated and the office and the Mass likewise of the dead sung for him as if he had been dead indeed when he was aliue The premisses euidence enough the true sense and meaning of the Churches lyturgyes against all
hereticall interpretations Howeuer an answer shall of Mr. Whits proofes To wit nor is it saith he infrequent among the pious when they name a Saint or Martyr to adde whose glory God increase Hereby Mr. white either means essentiall or accidentall glory if he vnderstand an increase of essentiall glory in order to the intensnes therof he teacheth an heresy for the Church of God ascribes such an increase of blessednes * Concil Flor. in dee vnionis desinit animas beatorū videre clarè Deum sicut◠est sed alian◠alia perfectius pro diuersitate meritorum Et definitum est sess 6. can 32. iustificatum bonis operibus augmētum gratiae mereri ita profit entur veteres Patres Et ratio distributiua iustitiae exigit vt plus merenti maior reddatur morces to the Saints own merits and not to the prayers of their friends according to that saying of the Apostle 2. Cor. 9. He that soweth sparingly reapes alsoe sparingly and he that soweth liberally shall reap also liberally and indeed it is the proprietie of distributiue iustice to better the reward in order to such as deserue better and God compenseth the merits of his faithfull according to destributiue iustice but if Mr. White vnderstand an increase of accidentall glory either in order to speciall reuelations of mysteries whereof the Saints were ignorant afore or in order to a greater measure of honour and reuerence from the faithfull aliue that makes nothing to his purpose and in that sense may be meant that saying (n) According to the Roman Catholick Church a Priest preparing himselfe to say Mass prayeth thus I vill say Muss and offer in saecrifice the body and blood of our lord Iesus Christ to the prayse of God and the vvhole triumphant Court Now if by praying soe he prayeth for the blessed he prayeth for God also being he promiseth therby to offer sacrifice to the praise of both in cosequence of which S. Paul likwise 1. Tim. 1. prayed for God when he said vnto the king of vvorlds immortall inuisible sole God be bonour and glory for euer and euer amen But were it not an extream madness to think that S. Paul by praying so conceiued that he might bring vnto God an encrease of glorie Howeuer Mr. White will needs haue the words of the prayers set down in the Roman lyturgie after the offertorie Receiue vvhat vve offer to the honour of thy Saints c. to proue it lawfull to pray for Saints that thereby they may find mercy and encrease of glory But S. Thomas 3. p. q. 71. art 8. in resp ad 1. obiec saith that when we celebrate the feasts of Saints their glory is not augmented by that solemnity but we receiue greate benefit thereby and euen so saith he when we giue praise to God we and not God receiue benefit thereby from the premises clearly appeares how vnaduisedly Mr. White in the 3. account of the midle state of souls alleageth S. Greg. to proue that the blessed receiue encrease of glory through the prayers of the faithfull liuing Sed mira sunt qua docet Albius noua sunt mira stupemus noua cauemus Aug. l. 3. con Iulia. Whose glory God encrease and after that sense Christians pray Glory be to the Father to the son and to the holy Ghost Amen CHAR. XXIJ. OF FOVNDAMENTALL AND NOT foundamentall Articles of faith T' Is a moderne distinction that was ingeniously contriu'd by (a) Marke Anthony de Dominis Arch-Bishop of Spalatto became an Apostate fled out of Italy into England in the Reign of king Iames of happy memory and taught that a Christian might be saued in any sect professing the foundamentall Articles of Christian faith as for example said he euery one may attaine vnto saluation either by adhering to S. Thomas doctrine or the doctrine of Scotus Marke Anthony de Dominis Arsh-Bishop of Spalatto and brought into the Protestant Church in order to the said Churches claim vnto as to foundamentall and disclaim from the Roman Church as to not foundamentall Articles of faith that is as to errours in order to such Articles of faith as may be denyed without hurt of faith and loss of saluation though sufficiently propounded in regard whereof they beare the name of not foundamentall * Protestātes communiter constituunt hocdiscrimen inter fundamentales non fundamentales quod scilicet damnabile sit ab illis dissentire cū sufficienter proponūtur non item dissentire à nō fundamentalibus dum sufficienter proponūtur vt vniuersalitatem amplitudinē suae Ecclesiae estendant as disinct frō foundamētals which cā not be reiected without incurring both loss of faith and saluation in consequence wherof Protestans of theses dayes commonly represent the Roman Church as a naturall body that is partly sound and partly vnsound infected with sundry soares and vlcers which is to say that although the Roman Church hath continued alwaies sound at heart hauing neuer deuiated from the true doctrin of Christ as to foundamentall requisits vnto saluation neuertheless she still retaines sundry errours in order to not foundamentall requisits which they pretend to haue purged away and therby make their Church to be the same with the Roman Church as to the sound part therof Marke Antony de Dominis saw a necessity of inuesting the Protestant Church with visible existence least it might appeare to haue perished afore and with perpetuall succession of Pastors and Teachers these being of necessary vse in the gouernment therof for as much as they be essentially required to the professing of faith preaching the diuine word instructing the illiterat and administring the Sacraments which functions could neuer haue been performed if the Church of God wherof these be necessary markes had been inuisible and therby destitute of Pastors for the work of the ministery wherfore to fit vnto the Protestant Church visible existence and a series of Pastors and Teachers in a continuall line of succession down from the Apostls he aduiced such as carried on the Protestant Reformation not to quitte all claim to the Roman Church without which visible existence and perpetuall succession of their Church had been impossible since no one society of Christian belieuers appeared vpon earth when the Protestant Reformation begun that was seperated from the Church of Rome Again he saw that by asserting the Romā Church to haue in all times reserued necessary requisits vnto saluation that is foundamentall Articles of faith it might seem as to reason consonant that the Protestants departure from it had been without cause and thereby they as to reason might be counted guilty * Secundum Aug. l. 1. con Epis Parm. cap. 4. schisma omnia scelera supergreditur of deadly schism for going out from and breaking vnity and communion with a Church wherin if they had continued they might haue attained vnto saluation therfore to escape this rock he aduiced again that Protestants should represent the Roman Church
deadly schism caused by themselues that departed from and not by Catholicks that abided in her In euery ciuill state such as dissobey not such as obey authority such as abrogate not such as conserue the ancient lawes and ordinances such as reject not such as keep the setled customes therof bear the infimous brand to all posterity of being the men that rent and diuided the common wealth but Protestants haue dissobeyed not obeyed abrogated not preserued reiected not obserued the authority lawes and Customes of the Roman Church hauing by their own power only vnder a specious colour of reformation introduced nouell doctrines lawes and rites contrary to the vsage and practice therof wherfore they of necessity bear the guilt of deadly schism and not Catholicks that haue altered nothing Besides Protestants went out of the Roman Church without cause for at the time of their departure the Roman Church retained all requisits necessary vnto saluation for then was there no Christian Church vpon earth Seperated from her so that when the Protestants reformation begun the Roman Church or none was the true Church of God in consequence of which their departure was without cause * Aug. l. 3. de baptis con Donat. c. 2. in fine ait si Ecclesia Romanae sit verae Dei Ecclesia in qua salus haberi potest non habent Donatista sua pracisionis aliquam defonsionem sed exeundo communionem Ecclesiae relinquâ—â—do in quae poteraÌ„t saluari irrucrunt in sacrilegium schismatis For whosoeuer goeth out from a Church wherin he might attaine to saluation goes out without cause and commits sacriledge of damnable schism as the great Doctour S. Austin teacheth in his third book of baptism against the Donatists Moreouer this asserted truth appeares euidently by the foundamentall doctrines of Protestant Religion which are as opposite to the faith of the Roman Church as the ends of a Diameter are ouerwhart and cross For example Protestants commonly teach that good works proceeding from diuine grace can neither iustify nor merit saluation these being prerogatiues of faith only in regard wherof it beares the name of iustifying faith but all ancient and modern Pastors and Doctours of the Roman Church assert that good workes exercised in and by diuine grace doe bring vnto iustification of life and that they are in order to merit causes of euerlasting saluation as wicked workes in order to demerit are causes of perpetuall damnation Protestants commonly teach that the sacrifice of Mass wherin Catholick Priests offer the body and blood of Christ for the liuing and dead is a blasphemous tale and a daÌ„gerous deuise Protestants coÌ„monly teach that confirmation Penance Order Extream-vnction and Matrimony want requisits necessary to an Euangelicall Sacrament Protestants commonly teach that the doctrines of Purgatory Indulgences religious veneration of holy Reliks pertaining vnto and inuocation of Saints are idle fancies and trifles crept into the Church without warrantable authority of scripture testimony Protestants commonly teach sundry other doctrines as foundamentall requisits to their religion clean contrary to the faith of the Roman Church as is manifestly demonstrated in the Characters concerning the outward Sacrifice of Masse Confirmation Penance Order Extrem-vnction Matrimony Purgatory Indulgences and Adoration From the premises is inferred that the Protestant Reformation cannot borrow of the Roman Church visible existence together with continuall succession of Pastors vnto perpetuating that Church in foundamentall Articles of faith vnto excusing from schism Howeuer it cannot be denyed but that Protestants can shew clearly that the whole body of doctrines foundamentall to Protestanism hath been asserted by sundry learned men that liu'd in sundry ages respectiuely long before their reformation began namly Simon Magus taught that faith alone was an expedient sufficient vnto saluation as witnesseth S. Irenaeus and rejected good works as vnnecessary therto as doth attest Clemens Romanus Manichaeus despised the Sacrifice of Masse spoiling Christs Church of all outward sacrifice as witnesses S. Austin Nouatus impugned the Sacraments of Confirmation Eucharist Extrem-vnction and Matrimony as S. Cyprian affirmeth Vigilantius detested the inuocation of Saints and the veneration of their Reliques and likewise single life of Priests as S. Hierom relateth Iulian the Apostat had in detestation the cross of Christ and demolished his statue as Eusebius writeth Aerius condemned prayers and sacrifices offered for the souls departed as S. Austin and S. Epiphanius auerre But that which is exacted of the Protestants is to shew from the first age for 1500. yeares a setled company of Christians and the place country town or village where they liued that taught and preached the whole body of their foundamentall doctrines it is not enough to produce the example of such as at different tymes and in different places agreed with them in two or three of their Articles for that is not sufficient vnto constituting a society of true belieuers because so Turkes and Iewes might be lifted for Protestants these agreeing with them as to sundry Articles namely they deny the Popes supremacy transubstantiation inuocation of Saints and the sacrifice of the Masse Again the fore named sectaries themselues were destitute of visible existence and perpetuall succession and consequently could not deriue either of both vnto the Protestant Church Besides Simon Magus Manichaeus Nouatus Vigilantius c. bear the infamous brand of being condemned Hereticks before the ProtestaÌ„ts reformation begun Howeuer some Protestants there be that endeuour to proue their visible existeÌ„ce in a long line of succession from the Albigenses but vnaduisedly first because this seed of sectaries knowes not to deriue the Genealogy of their own Religion down from the Apostles which is the question in debate wherin satisfaction is expected secondly the Albigenses are condemned Hereticks that taught doctrine impious and blasphemous for example they asserted a good and an euill God denyed originall sin reiected baptism and impugned the resurrection of bodyes By the premises plainly appeareth that Mark Antony de Dominis Bishop of Spalatto his distinction between foundamentall and not foundamentall Articles of faith carrieth nothing of weight with it t' is like a specious building that wantes a good foundation to support it And truly it is as impossible an enterprise to proue the visible existence and perpetuall succession of Protestant Pastours from the Roman Church as it is for Caluinists to shew that the true Church of God laid hid for sundry ages inuisible without perishing which is impossible also for the markes of a liu'd Church are professing of faith preaching of the diuine word instructing of the illiterate and administring of the Sacraments which functions can noe more be executed in a Church that is inuisible then in a Church that is perished FINIS Laus Deo eiusque Matri Sanctissimae omnibus Sanctis Omnia Sanctae Romanae Ecclesiae subiecta sunt