Coetus or Congregatio 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 condixit so that it 's taken for the solemn assembly gathered together at Gods appointed time or for the assembly at the appointed place viz. the Tabernacle and therefore the Tabernacle of the Congregation which Congregation was the Church of old Act. 7.38 Ecclesia in the New Testament is taken for any assembly though rude and riotous Act. 19.32 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is not used v. 37. where our Interpreters use our English word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ought to be rendred robbers of Temples Heathenish and Jewish but it is mostly used for and appropriated to a sacred assembly as Mat 18.17 Act. 2.47 Ch. 8.1 Ch. 11.26 1 Cor. 1.2 c. Phil. What do you say then is a Church of Christ in the most comprehensive sence Christ A Church of Christ is a Congregation of Saints associated in Christ Jesus our Lord Eph. 3.21 In the Church in Christ Jesus Phil. Why do you say associated Christ Because a Church is not a transient and occasional Congregation but fixed and a joyned Society by Union and Communion with Christ and one another 1 John 1.3 and because the Saints are the members of Christ and he is the Head they are said to be gathered together always in Christ Jesus really or professedly they are gathered unto him by way of insertion mystically or Politically they are gathered together in his Name or Authority Phil. Then a Church comes under various considerations Christ Yes Sir it doth but the Church of Christ is properly but one as he is the one Head and only so the Body is but one 1 Cor. 12.12 For as the Body is one and hath many members and all the members of the one Body being many are one body so also is Christ i. e. Mystical Phil. I pray be as distinct as you can upon the several considerations of this one Church of Christ Christ I will you know the most comprehensive consideration of the Church of Christ is under the name of Catholick and there are two Articles in the Creed called the Apostles that express our Faith therein 1. I believe the Holy Catholick Church 2. I believe the Communion of Saints which two words Holy and Saints denote the Matter and Form of this Church that it is Saints in Christ Jesus it is a Holy Church made up of Saints and then that it is comprehensive of all Saints And lastly That the formal nature of this Church consists in a certain Union and Communion for the latter always implys the former Phil. But is there not particular Churches do you not call every single Congregation a Church Christ. Yes we do so but that you may have the right and distinct notion of it we must duly weigh the Catholick Church as to its Relation to Christ its Head The Catholick Church is to be considered as to its mystical and political standing in Christ In respect of its mystical standing these things belong unto it 1. That it is the general assembly or collection of real Saints Heb. 12.23 ye are come 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to the Catholick assembly and Church or Congregation of first born whose names are written in Heaven This is the Heavenly Church to which he saith Believers in the Gospel days are come to which Church Jesus the Mediator of the New Covenant is the Head of influence and to which all Saints as such are spiritually knit and with whom they have Communion and in him one with another 2. The Church in this sence is it which Christ hath purchased and are effectually partakers of all his benefits Eph. 5.25 26 27. to it belongs Election Redemption Effectual Vocation Justification Adoption Sanctification and Glorification John 17.9 10 11. Rom. 8.29 30. 3. Here in this respect the Church is said to be Catholick in relation to individual Saints only it 's not Catholick as a genus comprehending many species of Churches but as a totum integrale comprizing many parts and all have a coordinate standing in subordination only to Christ their Head yea they all conduce to the making up of Christ Mystical one body being members in particular 4. This Mystical Body is to be considered according to its manner of existing secundum modum existendi and that two ways 1. In its Militant State or Standing or in its Triumphant in Viâ or in Patriâ In its Militant State it comprehends all the true believers in the world existing at the same time whether they are visible by professing or not the complement whereof are all the Saints actually glorified or the Spirits of just men made perfect And this distinction is only of the Church in respect of the different state in the enjoyment of Christ in the way of Communion in Grace and Glory the difference is only gradual and no more the Union is the same 2. It is to be considered in its Invisible and Visible standing The Church's Invisible standing is wholly in respect of that inward spiritual Relation which the Saints have to Christ and one another It s Visible standing is in professing Saints that are real members of Jesus Christ Phil. I Pray Sir give a right understanding of the Church in its relation to Christ as a Political Head Christ Thus Christ is to be considered as King and Law-giver to his Church and People and he governs his Church either immediately by his ruling Spirit in the heart of every Member of his Body whereby they are influenced Eph. 4.4 There is one Spirit one Body one Lord c. Or he governs mediately as a Politick Head and that is only so far as the Church is visible and professing and as such he hath given Immunities Laws Officers Ordinances for establishment of Visible Polities Societies or spiritual Corporations And here we are to observe diligently these things 1. That under this consideration the Catholick Church is most large and extensive for it comprehends all credible Professors though not real and all actual Church-Members though secret Hypocrites Ephes 3.15 Of him the whole family is named in Heaven and in Earth i.e. real and professing 2. That the Church so far as it 's capable of Visible Communion and Fellowship is the subject of Christ's mediate Political Rule and Government and that is only in particular Congregations to them he hath given his Word Ordinances and Officers and to no other for he suited them to particular Societies neither hath he substituted any Officers or Ordinances to the meer mystical standing of the Church 3. All the Instituted External Worship though it be given to the Church in its visible standing which it hath in particular Churches yet it is for the sake of the Mystical Body for the edifying and building it up by the Means of Grace Eph. 4.12 13 and for the multiplying it by calling in the Elect. 4. In this sense and acceptation as the Catholick Church being a Political Body of all
Saints mystically and immediately under Christ their Head so this Political Body shews it self and becomes visible in some particular parts there-only which are called Visible Churches and are under a mediate Rule and Government of Christ and in this respect the Catholick Church comprehends particular Churches as some distinct parts and parcels thereof Phil. Then I suppose your apprehensions are that there is a Catholick Visible Church which is the next and immediate subject of all Officers and Ordinances Christ Mistake me not I have not said so as yet I say the Catholick Church becomes in part visible in particular Congregationâ—s and they are the immediate subjects of visible Ordinances and Officers which are instituted and placed therein for the edification of the Mystical Body of Christ Phil. But is not the universality of Saints Militant the Catholick Visible Church of Christ on Earth Christ The universality of Saints on Earth doth not constitute a Church in a visible standing for many are Believers that as yet make not themselves visible by profession 2. They are not nor can be bound together in visible Union and Communion That which makes a Catholick Church is a Catholick Bond of Union and Catholick Communion which is only mystical and invisible but there is not nor cannot be a Catholick visible Bond for as they cannot appear in one visible Congregation so they cannot be bound to walk together in Fellowship nor can have visible Communion as one Church in the same individual Administration if they profess the same Faith preach the same Word pray alike c. yet this makes not one particular Church 3. If there be a Catholick Visible Church then it must have Catholick Visible Officers every Officer must relate to the whole Church every ordinary Officer must be Officer to the whole Catholick Visible Church and there had need be a Visible Pastor Pastorum over them all 4. All Visible Members of the Catholick Church are not therefore Members of any Visible Church with Ordinances for they must be supposed to be Members of the Catholick Church before they can be made Members of a Visible Church with Ordinances 5. A Visible Church is Organized with Officers to the whole Church and not to a part of it A Pastor Elder Deacon are Officers to the whole and who will say a Deacon hath as much power in all the Churches on Earth as in the Church to which he is constituted he may as well say so as say a Pastor hath 6. If Christ instituted a Catholick Visible Church it was under the Old Testament or under the New but he did neither for there was but one Particular Congregation under the Old and Christ left but one when he ascended Chap. II. Of a Particular Church Phil. I Pray Sir come now to the main thing I aim at viz. to the true nature and constitution of a Gospel Particular Church Christ You mean such a Congregation as is the immediate subject of all the Ordinances and Offices of Christ's Institution where every Believer is bound to wait upon God in Gospel Faith and Order for the glory of Christ and his own edification Phil. Such a Church I mean may not a National Church be it Christ By no means it 's no Church but such whose Members may all meet together in one place for Communion in all Ordinances for so the first Church at Jerusalem did the greatest for ought I know that ever was since and all other that we read of in Scripture since If any comprized all the Saints in the Nation Province or Territory they all assembled for frequent Communion in one place under the same Officers We read of no Particular Church in Scripture but what was Congregational for the National Church of the Jews which was the only one of that kind which ever was in the World of God's Institution was Congregational for all the Males came to the Temple and before to the Tabernacle three times a year to appear before God to worship in acts of Communion therefore it was called the Tabernacle of the Congregation Phil. I am pretty well satisfied now from the weighty arguments I formerly heard from you though my thoughts through prejudice passed lightly over them then that all National Diocesan and Parochial constitution of Churches was merely from Man if not from the Man of Sin which latter I see cause enough to suspect But I pray give me a plain description of a particular Gospel Church Christ With all my heart Sir a Particuler Gospel Church is a separate company of Visible Believers with their Seed or Saints associated together in special bond of Union for the enjoyment of Communion with Christ and one another in all the Ordinances of Christs appointment for their edification Phil. You say the allowed matter of this Church is Visible Believers what understand you by a visible Believer Christ I mean one that makes a credible profession such an one as I am bound by all the rules of Charity to believe he is a true believer on the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and I do not say 1. That it is necessary that therefore he be no Hypocrite for so he may be and I not know it 2. Neither do I say that his meer professing makes him a Church member for they in Act. 2. believed before they were Church Members and professed their Faith which gave them right of claim Yea there are many have right of claim and do profess but do not seek to joyn to a particular Church and it cannot be without a voluntary offer and subjection to the Order of the Gospel Phil. What is required to a credible profession for the due satisfaction of a particular Church of Christ Christ The Tree cannot be known to me but by the Fruits see Mat. 7.17 18 19. chap. 12.33 Luk. 6.44 the credible fruits are therefore Holiness of life and profession of Faith It 's required there be visible holiness of life Phil. 1.27 Let your conversation be as becometh the Gospel i. e. both the Doctrine and Order of it And this lies in negative and positive holiness appearing in the conversation 1. Negative that it be without blame Eph. 1.4 Phil. 2.15 1 Th. 5.23 2. A meer negative religion in respect of grosser and more observable sins is no more than what many a Carnal man may attain unto there must be the practice of positive duties required and not merely moral in justice and mercy but such by which a Christian is more peculiarly distinguished from Moral Heathens such as family duties of reading the word and daily prayer those of a more publick nature as constant attendance on the word Preached sanctifying the Lords day free distribution to the necessities of the Saints and a manifest readiness on all occasions to follow Christ as his disciple in all things Tit. 3.8 ch 2.11 12. yea in suffering Phil. But what more profession is needfull besides this visible practical walking is not this enough
are Members and capable of being judged by it so it is here Christians meet and agree together to walk in Church fellowship and what do they promise solemnly to God and one another to give up themselves to the Lord and one another to walk in all the ways ordinances and appointments of Christ Now I find this is that which is called adding to the Lord when a people first joyn themselves to Christ in Church fellowship and so the first gathering the Church at Antioch is expressed for Act. 11.19 some scattered upon the persecution by Saul men of Cyprus and Cyrene I doubt not but Prophets inspired at Pentecost Preached to the Grecian Jews the Lord Jesus Christ v. 20. and the hand of the Lord was with them and a great number turned unto the Lord v. 21. Upon the tidings of this success Barnabas was sent from Jerusalem who was a good man and full of the Holy Ghost and of Faith And much People were added to the Lord i.e. they by mutual consent gave up themselves unto the Lord Jesus Christ they turned to the the Lord by Repentance by the Preaching of these first comers But now the Spirit tells us the success of Barnabas his coming and it was upon his exhortation of them thereto v. 23. and when he was come and saw the Grace of God which had prevail'd unto conversion he rejoyced and exhorts them all with full purpose of Heart i. e. with sincerity and resolution 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to joyn themselves for constancy unto the Lord in Church fellowship afterward when Paul comes v. 26. he finds them a Church and as such abides among them for an whole year for it 's said Paul and Barnabas assembled themselves with the Church 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Preaching to a great multitude many of which were not yet of the Church and that this adding or joyning to the Lord is entring into the Church obligation is manifest also from Act. 5. where it appears upon the signal Judgments that Ananias and Sapphira fell under v. 13. of the rest such Hypocrites as they none durst joyn themselves the word is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifying to cement and unite into a Body it 's used for joyning to the Church of Jerusalem Act. 9.26 and 1 Cor. 6.17 in the same sence And it 's said here v. 14. Believers were the more added to the Lord which must be by some visible overt act whereby they became Members of the Church after believing for it cannot be meant of their mystical joyning to Christ by believing for then the Antithesis would not hold between them that durst not and them that did In the same sence is the adding a Member to a Church which is joyned to the Lord Act. 2.41 47. there they were first visible Believers then added to a society by some overt solemn act and therefore said to be added to the Church It would be too long in this way of conference between you and me to evince this Truth particularly from the method that God used in the constituting and maintaining a visible Church from the beginning to look back but as far as Abraham how he and his family and his seed became a Visible Church it was by explicite obligations and overt acts in binding them by Sacrifice I might mention the several express obligations that Church came under from time to time in Moses time at Horeb Joshua's the Judges Samuel's especially David's and the rest of the Reforming Kings remarkably by Josiah and after the Captivity in Ezra's and Nehemiah's days And that this was not a dispensation peculiar only to the Old Testament State and standing of the Church is manifest from Isa 56.3 4 5 6. for there God speaks of the priviledges of the Gospel Salvation which was near meaning the Gentile by the Son of the stranger and by the Eunuch any other excluded from the priviledges of the Church of the Jews and incapacitated by Levitical uncleanness these saith the Lord being Believers and joyning themselves to the Lord the words used in the acts and taking hold of his Covenant shall have a place and a name in my house i. e. to be Church Members and have right to all Church Priviledges And this is that bond of the Covenant which the Prophet Ezekiel foretells that the Great and Gospel restauration of the Jews should bring them under Ezek. 20.37 of which the Prophet Jeremiah chap. 50.4 5 6. and Zech. 2.10 11. I refer you in this matter to that clear discourse that the Learned Mr. J. Cotton hath upon this subject in his way of the Churches of N.E. Pag. 59 60 61 c. where you may receive full satisfaction in this point if what I have briefly spoken be not enough You may read also Mr. J. Davenport's power of Congregational Churches his answer to Mr. J. Paget where he shews pag. 27. that this Covenant obligation is the formal cause of a Church and sheweth the nature and evinceth the necessity of it to a Churches being as likewise Mr. Hookers survey chap. 4. page 45. Phil. Sir I thank you for discovering these authors to me I have heard of them that they were Reverend Pious Learned Men who suffered much for the Testimony they bore against our corruptions prejudice for a long time hath kept me off from reading the works of such men but I pray Sir give the heads of the Arguments they insist on for it Chr. 1. Believers are under Church power this way or quatenus Believers If quatenus professing Believers then where ever they come the Church and Officers there may challenge power over them as Members this will be denied by most till they voluntarily submit themselves it may be some will come for Church priviledges but will not admit of any Church power for their Reformation to be administred towards them 2. They argue from all Civil Societies of that nature and Marriage it self cannot have a formal being without mutual compact and agreement so there is a mutual relation that all Church Members stand in one to another and all of them to their Officers and their Officers to them and reciprocal duties to be performed these cannot be performed or will not without mutual consent and obligation 3. They argue from all the Metaphors whereby a Church is described a House and Temple is bound and pin'd together a natural body hath all the Members knit together by joints and bands it 's represented as a City compact Rev. 11.2 Eph. 2.19 and what City can become enfranchised but this way and manner 4. It 's no reason any should challenge priviledges of a Society without they be subject to the orders and rules of walking 5. If this be not but Members may come in and out as they please without obligation Churches have no power to keep themselves pure by Admission or Excommunication for as a Member can come at pleasure so he may depart 6. Lastly the practice of the Primitive
that joyns to the Church doth primarily and professedly joyn themselves to the Lord in Church Communion And the immediate declared event of this Exhortation of Barnabas was that they joyned to the Lord in Church fellowship and became a Church ver 26. See also Act. 16.5 2. It appears to be the duty of every Believer to joyn himself to a particular Church from the Nature of Conversion it is the turning the whole man unto God in all the ways and appointments of Christ wherein he is to be found but Church fellowship is a Divine Institution where God is to be found joyned with and submitted unto as is abundantly manifest from the currant of the Old and New Testament This seems to be the meaning of the Apostle when he doth beseech the Romans ch 12.1 by the Mercies of God to present their Bodies i. e. their Persons to give up their Persons by presenting them to or before the Lord viz. in Church Communion a living Sacrifice of thanksgiving Holy and Acceptable unto God which is your reasonable worship 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it should be rendred your word service or worship the word is used for the Word of God 1 Pet. 2. Or a service of Words As new born babes desire 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the sincere Word the Milk or Milk of Word So that the Exhortation of the Apostle seems to be made to Believers to devote and dedicate themselves unto the Lord in Church fellowship by a Covenant or Obligation of Words being called their service of Words viz. their explicate word the Presentment or Devotement of themselves unto the Lord according to Hos 14.2 This Dedication or Devotement is lively signified in Baptism wherein every Believer doth federally oblige himself to Father Son and Holy Ghost and thereby doth both bind himself to joyn unto the Lord in professed Subjection to all his Ordinances and doth shew it Sign and Seal it before the Lord. And every adult one that professeth himself baptized and doth not actually joyn himself unto the Lord in Church fellowship doth practically deny his Baptismal Dedication wherein he is devoted to be a living i. e. visible lively Sacrifice of thanksgiving in his Person and all his performances unto the Lord. 3. That Believer that joyns not himself in Church Society falls short of many great ends of his professed high and holy Vocation for we are called according to Gods purpose of Grace to be a choice Generation a Royal Priesthood a People 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. for a peculiarity i. e. unto God for his special visible service to offer up Spiritual Sacrifices of a true Gospel Nature acceptable unto God through Jesus Christ ver 5. Wherein the Virtues of Christ are shewed forth or declared ver 9. Not only perceived in our selves but shewed forth in Practice and Profession and this is or can be no way so much as in Gospel instituted worship wherein a Believer comes unto and is built up in the Lord Jesus Christ as a living Stone The great reason of squaring a stone is to be laid in the building as the end of squaring the Stones in Mount Lebanon was to lay them in Solomons Temple a Type of a Visible Gospel Church Such I doubt not but the Holy Ghost means by the Apostle Peter saying Ye as lively Stones are built a spiritual House ver 5. and so the Apostle Paul Eph. 2.20 21. Again the Lord Jesus doth declaredly design that Believers should be visibly separated from the World to come out in the way of Gospel Communion from all unclean things and Persons 2 Cor. 6.14 15 16 17. From all Heathenish Antichristian or false unwarranted worship and from Communion with professed Vnbelievers and enter into a solemn explicite Covenant with the Lord without doing of which they answer not the end of their calling in Christ Lastly our Calling is not only to be the Lords singly but conjunctly with the Saints and redeemed ones to a mystical Relation to Christ in a Community of the Elect and called ones which is answered by us as in our inward and spiritual so by our external and visible joyning our selves to the Society of the faithful to serve the Lord in one Body with them for we are called to the Peace of God that rules in our Hearts in one body Col. 3.15 i. e. with other Saints and Believers and therefore are to walk worthy as it becometh this vocation not only as to Moral Duties but instituted worship Eph. 4.1 c. Phil. 1.26 Let your Conversation be as it becometh the Gospel of Christ and this in our Order and stedfastness of our Faith in Christ Col. 2.5 4. There are Duties to be performed by every Believer by Virtue of his Relation to Christ as such which cannot be done but in a way of Church Communion for he is obliged to observe what ever Christ hath commanded Mat. 28.20 And how great things hath Christ required to be observed in a way of Church Communion as the exercise of Brotherly love Heb. 13.1.1 Joh. 3.11 And he there refers to our Saviours express command Joh. 13.34 The Obedience to which lyes in the sensible Expression thereof as it appears by what follows Hereby shall all men know that ye are my Disciples if ye have love one for another i. e. In outward visible acts And the Apostle speaks of the â—ommunion of Love fellowship of the Spirit Bowels of Mercy sameness of Mind c. Phil. 2.1 2 3. Love is a Grace that gives Life to all acts of Communion it flouâ—isheth and branches it self in the most lively manner in a Society and Societies are for the sake of it Destroy love and not only the ends but the very bond and Life of a Society comes to nothing There are great commands of Christ that we are not capable of obeying him in but in Church Communion As frequent assembling together provoking one another to love and good works Heb. 10.24 The remembrance of the Lords Death frequently in the Lords Supper And this is to be observed in a Body or Society of Believers See 1 Cor. 10.16 17. I might instance also in all Duties that concern brotherly watch Pastoral watch each Officers duties by their respective places and Members to them all Discipline actively or passively considered Christs Church Institution Ordinances and Statutes are those which are principally intended by David Psal 119. And such were those that Zechary and Elizabeth walked in blameless Luk. 1.6 5. Every one that supposeth himself in a state of Grace should use all endeavours required by Christ and means instituted by him for growth in Grace Now that Church fellowship and Ordinances are instituted by Christ for growth in Grace I think no sound Christian will go about to deny Believers are exhorted or commanded to grow in Grace 2 Pet. 3.18 And that Churches and their Officers and Ordinances are appointed for that end which we are to abide stedfast in the use of
Churches seems very clear as hath been touched but suppose it had not been so clearly expressed I know not out if God institutes a Society or other thing what ever is necessarily required to the very nature essence of the thing without which it would inevitably be destroyed ought to be done the general rule in such-cases ought to lead us to the practice of duty in all those particulars that must necessarily attend obedience thereunto Phil. But if this bond of visible obligation be the formal Cause of a Church then there is no true Churches but such where it is which seems to be hard Christ How far the Lord Jesus Christ will own a people professing themselves a Church and how far he will dispense with their failures and defects in matter of order especially while it hath been in the Antichristian Wilderness he himself only knows Much hath been done by Christ undoubtedly in the latter times of that great Apostacy in the days of Reformation and that he hath had his true Churches all along it 's not to be questioned but that for the most part was in a mystical not a visible organical standing and in many congregations where the Word and Sacraments have in some measure of purity been administred in respect of the matter of the Congregation visible Saints and the manner of administration freed from Romish Pollutions and humane Inventions we will not deny but there may have been a true though not right regulated Church of Christ without this express and solemn obligation it is implicit and such as is to be supposed as intended by their practice in attending and constant waiting upon God in all the Ordinances of his appointment in one assembly or congregation especially in that great Ordinance of Communion in the Lords Supper wherein they seal their union in one body 1 Cor. 10 17. And undoubtedly a people that is congregated having explicitely chosen their Pastor or implicitely subjected to him and received this Sacred Ordinance from his hands are bound to abide as a society mutually related one to another in constant and frequent Communion by the nature of the Ordinance it self But the coming of a Church thus together 1. Is far short of the order of the Gospel 2. The generality of communicants of this sort do not apprehend themselves hereby bound to one Congregation more than another and their Ministers look not upon themselves bound to one People more than another any more than for external emolument taking themselves to be Ministers to the Catholick Church and so may administer the Sacrament to as many people as they Preach to here or there without designing a peculiar flock to take charge of So that their Churches are occasional most times and but for a while during their pleasure to administer to them 3. Such a Congregation is not at all governable though as to priviledges so called they take and leave as they please yet for their disorders miscarriages and sins they think themselves not accountable to any And so liable to no censure and therefore though we would go as far as possible in allowing the Right Hand of fellowship to professing Protestant Congregations yet we cannot do to all promiscuously but may undoubtedly use the judgment of discretion therein so as we be careful we do not by our practices in this and other cases nullify the appointed order of our Lord Jesus Christ and pollute our Communions Phil. I pray what is the manner of a Peoples first entring into a Church State Christ I will tell you the usual manner of them in N. E. and other places who have chosen to practise most agreeably to Gospel order when a competent number of professing Believers living within a vicinity desire to joyn together in a Church State having good knowledge one of another and having solemnly sought God together for help and direction in this weighty matter they appoint a day for it and acquaint Churches with it that their Pastors or Messengers or as many of other Churches as please may be present at the time After spending some part of the day in such solemn duties as concern the matter in Hand they do declare the dealings of God with their Souls one after another then or before one being chosen by the consent of all to preside for order sake this day it may be some Brother upon whom they have their Eye for a Pastor he then declares in the name of all there now intending to associate naming each of them at which they are standing the speaker addressing himself to the Pastors and Messengers of other Churches present after this or the like manner Brethren you are Witnesses of that great and solemn obligation that we are entring into that we may have a name and a place within the Walls of the House of God together with you and may have but the Honour to be reckoned one of the least of the Tribes of Israel We therefore here upon mature consideration and chearfully do give up our selves with Children to the Lord Jesus and one another promising in the strength of the Lord to subject our selves to all the Commands and Institutions of Christ in the Gospel and continue stedfastly in fellowship one with another to the Glory of him that hath called us and our mutual comfort and edification and do accordingly receive each other in the Lord and cleave to each other in Brotherly love and mutual subjection according to God These words whether more or less to the same purpose may be used only to declare their professed subjection to the Gospel of Christ in Faith and Order Accordingly one of the Pastors or Brethren of other Churches stands up in the name of the rest of the Brethren of other Churches there present and declares their joyfulness and gladness of Heart to see their Faith and Order and accordingly doth reach out unto them the Right Hand of Fellowship with holy wishes and desires that as their Foundation is laid in Christ Jesus so they may be Edified in him walking in the fear of the Lord and in the comforts of the Holy Ghost and be multiplied See Cotton's way to the same purpose Phil. Sure this practice looks very much as becomes the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ But what is the next thing to be done Christ Now the next thing is to Organize this Body with Officers in order to due administration of Ordinances Chap. III. Of Church Officers Phil. HAVE they power within themselves to choose their Officers Christ They must undoubtedly have the nature of the society is such that they must have it for they associate not themselves by the Command or Power of Man but of the Lord Jesus If none hath power over them but the Lord Jesus alone none but himself by their own free act can constitute a Pastor over them 2. The power of chusing their Officers is one of the subordinate ends for which they do associate because they will not
be imposed upon in this kind 3. This power naturally grows up with and is inseparable from all free societies gathered by mutual consent unless they be limited by their Charter in this kind or be so false to themselves and successors to give away their Priviledges as many have done to Antichristian and Usurping Powers 4. Thus you see Officers were chosen by common suffrage Act. 1.23 ch 6. Act. 14.23 it should be read that when they had constituted Elders by common suffrage or lifting up of Hands in every Church so that it was the usual way The Apostles or their substitutes one or more might be present to encourage or direct but the People ordained by choice Phil. Doth their Power reach to call whom they will into Office Christ 1. So as he be qualified for them and the Office they call him to as the Holy Ghost requires they are to be very observant of the rule of the Gospel for that is their Charter by which they associate and by which they do act 2. They are hereby limited to chuse men out from among themselves Act. 6. Phil. But what if as yet they have none duly qualified among themselves Christ They may then invite qualified men that can be spared from other Churches with the leave of the Church or Churches from whence they invite or call them Phil. Doth such an invitation or call of one that is a Member of another Church or Non-Member to any Church make an Officer Christ No it is but in order to the making such an one an Officer for he must be incorporated as a Member before he can be chosen and constituted an Officer It is so in all civil societies of the like nature an Office is Power and Priviledge which none can enjoy in any society but the Members thereof unless he come to it by force or usurpation Phil. How many may be a sufficient number to begin a Church Society some say two or three agreeing in this kind is a sufficient number from Mat. 18.19 20. Christ They misunderstand the place who say so for the two or three there may be understood of Women as well as Men and are capable of performing the Duties which our Saviour there intends But the Holy Ghost allows them no Office unless of Deaconesses no ruling Office or Power of suffrage in Election and therefore if all of them be such or but two or one they cannot constitute a Church for the ends Christ hath appointed it It 's plain the words of our Saviour they are only to encourage a Church Duty and the regular gradual proceeding therein in case of private offences arising between Brother and Brother And promiseth his Presence with And Blessing upon the smallest number that are found to exercise themselves in agreement to perform any duty required of them in their capacities for the Honour of Christ and in this case for the Restoration of a fallen Brother See Cottons Way As for the exact number that may begin a particular Church the Holy Ghost hath left it indefinite only it is easily to be supposed that spiritual reason and Christian discretion must be our guide that there be such a number as is consistent with the Nature of the thing the greater the better And that we begin not a Church with so small a number as may render the institution of Christ absurd and his Obedience unto his commands therein impracticable Phil. I perceive then you allow not women any power in the Church they are members and incorporated in the same body by mutual obligation to Communion with the Brethren why have they not equal power with them Christ Women are members and very useful and profitable many ways in their Graces and Gifts and capable of performing any admonition between one another according to Mat. 18. for it belongs to mutual watch required of all members indefinitely But our Lord Jesus Christ hath excluded them from all acts that are not suitable to their Sex in respect of Modesty and the state of Subjection that they placed in to the man 1. They are not Ministerially to teach nor speak authoritatively 1 Cor. 14.34 Let your Women keep silence for it s not permitted to them to speak but to be under obedience Not but there may be occasion for a Woman to speak in way of obedience as to speak in answer to Questions asked her as at admission to answer in giving a reason of her Faith when asked in case of offence to answer for her self if accused or to witness for or against another But to do any ministerial act in teaching or to speak in the management of any act of power or judicial proceeding it belongs to the men and not the women 2. They may not exert any power of the keys so much as by publick giving their suffrage or vote for this reason 1 Tim. 2.12 I suffer not a Woman to teach or usurp authority over the man but to be in silence viz. In the Church it 's plain by the Text and Context that the Apostle treats of the Womans carriage in the Church and that it ought always to be in a way of Submission and Subjection not with Rule and Power for such a carriage is Usurpation of that which belongs not to her the Words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is no where else used in the New Testament and seldom in other authors a thing is said to be authentick when it 's legal true and right it 's used of writings when approved and so of witnesses and authority that there is no ground to contradict the one or question the legality and just right of the other therefore this kind of Power is denied to the Woman the Translators render it well by usurping Authority where any assume Power or Authority to themselves that belongs not to them there they usurp it the Apostle saith they have no authentick Power i. e. Just and belonging to them neither shall exercise any regularly in the Church of Christ Phil. I am satisfied that God never intended any ruling Power to Women in any Societies but in Families over Children and Servants and there not over their Husbands therefore not a decisive supream Power unless Providence remove their Husbands But if they should have an equal suffrage with men in civil or ecclesiastick Societies they must certainly then have exercise of Power over the men so far as they carry their share in the Majority But I confess it seems odd that members of the same Body each challenging an equal membership should not have all the same power Christ There is nothing absurd in it at all because Christ hath so appointed and if we look but into natural Bodies to which the Church is compared for there are some members that are ruling as the Head so the faculties of the Brain and Soul and others are ruled as Tongue Hands Feet and the whole Body consents to it and each of them consents that the ruling Power be in the
Head so it is in Bodies Politick Phil. I pray Sir where do you place Church Power Christ The Power that is in a Church is Christs but it is acted in and by the Church in ecclesiâ mediante ecclesiâ The Church is entrusted with it as an associated or embodied company of Believers for the Key of Government was given to Peter and the rest primarily as believing Disciples and associated followers of Jesus Christ Secondarily as Ministers and lastly as Apostles extraordinary Ministers And that the Power of binding or loosing is primarily in the Society as such without the consideration of Officers appears 1. Because the Church hath the essence that is the matter and form of a Church without Officers and therefore the power of it for it admits the definition of a Church and can act as a Church 2. That body which by mutual agreement of it's members gives it self a being will not deny it self that power and priviledge which conduce to it 's well being or integral perfection such is a Body Politick especially a Church of Christ 3. A Church considered only in it's membership is the first subject of Christs power for the exercise of it because they can immediately after they are associated before they have chosen an Officer admit more members they can also admonish and excommunicate a corrupt member out of their body for all such societies have an innate power of increasing themselves and of purging themselves 4. An associated or incorporate Body not yet organized hath power to consult it's bene esse and make it self an integrum Organizatum a Body furnished with Officers as well as Members and therefore can confer Office Power where there was none before now there is Power in that body whatever it is that doth confer Office Power 5. If there were not a Power in the Church as a Body Politick it would be wholly devested of it whenever it were deprived of it's Officers by Death as it often is but it is not because it can proceed to another choice Phil. I pray Sir what kind of Power is this is it legislative or executive and where doth it lye that I may know what you understand by the Keys Christ Christ is the only Legislator and in that respect his revealed Will is the Key of David who openeth and no man shuts and shuts and no man opens And in this respect he doth not communicate his power but in respect of execution he doth deligate his Power to Churches and Officers to act in his Name And this is no other than a decisive Power exerted in the Church according to the rule that Christ hath given This decisive power passeth always upon matter of fact committed by a particular member or to be done by the Church in admission or rejection of members or in choosing of Officers This decisive power consists in opening and shutting the doors of this spiritual house and I call it the key of Government for such is the nature of a Key to open and shut a door now this key of decisive power is the unanimous suffrage of the brotherhood or where that cannot be had it must be the Majority or else there could be no end of some differences in such Societies Phil. Then the keys being this decisive power and lying in the fraternity there needs no Officers at all Christ It is one thing to be a key and another to have the management of a Key Christ gave Peter the key but did not make him the key as a Church Officer any otherwise than as an Apostle and as other Apostles were who had all decisive Church-power in themselves to exert as occasion required but for the most part they acted by the management of the Church Key as Peter in the choice of Matthias Act. 1. and of Deacons Act. 6. and Paul in casting out of the incestuous Person Phil. A key is a dead thing and cannot open or shut without a hand to manage it Christ In a Politick body where the members are intelligent Agents it is not a dead thing the Subjects of it being rational creatures voluntary free agents and living stones and the indispensible Law of self preservation is a justifiable reason of acting in this kind though they do not act in so orderly a manner as they desire being as yet uncapable for it But Christ having instituted Officers in his Church for the more orderly and comely management of the keys they are upon the Terms of congregating bound also to choose them Officers of his appointment to whose prudent care and watch the management of the decisive power is committed by Jesus Christ through the hands of the people and to them Parents Officers the Church doth subject themselves in the Lord. Phil. That is they now give up their power to the Pastor they choose and the decisive power remains no longer in them but they are divested of it Christ It is one thing what a people do de facto and another what they may do de jure It is too true that through Ignorance or being imposed upon by men of name many Churches do give away their Power or suffer it to be wrested from them by usurping Officers such as Diotrephes who will be the Keys as well as have the management of them but this is not to be de jure for 1. The decisive power being the Key and this the suffrage of the majority they break the key or change it by putting the decisive power into the breast of the minority which is a single persons or a few at most 2. They cannot devest themselves without destroying the very formal nature of the Society for as their first being ariseth by common consent so their continued acting must be 3. If they give up this power they part with their freedom and are at the mercy of one man and they set up an Arbitrary Government 4. They cannot exercise that power which they have given up and then in case of Male-administration who shall say to Archippus take heed to thy Ministry that thou fulfil it c. for it may so fall out that a Church may see reason to deal with an Officer and to excommunicate him from his Office Relation and Membership too 5. What a condition is such a Church in that doth so For if a Pastor or ruling Elder will be corrupt how many ill members at least such as are offensive to the Church may he take in and how many good may he cast out as Diotrephes did 3 John 9. 6. What Christ hath jâ—â—ned together none should separate but Christ hath conjoyned Office Power and the Church Power The Officers are for the due orderly honourable and solemn management of the Church Power not for the taking of it away Officers are no addition of Power to a Church but for the better administration to edification and advantage and in obedience unto the Lord Jesus Christ and subordination unto him And so far as they are
stands in Doctrine exhortation and reproof c. to bring home the Scripture for the instruction of the Hearts and Minds of Men by exposition application catechism and defending the Truth against gain-sayers Phil. You give the whole Preaching Office unto the Pastor Christ It is in him and may ordinarily be performed by him providing his strength and ability can reach to it and other parts of his Office lye not too hard upon him or can be performed to the Churches full edification Phil. But what if it cannot be performed to the Church's full edification Christ Then it is requisite that a Coadjutor or assistant to him be chosen in this part of his Office to wit a Teacher or Teaching Elder who is to wait mostly on doctrinal expository and catechumenal teaching Phil. But this seems not a distinct Officer Christ Though he come into part of the Pastoral or Episcopal Office yet he becomes a distinct Officer for he comes in as a governing feeding Officer attending more particularly on the part of the Office to which he is appointed and chosen for he is to feed the Flock so far as the Holy Ghost hath made him overseer by the call of the Church for their necessary supply Neither doth his Office power curtalize at all the power of the Pastor only acting in conjunction with his Office is an 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 opitulatio a help or assistance taking off part of the burthen from him and such Teachers were set in the Church 1 Cor. 12.28 and such an one is to wait on his teaching Rom. 12.7 Where teaching seems plainly to be specified as a distinct office-work in one called thereto as exhorting in him that is more especially called to exhortation And Teachers are plainly enough named in distinction from Pastors as Officers set by Christ in his Churches Eph. 4.11 12. For the perfecting of the Saints for the work of the Ministry i. e. Officers for the filling up the ministerial office and edifying the body of Christ Therefore when this Officer is necessary for full edification of the Church in the work of the Ministry then he is to be added Phil. Is there no Officer appointed to take up as a help to the Pastor in ruling and governing the Church For where a Church is large the oversight of the flock in way of rule according to the order of the Gospel will require much labour diligence and wisdom Christ There are ruling Elders or Presbyters called to attend and wait upon that part of the Pastoral Office to take up with him and be helps in Governments I conceive they are to be understood by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1 Cor. 12.28 which should not be rendred miracles but ruling Officers or Powers as the same word is rendred Rom. 8.38 Persons in Power the abstract put for the concrete and the gifts for the edifying of the Church first and last are specified under the name of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Gifts graciously bestowed among which are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 gubernationes governing or ruling Gifts Phil. You make then a Ruling Elder a distinct Officer of the Church Christ I do not say that the Pastor or Teacher are not ruling Elders but that when one or both are not able to manage the ruling part for the sufficient edification of the Church there ought one or more to be called into that part of the Ministry and to attend thereto with Diligence And accordingly the Apostle Rom. 12.7 8 9. calls the whole Ministry of the Church Episcopal and Diaconal by the Name of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Ministry and gives us an account of the several Offices to be attended to the Teacher that attends on Teaching the Exhorter that attends on Exhortation the Deacon that distributes with simplicity the ruling Elder 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he that presides in governing let him do it with Industry or Diligence Phil. But is there any Presbyter or Elder that is not teaching You seem to be for Lay-Elders Christ The distinction between Clergy and Laity comes from Rome we own it not in the sence it 's used by no means for the people are the Clergy in the sence of the Spirit of God The Apostle Peter shewing the Duty of Presbyters 1 Pet. 5.3 he saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not Lording it as Lord-Bishops over Gods heritage 2. They are no more Laymen than the Pastor and Teacher yea I may affirm if they that are ordained Officers of Christ in the Church are made thereby the Clergy then all the Ministers even Deacons as well as Pastors for there 's but one kind of Ordination to all the Officers Presbyters and Deacons 3. We deny not Pastors and Teachers to be ruling Elders neither do we deny that a ruling Elder may speak and teach as occasion requires to the edification of the Church especially in matters that concern his Office in Publick or Private And therefore it 's one qualification requisite to all Presbyters or ruling Elders preaching or not that they be apt to teach 1 Tim. 3.2 and 2 Tim. 2.24 The Elder must be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for a Bishop i. e. a ruling Elder or Presbyter must be apt to teach i. e. so far at least as to be able to give a Word of Exhortation as he is called thereto 4. But the Apostle doth speak very clearly in distributing the Elders into them whose ordinary and chief work is to labour in the Word and Doctrine And such whose more peculiar work is to attend Government though there never wants those that will endeavour to darken and baffle the expressions of Scripture that are clearest to common sence 1 Tim. 5.17 The Presbyters that rule well for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are Presiders or Presidents in rule and Government as all the Presbyters or Bishops are in the Church shall be worthy or let them be counted worthy of double honour i. e. by virtue of their Office and well management thereof Let such have greater honour than any aged person that is but an ordinary Brother for he had spoken before of our carriage to aged Brethren and Sisters But such as these we should esteem them for their work sake but especially they that labour in the Word and Doctrine the Preaching Presbyters let them in an especial manner be honoured or esteemed Phil. How many ruling Elders ought there to be Christ Christ hath not limited Churches here but left them to walk by the rule of edification The Church may be such as that it may be fully edified by a Pastor or Teacher as the sole Presbyter And there may be little or no use of a distinct ruling Elder till the Church encrease to a greater bigness and when it is encreased the Church may choose one or more according as is judged necessary to it's edification Phil. What if the Church have not a man or men duly qualified for that Office Christ. They may pitch upon a Brother not in Office of
Wine poured out signifie the Body and Soul sufferings of the Lord Christ they are exhibited in this Ordinance in a lively manner to our thankful remembrance of Gods and Christs love to us therefore by the ancients called the Eucharist 2. Hereby our acts of Faith are renewed and our Faith greatly strengthned in the love of God to us in the Redemption wrought by Jesus Christ for us in his Death and Suffering for our present Justification and Sanctification and Future Glory 3. It is a sign and Seal of our Union to and Communion with the Lord Jesus Christ and to one another our Communion together by a common participation of Christ our Head in his personal Excellencies and mystical Communications as also our Communion in him one with another as a mystical and visible Politick Body 4. It is a visible Testimony and Profession of our mutual love and Obligations therein as members one of another 5. There is a sweet Communion in each others Gifts and Graces in order to edification and growth in Grace Phil. To what Church Officer doth the administration of this Ordinance appertain Christ It appertains to the Pastoral teaching Office for the Seals are teaching Ceremonies by way of Instruction unto us for increase in Faith and Love and by way of Consolation and Confirmation in our right to Covenant Benefits and Priviledges And hence it belongs primarily to the Pastor that is principally called to the whole Office of feeding the flock for Christ the great Pastor first administred it And secondarily to the Teacher who is called to bear a share with him in his Teaching work which is feeding the flock with wholesome Doctrine and administring such instituted signs and seals as tends to the Confirmation thereof unto their Souls and Consciences and therefore where there is actually Pastor and Teacher it may for the ease of the Pastor that part of this Labour may be born by the Teacher as well as that of teaching And in case of the Death of the Pastor the whole pastoral charge as to Teaching and Administring falls upon the Teacher unless the Church think meet to choose another Pastor Phil. But I pray what do you think of the practice of our Minister and if I mistake not some Non-conformists use it still viz. for the Administrator or Administrators for I have known several at the same time in one Congregation to go about from Person to Person and deliver the Bread and Wine into the hand of each repeating as oft the Words of institution Take eat c. Take drink c. Christ I take it to be an unscriptural usage for Luke 22.17 Christ said Take this and divide it among your selves And if it be said that is spoken of the Passover Cup it makes not against us for in the same manner as that Cup went about did also the Bread and Wine that followed And we have no ground to suppose that he delivered the Bread with the Words This is my Body take eat nor the Wine c. any more than once Again it 's plain that this practice came from Rome from that blasphemous Heresie of theirs that the Bread is the very Body of Christ after Consecration of the Priest and therefore not to be touched by the Communicant but put into his Mouth by the supposed sacred Hands of the Priest Therefore it hath the same Idolatrous Original as Kneeling in receiving hath nourisheth much vain Superstition in the people makes the Ordinance most tedious and troublesome if not too Comical Phil. You mention Kneeling methinks that seems to be a comely gesture enough in so solemn and sacred an Ordinance though I confess I am not for imposing of it Christ I need not tell you the reason and ground of that Innovation viz. From the Idolatrous worshiping the Bread And I need not tell you that the posture in receiving was not so from the beginning but after the eastern manner of sitting at a Feast It is not proper or comely to kneel at a Feast which is for a sociable rejoycing Kneeling is a posture of prostration in Prayer but this is a distinct Ordinance from Prayer though it be blessed by Prayer The Prayer is over when the Element is distributed and then our business is not to pray but to feed in a Feasting Sacramental and Spiritual manner Neither is the practice of some Communicants to be commended who after the Element is blessed by the Prayers of the Congregation betake themselves to their particular private prayers before they eat or drink it 's a new Consecration as if the Element were not sufficiently consecrated Or as if they were to receive in an act of Prayer Whereas now they are to receive their spiritual food to the satisfaction of their hungring and thirsting Souls with rejoycing and gladness of Heart making it the Bread of Consolation and cup of Salvation praising the Name of the Lord. The Nature of receiving clearly appears from this that it is a Feast of Remembrance and therein for spiritual Repast Nourishment and Consolation and it appears in that the distribution of the last Element ends with a Psalm or Hymn of praise before we arise from the Table and therefore to be performed in the same posture we were in when we received the Cup and we use not a kneeling posture in singing Phil. I have read many considerable Arguments indeed against this posture in receiving which gives ground to suspect there is too much of Superstition in it and that it was derived from Rome but I have not before considered what you say of its great disagreement to the very Nature of the Ordinance the Act of receiving being a distinct duty from praying and therefore I believe many that profess to more Knowledge in these things than I do do they know not what in betaking themselves to private Prayers when they should be exercised after another manner and so do unduly mix one Ordinance with another or thrust out one spiritual duty by another I am glad you mention it to me I hope it will be matter of good instruction to me in my practice for the future Christ I am glad to find your Heart so moulded by the Grace of God that you are ready to receive the impression of Truth It was otherwise not long ago Phil. I think the next Head of Church Ordinances which you mentioned were the Keys I pray speak to them Christ. By Keys I mean Church power of opening and shutting It is a Scripture Word but Metaphorical A Key is used in respect of spiritual Knowledge or in respect of Power In respect of Knowledge Luke 11.52 In this respect Peter had the Key of the Kingdom of Heaven committed to him as an Apostle as is spoken by our Saviour Mat. 16.19 Being the first Apostle instructed by God to open the door for preaching the Gospel unto the Gentiles Act. 10. But this Key tho' first turned in exercise by Peter was given to the rest of the
Apostles at the same time and with them to all faithful Ministers There is another Key of the Kingdom of Heaven which is in the Church of the Gospel viz. The Key of Power which is either of Supream Church-power and is the Power of the Lord Jesus Christ which is Soveraign Absolute Legislative and therefore called the Key of David which he alone hath Rev. 3.7 And there is the Key of subordinate Power which is delegated by Christ unto his Church and therefore given by Christ unto Peter and the rest of the Disciples as his associated Church on Earth to which he himself was Pastor and to which he administred as such the Lords Supper The twelve Apostles had this Key given them as such in that for their time they had all Church Power committed unto to them did exercise it as occasion required as to Constitution of Officers receiving dismissing or excommunicating members But there being none in Succession unto them this Key of Power can be found no where lodged but in a particular Congregation built on the Faith which Peter in the Name of the rest professed Mat. 16.19 Phil. But the great Question is where the Power of the Keys lyes in a particular Congregation whether in the Fraternity or in the Eldership Christ I call the decisive Church Power the Key and say it lyes in the Majority as in all Societies that arise by mutual Consent or Agreement But I distinguish between the Keys and the management of them for a Key is dead and opens no door if there be not a hand to make use of it So that in an Organized Church the orderly managing and making use of the Churches Power lyeth in the Elders But if the Church be not Organized they are guided by a common rule of self-preservation and using all means to procure their well being they act by common consent as they came together in the Name of Christ till they be duely Organized with Officers And therefore they admit members or excommunicate if necessity require as they may before they have Officers But having chosen Officers the orderly way of proceeding is by the authoritative Power of the Officers in management of this Key which is the decisive Power Hence I distinguish between a Churches acting pro necessitate and pro regula ordinis Phil. What part have the ruling Elders viz. the Pastor if there be no more or if there be the ruling Presbyters that take part with him as assistants in admitting of a Member Christ The Elder or Elders work is 1. To speak with the party that desires admission propound him to the Church and upon mature deliberation cause the decisive Vote of the Church to pass upon him Whereby he is received or rejected If received the Elder declares the sence of the Church and doth solemnly in the Name of the Lord Jesus Christ and the Church enter into a mutual obligation with the said Member saying You are here now to give up your self and Children if he hath any to the Lord and this Congregation promising as Christ shall help you to walk and abide in and with this Church in all Gospel Conversation according to the rules of Faith and order of the Gospel submitting your self to the watch of the same and promise to bring your Children to the Ordinances of the Church educating them in the nurture and admonition of the Lord. Likewise adds I do in the Name of Christ and this Congregation give you the right hand of fellowship and receive you in the Lord promising to perform all the duties toward you that are required of us in order to your Edification as Christ shall enable us Phil. Hath an Elder no more part in the decisive Power by Vote than an ordinary Brother Christ Though the Elders Judgment is usually hearkened to and sways many times much with the Congregation giving light unto them from the Word yet when a matter comes by Vote to be determined his Vote is but single as another Brothers and therefore we say this Key of decisive power is in the Fraternity though the orderly management thereof and authoritative declaration thereof in the Name of Christ belongeth to the Elder Phil. In what other Cases is this Key made use of Christ In letting shutting out and turning out of Members 1. In Letting out or translating Members from one Church to another when upon good reasons a Church Member desires to change his or her Communion and asketh a Dismission it is granted by the suffrage of the Church approving his reasons for it Phil. Is there any Scripture ground for a Dismission may not a Church Member not chargeable with any scandalous Sin go away to another Church without a Dismission Christ No! For it will cause Confusion in the Churches and God is the God of Order and not Confusion as in all the Churches of the Saints Besides it 's contrary to the Nature of such Societies and the obligation by which the Members stand mutually bound together in one Body And Christ hath provided as well the orderly departure as stay of Church Members The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 used Rom. 16.1 should be rendred statuo constituo in coetu vobiscum I dismiss to you for tho' our translators render it I recommend yet it should more rightly be rendred I dismiss or place in Church fellowship with you and so all the Apostle speaks afterward are terms of a dismission These Paul needs not he being an Apostle and having had a Seal of his Apostleship among them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are commendatory Letters with Dismission 2 Cor. 3.2 Phil. What then are your Letters of Recommendation Christ A Letter of Recommendation is but a Certificate under the hand of an Officer that this or that Brother or Sister is a Member of such a Congregation walking blamelesly and as becomes the Gospel that when any Brother or Sister comes to other Churches in their travels they may make no scruple to receive them to occasional or transient Communion but transfers not any as Members to another Congregation Phil. How is the Key used for Exclusion of a Member Christ A Church Member is excluded or put out of Communion by Himself or by the Church and either amounts to Excommunication for Excommunication is the putting one out of the Communion of a particular Congregation which is done when a Member doth disorderly withdraw and divide himself from the Church Communion obstinately refusing to be reduced to his place and duty in the said Church This is an usurpation of the Key of Power and separating of himself and I call it Indirect Excommunication because he divides himself violently and schismatically upon which the Church is to reassume the Key and shut the door of Communion upon him either by a direct Excommunication which is the regular way and may be justified from express places of Scripture such as Rom. 16.17 18. Or else if this way of Discipline will not be born Judicially to