Ordinance wherein Christ communicates himself to his people and seems to have a more special relation to this Spiritual Repast though not then instituted as the words shall give will give c. in the future tence import Are an invincible evidence that Christ doth as effectually promise and as really convey exhibite his flesh and bloud in a spiritual way with eternal life and salvation unto men and works faith and true conversion in their Souls in a proper ordinary way by his Supper duly administred as he doth by the Word preached or any other means of Grace it being of divine institution representing the flesh bodie and bloud of Christ more lively to their senses and by them unto their souls than any other Gospel Ordinance working upon three distinct senses at once the eie ear taste which no other Ordinance doth 9ly That Text of 1 Cor. 10.16,17 The Cup of blessing which we bless is it not the Communion of the bloud of Christ The bread which we break is it not the Communion of the body of Christ For we being many are one Bread and one Body and are ALL partakers of that one bread compared with Ver. 1 2 3 4 5. and that parallel Text 1 Cor. 12.12,13 For as the body is one and hath many members and ALL the Members of that one body being many are one body So also is Christ for by one Spirit we are ALL baptized into one body whether we be Jews or Gentiles whether we be bond or free and have been ALL made to drink of or into one Spirit afford us these Conclusions proving the Lords Supper a Converting Grace-begetting Spirit-infusing Ordinance as well as the Word preached 1. That all visible Church-members professing Christ makeÌ„ but one Mystical Bodie of Christ into which they all are actually incorporated united together by Baptism and the Lords Supper of both which Sacraments they did all equally participate in the Apostles times without any restraint suspension seclusion communicating together in the Lords Supper and being all made partakers both of the Sacramental Bread and Cup when ever administred whether regenerate or unregenerate ignorant or knowing scandalous or unblameable by virtue of their incorporation into this One mystical Body Now the Major part of visible Christians Church-members in g 1 Cor. 1.2,3 c. 6.1 to 8. c. 3.1,2,3,4 c. 6.18,19 c. 7.10,11 c. 8.1,2,7,8 c. 10.8.22,23,28 to 34. c. 11.30 to 34. c. 14 Corinth other hurches in all ages admitted to Baptism and the Lords Supper have been unregenerate ignorant void of saving Faith and Graces so as the Lords Supper could be no confirming Ordinance in the Objectors sense to wit of their several Graces unto them Therefore it was administred to them only as a converting Ordinance upon that reason which Chrysostom h In Marc. c. 14. Victor Antiochenus i Summa Theol. pars 4. qu. 11. Art 1. Sect. 3. Alexander Alensis and others render why our Saviour himself administred it to Judas at its primitive institution That he might leave no means unattempted to convert reduce him to a sound mind and reclaim him from his wickedness 2ly That the Lords Supper worthily received doth really communicate the body and bloud of Christ with all the benefits of his death and passion to those who receive it yea make them all partakers of that one bread of life to their eternal Salvation and to drinke into one spirit Whence judicious * â—n 1 Cor. 12. Calvin expounds this phrase of the Sacramental Cup to which doubtless it referrs thus Participationem Calicis huc spectare ut unum Spiritum accipiamus Learned Gerhard thus Ex uno Calice bibimus in the Lords Supper ut unum spiritum sanctum recipiamus Whom the French Divines in their Theses Salmur pars 3. p. 40. back asserting That the Spirit of comfort and sanctification doth much rather follow the lawfull celebration of the Sacraments than the hearing of the Word since that is not slightly to be passed by which St Paul hath said And have all been made to drink into one spirit to wit in the Lords Supper whereas he never uttered any like thing when as he spake of the preaching of the word as learned Mr. Morrice hath also noted to my hands in his Diatribe 3ly That all worthy Communicants of the Lords Supper are there really incorporated into the invisible body and Church of Christ and made bone of his bone flesh of his flesh spirit of his spirit as visible Church-members are thereby actually incorporated into his visible mystical bodie as these Texts compared with Eph. 1.22,23 c,2 18 to the end c. 4.12 to 17. c. 5.25 to 33. Col. 1.18 c. 2.19 resolve 4ly That this Sacrament is a k See Articles of Engl. c. 26. Harmony of Confessions Sect. 14. Bishop Jewels Reply to Harding p. 20 21. 93. 112. special means to unite both the visible and invisible Church and their members together and to prevent all Scismes in these bodies being both the bond and badge of their union and communion one with another A prevailing motive in these sad times of Scisms and Divisions in all places to restore the frequent constant use of this holy Ordinance the disusage whereof hath been the principal cause of the Growth and continuance of these manifold Sects and Differences which l Mat. 12.25 threaten desolation to our Church and State 10ly The Scripture positively resolves Rom. 1.16 and all our Opposites assert That the Gospel of Christ is the power of God unto Salvation to every one that believeth to the Jew first and also to the Greek for therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith as it is written The just shall live by faith Now the principal part and summ of the Gospel recorded in sacred Writ and preached by the Apostles to beget or increase faith convert win bring men to salvation is this m 1 Cor. 15.1,2,3,4 Isay 53.4,5 c. Acts 2.22 to 40. c. 3,4 to 20. c. 4.10 c. 5.30,31 c. 8,5.35 c. 10.36 to 42. c. 13.19,30 Rom. 1.2,3,4 c. 4.24,25 c. 5.6,7,8,9 Gal. 3.1 That Jesus Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures when we were yet sinners and his professed Enemies to reconcile us unto God to cleanse heal save us from our sins to make us his adopted sons and preserve us to his heavenly kingdom Hence iâ— that of the Apostle 1 Cor. 1.23 But we preach Christ crucified and chap. 2. 2. I determined not to know any thing amongst you save Jesus Christ and him crucified as being the marrow and substance of the Gospel whereupon the preaching of the Gospel is stiled n 1 Cor. 1.17,18 The preaching of the Cross This transcendent love of Christ in dying suffring for such wretched sinners Enemies as we in washing us from our sins in his own most precious bloud and redeeming us from Gods wrath Hell eternal damnation out of the freeness fulness and riches of his
Church of England which resolves it ORDAINED OF CHRIST to be AN EFFECTUAL SIGN of Grace and Gods good will toward us by which HE DOTH WORK INVISIBLY IN US and doth NOT ONLY QUICKEN but also strengthen and confirm our faith Hence Cardinal Cajetan in 1 Cor. 10. and Dr. Ames as well as Bellarmin in his Bellarminus Enervatus Tom. 3. c. 4. p. 43. conclude Haec autem est COMMUNIS THEOLOGORUM DOCTRINA Sacramenta CONFERRE GRATIAM vel FACIENDO UBI NON INVENIT FACTAM vel factam AUGENDO And that not only as Signa theorica ad signific andum tantum instituta sed practica ad signifiandum et EFFICIENDUM INSTITUTA as they there express themselves cap. 3. p. 29. To which Dr. Ames adds this as his own and all Protestants Opinions c. 3. p. 24. Nostrae sententia est SACRAMENTA OMNEM EFFICIENTIAM HABERE RESPECTU GRATIAE quam Signum practicum potest habere per ullam relationem non tamen efficere gratiam immediatè sed MEDIANTE SPIRITU DEI ET FIDE But of this more largely in answer to their last Objection against its converting power objection 6 Their 6. Objection is this h Mr. Drakes Boundary p. 163. An Answer to Susspension suspended p. 23 24. If the Lords Supper were a converting Ordinance then it should be administred to meer Heathens as well as the Gospel preached to them to convert them unto Christ But meer Heathens are not to be admitted to but debarred from it Therefore it is no converting Ordinance but confirming only Before I answer the Argument I must premise that there is a twofold Conversion mentioned in Scripture 1. Visible and external when i 1 Thess 1.8,9,10 Psal 22.17 Is 60.5 Acts 15.3.7.12.14.19 c. 2.41 c. 8.5 to 18. c. 6,7,8 c. 11.1.15 18. c. 18.10,11 c. 26.17 Rom. 10.14 to 21. c. 15.16.18 Eph. 2.11,12,13 c. c. 3.6 to 12. Gal. 3.1,2 c. 2.2.8 1 Cor. 12.2.28 Col. 1.26,27 1 Tim. 3.16 2 Tim. 1.10,11 c. 4.17 Mat. 28.19,20 Mar. 16.15 to 19. meer Heathens Infidels Jews Turks and Pagan Idolaters are converted from their Heatherism Idolatry Idols and Idol-Gods to the external profession only of the Gospel of Christ and visible worship service of the true and living God This kind of conversion not here controverted is originally wrought in an ordinary way only by the word preached or the sight of Miracles accompanying the word not by the Lords Supper Baptism or other publike Ordinances as the marginal Texts demonstrate 2. Invisible Spiritual k Rom. 2.28,29 1 Pet. 1.3,4 Rev. 2 17. Ezech. 36.26,27 Internal when unregenerate carnal Christians professing externally the Gospel of Christ and worshipping the only true God are effectually turned from all their sins lusts evil wayes works of darkness and the power of Satan to unfeigned repentance faith holiness newness of life love and obedience to God as well in their souls spirits as outward conversation doing works meet for repentance and what is lawfull and just both in the sight ef God and men Of which Conversion we read Ps 19.7 Ps 51.13 Isa 6.10 c. 59.20 Jer. 3.14 c. 25.5 c. 26.3 c. 31.18 c. 44.5 Lam. 3.40 c. 5.21 Ezech. 3.13 c. 14.6 c. 18.21.30.32 c. 33.11 to 20. Hos 12.6 c. 14.2 Joel 2.12,13 Jonah 3.8 Zech. 1.3 Mat. 13.15 c. 18.3 Mar. 4.12.20 John 12.40 Acts 28.27 c. 26.18,20 2 Cor. 3.16 Jam. 5 20. The first sort of these Conversions is peculiar only to meer Heathens and Idolaters never formerly professing the Gospel The second is proper to none but visible Christians living within the pale of the Church though I willingly acknowledge that meer Heathens upon the first preaching of the Gospel to them may be at the self same time both inwardly and outwardly converted unto God even before they are actually baptized or externally incorporated into the visible Church of Christ as is clear by Acts 2.37,38.41 c. 8.12 c. 10.44 c. c. 11.15,16,17,18 c. 13.47,48 c. 16.14,15.30 to 35. c. 26.18,19,20 1 Thess 1.9,10 This later Conversion of which we only dispute both may be and usuall is as properly as effectually wrought in the Souls of Christians by the Lords Supper where duly frequently constantly administred as by the word preached it being not only as apt to beget Saving faith and assurance as the naked word alone but in some respects more probable to effect them since l 1 Kings 10.6,7,8 Lu. 1.2 Acts 10.40,41 2 Pet. 1.16 Eye-witnesses Evidences are more perswasive and apter to beget belief assurance then Ear-witnesses and m Deut. 17.6 c. 19.17 Mat. 18.16 two witnesses than one alone and an Oath or Seal annexed to Promises Covenants more strong powerfull to assure resolve comfort work faith of adhaesion in our doubting spirits than naked Promises or Covenants without them Hebr. 6.17,18 Psal 89.3.33,34,35 Psal 110.4 This distinction premised I answer 1. That the sequel of the Major is false 1. Because the Lords Supper belongs not to meer unconverted Heathens and Idolaters being not instituted by Christ for such to convert them from Paganism to Christianity but only to baptized Christians and Members of the visible Church as is evident by Mat. 26.17 to 33. Mat. 14.12 to 28. Lu. 22.8 to 31. c. 24.30,31 Acts 2.41,42,46 c. 20.7.11 1 Cor. 10.16,17.21 c. 11.20 to the end even as the Passeover belonged to none who were uncircumcised but to the circumcised alone Exod. 12.43 to 50. and the Sacrament of Baptism was to be administred to no meer Pagans but only to such who embraced the Gospel first preached to them and professed their belief thereof before they weÌ„re actually baptized Mat. 28.19 Mat. 16.15,16 Acts 2.41,42 c. 8.12,13,36,37 c. 10.47,48 c. 16,14,15.31,32,33,34 Now the reason why neither the Lords Supper nor Baptism might be administred to meer Infidels before their embracing of the Gospel is not because they are no really converting Ordinances in the sense forementioned as I have proved the Lords Supper to be and the n See Bochellus Decr. Eccl. Gal. l. 2. Tit. 3. de Baptismo Jewels Reply to Harding p. 21. 27. 242 249 250 458. Ames Bellarm. Enervat Tom. 3. l. 1. c. 3. Fathers with others assert Baptism to be from Mat. 3.11 John 1.26 Rom. 6.34 Gal. 3.27 1 Pet. 3.21 Eph. 5. â—26 27 Tit. 3.5 but because they are badges of our Christianity to distinguish us from Pagans and all other false Religions the means signs Bonds of our actual incorporation and mystical union into the visible Church of Christ the Memorials of the death of Jesus Christ whereby we shew forth his death till be come and Evidences of our Christians Communion and mutual agreement in faith and brotherly Christian love one towards another as members of the selfsame body as 1 Cor. 10.16,17.21 c. 11.23,24,25,26 c. 12.12.13,14 the 25. 28 Articles of the Church of England the Harmony of Confessions Sect. 11 12 13 14 15. and all who have written of them define them to be 2ly Because there