The TEXTS examined which Papists cite out of the Bible TO PROVE The Supremacy of St. PETER and of the POPE over the whole Church IMPRIMATUR Guil. Needham Febr. 14. 1687. THE Question to be debated in this Paper is Whether the Apostle St. Peter was constituted by Christ himself to be in his stead the Head and supreme Governour of the whole Church This we deny having undeniable Proofs that all the Apostles were placed by Christ in equal Power and Authority over his Church But the Doctors of the Roman Church affirm this with so much Confidence as to say that to deny it is not a simple Error but a pernicious Heresy They are the words of Bellarmine * L. 1. de Rom. Pontif. c. 10 11. who earnestly contends that the Government of the whole Church was committed to Peter especially about Matters of Faith. Which bold Assertion he labours to support three ways First By some places of Holy Scriptures Secondly By many Privileges and Prerogatives of St. Peter Thirdly By Testimonies of Greek and Latin Fathers I am concerned only in the first of these Ways in which if this Cause find no true support we need not trouble our selves about the other two which are so weak that some ingenuous Persons in their Communion have acknowledged the Prerogatives are either feigned at pleasure or no more to the purpose of his Supremacy than the pretended Testimonies of Ancient Fathers which are against it Now the Scriptures which they alledg for the proof of it are two places in the holy Gospels The one in St. Matthew xvi 18 19. the other in St. John xxi 17. In the former of these this Supreme Authority they say is promised to St. Peter in the latter it is conferred I begin with the first Matth. xvi 18 19. And I say unto thee that thou art Peter and upon this Rock I will build my Church c. And I will give unto thee the Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven and whatsoever thou shalt bind o◠Earth shall be bound in Heaven and whatsoever thou shalt loose on Earth shall be loosed in Heaven The Sense of which words says Bellarmine is plain and obvious giving us to understand the Soveraignty over the whole Church to be here promised unto Peter in two Metaphors The one is a Metaphor of a Foundation and a Building the other is a Metaphor of Keys For what a Foundation is in the Building that the Head is in the Body the Governour in the City the King in his Kingdom and the Father of the Family in the House and to whom the Keys of a City are delivered he is appointed the King or at least the Governour of that City to admit and shut out whom he pleaseth Unto which I have this to say before I give the true Sense of these words That to call this a plain and obvious Sense of the words which is wrapt up in a couple of Metaphors is to stumble at the very Threshold and to contradict himself in the terms as they ordinarily speak For what is metaphorical is not plain and obvious but needs Explanation by putting it into common words Into which if these Metaphors be reduced we shall find there is no such Sense contained in them as is pretended I shall explain them distinctly and begin with the former part of this Promise Thou art Peter and upon this Rock I will build my Church which we may call the first Proof they bring of St. Peter's being the Monarch of the Church I. Which Sense is so far from being plain and obvious that having considered both the words and all the ancient Expositors upon them I can find nothing plainer than these two things First That there is no certainty St. Peter is here meant by the Rock upon which Christ saith he will build his Church Nor Secondly If he were that Christ intended by calling him a Rock to make him the Lord of his Church First I say there is no Evidence that St. Peter is here meant by the Rock but quite contrary we are led by the general stream of Ancient Interpreters to understand by the Rock upon which the Church is built that Faith concerning Christ which Peter had newly confessed There are more than two that thus expound the words for one that expounds them otherwise as may be seen in a Sermon lately printed on this Subject * Sermon on St. Peter's day 1686. which shows also that the other Expositions do not really differ from this but even they who apply these words to St. Peter had respect in calling him the Rock to his preaching the Doctrine of Christ and having the honour to be the first Preacher of it to the Gentiles Which is all the Priviledg that can be thought to be peculiarly intended to him in these words For excepting this whatsoever was said to him was directed to all the Apostles because Peter as their Mouth spake the Sense of them all when he said Thou art Christ the Son of the Living God and therefore Christ's Answer was returned to them all when he said Thou art Peter and upon this Rock will I build my Church As much as to say Thou art what thy Name imports which I have given thee with respect to this solid Faith thou hast now confessed upon which as upon a Rock I will build my Church by your Ministry and particularly by thine who shalt have the Honour to lay the first Stone of it in the Gentile World. Thus St. Austin †Tract exxiv in Joh. Serm. xiii de verbis Dom c. expounds the words in many places where he observes Peter had his Name from Petra the Rock viz. That Faith which he confessed upon which Christ told him he would build his Church For he doth not say Thou art Peter and upon thee will I build my Church but upon this Rock which plainly relates to another thing viz. that immoveable Foundation confessed by Peter that he was Christ the Son of God. Whence those known words of the same Father I will build thee upon me not me upon thee If it were the intention of this Paper to quote Testimonies I could name a great multitude even the ordinary Gloss which speak to the same purpose But it is wholly needless since the other Exposition which makes St. Peter the Rock here spoken of is against the most unanimous consent of the Fathers of the Church which they of the Church of Rome are bound to follow both by the Doctrine of the Council of Trent * Sess iv and by the form of that Oath of Profession of Faith which Pope Pius IV. drew up and enjoined according to the Mind of that Council And yet so vilely are some addicted to regard nothing but their Interest there are those who to make these words sound as if Christ promised to build his Church upon Peter himself have not blush'd thus to translate them Thou art Peter and upon this PETER will
of the Church as appears by St. Cyprian in ancient times who observes that our Lord who said to Peter Thou art Peter c. gave to all his Apostles equal Power * Parem Potestatem after his Resurrection when he said As the living Father sent me so I send you c. concluding from thence that all the Apostles were what St. Peter was †Hoc utique erant caeteri Apostoli quod suit Petrus pari consortio praediti honoris potestatis c. L. de unitate Ecclesiae Epist xxiii ad Jubianum And by Theophylact in later times who thus glosses upon Matth. xvi 19. Though our Lord said only to Peter I WILL GIVE THEE yet they were given to all the Apostles When at that time when he said Whosoever Sins ye remit they are remitted For the word I WILL GIVE denotes the future time that is after the Resurrection Then he said to them all As my Father hath sent me so I send you Which are words so large that they contain in them a plenitude of Power and confute the conceit of those who say that Christ indeed gave the Power of remitting and retaining Sins to all the Apostles but the Power of the Keys to Peter alone Whereby if they meant that to Peter it was given to open the Gate first to the Gentiles it ought to be allowed to be a true sense tho we are not certain it was the thing peculiarly intended by our Saviour in these words But understanding thereby a distinct Power from that of binding and loosing retaining and remitting which St. Peter exercised when he let the Gentiles into the Church it is certainly false that he gave him such a Power which he did not confer upon the rest For should we suppose binding and loosing to be distinct from the Power of the Keys yet this Power of the Keys be it what it will we may be sure is included in these comprehensive words As my Father hath sent me so I send you which were spoken unto them all And therefore as the Keys were not promised to him alone so not to him more than any other Apostle but only the use of them first before any other Apostle That 's the most as I have often said which can reasonably be conceived to be peculiarly promised to Peter in these words that he should first open the Door of Faith to the Gentiles as we read he did Acts x. and as some think to the Jews also Acts ii Tertullian * L. de Pudicitiae c. xxi seems to be of this mind and I shall not here dispute it who mentioning this place I will give thee the Keys c. thus proceeds so the Event teaches us the Church was first built on him that is by him He first handled the Key See what Key Ye Men of Israel hear these words Jesus of Nazareth a Man approved of God among you c. Acts ii 22 c. He in fine did first by the Baptism of Christ unlock the entrance of the Heavenly Kingdom c. He bound Ananias with the Bond of Death and he absolved the Man lame of his Feet from the weakness wherewith he laboured And in the Dispute which arose about the Obligation of the Law Peter first of all by the instinct of the Holy Ghost having told them how God made choice of him that the Gentiles should hear the Word from his Mouth said And now why tempt ye God to put a Yoke upon the Neck of the Disciples which neither our Fathers nor we were able to bear c. where he plainly makes the Power of the Keys and binding and loosing to be the same thing and from the scope of his Discourse it appears as Launoy †Epist par ii Hadriano Vallantio p. 6. hath observed that they then believed at Rome that in the Person of Peter the Keys were given to the Church that is says he the power of binding and loosing Which things if the late Catholick Scripturist had known or would have been pleased to mind how could he have had the Confidence to say that our Lord spake these words to Peter to signify that he was the Head and Chief in ordinary For tho the Power of binding and loosing was afterward given to the other Apostles yet the Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven are never in Scripture said to be given to any but to St. Peter * The seventh Point n. 6. By which Keys also he saith is signified the plentitude of highest Power For this vain Conceit is contrary to the common Opinion of the ancient Fathers whom they are bound by their Profession of Faith and Oath to follow contrary to their greatest Schoolmen such as Scotus Aquinas Alex. Alensis who affirm that the Keys promised to Peter in St. Matth. xvi were given to all the Apostles in St. John xx contrary also to their own Catechism as I have shown according to which he ought to have instructed his Followers The Sum of what hath been said is this 1. The Power which our Lord here promised to Peter was not meant to him alone 2. For he did but represent and sustain the Person of the Church as the Ancients speak to whom this Promise belongs 3. And therefore our Lord afterward promises the very same thing in the same words to all the Apostles which he here promises to Peter 4. And accordingly when he performed his Promise he gave this Power to every one of them equally 5. But Christ directed this Promise at the first singularly to him that he might commend Vnity 6. Or at the most he promised him the Honour of opening the Door of Faith first unto the Gentiles 7. From whence we can only gather that he was the first among the Apostles but not that he was promised any Power which the rest had not for the contrary is apparent 8. To all which I must add repeating briefly what I said upon the foregoing words that if we should grant our Saviour to have promised some Power to Peter when he said I will give thee the Keys which the other Apostles had not it would prove a personal Prerogative and cannot be shewn to have descended to any Successor much less to the Pope of Rome who Bellarmine saith is a true Prince who hath Power to make true Laws to bind the whole Church And this he proves from these words Whatsoever thou shalt bind on Earth shall be bound in Heaven c. * L. iv de Rom. Pontif. c. xvi Concerning which it will be thought too sharp perhaps to say tho they are the words of one in the Roman Communion †Launoy ubi supra p. 77. simply to relate the words of this Author is simply to confute them they are so very contrary to Truth and Equity The Reader therefore may be pleased briefly to consider what our Lord himself saith to all his Apostles Matth. xxiii 8 9 10. which utterly overturns
these proud Pretensions But be not ye called Rabbi for one is your Master even Christ and ALL YE ARE BRETHREN And call no Man your Father upon the Earth for one is your Father which is in Heaven Neither be ye called Masters for one is your Master even Christ The repetition of one and the same thing so often in words of the same import argues it to be a matter of great moment which ought to be duly weighed And it is this that no Man no not any of his Apostles should take upon him to prescribe that as a part of Religion which God our Saviour hath not prescribed by his Laws and that we ought not absolutely to submit to any Man's Dictates as Children do to the Will of their Fathers nor pin our Faith as we speak upon any Man's sleeve i. e. let it depend intirely upon his Authority For this is a submission which is due only to God our Saviour who in this Sense of the words is our only Father and Master and Leader and therefore we cannot without the highest injury to him own any one else to be such nor give them these Names but as they teach not their own but Christ's Doctrine unto Men. And in this Office all the Apostles were equal and no one of them could claim an Authority over the rest of his Brethren There are many other places wherein we read of one Shepherd one Lord one Lawgiver who is able to save and to destroy from whence we may conclude that Peter himself had no Power to make but only to declare the Laws of his and our Lord and Lawgiver Jesus Christ So the words of Christ's Commission run when he saith not to him alone but to them all Go ye and disciple all Nations c. teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you Matth. xxviii 20. Here is their Authority to publish the Commands of their Master not what they pleased to command themselves Which Peter was so far from doing that he went not about the abrogation of the Ceremonial Law and the calling of the Gentiles till he was authorized by an heavenly Vision which discovered this Mystery to him as a part of the Counsel of God but no Law nor so much as a Thought of his own For being charged afterwards by the Jews for eating with Men uncircumcised he excuses himself by a long Apology wherein he relates how he was commanded to do it by God himself whom he could not withstand Acts xi 3 4 c. which was not done like a Lawgiver Nay after this Revelation made to him he was so weak as to observe this Law to the great Offence of the Gentiles for which he was reprehended by St. Paul who had the honour to abrogate the Law of Moses among the Gentiles while St. Peter who began that work was the Minister of the Circumcision Gal. ii 7 10 11 c. Nor doth the word Bind import a Power to impose Laws but only to tie Men to those Laws which are already made Thus it signifies in that very place which Bellarmine alledges to maintain his Sense of the word viz. to make Laws Matth. xxiii 4. For they bind heavy Burdens and grievous to be born and lay them on Men's Shoulders c. that is they were rigorous Interpreters of the Laws of God which it was their Office to expound according to the plain sense and meaning of them and not according to the Traditions of the Elders which had made them intollerable Burdens But suppose the word to signify what they please it will do them no service because this Power of Binding was not promised to Peter alone but to them all as hath been before proved And consequently he could do nothing which they could not do as much as he that is they were all Ministers of Christ and Stewards of the Mysteries of God All of them like to Eliakim 1 Cor. iv 1. to whom the Key of the House of David is promised as the Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven to Peter For by that very word which we translate Stewards or Dispensers is that Office * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to which Eliakim was advanced in the room of Shebna expressed by the LXX in Isa xxii 19 21. which was not a Supreme Power in the Court where all the rest of the Courtiers did not depend on him as their Lord and Prince but the Power of a prime Minister in the Royal Family which he governed not after his own Will but the King 's In like manner all the Apostles were Ministers by whom Men believed 1 Cor. iii. 5. Stewards of the heavenly Mysteries which they faithfully dispensed 1 Cor. iv 1 2. according to the Will of Christ who hath the Key of David that is is the sole Supreme Governour of the Church and gives Rules to it which the Apostles delivered but did not ordain themselves nor bind upon Men by their own Authority but by his For they were not Authors of the Divine Laws which they taught but the Publishers of them and equal Publishers of one and the same common Doctrine Which every Bishop in the Church hath as much Authority to bind upon Men as the Pope They being all of the same Merit and Priesthood as St. Hierom * Epist ad Evagrium speaks all Successors of the Apostles There are some other words of St. Hierom it may not be unfit here to note which are usually alledged to prove the contrary viz. That he thought St. Peter had some Supremacy of Power over the rest of the Apostolical Colledg from whence they hope to derive the like Power unto the Pope over all Bishops They are in his first Book against Jovinian where he saith One among the twelve was therefore chosen that an HEAD being constituted the occasion of Schism might be removed But they are unconscionably disingenuous who alledg this Passage and do not give us the entire Sentence but only this Conclusion of it which can have no such meaning as they pretend without making meer Nonsense of the words foregoing which are these But thou sayst the Church was founded upon Peter tho the very same in another place is done upon all the Apostles and they received the Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven and the strength of the Church is solidly bottom'd upon them EQVALLY And then follows the words now named Yet ONE was therefore chosen among the XII c. which makes it as clear as the Sun that he dreamt of no such HEADSHIP of ONE over all the rest as signifies a Supremacy of Power for what one Text he saith affirms of Peter another affirms of them all they all receiving the Keys which is the highest Power and the stability of the Church relying upon them equally I conclude this part of my Discourse with the Observation of a late Learned Writer of our Church * Dr. Hammond 's Dispatcher dispatch'd P. iii. c. 7. Sect. 2. n.
13. If any Power or degree of Power was here promised to Peter more than to the rest of the Apostles it must be gathered either from the force of the Substance of the Promise or from the Circumstances wherewith it was delivered The Substantial part is nothing else but that of a Steward in the Church set forth by the Emblem of Keys and more explicitly declared by the Power of binding and loosing which carries in it no intimation of such a thing as a Supremacy over the whole Church but only of a ruling Power in some Family that is in that part of the Universal Church where his lot should fall For this very thing being presently after promised to all the Apostles it makes it evident there was no Supremacy here promised for then there must be not one but twelve Supremes As for the Circumstances wherein this part and the former of our Saviour's Promise was delivered which some are pleased to urge as very considerable they are of no strength to support so great a weight as they lay upon them For first It is very unreasonable that Circumstances should be thought of greater force to declare the meaning of this Promise than the very Substance it self is And secondly All these Circumstances save only that of his own Name and his Fathers joyned together are not peculiar to him but common to others who confessed Christ's Divinity and had it revealed from God and were blessed and designed for Stones in the Fabrick of the Church as well as Peter And further even that Circumstance of calling him Simon Bar-jona had a visible reason for it to distinguish this Simon from Simon Zelotes So that there is nothing left but the small Circumstance of calling him by his Name to be the grand Foundation of St. Peter's Supremacy Can any one be satisfied with such poor Proofs Which are no better than if we should argue in this manner our Lord said to Peter Follow me and so he did to the other eleven and by this made them his Disciples in common But had he said Simon Barjona Follow thou me as he might very well if any other Simon were then present he alone according to this way of discoursing had been taken into Discipleship and none after him enjoyed this Honour But I have said enough if not too much upon these Texts and must here end this Paper for fear of swelling it beyond the intended bulk The rest shall soon follow ERRATA PAge 81. line 21. for will be read were P. 83. l. 31. r. understood P. 85. l. 10. del of l. ult r. walk on P. 88. penult r. falsified P. 93. l. 29. del of before Peter's LONDON Printed by J. D. for Richard Chiswel at the Rose and Crown in St. Paul's Church-Yard 1688. The Second Part. The TEXTS examined which Papists cite out of the Bible TO PROVE The Supremacy of St. PETER and of the POPE over the whole Church IMPRIMATUR Guil. Needham Febr. 14. 1687. III. NOw we are come to the last reserve of the Roman Church for the support of this Cause which lies in those Words of Christ to Peter John xxi 15 16 17. Feed my Lambs and feed my Sheep They are sensible of the truth of that which hath been oft repeated that in neither of the former places Christ gave any thing to Peter but only promised he would give him such things as are there mentioned Now they are hard put to it to find when he did perform this Promise and not find with all that he performed it to all the Apostles and therefore as I have said made it to them all Here is the only Place they rely upon here they would fain find what is no where else to be found something peculiarly granted to Peter which was conferred upon none of the rest Read the words say they and observe how they are peculiarly spoken to Peter So when they had dined Jesus said to Simon Peter Simon Son of Jonas lovest thou these me more than these He saith unto him Yea Lord thou knowest I love thee He saith unto him FEED MY LAMBS He saith to him again the second time Simon Son of Jonas lovest thou me He saith unto him Yea Lord thou knowest that I love thee He saith unto him FEED MY SHEEP He saith unto him the third time Simon Son of Jonas lovest thou me Peter was grieved because he said unto him the third time Lovest thou me And he said unto him Lord thou knowest all things thou knowest that I love thee Jesus saith unto him FEED MY SHEEP See say they with what Solemnity our Lord here speaks to Peter and to him alone calling him three times particularly by his Name and Relation and bidding him as oft feed his Lambs or Sheep whereby he instated him in the Office he had promised him and made him in a particular manner to be a Pastor even the Pastor of the whole Church with a Supreme Power over it First To which we reply That having seen and considered all this we can see nothing here that looks like a Grant or Commission nothing given to St. Peter by these words which are a plain Charge or Command requiring him to do his Office which was therefore conferred upon him before together with the rest of the Apostles when our Lord said As my Father hath sent me so I send you c. Receive ye the Holy Ghost c. Secondly And as here is no Commission no Conveyance of any thing made to him but a bare Precept to do his Duty So the Duty doth not concern him alone but belongs to them all as much as him It is at this time required in a Precept directed to him alone that 's true and Bellarmine might have spared all his Labour to prove that these words were spoken to Peter alone They were so if we understand thereby that he only by Name is now admonished of his Duty the reason of which we shall see presently but the Duty of which he was admonished was not peculiar to him and so the words do not belong to him alone as appears by many Arguments 1. From St. Peter himself who seems to have interpreted the Mind of Christ in this Speech to him in his words to the Elders of the Church to whom he wrote 1 Pet. v. 1. The Elders which are among you I exhort who am What the Monarch of the Church the Vicar of Christ Or Pastor of Pastors The Chief Apostle Or Supreme Bishop No such thing but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 your fellow Elder c. Feed the Flock of God which is among you c. And from whom did these Elders receive their Power and Authority From St. Peter No such matter but from the chief Shepherd or Pastor from whom he bids them expect their Reward ver 4. 2. In like manner St. Paul gives the very same Charge to the Elders of Ephesus to take heed to themselves and to all the Flock over which the Holy
they have this wise Note Peter saith St. Bernard walking upon the Waters as Christ did DECLARED himself the ONLY VICAR of Christ which should be Ruler not over one People but over ALL For many Waters are many People And from hence he deduceth the like Authority and Jurisdiction to his Successors the Bishops of Rome And a goodly Deduction it is for which they are mightily beholden to St. Bernard who could spy such a notable Declaration of St. Peter's sole Vicarship and draw from thence such a fine Argument for the Pope's Authority as no ancient Doctor besides himself was able to find in this place But must his Fancies pass for substantial Proofs of the Bishop of Rome's Supremacy which was raised to a great height in his days At this rate no body need want Proofs for the most detestable Heresies which he shall please to devise if such Conceits as these be allowed for Arguments And their second Annotation is like to this of which for ought I know they may have the honour to be the Inventors without the help of St. Bernard For because our Saviour when there were two Ships went in that which was Simon 's Luke v. 3. and thence taught the People they gravely conclude that undoubtedly he taught out of that Ship and not the other on purpose to signify the Church resembled by Peter's Ship and that in it is the Chair of Christ and only true preaching By which it is evident they intended the Reader should understand that as Peter was Owner of that Ship so he and his Successors are Rulers of the whole Church For upon the following Verses ver 7 10. they observe how Peter had so much work that he was fain to call for help and joyned those who were in the other Ship as Co-partners in the Preaching of the Gospel As much as to say the Work was committed to him alone who took in such help as he needed He was the only Pastor and all the rest as was said before his Curates For they tell us all this aforesaid did properly mean his Travels in the Conversion of the World and his Prerogative therein before all Men as is evident by Christ's special Promise made to him SEVERALLY and APART in this place that he should be made the TAKER OF MEN. What then became of all the rest Were they to sit still in their Ship and do nothing O no by no means He giveth to other say these Annotators the like Office as to Peter 's Co-operators and Coadjutors Before they said that Peter called them and joyned them to himself as Co-partners in the preaching of the Gospel but now having better it seems bethought themselves they say Christ appointed them to this Office yet still they are but as Peter's Co-operators and Assistants He was the Taker of Men and converted the World they only came in to his help and brought all the Fish into his Net. Their Ship signified nothing it was Peter alone that signified all Their Ship stands for a meer Cypher his Ship is the Figure of the whole Church where he governs and they are but helps in Government meer Co-adjutors unto him the great and indeed only Bishop over all Who can endure such Annotations as these in which Men play with the Holy Scriptures as they please and play with them in so saucy a manner as to interpret them directly against the Scriptures In which the Apostles call themselves Workers together with Christ 2 Cor. vi 1. imployed by him to be his Co-operators not St. Peter's who was so far from being the Converter of the World that his Travels and Pains were most bestowed in the least part of it Which Bellarmine I suppose saw well enough and therefore was so wise as not to mention such Allegories Which may serve to entertain the Fancies of silly People but are the just scorn of those that have any measure of Spiritual Understanding Who have heard perhaps that the Fathers sometimes resembled the Church of Christ to Peter's Ship but not that they ever dream'd of making him and the Bishop of Rome after him the Governour of the whole Church because he was Master of that Ship. There is nothing more unaccountable than such a Conclusion unless it be their pretence to Infallibility who are meer Triflers when they meddle with the Holy Scriptures which is the next thing I would have observed Secondly If the danger of wresting the Scriptures be a good reason why the common People should not read them then no body at all should look into them for their most learned Priests have wrested them more than the common People And that against their Oath whereby they are bound to interpret Scripture according to the unanimous consent of the Fathers who all agree that what was said to Peter in these three places belonged to all the Apostles whose Writings as the rest of the Scriptures have by none been more foully abused than by the Popes of Rome whose Interpretations and Applications of them should they be collected in a Book would make one of the most shameful pieces that hath been yet extant in the World. Thirdly And let the Reader observe once more how ill they of that Church are agreed about the Interpretation of these three places of Scripture which are the Subject of this Discourse There are four Interpretations of the first place Thou art Peter c. as hath been else-where observed which have had great Authors in the Roman Church as well as others Some by Rock understand Peter's FAITH in the Confession he had newly made which by the way Joh. Ekius * L. 1. contra Luther de Petri Primatu c. 13. says in the Age before us no body denied to be the sense and bids Luther name the Man that said otherways Others CHRIST himself whom Peter had confessed to be the Son of God others PETER and others ALL the APOSTLES which last is the Exposition of Paschasius Radbertus the famous Broacher of Transubstantiation whose words are these * L. iv in Matthaeum The Church of God is built not only upon Peter but upon all the Apostles Now they who follow the first and second sense can find no Prerogative here for St. Peter above the rest of the Apostles and they that adhere only to the third in opposition to the other as they now commonly do are confuted by those who assert the fourth that these words were spoken to all the Apostles And indeed they are all forced to confess that nothing is here promised which is not contained in the next words And I will give thee the Keys c. But what this is none of them can certainly tell For one sort such as Cajetan hold the Keys contain more than binding and loosing which Bellarmine says is false nay a thing never heard of in the Church And consequently this Power of binding and loosing being promised to them all Matth. xviii 18. the Power of the Keys was promised to