Selected quad for the lemma: church_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
church_n bishop_n jurisdiction_n presbyter_n 3,202 5 9.9978 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A75492 A consideration of certaine controversies at this time agitated in the kingdome of England, concerning the government of the church of God. / Written at the command and appointment of the Walachrian classis, by Guilielmus Apollonii, minister of the Word of God at Middleburgh. And sent from the Walachrian churches, to declare the sense and consent of their churches, to the Synod at London. Octob. 16. 1644. Stilo novo. Translated out of Latine accorning to the printed copy. Apollonius, Willem, 1602 or 3-1657. 1645 (1645) Wing A3535; Thomason E1155_2; ESTC R208676 76,829 175

There are 11 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

Church and judge of Church affaires so as that the company of beleevers governe and judge by those Elders as their instruments and deputies like as the Kings deputy represents the King himselfe For the multitude of Beleevers in the Church hath not by the Word of God a power of ruling and judging Church affaires by a spirituall jurisdiction and therefore cannot delegate it to the Elders and Presbyters But the Presbyters doe themselves immediately from Christ the King of the Church receive power of ruling and Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction 2 Cor. 5. 20. 1 Cor. 4. 1. In this sense therefore we doe not acknowledge a representative Church Neither doe we acknowledge such a Representative Church as by commission from the multitude of beleevers should have absolute power by their lawes and acts of jurisdiction to bind the multitude and subject their faith and consciences so as without triall they should receive and imbrace what soever should be determined by this Church For this is the Papists tyrannicall Antichristian representative Church in the Pope and his popish Bishops which by Reformed Churches is denied and cast out But this representative Church we acknowledge out of the holy Scriptures viz. a company of Presbyters chosen by the multitude of the Church which by authority and ecclesiasticall jurisdiction received from Christ is set over and takes care of the Church and rules it by spirituall jurisdiction and decrees made consonant to the Word of God to whom the whole multitude of beleevers is bound to yeeld obedience in all things which from the Word of God and by the power by Christ committed to them they decree This governing ministeriall or representative Church is proved by these Arguments 1. From Matth. 18 17 18. Tell the Church This is that Church which hath the power o● the keyes the power of binding and loosing in heaven and earth But now this power was not given to the whole multitude of beleevers but to the Elders and Governours of the Church who must be obeyed in the Lord under the penalty of Excommunication For the Government of the Church is not a promiscuous and popular Government but is committed by God to the Presbyters and Elders which are the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Rulers and Guides in the Church This is that Church which is to receive and judge of the beleevers complaints brought before them concerning the scandals and offences of the members of the Church which is the office of the Pastours and Presbyters to whom the Holy Ghost hath prescribed lawes and rules according to which they ought to receive and judge of those complaints Tit. 1. 13. which to all the multitude of beleevers in the Church is not injoyned This is that Church-which hath the power of remitting and retaining sins which was given to the Apostles and their Successours Matth. 16. 18 19. Joh. 20. 21 22. but no where to the whole multitude of beleevers The ruling and ministeriall Church of Presbyters is therefore here understood Whence also saith Beza upon Matth. 16. 18. that in the Holy Scripture the word Church is sometimes used for an Ecclesiasticall Senate as Matth. 18. 17. to wit because convened in the name of the whole Church over which they are set it 's elsewhere called by Paul a Presbytery 1 Tim. 4. 14. and that in this place by Church the Evangelist understands a Colledge of Elders he proveth from hence that he doth after make mention of binding and loosing which power and jurisdiction was allwayes in their power who were therefore called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 rulers of the Synagogue And Tremellius in his notes upon the New Testament translated out of Syriack To the Church saith he that is to that Councell instituted by God and the congregation of his Saints that the authority both of binding and loosing according to God should be in their power as appeares in this and the following verse Deodate in his notes on the Italian Bible upon this place expounds Church to be a meeting of them that have the care of governing the Church amongst Christians and the inspection of the order peace and discipline thereof 1 Cor. 5. 3 4. 2 Cor. 2. 6. according to the custome of the Jewish Church which allso had their Consistory for correction of manners The Doctors and Professors of Geneva in their notes on the French Bible in this place do understand those who have the care and ordinary calling of administring Doctrine and Discipline in the Church as there had alwayes been use of it among Gods people but was specially renewed in the Ecclesiasticall Ministery under the Apostles The Dutch interpreters in their notes on the new Dutch translation upon this place expound Church by Church Governors who as it were represent the whole Church 1 Cor. 12. 28. 2 Cor. 2. 6. 2. It 's proved from 1 Cor. 5. where is an Ecclesiasticall assembly described which by a spirituall jurisdiction transacts the Church affairs and represents the Church to wit the Presbytery taking care of the Church discipline which is gathered together with Pauls ministeriall spirit and the power of the Lord Iesus that is the power of the Keys which Christ as Lord of his Church only hath Revel 3. 7. which therefore consisteth only of the Churches Ministers and Christs Embassadors as being they who alone have the ministeriall spirit of the Apostles and the power of the Lord committed to them which is allso gathered together for this end to deliver to Sathan an incestuous person a Church member which exercise is committed not to all the Church-members but to the Ministers and Pastors We must therefore acknowledge a governing and representative Church We reject therefore these opposite opinions following 1. That there is no other Church visible described in Scripture but a particular or parochiall Church which might meet together in one place to celebrate the holy worship of God For there is such a visible Church described in Scripture which hath those attributes given to it which agree not to a particular Church as such as that it 's dispersed through Pontus Galatia Cappadocia Asia and Bithinia 1 Pet. 1. 1. compared with chap. 5. 1 2. that all both Jewes and Greeks whether bond or free make up one body thereof 1 Cor. 12. 13. 2. That a particular visible Church is by the Word of God limited to such bounds as that of necessity they may be ordinarily contained and ought to meet in one place for performing the publike worship of God with mutuall edification For we have shewed that the constitution of such a Church as by reason of their multitude or some other cause cannot ordinarily meet in one place doth well agree with the word of God and Apostolicall institution For the essence and lawfull constitutiō of a Church dependeth not on the outward circumstance of place but on a due Profession of faith and bond of holy communion For as Ames saith that same in
19. 8 9. and 20. 17 18. which did allso very greatly abound in multitude of members as appeareth Act. 19. 10 17 18 19 20. and 20. 20 21. 1 Cor. 16. 8. Revel 2. 2 3. And yet met in some private house for celebrating the worship of God Act. 19. 9 10. and 20. 20. But that this whole multitude could in one schoole or house celebrate the worship of God is impossible It 's certaine therefore to us that they met in divers places and at divers times under the inspection of divers Pastors 3. The Church of Rome did not meet in one place for celebrating the worship of God there were more holy assemblies there in divers places there was a Church in the house of Aquila and Priscilla Rom. 16. 5. Paul when he was at Rome had holy Church Assemblies in his owne house Acts 28. 23 30 31. which yet was not that whole collectively taken and famous Church of the believing Romans whose faith was famous through the whole world Rom. 1. 8. Other examples we meet with in the Scripture of Churches duly constituted according to Gods appointment which met not in one place for exercising the worship of God but did in divers places under a common Presbytery of divers Pastors performe holy duties Hence allso in our Belgick Churches in some greater townes though there be more believers then can celebrate the holy worship of God and exercise other ordinances of Christ together in one place yet they are not divided into severall Churches but do together make one visible Church under the common Presbitery and government of divers Pastors II. We affirme that a visible Church described in the holy Scripture was not only parochiall or particular but there was allso a Nationall Church of one nation or kingdome which consisteth of many and divers parochiall Churches joyned under one Ecclesiasticall government and knit together amongst themselves by a mutuall visible communion and fellowship Ecclesiasticall We deny indeed that there can be any such Typicall Nationall Church now under the New Testament as the Jewish Church was wherein all of that nation were bound to a publike and solemne Typicall worship to be performed in one place chosen by God under the inspection of one visible pastor or priest who in worship and Sacrifices did hold forth and represent the whole people or nation For this vanished away with the types and carnall precepts of the Old Testament We reject allso that Nationall and Provinciall forme of a Church introduced by men in which many Churches are united and subjected to a Cathedrall Church and depend upon one visible Pastor who is Pastor and Lord of all other pastors and inferior particular Churches wherin the inferior Churches injoy Gods holy ordinances and Ecclesiasticall power by derivation and commission from the power and jurisdiction of that Cathedrall Church or that Nationall or Provinciall Pastor and Bishop For these are the inventions of Antichrist which bring a tiranny into the Church and overthrow the power granted by God to the Churches and pastors Yet such a Nationall and provinciall Church we acknowledge wherein many particular Churches are by one visible Ministery and Church-government joyned into one collective Ecclesiasticall body visible for celebrating all those ordinances of God which are necessary to the visible ministeriall government of those Churches and mutuall Ecclesiasticall followship in it This notion of a Church we deduce from Scripture by these arguments 1. The Church of God under the Old Testament consisted of many particular Churches Synagogues which did in divers places celebrate the worship of God and the exercises of Doctrine Discipline and Church-Government as appeareth Act. 15. 21. Act. 13. 15 16. Luk. 21. 12. Ioh. 12. 42. all which were yet conjoined into one national visible Church which God had chosen out of every nation and people Deut. 7. 7. and 32. 8. But the Churches of the New Testament are of the same nature and forme in all effentialls which do constitute a Church as having the same Faith the same Covenant of grace the same signes of that Covenant for substance the same way of Salvation the same Religiō the same visible profession of Faith which constitute a Church visible common to both and differ only in accidentall typicall ceremonies which change not the essence and forme of a Church Hence Protestant writers observe that the holy Scripture doth not refuse to make use of the name Synagogue to denote a Christian Church Jam. 2. 2. 2 Thes 2. 1 Heb. 10. 25. For when as the Church of both Testaments is one and the same for essence there is no reason why both people may not be described by one and the same name saith Tilenus in his Theses part 2. disput 14. Thes 3. It was morall and perpetuall therfore that those many Synagogues and parochiall or particular Churches should unite into one Church Nationall Hence allso the Jewish Churches brought to the faith of Christ under the New Testament though dispersed through divers Countries were joyned into one Ecclesiasticall body ruled by the same law government and Ecclesiastciall discipline 1 Pet. 1. 1 2. compared with chap. 5. 1 2. 2. The Church of Galatia consisting of many severall particular Churches as appeareth Gal. 1. 2. and yet was united into one Ecclesiasticall body of that nation and united in a Church society under one common Discipline and Government Hence Gal. 5. 9. it 's compared to a Lump which is easily corrupted by a little leaven like as the united and compacted body of the Corinthian Church is set forth by the same similitude 1 Cor. 5. 6. He giveth cōmand to the Galathians cōcerning an uniformity of government in externall discipline and worship to be observed amongst them against the seducers false teachers Gal. 4. 10. c. and 5. 9 10. which intimates an united authority in Church government whereby the false teachers might be removed out of all the particular Churches The Church of Galathia therefore was Provinciall 3. The particular Churches of one province or nation which in the ministeriall government in Ecclesiasticall fellowship and communion are conjoyned and united into one visible Ecclesiasticall body for the exercising visible acts of Church communion joyntly amongst themselves those constitute a Church Provinciall or Nationall For the members which do in an Ecclesiasticall manner mutually exercise amongst themselves visible acts of Ecclesiasticall communion and doe together jointly participate in the same acts and priviledges of a Church they make one visible body of a Church But the particular Churches of one Nation doe according to the Word of God exercise amongst themselves such visible Ecclesiasticall communion for they doe by their particular members by their Pastours and Elders delegated sometimes heare the same Word frequent the same divine Worship partake of the same Sacraments and doe ordinarily avoid and shut out from the Kingdome of Christ the same excommunicated person exhort reprove comfort and mutually edifie one another
Ecclesiastically and when one of them hath made defection from the Gospell of Christ others indeavour by Ecclesiasticall Ministry and the Discipline of Christ to reduce it into the right way and if they refuse to hearken to their Ecclesiasticall admonition they judge them as a company of heathens and publicans avoid and exclude them from their holy communion Since then the Churches of one people or nation performe amongst themselves these specificall exercises of Ecclesiasticall communion and union there is therefore a coalition of them into a Church Nationall Hence also our Churches of the Netherlands in their Synodall Canons have ordained not only Ecclesiasticall Assemblies Consistoriall Presbyteriall and Classicall but have also often decreed that Synods Provinciall and Nationall are to be called for the Ecclesiasticall judging of the affaires of the Church As appeares by the Synod at Emda Anno 1571. art 6 7 8 9. at Dort Anno 1578. art 16 17. at Middleburgh Anno 1581. art 20 21. at the Hagh Anno 1586. art 26 27. at Middleburgh Anno 1591. art 25 26. at Dort Anno 1619. art 29 30. where it is decreed that there shall be foure sorts of Church Assemblies held to wit Consistories Classes Synods Provinciall and Nationall wherein nothing but Ecclesiasticall affaires may be handled and that in an Ecclesiasticall manner III. We affirme that there is described in Scripture an universall externall Church dispersed through the whole world which in a visible polity maketh one Ecclesiasticall organicall body under which are contained all Particular Classicall Provinciall and Nationall Churches as parts of that whole This assertion we thus prove from Scripture 1. From 1 Cor. 12. 28. God hath set some in the Church c. where by the word Church is signified that one body of which there are many members spoken of ver 12. wherein is not described the Invisible and mysticall Church of Christ as such but the Church of Christ as Visible and externall as being that which is distinguished by the visible Sacrament or signe of Baptisme ver 13. which consisteth of various and heterogeneous externall members and organs ver 15 16 17 18. to which are given from God those various and externall administrations for edification spoken of ver 28. which is subject to Schisme and separation ver 25. Nor is it any Particular Church that is there described but the Universall and Catholike Church wherein all as well Jewes as Gentiles are joyned into one body ver 13. which comprehends all that are baptized in one Spirit ver 13. to which are given from God Apostles Prophets Teachers Pastours the gifts of tongues and miracles c. ver 28. which are not given to this or that particular but to the Catholike Church visible There is therefore here described an Universall Church 2. There is by the Word of God some fellowship and communion Ecclesiasticall betweene all the visible Churches of the whole world and therefore we must acknowledge by the Institution of Christ a universall body of the Church For there is between them an internall fellowship and an obligation to mutuall duties of Christianity Eph. 4. 3 4 5 6. which requireth also an externall Ecclesiasticall fellowship and communion in exhorting reproving comforting and edifying of all and bindeth us to offer prayers and thanksgivings to God in the Ministry of the Church in behalfe of all the Churches of the whole world to reduce Churches gone astray c. and that fellowship which the members of a particular Church hold amongst themselves the same in a due proportion ought the Provinciall and Nationall Churches to hold amongst themselves for the mutuall edification and increase of the body of Christ by which Ecclesiasticall communion all Nationall Churches doe make up one Universall Ecclesiasticall body 3. So also we see in Scripture Ecclesiasticall meetings held which represented the Church Catholike and Universall of the whole world wherein businesses were transacted which concerne the Universall Catholike Church of the whole world as Act. 1. where an Ecclesiasticall meeting is held by Preaching the Word and exercises of Discipline or Church-Government ver 15 16 26. and that in the name of the Church Catholike for there are the Pastours of the Church Catholike the Apostles sent into the whole world Matth. 28. 19. with the brethren out of Galilee and Jerusalem ver 15. and they transact a businesse which concerneth the Church Universall to wit the Election of an Apostle to be a Pastor of the Church Universall And they who transact those things which concern the rule government and oversight of the Church Universall ought to represent the Church of the whole world And All. 15. 22. that meeting of Apostles Elders and Brethren is called a Church who by an ordinary power prescribed Ecclesiasticall decrees and canons to all the Churches of the Gentiles and imposed them in a way of Jurisdiction which no Provinciall or Nationall much lesse Parochiall Church might lawfully do but is an act of the Catholike Church The Reformed Divines also acknowledge a Catholike visible Church see amongst others Walaeus in his common places loco de Ecclesia militante pag. 458. of his works in folio where explaining the nature of the Church visible after the definition of it he affirmes that this Church visible is considered two wayes either Vniversally for the Church which through the whole world is by the preaching of the Gospell called out of the world which in some respect may be called also Catholike or for a Particular company confined to one certain place See also the Positions of the Professours of Leyden disp 40. thes 27. where they tell us that the Church Visible is by some consounded with a Church Particular and the Invisible with the Vniversall But we say they saving alwayes better judgements think● these members ought not to be confounded And thes 33. thus they say This Church visible is considered two wayes either as a certaine company of one particular village towne or province those to wit who are knit together not only in a community of Faith and Sacraments but also in the forme of externall Government and Ecclesiasticall rites or as a certaine company Occumenicall and universall dispersed in divers places through the whole world though in the very externall forme of Government and circumstantiall rites they doe often much differ amongst themselves yet agreeing in the essentiall communitie of the Faith and Sacraments whence also that is frequent in Cyprian The Bishoprick is one whereof each severally hold a part IIII. We affirme that a company of Presbyters met together with Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction for transacting Church affaires are a Church to wit a ministeriall or a governing and representative Church as they call it and therefore called in Scripture by the name Church We confesse that such a company of Presbyters are not a Church Representative properly so called as if the Elders were the delegates of the beleevers who in their name and their stead governe the
Profession doth constitute a Church Visible which in Reality and it's internall nature constituteth the Church Mysticall that is Faith Medull lib. 1. cap. 32. thes 7. 3. That there is no visible instituted Church but that which is met together for the performance of all the Ecclesiasticall ordinances of Christ for preaching the word of God and administration of the Sacraments and the exercises of all the offices and spirituall gifts in a constituted Church But Christ speaketh of a Church Mat. 18. 17. met together not for the word and Sacraments but only for the exercise of Church Discipline So likewise is that meeting called a Church wherein the Apostles did not by way of Sermon preach the word nor administer the Sacraments but only told what God had done among the Gentiles Act. 14. 27. 15. 4. or chose some to carry their decrees to others Act. 15. 22. which were acts of Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction And therefore that meeting which meeteth only for the exercise of discipline and Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction is allso a Church and so called in Scripture CHAP. IIII. Of Ecclesiasticall power Question VVHether the Ecclesiasticall power or power of the keyes be given by Christ to the multitude or all the members of a Church as the first and immediate subject so as believers not bearing any Church office may by themselves immediately exercise all Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction discipline and causes Ecclesiasticall save only the Sacramēts And cōsequently whether private Christians being Church members have such an Ecclesiasticall power as that they may authoritatively admit Church members to Ecclesiasticall communiō reprove by Ecclesiasticall authority such as cōmit offences bind by excommunication and Church censures absolve from excommunication and authoritatively remit sinnes whether to them also belongeth the conferring the power of the keys on the Ministers and Pastors of the Church and that power which giveth to the Ministers an Ecclesiasticall office and consequently the examination of Pastors the sending unto and confirming them in that Church office by imposition of hands and againe authoritative suspending and removing Pastors from that function Answer THe Reformed Divines teach that none in the Church of Christ which is his Kingdome may arrogate any power to himselfe but from a divine calling and delegation from Christ for whereas those Ecclesiasticall affaires are administred in the Church in the name of Christ and with his power none may performe them but he to whom they are committed by Christ 1 Cor. 4. 1. and 5. 4. 2 Cor. 5. 20. and when as Christ hath vouchsafed this calling and delegation to administer those holy functions not to all in the Church but to some only 1 Cor. 12. 28 29. Rom. 12. 4 5 6. they therefore deny that this power belongeth to all They allow indeed to all beleevers and godly members in the Church visible a spirituall dignity and authority of Grace whereby they are Kings and Priests to God for divine Grace hath a heavenly authority and majestie accompanying it but deny that authority of Office and Ecclesiasticall power or jurisdiction belongeth to them all We grant in this controversie 1. That the power of the Keyes is given by Christ for the benefit of the whole Church and of all beleevers for their spirituall edification Ephes 4. 11 12. 2. That to all the members of the Church belongeth power to choose their Ministers and Pastours either by suffrages or by free consent For this power is found grounded on rules of holy Scripture Act. 1. 23. and 6. 2 3 4. 14. 22. But by this Election the beleevers doe not conferre or derive the power of the Keyes on the Ministers or Pastours chosen but only designe him on whom the power of that Church office is by divine Institution to be conferred by Ecclesiasticall Ordination The whole derivation of Ecclesiasticall authority and spirituall power on Ministers so farre as it can be ministerially secondarily and subordinately performed by the Church is by the whole Ecclesiasticall Vocation But by Election is only the designation of the person on whom that power is to be conferred and by Ordination he is authoritatively sent and put into possession of that function to which he was by Election designed to be ordained Ordination therefore is an act of Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction as the Bishop of Spalato righly discourseth De repub eccles lib. 2. cap. 3. num 54. but the act of Election or Nomination is not an act of jurisdiction or Ecclesiasticall authority but of the gift of discretion whereby they prove the spirits and discern the voice of the shepheard and choose him by whose teaching they will be lead For the better clearing of this businesse When we consider of a Pastors Calling intirely and absolutely and not in reference to some part of it by it is the whole derivation of Ecclesiasticall right on this or that person performed And thus it comprehendeth Election and Ordination Election hath three parts Examination Approbation and Nomination Examination consists in the triall of his Learning and Gifts and former Conversation Approbation lieth in two things Judgement and Assent Judgement we call that sentence whereby the person examined is judged fit to undertake the Ministery and may profitably performe it Assent is of them who rest satisfied in this judgement Nomination is when one by name is by common advise decerned to be invited to the Ministery of a Church Ordination comprehendeth Mission and Admission Mission or sending is an authoritative act of the Presbytery whereby the Office is conferred on the person elected and he sent and commended to the Church for which he had been designed and put in possession of his Ministery Initiation or Admission is the publike administration of an outward rite wherby the person elected is established in the ministery of that Church and is performed by explaining the divine Institution Prayer and a solemne blessing the common Symbol of this Ordination is Imposition of hands In this whole businesse therefore of Vocation we grant to the people Nomination which was at first in the power of the Presbyters and people in common The Governours of the Church meane while moderating the whole action for they being better able to judge of the quality of their learning and gifts were therefore to performe this charge that according to the canons they were not to follow the people but to leade them for the Election was chiefly the act of Ministers the worke of the faithfull people to consent to that Election distinct 63. cap. Nosse cap. Cum longè For it is cleare by Apostolicall examples and the practise of the Ancients that the Ministers were first to Nominate and the people to assent to that Nomination duly performed or to consult in common about the person to be nominated or lastly if they have any cause why they might justly oppose that Nomination freely to produce their judgement to the Governours of the Church Their consent they signified anciently as Junius acknowledgeth disput
Servants in the house of God by speciall office 2 Cor. 4. 5. who know how to behave themselves aright in the house of God 1 Tim. 3. 16. and to give to those in the house their due portion in season Math. 24. 25. rightly to divide and distribute the word of God 2 Tim. 2. 15. For the Keyes are a signe of power intrusted which are by Christ committed to the stewards and overseers in his house whereby to administer their power And by the Keyes in Scripture is signified authority faculty power administration of government which is exercised in commanding forbidding allowing restraining As Isa 22. 22. compared with Isa 9. 6. Rev. 1. 18. 3. 7. And Mat. 16. 18 19. denotes Ministers power and full administration They are committed therefore to those who are set over the Church not to all in the Church 2. That opinion is not to be admitted which doth overthrow the order constituted by Christ in the Church by which order Christ hath in the Church visible as in an Heterogeneous Organical Body constituted of divers integrall parts to which he hath given their peculiar functions and operations in that Ecclesiasticall body For he hath set in the Church eyes eares hands feet rulers and such as are over them in the Lord overseers watchmen Pastors Embassadors in Christs name preachers fathers builders sowers c. And a flock a people a house a field children and such as governed and who are bound to obey those that are set over them c. see Heb. 13. 17. 1 Thes 5. 12. 1 Tim. 5. 17. 2 Cor. 5. 20. 1 Cor. 4. 1 2 15. 1 Cor. 3. 9. c. But if all in the Church have the power of the Keys power of building ruling the Church by censures Ecclesiasticall c. all will be Embassadors Rulers Fathers Pastors Watchmen Eyes Eares for to those parts of the Church do Ecclesiasticall and authoritative oversight and rule belong as their proper function Therefore the power of the Keys and exercise thereof is not common to all members of a Church but is the proper function of the overseers and Pastors to whom the Rod and that severe power is committed for the edification of the Church 1 Cor. 4. 21. 2 Cor. 13. 10. 3. The Cannons and rules proposed in holy Scripture whereby the right government of the Church and the due use of the Keyes is directed are not given to all the beleevers in a Church but the Pastors and Elders Timothy and Titus and other Church-Governors are by the Apostle instructed how to behave themselves in the house of God as faithfull stewards in the Epistles to Timothy and Titus and also 1 Cor. chap. 3. 4. And the faults which are committed in mis-governing of Churches and abuse of the Keys are not by God imputed as the fault of all the beleevers in a Church but of some to wit the overseers 1 Tim. 3. 4 5 6. Tit. 1. 7. 1 Pet. 5. 3. Revel 2. 14 20. 3. Ioh. 16. 10. The praise and reward promised for due ordering of Churches is not by God promised to all the beleevers in a Church but to the Pastors and Elders who rule well in the Lord 1 Thes 5. 12. Heb. 13. 17. 1 Tim. 5. 17. 2 Tim. 4. 4 5. 1 Pet. 5. 4 5. Revel 22. Therefore to those only is the Government of Churches and the exercise of the Keys intrusted by Christ 4. To whom Christ gave the power and exercise of the Keys or Rule in the Church to those he gave the spirit for administration and those gifts which are necessary for the government of the Church For when God sendeth any into his Church he alwayes qualifieth them with gifts sufficient and fit for the exercise of that ministery and office committed to them as is evident by the examples of all whom God hath sent into the Church But where is the Spirit promised to all whereby all the beleevers in a Church may remit and retaine sinnes spoken of Ioh. 20 21 22 23. Where is that prudence and wisdome promised to all whereby they may be able to rule the house of God to go in and out before the people of God c. Therefore the Government of the Church and the exercise of the Keys is not by God committed to all Hence also have the Reformed Churches alwayes rejected a popular Church-Government See Sadeel's treatise in French concerning Ecclesiasticall Discipline against Morellius Of whom Reverend Beza libro de Ministrorum gradibus cap. 25. when he had described the manner of Election in the Church saith thus which order by the goodnesse of God religiously and prudently observed hitherto in this City when one democraticall fanaticall Morellius of Paris was bold by word and writing to find fault with that his writing was both in this Church and in France in many Synods worthily condemned And in our Synodicall constitutions the Churches Ecclesiasticall power Judgement Exercise of the Keys and Church-government is every where committed to the Pastors Elders to Presbyteries Consistories Classes and Synods See the Synod at Embden Anno 1571. from Article 25. to art 35. At Dort Anno 1578. art 92. to art 101. at Middleburgh Anno 1581. art 58. to art 66. at the Hagh Anno 1586. art 64. to art 74. at Middleburgh Anno 1591. art 58. to 75. at Dort Anno 1619. art 71. to art 81. II. We affirm that the power of sending or ordaining Pastors or Church-Governors is committed by God in a setled Church not to the multitude of the Church but to the Pastors and Elders or Presbyters of Churches We grant indeed as was said before that there is a liberty of nomination or election allowed by the word of God to all the members in a Church so as no Minister may without the agreement and consent of the people be obtruded upon a Church whether they will or no which Nomination or Election doth not yet confer Ministerial power on the person elected but only designeth a Person on whom it may be duly derived according to the instituted rule by those who have under Christ received that power whereby Ecclesiasticall authority is derived on this or that person We deny not also but that extraordinarily in a perplexed and depraved estate of a whole visible Church the multitude or faithfull people in a Church may choose their Pastors and Rulers and authoritatively put them into the power right and possession of the Ministery and that by reason of a cogent necessity which admitteth no law and to which all positive law giveth place But we affirm that in a setled and constituted visible Church the people by the positive law of God have not power of ordaining or sending their Pastors but that potestative Mission Ordinatiō whereby Ecclesiasticall authority or the Ministeriall power is conferred on this or that man designed to the Ministery belongeth to Presbyteries Our assertion is proved 1. From those precepts described in holy Scripture concerning Ordination or
Sending Rulers to a Church whereby it is committed not to the multitude of beleevers but to the Elders and Church-Governors 1 Tim. 5. 22. 2 Tim. 2. 2. Tit. 1. 5. c. 2. From the Examples of the Apostolick Church wherein the power of sending and ordaining Pastors was reserved to Church-Governors and never committed to the people See examples Act. 6. 6. Act. 13. 1 2 3. 1 Tim. 4. 14. 2 Tim. 1. 6. 3. Because the power of suspension or degrading Ministers of a Church belongeth not to the Multitude For to whom belongs the authority of taking away an Ecclesiasticall Ministery to the same it belongeth to conferre it for in what way any thing is obtained in the same way it is dissolved But no where in Scripture is this committed to the people to passe an Ecclesiasticall censure on false Ministers or Teachers or remove them from the Ministery but is required of the Angels of Churches and their Presbyters Tit. 1. 10 13. Reve. 2. 2 14 15 16 20. Act. 20. 28 29. So also is it decreed by our Belgick Churches that the Election of Pastors and Elders be not transacted without the peoples suffrages or free assent yet that the Mission or Ordination into the Ministery of a Church as also the suspension and degradation of a Minister be done by the Consistoriall Presbitery upon the judgement and assent of the Classis See the Canons of the Synod at Middleburgh Anno. 1591. art 3 4 5 11 58. at the Hagh Anno. 1586. art 4 13 72. at Middleburgh Anno. 1581. art 4 7 64. at Dort Anno. 1619. art 4 5 79. We reject therfore these contrary opinions following I. Of those who ascribe to the people or multitude of beleevers the power of the Keys even where there are no Rulers or Governors so that a Congregation of beleevers joyned in Church-Covenant though wanting Church Governors hath power of excommunication and of exercising all acts of the Keys or Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction and government save only the Sacraments But to us it is certaine from the word of God that that Church to which Christ gave the power of the Keys and the exercise of Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction is an Organicall body of divers members wherein are Eyes Eares Hands and Feet Pastors Rulers and a Flock which is lead and governed 1 Cor. 12. 14 15. Rom. 12. 4 5. 6. Act. 20. 28 29. But now beleevers joyned in Church Covenant destitute of Church Rulers doe not make up such an organicall body And therefore never in Scripture do we meet with a Church which exercised Ecclesiasticall Iurisdiction and the power of the Keys and yet was destitute of Church Rulers See 1 Cor. 5. 4. Act. 20. 28 29. Revel chap. 2. and 3. Therfore to no Church of beleevers wanting Rulers are we to ascribe the Keys of the Kingdome of Heaven II. Of those who affirme that the multitude of a Church doth derive Ecclesiasticall power on the Church-Governors and the Church-Governors are the beleevers servants properly so called the Churches mouth hand and instruments by whose intervention she doth execute her decrees so that the Church of beleevers under Christ the Lord and Head of the Church as his spouse and wife doth communicate government stewardship and legall exercise of Iurisdiction to some certaine men chosen by her selfe who as her servants and deputies by an authority borrowed from the multitude as the first and immediate subject of Ecclesiasticall authority do govern the house of God and exercise the chiefe acts of their function But we in this cause do from the holy Scriptures thus judge 1. That all the Functions and Offices and their authority are instituted by Christ in the Church and House of God and that the Governors of the Church do derive and receive the offices which they beare and their power and authority not from men but from Christ alone and his institution Ephes 4. 11 12. 1 Cor. 12. 26 27 28 29. Act. 20. 28. and that the power of the Keys and all authority of order and jurisdiction is primarily in Christ which Christ doth immediatly communicate to his Apostles and their successors therein 2. That the multitude of beleevers in a Church by this nomination or designation of a person on whom it may according to Christs institution be duly conferred doth effect thus much that the Ecclesiasticall office and the power thereof by the donation of Christ may be applyed to this or that man but doth not derive this power on that person But the Presbytery of Churches by a potestative Mission or authoritative Ordination and imposition of hands doth apply and send forth that person designed by the peoples choice into the possession and exercise of that function and authority So that Church Offices and their authority is immediatly from Christ conferred on the Church Governors but the application of these Offices to these or those men is done by the potestative Mission of the Presbytery with the previous assent or nomination of the people 3. The Pastors therfore in the execution of all acts of their office are not the Churches servants properly called but Governors Guides Fathers Rulers in the Church to whom the people are bound to obey whose Government Rod and authority they ought to submit to and imbrace with due subjection and reverence Heb. 13. 17. 1 Thes 5. 12 13. 1 Cor. 4. 1. And therfore when they are called the Servants of the faithfull 2 Cor. 4. 5. they are called by that name not subjectivè as if they derived and held their authority frō the Church for then were they the servants of men not of God but finaliter or objectivè because they are the servants of God for the Church for whose good and benefit they labour As Christ is called our servant Mat. 20. 28. and the Angells are called ministring Spirits Heb. 1. 14. Yet neither Christ nor the Angells have the authority of their vocation from us but exercise it for our good and service The Church Officers therfore are servants but servants of God and of Christ 1 Cor. 4. 1. in whose name they are Embassadours in all the acts of their Ecclesiasticall functions 2 Cor. 5. 20. and are furnished with his commands 2 Cor. 5. 18. are his Angells Revel 2. 1. and stewards in his house 1 Cor. 4. 1 2 3 10. III. We reject also the opposite opinion of those who teach that the exercise of Excommunication cannot be duly and lawfully done but by the judgement and decree of the people so as the whole multitude of the Church be the Judge in the case of Excommunication Although we grant that no man may in the Church be duly excommunicated without the knowledge and against the consent of the people but that the Exercise of the greater Excommunication ought to be with the assent of the whole people as was said before Yet to set all the Church members in the places of Judges we certainly beleeve would bring anarchy and confusion into the Church
And our assertion is proved 1. From Mat. 16. 17 18. where the Keys of the Kingdome of Heaven are promised to Peter as a Pastor and ordinary Ruler of the Church of God for to those is promised the power of binding and loosing of retaining and remitting sinnes ver 19. which authority is peculiar to Christs Embassadours whom he sendeth into the world with his authority Joh. 20. 20 21 22. 2 Cor. 5. 19 20. To those therefore is the exercise of the Keyes in Excommunication intrusted and not to the whole people to whom they are not promised 2. From Matth. 18. 17 18. We have shewed before that this place is to be understood of a Church representative or Company of Presbyters to whom Christ hath given power whereby they actually cast out the scandalous and obstinate as heathens and publicans from Church-communion which power is not given to the multitude of beleevers 3. Our assertion is evident from 1 Cor. 5. 4 5. You saith the Apostle and my spirit being gathered together in the Name of the Lord Jesus Christ with the power of the Lord Jesus Christ let such a man be delivered to Satan and this rebuke or Church censure was done 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by many as he writes 2 Cor. 2 6. Surely that by these many the Apostle understandeth not the whole multitude is easily manifest if all were present at the deliberating every one even of the meanest capacity may see there was no reason why Paul should not have written 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of all for this had been very sutable to commend that cause which the Apostle was urging for from the multitude of those who had by Ecclesiasticall Discipline corrected the incestuous person he endeavours to prevaile with the Corinthians that they would now afford pardon to him upon his repentance And further let it be remembred that these 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 these many are described in the former place to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 gathered together with the power of our Lord Jesus Christ For since we know that this power is by Christ committed to the Ministery of the Church and lies in the administration of the spirituall Keyes we may easily guesse that by the terme many is to be understood the company of Pastours and Elders to whom the care of Ecclesiasticall Discipline is committed Hence Bullinger on that place 1 Cor. 5. doth thus comment Therefore the ancient Church had a holy Senate of Presbyters which did diligently admonish offenders in the Church sharply correct them yea and exclude them from Church fellowship to wit if it appeared that no amendment might be expected And Hyperius noteth upon this place That by Congregation must not simply be understood the whole multitude amongst whom are mingled many Jewes Ananias's false brethren men vitious who would never suffer that such a sentence should be unanimously passed but rather certaine selected Elders eminent for learning and piety in whose power he would that the Judgement of the Church should be in like causes so that these by a Synecdoche are taken for the whole Church Which hence appeares that Matth. 18. after it was said Tell the Church it is added Where two or three are gathered together in my Name I will be in the midst of them And 2 Cor. 2. 6. he saith Sufficient is the punishment that was inflicted by many And Tertullian in his Apologetick chap. 39. saith that all the approved Elders used to preside If any saith he do so offend as that he be to be debarred from communicating in Prayer and Assemblies and all holy commerce all the approved Elders did preside who attained that honour not for mony but desert CHAP. V. Of the Ecclesiasticall Ministery and the Exercise thereof Question 1. WHether the end and effect of the work of the Ecclesiasticall Ministery be only the Confirmation and Edification of those Church-members who are already converted and truly godly so as that Pastours are not more obliged by vertue of their Ecclesiasticall function to convert the straying soules of such as live in the world and in sins out of Church-communion then all beleevers indued with the gifts of the holy Ghost are by the common duty of Charity bound to doe Answer WE judge that the Word of God duly and truly preached and publikely received is both a meanes of constituting a Visible Church and a note of a true Visible Church and a meanes also of confirming and saving of beleevers who doe already in a visible Church professe the Faith We grant in this Question 1. That private Christians from the common duty of Charity making use of those spirituall gifts which they have received from God for mens edification doe sometimes convert to the faith those souls which went astray and bring those who live in the world out of the Church unto the body of the Church of Christ See John 4. 29. c. 1 Cor. 7. 16. 2. We doe not think that the office of him who preacheth the Word as sent of God and the Church doth conferre any efficacie to the Word preached by him or hath any influence upon the soule of him that is converted For the power of God only and the Spirit which accompanieth the Word preached doth give to the Word preached a vertue and saving efficacy for the Conversion and Salvation of soules 1 Cor. 12. 11. 15. 10. But we affirme that the Word preached by him who is ordained to an Ecclesiasticall Office and doth by his Ecclesiasticall Office authoritatively preach the Word is the ordinary meanes to which God doth by the Efficacy of his Spirit give assistance for the Conversion of those who live in sinne out of Church-communion So that Pastours as Pastours by vertue of their Pastorall Office are the ordinary meanes of the Conversion of those men who live in the world This Assertion is proved 1. Because Faith is given and first attained by the Word preached by those who by an Ecclesiasticall call are sent of God to the Pastorall Office and by vertue of mission and function preach the Word whereby faith is wrought in man See Rom. 10. 14 15. 1 Cor. 3. 19. Gal. 3. 2. 2. Because Pastours of Churches by reason of the Office they beare are Fathers who doe first beget their children to Christ in the Church and by the spirituall seed of God do give spirit and life to those that are dead in sins See 1 Cor. 4. 15. Gal. 4. 19. 2 Cor. 2. 16. 3. Pastours are injoyned as an Office peculiarly belonging to them to preach the Word of God with all meeknesse mildnesse and patience if perhaps God will give repentance to those who are held captives in the shares of the devill 2 Tim. 2. 24 25 26. to open the eyes of those who sit in darknesse and to bring them to the light of the Gospel and of Grace Act. 26. 18. to seek lost sheep for the Lord Ezek. 34. 4 5. and to bring into captivitie to the
Synods a power Dogmaticall but deny a power Diatacticall and Criticall A power Dogmaticall which is a power and right of judging in matters of Faith and Religion doth so belong to Synods as that it is also given by God to single Pastors For the Apostle requires of Elders not only to exhort by sound doctrine but also to convince gainsayers and to stop the mouthes of the unruly vain-talkers and deceivers Tit. 1. 9 10 11 12. Doth not this plainly intimate that they are to judge of matters of faith if in a Particular Church there arise a disputation about any question of faith or the soundnesse in judgement of one who is reckoned a member of that Church be doubted of This therefore is not the whole power of Synods which belongeth even to single Pastours Hence there is also attributed to Synods a Diatacticall power whereby they have right to manage the externall Government of the Church so that all things be done decently and in order in the administration of Gods worship to the common edification of al. Not only the Apostles but the Elders also did in the Councell at Jerusalem decree that the Gentiles who had given themselves up to Christ should abstaine from things offered to idols and from bloud and things strangled Acts 15. 25 28. So when Paul at Jerusalem was received by the brethren not only James but the Classis of Elders advised him for the beleeving Jewes sake to joyne himselfe with some though too much addicted to the Law who had a vow on them and decreed to intreat him that for the peace of the Church and satisfaction of the weake he would vouchsafe so farre as in that case was yet lawfull to submit himselfe to the observance of the Law Acts 21. 20 21 22 23 24. We see therefore that a Classis of Elders do by a joynt care and endeavour provide for the observing of what with one consent they judged expedient for the Church I need not further instance in Councels in which that Presbyters joyned in consultation and decision for the establishing Ecclesiasticall decency and order is so cleare by their Acts that none can be ignorant So the Lawes of Ecclesiasticall Government in the Netherlands are by the Synodicall decrees imposed on particular Churches And that a Criticall power which containes the right of maitaining and exercising the Ecclesiasticall Discipline given by God to the Church for the judging and removing of scandals belongeth to Synods and Classes of Presbyters we shall by and by prove by places of Scripture For a Synod may assemble not only to admonish an offending Presbytery or Consistory of a particular Church but also if they refuse to heare to censure them by suspension deposition or removing from their Ecclesiasticall function c. Question 2. VVHether Classes and Synods have power of sending or ordaining Pastors in a particular Church Answer WE affirme in this controversie 1. That some heads in this argument are by the judgement of Scripture to be held undoubted which our Reverend Bucerus referreth to these heads First saith he that Election and Ordination of Ministers belong to the Church not to those that are without who are strangers from the commerce of beleevers and have not yet applyed themselves to their fellowship and conjunction For no where doe we reade in Scripture that such had Votes in Election of Ministers Secondly that this holy action belongs to the whole Church that is to both its integrall parts whereof the one is of those who are Church Ministers the other of those to whom they minister which is evidently declared by testimonies which may be brought from Scripture Thirdly that this businesse is not to be committed to some one or few of the Presbytery selected but belongs to the whole Colledge of Presbyters in common which appears by the Example of the Church of Jerusalem and of Antioch Acts 1. 23. 6. 2 3. 13. 1 2. 15. 22. Fourthly that the principall parts herein belong to the Ministers of the Church for they are to preside and guide the Church that the multitude through levity or tumult or ill designes do not miscarry and therfore to teach and exhort every one and moderate the whole action of Election with wholesome and right counsels Which is manifestly evinced by the testimonies we have produced I adde lastly that the Nomination was principally in the Ecclesiasticall persons the people were by their suffrage to declare their consent to it So when one was to be taken in into the place of Judas the Apostles named two and when one of them was chosen by lot the Churches approbation was presently added otherwise they did by their suffrage concurre to the Election But that the Apostles in the institution of Deacons did somewhat more condescend to the multitude Acts 6. 3. there was a peculiar reason for it for that they were especially in that tendernesse of the Church and when a murmuring arose of the Grecians against the Hebrewes to put off from themselves all sinister suspicion of those whose suffrages did not approve them To this purpose Calvin Luke relates that there were Elders constituted in every Church by Paul and Barnabas but he notes withall the way and manner of it when he saith that it was done by suffrages 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith he 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 those two therefore did create them but the whole multitude as the custome of the Grecians was in Elections declared by lifting up their hands whom they would have Calvin Instit lib. 4. cap. 3. sect 15. Therefore the chiefe of what the people were to doe was of those who were nominated to choose one All which is fully cleare from Scripture Thus Bucerus dissert de gubernat Ecclesiae pag. 323 324. 2. But because we are to account those in Ecclesiasticall Communion with us not only who have joyned themselves to some one particular Church as fixed members but those also on whom by reason of their function the charge and care of many Churches doth lie and who are to take care that in them all things be done decently in order and to edification hence the power of ordaining Pastors is not so granted to a particular Church as that absolutely by themselves they may be the Word of God performe all those things that are required to the Ordination of their Pastors But if the Ordination of Pastours in a particular Church be duly performed it ought to be done in Church Communion with the judgement consent and potestative Mission of Classes or Synods with whom that particular Church holdeth Ecclesiasticall Communion For Ordination of Pastours is not a thing peculiar to one Church and its members but a thing common to all the Churches of one Classis or Synod and what concerneth all ought to be performed by all That therefore a particular Church in such a matter of common concernment do not do ought which may disturbe the common order or which in a like case may
prejudice other Churches they are in the Vocation of Pastours to proceed with the common consent of all the Churches of that Synod 3. In the acts and exercise of power Ecclesiasticall in the Ordination of Pastours we conceive there is this difference between a Classis or Synod and a Particular Church 1. That as it is the act of Classes and Synods it is actus imperatus as it is the act of the Particular Church is actus elicitus that is that Synods and Classes are to take care and authoritatively to enjoyne Particular Churches that they excite their power and exercise it for the ordaining their Pastours But the particular Churches are to doe those Ecclesiasticall acts whereby the Ordination it self is performed 2. That there belongs to Synods and Classes an authoritative judgement of the sufficiencie and sutable sitnesse of the person to be ordained to the Ministery and of the due and orderly manner of proceeding in the whole Election dispatched and the Ordination to be performed 3. That it belongs to Synods and Classes to decree Canons and prescribe decrces for the common edification of all those Churches according to which the particular Church ought to doe those acts whereby the Ordination of Pastors is performed 4. That the Synod and Classis doe authoritatively concurre with the particular Church in the power of sending Pastours and in the exercise thereof by which an Ecclesiasticall Right is derived on the Minister For the Ecclesiasticall Power which is conferred on a Minister by Ordination is derived ministerially secondarily and subordinately under God not only from the Eldership of that Particular Church but from that whole ministring or governing Ecclesiasticall Society into which the Pastour ordained is admitted by Ordination to performe the exercises of the Ecclesiasticall Ministry Thus we conceive these acts are to be distinguished in the legitimate Ordination of Pastours in a constituted and setled Church 4. In a case extraordinary when a Nationall Church is corrupted and depraved the due power of Classes and Synods overturned and destroyed and when the polity of the Church so utterly ruined as that there is no more any face of it to be seen no where any to be found that labour in sound doctrine no markes of a visible Church discernable by the eyes of men In such a case the Ordination of Pastours is in the power of the particular Church who have received from God right to ordaine in this necessity by their own Eldership and therefore where there is no such Eldership they first goe about the constitution of it and then being thus constituted they performe their Ordinations by it For that is sure which Melancton doth oft inculcate When the ordinary Bishops saith he become enemies to the Church or refuse to afford Ordination the Churches retain their owne right For where ever there is a Church there is power of dispensing the Gospell so that of necessity the Church must retain a right of their owne to call elect and ordaine Ministers And this right is a gift granted to the Church which no humane authority can take from it Argum. Respons part 7. de potest Epise argum 2. That this power should be wholly abrogated and brought to nothing for want of Pastours is not to be thought but common sense teacheth that it 's better in such a case to inlarge it then that the Church should be destitute of the large fruites of the Gospels preaching for that the Church should be then deprived of this power when the exercise of it is most chiefly required is absurd And on the other hand when there is no particular Church nor Eldership in some place where there is a Church to be planted and erected and the dispensation of the Gospel to be first introduced here the neighbouring Ecclesiasticall Assemblies who are by the opportunity of occasions invited by God to afford their mutuall help and assistance in this spirituall matter have power of sending Ministers and Pastours with Ecclesiasticall power for the gathering erecting and promoting a Church in that place for that manner of Mission is warranted by the holy Scriptures Acts 13. 1 2 3. where Paul and Barnabas are sent by the Church of Antioch to the neighbour Churches Hence therefore concerning the power of Classes and Synods in the Ordination of Pastors and a particular Church we maintaine these assertions 1. That a particular Church wanting a Presbytery may not in the ordinary and setled state of Churches performe the Ordination of Pastors But the Mission of Pastors and Elders into a sacted function is to be performed by the Governours of the Churches which is proved 1. From expresse places of Scripture wherein this Ecclesiasticall act is injoyned the Pastours and Elders 1 Tim. 5. 22. Lay hands suddenly on no man and 1 Tim. 4. 14. Neglect not the gift which is in thee which was given thee by Prophecy with the laying on of the hands of the Presbytery And that by Presbytery there is signified a Colledge of Presbyters is proved by most certaine arguments against the Hierarchie Our reverend Bucerus discourseth excellently of this place Dissert de gubern Ecclesiae pag. 339 340. I know saith he that the word Presbytery may be expounded either of the Colledge of Presbyters or of the Office of Presbyters but three reasons chiefly perswade me to think that we ought to rest in the former signification The first is that we find it no where used by the Holy Ghost so farre as I remember for the Presbyters Office But that on the contrary it 's used to signifie their Meeting is evident For what Luke relates Chap. 22. 66. that when Christ was apprehended 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Presbytery of the people was gathered together certainly cannot be understood of the Presbyteriall Office So Paul at Jerusalem rendering an account of his faith for testimony of what he said citeth the high Priest and the Presbytery 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Acts 22. 5. Where every one understands the word Presbytery to be taken for the Company of Elders not the Office A second Reason is that there will appeare a kind of Tautologie in Paul's speech if by the word presbytery we understand the Presbyteriall Office for the Gift 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which Paul bids Timothy not to neglect in the exposition of most signifies that Office it selfe joyned with a sufficiency of Gifts The Apostles words therefore would sound to this purpose Neglect not the Presbyteriall Office which was given thee by Prophecy with the imposition of hands of the Presbyteriall Office In good earnest I like it not I know that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is understood by some only of the faculty of teaching but when Paul addeth that it was given Timothy by Prophecy whether or no will you not judge this expression to suite better to the Office of teaching for any one will easily discerne with me that it is a harsh speech to say that the Faculty of teaching was
conferred on Timothy by Prophecy that is by a singular Revelation of the Spirit at the Prophets Command But on the contrary it 's a very apt expression to say The Presbyters Office was conferred on Timothy by his Vocation both extraordinary declared by the testimony of Prophets and ordinary performed by the judgement of the Church in obedience to the Revelation of the Spirit c. Two things doth Reverend Bucerus here evince that by Presbytery is understood the Company of Presbyters and that by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is signified the Office of the Ministery together with sufficiency of gifts This place therefore doth assert that the Ministeriall Office by the Ordination of the Colledge of Presbyters is committed to Pastours by Gods Law and Apostolicall Institution 2. It appeares from the Apostles practise wherein Ordinations of Pastours were performed by Pastours and Ministers that had the Government of Churches see Acts. 6. 2 3. Act. 13. 1 2 3. 14. 23. Tit. 1. 5. c. Nor is there any example to be found wherein the Ordination of Pastours was performed by the multitude of the Church without Presbyters And because the practise of the Apostolicall Church is our safest rule of Church-Government we judge that by Gods Ordinance it cannot be that a Pastor in setled state of Churches should be ordained and put in possession of his Ecclesiasticall function by the multitude of the Church See also what was said Chap. 4. concerning Ecclesiasticall Power II. We therefore affirme that Classes and Synods have power of sending and ordaining Pastours in particular Churches which want Presbyteries This assertion appeares also by the practise of the Apostolicall Church which by Ordination did set apart and send forth Pastours for the Ministry of neighbour Churches Acts 8. 14. Acts 13. 1 2 3. And surely that in the Reformed Churches the right of Mission for the planting of Churches or for the raising them up out of a defect was alwayes practised by Classes and Synods as is knowne to all who have but so much as heard any report of Churches labouring under persecution As also the Apostolicall Synod for supply of the Churches defect chose and sent men for the performance of Ecclesiasticall duties necessary to that end Acts 15. 22. It seemed good to the Apostles and Elders with the whole Church to choose men of their owne company and send them to Antioch and ver 25. It seemed good to us being assembled with one accord to choose and send men unto you c. Neither did the Apostolicall Churches do this by an extraordinary Apostolicall but by an ordinary Ecclesiasticall power for they did this joyntly together with ordinary Elders and the whole Church in an ordinary Synod These Examples therefore declare the ordinary right of Mission to those Churches who are destitute of a Presbytery or Ministery or labour and grone under persecution and defect But that Mission doth inferre Vocation and Ordination and doth conferre power of preaching and of ruling the people Reverend Voetius proveth by many arguments in Desperatâ causâ Papatus lib. 2. sect 2. cap. 17. And it appeares from the word it self to send 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from whence comes sent and sending or Mission which is nothing else but a Commission whereby a man hath some Function or Charge fully committed to him which is nothing else but to call and constitute for as Mission or sending is taken either actively or passively as it implies either a relation of him that sendeth to him that is sent or of him that is sent to him that sendeth so also Vocation or Ordination For all those Metaphors to send into the Vineyard to send into the Field to the Lords work to the Ministery and Charge of the Flock c. signifie nothing else but to call one to the Feeding of the Flock dressing the Vineyard or to constitute one a Pastour and one that takes charge of soules Hence those that are called and constituted Pastors of soules are commonly called Apostles 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sent In Hebrew the Priest and Pastour of the Church is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is sent a Messenger or Embassador Malach. 2. 7. of the originall and signification whereof Ludovicus de Dieu speakes Append ad Matth. 27 2. where he shewes elegantly from the footsteps of the Arabick and Aethiopick root that this name is derived from sending Whence also Presbyters whether the greater and extraordinary or the lesser and ordinary lawfully ordained and called are sent to preach and to feed and on the other side those who are lawfully sent are ordained to preach For to the actuall giving an Apostleship or calling to the Ministery that is to an Active Mission of him that sendeth there is answerable a Passive Mission of him that is sent which is an actuall Receiving an Apostleship or Ministery for or Relatives the affirming one inferreth the other The Ordination of Pastors therefore for a Church that wants an Eldership or is labouring under defects which hinder the ordinary exercise of the Eldership is lawfully performed by Synods and Classes under whose Ecclesiasticall communion they lived So in the Belgick Churches the Mission or Ordination of Pastors which are sent to Churches groaning under the Crosse of persecution is performed in the Classicall Assembly See the Synod at the Hagh Anno. 1586. art 4. And so of those who are sent to the Churches of the East and West-Indies III. We allow also this power to Classes and Synods in the right of Ordination That even in a setled and constituted state of the Church a particular Church which holds Ecclesiasticall communion with other Churches in a Classis or Synod may not performe the vocation or Ordination of their Pastors without the authoritative judgement and potestative mission of the Classis This assertion is proved by these arguements Because he that is to be ordained is admitted into the holy society of the Classis or Synod and into the Ecclesiasticall body as a member belonging to the Consistory of the Classis or Synod in the right of that particular Church and is therefore with their judgement and consent to be admitted by Ordination into that society Because also by Ordination a Pastor is put into the possession of his Ecclesiasticall function by vertue of which function he may performe ministeriall acts of his pastorall office in other particular Churches and exercise a ministeriall authority in many cases towards other Churches and reason plainly sheweth that it cannot duly be performed without the judgement of those Churches over whom the person to be Ordained receives ministeriall power A particular Church may not lawfully Remove or Put-out a Pastor from his Office without the assent and authoritative judgement of the Classis or Synod wherein he is duly admitted a member therefore without that judgement they cannot lawfully admit into an Ecclesiasticall office by Ordination for it is of the same power to take in and to put out in
bind by Oath our owne soules and the soules of others who live under our power to such a profession of saving Faith we may bind them also by Lawes and Canons to the same profession for of like things there is like judgement Question 2. VVHether it be lawfull to use in the Church prescript Formes of Prayer administration of the Sacraments c or whether those Churches who use them be guilty of superstition and will-worship and whether it be lawfull to hold Ecclesiasticall Communion with those Churches where such Formes in the publike worship are in use Answer IN this controversie we easily assent to what is written by Ames upon this question in his Cases of Conscience lib. 4. cap. 17. quaest 4. and to what the professors of Leyden have in their Synopsis Theologiae disput 36. Thes 33 34. And that we may handle the question distinctly 1. We reject such Formes of prayer of Administration of Sacraments c. which for the matter of them are vitious for we may not in prayers and other parts of the publike worship of God propound any thing unlawfull impertinent and unfitting which savoureth of superstition Idolatry or heresy or carnall profanenesse and pomp of the World and which introduceth a communion with the unfruitfull workes of darknesse And for this cause we reject the ceremonies and forms of publike worship introduced in the Church of England in these last corrupt times by the Hierarchicall Bishops as which being superstitious and idolatrous did deface the Church and worship of God and obscure the brightnesse and beauty of a glorious Reformation and a Church which takes up superstitious and idolatrous ceremonies partakes in superstition and idolatry 2. We reject also those Forms of prayers and publike worship which by a tyrannicall and violent command are imposed on the consciences of men as absolutely necessary and as essentiall parts of Gods worship though for the matter of them they be legitimatly disposed yet for the Form of them and the manner of their introducing they become illegitimate instruments of cruelty and pretences for perverse wickednesse and occasions of violent tyranny against the worthiest and best sonnes of the Church For there are not by Christ or the Apostles whose institutions are not defective in the absolutely necessary parts of Gods worship any Forms prescribed as simply and absolutely necessary wherein they have drawne up an exact and immutable rule for all Christians in Churches in matter and form and method to which all faithfull worshippers of God to the worlds end are to be precisely bound 3. The question is not here of the absolute necessity of Forms whereby they are obtruded as parts of Religion and essentiall meanes of divine worship but of such a prescribing them whereby they are by Ecclesiasticall authority commended for the order and decency of the worship of God as usefull and profitable for those who want either sufficient ability or freedome of exercising it for the seemly expression of those parts of divine worship that they may be as it were guided by them as helps in their meditations petitions words and actions and that the attention of the auditors especially in great Congregations may by those forms be helped and directed and that there may be an Uniformity observed in the exercises of publike worship in all Churches for the preventing of scandalls and for the greater edefication of the Churches But we judge those Forms as well publikely as privatly used to be lawfull and profitable so that they be read out of the booke with due attention reverence faith and spirituall affection and zeale towards God and that not only in case of necessity when he that is to perform those parts of divine worship is destitute of sufficient ability and fit words to expresse the prayers and other parts of divine worship but also for the helping and directing the attention of the auditors thereby and for keeping an uniformity in the exercises of Divine Worship for the edification of the Churches of God This Assertion is proved 1. Because we may in a prescript form sing Psalmes and offer thanksgivings to God with due reverence faith spirituall affection and zeale Asaph and his brethren had Forms for the due praising of God prescribed them by David according to the prescript whereof they were in set words to celebrate publike thanksgivings See 1 Chron. 16. 7 8. So in the dedication of the Temple the Priests and Levites did celebrate the publike worship of God according to the set-Forms prescribed by David 2 Chron. 7. 6. The like examples we have Numb 6. 22 23. 2 Chron 20. 21. Esra 3. 10 11. Psal 92. 1. But now if thanksgivings and singing of Psalmes which ought to be performed with spirituall affection reverence and understanding and joy 1 Cor. 14 15. Ephes 5. 19. Col. 3. 16. both lawfully may be and were performed according to the Word of God in set Forms then also Prayers and other parts of Divine Worship may in set Forms be duly and lawfully conceived and offered to God for thanksgivings and blessing of God are kinds of prayer and of the same nature which require the same affections of mind with other parts of Divine Worship 2. That is a just and lawfull forme of prayers in which are observed the essentialls and necessary requisites to all prayers But all things which in the holy Scripture are required to the due constitution of prayers may be observed and by the godly are observed in a holy manner in prayers conceived in set Forms and pronounced out of a booke Therfore this form of prayers is just and lawfull For what is there in Scripture required to the worship of supplications and godly prayers but that the matters of them be lawfull and stily disposed according to the present necessities that they be offered to God in a holy manner with reverence zeale humility and faith and that they duly expresse our urging necessities But we know by certaine experience that a prayer holy and lawfull for the matter of it may in a set Form be pronounced and offered to God with an humble sence of our necessities desire and zeal holinesse of affections faith and religious motions of our will towards God and that according as our affairs require The faithful reade the text of holy Scripture with understanding humility reverence zeale religious motions of the will and faith in God and application of them to particular necessities and why may not prayers in like manner be pronounced in prescript formes when as prayers differ in this only from hearing and reading the Word of God that in the one our will is moved towards God that we may be moved by him but in the other our will is moved towards God that he may be affected with our desires as Ames elsewhere observeth 3. Our Lord and Saviour Christ hath prescribed us a form of prayer For he hath given us the Lords-Prayer not only as a pattern or platform according to