circumstances thereof yea and in these cases of the ordinary conversation of the person offending We need not inlarge in the application of this Although a greater Assembly of Elders are to be reverenced as more wise and able than a few Elders with their single Congregations and accordingly may have an higher doctrinall power a power properly and peculiarly suited to their Abilities in cases of difficulty to determine and direct Congregations in their way yet Christ hath not betrusted them with that power Hee hath done the Congregations because they are abstracted from the people And so one Tribe of men concerned in all the forementioned respects is wanting which Christ would have personally concurring not by delegation or representation alone not to the execution only but even to the legall sentence also of cutting men off as in the former paralell and instance may bee observed Yea and the higher and the greater the association of the Presbyteries are the further are they removed from the people and although you might have thereby a greater helpe in that Juridicall knowledge of the Rule to be proceeded by yet they are in a further distance and disinabled therby from that Precise practique knowledge of the Fact and frame of spirit in the person transgressing And Cases may be as truely difficult and hard to bee decided from obscuritie and want of light into the Circumstantiation of the Fact and person in which it was committed and by him obstinately persisted in as of the Law it self Other considerations of like weight might here be added if not for the proofe which we do not here intend yet the clearing of this particular As also to demonstrate that that other way of proceeding by withdrawing communion is most sutable to the relation that by Christs endowment all Churches stand in one towards another yea and wherein the least being a body to Christ doth stand unto all But we should too much exceed the bounds of an Epistle and too long detayne the Reader from the fruitfull and pregnant labours of the worthy Authour The God of peace and truth sanctifie all the truths in it to all those holy ends and through his grace much more which the holy and peaceable spirit of the Author did intend THO GOODVVIN PHILIP NYE Of the Keys of the Kingdome of HEAVEN and the Power thereof according to the WORD of GOD c. CHAP. I. What the Keyes of the Kingdome of Heaven be and what their Power THe Keyes of the Kingdom of Heaven are promised by the Lord Jesus the head and King of his Church unto Peter Mat. 16.19 To thee saith Christ will I give the keyes of the Kingdom of Heaven and whatsoever thou shalt binde on earth shall be bound in Heaven and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in Heaven The words being Allegoricall are therfore somewhat obscure and holding forth honor power in the Church are therefore controversall Prov. 15.1 For where there is no honour nor pride to pursue it there is no contention It will not therefore be amisse for opening of the Doctrine of the Power of the keyes somewhat to open the words of this Text whereon that power is built Five words require a little clearing 1. What is here meant by the Kingdome of Heaven 2. What are the keys of this kingdom and the giving of them 3. What are the acts of these Keyes which are said to be binding and loosing 4. What is the object of these acts to be bound or loosed here put under a generall name Whatsoever 5. Who is the subject recipient of this power or to whom is this power given To thee will I give the Keyes c. 1. For the first By the Kingdome of Heaven is here meant both the Kingdome of Grace which is the Church and the Kingdome of Glory which is in the highest heavens For Christ giving to Peter the keys of the kingdome of Heaven conveyeth therewith not only this power to binde on earth that is in the Church on earth for he gave him no power at all to binde in the world The kingdome of Christ is not of this world but he gives him also this priviledge That what he bound on earth should be bound in heaven And heaven being distinguished from the Church on earth must needs be meant the kingdome of Glory 2. For the second What the keys of the kingdom of heaven be The keys of the kingdom are the Ordinances which Christ hath instituted to be administred in his Church as the preaching of the Word which is the opening and applying of it also the administring of the Seals and censures For by the opening and applying of these both the gates of the Church here and of heaven hereafter are opened or shut to the sons of men And the giving of these keyes implyeth that Christ investeth those to whom he giveth them with a power to open and shut the gates of both And this power lyeth partly in their spirituall calling whether it be their office or their place and order in the Church and partly in the concurse and co-operation of the Spirit of Christ accompanying the right dispensation of these keyes that is of these Ordinances according to his will Moreover these keys are neither Sword nor Scepter No Sword for they convey not civill power of bodily life and death nor Scepter for they convey not Soveraigne or Legislative power over the Church but stewardly and ministeriall As the key of the House of David was given to Hilkiah Isa 22.22 who succeeded Shebna in his office and his office was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 over the house v. 15. and the same word over the house is translated steward in the house Gen. 43.19 3. Touching the third thing what are the acts of these keys The acts of these keys are said here to be binding and loosing which are not the proper acts of materiall keys for their acts be opening and shutting which argueth the keys here spoken of be not materiall keys but metaphoricall and y t being keys they have a power also of opening and shutting for Christ who hath the soveraigne power of these keys hee is said to have the key of David to open and no man to shut to shut and no man to open Rev. 3.7 which implyeth that these keys of Christs Kingdome have such a power of opening and shutting as that they do thereby binde and loose retain and remit in opening they loose and remit in shutting they binde and retain which will more appeare in opening the fourth point 4. The fourth point then is What is the subject to be bound and loosed The Text in Mat. 16.9 saith whatsoever which reacheth not so far as the Papists would stretch it to whatsoever oathes or covenants or contracts or counsels or lawes as if whatsoever oathes of allegiance covenants of lease or marriage c. the Pope ratifieth or dissolveth on earth should be ratified or dissolved in heaven No this
is not the key of the kingdome of heaven but the key of the bottomelesse pit Rev. 9.1 But this word whatsoever is here put in the Neuter Gender not in the Masculine whomsoever to imply both things and persons Things as sins Persons as those that commit them For so when our Saviour speaketh of the same acts of the same keys Ioh. 20.21 he explaineth himself thus Whose sins soever yee remit they are remitted and whose sins soever yee retain they are retained Whatsoever you binde on earth is as much therefore as whose sins soever you retain on earth and whatsoever you loose on earth is as much as whose sins soever you loose on earth Now this binding and loosing of whatsoever sins in whosever commit them is partly in the conscience of the sinner and partly in his outward estate in the Church which is wont to be expressed in other terms either in foro interiori or in foro exteriori As when in the dispensation of the Ordinances of God a sinner is convinced to lie under the guilt of sin then his sin is retained his conscience is bound under the guilt of it and himself bound under some Church-censure according to the quality and desert of his offence and if his sin be the more hainous himself is shut out from the communion of the Church But when a sinner repenteth of his sin and confesseth it before the Lord and if it be known before his people also and then in the ministery of the Doctrine and Discipline of the Gospel his sin is remitted and his conscience loosed from the guilt of it and himself hath open and free entrance both unto the promise of the Gospel and into the gates of the holy communion of the Church 5. The fifth point to be explained is To whom is this power of the keyes given The Text saith To thee Simon Peter the sonne of Jona whom Christ blesseth and pronounceth blessed upon his holy confession of Christ the Sonne of the living God and upon the same occasion promiseth both to use him and his confession as an Instrument to lay the foundation of his Church and also to give him the keys of his Church for the well ordering and governing of it But it hath proved abusie Question How Peter is to be considered in receiving this power of the keys whether as an Apostle or as an Elder for an Elder also he was 1 Pet. 5.1 or as a Believer professing his faith before the Lord Jesus and his fellow Brethren Now because wee are as well studious of peace as of truth wee will not leane to one of these interpretations more than to another Take any of them it will not hinder our purpose in this ensuing Discourse though to speake ingenuously and without offence what we conceive the sense of the words will be most full if all the severall considerations be taken joyntly together Take Peter considered not onely as an Apostle but an Elder also yea and a Beleever too professing his faith all may well stand together For there is a different power given to all these to an Apostle to an Elder to a Beleever and Peter was all these and received all the power which was given by Christ to any of these or to all of these together For as the Father sent Christ so Christ sent Peter as well as any Apostle cum amplitudine plenitudine potestatis so far as either any Church-Officer or the whole Church it selfe was capable of it John 20.21 So that Austin did not mistake when he said Peter received the keys in the name of the Church Neverthelesse wee from this place in Mat. 16.19 will challenge no further power either to the Presbytery or to the Fraternitie of the Church then is more expresly granted to them in other Scriptures Now in other Scriptures it appeareth First That Christ gave the power of retaining or remitting of sins that is the power of binding and loosing the whole power of the keys to all the Apostles as well as to Peter Joh. 20.21.23 Secondly It appeareth also that the Apostles commended the rule and government of every particular Church to the Elders the Presbytery of that Church Heb. 13.17 1 Tim. 5.17 And therefore Christ gave the power of the Keys to them also Thirdly It appeareth farther that Christ gave the power of the keys to the Body likewise of the Church even to the Fraternitie with the Presbytery For the Lord Jesus communicateth the power of binding and loosing to the Apostles or Elders together with the whole Church when they are met in his Name and agree together in the censure of an offender Mat. 18.17 18. If an offender saith he neglect to heare the Church let him be to thee as an Heathen or a Publican that is let him be excommunicated Which censure administred by them with the whole Church he ratifieth with this promise of the power of the keys Verily I say unto you whatsoever you shall binde on earth shall be bound in heaven and whatsoever you shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven In which place howsoever there be some difference between Classicall and Congregationall Divines what should be meant by the Church Tell the Church whether the Presbytery or the Congregation yet all agree in this and it is agreement in the truth which wee seek for That no offender is to be excommunicated but with some concurse of the Congregation at least by way 1. Of consent to the sentence 2. Of actuall execution of it by withdrawing themselves from the offender so convicted and censured Now this consent and concurse of the Congregation which is requisite to the power and validitie of the censure we conceive is some part of the exercise of the power of the keys So that when Christ said to Peter To thee will I give the keys of the kingdome of heaven If Peter then received the whole power of the keys then he stood in the roome and name of all such as have received any part of the power of the keys whether Apostles or Elders or Churches Or if he stood in the roome of an Apostle onely yet that hindreth not but that as he there received the power of an Apostle so the rest of the Apostles received the same power either there or elsewhere and the Presbytery of each Church received if not there yet elsewhere the power belonging to their office and in like sort each Church or Congregation of professed Believers received that portion also of Church-power which belonged to them CHAP. II. Of the Distribution of the Keys and their power or of the severall sorts thereof THe ordinary Distribution of the keys is wont to be thus delivered There is clavis 1. Scientiae A key of knowledge and a clavis 2. Potestatis key of power and the key of power is 1. Ordinis Either a key of order or a key of 2. Jurisdictionis Jurisdiction This distribution though it goe for current both amongst
word and doctrine but rather Pastors and Teachers above them The Elders saith he that rule well are worthy of double honour but especially they that labour in word and doctrine 1. Tim. 5.17 5 Conclus When after the Apostles times one of the Pastors by way of eminencie was called Bishop for order sake yet for many yeers he did no act of power but 1 With consent of the Presbyterie 2 With consent and in the presence of the people As is noted out of Eusebius Ecclesiast Histor lib. 6. ca. 43. Gr. ca. 35. Lat. Cyprian Epist lib. 3. Epist 10. lib. 1. Epist 3. Casanb adversus Baronium exercitat 15. num 28. When it is alledged out of Hiereme to confirm the same that in the primitive times Communi Presbyterorum consilie Ecelesiae gubernabantur It is a weak and poore evasion to put it off with observing that he saith Communi Presbyterorum consilie not authoritate For 1. No authoritie is due to Presbyters over the Bishop or Pastor no more then to the Pastor over them They are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 fellow-Elders and coequall in authoritie And 2. when Hiereme saith The Churches were governed by the common counsell but all with it else it might be said the Bishop governed the Churches with the common counsell of Presbyters to wit asked but not followed And that would imply a contradiction to Hieronus testimonie to say the Churches were governed by the sole authoritie of Bishops and yet not without asking the common counsell of the Presbyters For in asking their counsell and not following it the Bishop should order and govern the Churches against their counsell Now that the Churches were governed by the common counsell of Presbyters and against the common counsell of Presbyters are flat contradictories 2. For a second Argument to prove that the Brethren of the Church of a particular congregation walking with their Elders in truth and peace are the first subject of all that Church power which is needfull to be exercised in their own body It is taken From their indispensable and independent power in Church censures The censure that is ratified in heaven cannot be dispensed withall nor reversed by any power on earth Now the censure that is administred by the Church of a particular congregation is ratified in Heaven For so saith the Lord Iesus touching the power of Church censures Matth. 18 17 18. If the offender refuse to hear the Church let him be to thee as a heathen and a Publican Verily I say unto you Whatsoever ye shall bind onearth shall be bound in Heaven and whatsoever ye shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven Against this Argument from this Text many objections are wont to be made but none that will hold Object 1. By Church in Mat. 18.17 is not meant the Christian Church for it was not yet extant nor could the Apostles then have understood Christ if he had so meant but the Jewish church and so he delivereth their censure in a Jewish phrase to account a man as an Heathen and a Publican Answ 1. The Christian Church though it was not then extant yet the Apostles knew as well what he meant by Church in Mat. 18.17 as they understood what he meant by building his Church upon the Rock in Mat. 16.18 It was enough the Apostles looked for a Church which Christ would gather and build upon the confession of Peters faith and being built should be indued with heavenly power in their censures which they more fully understood afterwards when having received the Holy Ghost they came to put these things in practice Answ 2. The allusion in the Church-censure to the Jewish custome in accounting a man as an Heathen and Publican doth not argue that Christ directeth his Disciples to complain of scandals to the Jewish Synagogues but only directeth them how to walk towards obstinate offenders excommunicate by the Christian church to wit to walk towards them as the Jews walk towards Heathens to wit denying to them religious communion and as towards Publicans with-holding from them familiar civill communion for so the Iews said to Christs Disciples Why eateth your Master with Publicans and Sinners Answ 3. It is not credible that Christ would send his Disciples to make complaint of their offences to the Iewish Synagogues For first Is it likely he would send his Lambs and Sheep for right and healing unto Wolves and Tigres Both their Sanhedrim and most of their Synogogues were no better And if here and there some Elders of their Synagogues were better affected yet how may it appear that so it was where any of themselves dwelt And if that might appear too yet had not the Iews already agreed That if any man did confesse Christ he should be cast out of the Synagogues Joh. 9.22 Object 2. Against the argument from this Text it is objected That by the Church is meant the Bishop or his Commissary Answ 1. One man is not the Church If it be said one man may represent a church the reply is ready one man cannot represent the Church unlesse he be sent forth by the Church but so is neither the Bishop nor his Commissary They not for them but they come unsent for like water into a Ship chiefly for the terror of the servants of Christ and for the incouragement of the prophane And though some of Christs servants have found some favour from some few of Bishops men of more learning and ingenuity yet those Bishops have found the lesse favour themselves from their fellow-Bishops Answ 2. The Bishop ordinarily is no member of the Church of that congregation where the offence is committed and what is his satisfaction to the removall of the offence given to the Church Answ 3. The new Testament acknowledgeth no such ruler in the Church as claimeth honour above the Elders that labour in word and Doctrine 1 Tim. 5.17 Object 3. To tell the Church is to tell the Presbyterie of the Church Answ 1. We deny not The offence is to be told to the Presbyterie yet not to them as the Church but as the guides of the church who if upon hearing the cause and examining the witnesses they finde it ripe for publike censure they are then to propound it to the Church and to try and cleer the state of the cause before the church that so the church discerning fully the nature and quality of the offence may consent to the judgement and sentence of the Elders against it to the confusion of the offender and the publike edification of them all who hearing and fearing will learn to beware of the like wickednesse Answ 2. The Church is never put for the Presbyterie alone throughout the new Testament though sometime it be put expresly for the Fraternity alone as they are distinguished from the Elders and Officers Act. 15.22 and therefore Tell the Church cannot be meant Tell the Presbyterie alone Object In the old Testament the Congregation is often put for the
be also betrusted by the civill State with the preservation and protection of the Lawes and Liberties peace and safety of the same state and shall meet together in a publike civill assembly whether in Councell or Camp they may there provide by civill power according to the wholsome lawes and liberties of the countrey Ne quid Ecclesia ne quid Respublica detrimenti capiat If King Saul swear to put Ionathan to death the Leaders of the people may by strong hands rescue him from his fathers unjust and illegall fury 1 Sam. 14.44 45. But if Saul persecute David though as unjustly as Ionathan yet if the Princes and Leaders of the people will not rescue him from the wrath of the King David a private man will not draw out his sword in his own defence so much as to touch the Lords anoynted 1 Sam. 24.4 to 7. To conclude this Corollary touching the subjection of churches to the civill State in matters which concern the civill peace this may not be omitted that as the Church is subject to the sword of the Magistrate in things which concern the civill peace so the Magistrate if Christian is subject to the keys of the Church in matters which concern the peace of his conscience and the kingdome of heaven Hence it is prophesied by Isaiah that Kings and Queens who are nursing fathers and mothers to the church shall bow down to the Church with their faces to the earth Isai 49.23 that is they shall walk in professed subjection to the Ordinances of Christ in his Church Hence also it is that David prophesieth of a two-edged sword that is the sword of the Spirit the word of Christ put into the hands of the Saints who are by calling the Members of the Church as to subdue the nations by the ministery of the Word to the obedience of the Gospel Psal 149.6 7. so to binde their Kings with chains and their Nobles with fetters of iron to execute upon them the judgement written that is written in the Word Psal 149. v. 8 9. 3. A third Corollary touching the independency of churches is this That a church of a particular Congregation consisting of Elders and Brethren and walking in the truth and peace of the Gospel as it is the First subject of all Church-power needfull to be exercised within it selfe so it is independent upon any other Church or Synod for the exercise of the same That such a Church is the first subject of all church-power hath been cleered above in the opening the third Proposition of the first subject of the power of the keys And such a church being the first subject of church-power is unavoidably independent upon any other church or body for the exercise therof for as hath been said afore the first subject of any Accident or Adjunct is independent upon any other either for the injoying or for the imploying the having or the using of the same 4. A fourth Corollary touching the independency of churches is That a Church fallen into any offence whether it be the whole church or a strong party in it is not independent in the exercise of church-power but is subject both to the admonition of any other church and to the determination and judiciall sentence of a Synod for direction into a way of truth and peace And this also ariseth from the former discourse For if clavis errans non ligat Ecclesia litigans non ligat that is if Christ hath not given to a particular church a promise to binde and loose in heaven what they binde and loose on earth unlesse they agree together and agree in his name then such a church is not independent in their proceedings as do fail in either For all the independency that can be claimed is founded upon that promise What yee binde on earth shall be bound in heaven what yee loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven Matth. 18.18 On that promise is founded both the independency and security and parity also of all churches But if that promise be cut off from them they are like Samson when his haire was cut off weak and subject to fall under other men and yet they fall softer then hee did hee fell into the hands of his enemies but they fall under the censure of their friends As the false Prophet recanting his error did acknowledge so may they Thus was I wounded in the house of my friends Zach. 13.6 In the house of a neighbour-church or two I was friendly smitten with a brotherly admonition which like a precious oyle did not break mine head and in the house of a Synod of churches I was friendly yea brotherly censured and healed 5. A fifth and last Corollary arising from the former discourse touching the independency of churches may be this Though the church of a particular Congregation consisting of Elders and Brethren and walking with a right foot in the truth and peace of the Gospel be the first subject of all church-power needfull to be exercised within it selfe and consequently be independent from any other church or Synod in the use of it yet it is a safe and whole some and holy Ordinance of Christ for such particular churches to joyn together in holy Covenant or Communion and consolation amongst themselves to administer all their church affairs which are of weighty and difficult and common concernment not without common consultation and consent of other churches about them Now church-affaires of weighty and difficult and common concernment wee account to be the election and ordination of Elders excommunication of an Elder or any person of publick note and employment the translation of an Elder from one Church to another or the like In which case we conceive it safe and wholsome and an holy ordinance to proceed with common consultation and consent Safe for in multitude of counsellers there is safetie as in civill so in Church affairs Prov. 11.14 And though this or that Church may be of a good and strong constitution and walk with a right foot in the truth and peace of the Gospel yet all Churches are not in a like athletick plight and they will be Ioath to call in or look out for help as much or more then others though they have more need then others yea and the best Churches may soon degenerate and stand in as much need of help as others and for want of it may sink and fall into deep Apostasie which other Churches might have prevented had they discerned it at first It is also wholsome as tending to maintain brotherly love and soundnesse of doctrine in Churches and to prevent many offences which may grow up in this or that particular Church when it transacteth all such things within it self without consent It is likewise an holy ordinance of Christ as having just warrant from a like precedent The Apostles were as much independent from one another and stood in as little need of one anothers help as Churches do one of
officers in the due censure of offenders and the like This libertie and the acts thereof are often exemplified in the Acts of the Apostles and the Apostle Paul calleth it expresly by the name of libertie Brethren saith he you have been called unto LIBERTY onely use not your liberty as an occasion to the flesh but by love serve one another Galath 5.13 that the Apostle by that libertie meaneth Church libertie or power in ordering Church affaires will evidently appeare if we consult with the context rather then with Commenters For the Apostle having spent the former part of the Epistle partly in the confirmation of his calling partly in disputation against justification by the works of the Law to the end of v. 8. of Chap. 5. in the ninth Verse he descendeth not to exhort unto bonos more 's in generall as usually Commenters take it but to instruct in Church Discipline in which he giveth three or foure directions to the tenth v. of Chap. 6. 1 Touching the censure of those corrupt Teachers who had perverted and troubled them with that corrupt Doctrine of justification by works Chap. 5. ver 9. to the end of the Chapter 2. Touching the gentle admonition and restoring of a brother fallen by infirmitie Chap. 6. ver 1. to 5. 3. Touching the maintenance of their Ministers ver 6 7 8. and beneficence to others ver 9 10. Touching the first the censure of their corrupt teachers 1 He layeth for the ground of it that which himself gave for the ground of the excommunication of the incestuous Corinth 1 Cor. 5.6 A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump vers 9. 2 He presumeth the Church will be of the same mind with him and concur in the censure of him that troubled them with corrupt doctrine v. 10. from fellowship with which corrupt doctrine he cleareth himself v. 11. 3 He proceedeth to declare what censure he wisheth might be dispensed against him and the rest of those corrupt teachers I would saith he they were even cut off that trouble you cut off to wit by excommunication ver 12. Now lest it should be objected by the brethren of the Church But what power have we to cut them off The Apostle answereth they have a power and libertie to wit to joyn with the sounder part of the Presbyterie in casting them out or cutting them off For brethren saith he you are called unto liberty If it should be further objected Yea but give the people this power and libertie in some cases either to cast off their teachers or to cut them off the people will soon take advantage to abuse this libertie unto much carnall licentiousnesse The Apostle preventeth that with a word of wholsome counsell Brethren saith he you have been called unto libertie onely use not your libertie as an occasion to the flesh but by love serve one another v. 13. and thereupon seasonably pursueth this counsell with a caveat to beware of abusing this liberty to carnall contention an usuall disease of popular liberty and withall dehorteth them from all other fruits of the flesh to the end of the Chapter Evident therefore it is that there is a key of power or libertie given to the Church to the Brethren with the Elders as to open a doore of entrance to the Ministers calling so to shut the doore of entrance against them in some cases as when through corrupt and pernicious doctrine they turn from Shepherds to become ravenous wolves Having spoken then of that first key of order namely the key of power in a more large sense or liberty in the Church there remaineth the other key of order which is the key of Authority or of Rule in a more strict sense which is in the Elders of the Church Authoritie is a morall power in a superiour order or state binding or releasing an inferious in point of subjection This key when it was promised to Peter Matth. 16.19 and given to him with the rest of the Apostles Ioh. 20.23 they thereby had power to bind and loose and it is the same Authority which is given to their successours the Elders whereby they are called to feed and rule the Church of God as the Apostles had done before them Act. 20.28 And indeed by opening and applying the Law the spirit of bondage accompanying the same they bind sinners under the curse and their consciences under guilt of sin and fear of wrath and shut the kingdom of heaven against them And by opening and applying the Gospel the Spirit of Adoption accompanying the same they remit sin and loose the consciences of beleeving repenting souls from guilt of sin and open to them the doores of heaven By vertue of this key as they preach with all authoritie not onely the doctrine of the Law but also the Covenant of the Gospel so they administer the seals thereof Baptisme and the Lords Supper By virtue also of this key they with the Church do bind an obstinate offender under excommunication Matth. 18.17 18. and release and forgive him upon his repentance 2 Cor. 2.7 This Distribution of the keyes and so of spirituall power in the things of Christs kingdom we have received from the Scripture But if any men out of love to Antiquitie do rather affect to keep to the terms of the former more ancient Distribution as there be who are as loath to change Antiquos terminos verborum as agrorum we would not stick upon the words rightly explained out of desire both to judge and speak the same things with fellow-brethren Onely then let them allow some spirituall power to the key of knowledge though not Church-power And in Church power let them put in as well a key of liberty that is a power and priviledge of interest as a key of Authoritie And by their key of order as they do understand the key of office so let them not divide from it the key of jurisdiction for Christ hath given no jurisdiction but to whom he hath given office and so we willingly consent with them CHAP. III. Of the subject of the power of the keyes to whom they are committed and first of the key of knowledge and Order AS the keyes of the kingdom of heaven be divers so are the subjects to whom they are committed divers as in the naturall body diversitie of functions belongeth to diversity of members 1. The key of knowledge or which is all one the key of Faith belongeth to all the faithfull whether joyned to any particular Church or no. As in the primitive times men of grown yeers were first called and converted to the faith before they were received into the Church And even now an Indian or Pagan may not be received into the Church till he have first received the faith and have made profession of it before the Lord and the Church which argueth that the key of knowledge is given not onely to the Church but to some before they enter into the Church And yet to Christians for
judge the world even Angels so in the next Chapter the 6. of that 1 Cor. 1.2 3 4 5. And the same Brethren of the same Church as well as the Elders he intreateth to forgive the same incestuous Corinthian upon his repentance 2 Cor. 2.7 8. If it be said to judge is an act of rule and to be Rulers of the Church is not given to all the Brethren but to the Elders only Answ All judgement is not an act of authority or rule for there is a judgement of discretion by way of priviledge as well as of authority by way of sentence That of discretion is common to all the Brethren as well as that of authority belongeth to the Presbytery of that Church In England the Jury by their verdict as well as the Judge by his sentence do both of them judge the same malefactor yet in the Jury their verdict is but an act of their popular liberty In the Judge it is an act of his judiciall authority If it be demanded What difference is there between these two The answer is ready Great is the difference for though the Jury have given up their judgement and verdict yet the malefactor is not thereupon legally condemned much lesse executed but upon the sentence of the Judge In like sort here though the Brethren of the Church do with one accord give up their vote and judgement for the censure of an offender yet he is not thereby censured till upon the sentence of the Presbytery If it be said again Yea but it is an act of authority to binde and loose and the power to bind and loose Christ gave to the whole Church Mat. 18.18 Answ The whole Church may be said to bind and loose in that the Brethren consent and concurre with the Elders both before the Censure in discerning it to be just and equall and in declaring their discernment by lifting up of their hands or by silence and after the censure in rejecting the offender censured from their wonted Communion And yet their discerning or approving of the justice of the censure before-hand is not a preventing of the Elders in their work For the Elders before that have not onely privately examined the offender and his offence and the proofes thereof to prepare the matter and ripen it for the Churches cognizance but doe also publickly revise the heads of all the materiall passages thereof before the Church and doe withall declare to the Church the counsell and will of God therein that they may rightly discerne and approve what censure the Lord requireth to be administred in such a case So that the peoples discerning and approving the justice of the censure before it be administred ariseth from the Elders former instruction and direction of them therein Whereunto the people give consent in obedience to the will and rule of Christ Hence is that speech of the Apostle Wee have in readinesse to revenge all disobedience when your OBEDIENCE IS FVLFILLED 2 Cor. 10.6 The Apostles revenge of disobedience by way of reproofe in preaching doth not follow the peoples obedience but proceedeth whether the people obey it or no. It was therefore their revenge of disobedience by way of censure in discipline which they had in readinesse when the obedience of the Church is fulfilled in discerning and approving the Equitie of the Censure which the Apostles or Elders have declared to them from the Word This power or priviledge of the Church in dealing in this sort with a scandalous offender may not be limited only to a private brother offending but may reach also to an offensive Elder For as hath been touched already it is plaine that the Brethren of the Circumcision supposing Peter to have given an offence in eating with men uncircumcised they openly expostulated with him about his offence and he stood not with them upon termes of his Apostleship much lesse of his Eldership but willingly submitted himselfe to give satisfaction to them all Act. 11.2 to 18. And Paul writeth to the Church of Colosse to deale with Archippus warning him to see to the fulfilling of his Ministery Col. 4.17 And very pregnant is his direction to the Galatians for their proceeding to the utmost with their corrupt and scandalous false Teachers I would saith he they were even cut off that trouble you And that upon this very ground of their libertie Gal. 5.12 13. as hath been opened above in Chap. 2. But whether the Church hath power or libertie for proceeding to the utmost censure of their whole Presbytery is a Question of more difficultie For 1. It cannot well be conceived that the whole Presbytery should be proceeded against but that by reason of their strong influence into the hearts of many of the Brethren a strong partie of the Brethren will be ready to side with them and in case of finding dissension and opposition the Church ought not to proceed without consulting with the Synod As when there arose dissension in the Church at Antioch and SIDING or as the word is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 they sent up to the Apostles and Elders at Jerusalem who in way of Synod determined the businesse Act. 15.2 to 23. A precedent and patterne of due Church proceedings in case of dissension when some take with one side some with another But of that more here after 2. Excommunication is one of the highest acts of Rule in the Church and therefore cannot be performed but by some Rulers Now where all the Elders are culpable there be no Rulers left in that Church to censure them As therefore the Presbytery cannot excommunicate the whole Church though Apostate for they must tell the Church and joyne with the Church in that Censure so neither can the Church excommunicate the whole Presbytery because they have not received from Christ an office of rule without their Officers If it be said the twentie-foure Elders who represent the private members of the Church as the foure living Creatures doe the foure Officers had all of them Crowns upon their heads and sate upon thrones Rev. 4.4 which are signes of regall authoritie The answer is The crowns and thrones argue them to be Kings no more then their white rayments argue them to be Priests ver 4. but neither Priests nor Kings by office but by libertie to performe like spirituall duties by grace which the other doe by grace and office As Priests they offer up spirituall sacrifices and as Kings they rule their lusts passions themselves and their families yea the world and Church also after a sort the world by improving it to spirituall advantage and the Church by appointing their own Officers and likewise in censuring their offenders not onely by their officers which is as much as Kings are wont to doe but also by their own royall assent which Kings are not wont to doe but onely in the execution of Nobles But neverthelesse though the Church want authoritie to excommunicate their Presbytery yet they want not libertie to
another And yet Paul went up to Ierusalem to confer with Peter Iames and Iohn lest he should run in vain in the course of his ministery Galat. 2.2 And though in conference the chief Apostles added nothing to Paul ver 6. yet when they perceived the Gospel of the uncircumcision was committed to Paul and Barnabas as that of the circumcision to Peter Iames and Iohn they gave unto one another the right hand of fellowship ver 9. Now then it will follow by just proportion that if the Apostles who are each of them independent one of another had need to consult and confer together about the work of their ministery to procure the freer passage to their calling and to their doctrine then surely Churches and Elders of Churches though independent one of another had need to communicate their courses and proceedings in such cases one with another to procure the freer passage to the same And if the Apostles giving right hand of fellowship one to another did mutually strengthen their hands in the work of the ministery then the Elders of Churches giving right hand of fellowship to one another in their ordination or upon any fit occasion cannot but much encourage and strengthen the hearts and hands of one another in the Lords work Again something might be added if not for confirmation yet for illustration of this point by comparing the dimensions of the new Ierusalem which is a perfect platform of a pure Church as it shall be constituted in the Iewish Church state at their last conversion The dimensions of this Church as they are described by Ezekiel Chap. 48.30 are according to Iunius twelve furlongs which after the measure of the Sanctuarie which is double to the common is about three miles in length and as much in breadth But the dimensions of the same Church of the Iews in Revel 21.16 is said to be twelve thousand furlongs Now how can these two dimensions of the same Church stand together which are so farre discrepant one from another For there be a thousand times twelve furlongs in twelve thousand furlongs The fittest and fairest reconciliation seemeth plainly to be this that Ezekiel speaketh of the dimensions of any ordinarie Iewish Church of one particular congregation But Iohn speaketh of the dimensions of many particular Iewish Churches combining together in some cases even to the communion of a thousand Churches Not that the Church of the Iews will be constituted in a Nationall and Diocesan frame with Nationall officers and Diocesan Bishops or the like but that sometimes a thousand of them will be gathered into a Synod and all of them will have such mutuall care and yeeld such mutuall brotherly help and communion one to another as if they were all but one body If any man say Theologia symbolica or parabolica non est argumentativa that arguments from such parables and mysticall resemblances in Scripture are not valid let him enjoy his owne apprehension and if he can yeeld a better interpretation of the place let him wave this collection Neverthelesse if there were no argumentative power in parables why did the Lord Iesus so much delight in that kind of teaching and why did Iohn and Daniel and Ezekiel deliver a great part of their prophesies in parables if we must take them for riddles and not for documents nor arguments Surely if they serve not for argument they serve not for document But furthermore touching this great work of communion and consociation of Churches give us leave to adde this caution A Caution To see that this consociation of Churches be not perverted either to the oppression or diminution of the just libertie and authoritie of each particular Church within it self who being well supplied with a faithfull and expert Presbyterie of their own do walk in their integritie according to the truth and peace of the Gospel Let Synods have their just authoritie in all Churches how pure soever in determining such 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as are requisite for the edification of all Christs Churches according to God But in the election and ordination of Officers and censure of offenders let it suffice the Churches consociate to assist one another with their counsell and right hand of fellowship when they see a particular Church to use their libertie and power aright But let them not put forth the power of their communitie either to take such Church acts out of their hands or to hinder them in their lawfull course unlesse they see them through ignorance or weaknesse to abuse their libertie and authoritie in the Gospel All the liberties of Churches were purchased to them by the precious blood of the Lord Iesus and therefore neither may the Churches give them away nor many Churches take them out of the hands of one They may indeed prevent the abuse of their liberties and direct in the lawfull use of them but not take them away though themselves should be willing The Lord Iesus having given equall power to all the Apostles it was not lawfull for eleven of them to forbid the twelfth to do any act of his office without their intervention Neither was it lawfull for the nine who were of inferiour gifts to commit the guidance and command of all their Apostolick administrations unto Peter Iames and Iohn who seemed to be pillars And that not onely because they were all one as well as another immediately guided by the holy Ghost but because they were all equall in office and everie one to give account for himself unto God It is the like case in some measure of particular churches yea there is moreover a three-fold further inconvenience which seemeth to us to attend the translation of the power of particular churches in these ordinary admninistraons into the hands of a Synod of Presbyters commonly called a Classis 1. The promise of Binding and Loosing in way of Discipline which Christ gave to every particular church as hath been shewed is by this means not received nor injoyned nor practised by themselves immediately but by their Deputies or Over-seers 2. The same promise which was not given to Synods in acts of that nature as hath been shewed in the Chapter of Synods but in acts of another kinde is hereby received and injoyned and practised by them and by them onely which ought not to be And which is a third inconvenience The practice of this power of the keys only by a Synod of Presbyters still keepeth the Church as under nonage as if they were not grown up to the full fruition of the just liberty of their riper yeers in the dayes of the Gospel For a mother to bear her young daughter in her arms and not to suffer it to go on its own feet whilest it is in the infancie is kindly and comely but when the Damosell is grown up to riper yeers for the mother still to bear her in her arms for fear of stumbling it were an uncecessary burthen to the mother and a reproach to the Virgin Such is the case here The community of churches according to the Hebrew phrase is as the Mother each particular church is as the Daughter In the old Testament while the Church was in her nonage it was not unseasonable to leave the whole guidance and bearing thereof in the hands of their Tutors and Governours the Priests and Levites and in the community of the nationall courts But now in the dayes of the new Testament when the churches are grown up or should be grown at least to more maturity it were meet more to give the Church liberty to stand alone and to walk upon her own legs and yet in any such part of her way as may be more hard to hit right upon as in her Elections and Ordinances and Censures of eminent persons in office it is a safe and holy and faithfull office of the vigilancy of the community of churches to be present with them and helpfull to them in the Lord. And at all times when a particular church shall wander out of the way whether out of the way of truth or of peace the community of churches may by no meanes be excused from reforming them again into their right way according to the authority which the Lord hath given them for the publike edification of all the severall churches within their Covenant Soli Christo 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This is licensed and entred according to Order FINIS
her is but simply the power of her own act in which her own concernement which doth intrest her free by an intrinsecall right The like difference would appeare if we had seene a Governement tempered of an Aristocracy and democracy in which suppose the people have a share and their actuall consent is necessary to all lawes and sentences c. whereas a few Nobles that are set over them whose concernement is lesse generall in whom the formall sanction of all should lye in these it were Rule and Authority in that multitude but Power and intrest and such an Authority is to be given to a Presbytry of Elders in a particular Congregation or else as wee have long since beene resolved all that is said in the New Testament about their Rule and of the peoples Obedience to them is to be look't upon but as Metaphors and to hold no porportion with any substantiall reallity of Rule and Governement And in this Distribution of power Christ hath had a sutable and due regard unto the estate and condition of his Church as now under the New Testament He hath qualified and dignified it Vnder the Old Testament it was in its infancy but it is comparatively come forth of its nonage growen up to a riper age both as the tenure of the Covenant of grace in difference from the old runs in the Prophets as Paul to the Galatians expresseth it They are therefore more generally able if visible Saints which is to be the subject matter of Churches under the N. Testāent to joyn with their Guides Leaders in judging discerning what concernes their own their Brethrens consciences And therefore Christ hath not now lodged the sole power of all Church matters solely intirely in the Churches Tutors Governors as of old when it was under age He did But yet because of their weaknes unskilfulnes for the generality of them in comparison to those whō He hath ascended to give gifts unto on purpose for their guidance the Government of thē He hath therefore placed a Rule and Authority in those Officers over them not directing onely but binding so as not onely nothing in an ordinary way of Church government should be done without them but not esteemed validly done unlesse done by them And thus by meanes of this due and golden ballancing and poysing of power and interest Authority and Priviledge in Elders and the Brethren this Government might neither degenerate into Lordlynesse and oppression in Rulers over the Flocke as not having all power in their hands alone nor yet into Anarchy and confusion in the Flocke among themselves so as all things belonging to mens consciences might be transacted to common edification satisfaction For the second Let it not seeme a paradoxe that a Ministeriall Doctrinall Authority should be found severed from that power of Excommunication to second it if not obeyed Every Minister and Pastour hath in himselfe alone a Ministeriall Doctrinall authority over the whole Church that is his charge and every person in it to instruct rebuke exhort with all authority By reason of which those under him are bound to obey him in the Lord not only vi Materiae by vertue of the matter of the commands in that they are the commands of Christ for so he should speake with no more authority then any other man yea a Child who speaking a truth out of the word should leade us as the prophet speakes But further by reason of that Ministeriall authority which Christ hath endowed him withall he is to be look't at by them as an Ordinance of His over them and towards them And yet he alone hath not the authority of Excommunication in him to inforce his Doctrine if any doe gainesay it Neither therefore is this authority as in him considered to be judged vaine and fruitlesse and ineffectuall to draw men to obedience Neither let it seeme strange that the power of this Censure of cutting men off and delivering them to Satan in which the positive part and indeed the controversie betwixt us others of Excommunication lyes should be inseperably linked by Christ unto a particular Congregation as the proper native priviledge hereof so as that no Assembly or company of Elders justly presumed and granted to be more wise judicious should assume it to themselves or sever the formall power thereof from the particular Congregations For though it be hard to give the reason of Christs institutions Yet there is usually in the wayes of humane wisedom and reason something analogous thereunto which may serve to illustorate if not to justifie this dispersion of intrests And so if we mistake not there may be found even of this in the wisedome of our Ancestours in the constitutions of this Kingdome The sentencing to death of any subject in the Kingdome as it is the highest civill punishment so of all other the neerest and exactest paralell to this in spiritualls of cutting a soule off and delivering it to Satan yet the power of this high judgement is not put into the hands of an Assembly of Lawyers onely no not of all the Judges themselves men selected for wisedome faithfullnesse and gravity who yet are by office designed to have an inerest herein But when they upon any speciall Cause of difficulty for councell and direction in such judgements doe all meete as sometimes they doe Yet they have not power to pronounce this sentence of death upon any man without the concurrence of a Jury of his Peeres which are of his owne ranke and in Corporations of such as are Inhabitants of the same place And with a Jury of these men of themselves not supposed to be so skilfull in the Lawes c. two Judges yea one with other Justices on the Bench hath power to adjudge and pronounce that which all of them and all the Lawyers in this Kingdome together have not without a Jury And we of this Nation use to admire the care and wisedom of our Ancestors herein do esteeme this priviledge of the Subject in this particular peculiar to our Nation as one of the glories of our Lawes and doe make beast of it as such a liberty and security to each persons life as we thinke no Nation about us can shew the like And what should be the reason of such a constitution but this which in the beginning we insisted on the dispersion of power into severall hands which in capitall matters every mans tryall should runne through whereof the one should have the tye of like common intrest to oblige them unto faithfullnesse as the other should have skill and wisedome to guide them and direct therein And besids that intrest that is in any kind of Association fraternity yea or neighbourhood or like wise that which is from the common case of men alike subjected to an Authority set over them to sentence them there is also the speciall advantage of an exact knowledge of the fact in the hainous
the Churches sake that they who receive this grace of faith by it may receive Christ and his benefits and therewith may receive also this priviledge to find an open doore set before them to enter into the fellowship of the Church 2. The key of order speaking as we do of Church order as Paul doth Col. 2.5 belongeth to all such who are in Church order whether Elders or Brethren For though Elders be in a superiour order by reason of their office yet the brethren over whom the Elders are made Overseers and Rulers they stand also in an order even in orderly subjection according to the order of the Gospel It is true every faithful soul that hath received a key of knowledge is bound to watch over his neighbours soul as his own and to admonish him of his sin unlesse he be a scorner but this he doth Non ratione ordinis sed intuitu charitatis not by vertue of a state of order which he is in till in Church fellowship but as of common Christian love and charitie But every faithfull Christian who standeth in Church order is bound to do the same as well respectu ordinis as intuitu charitatis by virtue of that royall Law not onely of love but of Church order Matth. 18.15 16 17. whereby if his brother who offended him do not hearken to his conviction and admonition he is then according to order to proceed further taking one or two with him and if the offender refuse to hear them also then he is by order to tell the Church and afterwards walk towards him as God shall direct the Church to order it CHAP. IIII. Of the subject to whom the key of Church priviledge power or Liberty is given THis key is given to the Brethren of the Church for so saith the Apostle in Gal. 5.13 in the place quoted and opened before Brethren you have been called to liberty And indeed as it is the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of a Common-wealth the right and due establishment and ballancing of the liberties or priviledges of the people which is in a true sense may be called a power and the authority of the Magistrate so it is the safety of Church estate the right and due settling and ordering of the holy power of the priviledges and liberties of the Brethren and the ministeriall authority of the Elders The Gospel alloweth no Church authority or rule properly so called to the Brethren but reserveth that wholly to the Elders and yet preventeth the tyrannie and oligarchy and exorbitancy of the Elders by the large and firm establishment of the liberties of the Brethren which ariseth to a power in them Bucers axiome is here notable Potestaspenes omnem Ecclesiamest Authoritas ministerii penes Presbyteros Episcopos In Mat. 16.19 where Potestas or power being contradistinguished from Authoritas Authority is nothing else but a liberty or priviledge The liberties of the Brethren or of the Church consisting of them are many and great 1. The Church of Brethren hath the power priviledges and liberty to choose their officers In the choyce of an Apostle in to the place of Judas the people went as far as humane vote and suffrage could go Out of 120. persons v. 15. they chose out and presented two out of which two because an Apostle was to be designed immediately by God God by lot chose one And yet this one so chosen of God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 communibus omnium fuffragiis inter duodecim Apostolos allectus est v. 26. was counted amongst the Apostles by the common suffrages of them all And this place Cyprian presseth amongst others to confirm the power that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or priviledge or liberty of the people in choosing or refusing their Ministers Plebs Christiana saith he vel maxime potestatem habet vel dignos sacerdotes eligendi ves indignos recusandi Epistol 4. lib. 1. The like or greater liberty is generally approved by the best of our Divines studious of Reformation from Act. 14.23 They ordained them Elders chosen by lifting up of hands The same power is cleerly expressed in the choyce of Deacons Act. 6.3.5 6. The Apostles did not choose the Deacons but called the multitude together and said unto them Brethren looke you out seven men amongst you whom we may appoint over this businesse And the saying pleased the whole multitude and they chose Stephen c. 2. It is a priviledge or a liberty the Church hath received to send forth one or more of their Elders as the publike service of Christ and of the Church may require Thus Epaphroditus was a Messenger or Apostle of the Church of Philippi unto Paul Phil. 2.25 3. The Brethren of the Church have power and liberty of propounding any just exception against such as offer themselves to be admitted unto their communion or unto the seales of it Hence Saul when hee offered himself to the communion of the Church at Jerusalem was not at first admitted thereto upon an exception taken against him by the Disciples till that exception was removed Act. 9.26 27. and Peter did not admit the family of Cornelius to Baptisme till he had inquired of the Brethren if any of them had any exception against it Act. 10.47 4. As the Brethren have a power of order and the priviledge to expostulate with their Brethren in case of private scandals according to the rule Mat. 18.15 16. So in case of publike scandall the whole Church of Brethren have power and priviledge to joyn with the Elders in inquiring hearing judging of publike scandals so as to binde notorious offenders and impenitents under censure and to forgive the repentant For when Christ commandeth a brother in case that offence cannot be healed privately then to tell the Church Mat. 18.17 it necessarily implyeth that the Church must heare him and inquire into the offence complained of and judge of the offence as they find it upon inquiry When the Brethren that were of the circumcision expostulated with Peter about his communion with Cornelius and his uncircumcised family Peter did not reject them and their complaint against him as transgressing the bounds of their just power and priviledge but readily addressed himself to give satisfaction to them all Act. 1 1 2 to 18. The Brethren of the Church of Corinth being gathered together with their Elders in the name of the Lord Jesus and with his power did deliver the incestuous person to Satan 1 Cor. 5.4 5. And Paul reproveth them all Brethren as well as Elders that they had no sooner put him away from amongst them v. 2. and expresly he alloweth to them all power to judge them that are within v. 22. Yea and from thence argueth in all the Saints even in the meanest of the Saints and ability to judge between brethren in the things of this life as those that have received such a spirit of discerning from Christ by which they shall one day
and peace to such churches as through want of light and peace lye in error or doubt at least and variance so they have power by the grace of Christ not only to give light and counsell in matter of Truth and Practice but also to command and enjoyn the things to be believed and done The expresse words of the Synodall letter imply no lesse It seemed good to the Holy Ghost and unto us to lay upon you no other burthen Act. 15.27 This burthen therefore to observe those necessary things which they speak of they had power to impose It is an act of the binding power of the keys to bind burthens And this binding power ariseth not only materially from the weight of the matters imposed which are necessary necessitate praecepti from the word but also formally from the authority of the Synod which being an Ordinance of Christ bindeth the more for the Synods sake As a truth of the Gospel taught by a Minister of the Gospel it bindeth to faith an obedience not only because it is Gospel but also because it is taught by a Minister for his callings sake seeing Christ hath said Who so receiveth you receiveth me And seeing also a Synod sometime meeteth to convince and admonish an offending church or Presbyterie they have power therefore if they cannot heal the offenders to determine to withdraw communion from them And further seeing they meet likewise sometimes for generall reformation they have power to decree and publish such Ordinances as may conduce according to God unto such reformation Examples whereof wee read Neh. 10.32 to 39. 2 Chron. 15.12 13. For the second question How far the Fraternity or the Brethren of the church may concurre with the Elders in exercising the power of the Synod The Answer is The power which they have received is a power of liberty As 1. They have liberty to dispute their doubts modestly and Christanly amongst the Elders For in that Synod at Jerusalem as there was much disputation Act. 15.7 so the multitude had a part in the Disputation v. 12. For after Peters speech it is said the whole multitude kept silence and silence from what to wit from the speech last in hand amongst them and that was from Disputation 2. The Brethren of the church had liberty to joyn with the Apostles and Elders in approving of the sentence of James and determining the same as the common sentence of them all 3. They had liberty to joyn with the Apostles and Elders in choosing and sending messengers and in writing Synodall Letters in the names of all for the publishing of the sentence of the Synod Both these points are expressed in the Text v. 22.23 to 29. Then pleased it the Apostles and Elders with the whole Church to send chosen men and to write Letters by them See the whole church distinguished from the Apostles and Elders and those whom he called the whole Church v. 22. he calleth the Brethren v. 23. The Apostles and Elders and Brethren c. But though it may not be denyed that the Brethren of the church present in the Synod had all this power of liberty to joyn with the Apostles and Elders in all these acts of the Synod yet the authority of the Decrees lay chiefly if not only in the Apostles and Elders And therefore it is said Act. 16.4 That Paul and Silas delivered to the Churches for to keep the Decrees that were ordained of the Apostles and Elders So then it will be most safe to preserve to the Church of Brethren their due liberties and to reserve to the Elders their due authority If it be said The Elders assembled in a Synod have no authority to determine or conclude any act that shall binde the Churches but according to the instructions which before they have received from the Churches Answ Wee do not so apprehend it For what need Churches send to a Synod for light and direction in ways of truth and peace if they be resolved afore-hand how far they will go It is true if the Elders of Churches shall conclude in a Synod any thing prejujudiciall to the truth and peace of the Gospel they may justly expostulate with them at their return and refuse such sanctions as the Lord hath not sancited But if the Elders be gathered in the name of Christ in a Synod and proceed according to the rule the word or Christ they may consider and conclude sundry points expedient for the estate of their Churches which the Churches were either ignorant or doubtfull of before As for the third Question whether the Synod have power to injoyn such things as are both in their nature and their use indifferent We should answer it negatively and our reasons be 1. From the pattern of that precedent of Synods Act. 15.28 They laid upon the Churches no other burthen but those necessary things necessary though not all of them in their own nature yet for present use to avoid the offence both of Jew and Gentile of the Jew by eating things strangled and blood of the Gentile and Jew both by eating things sacrificed to Idols as Paul expoundeth that Article of the Synod 1 Cor. 8.10 11 12. and Chap. 10.28 This ea ing with offence was a murther of a weak brothers soule and a sin against Christ 1 Cor. 8.11 12. and therefore necessary to be forborn necessiâ—ate praecepti by the necessity of Gods Commandement 2. A second reason may be from the latitude of the Apostolicall commission which was given to them Mat. 28.19 20. where the Apâ—stles are commanded to teach the people to observe all things which Christ had commanded If then the Apostles teach the people to observe more then Christ hath commanded they go beyond the bounds of their commission and a larger commission then that given to the Apostles nor Elders nor Synods nor churches can challenge If it be said Christ speaketh only of teaching such things which he had commanded as necessary to salvation Answ If the Apostles or their successors should hereupon usurpe an authority to teach the people things indifferent they must plead this their authority from some other commission given them elsewhere for in this place there is no foot step for any such power That much urged and much abused place in 1 Cor. 14.40 will not reach it For though Paul requiring in that place all the duties of Gods worship whether Prayer or Prophesying or Psalmes or Tongues c. that they should be performed decently and orderly he thereby forbiddeth any performance thereof undecently as for men with long hayre and women to speak in open assemblies especially to pray with their hair loose about them And though he forbiddeth also men speaking two or three at once which to do were not order but confusion yet he doth not at all neither himself injoyn nor allow the Church of Corinth to injoyn such things as decent whose want or whose contrary is not undecent nor such orders whose want or
given to a particular Church of Brethren as such primo per se then it would be found in every particular Church of Brethren For a Quatenus adomnia valet consequentia Obj. 4. But it is an usuall tenent in many of our best Divines that the government of the Church is mixt of a Monarchy an Aristocracie and a Democracy In regard of Christ the head the government of the Church is soveraigne and monarchicall In regard of the Rule by the Presbytery it is stewardly and Aristocraticall in regard of the peoples power in elections and censures it is Democraticall which argueth the people have some stock of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 power and authority in the government of the Church Answ In a large sense Authority after a sort may be acknowledged in the people As 1. when a man acteth by counsell according to his own discerning freely he is then said to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Dominus sui actus So the people in all the acts of liberty which they put forth are Domini sui actus Lords of their own action 2. The people by their acts of liberty as in election of officers and concurrency in censure of offenders and in the Determination and Promulgation of Synodall acts they have a great stroke or power in the ordering of Church affairs which may be called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or potestas a POWER which many times goeth under the name of rule or authoritie but in proper speech it is rather a priviledge or liberty then authoritie as hath been opened above in Chap. 3. For no act of the peoples power or liberty doth properly bind unlesse the authoritie of the Presbytery concur with it 3. A third argument whereby it may appear that the Elders of a particular Church are the first subject of authoritie in that Church is taken from the like removall of other subjects from whence they might be thought to derive their authoritie as was used before to prove the Church of Brethren was the first subject of their own libertie in their own Congregation The Elders of Churches are never found in Scripture to derive their authority which they exercise in their own congregation either from the Elders of other Churches or from any Synod of Churches All particular Churches and all the Elders of them are of equall power each of them respectively in their own Congregations None of them call others their Rabbies or Masters or Fathers in respect of any authoritie over them but all of them own and acknowledge one another as fellow Brethren Matth. 23.8 9 10. And though in a Synod they have received power from Christ and from his presence in the Synod to exercise Authoritie in imposing burthens such as the holy Ghost layeth upon all Churches whose Elders are present with them Act. 15.28 for the Apostles were Elders in all Churches yet the Elders of every particular Church when they walk with the brethren of their own Church in light and peace they need not to derive from the Synod any power to impose the same or the like burthens upon their owne Churches For they have received a power and charge from Christ to teach and command with all authoritie the whole counsell of God unto their people And the people discerning the light of the truth delivered and walking in peace with their Elders they readily yeeld obedience to their Over-seers in whatsoever they see and hear by them commended to them from the Lord. 3. Now we come to the third branch of the third Proposition which was this That the Church of a particular congregation Elders and Brethren walking and joyning together in truth and peace are the first subject of all Church-power needfull to be exercised within themselves whether in the election or ordination of officers or in the censure of offenders in their own body The truth hereof may appear by these Arguments 1 In point of ordination From the compleat integritie of a Ministers calling oven to the satisfaction of his own and the peoples conscience when both the Brethren and the Elders of the particular Church whereto he is called have put forth the power which belongeth to them about him As when the Brethren of the Church have chosen him to office and the Presbyterie of the Church have laied their hands upon him and both of them in their severall acts have due respect to the inward ministeriall gifts whereunto God hath furnished him he may then look at himself as called by the holy Ghost to exercise his talents in that office amongst them and the people may and ought to receive him as sent of God to them What defect may be found in such a call when the Brethren exercise their lawfull libertie and the Elders their lawfull authority in his ordination and nothing more is required to the compleat integritie of a Ministers calling If it be said there wanted imposition of hands by the Bishop who succeedeth in the place of Timothy and Titus whom the Apostle Paul left the one in Ephesus the other in Crete to ordain Elders in many Churches Tit. 1.5 Ans Touching ordination by Timothy and Titus and upon pretence of them by Bishops enough hath been said by many godly learned heretofore especially of later times The summe cometh to these conclusions 1 That Timothy and Titus did not ordain Elders in many Churches as Bishops but as Evangelists Timothy is expresly termed an Evangelist 2 Tim. 4.5 And Titus is as clearly decyphered to be an Evangelist as Timothy by the characters of an Evangelist which either Scripture holdeth forth or Eusebius noteth in his Ecclesiast histor lib. 3. cap. 37. Gr. cap. 31. Lat. Not to be limited to a certain Church but to follow the Apostles finishing their work in planting and watering Churches where they came They did indeed ordain officers where they wanted and exercised jurisdiction as the Apostles did in severall Churches yet with the rest of the Presbyterie and in the presence of the whole Church 1 Tim. 5. But for the continuance of this office of an Evangelist in the Church there is no direction in the Epistles either to Timothy or Titus or any where else in Scripture 2. Conclusion Those Bishops whose callings or offices in the Church are set forth in those Epistles to be continued they are altogether Synonyma with Presbyters Tit. 1.5 7. 1 Tim. 3.1 to 7. 3. Conclus We read of many Bishops to one Church Phil. 1.1 Act. 14.23 and Chap. 20.17 28. Tit. 1.5.7 but not of many Churches much lesse all the Churches in a large Diocesse to one Bishop 4. Conclus There is no transcendent proper work cut out or reserved for such a transcendent officer as a Diocesan Bishop throughout the New Testament The transcendent acts reserved to him by the Advocates of Episcopacie are Ordination and Iurisdiction Now both these are acts of Rule And Paul to Timothy acknowledgeth no Rulers in the Church above Pastors and Teachers who labour in
Elders and Rulers of the Congregation Answ Let all the places alledged be examined and it will appeare that in matters of judgement where the Congregation is put for the Elders and Rulers it is never meant for ought we can finde of the Elders and Rulers alone sitting apart and retired from the Congregation but sitting in the presence of the Congregation and hearing and judging causes before them In which case if a sentence have passed from a Ruler with the dislike of the Congregation they have not stuck to shew their dislike sometime by protesting openly against it as 1 Sam. 14.44 45. sometime by refusing to execute it 1 Sam. 22.16 17. And what the people of the Congregation lawfully did in some cases at some times in waving and counterpoizing the sentence of their Rulers the same they might and ought to have done in the like cases at any time The whole Host or Congregation of Israel might protest against an unrighteous illegall sentence and a part of the Congregation who discerned the iniquity of a sentence might justly withdraw themselves from the execution of it Object 4. When Christ said Tell the Church hee meant a Synodicall or Classicall assembly of the Presbyters of many Churches For it was his meaning and purpose in this place to prescribe a rule for the removing of all scandals out of the Church which cannot be done by telling the Church of one Congregation for what if an Elder offend yea what if the whole Presbytery offend The people or Brethren have not power to judge their Judges to rule their Rulers Yea what if the whole Congregation fall under an offence as they may do Lev. 4.13 a Synod of many Presbyters may reform them but so cannot any one Congregation alone if the Congregation that gave the offence stand out in it Answ 1. Reserving due honour to Synods rightly ordered or which is all one a Classis or Convention of Presbyters of particular churches we do not finde that a Church is any where put for a Synod of Presbyteries And it were very incongruous in this place For though it be faid a particular Congregation cannot reach the removall of all offences so it may be as truly said that it were unmeet to trouble Synods with every offence that falleth out in a Congregation Offences fall out often Synods meet but seldome and when they do meet they finde many more weighty imployments then to attend to every offence of every private brother Besides as an whole particular Congregation may offend so may a generall Assembly of all the Presbyters in a Nation offend also For generall Councels have erred and what remedy shall be found to remove such errors and offences out of this Text Moreover if an offence be found in a Brother of a Congregation and the Congregation be found faithfull and willing to remove it by due censure why should the offence be called up to more publike judicature and the plaister made broader than the sore Again If an Elder offend the rest of the Presbytery with the Congregation joyning together may proceed against him if they cannot otherwise heal him and so remove the offence from amongst them If the whole Presbyterie offend or such a part as will draw a party and a faction in the Church with them their readiest course is to bring the matter then to a Synod For though this place in Matthew direct not to that yet the Holy Ghost leaveth us not without direction in such a case but giveth us a pattern in the church of Antioch to repaire to a Synod And the like course is to be taken in the offence of a whole Congregation if it be persisted in with obstinacy Neither is it true which was said that it was the purpose of Christ in Mat. 18.17 to prescribe a rule for the removall of all offences out of the Church but only of such private and lesse hainous offences as grow publike and notorious only by obstinacy of the offenders For if offences be haynous and publike at first the Holy Ghost doth not direct us to proceed in such a generall course from a private admonition by one brother alone and then to a second by one or two more and at last to tell it to the Church But in such a case the Apostle giveth another rule 1 Cor. 5.11 to cast an haynous notorious offender both out of church-communion and private familiar communion also Object 5. The Church here spoken of Mat. 18.17 is such an one as whereto a complaint may orderly be made But a complaint cannot be orderly made to a multitude such as an whole Congregation is Answ And why may not a complaint be orderly made to a whole multitude The Levite made an orderly conplaint to a greater multitude then 400. particular Congregations are wont to amount to Jud. 20.1 2 3 4 c. Object 6. The Church here to be complained of meeteth with authority for censures are administred with authority but the church of a particular Congregation meeteth with humility to seek the face and favour of God Answ Humility to God may well stand with authority to men The 24. Elders who represent the growne heyres of the Church of the new Testament they are said in Church-assemblies to sit upon thrones with crownes on their heads Rev. 4.4 yet when they fall down to worship God and the Lamb they cast down their crownes at his feet v. 10. Object 7. In the church of a particular Congregation a woman may not speak but in this Church here spoken of they may speak for they may be offenders and offenders must give an account of their offences Answ When the Apostle forbiddeth women to speak in the church he meaneth speaking partly by way of authority as in publike praying or prophesying in the Church 1 Tim. 2.12 partly by way of bold inquiry in asking questions publikely of the Prophets in the face of the Church 1 Cor. 14.34 But to answer it If the whole Congregation have taken just offence at the open sin of a woman she is bound as much to give satisfaction to the whole Congregation as well as to the Presbyterie Object 8. When Schismes grew to be scandalous in the Church of Corinth the houshold of Chloe told not the whole Congregation of it but Paul 1 Cor. 1.11 Answ The contentions in the Church of Corinth were not the offence of a private brother but of the whole church And who can tell whether they had not spoken of it to the Church before But whether thay had or no the example only argueth that Brethren offended with the sins of their brethren may tell an Elder of the church of it that he may tell it to the Church which no man denyeth Paul was an Elder of every church of Christ as the other Apostles were as having the government of all the churches committed to them all Having thus by the help of Christ cleered this Text in Mat. 18.17 from variety of
the sins of these Churches But we see neither is Pergamus blamed for tolerating Jezabel nor Thyatira for tolerating Balaam nor Smyrna for tolerating either Indeed what Christ writeth to any one Church his Spirit calleth all the Churches to hearken unto and so he doth our Churches also at this day not because he blamed them for the toleration of sins in other Churches but because he would have them beware of the like remissenesse in tolerating the like offences amongst themselves and also would provoke them to observe notorious offences amongst their Sister-Churches and with brotherly love and faithfulnesse to admonish them thereof It is an unsound body that wanteth strength to purge out his own vicious and malignant humours And every Church of a particular congregation being a bodie even a body of Christ in it self it were not for the honour of Christ nor of his body if when it were in a sound and athletick constitution it should not have power to purge it self of its own superfluous and noysome humors IV. Proposition In case a particular Church be disturbed with error or scandall and the same maintained by a faction amongst them Now a Synod of Churches or of their messengers is the first subject of that power and authoritie whereby error is judicially convinced and condemned the truth searched out and determined and the way of truth and peace declared and imposed upon the Churches The truth of this Proposition may appear by two Arguments 1. Argum. From the want of power in such a particular church to passe a binding sentence where error or scandall is maintained by a faction For the promise of binding and loosing which is made to a particular church Mat. 18.18 is not given to the church when it is leavened with error and variance It is a received maxime Clavis errans non ligat and it is as true Ecclesia litigans not ligat And the ground of both ariseth from the estate of the Church to which the promise of binding and loosing is made Mat. 18.17 18. which though it be a particular church as hath been shewed yet it is a Church AGREEING together in the name of Christ Mat. 18.19 20. If there want agreement amongst them the promise of binding and loosing is not given to them or if they should agree and yet agree in an error or in a scandall they do not then agree in the name of Christ For to meet in the name of Christ implyeth they meet not only by his command and authority but also that they proceed according to his Lawes and Will and that to his service and glory If then the church or a considerable part of it fall into error through ignorance or into faction by variance they cannot expect the presence of Christ with them according to his promise to passe a binding sentence And then as they fall under the conviction and admonition of any other sister church in a way of brotherly love by vertue of communion of churches so their errors and variance and whatsoever scandals else do accompany the same they are justly subject to the condemnation of a Synod of churches 2. A second Argument to prove that a Synod is the first subject of power to determine and judge errors and variances in particular churches is taken from the pattern set before us in that case Act. 15.1 to 28. when certain false Teachers having taught in the church of Antioch a necessity of circumcision to salvation and having gotten a faction to take part with them as appeareth by the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of Paul and Barnabas against them the church did not determine the case themselves but referred the whole matter to the Apostles and Elders at Jerusalem Act. 15.1 2. Not to the Apostles alone but to the Apostles and Elders The Apostles were as the Elders and Rulers of all churches and the Elders there were not a few the Believers in Jerusalem being many thousands Neither did the Apostles determine the matter as hath been said by Apostolicall authority from immediate revelation but they assembled together with the Elders to consider of the matter v. 6. and a multitude of Brethren together with them v. 12.22 23. and after searching out the cause by an ordinary means of disputation v. 7. Peter cleered it by the witnesse of the Spirit to his Ministery in Cornelius his family Paul and Barnabas by the like effect of their Ministerie among the Gentiles ◠Iames confirmed the same by the testimony of the Prophets wherewith the whole Synod being satisfied they determine of a judiciall sentence and of a way to publish it by letters and messengers in which they censure the false Teachers as troublers of their Church and subverters of their soules they reject the imposition of circumcision as a yoak which neither they nor their fathers were able to beare they impose upon the churches none but some necessary observations and them by way of that authority which the Lord had given them v. 28. Which pattern cleerly sheweth us to whom the key of authority is committed when there groweth offence and difference in a church Look as in the case of the offence of a faithfull brother persisted in the matter is at last judged and determined in a church which is a Congregation of the faithfull so in the case of the offence of the church or congregation the matter is at last judged in a congregation of churches a Church of churches for what is a Synod else but a Church of churches Now from all these former Propositions which tend to cleare the first subject of the power of the keys it may be easie to deduce certain corollaries from thence tending to clear a parallel Question to this to wit In what sense it may and ought to be admitted that a church of a particular congregation is independent in the use of the power of the keys and in what sense not For in what sense the Church of a particular congregation is the first subject of the power of the keys in the same sense it is independent and in none other We taking the first subject and the independent subject to be all one 1. Corollary The Church is not independent on Christ but dependent on him for all church-power The Reason is plain because he is the first subject of all church-power by way of soveraigne eminency as hath been said And therefore the church and all the Officers thereof yea and a Synod of churches is dependent upon him for all ministeriall church-power Ministery is dependent upon soveraigntie yea the more dependent they be upon Christ in all the exercise of their church-power the more powerfull is all their power in all their adminstrations 2. Corollary The first subject of the ministeriall power of the keys though it be independent in respect of derivation of power from the power of the sword to the performance of any spirituall administration yet it is subject to the