Experience is to be expected from them and on the other side how necessary notwithstanding it is for the Peace and Repose of this Nation that the Occasions of such mischievous Dissentions should be better considered and removed I presently perceived I had a fair Opportunity in this to present a proper instance of a Matter of such Importance to Persons as well qualified to judge and who were likely to be as sensible of the Importance of it as any and thereupon concluded to present it alone to the Consideration of Your Lordships and the Gentlemen of Your Honourable Profession having already as to the rest made a considerable Experiment of what I have here said of the Hopes we may have of a good Success if they to whom it doth belong will but do what is in their Power towards it For having published a Liturgy Entituled The Liturgy of the Ancients represented as near as well may be in English Forms not much different only a little more compleat from that Restitution of the True English Liturgy attempted by the Scotch with the Assistance of the Principal of the English Bishops Anno 1637. I presented it to some of the principal learned Men first of the English who much approved it and wished it restored by Law then of the Lutherans who also approved it and declared their Satisfaction to communicate in that Form and at last of the Roman Catholicks who had no Exceptions to the Matter or Form of it And in short to say the Truth the Abuse and Corruptions of the Publick Liturgy in these two particulars Of Prayers for the Dead and the Christian Sacrifice to mention nothing more are so gross and notorious that they alone are sufficient to make the Church of England inexcusably Guilty of Schism and justly obnoxious to Excommunication which may be the Enchantment it seems to lie under and unsafe for any pious Person after notice to hold Communion with it so that it seems not only expedient and prudent for the State to consider these Matters for otherwise nothing is to be expected from these Bishops but absolutely necessary And so I leave it with Your Lordships Your Lordships most Humble Servant Of the Practice of Prayers for the DEAD In the Christian Church THE Performance of any good Offices for the Dead even to their Bodies their Bones their Memories their Wills c. hath always been reputed a very commendable thing among all civilized Nations and whatever hath been acted to the contrary barbarous and inhumane and the only Neglect of such Offices by such as were under any special Obligation of evil consequence as if Mankind had some secret sense that Separate Souls were sensible of the Kindness or Unkindness of those who survived them and had some power to gratifie or revenge the Kindness or Injuries especially of their Relations and such as they had any special Interest in in their Life-time And if such inferior Offices to their Bodies and Memories have been so reputed much more may such good Offices as Prayers for the Souls departed deserve commendation And accordingly it hath been always commonly practised by all Nations Gentiles Jews Mahometans and Christians and that without any known Beginning but very probably by Tradition from the common * Concerning Matters transmitted from them and received and conserved by the Gentiles See Mr. Dodwell's 2d Letter § 8. Parents of Mankind being very agreeable to Nature and confirmed by Apparitions And certainly this is a thing so innocent so free from all appearance of Evil so desirable both for ones self and their Friends that it is very strange that any especially good People should be persuaded nay frighted from it and much more that any should so presume upon their own Opinion and Conceit as to offer to persuade them so contrary to the Practice of the whole World in general and of the whole Catholick Church without clearer Evidence in so obscure a Case as is that of the middle State of Souls to us Mortals which is not to be believed could ever have been without some secret Energy of those Powers of Darkness which have effected greater Mischiefs than this by the same Instruments It is the Practice of the Jews at this day and has been so without any known beginning was so before our Saviour's time as appears by the Book of Maccabees and their ancient Form of Prayer which 't is said they used in the Captivity still extant in their Talmud and never was reproved by our Saviour or any of his Apostles or of the Primitive Christians It is the Practice of the whole Catholick Church at this day and of all Christians except such as according to the unanimous Sentiments of the Ancients are gone and are out of it and hath been so without any known beginning in their most solemn Worship so that no Church can be assigned where they who scruple at it now could have had Communion without it And never was opposed contradicted or questioned by any one of any Reputation in the Catholick Church or by any one at all for near 400 years The first who is known to have questioned it was Aerius in the time of Epiphanius a Presbyter a frantick proud conceited Man discontented because he could not get a Bishoprick and thereupon 't is probable quarrelled not only at divers Practises of the Church but at Episcopacy it self an ill Man by the Judgement of all and Epiphanius and St. Austin reckon him in their Catalogues of Hereticks for his Opposition of this Practice especially The next whose Testimony is produced in this Cause is one Stephanus Gobarus and obscure Scribler and a confessed Heretick even by Vsher who alleadgeth his Testimony as well as by Photius from whom he takes it and who gives this Character of his Book that it seems a Work of much Labour but little Profit and a Study rather of Applause and Vain-Glory than any great Usefulness It was a Collection of the different Sentences of the Fathers in divers points of Doctrine and alleadged to prove such a Difference of Opinions in this Case and what was the true Sentence of the Church A special Witness and to much purpose an Heretick to prove the true Sentence of the Church and a vain-glorious Person who out of Ostentation of Parts and Learning seeks for Differences in the Fathers and sets himself up for a Judge which he might if he had pleased have done also in the Scripture it self But after all he doth not so much as declare his Opinion in the principal Question in this Case but only in a by-point A poor Cause that stands in need of such Supports If we set him aside as well we may who is neither a competent Witness of the Sentence of the Church nor doth declare his own in this Case we find not another in near 700 years after Aerius till Peter de Bruis and one Henricus a runagate Monk who took up a Trade of Preaching and spent what he
Altar of God should Memory be made of them in the Communion of the Body of Christ. In these words is couched one general Intendment of the Church For as the Holy Rite of the Eucharist was intended not only for the Peculiar Solemnity of the Churches Address to God here upon Earth with the Memorials of our Saviour's Passion the great Propitiation for the Sins of the World but also for Communion between our Head and the Members of his Mystical Body here upon Earth and also between the Members of his whole Mystical Body themselves so the Church in that Holy Solemnity hath always performed Acts of Communion not only with the Head but with all his Members both present in external Communion and Participation of the sanctified Creatures and with all absent whether in the Body or out of the Body by Commemorations Thanksgivings and Prayers And because they were in several States they were accordingly remembred distinctly in order which is what S. Augustin expresseth suo loco This Communion was by the ancient Christians reputed a matter of very great Importance and accordingly they were equally careful whose Oblations they did receive and whose Names they did remember whether Living or Dead and those who were ejected or rejected or refused were looked upon as out of Communion and excluded from all the Privileges of the Church both on Earth and also in the separate State according to our Saviour's Promise It was then believed that the Souls departed which should be saved were all indeed with Christ but not at the Right-hand of his Father but some before the Throne some upon Mount Sion some in the Holy of Holies some in the Temple but not in that place some in Paradice in Abraham's Bosom in the Third Heaven in very different Mansions or Receptacles as one may be said to be with the King who is with him in foreign Parts tho' but in his Army or at his Court tho' never admitted into his Presence Chamber and that by some the Church here upon Earth her self received much Benefit but others received Benefit by her Communion and Prayers and stood in need of it Nor ought we to think that these two Articles of the Holy Catholick Church and the Communion of Saints were put into the Summary of the Christian Faith and Profession and in the Order they are but for special and weighty Reasons and indeed such as are little taught or understood or regarded amongst us in this Age. S. Augustin hath many Testimonies concerning this matter of Fact and known Practice of the Church in these distinct Orders of Commemoration of the Dead so plain that the Arch-Bishop himself could not but confess that in the Church Service there was made a several Commemoration first of the Patriarchs Prophets Apostles and Martyrs after one manner and then of the other Dead after another pag. 194. and one or two he cites in the Margin but was so wise as not to recite the words It is Serm. 17. de Verbis Apost * Ideòque habet Ecclesiastica disciplina quod fideles noverunt cum Martyres eo loco recitantur ad altare Dei ubi non pro ipsis oretur pro caeteris autem commemoralis defunctis oretur Injuria est enim pro Martyre orare cujus nos debemus orationibus com mendari And Tr. 84. in Evang Johan This hath the Church Discipline which the Faithful know when the Martyrs are recited at the Altar of God in that place where Prayer is not made for them but Prayer is made for others who are commemorated For it is an Injury to pray for a Martyr to whose Prayers we our selves ought to be commended And Tr. 84. in Evang. Johan * Ad ipsam mensam non sic â—os commemoramus quemadmocum alior qui in pace requiescunt â—t et am pro eis or mus sâ—d magis ut crenâ— ipsi pro nobis ut eorum vestigiis adhaeâ—eamus quia impleverunt ipsi charitatem qua Dominus dixit non posse esse majorem At the Table it self we do not so commemorate them as others who rest in Peace that we should also pray for them but rather that they pray for us that we may tread in their Steps because they themselves have fulfilled that Charity than which our Lord saith there cannot be greater And here I cannot but take notice of the Partiality and Disingenuity of this magnified Man in this place for it is a Scandal and Offence to me Having cited the words of S. Augustin in Euchrid ad Laurent cap. 110. ‖ Cum sacrificia sive altaris five quarumcunque Eleemosynarum pro baptizitis defunctis omnibus offeruntur pro valdè bonis gratiarum actiones sunt pâ—o valdè malis etsi nulla sunt adjumenta mortuorum quaâ—â—icunque vivorum consolationes â—uâ—t That the Oblations and Alms usually offered in the Church for all the Dead that received Baptism were Thanksgivings for such as were very Good Propitiations for such as were not very Bad but for such as were very Evil altho' they were no Help for the Dead yet were they some kind of Consolations of the Living He calls this a Private Exposition not only as he pretends because it is not to be found in the Writings of the former Fathers but also because it suiteth not well with the general Practice of the Church which it intendeth to interpret p. 194. If it had not been in the Writings of any of the former Fathers had not the notorious Practice of the Church which he often mentions with special notes of the Notoriety of the matter of Fact been sufficient and much more than any thing mentioned dogmatically by others tho' more ancient But besides that is false for we shall see it hereafter attested by Cyril of Hierusalem and not by the by but in a professed Description and Explication of the Greek Liturgy which shews the Agreement of all both Greek and Latin Churches And therefore it is but reasonable that the honest Reader be admonished to beware of this Author how he trusts him for he is a partial and crafty Writer of which other instances may be produced But perhaps it may not only do right to S. Augustin but be a Satisfaction to the Reader to see him more fully declare his mind which he doth in the words precedent to this effect * Neque negandum est Desu ctorum animas pietate suorum viventium relevari cum pro illis sacrificium Mediaâ—oris offertur vel Eleemosynae in Ecclesia fiunt Sed eâ—s haec pro unt qui cum viverent ut haec sibi postea prodesse possent meruerunt Est enim quidem vivendi modus nec tam bonus ut non requirat ifta post mortem nec tam malus ut ei non prosint ista post mortem Est vero talis in bono ut ista non requirat est rursus talis in malo ut nec his valeat cum ex hâ—c
vita transierit adjuvari Quo circa hic omne meritum comparatur quo possit post hâ—nc vitam relevaâ—i quisplam vel gravari Nemo autem se speret quod hic neglexerit cum obierit apud Deum promoreri Non igitur ista quae pro defunctis commendandis frequentat Ecclesia illi Apostolicae sunt adversa sententiae qua dictum est Omnes enim astabimus ante Tribunal Christi utreserat unusquâ—sque secundum ea quae per corpus gessit sivebonum sive malum quia etiam hoc meritum sibi quisque cum in corpore viâ—eret comparavit ut ei possent ista prodesse Non enim omnibus prosunt quare non omnibus prosunt nisipropter differentiam vitae quam quisque gessit in corpore Cum ergo sacificia c. Nor is it to be denied saith he that the Souls of the Deceased are relieved by the Piety of their living Relations when the Sacrifice of the Mediator is offered or Alms given in the Church for them But to those are these things profitable who when they lived merited that these things might be profitable for them afterward For there is one sort of Life neither so Good that it might not need those things after Death nor so Evil that they cannot profit after Death But there is such in Good that it may not require them and there is again such in Evil that it cannot be helped by these things when this Life is ended Wherefore here is all Merit acquired whereby any one can after this Life be relieved or grieved But let none hope that he may obtain of God after he is Dead what he hath neglected here Wherefore those things which the Church doth frequently use for Recommending the Dead are not contrary to the Sentence of the Apostle where it is said We must all stand before the Judgment-Seat of Christ that every one may receive according to those things which he hath done in the Body whether it be Good or Evil because even this Merit every one acquired for himself when he lived in the Body that these things might profit him For they do not profit all And why do they not profit all but by reason of the Difference of Life which each lived in the Body When therefore Sacrifices whether of the Altar or of whatever Alms are offered for all the Deceased who were baptized c. as before recited by Vsher More to like purpose may be seen in his Book de Cura pro Mortuis cap. 4. and cap. 18. where he adds ‖ Sed quia non discernimus qui sint oportet ea pro regeneratis omnibus facere uâ— nullus eorum praetermittatur ad quos haec beneficia possint debeant pervenire Melius enim supererunt ista eis quibus nec obsunt nec prosunt quam eis deerunt quibus prosunt Diligentius tamen facit haec quisque pro necessariis suis quod pro illo fiat similiter à suis p. 294. b. 2. to 4. But because we do not distinguish who they are who are profited by them we ought to do these things for all the Regenerate that none of them be pretermitted to whom these Benefits may and ought to come For it is better that they should be superfluous as to them who are neither helped nor hurt by them than be wanting to those whom they may benefit Yet every one doth these things the more diligently for his deceased Relations that the same may be done by his Relations surviving for himself The same he hath qu. 2. ad Dulcitium and more to like purpose Serm. 32. de Verb. Apost To the Testimonies of these two Eminent Holy Learned Bishops of the Latin Church I will add the Testimonies of two or three Eminent Bishops of the same Age in the Greck Church concerning the Practice and Custom of the Church in their time and the Ages precedent even to the Apostles in this Case The one is S. John Chrysostom Patriarch of Constantinople a Man as eminent for his own personal Worth as for the Place he held He hath much concerning Prayers and Oblations for the Dead but much of it by way of Exhortation and therefore to be as brief as may be I will select principally what concerns the Practice and Original which he refers expressly to the Ordination of the Apostles and Directions of the Holy Spirit But first for the common Practice of the People Hom. 32. in Mat. * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Why after the Death of any of thy Family dost thou call the Poor together Why dost intreat the Presbyters to pray for him Thou wilt say That he may obtain Rest. And dost thou then weep and lament for these things Secondly S. Chrysostom's Advice Hom. 61. in Johan †〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But if a Sinner and who hath often offended God dieth is he to be bewailed or rather not at all since that cannot do him any good But these things are to be performed for him which may do him good viz. Alms and Oblations And concerning Alms he presseth it much Hom. 21. in Act. pag. 605. And Thirdly for the common Office of the Priest in his Sixth Book de Sacerdotio cap. 4. ‖ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 What manner of Man ought he to be who interceeds for the whole City What do I say for the City for the whole World and prays to God that he will be propitious to the Sins of all not only of the Living but also of the Dead Then that these things are of Apostolical Authority Hom. 3. in Phil in the Moral Exhorting People to pray themselves and to intreat the Prayers of others and to give Alms continually for their deceased Friends * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Will this saith he give any Relief and then answers Hear God thus saying I will protect this City for my own and for my Servant David's sake If the Memory only of a righteous Man avails so much where Works are also done for the Dead what cannot they do and then goes on These things were not in vain constituted by the Apostles that in the venerable and tremendous Mysteries Memorial should be made of those who were departed They knew much Benesit would accure to them by it and much Advantage For at that time when all the People stand with their hands lifted up and the Company of the Priests and that venerable and awful Sacrifice present how shall we not please or appease God praying for them And that indeed for those who departed in the Faith But the Catechumens are not deign'd this Consolation but are destitute of all help one only excepted But what is that Why Alms may be given to the Poor for them and hence they receive some Refreshment For it is God's Will that we should mutually help one another And to the same purpose Hom. 69. ad Pop. Antioch Lastly and that this was by the Direction of the Holy Spirit he is
and so comprize the whole time of the four first General Councils from first to last Eusebius in his 4th Book of the Life of Constantine describing the Martyrium of the Apostles built by him at Constantinople adds chap. 60. All these did the Emperor dedicate that he might consign to Posterity the Memory of our Saviour's Apostles But he had another Design in his Mind when he built this Church which was at first concealed but in the end it became known to all For he had designed this place for himself after his Death foreseeing by a transcendent Alacrity of Faith that his Body after Death should be made Partaker of the Apostles Apellation that even after Death he might be esteemed worthy of the Prayers which should be performed there in Honour of the Apostles believing that their Memory would be useful and advantagious to his Soul And afterward describing the Solemnity of his Funeral chap. 71. he saith that a vast Number of People together with those Persons consecrated to God not without Tears and great Lamentation poured forth Prayers to God for the Emperor's Soul thereby performing a most grateful Office to this pious Prince And herein also God demonstrated his singular Favour towards his Servant because after his Death agreeable to his own most earnest Desire the Tabernacle of his thrice blessed Soul was vouchsafed a place with the Monument of the Apostles and that it might be joined with God's People in the Church and might be vouchsafed the Divine Rights and Mystick Service and might enjoy a Communion of the Holy Prayers This was but 12 years after the Nicen Council and a great and most illustrious instance of the common received and settled Practice of that time And here before I proceed further it is fit to consider how far the continuance of that wicked and shameful Abuse by Cranmer put upon the Church of England in his clandestine Corruption of the True English Liturgy I say the Continuance of it to this day whether by supine Negligence or base Compliance with a Faction of Sectaries be consistent with that Profession of Reverence to Antiquity in general and to those first four General Councils in particular which is made by all who pretend to be genuine Sons of the Church of England with their use of the Constantinopolitan Creed in the most solemn Office so fouly deformed contrary to the Publick Office at that time used in the Church and attested by S. Cyril Bishop of Hierusalem who was present at that Council and a principal Man there How consistent with the Statutes of most ancient Colleges in both the Universities and the Oaths taken by so many Scholars for the Observance of them How consistent with the Belief of One Holy Catholick Church and of the Communion of Saints with that Reverence and Respect which the Holy Scriptures require should be paid to the Body of Christ the Depository of Christian Verities and the Pillar or Monument and Basis of Truth with that Reverence and Honour and Esteem which all true and genuine Christians cannot but have for so many glorious Saints as flourished in the Church of Christ and all agreed in this pious Practice for more than 1200 years from the time of Constantine who himself was none of the least being converted in an extraordinary manner by special Vision from our Saviour and the Truth thereof confirmed by very remarkable Victories and afterward so great a Promoter of Christian Piety that he was as Eusebius relates partaker of the Apostles appellation being called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Offices of the Greek Church and deservedly How it can be consistent therewith and with Christian Modesty to set up a Calvin a Bucer a Cranmer an Vsher like little Idols above all and not rather an undeniable proof of the very Spirit of Hereticks and Schismaticks Mr. * Life Appendix p. 55. Baxter's Questions in another Case not unlike this may very properly be proposed to our modern Opposers of this Catholick Practice Would they have held Communion with the Catholick Church for a Thousand Years together Or would they not if they had lived in those times If they would then why not with us who are of the same Judgment Was it a Duty then And is it unlawful now If they would not in all those Ages have held Communion with the visible Church what would they have done but separated from the Body and so from the Head and cast off Christ in all his Members and taken him to be a Head without a Body which is no Head and so no Christ What would they have done but denied his Power and Love and Truth and consequently his Redemption and his Office Hath he come at the end of 4000 years since the Creation to redeem the World that lay so long in Darkness And hath he made such wonderful Preparations for his Church by his Life and Miracles and Blood and Spirit c. and promised That the Gates of Hell shall not prevail against it and that his Kingdom shall be an Everlasting Kingdom and his Dominion endureth from Generation to Generation and yet after all this shall he have a Church even as the Seekers say but for an Age or two Thus Mr. Baxter and very good but if this be good in the Case of Baptism of Infants why not as good in the Case of Prayers and Oblations for the Dead which I think hath as good Evidence of Apostolical Original as that or the Lord's-Day or Episcopacy or a good part of the Scriptures of the New Testament And if they stand all upon the same Foundation why should they not stand or fall together There is also an Assertion of St. Augustin 's which deserves to be here considered in this Case That * Quod universa tenet Ecclesia nec in Consiliis institutum sed semper retentum est non nisi Authoritate Apostolica traditum rectissimè creditur cont Donat l. 4 c. 24. what the Vniversal Church doth hold and was not instituted in Councils but always retained is most rightly believed to have been delivered by no other than Apostolical Authority For as this is a Practice which none did ever pretend was instituted by any Council so amongst all who have written concerning the Original or first Invention or Introduction of things none has ever assigned any Original of it in the Catholick Church later than the Apostles or in any part of the Catholick Church later than of the rest of Christianity it self So that could we trace it no further back than the time of Constantine it would be unreasonable to believe that the whole Christian Church so largely spread over the Face of the Earth and planted by so many several Persons at first and in Places so divided and remote one from another should so unanimously agree in such a Practice did it not proceed from some Common Cause which could be no other than the Mutual Agreement of all the Apostles in it
Company till something more compleat be established that I may neither offend Authority by acting without Leave nor my own Mind by too much varying in a marter of this moment from the good Order and Practice of the Catholick Church nor yet be forced to make use of that Indulgence which is now allow'd to such as I would not willingly be And possibly from such a Beginning by the Favour and Blessing of God may a good Reformation insensibly ensue without Trouble or Difficulty for in what is here proposed is very little but what hath the Authority of Law and the Declaration of the whole State that it was composed by the Aid of the Holy Ghost and that Little such as is not like to offend any Man of Judgment and truly Religious And I should be glad to have no Occasion to proceed any further to the opening such Sores as I had rather see insensibly healed and covered than exposed to publick View But I have such Assurance and Divine Attestations that the Work I am imploy'd in for the Restitution of this most Holy Solemn and peculiar Part of the Christian Worship to its Integrity as well as just Frequency of a Daily Celebration in places proper for it and Weekly in all Churches is the Special Work of God not only for his Service but ordered by Himself by his own Hand of Providence and under his Divine Conduct that as it is no little Comfort and Encouragement to me so it is a special and great Obligation to be Faithful in it I am very sensible of the Obligation upon me and very much desire to pay all due Respect and Observance to all Humane Authority whether Ecclesiastical or Civil as the Ordinance of God but if they in Authority will give unnecessarily Occasion for a Contest we must obey God rather than Man and prefer the Authority of the Catholick Church before that of any particular Church whatever and especially the Honour of God and of our Saviour before that of Man or any Society of Men be it what it will and if nothing else will do I must proceed and open the whole Matter in the Cause of God to the whole Church in the best manner that I can And this is what I have to say here at present in Order to the Restitution of this Holy Service to its Integrity For for the Reasons of what is here done they may be more proper to have their place in the Notes which are intended for that purpose But as for that of its just Frequency of Celebration there needs not that Caution though what I have to say do reflect Shame upon our Clergy For 1. that may be without Disparagement to the Constitution of this Church in this Matter because there be Learned Men who have asserted in Publick and are ready to prove That by the Constitution of this Church there ought to be a Daily Celebration in all Places where there are but a competent Number of Devout Persons to attend and commenicate And 2. it is but just and reasonable to do it notwithstanding for their Humiliation before God and Reformation to prevent what might be worse for them Our Wise and Gracious God hath given them a gentle tacit Admonition by a small Company of Daily Communicants excited and conducted by his Hand from a private Room to a publick Church and by degrees from one without the Walls at last to one in the very Heart of this City where they have constantly assembled for this Holy Service without Intermission of a Day for a Twelve-month together and thereby born a Testimony for Him and been a tacit Admonition to all others but especially the Clergy And I have formerly proposed the Case by Way of Questions in Print which have come to the Hands of some of the Principal of those concerned and been under their Consideration besides many others And since those have had no more Effect I know nothing more proper for this Purpose than these Theses and Conclusions concerning the Frequent Celebration and Participation of the Holy Eucharist which I lately drew up upon a private Occasion little thinking then of this for which they serve much better and possibly might be so designed then by that over-ruling Wisdom whose Thoughts are as far above ours as the Heaven above the Earth Thes 1. That this One Vnbloody Sacrifice or Holy Rite of the Blessed Eucharist doth succeed as an Antitype and Memorial in the Christian Church in the Place of all those Bloody Typical Sacrifices of the Jews as is taught both by Ancient Christians and by Learned Men of our own Church and Times Concl. 1. That it is very Unworthy of a Christian to imagin our Memorial of what is actually done and consummate to be less effectual for Christians than were their Types of what was then yet to be done for the Jews for any Intent or Purpose whatever 2. That this being of as great Use to us as were theirs to them ought as frequently to be used among us as were theirs among them upon all just Occasions Thes 2. That this Holy Rite was a Rite in Vse among the Jews for Solemn Thanksgiving to God for any great Mercy or Blessing as often as they met together to celebrate any such and was appropriate by our Saviour for a Eucharistical Commemoration of His Passion before God as often as Christians should have any Solemn Assembly for the Worship of God Concl. That this being instituted by our Saviour as the Peculiar Solemnity of that Memorial ought to be used as often as we assemble to give Solemn Thanks for that great Blessing or to offer up Solemn Prayers for the Obtaining of the Benefits thereof Thes 3. That it is a Rite of the Greatest Honour to God and to our Saviour and of the Greatest Benefit to Men of any in the Christian Church Concl. 1. Both these Considerations are both Great Motives and Great Obligations to a frequent Celebration and Participation of it 2. The Neglect thereof in Respect of the Honour of God and of our Saviour is Ingratitude and Impiety and in Respect of the Benefit to Man as to others Vncharitableness and as to themselves Prophaneness and Folly like that of Esau Heb. 12.16 Thes 4. It is the Principal and most Solemn Part of the Christian Worship and so Essential a Part that in the Judgment of most Eminent Men of our own Church our Service is not compleat without it but defective and defective in the Principal Part wanting Concl. 1. Concerning Reading of a part of the Communion Service at the Altar where no Communion is prepared for intended or expected what Conclusion is to be made in Respect of God to whom it is offered in Respect of the Minister who doth offer it and in Respect of the People who should attend and communicate is not hard to be understood Thes 5. Not any One Solemn Assembly of Christians for the Worship of God in the Times of the Apostles
invisible Ministers of the Divine Providence the other Natural and Humane proceeding from Error of the Vnderstanding or Corruption of the Will and Affections in one or both of the Parties And for the most part there are Faults on both sides if not from the beginning at least in the Progress and Continuance of the Difference For it is no unfrequent thing for such as have a Good Cause at first to spoil it in the Management And such is the Case in these Differences in Religion which have so long infested this part of the World Wherein the Supernatural Secret is the Operation of those Invisible Powers by the Commission or Permission of God for Correction of what was and is amiss in the several Parties among whom they arose the Consideration of which belonging more properly to Divines I shall say nothing of it here But of those Differences the first and most considerable are those between the Roman Church and those who pretend a Reformation And the Natural and Humane Secret in them lies in certain Faults on both sides The Faults and Scandals of the Papacy and Court of Rome were so gross and notorious that all good and intelligent People groaned for a Reformation long before Luther was born But the Faults of them who pretended to that Work will appear when well considered no less neither in Number nor Nature There is none of them all that is not notoriously guilty of Sacrilege Schism and Heresie besides divers Vnchristian Practices to promote or maintain their Party It is even natural to Men to run out of one Extream into the other and the Evil Spirits when they are permitted cease not to instigate the corrupt disposition of Men to the utmost they can Hence have proceeded those many endless Differences among themselves who at first differed only from the Church of Rome And their Faults and Miscarriages are so notorious that they are many of them confessed acknowledged and disclaimed by divers of the most learned of all Parties The English Reformation which was not faultless before was farther corrupted by Cranmer who tho by some magnified as a Martyr will appear in time to have been so mischievous an Instrument both in Church and State as makes him very unworthy of any honourable Character or Memory in any part of the Catholick Church but especially that of England and settled at last thro the prevalence of a Party of Calvinian Sectaries with such Abuses and Corruptions in the beginning of Queen Elizabeth's Reign as the most learned and eminent of the English Clergy have long desired and indeavoured what they could to rectifie but have never been able to effect or scarce dared to attempt it in any great Matters being abused and bug-beared with popular Outcries and Imputations of Popery with which the People of this Nation have been very grossly abused when-ever they dared to assert or own any thing of the Primitive Genuine Christianity contrary to the Nations of that Faction who have been pricks in their Eyes and thorns in their Sides both to Church and State ever since by the just Judgment of God for their Politick Compliances with the Corruptions of that pretended Reformation which are in truth much greater than is believed or suspected by many good People as I may possibly by the Grace of God shew more particularly in due time But for the present to calm the Minds and stop the Mouths of such as may be offended at what I say as briefly as may be I shall only recommend to their Consideration if they be Dissenters the Expostulation of a late leading Man amongst them Mr. Richard Baxter to the zealous Anti-Papists which he saith is written to try if it may be to promote our common Repentance and to reform the Dominal Distaken Reformation of those who have sinned by Extreams which by the assumed Name of Reformation have wronged God and the Truth and Mens Souls with the greater Advantage and Success Thus of the Reformation in general in his Book against Foreign Jurisdiction printed but little before his Death Part 2. ch 1. and ch 7. he sets down together no less than seven summary Heads of False Charges and Wrongs done to the Papists by the Sectarian weak-headed part of Protestants as he elsewhere calls them 1. Some Men saith he do ignorantly charge some Errors on the Papists which they are not guilty of 2. or lay the Errors of some few upon the most 3. Some make Errors which are but de Nomine to seem to be de Re 4. and lesser Errors to seem Great 5. Some take divers Truths to be Errors 6. And some are ready to call some lawful Customs of the Papists by the Name of Popery and Antichristian 7. Some would deny the Papists the common Civilities and Liberties which are their due c. And elsewhere he gives us part of a Catalogue of such rash Charges with an c. to let us know that those are but part How far Protestants mistake and rashly Charge them in the Doctrines of Predestination Free-will Grace Merits Justification Redemption Perseverance c. I saith he have freely shewed in my Catholick Theology and End of Doctrinal Controversies and Ludovicus le Blank after Others hath excellently opened Which is a plain Confession that in all those Differences besides that about Antichrist which he does not at all approve the Fault lies on the side of the Protestants and the Nominal Mistaken Reformation And herein I know no Conformists except Calvinian Sectaries who do not agree with him and those Others he mentions And for Conformists they may there see without looking further that there are and have been many amongst us of greatest Reverence and Name as he elsewhere expresseth it who have thought the Differences as unjust and unreasonable on the Protestant side in divers other Particulars such as Arch-Bishop Laud Arch-Bishop Bramhall Bishop Guning Bishop Sparrow Bishop Parker Dr. Hammond Dr. Heylyn Dr. Pierce Dr. Saywell Dr. Beveridge Dr. Sherlock Mr. Thorndike Mr. Dodwell all whom he particularly names and indeavours to answer To whom might be added for my purpose Bishop Andrews Bishop Cousens Bishop Taylor Bishop Forbes Dr. Field and divers other eminent learned Men in and since the Reign of Queen Elizabeth besides divers now living And a worthy dignified Clergy-Man of the City in a Book lately printed hath asserted that the Reformation was and was to be but an imperfect Work By all which it is easie to be perceived that the Cause of the Reformation is no such clear Cause or infallible Truth as is generally believed by those who are educated in such a Presumption or Persuasion Which might also justly be suspected from the Differences which arose presently and have been continued from the beginning with bitter Contentions between the Principal Actors in that Work and their several Parties to this day which are things manifest to all People in all Places where any thing called the Reformation hath prevailed But there
are other Matters very observable in this Case as several indirect Ends and Motives which probably might be and certainly were the Inducements to many of the Beginners and Promoters of it the Irregular Manner in which it was managed and settled the subtile Accommodations of the principal parts of the Work to recommend the Preachers and gratifie the People but undermining the Honour of Christ and the Power of Godliness and settling the People in Presumption and Security upon a False Foundation according to the Description of the Apostle Speaking perverse things to draw away Disciples after them and the Fruits and Effects agreeable thereunto a plain Indication that it was not of God but in the Nature of a Judgment and that they knew not what they did nor what Spirit they were of which tho' certain Truths and very evident when looked into yet are not so obvious to common Observation Nor indeed was I my self so sensible of much of them till after much Study and Indeavours to promote the Service of God and Good of my Country it all seemed to me to be under an Enchantment so that no Good could be done Whereupon considering the Fruits according to our Saviour's Rule upon a fair Invitation and Opportunity I resolved upon a Retirement and a Review of the Reformation the Root which produced no better Fruits And coming to it with much Sincerity and Impartiality I soon perceived all this that I have here said and more very clearly and some things which relate to the Civil State and present Settlement of this Nation of which I soon gave an account to such Persons as I thought most proper to acquaint His Majesty with it to discharge my own Conscience what-ever was farther done in it I do not deny but there was need of a Reformation of divers things but none know better than your Lordships and the Gentlemen of your Profession how common a thing it is for Men who have really a good Cause to make it ill through Passion Partiality unreasonable Demands or Charges and such ill Management as if it come to Tryal it must be found against them or tho' it be not Good yet through Partiality or Prejudice to think it Good and then when by degrees they have well fixed and rivetted that Opinion and besides engaged their Reputation in it to persuade themselves that those things are lawful for the Maintenance of it which in truth are not and those things useful or necessary which in conclusion will but expose and ruine it how much Mischief People thus affected frequently bring upon themselves and others and endless Vexations when obstinate in their Opinion resolute in their Demands and pertinacious in their Contentions right or wrong how undecent and unbecoming even in Civil Matters this appears to all wise and good Men who have Opportunity to observe the Truth of the Case On the other side how much more Prudent it is as well as Just and Honest if a Man have the Misfortune to purchase an ill Title or be unhappily concerned in an ill Cause to indeavour to make it Good by fair Agreement with Parties concerned and Tender of what is just and reasonable and such honest Means as will at least secure his Reputation if not his Cause also however much mend the matter This has been always my Practice and this I am resolved to do in this Case of what I have discover'd upon my Review aforesaid I do utterly disclaim all the Iniquity of the Case that I have already discovered or can discover all the Sacrilege Schism and Heresie and other Corruptions of the pretended Reformation in general and of that of England in particular And tho' I do not forsake the Corruptions of this Church to espouse those of another yet I think fit to make my own Cause good and to stand only upon such Terms as I can comfortably refer to the Goodness and Mercy of God and as I am satisfied will make it their Faults not mine who shall refuse Agreement and Communion with me What I think prudent in my own Case if it be so indeed I could wish the whole Nation did see it as well as I For I believe it a more firm Foundation for a lasting Peace and true Happiness than any other we can build upon And if I be not mistaken in the Matters in Difference there is scarce any but such as many principal Men of the one side think ought to be yielded by them or as all on the other confess may for just Cause be granted by them or may be otherwise accommodated by only fit Explications and Expressions To which since the most considerable on both sides have shewed a very good Disposition and the Nature and Precepts of the Gospel and the Peace and Repose and Common Good of Mankind especially in this part of the World which may have a great Influence upon the rest do require it I believe it would be for the Honour and Interest of which side soever should do it to make the Proposal provided it be very just and reasonable Of those Matters which are thought ought to be yielded this which I propose to your Lordships Consideration concerning the ancient Practice of Prayers for the Dead is one and the most proper Instance that can be in all respects It is indeed a double Instance for it is a plain Evidence that one of the principal Suppositions with which not only Multitudes of People in these last Ages but ever since the first Ages of Christianity have been deceived and misled with very plausible pretence is notwithstanding false in it self besides fallacious misapplications of what is true as appears abundantly by Irenaeus Tertullian and the Common Practice of the Ancient Christians in their Contests with Hereticks and Schismaticks And it is in its self one of the greatest Instances of the Power of Prejudice to abuse weak Men out of their apparent Interest without any other competent ground or reason of the Weakness of Men to be so abused and of the Inconsiderateness of those who presume to be positive and direct others in such Cases that I know of My intention at first was to have published a Vindication of the True English Liturgy the first Book of Ed. 6. composed by known English Clergy-Men and afterward corrupted and disordered by Cranmer and a Faction of Foreigners and other unknown Calvinian Sectaries in Secret and so craftily imposed upon the Church and Nation But when I considered in these unhappy Differences how partially Zealous the Generality of Clergy-Men who have any Zeal at all are for their own Party more than for the common Concerns of Religion or of their Country and how unconcerned the chief of the Clergy of this Nation are and have been ever since the State assumed the Supream Power of Ecclesiastical Matters as if either dispirited or presuming that the Care also is incumbent only upon them who have assumed the Power and how little I have found by
Practice and set up themselves against the Authority of the whole Catholick Church I come now to consider the Opposition it self their Allegations and Reasons Such is the Wit of Man and the Subtilty of Satan that scarce any Truth is so evident but they can find out some specious Appearances to set up against it But such is the Mercy and Wisdom of God that he hath provided sufficient means for Direction for all such as keep within the Bounds of Humility and Obedience that is in Subjection not only of their Wills but also of their Intellects and Understandings to his Orders Ordinances and Prescriptions the very Business of their Lives in this World for Preparation for another And to such besides the Common Means he will kindly vouchsafe a special Guidance sufficient for their Circumstances Of the Danger our Saviour and his Apostles have given to all fair Warning and great Caution acquainting us with the End why the most Wise and Gracious God permits it for Tryal and Exercise the Danger and Subtilty of the Ministers of Satan such as should deceive if it were possible the very Elect the special Marks to know and avoid them viz. Their Fruits specious Pretences Sheeps Clothing and Distraction and Disagreement among themselves crying Here is Christ and There is Christ and special Directions Believe them not Go not out after them All this Provision hath the Devil attempted to undermine partly by raising real Scandals and Offences and partly by strongly representing Imaginary ones But against all this Humility and Charity will fortifie us and the Grace special Guidance and Mercy of God will preserve us if we be careful to continue in those Graces It was Pride and Arrogance and Discontent in Aerius which gave the * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Epiphan p. 905. a. Devil Advantage to instigate him to the first Opposition of such a Catholick Practice It was Pride Vanity and Ostentation of Parts by which he set Gobarus to work to shew his Learning and Acuteness in finding out Differences of Opinions among them who perhaps in many of those things differed no more than the Writers of the Sacred Scriptures seem to do For I do not find that he made any special Opposition against this Practice But I doubt it was not imaginary but real Scandal and gross Abuses of a good Practice by which Waldo and his Followers and the Albigenses were moved to oppose all without Distinction tho' there seems to have been in him with a Zeal for God but without Knowledge a Mixture of Pride and Conceitedness And it was real and not imaginary Scandal by which Luther was at first moved to oppose Indulgencies and his Followers at first to oppose even this innocent and commendable Practice But in such Men as Vsher and Bucer it was the Reputation of the Cause they had espoused in gross and Compliances with the Times and their particular Interests by which they were moved But let us but carefully follow our Saviour's Admonitions and Directions wisely distinguish the Ingredients of the Composition of Truth and Falsehood and honestly imbrace hold fast and own the Truth when we have the Opportunity and we shall not want sufficient Light and Evidence to find it The specious Appearances set up against this Catholick Practice of the Church of Christ are these 1. That there is no Scripture Authority for it 2. That the Ancient Practice was to Pray for all such as were at Rest 3. That the Ancients were not agreed in their Opinions concerning the State of Separate Souls or the general Intention of the Church in those Prayers To detect the Fallacy Falsity and Impertinence of these Allegations as briefly as may be To the first I say it is a meer Fallacy and grounded upon a false Supposition that nothing is to be admitted in Doctrine or Worship but what there is Scripture Authority for if it be understood of a special Authority and their usual Pretences of not Adding or Diminishing are to be understood of those particular Parts or Books of the Scripture as is plain by the Additional Writings and Practices of Holy Men afterwards 2. It is inconsistent with the Tradition of the Doctrine and Institutions of the Gospel and of the Ordinances of the Apostles which were all by Word and Deed without Writing as the Common Laws of this Nation were at first settled and much of what was written was written upon special Occasions and much with that Brevity and Conciseness by the special Providence of God as was sufficient for them for whom it was intended and yet so as should need an Authentick Explication to preserve the Authority of the Catholick Church 3. It is contrary to the express Directions of the Scripture to contend for the Doctrine once delivered to the Saints in general and to hold the Traditions they had received whether by Word or Epistle c. And if it be understood of a general Authority the Allegation it self is false For it is contrary to all those Scriptures which declare the Authority of the Church and require Obedience to Superiors And either way it is contrary to the Sentiments Testimony and Practice of the Ancient Christians who in Questions of Difficulty and Contests with Hereticks always inquired not only what was written by the Apostles but also or principally what was delivered by them to the Churches which they founded in all Parts of the World of which the Catholick Church doth consist which the Scripture it self stiles the Pillar and Basis of Truth 1 Tim. 3.15 v. Grot. not only for the Sense and Meaning of the Scripture as Lawyers with good reason do when in doubts about the Construction of Writings they inquire how the Usage hath gone for in that case the Writing is the Principal Evidence but in this case what was delivered to the Churches which were compleatly and plainly instructed and ordered by the Apostles was the principal Inquiry and the Scriptures but an accessory Evidence as our Year-Books are of the Common Law in Questions concerning the Common Law But I doubt not but there was a special Providence in it that so much was written and no more and that it was written in such a manner Lastly This hath been the Practice and Pretence of Hereticks and Schismaticks in all Ages to the intent with the better colour to set aside the Authority of the Catholick Church that they might so make way to set up their own private Opinions and Conceits in the Place thereof but never more grossly nauciously and scandalously than by some of the Principal of the late Reformers Calvin especially on the one side inculcating and crying up The Pure Word of God The Pure Word of God and on the other abusing it by straining wresting it to serve their own turns and eluding and evading what is plainly contrary to them which is now past all doubt not only by the Confessions of Mr. Baxter and Le Blank but the many of all
express Hom. 21. in Act. * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Not in vain are Oblations for the Dead Not in vain Prayers Not in vain Alms For all these things did the Spirit Order willing that we should mutually help one another .... Doubt it not the Fruit will be pleasant It is not a light thing that the Deacon calls out to pray For those who are departed in Christ and For those who offer for their Memories And the same he saith also Hom. 41. in 1 Cor. 15. and adds †〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For if Commemorations were not made for them not so much as this would be said For our Matters are not Stage-Plays Far be that For these are done by the Ordination and Disposition of the Spirit Let us therefore afford them help and perform their Commemorations c. The Propitiation proposed is common to the World therefore do we then confidently pray for all the Worthy and name them with Martyrs with Confessors with Priests for we are all one Body tho' some Members more splendid than others .... Why dost thou grieve and lament so much Favour may be obtained for the Deceased And that he himself formed a Liturgy which is at this day in use in the Greek Churches is affirmed by the Greeks and cannot with any good reason be denied and tho' 't is likely there may be some Alterations or Additions in it yet what relates to this matter is so confirmed by this and by more ancient Authority that it cannot reasonably be questioned The other is S. Epiphanius Bishop of Salamis the Metropolis of the Isle of Cyprus a Man of good Reputation for Ability and Piety and particularly studied in all the Doctrines and Practices of the Church and the several Heresies contrary thereunto In him we have a double Testimony that of Aerius and his own in a Book of all the Hereticks and Heresies In that of Aerius is observable 1. The Matter of Fact and common Practice viz. commemorating the Names of the Dead and Praying for them 2. * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The End for which it was done viz. That they might be benefitted by the Pardon of their Sins at the Prayers c. of their Surviving Friends and the Church Both these he opposeth and that is a Proof of both and by the Testimony of an Adversary which is reputed the most convincing 3. The Opposition without any denial or question of the Antiquity or Universality of the Practice or Observation or of the Tradition of either the Practice or the Intention and Doctrine which if he had had any colour or pretence for it he would certainly never have omitted but he is able to say nothing against either the Practice or Benefit of it but If it be so it is in vain to be pious it would be sufficient to get People to pray for the Pardon of ones Sins after his Death In all these respects is the Opposition of Aerius a very considerable Testimony of both the Practice and Intention and consequently of the Doctrine of the Church in this case But because our great Man useth his utmost Skill and very grossly to evade and elude these Testimonies I will here present them both intire according to his own Translation with Notes of the Pages where most of the distracted Parcels may be found in his Book that the Reader who hath a mind to entertain himself with a Prospect of his Ingenuity may the more plainly discern it The Objection of Aerius For what reason do you commemorate after Death the Names of those that are departed He that is alive prayeth or maketh Dispensation of the Mysteries what shall the Dead be profited hereby And if the Prayer of those here do altogether 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 profit them that be there then let no body be Godly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 let no Man do Good but let him procure some Friends by what means it pleaseth him either by persuading them by Money or intreating Friends at his Death and let them pray for him that he may suffer nothing there and that those inexpiable Sins which he hath committed may not be required at his hands p. 238. Epiphanius his Answer and Testimony As for the reciting of the Names of those that are deceased what can be better than this What more commodious and more admirable that such as are present do believe that they who are departed do live and are not extinguished but are still Being and Living with the Lord and that this most pious Preaching might be declared that they who pray for their Brethren have hope of them as being in a Peregrination p. 240. But the Prayer also which is made for them doth profit altho' it doth not cut off All their Sins 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 here answers to 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Objection Yet forasmuch as whilst we are in the World we oftentimes slip both unwillingly and with our Will it serveth to signifie that which is more perfect For we make a Memorial both of the Just and for Sinners For Sinners intreating the Mercy of God of the Just both the Fathers and Patriarchs Prophets and Apostles and Evangelists and Martyrs and Confessors Bishops and Anchoretes and the whole Order that we may sever our Lord Jesus from the Rank of all other Men by the Honour that we do vnto him and that we may yield Worship unto him while we thus judge p. 240. That our Lord is not to be compared unto any Man tho' a Man live in Righteousness a thousand times and more for how should that be possible considering that the one is God the other Man and the one is in Heaven the other in Earth by reason of the Remains or Reliques of the Body yet resting in the Earth p. 242. Except those who being raised from the Dead entred together into the Bride-Chamber as saith the Holy Gospel c. But forbearing these things I return to what I was about The Church doth necessarily perform this having received it by Tradition from the Fathers And who may dissolve the Ordinances of his Mother or the Law of his Father p. 237. as Solomon saith Hear my Son the Words of thy Father and reject not the Laws of thy Mother declaring by this that our Father that is God the Only begotten and the Holy Spirit hath taught us both in Scriptures and without Scripture But our Mother the Church hath Ordinances settled in her which are inviolable and may not be broken Seeing then there are Ordinances established in the Church and they are well and all things are admirably done this Seducer is again refuted p. 237. This is the Answer of Epiphanius the words inclos'd in Crochets are not in Vsher To this we may well apply what he saith before concerning Easter the Observation of which was another thing which Aerius quarrelled at But who knows these things best This seduced Fellow who is but newly sprung up and now
living amongst us or they who were Witnesses before us and who held the same Tradition in the Church before us which they had received from their Parents and their Parents had learned from their Ancestors as the Church to this day observes the true and sincere Faith which it received with the Traditions from the Fathers In all this we may observe 1. The Practice of the Church both in the General Commemorations and in the Prayers agreed on both Sides 2. The End and Intendment of the Church that it was the Profit and Benefit of the Deceased also agreed 3. The Question between them Whether the Prayer of the Living could profit or benefit the Dead as the Church intended 4. That this was what Aerius did principally deny and therefore that the Practice was reasonable as a necessary consequence 5. His only reason was that it would make Piety and good Life needless 6. Epiphanius his Answer 1. from Reason 1. as it is a seasonable and excellent Declaraction of the Faith and Hope of the Church 2. as an Act of Charity for the Benefit of the Deceased 2. from Authority as received in the Church by Tradition from our Saviour and the Holy Spirit And now how does our great Man elude this Epiphanius saith he doth not Name this viz. That Prayers and Sacrifice profiteth not the depa ted in Christ an Heresie 2. Nor doth it appear that himself did hold that they bring such Profit to the Dead as these Men Dream pag. 236. 3. He doth not at all charge him with forsaking the Doctrine of the Scripture or the Faith of the Catholick Church but with rejecting the Order p. 237. 4. Aerius his Argument would have been in force indeed if the whole Church had held as many did That the Judgment after Death was suspended until the General Resurrection and that in the mean time the Sins of the Dead might be taken away by the Suffrages of the Living But he should have considered as Gobarus as great an Heretick as himself did that the Doctors were not agreed upon the Point p. 238.5 It was a foolish part in him to confound the Private Opinion of some with the Common Faith of the Universal Church 6. That he reproved this particular Error he did well but that thereupon he condemned the General Practice of the Church he did like himself headily and perversly ibidem As to the first of these I must refer the Reader to Epiphanius himself for the Character he gives of the Person and Opinions of Aerius a very Vile man a thorough-pac'd Arian and who exceeded Arius himself in his new Opinions which he imputes to the operation of the Devil though he doth not particularly name them Heresies yet it is plain he and S Austin too accounted them such and of the rest the Reader may judge by what is here laid plainly before him S. Ephraem was not much before these but because he was neither Greek nor Latin but a Syrian and a Man of Parts and extraordinary Sanctity greatly esteemed by the most excellent Persons of that time and of so great Reputation that his Writings were read publickly in divers Churches after the Holy Scriptures I cannot pass him by without taking notice of his Testament his Discourse to his Disciples upon his Death-Bed wherein he tells them he is Dying and desires to be mentioned in the Commemoration of their Holy Prayers and bewailing his Sins and declaring his Sense of the terrible Judgment of God he doth admonish exhort and strictly enjoyn them to remember him constantly after his exit and passage in their Prayers and after some Admonitions to them and account of himself he again desires to be remembred in their Prayers Then he strictly forbids his being Buried under the Altar or in the House of God all Solemn Pomp and Funeral Orations and Encomiums and all cost of rich Vestments of Grave Cloaths of Spices of Odors of Candles and the like but desires that all that Cost may be bestowed upon the Poor and for himself that in the place of all such Pomp and Funeral Orations they will accompany him with Psalms and help and assist him with their Prayers and Bury him in the Church-yard where the contrite in heart are Buried Then he bids them come near and imbrace him for his Spirit fails him and again intreats them diligently to make Oblations for him and prettily represents the Communion of Saints by a Simile of the Sympathy of things in Nature the Wine which flowers in the Cellar when the Vine Buds in the Vineyard and the like And tells them that the Oblations of Priests under the Law were effectual for those who were slain in their Sins and how much more the Priests of Christ under the New Testament And gives great caution that when they come to his Memory I suppose he means the Thirtieth Day which he expressly mentioned before and his Anniversaries ne quisquam in Sancta peccet that none commit any thing unmeet for holy things by any Excess but that the Vigil be kept attentively and reverently and humbly and holily and purely for it would be a miserable thing for him if by occasion of his Memory he should be accountable to his God for their inordinate Actions Thus this Holy Man an Instance equal to a very ample Testimony of the Practice in those parts About the same time was S. Cyril Bishop of Jerusalem He in his Mystagogick Catechism concludes all with a Description and Scheme of the Liturgy then in use wherein after mention of the Holy Trisagium Hymn * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Therefore saith he do we recite this Seraphick Theology delivered to us that in that Coelestial Hymnody we may communicate with the supra-mundain Militia the Heavenly Host and thus by such kind of Hymns sanctisying our selves we pray the most benign God that he will send out his Holy Spirit upon the proposited Elements that it may make the Bread the Body of Christ and the Wine the Blood of Christ. For certainly whatever the Holy Spirit doth touch it is sanctified and transmuted Then after that Spiritual Sacrifice that unbloody Worship is done that is after the Consecration and Oblation in Commemoration of the Passion of Christ over that very Host of Propitiation do we obsecrate God for the common Peace of the Churches for the Tranquility of the World for Kings for their Armies and Confederates for the Sick and Afflicted and in sum for all who need Help We commemorate also those who have fallen asleep before us First the Patriarchs Prophets Apostles Martyrs that God at their Prayers and Deprecations would accept ours Then we pray for the Holy Fathers and Bishops deceased and lastly for all who are deceased amongst us believing it to be a very great Help to the Souls for whom the Obsecration of that tremendous Sacrifice which is placed on the Altar is offered I will add but one instance more for the flourishing times of the Church
been if this had been the Practice of the Montanists and not of the Church But for the Readers better Information and more ample Satisfaction that the Objection is a meer Scarecrow and serves only to discover the Disingenuity and Inconsiderateness of the Objectors he must know That Montanus and his Companions Alcibiades and Theodotus were at first looked upon in the Opinion of most Men as Prophets For very many Miracles of Divine Grace at that time wrought in many Churches made most Men believe that they also were Prophets Euseb 5. Hist 3. So that if Tertullian did believe this it was no more than what most others did But what more specially inclined him to favour Montanus was this He was a Man of great Austerity and Strictness in Matters of Discipline Penance Fasting Chastity Suffering c. which were things which Montanus asserted and highly pretended to And that which fixed him in his Opinion of Montanus was some unhappy Contests which arose between him and the Roman Clergy about some of these things which gave him that Offence that he not only reflects upon them in his de Corona Militis Novi Pastores eorum c. but afterwards in his other Writings frequently calls them Psychici Animal or Sensual Man And this which is observable in his Writings is also affirmed by S. Hierom. This was his * For as to what relates to the Rule of Faith that is to the Principal Doctrines of Religion Tertul and the first Montanists were of the same Opinion with the Church c. saith Du Pin p. 82 83. Montanism And what is this to the Prejudice of his Testimony concerning Prayers for the Dead It is so far from that that it is the greatest Confirmation and Amplification of it that this Practice and Tradition was no part of Montanism for nothing could have been a greater Prejudice to the Church of Rome against it and it had certainly been condemned by them nor peculiar to the African Church but the known Practice of the Catholick Church and of the Roman Church in particular quite contrary to what the Objectors would persuade us But such Infatuations are the greatest of Men subject to when they will obstinately persist in the Maintenance of an ill Cause We may here therefore fix upon as good ground as can reasonably be desired this Practice and Tradition of the Catholick Church And now it is time to consider how much we are short in our Evidence of the Apostles Age and from what Original this Practice did in truth proceed It is agreed that St. John wrote his Gospel about the beginning of the second Century and that Tertullian fell to the Sect of Montanus in the beginning of the third Vid. Du Pin p. 44. and p. 70. And S. Hierom informs us that he lived to a great Age usque ad decrepitam atatem and that after he had continued usque ad mediam aetatem a Presbyter of the Church invidia postea contumeliis Clericor Romanae Ecclesiae ad Montani dogma delapsus * After having continued in the Church 40 or 45 Years he separated from it in the beginning of the 3d Centutury c. saith Du Pin p. 70. So that he lived the greatest and best part of his Life in the same Age wherein St. John wrote his Gospel and did live some time And here comes as seasonably as unexpectedly to my hand at the very instant that this is at the Press a Book of a learned Opponent who seeing this too plain to be dissembled and supposing that he can otherwise evade the force of this Evidence presents us with a plain Confession of the Matter of Fact †Of the Sibyls l. 2. c 23. David Blondell I make no difficulty saith he to affirm that it might be practised some time before the Year 200 in as much as Tertullian the most ancient of all those that say any thing of it numbred it even then among the Customs received in his time writing in the Year 199. Oblationes pro Defunctis pro Natalitiis annua die facimus c. and recites also the other two Testimonies only in that de Monogamia mistakes the Husband for the Wife and then adds From the things which this great Person the most Ancient and most Learned of all the Latines that we have remaining does advance as to Matter of Fact concerning the Oblations which were publickly made and the Employment of the Priests the only Ministers of the publick Service as a thing Ordinary and grown into Custom it is manifest that Praying for the Dead was in his Time used not only by particular Persons but also in the Body of the Church and that the Liturgies thereof were full of it Thus we see not only by plain Proof but also by the * The same is confessed by John Dalle since recommended to me as one who hath written learnedly on this Subject but I find not any thing in him added to Blendel but such Pride Arrogance Insolence Contempt and reproachful Expressimsoâ— the Anciâ—nt Holy Christians Martyrs as cannot but be very offensive to any true Christian Spirit being most apparently the common Spirit and Genius of all wicked and obstsnate Hereticks leading to Atheism and Ap stâ—cy and as contra ry to the Pare Word of God which they pretend as to the true Spirit of Christianty Confession of a learned Adversary that this was not only a Practice in the Church when Tertullian wrote but a Received Custom in his time and therefore of some standing before and of such standing as he knew no other Original of it but Apostolical Tradition and for such doth he alleadge it and not only so but for an unquestionable Proof of such unwritten Traditions as this Author also confesseth and asserts cap. 24. p. 142. And what other Original could it have in that little time and such a Man as he have been ignorant of it And had any other been known could He have been guilty of so great Weakness as to have alleadged this for an unquestionable Proof in such a Case if he had had so little Honesty But we have here a learned Man who under pretence of detecting an Imposture presumes by his Learning to impose upon the World How well he hath used his Learning in other Matters some Learned Men of the Church of England I think besides others have sufficiently shewed and how far his Judgment is to be relied upon In this I shall shew the like in a word He would perswade that not only Tertullian but the whole Church of Christ hath been imposed upon in this Matter by a counterfeit Sibyl written between the Years 138 and 151. and of Tertullian saith positively That he relied upon no other Hypothesis than those proposed by the Author of the pretended Sibylline Writings But in these few words there is no less than at least one notorious Fallacy and two Falsities a Fallacy in the word Hypothesis for he
generality of Souls departed in the State of Grace in certain secret Receptacles signifying no more than the unknown Condition of their Estate For the Practice of the Church in interceeding for them at the Celebration of the Eucharist is so General and so Ancient that it cannot be thought to have come in upon * As Blondel Dalle have no less impiously than impudently asserted without any Ground at all Imposture but that the same Aspersion will seem to take hold of the Common Christianity What hinders them to receive Comfort Refreshment Rest and Peace and Light by the Visitation of God by the Consolation of his Spirit by his good Angels to sustain them in the Expectation of their Trial and the Anxieties they are to pass through during the time of it And tho' there be Hope for those that are most solicitous to live and die good Christians that they are in no such Suspence but within the bounds of the Heavenly Jerusalem yet because their Condition is uncertain and where there is Hope of the better there is Fear of the worse therefore the Church hath always assisted them with the Prayers of the Living c. All Members of the Church Triumphant in Heaven according to the degree of their Favour with God abound also with Love to his Church Militant on Earth c. It is certain both that they offer continual Prayers to God for those Necessities of the Church Militant on Earth and that their Prayers must needs be of great force and effect with God for the Assistance of the Church Militant in this Warfare Which if it be true the Communion of Saints will necessarily require that all who remain solicitous of their Trial be assisted by the Prayers of the Living for present Comfort and future Fâ—est and that the Living beg of God a Part and Interest in the Benefit of those Prayers which they who are so near to God in his Kingdom tender Him without ceasing for the Church upon Earth c. Again Chap. 22. The Eloquence whereby the Church hoped to prevail with God was the Devotion and Unity which it celebrateth the Sacrament with But I must by no means leave this place till I have paid the Debt which I owe to the Opinion which I have premised and openly profess again and again that we weigh not by our own Weights nor mete by our own Measures do not justly if believing one Catholick Church and enjoying Episcopacy and the Church Lands upon that account we recall not the Memorial of the Dead as well as of the Living into this Service There is the same Ground to believe the Communion of Saints in the Prayers which those that depart in the highest Favour with God make for us and in the Prayers which we make for those that depart in the lowest degree of Favour with God that there is for the Common Christianity namely the Scriptures interpreted by the perpetual Practice of God's Church Therefore there is ground enough for the Faith of all Christians that those Prayers are accepted which desire God to hear the Saints for us to send the Deceased in Christ Rest and Peace and Light and Refreshment and a good Trial at the Day of Judgment and Accomplishment of Happiness after the same And seeing the * So he modestly calls the shameful Abuse put upon the Church and Nation in corrupting the True English Liturgy by Cranmer c. abating of the first Form under Edward 6. hath wrought no Effect but to give them that desir'd it an Appetite to root up the whole what Thanks can we render to God for escaping so great a danger but by sticking firm to a RULE that will stick firm to us and carry us through any dispute in Religion and land us in the Haven of a quiet Conscience what Troubles soever we may pass through in maintaining That the Reformation of the Church will never be according to the Rule which it ought to follow till it cleave to the Catholick Church of Christ in this particular Sold by John Davies at Mr. Thompson's in Dean's Court over-against the Sessions-House in the Old-Bailey