say much sand without lyme 1. The Gentiles of whose Conversion Act. 15. 3. speaks were of many more places besides Antioch Now suppose all here alledged were granted what evidence can Mr. Lockier give us that Paul and Barnabas or any such other persons competentlie able to judge had stayed as long in every one of these other places 2. But to hold our selves to this Church of Antioch I confesse indeed it were dangerous universally to say that these first Christians at Antioch had not I say not only as Mr. Lockier hath it as far as able men could apprehend but in very deed both name and thing i. e. gracious heart-Christianity But I see it not so very dangerous to say that not all and every one of them had so much Nay I think it very dangerous positively to say they had for 't is clearly contrary to what the Scripture speaketh of the effect and successe of the Preaching of the Gospel and to many passages of this very Story of the Acts. 3. True Paul and Barnabas were discerning men able to give a good judgement in so much time what they found amongst those Christians But what evidence can the Author give us from the Text that this was their intended work during that space to examine and try what heart was in every one of these Professours and that in relation to constituting them a Visible Church after that tryall and judgment passed thereupon The only work we find mentioned in the Text ver 26. is their teaching they taught much people And there is nothing in it so much as hinting at this that they were not in state of a Visible Church untill after that whole years tryall Paul and Barnabas had given judgement what they did find amongst them as to their inward spirituall estate Nay there is a right apparent intimation that all along that years space they were a Visible Church and so esteemed a whole year they assembled themselves with the Church or in the Church 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 4. I will note but another thing here The Author intimateth that Barnabas his being full of the Holy Ghost is spoken of in that Text in relation to and as the Principle of tasting trying and judging these Christians soul-complexion for Church communion with them this is a â—eer forgerie It being clear as day light that 't is mentioned as the reason and Principle of the zealous exhorting them to sincere and constant continuing in the faith section 12 He goeth on thus In particular Churches some competent judgement may be made of every particular member by able men in a long tract of time And so are these worthies else where said with this Church to have had intimat communion Act. 14. 27 28. And there they abode a long time with the Disciples pag. 5 6. Answ I wonder how Mâ— Lockier speaking of the judgement touching Church members their qualification as members talks of it as given by some that are able men when as the way maintained by his side of judging and admitting Church members requireth this to be done by the decisive votes of all and every one in the Church all which cannot be supposed to be such able men as he speaks of But to the purpose in hand true able men in a long tract of time having conversed with every particular member of a Church may be able to give a good judgement of them but the matter in question is in thesi whether such a judgement grounded upon a tryall of so long a time must be antecedent to their stateing in Church-membership And in the hypothesis of the particular now in hand whether Paul and Barnabas had so long a time intimat communion with the Antiochian professors and thereby gave a judgement upon them concerning their spirituall estate before they were constitute in a Visible Church This Mr. Lockier should have alledged and made good if he would had a solide ground for his Doctrine intended But doth the Passage cited Acts 14. 27 28. say any thing for this purpose Now I report my self for judgement upon this to any Reader of ordinary common capacity let him but take this to consideration that before the time of this abode at Antioch mentioned Acts 14. 28. Barnabas after the work of the Gospel begun at Antioch had come thither sent from Jerusalem he and Paul had Preached there together a whole year they had gone in commission sent by the Antiochian Christians with a relief to the distressed Brethren at Jerusalem Chap. 11. and had returned again Chap. 12. 25. And having stayed there some time by speciall Divine appointment they are sent abroad through the Nations about to Preach the Gospel and having after a long peregrination returned again to Antioch then is said that Chap. 14. 28. and there they abode a long time with the Disciples Now were not the Antiochians stated in a Visible Church untill judgement was given upon them after intimat communion in this time of abode I might bring a multitude of Arguments to prove the contrary from severall passages of the Story going before But I need go no further then the immediat preceeding Verse v. 27. When they were come and had gathered the Church But it may haply be said that the Author brings this Passage to shew not what tryall and knowledge Paul and Barnabas had of them before they were stated Members in a Church Visible but what they might had of them to be a warrantable ground of their report made touching them Chap. 15. 3. Answer If so then say I he alledges it to no purpose as to his scope in this Lecture for his intention is to have Paul and Barnabas Chap. 15. 3. speaking of the qualification of these Gentiles in relation to their stating in a Visible Church and accordingly thereupon to build a generall Doctrine touching the proper matter of a Visible Church section 13 Adde saith he to this Acts 15. where you shall see further what is solemnly asserted of these Converts in severall verses as v. 8. And God which knoweth the hearts beareth them witnesse giving them the Holy Ghost even as he did unto us and put no difference between us and them purifying their hearts by faith Here is a Text to some purpose God which knoweth the hearts beareth them witnesse c. That they have the like powerfull spirituall receptions with the best of them at Jerusalem And indeed I think it dangerous for any to affirm that all these expressions might not mean effectuall grace or else be spoken of some only but not of the whole Compare with this v. 11. 16 17 18 19. what he concludes Wherefore my sentence is c. pag. 6 7. Ans Here is indeed a Text to some yea to a very great purpose viz. for the end for which it was spoken by the Apostle Peter that is to prove that Circumcision and the rest of the yoke of the Ceremoniall Law ought not to be imposed upon the
it which is not a little fault in determining contraverted points while as he speaks thus allowed mater of the Visible Church For mater of a Visible Church may be said to be allowed in a double sense or relation viz. either in regard of what is incumbent to a man himself by way of duty before God or in regard of what is requisite in him by way of qualification in the outward Ecclesiastick Court whereupon the Church may and ought to proceed in admitting him to the externall communion of the Church I confesse that none are mater of a Visible Church allowed in the former sense or relation but such as are not only so far as men most spirituall can discern or judge but also in very deed true converts and beleevers It s a mans duty in professing Christianity and adjoyning himself to the Church of Christ to beleeve with his heart as he professeth with his mouth otherwise he is matter not approven not allowed of God But I beleeve its another thing to enquire what is mater of the Visible Church allowed in the latter sense and thinks that advised men among our Brethren of the Independent way will say the same in the generall Yet I trow it shall be found afterward that the strength and stream of our Authors Arguments runs in the former and so are little to the purpose of the Controversie between us and our Brethren touching the mater of the Visible Church section 7 To make way for a more clear discovery of this and to the effect we may in the whole ensueing disput know what we are doing and not fight in the dark Andabatarum more it is necessary before we proceed further to open up and bound the state of the controversie which Mr. Lockier hes not done I cannot tell upon what intention or if upon any design at all and not rather out of pure neglect or some other such thing If he say he was Preaching to people and not Disputing in the Schoole and that therefore it was not needfull nor becoming Scholastically to state a controversie I Answ Whether in Pulpit or Schoole his purpose was to draw his hearers of this Nation from a Doctrine which they had learned and professed before the world to a new way Sure ingenuous dealing would have required that the Doctrine of this Church which he intended to refute and to take them off should been once at least plainly and simply propounded and presented before them This he doth not all along but in effect speaks so indirectly as if we allowed all meer professours whatsoever to be members of the Visible Church Well what he hes not done we shall endeavour according to our weaknesse to do and shall deal more liberally with his side then he hes done with ours Now then let these considerations be premised section 8 1. Let it be considered that this controversie is not about the Members of the Mysticall Invisible Church or of the Church according to its inward state but of the Members of the Visible Church as such or of the Church according to its external state The Church Mysticall Invisible or according to its inward state is the societie of men effectually called unto saving communion with Christ to which doth belong in the intention and purpose of God all the promises of spirituall blessings pertaining to life and salvation The Church Visible and considered according to its externall state is the societie of men professing true Christian faith and Religion for communion in the outward exercises of the Worship and Ordinances of God Admission of members into the Church Invisible is the work of God by the operation of the Spirit in Effectuall Calling and ingraffing men into Christ Admission of members into the Church Visible and according to its externall state is committed to the Pastors and Rulers of the Church who being men and so not seeing the inward constitution and condition of hearts must look at things obvious to the senses in their administration of this work Whence one may be orderly and lawfully admitted a member of the Church Visible who is not a member of the Church Invisible And about this our adversaries I conceive at least such as are most sound and intelligent amongst them will make no controversie Further it is to be observed that the question and controversie between us and the Independent Brethren much differs from that which is debated between the Papists and the orthodox concerning Church-members The state of thâ— controversie with Papists which they and namely Bellarmine involve with many Sophismes is truely and really this as the judicious Ames hes well observed Bellar. Enerv. lib. 2. de Ecclesia cap. 1. thesi 10 others have not so well considered whether the whole multitude of professours comprehending as well unregenerate hypocrites and reprobats as true elect believers be that Church of Christ to which properly doth belong all these excellent things spoken of the Church in Scripture viz. that it is redeemed by Christ the Body of Christ the Spouse of Christ quickened acted and led by tâ—e Holy Spirit partakers of all the spirituall blessings so that the gates of Hell shall not prevail against it Albeit Papists dare not state the question in these terms yet the affirmative thereof is the thing they intend that they might obtain a Catholick Visible Church at all times illustriously visible infallible and unfailable and that there Romane is it But it is a far other matter that is debated between us and our present adversaries viz. what persons are to be admitted and accounted to belong to the Church Visible according to its outward state So that these who shall make use of Arguments used by Orthodox Writers in shewing that not wicked hypocrites and reprobates but only the elect true beleevers are members of Christs Church against us for affirming that all who outwardly do seriously professe the Christian faith are to be admitted and accounted members of the Visible Church they are clearly in a great mistake and impertinency section 9 2. Consider we are to distinguish Visible Church-membership in actu primo and in actu secundo I must crave leave to use these terms and shall explain what I mean by them By the actus primus of Church-membership I mean such a state and condition of a person as makes that now he is not to be reckoned and looked upon by the Church Pastors or Professours as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. without but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not as a stranger and alien but as a Brother 1 Cor. 5. 11 12. And consequently may and ought to be overseen cared for and fed by the Pastours and Rulers of the Church as a part of the flock and by private professours dealt with in duties of Christian fellowship according to their and his capacitie The actus secundus of Visible Church-membership is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 fruitio i. e. the fruition and actuall use of Church priviledges ordinancâ—
the Apostle who wrot to them ye have heard Answ We take what the Author saith that this great house is the Church of the Ephesians and it may well be so taken as applicable to the Church of Ephesus or any other Church then I say he hath furnished a weapon against himself for if this house be the Church of the Ephesians to which â—he Apostle wrot then when as writing to them he â—…lled them Saints he meaneth not that â—f all and every one of them but spake it 〈◊〉 the body indefinitely and confusedly why Should that bâ— understood universally it should be a flat contradiction to what he saith here that the Church of the Ephesians is a great house in which there are some vessels to dishonour non-saints yea very reprobates appointed to wrath It will not salve the mater to say as Mr. Lockier insinuateth that the Apostle in writing to the Ephesians speaketh of what they were in his judgement For Paul is speaking his judgement here too Now how can these two judgements consist in one man To my judgement all and every one of the Church of Ephesus are reall Saints sealed as his and yet I pronounce there are in the Church of Ephesus some reall un-saints very reprobates Indeed if the Apostle here had not determined positively and purè But by way of suspence and modaliter in this house the Church of Ephesus may be or possibly there are some vessels of dishonour there would not be such repugnancie or incompatibilitie of this with the former But he speaks absolutely and positively there are some vessels to dishonour SECTION IX Some further Arguments confirming our Doctrine and everting the adverse opinion about the necessarie qualification of Members of the Visible Church section 1 MR. Lockier hath chosen out some Objections against his Doctrine as made by his adveâ—sarie but indeed framed at his own pleasure only two of them are in causâ the other are but extrinsecall to the cause Reflections and prejudices against persons this I confesse has been wittily done for gaining advantage in the minds of Hearers and Readers unacquainted with the controversie for his own and against his adversaries cause But it is not very ingenuous dealing What has there never a reason more been brought against that Tenet of his by learned men but these two I cannot think but he has seen and read Gul. Apolon consideration of certain controversies c. sâ—nt to the Assembly at Westminster 1644. Spanhems Epistle to Mâ— Buchanaâ— Mr. Rutherfurd his fiâ—st and second book aâ—ainst the Independent way however he might have read them and found therein besides other writings of Orthodox Divines some other arguments to answer Well because he has thought it fit to content himself with these two which yet how he has satisfied we leave it to the intelligent Reader to judge we shall adde some few more not troubling our selves nor the Reader with repetition of all that hath been said by others section 2 Arg. 1. If Moses did admit as Members into the external communion of the Visible Church under the Old Test men professing the true God of Israel the Covenant with him and his true Worship without enquirie for the Work of true Grace in their hearts or positive evidences that they were truely converted regenerate and gracious so far as men could discern and judge Yea knowing assuredly that many of them were as yet unconverted and hard hearted Item if Iohn the Baptist the Apostles and the Master Builder and Lord of the Church Jesus Christ himself did admit into the externall communion of the Visible Church of the New Test such as did professe the Christian Faith as soon as they did professe without delay for trying and searching evidences of the Work of Grace in their hearts Then in all Churches persons ought to be admitted upon the same termes And it is not a necessary qualification in foro Ecclesiastico for constituting one capable of Visible-Church-Membership that he be truely converted such as God who knoweth the hearts of all men can bear witnesse to as indeed sealed for his by his Spirit so far as men truely converted and very spirituall are 〈◊〉 to discerne and judge but the antecedent is true in all the parts thereof Ergo c. section 3 As to the consequence or connexion of the proposition it is likely Mr. Lockier will not acknowledge it upon the first part of the antecedent viz. the manner and ground of admitting Members into the Visible Church of the Old Testament because his judgement as seemeth is that the constitution of the Visible Church of the New Test in this point is essentially different from that of the Old for he restricteth his Thesis concerning the matter of the Visible Church to the dayâ—… of the Gospel not once which to me smelleth â—…nk of Anabaptists who as we know denying Infant Baptisme upon this ground because they cannot give evidences of Faith Being pressed with the Argument taken from Infants Church-Membership and sealing with the initiating Sacrament under the Old Testament to eschew if they could the dint of that argument do run upon the assertion of an essentiall difference between the constitution of the one Church and of the other and so deayes the consequence from practise in the one to the other as we see Mr. Tombs doeth in his dispute with Mr. Baxter I will not think that Mr Lockier doth run the Anabaptists length in making use of that difference Buâ— certaiâ—… if he assert as he seemeth to do an essentiall difference 〈…〉 one and the other he for his part gives them a fair ground 〈…〉 that argument used by all Orthodox Divines for Infant Bapâ—…e but the Orthodox have solidely asserted and maintained that the constitution of the Church under the Old Test and New differ not in essentialls but in accidentals only If our Author be otherwise minded I desiâ—… him to ponder and answer what the learned and acute Divine Mr. Baxter hath on that purpose in his dispute against Tombs pag. 30 31 32 33 34 35 36. and I will in the mean time suppose with the consent of all Orthodox Divines the consequence of the Proposition even upon that first part of the Antecedent to be valide section 4 As to the consequence 〈◊〉 the other part of the Anâ—…cedent viz. the practice of John the Baptist the Apostles and of our LORD JESUS CHRIST himself under the New Test admitting persons to the fellowship of the Visible Church upon their first professing faith and subjection to the Ordiâ—…nces without any delay of time for trying the sincerity â—…d â—rutâ— of the work of grace in the heart I know what uses to be excepted against the practice of the Apostles and the consequences there deduced from it viz. that the Apostles were men induâ—… with an eminent gift of discerning and therefore although th◠〈◊〉 admit men as soon as they made profession without further deny or tryall yet that they did this as
Appendix For the present what we have said is sufficiâ—nâ— to shew that Iohn baptized such as came to him upon th◠〈◊〉 profâ—ssion without any delay of time or waiting for tryall of the sincerity of their saving Conversion section 11 In like maner find we that the Apostles admitted to Baptism persons as soon as they made profâ—ssion of the Christian Faith without delay â—or triall of the truth of grace in their hearts as Acts 2. 38. 41. We read they baptized and so added to the Church three thousand that same day that they first professed without delay of the mater for so much as one day when as so great a number might excused the delay if they would have taken longer time to the buâ—…nesse And certainly it being 〈◊〉 the conversion of these men was so suddain one would think 〈◊〉 Apostleâ— would have waited for a triall and proof of their sincerity if so be such a triall and proof had been by Christs institution necessary to go before the admission of men into the Visible Church But the Spirit of God which acted and directed the Apostles did dictate them no such thing In like maner the Samaritâ—… men and women were baptized without any delay Acts 8. 1â— So Simon at that same timâ— albeit to that very day he had been a Sorcerer dementâ—d that people with his devillish enchauntments and with sacrilegious impiety given himself out as the great powâ—… of God yet as soon as being convinced by thâ— sight of miracles he professed the Christian Faith was baptized by Philip. Finally whosoever were baptized by the Apostles that we read of were baptized after this same maner nor can there be given from Scripture so much as one instance of any one man who professâ—…g the Faith and desiring the communion of thâ— Church was râ—fâ—sed Baptism for a time untill he should give a trial and evidence of the siâ—…erity of the work of grace in his heart section 12 To the practice of John Baptist and the Apostlâ—… adde the practice of Jesus Christ himself 'T is worthy of observation saith Mr. Baxter well against Tombs pag. 127. that it is said John 3. 26. he baptized viz. by the Ministry of his Disciples and all men came unto him Whereby it is evident that he baptized men presently and without delay as soon as they came and professed themselves his Disciples Shall we then miserable men not content with our Lords example take upon us to be more severe and exact in his maters then himself Verily I cannot look upon this too great diligence but as a counsell of mans pride shuffling it self in under a maske of purity â—…d accuracy in the matters of God section 13 What further may be excepted against this Argument built upon that ground whereon as a sufficient qualification Christ his Apostles and John Baptist admitted persons to baptism I know not unlesse some haply will say that baptism doth not constitute one a member of the Visible Church as Reverend Hooker contends in a large dispute Surv. p. 1. c. 4. pag. 55. seq and that to be admitted to baptism and to be admitted a member of the Visible Church are not one and the same thing and that more may be required as a necessary antecedent qualification to this then is to that But as to this exception 1. I yeeld that baptism in it self gives not the being of a member of the Visible Church But that one must be first a member thereof de jure which we say is given by such externall profession as we have described before to men of years and to Infants by federall holinesse derived from their Parents otherwise baptism could not constitute one a member Neverthelesse we hold this for certain that baptism is the ordinary Ordinance whereby solemne admission and initiation into actuall communion of the Visible Church is performed Neither since the time that baptism was instituted can their be shown in Scripture either precept or example of any externall way or means of admitting members of a Visible Church beside baptism further let me aske of the adversaries that they would produce from the holy Scriptures an instance of any one man who being admitted to baptism was not presently and ipso facto esteemed a member of the Visible Church They cannot it is a thing unheard of in the Word of God Therefore it is clearly evident that upon what condition men were â—dmitted to the Laver of baptism that same was accounted qualification sufficient in foro Ecclesiastico to constitute a member of the Visible Church and how grosse an absurdity in theologie were it to say that a man tho orderly baptized and no new impediment interveening yet were not a member of the Visible Church For hence it should follow that a baptized Christian even after he is such were yet 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. amongst these that are without Pagans and infidels 1 Cor. 5. 12. for there the Apostle divides the whole satitude of mankinde into these two Classes of those that are within and 〈◊〉 that are without and as by these that are within he understands such as are of the Visible Church whom also he calls Brethren v. 11. so by those who are without he understands infidels whom he calls the men of the world v. 10. This much for our first Argument section 14 Arg. 2. If our Lord Jesus Christ has not given to any man or society of men upon earth judiciary power authoritatively judicially and positively to pronounce sentence touching the inward spirituall condition of all men professing true Christian Religionâ— and submitting themselves to the Ordinances of Christ whether they be regenerat or not Then it cannot be by Christs institution a necessary qualification requisite to the admitting of persons into the outward fellowship of the Visible Church that they be in foro Ecclesiastico judged truely converted and regenerated But the former is true therefore so is the latter The connexion of the proposition is evident of it self As to the assumption let it be noted 1. That I deny not but a Minister has power from God with Ministeriall Authority to determine Doctrinally and in thesi men regenerated and in the state of grace and reconciliation or unregenerate and as yet in the state of nature according as they want or have the characters of true regeneration and faith They have a warrand from the word of God to pronounce all men that have never been humbled before God for their sins that esteem not Christ more precious then all things beside in the World that walk not after the Spirit but after the flesh c. to be unregenerat men and strangers from the life of God contra â— I grant that Ministers have power and authority to apply the generall Doctrinall sentence to particular persons in â—…pothesi but conditionally whom also they may and ought earnestly to presse to make positive application in their own consciences and as they perceive more
Anabaptists whose Doctrine concerning the mater of a Church is the very same with his section 36 Having added some reasons from Scripture to these which Mr. Lockier was pleased to take into consideration besides which he may find sundry others in other Divines who have Written on this Subject as namely Reverend Mâ— Rutherfurd Apollonius his consideration of sundry Controversies c. and Spanhemius his Epistle to David Buchanan I might adde a large enough Catalogue of Testimonies from Orthodox Divines both ancient especially in their Writings against Novatians and Donatists and Moderne since Reformation of Religion from Poperie But being of the mind of that Reverend and Learned man who said he esteemed more of one Testimony of Scripture then of ten reasons and of one solid reason more then of ten humane testimonies I will spare to fill up Paper this way only this I may say that our opposites have the whole stream of Orthodox and Reformed Divines against them Let the Learned Ames a man in some other points too much inclining to the Independent Tenents speak for this Bellar. Enervat Tom. 2. lib. 2. c. 1. 11. 5. falsum est sayeth he internas virtutes equiri à nobis ut aliquis sit in Ecclesiâ quoad Visibilem ejus statum i. e. it s false that inward vertues or graces are required by us that one may be in the Church as to its visible state And he had good reason to say so for we shall find all Orthodox Reformed Divines alwise defining the Visible Church by outward Profession of the true Christian faith or Religion and externall communion in the Worship and Ordinances of God But never by inward holinesse and heart-conversion Thus I have done with Mr. Lockiers Lecture APPENDIX Wherein is Examined so much of that Letter Written by these of ABERDENE who lately have separated from this Church upon the INDEPENDENT grounds as relateth to the present Question touching the necessary qualification of Visible church-Church-members section 1 LAst Summer some persons Ministers and others in Aberdene did Write a Letter of the date 24. of May to some Godly men in the South declaring their separation from the communion of the Church of Scotland upon two points of Controversie between us and these of the Independent way viz. the constitution of the Visible Church and the Government thereof contrary to their solemn Vowes made to Almighty God in two Covenants the Nationall Covenant of this Kirk and the Solemn League and Covenant of the three Kingdomes and undertaken with so lemn declaration of their conviction in Conscience of the truth of Religion professed in this Church and under the pains of Gods everlasting wrath and of infamie and of losse of all honour and respect in this world if they should ever make defection from the same which curse I pray the God of all grace avert from them granting unto them Repentance and forgivenesse of their great sin through Jesus Christ section 2 It is not my purpose here to write an Examination of that whole Letter knowing some Godly and able men have done that sufficiently already to themselves whose pains I heartily wish the Lord may be pleased by his blessing yet to make effectuall upon the hearts of these men to reduce them from their errour into unity with this Church in his Truth from which they have departed I mind only to consider what new appearance of reason they bring touching these two points the qualification of Church-members and form of Government and shall speak to the former in this Appendix to the latter in another after our second Part of Mr. Lockiers Examination The cause why I do this thus apart in Appendices is partly because I was loath to interrupt so much the threed of Mr. Lockiers Examination Partly because it was long time and I had gone on a great way in that Examination ere a Copy of this Letter came to my hands Come we then to consider here what they say upon the first point section 3 Their Thesis is this To us it seemeth for ought we can search in the Word that none should be admitted constitute members of a Visible Church But such as with a profession of the truth joyn such blamelesse and Gospel-like behaviour as they may be esteemed in a rationall judgement of charity beleevers and their children On which I would represent these animadversions 1. A little before they expresse a restriction of this to Gospel Churches 1. As I conceive Churches of the New Testament for ought we understand say they the reall constitution of Gospel Churches c. Now as to this we desire these things propounded upon the same restriction made by Mr. Lockier before Sect. 2. may be considered 2. When as they speak of the members of a Church and not of the Church I would know whether they do acknowledge the being and unity of an Universall Visible Church or not If they acknowledge the being and essence thereof then why do they not define the qualification of members in relation to it but in relation to a Church i. e. a particular Congregation Is the necessary qualification of a member of the Visible Church Universall one thing and the necessary qualification of a member of this or that particular Congregation another and may one be fit to be a member of the Universall Visible Church and yet not qualified to be a member of a particular Congregation If they deny the being and unity of the Universall Visible Church which may be pâ—obably they do then I desire them in the fear of God to consider and if they can give us satisfactory answers to the weighty reasons from the Word of God brought by sundry late Divines particularly these of the Judicious and Learned Mr. Hudson in his late Treatises on that purpose to prove the being and unity thereof Which I am perswaded nor they nor any living man shall ever be able to do 3. When as they speak not simply of members but distinctly of constitute members none say they are to be admitted as constitute members of a Visible Church I would aske them what is the other part of the distinction What other members are there of the Visible Church unto which these constitute members are contradistinguished How are they called in their specification And what is their necessary qualification 4. When as they say that none are to be admitted constitute members but such as with a profession of the truth joyn such blamelesse and Gospel-like behaviour as they may be esteemed in a rationall charity beleevers i. e. true gracious beleevers with a saving faith 1. I would ask here why do they omit that part of the qualification required and made a part of the ground of esteeming persons beleevers by others of that way they have taken themselves to viz. a declaration of the experimentall work of effectuall vocation upon their heart and only mentioned the behaviour or conversation 2. Why have they not defined that blamelesse and
exceptions made to the contrary abundantly confuted 4. What Mr. Lockier has found or not found we know not nor stands on it but he might have found a Presbytery over more Congregations then one in Jerusalem Antioch Corinth Ephesus and he cannot deny but he has found the Church of Antioch making use of an associate Synodicall Presbytery at Jerusalem and that that Presbytery was more then consultative even authoritative and juridicall has been proven But I think what ever he conceives that he has found of a Congregationall Eldership exercising jurisdiction Ordaining or Excommunicating by it self he shall hardly point us to the place of Scripture where he found the instance of it what he saith of the Elders and Church of Ephesus from Acts 20. has been answered before SECTION XII Reply to Mr. Lockiers Answers to some Objections from SECTION 47. to the end wherein separation from not onely this Church of Scotland but all the Protestant Presbyterian Churches as Idolatrous is driven at section 1 MR. Lockier having hitherto gone about as he could to maintain that the power of the Keyes and Government of the Church of Christ ought not to be in the hands of Officers and Governours set over the Church in the Lord by the Lord himself but in the hands of the whole Church and that in the hands of every particular Congregation independently and supremely without association in or subordination unto any common Ecclesiastick Government which how well he has asserted and maintained we leave it to all understanding impartiall Readers to give their judgement he applyes himself to Answer some Objections against the things he has handled as he sayeth But what Objections are they I pray none of those which are brought directly against the points maintained by him before this Likely he found these too hard for him to grapple with and therefore thought it his wisedome to passe them rather by in silence And the Objections he brings are onely some things which he conceived might been said against his designe in casting this Little Stone at Presbyterian Churches to drive all good Christians if they might be affrighted to separation from them A wicked and shamefull designe especially for a man professing Godlinesse to have set before him I mind not here to insist or enlarge myself upon the Question of Separation from Churches not onely because other learned men have spoken abundantly and well upon that purpose namely my Reverend and Learned Collegue in the Ministrie and Superiour in the society wherein I live Mr. Rutherfurd in his Peaceable Plea and Due Right But also because I find nothing brought by this Author upon the mater worth the staying upon in handling that mater I shall onely give some few notes upon some things the Author I think out of hear of passion hath vented himself in section 2 Having Sect. 47. objected to himself thus You seem to be for separation from a Presbyteriall Church We find no separation but in case of Idolatry To this Sect. 48. he answers thus in summe That not only heathens had their idolatry as Dagon but also Christians theirs as a supreme Bishop over all Churches which he insinuateth to have been the Papists Idolatrie Alas he might have given other instances of their Idolatry then this as their worshiping a breaden god Crucifixes Relicks Saints departed Images c. then a supreme Bishop or Archbishop over the Church in such a Nation the Prelaticall Protestants Idol he would say and then a combination of Bishops over Churches hereby meaning an associat Presbyterie or Assembly Presbyteers Ruling more Churches odiously calling them Bishops that to him is also Idolatry So that command 2 Cor. 6. 17. come out from one kind of Idolatrie is come out from all Or else that rule binds only to separate from Heathnish Idolatrie What is not warranted by the Word is an Idol Answ We shall not deny but that whatsoever is practized in the Worship of God or set up as an Ordinance without Gods warrand in his Word may be comprehended under Idolatry taking Idolatrie in a large sense but that every thing set up or practized in the Worship of God or in Ordinances is such Idolatry as is a ground sufficient to separate from a Church wherein it is practized as no true Church is a conceit in it self without warrand of the Word nay directly contrare to the allowed practise of Gods people in the Word both in Old and New Testament This conceit of Mr. Lockiers is very Brounisme and rigide Separatisme ingraine But of this and the place 2 Cor. 6. 17. see enough in the Reverend Author whom I last mentioned But as for association or combination of Churches under a common Presbyterie it is warranted in the Word of God and so is his Ordinance as has been abundantly proven and what Mr. Lockier has brought to the contrare we trust has been sufficiently refuted And therefore let him consider his account he has to make to Almighty God for so atrocious a calumnie as his branding it with the name of Idolatrie and involving all the Reformed Orthodox Churches of Jesus Christ in the fearfull crime of Idolatrie And as for his pressing separation from all the Reformed Churches as Idolatrous I shall say no more but bring some Godly men amongst Independents themselves giving testimony against him Hear Mr. Hooker speaking in the name of the Divines of new England of the Congregations of old England I would sayeth he intreat the Reader that if he meet with such accusations that we nullifie all Churches beside our own that we are rigide Separatists c. such bitter calumnies a wise meek spirit passeth by them as an unworthy and ungrounded aspersion That which that Godly man in name of many other Independent Brethren with him intreats may not be believed to be thought or said by them accounteth it an unworthie and groundlesse aspersion Mr. Lockier with open mouth ownes and proclaimes that and worse Then we see what the Dissenting Brethren in the Assemblie of Divines say of their keeping communion with Presbyterian Churches Papers given in to the Honourable Committee c. pag. 29 30. holding communion with neighbour Churches in baptizing our Children as occasion may fal out in absence of Ministers in their Churches by occasional receiving the Communion in their Churches Also our Ministers to Preach in their Congregations and receiving theirs also to Preach in ours as Ministers of the Gospel as mutually their shall be a call from each other when we have any cases hard and difficult for our selves to advise with the Elders of their Churches in case of choise of Elders to seek the approbation and right hand of fellowship from Godly Ministers of their Churches and when an Ordination falls out to desire the presence and approbation of their Elders with our own In case any of our Churches miscarry through mal-administration to be willing upon scandall taken by their Churches to give an account as unto Sister Churches
walk together c. 4. And our Brethren when they protest against an Assembly do not submit unto it section 7 Here is sweet stuffe forsooth very Brounisticall separation ingrain'd That if any things be corrupted in a Church suppose wicked and scandalous persons be retained therein and admitted to Ordinances albeit therein be the true Doctrine of the Gospel Preached and worship for the acts thereof and other Ordinances for their substance right Godly Christians must separate from such Churches and may not in the very instituted Ordinances of Christ and true exercise of worship joyn with such Churches wherein such wicked persons joins with them This is the drift and upshot of this passage as any discerning man may perceive tho it be very intricately and confusedly expressed We shall not need to fall upon a refutation of this vile errour which has been so learnedly and fully refuted of old by the Orthodox Ancients especially Augustin and Optatus in Donatists by the first Reformers in the fantastick Anabaptists See particularly Mr. Rutherfurds Learned Disputes on this purpose in his Peaceable Plea and in his Due Right of Presbytery I shall for the present note but some few things on that which Mr. Lockier hath here section 8 And first to the propounding of the case in the Object as it is so generally and comprehensively expressed If things be corrupted in the Church and I protest against them may I not go on with that Church We owne not the affirmative of it We acknowledge that it is not lawfull to go on with any Church in the practice of things that are corrupt in it 2. We acknowledge further that there may be such corrupt things in a Church or a society taking unto them the name and profession of a Church as that it is not lawfull to go on with such a Church or join with them in Church communion at all as where the Worship is grossely idolatrous or Doctrine is publickly taught or professed contrary to the very foundation of Christianity But bring the case to the particular corruption instanced by the Author and then we say that if in a Church through negligence or loosnesse of discipline corrupt members be admitted or wicked scandalous persons be admitted to the Communion the Godly indeed ought in an orderly way to testify against such a corruption to say to Archippus to the Minister and Rulers take heed to your Ministry to mourn for such abuses in the Church But ought not to separat from that Church and the exercise of the true Worship and Ordinances of Christ therein But may go on and partake with that Church in warranted acts of Worship participation of the Sacraments in the exercise of all Gods instituted Ordinances and yet be free of the sin of corrupt fellow partakers of these Ordinances and of the sin of Rulers sinfully admitting such enjoy Gods presence in the Ordinances as well as if all joining with them were holy and good and to say that other mens wickednesses in abuse of Ordinances prejudices or defiles these Ordinances to me using them aright for my self and testifying against mourning for others abuse thereof is a wild errour contrary to the stream of holy Scripture both in the Old and new Test as has been abundantly demonstrated by these I last mentioned section 9 Now for his exceptions against this To the first to protest against a thing as evil and wicked and yet daily and continually to go on in the acting of that thing and practizing it is indeed a wicked mocking of God and man But daily and continually to go on in the exercise of a lawfull and necessary duty in the company of wicked persons against whose wickednesse I do testifie and does all that is incumbent to me in my station is not to mock or dissemble nor to do the thing I protest against I am but a mere passive or has no concurrence to the wickednesse of others But there is here in Mâ— Lockiers words a grosse supposing or begging of the very thing mainly in Question viz. That if wicked persons be admitted to fellowship in a Church as to the communion of the Lords Supper that the thing a Godly Christian ought to protest or testifie against is all joyning in the Ordinance when such wicked persons are joining therein with them This is a very begging of the thing in Question and utterly false The thing the Godly ought to testifie and protest against is the wickeds presuming to abuse the Ordinance and the Rulers sinfull permitting them so to do But to say he does or should protest that no Godly person ought to use the Ordinance of God or performe warrantable Worship when wicked persons either thrust themselves in with them or negligent Rulers permits them so to do is to suppose the thing in Question and is unwarrantable yea contrare to the current streame of the practise of the Godly under the Old and New Testament both yea to the practise of Jesus Christ himself in the Church of the Jews To his second exception 'T is true in practicall things it is not so much a mans word as his practise which gives the dislike But the Question is whether the performance of a lawfull and necessary duty of worship or exercise of a true Ordinance of Jesus Christ for instance partaking of the Lords Supper to remember his death till he come againe when and where wicked and scandalous persons will thrust themselves in to do it prophanely or are permitted by Rulers so to do be such a practicall thing as I am oblidged to dislike as a thing unlawfull for me to do this is the Question the negative whereof we hold to be the truth of God held forth in his Word The instance produced by the Author for clearing this his second exception viz. of a man in an Idolatrous Church protesting against the Masse and yet still going to Masse is so grossely and absurdly impertinent that one may wonder how it could be alledged in this purpose by an intelligent man The Masse is even upon the mater one of the grossest Idolatries that ever was in the world And for a man to go to Masse when he pretends to protest to go against it is to adde to commission of Idolatry mocking of God and sinning against light professedly So that Mr. Lockier needed not make it a mater of doubting how well such a practise should please God or deliver the man from guiltinesse But what is this to participating of a true Ordinance of Jesus Christ for instance the communion of the Lords Table in a Church not Idolatrous but may be negligent and loose in the exercise of Discipline and permitting wicked scandalous persons to participate in that Ordinance when the Godly participating with them testifies against such abuse in the Ordinances Nay can it be freed from great rashnesse I will not say that which I might to parallel these two together But yet farther to bring in as a parallel
A LITLE STONE Pretended to be out of the MOUNTAIN Tried and found to be a Counterfeit OR AN EXAMINATION REFVTATION OF Mr. LOCKYERS LECTURE Preached at Edinburgh ANNO 1651. Concerning the MATER of the VISIBLE CHURCH And afterwards Printed with an APPENDIX for Popular Government of single CONGREGATIONS Together with an EXAMINATION in two APPENDICES Of what is said on these same purposes in a LETTER of some in Aberdene who lately have departed from the Communion and Government of this CHURCH By JAMES WOOD Professor of Theol. in S. Andrews EDINBVRGH Printed by ANDRO ANDERSON for George Suintoun and Robert Broun and are to be sold at their Shops 1654. TO THE RIGHT HONOURABLE JOHN EARLE of CASSILS LORD KENNEDY My Lord WHat the wise observing King uttered long agoe that of making of Books there is no end was never more verified in any then it is in the present age wherein scribunt docti indoctique every smatterer and every fancie-full head must have the Presse travel to bring forth their froathy conceptions And Presses by many are made use of as engines to discharge revylings reproaches and blasphemies against the God of Heaven his blessed Truths wayes and Ordinances For my self I can say in truth it hath not hitherto been my ambition to increase wearinesse of the flesh by much Reading And that now I come this way to the worlds view 't is not of mine own meer choise but because a necessity was laid upon me The Author with whom I have to do in this ensueing debate having not only opened his mouth to Preach in the most eminent-place in this Land but also adventured to Write and Print against the Orthodox Doctrine touching the constitution and Government of the Visible Church of Christ revileing in speciall the Church in this Land yet through its side also stricking at all the Orthodox Churches in Europe as no Church but a dead carcasse having neither matter nor form of a true Church a nest of unclean birds idolatrous c. And thereupon charging with a great deal of confidence and big words all truely Godly to come out of it and to separate from it It was by some Reverend and Godly men thought expedient that altho there appear little or nothing in what is said by him which may brangle the mind of any judicious Reader Yet because it is a thing usuall to adversaries of the Truth if what they say be it never so weak get not an Answer to brag of it as unanswerable And unsettled minds that have not their senses exercised to discern good and evill are ready to be taken with any thing busked up with gay words and so to be carried about like weather-Cocks with every wind of Doctrine as many sad examples of this time prove an Answer should be returned to him lest truth should so much as seem to suffer prejudice any way And this taske they were pleased to lay upon me Who albeit I do and cannot but ingenuously acknowledge my self one of the least and weakest Servants of Christ and that many others there are in this Church who might far more worthily acquit themselves in this service Yet durst not withstand the motion having so clear a Calling and considering withall how I stand oblidged in my station to maintain the true Religion in Doctrine Worship Discipline and Government by the mercy of God established amongst us in common with the rest of the Lords people in the Land by Solemn Vow and Covenant and more particularly by the Lords bringing me who had been in my younger years educated as to many things in a contrary way to the acknowledgment of â—he truth in a very gracious manner with a strong hand and in much long-suffering patience whereby he waited to be gracious that he might be exalted in shewing mercy on me Haply it will be matter of talking to some that this of mine has been so long in coming forth after Mr. Lockier published his But it is not unknown to many who have been witnesses to my diligence that my Answer was in readinesse within a few Moneths after his Peece came to my hands and the task was laid upon me And had come abroad if several difficulties had not interveened Now when it is to be published I desire humbly to present it to your Lordship first and under your Honourable name to the view of the world I must spare to expresse all the great causes oblidging me so to do Because to expresse them would not only be haply inexpedient But also would be I know unsavoury to your self whom I have alwayes found desirous to aprove your self in reality of wel doing but never liking well to hear of other mens euges Only this much I cannot forbear and must begge your Lordships leave to say The personall obligations which you have laid upon me by a continued tract of undeserved respects ever since the first time I was known to your Lordship would require a worthier testimony of acknowledgment then is this mean present or any thing else my small store of abilities can afford But to speak truth it is not so much any personall concernment that hath engaged my heart to your Lordship as that which hath endeared you to all who know the truth and you That grace which God hath vouchsafed upon you to walk in tendernesse and closenesse with himself in your privat course and with constant zeal to improve your publick station wherein ye have stood for promoving the interest of Religion and righteousnesse and the good of Gods people without byasse or wavering in any revolution of times wherewith many turning upon the axletree of their own self-interests have whirled about the sweet fruit whereof I doubt not but you find in these glowmie dayes and trust shall abide with you to the end through the mercy of the Lord whose gifts and graces are without repentance I will not adventure upon such severe self-denyednesse to speak more of what I have had the happinesse to be acquainted with in your Lordship I hope this testimony of my sense of the obligation I ly under to honour your Lordship shal finde favourable acceptance at your hands I will not presume for indeed it were presumption to commend my work in it I pretend to nothing therein but that through the Grace of God I have ingenuously and in simplicity tho in much weaknesse spoken for truth But the matter it self is precious and of great weight consisting of two great interests of Christ Jesus his Visible Church which is his Visible Kingdom on earth The one touching the qualifications of the persons that are to be acknowledged members of his Visible Church and so in effect comes to be a Question de sinibus of the marches of his Visible Kingdom The other touching the matter and way of the externall Visible Government thereof As to the former my Author has so straitned the bounds of Christs Visible Church that by his sentence none are to be
acknowledged as members thereof and consequently to be under the Ministeriall dispensation of the publick Ordinances of Christ the ordinary means of saving souls but such as are already and antecedently found to be savingly converted regenerated and sealed of God for his by the Holy Spirit if not in the truth of the object which yet most part of his reasoning and discourse pleads for yet in the positive judgement of very spirituall and discerning men And that as some others of his way further lay out the matter upon triall and proof thereof given by a conversation led without the omission of any known duty or commission of any known sin A publick declaration of their knowledge in the fundamentalls and of other points of Religion necessary to lead a life without scandall together with a narration of the experimentall work of their Effectuall Calling unto Repentance and faith And all Churches that are not constituted of only such matter as this are to our Author wrong constitute In the former part of this Examination my labour is to discover the unwarrantablnesse and contrariety of this Tenent to the Word of God And to shew that all who being of years does seriously professe the Christian faith and subjection to be disciplin'd and governed by the Ordinances of Christ ought to be admitted into the fellowship of his Visible Church without any necessity of puting them to a triall touching their inward spirituall estate and judging upon the same whether regenerat or not as to that effect And are to be dealt with by Pastours and privat Christians in their respective wayes as these that are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 within 1 Cor. 5. 12. Upon this point I have insisted the more largely because not so fully and of purpose handled by others before And it is of a truth of greater importance then many are awarre of 'T is far from my thoughts to charge our Independent Brethren with any perverse designe in taking up and following that opinion which I dispute against Many of them known to me by their writings especially these worthy Ministers in New-England Cotton Hooker Shepheard Norton c. I do from my heart reverence as godly and faithfull Servants of Christ and as burning and shining lights in the Reformed Church But I think verily the specious notion of a pure Visible Church has duzled their eyes and led them upon a way which in it self beside that it hath no warrand in the Word of God should it get footing in the world tends to the ruine loss of many souls and to the bringing of the greatest prejudice to the present Cause and Churches that any thing ever yet did since the first Reformation from Popery And I am perswaded that albeit the intention of those holy and reverend men abettors of it be honest and from simplicity of heart Yet Satan is under-board let no man offend at this I say Peters example teacheth us that Satan may abuse good mens zeal and intentions for Christ to wicked ends contrair to his Cause Satan I say is under-board driving that wicked designe For if that be the the rule and modell of constituting the Visible Church which they give us are not all the Reformed Churches by this means condemned of wrong constitution razed out of the account of true Visible Churches as not being conformed nor ever having been set up according to that modell And what could more gratifie the Roman Antichrist and his followers then to yeeld this Again is there not hereby a ground laid to Question all Administration of Ordinances that has been in them and to justifie the wilde fancy of Seekers denying that there is or hath been for many ages any Church or Ordinances in the world Moreover when as none of the Reformed Churches at this day are thus constitute if that modell should have place must not either all of them be dissolved and cast down to the ground that new ones may be reared up of some few precious ones picked out of their ruines or to the effect they may consist only of persons regenerated and sealed by the Spirit all other persons who albeit they professe the truth subject themselves to Ordinances yet come not up so far as to obtain a positive sentence that they are regenerat upon such 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 evidences as these men require must be all cast out and banished the Church put amongst those that are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 without 1 Cor. 5. 12 left destitute of the custody of spiritual Discipline Pastorall instruction inspection and authority And so exposed to be a prey to Satan and his Emissaries Jesuits Hereticks and erroneous spirits whatsoever to be led away unto what soever pernicious soul-destroying errours or to turn black Atheists That this is no needlesse fear but a reall consequent of this way is too too clear by the sad examples of many in these times who living without the pale of true Visible Churches and not subject to the shepheards staffe and vigilancy are run out into so many wilde errours in Religion as never age of the Christian Church saw the like Touching the other head the Author in his Appendix pleadeth for two things 1. That the power and exercise of Church Government should be in the hands of the whole body or community of Professours as well as of the Officers appointed by Christ in the Church A Tenent not heard of in the Christian Church untill Morellius in France Anabaptists and Brownists fancied it and as contrary to the Word of God which to Ministers and other Officers appointed by Christ in his Church as contradistinguished from common Professours attributeth the name of Rulers injoyns the work of Ruling and prescribes the rules of right governing but never to the people so cannot but unavoidably draw after it much confusion and frequent schisms in the Church of God whereof experience affordeth plenty of examples 2. That this power of Government should be solely intirely â—nd Independently in a single Congregation A Tenent that besides the contrariety thereof to the Word of God and the very light of nature carrieth with it a multitude of gross absurdities and inconveniencies By this means let a particular Congregation of 30. or 20. or fewer 10. or 7. persons for of so few may a Church as our Brethren say be compleatly constitute run into never so grosse an errour as to Excommunicate a person unjustly to hold and maintain Heresie in Doctrine to set up idolatrous worship there is no Ecclesiastick authoritative remedy left under Heaven to rectifie it All church-Church-communion amongst the Churches of Christ is taken away The unity of Christs sheep-fold the Visible Church upon earth is dissolved and Christ should have as many visible bodies as there are particular Congregations A Minister could not perform any Ministeriall act out of his own Congregation Not Preach but as a privat gifted Brother Not Administer the Sacraments out of his own Congregation nor give the Sacrament
to a member of another Congregation as Mr. Hooker ingenuously acknowledges Surv. Part. 2. admission and ejection of members should only be into and from a particular Congregation A child should be Baptized into a particular Congregation only and not into the Universall Church And one Excommunicated cast out only of a particular Congregation because the power extends no further Way is made to let in all errours and heresies and as many Religions as there are particular Congregations and none can hinder it in an Ecclesiastick way and many more absurdities should follow as Learned and Godly men have judiciously observed Contrair to those Assertions is my second Part imployed for vindication of the true way of Government which Christ has instituted in his Word and in great mercy set up in this Church to wit by his Ministers and Officers not Lording over the people of God in a Papall or Prelaticall way as this Author either mistakes or calumniats but Ministerially under Christ the only Lord of his Church Ruling them according to the Rule of his Word in a way of rationall obedience And that in a way of communion and association of Churches and subordination of lesser associations unto greater and larger as the Lord grants by his providence conveniency On this I have not insisted so largly as the matter it self might afforded occasion of discourse Because it has been by learned and reverend men already so fully debated the proofs of the truth so clearly made out and all contrary Objections so abundantly discussed and satisfied that I had little or nothing to adde Yet I trust I have through the Lords help in some measure discovered the insufficiency and invalidity of what is brought by this Author who I wonder much should have adventured to present the world with such a discourse upon the mater after so learned labours of others as are extant upon the same I have also in two Appendices taken into consideration what is said upon these same points by some in Aberdene lately turned aside from the truth in a Letter of theirs directed to some Godly men in the South May 1652. The reasons moving me hereto were 1. Because of their correspondence with Mr. Lockiers Peece and it seemeth they have been in a manner his proselytes Then having some time had more particular and intimat acquaintance with some of them it would be to me mater of much rejoicing in the Lord if I could be instrumentall to discover to them the we knesse of the grounds whereupon they have fallen from their stedfastnesse that so if possible which I wish from my heart they might be moved to remember whence they have fallen to repent and to do their first works And finally tâ—… what ever should be the effect as to them the irrelevancy 〈◊〉 the causes of their departure being laid open others might see no cause why any should be shaken with their fall And blessed be God there are not yet many in this Land that have followed them in this What may be afterward the Lord who sees the thoughts of mens hearts afar off knoweth Times indeed are sifting And the ignorance of many the base earthly time serving minds of others unadvised principles in some who may be sees not yet the far end of their consequences may prove an advantage to seducements produce more defection from the profession of the truth if temptations continue then as yet we have seen But let temptations and trialls be what they will the Cause of Christ even that part of it which I stand for here the order Government of this Church which he has appointed in his Word and thereby made known to this Church shal stand firm It has been a cup of trembling to all that have hitherto laid siege against it and a burdensome stone to all that have at any time burdened themselves wâ—…h it to cut them in pieces it will yet prove so to all who will adventure to do the like And turn their back upon it who will Christ will not want his witnesses to bear witness unto it Even if need be by not loving their lives unto the death And O but that man might count himself highly favoured of God whom he should honour with that dignity as that eminent servant of Jesus Christ Mr. Welsch spoke in relation to himself of suffering for some branches of the same cause wâ—…ged in his time But having detained your Lordship too 〈◊〉 I present this testimony I have given to it according to my weak measure to you commending it not only to your favourable acceptance but also to your judicious censure and your self unto the Grace of God who has called you unto the uâ—…ained love of the truth and is able to preserve you therein â—…lameable unto the end I am Your Lordsâ—… most humble Servant in the Lord James Wood. AN ADVERTISEMENT TO THE READER ALbeit it hath pleased Mr. Lockier to prefixe unto his Book two Epistles of his own and a third of three of his friends containing many sharp invectives against this Church and strange Commentaries upon the Lords dispensations toward us as striking against our Church constitution and Government Yet I shall not detain the Reader with scanning of the same being confident that upon the clearing and vindicating of the truth in the following Treatise these discourses will be found by the Godly and Judicious to be not only bitter against Brethren in affliction proving them to be Physitians of no value but injurious to God and his Truth in ascribing our calamities to our adhering thereto and judging of the truth of our Religion by the Lords outward dispensations toward us An Index of the Sections PART I. Concerning the Mater of the Visible Kirk SECT I. MR. Lockier his Analysis and explication of the Text Act. 15. 3. for laying a ground to his Doctrine concerning the Mater of the Visible Kirk considered p. 1. SECT II. His Doctrine pondered and the state of the controversie between us and the Independent Brethren touching the necessary qualification of Members of the Visible Kirk cleared p. 16. SECT III. His first Classe of Arguments from Act. 9. 26. and 2. 47. and Heb. 3. 5 6. brought as directly holding forth his Doctrine Answered p. 31. SECT IV. The Authors Texts which he calls hints and shadows of his Doctrine p. 40. SECT V. Examination of the proof of his Doctrine by induction p. 56 SECT VI. ExaminatioÌ„ of his proofs brought under the name of reason p. 83 SECT VII A short modest reply to the bitter use he maketh of his Doctrine p. 102. SECT VIII The Objections he maketh to himself and his Answers thereto considered p. 107. SECT IX Some Arguments confirming our Doctrine and everting the adverse opinion about the necessary qualification of Members of the Visible Kirk p. 127. APPEND Wherein is Examined so muc◠〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that Letter written by these of Aberdene who lately have sepâ—…ted from this Kirk upon the
and acts of outward Christian fellowship This distinction is of necessary consideration in this controversie For it is certain one may be actually a member of the Visible Church in actu primo and yet not actually injoy the use and exercise of all and every Church priviledge and ordinance whereunto Church-membership gives him a right in habitu Because unto the fruition of the actuall exercise of some priviledge and ordinance there may be required an especiall condition which may be a man wanteth through some physicall incapacitie or some morall defect As under the Old Testament persons that were undoubted members of the visible Church of Israel yet might for some legall pollution as an issue of blood touching of a dead body c. been debarred from the publick Assemblies of the Church and Sacrifices for a time untill they were cleansed from the pollution according to order instituted by God So also one who is an acknowledged member of the Visible Church being overtaken with a scandalous fault and not carrying himself obstinatly but submitting himself may be kept from the actuall exercise and use of some Ordinances untill the scandall be sufficiently removed yet still as is acknowledged on all hands continue a Church-member in actu primo and it hath been constantly held by Orthodox Divines untill Anabaptists arose that Children under the Old Test being born in the Church were then and now being born in the Christian Church are even while under the years of discretion members of the Visible Church Although neither then they were nor now are capable of actuall use and exercise of all Church-priviledges and Ordinances Therefore it is one thing to enquire what is requisite to constitute one capable of Church-membership simpliciter and in actu primo and another to enquire what is requisite to make one immediatly capable of actuall use and exercise of all and every Church-priviledge and Ordinance whereunto Church-membership doth entitle him section 10 3. Consider we must difference between that which is required of a man by way of duty in foro Dei that he may adjoyn himself unto church-Church-communion and participate Ordinances in such a manner as is necessary for his own salvation and approving himself to God and that which is required of him by way of qualification in foro Ecclesiastico that the Church may lawfully and orderly admit him to their externall communion and thereafter respect account and deal with him as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. amongst these that are within The reason of this distinction is clear because the duty of a man that will so adjoyn himself into the communion of the Church as is requisite for salvation and for approving himself therein to God doth no doubt reach formally and directly the inward man the frame and acting thereof But the qualification requisite in the Ecclesiastick Court whereupon the Church is to proceed in admitting or acknowledging men Church-members doth consist formally and directly at least only in somewhat outward and apparent to men For it is a sure rule de occultis non iudicat Ecclesia as is confessed by Hooker Survey Part. 1. c. 2. pag. 15. speaking of the same purpose and by Mr. Lockier himself pag. 55. section 11 4. Consider There is an holinesse relative or adherent and an holinesse absolute and inherent The holinesse relative and adherent consisteth in the separation of a thing from a common use and dedication of it unto some holy use or end Holinesse absolute or inherent consisteth in qualities or actions of a person agreeable to the Law of GOD. In the former way the stones of which the Temple was built are called stones of holinesse Lam. 4. 1. So the Temple it self the Vessels consecrated to the Worship of God the City of Jerusalem are called holy In like manner persons in a speciall way set apart for the Worship of God as the Priests and Levites and especially the High Priest are called holy In like manner the whole People of Israel are said to be holy Deut. 33. and to be sanctified by God Exod. 31. 13. Lev. 8. 8. and 21. 8. and 22. 32. Because to wit God by entering in Covenant with them had separated them from other people and Adopted them to be a peculiar People for himself in the same sense 1 Cor. 7. 14. The Children born of one Parent at least a beleever i. e. a Professour of Christian Religion are called holy because they are comprehended in the Covenant made with and imbraced by the Parents for themselves and theirs and so are to be esteemed as among Christians separated from prophane people and dedicated to God Again holinesse is either inward and true which consisteth in the inward renovation of the soul faith hope love and other supernaturall habites and their elicite acts Or externall which consisteth in the Profession of the true and Orthodox Religion and a conversation so far as comes under mens knowledge ordered according to the rule of Gods Commands as is competent to humane weaknesse i. e. without scandall at least contumacy and obstinacy in some given scandall and comprehendeth also in it that holinesse relative and of dedication Further it is worthy diligent observation here that when it is said the Church is a societie of visible saints this may be understood in a double sense for the Epithete visible may either be taken as a note signifying not the nature of the form which gives the denomination of Saints or holy but an adjunct thereof viz. the notoreitie and manifestation of it before men In which sense if it be taken in that description visible Saints are such as by outward manifest and evident signes and tokens are perceived and acknowledged to be endued with true inward holinesse and grace of regeneration Or it may be taken as a note signifying the very nature and kind of the form i. e. holinesse which giveth that denomination In which sense if it may be taken then men are said to be visible Saints in so far as they are adorned with externall holinesse although abstract from that internall and true grace of regeneration section 12 The state of the Controversie then lyeth in this to expresse it as plainly as I may what is requisite in a person as the necessary qualification in the Ecclesiastick Court whereupon he is to be received or acknowledged as a member of the Visible Church and is to be accounted as not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. among these that are without but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. among those that are within and so over whom the Pastors and Rulers of the Church should watch and care to feed him by the Ordinances of Christ according to his capacity and to whom private Christians ought to perform duties of Christian communion according to their stations viz. whether reall internall grace of regeneration repentance toward God and faith in Jesus Christ at least such evident signs thereof manifested and approven upon acurate examination
1 2 8 9. Mr. Cottons way cap. 3. sect 2. pag. 54 55. sect 3. pag. 56 57 58. So in a word their Doctrine in this point is that none are to be received members into externall fellowship of the Visible Church but such as are already true heart-converts indued with saving grace and having reall internall fellowship with Christ in the judgement of charity grounded upon such triall and evidences as we have heard section 15 As for our judgement in the controversie I mean of the Church of Scotland at which the adversaries especially this with whom we have to do mainly hath an eye Albeit we know no Protestant Church in the world differing from us in this but the Independents scarcely shall you find any of our adversaries directly make a proposall of it what it is but for the most part as they give intimations thereof here and there would bear men in hand that we do allow any whosoever professe the Christian faith although their lives and conversations were never so wicked and prophane to be fit matter and members of the Visible Church Which is I must say much want of ingenuitie in them and great injurie done to us as will appear shortly So Mr. Lockier along this Peece intimating our Doctrine speaks alwayes of persons meerly professing the things of God But I wonder much how that did fall from the Pen of Reverend Mr. Hooker speaking of our judgement Surv. p. 1. c. 2. pag. 20. The pinch of the difference lyeth in this whether such as walk in a way of prophanenesse or remain pertinaciously obstinate in some wickednesse though otherwayes professing and practising the things of the Gospel have any allowance from Christ or may be accounted fit mater to constitute a Church this is that which is controverted and should have been evicted by Argument he is speaking to Mr. Rutherfurd Good Mr. Hooker where did you ever read such an assertion as this in Mr. Rutherfurd or any of ours I need not stay upon vindicating Mr. Rutherfurd in this he will do it ere long himself I shall only plainly propound our Judgment upon the Question in these two Conclusions section 16 1. Conclus True heart conversion regeneration sanctificatiâ—… inward saving grace in reality of existence or conceived at 〈…〉 to be in the judgement of charitie is not requisite as the qualification necessary in the Ecclesiastick Court in order to admitting persons to be members of the Visible Church Or thus to the same purpose it is not necessary nor requisite to the effect that persons be accounted fit mater of the Visible Church that they be such as upon tryall and approven evidences may and ought to be conceived in the judgement of charity by the Church already inwardly regenerate sanctified taken into reall fellowship with Christ And therefore we judge it altogether unwarrantable to put such as are desirous of the externall fellowship of the Visible Church to such tryalls touching the work of saving grace in their hearts in order to admitting into Church-fellowship and as antecedently necessary thereunto as is tanght and practised by Independents and set down summarly here a little before section 17 2. Conclus A serious sober outward profession of the faith and true Christian Religion together with a serious profession of forsaking former sinfull courses if the person be one coming out of heathenisme or some false Religion or an outward conversation free of scandall at least accompanied with obstinacy if he hath been a Christian in Profession before and a serious Profession of subjection unto the Ordinances of Christ A serious profession of these things I say as such considered abstractly abstractione simplici from the work of inward saving grace and heart-conversion by true Repentance and Faith is sufficient qualification in the Ecclesiastick Court to constitute a person fit mater to be received as a member of the Visible Church and accounted 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. amongst these that are within If it be asked what I mean by a serious profession I Ans Such a profession as hath in it at least a morall sincerity as practick Divines are wont to distinguish tho haply not alwayes a supernaturall sinceritie i. e. that I may speak more plainly which is not openly and discernably simulate histrionick scenicall and hypocriticall in that hypocrisie which is grosse but all circumstances being considered by which ingenuity is estimate amongst men giving credit one to another there appears no reason why the man may not and ought not to be esteemed as to the mater to think and purpose as he speaketh from whatsoever habituall principle it proceedeth whether viz. of saving grace and faith or of faith historicall and conviction wroâ—… by some common operation of the Spirit A man that hath such a profession as this and desireth church-Church-communion I say the Church ought to receive him as a member And albeit I deny not but where there is just or probable ground of suspition that the profession hath simulation and fraudulent dealing under it as in one new come from a hereticall Reâ—igion or who has been before a persecutor of the faith and professours thereof there may be a delay in prudencie and time taken to try and prove if he dealeth seriously and ingenuously but that tryall must not be to cognosce upon the truth of the work of saving grace in the heart Pastours indeed ought wisely and diligently try and acquaint themselves as far as they can with the spirituall state of all the members of their flock that they may the better know to divide the Word of God aright giving to every one their suitable portion that beginners may be promoved in the grace of Christ and such as are yet in a naturall state may be awakened to slee from the wrath to come But I utterly deny that such a tryall of persons touching the truth of the work of grace in their hearts is antecedently and in order to their admission necessary and in duty incumbent to the Church that is to admit them section 18 Having thus stated the Question and bounded the differences about it it would follow that we should in the next place bring Arguments to confirm what we hold for truth and to refute the contrary Which method we would have followed were we not upon the examination of a particular Peece of an adversary whose method we resolve to trace step for step Therefore proceeds now to consider his Arguments what force they have to confirm his or infringe our Doctrine Afterward having considered what Objections he brings against himself as ours and his answers to the same we shall adde some such other Arguments as may be satisfactory to Readers and the Author may if he think fit take to his consideration SECTION III. Mr. Lockyers first Classe of Arguments viz. Texts of SCRIPTURE Act. 9. 26. Act. 2. 47. Heb. 3. 5 6. brought as directly holding forth his Doctrine answered section 1 HIs Arguments are of four
did apostatize much and so forsook their assemblings and so their exhorting one another with all these means of grace and life which God hath instituted in this new house and so indeed grew worse and worse till at last they came as the rest of the Jewish Churches to nothing As long saith the Apostle as ye hold fast the practice and power of what you profess so long you are a Church but when you let go this you unchurch your selves and should it be persued upon you you should be thrown out as unhallowed mater but if others which should do it will not do it the Master himself who is faithfull will do it He wil cast such a Church wholly off which thus suffer his institution to be corrupted and so indeed he did write Loammi upon the first Churches quickly after the Apostles time for this thing section 7 Ans If this be not to force Scripture and make it speak what men please I know not what else is Let 's first mark some groundlesse Assertions and then we shall come to the main point of our Answer 1. I wonder at that rash assertion in the close of this and so indeed did he write Loammi upon the first Churches quickly after the Apostles time for this thing What and were the first Churches so soon casten off by Goâ— as no Churches What divine warrant is brought for this Assertion Sir produce the Bill of Divorcement given to them from the Lord. And was there never a Church since untill they were erected of the new Independent frame and model Were all the Christian Churches in Asia Africk and Europe in the times of the four famous Generall Counsels the first whereof was about three hundred years after the Apostles time now no Churches at all Here indeed look out the Donatists ubi cubas in meridie especially if we 'll consider upon what account the Author unchurches them because forsooth they admitted members into their fellowship which were not true Converts partakers of the sure mercies of David c. this is very Donatism in grain 2. The Author supposeth that the Apostle here is speaking to a Church of the Jews i. e. to one particular Congregation distinct from all the rest of the Jewish Churches This is but a bare Assertion without any proof or semblance of proof joined with it We know that some of the Learned Interpreters take this Epistle to have been written not to any particular Church or Congregation but to the whole multitude of the Jews professing Christian Religion scattered abroad through the world as were the Epistles of James and Peter and have for them an argument not improbable from that 2. Epist of Peter c. 3. v. 15. 'T is true that others think otherwayes upon consideration of what we read Heb. 13. 19. where the divine Author desires them he writes to to pray for him that he might be restored the sooner to them which seemeth to import a more limited compasse then the whole dispersion But granting this that it was not written to all the Jews why might it not be written to all the Christian Jews that were in Palestina and Judaea Most part Interpreters take it so but that it was written to one single Congregation of the Jews as Mr. Lockier would have it who will believe upon his bare word 3. He seems to suppose a clear untruth of these to whom the Apostle speaketh viz. that they did apostatize much forsook their Assemblies their mutuall exhorting with all the means of grace and life Indeed the Apostle warneth them to take heed of these things and speaks of some that did so but as for them he writeth unto he layeth no such thing to their charge as done by them but giveth testimony to the contrair c. 6. v. 9 10. cap. 10. v. 32 33 34 39. 4. The maine mistake groundlesse supposition here is this that when the Apostle saith whose house ye are if ye hold fast c. he meaneth this of an outward Visible Church-state So long saith he as ye hold fast c. so long ye are a Church he meaneth a stated Visible Church but when you let go c. you un-Church your selves c. And so as we see will have the words to involve a threatning of losing that visible Church-state upon failing of performance of that which is urged viz. holding fast the confidence c. contrary to the current of all Orthodox Interpreters * See Pareus Hyper. others in Morlorâ—t Excellent is Mr. Dav. Dickson a man of exercised senses in the Word of God his opening of these words N. 3. He the Apostle addeth a condition if we hold fast c. i. e. If we continue stedfast inward ly gripping the promised glory by hopâ— outwardly avowing by confession CHRISTS Truth Whereby he neither importeth the possibilitie of finall apostacy of the Saints nor mindeth to weaken the confidence of Believers more then he doubteth of his own perseverance or mindeth to weaken his own faith but writing to the number of the visible Church he putteth a difference between true believers who do indeed persevere and time-servers who do not persevâ—re to whom he doth not grant for the present the priviledge of being the house of God And then he hath this 2d. Doct. such as shall make defection finall are not a part of Gods house for the present howsoever they be esteemed I believe any judicious Reader will see this Interpretation somewhat more genuine then that of Mr. Lockiers who expone that whose house ye are of the state of grace and spirituall communion with Christ proper to the Mysticall Invisible Church in regard of which Christ dwells in the heart by faith and consequently conceive not the context of the verse to import a turning of them out of one state which now they were in into another estate upon non-performance of that duty which is required But to intimate that the non-performance thereof would discover that they were not in that state which they professed themselves and seemed to others to be in And I prove that it is to be Interpreted thus and not as Mr. Lockier will have it The Apostle meaneth the same here whose house ye are c. which he saith v. 14. We are partakers of Christ if we hold fast the beginning of our confidence c. So Interpreters agree that one and the same thing is said in both verses and the very purpose it self evidenceth so much But now is partaking of Christ nothing else but to be in a Visible Church state Yea for confirmation let it be observed that the Apostle saith not whose house ye are but we are so that he speaks of some what under the metaphor of house which he supposeth common to him and them together What was this Visible Church-member-ship of a certain we are not told where residing particular congregation of Jewes Mr. Lockier hes not heeded this or has purposely passed it over 5.
to be under Pastorall care and the Ministry of the Word If he could shew us this either in precept or approved practice we should soon yeeld and be at an end of this controverâ—…e But this he cannot nor ever will be able to shew and therefore the reasoning from the care and acuracy to be used in trying persons who are already in the Church in relation to admitting them to places of office unto admission of persons into the society of the Visible Church is unreasonable 5. When he saith that men are to be cast out by Excommunication when it doth evidently appear that they are hypocrites though not drunkards c. I desire 1. That it may be observed that an hypocrite may be taken in a double sense First for such an one as grossely and knowingly counterfeits a Profession of Christianity and so indeed is nothing else but an histrionicall stage-professor Secondly more largly for any that hath a profession of Christianity wherein may be he is morally serious but hath not within a Principle of true supernaturall saving grace Such are all unregenerate persons in the Church such an one was that young Man in the Gospel whom our Lord is said to have loved and the Lawyer of whom he said thou art not far from the Kingdome of Heaven Now if we speak of hypocrites in the former sense if men appear to be such I shall confesse that if they have been within they are to be cast out by Excommunication yet in the order that Christ hath prescribed after due admonition and evidence of obstinacy and incorrigiblenesse in the evill and of this I shall say more then Mr. Lockier viz. that it is far greater not only then drunkennesse and other such bodily sins simplie in genere peccati in the nature of sin But if it evidently appear also in genere scandali in the nature of scandall which is the ground and consideration upon which censure proceedeth because it is a very mocking of God in the highest degree But if we speak of hypocrites in the latter sense We deny utterly that every man appearing to be such is to be Excommunicated and casten out of the Societie of the Visible Church If a man professe seriouslie Religion submitting himself to Ordinances though there were appearance yea though it were revealed by God that yet he were not Regenerate and indued with true supernaturall Grace I say such an one were not to be excommunicate Let Mr. Lockier or any for him shew a warrand of Scripture for Excommunicating a man for non-regeneration The Doctrine of all Orthodox Divines hither till concerning the object of Excommunication and that grounded upon the Word of God is that which is shortly expressed by the Learned and Reverend Professours of Leyden Synop. pur theol Objectum circa quod exercetur haec Disciplina Ecclesiastica sunt illi qui fratres nominantur causa verò est vita prava vel Doctrina perversa nec ideo statim ubi quis frater nominatus in hujusmodi scandala incidit a corpore Ecclesiae excludi debet quemadmodum quibusdam Anabaptistis in usu est Sed post privatas demum publicas Ecclesiae admonitiones contemptas rejectas sicuti Christi verba aperte significant Mat. 18. disp 48. thes 25 26. And though drunkennesse and such like bodily-sins be lesse then hypocrisie in this sense i. e. non-regeneration simply and in genere peccati in the nature of sin yet it is not lesse in genere scandali in the kind of scandall and offence unto the Church Nay this hath not the nature of scandall at all 6. Yet Mr. Lockier according to the genius of his Doctrine ought to say not only men when it doth evidently appear that they are hypocrits but even if it doth not evidently appear that they are truly gracious and we cannot discern in them the power of godlinesse they are to be Excommunicate For his Doctrine is that none are fit mater to be admitted or permitted to constitute a Visible Church but such as are truely Godly so far as men truely Godly can judge and discern I beleeve most of the Independent way will disclaime him in this 7. Excommunication is an Ordinance to keep the house of God pure and according to what it ought to be in point of duety in foro exteriori and in order to salvation this we grant only in this sense that it is an Ordinance tending towards this as a means for this is an end of Excommunication that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus but not in this sense that the Church is obliged thereby to effectuate it quoad eventum this belongeth to God alone Excommunication is an Ordinance to keep the Church pure and according to what it ought to be in point of qualification in foro exteriori in order to externall Visible Church-state even quoad eventum But now what this qualification in foro exteriori in order to Church-state is is the thing in Question So Mr. Lockier in his reasoning from Excommunication to his Doctrine either alledgeth nothing to the purpose taking his antecedent in the former sense or begs the Question taking it in the latter 8. In the conclusion as propounded here First note If only reall Saints be the proper mater of a Visible Church and saving grace the complexion of it then all Saints so far as men can judge are not fit mater for these are not necessarily reall Saints simply 2. When as he saith not one known to be otherwise he should have said answerably to the former words no not one not known so far as men can judge to be such 3. Can justifiably enter may be conceived either in point of duty incumbent to themselves who enter and so the meaning is this men joyning themselves to the Visible Church and making profession of Religion without true faith and repentance are not justifiable in this before God or it may be conceived to be spoken of the Churches active admission of men into externall church-Church-communion and the sense is this it is not justifiable that men not having saving grace should by the Church be admitted to enter into the fellowship of the Visible Church If in any thing certainly in propounding Doctrines stating controversies forming conclusions ambiguities should be shun'd We grant the former sense but the latter we deny and it is not yet proven This much of the inductiâ—… Now come we to the fourth way of probation by reasons SECTION VI. Examination of Mr. Lockyers proofs brought under the name of reason section 1 HIs reasons are four which because they ly loose out of form and are somewhat prolixely pro pounded I shall labour to take up the strength of them as far as I can see ingenuously in form that we may both with the more shortnesse and clearnesse to the greater satisfaction of the Reader consider and answer them section 2 The first reason so far as I can possibly see may
terrour of this Text for that section 16 The place Rev. 3. 10. spoken to the Church of Philadelphia is but abused For 1. What warrand is there to expone that hour of temptation spoken of there of the time immediatly before the Calling of the Jews And the Church of Philadelphia in a typicall sense of some Churches to be then 'T is too much boldnesse to force such typicall Interpretations upon Scripture where the Spirit of God in the Word goeth not before us to warrand us 'T is true Reverend Brightman hâ—s Interpreted all the Churches and the things written to them as types of other Churches in these latter dayes But 1. All solide Divines have shown their discontentment with his conceit as groundlesse 2. Yet doth not he understand by Philadelphia such Churches immediatly before the incalling of the Jews as Mr. Lockier fancies But hes expresly named some present Churches which he will have to 〈◊〉 signified thereby Geneva France Low-Countreys and with the rest even that Church of Scotland which Mr. Lockier counts an evill vessell that will be broken in pieces and that because of the order and Government set up in them 3. The place speaks not here of cutting off Churches but of trying the Inhabitants of the World 4. If these Churches typified by Philadelphia are not to be cut off because of their constitution like its how comes that it self which was the Patern and to whom this word was spoken in the first instance and place hath been cut off section 17 The place of Daniel is as grossely abused What ground or appearance can Mr. Lockier give us that the Holy Ghost means one and the same time Daniel 12. and Rev. 3. in the Epistle of Philadelphia He sayeth by these words Daniel 12. 1. It doth plainly appear that this hour of temptation viz. Rev. 3. 10. will be immediatly before the Calling of the Jews and he doth no more but say it Learned men and that upon considerable grounds and reasons have conceived that time Daniel 12. 1. not to be a time after Christs first comming but before it the time of Antiochus persecution And must Mr. Lockiers naked assertion without reason that it is a time immediatly before the Jews incalling be sufficient to obtain beliefe section 18 The New Jerusalem spoken of Rev. 21. is groundlessely expounded to be the Visible Church of the Jews as contradistinguished from the Church of the Gentiles And I verily think that it cannot be understood of the Church upon earth at all ver 22. seemeth to me to speak this much clearly The place Isa 11. 7. is also grossely missapplyed to the Visible Church of Gentiles to be joyned with the Visible Church of the Jews after their incalling it being clearly a Prophesie concerning the Universall Church of the Gospel reaching along from the time of Christs first comming unto the end as all Interpreters expound it and the context it self holdeth it forth evidently And so is the place of Zechariah pointed at to be understood The hint at Jer. 12. 9. where that ancient people are likned to a speckled bird as if thereby were meant that because that Church in its visible constitution was mixed of â—ypocrites with the Godly therefore it is called a speckled bird and that upon that account they were casten off might make a man laugh were we not on a serious matter and it s rather a mater of mourning to see Scripture and so much of it so wrested The simple meaning of the words being this that as a wilde strange bird of an uncouth colour coming in among other birds all flieth about it and pursueth it So because the people were become uncouth estranged from God wilde untame the Lord would raise up the Nations round about to destroy them But what meaneth Mr. Lockier to speak here of the casting off the ancient Visible Church of the Jews under the Old Testament for not constituting their outward Visible society of all truely Saints but suffering it to be speckled Seeing all along this discourse he hes restricted his Doctrine concerning the mater of the Visible Church to the dayes of the Gospel As for his inference wherewith he closeth consequently the allowed mater of a Visible Church Remember we are speaking of Mater allowed in relation to the outward Ecclesiastick Court its proceeding in admitting persons to externall Church fellowship now in the dayes of the Gospel are persons truely holy we say it followeth not upon any thing you have been alledging in this paragraph For were all granted you have been writing out of these places all comes to this that God sometime after this will bring the Church Visible to such an estate that all in it shall be truely holy de facto But dispensations of efficacious grace are not a rule of Ecclesiastick proceeding in admitting persons to the outward communion of the Visible Church SECTION VII A short modest reply to Mr. Lockyers bitter use made of his Doctrine section 1 I had heard oftentimes before this time Mr. Lockier commended for a man of an ingenuous humble meek sweet spirit and when I read the Epistle of his three Brethren prefixed to this Peece wherein they called him a soft sweet whisperer I expected to have found him such here But sure I am any impartiall man who readeth his Use and application of his Doctrine may see great want of ingenuity and such bitternesse vented against men desirous to keep the truth and to walk before God in simplicity and godly sincerity as becometh not any man of a Christian spirit and the like whereof could hardly been expected to come from the very sons of Babel themselves against any Protestants section 2 He begins with this Take heed then of setting against a Church of such a complexion and constitution Wilt thou oppose a thing because it is as it ought to be To whom do you speak Mr. Lockier To us who oppose your Doctrine concerning the necessary qualification of Church members in relation to externall Church fellowâ—hip Do we by opposing this oppose a thing because it is such as it ought to be Nay we do but oppose you who sayes the Church Visible as such ought to be even in the Ecclesiastick Court that which God never said in his Word that it ought to be and makes the door of the Visible Church straiter then ever the Lord made it and so in effect disclaimes the way allowed by God himself for ordering his Church as not wise enough nor accurate enough Or do we set our selves against a Church of such complexion and constitution as you descrive consisting of all truly godly so far as men can judge God forbid and far be it from us were there such a Church in the world of such complexion and constitution it should be very dear and precious in our estimation and we should blesse the Lord for the riches and power of his grace bestowed upon them We wish from our souls that our Churches
this concludes Thus no doubt was Simon very diligent and full of care and circumspection to carry it so in all things that he might carry it with all beholders equally to the Apostles themselves that he might be still as high in every ones opinion even in the opinion of the Apostles themselves as he was in the opinion of the blinded and deluded people Ans 1. Mr. Lockier supposeth that Simons continuing with Philip which is spoken of in the Text was antecedent to his receiving unto the fellowship of the Church and the ground upon consideration of which he was received But let him shew me in the Text volam auâ— vestigium of Peters admitting him unto the fellowship of the Church after and upon consideration of this Nay it is not unworthy the observation that Mr. Lockier in all this discourse upon Simon Magus doth not so much as once point his Reader to the Chapter where the story lyeth by his custome in making use of other Passages which makes me apprehend he saw that the Reader turniâ—g over to it would easily seen the weaknesse of his discourse by the conteâ—… of the words Saith not the Text it self that when he was baptized 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. after he was baptized and so after he was received into the Church he continued with Philip And so what ever may be imported by this continuing let it be never so much evidence of inward grace it is nihil ad rhombum nothing to the purpose in hand For we are speaking now of what was found in him before and in relation to his receiving If Mr. Lockier shall say that he was not received into the Church fellowship when baptized or by baptisme I repone first Then he must grant that 〈◊〉 was required in adultis for baptizing them then for admitting them to Visible Church fellowship 2. Then it must follow that persons then were first baptized and then tryed a while further ere they were admitted Visible Church members let me see either precept or practice for this in all the Word oâ— God let Mr. Lockier or any for him shew me in Scripture one baptized and not hoc ipso made a member of the Visible Church 2. That his continuing with Philip whether antecedent or consequent to his admission is but a poor ground to prove what Mr. Lockier alledgeth it for viz. that Simon had such outward appearance of real inward grace that so far as man could judge he seemed a true and reall Saint I pray what is said 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. he constantly followed and waited on Philip this is all that the word iâ—ports when joyned to a name of a person * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 est ab alicujus latere non discedere sed assiduum comitem praesta re Constantin in lex Graec. Lat. Mr. Lockiers further criticisme upon the word is to little purpose and that he was astonished at the miracles and signes that were done That which Mr. Lockier alledgeth that no doubt Simon Magus was very diligent and full of care and circumspection to carry it so in all things c. is no doubt a confident assertion without bottom in the Text and yet is this evidence enough that a man is a true and reall Saint as far as men can judge I wonder how a judicious man before judicious men can assert such a thing I confesse this cariage of Simons was ground to repute him not a grosse hypocrite a dissembler and a mock-professor But it can be a ground of no further I find indeed sundry of the Interpreters saying that Simon would have been equall in reputation to the Apostles themselves But they speak not of this as his designe in his continuing with Philip as the Author mistakes for that was not a sufficiently â—pparent mean to obtain that reputation but as his designe in seeking to have the power of bestowing the Holy Ghost for his money which was the very discovery of his rottennesse so far was it from being any part of diligence carefulnesse and circumspection to carry it so in all things c. section 13 For consent of the Learned Interpreters he citeth some words of Pisc English annot Junius Premellius Pellicannus Beza And then tells that he addeth all these testimonies for the Learneds sake that they may see and know that Simon he caried the mater that he seemed another man then a meer professor otherwise the Apostles had not received him And when thus his hypocrisie did appear the Apostles rejected him as one not in Christ and as one whâ— had no share in reall grace and upon that ground rejected communion with such an hypocriâ—… that all else might know what they had to do namely to follow that rule of the Apostle 2 Tim. 3. 9. Having a forme of godlinesse but denying the power thereof from such turn away Which place saith he shewes plainly that it was the power and not the Prosession and not the forme that was looked and is to be looked at in the admission of members of the Visible Church Answ I wonder how the Author could so contemn the Learned who might read him as to say that for their sakes he had added these testimonies cited by him that they may see and know that Simon carried the mater so that he seemed another man then a meer Professour i. e. as he meaneth a true and reall Saint had he been pleased but to English these testimonies cited by him as it was his prudence to let them ly under the Latine vail the very unlearned who had common sense would evidently have seen and known them to import no such thing For this I appeal to the judgement of all that understand Latine and will be pleased to read them For I think it not worth the while to translate and insert them here the most that any of them amounteth to is that which the word ested from the English annot hath that he made outward profession of faith and conversion Might he not done this much and yet not carried it so in all things as to give ground positively to repute him as far as men could judge to be a true and real Saint Will Mr. Lockier acknowledge that a man hath said enough of another for that end when he saith no more of him but this he was so convinced by miracles as to professe faith and conversion Nay he 'll say it s the power of Godlinesse not profession that 's to be looked at 2. That when Simons hypocrisie did thus appear the Apostle did abominat the impiety of his deed discover and bear in upon him the perversenesse of his heart and his miserable estate and denunce the temâ—le deserved Judgement of God against him is clear in the Text But that he did reject him from outward communion of the Viâ—…ble Church I see it not Nay what ever became of him afterward about it Writers are of different judgement see Calv. in loc there
appears to be some grounds in the Text to think the contrary viz. these 1. That Peter with his severe objurgation and denunciation joynes a serious exhortation to Repentance and Prayer with an insinuation of some hope of mercie v. 2â— 2. That the Historian has registrate that Simon did not shew himself obstinate but accepting of the words of Peter and touched with the terrour of the threatned Judgement sought the help of the Apostles Prayers to escape it 3. But supposing that Peter did at this time Excommunicate him yet that it was done upon this account simply that he was not in Christ that he had no share in reall grace has no footing in the Text we will find a further mater â—…d to his charge an atrocious crime of seeking to buy the gift of the Holy Ghost with money Nay that for non regeneration simply a man should be Excommunicat is a wild assertion unheard of in the Word of God which enjoyneth this censure only in the case of obstinacy and contumacious contempt of the Discipline of the Church or at farthest in case of an atrocious scandall which case yet is doubtfull as may appear in the debates of Learned Men about the Excommunication of the incestuous Corinthian 4. The place 2 Tim. 3. 5. is most contrary to the scope and purpose of the context alledged as a rule holding forth that all professours not having true grace of Regeneration or not giving evidences thereof so far as men can discern and judge are for that to be casten out of the communion of the Visible Church It is clear as nooâ—-day that the Apostle by the men of whom he saith they have a form of godlinesse means not every professour unregenerate or not giving evidences convincing so far as men can judge of Regeneration but persons openly and grossely in their conversation scandalous flagitious blasphemous c. As is evident both by the words going before and following section 14 Thâ—â—ast Object he laboureth to answer the Apostle 2 Tim. 2. 20. But in a great house there are not only vessels of Gold and of Silver but also of Wood and of Earth and some to honour and some to dishonour by house he meaneth Visible Church therefore the Visible Church may consist of good â—…d bad Mr. Lockier propounds Arguments against his Tenent as himself pleaseth in the most â—oft way for his own advantage We hope in the next Section to give an Argumeâ—… from this and other like descriptions of the Visible Church formed somewhat more pungent now we shall only consider what he answâ—…eth unto it as laid down by himself His Answers are two section 15 First That there may be bad men in a Church hath not been denyed because Hypocrites may delude the judgement of the best men but he the Apostle saith not that these vessels of earth are there allowedly but they are there to dishonour That is being creept in where they should not be they are to be cast out of the Church as dishonourable as indeed was Hymeneus and Philetus of whom and of one Alexander see what the Apostle sayeth 1 Tim. 1. 20. which shews that when men put away that which they seem to have faith coupled with a good conscience they are to be put away to their master as vessels of dishonour appointed for wrath Answ 1. Passing now that expression that bad men are not in the Church allowedlie having pondered before in what sense it may be granted and in what not passing this what a wilde and forced Interpretation is that vessels to dishonour i. e. that are to be cast out of the Church by Ecclesiastick censure Excommunication Who ever dreamed of the like before Clear it is that the Apostle in the back or outside of the comparison by being to honour means appointed and imployed to more honest and honourable uses in an house And by to dishonour meaneth not casting out of the house to Interprete him so were ridiculous but to be appointed and imployed to more base and fordid uses And in the kirnell or application of the similiâ—ude under the name of vessels to honour is meaned the elect of God sanctified and prepared to every good work and ordained â—o glory as is clear by the verse going before and the verse following And so by vessels to dishonour are meant cast-awayes whom being in the Visible Church God makes use of for such ends as he pleaseth and in end will separate them to that wrath and confusion they are fitted for whether ever here-away they break out into such scandals as shall make them to be casten out of the Visible Church or they continue in the heap or in the house to their ending day That this is the genuine meaning of the words I think no intelligent man will deny 2. It is a false supposition which Mr. Lockier insinuateth that bad men in the Church i. e. men void of true grace and unregenerat as and becausâ— such are to be cast out of the commuâ—…on of the Visible Church the Scripture allowâ—…h no casting out of men but because they are scâ—…dalous and contumâ—…ous or at least atrociously scandalous which latter yet as we said before is questionable and it alloweth men that are such to be casten out though they be haply in state truely regenerat and justified And therefore 3. It is a most inconsiderat word of the Authors where expressing the nature of Excommunication he â—ayeth they are to be put away to their master as vessels of dishonour and appointed unto wrath i. e. in plain words as reprobates ordained to eternall damnation This is very different from Pauls theologie 1 Cor. 5. 5. to deliver unto Satan for the destruction of the flesh that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus Far be it from me and from the Churches of Christ to use Excommunication upon such a consideration of a person and for such an end as Mr. Lockier determines here which in effect makes the Church in the sentence of Excommunication to determine concerning mens reprobation a secret which God hath keped up to himself and is altogether hid unto and undiscernable by men except in the case of sinning against the Holy Ghost which yet is hard for any to determine upon 4. The Excommunication and casting out of Hymeneus Philetus and Alexander is impertinently alledged to the purpose viz. that all men that are not true Saints or have not true grace so must Mr. Lockier's bad men be understood are upon this account to be cast out of the Church these were not such men simply but taught abominable heresies denyall of the Resurrection perverse seducers of people from the faith blasphemers and for these they were cast out 2 Tim. 2. 18 2 Tim. 1. ult section 16 His next Answer is this Moreover by this great house he Paul First means the Church of the Ephesians for whose sake Paul wrot to Timothy and what they were according to the judgement of
profession who are not sincere in this sense yea may evidence seriousnesse when they do not as yet give any positive evidence of this And therefore I conceive he doth not upon good enough ground quarrell with Tombs pag. 129. for that Mr. Tombs requiring a profession sober serious and understanding he doth disclaime an enquirie after the sincerity of their profession if Mr. Tombs meant supernaturall sincerity as I conceive he did the distinction of morall sincerity and spirituall or supernaturall sincerity is common amongst practick Divines and rationall and there may be positive probable evidences of the former when there is not yet so much of the latter I humbly conceive there cannot be had positive probable evidences of this ordinarly without observation of a mans way after profession for a time wherein notice may be taken of his walking equally in the latitude of duties and constantly in variety of cases and conditions But the other may sooner and more easily appear and positively be judged of as we judge of a mans seriousnesse in any other action And 't is Mr. Baxters own judgement that as soon as a man maketh profession of the faith without delay or tryall for discovery of his heart-Conversion he is to be admitted into the Visible Church To conclude Mr. Baxter and I are at agreement upon the mater concerning the qualification that is sufficient for admitting persons into the Visible Church viz. sober serious profession without delay to enquire for more and so we are agreed in the maine about the mater of the Visible Church We differ in this that he thinks persons are not to be admitted but under the consideration of persons judged at least probably Converted and Regenerated My mind is that they are to be admitted under the name of serious sober outward professours abstracting from Conversion or non-conversion Which upon the mater and as to the main businesse of the mater of the Visible Church will only make some differences between us in some Arguments to prove the maine conclusion Some Arguments that I use will not sute his way But that is not much to thâ—… point Now I come to a fourth Argument section 24 If the Ministry and Ministeriall dispensation of the Ordinances especially the Preaching of the Gospel in the Church be instituted and appointed by Jesus Christ to be a means not only for advancing and perfecting the work of saving grace where it is already begun But also for converting and bringing to Christ and into the estate of grace such as are not yet savingly Converted nor regenerat nor in Christ then it is not a qualification necessarily requisite in persons in foro Ecclesiastico i. e. in the outward Court of the Church for admitting them into the externall communion and Society of the Visible Church that they be before truely Regenerat Converted sealed of God by his Spirit for his or give such manifest evidences of this as that they may and ought to be judged by the Church truely Regenerat and Converted But the former part or antecedent is true Therefore also the consequent section 25 The connexion of the proposition I conceive is clear to any discerning man For ex suppositione consequentis sequitur oppositum antecedentis i. e. if all that are in the Visible Church be supposed to be already and antecedently to their reception into the Visible Church truly Converted and Regenerated What is the Minister as a Minister or the Ministeriall dispensation of the Gospel adoe with Converting of souls All with whom he has to doe as a Minister are supposed to be Converted to his hand and so in his Ministry he has only to do with their advancing in grace This is the more constringent towards our Brethren of the Independent way that they make the Ministry relative to a constitute Visible Church only and that a Minister cannot act as a Minister but in relation to a particular Visible Church and these that are within it And therefore if a Minister by Preaching the Gospel should be an instrument of the Conversion and Regeneration of an infidell yet that is but by accident and that is not done by him as a Minister If any shall say that many of these who are received into the Visible Church albeit they be supposed and judged to be true Converts and Regenerat ones yet they may really be unconverted and unregenerated and so may being in the Church and under the Ministry be converted by the Ministeriall Preaching of the Gospel That is nothing to the purpose 'T is but by accident that this cometh to passe and were it known that a man were unregenerat and unconverted he were not to be received under the Ministry Yea were he before a member he should be by Mr. Lockiers Tenet un-Churched again untill he were a true Convert And that which cometh to passe by the Ministry of the Word but by accident cannot be said to be an end for which it is institute and set up in the Church Yea further I say if the Visible Church consist of all and only such as are supposed and judged so far as men can discern to be antecedently to their admission into the Church truely Converted and Regenerat It followeth necessarly that the ordinary Minister of the Gospell has nothing adoe to Preach points of Doctrine tending to preparatory humiliation awaking of naturall consciences and Converting souls to Christ but all his Preaching ought to be upon points that concerne comforting directing strengthning confirming souls already Converted he shall have nothing adoe to intreat souls to be reconciled to God but he is only to help them to injoy the sweetnesse and comfort of Reconciliation they are already stated in Farewell all Preaching of mens miserable estate by nature of the terrours of the Law except only it be to let souls know the better what they are delivered from section 26 For the assumption of the Argument viz. that the Ministry and Ministeriall dispensation and Preaching of the Gospel is instituted to be an ordinary means of Converting souls as well as of advancing grace in them that are Converted may be proven by innumerable Scriptures I shall point at some 1. Prov. 9. 3 4. Wisedom hath sent forth her maidens she cryeth upon the high places of the Citie who so is simple let him turn in hither as for him that wanteth understanding she sayeth to him come eat of my bread and drink of the wine which I have mingled By these maidens of wisedom are meant as Interpreters agree the Ministers of the Word sent forth by Jesus Christ Now what is the end and erand for which they are sent To call and invite such as are simple and have no understanding i. e. as Cartwright well expoundeth such as yet are void of Religion and wisdome i. e. of true saving grace tho not malicious opposers of the truth and the professours thereof that is in effect such as we described in stating the Controversie serious sober outward
professours but yet unregenerat to invite and so to be means of bringing in such to communion with Christ and participation of his saving grace set forth under the Parable of a Feast Hence then 't is evident that the Ministry and Ministeriall dispensation of the Gospel is ordained and instituted in the Church to be an ordinaâ—y means of Conversion 2. 2 Cor. 5. 18 19 20. Hence we reason thus The Ministry of the Gospel iâ— a Ministry of Reconciliation i. e. for bringing men from their estate of enimity to peace with God and it is the Office of Ministers as ambassadours in Christs stead to treat with souls and bring them in to Reconciliation with God Therefore they are appointed to be the ordinary means of Conversion 3. 2 Tim. 2. 24 25. The servant of the Lord must not strive but be gentle to all men apt to teach patient In meeknesse instructing those that oppose themselves if God peradventure will give them Repentance Then 't is evident Ministers are instituted to be means of Converting souls and they must be qualified in relation to this as the work of their Ministry It is well marked by Estius tho a Papist yet in most things a judicious solid Interpreter docet hic locus Deum ad convertendum peccatores uti velle operâ hominum qui externum adhibeant Ministerium correptionis Doctrinae 4. Rom. 10. 14 17. 'T is so clear from this place that the Ministers of the Gospel by their Ministeriall Preaching thereof are the ordinary means appointed by God for Conversion and begetting faith that it cannot be avoyded but by denying absurdly with Arminians Socinians and others everters of the Ministry that by a sent Preacher is not understood any other but any gifted man though not called and set apart to the Office of the Ministry We conclude then that seeing the Ministry of the Gospel is ordained of God to be an ordinary mean of converting the elect and bringing them to Christ it cannot be a condition necessarily requisite in the members of the Visible Church antecedently to their admission into the society thereof that they be already converted or supposed and judged to be such so far as men can discern And that which followeth upon the contrary That privat Christians and not the Ministry of sent Preachers are the ordinary means and instruments of converting souls is a meer dream having no warrand in the Word of God * Hooker Sur. p. 1. c. 7. pag. 84 85. I know Mr. Hooker stormes at my Reverend Collegue for charging this absurdity upon them And he confesseth that is a dream and hath no warrand in the Word and wonders how such an absurdity is so continually in the eare and minde of Mr. Rutherfurd and sayeth he knoweth not whence it cometh But verily the good man was angry at Mr. Rutherfurd without cause For it cometh as naturally from his principles as any conclusion can come from its premisses For if a Visible Church cannot be constituted of any but such as are supposed to be before converted and an Visible Church is prior to an ordinary Minister neither can there be a Minister but in a constitute Church as themselves maintain I pray what must be the ordinary means for there are not alwayes Apostles extraordinarily sent of God of converting souls but privat Christians What the good man sayeth pag. 84. materialls of new gathered Churches with us are such as have been converted by Ministers in their severall Congregations With reverence of his memorie be it spoken is childish and nothing to the purpose for first the Question is not how or by what means de facto this or that man is converted but what followeth upon his Tenet And according to the genius of this it followeth clearly that all are supposed to be converted we speak of Conversion ordinarily before ever they come under a Ministry and so by privat Christians And these some of whom you gather your Congregations having them from under other Ministers in their severall Congregations if these Congregations be rightly constitute according to your principles were converted ere ever they came under such Ministers section 27 Argument 5. If the mater of the Visible Church were only reall Saints and the complexion of the Visible Church true holines and saving grace as Mr. Lockier roundly expresseth in his Tenet pag. 29. and that by expresse opposition to seemingly good pag. 25. or such as are positively to be judged such by evidence so far as men very spirituall can discern as other where he expresseth it then it doth follow that a man being in the Visible Church for non-regeneration simply or non-appearance or defect of positive evidence to ground a positive judgement of his Regeneneration ought to be Excommunicat and casten out of the Visible Church but the consequent is false Ergo the antecedent also The connexion of the proposition Mr. Lockier cannot deny for in effect it is his own pag. 28. where he sayeth Excommunication is an Ordinance to cleanse the House of God and keep it pure and according to what it ought to be so far as men can discern according to his Tenet consisting of only reall Saints and not one other And sayeth expresly that if men creep in where they should not be i. e. if men not Regenerat creep into the Visible Church they are to be cast out 'T is true pag. 29. in the end of the paragraph he mincheth the mater and sayeth only not one known to be otherwise can abide within But he should have said by the consequence of his Tenet not one not known positively to be such c. As to the Assumption that it is false that for non-regeneration simply or defect of positive evidences of Regeneration persons are to be cast out of the Visible Church 1. Because there is neither precept nor practice in the Word of God for casting out any upon this account Let Mr. Lockier produce us any thing from Scripture of this kind The Scripture enjoyneth Excommunication for obstinacie in known publick scandalous sins in conversation or heresie in Doctrine or at most for atrocious crimes whether the persons be judged Converts and Regenerats or not but no mention of any other cause of Excommunication And in maters de jure in Religion a negative Argument from Scripture is sure 't is not commanded 't is not written in Scripture Ergo it ought not to be done I do professe this consequent following upon this opinion is one of the considerations amongst others that of a long time has swayed me to think that 't is a way which is not of God But on the contrary tho I esteem reverently of many of the followers of it and has no harsh thoughts of their intentions therein that 't is a subtile device of Satan transforming himself into an Angel of light set on foot by him as to advance Atheism in the World so in speciall to overturn the Protestant Religion and Churches For
constituting Visible Churches because it is a rule that God never constituted for that purpose But they have cause to weep and say alas which I pray God of his Grace they may do for themselves that they have separated themselves from the Church of Christ upon the very ground that Donatists separated of old section 13 In the rest of the former part of their Letter they declare their purpose of separating from the Communion of this Church and their ground of so doing which I follow not here it being my purpose to take unto consideration only so much of their Letter as directly concerneth the present Question I had in hand touching the necessary qualification of Church members I doubt not but some of these men to whom they directed that Letter has returned them a sufficient Answer upon that point of their separation And one of them has abundantly refuted that same point in Print against Separatists as many other Orthodox Divines has done the like not only modern Divines in their writings against late Separatists But also ancient against Donatists and Novatians Certain it is and cannot be denyed by any that has any tollerable insight in the Ancients that these our Authors in their separatioÌ„ goes upon that same very ground that Donatists and Novatians separated of old It was one of the Errours of these that by fellowship with wicked and ungodly men in the Worship and Ordinances of God others are polluted as we may learn from Cyprian Epist 51. and 52. and August in his writings against Donatists particularly contra Epistolam Parmeniani and therefore did separate from all other Churches as defiled with such mixtures using as an Argument and ground for them that same very passage brought by these present Authors for themselves 2. Cor. 6. As we see by Augustin ad Donatist post collationem cap. 21. cited by us a little before where the Godly and Learned Ancient does abundantly and solidly refute the Donatists abuse of that place as he does in his severall writs against these proud Schismaticks all their other Arguments And I much wonder that these our Brethren I yet say if so they will suffer themselves to be so called by us should have licked up that Schismaticall Doctrine practice of Donatists so universally condemned by the ancient Church and solidly refuted by the Orthodox Divines that then were But it not being my purpose at this time to prosecute this part of their Epistle I shall close this Appendix adding only a word or two out of these two Ancients I have named concerning this mater Cyprian Epist 21. written to 4. Confessours who having been seduced into the Novatian separation and schism had returned again to the unity of the Church and signified the same to Cyprian thus sayeth he to these Confessours Postea quam vos de carcere redeuntes â—…maticus Haereticus error excepit sic res erat quasi vestra gloria in carcere remansisset Illic enim vestri nominis dignitas recedisse videbatur quando milites Christi non ad Ecclesiam de carcere redierunt in quem prius cum Ecclesiae laude gratulatione venissent nam si in Eccesiâ videntur esse Zizania non tamen impediri debet aut fides aut charitas nostra ut quoniam Zizania in Ecclesia esse cernimus ipsi de Ecclesia recedamus nobis tantum modo laborandum est ut frumentum esse possimus ut cum caeperit frumentum Dominicis condi horreis pro opere nostro labore fructum capiamus Apostolus in Epistola sua 2 Tim. 2. dicit in domo autem magna non tantum vasa sunt aurea c. nos operam demus quantum possumus laboremus ut vas aureum vel argenteum simus Caeterum fictilia vasa confringere Domino soli concessum est cui virga ferrea data est esse non potest major Domino suo servus nec quisquam sibi quod soli filio pater tribuit vendicare se putet ut ad aream ventilandam purgendam paleam ferre se jam posse aut à frumento universa Zizania humano judicio segregare Superba est ista obstinatio sacrilega presumptio quam sibi furor pravus assumit Et dum Dominium sibi semper plusquam mitis justitia deposcit assumunt de Ecclesiâ pereunt dum se in solenter extollunt ipso suo humore caecati veritatis lumen amittunt Here we see separation from the Church because of the mixture of naughty persons solidly condemned and noted with a black mark by this Godly Ancient The like or almost the same he hath in the Epistle immediatly following that former cited The word I would present from Augustine is that contra Epistolam Parmeniami lib. 3. cap. 1. Ab initio cum omnis pia ratio modus Ecclesiasticae Disciplinae unitatem Spiritus in vinculo pacis maxime debeat intueri quod Apostolus sufferendo invicem praecepit custodire quo non custodito medicinae vindicta non tantum superflua sed etiam perniciosa propterea jam nec medicina esse convincitur illi filii mali qui non odio iniquitatum alienarum sed studio contentionum suarum infirmas plebes jactantiâ sui nominis irretitas vel totas trahere vel certe dividere affectant superbia tumidi perâ—…iâ—…a vesani calumniis insidiosi seditionibus turbulenti ne lucis veritate carere ostendantur umbram rigidae severitatis obtendunt quae in Scripturis sanctis salva dilectionis sinceritate custoditâ pacis unitate ad corrigenda fraterna vitia moderatiori curatione praecepta sunt ad Sacrilegium Schismatis ad occasioneÌ„ praecisionis usurpant dicentes ecce ait Apostolus auferte malum ex vobis ipsis Yea the very universall Argument and purpose of these Books against Parmenianus this Ancient himself Retract lib. 1. cap. 17. expresseth to be this in tribus libris contra Parmen Donatislarum Carthaginensis Episcopi successorisque Donati questio magna versatur solvitur utrum in unitate eorundum communione Sacramentorum mali contaminent bonos which is the very ground whereupon these our Brethren builds the necessity of their separation quemadmodum non contaminent disputatur propter Ecclesiam toto orbe diffusam cui calumniando Schisma fecerunt If I would bring here all that that Ancient hath against this Tenet and practice of separation of these Authors I might transcribe the most part of all his writings against the Donatists Therefore I refer the Reader to the writings themselves and beseeches these our Brethren yet in the fear of God and in humility of Spirit to consider and ponder their way they have run into was condemned and solidely refuted from the Word of God in these ancient Schismaticks by the Godly and Orthodox ancient Doctors of the Church in that time And now I go on to Mr. Lockiers Appendix PART II. Wherein is EXAMINED Mr. LOCKIERS TWO ASSERTIONS
lean that way 1. Not only speaks he to his heare â—s in the present â—…seâ— if thy brother offend thee go and tell him tell the Church but also is speaking of a case that might have in that present time fallen out and which falling out it was necessary for them to know and be informed what course they should follow fâ—…edresse of it Hudson vindic of the Essence and Vnity of c c. 1. p. 3. 2. It inclines not a little to understand a Church that was in present being among the Jews because he applyes his present speech to the capacity of the Jews Let him be to thee as an Heathen and Publican who might not have communion with Heathens and would not with Publicans But Christians might eat and drink with both I say not these are demonstrative grounds Yet they may seem to lean that way But see we what the Author brings from the Text that the order of the Gospel Church and it only for so he must be understood is meant section 7 His first Ground is this He Christ speaks in the verse foregoing of little ones which he explaines to be true beleevers and converted ones v. 6. v. 3. this is made the qualification of the visible members of the New Church in the Chapter foregoing Mat. 16. 17. Ans 1. That true saving faith and conversion is the qualification viz. in the externall Ecclesiastick Court of Visible Church members is a dream and that it is taught Matth. 16 17. is another dream and that another kind of qualification as to substance is requisite in visible members of the Church under the N. T. then was under the Old is a third as many of his own side will confesse who usually in that Question bring Arguments from the constitution of the Church under the Old Test 2. What necessity of consequence is here Christ in the foregoing v. 14. of Matth. 18. speaks of little ones true beleevers and true faith is the qualification of members of the New or Gospel Church â—…rgo when v. 17. he bids a Brother if he cannot get an offending â—rother reclaimed by privat admonition tell the Church he is to be understood to speak only of the order to be kept in such offences in the Gospel Church that was to be afterward I confesse if this consequent can be clearly deduced and proven from that anteâ—…denâ— per decimam nonam consequentiam I am deceived certainly the consequence of it is not immediatly evident let the Author assay to make it out section 8 2. Ground Then saith he the very words of censure in case the Church be disobeyed are the same he useth to Peter when he gave the Keyes to him upon his faith Whatsoever ye bind on earth c. Mat. 18. 18. and just this he saith to Peter c. 16. 19. And I will give unto thee the Keyes of the Kingdom of Heaven and Whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth c. so that the one explains the other That by Church is not meant the Presbytery or Eldership of one sort or other but the Gospel Church the Congregation of beleevers these conjunctim have the power to censure Answ I confesse I cannot well such is may be my dullnesse conceive what is the order and forme of this Argument in relation to prove that which he undertook a little before viz. that in that tell the Church is not meant the Jewish Eldership whether Civill or Ecclesiastick 1. If he would reason thus the words of censure here used are the same with these Mat. 16. 19. when the power of the Keyes were given to Peter upon his faith and these are words expressing the order of the Gospel Church Therefore by the name of the Church used here cannot be meant the Jewish Eldership I Answer then the Author considers not that the first words of censure are such as are relative to the order of the Jewish Church let him be to thee as a Heathen man and a Publican Or 2. If his purpose be to reason only thus The power of censure spoken of here being the same with that spoken of Mat. 16. these to whom it is ascribed here and given to there are the same the one plaâ—… explains the other But there Mat. 16. it is given 〈◊〉 Peter is a beleever and so in him to the Church of beleevers the Gospel Church Ergo here must be understood not the 〈◊〉 of â—…e and or other Jâ—wish or Christian Answ It s 〈…〉 â—ver yet proven not ever will be that the power of the â—…yer of binding and loosing were Mat. 16. given to Peter as a beleever 〈◊〉 to the 〈◊〉 Church of beleevers section 9 He adds for 〈◊〉 These 〈◊〉 have the power to censure and cast out according to that Corn. 5. 4. When you are gathâ—…ed together c. to deliver such a one to Satan c. and by the same power â—…ved in again that as his punishment was by many so his consolatio◠〈◊〉 reception might be by many also as 't is 2 Cor. 2. â— that Satâ—… might take no advantage which is enough to shew how that admission of members should be by a joint act of the Church as well as excommunication of Members ANSW The Author contemns his Readâ—… very much when as he thinks it enough to cite controverted Paâ—…ges of Scripture and affirm they speak enough for his 〈◊〉 without the least essay to bring any argument or ground to prove and clear that to be their meaning which he affirmeth They are too too credulous that will be moved by such kinde of dictating rather then disputing We deny that the place 1 Cor. 5. 4. doth import that the power to censure and excommunicate doth belong to the whole Congregation of believers as Judges and formall authoritative Actors therein And we deny in like maner that 2 Cor. 2. 6. doth import that the reception of the censured or excoÌ„municated is by the whole Congregation acting therein authoritatively When Mr. Lockier shall be pleased to present us some reasons for what he saith we shall take them into consideration In the mean while he must give us leave not to be moved by his naked Assertions and withall we refer the Reader for further satisfaction concerning these Passages to Cameron praelect in Mat. 18. 15. p. 19 â—0 Edit Salmur in 40. Rutherfurd due right of Presâ— c. 2. pag. 36 37. and c. 10. pag. â—48 349 35â— 351 352. Jus Divin of Church Government par 2. c. 10. pag. 97. and humbly desires Mr. Lockier to consider what they have said on the places section 10 What followeth said by the Author in his 7th SECT the contrary to this understanding c. to the end Is nothing else but a bitter railing which I think the judicious godly men of his way will not own and account unworthy the defiâ—…ng Paper with transcribing it onely briefly to it 1. Whether â—…e Independent way or the Presâ—yterian way of Government be liker and nearer to
to these Answers of the Assembly for full satisfaction and for the present say onely in brief 1. If all that is said in this Argument were granted yet would it not conclude simply against an Eldership Ruling more Congregations then one but only against an Eldership made up of Elders fixed in their Teaching to severall particular Congregations But nothing against an Eldership consisting of Officers noâ— fixed to severall particular Congregations but Teaching and Governing in common the severall Congregations associated under their one Government And likely it is that so it was in the Church of Jerusalem and others these first Churches Certainly the contrair cannot be proven And we think so it may be at thiâ— day as it is indeed in some Reformed Churches without repugnancy to any positive Divine institution But 2. granting that the Scriptures doe testifie that the ordinary Ruling power of Elders is not extendended beyond their ordinary power of Teaching for that which Mr. Lockier addeth that the Scripture holdeth forth that rather the Teaching power exceeds in extent his Ruling power we desire proof of it for he brings none we say that it is a mistake which is alledged that the Presbytery we speak for Ruling over more Congregations extends the ordinary Ruling power of Pastours beyond the extent of their ordinary Teaching power It does only extend the ordinary exercise or actus secundos of the one beyond the ordinary exercise or actus secundos of the other having herein a call to the one and not to the other which is no incongruity nor doth oppose any part of the Word of God As for the Scriptures alledged by the Dissenting Brethren in thâ—t forecited Reasons and from them here by Mr. Lockier we still affirm with the Reverend Assembly in their Answers none of theâ— proves the contrary they only shew that all these things belong to their Office and that this is the usuall practice and work of Elders where their work lyes But none of them prove it prohibited of God or unlawfull for an Elder upon a call to do or exercise one of these where they have not occasion and a call to do the rest Any thing that Mr. Lockier sayeth to the contrary of this is but his meer assertion but no proof from the words of the Texts for which I appeal to the judgement of any understanding man reading and considering the Texts themselves Let any man shew me out of these Scriptures any thing bearing this much Elders rule these particular Congregations only which you do ordinarily teach So we shall not need to insist upon them particularly only a note upon somewhat said by him upon some of them section 2 When as upon that Act. 20. 28. That there were many Officers belonging to this Church of Ephesus herein we join with him and that it is manifest here was but one flock on this wee join also as to the word one flock But that it was one single flock or Congregation only as he meaneth we utterly deny and affirme it was an associate flock or Church made up of severall single particular Congregations For proof and satisfaction herein we refer the Reader to thâ—â—ssemblies Answers to the Dissenting Brethrens reasons against the instance of the Church of Ephesus And here again I must crave leave to say Mr. Lockier exceedingly contemneth his Readers when as such considerable Answers being given and extant against all that could bee alledged by these ablest men of his side to prove that there was not many but one single Congregation in Ephesus he without any assay to infringe these Answers obtrudes 〈◊〉 bare naked Assertion that it was but one What Must 〈…〉 to him aâ— Pythagoras Disciples to captivate their judgement and acquiesce with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 section 3 Against his reasoning upon this Medium he propounds an Objection as one of our Arguments Sect. 36. and Answers it Sect. 37. Obj. Elders may Preach in this Church and that and many particular Churches Therefore they may according to this you have said rule over many particular Churches To which he Answers 't is not occasionall Preaching which one Church by consent and desire may admit to another that the Scriptures forementioned make thâ— bound of rule But where mens fixed call and work he must mean the work of Preaching properly lyeth To where I am called to Preach he must mean ordinarily this bounds commensurates and proportions my power as an Officer to Rule so that to go beyond this is to go beyond the Word to oppose the Word Ans 1. Albeit from what you have said viz. that the power of Preaching and the power of Ruling are commensurat and of equall extent it should not follow that if Presbyters may Preach to more Congregations then one occasionally Therefore may Rule over more Congregations then one ordinarily Yet it will follow they may rule over more Congregations then one in such a way as they may Preach to them For say yee their Preaching and Ruling are commensurate by Scripture Yea further if Elders may Preach to more Congregations then one not only occasionally but ordinarily which they may as suppose in a City where are many Congregations the Ministers be not fixed to them severally but teach them in common as they may do without violation of any Divine institution and that de facto it was not so in the first Churches nothing can be brought to demonstrat it will follow such Elders may Rule over moâ—e 〈…〉 out 2. We do not make the occasion◠〈…〉 more Congregations then one 〈◊〉 râ—aso◠〈…〉 â—hey may rule over more then one ordinâ—rily 〈…〉 a Minister by Christs institution and 〈…〉 Office â—s a Minister and hath that office habit 〈…〉 to the Universall Visible Church of Jesus Christ 〈…〉 singlâ— Congregation see â—his abundanâ—ly 〈…〉 the Learned Mr. Hudson Vinâ—ic of the â—ssâ—… 〈…〉 c. 6. pag. 138. seq â—nd so may and 〈…〉 Oâ—fice and â—ny part thereof in relation to 〈…〉 Church i particular Congregation o◠〈…〉 according as 〈◊〉 promoving of the good of the whol◠〈…〉 and h◠〈…〉 particular call there 〈◊〉 and 〈…〉 of Preaching be bounded 〈…〉 yet his 〈…〉 Ruâ—…ng may be ordinarâ—…y 〈…〉 Congregatioâ—… havâ—… a call thereunto by 〈…〉 that Congreâ—…tion â—nd 〈◊〉 theâ—… together â—or 〈…〉 and 〈…〉 association 〈…〉 obliged to â—…ter 〈…〉 section 4 In thâ—â—…st of hi◠〈…〉 it 〈◊〉 are brought to 〈◊〉 that a Miniâ—…e◠〈…〉 wor◠〈◊〉 Preaching bounds hiâ— ordâ—nary power of 〈…〉 that whâ—… he does not that hâ—â—…nnot do this 〈…〉 Thess â— â—… 〈…〉 that labour among you 〈…〉 compared with 〈…〉 that â—…uring to be in the Worâ— and 〈…〉 These 〈◊〉 sayeth he â—eacheth that fixed 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 Ruling go togethâ—r Answ These placâ—… 〈◊〉 teach 〈…〉 here 〈◊〉 Preach ordinarily over these 〈◊〉 also 〈…〉 not that ove◠〈◊〉 only they rule Mr. Locâ—ier 〈…〉 but proveth not noâ—â—an prove from the words The Author hath it 1. 17. I will not say but it may be an
offended and to esteem and account as we do a sentence of non-non-Communion by them by Churches against us upon such scandals wherein they are not satisfied an heavy and sad punishment and to be looked upon as a means to humble us and an Ordinance of God to reduce us If those men pillars of the Independent way had accounted as Mr. Lockier does Presbyterian Churches to be idolatrous would they have professed to hold retain such Communion with them Nay do they not themselves alledge all these things as Arguments to evidence that they are far from the mind of those who accounts them false Churches All this say they is more then as if in nothing they were to be complyed with nor their Churches to be communicated with in any thing which should argue Church Communion more is said and done by those who account them false Churches section 3 His second obj Sect. 49. Answ Sect. 50. is but a fiction set up by himself that he may seem at least to gain a victory We use not to reason so many has been converted under Presbyteriall Government doth not this seal it to be of God We know many have been and doubts not but some are at this day converted under Papall Government which is very Antichristianisme But this Sr we tell you that Presbyteriall Government in the exercise thereof has been the blessed means under God of Converting souls reduceing them from their sinfull wayes to God and his Son Christ Jesus the terrour of evill doers the preserver of his Church the Hedge that has guarded the Vineyard of the Lord from Foxes the very Hammer of Errours Haeresies and Haereticks and therefore is so much at this day maligned and hated of all such that in these lamentable times has turned aside unto their loose and erroneous wayes 'T is true Presbyterians takes it for no good Argument to prove Episcopall Government to be of God that many were Converted under it and believes it was a Government of mans invention Yet Presbyterians never thought of Churches under Episcopall Government in which the truth of the Gospel was Preached and Sacraments administred according to Christs institution for their substance as you think of Presbyteriall that they were false Churches But something more of this in considering his next Objection and Answ thereunto which fully unbowels the Authors design against Presbyterian Churches section 4 The Objection he frameth to himself is this But many Godly being in the Presbyterian way is it not more proper to purge then to pull down all To make use of the root and not up with root and branch To which his Answer in summe is that it was just so objected by the Godly in England when the Presbyterians would have down with our Episcopall Church But it behoved to be up root and branch So must now the Presbyterian The Lords controversie has come about to it and means the same And thereupon he gives his plain and faithfull warning to his dear Brethren Does this man know of what spirit he is To speak so Edomitelike of all Presbyterian Churches Down with them raze them to the ground up with root and branch of them Hoc Ithacus velit magno mercentur Atridae I think the man has wished a peece of acceptable service to Antichrist and his father the Devil Lord grant him mercy of it 'T is none of our pleading for the Presbyterian way that many godly being in it therefore simply purging of Presbyterian Churches were more proper then rooting up and pulling down all If any man Sir has come to reason with you thus poorly for Presbyterian Churches we doubt not but ere that time he has dealt treacherously against the truth We tell you the Presbyterian way is Gods way instituted in his Word the contrary whereof you but beggingly suppose in framing your Objection but has not nor ever will prove Yet this we affirme that albeit there be in Churches corruptions not only in the conversations of many persons but also in some things in the Worship and Ordinances yet if they be not such corruptions as everts and destroyes the foundation and substance of Religion But there is therein the substance of the Gospel orthodoxly Preached the Sacraments for their substantialls agreeable to their institution the way to be kept is purge out the old leaven And there is neither in Old nor in New Testament warrand for separating from or pulling down and rooting up such Churches And as to that Mr. Lockier alledgeth that Presbyterians would have down Episcopall Churches Either he has not understood or misrepresented Presbyterians mind in that matter Indeed Presbyterians were zealous to have the corrupt office of Prelacy plucked up root and branch because a plant that God had never planted in his Church and could not hear of a purging or circumcising of it that some would been at by clipping from them officialls and such other appendicles and limiting them thus and thus But that the whole frame of Churches that were under Prelaticall government should be razed down to the ground pluckt up root and branch cast all in a heap of ruine that out of the ruines thereof their should been picked out here and there some stones to build up new Churches it never entered in the thoughts of some Presbyterians Nay but on the contrary even in the time that Prelats possessed their Government sound Presbyterians as with the one hand they did fight against Prelats the corrupt Officers So did they at that same time with the other hand against Separatists with whom Mr. Lockier here agrees maintaining the Churches of England to be true Churches from whose communion it was not lawfull to separat Witnesse amongst sundry others that grave and judicious peece written by sundry non-conforme Divines jointly in the times of Prelats and published by Mr. Rathband An. 1604. section 5 But Mr. Lockier in his SECT 53. goes about to prove that it is not purging that must be applyed to Presbyterian Churches but they must be pulled down and pluckt up root and branch or utterly separated from His discourse in summe commeth to this much When the forme of Churches or their matter is right tho many things may be done amisse then purging may be used but when matter and forme both are corrupt and naught as it is in Presbyterian Churches For forme knit by situation and by forrain forinsecall Elderships For matter three parts of four naught prophane Atheists of Elders and people So that the Church state is quite dead 'T is not a man but a carcase not a Church but a nest of unclean birds a den of theeves to depart is proper But to talk of purging such the dead is discourse full of weaknesse if not of unwillingnesse to see and censure our own shame â—…sw Verily Sr I am of the mind that any judious man that reads your discourse in this Section will account it such as is full of that which ye charge on others weaknesse
and much worse I will not say the worst that might be said but shall rather pray God to be mercifull to you in this matter so blinded with prejudice and transported with passion far otherwise then becometh a man professing to have the meek and wise Spirit of Christ 1. If speaking so broadly he mean of Presbyterian Churches through the World as indeed your discourse here for pulling them down and separating from them runneth generally without any exception or limitation that for their matter three parts of four are naught prophane atheists c. What bold and blind conjecturing is this 2. If ye mean only the Church of Scotland and that therein three parts of four are naught prophane atheists both Elders and people Yet I say who art thou that judgeth another mans servant No doubt many amongst us are nothing such as they ought to be and it has been alwayes so for the most part in Churches from the beginning But that they are so many and so grosse prophane atheists both people and Elders for a man that is a stranger to the most part of our Churches Elders and people thereof to pronounce so peremptorly is more then he dare answer to God or his own conscience upon second considerat thoughts 3. Suppose it were so indeed that three of four in Churches were naught yet supposing in Churches there be the true Doctrine of the Gospel Preached the Sacraments for their substance and essentialls agreeable to their institution the acts of worship for matter pure must therefore Gods people separat from those Churches and the true Ordinances and Worship of God therein Or must the Churches be pulled down and plucked up root and branch Shew us warrand either of precept or practice for this in the whole Word of God Nay the strain of Prophets Apostles and Christ himself are clearly as the Sun-shine against it How often was it so with the ancient Church that we may say more then three parts of four were prophane and naught And yet did not the Godly and the Prophets of the Lord continue in the exercise of the Ordinances and Worship of God in that Church Was it not so in the Church of the Jews in the time of Christ being amongst them upon earth Did ever Christ for that require his Disciples to depart and separat from that Church Or did he not himself never a white the lesse continue in the Church communion thereof Yea when in glory writing a Letter to the Church of Sardis of whom he testifies that they had a name that they were living but yet were dead and that there were but a few names there which had not defiled their garments Yet his wise and meek zeal is not for pulling down and rooting up and separating from the Church Communion in his Ordinances and Worship But that is his direction v. 2 3. Be watchfull and strengthen the things which remain and are ready to die Remember therefore how thou hast received and heard and hold fast and repent 4. But suppose that de facto in some Churches the generality of persons Elders and people were so grosse and abominably prophane that there were no living for godly ones amongst them is this a good Argument to prove that the very species and kinde must be destroyed and plucked up root and branch Unlesse that Mr. Lockier could shew that the way of Presbyterian Churches of it self in its very kind allowes Churches to be constitute so of persons notoriously prophane and atheists that will not follow But if he shall say this we will avow it to be a slander 5. When as he will have our Churches to be destitute of a right forme because they are not united by way of their Church-Covenant but are knit together only by situation and by forrain forensicall Elderships And upon this account will have them no Churches but only carcasses of Churches It is utterly false that we make situation or cohabitation in place or a forrain Eldership the form of our Churches We say according to the Word of God that the form which gives the being to the Universall Church Visible and unto every member thereof is the profession of and entering unto that generall Covenant with God in his Son Jesus Christ and whereby every Christian is oblidged and engaged to walk in all the wayes of God and perform all duties towards God and other Christians in all their relations required of them according as God giveth opportunity and occasion to perform and exercise them As for Mr. Lockiers Church-Covenant distinct from that generall Covenant with God in Christ as the form of a particular Church giving it the being of a Church and right to the Ordinances of Christ 't is nothing else but a new device of men having no warrand of precept or example in the Word of God either of the Old or New Testament And his un-Churching of our Churches for want of such a Covenant as this is like many other things in this peece has more boldnesse in it then understanding or reason Concerning this matter of the Church-Covenant See Mr. Rutherfurd Due Right of Presbytery Caudrey Review of Mr. Hookers Survey cap. 4. Gul. Apollon Consider of certain Controversies section 6 Mr. Lockier going on yet more to vent his Brounisticall separation objects to himself thus SECT 54. But will no my protest serve the turn If things be corrupt in the Church and I protest against them may not I go on with that Church As for instance If they take in corrupt members or admit corrupt or impenitent communicants And I protest against those may I not go on and partake with these and yet be innocent and enjoy as much presence of God in his Ordinances as if all were holy and good To which he answereth SECT 55. 1. If protesting were only words then such a thing will do But to say the precious should not mingle with the vile and yet the man doth this daily and continually is not to protest but to mock and dissemble Because here is not a meer passivenesse in this man as to the going on in that thing which he protests against 2. Again in practical things t is not so much a mans word as his practice which gives the dislike If a man of an idolatrous Church should stand up and protest against the Masse and yet still go to Masse I doubt how well this would please God or deliver him from guilt Naaman implicitely protests against the idolatry he had practised that he would worship no God but the God of Israel and did he continue to bow down Yes say some but he begs pardon for it But most aptly in our last English Annot. The word being rendered in the time past Pardon that I bowed down 3. Protesting is a piece of revenge which is the vehemence of Repentance and the clearing of ones self which how well this will accord with halting and halving is worthy of deep thoughts of heart Can two
to clear the businesse Naamans practising of heathnish Idolatry in the house of Rimmon amongst a people not so much as professing the true God but an Heathnish people professedly denying the God of Israel what will intelligent pious men say to this To the third exception Whether Mr. Lockier defines protesting well to be a peece of revenge the vehemencie of Repentance let Lawyers judge To my simple apprehension protesting in the nature of it has nothing to do with Repentance as not importing guiltinesse in the person protesting but being an act whereby he testifies against the sinfulnesse and unjustice of the dead of some others that he himself may appear clear and free from the concurrence in or the accession to it and preserves himself in a legall capacitie to challenge it before a judge competent but whereas Mr. Lockier supposeth that a man protesting or testifying against the intrusion or admission of scandalous wicked persons into the participation of an Ordinance of Christ or lawfull necessarie act of Worship if he participate in that Ordinance or Worship when and where scandalous persons participates therein that in this the man halts and halves he does but beg the thing which will not be granted to him and he will never prove And on begged suppositions to say how these will accord is worthy deep thoughts of heart favours of contempt of Readers if not of somewhat else To the fourth when there is a Protestation against the constitution and very being of an Assembly 't is true there is no submitting to it by the Protesters But yet there may be a protesting against some on or more particular deeds of an Assembly when the constitution and being of it is acknowledged and to such an Assembly submission is not refused or denyed by any principles of ours So there may be a protesting or testifying against some particular abuses in a Church and yet communion keeped with that Church in lawfull true necessarie acts of Divine Worship But if the Author mean that if such an abuse be in a Church as that wicked persons are permitted in it or coming to Communion that in that case the Godly must protest not only against the deed but the very thing of that Church as no Church and therefore must not joine therewith in warranted acts of Worship but separate from its Communion altogether he will not have the simile of Assemblies and our cariage to them to go along with him and it is in it self without warrand contrare to the warrand of Scripture and we doubt not to say a most Schismatick Assertion Mr. Lockier in Sect. 56. and 57. brings and answers a new Objection and therein raiseth much dust to small purpose about the causalitie of Baptisme as to the constituting a Church The Objection is this Doeth not Baptisme give the forme of a true Church and you say if the forme and foundation be right it may be capable to purge it self right Sir you are much mistaken if you think that we hold Baptisme alone to give the forme of a true Church We say it is the initiall seal and solemne entry and admission of Members into the Visible Church so this is a needless Objection brought in it would seeme to vent a new conceit borrowed out of Mr. Hookers Survey part 1. c. 5. of a Church without Baptisme of which a word shortly upon his Answer to this Objection Only here we say this that which gives form and being to a Church is the true Doctrine of the Gospel and Covenant of Grace for substantials at least solemnly avowed by the sealing of Baptism and Preached by a lawfull Ministry Lawfull Ministry I say as to the essentials of a Gospel-Ministry these three at least are necessary to give the being of a Gospel-Church And where these are tho there be many corruptions and defects in the Church yet it is capable to purge it self from its corruptions and to supply its defects and to urge unchurching of such a society and dissolving of it as no Church or totall separation from it is not of GOD. But come we to speak a little to the Authors Answer to his Objection Baptism saith he doth not give the form of Church membership So say we too Profession of the true Christian faith is that which giveth the form of Church-membership de jure Baptism is the solemn seal thereof But Mr. Lock having in his Objection spoken of that which giveth form being to a Church how falleth he now to speak of that which giveth form of Church-membership Is there no more requisite to give form and being to a Church we are now speaking of a Church Visible but that which giveth form to Church membership simply This is a grosse mistake Profession of the Christian Faith simpliciter is that which adaequately gives the form and being to Church-membership simply But to give form and being to a Church there must be concurring with this a Ministeriall dispensation of the Doctrine of Faith and Ordinances by such means as Christ hath instituted them to be dispensed by A Church existing without a Ministry compleat in the nature and being of a Visible Church is a thing unheard of in the Word of GOD. See Huds c. 6. vindic section 12 But to Mr. Lockiers purpose in hand His aim here in his solution is to maintain that Baptism is no wayes necessary to Church-membership We confesse it is not that which giveth the forme and being of a member or the jus but yet we say it is necessary as the solemn seal of actuall admission into the possession of Church-membership in the ordinary way appointed by Christ The Authors Reasons for his Assertion are two 1. There may bee a Church and so consequently members of a Church before Baptisme Ministers are before Baptisme and the Church is before Ministers for out of it are they made and have their keyes c. See this abundantly dashed by Caudry in Mr. Hookers Surv. c. 5. 2. Saith he The Church was visibleble when there was no seal neither Circumcision nor Baptisme and then how could these constitute a Church Answ What a childish reasoning is this There was a Church without Circumcision and without Baptism when neither of them was yet instituted by God Ergo after Circumcision was instituted to be the solemn seal of his Church there might yet been a Jewish Visible Church without it and now after Baptisme is instituted to be a solemn initiall seal of the Christian Church there may be a Christian Church without Baptisme he might as well say that there may be a Christian Church without the profession and belief of that Article JESUS the Son of MARY is the CHRIST why the Church was sometime when there was no such Article to be believed section 13 He addeth to these two Reasons this prejudice Besides how much this gratifieth the judgement and practice of Anabaptists any one may see who constitute Church members by baptism and how much Presbyterians
of it Like as if the Congregation be not fixed by its self in its constitution and Officers that Command intends the bringing of the matter at first to an Eldership common to more Congregations As also if the matter to be judged be of publick and more common concernment then of one Congregation that same Commandement warrands by analogie and proportion the bringing of the matter first to some more large Presbytery or Colledge of Elders then the Congregational as the first Judicature to cognosee judicially upon it But withall let it be so observed that when Christ instituteth this order that offences when they cannot be removed otherwise should be brought to the Church that is to an Ecclesiastick Judicature he sayeth not that they may not in any case proceed further for judiciall cognition and sentence upon the mater then to the first Judicature to which the judiciall cognition of it belongeth Nor is there any ground in his words whereupon this can by good consequence be inferred In a word there is nothing in this Text either against the juridicall power of larger Eiderships then Congregationall such as are Classicall Presbyteries and Synods Nor against the subordination of Congregationall Elderships to the jurisdiction and authority of such larger Elderships But upon the contrary there is in them solid ground whereupon both have been clearly demonstrat by severall Presbyterian Writers and discussed all contrary exceptions and reasonings upon the place for shortness I refer the Reader to Answ of the Assembly of Divines to c. pag. 178. Guliel Appoll Considerat of certain Controversies cap. 6. pag. 94 95. and pag. 127. Spanhem Epistol ad Dav. Buchan Class 3. Arg. 2. Huds Vindicat. of the Essence and c. pag. 156 157 158. and pag. 164 165. Mr. Rutherfurd Due Right cap. 10. pag. 310. seq section 8 To what the Authors adde that no where do we read in the Gospel of jurisdiction in relation to censure committed to Classicall Presbytery Answ 1. If the meaning be no where in the Gospel do we read this power committed by a formall precept to Classicall Presbytery by name or specifically by it self it may be granted without prejudice to what we assert and I pray where will these Authors read in the Gospel this power committed to the Eldership of a single Congregation specifically and that as they maintain Independently and supreamly 2. It is sufficient for us if we read in the Gospel this power of Jurisdiction committed to the Officers and Rulers of the Church as united together in Collegio either in one single Congregation or over more Congregations combined and associat together as is most convenient for exercise of their Ecclesiastick communion And this we read Mat. 18. 17 18. for there Discipline and Ecclesiastick jurisdiction institute by Christ is committed unto the Officers and Rulers of the Church as united in Collegio Not to Officers of a single Congregation only as united but unto the Officers of the whole Catholick Visible Church of Christ as united in lesser or larger combinations even to an Oecumenicall Assembly Because the power of Jurisdiction and Discipline Ecclesiastick there is instituted and intended by Christ to be a remedy against all scandalls and offences in his Church but all and every sort of scandall falling out in the Visible Church of Christ cannot be so remeeded or removed by the Colledge of Officers in a single Congregation They can only be a means for remedying and removing this way scandalls and offences concerning their particular Congregation and therefore there must be understood as intended here by Christ larger Ecclesiasticall Assemblies and Judicatures to exercise Discipline and Jurisdiction for remedying offences and scandalls which Congregationall Elderships cannot reach 2. It is sufficient if we read in the Gospel approven examples of larger Presbyteries then Congregationall Classicall or Synodicall authoritatively governing and exercising Acts of Rule over more particular Churches We read of such a Presbytery as we call Classicall in Jerusalem Ephesus Corinth Ruling authoritatively more Congregations as has been demonstrat by severall Learned men See namely Assembly of Divines in their Answer to c. upon the proposition 3. of Presbyteriall Government Ius Divin par 2. c. 13. We read also an example of a Synod exercising such power and authority Act. 15. section 9 With this last instance doe these Authors meet thus All the power we find exercised by the meeting at Jerusalem Acts 15. is dogmaticall the people and Brethren having their interest likewayes which the Congregationall Divines willingly yeeld all the certificat they use is if ye do these things ye shall do well but do not threaten those that disobey with Excommunication Ans These things here alledged to elude this place of Scripture have been often dashed For the present briefly 1. These Authors speak warrily in calling that Assembly at Jerusalem by the generall name of a meeting and not a Synod It seemeth here they remembred that what whereas some Congregationall men acknowledges it to have been a Synod as Cotton cited before P. 2. and Mr. Lockier others finding that not so advantagious for them deny it and say only a reference of one particular Church of Antioch to one particular Church of Jerusalem as the Dissenting Brethren in the Assembly at Westminster Papers of the Assemb pag. 128. and therefore have chosen a name that might serve both and so displease neither But that it was a Synod see cleared by Jus Divin P. 2. C. 14. 2. Suppose it did not exercise a criticall power or power of censure yet it followeth not that it had not a power of censure to exercise On the contrary the dogmaticall power of a Synod being of another sort then the dogmatical power which is competent to a single Pastour this being only concionall and an act of the power of order this is juridicall and an act of the power of jurisdiction and of the Key of Discipline it carieth along a power of censure with it Tho this be not alwayes put in actuall exercise when the other is There may be and ofter is need of a juridicall determination of a case by a Judicature when there is not occasion of exercising of censure by that Judicature as is evident 3. It is contrary to clear truth that all the power that Synod exercised is dogmaticall For besides their exercising a dogmaticall power in confutation and condemnation of the Haeresie taught by the Judaizing Teachers and vindication of the truth about the great point of Justification by faith alone without the works of the Law They do also exercise a diatacticall power for healing the scandall of the weak Jews especially and their alienation of mind from the Gentile Christians who neglected their ceremoniall observances by making and enjoining a practicall canon ordaining the Gentiles to abstaine from some things that might any wayes occasion their offence And also a criticall power or power of censure against the schisme or 〈◊〉
and triall as is a sufficient ground whereupon the Church may and ought to esteem and judge the person truly gracious regenerate and endued with true saving faith and repentance in a word a true inward Saint or if somewhat else section 13 As for the Tenet of the Independent Brethren all of them speak not the same way Mr. Hooker Survey part 1. c. 2. pag. 20 21. confesseth that the expressions of some of his Brethren as well as those of the Separation are somewhat narrow at the first sight and seem to require exactnesse of the highest strain and so speaks for a candide interpretation of them to wit that when such Phrases of theirs occurre upon this Subject as these Onely the Saints faithfull called and sanctified are to be members of the Congregation such a construction as this be put upon these words persons visibly externally such to the judgement of charity not alwayes really and internally such by the powerfull impression of Gods free grace Certainly some of them have so roundly affirmed that none should be acknowledged members of the visible Church but such as are true internall Saints that hardly can such a construction be put upon their words See D. Holmes and Mr. Barclets expressions set down by Daniel Cawdry in his Schem of contradictions in the Independent way n. 17. And Mr. Lockiers expressions of this purpose along his Lecture can as hardly suffer such a construction Others of them indeed have spoken more warily and in a lower strain as Mr. Hooker himself stating the Question p. 1. pag. 15. tells us persons who may be are hypocrites inwardly yet if their conversations and expressions be such that we cannot but conclude in charity there may be and is some spirituall good in them we say and hope and are bound to conceive they are Saints these are fit mater of a Visible Church Only it is to be observed that it cannot be well discerned by his words whether he meaneth a * By a positive judgement wee meane the elicting of an act of the understanding whereby we affirme the man to be such and by a negative judgement the abstaining from affirmation of the contrarie negative judgment of charity or a positive his words as to this are so wavering and fluctuating and that very remarkably pag. 14. end and 15. begin he speaketh of the mater thus So far as rationall charity directed by rule from the Word a man can not but conclude that there may be some seeds of some spiritual work of grace in the heart Here if we look at these words A man can not but conclude one would think that a positive judgement were intended for that expression doth import a necessity of elicting positively an act of judgement affirming of the subject that form touching which the Question is But the next word which is but a may be nothing being more said there before he concludeth the description of Visible Saints seemeth to cast down that and to import lesse Then a little after he expresseth clearly a positive judgement we say and hope and are bound to conceive they are Saints Again in propounding the state of the Question the mater is involved in a cloud We cannot conclude but in charity there may be and is some spirituall good in them c. If we look at that we cannot conclude but c. one would think only a negative judgment were intended for these words import no more but a necessity of abstaining from an act of judgment whereby the form in Question is denyed of the subject or the contrair thereunto affirmed But when it is added there may be and is c this seems to speak for a positive Before it was we cannot but conclude and therewith there may be only Now it is we cannot conclude but and herewith there may be and is I verily think the godly man has been at a puzzle in his conceptions about the mater Of all the Brethren of the Independent way whose Writings I have had occasion to see Mr. Nortoun in his Answer to Gulliel Apoll. his Questions are most mâ—derate and come nearest to the truth In many particulars he cometh below that which is required by most part of all others of that way particularly in that expresly he asserteth that it is not a positive judgement but only negative that we are to have of the grace of Church-members c. 1. that we are not positively to judge ill of them section 14 But not to insist on these differences this in generall is their common Tenet that only such can be taken to be members of the Visible Church whether as foundationalls at the first gathering of the Church or as additionalls by admission into fellowship of the Church as may and ought to be accompted in the judgement of charity true heart-beleevers having reall communion with Christ and that upon sufficient evidences given thereof 1. By knowledge in the Fundamentall points of Religion and such other as are requisite and necessary to be known for leading a life without scandal 2. An experimentall work of Grace upon their hearts of Repentance towards God and Faith in the LORD JESUS CHRIST 3. A conversation not only without scandall and offence before men indeed Norton goeth no further but also without neglect of any known duty and commission of any known ill concerning which they must be a good space tryed first in a way privat if the Church be a gathering by one another mutually untill they be mutually satisfied in the judgement of charity touching the truth of the grace of each other If it be in the admission of additionall members the triall is first by the Ruling Elder or Elders both by way of diligent enquiry for information from others and by way of conference with and examination of the parties themselves Then all things being clear and satisfactory to the Elder the person being propounded to the Church the people also must as opportunity may serve them try their spirituall condition and that both wayes too If these find no realitie of satisfaction they present their dissatisfaction to the Elder or Elders which stayes the proceeding for the present But if satisfaction hath been gotten by Elders and People in this privat way then the persons to be admitted must further every one after another if it be at the first gathering of the Church make first a publick confession of their knowledge and faith in the grounds of Religion then a declaration of the experimentall work of their effectuall vocation 1. In Repentance from dead works 2. In their unfeigned faith towards the Lord Jesus and then must produce if required a testimony of their blamelesse conversation For a testimony to my faithfulnesse in this representation of their Doctrine I refer the Reader to these on the Margent * Hookers Survey p. 1. c. 2. pag. 14 15 24 25. p. 3. cap. 3. pag. 4 â— Brief Narrat of the pract of the Churches of N. E. pa.