constituted these extraordinary calls are no warrant for men in our dayes to assume that office for Christ now and afterwards more plainly appoints them to give power to others for the execution of those things having made it an Ordinance and from them and by them to continue to the end of the world And now as these people have constituted themselves a Church and have in that notion by man or woman received the Ordinances of the Church cast out and took in in the times of a Church long agoe constituted we pronounce them to be no Churches but nurseryes of Faction and prusumptuous Boasters That they are no Churches we shall endeavour to prove so clearly as we hope any indifferent or unprejudiced reader will not long halt between two opinions They appear to be no Churches For 1. They have no Bishops Preists Ministers or Teachers call them what they please deriving their authority from the Apostles of Christ. The Apostles were the masters of our Israel ordained by Christ to preach the Gospel to all Nations and where they Taught they Ordained and appointed Ministers for the Ruling and Governing of that Church and gave them power also to Ordaine others For this cause saies Paul to Titus I left the in Crete the same place now called Candy that thou shouldest set in order things that art wanting and ordain Elders in every City as I had appointed Tit. 1.5 The word Elder in the original is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Presbyters or Priests he must ordain Priests he cals them Bishops v. 7. Titus was therefore left in Crete to Ordain Bishops or Priests in every City that the Gospel might be purely taught and the Sacraments administred Thus holy Polycarpus Saint Iohn's Disciple was placed by him in the Church of Smyrna Ignatius that had his name given ab igne charitatis he was also called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as being born of God was the second Bishop of Antioch next Peter For Peter ruled that Church 7. years and afterwards came to Rome An. Christ. 71. The succession of Bishops I would have none offended at the word suppose what other name they will only this is the antient Word from Peter or any other Apostle was a certain sign of a true call into Holy Orders among the Antients Let us suppose a man Ordained by the present Bishop of Canterbury and let it be inquired what power he had to do it he shews it from Abbot Whitgift and so upward for a thousand Years the Records of that Sea being known until you come to Augustin the first Bishop of Canterbury Then ask who gave him power to Ordain for that Office he names you Gregory a holy Catholick Bishop Rome not yet being Antichrist servus Serverum Dei as he called himself He again was Ordained by Pelagius he by Benedictus he by Iohn he by Pelagius the First he by Vigilius he by Sylverius he by Argapetus Anno Christi 535. and so upward for 400. years or more until you come to Alexander the great An. Chr. 121. He was Ordained by Evaristus he by Anacletus he by Clemens he by Cletus he by Linus and he by Saint Peter the Apostle of our Lord the First Bishop of Rome who after he hâ—d ruled the Church of Antioch 7. year in which City the Apostles and Disciples were first called Christians Acts 11.26 came An. 67 in the 14. Year of Nero the Emperours Reign to Rome by whom he was crucified with his head downwards and all the Bishops after him until Elutherius were put to death by Heathen Emperours for he was the first of 13 Bishops that dyed a naturall death It is said of him Est Primus Episcopâ—rum Româ—norum qui non perjit morte violenta By this Bishop Lucius who Reigned in England Anno Christi 180. had some knowledge of the faith and Doctrine of the Gospel Bring this succession down again from Peter to Linus from him to Cletus from him to Clemens and so down for 400 years to Gregory who sending Augustin into England set up his Bishops seat first at Dover then removed it as the Gospel prospered unto London whence he was removed to Canterbury where his continued succession remains unto this day In all those places he taught the Gospel and Ordained Priests or Ministers and gave them power to Ordain others Planted Teachers in Winchester York Carlisle and from these again as from fountains came the Authority of Ordination to water other dry parts of the Nation about them and so from age to age was it delivered untill it came upon the Authours head by unquestionable Authority Now let us ask one of these Mechanicks By whom were you constituted and appointed a Church-Officer to exercise the power of the Keys if you say from Christ we deny it for he Ordained none but his Disciples if from his Disciples show or produce your Warrant for Ordination was given to them and by their hands given to others that the succession might be preserved unto the end of the World So Saint Iames the Apostle sate Bishop in the Church of Ierusalem Evodius was Bishop of Antioch next Peter next to him Ignatius and to Theophilus and downward If we had the Register of the Church of Crete in which place Titus was set to Ordain Elders in every City and then ask one By whom were you appointed to dispence the Word and Sacrament and exercise the power of the Keys by such a one he by him and he by him and so you should fal on Titus himself And Timothy who was Ordained by the same Apostle the First Bishop of the Church of Ephesus had a charge in the Epistle sent unto him to commit the Doctrine to faithful men that they might be able to teach others 2. Tim. 2.2 Which Commitment is by laying on of hands that being the Ceremony for translating the power viz. the Authoritative of Teaching from one person to another as afterwards shall be discovered which Commitment Timothy must not be too rash in but weigh and examine what manner of man he is 1 Tim. 5.22 For a Bishop must be blamelesse sober apt to teach 1 Tim. 3.2 Or if it be a Deacon that Tim. so Ordain the lowest authoritative Office in the Church he must be grave 1 Tim. 3.8 Which Office of Deacon-ship if they use well they may be through their faith in God receive a higher Office called a purchasing to themselves a good degree 1 Tim 3.13 Which may truly bear this construction that good degree though a low one shall make them esteemed of God and esteemed so wel of his Church as to make him a Presbyter or a Bishop for that that Office was made a step to that of the Priest-hood is clear both in gospell and Church-History A Deaconship being only a Probationers place for it and according as the Church gave them a Benegessit for the one they received the degree of the other But what authority had Timothy to
do all this viz. to ordain Bishops and Elders because he himself had the power given unto him by the laying on of the hands of the Presbytery 1 Tim. 4 14. at which Ordination or laying on of hands Paul had his hand upon Timothy's head with the Priests or Presbyters 2 Tim. 4.6 suitable to the practice of the Church of God unto this day where there are Clergy-men or Presbyters and these with the Bishop or Superintendent ordain Ministers by Prayer and using the Ceremony of laying on of hands in that time the Bishop laying on first as chief and by that Ordination they have power to ordain others and they others to keep up the Apostolical Succession in the authoritative way of teaching Now let us go to the Church of Ephesus and ask those Elders or Presbyters that were in every City what power and Authority they have to dispense the Word and Sacraments c Since there is a Church constituted by what Authority therefore do you you you The Answer will be I had it from such a one he from him and he from him and he from him and he from such a one and he from Timothy and he from the Presbytery where Paul was present But now we call to mind What Authority had Paul to ordain for Christ ordained none but his Disciples could Paul therefore give that Power to another which he never had himself Is not Paul in this irregular presuming to ordain Timothy a Church-officer he having no such power given unto him by Christ For the understanding of this cast your eye upon Acts 13.1 2. in which place we finde that after Saul or Paul hath given good experience of the truth of his conversion for the Church was at first afraid of him Acts 9.26 we finde a meeting of the Church of Antioch and as they were ministring to the Lord or exercising their Ministry let it be in preaching and praying for the Text will hold it out the holy Ghost calls saying Separate me Barnabas and Saul for the work whereunto I have called them And when they had fasted and prayed and laid their hands on them they sent them away c. These two were called before by God for the Work of the Ministry that the holy Ghost witnesseth in these words for the work whereunto I have called them In a word qualified they were for that work and of their Abilities the Church had sufficient experience but now that that order might not be subverted which in the Church by Christ and his Apostles had been constituted Separation that is a solemn setting of them apart from all other Members by constituting them Church-officers is required by the holy Ghost that in their going thorow the World they might have power to constitute others and also be looked upon by the Church as men sent of God in an authoritative way for preaching of the Word delivering the Sacraments and exercising the power of the Keys not onely by their inward Qualification but by external Ordination that Law being established When a gifted-Brother who boasts of an inward Call can give as good testimony to the Church as Paul is able to do touching his power none but beasts will move their tongues against them and when they can shew their Abilities to the Church to be deserving I dare promise to any that they may have Ordination which Paul though I suppose as well qualified as they after trial received and had and that by especial order the Church it seems being backward by reason of his former being a persecutor and desirous of further trial from God to prevent irregularity or any breach though in so eminently a gifted person of that Law which Christ had appointed in his Church Thus Timothy can make good his Ordination to be Apostolical in each part Bring this line down again By the Ministers and Prophets of Antioch was Paul ordained he ordains Timothy and Timothy again gave this power to other faithfull men sometimes ordaining them Deacons and sometimes Priests and so throughout the famous Church of Ephesus though afterward it languished Rev. 2.9 and whether Timothy be the Angel that that Epistle is sent unto is uncertain but certain that all the Presbyters and Deacons in the Church of Ephesus are able to produce their power as Church-officers from the Apostles who were as before was said the Masters of our Israel and he that would be owned a Church-officer shall be owned by me producing his power from them or deducing that power from them to himself according to that Apostolical way constituted in the Church of Christ and in all the Churches of the Saints But of Ordination by Gods help we shall speak more at large when we come to that Ordinance in particular For the present know that by this succession of Ministers Priests or Bishops were the Hereticks known from Catholicks the antients knew no other division in the Church and whence they derived their power to administer the seales by putting them to show their succession from the Apostles who instituted the way of Ordination to be a standing Ordinance for ever in the Church Thus Ireneus confuted Valentinus Cerdon and Marcion we are able saith he to reckon up those that were appointed Bishops by the Apostles in their severall Churches unto our time he then reckons up such as succeeded Peter and Paul in the Church of Rome to them succeeded Linus who sat eleven years in that Chair to him succeeded Cletus who sat twelve years to him Clemens who sat nine years c. By this Ordination which from the Apostles is received in the Church the publishing of the faith hath come even to us which being able to show consundimus omnes cos qui quâ—quo modo vel per suam placentiam c. we put to silence all that through vaine glory or ignorance broach new Doctrin in the Church for none of the Hereticks can derive their succession from the Apostles nor show how their doctrines were received by tradition from them And indeed the rise both Old and New Hereticks and the time that they were first received and oftentimes the first broacher or Authour of them is known The Doctrine of the Nicholaitans was not for 50. Years after Christ. The Menandrians for 68. The Ebionites in the year 71. were first heard to preach their Doctrine the Millenaries or Fifth Monarchy men did frame theirs An. 108. The Valentinians theirs An. 130. the Manicheans theirs An. 275. the Arrians theirs An. 310. this did almost drown the World The Donatists theirs An. 315. the Photinians theirs An. 350. the Macedenians theirs An. 360. the Pelagians theirs An. 415. the Eutycheans their An. 447 with an infinite number more The Ananabaptists first broke out An. 1520. the wildest Hereticks of all that had gone before them The Ubiquitaries An. 1580. the Arminians An. 1612. All these having their Rise in the Church from their several Patriots after the Apostles had confirmed and declaâ—ed
between the Summers heat and the Winters Frost All the Christian Churches in the World have been or are Synagogues of Sathan if these segregated Congregations be the Churches of Christ the Church of Ierusalem was no Church the Church of Antioch was no Church the Church of Crete was no Church the Churches of Corinth of Galatia of Philippi of Ephesus of Smyrna of Philadelphia of Sardis were no Churches if these be See the Confession of Faith of all Reformed Churches now in Christendom of Helvetiae Bohemia of France of Basil of Belgiae of Auspurge of Saxony of Wirtemberge of Swedeland of Scotland of England all of them do with one joint consent teach the contrary Doctrine of Separation of Ordination of Sacraments of the Keys unto those Congregations Cast your eye upward to the Writings Sermons Expositions Epistles Disputes of the most Ancient Worthy Learned Godly Patriarchs Martyrs Fathers that lived in any age of the Church or in all the Centuries of the purer times that immediately followed the Apostles and you shall by the whole Body of the Church see these mens practises and Doctrine as they have constituted themselves to be doomed judged sentenced as schismatical or heretical there being no such Doctrine touching those points they maintain in reference to the Ordinances above named taught by the Apostles or their immediate Successors Saint Iohn the Apostle taught no such Doctrine to Polycarpus whom he ordained Bishop of Smyrna Anno Christâ— 71. about forty years after Christs death nor Peter to Linus whom he made Bishop of Rome Anno 70. Neither did he teach any such Doctrine to Evodius the Second nor to Ignatius the Third nor to Theophilus the sixth Bishop of Antioch after himself who lived Anno 170. These would have been faithfull in delivering that Doctrine if they had received any such command frâ—m the Apostles But they teach the contrary and to Posterity deliver the contrary and from Generation to Generation it hath been taught until it came to the very Age wherein we live Cyprian Bishop of Carthage who lived anno 240. Athanasius Bishop of Alexandria anno 376. Hilarius Bishop of Poicttiers in France anno 355. Optatus Bishop of Millaine anno 365. Basilius the great Bishop of Caesarea anno 370. Gregory Bishop of Nazianzum anno 370. Epiphanius Bishop of Salamine in Cyprus anno 370. Ambrose Bishop of Millain anno 374. Gregory Bishop of Nâ—ssa anno 380. What shall I do I might weary myself in copying out the worthy Champions of the Church that lived in other times as Hierom the best of Presbyters Chrysostome Augustine Cyrill who all before a Papist was heard of taught the very self-same thing that we are now proving viz. That such as separate themselves from the Catholick Church upon the account of mixture and assume to themselves the power of executing in an authoritative way the Ordinances Seals Censures of the Church upon what account soever be irregular persons unlawfull Assemblies and ought to be curbed suppressed and punished by all in authority unto which consent the Reformed Churches To Church these men and to sentence their Doctrine for truth at the same breath we must unchurch all Churches that are that have been in the Christian World and before we condemn them let us sentence these And we do by these Presents censure them as proud boasters blasphemers disobedient to Parents the Church is their Mother whom they ought not to forsake because she is old unthankfull unholy to be without natural affection to be truce-breakers false accusers incontinent fierce despisers of those that are good all the Army of the noble Worthies that have gone before us traytors heady high-minded lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God having a form of godliness but denying the power thereof 2 Tim. 3.2 3 4. And Lord have mercy upon their souls This may be thought a harsh censure yet it is no other than upon my own knowledge I am able to justifie having an unhappy curiosity a long season to be frequently at the meetings of several sorts of Hereticks where I saw more and heard more than ever I should have believed from any other 4. Should we hold them to be rightly constituted Churches we should never be sure of a right Church in the World which is expresly contrary to the ninth Article of our Creed for there we believe the holy Catholick Church that is that there is was and shall be a Châ—rch whereof we believe our selves to be Members For that with us may be accounted as the true and onely Church this day and wherein we intend to live and die and by prayers and tears seek its preservation The next offence we take at some party or other of that Church or next turn or new Religion that is turned up we are of another mind and we conclude that the Church of Christ is onely those that hold that opinion which for the time past we have spoken against and if we would walk in the mind and agreeable to the will of God we mâ—st be of that society that holds such an opinion and so from one Congregation to another still keeping from the Doctrine of the Catholick â—od in justice suffering few of them to come back until through pride we be puffed up That we hold it needless to be of any Congregation or create our selves one which the better to procure some new opinion is broached the novelty whereof the giddy heads of men being taken withal brings disciples in a short time to that teacher which is the very cause that scarce shall we finde one Heretick maintaining one heresie but hath with that some other mingled There being therefore such a mixture of Religions in every one that its hard from which to give him his name yet for a mark of distinction he gets a denomination from some opinion that he principally holds hence one is called a Quaker though in many points he agree with the Anabaptist and the Anabaptist with him and the Millenaries or Fifth Monarcy men with them both and each Heresie maintaining stifly that that is the Church makes him that goes from the Catholick to doubt of the very being of a Church which doubt is the immediate parent of those turnings and windings in points of Religion and opinion as the looseness and iniquity of late years hath cleâ—rly discovered to any understanding Christian. Of all those Congregations or Opinionists that have revolted from the Apostolick Catholick Church I should chuse to be of that society known by the name of Seekers they know that there is no Church visible in the World no Ordinance at all and therefore they spend their days in seeking one out and enquiring after one which makes them of all Opinions the most uncertain and yet there is great hopes that for the future they may be of some certainty Some of them affirm the Church to be in the Wildernesse others are seeking her in the smoak of the Temple where lest I lose my self
carriage without and some their deportment within the Pulpit we shall see only the chief of them In a Minister there is required 1. Courage Tit. 2.15 2. Sobriety 1 Tim. 3.2 3. Liberality 4. Docibility or aptness to teach 5. Temperance 6. Patience 1 Tim. 3.2 7. A Lover of good things and of good men 8. Holiness 9. Justice 1 Tit. 7.8 We must note that some of these cannot be known by the quickest eye No Bishop is omniscient to know the heart and therefore may ordain a man that wants many of these and also we must observe that a person may come for ordination with many or all of these and yet may backslide which takes not away the force of ordination The Angel of the Church of Ephesus fell from his first purity and love yet was an Angel still Rev. 2.4 5. he may loose his patience his temperance his holiness yet a Minister still and the power of preaching and administring the Sacraments and exercising the keys abide with him these ordinances not depending upon the quality of him that doth administer them more then the force of the Broad Seal of England depends upon the merits of my Lord Chancellour as shall God willing be proved in its own place To all these qualifications above named must be joyned competency of knowledge It is not every man that is just holy or patient must be ordained he must be of understanding competent for the work which competency appears in these particulars from Tit. 1.9 viz. 1. His adhering to the truth known not opinionated 2. In his ability to teach and that soundly for the edification of the Church according to that truth 3. In his dexterity in maintaining of that truth stopping the mouth of Gainsayers he that is so qualified cannot be refused ordination We say competently qualified ' For who is sufficient for these things SECT III. Let us see who they are that must thus ordain whose hands they be that by their laying on the person is qualified in an external way for the publick preaching of the word 1. Not their own Heb. 5.4 It is against the practise of the whole Church of God in all ages for any man though never so well gifted to separate himself or ordain himself as is clear in the examples of Stephen Nicanor c. Nay if it were in a mans own power to separate himself for the work of the Gospel Paul needed not to have left Titus in Creet to ordain Elders in every City Tit. 1.5 It is a practice beyond a president in the Church of Christ for one to ordain himself We read indeed how Frederick the second upon Easter day through necessity crowned himself with his own hands King of Ierusalem in Ierusalem but that ever man made himself a Priest in Ierusalem save Saul Ieroboam and such prophane Wretches whom God did curse even for so doing we read not Neither in old or new Testament is there any instance of one who set himself apart for holy functions or that thought himself qualified in an authoritative way to reach the Gospel upon the sufficiency of gifts as Courage Holiness Knowledge and the like if so Stephen Philip Prochorus c. needed never have been ordained Deacons Acts 6.3 4 5. Nor Paul nor Barnabas Apostle or Evangelist Acts 13.2 nor Timothy a Bishop or E'der 1 Tim. 4.14 2. Not the multitude Never did God give the power of ordination to the people in general before nor after Christ if so where two or three would please to meet they might ordain which in few dayes would make the Church of Christ conâ—ist of Shepherds rather then of sheep yea would make all Apostles all Teachers c. We find the contrary practised For when the multitude had chosen and nominated persons of honest report full of the holy Ghost and Wisdom thâ—y set them before the Apostles who prayed and lâ—id their hands on them Acts 6.3 6. yea as was said before the inhabitants of the Cities of Creet might have ordained Elders Titus might have gone forward with Paul In summe God never giving the people the power of ordination since the creation they can never deliver that power to any untill the dissolution of the world Presumptuous are they therefore that will take ordination from them impudent before the Lord therefore they that will presume to give that authority in matters of so great concernment as the word and Sacraments to any of their own body 3. Only Church officers or the Apostles successors they are only to teach and to baptize unto the end of the world Paul and the Presbytery ordains Timothy he ordains others and they others and so by a moral succession from the Apostles is the Ministerial office upheld but of this we have spoken It were too great a task for me to offer to wade into that troublesome discourse touching Episcopal or Presbyterial ordination least I should drown my self being but of small standing in the Church of Christ yet by vertue of that Proverb It is good to be sure Episcopacy is much to be preferred that being the most ancient way since if not before the Apostles departure from the world and albeit it hath some ruptures or breaches in some of the reformed Churches yet the Acts and Lawes of England make no ordination valid but what originally is Episcopal SECT IV. We are to behold the man thus separated for the Lords use For the perfecting of the Saints for the work of the Ministry for the edifying of the body of Christ Ephes. 4.12 We say we are to see what his duty is and what he is to perform amongst men The very naming of his ordination shewes you what he is to do and the distinction above named discovers his duty but to be more particular yet not large 1. He is to take all advantages and opportunities of preaching that word the preaching of which he is separâ—ted for 2 Tim. 4.1 2. The more wicked the times be he lives in the more bold and confident he ought to be 2 Tim. 4.3 yet this excludes not but that he may flee persecution Acts 9.25 3. In preaching of the Word he is to observe the proportion of faith Rom. 1â—2 6 4. He is to teach the word according to the capacity of his people 1 Cor. 14.9 the other parts of his duty are clear and obvious SECT V. Questions resolvedâ— Quest. 1. Whether ordination may better a Ministers gifts Quest. 2. Whether a Minister may renounce his ordination Quest. 3. Whether the Ministerial office be to continue alway in the world Quest. 4. Whether it be lawfull to hear an unordained man preach Quest. 5. Whether an ordained person may bear an office in the Common-wealth Quest 1. Whether Ordination may better a Ministers gifts Though this sacred ordinance be of no account with some yet to the conscionable Receiver it may be very advantageous For 1. It is an odinance of God alwayes practised in his Church it may appear at
the name of a Catholick no more then a theife when he gets into a House deserves the name of a true Heire for by their new fangled toys brought in by the keys of the Pope a new word also the true antient and Catholick faith is robbed of her gracefull purity yea the antient Church of Rome is divested of her glorious Apparel by which those Popish impostors passe the better undiscovered and Romish Polititians make the better show but set them passe Are all the members of the Catholick Church holy No All are not Israelties that are of Israel Rom. 9.6 Would all the Lords people were Prophets Christ hath some Branches in his Body that bring not forth fruite and therefore shall bee taken away Iohn 15.2 There are some that by profession are members of his visible Church yet are dead Branches not having in them the sap of the Spirit to bring forth the fruits of Holinesse and good Works which alone makes them members of his invisible There are Prophane and Hypocritical sinners which are part of Christ but so as Mos or dead Branches are of the Tree accounted so of God and by Christ esteemed so to be Yet they professing the Doctrine of the Gospel owning the Sacraments of our Lords institution must be looked upon as members of the holy People There were prophane men no doubt in Israel yet by outward profession they were all the Lords people there were in our Saviours time those whom he threatnâ—d should be cast out and with the same breath acknowledges them Children of the Kingdom Mat. 8.12 It could not be that a Prophet should perish out of Jerusalem and the whole multitude with the high Priests and Elders of that City having seen the man that was Gods Fellow cryed out away with him away with him Crucify him Crucify him in her God found as in a common slaughter house the blood of all the Prophets and the Blood of the Son of God was charged upon her yet at the seâ—f same time the holy Ghost acknowledges Jerusalem to be a holy City Matthew 27.53 For there the law of God was read the worship of God performed and outwardly the people of God dwelt and the house of God was frequented There were divisions among the Corinthians contentions Law suits Fornication great haughtinesse of mind great prophanenesse and loosenesse in the administration of the Lords-Supper yea some receive it drunk and for all this the Apostle call them Saints prefacing the Epistle he sends to them for the redressing of those disorders thus viz. unto the Church of God which is at Corinth 1. Corinthians 1.2 Their profession made them outwardly holy and by their owning the Gospel ordinances it is manifest that they were outwardly called though their sins did demonstrate that they even those whom he had called before Saints were carnal 1 Cor. 3.3 If we in this age could but learn or see that the gate of the Church is wider then the gate of Heaven we should have less noise amongst us and more charity for each other Laodicea had lost her first love and was wretched miserable blind and naked nigh to be spued out yet the true and faithfull witnesse beares this record of her that she is a Church and her Pastor or Bishop is an Angel Revelations 3.14 In a word profession of the most holy faith and beleiving of fundamental Doctrine is sufficient among men to own any man as a member of the visible Church and to denominate him there from but not to give them interest or Title to the invisible or to make them fellow Citizens with the Saints in the new Jerusalem for without holinesse no man can see the Lord Hebrews 12.14 And therefore the Church is compared to a draw-net which draweth up Fishes of all sorts both good and bad Matthew 13.47 And to a field wherein is found both darnell and good corn both tares and wheat and they must not be plucked up before the time If Saul had been plucked up as a tare we should never have had such a pretious Paul To this Doctrine consent the reformed Churches Art 17. of the Church of Helvetia Art 8. of the Church of Bohemia Art 26. of the Church of France Art 27. of the church of Bel. Art 7. of the Church of Auspurge c. It is now time to come 2. To resolve some Questions concerning the Church Question 1. WHether the single Testimony of the Church be to be received in matters of Faith Quest. 2. Whether the Church hath pâ—wer to Ordain Ceremonies that are not Ordained â—f God Quest. 3. Whether the Church hath Power to compell any irregular person to her Ordinances Quest. 4. Whether the civill Magistrate hath power in or over the Church Quest. 5. Whether the segregated congregations now in England be Churches Quest. 6. What may justifie a Separation from a Church Quest. 7. Are there more Religions then one to be celebrated where the true Church is established Quest. 8. Wherein consists that individuality singlenesse unity or Oxenesse of the true Church Quest. 9. Why the true Church is called holy Quest. 10. Why is the true and only Church called catholick Quest. 11. Whether the Elect be onely Members of the true Church Quest. 12. What are the Marks of a true Church Quest. 1. Whether the bare and single Testimony of the Church to be received in matters of Faith or Salvation The Church of Rome defends the necessity of her Members yielding to the simple Testimony of the Church in matters of faith but very unsoundly for 1. Every particular Member of the Church hath erred and therefore the whole Church may for what ever be the quality of the parts the whole must be of the same as the simples are so is the Electuary that is made of them hot ingredients can never make a cooling plaister It is dangerous to make it the ground of my faith of which I have no surer testimony then he or they sayes so The Popes we know have sinfully erred whom they would make the Church virtual Councels have erred whom they would make the Church representative the Councels of Basil and Constance cannot both be true Peter erred Demas may fall back Laodicea may lose her first love It s hard to make a sound Christian believe he shall be damned for not doing that or not believing that which God hath nowhere commanded or spoken of Certainly to make the precepts of men equally binding to Scripture is against that text Deut 12.33 What thing soever I command you observe and doe it thou shalt not and the reto nor diminish therefrom why then should I believe that there are pains in purgatory which I must undergo with as strong a faith as to believe there are joyes in Heaven And why must I be damned if I believe not that the Pope is as really head of the whole Univarsal Church as to believe that Christ is risen from the dead The reason is the Church it
the practise of the Church was warrant enough for him to follow and obey that custome whatsoever it were and to think it good and that he would believe that the Apostles Creed was made by them such reverence I bear to the Churche tradition they are his Majesties own words untill other Authors should be certainly found out and 2. it is of all humane testimonies the greatest in respect of the Wisdome Gravity Learning Prudence Godliness of those men that lived about the first centuries and were Governours in the Church of Christ but no waies is their authority to be taken or ought to be taken as the ground of a mansfaith and assurance since it is but the testimony of men Quest. 2. Whether the Church hath power to ordain ceremonies upon her members that are not ordained by God For the cleering up of this Question wee shall premise 1. That the Church hath no power to impose any ceremonies that are in their nature impious Exe. 20.18 nor 2ly such as may cumber men and hinder them in the cheerefull execution of the essentiall parts of worship like the Jewish constitutions there is a rule against that Luke 11.46 But if the rulers of a Church impose Ceremonies which are not contradictory to the Canon of faith or rule of the Word they have a power that will defend them in their so doing and no private person in the least ought to speak against the execution of that power In generall what ever may tend or what ever in their judgements will tend 1. To the edification of the Church 1 Cor. 14.26 there is a power given to put that in Execution Let all things be done to edifying Or 2. whatever in their judgements may be comely in the Church they have a Power to put that in execution 1 Cor. 11.13 Iudge in your selves Is it comely that a Woman pray unto God uncovered By this Text whatever is by the Officers judged to be uncomely may be removed and whatever is comely in their judgements by this power may be enjoyned in to the Church Or 3. What may in their judgements be orderly or make for an uniformity they have a power to put that in execution 1 Cor. 14.40 Let all things be done decently and in order Now that ceremonies of this nature may be imposed by Church officers upon her members and that lawfully and religiously may be proved in particular by these following Arguments 1. From the Apostles practice in the Church who besides other things as the changing of times and places for their assembling together and touching the administration of the Lords Supper sometimes at midnight and then at daytime we find in particular that Paul injoyned that in the Church women should be covered 1 Cor. 11.6 Which one might think a ceremony that might have been forborn And indeed in imposing of it the Apostle is not authoritative but persuaâ—ive He leaves it to the Officers themselves and to their own judgements A ceremony possibly that gave as great offence to some coy and fine Dames as c. And so be appointed a known Tongue in the Congregation if he had been in England he would have found some to have told him that he took away their Gospell liberty in the time when strange tongues were not an unusuall gift Now from this very action we may conclude the truth of that position now under defence for by the prohibition of the one it should seem to be practised and by enjoyning the other it should seem to be neglected The former might seem a needlesse ceremony what matter were it whether women are covered or no the other might be thought in some sence hurtfull that they might not speak with those tongues which God by his Spirit that bloweth where and when it listeth did furnish them withall in the Church but the Apostles had power and they give the Officers of the Church power to rectifie that errour or in any other that in their judgments should have a tendency to the robbing of the Church of that order that ought to be in it But further 2. From the Apostles Counsells and warnings to the Officers of the Church There are generall precepts given to the Officers of the Churches which are gravidated with this power and demonstrates that they have a commission to impose such ceremonies as they shall think fit for the good of that Church whereof they are Governours Saint Paul not knowing what should befall him at Ierusalem whether he was going from Miletus sent for the Elders of the Church of Ephesus and charges them when he was gone to take heed to the Flock over which the Holy Ghost had made them Overseers soreseeing that grievous Wolves should enter the flock Act. 20.28 From which precept or caution given by this holy Apostle I may truly argue without offence to any that whatever these Elders thought or in their judgments supposed might tend to the good of their Churches though not particularly commanded in the Word might be injoyned by them and the church of Ephesus was bound to obey them in that particular And a sin that was or would have been in any private person to have murmured grumbled against much lesse oppose the practice of and usage of them So from that precept to the Corinthians 1 Cor. 14.40 Let all things bâ— done in decency and in order we may truly draw the same argument that what time was thought fittest what gesture was thought fittest by them to preach in to pray in to receive Sacraments in or to administer Sacraments in what garments what gestures to give or to receive them in might be imposed on the people of that place by the Church governours through vertue of this generall precept Moreover Paul writing to the church of Philippi with it's Bishops and Deacons Phil. 1.1 Among other directions as Bewarâ— of dogs beware of evill-workers chap. 3.2 comes and desires them chap. 4.8 that whatsoever things are true whatsoever things are just whatsoever things are pure whatsoever things are lovely whatsoever things are of good report Think on these things Now here is such an Epitomy of all good works as none are comparable to it It may be called an abstract of the whole Bible and this written to the Bishops and Deacons let none be offended at the name Bishop I mean no body hurt Shall it be understood that this full pithy Exhortation reached only to their own private capacity as Christians and not to their publick as Deacons without question what in their judgements were lovely and of good report if used in the Church might be commanded by those Deacons to the Church by vertue of this precept as Church officers In that Epistle to Titus Paul shews him the end of his leaving him at Crete chap. 1.5 That he should set in order the things that are wanting c. Concerning the Ordination of Elders the Apostle had given him in charge at the first but let Churches be
never so well planted there may be some that will be irregular especially where there are Lyars evill beasts and slow bellies of which sort Crete was full of chap. 1.12 And therefore Titus is further charged that what is wanting that may conduce to the Edification of the Church having a respect to the people they should make such as may curb the veay beastlinesse or irreverence in the House and Worship of God We might insist longer on such Texts but these are sufficient to cause the unprejudiced Christian to consent to the truth that we are now pleading for 3. From the power and practice that was in the Jewish Church touching ceremonies not commanded may we draw arguments for holding the same lawfull in the Christian. Did not David bring in Ceremonies Musicians Qâ—iresters Organists Violers Lutinists with many more into the Worship of God which he had no command nor precept of God and though God had his Prophets Priests Messengers there in and about Davids Court yet never gave he one of them Commission in the least to check David for this his chargeable presumption nor to no King nor to no age after him my Christ himself did never mention it neither do we find any of Gods people scruple at it in his time nor after possibly those sons of Belial that rebelled against his sons might for Rebellion is so â—gly-faced that it never durst appear in the World without a Mask generally it takes that of Religion but seeing God was silent what needed they care We have heard some say that Musick might bee under the Law but nor under the Gospell not that I plead for Musick in the least but using it as a sutable Medium to prove the truth it is now under demonstration ignorantly for it was not under the Law nor mentioned in the Law but a pure invention of Davids own He conjecturing that Musick might tend to the ends before specified From the liberty therefore that was given to the Jewish Tabernacle Synagogue or Temple for we may judge there were after Ceremonies brought in as there occurred necessity or conveniency we may argue the power of the Christian Church even in reference to ceremonies whose liberty is by Christs death more large then theirs in all respects and surely not diminished in this 4. From that Decorum that decent Ceremonies of which still we say the Governours are Judges makes the Ordinance of the Church appear withall Let his soul be bound up in the bundle of life and made higher then the Kings of the Earth who declares that he bears a greater reverence to the Ceremonies of the Church of England by being in those places and seeing those Congregations wherein they were not used or spoken against And indeed Reverent gestures grave Vestments decent and comely Deportments may be compared to that cloathing of Gold with which the Kings daughter is habited Psal. 45.13 making them exceeding beautifull in the eyes and ears of the Beholders and more esteemed of her members and reverenced of all that are partakers 5. It is the Doctrine of all reformed Churches Confes. of the Church of Helve Art 25. of Belg. Art 3â— Ausp Art 15. of France Art 32. of the Church of England Art 20. Church of Bohem. Art 15. with this advice that however such Ceremonies had their beginning whether from Bishops or from Councills or of any other the people were not to care for it nor be disquieted but to use them to good because they are good So the Church of Wittemburge Art 35 holds it lawful to appoint days for to hear and preach Sermons and any other Rites not contrary to Scripture So Sueve Art 14. and withall confesses that they reckon no traditions for mens traditions but such as are condemned in Scripture contrary to the Law of God but for such as agree with Scripture and were ordained for the good of men although they be not expressed in the Scripture yet in that they proceed from the commandment of love which ordereth all things to be done in decency they are worthily to be accounted rather of God then of man and closeth up their Article by showing from Scripture that the more willing a man obeys the civill Laws which are not â—repugnant to Religion the more fully he is enduced with the faiâ—h of Christ. In the mouth of these witnesses let this truth be justifyed And Quae non prosunt singula multa juvant Since my writing this going through the Harmony of confessions and other Authours we find the Church willing to show her own power limiting herself in the eyes of her own people in cases of Ceremony viz. 1. She hath no power to impose any thing contrary to the written Word of God 2. Nor none that are insignificant 3. None that are troublesome 4. Nor with any opinion or thought of necessity as to lay salvation upon them 5. Without all conceits of merit as to deserve Heaven by them 6. Not laying them down as parts of Divine worship 7. Or to conceit that the observance of them will make us the more perfect before God If the Church that imposeth those Ceremonies teach not the necessity of their observance directly or exactly by these arguments she may impose what ceremonies she wil according to the doctrine of most of the Protestant Churches in Christendome yea all of them that have declared their opinions upon that Subject Quest. 3. Whether the Church haâ—h power to compel any irregular Person to her Ordinances For the opening of this Question we must note that when the Church is said to compell it is neither to imprison nor to fine those being altogether out of their Verge and dominion excep you imply that the Church-Officer be likewise in civill authority and exercise Jurisdiction in that capacity or if you consider the civill Officer a Church member and in that sence the Church some way may be said to do it We shall consider the Church-Officer abstractly as no civill Officer but in that capacity that he bears toward the the Church and by compelling we hold out or mean no other thing then the utmost of the Churches power and largest extent and the execution of that highest Act of Justice wherein her Lord and Husband hath invested her to free both him and herself from contempt by which she hath authority to command and to punish those who wilfully absent themselves from her service without such reasons as the Church her self shall be satisfied withal for who ever went to hell without a reason And let none quarrel with the word Compel to omit the Grammer of it which holds out the sence before spoken of we finde in the great Supper Luke 14.6 the Master giving a charge to his servants to call his Guests some excused themselves yea all gave reasons for their absence to flesh and blood satisfactory Then they were to go to the Streets and Lines of the City chief places possibly affording Guests sufficient for
the doctrine of Christ and appointed a way for the publishing of that viz. by Ordination were known not to be Catholical As the Church grew by her continued succession of Teachers she found Heresies to grow by her side and by casting her eye back by succession she found them to be no Teachers and finding by Tradition no such Doctrine taught by the Apostles as those men held out still as they appeared condemned them as heretical having no Disciple for the Author of their Doctrine taught nor no Apostolick man whom they did succeed as Teachers The Church usually spoke to those upstarts in appearing in this or the like language Quando unde venistis quid in meo agitis non mei shew when and whence you came what make you here since you are none of my Sons none of my Teachers knows you no such Doctrine hath been taught them by the Apostles who put them in their places and Offices Polycarpus was placed Bishop in the Church of Smyrna by S. Iohn unto whom no such Doctrine was taught as is by you Valentinians and Anabaptists Linus was made Bishop by Peter of the City of Rome who was taught no such Doctrine as you Novatians Arrians and Quakers do teach and from them downward in a right moral succession they were found but starcups by the way side God suffering in every Age some Heresie to grow whereby the faith and stedfastness of the Saints might be known and tried This Succession was one thing amongst many that kept S. Augustine in the bosome of the Catholick Church Multa saith he in Ecclesiae gremio me justissime tenent The succession of Priests from S. Peter's Chair keeps me of right in the Church Tenet Catholic ae nomen For whereas all Hereticks would be called Catholicks yet if they be demanded by a stranger where the Catholick Church is at which they meet that is where is that Catholick Church that teacheth as you do and where had it beginning they having neither Doctrine nor Teacher of hers all being upstarts there is none that dare undertake to do that In a word Catholick Ministers in all Ages could shew the very Places Chairs wherein there was not onely a moral succession in purity of Faith and Doctrine but a local Succession of Priests or Ministers from the Apostles themselves who were immediately called by Christ as the Church was in constituting and by him directed to be given to others by them as they did and enjoyned those to give it to others as in the Epistles of Timothy and Titus and so to keep it in the Church constituted until the end of the World He himself not once offering to alter that estâ—blished Rule as in the case of Saul though he was furnished with all inward Graces and naturâ—l Abilities for the Work yet he must have an external Call by Ordination and those seven men that were of good report full of the holy Ghost and of wisdom Acts 7.3 could not or did not exercise the Offices of Deacons the lowest Offices of the Church and therefore by our upstart-Preachers never medled withal without Ordination or Imposition of Hands Now Reader weigh but with indifferent judgement the above-named Succession and let me ask thee if any Mechanick Tradesman or every Lâ—y-person ought or should assume to themselves the Power of exercising in an authoritative way any Office in the Church in the least degree of it without this external Call of Ordination now the Church is constituted that way Or ought they to receive that power from the People For from the beginning the Church had never such power given to her Ordination is an act of Authority and the power of ruling was never in the People but in her Officers Every one or any two or three gathered had no power to constitute Elders but Timothy onely and such as were deputed by him Ought then according to the Scriptures any of our Hereticks to be looked upon as Gospel-Ministâ—rs not having this Gospel-call Or ought he so to look upon himself because of his Holiness Parts Abilities Graces Gifts doth he finde the Spirit prompt him call him furnish him with whatever belongs to that Office in an inward way and the Spirit to assist him at all times in an eminent way so had Saul so had the seven Deacons yet they must be ordained and by those that had the power given unto them from Church-Officers of an Apostolical nature viz. by Ordination And though some few Members of the Church should out of their over-much zeal choose one to be a Teacher to them to be râ—led guided taught and instructed yet this can never give them authority to dispense the Sacraments or exercise the Keys or make him to be owned as a constituted Minister no more than when two or three give up themselves to be advised ruled commanded by another man which their so doing makes him not a Constable Judge or Justice in respect the power of making such Officers was not given at all to them So here though their rash zeal will have a Lay-person to teach them yet they ought not to own him nor he to esteem himself as a Church-officer since Ordination makes onely that which the People had never in their power and therefore cannot give that Office unto any When Christ was taking his leave of his Apostles and going to the Father Matth. 28.20 he promised to be with them to the end of the world Now Peter and Thomas and the rest being dead it cannot be personally understood of the Apostles but successively in their followers and they were to teach whatever Christ commanded But the Apostles never taught such Doctrine to their immediate Successors as our Hereticks teach now particularly this That people might ordain or that men by reason of their Gifts or Graces might assume to themselves the authoritative Act of reaching binding and loosing nay of exercising a Deacons Office which is the lowest which I cannot remember any of our Hereticks to go about once to touch though it be the passage to the oâ—her Offices of the Church by Apostolical Constitution but jumps immediately from the Shop into the Pulpit by his Gifts judging himself sufficiently qualified and because of the peoples call sufficiently ordained for such an Office unto whom that power was never given Neither do I envie any mans gifts would all the Lords People were Prophets let these men shew me their Succeâ—sion and let me perish if I give them not the right hand of fellowship And seeing they give out themselves for lawfull constituted Teachers in the Church as Paul as Timothy as Titus or as the seven Deacons give me leave to ask them how they came in and how they got thâ—t power if they came not in by this door they must pass for thieves and robbers and therefore no Teachers and those people that ordain them for rebels and traytors for setting up Governors and appointing Officers in another way than he
hath designed and caused to be delivered to the Church which is his Kingdom to take no notice of those railing accusations which they bring against and cast upon such as are Officers by Apostolical Authority which in the end of their days may heighten their punishment as it doth now their rebellion From all that hath been said we conclude these to be no Churches as they are now constituted for they have now no Gospel Priests Ministers or Teachers no Ministers because no Apostolicall succession bring the line downward from the Apostles and these men as they are now constituted are not to be found they have no succession because no Ordination and no Ordination because not Apostolical and not Apostolical because it is not come to them from the Apostles who were the first Ordained Gospel Ministers and immediately qualified and impowered for the work and bringing in of many to the Gospel and from their hands did the same power issue into others that as every age came up after another so there be those fitted to teach it unto all generations and so the Apostolical succession now the Church is constituted must ought and shal continue to the end of the World whatever Opposition men or Devils Hereticks and Persecutors the two beasts that Sathan useth to destroy the Church canmake against or what ever weapon they can form against it or whatever rayling accusation they can bring against it or whatever contumelious and reproaching specches they can cast upon it Reader It is not to be passed over in silence that Peters sitting in Rome as Bishop thereof nay of his being at Rome at all is doubted by some though famous Historians and antient Fathers that lived near and under these times do in their Histories and Writings affirm it yet Calvin that was almost of that judgement is brought to acknowledge that he dyed there Quia tamen plerique Scriptores in eo consentiunt ne pugnemus quin ibi moriuns sit Only how long he was there is uncertain the Church of Rome say 25 year but that is most improbable The Reasons that they bring against it are not so strong as to cause a man to call in Question ancient History his Apostleship no more hindering him at Rome then it did in Antioâ—h those of the Circumcision being scattered from their Country And when it is affirmed he was Bishop it is not to be understood that he always resided and constantly abode in Rome perfection and Apostleship might keep him from that which might be the ground of Pauls not mentioning him in Scripture in regard also of Peters being with the Lord in the body and of his seeing of the Lords glory in the holy Mount might he by the Church at Româ— who were beloved of God Rom. 1.7 be chosen to be Bishop possibly not by any formal instalment that is the chief Teacher or Ruler of that Society nothing reflecting to disparage Paul he being also frequent in journies However Eluselius that lived An. 180 writes in his Church-History that Peter and Paul in their going abroad to preach the Gospel to other Nations appointed Linus to Rule the Church of Rome they not tying themselves to any one people since the whole World was their Diocesse After whom succeeded Clesus and then Clemens as before onely with this difference that Eusebius make Anacletus the same with Cletus which other Authors make two different persons making Cletus to Rule 12. year An. Chr. 81. and Anacletus to Rule 9. year An. 103. according to Alsteads Chronology which as is above was followed the Reason of this disagreement might be the identity of their names possibly the distinction of first and second either through persecution or through inobservance of Authors being not observed or not thought necessary This Linus that the Historian records to have been made Bishop of that Church by Peter Paul during their being abroad may nor unlikely be supposed to be that Linus who is mentioned by Paul 2 Tim. 4. ult during his second and closer Imprisonment at Rome immediately before his death Most of them that question these Histories of Peters being Bishop of Rome by which we understand the supream Teacher and Governour of that Church are fearful that should it be granted they might gratifie the Pope too much then it would appear that he was Peters successor which to grant advantages him no more then it would do Demas that ever he followed Paul when he Apostatized from him or that it should be an honour to Ierusalem that Iames the Apostle was Bishop there which is granted nay that Christ who was chief Bishop ever lived there it is known that the Antichrist shall sit in the Temple of God 2 Thes. 2.4 Then it may be in Peters chair he hath therefore little reason to brag of either since his destruction is certainly to come from thence It is to be imagined that before this time the ignorant will wonder the Phanaticks smile the Schisinatickslaugh to hear so much spoken of Rome let all know that the Faith and Grace of the Church of Rome was spoken of throughout the whole World Rom. 1.7 8. It was a holy and pure Church as Ierusalem once was And Ordination being an Ordinance of God is no more to be contemned for it's coming from Rome to Canterbury then it is to be contemned for it's coming from Ierusalem to Rome though that was the slaughterhoâ—se of the Prophets yet Ordination is no bloody Ordinaence though Rome now be the Whore drunk with the blood of the Saints yet Ordination is none of her Bastards Rome was pure from Idolatry from Linus to Silvester the first that was until the year 300. It was somewhat defiled from Silvester the 1. unti Eonis face the third that was until the year 606. It was Antichrist from Boniface the third until Alexander the seventh who is this present year Bâ—shop of Rome 1660. We might show that before Rome was Antichrist Gregory the great sent Austin over into England but it needs not Ordination being none of Romes brats when she is at worst nor none of her bringing forth when she was at best From Christ it came first from Ierusalem that spread over all the World through Rome it came to England he therefore that despiseth this despiseth an Ordinance of Christ come whence it pleaseth for he enjoyned it and in no Ordinance of God ought we to separate from the Church of Rome neither do we but hold as we ought Communion with her The bright Orient Pearl and Jewel of the Church of England in his Apology for the separation of the said Church from Rome declares as touching that we have now done to depart from that Church whose errours were proved and made manifest to the world which Church hath already evidently departed from Gods Word and yet to depart not so much from it as the Errours thereof c. 2. The segregated Congegations in England are not
whose riches were from pillâ—ging of the goods burning the houses and murthering the persons of those that were not of an Anabaptistical spirit This Kings Title was The King of Iustice the King of the new Ierusalem he erected a Throne of great cost and coyned Money with this Motto Verbum carâ— factum quod habitat in nobis By this Kings Regall Authority Divorces were frequently made as men grew weary of their Wives all books burned but the Bible all Churches rifled demolished and as from God performed blood sighs tears was only to be seen and heard in this Kings Reign At a feast he gave the Sacrament of the Lords Supper to the Number of 4000. but accusing one of Treason you must note he was a King between them cut off his head himself and with bloody hands consecrated the Elements administring the bread one of his Queens following him delivered the cup. I long to make an end of this Monarch he came in a few days to be tyed to a stake by two Executioners with two hot pincers was his flesh torn from his bones in Munster where his most Sacrilegious Majesty had acted and enacted unheâ—rd of Villany This Sacrilegious King was not without Rebellious Subjects which the German Princes by burning drowning killing not for their consciences but for their â—reasoâ—â—â—tteâ— and hellâ—sh acts put an end to them At which time 〈…〉 of them into England for shelter A. 1535. 〈…〉 were burned and oâ—hers made to recant yet some 〈…〉 â—slily carrying them-themselves did live and became the 〈◊〉 Father of the Brownist Mr. Robert Brown of Northamptonshire venting their Doctrine in a Saw-pit first near Islington obtained Proselytes three years afterward he Recanted his errour and took Orders becoming a faithfull Teacher of the Doctrine of the Church of England though his Disciples remained as thorns in her sides they did somwhat refine the Doctrine of the German Anabaptists and continuing a separation did bring forth that Creature whom we call an Anabapist who must own the Quaker for his first born and all those by-opinions and fancies taught by the whole Rabble of Phanaticks must be acknowledge to grow out of his Roots and are sprigs of the Tame branch all of them being quickned with the same Sap or Spirit of their German Father who by a pretended humility and sâ—ow of Godlinesse got into the affections of the Vulgar which ceased not untill they had put them in the throne which deservedly brought them to the stake I have heard of a Welch-man that being condemned to be hanged by the neck called aloud O good my Lord hang her not by the neck her Father was hanged by the neck and her dyed Let our English Anabaptist remember that Her Father was burned at a stake and hanged by the neck for Treason Her Prince Prophet Her King and all Except I say this King they had never a Nursing Father So far hath it been from all Nations coming in unto it that if these be true Churches they have never had a village to boast of If these be true Churches there are more Churches then one and so the unity of the Church must be denied and consequently there must be more Christs then one Christ is the head of the Church Ep. 1.22 and the Church is his body Why because all the members move according to that life that is communicated unto them from the head Now this rabble hath not one Spirit nor one life neither do they preach all one kind of faith therefore there must be diversity of heads to give life to these several bodies consequently if they be Churches there must be divers Christs to quicken those severall Churches which destroy the unity of the Godhead in Trinity the consent Harmony and agreement of Prophets and Apostles and the unity of the Catholick Church on earth and before that be done let us condemn those segregated meetings for those that separate themselves sensual having not the spirit Iud. 19. Whence the Catholick faith came we know how old it is we know it hath Seniority over and above all other Doctrine as truth hath over error iâ— is of the same standing with the Creation And though heresie hath and must closely follow it yet it was before them the Wheat is first sowed and then the Tares Such is Sathans hast that he begun to lye at the beginning yet from the beginning lyes were not but truth Not to speak of those Heresies that were in the Church before the Time of our Saviour in his time there were those that denied the Resurrection and the being of Angels and Spirits Matth. 22.23 Acts 23.8 Most of those grand Heresies that troubled the Church by false Doctrine the time they came in the Authors that broached them are known by name and the occasion of their so doing is also known not so the Catholick faith We must know that all new lights that now shine are but the stinking snuffs of those old Heresies that were extinguished by the powerful breath of the Catholick Doctrine blown in again by the envious breath of him that fights against the Church and her seed and may be reduced to the same causes that before they of old were kindled by and may be reduced to these heads 1 Envy and discontentednesse when men could not get into those places that either their merit did not deserve or their ambition thought they were worthy of then to revenge themselves like Corah Dathan and Abiram Numb 16.1 they rose up against the Governours of the Church and rebelled against Catholick truth It was this that made Arius rise and swel like a great Sea to overthrow the faith of Christ. An. 310. for not being chosen Bishop of Alexandria of which he was a Deacon when Achillas the Bishop thereof dyed and Alexander a man he thought not so deserving as himself chosen in the place presently he set himself to oppose Episcopal dignity and such Doctrine as plagued the Church for almost three hundred years together purely because he could not be a Bishop whose Doctrine though condemned by 318 Bishops A. 325. gathered together at Nice at the command of the good Emperour Constantin the great is revived again in our Socinians Anabaptists c. for want of discipline in our Church And truly that hideous damp that came upon the Church of England in these last years had it's rise from the same ground viz. from the mouths of those men that were extended in a large measure for the receiving of a Mitre which not coming they vented their ill-favoured breath in the very faces of them that through desert wore it envying the glory that others had because they themselves had but Ordinary respect This made M. M. a principall Pres. break out into extravagancy he Petitioning the King for a Deanry and afterward for a Bishoprick getting neither strove as the King told to undo and overthrow all So D. T. an earnest Suitor for the Deanry of Salisbury or
a Prebendry at Windsor getting neither grew very discontent So D.B. I have read these in and have them from an Author that I am perswaded is able to defend his Print A man of the same Principles having gotten to be the Kings Chaplain shortly after being put out of it again by the Arch-Bishop for what cause my Author shews not to revenge himself became the chief leader of that Rascall rabble out of London crying for I against E. of S. Invaded afterward the Deanry of Paul's and the house of the Bishop of B. W. But says my Author had he been made Dean of Pauls or B. of B. and W. by King Charles he had never opposed the Bishops The like is known concerning M. H. B. the Original of his discontent against the Bishops was the losse of his place at Court which he enjoyed under Prince Charles and for that he was so enraged against the Government of the Church that what by speaking and what by writing he brought to himself deserved punishment not to call it suffering I Copy not this out of any distaste that I bear to the mens judgements or persons whose faces I never saw knowingly Yea the right hand was scarce known from the left when B. was putting on Armour to oppose the Hirearchy but that it may be known upon what ground some spirit opposed settled Government not so much out of zeal Religion or conscience as out of spite passion malice or discontentednesse which broached Arrius his Heresie and was the first moving cause of Corah his Rebellion Numb 16. and blew up some fiery spirits here in England to call out for a Reformation which was the mask they used to hide their ugly faces and the Cloak they wore to cover the wicked and malicious purposes of their revengeful hearts which at length though something late was discovered to the World by which they are now really as odious to the present age for their Villany as ever they were famous through Hypocrysie 2. Heresie springs from pride and ambition this is in some kind the Cause of the other before mentioned For if their pride meet with a fal they are discontented if it go smoothly on they are sattisfied To become a Teacher a head of a faction to have Disciples is to some in our days a gay businesse when Pride reigns in the bosomes of men it is Tyrannicall and must outlarge its Territories by bringing into subjection those Neighboring Countries and Cities that are about they are so full that they must empty their Hereticall Notions into shallow and ignorant brains and are not satisfied with being Masters of their own except they have Proseylites to their Doctrine Is it any other but this that makes our illiterate Mechanicks preach or Lay-men administer the Sacraments or our women to forget both their Sex weaknesse and the Word of God to expound the Scriptures What made the Vagabond Jews to presume to cast out Devills but this Acts 19. and how much this induceth the Church of Rome to stand and to defend strange points I leave for my Elders to consider 3. Heresie springs from lust or covetousnesse the Church lands since it 's establishment was usually a greater eye-sore to Hereticks then her doctrine the Egyptians that fold both their Cattle and their Land for bread when their mony was gone Gen. 47.18 never grumbled that the Priests Lands were preserved but these men having both Cattle Land and Bread grudge to see the Church enjoy her portion and if they want rather then they will dig will reach down all propriety and that the wicked should not enjoy the fruits of the ground The meek only should enjoy the Earth which Doctrine supposing it to passe in the affirmative not a foot of the Earth would fall to them Yet this set the Crown upon Iohn of Leydens head in Germany and hath been a fundamentall truth in England yea the corner-stone of strange divinity in our high places The silver Pillars the golden bottome the purple covering of the Church Ca. 3.10 hath been â—n alluring bait even to those who ought to have been her guard 4. It comes from the womb of ignorance a misapprehension many erre not knowing the Scriptures Mat. 22.29 Many things depending upon the knowledge of the diversities and seasons of times receiveth strange and strained interpretations from the unlearned This is one strong hinge that our Secretaries for the present move upon As that the Apostles being immediately called from fishing to preaching they shall be all taught of God And of Gods pouring out his spirit upon all flesh in the latter days and their daughters shall prophesie these with a many other are foundations upon which many build their Babel from the first they conclude that any man may preach from the second Isa. 54.13 they conclude that preaching is needlesse from the third Acts 2.17 they infer that women may preach as if that prophesie of Ioel Ioel 2.28 were not already fulfilled in the Apostles I must conclude this Question being quiet tyred with fighting with these beasts of Ephesus and beasts indeed they may be called not onely from their barking against the light of the Gospel but also from their surlinesse and crossenesse each to another or fawning upon any other for do but crosse or not humour them they will turn Ranter Quaker Adamite or Anabaptist and about from one to another if not locally in body yet professedly in judgement for never did you know any of them to be purely what he is called the Anabaptist is a Millenary the Millenary is a Quaker the Quaker is a Ranter and vice versa turn them again the Ranter is a Quaker the Quaker is a Millenary the Millenary is an Anabaptist and so round as one lye so one false opinion must have another to maintain it This makes such a monstrous unlovely hodge-podge among them that had these beasts been to have entered the Ark it would have perplexed Noah to have put them into pairs These Babel-builders are confounded in their Opinions as well as in their Language properly their own having that only in common that destroys the unity of the Church and never speaks with one tongue but when they rail against the Church of England Quest. 6. What may justifie a mans separation from a Church Saint Paul giving us some directions for walking after the spirit Gal. 5 in the 19. ver makes an enumeration of the works and fruits of either beginning with those of the flesh as Adultery Fornication Vncleannesse Lasciviousnesse Idolatry Witchcraft Hatred Variance Emulations Wrath Strife Seditions Heresies These two last in the Original might be Translated divisions Sects for there it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 where according to this Sects or Divisions or cause lesse separation as well as Murther or Adultery are the works of the flesh the two last are Twins in one and the same womb for the Heretick will breed division or sedition and
sedition or division to requit it will foster Heresie Hereticks do corrumpere sidem and Schismaâ—â—cks or Separatists do disrumpere charitatem the one corrupts the Doctrine of the Church the other falls from her Communion both are fruits of the flesh and they that do such things shall not inherit the Kingdome of God Verse ult The sin of Separation is so infectious that in Scripture we are to separate from them that so do Rom. 16.17 There is a Rule in Divinity that wil make the sin of separation to be great it is this Those sins are the greatest which are most contrary to and do most oppose the greatest of Christian vertues or graces Now they are recorded 1 Cor. 13.13 Now abideth Faith Hope and Charity but the greatest of these three is Charity Now by the Rule distrust in Gods promises or in his power is a great sin it being a sin against hope Heresie or a stout persisting in an errour is a far greater sin for it is a sin against faith and seeks to cover conceal if not to destroy the truth Now Charity is greater then either of these that follows therefore that that sin that destroys the peace of the Church untyes the Ligatures by which the whole body is compact together is the greatest but this doth the sin of Separation a thing by this age of no account yet they wil find it of great moment in the day of their Account It is a sin generally accompanied with the other lusts of the flesh viz. Hatred Varience Emulations Strife Wrath which seldome lurks long in a Corner but in time appears in the field in the habit and acts of Murtherers Ravishers Traytors and all with the voyce of Iacob pretending Godlinesse and conscience as Histories do abundantly show But to answer the Question So long as a Church makes no separation from Christ no separation is to be made from it but to keep in it is the duty and safety honour and happinesse of him that would enjoy the Communion of Saints the forgivenesse of sins the Resurrection of the body unto life Everlasting A Church separates from Christ two ways 1. When she overthrows the foundation of that Doctrine that is laid by Christ the foundation of all truth is already laid and he that goes to overthrow that may be said to turn from it Do we see a society of men whether Nationally or Domestically whether openly or secretly going in that road that thwarteth the foundation or fundamental points of Religion there must be a separation Rev. 18.4 whether it be in the adding to these fundamentals as if they were not sufficient or taking from them as if they were redundant or superfluous This made the Reformed Churches beyond Sea and the Church of England to separate from the Church of Rome which hath both taken from and added to those fundamental Truths whereupon the Church was by the Lord and his Apostles erected and builded Having to the Scriptures added some Books as the Apocrypha makes the Scriptures to be an imperfect Rule and must have Traditions to compleat it That the sense and meaning of the Scripture depends upon the Churches authority That in all matters of Controversie not the Scriptures but the Church must be the Judge They have made five Sacraments more then Christ made They have clearly blotted out the whole body of the second Commandment out of the first Table of the Law in several Books That Infants that die without Baptism are eternally separate from God except they be as it were martyred by which martyrdom they are baptized Baptismo sanguinis with their own blood They teach that men are not justified by Faith alone before God They make Saints and holy men departed assistant in the work of reconciling us to God and therefore maintain they must be prayed unto That the Doctrine of Purgatory must be believed if we would be saved That the efficacy of the Sacraments depends upon the worthiness or intention of the giver That Baptism totally abolisheth Original sin That the real fleshly body of Christ is in the Bread at the Sacrament of the Lords Supper as soon as the Priest pronounceth the words Hoc est corpus meum this is my body if he should say Corpus mea it were no Sacrament They take the Wine or keep the Cup from the Laity in that Sacrament That the wine in that Ordinance must be mingled with water that that Sacrament is profitable not only for the living but for the dead The Priest is not to bless a second marriage They baptize Bells with the very words of Baptism and by that they teach Devils are drove from the Church O Romanists great is your Faith and give them proper names That God-Fathers and God-mothers at the Font by reason of the nearness of their Spiritual Kindred are not to nor must noâ— marry for the seventh generation That the Pope or Bishop of Rome is the universal Head of the Church and Christs Vicar All which â—enets as they were utterly unknown to the former Bishops of Rome nor heard of in the Church of Christ for many Ages so they are for the present opposed by all the Reformed Churches abroad who have upon that account forsaken her and England hath thrown her off and separated from her and by the Champions of the several Churches hath their separation been defended By vertue of that Catholick truth 1 Tim. 6.3 If any man teach otherwise that is then the Scriptures do and consent not to wholsom words of our Lord Iesus and to the Doctrine which is accordâ—ng to godliness c. from such separate turn away or withdraw thy self their separation is justifiable What Paul would have Timothy in this place to do he practiseth himself in another Acts 19.9 yet probably in one and the same City was it both done by Paul and to be done by Timothy Saint Paul being in Ephesus some there were that believed his word others not but hardened their heart speaking evil of him and of the Gospel After he had preached three moneths and perswading to the things concerning the Kingdom of God he separated the Disciples he would not have those Believers that had received the Truth to be in any Church-fellowship with those that spoke against it Luther who began to rise up and take his farewell of the Church of Rome Anno 1517. being an Augustian Frier was called an Apostate answered Consitetur se esse Apostatam sed beatum Sanctum qui sidem Diabolo datam non servavit that he had only fallen back from that Covenant and Engagement he had made with Satan Not that there is a separation to be made from all the Doctrine of Rome for she holds many great mysteries of Divinity purely and soundly wherein we must and do all agree with her as Christians but he that is a true member of the Church of Rome as it now stands he must believe that the least coal in Purgatory is very
This Errour in point of worship you may call Idolatry But beware that you take not decent or comely Ceremonies for essentiall parts of worship The Apostle urging women in the Church of Corinth to be covered 1 Cor. 11.6 that which they might think was too much precisenesse in him for we may be apt to suppose he discontented them that did otherwise was decent in his eyes and commanded to be done but not making it a point of worship nor pressing it upon them as part of Gods service declares that ceremonies may be used in but ought ever to be differenced from the worship performed In brief whatever Ceremony of what nature or kind soever that is enjoined that is not contrary to the Word of God and by the Officers of the Church thought comely to be used as tending to make that worship then used to be the more Reverenced and esteemed by the performers is not to be opposed This age discovers what a dis-respect contempt undervaluinig thoughts most men have even good men in a great measure of the house of God table of God service of God and Servants of God since decent and comely ceremonies were banished from the Church of God and where such ceremonies are injoyned and thou separatest thou art guilty of renting the seamlesse coat there being no cause for making that separation justifiable For Hereâ—â—e then and Idolatry only then is there a cause of separation and what ever is more then these cometh of Satan Wherefore though our departure were a trouble to them sayth Reverend Bishop Iewel speaking of Rome yet they ought to consider how just cause we had of our departure And in another place he saith It is true we have departed from them and for so doing we give thanks to Almighty God but yet from Christ from the Apostles and from the Primitive Church we have not departed Romes Heresie and Idolatry gave a just ground for the Reformed Churches separation But In our days there is made such a separation as by no Scripture can be justified there being nothing in matter of doctrine taught nor in point of worship performed that in the least contradicts the Word written or the worship injoyned and therefore their sin is the greater tending to the destroying of that love charity concord union that ought to be in and amongst the members of the Church we must not cut off the arm for every scratch or smal hurt much lesse cut off our nose because it seems to stand awry through a false glasse neither ought we to separate from the body of the Church for every small errour in it as for every Ceremony that in our judgment is amisse and indeed those that are most separate from the Church now in the highest points of doctrine and fight against her did but at first dislike her Ceremonies so dangerous it is to yield in the least to the sin of Schisme for the hurt in that quickly turns to the Gangreen of Heresie Those that disliked her Suâ—plice now scorn her preaching those that disliked her prayers will not now pray at all those that disliked standing at the Creed now will fall down to no God those that disliked her Crosse in Baptism now scorn the Spiritual washing those that looked sowr upon my Lord the Bishop now casts stones at the Preacher Master G Those that dug down her Altars now would pull down her Churches they that saw her kneel at the Lords Supper and grumbled because she sate not are now so holy that they scorn it Which thing duly and seriously weighed might make men afraid to play about the hole of the asp or to put their hand in the Cokatrice den nay to touch it were it but with a stick least as it befals him that toucheth the Torpedo a spiritual numbnesse or Judiciall stupefaction befall them that they shall noâ— move one foot forward in a right way more Seldome can we see them returning to their mother Church and to that doctrine wherein they were baptized but like sheep out of the Fold as soon as out of the Church porch they wander further and further and so far they are gone that for the present I am not disposed to go after them but to such as are within hearing I give this short direction viz. to behold such as have gone before them that at first did but stâ—mble at straws were troubled at trifles thought to have gone no further yet whither are they now hurried look back to the Church you have left view her orders her Sacraments her points of worship study them try them by the Sciptures if you can find them contrary or repugnant to the written Word of God stand stil and save thy own soul but follow not them for they went in the way of Cain and run greedily after the errour of Balaam perished in the Gainsaying of Coâ—e Clouds without Water carried about of Winds raging waves of the Sea foaming out their own shame wandring stars Jude 11.12 13. By good Words and fair Speeches they deceive the hearts of the simple not for our Lord Iesus Christ but for their own belly Romans 16.18 Quest. 7. Whether more Religions then one may be Tollerated where the true Church is Established In the opening of this Question knowing the times wherein I live and the fewnesse of my years I will not shew you my opinion but you shall hear the Judgement of a Master in our Israel that was gathered with gray hairs to his Fathers and lately fell asleep One Religion is to be Tolerated and no more to be publickly taught then one 1. Because there is but one God who is the object of Religion his Essencâ— being simple and indivisible his worship is also to be diversitie of Religion breeds and produceth only diversity of Opinion touching God which in time may in the conceits of men dâ—stroy his unity and Onenesse 2. As there is but one truth so there ought to be but one Religion for false Religions either teach to worship false Gods or else in a false way and manner to worship the true God which made God himself in constituting the Church of the Jews in a strict manner to give charge touching that and in his constituting the Church of the Christians to do the same by commanding them to stone that Prophet that taught otherwise and us to curse that Angel that should teach other Doctrine then he did then by Moses and now to us by his Son give teach command and appoint Deut. 13.1 Gal. 1.8 3. There is but one Church which is the ground and pillar of truth 1 Tim. 3.15 and one Spirit to lead that Church in the way of truth and therefore there ought to be but one Religion which is the Doctrine of that one Truth 4. There is but one way to heaven and eternal Life in which way few through ignorance and errour walk or find and ways to Hell and destruction which many through corrupted nature fall
Church for though every one that are members of the visible are not of the body of the invisible Church yet he is not of the invisible that acknowledgeth not himself a member of the visible he that hath God for his Father hath the visible Catholick Church for his only mother and must have her if he would be saved She is like the Ark of Noah as all without that was drowned so all without this is damned In the judgement of Charity we must indeed suppose that God hath his own among the heathen and by working upon them by his Spirit in an extraordinary secret and hidden way brings them unto the knowledge of his Son by which they are ingrafted into his body and so made members of the Catholick Church for as before out of it there is no salvation the reason is out of it is to be out of Christ for that is his body and to be out of Christ is to be without God and to be without him is to be without eternal life For this is eternal life to know thee to be the only true God and Iesus Christ whom thou hast sent Quest. 12. What are the marks of a true Church General notes and marks are set down by the Church of Rome whereby it is pretended that the true Catholick and Holy Church may be distinctly and perfectly known from all false Congregations or Churches as 1. Visibility 2. Antiquity 3. Durability 4. Prosperity 5. The name of a Catholick Church 6. Agreement with the ancient Church 7. It s union with the head viz. the Pope 8. Holiness of Doctrine 9. Efficacy of Doctrine 10. Holiness of life 11. The glory and power of miracles 12. The gift of Prophesie 13. The acknowledgement or confession of her enemies 14. The unhappy and unfortunate success of her enemies 15. A succession of Bishops With several others which in their own nature are either separable from the true Church or may agree to a false and may constitute a Synagogue of Satan as well as a Church of Christ for which with many other reasons they are rejected of the Reformed Churches as proper Characters of that body whereof Christ is the head that being able to consist pure holy and visible without some of them though in some points they agree to her also in that but not as essential or Characteristical and knowing also that many of them are forged by and in Rome that she may appear the better and stand the firmer in her Pontificalibus The proper and essential Characters of a true Church whereby she is differenced from all false also from the Church of Rome and which gives her her esse vivere sentire are these viz. 1. The pure dispensation of the Word Act. 2.4 Where the Word is taught in a pure manner according to the institution of it without detraction from or addition to it wherever that is taught what Christ commanded and the Gospel holds out so farre there is a pure Church and where that is mixed and mingled with mens Inventions as points of doctrine so far the Church is impure 2. The pure Administration of the Sacraments Matth. 28.19 30.1 Cor. 11.23 That Church that keeps to the institution of those Ordinances appointed as Seals of the Covenant by Christ putting nothing to them nor taking nothing from them as necessary for the making of them Seals so far that is a pure Church and where that is not done it is so far impure Some adde Church discipline but that holds out rather her well being then her being in times of persecution she hath wanted that and may want it and yet a true Church by the keeping pure of the Word and Sacraments which a visible Church cannot consist without hence we behold and look upon Ierusalem Galatia Thessalonica Corinth Colos. and once those famous Churchs of Asia though the gospel was taught in them in a glorious and a pure dispensatory way yet for the present wanting those two we eye them not nor number them among the Churches of Christ. The same teacheth the Reformed Churches of Helv. Art 14. Behem Art 8. France Art 27. Belg. 29. Ausp Art 7. Sax. Art 11. Wirtem Art 32. Swed or the 4. Cities Art 15. Sâ—ot Art 15. and of England Art 19. That Article it self is this Art 19. of the Church of England The visible Church of Christ is a Congregation of faithfull men in which the pure word is preached and the Sacraments be duly administred according to Christs Ordinance in all those things that of necessity are requisite for the same c. All which considered it follows 1. That the Church of Rome is no true Church or pure Church making the Scriptures to be imperfect for salvation without their own Tradition They will not suffer the Church to be clean through the word that Christ hath spoken The Church is only tyed to the Gospel For if an Angel from heaven teach any other Doctrine he is to be accursed by her 1 Gal. 9. With her Baptismal water she adds oyl salt and spittle as essential parts of Baptism and useth this holy Ordinance upon Bells Stocks and wood With the Sacramental wine she must mingle water of which the Lairy must not taste With her Sacramental bread she visits the sick salutes Emperors makes Procession it must be also a wafer Câ—ke and it must not be broken with both these Elements she maketh a Sacrifice for the dead and she teacheth that a Priest may give it to himself alone that the vertue or efficacy both of that and Baptism depends upon the intention of him that doth administer and yet the efficacy must not be questioned but believed and forasmuch as they are administered in Latine which the common sort may not understand they must act implicite faith 2. That those segregated Congregations in England are not true Churches The word preached by many that are not men in Sex nor Ministers in Office prayer being preached down and preaching only to be heard from men of their own principles teaching for Doctrine not Traditions but fancies blasphemies affirming the nullity of Apostolical Ordination c. The Sacraments are either abused as re-baptizing those that were baptized before making dipping necessary to that Ordinance and the Sacrament performed by a Laick person The Sacrament of the Lords Supper being either preached down altogether or grosly abused in nature It s vertue depends upon his goodness that gives it a sin to receive it with any that we conceit not to be holy or know him to be prophane though he be never admonished by them and if he were yet he is not to be eaten withal least I eat and drink damnation to my self through his sin the Elements not consecrated through which that only is an Ordinance and the body or blood of the Lord they are not consecrated for he that often attempts to do it hath no power so to do wanting Apostolical Authority viz. Ordination 3. That the
they sinned that word that might have been purely and unsported given to the Father through negligence forgetfulness wilfulness might not have been delivered intirely and perfectly to the son but now in writing none of these can alter the age that now is can know if others do corrupt and those that come after may judge of this each having copies by them they are able to discover or iudge of the integrity of another neither can any one corrupt it in the least but it may easily be discryed by his neighbour through the copies or writings of it 3 That helpe might be afforded men against those imperfections that attend the best for through fraile nature cares and troubles of the world sutable comforts confirming truths might not suddenly be thought on now by writing this malady hath a proper cure the word being open and before our eyes we may take up and read such truths as may stay the Soul in her greatest shakeings and comfort her in her languishing distempers 4 That mens faith might be the more confirmed in the truth of it when men see the prophecies that were foretold in the book of Daniel and in the Revelation the fulfillings of the threatnings is against the Jews c. To know that these things are done and to see them foretold so many hundred years before induceth a man more firmely to beleeve them then if it were told him barely from another that his Father or Grandfather said it should be so of which he also might have cause to doubt and the truth of the Speaker even in that particular suspect Quest. 10. Whether men be bound to believe all that is in the Scripture For the dispatching this Question we must distinguish 1. Between the Scripture it self and the persons who writ it is not necessary to salvation to believe that Matthew writ that Gospell that goes under his Name nor that Peter writ his to believe what is spoken or written is one thing and to believe that David writ it is another thing 2. Between the writing it self and the time when or the place whence it was written It is one thing to believe the truth of those Epistles of Paul and another thing to believe that they were written from Corinthus as that to the Romans or that from Athens as that to the Thessalonians or from Rome when Paul was brought the second time before Nero as that last Epistle to Timothy 3. Between the Words written and the meaning or sence of the thing writ It is one thing to believe that Paul writ the words of his Epistles in that order method place as we have them in our Bibles ordered and placed and another thing to believe the sence and the meaning of the thing so written we shall find the writers of the Scriptures in citing of places deviate from the naturall order of the Words given them by the first Author which shews that we are not bound to believe that For instance David declares Psal. 16.8 I have set the Lord always before me because he is at my right hand I shall not be moved which Text Peter having occasion to use Act. 2.25 reads it thus viz. I foresaw the Lord always before my face he is on my right hand that I should not be moved The words being clearly varied but the sence and meaning being the same we are tyed to the one and not to the other which alteration is evident in many places particularly the very next verse both of that Psalm and this Chapter 4. Between an Historical and a saving faith we are to believe all that the Scripture contains and set down that is the sence and meaning of it to be no other then the very will purpose mind and Law of God which we must believe if we would be saved And that it was written by David and sent to the chief Musitian by Matthew by Paul and sent to them from Corinthus that the Epistle to Timothy Ordained the first Bishop of the Church of Ephesus was written from Rome when Paul was brought the Second time before Nero as his second Epistle at the close declares ought to be believed by an Historical faith that not being written by the infallible spirit of God but by the Churches Tradition of whose authority in an Historical way it is but presumption in any man to doubt CHAP. IV. Of Reading We are now come to the prosecuting and enforcing of those directions above named as necessary Antecedents for the Words indwaking The first was to read the Scriptures In the handling of which we shall 1. Prove it is a duty to read 2. Direct how to read 3. Resolve some Questions Sect. 1. THat all are to read the Scriptures is a truth that the Religious Christian will not doubt of and the Hypocriticall dare not deny yet that all might be left without excuse we shall prove that all must do it According to the usuall division of Magistrates Ministers and people or of Old and young which comprehendeth al sorts of persons whatsoever 1. Magistrates are to read it God giving Laws concerning the Ruling of his People to him that should be King â—ver them Commandeth Deut 17 18. that when he sitteth upon the Throne of his Kingdom that he shall write him a Copy of this Law in a book out of that which is before the Priests the Levites and it shal be with him and he shal READ therein all the days of his life The King therefore it not exempted from this duty though he be Lord of all notwithstanding all affairs he must READ therein all the days of his life And the truth is he will be the best Ruler that is best acquainted with this word he will know sin the better which he is to punish Rom. 13.13 the better he be acquainted with the Scripture Rom. 7.7 It is the abundance of the sincere milk of the Word that maketh Kings Queens nursing Fathers and nursing Mothers unto the Church Isai. 49.23 that all that live under them may by their knowledge and discipline grow in all godlinesse and wax strong to every good work sucking from their breasts wholesome doctrine springing from good government and Laws and enjoying the fruit of all in every Act of Justice What God doth in this place require of a King who is Supream 1 Pet. 2.13 he requires the same of all Magistrates and Officers under him that are as Kings in their proper places and Domininions and by the Subjects ought so to be beheld 1. That they be not puffed up by conceit of Earthly greatness Psal. 131 1 2. 2. That they may be impartiall in their Sentences Proverbs 31.5 3. That they may uphold and defend the truth of his worship 2 Kings 23.1 2 3 4. 4. That they may know whom to encourage and whom to punish Rom. 13.3 5. That every thing may be done by them as those that must give an account to the King of Kings and Lord of Lord for
when the briâ—egroom shall be taken from them and then shall they fast this is a duty not for every novice in religion there is great strength required to bear this exercise of fasting and therefore during the Apostles ignorance or weaknes our Saviour would not impose it upon them least it should prove like a new piece of cloth upon an old garment but when he the bridgroom was taken then they should fast for by that spirit he was then to give they were made as new bottles able to hold and stand under the practise of abstinence which before they were not able to do By severell circumstances in this text it might be shown Fasting was to be performed by the Apostles and if necessary for them how much more profitable is it for us now 3 The Church in the time of the Apostles was frequent in this exercise Acts. 10.30 Act. 13.1 2. Though the kingdome of heaven consisteth not in meat and drinke whether used or forborne Rom. 14.17 Yet fasting as an extraordinary help unto the chief exercises of piety hath the warrant and weight of a duty both in the old and new testament when either God in his providence or our own necessities call us thereunto alwayes remembring that when we fast out of religion we forget not them whose bowels are empty through poverty and want 58 Isa. 5 6.7 It is true that to fast upon the tenth day of the seventh moneth Lev. 23 27. was a Ceremony yet a fast or a yearly fast upon that account is no more a ceremony then to rest once in seven dayes c. Quest. 3. Why is the Fast of Lent observed by the Christian Church This most solemne fast is of very great antiquity and of old it was a time of renoune Lent is the Saxon word for the Spring but when it begun to spring is not certainly known but yet the fruit of it hath been sweet to the Christian pallat for many generations It hath overflowed the whole Christian world like Nilus once a year and made it fruitfull yet like the same river is the head of it unknown howbeit Telâ—sphorus the eight Bishop of Rome from Peter is supposed to have instituted this Fast An. Ch. 142. and his next successor save one viz. Pius to have instituted Easter and since they have both been observed with great devotion In all the Churches of the Saints though this blocked age of ours will have nothing passe for religion but what is framed upon addle heads ordered by sacrilegious persons and loved by notorious sinners Some make a threefold distinction of it the first is a fast of expectation and such were those fasts of the Iewes before the coming of the bridegroom or in remembrance that Moses fasted forty dayes at the receiving of the Law all which time the Israelites were in expectation of him The second was a fast of contemplation such was the fast of Elias when he fasted forty dayes as it were for the breaking of the Law The third of refrenation to bridle our affection that we might not sin against the Gospell and this last use only is in the eye of the Church in her Quadragesimall observations to let passe many things that might have here aptly been spoken to lent is observed 1 In a pious memoriall of our Saviours fourty dayes fasting in the wildernesse Moses fasted fourty dayes at the making of the first Covenant and our Saviour fourty dayes at the making of the new In memory whereof the Church voluntarily gives of her time this fourty dayes of Lent for Christian abstinence looking only at the moâ—al not at all upon the miracle of that long fast she not abstaining from all manner of food her weaknesse gives her a licence or dispensation from that but from some as the Jewes eats not nor did not eat of old of the sinew which is upon the hollow of the thigh in remembrance of the Angels touching the hollow of Iacobs thigh in the sinew that shranke Gen. 32.32 In which doing I dare not charge them of superstition seeing God himself was even pleased to let them so do No more ought we to be accounted will worshipers in abstaining from some kind of food as from the flesh of beasts in memoriall of our Lords fasting in the wildernesse 2 For the better subsistance of those whose trade and occucupation is about the Sea and rivers â—s fishers and drudgers are to be looked after by the civill magistrate as well as Butchers and Drovers If he would have the Child divided or not looked after pardon me he might be suspected not to be the true and lawfull Father 3 For the preservation and upholding a good stock of cattel in the Common wealth It is known that little is killed but what is young in the Spring time which this time of lent kâ—eps alive and that makes plenty and that againe causes cheapnesse so that the poor are much the better all the year of that abstinence for the rich It is observed that the Price of Cattle is now almost double what it was in the times when Lent was observed 4 To prevent that evill even morally which by high feeding might arise from the nature of man It is the spring time when the blood rises and waxeth hot now a moderate abstinence checks those proud humors which might arise to the hurting of a mans soul and offending against God 5 for the more worthy preparing of our selves for the holy communion celebrated at Easter abistence as hath been shown is a fit meanes to subdue sinfull lusts and a sutable help for meditation and pouring forth of the soul God was never more familiar then he was with great fasters witnesse Moses Elias Daniel and Christ the three great fasters Moses for the Law Elias for the prophets and Christ for the gospel meet together in the holy mount 17 Mat 3. now since Easter is a time appointed by the Church foâ— the receiving of that blessed ordinance of the Lords supper this lent may serve as a bâ—idle to inordinate affections and may be a time of attonement for the soul. It is a time of solemne repentance and as a sign of it hath ashes upon its head By an even thread it leads you to our Saviours passion and will shew you the place where the Lord lay and if you be not wanting to your selves It will show you the Lord himselfe in breaking of bread Be thou but a Simon and hear and do what the Church sayes unto thee thou shalt knowthat the Lord is risen indeed Quest. 4. Why are the fasts of the weekes of Ember observed by the Church THe time of Lent may be compared to the head of all the fasts of the Christian Church and the four Ember weeks may be termed the four quarters of their body the other fasâ—s being but as arteries ligatures and sinnews proceeding from or leading to those more principall parts They were of old called Qâ—atuor anni tâ—mpora
these ends 1. The glory and honour of God that his name might not be abused nor his worship defiled by such obstinate and refractory persons 1 Tim. 1.20 2. For the Honour of the Church that her enemies should not have occasion to triumph and boast that she consists of impure and wicked wâ—etches Christian religion might suffer through the wickedness of such men and therefore the Church disowns them and affirms they are not Christians but heathens 2 Thes. 3.6 3. For the prevention of sin a little leaven will leaven the whole lump one notorious sinner being suffered to go without this Church discipline might infect others which when this is set will not so easily be done he is punished that others might fear and be kept pure One arm may and in some times must be cut off not for hatred to it but being rotten the whole body is in danger the like case is here 1 Cor. 5.6 7. 4. To bring the sinner to the obedience of Christ when such a judicial sentence is pronounced and when the Members of the Church withdraw from him as a leprous person so far as stands with necessity and order and knowing what is done on earth is ratified in heaven the terror of God with him that is not past all sense will so follow it and the shame of men will so fill him that he is brought to his knees craving pardon of the Church for his obstinacy and desiring to be received again into her body is absolved and forgiven and receives the ordinances of the Church and for the future walks more humbly and holily then before which was the fruit of the Corinthians excommunicating that incestuous person 2 Cor. 26.7 8. But if there be any so perversâ— that this Church-censure will not reduce to obedience the Laws of all Christian stares takes that sinners case into consideration that God be not blasphemed and by them he is punished SECT III. To let pass the several wayes that the Church useth to reclaim the sinner which is different according to the Lawes and customes used in several places the sentence of Excommunication is pronounced by the Minister of that Congregation where the offender lives in this or the like form A. B. Having been lately a Member of this Church hath contumeliously and obstinately fallen into the sin of and hath renounced his Fellowship in this Church having reproached the same and the whole Ministration of Gods ordinance therein of all which he hath been tenderly and earnestly admonished sundry times in private and hath been publickly called to repent and turn from his sin And for as much as the Church finds her tender admonitions to be fruitless towards him she is compelled though with great unwillingness and hearty sorrow to vindicate her honour and provide for the peace and safety of her Members by executing that severe chastisement on him which Christ her head and husband hath authorized her to inflict on such rebellious Children who thus do renounce and cast dirt in the face of her that bare them For as much then as the said A. B. doth utterly refuse to hear the Church calling him with much long suffering and tender love to returne to the unity and Fellowship and to make a just acknowledgment and renunciation of his sin of but doth pertinaciously declare both by word and deed his obstinate pâ—rsisting therein Therefore after solemne calling upon God and having his glory before our eyes the credit of the Gospel and the prosperity of his Church I do hereby according to the commanâ—ment of Christ and by his authority committed to me as minister of thy Church and with the consent also of the same solemnity pronounce and declare in the name of our Lord Iesus Christ the said A. B. to be cut off from this Church and body of â—hrist as a most obstinate and impenitent and do leave him to that fearefull judgment and fiery Indignation denounced against such and do warne and beseech you to withdraw from him that he may be ashamed and to lay him aside to be dealt withall when the Lord Iesus Christ shall come Which sentence is nothing but a declaration of that which the sinner is before he be judicialy sentenced by the Church Yet it is to be noted that this casting out of the Church is not absolute save as touching external rights and priveledges of the Church from which Excommunication fully keeps him but as touching internall right he hath unto the same it is only conditional that is upon his persisting in his errour and therefore if the excommunicate will leave his wicked deeds confess his sin be reconciled to the Church whom he hath offended signifying this to his minister he is again to be restored to all the rights and ordinances of the Church and to be absolved from that sentence passed upon him that Satan geat no advantage over him or left he be swallowed up of too much sorrow 2 Cor. 2.7 The sinnes for which the sinner hath this sentence of Excommunication passed on him are not alike in all Churches for according to the laws and orders established in severall Churches crimes sins and offences may be different according to the Constitutions of those Churches that is of those offences which are made against the laws in those places commanded for the honour of the Church though not directly required by the law of God SECT IV. Quest. 1. Whether the Reformed Churches are legally excommunicated by the Pope Quest. 2. Whether Kings ought or can be Excommunicated Quest. 3. Whether excommunication debarres from all society of the Church Quest. 1. Whether the reformed Churches are legally excommunicated by the Pope The Bishop of Rome in regard of the separation made from him by the professors of the religion called the Reformed hath passed his sentence of excommunication upon them as Heretical but unjustly Foâ— 1 They are not Hereticks but Orthodox professors they have left that upon which their souls could have no sure hold There is no point that ever Christ taught or the Apostles preched or the primitive Church knew that is denied by the reformed 2 He hath no power to exclude them out of the Church who himself is scarce a member of it he is in the Church only as Antichrist in the temple of God and in as much as he exalts himself above all that is called God 2 Thes. 2.4 viz. all Kings and maâ—itrates in which regard in some measure his Churchship might be denyed 3 The Church of Rome her self is most hereticall if that be Heresy to preach down what God commands to blot out what he hath written to adde to what he hath spoken and dispence with what he hath enjoyned the Church of Rome cannot be found they ought first to cast the beame out of their own eyes and then they can see the better to pull the mote out of ours 4 The Pope or Bishop of Rome hath no authoritative power over the Churches of other
part of the substance of that Sacrament for when the Minister dipping the infant in water or laying of water upon the face of it hath pronounced these words I baptize thee in the name of the Father c. the infant is fully and perfectly baptized so as the sign of the Cross being afterwards used doth neither adde any thing to the vertue or perfection of baptisme nor being omitted doth detract any thing from the effect and substance of it 2. It is apparent in the Common Prayer book that the infant babtized is by vertue of baptisme before it be signed with the sign of the Cross received into the Congregation of Christs stock as a perfect member thereof and not by any power ascribed unto the sign of the Cross. So that for the very remembrance of the Cross which is very precious to all them that rightly believe in Jesus Christ and in the other respects mentioned the Church of England hath retained still the sign of it in baptisme following herein the primitive and Apostolical Churches and accounting it a lawful outward Ceremony and honourable badge whereby the infant is dedicated to the service of him who dyed upon the Cross as by words used in the book of Common Prayer it may appear Lastly The use of the sign of the Cross in baptisme being thus purged from all Popish superstition and errour and reduced in the Church of England to the primary institution of it upon those true rules of doctrine concerning things indifferent which are consonant to the word of God and the judgements of all the Ancient Fathers we hold it the part of every private man both Minister and others reverently to retain the true use of it prescribed by publick authority considering that things of themselves indifferent do in some sort alter their nature when they are either commanded or forbidden by a lawfull Magistrate and may not be omitted at every mans pleasure contrary to the Law when they be commanded nor used when they are prohibited The usual Objection against this harmless Ceremony is this Viz. what need is there of it but if Magistrates should not establish Lawes until every one of their Subjects were rationally convinced of their necessity when should there be Lawes made and many that makes this a sufficient Argument against the Crosse in Baptisme may remember that when they had power and fate at the Helm there were many things commanded of which we might have said What need they To conclude what ever is established by lawful Magistrates we are not to inquire the Reason of it Reason and Religion commanding us to obey without all Dispute for the Lords sake There being many things in the Church of Christ of themselves low and poor yet in regard of others so necessarie that she may say of them as our Saviour said of the Asse The Lord hath need of them Courteous Reader THis following Chapter was not so fully Preached as here handled in regard that the Iniquitie of the Times wherein these things were taught would from this chiefly have concluded the Preachers Malignancy whereby he should have been Crucified by an Ordinance By vertue of that Rule estote prudentes Matthew 10.16 it was passed over in a few words and they so clouded that it might have appeared the Preacher was not willing to be throughly understood CHAP. III. Of Confirmation THis is not here handled as a Sacrament but is placed as the space between the Font and the Table it being a most solemn Ordinance that the Baptized as in the ancient Churches was to be partaker of before he might be admitted to the Sacracrament of the Lords Supper Before we go any further it is necessary to speak something touching the rise of this word Confirmation in the Church which was briefly this In the Primitive Church when there were any persons wiling to imbrace the Christian Faith whether Iewes or Infidels they were not by and by admitted into the Priviledges of the Church but by certain â—teps or degrees set their foot therein 1. By hearing they were admitted to the hearing of the Word taught Catechized or Expounded which was common to them with men of all kinds whether Christians or not yet these were more particularly regarded by the Church and were called Audientes 2. By Catechizing having heard in common with others some grounds of the true faith and liked it they were after admitted in â— peculiar way and performing some Ceremony were admitted both to hear and see more in the Church then the Audientes were had the Principles of Religion taught them by eminent men purposely thereunto appointed who were called Catechista and their Disciples Catechumâ—ni Hence it is said that Theophilus is said to be instructed or as the word Originally is Catechized in the things of Christ 1 Luke 4. 3. By requesting that is having been Catechized and making good progress in the Christian principles and desireing to be owned as professors of the same they desired and required the Sacrament of baptisme which they did by giving in their names to the officers of the Church forty dayes before Easter that and Whitsunday being the publick dayes appointed by the Church for baptizing the Catechumeni and in regard of their number these two dayes being insufficient they set the two days following each of the former for that service apart from this giveing in their names they were called competentes quia nomina dederunt ad baptismum eum simul petebant 4. By baptizing after this upon the aforesaid dayes they were brought to the font or Baptistery and publickly and severally asked Credis in Dâ—um Patrem Believest thou in God the Father c. the party said Credo c. So was baptized and called hence baptizati and looked upon as Members of the body of Christ yet incompleate and imperfect that is weak Christians being newly born 5. By confirming that is having been baptized and so owned as visible Members of the Church they were brought before the Bishop or chief Officer of the place and before him openly making a declaration of his faith and resolution to walk in the same was confirmed by a solemn calling upon God in prayer unto which was annexed the outward sign of imposition of hands by the Bishop that God would strengthen and confirm the baptized in that faith wherein he was baptized and whereof he had made profession after which prayer and imposition of hands he was declared a perfect Church Member that is fitted for the receiving of all Church priviledges particularly the Sacrament of the supper unto which the Church in this had a peculiar respect which is a great confirmer of the faith of the Saints Hence they were called Fideles and were of full age men in Christ Iesus and received Imposition of hands signifying that the Lord blessed them ut pleni Christiani inveniantur This is confirmation and laid down by the Apostle as a Christian Principle
Hâ—b 6 2. after baptisme which in all ages of the Church it followed We must note that though we have mention onely of the Adâ—lt or those that were converted to the Christiâ—n faith when they came to years of discretion yet the children oâ— believing Parents were baptized in their Infancy and 〈◊〉 and confirmed â—s the other were before they were owned as compleate Members fit to receive all the Ordinances of the Church particularly the Lords supper As no Ordinance in itself though never so pure necessary and holy but hath been corrupted through the vanity and sinfulness of men this Ordinance among others hath groaned under great abuses 1. By Remanists Rome hath made it a Sacrament preferred it before and above baptisme vel quia à dignioribus datur in digniore parte corpâ—ris seilicet in fronte vel forte quia majus augmentum virtutum praestet licet baptismus plus ad remissionem valeat And besides prayer and laying on of hands there mâ—st be anointing with Oyle during the pronouncing of these words Consigno te signo crucis Confirme te Chrismate salusis in nomine patris c. Without all this there is no confirmation contrary and besides the Primitive institution of this Ordinance 2. By male contents there are ever some that will be against rule and order except they be the only men to rule themselves this was in several places of this Land called down as Popish and Antichristian and that imposition of hands did cease with the Apostles themselves whereby the governours of his Church though commanded by Law to their duty in reverence to this Ordinance the Bishop being every third year required in this visitation to confirm all that were trained up in the faith and the Ministers of every Parish to take care to prepare all of years and understanding for confirmation against the visitation yet some Ministers neglecting their duty in this particular and others calumniating it there wanted heads whereon to lay on hands in many places and since our late grannd defection from all order it hath been quite laid aside in all places and not so much as thought on among believers though it be a principle of our belief Yet the deadness of this age hath done so much good as to give the Alarum and cause three great Champions to arm themselves for the reviving of this ordinance and defend the purity and necessity of the same in three excellent treatises and laying it down as a sin expedient to remove our distempers learnedly and largely Whatever Rome doth to exalt this Ordinance in a superstitious manner or discontented persons to debase it in a prophane manner yet being of God let us in a few words see 1. It s Nature 2. It s End 3. Resolve some Questions SECT I OF its Nature we have spoken already yet for clearer illustration take this Description It is a holy Ordinance whereby the baptized after a publick profession of his Faith is declared a perfect Member of the Church and blessed by solemn Prayer and laying on of hands This Description needs no particular Explication to them that have read what before hath been written therefore we shall wave that for the present and consider 1. That the Church of England will have none confirmed but such as can rehearse the Creed the Lords Prayer the ten Commandements and answer to such Questions of the Church Catechisme as shall be put to him and none if possible to be unconfirmed that can do it 2. That the Baptized have witnesses of this his Confirmation it is not inexpedient if they be the same that were at his Baptisme 3. That at the laying on of hands this Prayer is to be made by the Bishop Defend O Lord this Childe with thy heavenly Grace that he may continue thine for ever and daily increase in thy holy Spirit more and more untill he come to thy everlasting Kingdome Amen Whether his Ordinance belongs to the Bishop in particular to perform or whether it is common to him with other Presbyters is too high a question for us to discuss Yet by Antiquity it seems to be the Bishops Right and learned men hâ—ve defended it what ever the Guisell say to the contrary Calvin himself being witness 4. Imposition or laying of hands is of great Antiquity in the Church of Christ as hath been above â—roved in the Chapter of Ordination and is an essential outward Rite at this Ordinance also Heb. 6.2 Acts 8.17 It is a usual Ceremony boâ—h in the Old and New Testament and to the case in hand by it or with it did our Saviour bless the children that were broâ—ght unto him Marke 10.16 SECT II. The Ends for whiâ—h his Ordinance is appointed are briefly these 1. For the fâ—rther stâ—â—ngthning of the baptized in the Faith of Christ â—he Holy Gâ—â—st waâ— given by the lâ—yâ—ng on of the hands Acts 8.17 and â—hoâ—gh â—hat visible wâ—y and miraculous long since ceased yet thâ—t inviâ—â—ble wâ—y of sanctifying the â—oul and strengâ—hing of the faith of â—he baâ—tized is noâ— ceased bâ—t may anâ— dâ—th accompany this Ordinâ—nce as Prayer Reading Hearing and oâ—her Ordinances do 2 To Capacitate the baptized for the Lords Supper this is tâ—â— top-stone of Christian Perfection in a visible way to approach that Table unto which Confirmation gives a real right and more proximate then Baptisme 3. It dischargeth the witnesses at Baptisme of that Engagement they then made for the baptized He now engageth himself personally to walk in the Faith and promises for himself before the Church to live accordingly they have brought him up in the Faith and by his Declaration there is declared that they have done what they promised and he himself now qâ—ittâ—th â—hem For which cause as we said before it is not inconvenient if the Baptismal witnesses be the confirming that they may see themselves discharged and be witnesses to â—iâ— of it 4. To remove or prevent the coming of the ignorant and scandalous to the Lord Supper i.e. aliquo modo some manner of way It is ordered by the Church and rightly That none communicate at the Supper but such as hâ—ve been confirmed which would make Parents more careful of their Childrens Education an they themselves if they have any discretion to be more heedful of their wayes Great a doe was made by some pretending purity concerning the celebration of the Ordinance of the Supper though they never went about to give it Admit the Aged was as they set them forth yet the younger sort might have been looked after and by this Ordinance of Confirmation might not onely have brought them to be worthy Receivers but the Aged to have become knowing and Penitents But now I remember this Ordinance of Confirmation favoured of the Common-Prayer and they were very tender-nosed though very hard-handed and hard-mouthed too they were not able once in seven year to say the Lords Prayer and yet the Common-Prayer at least
Secondly their stubbornness in opposing those Laws made by lawful power and when punished eâ—ey call out of persecution They held it an undervaluing of themselves to crave this examination of their people by any Law made by the Church and yet no presumption to press it upon them by vertue of their own association in the mean time producing no Scripture wherein directly these things were either to be done by them or obeyed by the people Thus far have we gone touching the doctrine referring to the Sacraments the second part of that work which in the begin-was by us undertaken FIDES CATHOLICA OR THE DOCTRINE OF THE CATHOLICK CHURCH Referring to Prayer With a farther defence of the Book of COMMON-PRAYER Of the Church of ENGLAND By W. A. Presbyter LONDON Printed for Edw. Brewster at the sign of the Crane in St. Pauls Church-yard 1661 To Mr. Francis Winton Robbert Downs Richard Dogget Church-wardens And to all other officers and Inhabitants of the Town and Parish of Leighton c. Gentlemen and in Christ dearly Beloved WHat I first entered upon about three years ago in another place I brought to perfection within these few days in your audience and truly for their sakes for whom the foundation was layed was the roofe chiefely fitted and squared I am emboldned to affix your names to this treatise judgeing that as your patience and charity gave it hearing from the pulpit attentively your zeal and affection will entertaine it from the presse kindly It happened to be your lot after the nations unsettlement to receive orders for providing me a book of Common-prayer as a means judged by our superiors for the Churches tranquillity you hâ—ve here in a few words that book defended by which our submission not for necessity but for conscience unto it may be justified and God be praised that he was pleased to give you that honour as in the least to be helpers in a publick way of that distressed Church into whose doctrine you were baptized Enter into this treatise and learn how to behave your selves in prayer to God and men and for men to God and to some men chiefly for God and to all men in God that with all Saints you may be glorified by God unto which end he shall further contribute his prayers and endeavours who is Your Minister in the Lord Jesus Will. Annand Of PRAYER CHAP. 1. 1 Thes. 5.17 Pray without ceasing GOd who at all times is rich in mercy and ready to forgive yet will have his people to call upon him for that mercy and make known unto him their desires or suits in that particular to signify not his straitnesse or backwardnesse unto them but their duty and dependance upon and towards him This is the third ordinance we undertook to defend cryed down in this generation by some that pretend to the Spirit and therefore to be held up by all that give attention to the word The misapplying of the word in our dayes The neglecting of the Sacraments hath raised such division and broached such foolish questions which gender strifes 2 Tim. 2.23 that the gift or spirit of prayer thoâ—gh mâ—ch boasted of was never lesse possessed that chiefly consisting in love and Charity Yea that gift of prayer that was became much spoyled not to speak of them that altogether threw it down as a thing of naught by some mens unnatural uncharitablenesse heedlesse impertinencies strange extravagancies apish gestures ugly faces and ridiculous tones which yet was no more to be wondered at then to see a stranger wander that either willfully hath left or cruelly murthered his guide Their flighting or disgracing that rule of prayer given to the Church by our Lord and Saviour was without question the ground or stem upon which these errors grew and stood and the matrix or wombe wherein their Heteroâ—lite petitions were conceived and bred but for the present to let them passe In prayer there are three things 1 Petition Iohn 17.51 2 Confession Psal. 51.5 3 Thanksgiving Rom. 6.17 We shall chiefly speak of the first the other two naturally following it will come and present themselves to our meditations freely without a particular summons for which cause it is by way of eminency called and 〈◊〉 for the present be entituled prayer In which we shall 〈◊〉 1 Its Nature 2 Its Ground 3 Its Parts 4 Its Rule 5 Its Hinderance 6 It s Form 7 Resolve some questions SECT 1. The Nature of prayer shall not be unknown to him that exerciseth his understanding about the parts of this description It is an immediate hearty calling upon the true God through Christ according to his will for the obtaining of any blessing to or diverting of any judgment from our selves or others for whom there is hope God will be entreated 1 It is an immediate c. This excludes praying either to Saints or Angels and according to the rule of prayer shews that immediately it ought to be made to our Father which is in heaven without making any direct prayer to Saints besides God or indirect by Saints to God though they be in heaven 2 It is an hearty calling c. It is not only a speaking lip but a praying heart that shall be accepted when the mouth is pleading and the mind not closing there is a more just cause of Gods complaining then of Delilahs Iuâ— 16.15 How canst thou say I love thee when thy heart is not with me he that would have God to have a pittying eye and a powerfull arme must in himself have a praying heart hence it is called a lifting up of the soul Psalm 25.1 and a pouring out of the soul 1 Sam. 1.15 In a word quod cor non facit non fit that prayer that is not hearty is but babling not praying an act of disobedience not duty heighting sin not removing judgment nor procuring mercy 3 Upon the true God Daniel and his companions prays unto the God of heaven Dan. 2.18 David to the Lord God of Hoasts Psal. 84.8 Moses Comes in the name of the Lord God of the Hebrews Ezek. 7.19 The God of Abraham The God of Isaac and The God of Jacob is the God of the Christians and to him the vow only is to be performed there is God can deliver after that sort he doth let prayer therefore be made only to him and daily let him be praised let none say any more to the work of mens hands ye are our Gods for in him only the fatherlesse findeth mercy Hos. 14.3 4 Through Christ before the fall men might have worshipped without a mediator but since we must make Christ as the Tyrians did Blastus Act. 10.20 our friend he is the eye by which the Father sees the miserable the ear by which he hears the humble the hand by which he helps the impotent the feet by which he hastens to relieve the oppressed and the heart by which he delights in the prayers of his people 5 According to his will This
to leave every thing done and taught in the Churches of France Spaine or Italy for so they should have denyed the Lord that bought them but the errors or false worship of those Churches It is a cause of laughter to read what use men make of that letter the Pope sent Queen Elizabeth of glorious memory promiseing to ratifie the Common-prayer if she would restore his Supremacy It is as clear as the Sun that the Pope and the Guisel will both of them according to the Proverb play a smal game before they stand out It was lately their main study how to reconcile themselves to the independent who had got the start of them and they have now studyed a new art how to reconcile themselves to the Lord Bishop he being now a corner stone in the Church of England if the Pope use the same policy of all men under heaven they have least cause to declare it since they will truckle with Quaker Ranter they whole brood of bastardly Hereticks to procure unto themselves a supremacy It is worthy of observation that by this the Pope could not pick a quarrel even with the Common-prayer all things therein being so lawfull that he had not impudence to speake against and so exactly composed that he would have established it by Papal Authority without diminution or augmentation And yet it gives no strength at all unto his Kingdom that having these three pillars 1. Infallibility 2. Supremacy 3. Purgatory All which the Common-prayer disowns and renounceth yet the Pope will licence it as he doth English bibles that is because he must he will play at a smâ—l gaâ—e because he hath hopes to win the set he proffered to ratifie Common-prayer not for love to it but to get his hand into the Kingdom of England knowing or at least hoâ—ing he might get in his arme and by degrees his whole body for the same reason the Guisel truckeled formerly under the Independent and lately with the Anabaptist and now would hold the stirrop to his spiâ—itual lordship not for love of either but to keep self in credit with the world being concious to himself that from him came all the evils that have befallen either Church or state in the by-past years and least with Cain he should become a vagabond is desireous of any that will befriend him 2. It s giving offence to tender consciences This is a high note and often heard but 1. Who discovered or layd the ground of that offence 2. How easily might that offence be removed if in popular Sermons the innocency and purity of that book were preached the people have for 16 years heard much against it and now they hear nothing at least from you for it no wonder therefore if they be not affected with it We say affected for it seemes to be but a prejudice against that book not conscience that maketh them to oppose the same that being guided by Sripture and reason not spleen and passion When we behold that service rayled at scorned shunned contemned condemned and the users of it scandaled and yet not one sentence word or petition proved unlawfull or not according to scripture we have ground to conjecture that it is stomack not religion maketh them to do so and the over-flowings of their gall not tendernesse of their consciences that makes them to flee out into such depraveing and abusive language They would appear so holy that it is dangerous to offend them or lay a stone of stumbling before them Yet what greater offence can be given then to abuse a national or personall Church by defaming the prayers therein established or by the other made when in the meane time in all their findings one sentence unlawfull in these prayers they cannot find were they as tender as they would seeme to be we should have more argueing lesse rayling The greatest number of them that pretend to receive offence are of that disposition that they desire not to be informed touching those set formes whether by discourse preaching or reading and the other part can produce no unseemly thing in them and yet they being established by good laws and Just authority give still occasion to conjecture that not conscience but wilfulnesse and obstinacy is the mother of their non-conformity There is a God above who often brings mens wicked devices upon their own pate It was piâ—y to see commissioners apointed in every county and ministers as their assistants turning cut ministers from their places to the ruine of their familees for not subscribing to the directory or for reading Common-prayer when they were bound by oath law and allegiance to the same and now men that are enjoyned or desireed to read Common-prayer pretend conscience and cry out they are offended and the same persons complain of persecution when the true owners are restored but c. The Reader can bear us witnesse that we have not mentioned that act of Popish Queen Mary who at her first coming to the Crown seeking to Erect popery in England repealed all acts made in the favour of the Common-prayer and altogether abolished it to facilitate that work Nor of the Practise of those Recusants who being under the penalty of a fine if they came not to the publick Churches of this nation in the days of Queen Elizabeth would commonly refraine themselves from hearing Common-prayer and not enter Church being in this Puritanicall untill the preacher was in the pulpit which are arguments of no smal weight to defend that the Common-prayer is not popishly affected the Papists themselves being witnesses To conclude this question seeing that some men do not grow strong and well favoured through holynesse knowledge and sobriety by other ordinances of the Church Common-prayer which they scornfully call poâ—age is fittest for their weak stomacks and sickly constitutions while those that are strong and of good digestion may receive the more meat and grow in grace and knowledge by their eating that is by a holy using the set formes of the Church together with other dutys Quest. 4. Whether there be not vaine repetitions in those formes This is a grand argument brought by many justifying their non conformity to the Churches liturgy and most heard from those men whose publick prayers were for the most part carried on by empty or at least by many repititons To be brief we must distinguish of repetitions there is a bare repetition and there is a vain repetition 1. Bare repetitions if repetitions of themselves were unlawfull lawfull to be used in prayer that is to repeate or bring over again and again the same thing before asked then many of the Saints of God must be blamed and the son of God must not be Justified who in one prayer repeated the same petition thrice over Mat. 26.44 It is a desireable faculty to vary in prayer yet every one cannot do it and they that can will repeate somtimes 1. Through pinching necessity this made Christ cry earnestly in