would not have that which is said so understood as if I did imagine there were to be Virtuosos in Religion as well as Philosophy and that this Age made new discoveries of Doctrines as the Astronomers have of the Stars and that new Creeds in Divinity are as necessary as new Systems of the World I am not so ignorant to think that Novelty can commend Religion though it may Philosophy and that for this reason the one is God's work and command fully revealed at once after Christ's coming But the product of Humane Observation suffers nothing in its Reputation by being new Neither doth Religion suffer but is rather honoured whilst new Arguments for they must needs be so at the first springing up of Heresie against new Hersies This therefore which is said will not minorize or lessen the esteem of the Creed which the Ancients had of it for I cannot but own the commendation which Cyril of Hierusalem gave of it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Catech. 4. And having before shew'd the concise and compleat Abridgment of it says 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 compares it to Muster-seed more fitly and pertinently than the Eunuchs is by Smyrk Consideration V. Though the Apostles Creed may maintain Charity and Union between members of the Catholick Church whether it can preserve charity in a particuler Church and in what sense short Professions of Faith so much insisted on by late Reformers and commended to the Parliament as the full matter of Christian Belief and in what circumstances they must be and what persons they are to whom they are sufficient IT may be said of matters of Faith in Religion as Aristotle distinguishes in Philosophy 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 principles of Doctrine and that which comes by deduction the first which are as the grand Ligament or Tye which knit the parts together or as a foundation to support a building though the root and other parts of it are demolished This is enough to denominate the Church a Church but if there be disagreement in other Doctrines which may indanger Man's Salvation though not so immediately as those in the Creed it takes off from the beauty of it and makes it look as in the former instance like a Skeleton knit together by the Articles of one Creed as sinews not agreeing in any other parts or like a frame or case of a house without a Roof or Ornament I speak not this as uncharitable to the Catholick Church but to shew how the want of Unity in all Doctrines disguise it By this Assertion the Catholick Church is not condemned for those Divisions which destroy not the Internal communion with it though External may be wanting but to shew Charity beautifies it Wherefore those who separate themselves from another Church must have some other reasons of their separation than are in the Apostles Creed otherwise the Reformation cannot be justifiable for the Roman Church professeth to believe the fame Creed as a late Author pleads therefore Separation not altogether founded on that Wherfore it remains there must be Doctrines which justifie Separation from other measures than the Creed c. This may unite in the Catholick Church but not a National or particular Church for the Church cannot be minced into Individuals without being destroyed at least breach of Charity and that for this Reason God under the Law and Gospel was never since Adam's Innocency worshiped alone Elias was mistaken when he thought he was left alone the only votary of the true God I am sensible of an Objection which may be this That Luther in the beginning of the Reformation was the only open professor of the Protestant Faith which being granted as it need not must suppose some critical time of Luthers Protestation in which he had no followers which with preciseness will conclude that Christ himself Head of the Church was without any votary at his first birth except his Mother was one and there must needs be a certain time when the Apostles were without a Church or Converts But Religion takes notice of no such Niceties and as the Common Law takes that to be done immediately which is done in the same day appointed in some cases taking no precise notice of the hours I am sure the Divine Law doth not distinguish such critical moments But to wave these niceties it was always the method of Reformers to make profession of their Faith Thus did the Lutherans in their Augustane confession for without this Charity would not have been maintained within themselves So then what would the Reformation signifie if there may be as many and as dangerous and different Opinions among themselves as there was between them and the Church of Rome their Reformation signifies little more than a Change not for the better but worse their dissenting from the Roman Church might be justifiable but amongst themselves especially in matters absolutely necessary to be believed such separation intollerable for though the Catholick Church like Josephs coat may have and be of divers colours and parts but particular must be like Christ seamless coat or to speak the Apostles Language like minded and speak the same thing Now this Unity of the Church is not better preserved by any means than by Appeals to several interpretations of places of Scripture which are ambiguous by the Councils Fathers and Pastors in several Ages Thus the Champions of the Reformation always owned that Authority as the best means to win Reformation and the best subsidy to support it The necessity of this seems to be implyed in the Apostles Advice to submission to Pastors and the Pastors being to give an accompt for the Peoples Souls I know these words may occasion a voluminous Dispute But I shall take them in their plaine acceptation and only desire the Reader to observe that in case this submission to Pastors is only to circumstances confin'd as some will have them and yet Pastors give an accompt it is like a Man who is invested with the power of a Tutor yet only to take care of his Pupils Cloaths This must be restrained to places which have a doubtful sense and the definitions or interpretations such as the words will bear for I am not so bold to conclude with some of the Church of Rome that it hath a power to command a Doctrine which hath no probable foundation in Scripture as Doctor Stapleton concludes that some things are to be believed and the Church propound them as matters of Faith Etiamsi nullo Scripturarum evidenti aut probabilis testimonio comfirmetur though he at the same time concludes the Church in its definitions is Suo modo Divina It fares with the Church in its desiring matters of Faith as it doth in prospects for though Telescopes and Perspections help the Sight yet there must be a rude discovery of the Object by the naked Eye thus the Milky way is discerned without the help of a Glass to be a bright tract of Heaven by the Telescope which
the present case for the age is sufficiently weary'd out with Distinctions and terms of Art which like dry Bones knit together only make a Skeleton not a man but that which is censur'd is the launching out the licentious phrase of Stage 'T is true this is unworthy of Divine Discourse and the Priest ought to scorn variety of humour or phancy in his language as much as the Spaniard doth a fantastick Dress his language ought to strike so much aw according to the Character given of Job Though I smil'd says he they believ'd me not though any thing drop which seems not of equal moment with the rest of the Discourse the weight of the one overpoyseth the levity of the other This may be well suppos'd for Gravity and Levity in discourse seem to be as natural and as necessary as they are in Bodys And as no bodys are so dense or thick but some subtile matter lurks in the Pores so no discourse so close but it may have its airy matter intermix'd and in imbodi'd with it The grave Writings of the Ancient Fathers are as a Witness of this I could instance in some if it were necessary To say all Arguments like Arrows to which a Plume is no less necessary than a ponderous Metal whilst one gives it flight the other makes the wound Such necessary Levity at least may be pardonable but Scurrility is a vice in Morals much more in Religion However a sharp and severe way of Arguing must not be omitted for it is as necessary to the Priest as an Acid humour to the Stomach without which the meat would not be digested There is no new Method Nazianzens 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is an evidence of it and primitive Fathers sharply check the Gentiles for their folly Yet all this was without Scurrilous Language altogether unlike to Luther's railing Method which occasion'd some of the Roman Church to call him and his Disciples Mad Men. However he deserv'd well of the Church I presume none will deny and it may be retorted on those who object it that some of theirs have fixed odious Names on Protestants Dogs Infidels Magicians nay worse as a great Doctor signs their Banishments in these words Ut magos publica Authoritate arcemus civitate pellimus c. I might cite others to this purpose no less Black-mouth'd but I forbear to do that and shall only suggest this to the Readers thoughts As the Church of England though the first Reformers if it can be reasonably imagin'd that its first Reformers gave any credit to the Objections of some of the Roman Church were sensible that the Reformation was begun as in a storm of passion and irreverent language yet disowns not the consequence of it seeing it as a Tempest cast them on a happy shore now shall not all sincere Christians do as the first Reformers did who when they saw Religion well defended though in an unbeseeming and boysterous way For which there is no reason of complaint in this case would not have Religion suffer for it for that would have argued as much folly as if a Prince should disown a Victory because gotten by rash and imprudent means or like casting Joseph into the Pit only out of spight to his Coat if Religion suffer because not pleasingly worded I speak not this as an Abettor of Lucians scoffs or a Rabshekah's railing but only to shew how prudence makes use of them To conclude with a late observation of some Anatomists who say there is not known a certain use of the Splene and that some creatures may live without it I determine nothing in this case but only say I am confident there is no use of a Petulant Splene in Religious Debates Consideration II. Whether belief which relies and depends on the Authority of the Catholick Church and as it is encouraged by the Civil Magistrate may properly be said to be forc't and to proceed from an unwarrantable usurpation of the right of natural reason THe Church hath not been so effectually undermined by any Method as by representing its Authority under the odious names of Tyranny and calling all obligation to belief unwarrantable Impositions or force Wherefore it is necessary to examine what is meant by force in its several acceptations and then assert the Negative of the Question Sometimes it is taken philosophically for that Power which rests a being beyond its natural inclination or tendency according to this account of it the determination of the Will must be accounted violent so far as it is concerned in Religion and Grace it self is not able to escape the imputation of force for grace may as well be said to be an enforcing influence on mans nature in his corrupted state as that power which according to philosophy diverts the natural course of the Elements in bodies and imprisons them in one mixture otherwise they would retreat to their own first home The fire and volatile parts would be always moving towards heaven and the sluggish parts of earth fettered to their center This is demonstrated in another Treatise N. F. viz. that mens thoughts are with as much difficulty composed to a settled and true notion of God and the Soul as the Elements are commanded to comply in the composition of natural Bodies Therefore I shall wave this and consider it in another sense as it is more directly and boldly complain'd of and that is it which relates to the authority of the Church and interest of the Magistrate in matters of Religion which is look'd upon by some as a Battery to destroy all Religion This is the Force generally exclaim'd against by the Libertine which is an unreasonable and an unjust imputation for if the constant and universal Doctrine of the Church which hath an obliging influence on Religious minds must be call'd force our Reformation and Separation from the Church of Rome must be esteem'd violent and consequently illegal For I cannot apprehend that Separation was justifiable on any better terms but that the Doctrine of the Reform'd Church is agreeable to the Scriptures with the consent and evidence of Councils and Fathers Besides this not only condemns holy Councils and Fathers being usurpers of Christian Liberty by imposing matters of Faith but makes the whole Church lyable to Error which was never yet asserted by any sober mind For though it may be granted that Councils and Fathers each have been lyable to some errors yet when there is a consent of all it is an infallible argument of Truth vid. N. F. The Bishop of Rome is so sensible of this that his Assertors know not how to invest him with Infallibility till they have intitled him to be the Virtual Church Having considered Force as it relates to the Church in the next place I cannot but take notice of that as it concerns the Magistrate or Civil Power This is the Force which the Libartine most complains of for that of the Church in its dreadful Censures is lookt on but
seems valuable but hath no strength for if the want of an immediate consultation with God destroys Authority or at least weakens it what will become of other Kings under the Law who had not such a priviledg intimately to converse with God or at least in so high a degree To say all It may as well be concluded that the Pastors of the Church are not oblig'd to follow the practice of the Apostles in all actions some of which Miraculous others suited to the exigency of the time the one of which cannot the other may not be imitated because none in these days can pretend to the like Inspiration as deny that Princes may not follow the examples of good Kings under the Law because later things cannot be so much Secretaries of the Almighty as they were in that Oeconomy Thus they have endeavour'd to invalidate the examples of the Jewish Kings persuading them that the constitution of the Mosaical Law and the practice of Moses and the Sanedrim or the practice of David and Solomon to oblige no more to Imitation than the lives of Numa Lycurgus or other Lawgivers in Plutarch or the constitution of Heathenish Priests by the Roman Senate This is true if it is understood of those Rites and Laws which were purely Judaical but otherwise in those which were not only Typical It is further urg'd as the first and second Oeconomy differ in many things and so do the Governors in the several Dispensations for says he all the Jewish Religion was in External Rights Civil and Religious Acts so interwoven that it was not easie to say whether the Church were more like a Commonwealth or the Common-wealth a Church Then concludes that the Magistrates buisiness was only to compel outward actions but the Christian Magistrate hath no such task Christianity consisting in inward acts of the mind This terrifying Objection may find a check from this consideration viz. That it is false when it says that all the influence good Kings had on the People was only to promote outward acts for that was not only conversant a-about the Ceremonial but Instrumental in promoting the Moral Law which certainly respects the powers of the Mind as much if not more than the outward Act. Besides in the ceremonial Acts of Law and offering of Sacrifice there was imply'd an Act of Faith as well in other persons as Abraham otherwise their Altars would have been no better than Shambles and their Priests than Slaughtermen Hence it appears that Kings pressing the outward act might be said to be instrumental in promoting Faith or inward Piety in which sense it may be said good Kings as of Josiah They made the People to serve the Lord their God 2 Chron. 34.33 But I must meet with an Objection which may be urged thus granting that there was acts of Faith requir'd in acts of Sacrifice yet those being inward acts of the mind Kings could not command or compel them 'T is true no earthly King can lay claim to such Spiritual dominion However Christianity being not such an invisible Religion but that it exerts it self in several visible acts as confession of Faith Communion c. which certainly will challenge the Magistrates care in case his aid is wanted neither will this appear as impertinent to his Office so long as he hath reason to suspect that those whom the Church cannot reduce by her Methods cannot be as good Subjects as others when they are declar'd not to be so good Christians Schism and Heresie though they do not by necessary consequence imply Rebellion and Schism and Rebellion not always terms convertible yet they are such as a Prince may suspect and seem as Vapors under the Earth which do not always cause Earth-Quakes but when they are confind to a natural Prison and cannot break forth for as the one doth not always put the Earth in such Convulsions yet excite fear so the other may have such influence on a Princes mind which though it cannot shake him for that supposes weakness yet may create a prudential Caution Consideration III. Of the authority of Reason as it stands in competition with the Church and of Schism and Heresie according to the new account of it and whether reformation or separation from Communion of the Church can be as sufently and legally justifi'd without an appeal to the constant Doctrine of the Catholick Church as with it TAking it for granted that Reason is not the last Object Faith and its principles the Elements into which it is resolv'd as the Reasoner phrases it it being not able to make a distinct discovery of the nature of God and unfit Judg of rules of his Worshop I refer the Reader to another Discourse N. F. It therefore at present seems only necessary that I assert Ecclesiastical Authority with its due right above private Judgment of single persons who so far become the Proselytes of humane Reason in that sense which a late Author asserted it as they appeal to nothing but the evidence of their own Reason conducted by its own natural Method only having the information by reading the Scriptures and fortifying their Opinions with mere natural Arguments without any respect to the consent or authority of the Church Many such Proselytes have appear'd in this late Age and cloakt their Foxish principles with Sheeps clothing of Piety and Tenderness yet still seem to have a reverence for the Church and its Authority as appears in late Pamphlets which nearly lookt into is but as an Ecclesiastical Compliment if it is not a Solaecism to say so for rational Authority is not Authority properly call'd for whilst men cause other mens Opinions to be tryed by the tests of their own judgments they cancel the authority of other men and make their own as an 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This consideration minds men of a Stratagem or Plot to subvert the authority of the Church and establishing their own which is not by any way more plausible done to an unwary Multitude than by partial citations of Authors without considering the Coherence Circumstance or Scope of the Author which they cite If I design'd to be large in this discourse I might shew how some undermine the authority of the Church by sinister and malicious application of Ecclesiastical Story as the Author of a late Pamphlet by the success of Constantine would prejudice all Princes against the authority of Councils and a partial citation of Gregory Nazianzen afterward to be consider'd but I shall not spend time in canvasing that Story and its application nor shew the weakness of Reason in its several particulars only shall take a prospect of Religion abus'd by some late partial Citations by which the Church is threatned Holy Fathers made to speak contrary to their scope and Religion expos'd to each cavilling Adversary Thus Jerome hath been represented by some an enemy to Episcopacy as asserted by the Church of England Thus the Church of England whilst some of the Roman Church
urgeth it with Citations out of the Fathers which speak the danger of separation from the Catholick Church they apply it to their own as if to be Roman and Catholick were all one Thus a late Author would persuade the Unwary that the most Puritan Protestants Mr. Perkins and many others do agree with Papists in several points controverted which they were as far from as we can imagine they thought the Romish Religion distant from the true The Fathers themselves are cited against themselves which minds me of some opposers of the authority of the Church who make them as a Patronage to their factious Presumptions Thus Lactantius is cited the words are these Lib de Orig. Error Cap. 8. having in the former Chapter remov'd the superstitious Rites and custome of some ancient Fathers who instituted them in Paganism he infers this Quare opportet in eâ re maximè in qua vitae ratio versatur sibi quemque confidere suoque judicio ac propriis sensibus niti ad investigandam perpendendam veritatem quam credentem alienis erroribus decipi tanquam ipsum rationis expertem Now how injuriously this is affixed as a Preface to authorize a factious Discourse as it often is against the authority of the Church may appear from the scope and design of the Holy Father in that Chapter viz. to oppose Heathenish Traditions Dreams and South sayings which began before Christianity had footing in the word But let it be applyed in opposition to the defintions and impositions of the Church all that can be concluded from the Words in this he condemns those who in a stupid observation of the Traditions of their Fathers More pecudum ducuntur as he phrases it an unreasonable implicit Faith which the Church of England doth not commend to her Sons but rather opposes its Assertors To say all this Holy Author though an accute Disputant and of a peircing wit yet is so far from disdaining Authority that none more frequent than he in Citations of Heathen Authors of Poets themselves to prove the weightiest matters of Religion when he disputed with Infidels as he was necessitated to do as he says Lib. de falsa Relig. Cap. 5. Sed omittamus sanè testimonia prophetarum ne minus idonea probatio vidcatur esse ab his quibus omnino non creditur He though a Father of the Church himself lib. de justitia c. 4. cites St. Cyprian arguing against Demetrius by Reason only because he was not capable of being confuted by any other Method as appears by the account given in the same Chapter Nam cum ageret contra hominem veritatis ignarum dilatis paulisper divinis lectionibus formare hunc a principio tanquam rudem debuit This gives me occasion of considering what esteem Reason was in matters of Religion being esteem'd only fit to dispose Infidels for Belief and to instruct Novices but in this Age it is so exalted that it is thought worthy of the highest place of Judicature to judg of all Controversies in so much that the Smyctimnian Divines in their late Papers declare it to be as the Eye and Religion as the Light or the Object Sic res ingeniosa est esse Christianum in another sense than formerly and that which the Author of Smyrk says of Wit in a Jeer may be retorted on them for whilst they make Reason an intrepreter of Scripture we may ask them too if their reason is an extraordinary gift of the Holy Ghost To conclude this part of the Consideration that those who interpret Scripture thus may not boast themselves Lactantius his Disciples but rather Proselytes of the authority of Humane Reason and by this method of making their Reason the only Standard to measure Controversies seem to appropriate the Preface us'd in General Councils at least one and corrupting Visum est nobis Spiritui Sancto by changing the terms to every particular person who is adjusted with equal authority to say Visum est mihi Spiritui Sancto which boldness exceeds Poetical License which seeing extraordinary acts of Providence attributed it to the Gods whilst they said Sic visum est superis This being premis'd I pass to the other part of this consideration viz. of Schism and Heresie according to the new account of it and how Reformation is not so justifiable without Appeals to the constant Doctrine of the Church This Assertion must expect to find as furious a return as Water doth when cast on hot Iron Whilst I affirm that Schism and Heresie are two of the greatest evils of the Church and affirm as I think I safely may that some have abus'd Religion almost as much by their extenuation of these horrid sins giving a soft account of them suitable to the humour of the Libertine as the Schismatick and Heretick by practice for such Theory makes way for practice whilst they teach men that Schism and Heresie are only terms of Art which the Church hath us'd to impose on the Christian Schollars what Doctrine it pleases and that 't is the terrors of the two Greek words which have not so dreadful a signification as they say affrights the poor Christian like thundring and lightning to run to his Litany to pray for deliverance This slight of subtile men will miss its aim if it is consider'd that the Church is not only as a Lexicon or Dictionary to tell the English of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but hath power to inflict its Censures when unjustifiable separations are attempted This unity of the Church is as much to be endeavour'd by the Pastors of it as the being of the Church is and that is so necessary that I may say of the Catholick Church in matters of Belief unum verum sunt idem Unity and Truth are undistinguished Now as it is certain that without the Catholick Church there is no Salvation for it is more than a Parenthesis in our Creed so is the Unity necessary in order to it Wherefore all Churches who at any time endeavour'd a regular Reformation made Appeals to some beside their own private interpretation of Holy Scripture which might be esteem'd unreasonable For if it may be imagin'd that each man may make interpretation of the Scriptures it is very difficult if not impossible for men especially those who will have communion with none but those of whom they are assur'd are of the same opinion with them in all things to maintain so perfect charity with a single person much less with the whole Church For suppose two different interpretations of some part of Holy Scripture viz. This is my Body and one takes the Body of Christ in the Eucharist to be only figuratively and the other corporally and both agree in this that the Consecrated Bread is rightly call'd the Body of Christ and the worthy Communicants receive it Thus supposing that these words appear in different senses to different persons how shall one convince the
other that he is of the same Faith with him if he do not express it in the same words and manner of interpretation which the Humane Reasoner according to his account of faith esteems not necessary except he could creep into his Soul to see the thought and the intimate motions of the mind without which he will not conclude any man can be declar'd a Heretick This is an unreasonable and impossible way of discouraging errors in Religion which will take away all power from the Church except it can keep Court in each mans mind and see each motion of it Such private interpretations are like Visions or Apparitions which appear to some persons only when they are alone Now as no man is oblig'd to believe the History of such Apparitions no further than the Authority of the persons obliges them to it I speak not of Holy Visions to the Prophets so no man will think himself bound to believe any private interpretation of a single person any further than he is possest with the authority of the person except he could enter into his phancy and borrow the whole Scene as it was represented to the Visor or Seer which is impossible Therefore it is necessary that there be an open profession of faith by plain and pertinent words which are as Ligaments to knit together persons in outward Communion This minds me of the charge given by Saint Paul to Timothy 2 Tim. 1. v. 13. of taking care of the form of sound words Whilst he gives his character of them that they were sound he omits not the form of words which in some cases may so alter the sense for it seems as necessary to Religion to distinguish the true Religion from the false as the Philosophers form of distinguishing one being from another An Instance in the word so oft repeated in late Pamphlets is a great evidence of it for when by a Holy Father without superstition or Adoration of words which Objection some have made against the name Jesus it self whilst commended to be bow'd at when nam'd which was preserv'd for the alteration of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 would destroy the Creed at least change its sense the pulling out of an Iota being as dangerous as removing a Pin from a curious piece of Mechanical Art This consider'd in its consequences will further appear more reasonable for the idle conjecture of the Humane Reasoner thoughdrest in a Theological habit is as much to be suspected as Jesuits Oaths prompting men to think that equivocation in belief as well as oaths is to be tolerated whilst it is concluded that an open profession of the most obscure Texts of Scripture is sufficient making each Man's phancy a Comment on the Text and the rule of Faith The most valuable Objection which comes to my thoughts at present is this That Jesuites equivocate in their Oaths on design but the other if they appear such it is on necessity let charity believe this and suppose them sincere yet let it be consider'd that the Jesuit will plead this that he uses this art in swearing only to evade the force of some Obligations which the Magistrate would bind him to and this he will tell us he doth that he may guard and not violate his conscience and what can the Libertine say more I speak not this to patronize either rather conclude them both worthy of censure who refuseth some Creeds or at least part of them because they descend to particulars to prevent all Equivocation To say all the only difference of the persons practice is this the one useth his art to impose upon Man the other on God himself I cease to start more Objections but rather pass to that which is granted by all who are not Enthusiasts viz. that in all Disputes there must be a third to appeal to When the Heathen is disputed with reason must be pitcht upon as the Umpire and the Jew appeals to the Prophets and the Christian to the Scriptures interpreted by the Catholick Church without which Tertullian's question may be askt Quiestis vos under quando venistis ubi tamdiu latuistis c. Tertull. de Praescrip Con. Haer. Besides to make each man's reason judg of Controversie is to make it both judg and party too which may be retorted on the Church which is a party too in deciding the Controversie Let this be granted yet the reason is not the same of private persons as a party and the whole Church and let the Libertine pitch upon any third Interpreter wherein the Objection will not return and make it the party This so generally obtains in most cases that a man 's own mind is not past possibility of having parties for an interested reason may assert that which true reason will deny and a man may by habit so frame his mind to tell lies and believe them himself But let it be granted that the Church is a party yet not such as to be suspected It is a prodigious kind of distrust to think the whole Catholick Church should pass a partial sentence That Fathers will not design to deceive their Sons in matters of Divinty is so true that some have made use of it to prove the existence of God and shall the ghostly Fathers be esteem'd such Monsters to deceive their Sons in matters of such moment To say all that which a Roman Doctor asserted of their Church so peremptorily may be said of the whole that it ought to give testimony of it self Before I conclude this Consideration I cannot but take notice that some who have extenuated Heresie in its name would also make it impossible that a Heretick should be discover'd because to an obstinate opposing the true Doctrine in which the nature of Heresie consists it is requir'd that the intimate motions of mens minds be seen This is illustrated by an instance from Murder to which I shall only oppose this that he may as well conclude it is impossible to discover Murther Besides that similitude fails in the main part of it for a Heretick hath opportunity of recanting and must be an obstinate Opposer of the Truth three time before he is declar'd so Now the Murtherer is not capable of such respite or pausing and opportunity of stifling his fault or making it rather to be none except he was capable of committing the act three times as well as the Heretick opposing truth which cannot be except a man had three lives Consideration V. Of Creeds and Impositions with some Reflexions on the Apostles and other Creeds and of the extent of Creeds how necessary for deciding Controversies ALthough there is no absolute necesity imply'd in the nature of Religion that there must be Creeds or a symbol of Faith yet it may be safely concluded they are not superfluous It is convenient that we have an Enchiridion and necessary for the well being of the Church though the substance of the Doctrine may be but as an Index to direct to its fuller Explanation
in particulars and a good mean to preserve the true Faith Though Christ did not immediately draw up his Doctrine in such Articles it is past doubt he directed the Church to do it and that perhaps that he might create reverence to the Pastors of the Church that they should not be only as Library-keepers but Authors too in that sense that a Publisher of an Epitome may be call'd so whilst they compose the contents of Scripture in a short abridgment by Divine Direction It is observ'd that Christ did some things to create a Reverence to his Evangelists and Apostles by committing the charge of the publishing of the Gospel in writing when he himself could as easily have done it as wrote on the ground with his finger and shall not his Apostles Successors be esteemed worthy to interpret these holy Writings To deny them this Authority and only allow them such a mere Ministerial office and that to be only understood as if they were only Mercuries with a hand stretcht out with a Scrol for the People to read it seems rash And to confine them only to be judg of Circumstantials is to minorize their Authority and makes them but Registers to keep the Divine Books 'T is true this is honour enough to be but Door-keepers and Saint Paul said the Jews might glory because the Oracles of God were committed unto them which may not be restrained to the bare letter of the Law according to each mans apprehension but in doubtful cases Appeals were to be made to the Sanedrim which hath no small affinity with the proceedings of Councils though some disputes set them at further distance besides I do not remember that Christ taxes in general the Jewish Doctors for Exposition of the Law but when they either clearly perverted the sense and meaning of the Law or plainly altered it by sinister Interpretations making the word of God of none effect For if all Illustrations of the Law by Jewish Doctors must be laid aside though we know and avoid the fabulous Interpretation of the Thalmudist many parts of the Old Testament would not be so plainly understood even those which relate to the coming of Christ and the manner of his Kingdom If it is said that the Jewish Doctors often err'd so their Authority suspicious if not invalid the same will be granted I presume of Councils and Church when their Assertions if it may be supposed are manifest contradictions to plain Scripture This Bellarmine confesseth when he says Councils may not be opposed Nisi manifestissime constet intollerabilem errorem Committi lib. 2. de Concil But more of this in its proper place In this only I shall take notice that the authority of the Church hath been rendered odious to weak minds whilst some part of it I do not mean the Catholick run into extreams in Creeds as some men in habits or cloaths sometimes the humour of the Age is such that men affect to appear in the large size of Primitive Ages others desirous to appear as small as Nature will admit one time as Gyants another time as Pygmies This vanity hath crept into the Church some will only own the Apostls Creed others not content with those which the Church hath received but must make it larger by Phylacteries of Decretals The Roman Church will have each Article of the Creed as Astronomers say of the Planets each must have its Assecla or Page attend it They will scarce believe that they ca satisfie the first Article of believing in case it is not represented by Images neither will they believe the Communion of the Catholick Church except Rome may pass for it and the Resurrection and day of Judgment not to be explained without Purgatory some run in another extream tream they will admire nothing so much as the Eunuchs Creed to be imposed on as matters of Christian belief However they magnisie the Creed of the Apostles at the same time decrying others allowed by the Church of England which gives just occasion of suspicion that those very persons who own the Apostles Creed in words if prest by the general interpretation of the whole Church would boggle at that as much as at the Athanasian Creed for though they commend it as it justly deserves it for its plainness of matter and the phrase so esteemed by the Fathers yet it is certain there are doubts in some Articles which are not agreed on so as to be past dispute for instance the Communion of Saints the belief on the Catholick Church and the manner of Christ's descending into Hell not yet agreed on by all parts of the Catholick Church besides those who will have nothing in other accompts of Religion but in Scripture phrase must be content with other Language in this That word Catholick hath lately been as much controverted as the threadbear word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which word was so hard to Luther that he went about to translate it into the German Language and alter the phrase for which boldness he was justly charged by Tanner the Jesuite for I am of nazianzens mind not to have a word changed for as he says One drop of Poyson may corrupt a great mass I would not have this which is said of the Creed as to be said in derogation from its reverence due to it above other Creeds which are but Comments on it yet there are two questions I hope may be started without violence done to it How it appears to be a sum of Fundamentals This is well Answered by some late Authors That the Apostles wrote the whole sum of what is to be believed for if they had omitted any part of it they might have as well omitted all Then it must be inquired how far this Creed as Apostlical depends on the Churches testimony or authority on this latter question the present Controversie depends therefore it must be considered what it is to be called Apostolical Apostolical is that which is agreeable to the Apostles practice and doctrine So the title Apostolical is fastned to some Churches and several persons whose piety had hath alliance to that of the Apostles but when it is given to any Doctrine as the rule of Faith Ubique semper ab omnibus obtains in this sense the Apostles Creed cannot be called Apostolical as to all its parts for all were not received at the same time as it is observed that St. Austin Origen and Tertullian commenting on the Creed make no mention of the Articles of the descent into Hell though 't is confest Saint Austin owns it as Catholick in other places 'T is true Rufsinus an ancient Doctor makes mention of that Article but says the Roman Church did not receive it at that time but since generally received I speak not this out of any irreverence or light esteem to the Creed as an Author I heard of who wrote a scurrilous and malicious piece against the Creed meerly in opposition to another opinion That which I infer
from what is said is only this All Doctrines if they are not immediately received by the whole Church not rashly to be rejected This also I could infer that seeing it is not certain the Apostles wrote it themselves but in several Ages it had its Ratification at least the compellation of Apostolical from the Church its plain that the authority of the Church which makes it above other Creeds and to be the sum total of all that is to be believed makes it depend on that authority of the Church which gave it its compellation which I hope though borrowed from the authority of the Church which since the Apostles time hath been abused will be no greater a prejudice to discerning minds than the title of the King though first derived from the Pope can minorize the honour due to him This which is said perhaps may be retorted by an instance in Books of canonical Scripture by saying we may as well conclude that the Gospel owes its name of Gospel to the Church and the Law its name of the Law as conclude that the Creed as to its denomination or being Apostolical depends only upon the Church which calls it so This Objection may find an Answer from this consideration that although the Church is Ministerial in both holding out a Light to declare unto us that the Gospel is the Gospel and the Law the Law as much as it doth evidence that the Creed is the Creed yet there is this difference the Books of the Law and Gospel its probable had their compellation or name written by the same Authors that wrote them but the Creed owes its title to the restimony of the Church so far as it is call'd the Apostles Creed By this limitation I hope I have prevented another cavil which might conclude I make the Doctrine of the Creed to depend on the Church when I only speak of the compellation as being borrowed from the Church which compellation is the only hinge on which the present Controversie turns for take away the name the Apostles Creed and it can be no more said to be the sum of all Religion than other Doctrines or Theses generally received by the Church If it is further urged that all Titles of the canonical Books bear not without doubt the Authors names as several Psalms and the Epistle to the Hebrews because it is not certainly known who were their Authors This may be granted yet the case is not the same with the Creed and some parts of the canonical Scripture for the latter it may be safely said that the Church gave no new Titles to those Books but delivered them as they found them waitten or were assured of their Titles by infallible Traditions but the same cannot so certainly be said of the Apostles Creed From all that is said it is easie to observe how some men are ready to own the Authority of the Church when serviceable to their designs and disowns it when it thwarts private Opinions It may be granted that the Apostles Creed is Regula fidei Tutissima as a Rule though but a foot in length may discover the crookedness of the greatest quantity and is useful in thousands of cases so the Creed may measure and discover though not so accurately the many Volumious errors in Religion but not in direct terms but by consequence To illustrate it by Instances Christ sums up all the Commandments in one word Love which modo implicito concludes against all Vice otherwise it could not be an abridgment of the whole Law this must be granted but it is rashness to say that this Command alone is able to check all Vices and conclude against each particular Sin It is also said of Manna a fit Emblem of the Creed always to be kept in the Ark of the Church that eminently contains all savours to gratifie the Tast and Smelling and the Opall and Iris have a lovely commixture of all colours Now as a man who would pass an accurate Judgment of a sweet body would not appeal to Manna which hath it mixt with others but to some particular object of the same kind and he who would pass judgment on Colours Yellow or Blue c. will not compare them with that in the Rainbow but some other Object of the same complexion or tincture the same may be said of the Articles of Faith which are severally comprehended in the Creed yet are not to be an exact measure of their numerous Errors implicitly condemned by it It hath been doubted by some whether the principles of Chymists Salt Sulphur c. are really in the Bodies or whether they were as matter fitly prepared and by Extraction made such I shall not presume to determine any thing in this but only apply it to the present case by saying there are the Semina or Principia in the Creed but particular Articles which confute particular Errors though they have their Foundation from it yet their whole Superstruction cannot be said to be taken from it It is impossible it should be done therefore weakness to attempt it for it argues as much weakness in those men who undertake to assert the Creed the sum of all to be believed and to confute all Errors as some when urged by some of the Roman Church to shew how the Sacraments were contained in the Creed have answered out of Aquinas 2.2 q. 1. a. 8. Eos Articulos continueri includi in Articulo fidei quo Credimus unam sanctam Ecclesiam Sanctorum Communionem Remissionem peccatorum that they are contained in the Articles where we profess a Belief in the Catholick Church Communion of Saints remission of Sins And being urged particularly to shew how Baptism was included there run for Sanctuary to the Athanasian Creed This seems to be a far fetcht and an unnatural deduction for though it may be concluded that the Sacraments are necessarily implyed in the Remission of Sins as he gives his reason Ibidem nam per Sacramenta peccata remittuntur it will conclude the necessity but says nothing of the nature wherefore that great Doctor with all the subtilties of his School-companions could never extract any thing thence of the nature of them so if Transubstantiation could not find any other confutation than from those Articles it would be to little purpose to dispute against it Thus one of our Church who being urged by a Papist how he shewed in the Creed that Doctrine of the Devils forbidding Marriage was exprest in the Creed answers that neither meats nor marrying of any persons could be unlawful because a Christian believes in God in his Creed to be maker of all thinks good so not to be forborn and all his Institutions holy therefore not to be abstained from by any persons This seems to me as vain an Attempt and as far fetcht a way of Arguing as those men use who will undertake to shew there is nothing New but demonstrate all new Philosophy to be taken out of Aristotle I