Church by Baptism nor can be by meer Cohabitation even so they never were by their own Consent either expresly or interpretatively They never held Communion with the Church of England in all Ordinances were never confirm'd by the Bishops nor ever did participate of the Lord's Supper and therefore I think it cannot be truly said That they Separate How can they cease that Communion which they never had For which reason to prove these Schismatical Separatists who never separated from the Church seems an Impossibility Surely their exercise of that Right and Power with which they are invested as Christians in chosing their own Pastor cannot be an Act Schismatical By this 't is manifest That those who never expresly nor implicitly consenting to hold communion with any parish-Parish-Church in all Ordinances were never actually obliged to hold Communion with such particular Parishes and consequently their forbearing such Communion or their Assembling in places distant from the Parish Church cannot be a Separation and if not a Separation it cannot be a Schism Thus the Reader may easily perceive how necessary 't is that the Conformists prove that those Dissenters who now meet in Assemblies locally distant from the Parish Churches were once Members and under an Obligation of holding external Communion with the Parish Churches if they will prove 'em Separatists Furthermore they must prove 2. That this people do ordinarily Separate themselves from the external Communion of their Parish Church For seeing the Sin of Schism consists in causeless Separation there must be a Separation or there can be no causeless Separation that is there can be no Schism but how the Conformist can prove a Separation any otherwise than by insisting on the people's not holding Communion in the same manner or same place with the Church is difficult to suppose And if they take either of their ways without the Addition of some other Consideration they must either make many of their own Meetings Separate which are in places locally distant from the Parish Church where their Modes of Administration are different or clear many Dissenters from the Reproach of Separation what do they think of such Meetings in which the Common Prayer is read are they Separate and Schismatical But after they have prov'd both these they cannot prove all Dissenters Schismatical unless they can also evince 3. That the Separation is Causeless and Sinful But how they can prove that those who if they separate do so on no other Account than that they may forsake Sin is a point worthy of Consideration If there be any sinful Imposition made the term of Communion 't is sufficient to justifie the Separation of those who withdraw themselves from the external Communion of that Church If a Church that is sound in the Doctrine of Religion though it detests an Idolatrous Worship yet if it make the least Sin the Term of Communion whereby the people cannnot have Communion with that Church but by a deliberate committing that Sin Separation from the Communion of this Church is justifiable For whatever some may suggest we must not commit the least Sin that good may come thereof To insist then so much on the Peace and Vnity of the Church as if it were a Good for the Obtaining which we might venture on a little Sin is a Notion of a very dangerous Tendency giving too great Countenance to a Doctrine of the Papists whereby they justifie all their Villanies A Little evil say they may be done for the Obtaining a great Good for instance The Salvation of the many Souls in Three Kingdoms is a great a very great Good the Killing One Two or Three Hereticks in order thereunto at most is but a little evil which may be done for so great a good Moreover this justifies all their Officious Lying and Equivocating they tell a Lye that some great good may come thereof But this is so contrary to the pure Nature of a Holy God and his Holy Good and Just Command that whoever will indulge himself in a practical embraceing such a Notion doth but prepare the greater Damnation for his own Soul God is a great God and the least Sin being an Offence to his Dread Majesty cannot knowingly with deliberation and allowance be committed but the person that does it exposeth himself to Divine Indignation who ever breaketh the least of these my Commands says Christ Matth. 5. 19. is in danger of loosing Heaven for though a man keep the whole Law and yet offend in one point he is guilty of all James 2. 10. We must not speak nor act wickedly for God he is not glorified by Mans lye and therefore Wo unto them that will do evil that good may come thereof Rom. 3. 8. If the least sin be made the Term of Communion no Consideration of Peace and Vnity or of Obedience to the Magistrate can excuse those from guilt that will venture on that sin Whence 't is evident That all those who by the Reasons insisted on in this Treatise are fully convinc'd That somewhat sinful is imposed as a Term of Communion with the Church of England they do but discharge their Duty and keep a good Conscience in separating and yet by separation do not accuse the Church as if she had been no true Church or as if Salvation could not by others be had in it A Church that is sound in the Faith that 't is a true Church in a Theological Sense being lyable to Error may even while Sound in the great things of Religion impose some Error as a Term of Communion from which those who are convinc'd of the Sin must separate A sound Church in the great things may err in lesser matters and may Impose Assent and Consent unto that Error as a Term of Communion with the which these Dissenters durst not comply but seeing they cannot have Communion on easier Terms must separate There is a great Difference between the Errors or Corruptions of a Church which are made Terms of Communion and those which are not 'T is not to be question'd but that a man may joyn with a Church that is less pure than another even with a Church that hath several Spots in it or he must joyn with none and may be under an Obligation of continuing with that Church although he may go elsewhere and be better edifyed otherwise there being variety of Gifts those who are more eminent than the rest among the Ministery must have most of the people round when other honest though not so able Preachers have few or none However if they make the least Spot or Impurity a Term of Communion he dares not comply As long as he may may continue Communion without being made a partaker of the impurities as in many instances he may he must not separate but when they impose their corruptions as Termes of Communion so that he cannot have Communion but by complying with the corruption he must not sin for the sake of Communion nor on any
THE HARMONY Between the Old and Present Non-Conformists PRINCIPLES In Relation to the TERMS of Conformity With Respect both to the CLERGIE and the PEOPLE Wherein A short History of the Original of the English LITURGY and some Reasons why several truly Conscientious Christians cannot joyn with the Church in it Humbly Presented to Publick Consideration in order to the obtaining some necessary Relaxation and Indulgence To which are added some Letters that pass'd between the Lord Cecil and Arch-Bishop Whitgift The Fault is on both sides and on neither side For the Godly wise on both sides bear with each other and concenter in the main But then there be selfish peevish Spirits on both sides some and these make the Quarrel Greenham's Answer to the Lord Cecil's Question Who is the Faulty Causer of the Division in the Church LONDON Printed and are to be sold by Joseph Collier on London-Bridge 1682. To the Right Reverend Edward Lord Bishop of Cork and Ross in Ireland MY LORD ON a perusal of your late Treatise Entituled The Protestant Peace Maker I find your Lordship so very much dispos'd to pursue Charity Peace and Vnion the only necessary mean left us for the preservation of the Reformed Protestant Religion that though I am a perfect stranger to you I cannot choose but make and hope that you will Candidly receive this present Dedication There is now as your Lordship expresses it p. 29. an argument for Vnity which must be heard and is uncontroulable We must Unite or be destroyed At all times Christian duty obliges us thereto now necessity or self-preservation too or more parties may ballance one when any single other cannot Thus 't is evident we must Vnite The strength of the Protestant Cause both here at home and throughout Christendom lies in the Vnion of Protestants and the glory purity and power of Christianity in this world stand or falls with Protestantism But the only question is upon what Termes must the Church of England come over to the Dissenters or the Dissenters go over to the Church The right stating the true Termes of Vnion is a work of extraordinary difficulty a work that requires the heads and hearts of the greatest the most judicious and Holy men on earth to contribute all they can towards it Government in the Church must be secur'd tender Consciences reliev'd Where there is no government all things will run into confusion where there is no relief for tender Consciences there can be no union The government of a National Church must be National and such as is most exactly suited to the civil constitution of the Natiou The former must not interferr with the later But of this though your Lordship speakes nothing yet may your Lordship see something God permitting it in good time that some Dissenters have to offer towards the healing our breaches and that also in a way consistent with an establishment of such a National Church government as agrees with the antient constitution of this Kingdom That which your Lordship's wisdom hath insisted on is a point of moment and importance namely the Liturgy and Ceremonies concerning which you propose mutual concessions and approaches as the only probable uniting expedient Now if complyance be likelyest to do the business you say let us relax a little on both hands in the fear of God and fall upon it Let us Candidly consult what good Conscience what prudence will bear towards an accommodation To this you add Page 118. 119. I do not conceive the alteration of an expression or perhaps here and there of an whole Prayer or two by Law or the dispensing still by Law with some ceremony in Law for the sake of some unsatisfied but otherwise regular Christians who are not suppos'd of the Cathedral Body I say I do not conceive such concession or relaxation as this would break the harmony and beauty of our worship or disturb the Vnion or Peace of our Church I will therefore freely publish my thoughts to be that whither we Consider the Nature of the thing it self or with regard to the Apostle's Rule Rom. 15. 1 2. Not to please our selves but every one of us to please his Neighbour for his good to Edification In either regard I say there are some Collects and perhaps Rubricks too which with all Duty and Submission I humbly conceive may be alter'd for the better And farther that in some Seasons and in some private places If the Obligation to a Ceremony or two were taken off the benefit which would hence redound to the Church would be very Considerable And I seem to my self herein to follow the sense and guidance of our Church for even at present the Injunction of the Ceremonies does not appear to me to extend it self to all places and seasons There are also divers other points which when once the design of a fair Accommodation shall be on foot will be fit to be mentioned and indeed will both of Course offer themselves and be I judge as easily granted such as the Liberty of exchanging Apocriphal Lessons for Canonical ones any Amendment of such Defects as can be prov'd in the Calendar The Use of the most Correct Translation of the Psalms A better Metrical Version also and perhaps some like matters which we may account small some Diffenters do not My Lord May the expedient you propose be attended unto the desired Vnion would soon be obtained for thereby all those Arguments mentioned in the ensuing Treatise which press hard on the Consciences of some Dissenters concerning the present Terms of Communion would be answered their Consciences relieved and they be of the same external Communion with the Church of England I do therefore humbly presume to beseech your Lordship to do your utmost for the furthering this peaceable and uniting Design for certainly you have hit on what if closely followed will reconcile us and as your Lordship will express it this is the only probable expedient for 't is an undoubted Truth That there are among the Dissenters a considerable Number who are under the most powerful and plain Convictions of Conscience about the Vnlawfulness of the present Liturgy as Ordered by the Canon and Rubrick to be used and of the Ceremonies that they cannot but by sinning against God to the wounding of their own Consciences conform That the World may be assured of this much and see how necessary some Relaxations are in Order unto Vnion I have shewn what are the Sentiments of some of the most Judicious and more moderate Dissenters why 't is yet they conform not to the Terms of lay-Lay-Communion impos'd by the Church and why 't is they erect seperate Congregations Some are so fully Convinced of the unlawfulness of the present Liturgy and Ceremonies that they refuse to Conform because they think their Conformity to be sinful but other do not so much insist on the sinfulness as on the Inexpediency of their Conformity They cannot Conform without Scandal By Scandal they
sayes the common fame went for truth that the Pope promised to confirm out of his own authority the English Liturgy provided her Majesty should rank her self with the Roman Church To thefe I adjoyn Dr. Boyes who was a bitter expositor of the English Liturgy as Heiga by the Doctors of Dowayes appointment was of the Mass after he hath whetted his teeth upon the Schismaticks in his Epistle to Bancroft he produceth the letter of Pope Pius for the approbation of the Service Book and notes also the Testimony of approbation from Bristow in his motives Queen Elizabeth being interdicted by the Popes Bull. Secretary Walsingham wrought so that he procured two Intelligences to be sent from the Pope as it were in secret into England to whom the Secretary appointed a State Intelligencer to be their Guide who shew'd them London and Canterbury service in all the pomp of it which the popish Intelligencers viewing and considering well with much admiration they wondred that their Lord the Pope was so ill advised or at least ill informed as to interdict a Prince whose Service and Ceremonies so Symobiliz'd with his own and therefore returning to Rome they possest the Pope that they saw no Service Ceremonies or Orders in England but they might very well serve in Rome whereupon the Bull was recalled to this also Doctor Carrier consid p. 45. a dangerous seducing Jesuit gives ample evidences The Common Prayer book saith he and the Catechism contained in it held no point of Doctrine expresly contrary to Antiquity that is as he explaineth himself contrary to the Romish Service c. Much more might be spoke to this purpose but I wave it judging that what hath been already offer'd is sufficient to evince that there is at least in the judgment of many a very great agreableness between the two service books 2. What is it that occasion'd the Church of Englands adhering to so great a part of the Romish Service Book even when she forsook the Communion of that Church Whoever considers the State of the Church in Edward the sixth his time will find that Cranmer and others discover'd a propension to drive on the Reformation much farther than they did but were hindred by the iniquity of the times Thus Bullinger as I find it in a difcourse of the troubles of Franckford reports to Mr. Williams Whittingham Gilby and others that Cranmer Bishop of Canterbury had drawn up a book of Prayers an hundred times more perfect than this we now have but the same could not take place for that Cranmer was matched with a wicked Clergy and Convocation with other enemies There were also reasons of a like nature that might hinder the furtherance of the reformation in Queen Elizabeths dayes for even then the ignorance of the vulgar accompanied with a proportionable hatred to true Religion was very great Whence 't is that Cambden assures us that the change of Religion was not suddenly made but by little and little by degrees for the Roman Religion continued in the same State it was first a full Month and more after the death of Queen Mary The 27th of December it was tolerated to have the Epistles and Gospels the Ten Commandments the Symbole the Litany and the Lords Prayer in the vulgar Tongue The 22 of March the Parliament being Assembled the order of Edward the sixth was re-established and by act of the same the whole use of Lord's Supper granted under both kinds The 24th of June by the Authority of that which concern'd the Uniformity of Publique Prayers and Administration of the Sacraments The Sacrifice of the Mass was abolished and the Liturgy in the English Tongue more and more Established In the Month of July the Oath of Allegiance was proposed to the Bishops and other persons and in August Images were thrown out of the Temples and Churches and broken and burn'd Furthermore as the illness of the times did impeed a sudden Reformation in like manner the moderate temper and favourable disposition the Queen had to some part of Popery was such as hindred a full Reformation whereupon it was not so far carryed on by this Queen as 't was sometime before by her Brother Edward the sixth That Queen Elizabeth had a natural propension to favour some part of Popery is not only manifest from her I hope Conscientious conforming so far in Queen Maries dayes as to hear Divine Service according to the rule in the Romish Church and her oft going to confession and afterwards when she came to the Throne her choosing to be Crown'd by a Popish Bishop according to the order of the Roman Pontifical which had so much in it of the Ceremonies and Superstitions of the Church of Rome that 't is thought very probable the Protestant Bishops would not act in it but with great alterations and that therefore she desired 'em not to be ingaged in it But beside this Dr. Burnet gives us the same Character I have suggested for sayes he in his History of the Reformation Queen Elizabeth receiving some impressions in her Fathers Reign in favour of such Old Rites as he had still retain'd and in her own Nature loving State and some Magnificence in Religion as well as in every thing else she thought that in her Brother's Reign they had stript it too much of External Ornaments and had made their Doctrine too narrow in some points therefore she intended to have some things explained in more general Termes that so all parties might be comprehended by them She inclin'd to keep up Images in Churches and to have the manner of Christ's presence in the Sacrament left in some general words that those who believed the Corporal presence might not be driven away from the Church by too nice an explanation of it So far Dr. Burnet In pursuance of these resolves the Queen attempts the accommodating matters of Religion so unto the Romish Clergy as to take 'em into the Communion of the Church of England the which end as Dr. Heylin affirmes she so effectually compass'd that for several years the Papists continued in the Communion of the Church and when they did forsake it it was not because they approved not of our Liturgy but upon political considerations and because the Councill of Trent had commanded it and Pope Pius the 5th had Excommunicated the Queen and discharg'd her Subjects from their Allegiance and made the going or not going to Church a sign distinctive to difference a Roman Catholick from an English Protestant I 'll give you the words of Dr. Heylin they are in his History of Queen Elizabeth There past another Act for recommending and imposing the book of Common Prayer and Administration of the Sacraments according to such alteration and corrections as were made therein by those who were appointed to revise it as before is said In the pursuance of which service there was great care taken for expunging all such passages in it as might give any scandal or offence to the
Medina himself doth assert that a man must rather obey an erroneous Conscience than the command of any Prelate that is contradictory thereunto Supposing these Dissenters do err yet they must not act contrary unto an erroneous Conscience the whole that can be justly desir'd is that they use all regular means to depose and shake off the error of Conscience which must be done by a sincere seeking God for more light that they may come to the knowledge of the truth and by a diligent and impartial enquiry into the true State of the controversie Moreover there must be if possible a consulting the writings of the Learned on both sides or a conversing with 'em with a readyness to weigh all things with deliberation and a resolution to embrace the truth where ever 't is found But if after all their old convictions are rather strengthned than otherwise they must beware they act not contrary to their Conscience They must not resign up their reason their Conscience nor their Religion unto the pleasure of the greatest Potentate on Earth This I take to be the Doctrine of all sound Protestants of the Church of England yea I can when there shall be an occasion prove it to be so by a Collection of the several Arguments of the Learned Drs. of the Church which they have urg'd for the confirmation of this truth in the opposition they make to the blind obedience of the Papist Whence I inferr That these Dissenters in refusing to joyn with the Church of England in the Liturgy do but discharge their duty unto God Their not joyning with the Church is not the sin of Schism Schism is asserted by Protestants to be a causless separation whence if there be a good cause why they separate 't is not causeless and can there be a better cause than the avoiding sin They separate because they should sin if they did not separate But though this be enough to clear the Dissenter who is fully convinc'd of the unlawfulness of those Termes of Communion that are imposed on the people yet 't is not enough to justifie the separation of those who do not only think it lawfull but expedient to joyn with the Church of England in their Prayers and Ceremonies c. who if they will separate from the Church of England and justifie their separation they must argue from other Topicks for certainly the peace of the Church and the authority of the Magistrate cannot but engage a people to do what is both lawfull and expedient These therefore I think deny that they separate from the Communion of the Church Although they worship God in Meetings locally distant from the Parish Church yet their Meetings are but as Chappels of Ease and the Preachers but as Curates to the Parish Churches That the Episcopal Party may effectually demonstrate a Religious Assembly locally distant from the Parish Church to be Schismatical they must prove 1. That the people of this Assembly were once actually Members of the Parish Churches 2. That these people do ordinarily separate themselves from the external Communion of their Parish Churches 3. That their separation is causless First They must prove that the people of this Assembly that is locally distant from the Parish Church were once Members of the Parish Church that they were under an obligation of holding external Communion with their Parishes 1. All External Communion must be in Parish Assemblys or single Congregational Churches For a Diocesan Provincial or National Assembly of all the Members of those Societies for External Communion is on the account of the multitude of the people impossible 't is impossible they should meet in one and the same Assembly and hold Communion with each other in Prayers in the Word and in the Sacrament Their External Communion in Prayers c. must be in lesser Assemblies or not at all 2. Those who are under any Obligations of holding external Communion with this or the other Parish must be Members of this or the other Parish Church Such as are not Members of this or the other Parish Church cannot be said to separate from it tho' they meet in places locally distant because they not being Members of the Parish Church are not under any Obligation of holding external Communion with that Parish A Man saies Dr. Stilling fleet is not said to separate from every Church where he forbears or ceases to have Communion but only from that Church with which he is obliged to hold Communion and yet withdraws from it This sufficiently evinces That unless the Conformists can prove that the Dissenters were oblig'd to hold Communion as Members of the Parish Churches they cannot prove a Separation To separate from a Church doth suppose that person to have been once of that Church But the Quaerie is how the Conformists will prove all the Dissenters to be Members of some particular Parish Church Will they say that they were all made Members of some particular Parish Church by their Baptisme That cannot be because by Baptism we are only made Members of the Catholick Church Doth our being born English Men and our Inhabiting in such a Parish make us Members of the Parish Church No for there are no Grounds in Scripture for this Our Lord Jesus Christ nor his Apostles did not leave any Intimations concerning such a Rule neither can any precept but what is fetch from God's word fasten any such Obligation on the Conscience that whoever lives within such a precinct must be a Member of such a Church How then must it be The Answer of our Lord Jesus Christ and his Apostles and the Primitive Christians for the first 300 years and of most Protestants is full for this which is That it must be by the peoples consent For as the people are invested with a Right to chose their own Pastor and the Church with which they would hold Communion Even so they cannot be Members nor under any Obligation of holding Ordinary Communion with this or the other particular Church without their own consent Consent is as absolutely necessary to the constituting a particular Parish Church as a National which consent may be discovered not only Expresly but also implicitly which is when a people do ordinarily joyn with some particular Church in all Ordinances as many Parishioners who by their Ordinary holding Communion with the Parish Church in all Ordinances do practically and interpretatively though not expresly discover their consent to be of that Church whereby I think they are under an Obligation to constant Communion with that Parish Church so long as they find it lawful Tho' these may Occasionally hold Communion elsewhere yet their ordinary and constant Communion must be with their Parish Church For which reason if they do ordinarily forbear or cease to have Communion with their parish-Parish-Church it may be justly said that they do separate from it But there are many an Inhabitant in most Parishes who as they were not made Members of the Parish
act contrary to the plain conviction of their Conscience and Conform If then there be any peace in the Church it must be either by a familiar sweet and plain discovery of their mistake or by a relaxing somewhat the rigor of the Terms of Communion The Forms by many years experience we find impossible and therefore as the Bishop of Cork and Ross expresses it the only probable expedient for Union left us is the later In the following History I must say that I have confin'd my self to urge those arguments of the Old Non-conformists which are against those parts of the Liturgy now in being and I have done it without passion or partiality My great care hath been to propose with indifference their judgment to the end the Reader considering it with the same equal mind as 't is written may be the better enabled to pass a Candid Censure on the whole I have not been curious in the choice of words for my design is only the information of the vulgar to whose capacity I have in the most familiar manner I could adjusted the following discourse That the God of Heaven will enable us all to follow peace with all men and Holiness for we must not so far pursue peace as to do any unholy thing in order thereunto ought to be our dayly Prayer to the God of Heaven April 3. 82. Farewell An Account of the Non-Conformists Principles concerning the Terms both of the Clergy and Lay-Conformity SINCE the 24th of August 1662 there have been many a Non-Conformist even among the Ministers and People of England who though they have different apprehensions concerning the Terms of Conformity do yet all agree in their not submitting unto all that is required by the Act of Vniformity There are some among the Ministers who can Conscientiously comply withall that is enjoyn'd the people and there are others that cannot That the Reader may with the greater clearness understand wherein the principal grounds of Non-Conformity consist I will with the greatest impartiality attempt the giving a particular account of the Principles of those who are now most commonly known by the name of Dissenters Not that I design to insist on all those principles they profess to embrace as they are sound Christians and good Protestants but only to shew what their Judgment is as they are Dissenters from the Church of England 1. There being a great difference between the Terms of Conformity imposed on the Ministers and those enjoyn'd the People there are some among the Non-Conforming Ministry who can submit unto the impositions laid on the people but not unto what is exacted from the Ministers They can hear yea read the ordinary Lord's days Service and joyn in the Communion of the Church but yet cannot Assent and Consent to every thing contained in the 39 Articles Book of Common Prayer and Homilies already extant and such as shall hereafter be set forth because they are fully convinc'd that there are several things contain'd in those Books which are not agreable unto the Word of God and because they cannot divine what may be inserted in the Book of Homilies hereafter to be published and are loath to subscribe to they know not what These have so great an advantage against the Conformists that Dr. Stilling fleet when he first entred on the controversies about the Terms of the peoples Communion with the Church wav'd that of the Ministers Conformity As these are Non-conformists so in their writings they triumph over the Conformists But then as they do ordinarily separate from the Communion of the Church and erect orderly Congregations for the Administrations of all Ordinances they have not that advantage which other Nonconformists have For say the Conformists unto 'em seeing you look on the terms of Lay-Communion to be lawfull and to shew so much you do occasionally hold Communion with us your Communion ought to be fixed and ordinary and that because the consideration of the Curches peace and the authority of our Governours in the enjoyning what is confessedly lawfull should oblige your Consciences There are several things replyed First The Ministers being consecrated unto God in that Holy Function of the Ministry dare not look back they commit Sacriledge should they withdraw themselves from the Ministry for wo unto them if they preach not Secondly The great necessity there is of their preaching in order to the reforming the people Moreover they add that they do not separate from the Church they do but preach as Lecturers or Curates unto the Parish Ministers In this controversie I 'll not engage my self for my business is principally design'd to give a right state of the controversie and so far as I can to offer somewhat in the Non-conformists defence which as to this particular shall be only to clear them from that reproach which is cast on them about their going to Church to Divine Service and the Communion and yet do not conform as Ministers The answer is easie viz. There is much more than these things required of them Viz. Subscriptions as enjoyn'd by the Act of Uniformity besides the abjuring the Covenant to the which several who have nothing to offer against the ordinary Lord's days Service and the other Terms of Lay-Communion cannot yield their Consciences 2. There are other Non-conforming Ministers who cannot conscientiously conform either unto the Terms impos'd on the Minister or People Of these there are two sorts 1. Some who look on the particular forms of Prayer imposed on all to be Lawfull but not Expedient 2. Others who consider this particular form of Prayer to be Vnlawfull 1. Of the first opinion are several Presbyterians if not some Congregational Divines For the clearer understanding their Sentiments we must consider 1. That there is a difference between the lawfulness of set forms of Prayer in Thesi and in Hypothesi A form of Prayer in general may be lawfull but this or the other set form in particular sinfull In the Popish Mass Book there are several forms of Prayer which are by sound Protestants esteemed sinfull not because they are forms so much as because they are such forms There are very few besides some Independents and Anabaptists who judge all forms of Prayer because they are forms to be Unlawfull 2. There is also a difference between the lawfulness of a form and its expediency A Stinted Liturgy may in some cases be both lawfull and expedient and in other though in it felf lawfull yet highly inexpedient For ought I can say to the contrary a set form of preaching is as lawfull as a set form of Prayer and 't is manifest that there was a time in the beginning of Edward the 6ths Reign that the making Sermons for the Ministers was as convenient as the making Prayers for them such was the ignorance peevishness and contentiousness of those in Holy Orders That a stinted form was as neeessary to be us'd in preaching as 't was in praying for which reason as an
the Anabaptist Here I 'll give the sense of the moderater sort of those who look on the present Liturgy as what cannot by them be used without sin The which I 'll do without an engaging my self so far in their defence as to espouse their quarrel As for my part I think moderation becomes all Christians especially English Protestants in a day wherein they are in danger of being destroyed by the common enemy the Papist This is not a time to fall out with one another and quarrel about lesser things for now the great and weighty matters of our Religion are in hazard there must be an exercise of Christian charity towards each other Let every man give that liberty to the conscience of another which he expects should be given his own for while the World endures there will be as different apprehensions about lesser matters as there are different complections among men and therefore there must be mutual forbearance or there will be no peace among us Methinks it lookes ill when men assume to themselves an unaccountable infallibility the which is attended with a proportionable severity in imposing their own sentiments on others This is not only common among the Papists but also to be observed too much among all sorts of Protestants whether Episcopal Presbyterian Independent or Anabaptist and is I verily believe one great reason of those violent Dissentions that are among us every one thinks that such as dissent from them do so without any solid reasons and therefore not to be tolerated Thus some of the Conforming Clergy esteem the Non-conformists dissent from them to be both unreasonable and intolerable and some Dissenters it may be are even with the Episcopal in those censures they pass on them and among the Non-conformists some who only desire that the subscriptions and abjurings of Covenants be remov'd are willing enough that the Liturgy be established with but a few amendments the which may be done by a Comprehensive Bill that hath nothing of Indulgence in it But really how weak soever the greatest part of the Non-conformists are 't is too manifest that they think that there are other Blocks which lye in their way to Conformity than subscriptions and abjurings whose Consciences should be regarded and who stand as much in need of an Indulgence as others do of a Comprehension If the Bill of comprehension should be comprehensive enough to take me in I think my self oblig'd to do my utmost that such Conscientious persons who through weakness cannot do as much as my self be at least indulg'd Conscience is a tender thing and is really the immediate directer of our actions against the plain convictions of which we must not go No Authority is sufficient to oblige any man to act against the plain convictions of conscience For which reason seeing the Dissenters are fully convinc'd in Conscience that they cannot lawfully conform to the present Terms of Lay-Communion there must be either some alteration of the Termes or some must suffer for Conscience sake whence then to shew the necessity of altering some things even for a comprehension and the indulging in other things for the ease of tender Consciences I 'll give the Reader an Historical Account of some of their reasonings against the Termes of Lay-Communion the which I will produce only to this end namely to shew that the reasons are such as may lay convictions on the Consciences of good and honest if not learned men Though men of great learning may be able to answer them yet if they be such as are unanswerable in the judgmenr of the Dissenters 't is sufficient for the purpose for which I produce them Those arguments may be strong in the judgment of some which are not so in the opinion of others My province then is only to propose not to defend the arguments that are cogent in moving some Dissenters to conclude that as Lay-men they cannot conform unto the imposed Termes of the Church of England For to the compleat Communion of Lay-men there is required a conformity not only to the ordinary Lord's dayes Service but moreover unto their Modes of Administring the Sacraments But that unto this they cannot conform I will essay particularly to evince by shewing more generally why they can't conform to the Terms impos'd on the people and then more particularly why they can't submit unto the Rubrick about baptizing their children nor Communicate with them in the Lord's Supper and in fine give several reasons why others can't with a safe Conscience attend on the Reading of the ordinary Lord's dayes Service 1. Why some cannot Conscientiously comply with the Termes of Communion imposed by the Church on the people 1. More generally Because there are so many things which the Church of England acknowledges to be in their own nature indifferent that are made so necessary apart of Religion as to be Termes of Communion with them They take the Word of God contained in the writings of the Old and New Testament to be the only Rule of the whole and of every part of their Religion whence what is enjoyned them as so necessary a part of Religion as to be made a Term of Communion they cannot conform thereunto unless it be agreeable to the Word of God A Term of Christian Communion is a very necessary part of Christ's Religion the non-embracing which deprives a person of the benefit and advantage of the Sacraments and therefore they must be no other than what our Lord Christ has in his Word made so If any man or society of men assume unto themselves a power concerning matters of Religion which Christ never gave them they think they cannot be faithfull unto Christ if they subject themselves unto them in their exercise of such an irregularly assumed power Christ Jesus is the Sole Lord of his Church and Law-giver in it and therefore the alone Author of the whole of Christian Religion for which reason they cannot receive any such additions as are made meerly by men as parts much less as necessary parts of Christian Religion they know that there are some who say the Imposition may be sinfull when a compliance therewith is a duty But this in matters of Religion especially in the present case they do not understand because when lawfull Authority commands any thing sinfully the great reason why 't is sinfull is because 't is in other manner than according to the Word of God but if the command be not according to God's Word how can their obedience be so All obedience is to a command and such is the connexion between the command and the obedience that we must consider the obedience to be as is the command If the command be out of the Lord and sinfull the obedience thereunto cannot be in the Lord and a duty If the command be not for the Lord but against him the obedience cannot be for the Lord. But that our obedience must be in and for the Lord is acknowledged by the
Church of England But there are many things in their own nature according to the confession of the Church os England indifferent which yet are made so necessary a part of Christian Religion as to be enjoyned as Termes of Christian Communion Whoever conscientiously refuses to be present at their publique Prayers or to kneel at the Sacrament is by the 27th Canon deprived of the Sacrament yea and though the Minister who shall wittingly administer the same to notorious offenders and perjur'd villains incurres not for such a default the pain of Suspension Yet no Minister when he celebrateth the Communion shall wittingly Administer the same to any but to such as kneel under pain of Suspension nor under the like pain to any that refuse to be present at Publique Prayers according to the Orders of the Church of England Thus not only a form os Prayer but this particular form of Prayer in which form there are many things with which these Dissenters cannot comply are made so necessary a part of Religion that if they conform not unto them they are denyed the Lord's Supper and what Minister soever admits such unto the communion is lyable unto a suspension a greater punishment than is threatned against those Ministers who admit such as commit the horrible sin of perjury Moreover though they are convinc'd in conscience they sin if they kneel yet they cannot be admitted unto the Lord's Supper unless they kneel Let us put the best sense on these things and 't is this As the notorious offender and perjur'd villain cannot be admitted to the Sacrament because he complyes not with God's Terms the Holyest man on earth cannot be admitted unless he complies with Man's Termes But what is this less than setting up mans posts with Gods or a setting as high if not a higher value on the precepts of men as on the commands of God But seeing our Lord Christ has purchased a liberty for them whereby they may be admitted to the Sacrament on easier Termes than Man will permit they must abide by this liberty in doing which they do but discharge their duty in asserting the Lord Jesus Christ to be the Sole Author of the whole of Christian Religion and of all the Termes of Christian Communion But 2. To be more particular in shewing why they cannot joyn with the Church in the Sacraments In doing which I 'll contract my self in giving you no other than what I find in the Altar of Damascus 1. Of Baptism I 'll only offer a very little that is insisted on in my Author and therefore will pass by that passage in the Second Prayer before Baptism where the Remission of sins is defired by Spiritual Regeneration As if the pardon of sin consisted rather in the Sanctification of the soul than the dissolving the obligation to punishment and consider the Interrogatories which are these Dost thou forsake the Devil and all his works c. Dost thou believe c. Wilt thou be Baptized in this Faith The Child hath not Understanding nor Faith nor desire of Baptism And how be it the child had Faith can the God-father tell absolutely and in particular that this Child whom he presenteth doth Believe desire Baptism or forsake the Devil It is a foolish thing and great mockery of God's service to demand that of Infants which was at the first demanded of such as were come to years of discretion and were converted from Gentilism The children of Faithfull Parents are within the Covenant of Grace whereupon it is that they are made partakers of the Seal of the Covenant The Covenant being made with the Parents in their Faith and not the Faith of the child the Parents should give confession of their own Faith and not of the Faith of the child which is not because their own Faith is the condition of the Covenant upon their part whereupon God promiseth to be their God and the God of their Seed Whereupon also it followeth that the Father of the child should present the child and give confession and not another because the Covenant is made with him and his Seed and the child is his Seed not the Seed of another whom we call Godfather The Natural Father is the proper God-father Others may be Witnesses of Baptism but that the Father should or can resign this duty to another I deny After that the child is dipped or sprinkled and Baptized in the Name of the Father Son and Holy Ghost the Priest maketh a Cross upon the child's Forehead Saying We receive this child into the Congregation of Christ's Flock and do sign with the sign of the Cross in token that hereafter he shall not be ashamed to confess the faith of Christ Crucified and Manfully to fight under his Banner against Sin the World and the Devil and to continue Christ's Faithfull Souldier and Servant unto his Lifes end He saith not we have received but we do receive as if the child were not received by Baptism but by Grossing or as if the child were again received by Crossing which was before received by Baptism This signing with the cross is no decent gesture it is rather like a jugglers gesture than a gesture of decency and comeliness It must then be used as a Symbolical and Significant Rite But we have no such sign set down in the Word of God as to make two Cross Lines in the Air with our fingers to represent the cross of a Tree or to signifie unto us that we should not be ashamed of the Cross of Christ c. Thou shalt make unto thy self no Image that is any Representation forged in thy own brain to be set up in the Worship of God Admit once the Aerial Cross in Baptism ye cannot refuse to set up the material Cross and the Rood in the Kirck nor the Wooden or Stone Crosses in the High-way For all may signifie the same thing that the Cross on the forehead And by this reason every one may wear a Silver Cross upon his forehead also Further not only other significant crosses material may be brought in upon this ground but also the rest of the beggarly ceremonies of Baptism to deface and deform the purity plainness and simplicity of Christ's institution As to put salt into the mouth of the child to anoint with Oyl the breast and shoulders and the top of the head with Holy Crism and to put a burning Taper into his hands c. for these Toyes had their own glorious signification as well as the Cross Lastly What doth it signifie but that which is already signified in baptism The same valour and courage and constant profession and fighting under Christ's banner is a part of that Grace which is sealed by baptism But besides that it is a significant toy it is also esteemed effective for they say that the infant by it is dedicated to the service of him that dyed on the cross Who did sanctifie this sign for such an use Are men able to
do it It was made also a consecrator of Water Bread and Wine and all other Holy things in time of Popery for the which corruption we ought to abhorr it Again we Sign this child in token that he shall continue Christ's faithfull Souldier to his Lives end These words shall continue to his lives end compared with the like in the Epistle of the 22 Sunday after Trinity God shall continue the work in you to the end shew unto us that we use the cross for a pledge to give assurance to the child to continue in grace to the end which if it be so then it serveth to work faith and is used effectually saith Parker Hooker saith that there cannot be a more forceable means to avoid that which may deservedly procure shame If it be in some sort a means to secure from confusion Everlasting then it is in some sort effective of Grace In a word suppose there were no sinfull use of it for the present the horrible abuse of it in times by-past and the danger and peril of these same abuses are sufficient to remove it out of this Holy Sacrament where it is set up in such honourable State beside the Lord 's own Altar 2. Of the Lord's Supper I 'll not mention all is said of this I 'll only apply my self to what is said of Kneeling which gesture though not according to Christs example nor the nature of the Ordinance is imposed as a necessary condition of our Right in the Lord's Supper whatever right Faith and Repentance may give unto this Ordinance no jus in re no right in it is acknowledged to any among us but such as Kneel whereby Kneeling is made by the Church of England a necessary Term and yet look'd on but as indifferent as if a man had been invested with a power of making a thing in it self indifferent to become a necessary part of Christs Religion But to give you what I find in the Altar of Damascus Where 't is said That without any farther he and they viz. Minister and People Communicate Kneeling after the Popish manner that is with a gesture of Adoration when they are beholding the signs taking eating drinking and inwardly in their minds should be meditating on the signification and the fruit and benefit which they reap by Christ Crucified and consequently cannot without distraction of mind from this employment of the Soul and Meditation pray a set and continued prayer to God or cannot meditate and be employed in the present action without distraction of mind from the prayer and therefore either they pray irreverently which they will not grant or do Communicate this Gesture of Adoration to the other imployments of the Soul and of the outward senses and members of the body about the objects presented which they must grant and so nill they will they they must be forced to confess that they commit idolatry Kneeling is no decent gesture for a Table for commodity they say maketh decency but this gesture is confessed not to be commodious as sitting is It is then enjoyned for another reason to wit for Reverence but to kneel for Reverence and Religious respects is ever Adoration in the highest degree To kneel for reverence that is to adore is not enjoyned here for prayer neither may prayer lawfully be enjoyned in time of another action and part of God's worship to be performed by the same person And suppose it were enjoyned for the short prayer uttered by their priest yet are not the outward senses and inward faculties employed principally on that prayer but upon another action principally and directly intended in the institution whereas the other is only super-added by man Let them frame their Canons and Acts as they please and suppose that they kneel for reverence of the Sacrament common sense may teach us that it is done for that respect either totally or principally but let it be in the least part yet that least part is idolatry Beside the idolatry of this gesture it cannot stand with the right manner of celebration and rites of the institution For when they kneel for adoration they cannot carry the cup from hand to hand nor divide the elements among themselves as Christ hath commanded In many places the people are raised from their kneeling to come about the Table there to receive kneeling and then are directed to their places again saith the Author of the Survey The priest giveth the Bread and the Wine to every one severally out of his own hands When the cup is to be carryed from one to another the communicant is too prophane in their opinion to reach it the Priests Holy hand must take it from one and give it to the other but Christ willed his Disciples to divide it among themselves and it was carryed from hand to hand indeed after the manner of the last paschal cup. When Christ therefore gave the Bread and the Wine he said in the plural number take ye eat ye c. The English priest speaketh in the singular number when he giveth the elements he annexeth not Christs words containing a comfortable promise and uttered in an Enunciative form but other words invented by man and in form of a prayer converting one part of God's worship into another or else confounding them By this 't is manifest that many Ministers may conscientioufly refuse to conform to the Termes imposed on the people They can no more satisfie their consciences in complying with the Termes of lay-Lay-Communion than others can with those of the Ministers Conformity Moreover II. As they cannot hold Communion with the Church in the Holy Sacraments and consequently not comply with what is required of the people in order thereunto so neither can they with a safe Conscience joyn in the ordinary Lord's dayes Service They cannot conscientiously approve of many things in that service unto which they must give their approbation if they conform thereunto Whoever conforms doth thereby shew his approbation of what he conforms unto To what a man conforms to that he manifests his good liking why is it that some cannot conform unto the By-Offices but because they do not approve of them and why do any conform to the ordinary Lord's dayes Service but because they approve of it which is as much as if it had been said Conformity is an Overt Act of Approbation 't is in practice an Approving the thing But some scrupulous Dissenters cannot conform unto the ordinary Lord's dayes Service without conforming to several things to which they refuse the giving their approbation By the ordinary Lord's dayes Service they understand all that Office that is according to the Liturgy and Canon of the Church appoynted to be read Ordinarily on the Lord's day or to speak in the Common Prayer Dialect that Service that is appointed to be read ordinarily on Sundayes against the use of which they do more generally argue thus I. If they must conform to the ordinary Lord's dayes Service it must
Popish party or be urg'd by them in excuse for their not coming to Church and joyning with the rest of the Congregation in God's publique worship In the Litany first made and published by King Henry the Eight and afterwards continued in the two Liturgies of King Edward the sixth there was a Prayer to be deliver'd from the Tyranny and all the detestable enormities of the Bishops of Rome which was thought fit to be expung'd as giving matter of scandal and disaffection to all that party or that otherwise wish'd well to that Religion In the First Liturgy of King Edward the Sacrament of the Lord's Body was deliver'd with this benediction that is to say the body of our Lord Jesus Christ which was given for the preservation of thy Body and Soul to Life Everlasting The blood of our Lord Jesus Christ c. which being thought by Calvin and his Disciples to give some countenance to the gross and carnal presence of Christ in the Sacrament which passeth by the name of Transubstantiation in the School of Rome was alter'd into this form into the second Liturgy that is to say take and eat this in remembrance that Christ dyed for thee and feed on him in thy heart by faith with Thanksgiving Take and drink this c. But the Revisers of the book joyn'd both formes together least under colour of rejecting a carnal they might be thought also to deny such a real presence as was defended in the writings of the antient fathers Upon which ground they expung'd also a whole Rubrick at the end of the Communion Service by which it was declared that kneeling at the participation of the Sacrament was required for no other reason than for the signification of the humble and gratefull acknowledging of the benefits of Christ given therein unto the worthy Receiver And to avoid that prophanation and disorder which otherwise might have ensued and not for giving any adoration to the Sacramental Bread and Wine there bodily received or in regard of any real and essential presence of Christ's Body and Blood And to come up closer to the Church of Rome it was ordered by the Queens injunctions that the Sacramental Bread which the book required onely to be made of the finest Flower should be made round in fashion of the wafers used in the time of Queen Mary She also order'd that the Lord's Table should be placed where the Altar stood that the accustomed reverence should be made at the name of Jesus Musick retained in the Church and all the old festivals observ'd with their several Eves By which complyances and the expunging of the passages before remembred the book was made so passable amongst the Papists that for ten years they generally repair'd to their Parish Churches without doubt or scruple as is affirm'd not only by Sir Edward Cook in his Speech against Garnet and his charge given at the Assizes held at Norwich but also by the Queen her self in a Letter to Sir Francis Walsingham then being her Resident or Leiger Embassador in the Court of France the same confessed by Sanders also in his book de Schismate To this Heylin within a few years following adds And now we may behold the face of the Church of England as it was first setled and established under Queen Elizabeth The Government of the Church by Archbishops and Bishops The Liturgy conform to the primitive patterns and all the Rites and Ceremonies therein prescribed accommodated to the honour of God and encreafe of piety The Festivals preserved in their former Dignity observ'd with all their distinct Offices peculiar to them and celebrated with a Religious Concourse of all sorts of people the weekly Fasts the Holy time of Lent the Embring weeks together with the Fast of the Rogation severely kept by a forbearance of all kind of flesh not now by virtue of the Statute as in the time of King Edward but as appoynted by the Church in her publique Calendar before the book of Common Prayer the Sacrament of the Lord's Supper celebrated in most reverend manner the Holy Table seated in the place of the Altar the people making their due reverence at their first entrance into the Church kneeling at the Communion the confession and the publique prayers standing up at the Creed the Gospels and the Gloria Patri and using the accustomed reverence at the name of Jesus Musick retain'd in all such Churches in which provision had been made for the maintenance of it or where the people could be trained up at least to plain Song All which particulars were either Established by the Lawes or commanded by the Queens injunctions or otherwise retained by virtue of some antient usages not by Law prohibited Nor is it much to be admired that such a general Conformity to those antient usages was constantly observ'd in all Cathedrals and the most part of the Parish Churches considering how well they were presidented by the Court it self in which the Liturgy was Officiated every day both morning and evening not only in the publick Chappel but the private Closet celebrated in the Chappell with Organs and other Musical Instrments and the most excellent voices of men and children that could be got in all the Kingdom The Gentlemen and Children in their Surplices and the Priests in Copes as oft as they attended the Divine Service at the Holy Altar The Altar furnished with rich Plate two fair Gilt Candlesticks with Tapers in them and a Massy Crucifix of Silver in the midst thereof which last remained there for some years till it was broke in peices by Pach the fool no wiser man daring to undertake such a desperate Service at the sollicitation of Sir Francis Knolles the Queens near Kinsman by the Caries and one who openly appeared in favour of the Schism at Franckford The antient ceremonies accustomably observ'd by the Knights of the Garter in their Adoration towards the Altar abolished by King Edward the 6th and reviv'd by Queen Mary were by this Queen retain'd as formerly in her Fathers time for which she received both thankes and honour from her very enemies i. e. the Papists as appeares by Harding's Epistle Dedicatory before his answer to the Apology c. So far Heylin Thus from what the sons of the Church Cambden Burnet and Heylin have affirm'd 't is apparent that Queen Elizabeth had a natural propension to favour the Papists and that this was discover'd by her making the Termes of Communion much more easie to the Papists than in King Edward's time whereby they became the more difficult and arduous to the Protestant Dissenter I 'll only add one observation of the Jesuit Reignold against Whitaker whereby the Reader may perceive not only that the Papists take notice how the practice of the Church of England contradicts their Rubrick but also that in the Rubrick concerning Apparel which is now to be found in the Communion Book even the beginning before morning prayer 't is order'd That the Minister
at the time of Communion and at all other times in his Ministration shall use such Ornaments in the Church as were in use by Authority of Parliament in the second year of the Reign of King Edward the 6th But Queen Elizabeth was not the only cause of driving back the Reformation but the Clergy themselves had an hand in it which was sufficiently discover'd when they perceiv'd that her Majesties Council began to entertain more favourable thoughts of Protestant Dissenters who continued their cries for a further Reformation Cambden assures us that about the year 1583 The Queen who held it for a maxime that she ought not to be more remiss in Ecclesiastical Affaires advancing Whitgift from the Sea of Worcester to that of Canterbury above all commanded him to re-establish the Discipline of the Church of England that as then lay dismembred by the connivency of Prelates the obstinacy of Innovators and by the power of some great ones whilst some Ministers using to their own fantasie new Rites of Services in their private Houses utterly condemning the Liturgy and the appointed manner of Administring the Sacrament as being in many things contrary to the Scriptures and therefore many refus'd to go to Church To abolish which things and to reduce 'em in Unity Whitgift propounded Three Articles to the Ministers by them to be subscribed But adds Cambden 't is incredible what controversies and disputations arose upon this What troubles and injuries Whitgift suffer'd of certain noble men So far Cambden But whoever might be so happy as to be throughly acquainted with a just impartial and particular History of those times would suddenly see that the true cause of all Whitgifts troubles was his intemperate persecuting Godly and Conscientious men who rather like a Spanish Inquisitor propos'd a multitude of Articles to ensnare than as a good Pastor to reduce his erring Brethren to the truth For even when he was most violent in letting out his rage on the Conscientious Dissenter even then the wicked the ungodly and prophane Priests knew not what it was to be prosecuted for their debaucheries Neither can it be truly said that the Earl of Leicester was the only great person that resented the ill proceedings of this Bishop but even the Lord Treasurer Cecill and her Majesties Councill 'T is sad to consider with what severity Whitgift treated the Couscientious Dissenter and with what mildness the drunkard glutton c. The which was so palpable that some zealous Conformists since that time have judg'd it necessary to essay the putting some colour on it as Isaac Walton in the life of Hooker most Satyrically represents the Nonconformist to be much more vile than the drunkard or glutton even when he could not impeach 'em as being guilty of any such enormities But that somewhat might be said to expose the Dissenter and defend the Bishops an encroachment is made on the divine prerogative and vain man who cannot but with much difficulty look into his own heart pretends to see into the secrets of the Dissenter where he finds so many Spiritual wickednesses that lye hid to lodge that he must be warm in discovering his abhorrence to such Villanies judging not according to the outward appearance but like unto the all-knowing God according to the heart I 'll give you Mr. Walton's own words who speaking of the Nonconformists sayes Of this party there were many that were possest with an high degree of Spiritual wickedness I mean with an innate restless radical pride and malice I mean not those lesser sins that are more visible and more properly Carnal and sins against a mans self as gluttony and drunkenness and the like from which good Lord deliver us but sins of an higher nature because more unlike to the nature of God which is Love and Mercy and Peace and more like the Devil who is not a glutton nor can be drunk and yet is a Devil those wickednesses of malice and revenge and opposition and a complacence in making and beholding confusions Men whom Pride and Self-conceit had made to over-value their own Wisdom and become pertinacious and to hold foolish and unmannerly disputes against those men which they ought to reverence and those Lawes which they ought to obey As if disputing freely with the Bishop and not giving him the desir'd respects by rendring obedience to his commands even when they could not without sinning against God had been the Overt Act of that Pride Malice c. which makes men more vile than Gluttony and Drunkenness But 't is no part of my present province to comment on this notion but only from it to inferr that as the dignified Clergy did consider the Non-Conformity of the Dissenter to be a sin most odious much more high and great than that of gluttony even so 't is easie to conclude that what is affirm'd in History concerning the Bishops treating the drunkard with more candor than the Conscientious Dissenter is very true For which no stronger reason can be assign'd than that the debauchees wickedness not being so great an impediment to the accommodating the difference between the Church of England and of Rome as the Non-Conformity of the Dissenter the wickedness of the former might be tolerated even when the Dissent of the latter would not be born That this is so namely that the Arch-bishops and Bishops in the respects they shew'd the ignorant and scandalous among the Ministry and the letting out their wrath on the intractible Dissenter as they term'd it was a plain evincement that they thereby aimed at the gratifying the Papist will appear with conviction to such as will be so just to themselves as to weigh impartially the import of those Letters are added to the end of this Treatise where he will not only see into the reason why the Episcopal would by all means hide 'em from the Light but moreover perceive the matter of fact I have suggested to be very true That these Letters are nor spurious nor feigned but copies from an Anthentick Original is well known to some zealous Sons of the Church who it may be will be surpriz'd to see that appear in face of the World which doth so plainly discover what they desire might be conceal'd In these Letters 't is apparent that when the prosecution was most brisk against Protestant Dissenters several among the dignified Clergy were very covetous and scandalous in their Conversations Numb 1. Even those who antecedently to their preferment were well affected when they came to the Cathedral Churches did so strangely degenerate that the Lord Treasurer Cecil Numb 2. did fear the places did alter the men whence 't is that her Majesties Councill in their Letter to the Bishop of London and Canterbury Numb 3. did observe from the many complaints brought unto them that the worst of men met with no trouble when Conscientious and Learned Ministers were greatly molested for their Non-Conformity But that which doth most fully discover the temper
other consideration whatsoever But seeing they cannot hold Communion with the parish-Parish-Churches The next great quaerie is what they must do whether live without some Ordinances all the dayes of their Life or Assemble themselves together for Communion in all Ordinances in such a way as they are fully convinc'd is agreable to the Sacred Scriptures That they must not constantly neglect any Ordinance of God nor the publick attendance on his worship somewhere is so clearly reveal'd in the word of God that whoever is not so far in love with Quakerism as to neglect the Testimony of God's written Word cannot but acknowledge it That the Lord Jesus who has instituted a Ministry and made it the peculiar work of some men in special to preach the Word not only for conversion of sinners but for the edisication of the converted for the help and benefit of whom there is instituted not the Ordinance of Baptism alone but that of the Lord's Supper which is design'd for the strength and encrease of Grace in Christians I say this Lord Jesus who hath so graciously instituted a Ministry and Ordinances hath made it the duty of Christians to assemble themselves together to the end they may be made partakers of the Blessings of his Institutions and Ordinances And such is the Relation between Minister and People that is between a Gospel Minister and an orderly Christian Assembly that the one cannot be without the other neither can the one ordinarily perform some Relational Duties but in an Assembly with the other and therefore must assemble themselves together 't is their duty I cannot at present enlarge on this head and therefore as to this I can only add that the sense of all Protestants generally is that all Christians ought to assemble themselves together for publick worship Viz. for Prayer the Word and Sacraments and that 't is the duty of a Pastor to take heed to himself and the Flock over which he is made over-seer and that 't is the peoples duty to attend Ordinarily on the Ministry of their own Pastor The great difference between the Church of England and Dissenters is not so much about the peoples duty of assembling themselves together for publique worship as about the place where and the Minister with whom The Church of England sayes it must be in the Parish Church with the Minister of the Parish but the Dissenter asserts that every Christian is invested with a right to choose his own Pastor and that therefore he must go where he finds the worship to be in a way most agreable to God's Holy word but when he is once fix'd he is under those Obligations of Duty unto his Pastor that the Church of England do say a Parishioner is unto the Minister of the Parish But seeing on these things I cannot now enlarge I will conclude with an humble and affectionate request to all good Christians whether Episcopal or Dissenter I beseech you to consider that conscience is a tender thing its wounds unsupportable frequently accompanied with such horror as is very like unto the pains and torments of the damned No man therefore must act contrary to the plain convictions thereof What man soever does what he is convinc'd in Conscience is a sin does greatly dishonour and provoke Almighty God All care must be taken to obtain the knowledge of the truth and gain a freedom from error but there must not be an acting against the plain convictions of conscience though erroneous On this I insist as a sound part of the Protestant Doctrine strenuously defended against the many feeble assaults of the Papist by several worthies of the Church of England And really this is a Rule all good Christians must walk by in doing which seeing there are almost as many different perswasions of conscience about some lesser things as there are considering mindes there will be as many different practices where there are different Sentiments about matters of practice there the practice will be different for which reason the strong must take heed that they despise not the weak and the weak look to it that they judge not the strong For whether we conform or conform not if we do what we do conscientiously to the Lord we shall be accepted of him I verily believe that many do think themselves bound in conscience to conform the which they would not do to gain a world if they did think it a sin and 't is as true that many among the Dissenters are as conscientiously Non-conformists and would really have conform'd did they not think that so conforming they should sin against God Both these must be tenderly regarded by such as will walk by the Christian Rule A Non-conformists censuring a conformist as one that acts against his conscience is unchristian and a Conformist's censuring all Dissenters as Hypocrites looking on their conscience to be but fancy their Religion to be faction is no less unchristian than the former But to be more particular my humble desire is 1. That those who are of the Communion of the Church of England would continue it so long as they can with a safe conscience Let not every little dissatisfaction with some men drive you off from those wayes you have nothing beside the miscarriage of some men of that profession to object against 't is true your duty is to mind the glory of God in the edification of your own Soul and if your Parish Minister be one whose incapacity for the Ministerial work is such as not to answer the end of the Ministry you must look out for a better and be where you may have more than the shadow of a Minister even one who is competently qualified for the workes But do this in a way as little offensive to the Church of England as your conscience will permit Why will you separate from that Communion where you may be without sin especially seeing by doing so you do what you cannot justifie But if you cannot continue your Communion without complying with sin you must rather withdraw than sin 2. That such as are not actually of any Communion i. e. neither joyn'd with the Church of England nor with the Dissenter of which fort there are many especially among the younger people would remember that they have as Christians a right to choose their own Pastor in the exercise of which right 't is their duty to have a special regard to the Glory of God the good of their own Soul and the peace of the Church and therefore if you may have all these ends answer'd by joyning your selves to the Church of England and you can with a safe Conscience do it you do well in joyning with that Church but if you can't with a safe Conscience joyn with the Church of England but can with the Non-conformists you must apply your selves to those of the Non-conformists who do in your judgments keep most exactly to the rule of the Gospel You must regard God's Glory as your ultimate
end the Salvation of your Soul as an end subordinate and God's word as your Rule by which in pursuance of these great ends you must walk Study therefore seriously the Rule and be sure you do not knowingly and with deliberation deviate there from 3. My third request is to such as are joyn'd with the Non-Conformists that you Censure not those who continue their Communion with the Church of England Are you Conscientious in your way So ought you to esteem them to be in their way Would not you have them consider you as Hypocrites or fanciful Humourists neither do you judge them to be such what though those Reasons I have Collected out of the Writings of the Old Nonconformists may fasten powerful Convictions on your Conscience yet they may not be of any such weight in the esteem of others Tho' I have produc'd them to the end the Conformist may be mov'd to look on you as conscientious persons yet do you not abuse it as if all Conformists were as much Convinc'd by 'em as you your selves are and therefore must be esteem'd to act contrary to their Consciences in conforming Take heed of such censuring Finally my humble desire is That such as are of the conforming Clergie would consider that the above mention'd Arguments may be as indeed with many they are of great Force and that although the Conformist may be able easily to answer 'em Yet Thousands among the Dissenters can not shake off the Convictions they receive from such Arguments Oh then be not too severe in your censure But consider that these Dissenters cannot conform but by wounding their Consciences be therefore very tender how you impose on 'em but do your utmost both for a Comprehension and Indulgence of those sound Protestants who walk conscientiously FINIS The LETTERS BY an impartial perusal of these following Letters the Reader may easily perceive the difference there was between some great States men in Queen Elizabeth's time and some of the Clergy and that when the Clergy were for a severe persecuting Protestant Dissenters the Councill and in special the Lord Burleigh that wonder of his age though a Son of the Church of England endeavour'd the relief of the Non-conformists These Letters were first taken from Arch-Bishop Whitgift's own Copy as may appear from the Title prefix'd to the Letter thus My Lord Treasurer's Letter unto me and my answer to the Lord Treasurer There are some great persons among the Clergy who have seen 'em in Manuscript Numb 1. THere is a Letter written to the Bishop for the execution of her Majesties Proclamation for the Vniformity set forth in the book and other injunctions pen'd as is suppos'd by Sir Thomas Smith The which I 'll not fully transcribe There is one clause only that is for my purpose which is concerning the meetings of the Clergy which were first ordained to keep all Churches in the Diocess in an Vniform and Godly Order which now is commonly said the more is the pity to be only used of you i. e. the Bishop and his Clergy and your Officers to get money or for some other purposes This passage shewes the corruption of the Clergy Numb 2. A Letter written by the Lord Treasurer Cecil to Arch-bishop Whitgift in answer to one received from the Arch-bishop MAY it please your Grace I perceive that the Bishop of Rochester through your perswasion is contented to be removed to Chichester whereof I am glad whereby the Dean of Westminster may be plac'd as your Grace may think fit and I do desire her Majesty will new place all the Bishops in the void room whereof I am very mindfull and desirous for the benefit of the Church wishing that the Church may take that good thereby that it hath need of for surely your Grace must pardon me I rather wish it than look or much hope for it I see such Worldlyness in many that were otherwise affected before they came to Cathedral Churches that I fear the places alter the men but herein I condemn not all but few there be that do better being Bishops in the void roomes whereof I am very mindfull than being Preachers they did I am bold thus to utter my mind of Bishops to an Arch bishop but I clear my self I mean nothing in any conceit to your Grace for though of late I have varied in my poor opinion in that by your order poor simple men have rather been sought for by inquisition to be found Offenders than upon their facts condemned yet surely I do not for all this differ from your Grace in Amity and Love but I do reverence your Learning and Integrity and wish that the Spirit of gentleness may win rather than severity But therefore enough of the misbehaviour of Browning towards the Master of Trinity Colledg I am sorry to hear as I do esteeming him meeter for Bethlehem than for that Colledg The Queen's Majesty asked me what I thought of Travers to be the Minister of the Temple whereunto I answered that at the request of Dr. Alney in his sickness and of a number of honest Gentlemen of the Temple I had yeilded my Allowance of him to that place so as he will shew himself Conformable to the order of the Church whereunto I was inform'd that he would so be But her Majesty told me that your Grace did not so allow of him which I said might be for something suppos'd to be written by him Tituled de Disciplina Ecclesiastica whereupon her Majesty commanded me to write to your Grace to know your opinion which I pray your Grace to signifie unto her as God shall move ye surely it were great pity that any impediment should be occasion to the contrary for he is well learn'd very honest and well lov'd and allow'd of the generality of that house Mr. Bond told me that your Grace liked well of him and so do I also as of one well learn'd and honest but as I told him if he came not to the place with some applause of the Company he shall be weary thereof and I commended him to her Majesty if Travers should not but her Majesty thinketh him not fit for that place because of his infirmity Thus I end wishing your Grace Assistance of God's Spirit to govern your charge unblameably Your Graces to command William Burleigh From the Court at Oatlands Sept. 17. 1584. Numb 3. A part of a Letter sent unto the Arch-bishop of Canterbury and Bishop of London from her Majesties Councill about September 20. 1584. AFter our hearty commendations to both your Lordships although we have heard of late times sundry complaints out of divers countries of this Realm of some proceedings against a great number of Ecclesiastical Persons some Parsons of Churches some Vicars some Curates but all Preachers whereby some were deprived of their livings some suspended from their Ministry and preaching yet we have forborn to enter into any particular examination of such complaints thinking that howsoever inferior