Selected quad for the lemma: church_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
church_n	believe_v	faith_n	infallibility_n	5,890	5	11.4885	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A54796	A vindication of The character of a popish successor, in a reply to two pretended ansvvers to it by the author of the character.	Settle, Elkanah, 1648-1724.; Phillips, John, 1631-1706.	1681 (1681)	Wing P2114; ESTC R6364	14,481	18

A VINDICATION OF THE CHARACTER OF A Popish Successor IN A REPLY TO Two Pretended ANSVVERS to it By the Author of the CHARACTER LONDON Printed for R. Dew 1681. A VINDICATION OF THE CHARACTER OF A Popish Successor In a REPLY to two pretended ANSWERS c. A Reply to the first Answer printed by N. Thompson THERE has lately as the Author has most truly exprest a very slight Reply been made to a Pamphlet call'd A Character of a Popish Successor in which he arraigns the Pamphleteer as he calls him of contradictory discourse and reasoning but says his principles are not so To prove which he allows you to fancy a picture of the late Rebellion for like that it begins with fears and jealousies of Religion Liberty and Property and continues in murmur and revile at the Imperial Root and to stiffen the knees that would bow to a crowned head The last two parts of this Inditement has been so far from being justified by the Author that where he found them they were own'd as the evil effects of a worse cause but by advising us not to be subdued like less than English men not to submit our necks like slaves to the Roman yoke he does infer we must repel a King under the name of an Invader Truly when tho' by the permission or aid of any English King Popery Superstition Idolatry and Cruelty are entring our Gates and are ready to butcher our Protestant Ministers at their Divine Worship make Human Smithfield Sacrifice of us our Wives and Children we justly may resist the Invading Tyrannick Power of Rome In the next place our Answering Pamphleteer would have you believe notwithstanding your own sense and reason to the contrary there is no just fear of Popery nor any danger in any of their Plots but from his own wise suppositions drawn from 41 and 48. has found or made a Plot and as prudently laid it at the Presbyterians door a Plot so subtil that they have outdone the very Jesuits themselves in the contrivance and laid it with so much art and cunning that no heart could have imagined it nor no eye discerned it but his And now let us take notice who this honest Gentleman under the sinily of his Leviathans means that sport and take their pastimes in our troubled deep whose restless and uneasie rolling does not foretell but is it self the storm But I think with our wise Authors leave this had been better proved before so positively asserted considering 't is no less than three whole successive Parliaments his Leviathans that have been restless to find out a Plot and vigorous to prevent our ruin all which he has drawn in as the greatest nay only principals of our destruction and as his Text goes are themselves the storm or Plot he musters up a thundering accusation against them that they foment the people into rebellion distract them with dreadful apprehensions casting them into a raving frenzy and as the greatest plague of the wicked makes them afraid where no fear is And this honest well principled man is all this while a man of the Church of England And to prove the correspondence of this truth with that of his Pamphlet we may easily remember that all the Parliaments were not all Presbyters the first Parliament were all men chose at His Majesties blessed Restoration when there was not the least favour for that Party and those Loyal Wise and Honest Patriots of their Countrey gave the first blow to the Plot first Allarmed the people made Tests and removed the DUKE out of his places and seat in Parliament yet these are the men and this the storm which is ready to shatter our Royal Vessel the Brittish Kingdom into pieces But since he is a zealous Protestant they have no reason to be angry at his making bold with his own Party But why should we stand in fear of Popery Ay why indeed says he He has no fear at all they will not hurt him for his Religion then why should we fear But alas all are not such Protestants as he Heaven knows such Champions for their Cause and Interest and therefore we may have reason to fear notwithstanding all his brotherly advice to the contrary In the next place let us see what small difference he makes between the principles of the Church of Rome and those of the Church of England only a few disputable matters of faith and not very material Ceremonies of Divine Worship as what harm is it to pray to Saints to worship Images or what great matter to believe the Infallibility of the Pope or the Transubstantiation in the Sacrament or to allow the Doctrine of the Roman Church without error when it shall depose and murder Kings command Massacres make Plots Fire Cities Canonize the principal Actors of their Revenge and barbarous Cruelties and consecrate the Instruments of death Is it not hard says our honest Protestant that these frivolous divisions on a sudden should ruine and efface all those good characters of Magnanimity and Iustice of Generosity and Goodness in this our Popish Prince which even his greatest enemies nay the most detestable Character it self allows him Indeed Mr. Scribler I remember no such allowance but as your self remarkt suppose and suppose But if the encouraging of Plots and Popery holding correspondence with his Holiness and other Forreign Princes contrary to the Laws of this Nation be Virtues those and more perhaps of such a nature may be allowed him In the next place he takes a great deal of pains to let you know what the Virtues are which though the Characterizer does not understand he does especially when Cardinal and to shew you he is a man of truth and can keep his word sometimes he has there made so slight a Reply as I have not thought it worth the answering but will refer the ingenious Reader to compare that part of the Character with his Answer and now I will skip over this page as he has done several which he could not with all his stock of Impudence defend Well now says he since we have Laws to suppress Popery what remains then for a Popish King but to put those Laws in execution and for us but to sit down under the shadow of this Fence Yes I think a greater assurance that he will execute them than our Answerer can give His next Argument or rather Opinion is so far from thinking that the Reign of a Popish King can be any ways advantageous to the Iesuitical Instruments that he rather believes it will be their destruction and why because there is Laws of foree against them and the power of executing those Laws he himself has already given to the people and which he has concluded they will more vigorously do under such a King But hold this Sham wont pass we know the people may convict them but none can punish them but their Prince But if the people by the authority of our Scribler do what will he have

then granting the truth of this his opposers has more reason to dread his Power for 't is a known Maxim The greatest and truest friend the most implacable and revengeful Enemy But for those Acts of Parliament which we find ordering and disposing of the Succession they make says he very little for the purpose for which they were produced Yes they prove that the Succession has been given by Act of Parliament where the King and the Parliament thought fit and upon those reasons they afterwards thought more weighty the Gift has been recalled and they have placed a Right elsewhere and who shall dare to say these Acts or any made by King and Parliament are unjust Indeed the King without his People or the People without their King cannot alter the Succession but with a joynt consent Those Acts of Parliament declare it has and may be done again and certainly there never was a Cause that did require the changing of the Succession half so much as we have now But he is drawn to an end and I thought nothing could have been more audacious than his Answer is throughout in notorious Accusations of all our Great and Honourable Parliaments but the dedicating his Libel to those very men with the same hand he writ it of them is a boldness that certainly has no president but is an Original of Impudence A REPLY TO Roger L' Estranges PAMPHLET WELL but now for our Second Masquerade who Begins just like his Brother and carries on the Argument of Forty one throughout every Paragraph of his whole Pamphlet to answer all that can be said against Popery with that He tells us The Character of a Popish Successor were an excellent piece in the kind if it had not too much Sublimate in it The truth of it is says he the Author has made the figure of his Successor too frightful and too enormous and then he finishes his Master-piece with a paradox by the supposal of a most excellent Prince and yet making him the greater Devil for his Virtues I cannot suppose it any Paradox to say the intoxication of Romish Principles and that Religious frenzy in the brains of Majesty will pervert all his Natural Virtues and make him imagine he does his God and his people good service and think he improves his Talent sevenfold when he puts the severest Roman Laws in force against us which is no less than the forfeiture of our Estates next the loss of our Liberties and our Lives in a very short time after Nor are we to suffer any death more merciful than burning alive which is the Popes own Law in these words Decerminus ut viva in conspectu hominum Comberatum De Hereticis 7 Decretat sect in consutilem Nay his obeying his Superior Ecclesiastick Power in executing these Laws shall be so far from making him or any other Papist else think him the greater Devil as he says that on the other side the Pope and all of that Church will tell him he has improved all his Virtues to that height that he deserves to be a Saint has merited that Heaven which they will give him But before I go any further says he let me recommend to the Reader one Remark as a thing worthy his attention That he cuts all the way upon the Successor as presupposing him to be a Papist and consequently dangerous and insufferable by reason of that perswasion and very magisterially gives his own bare word for the dangers of that perswasion why does he not rather tell us in particular terms These and these are the principles and then make his inference from those principles to the dangers that attend them I thought both the Principles of the Roman Church and the dangers that attend them had been too well experienced in England as well as other places not to be known to the most Vulgar person in it for what was Q. Maries Tyranny but an impulse of Conscience derived from those Popish Principles that told her that all Hereticks are all notorious Traytors Traytors against God himself and therefore guilty of the highest High Treason which they call Crimen Laesae Majestatis Divina and therefore they deserve that worse penalties should be inflicted for that than other High Treason And it is besides enacted by a General Decree That whatsoever King Bishop or Nobleman shall believe that the Decrees of the Roman Bishops may be or shall suffer them to be violated in any thing be accursed and shall remain for ever guilty before God as a betrayer of the Catholick Faith Caus. 25. 91. cap. 11. and therefore considering all this we cannot with reason think that such barbarous Cruelty could be the delight of naturally soft and tender hearted woman or that Majesty could be so perjured so ungrateful and so dishonourable for little or no advantage but she was a servant of the Church and Pope and durst not incur his curse that was to open her the Gates of Paradice and 't is impossible for any Papist to have such a Soveraign Power as hers and not to be the same Tyrant that she was Now in Answer to a paragraph which his Brother the wiser of the two skipt over concerning the barbarity of the known Doctrine of the Roman Church that pronounces damnation to all that differ from it in any one matter of faith and to justifie his Masters and his Religion from such a terrible Accusation as tearing up his Fathers Sacred Monument branding his blessed memory with the name of Heretick and the compleating the horrid Anathema of most impiously execrating the very Majesty that gave him being He says the Characterizer lays down a false supposition and then raises out of it a most uncharitahle consequence for the very position That there is no salvation out of that Church is yet qualified with an exception In case of an invinsible perswasion I think that case was plain in that Royal Martyr who sealed the invinsible perswasion of the Protestant Faith with his blood And next he says If this be so lewd a principle in one Religion why is it not so in another Which being admitted involves every individual member of the Church of Rome in the same condemnation So that he says in asserting this Doctrine the Characterizer himself damns all the Papists as well as he makes them damn all the Protestants Now as I never thought the Protestants in a more likely state of damnation for the Papists saying or believing so so I always thought it was the proof of Crimes and not the accusation that must condemn all men before so just a Judg as God Almighty and there are such proofs of that Hellish Doctrine that it bears witness against it self for 't is not the Protestants knowing and judging their principles but their believing and following them damns the Papists but he is a Protestant that holds the Romish Tenents as good as those of the Church of England and is of whether for a peny so that 't is