it in the Church ascribing an alike Dignity and Power unto the Prelates of those Cities and a Jurisdiction extending itself unto Nations Diocesses and Provinces Hereby the lesser Congregations or Parochial Churches being weakened in process of time in their Gifts and Interest were swallowed up in the Power of the others and became only inconsiderable Appendixes unto them to be ruled at their Pleasure But these things fell out long after the times which we enquire into only their occasion began to present it self unto men of corrupt minds from the Beginning but we have before at large discoursed of them 4. Some Churches had a great Advantage in that the Gospel as the Apostle speaks went forth from them unto others They in their Ministry were the Means first of the Conversion of others unto the Faith and then of their gathering into a Church-State affording them Assistance in all things they stood in need of Hence there newly formed Churches in lesser Towns and Villages had alwaies a great Reverence for the Church by whose means they were converted unto God and Stated in Church Order And it was meet that so they should have But in process of time as these lesser Churches decreased in spiritual Gifts and fell under a scarcity of able Guides this Reverence was turned into Obedience and Dependence and they thought it well enough to be under the Rule of others being unable well to rule themselves On these and the like Accounts there was quickly introduced an Inequality among Churches which by vertue of their first Institution were equal as unto State and Power 4. Churches may admit of many Variations as unto their outward Form and Order which yet change not their State nor cause them to cease from being Congregational As 1. Supposing that any of them might have many Elders or Presbyters in them as it is apparent that most of them had yea all that are mentioned in the Scripture had so Act. 11.30 chap. 14.23 chap. 15.6 22 23. chap. 16.4 chap. 20.17 18. chap. 21.18 Phil. 1.1.1 Tim. 5.17 Tit. 1.5 they might and some of them did choose out some one endued With especial Gifts that might in some sort preside amongst them and who had quickly the name of Bishop appropriated unto him This Practice is thought to have had its Original at Alexandria and began generally to be received in the 3 Century But this changed not the State of the Church though it had no divine Warrant to authorise it For this Order may be agreed unto among the Elders of a particular Congregation and Sundry things may fall out enclining unto the reception of it But from a distinct mention if any such there be in the Writings of the second Century of Bishops and Presbyters to fancy Metropolitical and Diocesan Churches is but a pleasant Dream 2. The Members of these Churches that were great and numerous being under the care and Inspection of their Elders in common might for the ordinary Duty of Divine Worship meâ—t in parts or several actual Assemblies and they did so especially in time of Persecution Nothing occurs more frequently in Ecclesiastical Story than the Meetings of Christians in secret Places in private houses yea in caves and dens of the Earth when in some places it was impossible that the whole Body of the Church should so assemble together How this Disposition of the Members of the Church into several Parts in each of which some Elder or Elders of it did officiate gave occasion unto the distinction of greater Churches into particular Titles or Parishes is not here to be declared it may be so Elsewhere But neither yet did this alter the State of the Churches from their Original Institution For 3. Upon all extraordinary occasions all such as concerned the whole Church as the Choice of Elders or the Deposition of them the admission or exclusion of Members and the like the whole Church continued to meet together which practice was plainly continued in the days of Cyprian as we shall see afterwards Neither doth it appear but that during the first 200 years of the Church the whole Body oâ— the Church did ordinarily meet together in one place for the solemn Administration of the Holy Ordinances of Worship and the Exercise of Discipline Wherefore notwithstanding these and other the like Variations from the Original Institution of Churches which came in partly by Inadvertency unto the Rule and partly were received from the Advantages and Accommodations which they pretended unto the State of the Churches continued Congregational onely for 200 years so far as can be gathered from the remaining Monuments of those times Only we must yet add that we are no way concerned in Testimonies or sayings taken from the writings of those in following Ages as unto the State way and manner of the Churches in this season but do appeal unto their own writings onely This is the great Artifice whereby Baronius in his Annalls would impose upon the Credulity of men an apprehension of the Antiquity of any of their Roman Inventions he affixeth them unto some of the first Ages and giving some Countenance unto them it may be from some spurious writings layes the weight of Confirmation on Testimonies and Sayings of Writers many years yea for the most part Ages afterwards for it was and is of the Latter Ages of the Church wherein Use and Custom have wrested Ecclesiastical words to other significations than at first they were applyed unto to impose the present State of things among them on these who went before who knew nothing of them I shall therefore briefly enquire into what Representation is made of the State of the Churches by the Writers themselves who had in the season enquired after or in the Age next unto it which was acquainted with their practice That which first offereth itself unto us and which is an invaluable Testimony of the state of the first Churches immediately after the Decease of the Apostles is the Epistle of Clemens Romanus unto the Brethren of the Church of Corinth This Epistle according to the Title of it Irenaeus ascribes unto the whole Church at Rome and calls it potentissimas literas sub hoc Clemente dissensione non modica inter â—os qui Corinthi erant fratres facta scripsit quae est Romae Ecclesia potentissimas literas lib. 3. cap. 3. By Eusebius it is termed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 great and admirable who also affirms that it was publickly read in some Churches Ecclesiast Hist. lib. 3. cap. 14. And again he calls it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a most powerful writing lib. 5. cap. 7. There is no doubt but some things in the writings of it did befal him humanitûs that the work of such a companion of some of the Apostles as he was might not be received as of divine Institution such was the credit which he gives unto the vulgar fable of the Phenix But for the substance of it it is such as every way becomes a
is the matter of Fact that the Apostles appointed onely particular Congregations and that therefore they did not oblige the Christians about in a Province or Diocess to be of that Church which was first erected in any Town or City but they founded new Churches with new Officers of their own in all places where there were a sufficient number of Believers to make up such a Church And this I prove from the instance of the Church of Hierusalem which was first planted but quickly after there were Churches gathered and settled in Judea Gallilee and Samaria They planted Churches 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Cities and Villages as Clemens speaks But what saith he is this to the proof of the Congregational way this it is namely That the Churches instituted by the Apostles were all of them Congregational not Diocesan Provincial or National but saith he the thing I desired was that when the Christians in one City multiplyed into more Congregations they would prove that they did make new and distinct Churches He may desire it of them who grant that the Christians did multiply in one City into more Congregations then one which I deny untill the end of the second Century although they might and did occasionally meet especially in times of Persecution in distinct Assemblies Neither will their multiplication into more Congregations without distinct Officers at all help the cause he pleadeth for for his Diocesan Church consisteth of many distinct Churches with their distinct Officers Order and Power as he afterwards describes our Parishes to do under one Bishop Yet such is his apprehension of the Justice of his cause that what hath been pleaded twenty times against it namely That speaking of one City the Scripture still calls it the Church of that place but speaking of a Province as Judea Galilee Samaria Galatia Macedonia it speaks of the Churches of them which evidently proves that it knows nothing of a Diocesan Provincial or National Church he produceth in the justification of it because he saith that it is evident theâ—ne that there was but one Church in one City which was never denyed There were indeed then many Bishops in one Church Phil. 1.1 Acts 20.28 And afterwards when one Church had one Bishop only yet there were two Bishops in one City which requires two Churches as Epiphanus affirms 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Haeres 68. S. 6. For Alexandria never had two Bishops as other Cities had Whether he intend two Bishops in one Church or two Churches in one City all is one to our purpose But the Dr. I presume makes this observation rather artificially to prevent an Objection against his main Hypothesis then with any design to strengthen it thereby For he cannot but know how frequently it is pleaded in opposition unto any National Church State as unto its mention in the Scripture For he that shall speak of the Churches in Essex Suffolk Hartfordshire and so of other Counties without the least intimation of any general Church unto which they should belong would be judged to speak rather the Independent then the Episcopal Dialect But saith he p. 236. I cannot but wonder what Dr. O. means when after he hath produced the Evidence of distinct Churches in the same Province he calls this plain Scripture Evidence and practise for the erecting particular distinct Congregations who denies that I say then it is incumbent on him to prove if he do any thing in this cause that they erected Churches of another sort kind and order also But saith he I see nothing like a proof of distinct Churches in the same City which was the thing to be proved but because it could not be proved was prudently let alone But this was not the thing to be proved nor did I propose it to confirmation nor assert it but have proved the contrary unto the end of the second Century This only I assert that every Church in one City was only one Church and nothing is offered by the Doctor to the contrary yea he affirms the same But saith he sect 6. p. 237. Dr. O. saith That the Christians of one City might not exceed the bounds of a particular Church or Congregation no although they had a multiplication of Bishops or Elders in them and occasional distinct Assemblies for some Acts of Divine Worship But then saith he The notion of a Church is not limited in the Scripture to a single Congregation Why so for saith he if occasional Assemblies be allowed for some Acts of Worship why not for others I say because they belong unto the whole Church or are Acts of Communion in the whole Church Assembled and so cannot be observed in occasional meetings do this saith the Apostle when you come together in one place And if saith he the number of Elders be unlimited then every of those may attend the occasional distinct Assemblies for Worship and yet altogether make up the Body of one Church and so say I they may and yet be one Church still joyning together in all Acts of Communion that are proper and peculiar unto the Church For as the meetings intended were occasional so also was the attendance of the Elders unto them as they found occasion for the Edification of the whole Church It may be the Dr. is not so well acquainted with the Principles and Practise of the Congregational way and therefore thinks that these things are contrary unto them But those of that way do maintain that there ought to be in every particular Congregation unto the compleatness of it many Elders or Overseers that the number of them ought to be encreased as the encrease of the Church makes it necessary for their Edification that the members of such a Church may and ought to meet occasionally in distinct Assemblies especially in the time of Persecution for Prayer Preaching of the Word and mutual Exhortation so when Peter was in Prison after the Death of James many met together in the House of Mary to Pray Acts 12.12 Which was not a meeting of the whole Church And that there were such private meetings of the Members of the same Church in times of Persecution among the Primitive Churches may be proved by a Multiplication of instances but still they continued one Church and joyned together in all Acts of Church Communion properly so called especially if it were possible every Lords-day as Justin Martyr declares that the Church did in his time For all the Christians saith he then in the City and Villages about gathered together in one place for the Ends mentioned But still these distinct occasional Assemblies did not constitute any distinct Societies or Corporations as the distinct Companies do in a City But saith he grant one single Bishop over all these Elders and they make up that representation of a Church which we have from the best and purest Antiquity I say we would quickly grant it could we see any warrant for it or if he could prove that so it was
3. This therefore is that which he opposeth namely that there was a Deviation in various degrees and falling of from the Original Institution Order and Rule of the Church until it issued in a fatal Apostasie This is that which on the present Occasion must be further spoken unto For if this be not true I confess there is an end of this contest and we must all acquiesce in the State Rule and Order that was in the Church of Rome before the Reformation But we may observe something yet farther in the Vindication and Confirmation of this Truth which I acknowledge to be the Foundation of all that we plead for in point of Church Reformation As 1. That the Reasons and Arguings of the Doctor in this Matter the Necessity of his Cause compelling him thereunto are the same with those of the Papists about the Apostacy of their Church in Faith Order and Worship wherewith they are charged namely when where how was this Alteration made who made opposition unto it and the like When these Enquiries are multiplyed by the Papists as unto the whole Causes between them and us he knows well enough how to give satisfactory Answers unto them and so might do in this particular unto himself also but I shall endeavour to ease him of that trouble at present Only I must say that it is fallen out somewhat unexpectedly that the Ruins of the principle Bulwark of the Papacy which hath been effectually demolished by the Writings of Protestants of all sorts should be endeavoured to be repaired by a Person justly made eminent by his Defence of the Protestant Religion against those of the Church of Rome 2. But it may be pleaded that although the Churches following the first Ages did insensibly degenerate from the Purity and simplicity of Gospel Faith and Worship yet they neither did nor could do so from an Adherence unto and abiding in their Original constitution or from the due Observation of Church Order Rule and Discipline least of all could this happen in the Case of Diocesan Episcopacy I Answer 1. That as unto the Original of any thing that looks like Diocesan Episcopacy or the Pastoral Relation of one Person of a distinct order from Presbiters unto many particular compleat Churches with Officers of their own with Power and Jurisdiction in them and over them unto the Abridgement of the exercise of that Right and Power unto their own Edification which every true Church is entrusted withal by Jesus Christ it is very uncertain and was introduced by insensible Degrees according unto the effectual working of the Mistery of Iniquity Some say that there were two distinct Orders namely those of Bishops and Presbyters instituted at first in all Churches planted by the Apostles But as the contrary may be evidently proved so a supposition of it would no way promote the cause of Diocesan Episcopacy until those who plead for it have demonstrated the State of the Churches wherein they were placed to be of the same nature with those now called Diocesan Wherefore this Hypothesis begins generally to be deserted as it seems to be by this Author Others suppose that immediately upon or at or after the Decease of the Apostles this new Order of Bishops was appointed to succeed the Apostles in the Government of the Churches that were then gathered or planted But how when or by whom by what Authority Apostolical and Divine or Ecclesiastical only and humane none can declare seeing there is not the least footstep of any such thing either in the Scripture or in the Records that remain of the primitive Churches Others think this new Order of Officers took its occasional Rise from the Practice of the Presbyters of the Church at Alexandria who chose out one among themselves constantly to preside in the Rule of the Church and in all matters of Order unto whom they ascribed some kind of Preheminence and Dignity peculiarly appropriating unto him the namâ— of Bishop And if this be true as unto matter of Fact I reckon it unto the Beginnings of those less harmful Deviations from their Original Constitution which I assigned unto Primitive Churches But many Additions must be made hereunto before it will help the Cause of Diocesan Episcopacy What other occasions hereof were given or taken what Advantages were made use of to promote this Alteration shall be touched upon afterwards 2. Why may not the Churches be supposed to have departed from their original Constitution Order and Rule as well as from their first Faith and Worship which they did gradually in many successive Ages until both were utterly corrupted The Causes Occasions and Temptations leading unto the former are to the full as pregnant as those leading unto the latter For 1. There was no vicious corrupt disposition of Mind that began more early to work in Church Officers nor did more grow and thrive in the Minds of many then Ambition with desire of Preheminence Dignity and Rule It is not to be supposed that Diotrephes was alone in his Desire of â—reheminence nor in the irregular actings of his unduly â—ssumed Authority However we have one signal Instance in him of the Deviation that was in the Church with him from the Rule of its Original Constitution For he prevailed so far therein as by his own single Episcopal Power to reject the Authority of the Apostles and to cast them out of the Church who complyed not with his humour How effectually the same Ambition wrought afterwards in many others possessing the same Place in their Churches with Diotrephes is sufficiently evident in all Ecclesiastical Histories It is far from being the only Instance of the Corruption of Church Order and Rule by the Influence of this Ambition yet it is one that is pregnant which is given us by Amâ—rose for saith he Ecclesia ut Synagoga Seniores habuâ—â— quorum sine consilio nihil agebatur in Ecclesia quod qua neglâ—gentia obsoleverit nescio nisi forte doctorum desidia aut magis superbia dum soli volunt aliquid videri In 1. ad Timoth. cap. 5. It seems there was some alteration in Church Rule and Order in his Time whose Beginning and Progress he could not well discover and trace but knew well enough that so it was then come to pass And if he who lived so near the Times wherein such Alterations were made could not yet discover their first Insinuation nor their subtle Progress it is unreasonable to exact a strict account of us in things of the same nature who live so many Ages after their first Introduction But this he judgeth that it was the Pride or Ambition of the Doctors of the Church which introduced that Alteration in its Order Whereas therefore we see in the Event that all Deviations from the Original Constitution of Churches all Alterations in their Rule and Order did issue in a compliance with the Ambition of Church Rulers as it did in the Papal Church and this Ambition was signally noted
distributed the Faithful at Rome into distinct Titles or Parishes with distinct Presbyters of their own For it is apparent that in those days wherein Persecution was at its height the Meetings of Believers were occasional with respect unto their Security oft-times by Night sometimes in Caves under the Earth or in deserted Burial places at best in private Houses And they had for what they did the Example of the Apostolical Churches Acts 1.13 14. Acts 2.46 chap. 4.24 31. chap. 12.12 chap. 18.7 chap. 20.8 chap. 21.18 Instances of such Meetings may be multiplyed especially in the Church of Rome And to manifest that they took this course upon Necessity when Peace begun to be restored at any time unto them they designed Temples that might receive the whole Multitude of the Church together The Distribution mentioned into Titles and Parishes began a long time after and in very few places within 300 years In this State it is easie to conceive what Alterations might fall out in some Churches from their Primitive Order especially how the People might desert their Diligence and Duty in attending unto all the concerns of the Church And if those things which the Apostles wrote unto them in their Epistles the Instructions Directions and Commands how in all things they should act and deport themselves in the Church be esteemed to be Obligatory in all Ages I cannot see how after the second Century they were much complyed withal unless it were in the single Instance of choosing their own Officers or Rulers But Secondly After these there ensued greater Occasions of greater Variations from the Primitive Institution and Order of the Churches on the Part of the People For 1. Such Numbers of them were received into a Relation unto particular Churches as was inconsistent with the Ends of their Institution and the Observance of the Communion required in them as will afterwards appear And the Reliefes that were invented for this Inconveniency in distinct Conventions supplyed with the Administration of the Word and Sacrament from the first Church or by stated Titles did alter the State of the Church Among those Multitudes which were added unto the Churches especially in the fourth Century many if not the most did come short inexpressibly in Knowledge Gifts Grace Holiness and uprightness of Conversation of the Primitive Christians as the Writers of that Age complain And being hereby uncapable of walking according unto the Order Rule and Discipline of the Apostolical Churches there seemed to be a Necessity of another Rule of other ways and means for their Government without their own concurrence or consent then what was at first appointed which were gradually introduced Whence the original of a Multitude of those Canons which were arbitrarily invented afterwards for their Rule and Government is to be derived And it may be made to appear that the Accommodation of the Rule yea and of the Worship of the Church in the several Ages of it unto the Ignorance Manners and Inclinations of the People who were then easily won unto the outward Profession of Christian Religion was one means of the Ruine of them both until they issued in downright Tyranny and Idolatry But much more of the cause of the Deviation of the Churches from their Primitive Rule and Order is to be ascribed unto the Ambition and Love of Preheminence in many of the Clergy or Rulers of the Churches But this is no Place nor Season to manifest this by Instances besides it hath been done by others I shall therefore enquire only into one or two things in particular which are of principal consideration in the Declension of the Churches from their Primitive Institution Order and Rule And 1. It is evident that there was an Alteration made in the state of the Church as to its Officers For it issued at last in Popes Patriarchs Cardinals Metropolitan and Diocesan Bishops who were utterly forreign unto the State and Order of the Primitive Churches and that for some Ages Nor were these Officers introduced into the Church at one or in one Age nor with the Powers which they afterwards claimed and assumed unto themselves It was done gradually in many succeeding Ages working by a Design to accommodate the State of the Church unto the Political State of the Empire in the distribution of its Government 2. The Beginnings of this great Alteration were small nor at all perceived in the days wherein they were first acted Nor is it agreed nor as far as I see will it ever be agreed among Learned Men when first a Disparity among the ordinary Officers of the Church in Order Degree or Power did first begin nor by what means it was brought about The Apostles were all equal among themselves no one had either Office or Office-Power above others So were all the ordinary Bishops and Presbyters mentioned in the Scripture as shall be proved afterwards No intimation is given of any Preheminence or Superiority amongst them of one over others Yet afterwards in the third and fourth Centuries much of that nature appears It begins to be granted that the Bishops and Elders mentioned in the Scripture were the same and that there was no difference in Name Office or Power during the Apostles times which was the Judgment of Hierome and our Author seems to me to be of the same Mind p. 267. But they say that after the Decease of the Apostles there were some appointed to succeed them in that part of their Office which concerned the Rule of many Churches And this they say was done for the prevention of Schisme but with ill success For as Clemens affirms that the Apostles foresaw that there would be Strife and Contention about Episcopacy even when it was confined unto its Original Order because of the Ambition of Diotrephes and others like him so it became much more the cause of all sorts of Disorders in Schismes and Heresies when it began to exalt it self in Dignity and Reputation The first express Attempt to corrupt and divide a Church made from within itself was that in the Church of Hierusalem made by Thebulis because Simon Cleopas was chosen Bishop and he was refused Euseb. lib. 4. cap. 21. The same Rise had the Schismes of the Novatians and Donatists the Heresies of Arius and others Neither is there any thing certain in this pretended Succession of some Persons unto the Apostles in that part of their Office which concerns the Rule of many Churches by one Overseer No Intimation of any such Appointment by the Apostles or any of them no record of the concurrence of the Churches themselves in and unto this Alteration can be produced Nor is there any Analogy between the extraordinary Power of every Apostle over all Churches and care for them and the ordinary Power of a Bishop over a small Number which Lot or Accident disposeth unto him Besides it cannot be proved no Instance can be given or hath been for the space of 200 years or until the end of the
Church-State of others because in some things they agree not in Judgment or Practice with what they conceive to belong thereunto as obstructs a right Judgment herein And it hath risen of late unto such a degree of Phrensy that some deny peremptorily the Church-State and consequently the Salvation of all that have not Diocesan Bishops Alass that poor men who are known to others whether they are unto themselves or no what is their Office and what is their Discharge of it should once think that the Being and Salvation of all Churches should depend on them and such as they are Yea some of the men of this persuasion that Christians cannot be saved unless they comply with Diocesan Bishops do yet grant that Heathens may be saved without the knowledge of Christ. 3 Whatever Defect there hath been de facto in the constitution of these Churches and the celebration of Divine Worship in them in any Places or Ages whatever it will not prove that there was a total failure of them much less a Discontinuation of the Right of Believers to Reform and Erect them according unto the Mind of Christ. It is hence evident that the perpetual continuation of the Church-State instituted by Christ under the Gospel depends originally on the Grant of the Kingdom unto him by his Father with his Faithfulness in that Grant and his Almighty Power to make it good And they do but deceive themselves and trouble others who think of suspending this continuation on mean and low conditions of their own framing 2. The Continuation of this Church State depends on the Promise of Christ himself to preserve and continue it He hath assured us that he will so buiâ—d his Church on the Rock that the Gates of Hell shall not prevail against it Matth. 16.18 Under what consideration soever the Church is here firstly intended the whole State of it as before described is included in the Promise If the Gates of Hell do prevail either against the Faith of sincere Believers or the Catholick Profession of that Faith or the expression of that Profession in the Duties and Ordinances to be observed in particular Churches the Promise fails and is of no effect 3. It depends on the Word or Laws of Christ which gives Right and Title unto all Believers to congregate themselves in such a Church-State with Rules and Commands for their so doing Suppose 1 That there are a number of Believers of the Disciples of Christ in any such place as wherein they can assemble and unite themselves or joyn together in a Society for the Worship of God 2 That they are as yet in no Church State nor do know or own any Power of men that can put them into that State I say the Institution of this Church-State by the Authority of Christ his Commands unto his Disciples to observe therein whatever he hath commanded and the Rules he hath given whereby such a Church-State is to be erected what Officers are to preâ—ide therein and what other Duties belong thâ—reunto is Warranty sufficient for them to joyn themselves in such a Sâ—ate Who shall make it unlawful for the Disciples of Christ to obey the Commands of their Lord and Master Who shall make it lawful for them to neglect what he requires at any time Wherever therefore men have the Word of the Scripâ—ure to teach them their Duty it is lawful for them to comply with all the commands of Christ contained therein And whereas there are many Priviledges and â—owers accompanying this Church-State and those who are inâ—erested therein are as such the especial Object of many Divine Promises this Word and Law of Christ doth make a conveyance of them all unto those who in Obedience unto his institutions and commands do enter into that State by the way means that he hath appointed Whilst we hear â—im according to the reiterated Direction given us from Heaven whilst we do and observe all that he hath commanded us we need not fear that promised Presence of his with us which brings along with it all Church Power and Priviledges also Wherefore this State can have no Intercision but on a supposition that there are none in the World who are willing to obey the commands of Christ which utterly overthrows the very Being of the Church Catholick 4. It depends on the Communication of Spiritual Gifts for the Work of the Ministry in this Church-State as is expresly declared Ephes. 4.8.11 12 13 14 15. The continuation of the Church as unto the Essence of it depends on the Communication of saving Grace If Christ should no more give of his Grace and Spirit unto men there would be no more Church in the World as unto its internal Form and Essence But the continuation of the Church as it is Organical that is a Society Incorporated according unto the mind of Christ with Rulers and Officers for the Authoritative Administration of all its concerns especially for the Preaching of the Word and Administration of the Sacraments depends on the Communication of Spiritual Gifts and Abilities And if the Lord Jesus Christ should with-hold the Communication of Spiritual Gifts this Church-State must cease An Image of it may be Erected but the true Church State will fail for that will hold no longer but whilst the whole Body fitly joyn'd together and compacted by that which every joynt supplieth according to the effectual working in the measure of every part maketh encrease of thâ— Body and the edifying of it self in Love Ephes. 4.16 whilst it holds the Head c. Col. 2.19 such dead lifeless Images are many Churches in the World But this Communication of Spiritual Gifts unto the use of his Disciples to the end of the World the Lord Christ hath taken the charge of on himself as he is Faithful in the Administration of his Kingly Power Ephes. 4.18.11 12 13 14. Whereas therefore the Lord Christ in the Exercise of his Right and Power on the grant of the Father of a perpetual visible Kingdom in this World and the Discharge of his own promise hath 1 Appointed the ordinary Offices which he will have continue in his Church by an unalterable Institution 2 Ordained that Persons shall be called and set apart unto those Offices and for the Discharge of that Work and those Duties which he hath declared to belong thereunto 3 Furnished them with Gifts and Abilities for this Work and declared what their spiritual Qualifications and moral Endowments ought to be 4 Made it the Duty of Believers to observe all his Institutions and Commands whereof those which concern the Erection and Continuance of this Church-State are the principal and 5 Hath in their so doing or their Observance of all his Commands promised his presence with them by which as by a Charter of Right he hath conveyed unto them an Interest in all the Power Priviledges and Promises that belongs unto this State it is evident that its perpetual continuation depends hereon and is secured hereby
not or is neglected It is therefore fond to suppose that our Saviour should prescribe this Rule for that season wherein there was no need of it and not for those times wherein the Church could not subsist in order without it 3ly The Church here directed unto is a Christian Church For 1. whereas it hath been proved it concerned the times to come afterwards there was in those times nothing that could pretend unto the name of the Church but a Christian Church only The Jewish Synagogues had an utter end put unto them so as that an Address unto any of them in this case was not only useless but unlawful And as unto Magistrates or Arbitrators to have them called the Church and that in such a sense as that after the Interposition of their Authority or Advice a man should be freed from the discharge of all Christian Duties such as are mutually required among the Disciples of Christ towards his Brother is a fond Imagination For 2 It is such a Church as can exercise Authority in the Name of Christ over his Disciples and such as in Conscience they should be bound to submit themselves unto For the Reason given of the Contempt of the Voice Judgment and Sentence of the Church in case of offence is their Power of spiritual binding and looâ—ing which is comitted by Christ thereunto and so he adds immediatley ver 18. Whatever ye shall bind on Earth shall be bound in Heaven and whatsoever ye shall loose in heaven shall be loosed on earth is the Priviledge of a Christian Church only 4thly It is a visible particular Congregation alone that is intended For 1. As unto the Church in other acceptations of that name either for the Catholicâ— invisible Church or for the whole Body of professed Believers thoroughout the world it is utterly impossible that this Dâ—ty should be observed towards it as is manifest unto all 2. We have proved that the first and most proper signification of the word is of a single congregation assembling together for its Duties and Enjoyments Where ever therefore the Church in general is mentioned without the Addition of any thing or circumstance that may lead unto another signification it must be interpreted of such a Particular Church or Congregation 3. The Persons intended offending and offended must belong unto the same society unto whom the Address is to be made or else the one party may justly decline the Judicatory applyed unto and so frustrate the Process And it must be such a Church as unto whom they are known in their Circumstances without which it is impossible that a right judgment in sundry cases can be made in point of Offence 4 It is a Church of an easie Address Go tell the Church which supposeth that free and immediate aâ—cess which all the Members of a Church have unto that whole Church whereof they are members Wherefore 5 It is said 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 tell the Church not a Church but the Church namely whereunto thou and thy Brother do belong 6 One end of this Direction is that the offending and the offended parties may continue together in the Communion of the same Church in Love without Dissimulation which thing belongs unto a particular Congregation 7 The meaning is not tell the Diocesan Bishop for whatever Church he may have under his Rule yet is not he himself a Church Nor is it 8 the Chancellours Court that our Saviour intended Be it what it will it is a disparagement unto all Churches to have that name applied thereunto Nor Lastly Is it a Presbytery or Association of the Elders of many particular Congregations that is intended For the Power claimed in such associated Presbyteries is with respect unto what is already in or before particular Congregations which they have not either Wisdom or Authority as is supposed finally to order and determine But this supposeth that the Address in the first place be made unto a particular Congregation which therefore is firstly and properly here intended All things are plain familiar and exposed to the common Understandings of all Believers whose minds are any way exercised about these things as indeed are all things that belong unto the Discipline of Christ. Arguments pretendedly deep and learned really obscure and perplexed with logical Notions and distinctions applied unto things thus plain and evident in themselves do serve only to involve and darken the Truth It is plain in the place 1 That there was a Church-State for Christians then designed by Christ which afterwards he would institute and settle 2 That all true Disciples were to join and unite themselves in some such Church as might be helpful unto their Love Order Peace and Edification 3 That among the members of these Churches Offences would or might arise which in themselves tend unto pernicious Events 4 That if these Offences could not be cured and taken away so as that Love without Dissimulation might be continued among all the Members of the Churches an Account of them at last was to be given unto that Church or Society whereunto the Parties concerned do belong as Members of it 5 That this Church should hear determine and give Judgment with advice in the cases so brought unto it for the taking away and removal of all Offences 6 That this Determination of the Church is to be rested in on the Penalty of a Deprivation of all the Priviledges of the Church 7 That these things are the Institution and Appointment of Christ himself whose Authority in them all is to be submitted unto and which alone can cast one that is a Professed Christian into the condition of an Heathen or a Publican These things in the Notion and Practice of them are plain easy and exposed to the Understanding of the meanest of the Disciples of Christ as it is meet that all things should be wherein their daily Practice is concerned But it is not easily to be expressed into what horrible Perplexities and Confusions they have been wrested in the Church of Rome nor how those who depart from the plain obvious sense of the words and love not the Practice they direct unto do lead themselves and others into ways and paths that have neither use nor end From the corrupt abuse of the holy Institution of our Lord Jesus Christ here intended so many Powers Faculties Courts Jurisdictions legal Processes with Litigious Vexatious oppressive Courses of Actions and Trials whose very names are uncouth horrid foreign unto Religion and unintelligible without Cunning in an artâ—ficial barbarous Science of the Canon Law have proceeded as are enough to fill a sober rational man with astonishment how it could ever enter into the minds of men to suppose that they can possibly have any Relation unto this Divine Institution Those who are not utterly blinded with Interest and Prejudice wholly ignorant of the Gospel and the mind of Christ therein as also Strangers from the Practice of the Duties which it requires will hardly
believe that in this Context our Lord Jesus Christ designed to set up and erect an Earthly Domination in and over his Churches to be administred by the Rules of the Canon Law and the Rota at Rome They must be spiritually mad and ridiculous who can give the least entertainment unto such an Imagination Nor can the Discipline of any Diocesan Churches administred in and by Courts and Officers foreign to the Scripture both name and thing be brought within the view of this Rule nor can all the Art of the World make any application of it thereunto For what some plead concerning Magistrates or Arbitrators they are things which men would never betake themselves unto but only to evade the force of that Truth which they love not All this is fallen out by mens departing from the Simplicity of the Gospel and a contempt of that sense of the words of the Lord Jesus which is plain and obvious unto all who desire not only to hear his words but also to observe his Commands 3 dly Our third Argument is taken from the Nature of the Churches â—nstituted by the Apostles and their Order as it is expressed in the Scripture For they were all of them Congregational and of no other sort This the ensuing Considerations will make evident 1. There were many Churches planted by the Apostles in very small Provinces Not to insist on the Churches of Galatia Gal. 1.1 concerning which it is no where intimated that they had any one Head or Mother Church Metropolitical or Diocesan Nor of those of Macedonia distinct from that of Philippi whereof we have spoken before upon the first coming of Paul after his Conversion unto Jerusalem which was three years Gal. 1.18 in the Fourth year after the Ascension of Christ there were Churches planted in all Judea and Galilee and Samaria Act. 9.31 Neither of the two latter Provinces was equal unto one Ordinary Diocess Yet were there Churches in both of them and that in so short a time after the first Preaching of the Gospel as that it is impossible they should be conceived to be any other but single Congregations What is excepted or opposed hereunto by the Reverend Dr. St. shall be examined and disproved afterwards by itself that the Progress of our Discourse be not here interrupted 2. These Churches were such as that the Apostles appointed in them Ordinary Elders and Deacons that might administer all Ordinances unto the whole Church and take care of all the poor Act. 14.23 chap. 20.28 Now the Care Inspection and Labour of Ordinary Officers can extend itself no further than unto a particular Congregation No man can administer all Ordinances unto a Diocesan Church And this ordaining Elders in every Church is the same with ordaining them in every City Tit. 1.5 that is in every Town wherein there was a Number converted unto the Faith as is evident from Act. 14.23 And it was in Towns and Cities ordinarily that the Gospel was first preached and first received Such Believers being congregated and united in the Profession of the same Faith and subiection unto the Authority of Christ did constitute such a Church-State as it was the Will of Christ they should have Bishops or Elders and Deacons ordained amongst them and were therefore as unto their State such Churches as he owned 3. It is said of most of these Churches expresly that they respectively met together in one place or had their Assemblies of the whole Church for the discharge of the Duties required of them which is peculiar unto Congregational Churches only so did the Church at Jerusalem on all occasions Act. 15.12 22. ch â—1 22 see ch 5.11 ch 6.1 It is of no force which is objecteâ— from the Multitude of them that are said to believe and so consequently were of that Church so as that they could not assemble together For whereas the Scripture says expresly that the multitude of the Church did come together it is scarce fair for us to to say they were such a multitude as that they could not come together And it is evident that the great numbers of Believers that are said to be at Jerusalem were there only occasionally and were not fixed in that Church For many years after a small Village beyond Jordan could receive all that were so fixed in it The Church at Antioch gathered together in one Assembly Act. 14.27 to hear Paul and Silas This Church thus called together is called the Multitude chap. 15.30 that is the whole Brotherhood at least of that Church The whole Church of Corinth did assemble together in one place both for solemn Worship and the exercise of Discipline 1 Cor. 8.8 chap. 14.25 26. chap. 11.17 20. It is no way necessary to plead any thing in the illustration or for the Confirmation of these Testimonies They all of them speak positively in a matter of fact which will admit of no debate unless we will put in exceptions unto the Veracity of their Authors And they are of themselves sufficient to establish our Assertion For whatever may be the state of any Church as unto its Officers or Rule into what order soever it be disposed ordinarily or occasionally for its Edification so long as it is its Duty to assemble in and with all its Members in one place either for the exercise of its Power the Performance of its Duty or Enjoyments of its Priviledges it is a single Congregation and no more 4. The Duties prescribed unto all Church Members in the writings of the Apostles to be diligently attended unto by them are such as either in their Nature or the manner of their performance cannot be attended unto and duly accomplished but in a particular Congregation only This I shall immediately speak distinctly unto and therefore only mention it in this place These things being so plainly positively and frequently asserted in the Scripture it cannot be questionable unto any impartial-mind but that particular Churches or Congregations are of Divine Institution and consequently that unto them the whole Power and Priviledge of the Church doth belong for if they do not so whatever they are Churches they are not If therefore any other Church-State be Supposed we may well require that its Name Nature Use Power and Bounds be some or all of them declared in the Scripture Reasonings drawn from the Superiority of the Apostles above the Evangelists of Bishop above Presbyters or from Church Rule in the hands of the Officers of the Church only from the power of the Christian Magistrate in things Ecclesiastical from the Meetness of Union among all Churches are of no use in this case For they are all consistent with the Sole Institution of particular Congregations nor do in the least intimate that there is or needs to be any other Church State of Divine Appointment CHAP. V. The Sate of the First Churches after the Apostles to the end of the Second Century IN Confirmation of the foregoing Argument we urge the President and
person of an Apostolical Spirit consonant unto the stile and writings of the Apostles themselves a precious Jewel and just Representation of the state and order of the Church in those days And sundry things we may observe from it 1. There is nothing in it that gives the least intimation of any other Church-State but that which was Congregational although there were the highest causes and Reasons for him so to do had there been any such Churches then in being The case he had in hand was that of Ecclesiastical Sedition or Schism in the Church of Corinth the Church or Body of the Brethren having unjustly deposed their Elders as it should seem all of them Giving advice herein unto the whole Church using all sorts of Arguments to convince them of their sin directing all probable means for their Cure he never once sends them to the Bishop or Church of Rome as the Head of Vnity unto all Churches makes no mention of any Metropolitical or Diocesan Church and its Rule or of any single Bishop and his Authority No one of any such Order doth he either commend or condemn or once address himself unto with either Admonitions Exhortations Encouragements or Directions He only handles the cause by the Rule of the Scripture as it was stated between the Church itself and its Elders I take it for granted that if there were any Church at Corinth consisting of many Congregations in the City and about it or comprehensive as some say of the whole Region of Achaia that there was a single Officer or Bishop over that whole Church But none such is here mentioned If there were any such he was either Deposed by the people or he was not If he were Deposed he was only one of the Presbyters for they were only Presbyters that were Deposed If he were not why is he not once called on to discharge his duty in curing of that Schism or blamed for his neglect Certainly there was never greater Prevarication used by any man in any cause than is by Clemens in this if the state of the Church its Rule and Order were such as some now pretend For he neither lets the people know wherein their sin and Schism did lye namely in a Separation from their Bishop nor doth once mention the only proper cure and remedy of all their Evils But he knew their state and order too well to insist on things that were not then in rerum natura and wherein they were not concerned 2. This Epistle is written as unto the whole Church at Corinth so in the name of the whole Church of Rome 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Church of God which dwelleth or sojourneth as a stranger at Rome in the City of Rome to the Church of God that dwelleth or sojourneth at Corinth For although that Church was then in disorder under no certain Rule having cast off all their Elders c. yet the Church of Rome not only allows it to be a sister-Church but salutes the Brethren of it in the following words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 called and sanctified through the will of God by our Lord Jesus Christ. The Churches of Christ were not so ready in those days to condemn the persons nor to judge the Church-state and condition of others on every miscarriage real or supposed as some have been and are in these latter Ages 2. This Address being from the body of the Church at Rome unto that at Corinth without the least mention of the Officers of them in particular it is evident that the Churches themselves that is the whole entire Community of them had Communion with one another as they were sister-Churches and that they had themselves the transaction of all Affairs wherein they were concerned as they had in the days of the Apostles Acts 15.1 2 3. It was the Brethren of the Church at Antioch who determined that Paul and Barnabas and certain others should go up to Hierusalem to consult the Apostles and Elders See also Chap. 21.22 This they did not nor ought to do without the Presence Guidance Conduct and consent of their Elders or Rulers where they had any But this they were not excluded from And that Church the whole Body or fraternity whereof doth advise and consult in those things wherein they are concerned on the account of their Communion with other Churches is a Congregational Church and no other It was the Church who sent this Epistle unto the Corinthians Claudius Ephebus Valerius Bibo Fortunatus are named as their Messengers 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that are sent by us our Messengers our Apostles in these matters Such as the Churches made use of on all such occasions in the Apostles days 2 Cor. 8.23 And the persons whom they sent were only Members of the Church and not Officers nor do we any where hear of them under that Character Now they could not be sent in the name of the Church but by its consent nor could the Church consent without its Assembling together This was the state and order of the first Churches in that Communion which was amongst them according to the mind of Christ they had a singular concern in the welfare and prosperity of each other and were solicitous about them in their trials Hence those who were planted at a greater distance than would allow frequent personal converse with their respective Members did on all occasions send Messengers unto one another sometimes meerly to visit them in love and sometimes to give or take Advice But these things as indeed almost all others that bâ—long unto the Communion of Churches either in themselves or with one another are either utterly lost and buryed or kept above ground in a pretence of Episcopal Authority Churches themselves being wholly excluded from any concernment in them But as the Advice of the Church of Rome was desired in this case by the whole Church of Corinth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so it was given by the Body of the Church itself and sent by Messengers of their own 3. The description given of the state ways and walking of the Church of Corinth that is that whole Fraternity of the Church which fell afterwards into that disorder which is reproved before their fall is such as that it bespeaks their walking together in one and the same society and is sufficient to make any good man desire that he might see Churches yet in the world unto whom or the generality of whose Members that Description might be honestly and justly accommodated One Character which is given of them I shall mention only 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 There was a full or plentiful effusion of the Holy Ghost upon you all so that being full or filled with an holy will holiness of will and a good readiness of mind with a pious devout confidence you stretched out your hands in Prayers to Almighty God supplicating his clemency or Mercy for the pardon of your involuntary sins sins fallen into by infirmity or
their state as to make way for those greater alterations which not long after ensued For they were not introduced until through a defect in the multiplication of Churches in an equality of Power and Order which ought to have been done they were encreased into that multitude for number of Members and were so diffused as unto their habitations as made an appearance of a Necessity of another Constitution of Churches and anothâ—r kind of Rule than what was of original appointment Justin Martyr wrote his second Apology for the Christians unto the Roman Emperours about the year 150. It is marvellous to consider how ignorant not only the common sort of the Pagans but the Philosophers also and Governours of the Nations were of the nature of Christian Churches and of the worship celebrated in them But who are so blind as those who will not see Even unto this day not a few are willingly or rather wilfully ignorant of the nature of such Assemblies or what is performed in them as were among the Primitive Christians that they may be at liberty to speak all manner of evil of them falsely Hence were all the Reports and stories among the Heathen concerning what was done in the Christian Conventicles which they would have to be the most abominable villanies that were ever acted by Mankind Even thâ—se who made the most candid Enquiry into what they were and did attained unto very little knowledge or certainty concerning them and their Mysteries as is evident in the Epistles of Trajan and Pliny with the Rescript of Adrian unto Minucius Fundanus about them In this state of things this our great and learned Philâ—sopher who afterwards suffered Martyrdom about the year 160 undertook to give an account unto Antoninus Pius and Lucius who then ruled the Roman Empire of the Nature Order and Worship of the Christian Churches and that in such an excellent manner as that I know nothing material that can be added unto it were an account of the same thing to be given unto alike persons at this day We may touch a little upon some Heads of it 1. He declares the conversion of men unto the Faith as the foundation of all their Church-order and Worship 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 As many as are perswaded and do believe the things to be true which are taught and spoken by us and take upon themselves that they are able to live according to that Doctrine they are taught to seek of God by fasting and prayer the pardon of their fore-going sins and we also do joyn together with them in fasting and prayer for that end And heâ—ein 1. The only means of Conversion which he insists upon is the Preaching of the Word or Truth of the Gospel wherein they especially insisted on the Doctrine of the Person and Officeâ— of Christ as appears throughout his whole Apologie 2. This preaching of the Word or Declaration of the Truth of the Gospel unto the Conversion of the Hearers be doth not confine unto any especial sort of persons as â—e doth afterwards that Administration of the holy things in the Church but speaks of it in general as the work of all Christians that were able for it as doth the Apostle 1 Cor. 14.24 25. 3. Those who were converted did two things 1. They professed their Faith or Assent unto the Truth of the Dotcrine of the Gospel 2. They took it on themselves to live according to the Rule of it to do and observe the things commanded by Jesus Christ as he appointed they should Math. 28.18 19. 4. To lay a sure and comfortable foundation of their future profession they were taught to confess their former sins and by earnest prayer with fastings to seek of God the pardon and forgiveness of them And 5. Herein such was their love and zeal those who had been the means of their Conversion joyned with them for their comfort and edification It is well known how this whole process is lost and on what account it is discontinued But whether it be done so unto the Advantage of Christian Religion and the good of the Souls of Men is well worth a strict enquiry 2. In the next place he declares how those who were so converted were conducted unto Baptism and how they were initiated into the Mysteries of the Gospel thereby 3. When any was so Baptized they brought him unto the Church which he was to be joyned unto 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Him who is thus Baptiâ—ed who believeth and is received by consent among 〈◊〉 or to be of our number we bring him unto those called the Brethren when they are met or gathered together for joynt prayers and supplications for themselves and for him who is now illuminated and all others with intention of mind c. We have here another illustrious instance of the care and diligence of the Primitive Church about the enstating professed Believers in the Communion of the Church That hereon those who were to be admitted made their publick confession we shall afterwards declare And the Brethren here mentioned are the whole fraternity of the Church who were concerned in these things And Justin is not ashamed to declare by what name they called one another among themselves even to the Heathen though it be now a scorn and reproach among them that are called Christians 4. He proceeds to declare the nature of their Church-meetings or Assemblies with the Duties and Worship of them And he tells us first that they had frequent meetings among themselves they that have any wealth saith he do help the poor 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and we are continually together that is in the lesser occasional Assemblies of the Brethren for so in the next place he adds immediately 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 On the day called Sunday there is a meeting of all that dwell in the Towns and Fields or Villages about This was the State the Order the proceeding of the Church in the days of Justin whence it is undeniably evident that he knew no other Church-state or Order but that of a particular Congregation whose Members living in any Town or City or Fields adjacent did constantly all of them meet together in one place the first day of the week for the celebration of Divine Worship 5. In this Church he mentions only two sorts of Officers 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Presidents and Deacons Of the first sort in the Duty of one of their Assemblies â—e mentions but one 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the President the Ruler the Bishop to whom belonged the Administration of all the holy Mysteries And that we may not think that he is called the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with respect unto any Preheminence over other Ministers or Elders like a Diocesan Bishop he terms him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he that presided over the Brethren of that Church Now certainly that Church wherein one President Elder Presbyter or Bishop did administer the Holy Ordinances in one
power and liberty in choosing or refusing the Officers that were to be set over them Some few things we may observe from the Testimonies insisted on As 1. There is in them a true and full representation of the State Order Rule and Discipline of the Churches in the first Ages It is a sufficient demonstration that all those things wherein at the present the State and Order of the Church are supposed to consist are indeed later Inventions not merely because they are not mentioned by them but because they are not so when they avowedly profess to give an account of that State and Order of the Church which was then in use and practice Had there been then among Christians Metropolitan Archbishops or Bishops Diocesan Churches National or Provincial an enclosure of Church-power or Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction in and for the whole rule of the Church unto Bishops and Officers utterly forraign unto any pretence of Apostolical Institution or countenance had many Churches or many hundreds of Churches been without Rule in or among themselves subject to the rule of any one man standing in no especial relation unto any of them with other things of the like nature been then invented known and in use how could they possibly be excused in passing them over without the least taking notice of them or giving them the honour of being once mentioned by them How easie had it been for their Pagan Rulers unto whom they presented their accounts some of them of the state of their Churches to have replyed that they knew well enough there were other Dignities Orders and practises than what they did acknowledge which they were either afraid or ashamed to own But besides this silence on the other hand they assert such things of the Officers appointed in the Church of the way of their appointment of the Duty of Officers in the Church of the Power and Liberty of the people of the nature and exercise of Discipline as are utterly inconsistent with that state of these things which is by some pleaded for Yea as we have shewed whatever they write or speak about Churches or their Order can have no Being or Exercise in any other form of Churches but of particular Congregations 2. That account which they give that Representation which they make of the kind state and order of the Churches among them doth absolutely agree with and answer unto what we are taught in the Divine Writings about the same things There were indeed before the end of the second Century some practises in and about some lesser things such as sending the Consecrated Elements from the Assembly unto such as were sick that they had no warrant for from any thing written or done by the Apostles But as unto the substance of what concerns the State Order Rule Discipline and Worship of Evangelical Churches there is not any instance to be given wherein they departed from the Apostolical Traditions or Institution either by adding any thing of their own unto them or omitting any thing that was by them ordained 3. From this state the Churches did by degrees and insensibly degenerate so as that another Form and Order of them did appear towards the end of the third Century For some in the first Churches not applying their minds unto the Apostolical Rule and practice who ordained Elders in every Church and that not only in Cities or Towns but as Clemens affirms 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Country-Villages Many disorders ensued with respect unto such Collections of Christians and Congregations as were gathered at some distance from the first or City-Church Until the time of Origen the Example of the Apostles in this case was followed and their Directions observed For so he writes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And we knowing that there are other Congregations gathered in the Towns up and down by the Preaching of the Word of God or that there is another Heavenly City in any Town built by the word of God we perswade some that are sound in Doctrine and of good Conversation and meet for their Rule to take on them the conduct or Rule of those Churches and these whilst they Rule within the Churches those societies of Divine Institution by whom they are chosen they govern them according to the Prescriptions or Commands and Rules given by God himself Adver Cels. lib. 8. Those of whom he speaks 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 were the Pastors or principal Members of the Churches that were established When they understood that in any place distant from them a number of Believers were called and gathered into Church order by the Preaching of the Word they presently according unto their duty took care of them enquired into their State and condition assisting them in particular in finding out trying and recommending unto them persons meet to be their Officers and Rulers These he acknowledgeth to be Churches and Cities of God upon their Collection by the Preaching of the Word antecedently unto the constitution of any Officers among them as the Apostles also did Act. 14.22 23. Wherefore the Church is essentially before its ordinary Officers and cannot as unto its continuance depend on any Succession of theirs which they have none but what it gives unto them These Officers thus recommended were chosen as he tells us by the Churches wherein they were to preside and thereon did govern them by the Rule of Gods Word alone Hereby was the Original Constitution and state of the first Churches for a good season preserved Nor was there the least abridgment of the power either of these Churches or of their Officers because it may be they were some of them planted in poor Country-Villages For as no man in the world can hinder but that every true Church hath de jure all the Rights and Powers that any other Church in the world hath or ought to have or that every true Officer Bishop Elder or Pastor hath not all the power that Christ hath annexed unto that Office be they at Rome or Eâ—gubium so there was no abridgment of this power in the meanest of them as yet attempted But this course and duty in many places not long after became to be much omitted whether out of Ignorance or Negligence or unwillingness of men to undertake the Pastoral Charge in poor Country-Churches I know not But so it was that Believers in the Regions round about any City 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 were look'd on as those which belonged unto the City Churches and were not setled in particular Congregations for their edification which they ought to have been And the Councels that afterwards ensued made Laws and Canons that they should be under the Government of the Bishops of those City-Churches But when the number of such Believers was greatly increased so as that it was needful to have some always attending the Ministry among them they came I know not how to have Chorepiscopi among them and over them The first mention of them is in the Synod of
Indeed as when the Israelites came out of Egypt there came along with them a mixed multitude of other People Exod. 12.38 which fell to lusting for Meat when they came into the Wilderness Numb 11.4 to the danger of the whole Congregation So when Christianity was first Preached and received in the world besides those who embraced it sincerely and were added unto the Church there was a great mixture of stubborn Jews as the Ebionites of Philosophical Greeks as the Valentinians and the Marcionites of plain Impostors such as Simon Magus and Menander who all of them pretended to be Christians but they fell a lusting and exceedingly troubled and perplexed the Churches with an endeavour to seduâ—e them unto their Imaginations Yet none of their Abominations could force an entrance into the Churches themselves which by the means insisted on were preserved But when this Church-state and Order was changed and another gradually introduced in the room of it Errours and Heresies got new advantages and entered into the Churches themselves which before did only assault and perplex them For 1. When Prerogative and Preheminence of any single Person in the Church began to be in esteem not a few who failed in their attempts of attaining it to revenge themselves on the Church made it their business to invent and propagate pernicious Heresies So did Thebulis at Hierusalem Euseb. lib. 4. cap. 22. and Valentinus Tertul. ad Valentin cap. 4. and Marcion at Rome Epiphan Haeres 42. Montanus fell into his dotage on the same account so did Novitianus at Rome Euseb. lib. 7. cap. 43. and Arius at Alexandria Hence is that censure of them by Lactantius lib. 4. cap. 30. Ii quorum fides fuit lubrica cùm Deum nosse se colere simularent augendis opibus honori studentes affectabant Maximum Sacerdotium à potioribus victi secedere cum suffragatoribus maluerunt quà m eos ferre praepositos quibus concupierant ipsâ— ante praeponi 2. When any of their Bishops of the new Constitution whether Patriarchal or Diocesan fell into Heresies which they did frequently and that numbers of them they had so many advantages to diffuse their poyson into the whole Body of their Churches and such Political Interests for their Promotion as that the Churches themselves were throughly infected with them It is true the Body of the People in many places did oppose them withdraw and separate from them but it cannot be denied but that this was the first way and means whereby the Churches ceased to be the Ground and Pillar of Truth many destructive Errours being received into them which did only outwardly assault them whilst they abode in their first Institution And had not the Churches in process of time utterly lost their Primitive State and Order by coalescing into one Papal pretended Vniversal Church the Faith itself could never have been so utterly corrupted depraved and lost among them as in the issue it was 3. To propagate the Gospel is in like manner required hereunto This I acknowledge doth more immediately concern the Duty of Persons in any Church-Order than the Order itself For it must be the work of some particular persons dedicating themselves unto their Ministry as it was in the first Churches 3 Joh. 5 6 7 8. The like may be said of any other publick acknowledged end of the Institution of Churches If the Way pleaded for be not consistent with them all and the proper means of attaining them if it be not suited unto their accomplishment let it be discarded I shall insist on one more only 3. Our Lord Jesus Christ hath given that state unto his Churches hath instated them in that Order as that his Interest Kingdome and Religion might be carried on in the world without prejudice or disadvantage unto any of the lawful Interests of men especially without any opposition unto or enterfering with the Civil Authority or Magistracy which is the Ordinance of God and no Church-way that doth so is of his Institution Wherefore I shall briefly declare what are the Principles of those of this Way in these things which are the Principles of the Way itself which they do profess 1. Our first general Assertion unto this purpose is this The Lord Jesus Christ taught no Doctrine appointed no Order in his Church gave it no Power that is opposite unto or inconsistent with any righteous Government in this world of what sort soever it be of those whereunto Government is distributed in Reason and Practice His Doctrine indeed is opposed unto all Unrighteousness in and of all men Magistrates and others but not to the legal Rule of Magistrates that are unrighteous men And this Opposition is Doctrinal only confirmed with Promises and Threatnings of eternal things refusing and despising all outward aids of force and restraint This Rule we allow for the trial of all Churches and their state whether they be according unto the minde of Christ. But whereas the Lord Jesus Christ hath taught commanded appointed nothing that is contrary unto or inconsistent with righteous Governments of any sort if Rulers or Magistrates shall forbid the observance of what he hath commanded appointed and ordered and then charge it on him or his Way that his Disciples cannot dare not will not comply with that Prohibition and accuse them thereon of Sedition and Opposition unto Government they deal injuriously with him whereof they must give an account For whereas all Power is given unto him in Heaven and Earth all Nations are his Inheritance all People in his absolute Disposal and it is his pleasure to set up his Kingdom in the Earth without which the Earth itself would not be continued He could not deal more gently with the righteous Rulers of this world and he did it because righteous Rule is the Ordinance of God than to order all things so that whether they receive his Law and Doctrine or no nothing should be done in opposition unto them or their Rule And if any of them are not contented with this measure but will forbid the observance of what he commands wherein he alone is concerned and not they this is left to be determined between him and them In the mean time when Rulers are not able to fancy much less give a real instance of any one Principle Doctrine or Practice in any of the Churches of Christ or any belonging unto them that is contrary unto or inconsistent with the Rights or exercise of their Rule and Government and yet shall not only prohibit the doing of those things which he hath commanded merely with respect unto the Spiritual and Eternal ends of his Kingdom but shall also punish and destroy those who will not disown his Authority and comply with their Prohibition it doth scarce answer their Interest and Prudence For to what purpose is it for any to provoke him who is mightier than they when they have no appearance of necessity for their so doing nor advantage thereby 2. In particular
of that Nation and by living within such Parochial Precincts as the Law of the Land hath Arbitrarily established are Members of this or that particular Congregation At least they are accounted so far to belong unto these Churches as to render them liable unto all outward punishments that shall be thought meet to be inflicted on them who comply not with them So far as these perswasions and actings according unto them do prevail so far are they destructive of the principal foundation of the external being and order of the Church But that mens joyning themselves in or unto any Church Society is or ought to be a voluntary act or an act of free choice in mere obedience unto the Authority and commands of Christ is so sacred a truth so evident in the Scripture so necessary from its subject matter so testifyed unto by the practice of all the first Churches as that it despiseth all opposition And I know not how any can reconcile the common practice of giving men the reputation or reality of being Members of or belonging unto this or that Church as unto total Communion who desire or chuse no such thing unto this acknowledged principle 5. There is a double joyning unto the Church 1. That which is as unto total Communion in all the duties and priviledges of the Church which is that whereof we treat 2. An adherence unto the Church as unto the means of Instruction and Edification to be attained thereby So persons may adhere unto any Church who yet are not meet or free on some present consideration to confederate with it as unto total Communion see Act. 5.13 14. And of this sort in a peculiar manner are the Baptized Children of the Members of the Church For although they are not capable of performing Church-Duties or enjoying Churchâ—priviledges in their tender years nor can have a right unto total Communion before the testification of their own voluntary consent thereunto and choice thereof yet are they in a peculiar manner under the care and inspection of the Church so far as the outward administration of the Covenant in all the means of it is committed thereunto and their duty it is according to their capacity to attend unto the Ministry of that Church whereunto they do belong 6. The Proposition respects a visible professing Church And I intend such a Church in general as avoweth Authority from Christ 1. For the Ministerial Preaching of the Word 2. Administration of the Sacraments 3. For the Exercise of Evangelical Discipline and 4. To give a publick testimony against the Devil and the world not contradicting their profession with any corrupt Principles or Practices inconsistent with it What is required in particular that any of them may be meet to be joyned unto such a Church we shall afterwards enquire 7. It is generally said that out of the Church there is no Salvation and the truth hereof is testified unto in the Scriptures Act. 2.47 1 Pet. 3.20 21. Matth. 16.18 Ephes. 5.26 27. Joh. 10.16 8 This is true both positively and negatively of the Catholick Church Invisible of the Elect All that are of it shall be saved and none shall be saved but those that belong unto it Ephes. 5.25 26 27. Of the Catholick visible professing Church negatively that no Adult person can be saved that doth not belong unto this Church Rom. 10.10 9. This Position of Truth is abused by Interest and Pride an enclosure of it being made by them who of all Christians in the world can lay the least and weakest claim unto it namely the Church of Rome For they are so far from being that Catholick Church out of which there is no Salvation and wherein none can perish like the Ark of Noah that it requires the highest charity to reckon them unto that visible professing Church whereof the greatest part may perish and do so undoubtedly 10. Our enquiry is what truth there is in this Assertion with respect unto these particular Churches or Societies for the celebration of Gospel-worship and Discipline whereof we treat And I say 1. No Church of what denomination soever can lay a claim unto this Priviledge as belonging unto itself alone This was the antient Donatism They confined Salvation unto the Churches of their Way alone And after many false charges of it on others it begins really to be renewed in our days For some dispute that Salvation is confined unto that Church alone wherein there is a Succession of Diocesan Bishops which is the height of Donatism The Judgments and Determinations made concerning the Eternal Salvation or Damnation of Men by the measures of some differences among Christians about Churches their State and Order are absurd foolish and impious and for the most part used by them who sufficiently proclaim that they know neither what it is to be saved nor do use any diligence about the necessary means of it Salvation depends absolutely on no particular Church-state in the world he knows not the Gospel who can really think it doth Persons of Believers are not for the Church but the Church is for them if the Ministry of Angels be for them who are Heirs of Salvation much more is the Ministry of the Church so If a man be an Adulterer an Idolater a Rayler a hater scoffer of Godliness if he choose to live in any known sin without Repentance or in the neglect of any known duty if he be ignorant and prophane in a word if he be not born again from above be he of what Church he will and whatsoever place he possess therein he cannot be saved And on the other side if a man believe in Christ Jesus that is know him in his Person Offices Doctrine and Grace trust unto him for all the ends of the wisdom and love of God towards Mankind in him if he endeavour to yield sincere and universal obedience unto all his commands and to be conformed unto him in all things following his example having for these ends received of his Spirit though all the Churches in the world should reject him yet he shall undoubtedly be saved If any shall hence infer that then it is all one of what Church any one is I answer 1. That although the being of this or that or any particular Church in the world will not secure the Salvation of any men yet the adherence unto some Churches or such as are so called in their constitution and worship may prejudice yea ruine the Salvation of any that shall so do 2. The choice of what Church we will joyn unto belongs unto the choice and use of the means for our Edification And he that makes no Conscience hereof but merely with respect unto the event of being saved at last will probably come short thereof 2. On this Supposition that there be no insuperable difficulties lying in the way of the discharge of this duty as that a person be cast by the providence of God into such a place or season as
deny Salvation unto all that abode in their Communion which the Donatists did with the greatest fierceness This was that which if any thing did truely and properly constitute them Schismaticks as it doth those also who deny at this day Church State and Salvation unto such Churches as have not Diocesan Bishops Now there is no Principle in the World that we do more abhor We grant a Church state unto all however it may be defective or corrupted and a possibility of Salvation unto all their Members which are not gathered in pernicious Errors overthrowing the Foundation nor Idolatrous in their Worship and who have a lawful Ministry with sufficient means for their Edification though low in its Measures and Degrees We judge none but with respect unto our own Duty as unto the Impositions attempted to be laid on us and the Acts of Communion required of us which we cannot avoid Nor can any man else let him pretend what he will to the contrary avoid the making of a Judgment for himself in these things unless he be brutish These things are sufficient to evidence that there is not the least countenance given unto the antient Schismes by any Principles of ours yet I shall add some farther Considerations on the Instances he gives unto the same Purpose The first is that the Novatians whose Pretences were the Discipline and Purity of the Churches wherein he says there was a Concurrence of Dr. O' s Pleas Zeal for Reformation of Discipline the greater Edificatian of the People and the asserting of their Right in choosing such a Pastor as was likely to promote their Edification I am sorry that Interest and Party should sway with learned Men to seek Advantages unto their Cause so unduly The story in short is this Novatus or Novatianus rather being disappointed in his ambitious Design to have been chosen Bishop of the Church of Rome Cornelius being chosen by much the Major Part of the Church betook himself to indirect means to weaken and invalidate the Election of Cornelius And this he did by raising a new Principle of false Doctrine whereunto he as falsly accommodated the Matter of Fact The Error he broached and promoted was that there was no place for Repentance such as whereon they should be admitted into the Church unto them who had fallen into sin after Baptisme nor as some add any Salvation to be obtained by them who had fallen in the time of Persecution This the antient Church looked on as a pestilent Heresie and as such was it condmened in a considerable Counsel at Rome with Cornelius Euseb. lib. 6. cap. 43 where also is reported the Decree which they made in the Case wherein they call his Opinion Cruel or inhumane and contrary to Brotherly Love As such it is strenuously confuted by Cyprian Epist. 82. ad Antonianum But because the Church would not submit unto this Novel false Opinion of his contrary to the Scripture and the Discipline of the Church he and all his Followers separated from all the Churches in the World and rebaptized all that were baptized in the Orthodox Churches they denying unto them the means of Salvation Cyprian ad Julian Epist. 73. Euseb. lib. 7. cap. 8. That which was most probably false also in Matter of Fact when this foolish Opinion which Dionysius of Alexandria in his Epistle to Dionysius of Rome calls a most profane Doctrine reflecting unmerciful cruelty on our most gracious Lord Jesus Christ Euseb. lib. 7. cap. 8. was invented to be subservient unto was that many of those by whom Cornelius was chosen Bishop were such as had denied the Faith under the Persecution of Decius the Emperor This also was false in Matter of Fact For although that Church continued in the antient Faith and practise of receiving penitents after their Fall yet there were no such number of them as to influence the Election of Cornelius So Cyprian testifieth Factus est Cornelius Episcopus de Dei Christi ejus judicio de Clericorum poene omnium Testimonio de suffragio Plebis c. Epist. 52. On that false Opinion and this frivolous Pretence they continued their Schisme Hence afterwards when Constantine the Emperor spake with Acesius the Bishop of the Novatians at Constantinople finding him sound in the Faith of the Trinity which was then impugned by Arius he asked him why then he did not communicate with the Church whereon he began to tell him a story of what had happened in the time of Decius the Emperor pleading nothing else for himself the Emperor replying only O Acesius set up a ladder and climb alone by thy self into Heaven left him Socrat. lib. 1 cap. 7. This Error endeavoured to be imposed on all Churches this false Pretence in Matter of Fact with the following Pride in the condemnation of all other Churches denying unto them the lawful use of the Sacraments and rebaptizing them who were baptized in them do if we may believe the Doctor herein contain all my Pleas for the forbearance of Communion with Parochial Assemblies and have countenance given unto them by our Principles and Practises Of the Meletians whom he reckons up in the next place no certain Account can be given Epiphanius reports Meletus himself to have been a Good honest Orthodox Bishop and in the Difference between him and Peter Bishop of Alexandria to have been more for Truth as the other was more for Love and Charity And according unto him it was Peter and not Meletus that began the Schisme Haeres 68. N. 2 3. But others give quite another account of him Socrates affirmes that in time of Persecution he had sacrificed to Idols and was for that Reason deposed from his Episcopacy by Peter of Alexandria Lib. 3. cap. 6. Hence he was enraged against him and filled all Thebais and Aegypt with Tumults against him and the Church of Alexandria with intolerable Arrogance because he was convicted of sundry Wickednesses by Peter Theod. Hist. lib. 1. cap. 8. And his Followers quickly complyed with the Arians for their Advantage The Error he proceeded on according to Epiphanius was the same with that of Novatus which how it could be if he himself had fallen in Persecution and Sacrificed as Socrates relates I cannot understand This Schisme of Bishop Meletius also it is thought meet to be judged that we should give Countenance unto All things are in like manner uncertain concerning Audus and his Followers whom he mentions in the next place The Man is represented by Epiphanius to have been a Good Man of an holy Life sound in the Faith full of Zeal and Love to the Truth But finding many things amiss in the Church among the Clergy and People he freely reproved them for Covetousness Luxury and Disorders in Ecclesiastical Affairs Hereon he stirred up the hatred of many against himself as Chrysostome did for the same cause afterwards at Constantinople Hereupon he was vexed persecuted and greatly abused all which he bare patiently and continued in
as one of the first depraved Inclinations of Mind that wrought in Ecclesiastical Rulers and which in the fourth and fifth Centuries openly proclaimed itself unto the scandal of Christian Religion there was a greater disposition in them unto a Deviation from the Original Institution Rule and Order of the Church no way suited unto the satisfaction of that Ambition then unto a Defection from the Purity of Faith and Worship which yet also followed 2. As the Inclination of many lay towards such a Deviation so their Interests lead them unto it and their Temptations cast them upon it For to acknowledge the Truth unto our Author and Others the Rule and Conduct of the Church the Preservation of its Order and Discipline according unto its first Institution and the Directions given in the Scripture about it are according unto our Apprehension of these things a Matter so weighty in itself so dangerous as unto its Issue attended with so many Difficulties Trials and Temptations laid under such severe Interdictions of Lordly Power or seeking either of Wealth or Dignity that no wise men will ever undertake it but meerly out of a sense of a Call from Christ unto it and in compliance with that Duty which he owes unto him It is no pleasant thing unto Flesh and Blood to be ingaged in the conduct and oversight of Christs Volunteers to bear with their manners to exercise all Patience towards them in their Infirmities and Temptations to watch continually over their walkings and conversation and thereon personally to exhort and admonish them all to search diligently and scrupulously into the Rule of the Scripture for their Warranty in every Act of their Power and Duty under all their Weaknesses and Miscarriagâ—s continuing an high valuation of them as of the Flock of God which he hath purchased with his own Blood with sundry other things of the like kind all under an abiding sense of the near approach of that great Account which they must give of the whole Trust and Charge committed unto them before the Judgment seat of Christ for the most part peculiarly exposed unto all manner of Dangers Troubles and Persecutions without the least encouragement from Wealth Power or Honour It is no wonder therefore if many in the Primitive times were willing gradually to extricate themselves out of this uneasie condition and to embrace all occasions and opportunities of introducing insensibly another Rule and Order into the Churches that might tend more unto the Exaltation of their own Power Authority and Dignity and free them in some measure from the weight of that important charge and continual care with labour which a diligent and strict Adherence unto the first institution of Churches and Rules given for their Order and Government in the Scripture would have obliged them unto And this was done accordingly until in the fourth and fifth Centuries and so onward the Bishops under various Titles began by their Arbitrary Rules and Canons to dispose of the Flock of Christ to part and divide them among themselves without their own knowledge or consent as if they had conquered them by the sword This Bishop shall have such a share and number of them under his Power and that other so many so far shall the Jurisdiction of one extend and so far that of another was the subject of many of their Decrees and Laws for the Rule of the Church But yet neither did they long keep within those Bounds and Limits which their more modest Ambition had at first prescribed unto them but took occasion from these Beginnings to contend among themselves about Preheminence Dignity and Power in which contest the Bishop of Rome at length remained Master of the Field thereby obtaining a second Conquest of the World 3. That there was such a gradual Deviation from the Original Institution of Churches their Order and Rule is manifest in the Event For the change became at length as great as the distance is between the Gospel and the Rule of Christ over his Church on the one hand and the Canon Law with the Pope or Antichrist set over the Church on the other This change was not wrought at once not in one Age but by an insensible Progress even from the Days of the Apostles unto those dark and evil times wherein the Popes of Rome were exalted into an absolute Tyranny over all Churches unto the satiety of their Ambition For 4. This Mistery of Iniquity began to work in the days of the Apostles themselves in the suggestions of Satan and the Lusts of Men though in a manner latent and imperceptible unto the wisest and best of Men. For that this Mistery of the Iniquity consisted in the effectual Workings of the Pride Ambition and other Vices of the Minds of Men excited enticed and guided by the craft of Satan until it issued in the Idolatrous persecuting State of the Church of Rome wherein all Church Rule Order and Worship of Divine Institution was utterly destroyed or corrupted we shall believe until we see an Answer given unto the learned Writings of all sorts of Protestants whereby it hath been proved These things are sufficient to Vindicate the Truth of the Assertion which the Doctor opposeth and to free it from his Exceptions But because as was observed before the supposition hereof is the foundation of all our present contests about Church Order and Rule I shall yet proceed a little farther in the Declaration of the Way and Manner whereby the Apostacy asserted was begun and carried on And I shall not herein insist on particular Instances nor make a Transcription of Stories out of antient Writers giving Evidence unto the Truth because it hath been abundantly done by others especially those of Magdeburg in the sixth and seventh Chapters of their Centuries unto whose Observations many other Learned men have made considerable Additions but I shall only treat in general of the Causes Ways and Manner of the Beginning and Progress of the Apostacy or Declension of Churches from their first Institution which fell out in the successive Ages after the Apostles especially after the End of the second Century until when Divine Institutions as unto the substance of them were preserved entire Decays in any kind even in things Natural and Political are hardly discernable but in and by their effects When an Hectick Distemper befalls the Body of any man it is oftimes not to be discerned until it is impossible to be cured The Roman Historian gives this advice unto his Readers after he hath considered the ways and means whereby the Empire came to its Greatness labente deinde disciplina velut dissidentes primo mores sequatur animo deinde ut magis magisque lapsi sint tum ire caeperint praecipites donec ad haec tempora anibus nec vitia nostra nec remedia pati possumus periculuâ— est Liv. Praefat. His words do not give us a more graphical Description of the Rise and Decay as unto Vertue and Vice
Negligence I comprize both the Ignorance Sloth Worldliness Decay in Gifts and Graces with Superstition in sundry Instances that in many of them were the causes of it Dr. Stil pleads that it is very unlikely that the People would forego their Interest in the Government of the Churches if ever they had any such thing without great Noise and Trouble For saith he Government is so nice and tender a thing that every one is so much concerned for his share in it that men are not easily induced to part with it Let us suppose the Judgement of the Church to have been Democratical at first as Dr. O. seems to do is it probable that the People would have been wheadled out of the sweetness of Government so soon and made no noise about it pag. 226. His Mistake about my Judgment herein hath been marked before No other Interest or share in the Government is ascribed by us unto the People but that they may be ruled by their own consent and that they may be allowed to yeild Obedience in the Church unto the commands of Christ and his Apostles given unto them for that End This Interest they neither did nor could forego without their own Sin and Guilt in neglecting the Exercise of the Gifts and Graces which they ought to have had and the Performance of the Duties whereunto they were obliged But for any ingagement on their Minds from the sweetness of Government wherein their concern principally consists in an understanding voluntary Obedience unto the commands of Christ they had nothing of it Take also in general Government to be as the Government of the Church is meerly a Duty Labour and Service without those Advantages of Power Ease Dignity and Wealth which have been annexed unto it and it will be hard to discover such a Nicety or Sweetness in it as to oblige unto Pertinacy in an adherence unto it If the Government of the Church were apprehended to consist in mens giving themselves wholly to the Word and Prayer in watching continually over the Flock in acurate carefulness to do and act nothing in the Church but in the Name and Authority of Christ by the Warranty of his Commands with a constant Exercise of all Gifts and Graces of the Holy Spirit which they have received in these and all other Duties of their Office and that without the least Appearance of Domination or the procuring of Dignity Secular Honours and Revenues thereby it may be a share and Interest in it would not be so earnestly coveted and sought after as at present it is Nor is there any more pertinency in his ensuing supposal of a change in the Government of the Congregational Churches in London in setting up one Man to rule over them all and to appoint their several Teachers c. p. 227. which could not be done without noise It is in vain to fear it Non isto vivimus illic quo tu vere Modo and impertinent in this case to suppose it For it speaks of a suddain total Alteration in the State Order and Rule of Churches to be made at once whereas our Discourse is of that which was gradual in many Ages by Degrees almost imperceptible But yet I can give no security that the Churches of our way shall not in process of time decline from their Primitive Constitution and Order either in their Power and Spirit in Faith and Love or in the outward Practice of them unless they continually watch against all Beginnings and Occasions of such Declensions and frequently renew their Reformation or if it be otherwise they will have better success then any Churches in the World ever yet had even those that were of the planting of the Apostles themselves as is manifested in the Judgment that our Lord Jesus Christ passed on them Rev. 2. and 3. The Negligence of the People which issued in their unfitness to be disposed of and ruled according to the Principles of the first Constitution of Church Order may be considered either as it gave occasion unto those lesser Deviations from the Rule which did not much prejudice the Faith and Order of the Churches or as it occasioned greater Alterations in the ensuing Ages And 1. The great and perhaps in some things excessive Veneration which they had of their Bishops or Pastors did probably occasion in them some neglect of their own Duty For they were easily induced hereon not only implicitely to leave the Mannagement of all Church Affairs unto them but also Zealously to comply with their Mistakes The Church of Smyrna giving an Account of the Martyrdom of holy Polycarpus tells us that when he ascended the Pile wherein he was to be burned that he pulled off his own cloths and endeavoured to pull off his shooes which he had not done before because the Faithful strove among themselves who should soonest touch his Body Euseb. lib. 4. cap. 15. I think there can be no Veneration due to a Man which was not so unto that great and holy Person But those who did so express it might easily be induced to place too much of their Religion in an implicite compliance with them unto whom they are so devoted Hence a Negligence in themselves as unto their particular Duties did ensue They were quickly far from esteeming it their Duty to say unto their Pastor or Bishop that he should take heed unto the Ministry which he had received in the Lord to fulfill it as the Apostle enjoyns the Colossians to say to Archippus their Pastor chap. 4.17 but begun to think that the Glory of obsequious Obedience was all that was left unto them And hence did some of the Clergy begin to assume to themselves and to ascribe unto one another great swelling Titles of Honour and names of Dignity amongst which the Blasphemous Title of His Holiness was at length appropriated unto the Bishop of Rome wherein they openly departed from Apostolical Simplicity and Gravity But these things fell out after the writing of the Epistle of Clemens of those of the Church of Vienna and Smyrna wherein no such Titles do appear 2. Many of the Particular Churches of the first Plantations encreasing greatly in the number of their Members it was neither convenient nor safe that the whole Multitude should on all occasions come together as they did at first to consult about their common concerns and discharge the Duties of their Communion For by Reason of Danger from their numerous Conventions they met in several Parcels as they had opportunity Herewith they were contented unless it were upon the greater occasions of choosing their Officers and the like whereon the whole Church met together This made them leave the ordinary Administration of all things in the Church unto the Elders of it not concerning themselves further therein but still continuing Members of the same particular Church It is altogether improbable what Platina from Damasus affirmes in the Life of Evaristus about the End of the first Century that he
second Century of any one Person who had the care of more Churches than one committed unto him or did take the charge of them on himself But whereas this change did fall out and appears evidently so to have done in the fourth Century we may briefly enquire into the Causes and Occasions of it Churches were originally planted in Cities and Townes for the most part not absolutely for the Word was preached and Churches gathered by the Apostles 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Clemens testifieth In such Cities there was but one Church whereunto all Beleivers did belong I mention this the rather because our present Author who is pleased frequently to mistake my Words and Principles affirms that the thing which I should have proved is that there were more Churches at first planted in one City than one I know not why I should be obliged to do so because I never said so I do believe indeed that there may be more particular Churches than one in one City and that sometimes it is better that it should be so then that all Beleivers in the same City should be kept up unto one Congregation to the Obstruction of their Edification But that there were originally or in the days of the Apostles more Churches than one in any one City or Town I do wholly deny though I grant at the same time there were Churches in Villages also as will appear afterwards But though there was one Church only in one Town or City yet all the Believers that belonged unto that Church did not live in that City but sundry of them in the Fields and Villages about So Justin Martyr tells us that on the first day of the week when the Church had its solemn Assemblies all the Members of it in the City and out of the Country the Fields and Villages about met together in the same place In process of time these Believers in the Country did greatly encrease by the means of the Ministry of the City-Church which diligently attended unto the Conversion of all sorts of men with some extraordinary helps besides But hereon the Example of the Apostles was overseen For on this account of the Conversion of many unto the Faith in the Towns and Villages of any Province they erected and planted new Churches among them not obliging them all unto that first Church from whence the Word went forth for their Conversion But those who succeeded them being hindred by many Reasons which may be easily recounted from Thoughts of the Multiplication of Churches chose rather to give the Beleivers scattered up and down in the Countrey occasional Assistance by Presbyters of their own than to dispose them into a Chrch State and Order But after a while their Number greatly encreasing they were necessitated to supply them with a constant Ministâ—y in several Parcels or Divisions The Ministers or Elders thus disposed amongst them for their Edification in the Administration of the Ordinances of the Gospel did still relate unto and depend upon that City first Church from whence they came But the Numbers of Beleivers dayly encreasing and a Succession of Presbyters in their distinct Assemblies being found necessary they came to be called Churches though continuing in dependance both for a supply of Officers and for Rule on the first or City Church whereunto they esteemed themselves to belong This was the way and manner of the Multiplication of Christian Assemblies throughout the Roman Empire And hereby all the Bishops of the first Churches became by common consent to have a distinction from and Preheminence above the Presbyters that were fixed in the Country and a Rule over those Assemblies or Churches themselves And therefore when they met together in the Council of Nice among the first things they decreed one was to confirm unto the Bishops of the great Cities that Power over the Neighbouring Churches which they had enjoyned from this occasional Rise and Constitution of them Hereby was a Difference and Distinction between Bishops and Presbiters between Mother and Dependant Churches introduced equally almost in all places without taking any notice of the departure which was therein from the Primitive Pattern and Institution But these things fell out long after the Days of the Apostles namely in the third and fourth Centuries there being no mention of them before But Secondly There was another Occasion of this Alteration which took place before that insisted on For in many of those City Churches especially when the number of Beleivers much encreased there were many Bishops or Elders who had the Rule of them in common This is plain in the Scripture and in the ensuing Records of Church Affairs And they had all the same Office the same Power and were of the same Order But after a while to preserve Order and Decency among themselves and in all their proceedings they chose one from among them who should preside in all Church Affairs for Orders sake unto whom after a season the name of Bishop began to be appropriated Whether the Rule they proceeded by herein was to choose them unto this Dignity who had been first converted unto the Faith or first called and ordained to be Presbyters or had respect unto the Gifts and Graces of those whom they chose is not certain But this way began in those Churches wherein some extraordinary Officer Apostle or Evangelist had long resided It cannot therefore be doubted but they had some Design to represent hereby somewhat of the Dignity of such an Officer and a Resemblance of the continuance of his Presence among them And this I suppose fell out early in the Churches though without Ground or Warrant And the Principal Pastors of other Churches which had not any great Number of Elders in them yet quickly assumed unto themselves the Dignity which the others had attained Justin Martyr in the Account he gives of the Church its Order Rule Worship and Discipline in his Days mentions one singular Person in one Church whom he calls 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 who presided in all the Affairs of the Church and himself administred all the sacred Ordinances every Lords Day unto the whole Body of the Church gathered and met out of the City and the Villages about This was the Bishop and if any one desired this Office he desired a good work as the Apostle speaks Whatever Accessions were made unto the Church these 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which were either the first converted to the Faith or the first ordained Presbyters or obtained their Preheminence non pretio sed Testimonio as Tertullian speaks upon the account of their Eminency in Gifts and Holiness were yet quickly sensible of their own Dignity and Praelation and by all means sought the enlargement of it supposing that it belonged unto the Honour and Order of the Church it self Under this State of things the Churches encreasing every day in Number and Wealth growing insensibly more and more indies magis magisque decrescente disciplina into a form and
state exceeding the bounds of their Original Institution and becoming unweildy as unto the Pursuit of their Ends unto mutual Edification it is not hard to conjecture how a stated Distinction between Bishops and Presbyters did afterwards ensue For as the first Elder Bishop or Pastor had obtained this small Preheminence in the Church wherein he did preside and the Assemblies of the Villages about so the Mannagement of those Affairs of the Church which they had in Communion with others was committed unto him or assumed by him This gave them the Advantage of meeting in Synods and Councils afterwards wherein they did their own Business unto the Purpose Hereon in a short time the People were deprived of all their Interest in the State of the Church so as to be governed by their own Consent which indeed they also had rendred themselves unmeet to enjoy and exercise other Elders were deprived of that Power and Authority which is committed unto them by Christ and thrust down into an Order or Degree inferior unto that wherein they were originally placed New Officers in the Rule of the Church utterly unknown to the Scripture and Primitive Antiquity were introduced all Charitable Donations unto the Church for the maintenance of the Ministry the Poor and the Redemption of Captives were for the most part abused to advance the Revenues of the Bishops such secular Advantages in Honour Dignity and Wealth were annexed unto Episcopal Sees as that Ambitious Men shamefully contested for the attaining of them which in the Instance of the bloody conflict between the Parties of Damasus and Vrsacius at Rome Ammianus Marcellinus an Heathen doth greatly and wisely reflect upon But yet all these Evils were as nothing in comparison of that dead Sea of the Roman Tyranny and Idolatry whereinto at last these bitter Waters ran and were therein totally Corrupted I thought also to have proceeded with an Account of the Declension of the Churches from their first Institution in their Matter Form and Rule â—ut because this would draw forth my Discourse beyond my present Intention I shall forbear having sufficiently vindicated my Assertion in this one Instance It is no Part of my Design to give an Answer at large unto the great Volume that Dr. Still hath written on this Occasion much less to contend about particular Sayings Opinions the Practises of this or that Man which it is filled withal But whereas his Treatise so far as the Merit of the Cause is concerned in it doth consist of two Parts the first whereof contains such Stories Things and Sayings as may load the Cause and Persons whom he opposeth with prejudices in the Minds of others in which endeavour he exceeds all Expectation and what doth more directly concern the Argument in hand I shall at the end of the ensuing Discourse speak distinctly unto all that is Material of the second sort especially so far as is needful unto the Defence of my former Vindication of the Non-conformists from the Guilt of Schisme For the things of the first sort wherein the Doctor doth so abound both in his Preface and in the first part of his Book as to manifest himself I fear to be a little too sensible of Provocation for the actings of Interest in wise Men are usually more sedate I shall only oppose some general considerations unto them without arguing or contending about Particulars which would be endless and useless And whereas he hath gathered up almost every thing that hath been done written or spoken to the Prejudice of the Cause and Persons whom he opposeth though frequently charged before adding the advantage of his Style and Method unto their Reinforcement I shall reduce the whole unto a few Heads which seem to be of the greatest importance I shall leave him without disturbance unto the satisfaction he hath in his own Love Moderation and Condescension expressed in his Preface Others may possibly call some things in it unto a farther Account But the first Part of his Book is cast under two Heads 1. A Commendation of the first Reformers and their Reformation with some Reflections upon all that acquiesce not therein as though they esteemed themselves wiser and better than they From this Topick proceed many severe Reflections and some Reproaches The other consists in a story of the Rise and Progress of Separation from the Church of England with great Miscarriages among them who first attempted it and the Opposition made unto them by those who were themselves Non-conformists The whole is closed with the Difference and Debate between the Divines of the Assembly of the Presbyterian way and the dissenting Brethren as they were then called Concerning these things the Discourse is so prolix and so swelled with long Quotations that I scarce believe any man would have the Patience to read over a particular Examination of it especially considering how little the Cause in hand is concerned in the whole Story whether it be told right or wrong candidly or with a Design to make an Advantage unto the Prejudice of others I shall therefore only mark something with respect unto both these heads of the first Part of the Book which if I mistake not will lay it aside from being of any Use in our present Cause 1. As unto the first Reformers and Reformation in the Days of King Edward the Plea from them and it which we have been long accustomed unto is that they were Persons Great Wise Learned Holy that some of them dyed Martyrs that the work of the Reformation was greatly owned and blessed of God and therefore our Non-acquiescency therein but desiring a farther Reformation of the Church then what they saw and judged necessary is unreasonable and that what we endeavour therein though never so peaceably is Schismatical But 1. None do more bless God for the first Reformers and the work they did than we do none have an higher Esteem of their Persons Abilities Graces and Sufferings than we have None cleave more firmly to their Doctrine which was the Life and Soul of the Reformation then we nor desire more to follow them in their Godly Design They are not of us who have declared that the Death of King Edward was an happiness or no unhappiness to the Church of England nor who have reflected on the Reformation as needless and given Assurance that if it had not been undertaken Salvation might have been obtained safely enough in the Church of Rome nor were they of us who have questioned the Zeal and Prudence of the Martyrs of those Days in Suffering We have other thoughts concerning them another kind of Remembrance of them 2. The Titles assigned unto them of Wise Learned Holy Zealous are fully answered by that Reformation of the Church in its Doctrine and Worship which God wrought by their Ministry so that none without the highest ingratitude can derogate any thing from them in these things But it is no disparagement unto any of the Sons of Men any Officers of
are at all concerned in the Rhetorical Discourse of Dr. Still concerning the first Reformers and their Reformation neither do we at all delight in reflecting on any of the Defects of it desiring only the Liberty avowed on Protestant Principles in the Discharge of our own Duty Nor Secondly Are we any more concerned in the long story that ensues about the Rise and Progress of Separation from the Church of England with the Mistakes of some in Principles and Miscarriages in Practise who judged it their Duty to be Separate For as in our refraining from total Communion with the Parochial Assemblies of the Church of England we proceed not on the same Principles so we hope that we are free from the same Miscarriages with them or any of an alike Nature But it is also certain that after the great Confusion that was bâ—ought on the whole State and Order of the Church under the Roman Apostacy many of those who attempted a Reformation fell into different Opinions and Practises in sundry things which the Papists have made many a long story about We undertake the Defence only of our own Principles and Practises according unto them Nor do we esteem our selves obliged to justifie or reflect on others And it were no difficult Task to compose a Story of the proceedings of some in the Church of England with reference unto these Differences that would have as ill an Aspect as that which is here reported Should an Account be given of their unaccountable Rigor and Severity in that through so many years yea Ages they would never think of the least Abatement of their Impositions in any one Instance though acknowledged by themselves indifferent and esteemed by others unlawful although they saw what woful Detriment arose to the Churches thereby Yea how instead thereof they did to the last of their Power make a Progress in the same course by attempting new Canons to enflame the Difference and encreased in Severities towards all Dissenters should an Account be given of the Silencings Deprivings Imprisonings by the High Commission Court and in most of the Diocesses of the Kingdom of so great Numbers of Godly Learned Faithful Painful Ministers to the unspeakable disadvantage of the Church and Nation with the Ruine of the most of them and their Families the Representation of their Names Qualifications evident usefulness in the Ministry with the Causes of their Sufferings wherein the Observance of some Ceremonies was openly preferred before the Edification of the Church and a great Means of the Conversion of Souls would give as ill a Demonstration of Christian Wisdom Love Moderation Condescension Zeal for the Propagation of the Gospel as any thing doth on the other hand in the History before us It would not be omitted on such an Occasion to declare what Multitudes of pious peaceable Protestants were driven by their Severities to leave their Native Country to seek a Refuge for their Lives and Liberties with freedom for the Worship of God in a Wilderness in the Ends of the Earth and if it be said that what some did herein they did in discharge of the Duties of their Office I must say I shall hardly acknowledge that Office to be of the Institution of Christ whereunto it belongs in a way of Duty to ruine and destroy so many of his Disciples for no other cause but a desire and endeavour to serve and worship him according unto what they apprehend to be his Mind revealed in the Gospel Should there be added hereunto an Account of the Administration of Ecclesiastical Discipline in the Courts of Chancellors Commissaries Officials and the like as unto the Authority and Causes with the way and manner of their proceedings in the exercise of their Jurisdiction with the woful Scandals that have been given thereby with an Addition of sundry other things which I will not so much as mention I suppose it would as much conduce unto Peace and Reconciliation among Protestants as the Story here given us by our Author But setting aside the Aggravations of things gathered out of Controversial Writings wherein few men do observe the due Rules of Moderation but indulge unto themselves the Liberty of severe Censures and sharp Reflections on them they do oppose the Sum and Truth of the Story concerning these things may be reduced into a narrow Compass For 1. It is certain that from the first dawning of the Reformation in this Nation there were different Apprehensions among them that jointly forsook the Papacy as unto its Doctrine and Worship about the State Rule Order and Discipline of the Church with sundry things belonging unto its Worship also I suppose this will not be denyed 2. There doth not remain any Record of a due Attempt and Endeavour for the composing these Differences before one certain way was established by those in Power And whereas the State and condition wherein they were at that time from the confusions about Religion that were then abroad and the pertinaciousness of the Generality of the People in an Adherence unto their old ways and Observances in Religion with a great Scarcity in able Ministers the greatest part of the Bishops and Clergy disliking the whole Reformation they found themselves as they judged necessitated to make as little Alteration in the present state of things as was possible so as to keep up an Appearance of the same things in the Church which had been in former use On these Grounds the State and Rule of the Church was continued in the same form and posture that it was before under the Papacy the Authority of the Pope only being excluded and the Power of disposal of Ecclesiastical Affairs usurped by him declared to be in the King So also in imitation of that Book of Worship and Service which the People had been accustomed unto another was established with the Ceremonies most obvious unto popular Observation 3. This Order was unsatisfactory unto great Numbers of Ministers and others who yet considering what the necessity of the Times did call for did outwardly acquiesce in it in several Degrees in hopes of a farther Reformation in a more convenient season Nor did they cease to plead and press for it by all quiet and peaceable meanes abstaining in the mean time from the use of the Ceremonies and full compliance with Episcopal Jurisdiction 4. Hereon those who were for the Establishment having secured their Interests therein and obtained Power began after a while to Oppress Excommunicate Silence Deprive and Imprison those who dissented from them and could not come up unto a full practical compliance with their Institutions and Rules Yet the Generality of those so silenced and deprived abode in Privacy under their Sufferings hoping for a Reformation at one time or another without betaking themselves unto any other Course for the Edification of themselves or their People 5. After sundry years some men partly silenced and deprived as unto their Ministry and partly pursued with other Censures and Penalties began
Preservation of Church Peace and Unity All the Dispute is whether we keep unto this Rule of Christ or no wherein we are ready at any time to put our selves upon the Trial being willing to Teach or Learn as God shall help us Secondly We say that this Rule in general is the Rule of Faith Love and Obedience contained and revealed in the Scripture and in particular the Commands that the Lord Christ hath given for the Order and Worship that he requires in his Churches It may seem strange to some that we should suppose the due Observance of the Rule of Faith Love and Obedience that is of Faith real and unfeigned Love fervent and without Dissimulation and of Universal gracious Evangelical Obedience to be necessary unto the Preservation of Church Peace and Unity But we do affirm with some confidence that the only real Foundation of them doth lye herein nor do we value that Ecclesiastical Peace which may be without it or is neglective of it Let all the Christian World or those therein who concern themselves in us Know that this is our Principle and our Judgment that no Church Peace or Vnity is valued by or accepted with Jesus Christ that is not founded in that doth not arise from and is the effect of a diligent Attendance unto and Observance of the entire Gospel Rule of Faith and Obedience In the Neglect hereof Peace is is but Carnal Security and Unity is nothing but a Conspiracy against the Rule of Christ. Add hereunto in particular the due Observation of what the Lord Christ hath appointed to be done and observed in his Churches as unto their Order Rule and Worship and they who walk according unto this Rule need not fear the Charge of Schisme from the fiercest of their Adversaries Wherefore we say Thirdly Those who recede from this Rule in any material Branch of it are guilty of the Breach of Church Vnity according to the Measure of their Exorbitancy As suppose that any Preach Teach or Profess Doctrines that are contrary to the form of wholesome Words especially with reference unto the Person Offices and Grace of Christ which are the Subject of Doctrines purely Evangelical they break the Peace of the Church and we are bound to separate or withdraw Communion from them which is a Means of preserving the true Peace and Unity of the Church Speciosum quidem est Nomen Pacis pulchra Opinio Vnitatis sed quis ambigat eam solam unicam Ecclesiae Pacem esse quae Christi est saith Hilary Suppose that men retain a Form of Godliness in the Profession of the Truth but deny the Power of it acting their habitual Lusts and Corruptions in a vitious Conversation they overthrow the Foundation of the Churches Unity and we are obliged from such to turn away The like may be said of those who live in a constant neglect of any of the Commands of Christ with respect unto the Order Rule and Worship of the Church with a contempt of the Means appointed by him for their Edification All these according unto the Measures of their Deviations from the Rule of Christ do disturb the Foundation of all Church Peace and Unity And therefore we say Fourthly That Conscience is immediately and directly concerned in no other Church Vnity as such but what is an effect of the Rule of Christ given unto that End We know what is spoken concerning Obedience unto the Guides and Rulers of the Church which is a part of the Rule of Christ. But we know withal that this Obedience is required of us only as they teach us to observe and do all that he hath commanded for other Commission from him they have none When this Rule is forsaken and another substituted in the room of it as it quickly diverts the Minds of Men from a Conscientious Attendance unto that Rule of Christ as the only means of Church Vnity so that other doth either proceed from mens secular Interests or may easily be accommodated thereunto And whereas the Lines of it must be drawn in the Feilds of pretended Indifferencies and real Arbitrariness it will be the cause of endless Contentions whilst whatever some think themselves to have Power to appoint others will judge themselves to have Liberty to refuse Fifthly It is Vnity of Christs Appointment that Schism respects as a Sin against it and not Vniformity in things of Mens Appointment And Lastly Those who charge Schisme on others for a dissent from themselves or the refraining of Total Communion with them must 1. Discharge themselves of the Charge of it in a consistence with their charge on them For we find as yet no Arrows shot against us but such as are gathered up in the Feilds shot at them that use them out of the Roman Quiver Neither will it avail them to say that they have other manner of Reason for their Separation from the Church of Rome than any we have for our withdrawing Communion from them For the Question is not what Reasons they have for what they do but what Right and Power they have to do it namely to separate from the Church whereof they were constituting a new Church state of their own without the consent of that Church and against the Order and Authority of the same 2. Require no Communion but by vertue of the Rule before declared In no other are we concerned with respect unto the Peace and Unity of the Church 3. Give a farther Confirmation than what we have yet seen unto the Principles or Presumptions they proceed upon in the Mannagement of the Charge of Schisme As that 1. Diocesan Bishops with their Metropolitans are of Divine Institution 2. That the Power of Rule in and over all Churches is committed unto them alone 3. That the Church hath Power to ordain Religious Rites and Ceremonies no where prescribed in the Scripture and impose the Observation of them on all Members of the Church 4. That this Church they are 5. That no Mans Voluntary Consent is required to constitute him a Member of any Church but that every one is surprized into that state whether he will or no. 6 That there is nothing of force in the Arguments pleaded for Non-compliance with Arbitrary unnecessary Impositions 7. That the Church standeth in no need of Reformation neither in Doctrine Discipline nor Conversation with sundry other things of an alike Nature that they need unto their Justification But yet when all is done it will appear that mutual Forbearance first removing Animosities then administring Occasion of inoffensive Converse unto the revival of decayed Affections leading unto sedate Conferences and Considerations of a more entire conjunction in the things whereunto we have attained will more conduce unto Universal Peace and Gospel Unity than the most fierce contentions about things in difference or the most vehement Charges of Schisme against Dissenters But I must return to the Argument and shall add something giving Light into the Nature of Schism from an
Instance in the Primitive Churches That which is first in any kind gives the Measure of what follows in the same kind and Light into the Nature of them Whereas therefore the Schisme that was among the Churches about the Observation of Easter was the first that fell out unto the Disturbance of their Communion I shall give a breif account of it as far as the Question in hand is concerned in it It is evident that the Apostles did with care and diligence teach the Doctrine of Christian Liberty warning the Disciples to stand fast in it and not submit their Necks unto any Yoke of Bondage in the things of the Worship of God especially the Apostle Paul had frequent Occasions to treat of this subject And what they taught in Doctrine they established and confirmed in their Practice For they enjoyned nothing to be observed in the Church but what was necessary and what they had the Command of Christ for leaving the Observation of things indifferent unto their Original Indifferency But whereas they had decreed by the Direction of the Holy Ghost some necessary Condescensions in the Gentile Believers towards the Jews in case of Offence or Scandal they did themselves make use of their Liberty to comply with the same Jews in some of their Observances not yet unlawful Hereon there ensued in several Churches different Observations of some Rites and Customes which they apprehended were countenanced by the Practise of the Apostles at least as it had been reported unto them For immediately after the Decease of the Apostles very many Mistakes and Vntruths were reported concerning what they said did and practised which some diligently collected from Old Men it may be almost delirant as Eusebius gives an Instance in Papias lib. 3. cap. 36. And even the great Irenaeus himself was imposed upon in a Matter directly contrary to the Scripture under a Pretence of Apostolical Tradition Among those Reports was that of the Observation of Easter And for a while the Churches continued in these different Observances without the least disturbance of their Communion each one following that which it thought the most probable Tradition for Rule of Scripture they pretended not unto But after a while they began to fall into a Contest about these things which began at Laodicea which Church was as likely to strive about such things as any other For Eusebius tells us that Melito the Bishop of Sardis wrote two Books about Easter beginning the first with an Account that he wrote them when Servilius Paulus was Proconsul there being then a great stir about it at Laodicea Euseb. lib. 4. cap. 25. But as it falls out on such Occasions much talk and disputing ensuing thereon the differences were encreased until one side or Party at Variance would make their Opinion and Practise the Rule and Terms of Communion unto all other Churches But this was quickly condemned by those who were Wise and Sober For as Zozoman affirmes they accounted it a frivolous or foolish thing to differ about a Custom whereas they agreed in all the principal Heads of Religion And thereon he gives a large Account of different Rites and Observances in many Churches without any breach of Communion among them adding that besides those enumerated by him there were many others in Cities and Villages which they did in a different manner adhere unto Hist. lib. 7. cap. 19. At length this Matter fell into the handling of Victor Bishop of Rome And his Judgment was that the Observation of Easter on the Lords Day and not on the fourteenth day of the first Month precisely according to the Computation of the Jews in the Observation of the Passover was to be imposed on all the Churches of Christ every where It had all along until his time been judged a thing indifferent wherein the Churches and all Believers were left unto the use of their own Liberty He had no pretence of any Divine Institution making it necessary the Writers of those days constantly affirming that the Apostles made no Canons Rules or Laws about such things He had Persons of as great Worth as any in the World as Melito Polycrates Polycarpus that opposed him not only as unto the Imposition of his Practice on others but as unto his Error as they judged in the Matter of Fact and Right Yet all this could not hinder but that he would needs have the Reputation of the Father of Schismes among the Churches of Christ by his Impositions and cut off all the Asian Churches from Communion declaring them and their Members Excommunicate Euseb. lib. 5. cap. 23. The Noise hereof coming abroad unto other Churches great Offence was taken at it by many of them and Victor was roundly dealt withal by sundry of them who agreed with him in Practise but abhorred his Imposition of it and making it a Condition of Church Communion Among those who so opposed and rebuked him Irenaeus was the most Eminent And I shall observe some few things out of the Fragment of his Epistle as it is recorded by Euseb. lib. 5. cap. 23. And 1. He tells us that he wrote unto Victor in the name of those Brethren in France whom he did preside amongst The Custom of considering things of this Nature with all the Brethren of the Church and writing their Determination in their Name was not yet grown out of use though the Practise of it now would be esteemed Novel and Schismatical 2. He tells Victor that there were great varieties in this thing as also in the Times and Seasons of Fasting which did not saith he begin or arise in our days but long before was introduced by such who being in Places of Rule rejected and changed the common and simple Customs which the Church had before The Dr. therefore need not think it so strange that an Alteration in Church Order and Rule should fall out in after Ages when long before Irenaeus's time such Changes were begun 3. He gives hereon that excellent Rule 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Difference of Fastings and consequently things of an alike Nature commends the Concord or Agreement of Faith This was the first Effect of a Departure from the only Rule of Unity and Communion among the Churches which was given by Christ himself and his Apostles As hereby great Confusion and Disorder was brought upon the Churches so it was the first publick inroad that was made on the Doctrine of the Scripture concerning Christian Liberty And as it was also the first Instance of rejecting Men otherwise found in the Faith from Communion for Non-Conformity or the Non-Observance of Humane Institutions or Traditions which had therein an unhappy Consecration unto the use of future Ages so it was the first notorious Entrance into that Usurpation of Power in the Roman Bishops which they carried on by degrees unto an absolute Tyranny Neither was there ever a more pernitious Maxime broached in the Primitive Times nor which had a more effectual Influence into the Ruine
ways and means countenanced with the least semblance or appearance of Truth to load the Non-Conformists and their Cause with the Imputation of things invidious and burdensome should fix upon their Prayers by vertue of the Grace and Gift of Prayer which they have received ascribing the Original of its Vse unto the Artifice and Insinuation of the Jesuites as he doth Pref. pag. 14 15. But because I look on this as a thing of the greatest importance of all the Differences between them and us as that wherein the Life of Religion the Exercise of Faith and the Labour of Divine Love do much consist the Nature and Necessity of that kind of Prayer which is here reflected on and opposed shall God willing be declared and vindicated in a peculiar Discourse unto that Purpose For the Differences that are between us cannot possibly have any more pernicious consequence then if we should be influenced by them to oppose or condemn any Principles or Exercise of the Duties of Practical Holiness as thinking them to yeild matter of advantage to one Party or another The great pains he hath taken in his Preface to prove the Non-conformists to have been the means of furthering and promoting Popery in this Nation might as I suppose have been omitted without aâ—â— disadvantage unto himself or his Cause For the thing it self is not true as it is utterly impossible to affect the Minds or Consciences of the Non-conformists with a sense of it because they have a thousand witnesses in themselves against the Truth of the Charge so it is impossible it should be believed by any who are in the least acquainted with their Principles or have their Eyes open to see any thing that is doing at this day in Religion But as there are many palpable Mistakes in the account he gives of things among our selves to this Purpose so if on the other hand any should out of Reports Surmizes Jesuites Letters and Politicks particularly those of Contzen Books written to that purpose against them Agreement of Principles notorious compliance of some Bishops and others of the same way with the Papists some dying avowedly such Stories of what hath been said at Rome and elsewhere which are not few nor unproveable concerning the Inclinations of many unto a fair composition of things with the Church of Rome the deportment of some before and since the Discovery of the Plot with such other Topicks as the Discourse of our Author with respect unto the Non-conformists will furnish them withal as also from the woful Neglect there hath been of instructing the People in the Principles of Religion so as to implant a sense of the Life and Power of it on their Souls with all things that may be spoken on that Head with reference unto the Clergy under their various distributions with the casting out of so great number of Ministers who they knew in their own Conscience to be firmly fixed against Popery and its Interest in this Nation and could not deny but they might be useful to instruct the People in the Knowledge of the Truth and encourage them by their Example unto the Practice of it if any I say should on these and the like grounds not in a way of Recrimination nor as a Requital of the Drs. Story but meerly as a necessary Part of the Defence of their own Innocency charge the same guilt of giving occasion unto the growth encrease and danger of Popery in this Nation on the Episcopal Party I know not now how they could be well blamed for it nor what will be done of that kind For they who will take Liberty to speak what they please must be content sometimes to hear what will displease For my part I had rather if it were possible that these things at present might be omitted and that all those who are really united in opposition unto Popery as I am assured in particular that this Reverend Author and I am would rather consider how we might come out of the danger of it wherein we are then at present to contest how we came unto it This I speak seriously and that under the consideration of this Discourse which upon the Account of sundry Mistakes in Matter of Fact of great Defects in point of Charity with a design to expose others unto reproach for their great Crimes of being willing to be a little freed from being beaten fined punished and imprisoned by their means and on their Accounts is as apt to excite new Exasperations and to provoke the Spirits of them concerned as any I have read of late However the Defence of our own Innocency must not be forsaken But Cumque superba foret Babylon spolianda Trophaeis It is not Praise-worthy to abide in these contests beyond Necessity This Discourse indeed of the Reverend Author is encreased into so large a Volume as might justly discourage any from undertaking the Examination of it who hath any other necessary Duties to attend unto But if there be separated from it the consideration of Stories of Things and Persons long since past wherein we are not concerned with the undue Application of what was written by some of the Antients against the Schismes in their days unto our present Differences as also the Repetition of a Charge that we do not refrain Communion from the Parochial Churches on the Grounds and Reasons which we know to the contrary that we do with the Report and Quotations of the Words and Sayings of Men by whose Judgement we are not determined with frequent Diversions from the Question by attempting Advantages from this or that passage or Expression in one or another and the Rhetorical Aggrevations of things that might be plainly expressed and quickly issued and the controversie may be reduced into a narrower Compass It is acknowledged that the Differences which are amongst Protestants in this Nation are to be bewailed because of the Advantages which the Common Enemy of the Protestant Interest doth endeavour to make thereby Howbeit the Evil Consequences of them do not arise from the Nature of the things themselves but from the Interests Prejudices and byassed Affections of them amongst whom they are Nor shall any man ever be able to prove but that on the Doctrinal Agreement which we all profess provided it be real we may notwithstanding the Differences that remain enjoy all that Peace and Union which are prescribed unto the Churches and Disciples of Christ provided that we live in the exercise of that Love which he enjoyneth us which whilst it continues in the Profession of the same Faith it is impossible there should be any Schisme among us Wherefore whereas some are very desirous to state the Controversie on this supposition that there is a Schisme among us and issue it in an Enquiry on which side the blame of it is to be laid wherein they suppose they need no farther Justification but the Possession of that Church State which is Established by Law I shall willingly forego
their Rule but left that unto the Discretion and Authority of men as they think meet when they have outward Power for their Warranty But if by these particular Appointments and Framings of Churches with their Order men are disposed of as unto their spiritual concernments beyond the Obligation of the Light of Nature or the moral â—aw We must yet enquire who gave them this Right and Title to make this disposal of them 2. Authority As Right and Title respect the Persons of men to be reduced into a new form of Government so Authority respects the Rules â—aws Orders and Statutes to be made prescribed and established whereby the Priviledges of this new Society are conveyed and the Duties of it enjoyned unto all that are taken unto it Earthly Potentates who will dispose of men into a State and Government absolutely new unto them as unto all their temporal Concernments of Life Liberty Inheritances and Possessions so as that they shall hold all of them in dependance on and according unto the Rules and Laws of their New Government and Kingdom must have these two things namely Right and Title unto the Persons of men which they have by Conquest or an absolute Resignation of all their Interests and Concerns into their disposal and Authority thereon to constitute what Order what kind of State Rule and Government they please without these they will quickly find their Endeavours and Undertakings frustrate The Gospel Church-State in the Nature of it and in all the Laws and Constitution of it is absolutely new whereunto all the World are naturally Forreigners and Strangers As they have no Right unto it as it containeth Priviledges so they have no obligation unto it as it prescribes Duties Wherefore there is need of both those Right as unto the Persons of men and Authority as unto the Laws and Constitution of the Church unto the framing of it And until men can pretend unto these things both unto this Right and Authority with respect unto all the Spiritual and Eternal Concernments of the Souls of others they may do well to consider how dangerous it is to invade the Right and Inheritance of Christ and leave hunting after an Interest of Power in the the framing or forming Evangelical Churches or making of Laws for their Rule and Government This Authority is not only ascribed unto Jesus Christ in the Scripture but it is enâ—â—â—sed unto him so as that no other can have any Interest in it See Mat. 28.18 Rev. 3.7 Isa. 9.6 7 By vertue hereof he is the only Lawgiver of the Church Jam. 4.12 Isa. 22.22 There is indeed a Derivation of Power and Authority from him unto others but it extends itself no farther save only that they shall direct teach and command those whom he sends them unto to do and observe what he hath commanded Matth. 28.20 He builds his own House and he is over his own House Heb. 3.3 4 5 6. He both constitutes its State and gives Laws for its Rule The Disorder the Confusion the turning of the Kingdom of Christ upside down which have enâ—ued upon the Usurpation of men taking upon them a Legislative Power in and over the Church cannot easily be declared For upon a slight Pretence no way suited or serviceable unto their ends of the Advice given and Determination made by the Apostles with the Elders and Brethren of the Church of Jerusalem in a temporary Constitution about the use of Christian Liberty the Bishops of the 4 th and 5 th Centuries took upon themselves Power to make Laws Canons and Constitutions for the ordering of the Government and the Rule of the Church bringing in many new Institutions on a Pretence of the same Authority Neither did others who followed them cease to build on their sandy Foundation until the whole frame of the Church-State was altered a new Law made for its Government and a new Christ or Antichrist assumed in the head of its Rule by that Law For all this pretended Authority of making Laws and Constitutions for the Government of the Church issued in that Sink of Abominations which they call the Canon-Law Let any man but of a tolerable understanding and freed from infatuating prejudices but read the Representation that is made of the Gospel Church State its Order Rule and Government in the Scripture on the one hand and what Representation is made on the other of a Church State its Order Rule and Government in the Canon Law the only effect of mens assuming to themselves a Legislative Power with respect unto the Church of Christ if he doth not pronounce them to be contrary as Light and Darkness and that by the latter the former is utterly destroyed and taken away I shall never trust to the use of men's Reason or their Honesty any more This Authority was first usurped by Synods or Counsels of Bishops Of what use they were at any time to declare and give Testimony unto any Article of the Faith which in their daies was opposed by Hereticks I shall not now enquire But as unto the exercise of the Authority claimed by them to make Laws and Canons for the Rule and Government of the Church It is to be bewailed there should be such a Monument left of their Weakness Ambition Self-Interest and Folly as there is in what remaineth of their Constitutions Their whole endeavour in this kind was at best but the building of Wood Hay and Stubble on the Foundation in whose Consumption they shall suffer loss although they be saved themselves But in making of Laws to bind the whole Church in and about things useless and trivial no way belonging to the Religion taught us by Jesus Christ in and for the Establishment or Encrease of their own Power Jurisdiction Authority and Rule with the extent and bounds of their several Dominions in and for the Constitution of new Frames and States of Churches and new ways of the Government of them in the Appointment of new Modes Rites and Ceremonies of Divine Worship with the Confusions that ensued thereon in mutual Animosities Fightings Divisions Schisms and Anathematisms to the horrible Scandal of Christian Religion they ceased not until they had utterly destroyed all the Order Rule and Government of the Church of Christ yea the very nature of it and introduced into its room a carnal worldly Church-State and Rule suited unto the Interests of Covetous Ambitious and Tyrannical Prelates The most of them indeed knew not for whom they wrought in providing Materials for that Babel which by an hidden skill in a Mystery of Iniquity was raised out of their Provisions For after they were hewed and carved shaped formed and guilded the Pope appeared in the Head of it as it were with those words of his mouth Is not this great Babylon that I have built for the House of the Kingdom by the might of my Power and for the Honour of my Majesty This was the fatal Event of mens invading the Right of Christ and
Peace and Order as the light of Nature directs unto that where many have a common Interest they ought to consult in common for the due management of it with other things of the like Importance are evident Dictates of this Light and Law Now whatever Church-State may be superinduced by Divine Institution yet this Light and Law in all their evident Dictates continue their obliging Power in and over the minds of men and must do so eternally Wherefore things that belong hereunto need no new Institution in any Church-State whatever But yet 2. Whatever is required by the Light of Nature in such Societies as Churches as useful unto their Order and conducing unto their end is a Divine Institution The Lord Christ in the Institution of Gospel Churches their State Order Rule and Worship doth not require of his Disciples that in their Observance of his Appointments they should cease to be men or forego the Use and Exercise of their rational Abilities according to the Rule of that Exercise which is the Light of Nature Yea because the Rules and Directions are in this case to be applied unto things Spiritual and of meer Revelation he giveth Wisdom Prudence and Understanding to make that Application in a due manner unto those to whom the Guidance and Rule of the Church is committed Wherefore as unto all the things which the Light of Nature directs us unto with respect unto the observation of the Duties prescribed by Christ in and unto the Church we need no other Institution but that of the use of the especial spiritual Wisdom and Prudence which the Lord Christ gives unto his Church for that end 4. There are in the Scripture general Rules directing us in the Application of natural Light unto such a Determination of all circumstances in the Acts of Church Rule and Worship as are sufficient for their performance decently and in order Wherefore as was said before it is utterly in vain and useless to demand express Institution of all the circumstances belonging unto the Government Order Rule and Worship of the Church or for the due improvement of things in themselves indifferent unto its Edification as occasion shall require Nor are they capable to be any otherwise stated but as they lye in the light of Nature and spiritual Prudence directed by general Rules of Scripture These things being premised our principal Assertion is That Christ alone is the Author Institutor and Appointer in a way of Authority and Legislation of the Gospel Church-State its Order Rule and Worship with all things constantly and perpetually belonging thereunto or necessary to be observed therein What is not so is of men and not from Heaven this is that which we have proved in general and shall farther particularly confirm in our Progress Hence 6. There is no spiritual use nor benefit of any Church-State nor of any thing therein performed but what on the part of men consists in Acts of Obedience unto the Authority of Christ. If in any thing we do of this nature we cannot answer that enquiry which God directs in this case to be made namely why we do this or that thing Exod. 12.25 26 27. with this that it is because Christ hath required it of us we do not acknowledge him the Lord over his own House nor hear him as the Son Nor is there any Act of Power to be put forth in the Rule of the Church but in them by whom it is exerted it is an Act of Obedience unto Christ or it is a meer Usurpation All Church Power is nothing but a Faculty or Ability to obey the Commands of Christ in such a way and manner as he hath appointed For it is his Constitution that the Administration of his solemn Worship in the Church and the Rule of it as unto the observance of his commands should be committed unto some Persons set apart unto that end according unto his appointment This is all their Authority all that they have of Order or Jurisdiction or by any other ways whereby they are pleased to express it And where there is any Gospel Administration any Act of Rule or Government in the Church which those that perform it do not give an evidence that they do it in Obedience unto Christ it is null as unto any Obligation on the Consciences of his Disciples The neglect hereof in the World wherein many in the Exercise of Church Discipline or any Acts that belong unto the Rule of it think of nothing but their own Offices whereunto such Powers are annexed by humane Laws and Canons as enable them to Act in their own names without designing Obedience unto Christ in all that they do or to make a just representation of his Authority Wisdom and love thereby is ruinous unto Church Order and Rule 7. There is no Legislative Power in and over the Church as unto its Form Order and Worship left unto any of the Sons of men under any qualification whatever For 1. There are none of them who have an Interest in those Rights Qualifications and Endowments which are necessary unto an Investiture into such a Legislative Power For what was given and granted unto Christ himself unto this end that he might be the Law giver of the Church must be found also in them who pretend unto any Interest therein Have they any of them a Right and Title unto a disposal of the Persons of Believers in what way they please as unto their Spiritual and Eternal concernments Have they Soveraign Authority over all things to change their Moral Nature to give them new uses and significations to make things necessary that in themselves are indifferent and to order all those things by Soveraign Authority in Laws obliging the consciences of men And the like may be said of his Personal Qualifications of Faithfulness Wisdom Love and Care which are ascribed unto him in this work of giving Laws unto his Churches as he was the Lord over his own House 2 The Event of the Assumption of this Legislative Power under the best pretence that can be given unto it namely in Councils or great Assemblies of Bishops and Prelates sufficiently demonstrates how dangerous a thing it is for any man to be ingaged in For it issued at length in such a constitution of Churches and such Laws for the Government of them as exalted the Cannon Law into the room of the Scripture and utterly destroyed the true Nature of the Church of Christ and all the Discipline required therein 3. Such an Assumption is derogatory unto the Glory of Christ especially as unto his Faithfulness in and over the House of God wherein he is compared unto and preferred above Moses Heb. 3.3 4 5 6. Now the Faithfulness of Moses consisted in this that he did and appointed all things according to the Pattern shewed him in the Mount That is all whatever it was the Will of God to be revealed and appointed for the Constitution Order Rule and Worship of his
Church for their Work was to call gather and erect it out of the World But no ordinary Officers can be or ever were ordained but to a Church in Being Some say they are ordained unto the universal visible Church of Professors some unto the particular Church wherein their Work doth lye but all grant that the Church-State whereunto they are ordained is antecedent unto their Ordination The Lord Christ could and did ordain Apostles and Evangelists when there was yet no Gospel Church for they were to be the Instruments of its Calling and Erection But the Apostles neither did nor could ordain any ordinary Officers until there was a Church or Churches with respect whereunto they should be ordained It is therefore highly absurd to ascribe the continuation of the Church unto the successive Ordination of Officers if any such thing there were seeing this successive Ordination of Officers depends solely on the continuation of the Church If that were not secured on other Foundations this successive Ordination would quickly tumble into dust Yea this successive Ordination were there any such thing appointed must be an Act of the Church it self and so cannot be the means of communicating Church Power unto others A successive Ordination in some sense may be granted namely that when those who were ordained Officers in any Church do dye that others be ordained in their steads but this is by an Act of Power in the Church it self as we shall manifest afterwards 2. Not to treat of Papal succession the limiting of this successive Ordination as the only way and means of Communicating Church Power and so of the Preservation of the Church-State unto Diocesan Prelates or Bishops is built on so many inevident Presumptions and false Principles as will leave it altogether uncertain whether there be any Church-State in the World or no. As 1 That such Bishops were ordained by the Apostles which can never be proved 2 That they received Power from the Apostles to ordain others and Communicate their whole Power unto them by an Authority inherent in themselves alone yet still reserving their whole Power unto themselves also giving all and retaining all at the same time which hath no more of Truth than the former and may be easily disproved 3 That they never did nor could any of them forfeit this Power by any crime or error so as to render their Ordination invalid and interrupt the succession pretended 4 That they all ordained others in such manner and way as to render their Ordination valid whereas multitudes were never agreed what is required thereunto 5 That whatever Heresy Idolatry Flagitiousness of life Persecution of the true Churches of Christ these Prelatical Ordainers might fall into by whatever Arts Simoniacal Practices or false Pretences unto what was not they came themselves into their Offices yet nothing could deprive them of their Right of Communicating all Church Power unto others by Ordination 6 That Persons so ordained whether they have any call from the Church or no whether they have any of the Qualifications required by the Law of Christ in the Scripture to make them capable of any Office in the Church or have received any Spiritual Gifts from Christ for the Exercise of their Office and Discharge of their Duty whether they have any Design or no to persue the ends of that Office which they take upon them yet all is one being any way Prelatically ordained Bishops they may ordain other and so the successive Ordination is preserved And what is this but to take the Rule of the Church out of the hand of Christ to give Law unto him to follow with his Approbation the actings of men besides and contrary to his Law and Institution and to make Application of his Promises unto the vilest of men whether he will or no. 7 That it is not lawful for Believers or the Disciples of Christ to yield Obedience unto his Commands without this Episcopal Ordination which many Churches cannot have and more will not as judging it against the Mind and Will of Christ. 8 That one Worldly Ignorant Proud sensual Beast such as some of the Heads of this successive Ordination as the Popes of Rome have been should have more Power and Authority from Christ to preserve and continue a Church-State by Ordination than any the most holy Church in the World that is or can be gathered according to his mind with other unwarrantable Presumptions innumerable 3. The pernicious consequences that may ensue on this Principle do manifest its Inconsistency with what our Lord Jesus Christ hath ordained unto this end of the continuation of his Church I need not reckon them upon the surest Probabilities There is no room left for fears of what may follow hereon by what hath already done so If we consider whither this successive Ordination hath already led a great part of the Church we may easily judge what it is meet for It hath I say led men for Instance in the Church of Rome into a Presumption of a good Church-State in the loss of Holiness and Truth in the Practice of false Worship and Idolatry in the Persecution and Slaughter of the faithful Servants of Christ unto a State plainly Antichristian To think there should be a Flux and Communication of Heavenly and Spiritual Power from Jesus Christ and his Apostles in and by the hands and Actings of Persons ignorant Simoniacal Adulterous Incestuous Proud Ambitious Sensual presiding in a Church-State never appointed by him immersed in false and Idolatrous Worship persecuting the true Church of Christ wherein was the true succession of Apostolical Doctrine and Holiness is an Imagination for men who embrace the shadows and appearances of things never once seriously thinking of the true nature of them In brief it is in vain to derive a Succession whereon the Being of the Church should depend through the presence of Christ with the Bishops of Rome who for an 100 years together from the year 900 to a 1000 were Monsters for Ignorance Lust Pride and Luxury as Baronius acknowledgeth A. D. 912.5.8 Or by the Church of Antioch by Samosatenus Eudoxius Gnapheus Severus and the like Hereticks Or in Constantinople by Macedonius Eusebius Demophilus Anthorinus and their Companions Or at Alexandria by Lucius Dioscurus Aelurus Sergius and the rest of the same sort 4. The principal Argument whereby this conceit is fully discarded must be spoken unto afterwards And this is the due consideration of the proper subject of all Church-Power unto whom it is originally formally and radically given and granted by Jesus Christ. For none can communicate this Power unto others but those who have received it themselves from Christ by vertue of his Law and Institution Now this is the whole Church and not any Person in it or Prelate over it Look whatever constitutes it a Church that gives it all the Power and Priviledge of a Church for a Church is nothing but a Society of professed Believers enjoying all Church Power
and Priviledges by vertue of the Law of Christ. Unto this Church which is his Spouse doth the Lord Christ commit the Keys of his House by whom they are delivered into the hands of his Stewards so far as their Office requires that Trust. Now this which we shall afterwards more fully confirm is utterly inconsistent with the committing of all Church Power unto one Person by vertue of his Ordination by another Nothing that hath been spoken doth at all hinder or deny but that where Churches are rightly constituted they ought in their Offices Officers and Order to be preserved by a successive Ordination of Pastors and Rulers wherein those who actually preside in them have a particular Interest in the orderly communication of Church-Power unto them CHAP. IV. The Especial Nature of the Gospel Church-State appointed by Christ. THE Principal Enquiry which we have thus far prepared the way unto and whereon all that ensues unto it doth depend is concerning the especial Nature of that Church-State Rule and Order which the Lord Christ hath Instituted under the Gospel of what sort and kind it is And hereunto some things must be premised 1. I design not here to oppose nor any way to consider such Additions as men may have judged necessary to be added unto that Church-State which Christ hath appointed to render it in their apprehension more useful unto its ends than otherwise it would be Of this sort there are many things in the World and of a long season have been so But our present Business is to prove the Truth and not to disprove the conceits of other men And so far as our Cause is concerned herein it shall be done by it self so as not to interrupt us in the declaration of the Truth 2. Whereas there are great contests about Communion with Churches or Separation from them and mutual charges of Impositions and Schisms thereon they must be all regulated by this Enquiry namely what is that Church State which Christ hath prescribed Herein alone is Conscience concerned as unto all Duties of Ecclesiastical Communion Neither can a chaâ—ge of Schism be managed against any but on a supposition of Sin with respect unto that Church-State and Order which Christ hath appointed A Dissent from any thing else however pretended to be useful yea advantageous unto Church Ends must come under other prudential considerations All which shall be fully proved and vindicated from the exceptions of Dr. St. 3. There have been and are in the World several sorts of Churches of great Power and Reputation of several Forms and Kinds yet contributing Aid to each other in their respective stations As 1 The Papal Church which pretends it self to be Catholick or Universal comprehensive of all true Believers or Disciples of Christ united in their Subjection unto the Bishop of Rome 2 There were of old and the shadow of them is still remaining Churches called Patriarchal first 3 then 4 then 5 of them whereinto all other Churches and professed Christians in the Roman World were distributed as unto a Dependance on the Authority and Subjection to the Jurisdiction and Order of the Bishops of 5 principal Cities of the Empire who were thereon called Patriarks 3 Various Divisions under them of Archiepiscopal or Metropolitical Churches and under them of those that are now called Diocesan whose bounds and limits were fixed and altered according to the Variety of Occasions and Occurrences of things in the Nations of the World What hath been the Original of all these sorts of Churches how from Parochial Assemblies they grew up by the Degrees of their Descent now mentioned into the height and center of Papal Omnipotency hath been declared elsewhere sufficiently 4. Some there are who plead for a National Church-State arising from an Association of the Officers of particular Churches in several Degrees which they call Classical and Provincial until it extend it self unto the limits of an whole Nation that is one civil Body depending as such on its own supreme Ruler and Law I shall neither examine nor oppose this Opinion there hath been enough if not too much already disputed about it But 5. The visible Church-State which Christ hath instituted under the New Testament consists in an especial Society or Congregation of professed Believers joyned together according unto his Mind with their Officers Guides or Rulers whom he hath appointed which do or may meet together for the celebration of all the Ordinances of Divine Worship the professing and authoritatively proposing the Doctrine of the Gospel with the Exercise of the Discipline prescribed by himself unto their own mutual Edification with the Glory of Christ in the Preservation and Propagation of his Kingdom in the World The things observable in this Description and for the farther Declaration of it are 1 The Material cause of this Church or the Matter whereof it is composed which are visible Believers 2 The formal Cause of it which is their voluntary Coalescency into such a Society or Congregation according to the mind of Christ. 3 The End of it is presential local Communion in all the Ordinances and Institutions of Christ in Obedience unto him and their own Edification 4 In particular these ends are 1 The Preaching of the Word unto the Edification of the Church it self and the Conversion of others 2 Administration of the Sacraments or all the Mystical Appointments of Christ in the Church 3 The Preservation and Exercise of Evangelical Discipline 4 Visibly to profess their Subjection unto Christ in the World by the observation of his commands 5 The Bounds and Limits of this Church are taken from the number of the Members which ought not to be so Small as that they cannot observe and do all that Christ hath commanded in due Order nor yet so Great as not to meet together for the Ends of Institution of the Church before mentioned 6 That this Church in its compleat State consists of Pastors or a Pastor and Elders who are its Guides and Rulers and the Community of the Faithful under their Rule 7 That unto such a Church and every one of them belongs of Right all the Priviledges Promises and Power that Christ doth give and grant unto the Church in this World These and sundry other things of the like Nature shall be afterwards spoken unto in their Order according unto the Method intended in the present Discourse Two things I shall now proceed unto 1 To prove that Christ hath appointed this Church-State under the Gospel namely of a particular or single Congregation 2 That he hath appointed no other Church State that is inconsistent with this much less that is destructive of it 1. Christ appointed that Church-State which is meet and accommodated unto all the ends which he designed in his Institution of a Church But such alone is that Church Form and Order that we have proposed In Christs Institution of the Church it was none of his ends that some men might be thereby advanced to
Example of the Primitive Churches that succeeded unto those which were planted by the Apostles themselves and so may well be judged to have walked in the same way and Order with them And that which we alledge is That in no approved Writers for the space of 200 years after Christ there is any mention made of any other Organical visibly professing Church but that only which is Parochial or Congregational A Church of any other Form State or Order Papal or Oecumenical Patriarchal Metropolitical Diocesan or Classical they know not Neither Name nor thing nor any of them appear in any of their Writings Before I proceed unto the Confirmation of this Assertion by particular Testimonies I shall premise some things which are needful unto the right understanding of what it is that I intend to prove by them As 1. All the Churches at first planted by the Apostles whether in the greatest Cities as Jerusalem Antioch Corinth Rome c. or those in the meanest Villages of Judea Galilee or Samaria were as unto their Church-State in Order Power Priviledge and Duty every way equal not Superior or Inferior not ruling over or subject unto one another No Institution of any Inequality between them no Instance of any Practice Supposing it no Direction for any compliance with it no one word of intimation of it can be produced from the Scripture nor is it consistent with the nature of the Gospel Church-State 2. In and among all these Churches there was one and the same spirit one Hope of their Calling one Lord one Faith one Baptism whence they were all obliged mutually to seek and endeavour the Good and Edification of each other To be helpful to one another in all things according unto that which any of them had received in the Lord. This they did by Prayer by Advice and Counsel by Messengers sent with Salutations Exhortations Consolations supplies for the Poor and on all the like occasions By these means and by the exercise of that mutual Love and Care which they were obliged unto they kept and preserved Vnity and Communion among themselves gave a common Testimony against any thing that in Doctrine or Practice deviated from the Rule and Discipline of Christ. This Order with Peace and Love thereon continued among them until Pride Ambition Desire of Rule and Preheminence in Diotrephes and a multitude of the same spirit with him began to open a door unto the entrance of the Mystery of Iniquity under pretence of a better Order than this which was of the appointment of Christ. 3. It must be acknowledged that notwithstanding this Equality among all Churches as unto their State and Power that there were great Differences between them some real and some in Reputation which not being rightly managed proved an Occasion of evil in and unto them all For Instance 1. Some were more eminent in spiritual Gifts than others As this was a Priviledge that might have been greatly improved unto the Honour of Christ and the Gospel yet we know how it was abused in the Church of Corinth and what Disorders followed thereon so weak and frail are the best of men so liable unto Temptation that all Preheminence is dangerous for them and often abused by them which I confess makes me not a little admire to see men so earnestly pleading for it so fearlesly assuming it unto themselves so fiercely contending that all Power and Rule in the Church belongs unto them alone But 2. Reputation was given unto some by the long abode of some of the Apostles in them Of this Advantage we find nothing in the Scripture But certain it is it was much pleaded and contended about among the Primitive Churches yea so far until by Degrees Disputes arose about the Places where this or that Apostle fixed his Seat which was looked on as a Preheminence for the present and a security for the future But yet we know how soon some of them degenerated from the Church Order and Discipline wherein they were instructed by the Apostles see Rev. chap. 2. and 3. 3. The Greatness Power Fame or Civil Authority of the Place or City where any Church was planted gave it an Advantage and Priviledge in Reputation above others And the Churches planted in such Cities were quickly more numerous in their Members than others were unless men strictly kept themselves unto the force of Primitive Institutions it was very hard for them to think and Judge that a a Church it may be in a small Village or Town in Galilee should be Equal with that at Hierusalem or at Antioch or afterwards at Rome itself The Generality of men easily suffered themselves to be persuaded that those Churches were advanced in State and Order far above the other obscure poor Congregations That there should be a Church at Rome the Head City of the world was a Matter of great Joy and Triumph unto many and the Advancement of it in Reputation they thought belonged unto the Honour of our Religion Howbeit there is not in the Scripture the least regard expressed unto any of these things of place number or possibility of outward splendor either in the Promises of the Presence of Christ in and with his Churches or in the Communication of Power Priviledges unto them Yet such an improvement did this foolish Imagination find that after those who presided in the Churches called in the principal Cities had tasted of the sweetness of the bait which lay in the Ascription of a Preheminence unto them they began openly to claim it unto themselves and to usurp Authority over other Churches Confirming their own Usurpation by Canons and Rules until a few of them in the Council of Nice began to divide the Christian world among themselves as if it had been been Conquered by them Hence proceeded those shameful contests that were among the greater Prelates about their Preheminency and hence arose that Pretence of the Bishops of Rome unto no less a Right of Rule and Dominion over all Christian Churches than the City had over all the Nations and Cities of the Empire which being carried on by all sorts of evil Artifices as by downright Forgeries shameless Intrusions of themselves impudent laying hold of all Advantages unto their own exaltation prevailed at length unto the utter ruine of all Church Order and worship There is no sober History of the rise and growth by several Degrees of any City Commonwealth or Empire that is filled with so many Instances of ambitious seeking of Preheminence as our Church stories are By this Imagination were the generality of the Prelates in those dayes induced to introduce and settle a Government in and among the Churches of Christ answering unto the Civil Government of the Roman Empire As the Civil Government was cast into National or Diocesan or Provincial in less or greater Divisions each of which had its Capital City the place of the Residence of the chief Civil Governour so they designed to frame an Image of
the surprizals of Temptations not consented to not delighted or continued in your labour or contention of spirit 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as the Apostle speaks 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Col. 2.1 was night and day in your Prayers for the whole Brotherhood that is especially of their own Church itself that the number of Gods Elect might be saved in mercy through a good Conscience towards him This was their state this was their Liturgie this their practice 1. There was on all the Members of the Church a plentiful effusion of the Holy Spirit in his Gifts and Graces wherein it may be respect is had unto what was affirmed by the Apostle before of the same Church 1 Cor. 1.4 5 6 7. the same Grace being yet continued unto them 2. By vertue of this Effusion of the Spirit on all of them their Wills and Affections being sanctifyed their minds were enabled to pour forth fervent prayers unto God 3. They were not such as lived in any open sin or any secret sin known to be so but were only subject unto involuntary surprizals whose pardon they continually prayed for 4. Their love and sense of duty stirred them up to labour mightily in their Prayers with fervency and constancy for the Salvation of the whole Fraternity of Elect Believers whether throughout the world or more especialâ—y those in and of their own Church He that should ascribe these things unto any of those Churches which now in the world claim to be so only would quickly find himself at a loss for the proof of what he asserts Did we all sedulously endeavour to reduce and restore Churches unto their primitive state and frame it would bring more glory to God than all our contentions about Rule and Domination 4. It is certain that the Church of Corinth was fallen into a sinful excess in the Deposition and Rejection of their Elders whom the Church at Rome judged to have presided among them laudably and unblameably as unto their whole walk and work amongst them And this they did by the suggestion of two or three envious discontented persons and as it is probable from some digressions in the Epistle tainted with those Errors which had formerly infested that Church as the denial of the Resurrection of the flesh which is therefore here reflected on But in the whole Epistle the Church is nowhere reproved for assuming an Authority unto themselves which did not belong unto them It seems what Cyprian afterwards affirmed was then acknowledged namely that the right of choosing the worthy and of rejecting the unworthy was in the Body of the People But they are severely reproved for the abuse of their Liberty and Power For they had exercised them on ill grounds by ill means for ill ends and in a most unjust cause He therefore exhorts the Body of the Church to return unto their duty in the Restauration of their Elders and then prescribes unto them who were the first occasion of Schism that every one would subject themselves unto the restored Presbyter and say 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I will do the things appointed or commanded by the Multitude the Church in the generality of its Members The Plebs the Multitude the Body of the fraternity in the Church 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as they were often called in the Scripture Act. 4.32 Chap. 6.2 5. Chap. 15.12 30. had then Right and Power to appoint things that were to be done in the Church for Order and Peace I do not say they had it without or in distinction from their Officers Rulers and Guides but in a concurrence with them and subordination to them whence the Acts concluded on may be esteemed and are the Acts of the whole Church This order can be observed or this can fall out only in a Congregational Church all whose Members do meet together for the discharge of their Duties and Exercise of their Discipline And if no more may be considered in it but the miscarriage of the people without any respect to their Right and Power yet such Churches as wherein 't is impossible that that should fall out in them as did so fall out in that Church are not of the same kind or order with it But for the sake of them who may endeavour to reduce any Church-state into its Primitive Constitution that they may be cautioned against that great Evil which this Church in the exercise of their supposed liberty fâ—ll into I cannot but transcribe a few of those excellent words which are used plentifully with cogent Reasons in this Epistle against it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 It is shameful beloved exceeding shameful which is reported of you that the most firm and antient Church of the Corinthians should for the sake of one or two persons seditiously tumultuate against their Elders And herein he proceeds to declare the dreadful scandal that ensued thereon both among Believers and Infidels The Instruction also which he adds hereunto is worthy the remembrance of all Church Members 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 It is blessed Advice for all Church-Members that he gives Let a man be faithful let him be powerful in knowledge or the Declaration of it let him be wise to judge the Words or Doctrines let him be chast or pure in his works the greater he seems to be the more humble he ought to be that so the Church may have no trouble by him nor his Gifts But to return 5. Having occasion to mention the Officers of the Church he nameth only the two ranks of Bishops and Deacons as the Apostle also doth Phil. 1.1 speaking of the Apostles he says 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Preaching the word through Regions and Cities they appointed the first fruits as the House of Stephan as was the first fruits of Achaia who therefore addicted themselves to the Ministry of the Saints 1 Cor. 16.15 or the first Converts to the Faith after a Spiritual Trial of them as unto their fitness for their work to be Bishops and Deacons of them that should afterwards believe Where there were as yet but a few converted the Apostle gathered them into Church-order and so soon as they found any fit among them appointed and ordained them to be Bishops and Deacons so that provision might be made for the guidance and conduct of them that should be converted and added unto them after they were left by the Apostles These Bishops he affirms to be and have been the Presbyters or Elders of the Church even the same with those deposed by the Corinthians in the same manner as the Apostle doth Act. 20.28 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. It is no small sin in us to reject or cast off them who have offered the Gifts or discharged the Duties of Episcopacy holily and without blame Blessed are the Elders who went before namely as he expresseth it because they are freed from that amotion from their Office which those Elders now amongst them had undergone after they had
duely discharged the Office of Episcopacy Other distinction and difference of ordinary Officers besides that of Bishops or Elders and Deacons the Church at Rome in those days knew not Such ought to be in every particular Church Of any one single person to preside over many Churches which is necessary unto the Constitution of a Church-state distinct from that which is Congregational Clemens knew nothing in his days but gives us such a description of the Church and its order as is inconsistent with such a pretence 6. I shall add no more from this excellent Epistle but only the account given in it of the first constitution of Officers in the Churches 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Our Apostles therefore knowing by our Lord Jesus Christ that there would contention arise about the name of Episcopacy that is Episcopacy itself For this cause being indued with a perfect foresight of things they appointed those fore-mentioned their first Converts unto the Office of the Ministry for the future describing or giving order about the course of the Ministry that other approved men might succeed them in their Ministry These Elders therefore who were so appointed by them and afterwards by other famous men with the consent of the whole Church c. Sundry things we may observe in this Discourse 1. The Apostles foresaw there would be strife and contention about the name of Episcopacy that is the Office itself and those who should possess it This Episcopacy was that Office which the deposed Elders had well discharged in the Church of Corinth This they might foresee from the nature of the thing itself the inclination of men unto preheminence and the instance they had seen in their own days in such as Diotrephes with the former Divisions that had been in this very Church about their Teachers 1 Cor. 1.12 But moreover they were instructed in the knowledge of it by our Lord Jesus Christ through his Divine Spirit abiding with them and teaching them all things This therefore they sought by all means to prevent and that two ways 1. In that for the first time themselves appointed approved persons unto the Office of the Ministry not that they did it of themselves without the consent and choice of the Church whereunto any of them were appointed for this was directly contrary unto their practice Act. 1.15 22 23 26. Chap. 6.3 Chap. 14.23 But that the peace and edification of the Churches might be provided for they themselves spiritually tryed and approved of fit persons so to lead the Church in their choice Wherefore that which is added afterwards of the consent of the whole Church is to be referred unto those who were ordained by the Apostles themselves 2. They gave Rules and Orders namely in their Writings concerning the Offices and Officers that were to be in the Church with the way whereby they should be substituted into the place and room of them that were deceased as we know they have done in their Writings 3. After this was done by the Apostles other excellent persons as the Evangelists did the same These assisted the Churches in the Ordination and Choice of their Officers according unto the Rules prescribed by the Apostles And I know not but that the eminent Pastors of other Churches who usually gave their assistance in the setting apart and Ordination of others unto the Ministry be intended I have insisted long on this Testimony being led on by the Excellency of the writing itself Nothing remains written so near the times of the Apostles nor doth any that is extant which was written afterwards give such an Evidence of Apostolical Wisdom Gravity and Humility Neither is there in all Antiquitie after the writings of the Apostles such a Representation of the State Order and Rule of first Evangelical Churches And it is no small prejudice unto the pretensions of future Ages that this Apostolical person handling a most weighty Ecclesiastical cause makes not the least mention of such Offices Power and Proceedings as wherein some would have all Church-rule and order to consist The Epistle of Polycarpus and the Elders of the Church at Smyrna with him unto the Church of the Philippians is the next on Roll of Antiquity Nothing appears in the whole to intimate any other Church-state or Order than that described by Clemens The Epistle is directed unto the whole Church at Philippi not unto any particular Bishop 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This was the usual style of those days so was it used as we have seen by Clemens 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so it was used presently after the death of Polycarpus by the Church at Smyrna in the account they gave unto other Churches of his death and Martyrdome 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And the same was the Inscription of the Epistle of the Churches at Vienna and Lyons in France unto the Churches in Asia and Phrygia as we shall see immediately And these are plain Testimonies of that Communion among the Churches in those days which was held in and by the Body of each Church or the Community of the Brotherhood which is a clear demonstration of their State and Order And those whom the Apostle writing to the Philippians calls their Bishops and Deacons Polycarpus calls their Presbyters and Deacons It behoves you saith he unto the Church there to abstain from these things 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 being subject unto the Elders and Deacons Nor doth he mention any other Bishop among the Philippians And it may be observed that in all these Primitive Writings there is still a distinction made after the Example of the Scripture between the Church and the Guides Rulers Bishops or Elders of it And the name of the Church is constantly assigned unto the Body of the People as distinct from the Elders nowhere to the Bishops or Elders as distinct from the people though the Church in its compleat state comprehendeth both sorts Unto this time that is about the year 107 or 108 do belong the Epistles ascribed unto Ignatius if so be they were written by him For Polycarpus wrote his Epistle unto the Philippians after Ignatius was carried to Rome having wrote his Epistle before in Asia Many are the Contests of Learned Men about those Epistles which remain whether they are genuine or the same that were written by him for that he did write Epistles unto sundry Churches is acknowledged by all And whereas there have in this Age been two Copies found and published of these Epistles wherein very many things that were obnoxious unto just exception in those before published do not at all appear yet men are not agreed which of them ought to be preferred and many yet deny that any of them were those written by Ignatius I shall not interpose in this contest only I must say that if any of his genuine Writings do yet remain yet the Corruption and Interpolation of them for many Ages must needs much impair the Authority of what is represented in them as his nor am
I delivered from these thoughts by the late either more sound or more maimed Editions of them And the truth is the corruption and fiction of Epistolical Writings in the first Ages was so intolerable as that very little in that kind is preserved sincere and unquestionable Hence Dionysius the Bishop of Corinth complained that in his own time his own Epistles were so corrupted by additions and detractions so as that it seems he would have them no more esteemed as his Euseb. Ecclesiast Hist. lib. 4. cap. 22. But yet because these Epistles are so earnestly contended for by many Learned men as the genuine Writings of Ignatius I shall not pass by the consideration of them as unto the Argument in hand I do therefore affirm that in these Epistles in any Edition of them there is no mention made or Descâ—iption given of any Church or Churches state but only of that which is Congregational that is such a Church as all the Members whereof did meet and were obliged to meet for Divine Worship and Discipline in the same place What was the Distinction they observed among their Officers of what fort they were and what number belongs not unto our present enquiry our concernment is only this that they did preside in the same particular Church and were none of them Bishops of more Churches than one or of any Church that should consist of a Collection or Association of such particular Churches as had no Bishops properly so called of their own All these Epistle that is the seven most esteemed were written as that of Clemens unto the Bodies or whole fraternity of the Churches unto whom they are directed in distinction from their Bishops Elders and Deacons excepting only that unto Polycarpus which is unto a single person Under that consideration namely of the entire fraternity in distinction from their Officers doth he address unto them and therein doth he ascribe and assign such Duties unto them as could not be attended unto nor performed but in the Assembly of them all Such is the direction he gives unto the Church of the Philadelphians how and in what manner they should receive penitents returning unto the Church that they might be encouraged into that Duty by their Benignity and Patience And many things of the like nature doth he deal with them about And this Assembling together in the same place namely of the whole Church he doth frequenâ—ly intimate and express Some instances hereof we may repeat 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Meet all of you together in the same place let there be one Prayer in common of all Epist. ad Magnes This direction can be given unto no other but a particular Church And again to the Philadelphians 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Where your Pastor is there follow you as sheep And how they may do so is declared immediately afterwards 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I write with confidence unto your Godly Love and perswade you to use one Faith or the confession of it one Preaching of the Word and one Eucharist or Administration of the holy Sacrament For the flesh of Christ is one and the Blood of Christ that was shed for us in one one Bread is broken to all and one Cup distributed among all there is one Altar to the whole Church and one Bishop with the Presbytery and the Deacons my fellow servants Nothing can be more evident than that it is a particular Church in its Order and Assembly for Worship in one place that he describes nor can these things be accommodated unto a Church of any other form And towards the end of the Epistle treating about the Churches sending their Bishops or others on their occasions he tells them in particular 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 It becometh you as a Church of God to choose or appoint a Bishop who may perform the Embassy of God that it may be granted unto them to glorifie the name of God being gathered together in one place It is somewhat difficult how the Church of Philadelphia should choose or ordain a Bishop at this time For they had one of their own whom Ignatius greatly extols in the beginning of the Epistle Nor was it in their power or duty to choose or ordâ—in a Bishop for the Church of Antioch which was their own right and duty alone nor had the Church of Antioch any the least dependance on that at Philadelphia It may be he intends only their Assistance therein as immediately before he ascribes the peace and tranquillity of the Antiochians unto the Prayers of the Philadelphians For my part I judge he intends not the proper Bishop of either place but some Elder which they were to choose as a Messenger to send to Antioch to assist them in their present condition For in those days there were persons chosen by the Churches to be sent abroad to assist other Churches on the like occasions These were called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2 Cor. 8.23 the especial Apostles of the Churches as vers 19. it is said of Luke that he was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 chosen and appointed by the Churches for the service there mentioned Such was this Bishop who was sent on Gods Errand to assist the Church by his Advice and Counsel as unto the continuance of their Assemblies unto the glory of God though at present their Bishop was taken from them In that Epistle unto the Ephesians he lets them know that he rejoyced at their 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 their numerous Multitude whom he perswades and urgeth unto a common concurrence in Prayer with their Bishop 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And if the Prayers of one or two be so effectual that they bring Christ among them how much more will the consenting Prayer of the Bishop and the whole Church together So he again explains his mind towards the end of the Epistle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Do your diligence to meet together frequently for when you frequently meet together in the same place the powers of Sathan are destroyed And many other expressions of the like nature occur in those Epistles We are no way at present concerned in the controversie about that distinction of Bishops and Presbyters which the Writer of those Epistles doth assert this only I say that he doth in none of them take the least notice or give the least intimation of any Church-state but such alone wherein the Members of the whole Church did constantly meet together in the same place for the worship of God and Communion among themselves And not only so but he every where in all his Epistles to them ascribes such Duties and Rights unto the Churches as cannot be observed and preserved but in particular Churches only Nor doth he leave any room for any other Church-state whatever Although therefore there might have been and probably there was some Alterations in the Order of the Churches from what was of Primitive Institution yet was there as yet no such change in
place unto all the Members of it was a particular Congregation 6. The things that he ascribeth unto this Leader to be done at this general meeting of the Church every Lords day were 1. That he prayed 2. That after the reading of the Scripture he preached 3. That he consecrated the Eucharist the Elements of the Bread and Wine being distributed by the Deacons unto the Congregation 4. That he closed the whole Worship of the day in prayer 7. In the Consecration of the Sacramental Elements he observes that the President prayed at large giving thanks to God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 So vain is the pretence of some that in the Primitive times they consecrated the Elements by the Repetition of the Lords prayer only After the participation of the Eucharist there was a Collection made for the poor as he describeth it at large what was so gathered being committed to the Pastor who took care for the distribution of it unto all sorts of poor belonging unto the Church Hereunto was added as Tertullian observes the Exercise of Discipline in their Assemblies whereof we shall speak afterwards The close of the Administration of the Sacrament Justin gives us in these words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Pastor again according to his ability or power poureth forth or sends up prayers the people all joyfully crying Amen c. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is as Origen expounds the Phrase often used by himself 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 lib. 8. ad Cels. according unto the present Ability given unto him This was the state the Order and the Worship of the Church with its Method in the days of Justin Martyr This and no other is that which we plead for Unto these times belongs the most excellent Epistle of the Churches of Vienna and Lyons in France unto the Brethren in Asia and Phrygia recorded at large by Eusebius Hist. lib. 5. cap 1. Their design in it is to give an account of the holy Martyrs who suffered in the persecution under Marcus Antoninus I am no way concerned in what state Irenaeus was in the Church at Lyons whereon after the writing of this Epistle he was sent to Eleutherius the Bishop of Rome which he gives an account of Chap. 4. He is indeed in that Epistle called a Presbyter of the Church although as some suppose it was sundry years after the death of Pothinus whom they call Bishop of Lyons into whose room he immediately succeeded And Eusebius himself cap. 8. affirming that he would give an account of the Writings of the antient Ecclesiastical Presbyters in the first place produceth those of Irenaeus But these things belong not unto our present contest The Epistle we intend was written by the Brethren of those Churches and it was written to the Brethren of the Churches in Asia and Phrygia after the manner of the Scripture wherein the fraternity or Body of the Church was designed or intended in all such Epistles From them was this Epistle and unto those of the same sort was it written not from one Bishop unto another And as this manifests the concern of the Brotherhood in all Ecclesiastical Affairs so with all other circumstances it evidenceth that those Churches were particular or Congregational only Nor is there any thing in the whole Epistle that should give the least intimation of any other Church state knowâ— unto them This Epistle as recorded by Eusebius gives us as noble Representation of the Spirit and Communion that was then among the Churches of Christ being written with Apostolical simplicity and gravity and remote from those Titles of Honour and affected swelling words which the faigned writings of that Age and some that are genuine in those that followed are stuffed withal Tertullâ—an who lived about the end of the second Century gives us the same account of the State Order and Worship of the Churches as was given beâ—ore by Justin Martyr Apol. ad Gen. cap. 39. The Description of a Church he first lays down in these words Corpâ—s sumus de conscientia Religionis Disciplinae unitate spei foedere We are a Body united in the Conscience of Religion or a conscientious Observation of the Duties of Religion by an Agreement in Discipline whereby it was usual with the Antients to express Universal Obedience unto the Doctrine and commands of Christ and in a Covenant of Hope For whereas such a Body or Religious Society could not be united but by a Covenant he calls it a Covenant of Hope because the principal respect was had therein unto the things hoped foâ— They covenanted together so to live and walk in the Discipline of Christ or Obedience unto his commands as that they might come together unto the enjoyment of Eternal Blessedness This Religious Body or Society thus united by Covenant did meet together in the same Assembly or Congregation Corpus suâ—us â—oâ—mus in coeâ—um Congregationem ut ad Deum quasi manu facta precationibus ambiamus orantes And cogimur ad divinarum literarum commemorationem c. Designing to declare as he doth in particular Negotia Christianae factionis as he calls them or the Duties of Christian Religion which in their Churches they did attend unto he lays the foundation in their meetings in the saâ—â— Assemâ—ly or Congregation In these Assemblies there presided the Elders that upon a Testimony of their meetness unto that Office were chosen thereunto President probati quique seniores honorem istum non pretiâ— sed Testimonio adepti And in the Church thus met together in the same place Assembly or Congregation under the rule and conduct of their Elders among other things they exercised Discipline that is in the presence and by the consent of the whole Ibidem etiam exhortationes castigationes censura divina Nam judicatur magno cum pondere ut apud certos de Dei conspectu summumque futuri judâ—cii praejudicium est sâ— quis ita deliquerit ut à communicatione Oratinis conventus omnis sancti commercii relegetur The loss of this Discipline and the manner of its Administration hath been one of the principal means of the Apostacy of Churches from their Primitive Institution To the same purpose doth Origen give us an account of the way of the gathering and establishing Churches under Elders of their own choosing in the close of his last Book against Celsus And although in the days of Cyprian in the third Century the distinction between the Bishop in any Church eminently so called and those who are only Presbyters with their imparity and not only the precedency but superiority of one over others began generally to be admitted yet it is sufficiently manifest from his Epistles that the Church wherein he did preside was so far a particular Church as that the whole Body or Fraternity of it was admitted unto all advice in things of common concernment unto the whole Church and allowed the exercise of their
Anâ—yra in Galatia about the year 314 Can. 13. and mention is again made of them in a Synod of Antioch An. 341. and somewhat before at the Council of Neocaesarea Can. 13. and frequently afterwards as any one may see in the late Collections of the antient Canons I verily believe nor can the contrary be proved but that these Chorepiscopi at first were as absolute and compleat in the Office of Episcopacy as any of the Bishops of the greater Cities having their name or denomination from the places of their Residence 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and not for an intimation of any inferiority in them unto other City-Bishops But so it came to pass that through their poverty and want of Interest their Ministry being confined unto a small Country-Parish perhaps through a comparative meanness of their Gifts or Abilities the city-City-Bishop claimed a Superiority over them and made Canons about their Power the bounding and exercising of it in Dependance on themselves For a while they were esteemed a degree above meer Presbyters who accompanyed or attended the Bishop of the city-City-Church in his Administrations and a degree beneath the Bishop himself in a posture never designed by Christ nor his Apostles Wherefore in process of time the name and thing were utterly lost and all the Country-Churches were brought into an absolute subjection unto the city-City-Church something being allowed unto them for Worship nothing for Rule and Discipline whereby the first state of Churches in their Original Institution sacredly preserved in the first Centuries was utterly lost and demolished I shall add but one Argument more to evincâ— the true state and nature of Evangelical Churches herein namely that they were only particular Congregations and that is taken from the Duties and Powers ascribed in the Scripture unto Churches and the Members or entire Brotherhood of them It was observed before that the Epistles of the Apostles were written all of them unto the Body of the Churches in contradistinction unto their Elders Bishops or Pastors unless it were those that were written unto particular persons by name And as this is plain in all the Epistles of Paul wherein sometimes distinct mention is made of the Officers of the Church sometimes none at all so the Apostle John affirms that he wrote unto the Church but that Diotrephes who seems to have been their Bishop received him not at once rejecting the Authority of the Apostle and overthrowing the liberty of the Church which example was diligently followed in the succeeding Ages Joh. Epist. 3. ver 9. And the Apostle Peter writing unto the Churches on an especial occasion speaks distinctly of the Elders 1 Pet. 5.1 2. See also Heb. 13.24 the body of the Epistle being directed to the Body of Churches Wherefore all the Instructions Directions and Injunctions given in those Epistles as unto the exercise of power or the performance of duty they are given unto the Churches themselves Now these are such many of them as cannot be acted or performed in any Church by the Body of the People but that which is Congregational only It were too long here to insist on particulars it shall be done elsewhere and it will thence appear that this Argument alone is sufficient to bear the weight of this whole Cause The Reader may if he please consider what Representation hereof is made in these places compared together Matth. 18.15 16 17 18. Act. 1.12 23 Chap. 2.1 42 44 46. Chap. 5.11 12 13. Chap. 11.21 22 25 26 28 29 30. Chap. 12.5 12. Chap. 14.26 27. Chap. 15.1 2 3 4 6 12 13 22 23 27 28 30. Chap. 20.28 Rom. 15.5 6 14 25 26. Chap. 16.1 17 18. 1 Cor. 1.4 5. Chap. 5. throughout Chap. 12.4 7 8 9 11 15 18 28 29 30 31. Chap. 14. throughout Chap. 16.10 11. 2 Cor. 3.1 2 3. Chap. 7.14 15. Chap. 8.22 23 24. Chap. 2 6 7 8 9 10 11. Chap. 8.5 Ephes. 2.19 20 21 22. Chap. 5.11 12. Gal. 6.1 Philip. 2.25 26 27 28. Colos. 1.1 2. Chap. 2.3 Chap. 3.16 Chap. 4.9 12 16 17. 1 Thes. 5.11 12 13 14. 2 Thes. 3.6 7 14 15. Heb. 12.13 Chap. 10.24 25. Chap. 12.15 16. In these I say and other places innumerable there are those things affirmed of and ascribed unto the Apostolical Churches as unto their State Order Assemblies Duties Powers and Priviledges as evinces them to have been only particular Congregations CHAP. VI. Congregational Churches alone suited unto the ends of Christ in the Institution of his Church HAving given an account of that State and Order of the Gospel-Churches which are of Divine Institution it is necessary that we declare also their suitableness and sufficiency unto all the ends for which the Lord Christ appointed such Churches For if there be any true proper end of that nature which cannot be attained in or by any Church-state in this or that form it must be granted that no such form is of Divine Appointment Yea it is necessary not only that such a state as pretends unto a Divine Original be not only not contradictory unto or inconsistent with such an end but that it is effectually conducing thereunto and in its place necessary unto that purpose This therefore is that which we shall now inquire into namely whether this State and Form of Gospel-Churches in single Congregations be suited unto all those ends for which any such Churches were appointed which they must be on the account of the wisdom of Jesus Christ the Author and Founder of them or be utterly discarded from their pretence Nor is there any more forcible Argument against any pretended Church-state Rule or Order than that it is obstructive unto the Souls of men in attaining the proper ends of their whole Institution What these ends are was in general before declared I shall not here repeat them or go over them again but only single out the consideration of those which are usually pleaded as not attainable by this way of Churches in single Congregations only or that at least they are not suited unto their Attainment The first of these is Mutual Love among all Christians all the Disciples of Christ By the Disciples of Christ I intend them and them only who profess Faith in his Person and Doctrine and to hear him or to be guided by him alone in all things that appertain unto the Worship of God and their living unto him If there are any called Christians who in these things choose other guides call other Ministers hear them in their appointments we must sever them from our present consideration though there are important Duties required of us towards them also But what is alledged is necessary unto the constitution of a true Disciple of Christ. Unto all those his great command is Mutual Love among themselves This he calls in an especial manner his Commandment and a new Commandment as for other Reasons so because he had given the first absolute great Example of it in himself as also discovered
and Interest of the Papal See having no bottom for or supportment of their Church state and Order but Regal Favour and mutable Laws there have on such Causes and Reasons which I shall not mention ensued such Emulations of the Nobility and Gentry and such contempts of the Commonâ—People as leave it questionable Whether their Adherence unto the Government be not more burdensome and dangerous unto it than were their antient Contests and Oppositions CHAP. VII No other Church-state of Divine Institution IT may be it will be generally granted I am sure it cannot be modestly denied that particular Churches or Congregations are of a Divine original Institution as also that the Primitive Churches continued long in that Form or Order But it will be farther pleaded that granting or supposing this Divine Institution of particular Churches yet there may be Churches of another Form and Order also as Diocesan or National that we are obliged to submit unto For although the Apostles appointed that there should be Bishops or Elders ordained 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is in every City and Town where Christian Religion was received and Clemens affirmeth that they did themselves constitute Bishops and Deacons 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Regions or Villages and Cities yet there was another Form afterwards introduced Theodoret Bishop of Cyprus affirms that there were eight hundred Churches committed to his care Epist. 113. whereof many were in Towns and Cities having no Bishop of their own The whole Country of Scythia though there were in it many Cities Villages and Fortresses yet had but one Bishop whose Residence was at Tomis all other Churches being under him as Zozomen declares lib. 6. cap. 20. So it is at this day in divers Provinces belonging of old unto the Greek-Church as in Moldavia and Walachia where they have one whom they call the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Leader or Ruler that presides over all the Churches in the Nation And this Oâ—der of things that there should not be a Bishop in smaller Churches was first confirmed in the sixth Canon of the Council of Sardis in the Year 347. In Answer hereunto I shall do these two things First I shall shew that there is no Church Order State or Church-Form of Divine Institution that doth any way impede take away or overthrow the Liberty Power and Order of particular Congregations such as we have described Secondly I shall enquire into the causes of Churches of another State or Order as the Power of Magistrates and Rulers or their own choice and consent 1. There is no Form Order or Church state Divinely Instituted that should annul the Institution of particular Congregations or abridge them of their Liberties or deprive them of the Power committed unto them It is such a Church-state alone that we are now concerned to enquire after Whatever of that kinde either is or may be imagined that entrenches not on the State Liberty and Power of particular Congregations is not of our present Consideration Men may frame and order what they please and what advantage they make thereby shall not be envied unto them whilst they injure not any of the Institutions of Christ. But 1. These Churches as they are Churches are meet and able to attain the Ends of Churches To say they are Churches and yet have not in themselves Power to attain the ends of Churches is to speak contradictions or to grant and deny the same thing in the same breath For a Church is nothing but such a Society as hath Power Ability and Fitness to attain those ends for which Christ hath ordained Churches That which hath so is a Church and that which hath not so is none Men may if they please deny them to be Churches but then I know not where they will finde any that are so For instance suppose men should deny all the Parochial Churches in England to be such Churches as are intrusted with Church-Power and Administrations what Church in the first Instance could they require our Communion withal Will they say it is with the National or Diocesan Churches neither of these do or can as such administer Sacred Ordinances A man cannot Preach nor hear the Word but in a particular Assembly The Lord's Supper cannot be Administred but in a particular Congregation nor any presential local Communion of Believers among themselves like that described by the Apostle 1 Cor. chap. 12. and chap. 14. be otherwise attained No Communion is firstly and immediately required or can be required with Diocesan Churches as such Wherefore it is Parochial particular Churches that we are required to hold Communion with We say therefore these Parochial Churches are either really and truely so endued with Church-Power and Liberty or they are not If they are or are acknowledged so to be we have herein obtained what we plead for if they are not then are we required to joyn in Church Communion with those Societies that are not Churches and if we refrain so doing we are charged with Schism which is to turn Religion into Ridicule For 2. It is utterly forreign to the Scripture and a Monster unto Antiquity I mean that which is pure and regardable in this Cause that there should be Churches with a part half more or less of Church-Power and not the whole neither in Right nor Exercise or that there should be Church-Officers Elders Presbyters or Bishops that should have a partiary Power half or a third part or less of that which entirely belongeth unto the Office they hold Let one Testimony be given out of the Scripture or that Antiquity which we appeal unto unto this purpose and we shall cease our Plea But this is that which our Understandings are set on rack withal every day There is a National Church that is entrusted with Supreme Church-Power in the Nation whereof it is Here at the entrance we fall into a double disquietment For 1. we know not as yet what this National Church is here or in France nor of what Persons it doth consist 2. We know not whether this National Church have all the Power that Christ hath given unto the Church or that there is a Reserve for some Addition from beyond Sea if things were well accommodated Then that there are Diocesan Churches whose Original with the Causes and Occasions of their Bounds Limits Power and manner of Administrations I think God alone knows perfectly we do but guess for there is not one word mentioned of any of their concernments in the Scripture And we know that these Churches cannot be said to have all the Power that Christ hath entrusted his Church withal because there is another Church unto which they are in subjection and on which they do depend but it seems they have the next degree of Power unto that which is uppermost But whatever their Power be it is so administred by Chancellors Commissaries Officials in such ways and for such ends that I shall believe a dissent from them and it
stating of the Subject of our Enquiry 1. The Diversities and Divisions among Churches which respect is to be had unto in the choice of any which we will or ought to joyn unto are of two sorts 1. Such as are occasioned by the remaining Weaknesses Infirmities and Ignorance of the best of Men whereby they know but in part and prophesie only in part wherein our Edification is concerned but our Salvation not endangered 2. Such as are in and about things Fundamental in Faith Worship and Obedience We shall speak to both of them 2. All Christians were Originally of one Mind in all things needful unto Joint-Communion so as that there might be among them all Love without Dissimulation Howbeit there was great variety not only in the Measure of their apprehensions of the Doctrines of Truth but in some Doctrines themselves as about the continuance of the Observations of the Law or at least of some of them as also Oppositions from without unto the Truth by Hereticks and Apostates neither of which hindred the Church Communion of true Believers But the Diversity Difference and Divisions that are now among Churches in the World is the effect of the great Apostasie which befel them all in the latter Ages as unto the Spirit Rule and Practice of those which were planted by the Apostles and will not be healed until that Apostasie be Abolished 3. Satan having possessed himself of the Advantage of these Divisions whereof he was the Author he makes use of them to act his Malice and Rage in stirring up and instigating one Party to Persecute Oppress and Devour another until the Life Power and Glory of Christian Religion is almost lost in the World It requires therefore great Wisdom to deport our selves aright among these Divisions so as to contribute nothing unto the Ends of Malice designed by Satan in them 4. In this state of things until it may be cured which it will never be by any of the wayes yet proposed and insisted on the Enquiry is concerning the Duty of any one who takes care of his own Soul as unto a Conjunction with some Church or other And on the Negative Part I say 1. Such an one is bound not to joyn with any Church or Society where any fundamental Article of Faith is rejected or corrupted There may be a fundamental Error in a true Church for a season when the Church erreth not Fundamentally 1 Cor. 15. 2 Tim. 2.18 But I suppose the Error in or against the Foundation is part of the Profession of the Church or Society to be joyned unto For thereby the Nature of the Church is destroyed it doth not hold the Head nor abide on the Foundation nor is the Ground and Pillar of Truth Wherefore although the Socinians under a Pretence of Love Forbearance and Mutual Toleration do offer us the Communion of their Churches wherein there is somewhat of Order and Discipline commendable yet it is unlawful to joyn in Church Fellowship or Communion with them For their Errors about the Trinity the Incarnation of Christ and his Satisfaction are destructive of the Foundation of the Prophets and Apostles and Idolatry in the divine Worship of a meer Creature is introduced by them 2. Where there 〈…〉 any Church taught or allowed a Mixture of Doctrines or Opinions that are prejudicial unto Gospel Holiness or Obedience no man that takes due care of his Salvation can joyn himself unto it For the Original Rule and Measure of all Church Communion is agreement in the Doctrine of Truth Where therefore there is either not a stable Profession of the same Doctrine in all substantial Truths of the Gospel but an uncertain sound is given some saying one thing some another or that Opposition is made unto any Truths of the importance before menâ—â—oned None can be bound or obliged to hold Communion with it nor can incur any blame by refraining from it For it is the Duty of a Christian in all things 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And to joyn with such a Church would 1. Stain their Profession 2. Hinder their Edification 3. Establish a new Rule of Communion unknown to the Scriptures namely besides Truth as might easily be manifested 3. Where the Fundamentals of Religious Worship are corrupted or overthrown it is absolutely unlawful to joyn unto or abide in any Church So is it with the Church of Rome The various wayes whereby the Foundations of Divine Religious Worship are overthrown in that Church by Superstition and Idolatry have been sufficiently declared These render the Communion of that Church pernitious 4. Nor can any man be obliged to joyn himself with any Church nor can it be his Duty so to do where the Eternally fixed Rule and Measure of Religious Worship namely that it be of Divine Institution is varied or changed by any Additions unto it or Substractions from it For whereas one principal end of all Churches is the joint celebration of Divine Worship if there be not a certain stable Rule thereof in any Church of Divine Prescription no Man can be obliged unto Communion therewith 5. Where the Fundamentals of Church Order Practice and Discipline are destroyed it is not Lawful for any man to joyn in Church Communion These Fundamentals are of two sorts 1. Such as concern the Ministry of the Church 2. Such as concern the Church it self There are four things that are necessary Fundamentals unto the Order of the Church on the Part of the Ministry 1. That all the Ministers or Officers of it be duely chosen by the Church it self and solemnly set apart in the Church unto their Office according unto the Rule and Law of Christ. This is Fundamental unto Church Order the Root of it from whence all other Parts of it do Spring And it is that which is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or expresly provided for in the Scripture as we shall see If there be a Neglect herein and no other Relation required between Ministers Elders Rulers Bishops and the Church but what is raised and created by Wayes and Rules of mens appointment or if there be a Temporary disposal of Persons into a discharge of that Office without a solemn Call Choice Ordination and Separation unto the Office itself and its work the Law of Christ is violated and the Order of the Church disturbed in its Foundation 2. That those who are called unto the Office of the Ministry be duely qualified by their Endowment with Spiritual Gifts for the Discharge of their Duty is fundamental unto the Ministry That the Lord Jesus Christ doth still continue his Dispensation of Spiritual Gifts unto men to fit and enable them unto the Office and Work of the Ministry that if he doth not do so or should at any time cease so to do the whole Office of the Ministry must cease and the Being of the Church with it that it is altogether useless for any Churches or Persons to erect an Image of the Gospel Ministry by outward Rites and
Church namely that bad men were mixed with the Good for which cause they rejected those Churches wherein that was allowed as no true Churches of Christ. For no such thing is included in what we assert nor doth follow thereon We do own that wicked Hypocrites may be joyned in true Churches and be made Partakers of all the Priviledges of them Neither is this a Cause of withdrawing Communion from any Church much less of condemning it as no true Church of Christ. But this we say that if such Hypocrites discover themselves in open scandalous sins which upon Examination will prove to be of a larger extent then some suppose with respect unto sins of Omission as well as of Commission if they are not dealt withal according as the Discipline of Christ doth require in such cases the Church wherein they are allowed especially if the Number of such Persons be many or the most the Generality of the People and their sins notorious doth stand in need of Reformation as the Church of England doth acknowledge in the Commination against Sinners The Substance of what is proposed under this consideration may be expressed in the ensuing Observations 1. The Generality of the Inhabitants of this Nation are joyned and do belong unto the Church of England in its Parochial Assemblies 2. That many walk and live without any visible compliance unto the Rule of Christ in Gospel Obedience Yea 3. Great notorious provoking sins do abound among them for which it ought to be feared continually that the Judgements of God will speedily follow as is acknowledged in the Commination 4. That hereon they all stand in need of Reformation without which the principal Ends of Church Communion cannot be obtained among them 5. That this Reformation is the Duty of these Churches themselves which if it be neglected they live in a contempt of the Commands of Christ. For 6. Unto them in the Preaching of the Word and exercise of Discipline are the means of this Reformation committed for we treat not at present of the Power or Duty of the Supream Magistrate in these things 7. That this state of Churches cannot hinder nor ought so to do if continued in the true Disciples of Christ from reforming themselves by endeavouring the due Observance of all his Commands 2. In this state the Church of England doth not and it is to be feared will not nor can reform itself But although the weight of the whole Argument in hand depends very much on this Assertion yet I shall not insist on its particular confirmation for sundry Reasons not now to be mentioned It is enough that no such work hath been as yet attempted nor is at this day publickly proposed notwithstanding all the Mercies that some have received the losses which the Church for want of it hath sustained the Judgments for Sins that are feared which ought to be Motives thereunto Yea the Generality of Ecclesiastical Persons seem to judge that all things among them are as they ought to be that there is no Crime or Disorder but only in complaining of their Good Estate and calling upon them for Reformation 3. This being the state of the Parochial Churches in England the Enquiry is Whether every Beleiver in England be indispensibly obliged by Vertue of any Law Rule or Direction of a divine Original to continue in constant compleat Communion with them so as not to make use of any other ways and means of Christ Appointment for their own Edification on the Penalty of the Guilt of Schisme Now although we do not as we shall see immediately lay the weight of refraining from their Communion on this consideration yet is there enough in it to warrant any Man in his so doing For a Man in his conforming thereunto makes it a Part of his Religious Profession not only that the Church wherein he is joyned is a true Church but that there is in its state and actings a due Representation of the Mind of Christ as unto what he requireth of his Churches and what he would have them to be The Lord Christ is the Apostle and High Priest of our Profession and in all things that belong thereunto we declare that we do it in compliance with his Will and we do so or we are Hypocrites This no man can do in such a Church state who is convinced of its defects without reflecting the greatest dishonour on Christ and the Gospel More weight will be added unto this Consideration when we shall treat of the Matter of Gospel Churches or of what sort of Persons they ought to consist In the mean time those who pretend a Reverence unto Antiquity in those things wherein they suppose Countenance to be given unto their Interest may do well sometimes to consider what was the Discipline of the Primitive Churches and what were the Manners the Lives the Heavenly Conversations of their Members Because in the 3 d. and 4 th Centuries there is mention made of Bishops distinct from Presbyters with some Ecclesiastical practices and Ceremonies in Worship not mentioned in the Scripture nor known unto the Apostolical Churches shall we judge our selves obliged to conform thereunto as our Rule and Pattern so as that in the Judgement of some they are to be esteemed no Churches who conform not their outward state and practice unto the same Rule and shall we judge ourselves at liberty to reject all that they did in the Exercise of Discipline and in the Preservation of Purity of Life and Holiness in the Churches and that according to the Command of Christ and Rule of the Scripture Who knows not upon what diligent trial and experience first obtained of their Knowledge Faith and Godliness they admitted Members into their Churches Yea such was their Care and Severity herein that they would not admit a Roman Emperour unto Communion with them unless he first confessed his Sins and joyned amongst other Penitents before his Admission Euseb. lib. 6. cap. 33. Who knows not with what diligence they watched over the Walkings and Conversations of all that were admitted among them and with what Severity they animadverted on all that fell into Scandalous Sins What was hereon their Conversation in all Holiness Righteousness Temperance Usefulness unto the World in Works of Charity and Benevolence as all other Christian vertues we have sufficient Testimony The Heathen who were morally Sober and Vertuous desired no more than that they might find out among them an Indulgence unto any sort of Sin Crime or Wickedness which because they could not charge any of them withal they invented those brutish and foolish lies about their Nightly Meetings But when a sober Enquiry was made concerning them their Enemies were forced to confess that they were guilty of no open Sin no Adulteries no Swearings or Perjuries as is evident in the Epistles of Pliny and Trajan the Emperour In particular they utterly rejected from their Communion all that resorted unto publick Stage Plays or other Spectacles a solemn
shall endeavour to cheat his Conscience by Distinctions and mental Reservations in any concernments of Religious Worship I fear he hath little of it if any at all that is good for ought On these suppositions I say the Imposition of the things so often contended about on the Consciences and Profession of Christians as namely the constant sole use of the Liturgie in all Church Administrations in the Matter and Manner prescribed the Use and Practice of all Canonical Ceremonies the Religious Observation of stated Holidays with other things of the like Nature is sufficient to warrant any sober peaceable Disciple of Christ who takes care of his own Edification and Salvation to refrain the Communion required in this Rule of Conformity unless he be fully satisfied in his own Mind that all that it requires is according to the Mind of Christ and all that it forbids is disapproved by him And whereas the whole entire matter of all these Impositions are things whereof the Scripture and the Primitive Churches know nothing at all nor is there any rumour of them to be imposed in or on any Church of Christ for some Centuries of years I can but pity poor men who must bear the charge and Penalties of Schisme for dissenting from them as well as admire the fertility of their Inventions who can find out Arguments to mannage such a charge on their Account But whereas the Dissent declared from that Communion with Parochial Assemblies is that whereon we are so fiercely charged with the Guilt of Schisme and so frequently called Schismaticks I shall divert a little to Enquire into the Nature and true Notion of Schisme itself and so much the rather because I find the Author of the Vnreasonableness of Separation omit any Enquiry thereinto that he might not loose the Advantage of any pretended Description or Aggravation of it CHAP. XI Of Schisme ALthough it be no part of my present Design to treat of the Nature of Schisme yet with respect unto what hath already been discoursed and to manifest our inconcernment in the Guilt of it I shall as was said divert to give a plain and brief Account of it And in our Enquiry I must declare my self wholly unconcerned in all the Discords Divisions and Seditions that have fallen out among Christians in the latter Ages about things that were of their own Invention Schisme is a Sin against Christian Love with reference unto the deportment of men in and about the Institutions of Christ and their Communion in them As for Contentions Divisions or Separations amongst men about that Order Agreement Unity or Uniformity which are of their own Appointment whatever Moral Evil they have had in them they do not belong unto that Church Schisme which we enquire after Such have been the horrid Divisions and Fightings that have prevailed at Seasons in the Church of Rome a departure from whose self-constituted State Order and Rule hath not the least Affinity unto Schisme It will not therefore be admitted that any thing can fall under the note and Guilt of Schisme which hath not respect unto some Church state Order Rule Unity or Uniformity that is of Christs Institution There are three Notions of Schisme that deserve our Consideration 1. The first is that of Divisions among the Members of the same Church all of them abiding still in the same outward Communion without any Separation into distinct Parties And unto Schisme in this Notion of it three things do concur 1. Want of that mutual Love Condescension and Forbearance which are required in all the Members of the same Church with the Moral Evils of Whisperings Back-bitings and evil surmizes that ensue thereon 2. An undue Adherence unto some Church Officers above others causing disputes and janglings 3. Disorder in the Attendance unto the Duties of Church Assemblies and the Worship of God performed in them This is the only Notion of Schisme that is exemplified in the Scripture the only evil that is condemned under that name This will appear unto any who shall with heedfulness read the Epistles of Paul the Apostle unto the Corinthians wherein alone the nature of this Evil is stated and exemplified But this Consideration of Schism hath been almost utterly lost for many Ages whatever men do in Churches so that they depart not from the outward Communion of them it would be accounted ridiculous to esteem them Schismaticks Yet this is that which if not only yet principally the Consciences of Men are to regard if they will avoid the Guilt of Schisme But this Notion of it as was said being not suited unto the Interest or Advantages of any sort of men in the charge of it on others nor any way subservient to secure the Inventions and Impositions of the most is on the matter lost in the World 2. The second Instance of Ecclesiastical Schisme was given us in the same Church of the Corinthians afterwards an account whereof we have in the Epistle of Clemens or of the Church of Rome unto them about it the most eminent Monument of primitive Antiquity after the Writings by Divine Inspiration And that which he calls Schisme in that Church he calls also strife contention sedition tumult And it may be observed concerning that Schisme as all the Antients call it 1. That the Church continued its state and outward Communion There is no mention of any that separated from it that constituted a New Church only in the same Church they agreed not but were divided among themselves Want of Love and Forbearance attended with strife and contention among the Members of the same Church abiding in the same outward Communion was the Schisme they were Guilty of 2. The Effect of this Schisme was that the Body of the Church or Multitudes of the Members by the Instigation of some few disorderly Persons had deposed their Elders and Rulers from their Offices and probably had chosen others in their places though that be not mentioned expresly in the Epistle 3. That the Church itself is not blamed for assuming a Power unto themselves to depose their Elders much less that they had done it without the Consent Advice or Authority of any Bishop or other Church but only that they had dealt unjustly with those whom they had deposed who in the Judgement of the Church of Rome unto which they had written for Advice were esteemed not only innocent but such as had laudably and profitably discharged their Office whereon the whole blame is cast on those who had instigated the Church unto this Proceedure 4. There was not yet nor in an hundred and fifty years after the least mention or intimation of any Schisme in a dissent from any humanely invented Rules or Canons for Order Government or Worship in any Church or Religious Ceremonies imposed on the Practise of any in divine Service that is on any Church or any of the Members of it There is not the least Rumour of any such things in primitive Antiquity no Instance
to be given of any man charged with Schisme for a Dissent from such a Rule Any such Rule and any Ecclesiastical Censure upon it is apocriphal not only unto the Scripture but unto that which I call primitive Antiquity The first Attempt of any thing in this kind was in reference unto the time and day of the Observation of Easter This was the first Instance among Christians of an endeavour to impose the Observation of humane or Church Constitutions or groundless Traditions on any Churches or Persons in them And whereas that which was called a Schisme between the Churches of Italy and Asia or some of them did ensue thereon we have a most illustrious Testimony from the best the Wisest and the Holyest of that Age for Irenaeus in France and Polycrates in Asia were not alone herein that the blame of all that Division and Schisme was to be charged on them who attempted to deprive the Churches of their Liberty and impose on them a necessity of the Observation of the Time and Season which they had determined on After a Rebuke was given unto the Attempt of the Judaizing Christians to impose the Observation of Mosaical Ceremonies from the pretence of their divine Institution on the Churches of the Gentiles by the Apostles themselves this was the Original of all endeavours to impose humane Constitutions for which there was no such Pretence upon the Practise of any And as it was an Original not unmeet for the beginning and foundation of such Impositions being in a matter of no Vse unto the Edification of the Church so it received such a solemne Rebuke at its first entrance and Attempt that had it not been for the Ignorance Pride Interest and Superstition of some in the following Ages it had perished without Imitation The Account hereof is given in Eusebius lib. 5. cap. 21 22 33 as also of the Rule which then prevailed though afterwards shamefully forsaken namely that an Agreement in the Faith was the only Rule of Communion which ought to be kept under any diversity in voluntary Observations And the Discourse of Socrates on this Occasion lib. 5. cap. 21 Concerning the Non-Institution of any days of Fastings or Feastings or other Rites or Ceremonies then in use with the Liberty which is therefore to be left in such things unto all Christians is the plain Truth whatever some except against it declared with much Judgement and Moderation This Beginning I say had the Imposition of unscriptural uninstituted Rites Ceremonies and Religious Observations among the Churches of Christ and this solemn Rebuke was given unto it Howbeit the Ignorance Superstition and Interest of following Ages with the contempt of all Modesty brake through the boundaries of this Holy Rebuke until their own Impositions and Observations became the substance of all their Church Discipline unto the total subversion of Christian Liberty Wherefore to allow Church Rulers or such as pretend so to be a Liberty and Power to appoint a Rule of Communion comprizing Institutions and Commands of sundry things to be constantly observed in the whole Worship and Discipline of the Church not warranted in themselves by divine Authority and then to charge Beleivers abiding firm in the Doctrine of the Faith with Schisme for a Non-compliance with such Commands and Appointments is that which neither in the Scripture nor in Primitive Antiquity hath either Instance Example President Testimony Rumour or Report to give Countenance unto it The Pedigree of this Practise cannot be derived one step higher than the fact of Victor the Bishop of Rome in the Excommunication of the Churches and Christians of Asia which was solemnly condemned as an Entrenchment on Christian Liberty 3. After these things the Notion of Schisme began to be mannaged variously according unto the Interest of them who seemed to have the most Advantage in the Application of it unto those who dissented from them It were an endless thing to express the Rise and declare the Progress of these Apprehensions But after many loose and declamatory Discourses about it they are gerally issued in two Heads The first is that any kind of Dissent from the Pope and Church of Rome is Schisme all the Schisme that is or can be in the World The other is that a causeless Separation from a true Church is Schisme and this only is so But whereas in this pretended Definition there is no mention of any of its internal Causes nor of its formal Reason but a bare Description of it by an outward Effect it serves only for a weapon in every mans hand to perpetuate digladiations about it For every Church esteems itself true and every one that separates himself esteems himself to have just Cause so to do In the following Times especially after the Rise and Prevalency of the Arian Heresie it was ordinary for those of the Orthodox Perswasion to forsake the Communion of those Churches wherein Arian Bishops did preside and to gather themselves into separate Meetings or Conventicles for divine Worship for which they were accused of Schisme and in sundry places punished accordingly yea some of them unto the Loss of their Lives Yet I suppose there are none now who judge them to have been Schismaticks The Separation of Novatus and Donatus from the Communion of the whole Catholick Visible Church on unwarrantable Pretences is that which makes the loudest noise about Schisme in Antiquity That there was in what was done by them and their Followers the General Nature and Moral Evil of Causeless Schismes and Divisions will be easily granted But it is that wherein we are not concerned be the especiall nature of Schisme what it will Nor did they make use of any one Reason whereon the Merit of the present Cause doth depend The Novatians the modester Sect of the two pretended only a Defect in Discipline in granting Church Communion unto such as they would not have received though they were apparently in the wrong proceeding on mistaken Principles The Donatists pleaded only some Personal Crimes in some few Bishops fallen into in the time of Persecution which they could never prove and thereon grew angry with all the World who would not condemn them and renounce their Communion as well as they These slight Pretences they made the Occasion and Reason of renouncing the Communion of the whole visible Catholick Church in all its distributions for Communion that is all particular Churches and confined Sacraments and Salvation absolutely unto their own Parties And hereon they fell into many other woful Miscarriages especially those of the latter sort It is indifferent by what Name any are pleased to call this Evil and Folly A Sin and Evil it was Schisme or what you please to term it and justly condemned by all Christians not joyning with them in those days And that which was the animating Principle of the Tumult of the Donatists was a Supposition that the Continuation of the true Church state depended on the Successive Ordination of Bishops
which having as they thought unduely enough failed in one or two Instances it became the Destruction of a Church state not only in the Churches where such Mistakes had happened as they surmized but unto all the Churches in the World that would hold Communion with them But in these things we have no concernment Other Notions of Schisme besides those insisted on we acknowledge not nor is any other advanced with the least Probality of Truth Nor are we to be moved with outcries about Schisme wherein without regard to Truth or Charity men contend for their own Interest Of those Notions of it which have been received by men sober and learned we decline a trial by none that only excepted that the Refusal of Obedience unto the Pope and Church of Rome is all that is Schisme in the World which indeed is none at all That which is now so fiercely pleaded by some concerning different Observations of external Modes Rites Customes some more or none at all to make men Schismaticks is at once to judge all the Primitive Churches to be Schismatical Their Differences Varieties and Diversities among them about these things cannot be enumerated and so without any disadvantage unto the Faith or breach of Love they continued to be untill all Church Order and Power was swallowed up in the Papal Tyranny ten thousand times more pernicious then ten thousand such Disputes For a Close unto this whole Discourse concerning the original nature and state of Gospel Churches I shall use that Liberty which Love of the Truth puts into my Possession Churches mentioned in the Scripture ordained and appointed by the Authority of Jesus Christ were nothing but a certain number of Men and Women Converted to God by the preaching of the Gospel with their baptized seed associating themselves in Obedience unto Christs Commands and by the Direction of his Apostles for the common Profession of the same Faith the Observance and Performance of all Divine Institutions of Religious Worship unto the Glory of God their own Edification and the Conversion of others These Believers thus associated in Societies knowing the Command and Appointment of Jesus Christ by his Apostles for that End did choose from among themselves such as were to be their Rulers in the Name and Authority of Christ according to the Law and Order of his institutions who in the Scripture are called on various Considerations Elders Bishops Pastors and the like names of Dignity Authority and Office who were to administer all the solemn Ordinances of the Church among them Unto this Office they were solemnly appointed ordained or set apart by the Apostles themselves with fasting Prayer and imposition of hands or by other ordinary Officers after their decease This was the way and method of the Call and setting apart of all Ordinary Officers in the Church both under the Old Testament and in the New It is founded in the Light of Nature In the first Institution of ordinary Church Rulers under the Law the People looked out and chose fit Persons whom Moses set apart to the Office Deut. 1.13 14 15. And in the Call of Deacons Acts 6. The Apostle uses the same Words or words of the same importance unto the Church as Moses did to the People Acts 6.31 asserting the Continuation of the same way and order in their Call And whereas he who was first to be called to Office under the New Testament after the Ascension of Christ fell under a double Consideration namely of an Officer in general and of an Apostle which office was extraordinary there was a threefold Act in his Call the People chose two one of which was to be an Officer Acts 1.23 Gods immediate Determination of one as he was to be an Apostle ver 24. and the obedient Consent of the People in compliance with that Determination ver 26. The Foundation of these Churches was generally in a small number of Believers But their Church state was not compleat until they were supplyed with all ordinary Officers as Bishops and Deacons The former were of of several sorts as shall be proved hereafter And of them there were many in every Church whose number was encreased as the Members of the Church were multiplied So God appointed in the Church of the Jews that every ten Families should have a peculiar Ruler of their own Choice Deut. 1.13 14 15 For there is no mention in the New Testament of any one single Bishop or Elder in any Church of any sort whatever either Absolutely or by way of Preheminence But as the Elders of each Church were many at least more thenone so there was a parity among them and an Equality in Order Power and Rule Nor can any Instance be given unto the Contrary Of these Churches one onely was originally planted in one City Town or Village This way was taken from Conveniency for Edification and not from any positive Institution and it may be otherwise where Conveniency and Opportunity do require it The Number in these Churches Multiplying dayly there was a necessity of the Multiplication of Bishops or Elders among them Hereon the Advantage of some one Person in Priority of Conversion or of Ordination in Age Gifts and Graces especially in Ability for Preaching the Gospel and administring the Holy Ordinances of the Church with the Necessity of preserving Order in the Society of the Elders themselves gave him peculiar Dignity Preheminence and Title He was soon after the Bishop without any disadvantage to the Church For in those Churches in some of them at least Evangelists continued for a long Season who had the Administration of Church Affairs in their hands And some there were who were of Note among the Apostles and eminently esteemed by them who had eminent yea Apostolical Gifts as to Preaching of the Word and Prayer which was the peculiar work of the Apostle These were the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 mentioned by Clemens Of the many other Elders who were associated in the Rule of the Church it may be not many had Gifts for the constant Preaching of the Word nor were called thereunto Hence Justin Martyr seemes to assign the constant publick Administration of Sacred Ordinances unto one President And this also promoted the constant presidency of one in whom the Apostolical Aid by Evangelists might be supplyed These Churches thus fixed and settled in one place each of them City Town or Village were each of them intrusted with all the Power and Priviledges which the Lord Christ hath granted unto or endued his Church withal This Power is called the power of the Keys or of binding and loosing which hath respect only unto the Consciences of Men as unto things Spiritual and Eternal being meerly Ministerial Every one of these Churches were bound by the Command of Christ to live in Peace and Vnity through the Exercise of Peculiar sincere and fervent Love among all their Members as also to walk in Peace and useful Communion with all othâ—â— Churches in the
And 2. Such as might be observed any where among the Nations they acted accordingly Those who lived at Jerusalem adhered unto the Temple Worship the whole Church these did so Their Judgement in these things is declared Acts 21.20.21 Thou seest Brother how many thousands of the Jews there are which believe and they are all Zealous of the Law and they are informed of thee that thou teachest all the Jews which are among the Gentiles to forsake Moses saying that they ought not to circumcise their Children neither to walk after the Customes They were not at all offended with Paul that he did not impose the Law on the Gentiles ver 25. but only that as they had been informed he taught the Jews to forsake the Law and to reject all the Institutions of it This they thought unlawful for them And this they spake principally with respect unto the Temple Service as appears by the Advice given unto Paul on this Occasion ver 23 24. Those who lived amongst the Gentiles knew that there was no Obligation on them unto the Sacrifices and especial Duties of the Temple but continued only in the observance of such Rites and Institutions about Meats Washings Days New Moons Sabbaths and the like which the Gentiles were freed from Hence there were two sorts of Churches in those days if not three in Separation more or less from the Apostate Church of the Unbelieving Jews which yet was not finally taken away 1. The Church of Hierusalem and those Churches of Judea which were of the same Mind and Communion with them These continued in the Observance of all the Law and of the Services of the Temple being allowed them by the Apostles 2. Those of the Jews who lived in the Nations and observed all the Rites of the Law which were not confined unto the Land of Canaan And 3. The Churches of the Gentiles which observed none of these things forbearing only their Liberty in one or two Instances not to give the other Offence Some Differences and Disputes happened sometimes about these things and the Practise of them whereon Peter himself fell into a Mistake Gal. 2.14 And there seemes to have been great Disputes about them at Rome chap. 14. Yea it is judged that according unto their different Apprehensions of these things there were two Churches at Rome one of the Circumcision the other of the Gentiles walking in distinct Communion each by themselves However the different Rule of this kind that was between the Churches of Hierusalem and Antioch is sufficiently declared Acts 15. the one Church continuing Zealous of the Law and the other rejoyced for the Consolation of being delivered from it ver 31. Yet was there no Schisme between these Churches but a constant Communion in Faith and Love Such differences in Opinions and Practises were not yet formed into an Interest obliging men to condemn them as Schismaticks who differ from them For not to speak of what Orders and Rules for decency particular Churches may make by common Consent among themselves to make the Observation of Arbitrary Institutions not prescribed in the Scripture upon many Churches to be the Rule of Communion in them and between them which whosoever observe not are to be esteemed Guilty of Schisme which Victor Bishop of Rome first attempted is contrary to the Rules of the Scripture to the Principles of Christian Faith Love and Liberty to the Example of the Apostles hath no countenance given unto it in the Primitive Churches and will certainly make our Differences Endless I judge that in the Beginning of the Chapter the Apostle intends those of the first sort and that as well because he calls them Dogs and the Concision which answers unto the Account he gives of them 1 Thes. 2.14 15 as also because he speaks of them as those who advanced the pretended Priviledges of Judaisme absolutely against Christ the Gospel and the Righteousness of God revealed therein Hereon in opposition unto them he declares that they had nothing to boast of but what he himself had a Right unto as well as they and which he had voluntarily relinquished and renounced for Christ and the Gospel wherein he testifies what he had attained If any one do judge that he intend those of the second sort I will not contend about it because of the severity of Expression which he useth concerning them Gal. 5.12 But discharging the consideration of them the Direction in this place concerns those of the third sort only answering unto that which was prescribed and followed by the Apostles in all Places namely that there should be mutual Forbearance in some Difference of Practise between them and the Gentile Believers His second Enquiry pag. 168 is Whether the Rule which the Apostle lays down be only a Rule of mutual Forbearance I do not find that I said any where that it was only a Rule of mutual Forbearance but that the Words of the Apostle do enjoyn a mutual Forbearance among those who are differently minded pag. 26. And I must here say which I desire to do without offence that there is no need of any farther Answer unto that Part of the Doctors Discourse but a Transcription of that which he pretends to oppose for what is spoken unto that end consists in a perpetual Diversion from the Argument in hand I did not before precisely determine what was the Rule which the Apostle doth intend only proved sufficiently that it was not such a Rule as is pleaded for by the Doctor But the meaning of the Phrase and Expression is plain enough 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it is directly used once more by the Apostle Gal. 6.16 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as many as walk according to this Rule and what Rule is that namely what as unto the substance of it he lays down in the Words foregoing ver 14 15. God forbid that I should glory save in the Cross of our Lord Jesus Christ For in Christ Jesus neither Circumcision availeth any thing nor Vncircumcision but a new Creature and as many as walk according unto this Rule that is the Rule of Faith in Christ alone for Justification and Sanctification without trusting unto or resting on any of those things which were in difference among them The Places in Scope Design and manner of Expression are Parallel For this is plainly that which he pleads for in this Context namely that Justification and Sanctification are to be obtained alone through Christ and Faith in him by the Gospel without the least Aid and Assistance from the things that were in Difference among them Wherefore not farther to contend in so plain a Matter the Rule here intended by the Apostle is no Book of Canons but the Analogy of Faith or the Rule of Faith in Christ as declared in the Gospel in opposition unto all other ways and means of Justification Sanctification and Salvation which we ought to walk in a Compliance withal and that with Love and Forbearance towards them that in
Orthodox themselves but only as they were carried on unto a total Renunciation of all Communion whatever but only that which was enclosed unto their own Party 2. To Evidence that we give the least countenance unto the antient Schismes or do contract the Guilt with the Authors of them the thing aimed at there are three things incumbent on him to prove 1. That our Parochial Churches from whom we do refrain actual presential Communion in all Ordinances where it is required by Law which cannot be many and but one at one time do succeed into the room of that Church in a Separation from which those Schismes did consist For we pass no Judgement on any other Church but what concerns our selves as unto present Duty though that in a Nation may be extended unto many or all of the same sort But these Schismes consisted in a professed Separation from the whole Catholick Church that is all Christians in the World who joyned not with them in their Opinions and Practises and from the whole Church state then passant and allowed But our Author knows full well that there are others who long before our Parochial Churches do lay claim unto the absolute enclosure of this Church state unto themselves and thereon condemn both him and us and all the Protestants in the World of the same Schisme that those of old were guilty of especially they make a continual Clamour about the Novatians and Donatists I know that he is able to dispossess the Church of Rome from that Usurpation of the State and Rights of the antient Catholick Church from whence those Separations were made and it hath been sufficiently done by others But so soon as we have cast that out of Possession to bring in our Parochial Assemblies into the room of it and to press the Guilt of Separation from them with the same Reasons and Arguments as we were all of us but newly pressed withal by the Romanists namely that hereby we give countenance unto them yea do the same things with them who made Schismes in Separating from the Catholick Church of old is somewhat severe and unequal Wherefore unless the Church from which they separated which was the whole Catholick Church in the World not agreeing and acting with them and those Parochial Assemblies from whose Communion we refrain are the same and of the same consideration nothing can be argued from those ancient Schismes against us nor is any countenance given by us unto them For if it be asked of us whether it be free or lawful for Believers to joyn in Society and full Communion with other Churches besides those that are of our way and especial Communion we freely answer that we no way doubt of it nor do judge them for their so doing 2. It must be proved unto the End proposed that the Occasions and Reasons of their Separation of old were the same or of the same nature only with those which we plead for our refraining Communion from Parochial Assemblies Now though the Dr. here makes a flourish with some Expressions about Zeal Discipline Purity of the Church Edification which he will not find in any of their Pretences yet in truth there is not one thing alledged wherein there is a Coincidence between the Occasions and Reasons pleaded by them and ours It is known that the principal thing in general which we insist upon is the unwarrantable Imposition of unscriptural Termes and Conditions of Communion upon us was there any such thing pleaded by them that made the Schismes of Old indeed they were all of them imposers and separated from the Church because they would not submit unto their Impositions Some Bishops or some that would have been Bishops but could not entertaining some new Conceit of their own which they would have imposed on all others being not submitted unto therein were the Causes of all those Schismes which were justly esteemed Criminal So was it with the Novatians and Donatists in an especial manner Even the great Tertullian though no Bishop left the Communion of the Church on this Ground For because they would not admit of the strict Observance of some Austere Severities in Fasting Abstinence from sundry Meates and Watching with the like which he esteemed necessary though no way warranted by Scripture Rule or Example he utterly renounced their Communion and countenanced himself by adhering unto the Dotages of Montanus It is true some of them contended for a Severity of Discipline in the Church but they did it not upon any pretence of the Neglect of it in them unto whom the Administration of it was committed but for the want of establishing a false Principle Rule or Erronious Doctrine which they advanced namely that the most sincere penitents were never more to be admitted into Ecclesiastical Communion whereby they did not establish but overthrow one of the Principal ends of Church Discipline They did not therefore press for the Power or the Vse of the Keys as is pretended but advanced a false Doctrine in prejudice both unto the Power and Use of them They pretended indeed unto the Purity of the Church not that there were none impure wicked and hypocritical among them but that none might be admitted who had once fallen though really made pure by sincere Repentance This was their Zeal for Purity If a Man were overtaken if they could catch him in such a fault as by the Rules of the passaint Discipline he was to be cast out of the Church there they had him safe for ever No Evidence of the most sincere Repentance could prevail for a Readmission into the Church And because other Churches would admit them they renounced all Communion with them as no Churches of Christ. Are these our Principles are these our Practices do we give any countenance unto them by any thing we say or do I somewhat wonder that the Dr. from some general Expressions and casting their Pretences under new Appearances should seem to think that there is the least Coincidence between what they insisted on and what we plead in our own Defence He may see now more fully what are the Reasons of our Practise and I hope thereon will be of another Mind not as unto our Cause in general which I am far enough from the expectation of but as unto this invidious Charge of giving Countenance unto the Schismes condemned of old in the Church And we shall see immediately what were the Occasions of those Schismes which we are as remote from giving countenance unto as unto the Principles and Reasons which they pleaded in their own Justification 3. It ought also to be proved that the Separation which is charged on us is of the same nature with that charged on them of old for otherwise we cannot be said to give any Countenance unto what they did For it is known they so separated from all other Churches in the World as to confine the Church of Christ unto their own Party to condemn all others and to
the Discharge of his Duty as it fell out also with Chrysostome Nevertheless he abode firmly and tenaciously in the Communion of the Church but was at length cast out as farre as it appears by him for the honest discharge of his Duty whereon he gathered a great Party unto himself But Theodoret and others affirm him to have been the Author of the impious heresie of the Anthropomorphitae his principal followers being those Monks of Egypt which afterwards made such Tumults in defence of that foolish Imagination and that this was the Cause why he was cast out of the Church and set up a Party of the same Opinion with him lib. 4. cap. 10. Yea he also ascribes unto him some foolish Opinions of the Manichees What is our concernment in these things I cannot imagine Eustathius the Bishop of Sebastia in Armenia and his Followers are also instanced in as Orthodox Schismaticks and as such were condemned in a Council at Gongrae in Paphlagonia But indeed before that Council Eustathius had been condemned by his own Father Eulanius and other Bishops at Caesarea in Cappadocia And he was so for sundry foolish Opinions and evil Practises whereby he deserved to be so dealt withal It doth not unto me appear certainly whether he fell into those Opinions before his Rejection at Caesarea where he was principally it not only charged with his undecent and fantastical habit and Garments Wherefore at the Council of Gangrae he was not admitted to make any Apology for himself nor could be heard because he had innovated many things after his Deposition at Caesarea such as forbidding of Marriage shaving of Women denying the lawfulness of Priests keeping their Wives who were married before their Ordination getting away Servants from their Masters and the like Socrat. Hist. lib. 2. chap. 3. These were his Pretences of Sanctity and Purity as the Dr. acknowledgeth and I appeal unto his Ingenuity and candour whether any Countenance be given unto such Opinions and Practises thereon by any thing we say or do This Instance and some others of an alike Nature the Doctor affirmes that he produced in his Sermon but that they were gently passed over by my self and Mr. B. I confess I took no notice of them because I was satisfied that the cause under Consideration was no way concerned in them And the Dr. might to as Good Purpose have instanced in forty other Schismes made for the most Part by the Ambition of Bishops in the Churches of Alexandria Antioch Constantinople Rome and sundry other places yea in that made by Epiphanius himself at Constantinople upon as weighty a Cause as that of those who contended about and strove for and against the driving of sheep over the Bridge where there were none present The story of the Luciferians is not worth repeating In short Lucifer the Bishop of Caralli in Sardinia being angry that Paulinus whom he had ordained Bishop at Antioch was not received fell into great dissention with Eusebius Bishop of Vercells in Italy who had been his Companion in Banishment because he approved not what he had done at Antioch And continuing to contend for his own Bishop it occasioned a great Division among the People whereon he went home to his own Place leaving behind him a few followers who wrangled for a time about the Ordination of Bishops by Arians by whose means Lucifer had been banished and so after a while disappeared I had almost missed the Instance of the Donatists But the story of them is so well known that it will not bear the Repetition For although there be no mention of them in Socrates or Zozoman nor the History of Theodoret yet all things that concerned them are so fully declared in the Writings of Austin and Optatus against them as there needs no other account of them And this Instance of an Heretical Schisme is that which the Papists vehemently urge against the Church of England itself and all other Protestants Here their Weapon is borrowed for a little while to give a wound unto our Cause but in vain Yet I know full well that it is easier for some men on their Principles to flourish with this Weapon against us than to defend themselves against it in the hands of the Papists In breif these Donatists were upon the matter of the same Opinion with the Novatians and as these grounded their dissension on the receiving those into the Church who had fallen and sacrificed under Decius so did these on a pretence of severity against those who had been Traditors under Maximinus Upon this Pretence improved by many false Allegations Donatus and those that followed him rejected Cecilianus who was lawfully chosen and ordained Bishop of Carthage setting up one Majorinus in opposition unto him Not succeeding herein on this foolish unproved Pretence that Cecilianus had been ordained by Traditor they rejected the Communion of all the Churches in the World confined the whole Church of Christ unto their own Party denied Salvation unto any other rebaptized all that came unto them from other Churches and together with a great number of Bishops that joyned with them fell into most extravagant Exorbitances Upon the Consideration of these Schismes the Dr. concludes that on these Grounds there hath scarce been any considerable Schisme in the Christian Church but may be justified upon Dr. O' s Reasons for Seperation from our Church Concerning which I must take the Liberty to say that I do not remember that ever I read in any Learned Author an Inference made or Conclusion asserted that had so little countenance given unto it by the Premises whence it is inferred as there is into this by the Instances before insisted on whence it is pretended to be educed All that is of Argument in this story is this that there were of old some Bishops with one or two who would have been Bishops and could not who to exalt and countenance themselves against those who were preferred to Bishopricks before them and above them invented and maintained false doctrinal Principles the confession whereof they would have imposed on other Churches and because they were not admitted they separated at once from all other Churches in the World but their own condemning them as no Churches as not having the Sacraments or means of Salvation for which they were condemned as Schismaticks therefore those who own not Subjection to Diocesan Bishops by vertue of any Institution or Command of Christ who refrain Communion from Parochial Assemblies because they cannot without Sin to themselves comply with all things imposed on them in the Worship of God and Ecclesiastical Rule without judging their state or the Salvation of their Members are in like manner as they guilty of Schisme But we have fixed grounds whereon to Try Examine Judge and Condemne all Schismes that are justly so called all such as those before mentioned If Separations arise and proceed from Principles of false Doctrine and Errors like those of the Novatians and Donatists if
they are occasioned by Ambition and desire of Preheminence like those that fell out among the Bishops of those days when their Parishes and claimes were not regulated by the Civil Power as now they are If they do so from a Desire to impose Principles and Practises not warranted in the Scripture on others as it was with Tertullian If for slight Reasons they rend and destroy that Church state and order which themselves approve of as it was with all the antient Schismaticks who were Bishops or would feign to have been if those that make them or follow in them deny Salvation unto all that joyn not with them and condemn all other Churches as being without Gods Covenant and the Sacraments as did the Donatists and those do who deny these things unto all Churches who have not Diocesan Bishops if there be not a sufficient justifiable Cause pleaded for it that those who make such a separation cannot abide in the Communion which they forsake without wounding their own Consciences and do give Evidences of their abiding in the Exercise of Love towards all the true Disciples of Christ we are satisfied that we have a Rule infallibly directing us to make a Judgment concerning it Our Author adds Sect. 26. p. 197. Another Argument against this course of separation is that these Grounds will make separation endless which is to suppose all the Exhortations of the Scripture to Peace and Vnity among Christians useless But why so Is there nothing in the Authority of Christ and the sence of the Account which is to be given unto him nothing in the Rule of the Word nothing in the works of the Ministry and exercise of Gospel Discipline to keep professed Disciples of Christ unto their Duty and within the bounds of order Divinely prescribed unto them unless they are fettered and staked down with humane Laws and Constitutions Herein I confess I differ and shall do so whilst I am in this World from our Reverend Author and others To say as he doth upon a supposition of the taking away of humane Impositions Laws and Canons that there are no bounds set unto separation but what the fancies of men will dictate unto them is dishonourable unto the Gospel and somewhat more To suppose that the Authority of Christ the Rule of the Word and the Work of the Ministry are not sufficient to prescribe bounds unto separation efficaciously affecting the Consciences of Beleivers or that any other bounds can be assigned as obligatory unto their Consciences is what cannot be admitted The Lord Christ hath commanded Love and Vnion among his Disciples he hath ordained order and Communion in his Churches he hath given unto them and limited their Power he hath prescribed Rules whereby they and all their Members ought to walk he hath forbidden all Schismes and Divisions he hath appointed and limited all necessary separations and hath truly given all the bounds unto it that the Consciences of men are or can be affected withal But then it is said if this be all separation will be endless if such a separation be intended as is an unlawful Schisme I say it may be it will even as Persecution and other evils sins and wickednesses will be notwithstanding his severe Prohibition of them What he hath done is the only means to preserve his own Disciples from all sinful separation and is sufficient thereunto Herein lyeth the Original mistake in this matter we have lost the Apprehension that the Authority of Christ in the Rule of his Word and Works of his Spirit is every way sufficient for the Guiding Governing and Preserving of his Disciples in the Church Order by him prescribed and the observance of the Duties by him commanded It hath been greatly lost in the World for many Ages and therefore instead of Faithful Ministerial Endeavours to enforce a sence of it on the Consciences of all Christians they have been let loose from it through a confidence in other devises to keep them unto their Duty and Order And if these devises be they Ecclesiastical Canons or Civil Penalties be not enforced on them all the World is made to beleive that they are left unto the dictates of their own fancies and Imaginations as if they had no concern in Christ or his Authority in this matter But for my part I shall never desire nor endeavour to keep any from Schisme or separation but by the ways and means of Christs appointment and by a sense of his Authority on their own Consciences The remainder of his Discourse on this Head consists in a lepid Dramâ—tical Oration framed and feigned for one of his Opposers wherein he makes him undertake the patronage of Schism before Cyprian and Austiâ— The Learned Person intended is very well able to defend and vindicate himself which I suppose also he will do In the mean time I cannot but say two things 1. That the Imposition on him of extenuating the Guilt of any real Schism is that which none of his Words do give the least countenance unto 2. That the Doctors attempt in his feigned Oration to accommodate his Principles or Ours unto the case of the Donatists for their Justification the weakness whereof is evident to every one who knows any thing of the case of the Donatists is such an instance of the Power of Interest a design to maintain a Cause causelessly undertaken by all manner of Artifices and Pretences prevailing in the minds of men otherwise Wise and Sober as is to be lamented We come at length in the 5th place Sect 28. p. 209. unto that which is indeed of more importance duly to be considered then all that went before For as our Author observes it is that wherein the Consciences of men are concerned This Argument therefore he takes from the Obligation which lyes upon all Christians to preserve the Peace and Vnity of the Church For the confirmation of this Argument and the Application of it unto the case of them who refrain from total Communion with our Parocâ—ial Assemblies which alone is the case in hand he lays down sundry suppositions which I shall consider in their Order although they may be all granted without any disadvantage unto our Cause But they will be so the better when they are rightly stated 1. His first supposition is that Christians are under the strictest Obligations to preserve the Peace and Vnity of the Church This being the foundation of all that follows it must be rightly stated And to that end three things may be enquired into 1. What is that Church whose Peace and Unity we are obliged to preserve For there are those who lay the firmest claim unto the Name Power and Priviledges of the Church with whom we are obliged to have neither Peace nor Vnity in the Worship of God 2. What is that Peace and Vnity which we are so obliged to preserve 3. By what means they are to be preserved 1. We are obliged to follow Peace with all men to seek Peace
much concern'd My Words are Vindic. p. 41. Though many Alterations were before that time introduced into the Order and Rule of the Churches yet it appears that when Cyprian was Bishop of the Church of Carthage that the whole Community of the Members of that Church did meet together to determine of things that were of their common Interest according unto what was judged to be their Right and Liberty in those dayes I thought no man who is so Conversant in the Writings of Cyprian as our Author apparently is could have denied the Truth hereof nor do I say it is so done by him onely he takes occasion from hence to discourse at large concerning the state of the Church at Carthage in those dayes in Opposition to Mr. Cotton who affirms that there was found in that Church the express and lively lineaments of the very body of Congregational Discipline Herein I am not concern'd who do grant that at that time there were many Alterations introduced into the Order and Rule of the Church but that the People did meet together unto the Determination of things of their common Interest such as were the choice of their Officers and the readmission of them into the Fellowship of the Church who had fallen through infirmity in time of Persecution or publick offences and divisions is so evident in the Writings of Cyprian wherein he ascribes unto them the right of choosing Worthy and of rejecting Unworthy Officers and tells them that in such Cases he will do nothing without their consent that it cannot be gain-said But hereon he asketh where I had any Reason to appeal to St. Cyprian for the Democratical Government of the Church which indeed I did not do nor any thing which look'd like unto it And he addes that they have this Advantage from the appeal that we do not suppose any Deviation then from the Primitive Institution whereas my words are Positive that before that time there were many Alterations introduced into the Rule and Order of the Church such things will partiallity in a Cause and aiming at Success in Disputation produce M. Cotton affirms that the lineaments of the Congregational Discipline are found in that Church that there is therein a just Representation of an Episcopal Church that is I presume Diocesan because that alone is unto his purpose It is not lawful to make any Church after the time of the Apostles the Rule of all Church State and Order nor yet to be absolutely determined in these things by the Authority of any man not divinely inspired And yet I cannot but wish that all the three parties dissenting about Church Order Rule and Worship would attempt an agreement between themselves upon the Representation made of the state of the Church of Carthage in the dayes of Cyprian which all of them lay some claim unto although it will be an Abridgement of some of their pretensions It might bring them all nearer together and it may be all of them in some things nearer to the Truth for it is Certain 1. That the Church of Carthage was at that time a particular Church There was no more Church but one in that City Many occasional Meetings and Assemblies in several places for Divine Exercises and Worship there were But stated Churches with Officers of their own Members peculiarly belonging unto them Discipline among them such as our Reverend Author doth afterwards affirme and describe our Parochial Churches to be there were none nor is it pretended that there were 2. That in this one Church there were Many Presbyters or Elders who ruled the whole Body or Community of it by common Advice and Counsel whether they were all of them such as laboured in the Word and Doctrine with the Administration of the Sacraments or attended unto Rule only it doth not appear But that they were many and such as did not stand in any peculiar Relation unto any part of the people but concur'd in common to promote the Edification of the whole Body as Occasion and Opportunity did require is evident in the account given of them by Cyprian himself 3. That among those Elders in that one Church there was one peculiarly called the Bishop who did constantly preside amongst them in all Church affairs and without whom ordinarily nothing was done as neither did he any thing without the advice of the Elders and consent of the People How far this may be allowed for Orders sake is worth consideration of Divine institution it is not But where there are many Elders who have equal interest in and right unto the rule of the whole Church and the Administration of all Ordinances it is necessary unto Order that one do preside in their meetings and consultations whom custom gave some preheminence unto 4. That the people were ruled by their own consent and that in things of greatest importance as the choice of their Officers the casting out and the receiving in of lapsed members had their suffrage in the determination of them 5. That there was no Imposition of Liturgies or Ceremonies or any humane invention in the Worship of God on the Church or any members of it the Scripture being the sole acknowledged Rule in Discipline and Worship This was the state and order of the Church of Carthage in those days and although there were some alterations in it from the first divine Institution of Churches yet I heartily wish that there were no more difference amongst us then what would remain upon a supposition of this state For what remains of the Opposition made unto what I had asserted concerning Congregational or particular Churches I may referre the Doctor and the Reader unto what hath been farther pleaded concerning them in the preceding discourse nor am I satisfied that he hath given any sufficient answer unto what was before alledged in the vindication but hath passed by what was most pregnant with Evidence unto the Truth and by a mistake of my mind or Words diverts very much from the state of the Question which is no other but what I laid down before yet I will consider what is material in the whole of his Discourse on this subject SECT 5. p. 234 He says I affirm that as to the matter of fact concerning the Institution of Congregational Churches it seems evidently exemplyfied in the Scripture for which I referre the Reader unto what is now again declared in the confirmation of it And he adds The matter of Fact is that when Churches grew too big for one single Congregation in a City then a new Congregational Church was set up under new Officer with a separate power of Government that is in that City But this is not at all the matter of Fact I do not say that there were originally more particular Churches then one in one City I do grant in the words next quoted by him that there is not express mention made that any such Church did divide it self into more Congregations with new Officers But this
from the beginning However this is no part of our present contest namely whether some while after the days of the Apostles in Churches that were greatly encreased and many Elders in them there was not one chosen as at Alexandria by those Elders themselves to preside among them who in a peculiar manner was called a Bishop But if I mistake not that alone which would advantage his cause is to prove that there were in one City or any where else many not occasional Assemblies of Christians or Church Members but many stated fixed Churches with Officers of their own peculiarly related unto them entrusted with Church Power and Priviledges at least as much as he afterwards pleads to be in our Parochial Churches all under the Government of one single Bishop making up a new Church state beyond that of particular Congregations by their Relation unto him as their common Pastor This I take it is that which should have been prov'd All the difficulty wherewith our assertion is accompanyed ariseth from the multiplication of Believers and the encrease of Churches in the Apostles time or presently after For this seems to be so great as that those in one City could not continue in one Church notwithstanding the advantages of occasional Assemblies The Church of Jerusalem had 5000 in it at the same time the word grew and prevailed at Ephesus and other places whereto I shall briefly answer as hastning unto a close of this unpleasing labour I say therefore 1. Whatever difficulty may seem to be in this matter yet in point of Fact so it was there was no Church before the end of the second Century of any other species nature or kind but a particular Congregational Church only as hath been proved before let any one instance be produced of a Church of one denomination National Provincial or Diocesan or of any other kind then that which is Congregational and I will give over this contest But when a matter of Fact is certain it is too late to enquire how it might be And on this occasion I shall add that if in that space of time namely before the end of the second Century any proof or undoubted Testimony can be produced of the Imposition of the necessary use of Liturgies or of stated Ceremonies of the practise of Church discipline consistent with that now in use in the Church of England it will go a great way in the determination of the whole Controversie between us 2. The admirable prevalency of the Gospel in those days consisted principally in its spreading it self all the World over and planting seminaries for farther conversions in all Nations It did indeed prevail more in some Cities and Towns then in others in some places many were converted in others the tender of it was utterly rejected how be it it prevailed not unto the gathering of such great numbers into any Church solely as might destroy or be inconsistent with its Congregational Institution For not all not it may be half not sometimes a third Part of them who made some Profession of the Truth and attended unto the Preaching of the Word and many of whom underwent Martyrdom were admitted as compleat Members of the Church unto all the parts of its Communion Hence there were many who upon a general account were esteemed Christians and that justly where the Churches were but small 3. It doth not appear that in the next Age after the Apostles the Churches were any where so increased in number as to bear the least Proportion with the Inhaâ—itants of the Cities and Towns wherein they were The Church of Smyrna in the dayes of Polyicarpus may justly be esteemed one of the greatest in those dayes both from the Eminency of the Place and Person who was justly accounted the great Instructer of all Asia as they called him when he was carried unto the Stake But this Church giveth such an Account of it self in its Epistle unto the Churches of Pontus about the Martyrdom of Polycarpus as manifest the Church there to have been a very small number in Comparison of the multitude of the other Inhabitants so as that it was scarcely known who or what they were Euseb. lib. 4. cap. 15. So in the Excellent Epistle of the Churches of Vienna and Lyons unto the Churches of Asia and Phrygia concerning the Persecutions that befell them as they declare themselves to have been particular Churches onely so they make it evident that they bore in number no proportion unto the Inhabitants of the places where they were who could scarce discover them by the most diligent search Euseb. lib. 5. cap 1. 4. As for the Church of Hierusalem in particular notwithstanding the great number of its original Converts who probably were many of them strangers occasionally present at the Feast of Pentecost and there instructed in the knowledge of the Truth that they might in the several Countries whither they immediately returned be instruments of the propagation of the Gospel it is Certain that many years after it consisted of no greater Multitude then could come together in one place to the Mannagement of Church Affairs Acts 15.20 21. Nor is it likely that Pella an obscure place whose name probably had never been known but on this occasion was like to receive any great Multitudes nor doth Epiphanius say as our Authour pretends that they spread themselves from thence to Coelosyria and Decapolis and Basanitis For he affirmes expresly that all the Disciples which went from Hierusalem dwelt at Pella Only he says that from thence the Sect of the Nazarenes took its original which spread it self afterwards in Coelosyria Decapolis and Basanitis 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 speaking of that Sect 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 They dwelled all at Pella Sect. 7. p. 239. He quotes another saying of mine namely that I cannot discern the least necessity of any positive Rule or Direction in this Matter seeing the Nature of the thing and the duty of Man doth indispensibly require it And hereon he Attempts to make advantage in opposition unto another saying as he supposeth of mine Namely that the Institution of Churches and the Rules for their disposal and Government throughout the World are the same stated and unalterable from whence he makes many inferences to countenance him in his Charge of Schisme But why should we contend fruitlesly about these things had he been pleased to read a little farther on the same page he would have seen that I affirm the Institution itself to be a plain Command which considering the Nature of the duties required of men in Church Relation is sufficient to oblige them thereunto without any new Revelation unto that purpose which renders all his Queries Exceptions and Inferences of no use For I do not speak in that place of the Original Institution of Churches whose Laws and Rules are Universal and Vnalterable but our actual gathering into particular Churches for which I say the necessity of Duty is our Warrant and the
of the first Institution and Liberty of the Churches of Christ. For although the Fact of Victor was condemned by many yet the Principle he proceeded on was afterwards espoused and put in Practice Our Reverend Author will hardly find an Instance before this of Schisme among any Churches that retained the Substance of the Doctrine of Faith unless it be in those Divisions which fell out in some particular Churches among the Members of them And this we affirm to be in general the Case of the Non-conformists at this day For admitting such Variations as Time and other Circumstances must necessarily infer and they are rejected from Communion on the same grounds that Victor proceeded on in the Excommunication of the Churches of Asia Neither will there be any End of Differences whilst the same Principle is retained Before this Schisme was only esteemed a defect in Love and breach of the Rule of Christs Appointment for the Communion and walking together of Believers in the same Church But this Notion of Schism is in the Judgment of Dr. Still Pref. p. 46. so mean so jejune so narrow a Notion of it that I cannot saith he but wonder that men of Vnderstanding should be satisfied with it But in my Judgement the Author of it was a Man of Good Vnderstanding indeed I have heard him spoken of as one of abstruse Speculations that did not advantage Christian Religion And one hath published in Print that he is one of the Obscurest Writers that ever he read but never heard him before charged with mean and jejune Notions Now this was St Paul who expresly chargeth Schisme on the Church of Corinth because of the Divisions that were among them namely the Members of the same particular Church so as they could not come together in one place in a due manner Nor in all his Writings doth he any where give us any other Notion of Schisme But saith he this is short of that care of the Churches Peace which Christ hath made so great a Duty of his followers But if thâ—re be no other Rule no other Duty for the Preservation of the Churches Peace but only that no separation be made from it which is called Schisme we might have been all quiet in the Church of Rome Let no Man think to perswade us but that for the Preservation of the Churches Peace it is required of us that we do and observe all things that Christ requireth of us and that we enjoyn not the Observation of what he hath not Commanded on Victors Penalty of being excluded from Communion that Faith and Love and Holiness be Kept and promoted in the Church by all the ways of his Appointment And when these things are attended unto St. Paul's mean and jejune Notion of Schisme will be of good use also Nor was there the least Appearance of any other kind of Schisme among the Churches of Christ until that which was occasioned by Victor of which we have spoken The Schismes that followed afterwards were six to one from the Contentions of Bishops or those who had an Ambition so to be which the Apostle foresaw as Clemens witnesseth and made provision against it but that no banks are strong enough to confine the overflowing Ambition of some sort of Persons But saith the Dr. Pref. p. 47. The Obligation to preserve the Peace of the Church extends to all lawful constitutions in order â—o it Therefore to break the Peace of the Church we live in for the sake of any Lawful Orders and Constitutions made to preserve it is directly the sin of Schisme Now Schisme he tells us is as great and dangerous a sin as Murder p. 45. and we know that no Murderer hath eternal Life abiding in him 1 Joh. 3 1â— So that all men here seem to be adjudged unto Hell who comply not with who submit not unto our Ecclesiastical Conâ—titutions or Canons God forbid that ever such Doctrine should be looked on as to have the least affinity unto the Gospel or such Censures to have any savour of the Spirit of Christ in them The Lord Jesus Christ hath not cast the Eternal Condition of those whom he purchased with his own most precious blood into the Arbitrary disposal of any that shall take upon them to make Ecclesiastical Constitutions and Orders for Conformity in Rites and Ceremonies c. Shall we think that he who upon the best use of Means for his Instruction which he is capable of with fervent Prayers to God for Light and Direction cannot comply with and submit unto some Ecclesiastical Constitutions and Orders however pretended to be made foâ— the preservation of Peace and Vnity of the Church on this Ground principally because they are not of the Appointment nor have the Approbation of Jesus Christ though he should mistake herein and miss of his Duty is guilty of no less sin than that of Murder suppose of Cain in Killing his Brother For all Murder is from Hatred and Malice This is that which enflames the Differences amongst us For it is a Scandal of the highest nature when men do see that Persons who in any thing dissent from our Ecclesiastical Constitutions though otherwise sober honest pious and peaceable are looked on as bad if not worse than Theives and Murderers and are dealt withal accordingly Nor can any thing be more effectual to harden others in their Immoralities than to find themselves approved by the Guides of the Church in comparison with such Dissenters But 2. Who is it that shall make these Orders and Constitutions that must be observed for the Preservation of the Unity and Peace of the Church It can be none but those who have power so to do by being uppermost in any Place or Time Who shall judge them to be Lawful no doubt they that make them And what shall these Constitutions be about what shall they extend unto any thing in the World so there be no mention of it in the Scripture one way or other What if any one should now dissent from these Constitutions and not submit unto them why then he is guilty of Schisme as great and dangerous a sin as that of Murder But when all is done what if these Constitutions and Orders should be no ways needful or useful unto the Preservation of the Peace of the Church What if a supposition that they are so reflects dishonour on the Wisdom and Love of Christ What if they are unlawful and unwarrantable the Lord Christ not having given Power and Authority unto any sort of men to make any such Constitutions What if they are the great ways and means of breaking the Vnity and Peace of the Church These and other Enquiries of the like nature must be clearly resolved not by the Dictates of mens own Minds and Spirits but from the Word of Truth before this Intimation can be complied withal But that which is fallen out most beyond Expectation in this whole Discourse is that the Reverend Author seeking by all