do not note distinct species or kindes of Churches but are only several adjuncts of the same Church which is called invisible in respect of the inward and invisible union which Members have with Christ the Head by the Spirit and Faith and visible in respect of their outward Profession of their Faith which is visible to men But in neither of these senses is the Catholick Church the first subject of the Keys 1. Not as invisible for that is not built by a visible profession such as Peter's was nor are the Ordinances dispensed or administred visibly in it to or by men in visible fellowship Add hereunto that the Keys here given to Peter can shut out of the Kingdom of Heaven even the same persons to whom they have opened the door before which cannot befal Believers in the visible Church 2. Not as visible For the Scripture doth not acknowledge a Catholick visible Church The Catholick Church is not visible as a Church and the Church that is visible is not Catholick Though the Catholick Church may be visible in its singular Members yet so they are not a Church or though it may be visible in particular Congregations See Mr. Cott. Defence of the way of Congreg Churches par 2. p. 56 yet none of them is Catholick or though all of them if they could meet together may be called a Catholick Church or general Assembly yet so it cannot be the first subject of the Keys i. e. of all Ecclesiastical power for such Assemblies See Mr. Hooker ' ◠Survey part 1. ch 14 15. if possible are extraordinary and extraordinary Assemblies are not fit Judicatories to hear and censure ordinary offences or to administer the ordinary acts of Church-power 2. If the visible Catholick Church be considered as totum integrale which is such a whole as ariseth out of the aggregation of all particular Churches as an Army is made up of all the several Regiments and Troops or a Kingdom of all the Cities and Counties within it it cannot be the first subject of the Keyes i. e. of all Church-power For 1. particular Churches are the Members which give the essential causes whence the integrity of this whole is made up and therefore in nature before it as the cause is before its effect 2. Church-Officers with their Offices are set ordinarily by Christs Institution only in such a Church where they are called the Chosen but that is a particular Church Act. 14.23 Tit. 1.5 For that choice and calling is the foundation of the relation between Pastors and People and of the duties both of the Rulers and of the Ruled mutually Act. 20.28 1 Pet. 5.2 Heb. 13.17 3. If a Catholick integral Church ariseth from all particular Churches as Members of it joyned together then it must be distinct from them all as the whole Body is a thing distinct from its several Members then also there must be some Officer and Ordinance and Act belonging to it which doth not appertain to particular Churches as there is a General over an Army besides the Captains and Officers of the several Regiments and a Supreme Monarch in a Kingdom besides the Governors in the several Corporations and Counties But no such Catholick-Church distinct from all particular Churches can be shewen nor Officers or acts of it besides those which are exercised in particular Churches 4. Diocesan Bishops look at these words as giving the Keys to them as the Successors of the Apostles whence they assume the power of Ordinathon and Jurisdiction as belonging to them jure divino A claim which King James whether out of his policy which he called his King-craft or out of his insight into the Scripture would not suffer them to pretend in his time Nor indeed is there any warrant for it in Scripture as it hath been abundantly proved by sundry witnesses against that usurpation We read of Bishops in the New-Testament but what Not one Bishop over many Churches but many Bishops over one Church not Diocesan but Congregational Bishops Phil. 1.1 Those whom Luke calls Elders in Act. 20.17 Paul calleth Bishops in v. 28. The Bishops which the Apostles acknowledge to be Christs Ordinance to continue in the Christian Church are Congregational Elders 1 Tim. 3 1-8 Tit. 1.5 7. 1 Pet. 5.1 2. and all the Teaching-Elders are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 fellow-Elders coequal in authority above whom Paul acknowledgeth no Rulers in the Church but rather sets these above all 1 Tim. 5.17 Euseb Eccles hist l. 6. c. 43. Cypr. Ep. l. 3. Ep. 10 l. 1. ep 3. And when after the Apostles time one of the Pastors was called Bishop by way of eminency for orders sake yet for many years he did no act of power but 1. with consent of the Presbytery 2. with consent Dr. Cudw on the Postscript to Galat. and in the presence of the People What is pleaded from Titus his ordaining Tit. 1.5 helps not their cause for he did it as an Evangelist not as a Diocesan Prelate and the Office of Evangelists together with the Apostles ceaseth The Postscript of the second Epistle to Timothy where he is called the first Bishop of the Church of the Ephesians and of that to Titus where he is called the first Bishop of the Church of the Cretians are Apocryphal as the rest are and the first consisteth not with 2 Tim. 4.5 where Timothy is called an Evangelist and therefore not tyed to personal residence to abide in one place as Bishops and Pastors are but the Evangelists were to go from place to place to set things in order and confirm the Churches planted by the Apostles The same may be said of Titus Nor is the Postscript of that Epistle of more credit than the former where the Scribe saith it was written from Nicopolis Hiperius justly disliketh the ground of that opinion in the Scribe which he saith was from Tit. 3.12 Because Paul bade Titus come to him to Nicopolis for he determined to winter there whereas if he were there at that time he would have said I purpose to winter here not there as Beza noteth 5. Others conclude from this Text that the power of the Keys i. e. the power of Ordination and Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction is given in Peter to Church-Officers only especially to Pastors and Teachers And that such only or principally are meant in this Grant they endeavour to prove by five reasons especially We will examine them severally and briefly 1. Reas Because the Keys are given to Stewards by Office 1 Cor. 4.1 2 Cor. 4.5 1 Tim. 3.15 Isa 22.12 Answ 1. The three former Texts speak of the Apostles and Evangelists Office and in them of Pastors and Teachers not of Ruling-Elders But I suppose they will not deny the Ruling-Elders to have a Key of Office also The last Text proveth only that the Key sometimes signifies Office-power given to a Steward which none deny But this toucheth not this Text Mat. 16. which means not only
Alexandrum Omnia probate quod bonum est tenete estote probati nummularij ut si quis nummus adulter est figuram Caesaris non habet nec signatus est moneta publica reprobetur qui autem Christi faciem claro praefert Iumine in cordis nostri marsupium recondatur The Churches Charter Containing Two Parts 1. The Constitution of particular visible Churches 2. The Priviledges and Power given to such Churches BEfore I proceed to examine Mr. Pagets arguing for the Ecclesistical Juridical Power of Classes I shall positively declare what power is given by Christ to particular Churches after I have described their constitution according to Christ his appointment In every of which particulars I shall principally insist in the metaphor of a Corporation or body politick such as that of the chiefest and most perfect Cities is because I find that it pleaseth the Holy Ghost in Scripture frequently to express this matter under this similitude * Ps 48 1â— 2. 87.3 Isa 26.1 60.14 Ezek. 40.2 4â— 35 Rev. 3. â—â— â—0 â— 21. 〈…〉 22. 〈…〉 Luc. 1â—â—â— But I shall not venture to apply it any further than the light of Truth in Scripture will direct and warrant There we finde the grand Charter it self and the ancient Presidents of the first Christian Churches planted by the Apostles According to these Records I shall endeavour to declare the mind of Christ whom God the Father commands us to hear * Mat. 3.17 17.5 in all things whatsoever he saith unto us and that under a dreadful penalty †Acts 3.22 23. Cypr. ad Coecil lib. 2. ep 3. Si solus Christus audiendus est non debemus attendere quid aliquis ante nos faciendum putaverit sed quid qui ante omnis est Christus prior fecerit faciendum statuerit Neque enim hominis consuetudinem sequi oportet sed Dei veritatem cùm per Isaiam Prophetam Deus loquatur dicat c. Whence Cyprian doth wel infer If only Christ is to be heard we ought not to attend what any before us thought should be done but what Christ who is before all hath done and appointed to be done For we ought not to follow the custom of men but the truth of God seeing the Lord saith by the Prophet Isaiah In vain they worship me teaching for doctrines the commandements of men The Charter according to which particular Churches are to be constituted and their power in re propriâ is to be stated we find in Mat. 16.18 19. In the opening and explaining whereof I purpose with Christ's assistance to proceed in this method 1st handling the constitution of a particular visible Church 2ly clearing the power of it The words in Mat. 16.18 hold forth a perfect Rule for the constituting of a visible Church of its causes of which we shall speak severally and distinctly and the more largely that the strength of such objections as occurr in each particular may be duly weighed and in handling them I shall observe this order 1. I shall propound what I conceive to be the truth in certain doctrinal Conclusions 2. Explicate and confirm them 3. Deduce thence such Consectaries or Inferences as freely flow from them CHAP. I. 1. THe principal efficient cause is noted in this clause I will build my Church I who is that even he whom Peter had confessed in these words Thou art the Christ the Son of the living God That is Jesus our Mediator 1. He speaks in the first Person not in the second For though he useth men as his instruments yet himself by his Spirit buildeth his Church Zach. 4.6 Therefore it is called his Building 1 Cor. 3.9 2. He speaks not in the preter or present tense but in the future I will build For though Christ was yesterday is to day and shall be ever the builder of his Church yet he thus speaketh in a particular respect to the Christian Churches under the New-Testament which should be built after his Ascension of Jews and Gentiles joyned into one body upon the foundation of the Prophets and Apostles Jesus Christ being the Corner-Stone c. Ephes 2.20 21 22. The Conclusion hence is Concl. 1 That Jesus Christ our Mediatour is the only immediate Authour and Institutor of particular visible Churches That he speaketh here of a particular visible Church and not of the Catholick Church appeareth by his giving to it the Keyes Which we shall prove hereafter are given only to particular Churches 2. That Christ himself is the only immediate Institutor of such Churches may be evinced 1. Generally from Heb. 3.3 4 5. 2. Particularly by Induction thus 1. He is the Door by whom they that are orderly admitted must enter Joh. 10.9 2. He sets the Members every one of them in that place and rank which they have in the Body 1 Cor. 12.18 and gifteth them accordingly Ephes 4.7 3. He compacteth the whole Body Ephes 4.16 and firmly knits the materials together in this Spiritual building 1 Pet. 2.5 4. He gives the several Offices and Officers Pastors Teachers Ruling-Elders and Deacons 1 Cor. 12.28 Ephes 4.8 11. 5. He appointeth the visible Seals Baptism Col. 2.10 11 12. and the Lords Supper 1 Cor. 11 23 c. 6. He is the Law-giver to his Church Jam. 4.12 7. He is the Lord of all Church Admininistrations 1 Cor. 12.3 8. The Censures have their power and efficacy from him Rev. 3.7 1 Cor. 5.4 5. 9. The blessing of all the Ordinances is from his Institution of them and effectual presence with his Church and Ministers dispensing them Matth. 28.19 20. Reas Thus he is by a three-fold right 1. From the Decree and Donation of the Father Psal 2.7 8. John 3.35 and 5.22 23. 2. From the Redemption of his Church Act. 20.28 Phil. 2.9 10 11. Matth. 28.18 19 20. 3. From his conquest over the powers of darkness from whence he hath delivered them and translated them into his Kingdom Col. 1.13 In all these respects and many more Jesus Christ our Mediatour hath right to institute particular Christian Churches and to cast them into what mould he pleaseth From this Conclusion thus proved I infer as followeth 1. Consect Then Jesus Christ is the only Lord and Head of such Churches as himself hath instituted Thus from Christ's building his House followeth his being over the House Hebrews 3.3 6. And he is over it as the Lord of it Acts 2.36 And as the only Political Head of it in three respects 1. Of Preheminence as having the Spirit in a greater measure than all his Members Col. 1.18 John 3.34 2. In respect of Government Ephes 5.22 23 24. 3. In respect of Influence Joh. 15.5 and that not only in respect of common Gifts whereof Hypocrites partake which if they be joyned to Christ's visible Body the Church are but dead Members whom as dead Branches in the Vine God will take away and cast forth Joh. 15.2 6. but also
in resect of quickning Grace whence they are called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1. Pet. 2.5 Hence they grow up in all things into him which is the Head Christ and are edifying and edified Members in the Body Eph. 4.15 16. Nor is Christ the Head only of the Catholick Church but also of every particular Church instituted by him which is therefore frequently by Christ himself called the Kingdom of God and of Heaven the King whereof is Christ his Subjects are visible Believers professing their Faith in him and their subjection to his Laws and Ordinances 2 Cor. 9.13 This Soveraign power is so properly Christs that it is not communicable to any Creature nor can any man be his Substitute or Vicar herein For neither doth Christ or his Church need such a Vicar or visible Head of the Church seeing the Church is compleat in Christ alone Col. 2.10 Nor is any Creature capable of discharging the Office of an Head unto the Church Ephes 1.20 21 22 23. 2. Consect Then it is not in the power of Earthly Kings or States or Civil Courts to make Ecclesiastical Laws or to invent and impose any Rites or Forms of Worship upon Churches according to Principles of State-Policy or Humane Prudence Though Moses was as well a great Prophet as a great Prince yet God left no part of the building of the Tabernacle to his prudence but limited him in all things to the pattern in the Mount Exod. 25.40 Nor might Solomon though the wisest of meer men act by his own wisdom in building the Temple ◠Chon 28.11 12 13. but he was guided therein by the perfect pattern which David gave him from the Spirit So concerning Christian Churches Christ hath given his People a perfect pattern which he requireth the Ministers to hold forth distinctly in every point of it to his people according to that Prophesie in Ezek. 43.10 11. That they may keep the whole Form thereof and all the Ordinances thereof and do them which also Christ expresly requireth in Matth. 28.19 20. 3. Consect Then every particular visible Church must exalt Christ and his Institutions alone in their whole Church-Order and in all their Admistrations This is their visible receiving Christ Jesus the Lord and walking in him Col. 2.5 6. The Church is Christ's House and it 's equal according to Natural light and civil prudence that every man should bear Rule in his own House Esth 1.22 Much more Christ who is God and Man Artaxerxes shall rise up in judgment with all such as incroach upon Christ's Right in ordering Churches by their policies and condemn them for he fearing the jealousy and wrath of God if men should take such liberty to themselves provided against it by a strict Decree saying Whatsoever is commanded by the God of Heaven let it be diligently done for the House of the God of Heaven for why should there be wrath against the Realm c. Esth 7.23 Nor is the wrath of Christ less formidable to us or his jealousie less incensed against those that either add to or take from or alter his Institutions now than in times past but rather more Hebr. 12.25 to the end So much shall serve touching the Efficient Cause and Institutor of particular visible Churches CHAP. II. Concerning the Material Cause THe Materials whereof this Spiritual Building must consist are implyed when Christ saith Vpon this Rock will I build c. together with Peters confession in ver 16. and Christ's approbation of it ver 17. which gave occasion to this Speech of Christ Vpon this Rock c. For the Rock is Jesus Christ 1 Cor. 3.11 But how considered not simply and in an abstract sense but 1. As Preached by the Ministry of the Gospel Ephes 2.20 2. As believed on with a Faith made visible by publick confession according to Rom. 10.9 10. Christ believed on is the Foundation or Rock of the Catholick invisible Church But Christ believed on and confessed is the Rock whereupon a particular visible Church is built In this Exposition sundry of the Ancient Writers (a) Basil Tract de poenit Gre. Naz. de Comp. disserendi ratione Theod in Psal 47. Ambr. in Eph. 2.20 Aug. in lib. 1. Retract c. 21. and the Orthodox Modern generally consent The Doctrinal conclusion which these words of the Charter afford us concerning the materials of particular visible Churches is that 2. Conclusion It is the will and appointment of Christ that all and only such grown persons be admitted Members of particular Churches who make such a publick profession of their Faith as the Church may in charitable discretion conceive hath blessedness annexed to it and is such as flesh and blood hath not revealed to a man but our Heavenly Father 1. That Christ here meant a particular visible Church and not only the Catholick Church we have partly evinced already and shall more fully hereafter 2. That persons meant by Christ here are adulti grown persons appeareth by his questions to the Apostles Whom do men say and whom do ye say that I am and by Peter's answer As for Infants they are indeed Members of the Church and as such Baptized yet it is so only as they are included in their Parents by vertue of the Covenant wherein they are wrapped with their Parents Gen. 17.7 Acts 2.38 39. 1 Cor. 7.14 3. That such adulti or grown persons must make a publick confession of Faith before the Lord and his people So Christ required Peter to do here and when he had so done said Christ Vpon this Rock I will build my Church viz. in after times For no particular Christian Church was actually constituted at this time nor till after the Ascension of Christ in Act. 1. q. d. Then take this course and ever after all the World over if you will have a particular Church to be acknowledged by me to be my building 4. That their Confession of Faith must be so made as that the Church may in charitable discretion conceive it to have blessedness annexed c. For seeing it pleaseth Christ to use Men as his Instruments in building his Church Zach. 6.15 Ephes 4.11 12. He is content that they improve the judgement which they have Christs judgement concerning Peter was infallible for he knew what was in man John 2.25 But the Officers and Members of the Church are but men who judge by the outward appearance 1 Sam. 16.7 Therefore their judgment is fallible and hath been deceived as we see in the judgement of the Apostles and the Church at Jerusalem concerning Ananias and Sapphira and in that of Philip and the Church in Samaria concerning Simon Magus c. Their duty is to proceed as far as men may by Rule with due moderation and gentleness to try them who offer themselves to fellowship whether they be Believers or not refusing known Hypocrites though when they have done all they can close Hypocrites will creep in 5. That all they who hold
performed Coroll 3 Then it is not arbitrary but a duty for every Christian to endeavour to joyn himself in Membership with a Congregational instituted Church of Christ whosoever have opportunity and neglect so to do they greatly sin against God and break the second Commandment in not worshiping him according to his institution and also against their own souls in depriving themselves of the blessing which he hath annexed unto his Institution Exod. 20.24 Mat. 28.20 and if they persist in that neglect they can hardly be accounted Believers truly seeking the Kingdom of God what profession of Religion soever they make otherwise Mat. 6.33 and they sin against their posterity also to whom God promiseth mercy upon their parents worshipping him according to his Institutions If the Lord doth good to the posterity of such it is meerly from his own good pleasure but not from their Parents Covenant Ezek. 16.61 CHAP. V. Concerning the Churches impregnable stability TO the Church built by Christ upon this Rock he hath promised and given this great priviledge that the gates of Hell shall not prevail against it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Scripture signifieth not Hell but the state of the dead or the Grave 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are enemies vanquished by Christ for his Church 1 Cor. 15.26 55. and shal be cast into the lake of fire Rev. 20.14 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are the gates of Death in Job 38.17 Psal 107.18 and the gates of the Grave Isa 38.10 i. e. the power of Death and the Grave which seizeth on them as a Serjeant Psal 116.3 The sum is Let the Church be brought to the lowest that it seems to be dead as those two Witnesses Rev. 11.8 9. and buried as Christ's natural body was for a time yet neither Death nor the Grave shall prevail agaist it Yet we must not limit the sense of these words only to the power of Death and the Grave but it must be extended to all Satans plots and assaults against the Church against which if Christ did not help them Death and the Grave would prevail against them to their eternal destruction We conclude therefore that in this Text by the gates of Hell are meant all the machinations of Satan and temptations whatsoever whereby he laboureth to hinder the building of Christs Church to draw those from Christ who are built upon him The prevailing of them signifies their effectual working unto the attainment of those ends The sum is a promise that the Devil with all his policies and powers shall neither hinder the building of Christs Church nor cause the Church thus built to apostatize from Christ And that this is the true sense and meaning of the words whatsoever Socinians or Arminians say to the contrary may thus be evinced 1. Because the thing promised is the disabling of what ever opposeth the building of the Church upon this Rock or its constant adhering to Christ from prevailing to those ends but so do Satan's temptations Therefore they are meant by the gates of Hell 2. Because whatsoever goeth forth out of the gates of Hell or hath its beginning from thence is meant in this phrase but the Temptations and Machinations of Satan by himself and his instruments Hereticks and Tyrants go forth thence Therefore they are meant in this phraise 3. Because Peter to whom Christ spake these words describes unbelievers the adversaries of this building as belonging to the gates of Hell 1 Pet. 2.7 8. 4. Because the proportion which Christ implyes in these words requireth that they be so understood The proportion is between two Cities that of Heaven which hath its gates and keyes in v. 19. and the other of Hell which hath its gates whence it endeavors the ruine and overthrow of that but shall not prevail Seeing therefore City is opposed to City and Gates to Gates and one viz. the Church is considered in the state of present building it is most sutable that the other be also looked at as it opposeth that in the present whilst it is militant upon earth But from hence that Christ promiseth that the gates of Hell shall not prevail against his Church thus built some infer that Christ meaneth only the invisible Catholick Church For that only say they is bulilt on this Rock and only that shall not fail Answ 1. It is true that the Catholick invisible Church is built upon Christ by effectual and unfeigned Faith and that shall not fail For that is the general Assembly and Church of the fist-born which are enrolled in Heaven Heb. 12.23 And all the gates of Hell cannot prevail against those that are written in Heaven 2. But it is not true that these only are built on this Rock The Apostle Paul tells us that a particular visible Church rightly constituted as that at Corinth is built upon this Rock or Rocky-foundation 1 Cor. 3.10 11. and being so built is under the special protection of God in Christ in respect whereof the Lord promiseth any such Church as well among the Gentiles as the Jews Whosoever shall gather himself against thee shall fall Isa 54.15 and all the weapons that are made against thee shall not prosper vers 17. And it is clear that Christ in this place speaks of such a Church as is built upon the confession of Faith such as Peter made visibly and publickly whereupon not the invisible Catholick Church but visible particular Churches are built Therefore these only are meant here Concl. 5 The Church of Christ built by himself upon this Rock in using the means which he hath appointed for their safety is impregnable The Church of Christ is here indefinitely taken for a particular Congregational-Church instituted by Christ according to the sense of the former conclusions not for this or that definitely Therefore if any object that the gates of Hell have prevailed against the Greek-Churches those golden Candlesticks in Asia and against Rome whose Faith was spoken of throughout the whole World and against sundry other particular Churches Answ I Answer 1. Though it be true that the gates of Hell have prevailed against this or that particular Church yet not against a particular Church indefinitly considered or which is the same against the Church in general existing in its particulars In this sense the visible Church doth not fail For 1. Christ ever had and will have some or other visible Church on Earth wherein the general nature of a visible Church is preserved as the Genus is in its Species and the nature of man in this or that individual as when the Lord preserved Noah and his Family in the Ark mankind was preserved in them though multitudes of men were destroyed in the Deluge 2. Christ will shew that he makes a difference between Churches wherein are some true Believers mixed with many Hypocrites and other Societies Therefore he will not suffer such visible Churches to be totally destroyed as he doth his open enemies Hos 11.8 9. Isa 1.8 9.
Synagogue of the infallibility of their Popes as Peter's successors and of the indeficiency of their Church as built upon Peter when as neither had Peter himself any such priviledge as to be infallible The next story in this 16th of Matthew evinceth the contrary v. 23. Nor by the Rock whereupon Christ builds his Church is meant the person of Peter or Peter's confession personally as it had relation to him but as it is considered really in it self and is common to all the Disciples and to all visible Believers which may be thus confirmed 1. Because Peters confession must have relation to the matter which he confessed But Peter confessed not himself but Christ saying Thou art the Christ the Son of the living God Therefore his confession had relation to Christ not to himself 2. Because Peter confessed no more than that which he knew the other Disciples believed before he speake For Christ's question being general What say ye Peter answered as the mouth of the rest but the Apostles before he speak believed Christ confessed and not Peter confessing 3. Because this Rock is that confession whereupon Christ saith he will build his Church But whosoever shall truly believe that which Peter confessed viz. Christ the Son of the living God and confess or profess it in due order is accordingly built on this Rock though he had never heard of Peter's name Therefore the confession rightly understood had relation unto Christ and not to the person of Peter 4. Because the Rock signifieth that which is immoveable and impregnable such as is Christ and his truth But Peter's confession was movable and shaken at one time thrice denying this confession of his Lord. Therefore this confession which Christ calls the Rock had not relation to Peter but only to Christ Coroll 2 Then they that would have a particular Church to be impregnable stable and firm against the prevailing of the gates of Hell must see that it be built upon this Rock and not upon humane formes 1. That Christ himself be the builder of it according to his own institutions not the policies or customs of men 2. * Ex quo patet quòd Ecclesia non consistit in hominibus ratione potestatis vel dignitatis Ecclesiasticae vel saecularis c. sed in illis personis in quibus est notitia vera confessio fidei veritatis Lyra in loc That the materials of which it consists be such as believe and profess their Faith in Christ publickly before the Lord and his People 3. That they be firmly joyned together in one Congregation by an holy Covenant of subjection and submission to the Lord Jesus Christ and to one another in him and accordingly walk together in obedience to Christ and his Rules resisting Satan in all his Temptations and Machinations through Christ strengthning them without whom they can do nothing Joh. 15.5 and that they improve carefully and faithfully the power which Christ hath given them viz. the Keyes of the Kingdom of Heaven in opening and shutting binding and loosing according to Christ his appointment for the preserving of his Church safe in the purity of their Faith and Order against the gates of Hell which is the next thing to be handled The Second Part. CHAP. VI. Concerning the power given of Christ unto such a Church as the first and proper subject of it THe second branch or part of the Charter is concerning the Power given by Christ unto such Churches to have and use all the means appointed by him for their establishment against the the gates of Hell Mat. 16.19 And I will give unto thee the Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven and whatsoever thou shalt bind on Earth shall be bound in Heaven and whatsoever thou shalt loose on Earth shall be loosed in Heaven These words contain 1. A grant of Power 2. A ratification of that Grant We shall speak to them distinctly 1. To Christ his grant of Power and therein 1. Explicate the terms by shewing what is meant 1 by the Kingdom of Heaven 2. by the Keys of it 3 What this appropriation or application of them imports To thee I will give 1. By the Kingdom of Heaven is meant both the Kingdom of Grace Glory and that the Kingdom of Glory is also meant the following words shew when he saith What you bind on Earth is bound in Heaven c. 2. By the Keys which are a sign of Power and are put by a Metonimy for the Subject the Power it self is meant Church-power which is either Supreme and Soveraign in Christ only as Lord and Head of his Church who alone hath the Key of David which openeth and no man shutteth and shutteth and no man openeth in Rev. 3.7 or subordinate and delegate such as is in Christ's Stewards This is noted by Keys in the Plural number in this place which signifie all power delegated from Christ to dispense and administer all the holy things of his House according to Christ's will and in the order prescribed by him to that end For all power wherewith the Lord Jesus betrusteth his Church aims at this which is here expressed to open and shut to bind and loose 3. To thee I will give The Application of this Grant is to Peter in the name of the Church which Christ promised to build upon himself believed on and publickly professed as Peter did before him and his fellow-Disciples in Christs School at this time And the promise is more fitly given to Peter in the name of the Church than to the Church by name because it was not the Church that made this confession but Peter in the name of the Church But here we must make a little stand to examine the sundry claims which have been made to this Right upon several pretences from this Text. 1. Some looking at Peter as representing the Catholick visible-visible-Church conceive that a general Council which they say is the Catholick Church representatively is the Church here meant to which Christ gives the Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven But that cannot be For particular visible Churches in the Apostles dayes had and exercised the Keyes compleatly within themselves yet was there no general Council till the time of Constantine which was three hundred years after Christ 2. Others look at this Grant as peculiar to Peter considered as the Prince and chief of the Apostles and to the Popes of Rome as his successors But this Papal usurpation the Councils of Constance and Basil strongly and justly opposed shewing that the Keys which are here given to Peter are in Joh. 20.21 22 23. given to all the Apostles and that Peter himself is enjoyned in Mat. 18. to tell the Church 3. Others think that the Catholick Church considered not representatively but in it self is the first subject of the Keys Yet these differ among themselves For some affirm it of the invisible others of the visible Catholick Church As for the terms we know that visible invisible
said Salute them of such an house who are in the Lord and it was an exemplary Family and a seminary of the Church yet not such a Church as was capable of all Church Officers and power as this meant in the text hath by the gift of Christ 2. Sometimes it signifieth the Catholick visible Church Heb 12.23 but that hath been from the beginning and doth not nor can meet in one place on earth to worship God Therefore it is not meant here 3. Most commonly it signifieth a Congregational Church or an holy Society joyned together by an holy Covenant in one Congregation to walk together according to all the Ordinances and Lawes given by Christ to his Church And so sometimes it signifieth a definite particular Congregation meeting together in one place for the publick worship of God and their mutual edification as that at Corinth 1 Cor. 11.18 20. and 14.23 And in that acceptation it notes sometimes the Brethren as distinguished from the Elders Act. 15.22 Sometimes the Elders and Brethren assembled together as in 1 Cor. 11.20 but never the Elders meeting apart from the Brethren But in this place it doth not signifie a particular definite Church For there is no particular Christian Church built by Christ more or rather than other It remaineth that Christ speaks of a particular Congregational Church here in an indefinite sense And so the word Church is applyed in the New Testament when Paul saith he persecuted the Church Phil. 3.6 Not that at Jerusalem only or Damascus but all the Churches in Judea Gal. 1.22 23. In this sense Christ calls every Christian Congregational Church thus built his Church From the words thus opened this doctrinal conclusion is to be collectâ—d viz. That it is the will and appointment of Jesus Christ that the Christian Church under the New Testament be in respect of its quantity and compass Congregational Concl. 4 This we shall endeavour to prove both by Scripture and Reason 1. The Scripture in the writings of the Apostles clearly sheweth that they so understood this branch of the Church-Charter and therefore they speak of Christian-Churches as several and distinct from one another 1 Cor. 11.16 and 14.33 Yea in one and the same Country as Galatia Gal 1.2 Judea v. 22. Macedonia 2 Cor. 8.1 Yea in Corinth where God had much people Act. 18.10 yet the Church there was but one Congregation 1 Cor. 14. and though Cenchrea was a Port near unto Corinth yet it had a Church distinct from Corinth Rom. 16.1 The Church also in Jerusalem though a greater number of Believers was declared to be there than we read of in other Cities yet it was but one Congregation Act. 2.41 44 47. and 6.2 15. The same holdeth concerning other great Cities the Church in every one of them was Congregational and if the number of Believers grew too great for one Congregation doubtless more Churches were gathered in such a place and case if several parts of the Church met in times of Persecution now and then here and there as they might yet they continued one Congregation having the same Officers in common for any thing appears in Scripture to the contrary Now let us see why the Christian Church must be Congregational Reas 1 The first Reason is from the end of Church-fellowship which is mutual edification in the use of the means instituted by Christ thereunto Let all things be done unto edification 1. Cor. 14.26 but how can this be attained unless they so meet together that all may learn and all may be comforted v. 13 Hence all the Members of the Church are exhorted not to forsake their assembling together Heb. 10.25 which was the praise of the primitive Church in Jerusalem Act. 2.42 44. Therefore a particular visible Church is compared to a flock which are fed together Act. 20.28 and to an House or Family the members whereof injoy the same Family-priviledges in common under the same family-order 1 Tim. 3.15 Reas 2 The second Reason is from their duty to take up offences among Brethren which cannot be ended privately Mat. 18.17 18. which implyeth two things 1. That the Church must consist of more than two or three for though two or three may watch over one another admonish one another and in case of obstinancy withdraw from a convicted delinquent and though two or three praying together may expect the presence and blessing of Christ as v. 19 20. upon their admonition yet two or three cannot issue the matter compleatly in way of Church-censure but must tell the Church Therefore the Church must necessarily consist of a greater number Again how can two or three choose the four sorts of Officers amongst themselves which are described by four living creatures in Rev. 4.6 7. viz. Pastor Teacher Ruling Elder and Deacon 2. That they must not exceed the quantity and compass of one Congregation For the Church must meet ordinarily together with their Officers for these purposes Therefore the Scripture sheweth that the whole Church did meet together to chuse and ordain Officers as Deacons Act. 6.2 3 5. Elders Act. 14.23 to receive and admit Members Act. 9.26 for Prophesying 1 Cor. 14.23 for the Seals 1 Cor. 11.20 and for Censures 1 Cor. 5.4 and to release from censures 2 Cor. 2.6 7. So much for proof of the point The Conâ—â—ctaries are these Coroll 1 Then the Congregational frame of a Christian Church is no humane invention or constitution True it is that the Parish frame as it was wont to joyn all the inhabitants within such a praecinct into one Church injoyning them all to communicate at the Lords Table at least at Easter is meerly humane not being measured by the Golden Reed which is the Church-measure but by the Court-measure Rev. 11.1 2. But that Members so qualified as Christ requireth and so confederating should ordinarily meet togather in one Congregation for the solemn worship of God and their mutual edification is the Ordinance of Christ and according to the measure of the golden Reed whereby the City and Gates and the dimensions of the New-Jerusalem are measured Rev. 21.15 that they shall not be so few as to cut off Church-jurisdiction within themselves nor so many but that all may hear and be edified and be governed by the Power which Christ hath given to the Church to preserve the purity of his Worship and of their fellowship within themselves Coroll 2 Then when a People grow to be so numerous in any Church that they cannot ordinarily meet together to Church-ends it is the mind of Christ that they should be distributed into sundry Congregational Churches For though many thousands of Israel met together in the court of the Temple at Jerusalem to offer Sacrifice because they might stand in so large a place together and see the Sacrifices burnt yet that will not prove that such multitudes should be Members of a Christian Church where more communion is required then in seeing some one Ordinance
and their putting of it into act was a Judicial Act in them all ye judge them that are within 1 Cor. 5.12 So their forgiving him would be a Legal and Judicial acquitting him from thaâ— sentence 2 Cor. 2. This Church is our pattern and its practice in this is presidential to all particular Churches of Christ Reas 1 From the guilt which lyeth upon every such Church when any scandal given by their Members remaineth uncensured and unremoved Therefore Paul applyed this Reproof to the whole Church Brethren as well as Officers for their slowness to excommunicate that man 1 Cor. 5.2 And in like manner Christ reproveth the Angel and Church both of Pergamus Rev. 2.14 15. and of Thyatira ver 20. If these Churches had not sufficient power within themselves to purge out such Leaven why are they blamed for tolerating the same And why are not other Churches or the Classes blamed for neglect of exercising their power of Ecclesiastical Judicature over them if they stood under any such And what the Spirit speaketh to them he saith to other Churches also to beware of the like Remisness Which Admonition all particular Churches are bound to attend lest else the gates of Hell prevail against them through their neglect of exercising that power which Christ hath given them severally and respectively to preserve their Members and whole fellowship in Spiritual purity and safety Heb. 12.15 Reas 2 From the Analogy and agreement that is between the Spiritual power of a Congregational Church of Christ and the civil power of the most free and perfect Cities which Thucidides saith have three priviledges viz. to use 1. Their own Laws 2. Magistrates 3. Judgments whence he cals every such City 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 other Cities were not accounted intire and perfect Cities of themselves but less worthy Members of those great and perfect Cities Grot. de jure bel pac l. 1. c. 3. p. 4 5 7. under whose Jurisdiction they were The summa potestas of those great and perfect Cities is that cujus actus alterius juri non subsunt ita ut alterius voluntatis humanae arbitrio irriti possunt reddi Now every particular Church of Christ being compleated with its Officers is a most perfect and free City the City of God Psal 48.1 The City of the great King ver 2. the visible Kingdom of the blessed and only Potentate the King of Kings and Lord of Lords 1 Tim. 6.15 and therefore it must necessarily have sufficient and compleat power within it self to manage the Keys without dependence on Classes c. in its own concernments Yet herein is a difference between such perfect Cities and the Churches of Christ That such Cities may part with their Liberty in some cases Liv. Dec. 1. l. 1. Idem Ibid. l. 7. Populum Campanum urbemque delubra Deûm divina humanaque omnia in vestraÌ„ P.C. ditioâ—em dedimus as being overmatched by a Potent Enemy In this case the Collatives yielded up themselves and their City and Liberties to Tarquinius Priscus King of the Romans or when they are in extream danger by an Enemy whom they would not have to rule over them and cannot defend themselves by any other means which was the case of Campani distressed by the Samnites which forced them to yield up themselves and all they had with all their Liberties unto the Romans which when they had done they were said to be facti alienae potestatis Yet it was presupposed that they had power in themselves thus to do as appears by that question Estne populus Collatinus in suâ potestate But Churches have not power to alienate from themselves their Church-Liberties which Christ hath purchased for them with his Blood and commanded them to stand fast in them Gal. 5.1 and to whom they must give an account how they have kept and managed the same Luke 16.2 Reas 3 From the Concession of those that oppose this Truth The power of Classes and Syn. p. 33. ad Calcem Mr. Pag. acknowledgeth that if a particular Church of God should sojourn among the Indians or among Hereticks where it could not obtain fellowship with other Churches out of it self Or if by violence or other unavoidable inconveniences any Church should be hindred from enjoying this benefit of combination with other Churches in Classical Government yet notwithstanding this want this Church should subsist still and be reputed a true Church Others say the same of a Church in an Island and add Mr. Herle Indep p. 2 that in such cases a single Congregation must not be denyed intireness of Jurisdiction Mr. Rutterf adds that when Churches cannot injoy the society of neighbouring Churches with that comfort and conveniency as their occasions may require among them Ordination and so Excommunication may be performed by the Congregation From this Concession it will follow that 1. A Congregational Church of Christ quà talis hath a lawful right in an intireness of Church-Government within it self by the gift of Christ yea that the Church-power Natively and Naturally lyes in the Congregation for such cases are ordinary and the first Synod which is looked at as presidential to all Synods was a concurrence of two Churches which were two hundred miles distant 2. The other Churches or Classes or Synods have no right to take away this power from it For none may put asunder what God hath joyned as well in this case as in that noted in Mat. 19.7 God hath joyned intireness of Jurisdiction in re propriâ to a particular Church who then shall sunder it from such a Church to place it in Classes as Superior Judicatories where God never put it 3. If the first Church in a Continent had this compleat power within it self before other Churches were gathered and the rising up of other Churches there long after should deprive them of it by setting up a Classis as a Superior Judicatory over them then the neighbourhood of Churches should not be a benefit but a disadvantage to them and would give them cause to complain unto God Thou hast multiplyed the Nation Pow. of Class Syn. p. 33. Idem p 34. but not increased our joy But they hold that every Church is bound to seek this dependency and union with other Churches as God shall give opportunity and means and cannot without sin neglect the same And lest we should think it but a matter Arbitrary at best they tell us it is of the same necessity for a Church to combine unto Classeâ— and Synods for their Spiritual Government if they have opportunity as to joyn a mans self as a Member to a particular Church if he hath means and opportunity to do it and conclude all that neglect to do it sin against the Communion of Saints and walk not as becometh the Body of Christ Rom. 12.5 1 Cor. 12.15 Ephes 4.16 Answ 1. The Proofs alleadged do shew that the Communion of Saints ought to be preserved and exercised in