Angels or Messengers of the Lord. As the Iewes also stil make two sorts of Angels One of them whom they cal GNELIONIM because they haue their dwelling in the high places that is in the heauens and the other of them whom they call TACHTONIM as it were lower or inferiour And such are the Prophets and Priests saith Drusius alledging this in his Annotations on the New Testament Rev. 1.20 Besides that in the families and tribes of Israell and among the Priests and Levites also they had an orderly constitution and according to the distribution of them some that were heads and chief among them As may be seen in the Scriptures here before alledged p. 263. V. Order it self likevvise besides necessitie often falling out requireth that there be some one vvho in regard of his place office or condition may call together the other Elders and unto vvhom they may resort Who also vvith them may call the vvhole church together as there is occasion And of vvhom the chief or speciall oversight of the Church the moderation and disposition of the affaires thereof may be required To vvhom moreover the letters may be directed and delivered and other speciall things shevved and advertised which perteyne to the generall or publike estate of the church as vve see vvas done by Christ himself to the Angels of the seuen churches in Asia Rev. 2.1.8 c. whereabout also the Epistles sent to Timothee and Titus may haue their due consideration in this behalf and that vvhich is noted concerning James and the Elders of the church at Ierusalem Act. 21.18 vvith 2 King 6 32. And hereunto doe thus far forth the most learned agree in the Reformed churches albeit that yet themselues many of them haue not one particular Pastor in their severall churches M. Beza ansvvering Saravia affirmeth * that by Gods perpetuall ordinance it hath ben is and wil be needfull Beza respons ad Sarav c. 23 fol. 153. that in the Presbyterie or Eldership some one chief in place and dignitie should governe and rule the actions with that right which is giuen unto him of God Otherwise let it be well considered vvhether there would not be some defect in the order constitution of the church Which seeing it is ordeyned by Christ the Lord it is certainly most perfect in it self if we could aright obserue it and everie way absolute And how profitable and needfull the observation of this matter is may moreover then easily be perceived when controversies arise as divers times commeth to passe eyther among the Elders alone or in the church it self Besides that the continual oversight care of other the churches affaires and the due administration of the holy things of God in all good sort may thus be rightly performed and agreably to the vvord of God VI. To the same end may more specially be observed the estate of the church of Ephesus in the Apostles times The Overseers and Elders of which church are in fower several places spoken of in special manner viz. Act. 20 17 28. Ephes 4 11 12. vvith 1 1. 1 Tim. 5 17. vvith 1 3. and 3 1 15. Rev. 2 1. vvith 1 11 16 20. In the first of which places viz. Act. 20 17 28. the Elders are generally spoken off without the noting of any particular distinction among them Onely their works and dueties are comprised in the generall termes of taking heed to themselues the whole flock of being Overseers and of feeding the church of God Which generall termes comprehend in them al the dueties of al the Elders though otherwise otherwhere distinct one from another In the second place viz. Ephes 4 11 12 there is speach onely of the ministers of the vvord and among them of the Pastors and Teachers which are for the vvork of the ministerie more particularly In the third place viz. 1 Tim. 5 17. there is mention moreover of tvvo sorts of Elders the Ruling Elders and the Teaching Elders and those also distinct the one from the other In the fourth and last place viz. Rev. 2 1. there is mention in particular of the Angell of the church of Ephesus whom Beza understandeth and expoundeth to be the President who was first to haue vvarning of those things and by him the rest of his Colleages the whole church Bez. annot in Rev. 2 1. So Piscator likewise expounds it To the Angell that is to the Bishop of the church of Ephesus and also to the church it self as appeareth by the words ver 7. Piscat Analys Schol. in Apoc. 2 1. Napier saith To the Angel that is to the Pastor or Minister of the church of Ephesus Napier in Rev. 2 1. And Bullinger saith The Angels are the Embassadours of God euen the Pastours of the churches Bulling concion 6. in Apoc. And againe speaking of the church of Smyrna he saith The heauenly letter is directed to the Angel of the church of Smyrna that is to the Pastor Novv the stories witnesse that Angel and Pastor of the church of Smyrna to haue ben Polycarpus ordeyned Bishop of the Apostles themselues I meane by S. Iohn Ibid. concione 9. Also among the elder writers Augustine saith By the divine voice the Ruler of the Church of Ephesus is praised under the name of an Angell August epist 162. And Gregorie saith The Preachers in the Scriptures are sometimes called Angels as the Prophet saith †Mal. 2.7 the lippes of the Priest should keep knovvledge and they should seek the Lavv at his mouth for he is the Angell or Messenger of the Lord of hostes Gregor moralium in Iob. lib. 11. c. 3. Thus much briefly I thought to note in particular touching the estate of the Church of Ephesus and the Bishops or Overseers thereof vvhich being four severall times spoken of in the Scripture and that also vvith such different manner of speach as is aforesaid may help to giue good light and direction unto us about the question in hand VII Finally if the foresaid order be kept vve may by the vvord of God sufficiently ansvver all the objections and meet with all the corruptions of the Prelates or any other that erre in this behalf from the simplicitie first constitution of the primitiue churches Which how it can otherwise in deed so well and soundly be done had need duly to be considered of all that beare vvitnesse against them And hitherto concerning the first braunch of this question Novv for the other point of the question there is alledged about it both Scripture M. Sm. differ pag. 23 c. M. Parker Polit. eccles l. 3. c. 18. p. 236. c. and record of auncient writers The Scriptures are these and the like Act. 20.17.28 Phi. 1.1 1 Thes 5.12 1 Tim. 3. and Tit. 1 ch 1 Pet. 5.1 4. Which are alledged to shew that the Primitiue Churches had many Elders in one church which is graunted and those also all alike therefore that they had not one speciall
Pastor nor as some think such distinction of teaching and ruling Elders as is aforesaid The record of the auncient Writers produced also thereabout is to shew that sometimes there were tvvo Bishops at once in one church Of which more hereafter 1. Now first for the Scriptures leaving the point for the truth thereof so to be esteemed as it shal be found to be grounded on the Scriptures duly considered there is alledged Act. 20 17 28. vvhereby is gathered First that there vvere many Elders in the Church of Ephesus there spoken off and not one Pastor alone Which I think none of sound judgment vvill deny Secondly that the Elders were all alike and of one sort c. Which if it were so then 1. how is it that the Apostle vvriteth to Timothee vvhom he left with the Church of Ephesus both of teaching and of ruling Elders and the one differing from the other 1 Tim. 5 17. compared with 1 Tim. 1 3. 2. What then also or vvhere is the difference betweeene the Pastors and Teachers spoken off to the same church of Ephesus Ephes 4.11.12 3. And who is the Angel of this church of Ephesus spoken of Rev. 2.1 4. Or vvhere are the ruling Elders called the Angels of the Lord or of the church as the Prophets Priests and ministers of the Gospell are Hag. 1.13 Mal. 2.7 with Rev. 1.20 and 2.1.8 c. 5. And why may vve not think that there were both teaching and ruling Elders in the Church of Ephesus asvvell as in other of the Primitiue churches as may appeare by that vvhich is written Rom. 12 7 8. and 1 Cor. 5.8.28 compared vvith 1 Tim. 5.17 and with the practise and estate of Israel Jer. 19 1. Luke 22 66. vvith 2 King 6 32. and 2 Chron. 19 8 c. 6. And that there vvas also some one in the church of Ephesus as Archippus in the church of Colosse Col. 4 17. Polycarpus as divers write in the church of Smyrna spoken off Rev. 2 8. Irenaeus l. 3. c. 3. Euseb l. 3. c. 32. and l. 4. c. 14. c. to vvhom Christ directed his letters and of whom he straitly required to look to the contents thereof To redresse errors and abuses in the church c. the matters being all of them such as the Pastor who hath speciall charge of the flock should carefully regard and obserue according to the duetie of his office under the Archpastor Iesus Christ Rev. 2.1 c. 7. To vvhich end may also be observed that seuen starres are spoken off ansvverably to the number of the seuen golden Candlesticks that three times one after another Rev. â— 12.13.16 Also Rev. 1.20 And Rev. 2.1 Besides the mention again of seuen starres together with mention of the seuen Spirits of God Revel 3.1 Which whether it may not in some respects be observed for the other point and divers other good purposes also let it be duely considered 8. And hereunto agreeth the testimonie of the auncient writers Irenaeus Eusebius c. who make mention in particular of the names succession of divers Bishops or Pastors so specially called following one another from the Apostles daies for a long time after hovv ever in tract of time corruption grew in and then from the oversight of one particular church they became Bishops of many churches euen of whole Dioceses and Provinces c. 9. And whereas it is alledged that the Apostle gaue not the Elders Act. 20 17 28. severall charges as having severall dueties lying upon them but one generall charge common to them all namely the dutie of feeding vvhich is the work of the Pastor c. there may also here about be considered 1. that they vvere in generall al of them Bishops Overseers of the flock and church of Ephesus and therefore might well haue this charge giuen them in generall jointly together And yet this not hinder but that they might also in other respect haue distinction of place and function among themselues notvvithstanding As may be seen in other cases and generall speaches used often in the Scriptures as in Deut. 33.8.10 Iosh 23 2 and 24 1 c. 1 Chron. 28 1 2 c. 2 Chron. 19 5 9. c. Ier. 19 1 3. c. Hos 5 1. c. And more especially 2 Chron. 29 3 4 5. c. where king Hezekiah gaue a charge jointly and in generall termes to the Priests and Levites the ministers of the Temple for the sanctifying of themselues and purging of the Temple Yet vvho vvould thereupon conclude that all the Levites vvere Priests or that there vvas no distinction betvveen their offices in other respects or that the ministers of the Temple vvere all alike and of one sort 2. All things are not spoken in al places and Scripture must be compared with Scripture for the right understanding thereof When therefore other Scriptures shevv a difference vve must thence learne it and not because of some general or other speaches misconstrue or confound things vvhich the Scriptures othervvhere teach us aright to distinguish Othervvise men might inferre upon Moses generall speach Deu. 33 8 10. that all the Levites might burne incense before the Lord and that therefore Corah the Levite sinned not in so doing Num. 16 ch Which vvere indeed to pervert the Scripture and not to understand it aright 3. Though a speach be generall and such as may in some respects perteine unto all yet may it also be sufficient for their understanding and stirring up vvho othervvise knovv themselues vvell the distinction of their places or offices one from another and vvhat apperteyneth to their severall dueties thereabout Like as the Levites who although Hezekiahs speach aforesaid was generall and vvas made unto them together with the Priests yea though the Temple vvas novv polluted yet kept themselues vvithin their bounds and did not so much as goe into the inner part of the Temple that apperteyned to the Priests done 2 Chron. 29 16. 4. The terme of feeding and the vvord Pastor and other the like both in Scripture and in other writers are used sometimes largely and generally sometimes strictly and particularly In the former understanding are kings and Princes called Pastors said to feed 1 Chro. 11 2. Psal 78 70 71 72. Esa 47 28. Ier. 6 3. and 13 18 20. and 22 22. and 49 19. and 50 44. Ezech. 34 2. Christ also Ezech. 34 23. and 37 24. Zach. 13 7. Ioh. 10 11 16. Heb. 13 20. 1 Pet. 2 25. and 5 4. and the Apostles Ioh. 21 16. and all governors both civill and ecclesiasticall Jer. 3 15. and 17 16. and 23 1 2 4. and 50 6. Zach. 11 5 8. Act. 20 17 28. 1 Pet. 5 1 2. In the latter signification it is used for the Pastors and ministers that are expressely distinguished from the Apostles Prophets Euangelists and Teachers spoken of Eph. 4 11 12. and are also called Exhorters or Comforters Rom. 12 8. to whom the worâ—
of wisedome is ascribed 1 Cor. 12 8. As in Israell they had ministers that vvere called Wise men Mat. 23 34. So then in the generall use of the word all the Elders and governours of particular Churches are Pastors and doe feed according to the duetie of their office 1 Pet. 5.1 2. Acts 20 17 28. And thus there were and may be many Pastors in particular churches But shall we therefore conclude that there was no particular office of Pastor in the churches no difference betvveen the teaching and ruling Elders no distinction betvveen the Pastors and Teachers office c. 10. Lastly vvhereas others also alledge this Scripture Act. 20 17 28. M. Bright on Rev. 2.1 c. to shew that by the Angell of the Church of Ephesus Rev. 2 1. is meant the whole Colledge of Pastors Elders and Bishops let these reasons aforesaid be well observed about that point also for the better fynding out and clearing of the truth in this behalf And so I proceed to note somewhat likewise about the other Scriptures before mentioned touching the matter in hand The other Scriptures are these Phil. 1 1. 1 Thes 5 12. 1 Tim. 3 ch and Tit. 1 ch 1 Pet. 5 1 2. Which all of them haue this common unto them that the like collections are made out of them as out of Acts 20.17.28 And therefore the same things may be observed about them as haue ben noted here already about Acts 20.17.28 That so I need not repeat the same things over againe and againe Onely I will briefly annexe some fewe things more concerning these Scriptures in particular 2. With that place of Phi. 1.1 where the Apostle speaketh of the Bishops of that church as being many there may be compared another place in the same epistle where the Apostle saith I intreat thee also true yokefellow c. Phil. 4 3. By which manner of speach may be observed that though there were sundry Elders and Bishops in that church yet there vvas notwithstanding also some speciall man vvhom the Apostle in speciall and more particularly called his true yoke-fellow Whether it were the Pastor or not I will not determine And who it should be rather then the Pastor that by such a peculiar attribute without particular naming of him should be intended by the Apostle and understood by them to whome he vvrote I desire to haue shevved by others The question that is made about the gender is of no vvaight For besides the matter spoken off and other circumstances of the place the Syriak translation putteth the matter out of doubt which hath it thus I entreat thee also O sonne of my yoke c. vvhich shevveth both that he spake of a man of one that was of speciall note and imployment Tremellius Iunius in their notes on the Syriak translation expound it thus The sonne of my yoke that is partaker of the same yoke vvith me vvhich art my helper in the same ministerie A metaphor taken from bulloks who being put under the same yoke are used by men to one and the same ministerie service Also Ignatius writing to the church of Philippi nameth Vitalis Bishop or Pastor of that church And here in the Apostles next Epistle which is to the Colossians he speaketh of Archippus by name touching the fulfilling of his ministerie in the church of Colosse Col. 4 17. 3. The next Scripture 1 Thes 5 12. as it sheweth that there were divers Elders in that church so the vvords there used of labouring ruling or being over them in the Lord informing or admonishing them may notwithstanding imply that there vvas distinction of place and office among them as more plainly appeareth 1 Tim. 5 17. where the like vvords are used in the Apostles speach concerning the Elders and the distinction of their office and duties And as likevvise may be observed in Hezekiahs speach to the priests and Levites and in the termes there used though he spake unto them jointly together 2 Chron. 29 4 5. compared with v. 11. Besides that Origen writeth of Gajus by name reported to haue ben Bishop of the church of Thessalonica Origen l. 10. in cap. 16. epist ad Romanos 4. Both the places in 1 Tim. 3. and Tit. 1 ch shew likevvise that there vvere sundry Elders in the churches of Ephesus and Crete Yet this hindreth not but that they had also difference of office and function among them as may appeare by comparing 1 Tim. 5.17 Ephes 4 11 12. Rev. 2 1. and Rom. 12 7 8. 1 Cor. 12 28. with the places aforesaid and may be implyed by the particular properties and dueties required of them besides the estate and practise of the church of Israell vvhich giueth great light in this behalf as hath ben observed If any understand these places in 1 Tim. 3. and Tit. 1 ch to speak of such Elders onely as were ministers yet that vvill be no hinderance neyther For seeing the Priests and Levites in Israell vvere all of the tribe of Levi and lineally descending one from another according to their kinred vvhich novv is not so in the Pastors and Teachers for a lineall descent one of another according to kinred though otherwise they succeed and follovv one another in their place and function and now the Pastors Teachers are by the Lord taken out of the Gentiles and become answerable to the Priests and Levites Esa 66 18 21. and Jer. 33 15 22. therefore vvas it needfull that there should in speciall manner be mention in the Apostles vvritings * The like may be observed about the Deacons â—ho are in diverâ— things much answerable to the Levites in Israel as to the Leviticall Treasurers c. of their offices and of their properties qualities and dueties c. Which needed not so much to be about the ruling Elders chosen out of the people who are answerable to the like Elders in Israell notwithstanding the differences of estate are stil to be endowed with like qualities as those Elders were as may be seen by observing the qualities mentioned in Exod. 18 21. and Deut. 1 13 15 16 17. compared also with 1 Cor. 6 5. and 12 28. Rom. 12.8 1 Tim. 5 17. And here let it be considered vvhether if a Synagogue of the Ievves or many thereof were converted to the Christian faith the rulers of the Synagogue becoming Christians might not novv be taken or kept still to be ruling Elders of the church such as we read off Acts 13 15. and 18 8. and Mar. 5.22 c. whereas the Priests Levites comming to the faith as divers did Acts 6 7. they vvere necessarily to leaue their Leviticall office and then being fit might become ministers of the Gospel and so continevv in that ministration employment as before they did in the other Heb. 9 6 7. and 13 10. with Acts 4 36. and 11 22 26. and 13 1 5. c. Rom. 15 16. 1 Cor. 9 13 14. and with Esa 66 21
22 23. In vvhich respects let it also be observed whether the difference should not now in the church still carefully be kept betvveene the ruling Elders and betvveen the ministers of the Gospell the Pastors and Teachers as there was heretofore in Israell betvveen the Elders of the people and the ministers of the Temple the Priests and Levites Exod. 18 21. with 28 chap. Numb 11 16. vvith 3 and 4 and 8 and 16 and 18 ch Deu. 1 13 18. vvith 10.8 and 33 8 11. 2 Chro. 19 5 8 11. Jer. 19 1. Luke 22 66. Act. 4 5 6. and 5 21 34. and 22 5 30. compared with 1 Tim. 5 17. Rom. 12 7 8. 1 Cor. 12 28. Ephes 4 11 12 13. Acts 20 17 28. Phil. 1 1. Col 4 17. 1 Thes 5 12 13 14. Hebr. 13 7 17. Rev. 2 1. c. And this both for the difference of the offices themselues of the dueties and ministration thereof and for sundry other points and questions hereabout and namely for the continuance of the ministers in their offices and functions as did the Priests and Levites in the ministerie though there be a yerely or other like chaunge of the ruling Elders as is novv observed among the Ievves touching the rulers of their Synagogues and is very usuall in such policies as are Aristocraticall or Democraticall c. Although some also vvrite that in the church succeeding the Apostles times the Elders and Deacons were chosen to be perpetual and that speach of the Apostle concerning the Deacons purchasing to themselues a good degree if they haue used the office of a Deacon well is duly to be regarded thereabout 1 Tim. 3 13. But having thus by the way noted these things let us novv furthermore touching the places aforesaid the matter in hand obserue herewithall hovv the speaches in those Epistles are by the Apostle directed both unto Timothee and Titus in the singular number as is also by Christ to the Angels of the severall churches Rev. 2 3 chap. And whether this may not imply that in the churches vvhere either of these came and vvere left by the Apostle or vvhere there vvere not Pastors as yet either they themselues albeit Euangelists othervvise did novv for the time supply the Pastors place and office there as Iames is observed to haue done at Ierusalem though he vvas an Apostle othervvise Act. 21 18. or that vvhat they did for a time in the severall Churches where they came being Euangelists the same in al things ordinarie and perpetual should still be done by the Pastors in their particular and peculiar Churches from time to time untill the appearing of our Lord Iesus Christ Whereabout that charge so earnestly giuen to Timothee in special is wel to be observed being expressely giuen to endure untill the appearing of our Lord Iesus Christ 1 Tim. 6 13 14. which could not as I noted here before be done by Timothee in his ovvne person who dyed after he had served his ovvne generation by the vvill of God but was to be performed by his successors from time to time unto the end of the vvorld As may also appeare by comparing 1 Tim. 6 13 14. with Rev. 2 1 8 12 18. and 3 1 7 14. and Mat. 28 18 19 20. And more particularly touching the church of Ephesus where Timothee abode some time 1 Tim. 1.3 Eusebius giues record of Onesimus the Pastor of that church shevving how Ignatius vvhen he was at Smyrna vvhere Polycarpus vvas vvrote an Epistle to the church of Ephesus making mention of Onesimus the Pastor thereof Euseb l. 3. c. 32. Besides the speciall mention of the Angell of the church of Ephesus like as of the church of Smyrna and the other churches particularly spoken of Rev. 2.1.8.14.18 and 3.1.7.14 and that the contents both of Christs letters directed to the Angels of the churches and of the Apostles to Timothee Titus are of such matters as concern the Pastors office who by his name gift work and duties of his calling hath speciall charge of the flock over vvhich he is set in such things as Christ and the Apostle haue written off in the Epistles aforesaid And for the churches in Crete vvhere Titus was left Tit. 1.5 the like may be mynded as of the other churches aforesaid seeing they vvere so to be established as Paul had appointed Titus and the Apostles wayes vvere alike tovvards all churches as Paul himself witnesseth 1 Cor. 4.17 and 14.33 and 16 1. Col. 4.16.17 and Tit. 1.5 with 1 Tim. 6.13.14 5. There is a place likevvise in Heb. 13.7.17.24 shewing that there vvere divers Elders in the churches of the Ievves Yet neither doth this hinder but that they had also distinction of office among them for teaching and ruling Elders as there the Apostle speaketh of such who spake the word of God unto them and were their guydes and governours vvatching for their soules as they that should giue account c. where moreover the Apostle useth a vvord HEGOUMENOI signifying Guydes Leaders Captaines Rulers Governours chief c. vvhich is attributed to the Overseers Governours both in church and common wealth yea euen unto kings and to Christ himself Gen. 49 10. 1 Sam. 25 30. 2 Sam. 5 2 1 King 14 27. 2 King 20 5. 1 Chron. 26 24. and 27 4 16. Psal 68 27. Dan 3 2. Mat 2 6. Luc. 22 26. Acts 7 10. who is here also in this chapter Heb. 13 20. called the great Shepheard or Pastor of the sheep under vvhom the other Pastors and Guydes aforesaid ministred and guyded the flocks committed unto them And in Israell of old they had among the Iewes both Elders of the Priests and Elders of the people besides other differences of the ministers and Governors among them as vvas noted there before And in the church at Ierusalem since Christ there was Iames together with the Elders overseeing the affaires of that church Act. 21 18 c. And Eusebius vvith other auncient Writers notes the names of sundry Bishops or Pastors who after Iames follovved one another in that church for a long time aftervvard as is aforesaid 6. Concerning the place in 1 Pet. 5 1 4. the same things may be observed as about the other Scriptures before mentioned And this moreover that Peter an Apostle doth here call himself an Elder and a fellow-Elder vvith the rest ver 1. So generall is the word and comprising in it Elders of divers sorts and offices as euen this place undeniably sheweth Where may be noted further how Christ is here called the Archpastor or chief Shepheard ver 4. Which again plainely implyeth other Pastors Bishops that are inferiour and subordinate unto him vvho is the chief and great shepheard of the sheep and Bishop of our soules Heb. 13 20. and 1 Pet. 2 25. and 5 1 4. with Ioh. 21.15 16.17 Act. 20 17 28. Rom. 12.7.8 Ephe. 4.11 12. 1 Tim. 5 17. Rev. 2 1 8. And hitherto of these things concerning
sect 4. And a litle after comparing together those functions that are spoken off Eph. 4 11. he saith As the Teachers are ansvverable to the auncient Prophets there spoâ—en off so are the Pastors to the Apostles except that these haue their certain peculiar churches assigned unto them Ibid. sect 5. Piscator also hath the like vvho first noteth this that the Lord at the beginning of his kingdome raised up Apostles Prophets and Euangelists by whom when the Churches were founded and planted he appointed in their place Teachers and Pastors perpetually to endure And then putteth the same difference between these Offices and in the same words as Calvin doth here before Piscat Aphorism cap. 20. sect 8. and 12. Beza like wise in his Annotations on Rom. 12 7. making this difference betvveen them noteth it thus The Apostle calleth him a Teacher who in the church attendeth onely to the simple interpretation of the Scripture that the doctrine may be kept pure and syncere And the Exhorter who otherwhere is termed a Pastor he calleth him â—â—at â—â—yneth doctrine together with admonitions and exhortations also with the administration of the Sacraments Beza in Rom. 12 7. Vrsinus noteth the same difference betvveene these Offices Vrsin Catec part 3. writing on the fourth Commandement 〈◊〉 the Ministerie quest 2. So doth M. Fenner also in his Theologie vvhere he vvriteth thus The Teachers are they which are imployed privately and publikely in delivering of doctrine faithâ—â—â—â— touching all dueties both common and proper Nehem. 8.9 Luke 5 17. Rom. 12 â— 1 Câ—â— 12 8. The Pastors are they which are imployed in applying the word with wisedome to al duties 〈◊〉 proper and common Rom. 12 7 8. 1 Cor. 12 8. Wherefore besides exhortations there is required of him that in his publike office he apply the truth to the hearts of men by the administration of the seales Lev. 10.9.10 2 Chron. 13 10. Rom 12 5 8. Ephes 4 11. Fenneâ— Theâ—â— lib. 7. cap. 7. Divers others haue written in like sort hereabout which I leaue to the observation of the Reader CHAPTER VI. Of the having of one or moe Pastours in particular Churches Also of Diocesan and Provinciall Bishops c. VVHether it be not most according to the ordinance of God that in everie particular church there be * Rev. 2 1 8 12 18. and 3 1 7 14. and 22 16-19 vvith Phil. 4 3. Col. 4 16 17. Act. 21 18. Luc. 12 42. 1 Tim. 1 3. and 3 15. 5 19 22. and 6 13 14. one Pastor or Angel of the church so properly and specially called and †divers teachers and ruling Elders according to the condition of the church joyned to the Pastor in the ministerie and government of the same church who may all of them also generally be called Pastors yet so as one be specially distinguished from the rest in respect of his place function to be the Pastor 〈◊〉 more particularly called under Iesus Christ the Archpastor Or whether there being many Elders appointed to feed instruct governe the Church they should be all alike or of one sort vvithout any distinction of Office or function among them Where touching the first point these things and the like may be considered I. The constitution of the Primitiue churches as they were established by the Apostles As namely the churches of Ephesus Smyrna Colosse Laodicea c. Rev. 2 1 8 12 18. and 3 1 7 14. and 22 16-19 vvith Phil. 4 3. Col. 4 16 17. Act. 21 18. Luc. 12 42. 1 Tim. 1 3. and 3 15. 5 19 22. and 6 13 14. †Act. 20 17 28. compared vvith Rev. 2 1. and Ephes 4 11 12. 1 Tim. 1 3. and 3 1 15. and 5 17 19 21. Act. 11.30 and 13.1 and 14.23 and 15.2.6.22.23.35 and 16.4 and 21.18 Rom. 12.7.8 1 Cor. 12.5.8.28 Phil. 1. 1. Col. 1.7 and 4.12.17 1 Thes 5.12.13.14.27 Tit. 1.5 9. Heb. 13.7.17.24 Iam. 5.14 1 Pet. 5.1 4. And divers things also hereabout may be noted in the auncient vvriters who lived a while after the Apostles dayes This being stil carefully observed vvithall because the mysterie of iniquitie began to vvork euen in the Apostles time and the apostasie of Antichrist spread abroad aftervvard more and more that we insist no further nor otherwise upon those Writers in any points of religion but as they agree with the Scriptures and in such things as are grounded thereupon Now therefore concerning the point in hand Ignatius hath often in his Epistles to the Churches to which he wrote these the like sayings Let all things be done of you according to good order in Christ Let the laymen or people be subject to the Deacons the Deacons to the Elders the Elders to the Bishop the Bishop to Christ as he to his Father And again What is the Eldership but an â—â—ly Senate the Counsellors and assistants of the Bishops Ignat. epist ad Smyrn ad Tâ—â—lenses ad Antiochenos 3. ad Magnesios c. And Iustine Martyr calleth him TON PROESTOTA the president or chief governour whom Ignatius Irenaeus Eusebius and others call EPISCOPON the Bishop or Overseer so applying generall termes to this office more particularly Iustin Martyr Apolog. 2. Irenaeus writeth of Polycarpus by name that he was made Bishop by the Apostles in Asia in the church of Smyrna And that himself had seen him vvhen he was young Irenaeus libr. 3. cap. 3. He also nameth sundry of the Bishops of the Church of Rome who succeeded one after another in that church from the Apostles times to his ovvne dayes Ibid. Eusebius writeth likevvise of Polycarpus made Bishop of the church of Smyrna by the Apostles Euseb l. 3. c. 32. and l. 4. c. 14. and of many Bishops by name who follovved one another in the church of Rome and in sundry other churches after the Apostles Euangelists vvhich were long here to recite in particular Euseb lib. 3. c. 2.13.14.19.31.32 and lib 4. c. 1.4 5.10.19.22.23 c. Onely note these for some special instances hereabout In the church of Alexandria Anianus and after him Abilius c. Euseb l. 2â— 24. 3.13 In the church of Ierusalem Simeon after Iames the Apostle after him Iustus c. Ibid. l. 3. c. 11. 32. In the church of Antioch 〈◊〉 and after him Ignatius c. Ibid. l. 3. c. 19. In the church of Corinth 〈◊〉 and after him Dionysius c Ibid. l. 4. c. 21. 22. In the church of Athens Dionysius Areopagites after him Quadratus Publius c. Ibid. Where also obserue hovv Eusebius sometimes calleth the churches parishes As the parish of Alexandria the parish of Ephesus the parish of Ierusalem the parish of Hierapolis the parish of Athens Of other interpretation or application of the word parish I will not now insist nor of the 〈…〉 c. vvhereof such such there named were Bishops or Overseers one after another Euseb l. 2. c. 24. â— 3. c.
these allegations out of the Scripture Another allegation about the matter aforesaid is taken out of auncient writers Park Polit eccles p. 236. c. shewing that in some churches heretofore there were two Bishops or Pastors in one and the same office in one church at once As namely that there vvas in the church of Ierusalem at once Narcissus and Alexander and in the church of Hippo Valerius and Augustine in Rome Felix Liberius in Nazianzum Gregorie the father Gregorie the sonne c. Euseb l. 6. c. 7.9.10 Sozomen l. 4. c. 14. August epist 110. Gregor Nazianz. epist ad Gregor Nyssenum Whereabout may be considered I. Whether this vvas ordinarie or extraordinarie If ordinarie how is it then that the same other auncient vvriters doe usually still make mention but of one in one church at one time as in their vvritings everie vvhere may be seen If extraordinarie and upon some speciall occasions what then vvas the ordinarie course that vvas otherwise kept and observed usually II. By the instances alledged it appeareth that there were but two of these Bishops in these churches at those times Whereas by the Scriptures alledged and the generall acknovvledgement almost of all there may be many Elders or Bishops in a church and far moe then tvvo Yea if there were but one pastor one teacher one ruling Elder in a church there vvould yet be moe Elders or Bishops then two at once III. The tvvo aforesaid also vvere both of them teaching Elders and Ministers of the vvord and Sacraments vvhereas the Scriptures shevve that there vvere and should be in the Church both teaching and ruling Elders IIII. The vvriters vvhich mention these note some special occasions thereof as that it was in case of old age or sicknes or special good liking and approbation of the parties and returning to the churches and places from which through troubles or otherwise they had some vvhile ben absent or other the like and some difference vvithall observed betvveene some of them Which is also duly to be regarded For vvhich see the â—â—ters and places aforesaid V. The time moreover is to be noted when this vvas done Which by the instances alledged appeareth to be some good vvhile after the Apostles dayes Whereas the question is concerning the primitiue institution and practise from the beginning VI. Also if such examples in later times so recorded by these writers should be respected vvhy should not then the other examples of former times recorded by the same and other Writers likewise VII And finally the onely sure ground of truth and end of controversies in Religion is the word of God vvherevvith so far as the auncient Writers accord their testimonies vvritings may in their place well be regarded According to it therefore I leaue these things vvith the other before alledged out of the Scriptures to be considered discussed And hitherto of the latter braunch of this question Novv furthermore note withall that how ever it be for the matter in hand touching the Pastors and other Elders of particular churches yet still it lyeth on them who receiue or plead for Diocesan and Provinciall churches Pastors or Bishops that they shevv such churches and Pastors planted by the Apostles at the beginning For if it cannot be shevved that the Apostles by vertue of their commission from Christ established such Diocesan and Provincial churches and Bishops who then may establish or submit unto them If they vvho were the Master-builders under Christ did not set them up vvhat povver then is there under heauen that may erect them and what homage is it that a Christian soule can with good conscience yeeld unto them in this behalf 2. The churches must be such and so established as the Lord appointeth and approveth in his vvord Revel 1 12 20. And everie officer in the church must in a due regard be counted a meÌ„ber in the body of Christ Rom. 12 3 8. 1 Cor. 12 12 28. Ephes 4 4 16. And none may set members in the body of Christ but the Lord himself 1 Cor. 12 18 28. c. Euen as on the coÌ„trarie none may keep out despise or abandon those vvhom the Lord hath appointed to be in his church and to continevv therein to the end of the vvorld Rom. 12.6.7.8 Ephe. 4 11 12. with Esa 66 21. 1 Tim. 3.1 15. and 5 3 9 17. with 6 13 14. and with Mat. 28.18.19.20 Luke 10.16 and 12 42 43. Ioh. 13 20. 1 Pet. 5 1 4. Rev. 1 16 20. and 2 1 8 c. 3. Moreover the functions duties of such Prelates if they be members of the body of Christ are to be shewed out of the word of God as vve see done for the Officers of particular churches Rom. 12 6 7 8. Ephes 4.11.12 vvith Esa 66.21 1 Thes 5.12.13.24 1 Tim. 5.17 Rev. 2.1.8 c. and as vvas in Israell for the hy Priest and for the other Priests and Levites besides that vvhich was in their cities and Synagogues Exod. 28. and 29. Lev. 1 16 chap. c. Num. 3 and 4 and 8. Deut. 16 19 chap. Josh 21 chap. 1 Chron. 23 26 ch Luke 4 16 20. Act. 13.14.15 c. 4. The place also and manner vvhere and hovv such Bishops doe and can meet together with the rest of the body whereof they are members that is with their Diocesan and Provinciall churches is to be shewed in their practise agreable to the Scriptures as may be done for the Pastors of particular churches and their assemblies Rev. 1 20. and 2 and 3 ch vvith Acts 20.17.28 Rom. 12.4 8. Col. 4.16.17 1 Thes 5.12.13.14.27 Heb. 13.7.17.24 Jam. 2.2 vvhere the Apostle calleth the assemblies of Christians Synagogues vvhich as I noted before may haue reference to the Synagogues of the Ievves Mat. 4 23. Luke 4 16 20. Acts 13.5.14.15.42 and 14.1 and 17.1.2 and 18.4.7.8 c. As also Ierusalem was the place whither the Iewes were bound to come thrise a yere and where the high Priest and the other Priests and Levites that ministred there were bound to sacrifice and performe the other duties of their callings for the vvhole church from time to time according as the Lord particularly appointed in his word 5. Yea the higher and greater that the members and functions are which the Lord hath set in his church the more undoubted it is that they are specially described in his word and the more needfull both for the church and the Officers themselues to haue certain knowledge and assurance thereof As was for the chief Priests other officers of the church of Israell Necessarie therefore it is that the Diocesan and Provinciall Churches if any such vvere planted by the Apostles and the office entrance administration of Diocesan and Provinciall Bishops vvhich challenge to be chief in the church and distinct from the Pastors and Bishops of particular churches should be shewed out of the Scriptures by such as hold would uphold them if they
could The Catholike church of Rome as they call it and the universall Bishop thereof I omit as being Antichristian most of all and justly left by the Protestants and Reformed churches Though yet far more in some respects might be pretended for this from the state of Ierusalem the High Priests that vvere for the universall church then for the Diocesan or Provinciall churches and Bishops If any alledge in this behalf as some use to doe the examples of Timothee abiding at Ephesus and Titus left at Crete by the appointment of the Apostle for the oversight and government of those churches c. the subscriptions also of those Epistles vvherein both of them are styled the first Bishops of those churches let these things be observed thereabout 1. That those subscriptions are Apocryphall and not part of the Scripture it self 2. That some Greek copies and the Syriack and old Latin translation also haue not this style or title at all 3. That Timothee and Titus were Euangelists vvho were sent appointed by the Apostles sometimes to one place sometimes to another as they had occasion 2 Tim. 4.5.9 Tit. 1.5 and 3.12 whereas the Pastors Bishops vvere appointed to their peculiar flock and seat Act. 20.17 28. 1 Pet. 5.1 4. Rev. 1.20 and 2.1.8 c. If eyther of these were so particularly employed afterward it helps not the matter 4. The first Epistle of Timothee hath not this in the subscription And in the latter Epistle where the subscription styleth Timothee the first Bishop of the church of the Ephesians there doth Paul in the same Epistle both terme him an Euangelist and exhorte him to doe the work of an Euangelist 2 Tim 4.5 yea and call him from the church of Ephesus which was in Asia to come unto him to Rome which was in Italie 2 Tim. 4 9 21. if the subscription be right Likevvise in the Epistle to Titus vvhere the subscription styleth him the first Bishop of the church of the Cretians there doth Paul in the same Epistle call him from Creta in Greece to Nicopolis in Armenia Tit. 1 5. vvith 3 12. And these things may be observed in those Epistles themselues vvhere these subscriptions are besides that other Scriptures doe also shevve hovv they vvere sometimes in one part of the world and sometimes in another sometimes in Asia and sometimes in Europe doing the duties of their office As that Timothee vvas in Asia in divers countreyes and parts thereof in Phrygia Galatia Mysia Ionia c. And in Europe also in Macedonia Achaia Italie c. And in these countreyes and nations sometimes in one city and with one church sometimes vvith another for divers occasions purposes as namely at Thessalonica at Athens at Corinth at Ephesus at Rome at Philippi c. For al vvhich see these Scriptures Acts 16 ch and 17 14 15. and 18 5. and 19 22. and 20 4. Rom. 16 21. 1 Cor. 4 17. and 16 10 11. 2 Cor. 1 19. Phil. 1 1. and 2 19 22 23. 1 Thes 3 1 2 6. with both the Epistles to Timothee And that Titus likevvise was sometimes in Europe at divers places as at Corinth in Achaia at Rome in Italie in Creta and Dalmatia in Greece c. And sometimes in Asia as at Jerusalem in Iudea at Nicopolis in Armenia c. As is evident by these Scriptures 2 Cor. 8 23 24. and 12 18. Gal 2.1 2 Tim. 4.10 Tit. 1 4 5. and 3.12 vvith the whole Epistle to Titus By vvhich also appeareth that Timothee and Titus were Euangelists so imployed by the Apostle Paul sundry times and in sundry places 5. Besides the church of Ephesus vvas a particular not a Diocesan or Provinciall church as may appeare both by the places vvhere it is particularly spoken off Acts 20 17 28. Ephes 1.1 1 Tim. 1.3 and 3.15 Rev. 1 11.12 and 2.1 by the like estate of the other Churches of Asia written unto by Christ Rev. 1.4.11.12.13.16.20 and 2.8.12.18 and 3.17.14 compared vvith Col. 4.16 And so this toucheth not the point in hand Creta in deed is an Iland wherein were divers cities but in every of them were Elders and Bishops ordeyned as is here plainly expressed Tit. 1 5 6 7. c. And by this Scripture it seemeth that when the Apostle departed from thence all things vvere not yet finished among them vvhereupon he left Titus behind him to set in order the things that were wanting and to ordeyne Elders and Bishops in every city Wherein vvhat other thing did Titus then vvhat any other Euangelist so left there might haue done Which also the Apostle himself might and vvould haue done if he had remayned there longer and yet haue ben an Apostle still though for the time or by that occasion he had ben so particularly imployed there And when this was done there by Titus Paul called him from thence to come unto him to Nicopolis as vve haue noted here before out of the same Epistle Tit. 3 12. 6. Moreover the vvord Bishop or Overseer is sometimes used generally and very largely so as the office of an Apostle is sometimes so called Acts 1 20. 7. And lastly vvhy might not the Euangelists being in an office superiour to the Pastors or Bishops of particular churches haue and supply their place in any Church vvhere they came and remayned yet this be no ground or warrant of Diocesan or Provincial Bishops churches any more then Iames so being at Ierusalem who othervvise vvas an Apostle Act. 21.18 Euseb l. 2. c. 23. l. 3. c. 11. l. 7. c. 18. For the further consideration vvhereof besides that vvhich hath ben said before I will here propound two things in an other †Reasons touching cōmunicating with the Minist of the church of Engl. p. 26. c. treatise mentioned heretofore vvhich as they shal be found to haue waight may giue more light to these and other points sometimes called in question 1. The first is this Whether the Lords ordinance in his church be not such as the higher offices conteyne in them and comprehend the inferior offices so as they vvhich be in the greater offices haue besides their ovvne peculiar function vvhereunto they ought to attend povver and authoritie both themselues to performe the duties of the inferiour offices when there is needfull occasion and to look that they be performed by all such as they are specially layd upon for the better service of the Lord and his church therein As may be observed both by the estate of Israell heretofore in the Priests and Levites c. and by divers things written concerning the Apostles Euangelists Pastors and other Elders in sundry cases For example that the Apostles who were in the greatest ecclesiasticall office ordeyned by Christ under the Gospell had besides the peculiar office of Apostleship the povver also and authoritie of the offices of the Euangelists Pastors Teachers Elders Deacons both to performe them upon just occasion
the church are not committed to the Elders 19. That the Saints as kings rule the visible Church 20. That the Eldership is not the head in respect of the other brethren as Paul speaketh of the head 1 Cor. 12 21. 21. That the people are Rulers properly and the Governours of the Elders 22. That persons will not accept of the admonitions giuen by the Pastour or other Elders but say if the Church admonish them they will rest 23. That they wil not giue honour to such erroneous government 24. That the Ministers and Officers of the church are forreigne Ministers a forreigne ayde and assistance an unnaturall monstrous and adulterous interposition 25. That ecclesiastical officers haue not offices of authority 26. That the order of Saints or Saintship in the church is an order superiour unto and aboue the order of Officers or of Bishoprick or Eldership 27. That the order of Saints is an order of kings which is the highest order in the church sitting upon the thrones of David for judgement 28. That Suspension is a corruption and devise of men 29. That the Church of Israell had not power to cast out offenders 30. That if there were amongst the Ievves in Christs time a distinct ordinance of excommunication ecclesiasticall it vvas a Ievvish devise without ground of the Scriptures 31. That no good writers use the vvord ECCLESIA for the Congregation of Elders As if the Septuagint were not good vvriters or that this may not be a Synechdochicall speach as there are many in the Scriptures Gen. 3 20. and 9 6. Exod. 20 18 19. with Deu. 5 23. Lev. 9 1 3. in the Septuagint 1 Sam. 8.4 7. c. 2 Sam. 7 7. with 1 Chron. 17 6. Mar. 16 15. Col. 1 23. Iohn 9 22. c. or that GHNIDTAH were not the word used in the Syriack or that it were never used for the assembly of governors 32. That this place may be understood †The Prelates c. of one alone as of the Pastour or Bishop 33. That by these opinions Gods ordinance of the Synedrion Consistorie or Presbyterie is lost and abrogated 34. And the difference between the Synedria or the Councils and the Synagogues annihilated or taken avvay 35 That seeing the Elders are not called ARCHONTES in all the New Testament therefore they are not to rule the church of God 36. That if the Elders be stewards onely over the servants and not Lords over the vvife the church then is not the church to obey or submit unto them And that therefore it is a fallacie a conjunctione divisione to reason thus All the particular members must obey the Elders in their lavvfull instructions their wholsome admonitions severally Ergo the vvhole body or whole flock must joyntly obey the voice of the Elders c. These and other like errours false doctrines and sinfull courses haue ben conceived and urged by divers not all by any one but some by one some by others their toungues being exceedingly divided among themselues about these things By vvhich also may appeare how needfull it is to search out the meaning of this Scripture and carefully to obserue it still looking unto Israell and to the right understanding thereof what we can And this the more considering that †M. Ains his followers c some are so very peremptorie stifly conceited in their opinions concerning these things as they fear not to make schismaticall divisions and notorious scandals thereabout contrarie to the doctrine vvhich vve haue learned of the Prophets and Apostles For vvhich cause they are to be marked and avoyded of all that loue the trueth and seeke their conversion and amendement Rom. 16 17. with 1 Cor. 11 18 19. Gal. 5 19 20. Ephes 5 11. Iude ver 19. CHAPTER XX. Of the maintenance of the Ministers and other officers of the church VVHether it be not the duty of all Churches and of the members thereof every one according to their abilitie to giue maintenance unto their Ministers and as there is occasion to the Elders also that rule the church to the Deacons Deaconesses that serue minister therein 1 Cor. 9 7 14. Gal. 6 6. Rom. 15 27. 1 Thes 5 12 13. 1 Tim. 5 3 17 18. compared with Exod. 20 12. Prov. 3 9 10. Lev. 24 8 9 Num. 18 8 32. Deu. 12 19. and 16 16 17. and 18 1 8. Josh 21 ch 1 Sam. 9 6 7 8. 2 King 4 8 9 10 22 23 42 Luke 8 1 2 3. and 21 1 4. 2 Chron. 31 2 21. Neh. 10 32 39 Esa 30 20 24. Ezec. 44 28 29 30. Mal. 3 8 9 10. 1. Because the Lord hath ordeyned that so it should be 1 Cor. 9 13 14. Gal. 6 6. 1 Thes 5 13. 1 Tim. 5 3 17 18. compared with Numb 18 8 32. Deu. 18. 1 5. and 25 4. 2 Chron. 31 2 21. 2. And thus we shall honour the Lord vvith our substance which hath the promise of blessing from the Lord. Prov. 3 9 10. Ezec. 44 30. Mal. 3 8 12. with Exod. 20.12 and 1 Tim. 5 17. 3. Besides that it is no great thing but our duty to minister unto them in carnall things of whose spirituall things vve are made partakers 1 Cor. 9 11. Rom. 15 27. Gal. 6 6. 1 Thes 5 13. 4. Yea vvho planteth a vineyard and eateth not of the fruit thereof Or who fedeth a flock eateth not of the milk of the flock 1 Cor. 9 7. c. 5. Finally the Apostle teacheth expressely Let the Elders that rule well be counted worthy of double honour especially they who labour in the word and doctrine For the Scripture saith Thou shalt not mousell the oxe that treadeth out the corne and The labourer is vvorthy of his reward 1 Tim. 5 17 18. vvith Deu. 25 4. 1 Cor. 9 8 9 10. Mat. 10 10. But vvhere any churches are poore and not able to maintaine themselues their Officers or poore among them that there they should be holpen by other churches of better meanes and greater abilitie according to their several estate and occasions 2 Cor. 8 and 9 cha Act. 11 27 30. Rom. 15 25 26 27. Gal. 2 9 10. and 6 10. Phil. 4 10 19. together vvith the Scriptures aforesaid It doth in deed lye also upon Kings and all other Magistrates within their dominions cities jurisdictions to haue special care of the estate of the ministers and churches under them as of all other duties concerning religion apperteyning unto them after the example of Hezekiah king of Iudah and Nehemiah the Prince and other the like 2 Chron. 31 2 21. vvith 29 and 30 chap. Nehem. 10 32 39. and 12 44 47. and 13 10 14. vvith Deu. 17 18 19 20. Yet notvvithstanding this should not hinder the foresaid duty of the churches and people themselues but should rather further it and that not onely in affording help where there is want but also in requiring of such as are able that this
thou hast a name that thou livest and art dead Rev. 3 1. Should we novv infer hereupon as this man here doth upon the like phrase in the Prophets touching Israell that therefore baptisme and the other ordinances of God had in the church of Sardis vvere but in shew reteyned therein and could not be unto them the signes and seales of forgiuenes of sinnes and of life eternall and therefore vvere in their use of them false and deceitful as vvere the ordinances as he saith of God reteined among the Gentiles Would any man of heart and understanding endure such blasphemie Saith not the Scripture that the church of Sardis vvas one of the seuen golden candlesticks shewed unto Iohn And doth not Christ our Lord who hath the seuen spirits of God vvhose eyes are as a flame of fire accordingly approue it so to be Rev. 1 4 11 12 13 14 20. with 3 1 c. Far rather will I with Christ his Apostle esteem it to be dead in some respect yet acknowledge it a golden Candlestick and true Church of God in other respect then gather such maner of consequences as this man usually doth upon any such phrases that he meteth vvithall And this is the more to be mynded touching this doctrine of his because himself in the same treatise affirmeth that ‘ Animad pag. 103. our reasons from Israell are impertinent to the estate of Rome there spoken off but might vvell serue for the times vvherein Iohn lived vvhen the true †Rev. 2 and 3 cha Churches vvere many of them apostate Where also he citeth in the margent Rev. 2 and 3 chapters and so this Church of Sardis for one Where I might note againe his contradicting of himself and his manifold errors in divers respects if I vvould here stand thereupon For if the estate of apostate Israell may vvel serue the times of Iohn when the true churches spoken off in the Revelation ch 2 and 3. vvere many of them apostate then it cannot be that the estate and ordinances of God had in Israell should be such as ‡ Animad p. 70 c. in this other place and throughout his treatise he would beare us in hand Thē also should Israel be a true church though in apostasie as here himself calleth those churches in the Revelation apostate and yet true churches Which by vvord and vvriting othervvhere he still oppugneth That vvhich concerneth the church of Rome may be touched othervvhere In the meane time we haue now ynough from these men themselues seeing the church of Sardis vvhich they say was apostate and Christ saith vvas dead is by themselues acknowledged to be a true church by the Scriptures approved for a golden candlestick So al their pretences and oppositions vanish into smoke Secondly for the place of Hoseah it self if it be understood as by putting a vvord to the text here they expound it of death in sinne yet let it be vvell considered vvhether it will therefore follow that circumcision now in Israel was not the Lords signe his seale of forgiuenes of sinne but a false and deceitfull signe in their use thereof and no better then the ordinances of the heathen The Scripture sheweth how vvhen one being called of Christ to follow him requested saying ‘ Luke 9 59 60. Lord suffer me first to goe and bury my father Christ said unto him again Let the dead bury the dead but goe thou and preach the kingdome of God meaning Let the dead spiritually bury those that are dead bodily Shall we novv therefore hereupon gather that the circumcision then had among the Iewes vvas a false deceitful signe in their use thereof and not the Lords seale of forgiuenes of sinne and eternall life Also vvhen Paul speaking of widovves in the Church saith “ 1 Tim. 1 3 5 6. Honour widowes that are vvidowes in deed c. Now she that is a widow in deed and desolate trusteth in God and continueth in supplications prayers night and day But she that liveth in pleasure is dead while she liveth Meaning she that liveth the naturall life but is dead vvith spiritual death May we now infer hereupon that the baptisme had in the church of Ephesus where Timothee thus vvritten unto “ 1 Tim. 1 3. now was or in any other of the Primitiue churches wherein such widowes were was not the Lords signe of the remission of sinnes and eternall life but a lying execrable signe in their use thereof and no better then the heathens baptisme or other observations of theirs Shall the infidelitie of man make Gods trueth of none effect Shall not God be true though men be lyars Shal not his signes seales still be his true and holy ordinances though eyther Churches generally or some particular persons that enjoy them walk unworthy of them abuse and corrupt both them and themselues If some among this people that write shus yea if the Congregation it self vvherof these men themselues are should be dead in sinne having * Rom. 16.17 Gal. 5 19 20. Heb. 10 25 Iude v. 19. offended scandalously divided themselues from the church whereof they vvere as †Arrow against idolatrie p. 4 71. c. they acknovvledge that Israell did from Iudah notwithstanding all their pretences to the contrary will they therefore yeeld that the baptisme had among them is not the Lords ordinance nor his signe seale of forgiuenes of sinne and of eternall life but a lying and deceitfull signe in their use thereof and no better then the heathens ordinances Or if some in any Churches euen in the best at this day be found dead in their sinnes will they therefore infer such consequences about the baptisme other ordinances of God had among them that they are not the Lords signes and seales but lying deceitfull in their use thereof The vvord of God it self is by some made unto themselues the savour of death unto death Is it not therefore in the Lords ordinance the savour of life unto life 2 Cor. 2 14 15 16. So likevvise is it with the Lords supper as the Apostle shevveth 1 Cor. 11 18 34. Yet may vve not therefore gather such consequences thereupon as these men doe about the question in hand Thirdly their exposition of the place aforesaid being admitted it was then that Israell became dead in sinne when they offended in Baal But the vvorship of Baal in the ten tribes vvas first instituted by Achab. 1 Kin. 16. 31 32 33. And Ahab was the seuenth king of Israell and reigned about threescore yeeres after Ieroboam the sonne of Nebat that set up the Calues caused Israell to sinne 1 King 12 16 chap. And there was great difference betweene Ieroboams calues and Baals idolatrie as appeareth both by Eliahs historie vvho ‘ 1 Kin. 18 18. c. directly earnestly set himself against the Prophets of Baal in Ahabs time that first brought them into Israell
and remembred Novv touching the Scripture and question spoken off where the Apostle speaketh of the man of sinne sitting in the Temple of God ‘ Bellar. cōtrov 3 l. 3. c. 13 c. Rhem Test in 2 Thes 2 s 11. Bellarmine and the Papists vvill not haue it understood of the Church of God among Chistians and thus farre M. Ains and his followers agree with them in this place But Bellarmine expounds it literally of the Temple of Ierusalem M. A. expounds * Animad p. 78 82. 93 94. c. it straungly of the Synagogue of Sathan of the Temple of Antichrist and the Divell c. And here novv they differ one from another and both of them from the trueth as far as darknes doth from light The Temple at Ierusalem was destroyed long since and in the new Ierusalem which we expect clearly shortly to come at the conversion of the Ievves to the Christian faith there is no such Temple to be looked for the sacrifices shadovves and ceremonies of the Law being now ceased I saw no Temple therein saith Iohn for the Lord God Almighty and the Lambe are the Temple of it Rev. 21 2 22. So vve may first cashier Bellarmines exposition And then M.A. vvhich is in some respects a great deal more straunge that by the Temple of God the Apostle should meane the Synagogue of Sathan the Temple of Antichrist and the Divell c. Against vvhich if there vvere neyther other Scripture nor any other thing at all but that the Apostle here describeth it by this Name of the Temple of God calleth Antichrists sitting therein as God * 2 Thes 2 7. a mysterie of iniquity it vvere ynough to teach us to advise well and to take far more heed thereabout For is this terme of the Temple of God ever so taken in the Scripture Would the Apostle saith Augustine call the Temple of an idoll or of the Divell the Temple of God Or when he describeth the mysterie of Antichrists iniquity would he teach the Church that the place of his sitting is the Temple of God if he meant that it vvere in deed the Synagogue of Sathan the Temple of Antichrist For that Antichrist should sit in the Temple of Antichrist and Synagogue of Sathan what mysterie is there in it All the world would easily perceiue that these agreed very vvell and most fitly together But for Antichrist to sit in Gods Temple and Christs Church this is in deed a mysterie and a mysterie of iniquity such as men had need open the eyes of their understanding and set their hearts religiously to consider it if they vvould discerne it as it is Which may sufficiently appeare by these straunge expositions and like erroneous courses found among the Papists Anabaptists these men and other such vvhether Popishly or Anabaptistically addicted hereabout And what may we think is it that induceth thē hereunto Is it not first that this is a mysterie of iniquitie which eyther is not readily perceived or not rightly esteemed as it should Is it not vvithall in the Papists that they would turn away the application of this Scripture from the Pope church of Rome and therefore vvould send us to the Temple of Ierusalem to find out this mysterie there Is it not also on another hand in these men vvith the Anabaptists and others like mynded that they cannot endure that the Church of Rome should any way be esteemed the Church of God and therefore wil rather by the Temple of God understand the Synagogue of Sathan and Temple of Antichrist then they vvil admit that the church of Rome should be the Temple and church of God For my self my purpose is not to plead for the corrupt and adulterate estate of the church of Rome or of any degenerate churches at all much lesse for any impietie or iniquitie of the Man of sinne of Antichrist or his hierarchie of the corruptions false worship or superstitions of that apostasie against vvhich I haue heretofore many yeres in prison and now also by the mercy of God this twentie yeeres in exile witnessed and stil doe vvitnesse the trueth of Christ vvhat in me is and in that measure as it pleaseth him to manifest and vouchsafe unto me But my purpose is to shew that difference is to be put betvveen the Temple of God where Antichrist sitteth and betvveen Antichrist himself who as God sitteth therein that so the cause of the Protestants in general and ours in particular may be kept sound and intire both against the Papists and popish corruptions on the one hand and against the Anabaptists and Anabaptistical aberrations on the other Now therefore to speak of the church of Rome in this respect how this terme is used it is taken either particularly or more generally If vve understand it of a parttcular church as the Apostle wrote †Epist to the Romās his Epistle to the church there how shall we soundly deny eyther it to be the Temple of God or Antichrist to be set therein Euen the Papists themselues hold and tell us that the †Anton. Sum. part 3. tit 21. cap. 2. 6. Laterane Church in Rome is the Parish Church of the Bishop of Rome Which is much to be observed about this question And himself saith here as the trueth is that the Tsmple figured every particular church and therefore also the particular Church of Rome Which thing alone might suffice for the controversie in hand And that the more because the Antichristian usurpation opposition exaltation extent of unlavvfull jurisdiction and other such corruptions growen up since the first plantation of that church are rather to be referred to the Bishops of that church then to that particular church it self and doe more fitly and properly apperteyne to those clauses of the Apostles description of Antichrist where he calleth him the man of sinne opposing and exalting himself aboue al that is called God or is reverend sitting as God and shewing himself that he is God c. then to this other clause of the Temple of God whereabout our question is Like as in the Revelation they are to be referred to the Beast not to the church and people of God in and over vvhich the beast tyrannizeth Rev. 11 and 13 and 14 and 17 and 18 chapt If it be understood more generally then may it be applied to all other such Christian churches as synce the prevayling of Antichrist the Pope of Rome are come under his jurisdiction and government Rev. 11 2. and vvherein he sitteth or treadeth thereon though not in his ovvne person in each of them yet by his hierarchie authoritie usurpation and jurisdiction And if we mark it also we shal find that not the Pope onely but the other hierarchicall Prelates Diocesan Provinciall the like haue the Parishes or particular churches perteyning to their jurisdictions vvherein they sit although not in their owne persons yet by their hierarchie and authority Yea euen
at Rome to this day the Cardinals that are next to the Pope himself are all of them Presbyters or Deacons and haue each of them their particular church or parish whereof they are named and vvhereunto more particularly they doe apperteyne Whereupon to note it by the vvay this may also be observed that if there be any Bishop at this day in our ovvn countrey or otherwhere vvho hath not his particular Church or parish whereof he is overseer and whereunto he doeth properly appetteyne all such are more degenerate from the auncient way order of the Primitiue Churches then is the Pope himself in this behalf And if the Bishops haue stil every one his ovvn peculiar parish church to vvhich they doe properly belong it is a good print and footstep of the auncient vvay wherein the churches vvere planted at first by the Apostles and Euangelists And is a point that vvill giue great light to this other questions novv much controverted about the order and government of the church Note here also hovv the very things vvhich the Prelates chalenge in the particular churches under them are jurisdiction and ordination And that othervvise they leaue the particular Parishes to their ovvn peculiar Ministers for the ministration of the word and Sacraments among them ordinarily Which is observed in all churches by all Prelates euen the most Popish and under the Pope himself unto this day And is a point also that vvill giue light to the better understanding of the estate of the Prelacy and condition of the †Parishionall Diocesan Provinciall c. churches perteyning unto them of what sort soever But to proceed I am not ignorant that the termes of Diocesan Provinciall Nationall Oecumenical or universal churches are also otherwise used and applied and are ascribed to representatiue Churches to Councils Convocations Synodes Courts and the like whereof there may be some use consideration not unprofitable about the matter here in hand so it be not otherwise abused For vvho knoweth not that the Pope hath novv a long time sit in Councils Courts and other Christian assemblies opposing and exalting himself aboue all that is called God or that is worshipped shevving himself that he is God establishing confirming and disanulling vvhat he would ruling overruling vvhom vvhen as he would yet not present stil in his own person but sometimes by his designed substitutes alvvaies by his usurped povver authoritie and jurisdiction But of this I vvill not insist It may suffice for the point in hand that Antichrist is so set and exalted as hath ben said in the Christian Churches aforesaid which I suppose these men themselues being better advised vvill not deny to be the Churches and Temple of God Or if they doe then I hope they will shevv of vvhat other church or churches they understand this Scripture and hovv that vvhich the Apostle teacheth in this place is by the Man of sinne performed in the Temple of God Alvvaies remembring to distinguish betvveen the man of sinne himself and between the Temple of God wherein he sitteth c. And this for the present I thought to note hereabout Animadv p. 78. Where he saith if we meane a particular Church it will not agree with the prophecies of Antichrist whose City or church is so great as peoples kinreds toungues and nations doe dwell in the streets thereof Rev. 11 8 9. I ansvver first that stil he cals that Antichrists church vvhich the Apostle cals the Temple of God II. Secondly how vvill he proue that the Beasts city spoken off Rev. 11 8. is the Temple of God spoken of 2 Thes 2 4. If he say he speaks not of the Temple of God then he speaks not of the point in hand If he speak of it why doeth he still call it the City Church and Temple of Antichrist and not the Temple of God as the Apostle termes it Hath the very phrase of the Scripture so much light in it as he can not endure to look upon it Or doth he in these things loue darknes more then light Or is there no difference to be put between Antichrists City and Gods church III. Thirdly having this occasion I vvill propound some things hereabout and leaue them further to be considered off being assured that if the true meaning of these Scriptures be rightly found out the difficultie about these and sundry other matters will be far the more easy Whereas therefore he doth not distinguish betvveen the City and the Church but here and throughout his treatise usually confounds them as all one let us obserue and consider of these things thereabout 1. That this City spoken off in ‘ Rev. 11 8. the place that he alledgeth is spiritually called Sodome and Egypt where also our Lord vvas crucified But the church is here called the Temple of God or the Court vvithout the Temple or the holy City c. For which see 2 Thes 2 4. and the chapter it self vvhich here he citeth Revel 11 2. 2. That this great city is not onely Sodome and Egypt spiritually but is also that Sodome Egypt where our Lord was crucified Rev. 11 8. Now al know that Christ our Lord vvas crucified in and under the jurisdiction of the City not of the Church of Rome For he vvas condemned to death by Pontius Pilate the Deputie of the Romane Emperour under whose dominion and jurisdiction now the Iewes were and vvas crucified by the Romane souldjours being delivered to the Gentiles when yet there was no church at Rome as Christ himself had before told his disciples Mat. 27 2 11 26 27 31 35. with 20 17 18 19. Luke 18 31 32 33. and 23 1 2 c. Joh. 18 28 31. 19 1 2 10 12 15 16 18 23. c. Which is also acknowledged by this man himself here a litle after Animadv pag. 83. 3. That this City is that which vvas the Dragons throne and was by the Dragon giuen to the Beast Rev. 13 2. vvhich this man himself also noteth though to another purpose Animad pag. 79. But this was the City not the Church of Rome Neyther I think will these men themselues say that the Church vvas the Dragons throne or was by the Dragon giuen to the Beast 4. That this City also is the throne of the Beast Babylon the great City spoken of Rev. 16 10 19. and 17 18 ch Which that it is to be understood of the city of Rome and the dominion thereof vvill yet appeare further by the reasons follovving And note here how ‡ M. Brighon Rev. 16.19 some treating on Rev. 16 19. expound great Babylon there to be the city of Constantinople called New Rome Which then maketh the more for the point in hand 5. That this city is the woman that sitteth on seuen mountaines Rev. 17 9 18. And that the City not the church of Rome is built on * Called Palatinus Capitolinus Quâ—rinalis Aventinus Caelius
away vvith any pretence or applause Ibid. 30. And what pretence hath he here to beare him out in this matter Can a scab or gangrene saith he performe any action of a naturall body or member But if M. Iunius lived to returne him ansvver he would keep him to the point in hand and soon ask of him again Can a body that hath a scab or gangrene performe no actions of a naturall body And what can M. Ainsw ansvver hereunto but it will be against himself what ever pretence or colour he set upon it 31. Besides if Hymenaeus and Philetus spoken off by the Apostle were Ministers though haereticall schismaticall apostaticall c. vvho teaching errours their word did eat as a cancker or gangrene 2 Tim. 2 17 18. vvould M. Ains therefore conclude as here he doth that the baptisme ministred by them vvas not true baptisme but as the fretting of the gangrene Ibid. c. How then said he before * that he vvas farr from Cyprians errour who held that it is not baptisme that is ministred by hereticks or schismaticks ‘ Animad p. 71. and that it is to be renounced and rejected and accounted as profane Cyprian Epist 70 71 72. c. Or would he that men should not haue true baptisme or that they should still reteyne the fretting of a gangrene c. Or what vvil he say if he doe not distinguish betvveen their doctrine of errour and their other actions estate ministerie othervvise considered Likevvise when the apostate Ievves are by the Prophets compared to brasse yron lead tinne drosse reffuse and ofscouring c. Jer. 6 28 29 30. Lament 3 45. Eze. 22 18 19 20. vvhich cannot doe the actions of the body of a man will he therfore say that the circumcision had in Iudah was not true circumcision that no actions of the Priests or administration of that church could possibly be the actions of the body of the Church neither of Christ hovv ever they were considered and difference put betvveen the church it self and Gods ordinances on the one hand and their own corruptions and apostasie on the other 32. But why speaks he not also of the similitude of the plague or pestilence used likevvise by M. Iunius doth he perceiue Ibid. that the papacie may well be accounted the plague of that church yet be distiinguished from the church it self euen as iniquitie everie vvhere is justly esteemed the plague of churches cities kingdomes and common weales and yet is distinguished from them notvvithstanding 33. And why passeth he over M. Iunius his other similitudes of the Dropsie and Consumption Hath he no shift or colour there against Ibid. Doth he see it to be undeniable that these are accidents of the body and not the body it self and that therefore difference is to be put betvveene these diseases themselues and betvveen the bodies affected therevvith Why then doeth he not likevvise discerne it in the other And why doth he not yeeld thereunto Is it because he closeth up his eyes least he should see and hardeneth his heart least he should understand So in deed haue many done both teachers and people euen in Israell heretofore and that also from time to time Whom the Lord therefore punished accordingly blynding their eyes making their heart fat eares heavy least they should see vvith their eyes and heare vvith their eares and understand with their hearts and convert and be healed Esa 6 9 10. with Matth. 13 13 14 15. and Act 28 25 26 27. 34. Where he againe denyeth any calling to be in the church of Rome Animadv p. 100. I haue disproved it here before pag. 188. And vvhere he asketh how God doth call in that church of Rome Let him aske it of such of his follovvers as haue heretofore ben of the Priests and members of that church how they vvere called and that so as they left that estate whether it was by immediate revelation from heauen or by some meanes here on earth whether it was by the word of God or without it Let him tel us whence the Protestants Churches reformed of late did come vvhether from the church of Rome or no and hovv they were first called there Yea let him tell us vvhere and how himself and his other follovvers younger then the former had their calling If he say in the Church of England or by any of the Ministers or Members there let him remember how he esteemeth of that church and of the hierarchie there reteyned yea that he accounteth that Church also not to be the church of God but to be Babylon vvithout the covenant of God not having true baptisme nor any part of Christs ministerie at all yea nor Christ himself for their Mediatour c. But to let these alone let him tell us vvhether he think that God called any by those Prophets and Angels that are spoken off Rev. 11 3. c. and 14 6 8 9. or by the Prophets and Saints spoken off Rev. 18 24. also vvho be the people of God and by vvhom they are called out of Babylon that are spoken off Rev. 18 4. and vvhether none of them were of the church of Rome in the Ministerie yea in the hierarchie thereof vvhen God did call them Here note the case also of Gregorie the great bishop of the church of Rome it self whom M. Brightman thinks to be the Angell spoken off Rev. 8 13. or others by them c. Finally let him tell us what he thinketh in this behalf of Robert Grosted Bishop of Lincolne about the yere 1293. of Archbishop Cranmer Bishop Ridley of late yeres of John Wicklesse who lived and dyed Parson of Lutterworth in Leycester shier about the yere 1400. and many others in England and Scotland Also of Iohn Husse and Ierome of Prage in Bohemia Of Franciscus Petrarcha Ioannes de rupe scissa Conradus Hager Martin Luther and others in Germanie Of Waldus Gulielmus de sancto amore Farell and others in France Of Arnoldus de villa nova Diazius and others in Spain Of Ierome Savanarola a Monk Silvester a Frier vvith others in Italie For all which and exceeding many moe see their histories in the Acts and Monuments of the Martyrs Ibid. 35. Note also that these men doe not acknowldge the church of Rome in any of the cōsiderations or respects shevved by M. Iunius to be the body of Christ Yet for the terms them selues euen particular persons and these other also may thus be called being rightly understood the house and Temple of God no though the Apostle himself say as M. Iunius alledgeth that the man of sinne sitteth in the Temple of God 2 Thes 2 4 and yet they acknovvledge that Christian people men or women being joyned in covenant and having no ministers or Officers one or other better or vvorse are called in the Scriptures the body of Christ the house city and kingdome of God
ceased to be synce it vvas first planted but that it hath continued still eyther in syncerity or apostasie euen to this day Nor can he shevv that the Lord hath yet put them out of his covenant and giuen them a bil of divorce or that they haue left off to baptize in his name c. And yet further if vve mark it vvel M. Ain his ansvver about this matter is much like as the Papists giue themselues When the Papists are urged vvith this that Rome is the seat of Antichrist the Beast seing it is the city that is built on seuen hilles whereof Iohn speaketh Rev. 17 9. they ansvver that in deed †Rhem. Annot. on Rev. 17 9. Rome of old stood on seuen hilles but * D. Saunders c. the city is now gone from the hilles and standeth in the plain of Campus Martius the Pope sitteth on the other side of the river upon the hill Vaticane c. As if by reason of these chaunges Rome were not Rome still nor these Popes the successours of the other Popes that vvere before c. In like sort when M. Ains is urged with this that the church of Rome is become an harlot c. he answereth that †Animad p. 102 103 thâ— harlot is not the church of Rome that was of old it hath had many chaunges and â—â—â—â—rations since both in religion and the Romane state c. As if therefore the church and city of Rome vvere not the church and City of Rome still though they be altered many vvaies and in sundry respects Many other things hereabout if it vvere needfull might also be observed on vvhich I purpose not to insist As that by the invasion and calamities vvhich came upon Rome the vvesterne Empire by the Goths and Vandals c. may be understood the wounding of the Beasts head spoken off Rev. 13 3. Now difference is to be put between the Church and the Beast as is aforesaid Besides euen the Beasts head thus wounded vvas also healed againe Rev. 13 3. And an head now vvounded novv healed is still the same head though in several estate and condition Moreover his ovvne narration here hovv ever it be understood and applied whether to the church or Romane state of the empire c is against himself For if Alaricus with his Gothes did utterly vvast destroy it vvhat remayned for Genscricus vvith his Vandals afterward to doe thereabout Or if these did vvholly spoile and consume it what did Odoacer vvith another company there aftervvard Or if these did effect an utter ruine vvhat then did Theodoricus and the Ostrogothes after that And so may be observed of the rest here spoken off of Bellisarius vvith his army of Totilas king of the Gothes of the Saracens c. If he say he speaketh not of an utter destruction it is the more against himself Or if he meane it of an utter destruction his ovvne narration crosseth it besides the testimonie of all histories Yea those very clauses where he saith that Rome for a time remayned vvithout any inhabitant man or vvoman and that by the space of fourty dayes though he mention not this particular shevv that this vvas not an utter spoyling of them for altogether but onely for a time and so is still against himself Furthermore many of those people that made these invasions became Christians themselues and so the church in this behalf vvas increased Not to speak how the very Catalogue of the Bishops of the church of Rome giveth evidence against him Or vvill he say that though there vvere Bishops of that Church vvhether better or vvorse yet there vvas not a church vvhereof they vvere Bishops And mark that in the particulars which here he speaketh of the first time that he noteth is the yere of Christ 414. c. Novv let him speak therefore vvhether till this time and never after there vvas at Rome a church of God under the covenant of God having true baptisme or no. If he say there vvas not to what end then is this particular narration of his noting such a yere and such a yere c. Is it not all in vaine If he say there vvas then it vvas some hundreds of yeres after Pauls time that yet still it remayned the church of God yea and long after that many great corruptions and the hierarchie of Antichrist also had seazed upon it How also will he shevve that now at this time let him take any of the yeres that he nameth it ceased to be the church of God and to haue Gods baptisme and covenant any longer Finally to bring the truth more clearely to light and the matter to a plaine issue let him consider with himself and speak directly advisedly vvhether the church of Rome that was espoused to Christ is become an harlot or not If he say it is himself vvill soone perceiue all his dispute here to be vaine and erroneous If he say it is not how then saith he othervvhere that she is fallen into Apostasie like Israels Animadv p. 84. For did not Israel being espoused to the Lord become an harlot And was it not the same Israel for the body of the church in the account of the Lord and his Prophets though not in the same particular persons at al times that vvas both the one and the other whether we look on the ten tribes or on Iudah or both Esa 1 21. Ier. 3 ch Ezech. 16. and 23 chap. Hos 2 1 7. and 3 1. and 12 chap. and 13 4 5. and 14 1. Which is likewise to be observed touching the church of Rome and all other churches in like estate from time to time Othervvise the Papists one way and the Anabaptists another way wil be confirmed in their errors to the hardening of themselues seducing of others more and more And so let M. Ain obserue the fruit of his opposition of the truth and rejoyce therein but not vvith God 48. His esteeming of the state of the church of Rome in apostasie to be but as the estate of the Ishmaelites and Edomites also as Adonisedek vvith his Amorites and Jebusites in IerusaleÌ„ c. is disproved coÌ„tradicted by himself when he maketh them like Israel and Iudah in their apostasie Animad p. 84. Neyther doth M. Iunius giue this reason vvhy he accounts theÌ„ the church of God because they are the naturall posterity of the saints though this is not to be neglected being duly considered neither because they dvvel in Rome where the godly lived heretofore These are things put in by M. Ains himself for what cause himself knovveth best M. Iunius knew that there dwell Iewes at Rome vvho are not of the church and that the naturall posterity of the Saints may become Ievves Turks Pagans and as here he said expressely †See here before pag. 185. the church may at length cease to be a church when God ceaseth to call it back and takes away the
everie pure church of God is also a true church but everie true church is not alway pure except that true and pure be taken for all one as very often it is Like as all pure gold is taken for true gold but all true gold is not alway pure for gold mixed with drosse is in deed true gold but is not yet pure till it be severed from the drosse A leprous man also is a true man but not pure or cleane So is the church of Rome as yet a Christian church but leprous and most impure I will speak it more plainly A true Church is so called ambiguously eyther as it is opposed to an impure church or as it is opposed to a false church If a church be said to be a true one as it is opposed to that which is impure then it is al one as pure and orthodoxe But if it be opposed to a false and therefore no church then it is not all one as pure For at the time when Christ was borne and lived on the earth the church of the Iewes vvas a true church of God but it vvas not pure because it vvas corrupt both in the doctrine and discipline thereof And except these things be distinguished it will follow that there hath ben some time when there was no true church of God in the world vvhich is most absurd Polani Syntag. in fol. tomb 2. libr. 7. cap. 8. pag. 544. And a litle after again An impure Church is a company wherein religion is corrupt And it is eyther lesse impure or more impure or most impure of all c. The church of Rome at this day is yet the church of Christ but most impure of all but most corrupt of all and almost giving up the ghost because there is yet in it God calling there are in it the called and calling which constitute a church because it reteyneth yet somewhat of the doctrine of Christ though mixed with many errors and because it reteyneth Baptisme the signe of Christianitie in the substantiall forme thereof though defiled with many blemishes and corruptions as also because it reteyneth yet some invocation of Christ the mediatour Otherwise they that are baptised in Poperie should be baptised out of the church and therefore not with the baptisme of Christ Briefly the church of Rome at this day hath all things corrupted but not altogether As of old the church of Ierusalem so at this day the Church of Rome is like unto a vineyard which Christ fenced about with a wall and gathered out the stones thereof and planted it with the choicest vines and built a tower in the midst of it and made a wine presse therein but it brought not forth grapes but wild grapes Esa 5 1. c. For the church of Rome is to be distinguished from the Popes Church or faction of Antichrist which prevaileth in the church of Rome and will not suffer them that profes Christ more purely but labours to oppresse them that it alone may haue al. c. Seing therefore the church of Rome at this day is most impure and the popes church is that spirituall Babylon it is altogether to be forsaken as the spirit of God commandeth Revel 18 4. Come out of her my people that ye be not partakers of her sinnes and that ye receiue not of her plagues Ibid. pag. 549 550. More al so he hath hereabout in his vvritings otherwhere Of which of Keckermans testimonie vvithall see here before p. 178 and 208 and 209. in the Advertism pag. 113. Paraeus saith The Iesuites accuse us that we haue made a division departing from the church But we haue not departed from the church but from the Papacie we came out of Babylon at the Lords commandement who saith Come out of her my people Paraeus in Rom. 16.18 Piscator saith The Temple of Salomon was a type of three things First of the body of Christ as appeareth by his words Iohn 2 19. and by Pauls words Col. 2 9. Secondly of the Church as appeareth by the words of Paul 2 Thes 2 4. also by the words of Peter 1 Pet. 2 5. and by the words of Iohn Rev. 3 12. Thirdly of each of the faithful as Pauls words shew 1 Cor. 3 16. 6 19. 2 Cor. 6 16. Piscat Obser in 1 Reg. 6. c. Again he saith Paul describeth Antichrist first by his wickednes calling him a man of sinne that is wholy giuen unto sinne secondly by the punishment that shal come upon him according to the decree of God calling him the sonne of perdition that is appointed by God to perdition or eternall destruction thirdly by his intollerable impudencie and pride that he shall oppose himself against Christ and exalt himself aboue God himself fourthly by the place where he shall rule exercise his tyrannie to wete in the temple of God that is in the church Piscat Analys in 2 Thes 2 3 4. M. Bradford a faithfull martyr of our own countrey disputing with the Bishop of Chichester saith That wicked man sitteth in the Temple of God that is the church for it cannot be understood of Mahomet or any out of the church but of such as beare rule in the church Act. and Monum pag. 1616. M. Brightman treating of Antichrist speaketh very often of his sitting and dominering in the church As when he saith The Dragon is the open enemie throughout this book who were the Emperors of Rome as long as they remayned heathens The Turks play this part in these last ages The Beast is a more close and craftie enemie who is Antichrist that sitteth in the Temple of God Brightm on Rev. 16 13. In the English pag. 552. Againe To be extolled aboue all that is called God or that is worshipped is not to be extolled aboue that one God in heauen but aboue everie God in earth that is aboue all magistrates not onely those that be of the inferior sort but also aboue all that Majestie that is soveraigne amongst men the highest Emperors themselues who are called Augusti in Latin as they be Sebastoi in Greek of the high reverence and worship that is done to them Lastly as touching the true God if Antichrist should acknowledge no other God but himself how should he sit in the Temple of God as the Apostle saith he should sit 2 Thes 2 4. M. Brightm treatise of Antichrist against Bellar. on Rev. 17 ch 1. pag. 628 629. And again He should not deny the Father openly seing that by this meanes he should be openly known to be an Atheist which is contrary to that which the Apostle teacheth who saith that he should sit in the Temple of God Ibid. p. 629 630. And again There is not one litle word left for you out of the Scriptures which can teach that Antichrist shal be a certain or singular man after the right manner of concluding but we haue demonstrated out of them most certainly that he is that Apostaticall Sea of those
and baptise them Matt. 28 19. Or if of younger persons also yet vvould not suffer any to haue the Lords supper at all because of the many questions and troubles that haue ben and yet are among the Papists Lutherans and other Protestants thereabout Novv hereupon I would aske vvhether it should be sinne and schisme to leaue such an estate and to obserue also Gods ordinance of the Lords supper according to his institution Or if any vvould permit the use of it but onely under one kind Or if in both kinds to wit both with bread wine yet vvould not admit it vvithout the acknowledgment of Transubstantiation or at least of Consubstantiation pressing still those vvords This is my body c. Matth. 26 26. Or would not haue it administred according to the simplicity of the Gospell but as Princes or people did themselues like best to haue it Or admitting both preaching of the vvord and ministration of the Sacraments yet would haue al though never so profane and notoriously vvicked to be partakers of the Lords Table and not to be censured admonished debarred excommunicated c. Or would not suffer the people to chuse their ovvne Officers according to the word of God or the Officers not to performe the dueties vvhich God requireth at their hands but at the pleasure of man Princes or people or at least of the greater part of the people urging those vvords Tell the church c. Matth. 18 17. and All things are yours c. 1 Cor. 3 21 22 23. Or finally and summarily vvould not suffer the Churches the ministers and people to obserue whatsoever Christ hath commanded Matth. 28 20. but if they had the word preached would not suffer the seales of Gods mercy the Sacraments one or both to be enjoyed or if they had both these vvould not permit the Lords discipline to be had the censures and sanctions of his judgment according to his word and instistution c. Whether novv I say in these and such like cases we should not obey God rather then man and whether it be schisme and sinne so to doe Sixtly the church of England it self and all the reformed churches and Protestants at this day are charged by the Papists to be schismaticks for leaving the present estate of the church of Rome But are they therefore so in deed Sundry Protestant Writers haue shewed good reasons to the contrarie divers of vvhich being indifferently vveighed may be applied to the points case now treated off albeit withal I acknowledge great and unspeakable difference to be between the estate of these churches blesse God daily for the many good things had in the church of England for that they haue left the church of Rome For which see particularly of our ovvn countreymen D. Raynolds sixt Conclusion eyther in Latin or as it is in English joyned with his Conference vvith Hart pag. 666 667 c. And D. Willets Synopsis Papismi in fol. pag. 608 609. c. Lastly vvhereas Conformity is much urged and such as doe not conforme themselues are charged vvith schisme vvhether they remayne in that church or leaue the present estate thereof that they may keep the ordinances of God according to his vvord vve are still to remember that there is a double Conformitie touching the outward worship of God The one is that Conformitie of rites and order which the Lord requireth and prescribeth in his word The other is the conformity vvhich the lavves and constitutions of men ordeyn and require To the former all are bound and unto it the Lord hath giuen his promise Matth. 28 18 19 20. 1 Tim. 6 3 4 5 13 14. compared with Exod. 20 4 5 6. Deut. 12 32. Mal. 1 7 14. Where Piscator well observeth that in the outward worship of God there is required both a conformitie of rite agreeing with the prescript of Gods commandement and synceritie in all which performe that worship to the Lord. Piscat Observ in Mal. 1 7 c. To the latter we are bound no further or othervvise then as it agreeth with the conformitie prescribed by the Lord himself because vve must worship the Lord onely as he hath appointed in his vvord and as we haue the promise of his acceptance and blessing therewithall For which see the Scriptures aforesaid and Deut. 4 1 2. Psal 119 101 128. Esa 29 13. 30 21 22. Matth. 15 9. Hos 4 15 17. Amos 5 4 5. 2 Cor. 6 14 15 16 17. Col. 2 23. Rev. 22 18 19. Some other things perteyning hereunto see also before pag. 116 117 c. and in the third Treatise here following Now if any aske vvhether that Christians and Churches may not and ought not to beare one with another in their differences of this also I haue spoken here before pag. 118 and 119 c. the brief summe whereof is this that we may and should so doe vvhen the Churches and Pastors thereof professing the faith of Christ stand in their ecclesiasticall estate immediately under Iesus Christ having libertie power in themselues to receiue any truth and redres any error or evil as they shal be perswaded thereof and in the meane time doe not urge others to sinne in their owne persons but suffer them peaceably to practise and walk in the vvay and order which the Lord hath prescribed in his word Which if it vvere the estate dealing of the churches in England and other the like at this day the question would in divers respects be othervvise for esteeming of them and vvalking with them then novv it is And these are the things which I thought here to note by this occasion touching the church of England in regard of the points in question betvveen us the Anabaptists others to much overcaried that way Other things there are also good to be considered off as namely the divers degrees of Gods manifesting the truth and consuming of Antichrist with his apostasie the different estate and proceeding of the Angels spoken off Rev. 14 6 8 9 15 17. c. and 15. and 16 chap. c. the difference of ordinarie and extraordinarie estate and calling the divers consideration of spirituall and bodily or personall communion the distinction of Provinciall Diocesan and particular churches vvith the Bishops thereof Also whether the particular churches among them be not become parts and members of the Diocesan and Provinciall churches in their estate Whether the prelates bereaue not the particular churches of many rights perteyning unto them more particularly take away from them some speciall rights and dueties of the Pastors ruling Elders people and in some respects of al estates generally among them Finally whether such Ministers as haue left the corruptions of that estate and liue in Churches rightly established may not yet notvvithstanding upon occasion †1 King 13 chap. Hos 5 9. 7 12. Amo. 7 13 Rev. 14 6. c. preach in the other churches aforesaid both to
them to make prescribe or use them in such sort as churches and people now dayly doe Or hovv shall we assure our selues or others that it is not a will vvorship deviâ—ed by man and displeasing to God IX Yea and let it be vvell considered vvhether it be not a part of the apostasie of Antichrist and such as mainteyneth superstition in some churches an Idoll and dumbe ministerie and nourisheth the people still in ignorance of the nature and right use of prayer c. D. Raynolds writing against Bellarmine hath this general proposition that to worship God after an unlawfull manner is superstition as †Col. 2 23 Paul witnesseth and †In 2 a. 2 a. quaest. 92. 93. Aquinas and superstitious zeale is preposterous as the * Rom. 10 2. Aquin. in Rom. 10 lect 1. same persons testifie because it is not ordered by a right knowledge Rayn de Rom. Eccles Idolat contra Bellarminum lib. 1 cap. 5. sect 9. X. If such books of prayer so used be the leitourgie and worship vvhich the Lord hath appointed then ought all Churches and people on earth to use that service and maner of vvorship Mat. 28.20 1 Tim. 6.13.14 Rev. 22.18.19 And who then shall make such books for all churches and people in the vvorld Or who can shevv that the Primitiue Churches planted by the Apostles recorded in the Scriptures had any such books of prayer prescribed unto them Or that the Christians in that age did read their prayers out of such books and so vvorship God Fynd vve not mention of their prayers divers times recorded Mat. 14 28 30. Luk. 17 5. Act. 1 24 25. and 4 24 30. And doe not the Apostles in their writings Paul Iames Peter Iohn and Iude everie of theÌ„ in their Epistles speak of prayer and of the manner use thereof yet where doeth any one of them teach the Churches or particular persons to vvhom they write to read their prayers out of a book and so to use set formes of prayer devised by men for their spiritual worship of God making their requests known unto him Let the Scriptures here noted before in the 7 section and all their vvritings throughout be searched hereabout XI Finally if such book-prayers be the ordinance of God and lawfull to be used in such sort as is aforesaid then might one man knovve and set downe anothers prayers aforehand and all men might buy their prayers at the book bynders shops and carry them in their pockets and so out of their pockets take their prayers c. Whereas right and true spiritual prayer is the work of Gods spirit in our hearts stirring teaching and inabling us to povvre out our soules and prayers unto God in all our necessities and occasions and so to offer up spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God by Iesus Christ as is aforesaid Rom. 8 15 26 27. Ephes 6 18. Phi. 4 6. Jâ—de v. 20. 1 Sam. 1 12 15. Zach. 12 10. 1 Pet. 2 5. Rev. 8 3 4. Divers objections and exceptions made hereabout I haue treated of †Quaest de precibus p. 12. c. otherwhere in particular To vvhich I refer the Reader as also to the writings of others heretofore concerning the same argument For which see M. Greenvvoods treatise of read prayer c. besides the handling of this question in two epistles betvveen M. Carp my self p. 11 12 c. CHAPTER II. Touching the constitution of particular Churches VVHether by the ordinance of God there should be any set ordinarie churches novv but onely particular churches And vvhether the constitution of al the particular churches should not be such as each of them may ordinarily come together in one place for the performance of the vvorship of God and all other dueties apperteyning unto them by the word of God I. Because the Primitiue churches vvere thus planted and constituted by the Apostles And this also approved and stablished by Christ our Lord. As may be seen in the seuen Churches of Asia spoken of in the Revelation Rev. 1 4 12 13 20. vvith ch 2 1 8 12 18. 3 1 7 14. And in the other like churches at Ierusalem Act. 1 13 14 15. and 6 2 5. and 15 22 23. and 21 18 22. at Lystra Iconium and Antioch Act. 14 21 23 27. and 15 30. at Troas Act. 20 7 8. at Ephesus Act. 20 17 28. Rev. 2 1. vvith 1 Tim. 1 3. and 3 15. and 5 20. at Rome Rom. 12 3 8. at Cenchrea Rom. 16 1. at Corinth 1 Cor. 1 2. and 4 17. with chap. 5 4. and 10 16 17. and 11 20 22 23. and 12 18 19 27. and 14 23 33 40. In Galatia Gal. 1 2. at Philippi Phil. 1 1. at Colosse and Laodicea Col. 4 16 17. at Thessalonica 1 Thes 1 1. vvith ch 5.12.13.14.27 c. II. Thus also the particular churches of Christians are still ansvverable in this behalf to the particular Synagogues of the Iewes Luke 4 16 20 31 33. 7 5. Act. 13.14.15 and 17.1 and 18 4 7 8 27. And as the house where the Iewes met was called a Synagogue Luke 7 5. so the Apostle now also calleth the meeting of Christians together a Synagogue Jam. 2 2. Neither this onely but seeing novv everie particular constituted church hath right and povver vvithin it self to celebrate the Lords supper vvhich is answerable to the Passeover that vvas kept at Ierusalem this shevveth moreover that now everie particular church is to be esteemed as Ierusalem and so to stand immediately under Iesus Christ the Archpastor of his sheep and the high Priest of our profession 1 Cor. 10 16 17 18. and 11 23. c. Act. 2 42. and 20 7 17 28. compared with Deut. 12 5 6 7 13 14. and 16 â— 5 6. 2 Chron. 29. and 30. and 35 ch Ezra 6 18 19. Esa 66 19 23. Ier. 3 15 16 17. Rev. 21 1 2. c. III. Neyther els can the Pastor of each particular Church stand immediately under Christ the Archpastor Nor can the Ministers and Elders jointly together vvith their flock sanctify the Lords day nor feed the Church over vvhich the holy Ghost hath made them Overseers nor performe any other publick action with them unto them before them duly and orderly vvhether it be the ministration of the vvord or of the Sacraments or Censures or any actions that are publikely joyntly together to be performed according as was done in the Synagogues of the Ievves and in the primitiue churches For which see the Scriptures here before alledged and other the like as Mark 13 34 37. Luke 4.16 20. 12 42. Act. 20. â— 28. Rom. 12.4 8. 1 Cor. 4.1 and 14.23.33 40. Col. 4.17 1 Pet. 5.1 4. 1 Tim. 5.17.20 Heb. 13.7.8.17 IIII. Nor can they well otherwise know of certaintie vvhether the members of the Church be present or absent at their publike meetings for the vvorship of God or other dueties there to be performed
that so they may watch over them as those that must giue account for them unto God Act. 20.28 Heb. 13.17 1 Pet. 5.1 4. V. Neither can the Churches or members thereof be so well instructed governed and edified in faith and mutuall loue as if this order and practise be observed For which see also the Scriptures aforesaid and the like But if the church in any city be more large as often commeth to passe and is usuall in great cities then that it can conveniently and ordinarily meet together in one place then is it to be considered whether it should not be distinguished and distributed into divers particular Churches or parishes Which may everie one of them severally haue their owne peculiar place of meeting together their owne Pastour other ministers Elders and Deacons their ovvn meetings and all publick actions duly orderly performed among themselues for the reasons here before alledged and other the like To vvhich end may also be observed hovv at Ierusalem vvhere the great Synedrion of the Iewes was by the Lord appointed to be yet notvvithstanding there vvere in that one city many Synagogues And all the Synagogues also had their ovvn rulers ministers as may appeare by such other Synagogues as are particularly spoken of in the Scriptures Mar. 5 22. with Luke 4 16 20 31 33. and 12 11. and 21 12. with Mat. 10 17. and 23 34 Luke 13 14. vvith Act. 13 14 15. and 18 4 7 8 17. Here moreover about the estate and distinction of churches are two things carefully to be observed First As did the seuen churches of Asia c. Rev. 1 2 and 3 chap. that all particular churches vvith their Pastors as is noted here before do stand immediately under Iesus Christ the Archpastour vvithout any other straunge ecclesiastical power and authoritie interposed betvveen whether it be of the Prelates as of Diocesan Provinciall or Oecumenicall Bishops or of their unlawfull usurping Synods or any such like invented by men and brought into the church Secondly that notwithstanding the estate distinction aforesaid yet all the churches and ministers of them should be alway ready and vvilling with their mutuall ayde counsel assistance and all lawfull maanes to help comfort advise strengthen and build up one another in the truth vvhich is according to godlines in Iesus Christ Ephes 4.4 16. Rom. 12 3 8. 1 Cor. 12 4 27. Col. 2 5 19. and 4 16 17. Act. 15 2 23. with Psal 12 2 3. Sal. Song 8 1. c.. And so to this end and in this manner may be had a lavvfull and profitable use of Synods Classes Assemblies or Councels for mutual help advise in cases of question controversie and difficulties about religion to as alvvaies it be provided that they doe not challenge or usurpe any unlavvfull jurisdiction or power over the particular churches or their pastours and governours to whom their ovvn povver under Christ the Lord is alvvay to be reserved and to be kept whole and intier according to the vvord of God Like as may be seen in all the churches planted by the Apostles and particularly in those seuen of Asia standing not farre asunder to whom Christ vvrote his several letters directed to the Angels or Pastors of everie of them in particular and not to any one of the churches or Pastors more theÌ„ another as having authoritie over the rest nor to any Diocesan Provinciall or Oecumeniall Bishops set over the churches and Pastors thereof Which kind of Prelacie Office government if it had ben ordeyned by Christ and planted by the Apostles in those churches there had novv ben fit and necessarie occasion specially when Christ vvrote about the corruptions of those churches both to haue blamed those Bishops for neglect of their duetie as he doth the Angels of the particular Churches and to haue directed his letters unto them as being the next chiefest in ecclesiasticall authoritie under him to oversee and governe those churches if then there had ben any such among them by the ordinance of Christ Rev. 2 1.8.12 18. and 3 1.7 14. compared vvith ch 1.4.12.13.20 and vvith the estate and constitution of all other churches planted by the Apostles For vvhich see the Scriptures here beâ—â—â—â— alledged pag. 250. And of this also see more hereafter in the fift 〈…〉 here follovving If any aske to whom then the churches shal be subject if there be no Diocesan or other like Prelates set over them I answer that the churches and all the Officers members thereof are to be subject to the Princes States and magistrates under whom they liue according as the Apostles doe teach us saying Let every soul be subject to the higher powers c. Reâ— 13.1 Submit your selues to every ordinance of man for the Lords sake whether it be to the king as supreme or unto governours as unto them that are sent by him for the punishment of evill doers and for the praise of them that doe vvell 1 Pet. 2 13 14. vvith Tit. 3 1. The magistrates are under the Lord to be the keepers of both the Tables of the Law of God To whom al persons ought to be subject euen for conscience sake to yeeld obedience unto them yet alwaies in the Lord and not against the Lord by any meanes Deut. 17 18 19 20 Rom. 13 1 7. with Mat. 22 21. Dan. 3 14 18. Act. 4 18 19 20. Rev. 12 10 11. CHAPTER III. Touching the right and power of particular churches VVHether †everie Church haue not right and power graunted by the Lord to chuse their ovvn Pastours other Ministers Elders Deacons and Deaconesses making choise of meet fit persons as also to * use the ministration of the vvord Sacraments Censures and vvhole ecclesiastical administration being careful stil to haue al things done according to the ordinance of God prescribed in his word Mat. 28 18 20. with 〈◊〉 Act 6 3 5. and 14 23. compared with Act. 1 15 23 26. and 2 41 42 46. 11 22. 15 22 25. 1 Cor. 16 3. 2 Cor. 8 19. Gal. 1 1. 1 Tim. 3 1 15. 5 9 10 11 17 â—2 6 13 14. Ezec. 33 2. Lev. 8 2 3 4 5. Num. 8 9. Deut. 1 13 16 18. with Joh. 13 20. 1 Cor. 4 1. 2 Cor. 5 19. Heb. 5 4. Also * Act. 1 2 3 14 15. 15 2 6 23 30 and 20 7 17 18. 21 18 23. Rom. 12 6 7 8. 16 1 2. Mat. 18 17 18 19 20. and 28 18 19 20. 1 Cor. 4 17. 5 ch 10 16. and 11 23 26. and 12 ch Epist to Timoth. Tit. Rev. 2 3 ch with 1 Tim. 6 13 14. I. Because the Primitiue churches planted by the Apostles had this right and power at the beginning as may be seen in the Scriptures here before alledged II. And the Congregation of Israel had of old likewise their right in the election of their officers and other such
4 11.28.32 l. 4. c. 1.4.5.19.22 Which is vvel to be noted for better observation how every church or parish had at the beginning their own Pastor or Bishop and hovv those Bishops were much unlike the Diocesan Provinciall and Oecumenicall Bishops had now a dayes who content not themselues with a parish or particular Church but chalendge by vertue of such office authoritie over whole Dioceses Provinces and the universall vvorld as in the apostasie of Antichrist may be seen And thus much by the way concerning the testimonie of the auncient writers in this behalf Which I leaue to be examined by the Scriptures as is aforesaid II. Secondly vvhere the order is observed vvhich is mentioned in the question here before there may the difference be kept both between the Pastors and Teachers offices and betvveen the offices of the Teaching and ruling Elders Ephes 4 11 12. and 1 Tim. 5.17 vvith Rev. 2.1 and Rom. 12.3 8. 1 Cor. 12.5.8.28 c. Which othervvise is either unknovven of many and so neglected or els is confusedly caried and corrupted sundrie vvaies III. A particular visible church may in the outward constitutioÌ„ there of be considered as a particular visible body Now a particular visible body hath a particular visible head Which also is such as cannot say to the feete or inferiour members I haue no need of you 1 Cor. 12.18 21. vvith Eâ—a 1 5 6. and Rom. 12.3 8. Col. 2.5 and 4.17 Rev. 2.1.8 c. and vvith the Epistles to Timothee and Titus And touching the vvord head thus taken and used in the Scripture for some chief member or members governor or governors or any persons and things vvhich excell or are before others in dignitie office age authoritie time place or any speciall excellencie see Exod. 6 14. 30.23 Numb 1.3 4.16 and 7.2 Deut. 20.9 and 28.13.44 Iosh 23.2 and 2â— 1. 1 Sam. 15 17. 2 Sam. 23 8 13 18. 1 Chron 9.10 13. and 24 4 6 31. Neh. 11 16. 12.7 12 22 23 24. Esa 1 5 6. and 7 8. and 9 14 15. and 29 10. Ezec. 21 26. and â—â— 2 and 40 1. Mic. 3 3 9 11. Ier. 13 21. 1 Cor. 12 21. And note that here I speak onely of particular churches as they are organicall and set in an orderly visible constitution and so of the outvvard order and divers functions set in the church by the Lord himself and that I speak not of the church as it is the mysticall body of Christ nor of the spirituall and quickning head of the church of all the members thereof wheresoever Which is Christ alone and unto whom alone this apperteyneth and to none other vvhosoever besides Eph. 1.22.23 4 15 16. and 5.23 Col. 1.18 and 2.19 1 Cor. 12.12 compared vvith Jer. 33.16 Note also hovv both auncient and later vvriters doe thus use the same word and likewise apply it Chrysostome speaking of the returne of the Bishop vvhen himself was an Elder at Antioch saith Blessed be God that hath restored the head to the body the Pastor to the sheep c. Chrysost homil 20. ad populum Antiochenum Basil vvriting to the church of Neocaesarea upon the death of their Bishop saith The church closeth her eyes the solemne assemblies look heavily the sacred Synedrion Presbytery or Eldership desire their head they that are in dignitie their leader the people their ruler Basil epist 62. ad Eccles Neocasarienâ— Among later vvriters D. Raynolds conferring with Hart saith We teach that * Apolog. Eccl. Ang. confes Helvet c. 17. Christ is the head of the church as he doth quicken it vvith his spirit as he is the light the health the life of it and is present alvvaies to fill it vvith his blessings and vvith his grace to governe it In the vvhich respects because †Ephes 1.22 and 4.15 and 5.23 Col. 1.18 and 2.19 and so the church his body the Scripture giveth the name of head to Christ alone by an excellencie thereof we so conclude that he is the onely head of the church For othervvise vve knovv that in another kind and degree of resemblance they may be called heads who haue anie preeminence of place or government over others As in the Hebrevv text we read ‡ Nehem 11.16 the heads of the Levites for the chief of them * 2 Chro. 31 10. the Priest the head that is to say the chief Priest After the which sort I wil not contend if you entitle Bishops heads of the churches as †In Apolog 2. Athanasius doth †In Regist lib. 4. epist 38. Gregorie vvhen he had named our Saviour Christ the head of the universall church he calleth Christs Ministers as it vvere heads Paul Andrevv Iohn heads of particular flocks yet members of the church under one head Rayn conference with Hart. chap. 1 Divis 2. pag. 20. And M. Iacob in his Attestation vvriteth thus hereabout M. Gabr. Powel maketh it an heresie in the Pope to hold as he doth that in the visible church there ought to be a visible head What doe I heare A visible Body instituted by Christ without a visible head A church and no Pastor A multitude to be governed and no Governour These are straunge assertions whosoever and hovv many soever doe affirme them For I graunt there are not a few others vvhich use so to speak But indeed there is no colour of truth nor reason in these sayings M. Iacobs Attestat ch 7. p. 113. And a litle after again What shall vve think Hath Christ left his body and dear spouse vvithout help vvithout government in such dayly and continuall necessities Or can an ordinarie body be governed vvithout an ordinarie head To use D. Bilsons vvords ‡ Perpet goâ— p. 37â— this vvere an heathenish if not a hellish confusion Ibid. p. 114. He also that vvrote the Manudunction hath the like when he saith A visible church must be considered as an integrall body which for the well being of it exercising those operations which belong unto it and vvhereunto in serveth must become as we say organicall having members of divers ranks some as head mouth and eyes the Pastor Teachers and Elders some as hands the Deacons and helpers c. Manuduct 2. pag. 33. IIII. Here moreover may be considered the order observed in the church of Israell so far forth as it was moral and concerneth particular churches the constitution of the Synagogues vvherein besides the other officers vvas * M. Brou on Rev. 9. and 14. p. 83. 223. M. Ainsw defence of Scrip. pag. 113. one vvhoÌ„ they called SHELIACH TSIBBVR the ambassadour or Messenger of the congregation To which or the like Christ might haue reference wheÌ„ he speaketh of the Angel of each particular church in Asia Rev. 2.1.8.12.18 and 3.1.7.14 And of the terme Angel ascribed to the ministers of the Lord see also Hag. 1.13 Mal. 2.7 where we find the Prophets and Priests in Israell called the
themselues to see them performed by others as is aforesaid In like sort that the Euangelists besides their own peculiar office and function had in them the povver and authority of the inferior offices of Pastors Teachers and Elders c. And likevvise that the Pastors besides their own peculiar function haue in them the power and authoritie of the Teachers and other ordinarie offices for performance and oversight of them as is aforesaid Also that the Elders besides their ovvne speciall function haue in them the povver and authoritie of the Deacons office for the doing and overseeing thereof as was said before and so forth in the rest For all vvhich see Acts 2 40 41 42. and 4 34 35. and 6 1 6. and 8 14 25 26 35 38. vvith 21 8. and 11 29 30. and 14 7 23. 15 6 22 32 35 36 40 41. and 16 4.40 and 20 7 11 17 28 29 30. 21 18 25. vvith Mat. 28 18 19 20. Ioh. 20 21 22 23. and 21 15 16 17. 1 Cor. 4 15 17 22. and 5 3. and 9.7.16.17 and 10.16 and 12.28 and 16 3.4.10 2 Cor. 1.19 and 8. 16.17.23 Ephes 4.11.12 Phil. 1.1 and 4.3 1 Thes 3.2 and 5.12.13.14.27 Hebr. 13.7.17 1 Pet. 5.1 4. Rev. 2.1 c. 2. The second is this Whether on the contrarie the apostasie of Antichrist be not such as touching the ministerie and government of the church as therein they vvhich be in the lesser and inferiour offices haue power authoritie vvith them to exceed the dueties of the office which Christ hath appointed and to performe the duties apperteyning to the higher offices by meanes vvhereof both Antichrist hath risen up to so great a height and so many orders and degrees of superior and inferior ministers haue ben received stil are reteyned in that degenerate estate and apostasie of the man of sinne as is come to passe As namely when the pastors and bishops of particular congregations came to haue power authoritie over many churches over the Ministers people therein in a kind of resemblance of the extraordinarie offices of the Apostles and Euangelists alreadie ceased vvhen now the foundation was layd Contrarie to that which is written Rom. 17 3 8. Rev. 1 11 12.13 16 20. with 2 1 8 12 18. and 3 1 7 14. Ephes 4 11 12 13. Act. 20 17 28. Phil. 1 1. and 4 3. 1 Pet. 5 1 2 3 4. And that the ruling Elders or Presbyters did the ministeriall duties of the Pastors and Teachers in the particular Congregations Contrarie to 1 Tim. 5 17. Ephes 4 11 12. Rom. 12 7 8. 1 Cor. 12 28. And that the Deacons also baptise and became ministers of the word in the office of Deaconship vvhich the Apostles did expressely oppose to the duties of that office at the institution thereof Act. 6.2.3.4 So as of these things and the like in that estate it may be said as Christ did in another case From the beginning it was not so Mat. 19.8 These things and the like may be noted about the points questions aforesaid Which being not vvell observed in former ages a way vvas made for the Popes supremacy by the steps of the Diocesan and Provinciall Prelacy whiles each Pastor kept not his place within his bounds under Christ the Archpastor nor the other Officers theirs nor the Churches that order vvherein they vvere set by the Apostles at the beginning Which being novv in this latter age observed and discovered we should set our selues to reject and witnesse against the Antichristian apostasie of the man of sinne and all the aberrations and iniquitie thereof And be carefull on the other hand to returne to the auncient simplicity of the churches of Christ as they were planted in the beginning alvvaies obserueing good order in all things and that vvay of government of the church which is appointed by the vvord of God CHAPTER VII Touching the Teachers office more particularly and the Ministers of the word in generall VVHether there be not tvvo sorts of Teachers or Prophets which the Lord hath giuen for the work of the ministerie or at least a two fold duty and divers function or ministration thereof One of such as are peculiarly appointed to the teaching of particular churches Of whō see here before in the fift Question pag 259. The other of such as doe either †1 Sam. 19 20. 2 King 2 3 5 7 15. and 4 1. and 6 1. and 9 1. with Amos 7 14. Luc. 2 46. and Act. 5 34. vvith 22.3 in the Schooles and universities interpret the Scriptures train up the students in Theologie or doe ‡ Deut. 33 8 10. Nehem. 8 1 8. 2 Chron. 17 7 8 9. Prov. 1 20 21. and 8 1 2 3. and 29 18. Esa 30 10 20 21. and 57 19. and 59 21. Ier. 18 18. Hos 5 9. and 7 12. Amos 2 12. and 7 12 13. Mic. 3 11. Ezech. 22 25 28. and 13 and 14 chap. Jer. 14.13 Mat. 5 1 2. and 9 37 38. and 13 1 2 52. and 22 35. and 23 34. Luke 5 17. Act. 13 1 15. and 15 35. Rev. 11 3. and 18 24. vvith Act. 11 19 24. Rom. 10 14 15 17. 1 Cor. 12 28 29. and Ephes 4 11 12. othervvhere privately and publikly in houses streets ships armies garrisons or other assemblies any where instruct the people in Religion and al duties of godlines commō or speciall as there is just occasion Also vvhether these Teachers should minister the Lords supper is vvithal to be considered and examined by the Scriptures Seeing the Levites in Israell vvere not suffered to come to the Altar or holy things of God no nor to flay the sacrifices unlesse in a speciall case when there were not Priests ynough Num. 18 3. and 3 10. and Levit. 1 6. vvith 2 Chron. 29 34. Which is the more to be noted because the Levites vvere by the ordinance of God joyned to the Priests in the Ministerie of the Lords house and for teaching Israell the Lavv of God c. who yet notwithstanding might not doe all things perteyning to the Priests office Numb 18 2 3. and Ezech. 44 13 14 15 16. with Num. 3 5 10. c. and 16 chap. By vvhich also appeareth that some Ministers may be imployed in some works of the Ministerie vvho yet notwithstanding may not lavvfully do all things that perteine to the holy ministration and to some other Offices appointed thereunto And that the Pastors Teachers now are ansvverable to the Priests and Levites in Israell vvas noted before out of Esa 66 21. compared vvith Ephes 4 11 12. As touching the election or calling of these Teachers I spake here before of the calling of those which are of the former sort as touching their choise to particular congregations as may be seen in the third Question pag. 252 c. Now touching the calling of the Teachers of the latter sort whether they be such as are Professors in Vniversities